DOCSLIB.ORG

(Tor) Assessment of Production, Economic and Social Impact of Interventions with Innovations on Selected Fa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Tor) Assessment of Production, Economic and Social Impact of Interventions with Innovations on Selected Fa Terms of Reference (ToR) Assessment of production, economic and social impact of interventions with Innovations on selected farms with wheat and faba bean production in Arsi 1. Background Ethiopia has very diverse bio-physical environment with a variety of ecosystems, with significant differences in climate, soil properties, vegetation types, agricultural potential, biodiversity and water resources. That results in different farming systems and farming products. The crop subsector which, on average, accounted for about 30 percent of GDP has been the major contributor to the growth of the agricultural value added during the period of the GTP (Growth and Transformation Plan). The productivity of major food crops (Cereals, Pulses, and Oil seeds) reached an annual average level of 17.6 quintal (100 kg) per hectare. Further increase in production and productivity of major crops will continue to be a priority in the next five years (2016-2020) by fully implementing strategies such as delivering effective extension services, supplying agricultural inputs and conducting famers training. The participation of several actors like international partners and private business will be encouraged and supported as well by the government. In general, during the period of the second Growth and Transformation Plan, objectives are broadly set in terms of increasing crop and livestock production and productivity, promoting natural resource conservation and utilization, ensuring food security and disaster prevention and preparedness. In this regard, the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) has launched the Project “Green Innovation Centre – Ethiopia: Innovations for Agricultural Productivity in Arsi” (IFAP – Arsi)” in the Arsi zone. “ This project has the targets to enhance productivity in the agricultural sector through promotion of Wheat and Faba bean value chains by up-scaling of innovations and best practices with following major intervention areas: Up-scaling of technical, organizational and economic innovations with broad scale, positive impact on income and productivity of smallholder farmers Strengthening service provision for smallholder farmers (e.g. through strengthening extension services; training institutions; up- and downstream agribusinesses). Strengthening organizations of value chain actors and promoting their lobbyism at political level. The project is implemented in 5 woredas (Digeluna Tijo, Tiyo, Hitosa, Lude Hitosa, Arsi Robe) of the Arsi zone. Proven and economically efficient innovations will be demonstrated by the project through training and capacity building via existing institutions in the extension service, the cooperative system and the private sector. The up-scaling of “Good Farming Practice” is one of the core activities in these woredas. For that, two main pillars (pillar 1 and pillar 2) are carried out in 2016. About 20,000 farmers will be trained on selected “host farms” (farmers-to-farmers 1 schools) with improved farming skills via training courses (pillar 1) and observable interventions with innovations (pillar 2). With pillar 2 selected innovations will be implemented on these 500 host farms, to improve training via observing (demonstration and promotion). These interventions shall be done on the approach “with and without”: one part of a selected crop field will be done with one innovation (mono-factorial approach) and the other part will be managed as usual. This will allow the direct comparison and is not depended to weather and management. This interventions (“with and without”) shall be documented for further activities in the coming years. 2. Objective of the project This project is designed to enhance understanding and build evidence of the impact of these innovations on 500 host farmers through comparatively measured data on a) agronomic impact (outcome: productivity via yield per hectare etc.), b) economic impact (outcome: profitability through cost efficiency and effectiveness) and c) social impact (outcome: what do trained farmers and host farmers like: acceptance, expectations and perceptions). 3. Tasks of the National Consultant A team of national consultants will undertake the study in five woredas. The team is expected to fulfill the following key tasks: 1. Organize, manage and execute the activities and key tasks of the study described in this Terms of Reference. 2. During its inception phase, the team may suggest modifications and/or revisions to the Terms of Reference, which must be agreed with the Green Innovation Center prior to implementation. 