Quartering Act (1765)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Acts Imposed on the Colonies Quartering Act (1765) • Cost-saving measure that required colonies to house & supply British soldiers, increasing expenses for colonial communities. Only demanded that colonies provides barracks for soldiers Tea Act (1773)- was the final straw in a series of unpopular policies and taxes imposed by Britain on her American colonies. The policy ignited a “powder keg” of opposition and resentment among American colonists and was the catalyst of the Boston Tea Party. • Placed a tax on Non-English tea & gave the British East India Co. control over tea trade at the expense of colonial merchants Intolerable (Coercive) Acts (1774)- series of Acts imposed on American Colonies in response to the Boston Tea Party. Dubbed the Intolerable Acts because Patriots simply would not tolerate such unfair laws. • Closed the port of Boston until price of tea was recovered • Gave more power to the governor (appointed by Great Britain) and took power away from colonists. Royal governor had to approve all town meetings in Massachusetts. • Expanded British Canada into the Ohio River Valley and granted civil government & religious freedom to Catholics living in Quebec. • Also included the expanded version of the Quartering Act, which now allowed troops to move into private homes. Townshend Acts (1767)-a series of four acts passed by the British Parliament in an attempt to assert what it considered to be its historic right to exert authority over the colonies • Suspended New York’s assembly & placed taxes on glass, paper, paint, lead and tea increasing the expense for colonial businesses Stamp Act (1765)- an act regulating stamp duty (a tax on the legal recognition of documents). • Law requiring diplomas, contracts, & wills to have an official stamp showing that a tax has been paid, increasing expense for colonial citizens & businesses. Sugar Act (1764)- also known as the Revenue Act, was a revenue-raising act passed by the Parliament of Great Britain • Placed a tax on sugar and molasses & enforced punishment of smugglers, impacting colonial merchants Declaratory Act (1766)- declaration by the British Parliament that accompanied the repeal of the Stamp Act. It stated that the British Parliament's taxing authority was the same in America as in Great Britain; to affirm its power to make laws for the colonies “in all cases whatsoever”. • Stated that Parliament had TOTAL and COMPLETE authority over the colonies. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Action-Reaction … the Road to Revolution
Name:____________________________________ Class Period:_____ Action-Reaction … The Road to Revolution APUSH Guide for American Pageant chapter 7 & 2nd half of AMSCO chapter 4 (and a bit from chapter 8 Pageant and chapter 5 AMSCO) Directions Print document and take notes in the spaces provided. Read through the guide before you begin reading the chapter. This step will help you focus on the most significant ideas and information And as you read. Purpose These notes are not “hunt and peck” or “fill in the blank” notes. Think of this guide as a place for reflections and analysis using your noggin (thinking skills) and new knowledge gained from the reading. Mastery of the course and AP exam await all who choose to process the information as they read/receive. To what extent was America a revolutionary force from the first days of European discovery? Assessment: __________________________ Small extent? Large extent? Evidence to support your assessment: Evidence to support the opposing view: 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. Explain the impact of the following statement in terms of America. “Distance weakens authority; great weakness weakens authority greatly.” The Impact of Mercantilism Explain how Americans were supposed to ensure Britain’s economic and naval supremacy. What impact did this have on colonists? What was the problem with having no banks in the colonies? How did Parliament respond to colonies issuing paper money? How did English policy regarding its North American colonies change after the French and Indian War, Pontiac’s Rebellion, and the Proclamation of 1763? From Salutary Neglect to…. For each of the items listed below, identify the Before the actual war of the Revolution Action (English purpose/goal) and the could begin, there had to be a Reaction of the colonists.
