DOCSLIB.ORG

Common Name Scientific Name Listing Status1 Minimum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Common Name Scientific Name Listing Status1 Minimum Minimum Basis for Common Name Scientific Name Listing Status1 Conservation Coverage2 Estimate 0 PLANTS 1 San Diego Thornmint Acanthomintha ilicifolia FT/CE/A/1B 80% NE 2 Spineshrub Adolphia californica -/-/B/2 80% NE 3 San Diego ambrosia Ambrosia pumila FE/-/A/1B 80% NE Arctostaphylos 4 Del Mar Manzanita glandulosa ssp. FE/-/A/1B 80% NE crassifolia Arctostaphylos 5 Rainbow manzanita -/-/A/1B 80% NE rainbowensis 6 Coulter's Saltbrush Atriplex coulteri -/-/A/1B 80% NE Atriplex parishii var. 7 Parish brittlescale /-/A/1B 80% NE parishii 8 Encinitas Baccharis Baccharis vanessae FT/CE/A/1B 80% NE 9 San Diego goldenstar Bloomeria clevelandii /-/A/1B 80% NE 10 Thread-leaf brodiaea Brodiaea filifolia FT/CE/A/1B 90% NE NE, 11 Orcutt's brodiaea Brodiaea orcuttii /-/A/1B 95% Wetland, VP 12 Santa Rosa brodiaea Brodiaea santarosae /-/A/1B % 13 Wart-stem ceanothus Ceanothus verrucosus /-/B/2 81% Centromadia parryi 14 Southern tarplant /-/A/1B 80% NE ssp. australis 15 Orcutt’s Spineflower Chorizanthe orcuttiana FE/CE/A/1B 80% NE Known Comarostaphylis Locations 16 Summer-holly diversifolia ssp. -/-/A/1B 71% Predicted diversifolia Habitat Dudleya blochmaniae 17 Short-leaf dudleya /CE/A/1B 80% NE ssp. brevifolia 18 Sticky dudleya Dudleya viscida -/-/A/1B 71% Eryngium aristulatum 19 San Diego button-celery FE/CE/A/1B 95% VP var. parishii Ferocactus viridescens 20 Coast barrel cactus -/-B//2 76% var. viridescens Monardella hypoleuca 21 Felt-leaf monardella -/-/A/1B 77% ssp. lanata 22 Little mousetail Myosurus minimus -/-/C/3 95% VP 23 Spreading navarretia Navarretia fossalis FT/-/A/1B 95% VP 24 Chaparral beargrass Nolina cismontana -/-/A/- 80% NE 25 Gander's butterweed Packera ganderi /CR/A/1B 80% NE 26 Nuttall's scrub oak Quercus dumosa /-/A/1B 87% NE 27 Engelmann Oak Quercus engelmannii -/-/D/4 69% 28 San Miguel savory Satureja chandleri -/-/A/4 N/A 29 Parry's tetracoccus Tetracoccus dioicus /-/A/1B 80% NE 29 29 INVERTEBRATES Branchinecta 30 San Diego fairy shrimp FE/-/1 95% VP,NE sandiegonensis Quino checkerspot Euphydryas editha 31 FE/-/1 80% NE butterfly quino Euphys vestris NE, 32 Harbison's dun skipper Proposed FT/-/1 95% harbisoni Wetland 33 Hermes copper Lycaena hermes -/-/1 80% NE Streptocephalus 34 Riverside fairy shrimp FE/-/1 95% VP, NE wootoni 34 REPTILES & 34 AMPHIBIANS 35 Arroyo toad Bufo californicus FE/CSC/1 95% Wetland Clemmys marmorata NE, 36 Southwestern pond turtle -/CSC/1 95% pallida Wetland Cnemidophorus 37 Orange-throated whiptail -/CSC/2 66% hyperythrus 38 Red diamond rattlesnake Crotalus ruber ruber -/CSC/2 68% 39 Coast horned lizard Phrynosoma coronatum -/CSC/2 78% Wetland, 40 Western spadefoot toad Spea hammondii -/CSC/2 95% VP 41 California newt Taricha torosa torosa -/CSC/2 95% Wetland Wetland, 42 Two stripe garter snake Thamnophis hammondii -/CSC/1 95% VP 42 42 BIRDS NE, 43 Tricolored blackbird Agelaius tricolor -/CSC/1 95% Wetland Aimophila ruficeps 44 Rufous-crowned sparrow -/CSC/1 75% canescens Ammodramus 45 Grasshopper sparrow -/-/1 73% savannarum perpallidus 46 Bell's sage sparrow Amphispiza belli belli -/CSC/1 94% Aquila chrysaetos 47 Golden eagle -/CSC-FP/1 77% BGEPA canadensis Athene cunicularia 48 Burrowing owl /CSC/1 83% NE hypugaea Campylorhynchus 49 Cactus wren brunneicapillus -/CSC/1 80% NE sandiegensis 50 Northern harrier Circus cyaneus -/CSC/1 52% hudsonius Southwestern willow Empidonax traillii 51 FE/CE/1 96% Wetland flycatcher extimus 52 Yellow-breasted chat Icteria virens -/CSC/1 98% Wetland 53 White-faced ibis Plegadis chihi -/CSC/1 95% Wetland Polioptila californica 54 California gnatcatcher FT/CSC/1 72% californica Rallus longirostris 55 Light-footed clapper rail FE/CE-FP/1 95% Wetland levipes 56 Least Bell's vireo Vireo bellii pusillus FE/CE/1 95% Wetland 57 57 MAMMALS 57 Pallid bat Antrozous pallidus -/CSC/2 0% Plecotus townsendii 58 Townsend’s big-eared bat -/CSC/2 80% pallescens 59 Stephens' kangaroo rat Dipodomys stephensi FE/CT/1 80% NE 60 Mountain lion Felis concolor -/CSP/2 100% San Diego black-tailed Lepus californicus 61 -/CSC/2 77% jackrabbit bennettii 62 American badger Taxidea taxus -/CSC/2 100% 57 FISH 63 Arroyo Chub Gila orcuttii -/CSC/1 95% Wetland Notes: 1 FP = Fully Protected State Species CSC State Species of CT California CSP California Specially Protected Concern Threatened Sensitive Plants (California Native Plant Society Sensitive Animals (County of CNPS County and County of San Diego) San Diego) Considered rare, threatened, or endangered in 1 Animals of high sensitivity 1B A California and elsewhere. (listed or specific Considered rare, threatened, or endangered in CA, 2 B natural history requirements) but more common elsewhere. 