3. Develop and implement acceptable and appropriate data collection methodologies for specific interventions and deploy staff to collect, analyze and report findings on 500 host farmers in five woredas. 4. Conduct data collection, analysis and reporting from all participating farmers in the field sites. 5. Liaise with relevant stakeholders and partners of the Green Innovation Center to implement effective field monitoring tools for successful promotion of interventions (e.g. with IP consult as implementing partner). 6. Hand over all data and information collected during the study. 7. Hand over all monthly and final study reports. 2 4. Expected Results The consultant is expected to: 1. Submit a brief Inception Report after the first field visit to the host farmers and implementing woredas which demonstrates the Team’s basic understanding of the context and subject matter of focus, as well as its appreciation of potential constraints for the task at hand. The report will also include a detailed and realistic work-plan leading to its final output. The inception report should also include a detailed description of the methodology, tools and procedure to be followed for the participatory assessment of the selected innovations. 2. Submit monthly reports on time as stated in the Terms of Reference and conduct regular meetings with Green Innovation Center on the basis of reports and prepare minutes. 3. Submit a final Study Report. This report should consist of the following chapters: 1. Introduction 2. Materilas and Methods used 3. Results and discussions 3.1. Agronomic measures (comparative statstics on innovations Vs controls on yield and other measures) 3.2. Economic measures (cost benefit analysis and statstics of innovations Vs controls measurments) 3.3. Social impacts (measurments and statstics on acceptnce, perception and expectaions of innovations Vs controls) 4. Merged comparisons (prioritization) of innovations based on the parameters measured (agronomic and socio-economic) 5. Conclusions and recommendations of the results (what lessons have been learned from the project and what Green Innovation Center fulfill overall project targets) 5. Duration and Phases of Study The study will be conducted from May 1 to November 15, 2016. Upon completion of the study, the consultant will submit final report and other data, documents and information in hard and soft copies. All feedbacks, comments to and ownership (incl. copyright) of the final report and subsequent publications of results rests with the Green Innovation Center. 6. Implementation Strategy/Modalities The following strategy/modalities will be executed in the study. Activities below are not necessarily sequential. The Team Leader and members will be selected by the national consultant and confirmed by the Green Innovation Center. The Team Leader will be the principal contact person with the Green Innovation Centre program leader and will be responsible for the overall and direct 3 supervision and coordination of the team and any administrative and decision making tasks on behalf of the team. The Team Leader and members will together deliver the key outputs spelled out in the Terms of Reference. The team will work and consult closely with Green Innovation Center and its partners in the woredas. The Green Innovation Center will provide liaison and coordination support with IP-consult and other partners. 7. Roles and Responsibilities Obligation and Responsibilities of Green Innovation Center The Green Innovation Center shall have the following obligations and responsibilities: The Green Innovation Center is the lead organization for the study, and will be responsible for its overall policy guidance. Receive, review and discuss plans and reports (monthly and final) submitted by the consultant detailing activities accomplished and challenges encountered to ensure activities are being executed as planned. Obligations and responsibilities of the consultant The Consultant shall have the following obligations and responsibilities: Have the overall responsibility for the planning, implementation, reporting and monitoring of the project activities and financial issues. Assign one person to be directly responsible for the implementation and communication matters related to the project. Develop and implement clear methodologies and strategies for implementaion of the project majorly focusing on comparative measurment of interventions, proper data analysis methods, reporting schedule and formats etc with the prior approval of Green Innovation Center. Ensure that result based monthly progress and final reports are submitted on time. Consult Green Innovation Center before any change is recommended on the project document that would affect the work being performed. Follow all “Do-Not-Harm”, security and other consultancy standards of GIZ (submitted by request). 8. Submission for The deadline for submitting the expression of interest for implementing the above
