Quick viewing(Text Mode)

The Importance of Skin Preparation

The Importance of Skin Preparation

AESTHETIC FOCUS

The importance of skin preparation

BY ANNA BAKER

With both aesthetic procedures and resistance on the rise, good skin disinfection to reduce the risk of is more vital than ever. Anna Baker takes us through the evidence behind commonly used skin preparation formulations for aesthetic injectable treatments.

he global number of aesthetic the skin [7]. This paper will explore some described as insusceptible, phenotypically procedures performed continues of the commonly used skin preparation tolerant, tolerant or resistant to to rise exponentially [1]. The recent formulations used for aesthetic injectable [17]. Consistent with , resistance Tdata from The American Society for treatments. to antiseptics can be intrinsic or acquired. Aesthetic Plastic (2017) confirms Intrinsic resistance, or insusceptibility, to an overall 5.1% increase in the number chlorhexidine is demonstrated by bacterial of aesthetic procedures undertaken, Chlorhexidine is a divalent, cationic spores and mycobacteria [17]. In both in comparison to those performed biguanide agent that that was cases the outer layers of the cell form an in 2016; as well as a 40.6% increase first described in 1954 [8]. Chlorhexidine impermeable barrier to the ingress of the over the past five years. Furthermore, exists as a gluconate, acetate and molecules [11]. There are inconsistences in non-surgical procedures increased by hydrochloride salts [9]. It has a wide the literature when attempting to define 4.2% in 2017, compared to 2016. As a spectrum of activity encompassing gram- a consensus definition of ‘chlorhexidine consequence, a growing incidence of positive and gram-negative , resistance,’ as well as in defining a associated complications are described yeasts, dermatophytes, fungi and some robust and standardised method for the [2]. Furthermore, data from the US Food lipophilic viruses [7,10] but is ineffective detection of reduced susceptibility and / and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017, against bacterial spores [11]. Chlorhexidine or resistance to in-use concentrations of indicates a three-fold rise in adverse at low concentrations is bacteriostatic, chlorhexidine [17]. These are challenging reactions from 2008 to 2011, compared whereas at higher concentrations it can concepts to quantify owing to the gaps and with 2005 to 2007 [3]. be rapidly bactericidal [8]. Chlorhexidine inconsistencies in the literature with scope Alhede et al. reported on a murine acts by binding to the negatively charged for further research. study showing that pseudomonas, bacterial cell wall and affecting the osmotic In contrast, the and staphylococcus, and propionibacterium equilibrium of the cell [12]. Chlorhexidine Healthcare products Regulatory Agency were all cultured following administration effectively reduces numbers of bacterial (MHRA) issued a warning in 2012 for the of hyaluronic , polyacrylamide gel, poly- skin flora, and is available for use in use of chlorhexidine in light of a risk of L-lactic acid and calcium hydroxyapatite aqueous form, combined 70% alcohol and anaphylactic reaction due to chlorhexidine microspheres into the dermal pocket has been used in preparations for hand allergy [18]. A subsequent warning [4]. Furthermore, their findings also cleansing, both general and pre-surgical, for was published in 2017 by the US FDA demonstrated that once biofilm was more than 50 years [13]. reiterating a similar concern, reporting established, treatment with high dose Alongside a broad range of activity, 52 cases of worldwide anaphylaxis due to antibiotics was unable to eradicate the a key advantage of chlorhexidine when chlorhexidine gluconate [19]. In addition, infection. Antibiotic resistance is one of the used as a skin , was its in the 46 years between January 1969 most significant threats to patient safety ‘residual activity’ [14]. Furthermore, Aly and June 2015, the FDA reports 43 cases in Europe, fuelled by overuse of antibiotics and Maibach propose that in comparison worldwide. These statistics reinforce and inappropriate prescribing [5]. These to povidone iodine, chlorhexidine can the need for a comprehensive medical cumulative factors emphasise a growing produce a greater reduction in the skin consultation, which includes details need and awareness of utilising adequate flora, as well as exerting a longer residual regarding known sensitivities and allergies. precautions to reduce the risk of associated activity [14], although, irritation of the skin complications, and attention to appropriate and allergic reactions such as dermatitis, skin disinfection during all stages of a non- are more commonly reported at higher are classified into primary, surgical procedure is key [6]. concentrations [15]. secondary and tertiary alcohols, on the Chan et al. propose that the desirable Historically, chlorhexidine has been one basis of the number of carbon atoms traits of a good skin decontaminant of the most frequently used antiseptic linked to the carbon atom that bears the are that it can effectively remove the agents, yet, there are a small number of hydroxyl group [20]. Isopropyl alcohol, contaminant of interest, is readily reports within the literature of bacterial or isopropanolol, is a secondary alcohol, available, acts rapidly, does not enhance resistance to biocides, antibiotic resistance a structured isomer of propranolol, that percutaneous penetration / absorption of effects of biocides, as well as potential for can be produced by combining and the contaminant, can be readily removed reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine propene [21]. It is a clear and flammable without residue, and does not damage in staphylocci [16,17]. Bacteria may be liquid that has a moderate evaporation