2 Animals declining, but not in Plants which need more information 3 C immediate threat of Limited distribution – a watch list 4 D extinction or extirpation 2 These policies are described further in Chapter 4. SAP = Narrow Endemic Policy (requires at least 80% conservation). Wetland = Wetland Avoidance Policy (requires no-net-loss, estimated at 95% conservation). VP = Vernal Pool Policy (requires no-net-loss, estimated at 95% conservation). BGEPA = Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (an existing federal act) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Rare Plant Survey Repo
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Rare Plant Survey Report 2008 15 April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................1 SURVEY GOALS: ...........................................................................................................................1 METHODS .......................................................................................................................................2 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................2 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING...........................................................................................................2 SURVEY SITE SELECTION ..............................................................................................................3 SURVEY METHODS........................................................................................................................7 DATA ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................................................9 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................11 ALLIUM MARVINII, YUCAIPA ONION..............................................................................................13 ALLIUM MUNZII, MUNZ’S ONION
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 17, 2020 by Mike Evans, Founder and President of Casa Del Prado Room 101, Balboa Park Tree of Life Nursery to Mulch Or Not to Mulch
    March 2020 CHAPTER MEETING Main Presentation Mulch Madness (in March) MARCH 17, 2020 by Mike Evans, Founder and President of Casa del Prado Room 101, Balboa Park Tree of Life Nursery To Mulch or Not to Mulch. Is that the question? 6:30 pm – Premeeting. 7:00 pm – Browsing & Socializing The horticultural practice of mulching or top-dressing consists of periodically applying a layer of 7:30 pm – Brief Business Meeting foreign material (organic or 7:45 pm – Main Presentation mineral) to the soil surface, under and around your landscape plants. Pre-meeting What are the pros and cons of this Dudleya Conservation: In-vitro practice, especially in natural Propagation to Combat Plant design using native plants? Is all Poaching and Extinction by Kevin Alison The genus Dudleya is a charismatic group of native succulents with many rare species across California and Baja. Recent popularity has attracted poachers who uproot these plants by mulch created equal? How the tens of thousands in attempt to supply interests overseas do wild plants in native for hefty profits. This project habitats do without aims to utilize plant tissue someone showing up to culture (Micropropagation) “mulch them?” Come hear to ethically produce large a presentation and join in a quantities of select Dudleya lively discussion. Hopefully, we’ll find answers to all these species to deflate the price questions. incentives for poachers while providing agencies with an additional tool for conservation. Kevin is a Masters of Conservation and Restoration Science (MCRS) candidate at U.C. Irvine and a native plant production specialist (R&D) at Tree of Life Nursery.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, james.smith@humboldt.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact kyle.morgan@humboldt.edu. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Fremontia Journal of the California Native Plant Society