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Download E-Book (PDF)
    Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology Volume 9 Number 6 June 2017 ISSN 2141-2316 ABOUT JPHE The Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology (JPHE) is published monthly (one volume per year) by Academic Journals. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology (JPHE) is an open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as health observatory, biostatistics, occupational health, behavioral medicine etc. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published shortly after acceptance. All articles published in JPHE are peer-reviewed. Contact Us Editorial Office: [email protected] Help Desk: [email protected] Website: http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/JPHE Submit manuscript online http://ms.academicjournals.me/ Editors Professor Mostafa A. Abolfotouh Professor of Family & Community Medicine Head of Medical Team - Biobanking Section. King Abdullah International Medical Research CEnter, King Saud Bin-Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, National Guard Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia Editorial Board Dr. Guolian Kang Prof. Tariq Javed The University of Alabama at Birmingham/1665 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University Blvd, Ryals 443 University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-38040. Guolian Pakistan. USA Dr. María Elena Dávila L Universidad Centroccidental “Lisandro Alvarado”. Dr. Mohammed Danlami Salihu School of Medicine/ School of Health Science . Av. Public Health Department Andrés Bello C/ Av. Libertador. Barquisimeto, Lara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Venezuela, SA Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto. Nigeria. Dr. Lay Ching Chai Centre of Excellence for Food Safety Research, Faculty of Prof. Jahanfar Jahanban Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Oral Pathology Dept.Dental faculty of Tehran Islamic 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Azad University/ Malaysia Address:B 107 Pezeshkan-Farabi Build No 67 Javanshir St.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Extension Gap Among Improved Bread Wheat Producer's
    vv ISSN: 2640-7906 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/ojps LIFE SCIENCES GROUP Received: 15 May, 2021 Research Article Accepted: 31 May, 2021 Published: 02 June, 2021 *Corresponding author: Sintayehu Abebe, Ethiopian Analysis of extension gap Institute of Agricultural Research, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, Assela, P. O.Box 489, Ethiopia, Tel: +251 9 13 10 42 04; E-mail: among improved bread wheat Keywords: Bread wheat; Extension gap; Clustered- based; Demonstration producer’s farmers found https://www.peertechzpublications.com at Arsi Robe District of Arsi Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Sintayehu Abebe* Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, Assela, P. O.Box 489, Ethiopia Abstract This study reports the analysis of agricultural extension gap among four improved bread wheat varieties at Arsi Robe district, Arsi Zone, along with their management practices under farmers ’condition to enhance farmers’ knowledge and skill on bread wheat production. Four improved bread wheat varieties were used to demonstrate namely Honkolo,DEKA,Hidase(check) and Lemu. Honkolo variety had a 43.8% yield advantage over the standard check (Hidase), DEKA had a 16.4% yield advantage over the standard check (Hidase), and the variety Lemu had a negative -25.8% yield loss or below the standard check (Hidase) and it conclude that both Honkolo and DEKA varieties are the fi rst and second option for the farmers whereas the variety Lemu is not recommended due to low productivity in the study area and others areas having similar agro ecologies. The result of agricultural extension gap analysis showed that Honkolo variety had a -2.7q/ha yield increment or in other words Honkolo variety had achieved 104.3% of the potential at research fi eld and had a 4.3% yield advantage than the research fi eld.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • Limnologica 65 (2017) 61–75