The PMFA Journal | JUNE/JULY 2018 | VOL 5 NO 5 | www.thepmfajournal.com AESTHETIC FOCUS

rate and is widely used as an industrial in addition to cytosolic involved hypochlorous acid [35]. Furthermore, solvent, and cleaning fluid, and is present in the respiratory chain, causing them Robson et al. concur that stabilised in many products, such as lacquers, inks, to become denatured and deactivated hypochlorous acid has rapid and broad- and thinners, as well as household products [25]. In addition, the combination of spectrum activity against [20]. In the EU, it is approved for use in alcohol and iodine has demonstrated clinically relevant in vitro cosmetics as a solvent, an antifoaming good effectiveness, in comparison to and in vivo, as long as the narrow effective agent, a perfuming agent, and a viscosity alcohol alone, which may be a result of the pH range is maintained [36]. controller. In light of its antimicrobial immediate germicidal action of alcohol and In vivo, hypochlorous acid is produced activity (which includes multidrug-resistant the residual activity of iodine [30]. Data on in the intracellular matrix in response pathogens, mycobacterium tuberculosis, the systemic absorption of antiseptics is to phagocytosis of pathogens by and a variety of fungi), isopropyl alcohol limited and iodine seems to be absorbed neutrophils and plays an important is accepted as a , and as an from the skin, but more significantly role in the destruction of pathogens. antiseptic in the clinical environment [22.] from mucosa [25], although, this may be The hypochlorous technology has been Alcohol is fast and short acting, with determined by the condition of the skin developed further by Clinical Health broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, and barrier at the site of application [31]. Technologies to formulate a solution is relatively inexpensive [23]. It is believed Iodine based formulations are highly which has a skin neutral pH which the that alcohols cause membrane damage effective for surgical procedures owing to manufacturer claims to deliver a 6 log and rapid denaturation of proteins, with their broad antimicrobial properties, yet reduction within seconds, with a highly subsequent interference with the residual, and temporary discolouration oxidising action which is not subject to and cell lysis [11]. Alcohol-based solutions of skin following application may be antimicrobial resistance. Clinisept+ is a that contain chlorhexidine gluconate challenging in terms of practicality for stable, non-toxic, non-mutagenic, and or iodophores are reported to exert a practitioners administering aesthetic non-irritant to skin, eyes and mucosa with sustained and durable antimicrobial injectable treatments. non-cytotoxic properties to new skin cells activity that can persist after alcohol and is designed for topical use, pre and post evaporation [11]. In addition, alcohol-based Chlorine based and Hypochlorous treatment. Hypochlorous has been well solutions can cause irritation if applied solutions described to possess anti-bacterial, anti- to mucous membranes [23]. Isopropyl hypochlorite was the first sporicidal, anti-fungal and anti-virucidal alcohol remains a popular choice for antiseptic used to prevent infection, as properties [35] and is well positioned as skin preparation for aesthetic injectable demonstrated in the 19th century by the a current, strong contender to meet the treatments, yet, there are reports within pioneering work of Ignaz Semmelweis, demands of a safe, versatile and effective the literature of skin sensitivity and who used it to disinfect hands, lowering skin preparation to be used through all dermatitis following use [24]. the incidence and mortality of puerperal stages of aesthetic injectable treatments. fever [32]. In the 20th century, 0.5% Iodine formulations sodium hypochlorite (Dakin’s solution) Conclusion Iodophore-based formulations such as was used to treat traumatic during A significant body of literature povidone iodine have remained popular the First World War [11]. Subsequently, acknowledges that adequate skin after decades of use for antisepsis and it became widely used, yet its medical preparation, pre and post treatment, applications owing to use as an antiseptic has been limited due extends beyond the selection of the most their favourable efficacy and tolerability to its instability, which necessitated the appropriate skin cleansing formulation. [25]. In povidone iodine, iodine forms addition of large quantities of stabilisers The aesthetic practitioner needs to give a complex with the synthetic carrier [32]. In addition, Eusol (an acronym for consideration to a number of other factors, polymer povidone, which itself has no Edinburgh university solution of lime) for example, the clinical environment, as microbicidal activity [26]. In an aqueous was one of several hypochlorite solutions well as the use of sterile dressing packs, and medium, free iodine is released into that was used in the management of open a detailed consultation, outlining medical solution from the povidone iodine complex, wounds left to heal by secondary intention history as well as previous injectable with more free iodine being released [33]. Eusol consisted of a chlorinated lime treatments. Negating these important from the povidone iodine reservoir as (calcium hypochlorite) and boric acid considerations places the patient at risk iodine-consuming germicidal activity solution containing between 0.25% weight of developing complications, irrespective ensues [27]. Povidone iodine is one of the / volume of available chlorine with a pH of which skin preparation has been used. few topical shown to be between 7.5 and 8.5 [33]. Dakin’s solution It is likely that the exponential rise in the effective against bacteria, several viruses, has a higher pH and is based on sodium number of procedures performed in the fungi, spores, protozoa, and amoebic hypochlorite but contains no boric acid [33]. aesthetic sector will continue to rise, which cysts [28]. In conventional antimicrobial The production of an electrolyte will continually reinforce the importance testing, povidone iodine has been shown solution of sodium hypochlorite, stable of ‘getting the basics right’ in terms of to kill a variety of bacterial strains at approximately pH 10 was developed good skin practice. There is a considerable known to commonly cause nosocomial for patients receiving dialysis and to body of literature underpinning the skin , including methicillin-resistant irrigate wounds and [34]. More preparations discussed, underpinned Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other recently, Selkon et al. reported preliminary by National Institute for Health & Care antibiotic-resistant strains within 20-30 findings from their study to demonstrate Excellence (NICE) guidelines which are seconds of exposure [29]. an appreciable reduction in the bacterial focused principally on surgical procedures The microbicidal activity of iodine burden in chronic venous leg ulcers requiring skin disinfection. With this in appears to involve the inhibition of that had not healed with conventional mind, the clinician is encouraged to adopt a vital bacterial cellular mechanisms and treatment, with 10 out of 30 subjects critical approach in justifying rationale for structures, and oxidises nucleotides fatty / achieving a 44% ulcer reduction after choice of formulation(s), for cosmetic non- amino in bacterial cell membranes, three weeks of standard treatment with surgical procedures.