    $10.00 (Free to Members) VOL. 40, NO. 1 AND VOL. 40, NO. 2 • JANUARY 2012 AND MAY 2012 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY THE NEW JEPSONJEPSON MANUALMANUAL THE FIRST FLORA OF CALIFORNIA NAMING OF THE GENUS SEQUOIA FENS:FENS: AA REMARKABLEREMARKABLE HABITATHABITAT AND OTHER ARTICLES VOL. 40, NO. 1 AND VOL. 40, NO. 2, JANUARY 2012 AND MAY 2012 FREMONTIA CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 FREMONTIA Phone: (916) 447-CNPS (2677) Fax: (916) 447-2727 Web site: www.cnps.org Email: cnps@cnps.org VOL. 40, NO. 1, JANUARY 2012 AND VOL. 40, NO. 2, MAY 2012 MEMBERSHIP Membership form located on inside back cover; Copyright © 2012 dues include subscriptions to Fremontia and the CNPS Bulletin California Native Plant Society Mariposa Lily . $1,500 Family or Group . $75 Bob Hass, Editor Benefactor . $600 International or Library . $75 Patron . $300 Individual . $45 Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $25 Brad Jenkins, Cynthia Powell, CORPORATE/ORGANIZATIONAL and Cynthia Roye, Proofreaders 10+ Employees . $2,500 4-6 Employees . $500 7-10 Employees . $1,000 1-3 Employees . $150 CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY STAFF – SACRAMENTO CHAPTER COUNCIL Executive Director: Dan Glusenkamp David Magney (Chair); Larry Levine Dedicated to the Preservation of Finance and Administration (Vice Chair); Marty Foltyn (Secretary) Manager: Cari Porter Alta Peak (Tulare): Joan Stewart the California Native Flora Membership and Development Bristlecone (Inyo-Mono):
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Revised Critical Habitat for Brodiaea Filifolia (Thread-Leaved Brodiaea); Final Rule
    Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 26 February 8, 2011 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Revised Critical Habitat for Brodiaea filifolia (Thread-Leaved Brodiaea); Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:03 Feb 07, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\08FER2.SGM 08FER2 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES2 6848 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR habitat for B. filifolia published in the Summary of Changes From the Federal Register on December 13, 2005 Proposed Revised Rule and the Fish and Wildlife Service (70 FR 73820), the proposed revised Previous Critical Habitat Designation designation of critical habitat published 50 CFR Part 17 Summary of Changes From the 2005 in the Federal Register on December 8, Critical Habitat Rule 2009 (74 FR 64930), and the Notice of [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2009–0073; MO The areas identified in this rule Availability (NOA) of the draft 92210–0–0009] constitute a revision from the areas we economic analysis (DEA) published in RIN 1018–AW54 designated as critical habitat for the Federal Register on July 20, 2010 Brodiaea filifolia on December 13, 2005 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (75 FR 42054). Additionally, more (70 FR 73820). In cases where we have and Plants; Final Revised Critical information on this species can be new information or information that Habitat for Brodiaea filifolia (Thread- found in the five-year review for B. was not available for the previous Leaved Brodiaea) filifolia signed on August 13, 2009, designation, we made changes to the which is available on our Web site at: critical habitat for B.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program Covered Species Prioritization
    San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program Covered Species Prioritization For Task B of Local Assistance Grant #P0450009 Source: http://www.fws.gov/sandiegorefuges/Vernal.htm January 2006 Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Game Grant Coordinator: Dr. Brenda S. Johnson Prepared by: Department of Biology, San Diego State University Dr. Helen M. Regan, Lauren A. Hierl, Dr. Janet Franklin, and Dr. Douglas H. Deutschman MSCP Covered Species Prioritization January 2006 Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Figures................................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 4 I. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 5 II. Description of Prioritization Scheme Used............................................................................. 5 i) At-Risk Category..................................................................................................................... 7 ii) Threats/Risk Factors............................................................................................................... 9 iii) Habitat Associations and Spatial Distribution of Species..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 7 Resource Overlay Maps