    Limnologica 65 (2017) 61–75 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Limnologica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/limno Farmers’ awareness and perception of Lake Ziway (Ethiopia) and its MARK watershed management ⁎ Hayal Destaa,b, , Brook Lemmab,c, Till Stellmacherd a Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Leopoldstr. 11a, D-80802, Munich, Germany b Chair of Ecosystem Planning and Management, EiABC, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 518, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia c Department of Zoological Sciences, College of Natural Science, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia d Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, D-53113, Bonn, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The article examines how heads of farmers’ households perceive the socioeconomic benefits of Lake Ziway Watershed management (Ethiopia), the causes of its current degradation, and the state of land and water use management in its wa- Local perception tershed. The investigation was based on in-depth empirical field work including a survey with 635 heads of Awareness smallholder farmers’ households via interview using semi-structured questionnaires. Further, water abstraction Lake was estimated from three districts that border with the lake. Respondents believe that Lake Ziway provides a Water abstraction number of individual and collective benefits for local communities, private companies and public institution. They stated, however, that the lake is under pressure from the floriculture industry and other investment pro- jects, high population growth and subsequent expansion of settlements and irrigation farms, high applications of agrochemicals, soil erosion, uncontrolled water abstraction, and deforestation in the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Small and Medium Forest Enterprises in Ethiopia
    The annual value of small and medium forest enterprises (SMFEs) in Ethiopia amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars – dominated in rough order of value by fuelwood, herbal remedies, wild coffee, honey and beeswax and timber furniture. The majority of these enterprises are informal and remain Small and medium forest largely unregulated and untaxed by any government authority. Nevertheless these enterprises appear to have significant social and economic benefits. The Government of Ethiopia has responded by providing support, particularly through enterprises in Ethiopia the framework of Micro and Small Enterprises. The recent establishment of the Oromia State Forest Enterprises Supervising Agency and new policy declarations about the community’s stated role in forest management are clear indications of the current interest in forest resources and the roles they play in rural livelihoods. Non-governmental organisations have also been experimenting with Participatory Forest Management and offered training to emerging enterprises, particularly those engaged in non-timber forest products. Yet few associations have yet been established to try and access the more lucrative markets beyond the local setting. SMFEs have great potential to reduce poverty in Ethiopia, but in their present unregulated state also represent a threat to the country’s declining forest resources. This report consolidates information about them and suggests a practical way forward for those wishing to support them. IIED Small and Medium Forest Enterprise Series No. 26 ISBN
    [Show full text]
  • Full Report (Pdf)
    Working Together The sharing of water and sanitation support services for small towns and villages A WELL study produced under Task 510 by Brian Reed WELL Water and Environmental Health at London and Loughborough Water, Engineering and Development Centre Loughborough University Leicestershire LE11 3TU UK [email protected] www.lboro.ac.uk/WELL © LSHTM/WEDC, 2001 Reed, B.J. (2001) Working Together -the sharing of water and sanitation support services for small towns and villages WELL. Contents amendment record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Revision Description Date Signed 1 Draft final July 01 APC 2 Final 01/10/01 APC Designed and produced at WEDC Task Management by Andrew Cotton Quality Assurance by Andrew Cotton Cover photograph: Brian Reed (W/r Dirbe Ebrahem, village water committee member and w/r Likehesh Mengesha, tap attendant, Tereta, Ethiopia) WELL TASK 510 Working Together: draft final report Table of contents Table of contents...........................................................................................................................i List of tables................................................................................................................................ ii List of figures .............................................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................iii Summary .......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia a M Tigray a Afar M H U Amhara a Uz N M