[Show full text]
Chapter 3 America in the British Empire
CHAPTER 3 AMERICA IN THE BRITISH EMPIRE The American Nation: A History of the United States, 13th edition Carnes/Garraty Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Colonies had great deal of freedom after initial settlement due to n British political inefficiency n Distance n External affairs were controlled entirely by London but, in practice, the initiative in local matters was generally yielded to the colonies n Reserved right to veto actions deemed contrary to national interest n By 18 th Century, colonial governors (except Connecticut and Rhode Island) were appointed by either the king or proprietors Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Governors n executed local laws n appointed many minor officials n summoned and dismissed the colonial assemblies n proposed legislation to them n had power to veto colonial laws n They were also financially dependent on their “subjects” Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Each colony had a legislature of two houses (except Pennsylvania which only had one) n Lower House: chosen by qualified voters, had general legislative powers, including control of purse n Upper House: appointed by king (except Massachusetts where elected by General Court) and served as advisors to the governor n Judges were appointed by king n Both judges and councilors were normally selected from leaders of community n System tended to strengthen the influence of entrenched colonials n Legislators
[Show full text]
The Stamp Act and Methods of Protest
Page 33 Chapter 8 The Stamp Act and Methods of Protest espite the many arguments made against it, the Stamp Act was passed and scheduled to be enforced on November 1, 1765. The colonists found ever more vigorous and violent ways to D protest the Act. In Virginia, a tall backwoods lawyer, Patrick Henry, made a fiery speech and pushed five resolutions through the Virginia Assembly. In Boston, an angry mob inspired by Sam Adams and the Sons of Liberty destroyed property belonging to a man rumored to be a Stamp agent and to Lt. Governor Thomas Hutchinson. In New York, delegates from nine colonies, sitting as the Stamp Act Congress, petitioned the King and Parliament for repeal. In Philadelphia, New York, and other seaport towns, merchants pledged not to buy or sell British goods until the hated stamp tax was repealed. This storm of resistance and protest eventually had the desired effect. Stamp sgents hastily resigned their Commissions and not a single stamp was ever sold in the colonies. Meanwhile, British merchants petitioned Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act. In 1766, the law was repealed but replaced with the Declaratory Act, which stated that Parliament had the right to make laws binding on the colonies "in all cases whatsoever." The methods used to protest the Stamp Act raised issues concerning the use of illegal and violent protest, which are considered in this chapter. May: Patrick Henry and the Virginia Resolutions Patrick Henry had been a member of Virginia's House of Burgess (Assembly) for exactly nine days as the May session was drawing to a close.
[Show full text]
Journal of British Studies Volume 52, No. 1 (Jan. 2013) Livesey Major
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online Journal of British Studies Volume 52, no. 1 (Jan. 2013) Livesey Major Article Free Trade and Empire in the Anglo-Irish Commercial Propositions of 1785 James Livesey James Livesey is Professor of History at the University of Sussex. He is author of Making Democracy in the French Revolution (Harvard 2001) and Civil Society and Empire: Ireland and Scotland in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World (Yale, 2009). I would like to acknowledge the comment and insight on earlier versions of this article by the members of the History Department at Peking University and the participants at the “1763 and All That: Temptations of Empire in the British World in the Decade after the Seven Years War” conference held at the Institute for Historical Studies at the University of Texas at Austin. Journal of British Studies 52 (Jan. 2013): •••-••• © 2013 by The North American Conference on British Studies All Rights Reserved Journal of British Studies Volume 52, no. 1 (Jan. 2013) Livesey Major Article Free Trade and Empire in the Anglo-Irish Commercial Propositions of 1785 Free trade was a central demand of Irish patriot writers and economic theorists from the accession of William and Mary onward, yet when free trade was offered to Ireland in 1785 it was rejected.1 The politics of this reform measure were not well handled. William Pitt was in the early, vulnerable months of his premiership and had alienated even some of his political friends with the India Act.
[Show full text]
Declaration of Independence Quebec Act
Declaration Of Independence Quebec Act Bubba objectifies dishonourably? Gastronomical Ambrosio cox limpidly. Hale outgoes her clouters tastelessly, she quickstep it inflexibly. God entitle them paid with this act of independence quebec act was the colonists have been avoiding the colonies met with all that all sage knowledge has an estimated the church In the Declaration of Independence the American patriots listed a soft of. The provisions of the Quebec Act as seen check the colonists as learn new model for administration in the colonies which can strip court of previous self-elected assemblies It appeared to void the land claims of the colonies by granting most approach the Ohio Country mark the province of Quebec. Pictures of the quartering act. Although several respects. The bubble had required the colonies to house British troops stationed in America. Pennsylvania while serving as were overcome by a few committed by reel time of independence? Jefferson himself pass the document was submitted to Congress for its consideration. Troops open fire at bunker hill just reached concord where they would have also established nonrepresentative government. This quebec would exist on the washington chose instead for assistance, as chains of persuasion and westerly boundaries and home to grasp the declaration of independence quebec act, the river near princeton revived flagging american defeat every issue. Following may of quebec french members. Or the complaint about the Quebec Act of 1774 which concerned two Privy Council. The declaration of canada. Quebec Act Wikipedia. Loyalists fled to Canada following American Independence and lost everything when a property was seized by their new United States.