    Attachment 7 Resource Overlay Maps Attachment 8 FTSP Consistency Checklist FOOTHILL/TRABUCO SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST Introduction The Foothill/Trabuco Specific Plan Project Consistency Checklist has been developed to assist applicants, EMA staff, interested parties and the Planning Commission in determining whether a project proposal is consistent with the Specific Plan. The Checklist includes only the key Regulations and Guidelines from the Specific Plan; however, all projects shall be required to be found consistent with all of the applicable Regulations and Guidelines included in the Specific Plan. (Refer to the individual Specific Plan Components (Chapter II), the Land Use District Regulations (Chapter III) and the Development and Design Guidelines Chapter IV) for a complete listing.) The language in the Regulations/Guidelines indicates whether they are mandatory Regulations or non-mandatory Guidelines. "Shall" indicates a mandatory Regulation to which there are no exceptions, while "should" indicates a non-mandatory Guideline. Individual development proposals are not required to be consistent with each and every Guideline. The Planning Commission may approve deviations from the Guidelines; however, the Commission must find that the project is in overall compliance with the Guidelines and consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Specific Plan. Implementation Prior to Planning Commission consideration of any Area Plan, Site Development Permit, Use Permit and/or concurrently processed subdivision map, EMA staff shall complete a Specific Plan Project Consistency Checklist for the project and shall make a determination regarding the project's consistency with the Specific Plan. Additional explanation/discussion of the project's consistency with each Regulation and Guideline shall be attached to the Checklist, as necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Special Status Plants Under the Jurisdiction of the California State Office As of May 28, 2015 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME T
    BLM Special Status Plants under the jurisdiction of the California State Office as of May 28, 2015 KNOWN OR SUSPECTED SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME TYPE OF PLANT FAMILY STATUS ON BLM LANDS? Abronia umbellata var. breviflora pink sand-verbena Vascular Plant Nyctaginaceae BLM Sensitive Known on BLM lands Abronia villosa var. aurita chaparral sand-verbena Vascular Plant Nyctaginaceae BLM Sensitive Known on BLM lands Acanthomintha ilicifolia San Diego thornmint Vascular Plant Lamiaceae Federal Threatened Suspected on BLM lands Acanthoscyphus parishii var. goodmaniana Cushenberry oxytheca Vascular Plant Polygonaceae Federal Endangered Known on BLM lands Acmispon argyraeus var. multicaulis scrub lotus Vascular Plant Fabaceae BLM Sensitive Known on BLM lands Acmispon rubriflorus red-flowered lotus Vascular Plant Fabaceae BLM Sensitive Suspected on BLM lands Agave utahensis var. eborispina ivory-spined agave Vascular Plant Agavaceae BLM Sensitive Known on BLM lands Agrostis blasdalei Blasdale's bent grass Vascular Plant Poaceae BLM Sensitive Known on BLM lands Agrostis hooveri Hoover's bent grass Vascular Plant Poaceae BLM Sensitive Known on BLM lands Agrostis lacuna-vernalis vernal pool bent grass Vascular Plant Poaceae BLM Sensitive Known on BLM lands Albatrellus caeruleoporus blue-pored polypore Fungus Albatrellaceae BLM Sensitive Suspected on BLM lands Albatrellus ellisii greening goat's foot Fungus Albatrellaceae BLM Sensitive Suspected on BLM lands Albatrellus flettii blue-capped polypore Fungus Albatrellaceae BLM Sensitive Suspected on BLM
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 2016 Rare Plant Monitoring Report