    35°0'0"E 40°0'0"E Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia A m Tigray A Afar m h u Amhara a uz N m Dera u N u u G " / m r B u l t Dire Dawa " r a e 0 g G n Hareri 0 ' r u u Addis Ababa ' n i H a 0 Gambela m s Somali 0 ° b a K Oromia Ü a I ° o A Hidabu 0 u Wara o r a n SNNPR 0 h a b s o a 1 u r Abote r z 1 d Jarte a Jarso a b s a b i m J i i L i b K Jardega e r L S u G i g n o G A a e m e r b r a u / K e t m uyu D b e n i u l u o Abay B M G i Ginde e a r n L e o e D l o Chomen e M K Beret a a Abe r s Chinaksen B H e t h Yaya Abichuna Gne'a r a c Nejo Dongoro t u Kombolcha a o Gulele R W Gudetu Kondole b Jimma Genete ru J u Adda a a Boji Dirmeji a d o Jida Goro Gutu i Jarso t Gu J o Kembibit b a g B d e Berga l Kersa Bila Seyo e i l t S d D e a i l u u r b Gursum G i e M Haro Maya B b u B o Boji Chekorsa a l d Lalo Asabi g Jimma Rare Mida M Aleltu a D G e e i o u e u Kurfa Chele t r i r Mieso m s Kegn r Gobu Seyo Ifata A f o F a S Ayira Guliso e Tulo b u S e G j a e i S n Gawo Kebe h i a r a Bako F o d G a l e i r y E l i Ambo i Chiro Zuria r Wayu e e e i l d Gaji Tibe d lm a a s Diga e Toke n Jimma Horo Zuria s e Dale Wabera n a w Tuka B Haru h e N Gimbichu t Kutaye e Yubdo W B Chwaka C a Goba Koricha a Leka a Gidami Boneya Boshe D M A Dale Sadi l Gemechis J I e Sayo Nole Dulecha lu k Nole Kaba i Tikur Alem o l D Lalo Kile Wama Hagalo o b r Yama Logi Welel Akaki a a a Enchini i Dawo ' b Meko n Gena e U Anchar a Midega Tola h a G Dabo a t t M Babile o Jimma Nunu c W e H l d m i K S i s a Kersana o f Hana Arjo D n Becho A o t
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)
    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 1
    D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 1. Tigrey No. Woredas Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Expected Connecting Point 1 Adwa 13 Per Filed Survey by ETC 2(*) Hawzen 12 3(*) Wukro 7 Per Feasibility Study 4(*) Samre 13 Per Filed Survey by ETC 5 Alamata 10 Total 55 1 Tahtay Adiyabo 8 2 Medebay Zana 10 3 Laelay Mayechew 10 4 Kola Temben 11 5 Abergele 7 Per Filed Survey by ETC 6 Ganta Afeshum 15 7 Atsbi Wenberta 9 8 Enderta 14 9(*) Hintalo Wajirat 16 10 Ofla 15 Total 115 1 Kafta Humer 5 2 Laelay Adiyabo 8 3 Tahtay Koraro 8 4 Asegede Tsimbela 10 5 Tselemti 7 6(**) Welkait 7 7(**) Tsegede 6 8 Mereb Lehe 10 9(*) Enticho 21 10(**) Werie Lehe 16 Per Filed Survey by ETC 11 Tahtay Maychew 8 12(*)(**) Naeder Adet 9 13 Degua temben 9 14 Gulomahda 11 15 Erob 10 16 Saesi Tsaedaemba 14 17 Alage 13 18 Endmehoni 9 19(**) Rayaazebo 12 20 Ahferom 15 Total 208 1/14 Tigrey D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 2. Affar No. Woredas Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Expected Connecting Point 1 Ayisaita 3 2 Dubti 5 Per Filed Survey by ETC 3 Chifra 2 Total 10 1(*) Mile 1 2(*) Elidar 1 3 Koneba 4 4 Berahle 4 Per Filed Survey by ETC 5 Amibara 5 6 Gewane 1 7 Ewa 1 8 Dewele 1 Total 18 1 Ere Bti 1 2 Abala 2 3 Megale 1 4 Dalul 4 5 Afdera 1 6 Awash Fentale 3 7 Dulecha 1 8 Bure Mudaytu 1 Per Filed Survey by ETC 9 Arboba Special Woreda 1 10 Aura 1 11 Teru 1 12 Yalo 1 13 Gulina 1 14 Telalak 1 15 Simurobi 1 Total 21 2/14 Affar D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Program Description
    FSCP-GIAF-ETHIOPIA GRANT APPLICATION GUIDE 1. Program Description Cultivating New Frontiers in Agriculture (CNFA) is implementing the 34-month Farm Service Center Program (FSCP) in partnership with the GIZ Green Innovation Centres for the Agriculture and Food Sector in Ethiopia (GIAF-Ethiopia). The project will establish five private retail input supply stores known as Farm Service Centers (FSCs). These Ethiopian-owned and operated enterprises are designed to improve the productivity, food security and incomes of smallholder famers in the Arsi zone of Ethiopia by linking them to high-quality agricultural inputs and extension services. The project is strategically aligned to build the role of the private sector and is connected to CNFA’s other initiatives in Ethiopia, which also work in the development of FSCs. In addition, and in line with the larger GIAF-Ethiopia initiatives the project will establish FSCs in the following five woredas recommended by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources and the Oromia Bureau of Agriculture - Hitosa, Lude-Hitosa, Arsi-Robe, Digelu-Tijo and Tiyo. The project will also focus on up-scaling of innovations and best practices for wheat and faba bean production. FSCP-GIAF-Ethiopia is a follow-on to the successful Commercial Farm Service Program, which piloted CNFA’s Farm Service Center (FSC) Model in Ethiopia for the first time. CNFA’s Farm Service Center Model is a market-based, private sector model that applies matching grants and training methodology to establish small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that deliver farm supplies and services. FSCs are located in larger townships and serve as rural development centers that meet the needs of private farmers in their communities.
    [Show full text]