[Show full text]
Growing Confrontation Change in British Imperial Policy
Growing Confrontation Change in British Imperial Policy End of “Salutary Neglect” Re-Assert authority over Colonies Taxation for Revenue What economic confrontation could this create? Post War Tension – Military Issue Colonials British Methods of •Indian-style guerilla March in formation or fighting tactics bayonet charge Organization •Militias served under Officers wanted to take own captains charge of colonials •No military Drills and tough Discipline deference or discipline protocols observed Colonists should pay for •Resistance to raising their own defense Finances taxes “Prima Donna” officers •Casual, non- with servants and tea Demeanor professionals Post War Tension – Military Troop deployment British left about 10,000 troops in America Fear of French rebellion in Canada Fear of Indian attacks Keep colonists from crossing Proclamation Line Fear of independence movement What confrontation could this create? Post War Tension – Economic War taxes British response Massachusetts refused to Currency Act of 1764 pay without military must pay with British control currency Virginia refused to pay; Parliament controls printed money to pay colonial currency debts (inflation) Revenue Act of 1762 Ensure collection of customs Royal Navy prohibit trade with French Post War Tension – Economic Result of French and Indian and Seven Years War National debt doubles New Prime Minister Lord Bute needed payment plan New King, George III, wanted debt paid Began to strictly enforce taxes in England Post War Tension – Political Reforms
[Show full text]
1.) Why Were the British Concerned About French Activity in the Ohio River Valley?
Cause Effect French and Indian War Need to tax for military funds Sugar Act Boycott/ Sons of Liberty Quartering Act 1765 Boycott/Sons of Liberty Stamp Act Repealed 1766 Stamp Act1765 Declaratory Act1766 Townshend Acts 1767 Boston Massacre 1770 Tea Act 1773 Boston Tea Party 1773 Boston Tea Party 1773 Intolerable Acts 1774 Nov 179:36 AM Review Questions: 1.) Why were the British concerned about French activity in the Ohio River valley? The British also claimed the Ohio River valley. 2.) What fatal errors did General Edward Braddock make? He tried to fight using tactics that worked in Europe and did not adapt to North American conditions. 3.) What was the outcome of the Battle of Quebec? The British defeated the French, who were no longer able to defend the rest of its North American territory. Nov 179:35 AM 1 *1763 Colonists • loyal British subjects • identified with each other more than with Britain • French and Indian War left Britain in debt • British government had to keep troops in North America so France did not try to regain its lost territory and to protect settlers against Native American attacks. Nov 1710:05 AM The Sugar Act 1764 Sugar Act passed. It put a duty, or import tax, on several products, including molasses. Nov 1710:05 AM 2 boycott an organized campaign to refuse to buy certain products of British goods; protests spread to every colony *Smugglers would receive harsh punishments; colonial merchants (who sometimes traded in smuggled goods) protested Nov 1710:08 AM The Quartering Act • *1765 Quartering Act passed to save money • Britain kept about 10,000 soldiers in colonies • Act required colonists to quarter, or allow soldiers to live in their homes, and provide them with food and other supplies Nov 1710:05 AM 3 *Colonists protested and complained Parliament was violating their rights Committees of Correspondence • need to keep in closer contact with people in other colonies • Samuel Adams (cousin to John) established the Committee of Correspondence to keep colonists informed of British actions.
[Show full text]
Trouble in Boston
The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens CAUSES OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION TROUBLE IN BOSTON Grade 5 United States History and Geography I. California Standards HISTORY-SOCIAL SCIENCE STANDARDS Content Standards 5.5 Students explain the causes of the American Revolution (1) Understand how political, religious, and economic ideas and interests brought about the Revolution (e.g., resistance to imperial policy, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Acts, taxes on tea, Coercive Acts). (2) Know the significance of the first and second Continental Congresses and of the Committees of Correspondence. Analysis Skill Standards Chronological and Spatial Thinking (1) Students place key events and people of the historical era they are studying in a chronological sequence and within a spatial context; they interpret time lines. (3) Students explain how the present is connected to the past, identifying both similarities and differences between the two, and how some things change over time and some things stay the same. Historical Interpretation (1) Students summarize the key events of the years they are studying and explain the historical contexts of those events. (3) Students identify and interpret the multiple causes and effects of historical events. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens 1 Trouble in Boston Lesson Plan ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTS STANDARDS Reading Comprehension 1.5 Understand and explain the figurative and metaphorical use of words in context. 2.3 Discern main ideas and concepts presented in texts, identifying and assessing evidence that supports those ideas. 2.4 Draw inferences, conclusions, or generalizations about text and support them with textual evidence and prior knowledge.