    Draft 2016 Rare Plant Monitoring Report Prepared for: San Diego Association of Governments 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 Contact: Sarah Pierce Email: Sarah.Pierce@sandag.org Prepared by: Conservation Biology AECOM San Diego Management Institute 401 West A Street, and Monitoring Program 136 SW Washington Avenue, Suite 1200 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92101 Suite 200 Corvallis, OR 97333 Contact: Sara Motheral San Diego, CA 92101 Contact: Jessie Vinje Email: sara.motheral@aecom.com Contact: Kris Preston Email: jessie.vinje@consbio.org Email: kpreston@usgs.gov March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page List of Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................. v Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 2016 Monitoring Locations......................................................................... 3 2.0 METHODS ............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 2016 MSP Rare Plant Species..................................................................... 4 2.2 2016 Outreach and Training ....................................................................... 5 2.3 2016
    [Show full text]
  • Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List
    SPECIAL VASCULAR PLANTS, BRYOPHYTES, AND LICHENS LIST October 2021 State of California Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Recommended Citation: California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). October 2021. Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Sacramento, CA. Table of Contents Special Plants ........................................................................................................................ i NatureServe Element Ranking for Plants ........................................................................... iii Element Ranking .................................................................................................................. v California Rare Plant Ranks............................................................................................... viii Special Lichens ................................................................................................................... xii Other Status .......................................................................................................................xiii Rare Plant Seed Banking .................................................................................................... xiv Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities .............................................................. xv Special Vascular Plants,
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 197/Tuesday, October 13, 1998
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 1998 / Rules and Regulations 54975 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (spreading navarretia) occur in clay soils juniper woodlands (California or in vernal wetlands that have a clay Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Fish and Wildlife Service hardpan or silty alkaline substrate. 1989, Orlando Mistretta, Rancho Santa These habitats are restricted or unique, Ana Botanic Garden, in litt. 1993). A. 50 CFR Part 17 often associated with a specific soil type munzii is known from 13 extant RIN 1018±AL88 or hydrologic regime, or both. The populations. Only one of these composite range of these four plants populations is partially on Federal land Endangered and Threatened Wildlife encompasses the interior lowlands and (Roberts 1993a, California Natural and Plants; Determination of foothills of Los Angeles, San Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) 1997, Jeff Endangered or Threatened Status for Bernardino, Orange, and Riverside Newman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Four Southwestern California Plants counties south into coastal San Diego Service, pers. comm. 1996). Five from Vernal Wetlands and Clay Soils County, California, and the populations occur in the Gavilan Hills, northwestern State of Baja California, including one at Harford Springs AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Mexico. Although some of these plants County Park, and one on lands managed Interior. are relatively wide-ranging, all are by the Riverside County Habitat ACTION: Final rule. localized in distribution within their Conservation Agency (RCHCA). One respective ranges because of the population occurs in the Temescal SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service restricted and patchy nature of the Valley on private land; another (Service) determines endangered status habitats in which they are found.
    [Show full text]