The PMFA Journal | JUNE/JULY 2018 | VOL 5 NO 5 | www.thepmfajournal.com AESTHETIC FOCUS

References 1. Abduljabbar MH, Basendwh MA. Complications of 19. US Food & Drug Administratin www.fda.gov/Drugs/ hyaluronic acid fillers and their managements.Journal DrugSafety/ucm530975.htm Last accessed May 2018. of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery 2016;20:100-6. 20. Garcia-Gavin J, Lissens R, Timmermans A, Goossens A. “It is likely that the 2. Urdiales-Gálvez F, Delgado NE, Figueiredo V, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isopropyl alcohol: Treatment of soft tissue filler complications: expert a missed allergen. Contact Dermatitis 2011;65:101-6. exponential rise in the consensus recommendations. Aesth Plast Surg 21. Lecat P, Cropp E, McCord G, Haller NA. An -based 2018;42:498-510. cleanser versus Isopropyl alcohol to decontaminate number of procedures 3. US Food and Drug Administration. MAUDE- stethoscopes. Am J Infect control 2009;37:241-3. manufacturer and user facility device experience. www. 22. Riccio LN, Swenson BR, Sawyer RG. The importance of performed in the aesthetic accessdata.fsa.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/search. isopropyl alcohol in skin preparation solutions. Infecti cfm Control Hospi Epidemiol 2011;32(4):405-6. sector will continue to 4. Alhede M, Er Ö, Eickhardt S. Bacterial biofilm formation 23. Hemani ML, Lepor H. Skin preparation for the and treatment in soft tissue fillers.Pathog Dis prevention of surgical site infection: which agent is rise, which will continually 2014;70:339-46. best? Rev Urol 2009;11(4):190-5. reinforce the importance of 5. NHS England www.nhs.uk/nhsengland/arc/pages/ 24. Tiwari S, Rajak S, Mondal DP, Biswas D. Sodium aboutarc.aspx Last accessed May 2018. hypochlorite is more effective than 70% ethanol against biofilms of clinical isolates of staphylococcus aureus.Am ‘getting the basics right’ in 6. El-Khalawany M, Fawzy S, Saied A, et al. Dermal filler J Infect Control 2017 [Article In Press]. complications: a clinicopathological study with a terms of good skin practice.” spectrum of histologic reaction patterns. Ann Diagn 25. Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SAL, El-Kafrawi HY, et al. Povidone Pathol 2015;19:10-5. iodine in wound healing: a review of current concepts and practices. Inter J Surg 2017;44:260-8. 7. Chan HP, Zhai H, Hui X, Maibach HI. Skin decontamination: principles and perspectives. 26. Ripa S, Bruno R, Reder R. ‘Clinical applications of Povidone-Iodine as a topical antimicrobial’. In: Paulson Toxicology and Industrial Health 2012;29(10):955-68. DS (Ed). Handbook of Topical Antimicrobials Industrial 8. Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Applications-Industrial Applications in Consumer Products Periodontology 2000;15:55-62. and Pharmaceuticals 2002; CRC Press. 9. Russell AD. Chlorhexidine: antibacterial action and 27. Fleischer W, Reimer K. Povidone-iodine in antisepsis- bacterial resistance. Infection 1986;14:212-5. state of the art. Dermatology 1997;195(Suppl 2):3-9. 10. Maiwald M, Chan ESY. Pitfalls in evidence assessment: 28. Cooper RA. Iodine revisited. Inter Wound J 2007;4:124- the case of chlorhexidine and alcohol in skin asepsis. 37. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:2017-21. 29. Kunisada T, Yamada K, Oda S, Hara O. Investigation 11. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and : on the efficacy of povidone-iodine against antiseptic activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev resistant species. Dermatology 1997;195(Suppl 2):14-8. AUTHOR 1999;12(1):149-79. 30. Casey AL, Badia JM, Higgins A, et al) Skin antisepsis: it’s 12. Gilbert P, Moore LE. Cationic antiseptics: diversity not only what you use, it’s the way that you use it. J Hosp of action under a common epith. J Appl Microbiol Infect 2017;96:221-2. 2005;99:703-15. 31. Balin AK, Pratt L. Dilute povidone-iodine solutions 13. Milstone AM, Passaretti CL, Perl TM. Chlorhexidine: inhibit skin fibroblast growth.Dermatol Surg expanding the armentarium for infection control and 2002;28:210-4. prevention. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:274-81. 32. Alvarez JA, Macias JH, Macias AE, et al. Povidone-iodine 14. Aly R, Maibach HI. Comparative antibacterial efficacy of against sodium hypochlorite as skin antiseptics in a 2-minute surgical scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate, volunteers. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:822-5. povidone-iodine, and chlororxylenol sponge-brushes. 33. Leaper DJ. Eusol – Still awaiting proper clinical trials. BMJ Am J Infect Control 1988;16:173-7. 1992;304:931. 15. Russell AD. Bacterial resistance to disinfectants: 34. Cruz D, Ocampo C, Brendolan A, et al. Effectiveness Anna Baker, present knowledge and future problems. J Hosp Infect of sodium hypochlorite in the prevention of catheter Cosmetic & Dermatology Nurse Practitioner, UK. 1999;43:s57-s68. related infections. Contrib Nephrol 2007;154:97-102. 16. Chapman JS. Disinfectant resistance mechanisms, 35. Selkon JB, Cherry GW, Wilson JM, Hughes MA. E: [email protected] cross-resistance, and co-resistance. Int Biodeter Biodegr Evaluation of hypochlorus acid washes in the 2013;51:271-6. treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care Declaration of competing interests: The author 17. Horner C, Mawer D, Wilcox M. Reduced susceptibility to 2006;15(1):33-7. works as a clinical trainer at Aesthetic Source and chlorhexidine in staphylococci: is it increasing and does 36. Robson MC, Payne WG, Ko F, et al. Hypochlorous acid uses Clinisept+ in training sessions and live demon- it matter? J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:2547-59. as a potential wound care agent. J Burns Wounds strations at aesthetic conferences. It is one of the 18. www.gov.uk/drug-device-alerts/medical-device- 2007;e:55-67. products that Aesthetic Source distribute on behalf of Clinical Health Technologies. alert-all-medical-devices-and-medicinal-products- 37. Hunter DT. Sodium hypochlorite, an overlooked containing-chlorhexidine-risk-of-anaphylactic-reaction- therapeutic adjunct for herpes simplex infections. Publ due-to-chlorhexidine-allergy Last accessed May 2018. Hlth Lond 1983;97:218-20.

The PMFA Journal | JUNE/JULY 2018 | VOL 5 NO 5 | www.thepmfajournal.com

Top View