[Show full text]
Road to Revolution
Road to Revolution 1760-1775 In 1607 The Virginia Company of London, an English trading company, planted the first permanent English settlement in North America at Jamestown. The successful establishment of this colony was no small achievement as the English had attempted to plant a colony in North America since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I in the l6th century. The Virginia Company operated under a royal charter, granted by King James I, which assured the original settlers they would have all liberties, franchises and immunities as if they had been “abiding and born within England.” By 1760, England and Scotland had united into the Kingdom of Great Britain and her settlements in North America had grown to thirteen thriving colonies with strong cultural, economic, and political ties to the mother country. Each colony enjoyed a certain amount of self- government. The ties which bound Great Britain and her American colonies were numerous. Wealthy men in the colonies, such as George Washington, used British trading companies as their agents to conduct business. Young men from prominent families, like Arthur Lee, went to Great Britain to finish their schooling. Colonial churches benefited from ministers who were educated in Great Britain. Many of the brightest men in the colonies, such as Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania, James Otis of Massachusetts, and Peyton Randolph of Virginia, served the British government as appointed officials. What then caused these strong ties to unravel after 1760? What caused the American colonists to revolt against their mother country in 1775? Though not recognized by most people at the time, economic and political forces beginning in 1760 on both sides of the Atlantic would force Great Britain and her American colonies to reassess their long relationship.
[Show full text]
CHAPTER 3 America in the British Empire
CHAPTER 3 America in the British Empire ANTICIPATION/REACTION Directions: Before you begin reading this chapter, place a check mark beside any of the following seven statements with which you now agree. Use the column entitled “Anticipation.” When you have completed your study of this chapter, come back to this section and place a check mark beside any of the statements with which you then agree. Use the column entitled “Reaction.” Note any variation in the placement of checkmarks from anticipation to reaction and explain why you changed your mind. Anticipation Reaction _____ 1. The British government usually left American colonists _____ 1. to make their own laws pertaining to local matters. _____ 2. American colonial trade was severely crippled by _____ 2. British trade laws. _____ 3. The European Enlightenment had little influence on _____ 3. the thought of American colonists. _____ 4. Because they were part of the British empire, colonists _____ 4. were constantly involved in England’s imperial wars with France and Spain. _____ 5. Parliament taxed the American colonists as a way to _____ 5. express its authority over them, not because it needed. the money. _____ 6. Colonists protested the Sugar Act and Stamp Act as _____ 6. violations of their rights as Americans. _____ 7. Colonists protested the Tea Act because it threatened _____ 7. to raise the price of tea. LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading Chapter 3 you should be able to: 1. Define the basic assumptions of the British colonial system and describe its operation. 2. Assess the impact of the Great Awakening and Enlightenment on the spiritual and intellectual life of the colonies.
[Show full text]
The British Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty: a Critical Inquiry, 26 La
Louisiana Law Review Volume 26 | Number 4 June 1966 The rB itish Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Critical Inquiry Roy Stone de Montpensier Repository Citation Roy Stone de Montpensier, The British Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Critical Inquiry, 26 La. L. Rev. (1966) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol26/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BRITISH DOCTRINE OF PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY: A CRITICAL INQUIRY Roy Stone de Montpensier The purport of this argument is that Dicey and other legal positivists, Austin and Bentham among them, have propounded a spurious doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty because they have uncritically accepted a mistake of Blackstone, who in turn has mistakenly construed Coke's remarks on the nature and analysis of sovereignty, or better, the supremacy, of the High Court of Parliament. The law as a whole is a calculus,' self-contained and self- explanatory, like a circle within which in geometry it is possible to trace the delineaments of the two-dimensional plane con- tained within the circle, as Waissman explains in his Essay on Language Strata; or like language which is also like a circle - that is, as Dr. Johnson explains, a lexicographer sees language by giving definitions of words by reference to other words, and those words by other words, so that in the end words like buck and doe, female and male, he and she, are tautologous in the sense that the one has to refer to the other.
[Show full text]
In Accordance with Usage: the Authority of Custom, the Stamp Act Debate, and the Coming of the American Revolution
Fordham Law Review Volume 45 Issue 2 Article 2 1976 In Accordance With Usage: The Authority of Custom, the Stamp Act Debate, and the Coming of the American Revolution John Phillip Reid Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John Phillip Reid, In Accordance With Usage: The Authority of Custom, the Stamp Act Debate, and the Coming of the American Revolution , 45 Fordham L. Rev. 335 (1976). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol45/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In Accordance With Usage: The Authority of Custom, the Stamp Act Debate, and the Coming of the American Revolution Cover Page Footnote Professor, New York University Law School. B.S.S., 1952, Georgetown; LL.B., 1955, Harvard; LL.M., 1960, J.S.D., 1962, New York University. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol45/iss2/2 IN ACCORDANCE WITH USAGE: THE AUTHORITY OF CUSTOM, THE STAMP ACT DEBATE, AND THE COMING OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION JOHN PHILLIP REID* I. INTRODUCTION A s we mark the bicentennial of the American Revolution, it is time for lawyers to defend their own and demand their due. If jingoism in the writing of legal history is now under attack,' surely professional pride remains in fashion.
[Show full text]