DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Wikipedia by Graham, Howard, Kwan, Purewal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Wikipedia by Graham, Howard, Kwan, Purewal Introduction to Wikipedia by Graham, Howard, Kwan, Purewal Attribution All the content in this report, except for the Top Web Links section is from Wikipedia, licensed under the Creative Commons Share-Alike 3.0 Unported License (see below for an overview of both Wikipedia and the Creative Commons). The following picture shows the full license below (it is also set up as a hyperlink to the original web source for this license). Figure 1 - Wikipedia Creative Commons License (Wikipedia, 2009) Our Contribution We have attempted to add extra value to the content by structuring it in an easy to read, business report format and to add an informative “Top Web Links” section. We have also added an index to help you find what you are looking for. We hope you find it useful and worth the $1 purchase price. We have prepared this report as part of a MS Word 2007 assignment for BSYS 1000 – Computer Applications I that we are taking at the British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT). All proceeds will go to student clubs within the School of Business at BCIT. Wikipedia Wikipedia is a multilingual, Web-based, free-content encyclopaedia project based mostly on anonymous contributions. The name “Wikipedia” is a portmanteau of the words wiki (a type of collaborative Web site) and encyclopaedia. Wikipedia’s articles provide links to guide the user to related pages with additional information. Wikipedia is written collaboratively by an international (and mostly anonymous) group of volunteers. Anyone with internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles. There are no requirements to provide one’s real name when contributing; rather, each writer’s privacy is protected unless they choose to reveal their identity themselves. Since its creation in 2001, Wikipedia has grown rapidly into one of the largest reference web sites, attracting around 65 million visitors monthly as of 2009. There are more than 75,000 active contributors working on more than 14,000,000 articles in more than 260 languages. As of today, there are 3,062,069 articles in English. Every day, hundreds of thousands of visitors from around the world collectively make tens of thousands of edits and create thousands of new articles to augment the knowledge held by the Wikipedia encyclopaedia. (See also: Wikipedia: Statistics.) Creative Commons Creative Commons (CC) is a non-profit organization devoted to expanding the range of creative works available for others to build upon legally and to share. The organization has released several copyright-licenses known as Creative Commons licenses. These licenses allow creators to communicate which rights they reserve, and which rights they waive for the benefit of recipients or other creators. Page 1 of 40 Introduction to Wikipedia by Graham, Howard, Kwan, Purewal Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 3 History ....................................................................................................................................... 4 History of Wikipedia.............................................................................................................. 4 Nature of Wikipedia .................................................................................................................. 6 Editing model ........................................................................................................................ 6 Attacks on the encyclopedia ................................................................................................. 7 Vandalisation ........................................................................................................................ 7 Spam, agenda pushing, and trolls ......................................................................................... 7 Defences ............................................................................................................................... 8 Coverage of topics ................................................................................................................ 8 Quality ................................................................................................................................... 9 Reliability............................................................................................................................... 9 Wikipedia community ......................................................................................................... 10 Operation ................................................................................................................................ 12 Wikimedia Foundation and the Wikimedia chapters ......................................................... 12 Software and hardware ...................................................................................................... 12 Delivery media .................................................................................................................... 13 License and language editions ................................................................................................ 14 Cultural significance ................................................................................................................ 16 Related projects ...................................................................................................................... 19 Page 2 of 40 Introduction to Wikipedia by Graham, Howard, Kwan, Purewal Introduction Wikipedia (pronounced WEE-kee-PEE-dee-ə, or WI-ki-PEE-dee-ə) is a free,[5] web-based, collaborative, multilingual encyclopaedia project supported by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Its name is a portmanteau of the words wiki (a technology for creating collaborative websites, from the Hawaiian word wiki, meaning "quick") and encyclopaedia. Wikipedia's 13 million articles (three million in the English Wikipedia) have been written collaboratively by volunteers around the world, and almost all of its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the site.[6] Launched in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger,[7] it is currently the largest and most popular general reference work on the Internet.[3][8][9][10] Critics of Wikipedia accuse it of systemic bias and inconsistencies (including undue weight given to popular culture),[11] and allege that it favors consensus over credentials in its editorial process.[12] Its reliability and accuracy are also claimed to be an issue.[13] Other criticisms center on its susceptibility to vandalism and the addition of spurious or unverified information,[14] though scholarly work suggests that vandalism is generally short- lived,[15][16] and an investigation found that the material they compared came close to the level of accuracy of Encyclopædia Britannica and had a similar rate of "serious errors".[17] These claims have been disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica.[18] Wikipedia's departure from the expert-driven style of the encyclopaedia building mode and the large presence of unacademic contents have been noted several times. When Time magazine recognized You as its Person of the Year for 2006, acknowledging the accelerating success of online collaboration and interaction by millions of users around the world, it cited Wikipedia as one of several examples of Web 2.0 services, along with YouTube, MySpace, and Facebook.[19] Some noted the importance of Wikipedia not only as an encyclopaedic reference but also as a frequently updated news resource because of how quickly articles about recent events appear.[20][21] Page 3 of 40 Introduction to Wikipedia by Graham, Howard, Kwan, Purewal History History of Wikipedia Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopaedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process. Nupedia was founded on March 9, 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, Inc, a web portal company. Its main figures were Jimmy Wales, Bomis CEO, and Larry Sanger, editor-in- chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia. Nupedia was licensed initially under its own Nupedia Open Content License, switching to the GNU Free Documentation License before Wikipedia's founding at the urging of Richard Stallman.[22] Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales founded Wikipedia.[23][24] While Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopaedia,[25][26] Sanger is usually credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[27] On January 10, 2001, Larry Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[28] Wikipedia was formally launched on January 15, 2001, as a single English- language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[29] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[25] Wikipedia's policy of "neutral point-of-view"[30] was codified in its initial months, and was similar to Nupedia's earlier "nonbiased" policy. Otherwise, there were relatively few rules initially and Wikipedia operated independently of Nupedia.[25] Graph of the article count for the English Wikipedia, from January 10, 2001, to September 9, 2007 (the date of the two-millionth article)Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. It grew to approximately 20,000 articles and 18 language editions by the end of 2001. By late 2002, it had reached 26 language editions, 46 by the end of 2003, and 161 by the final days of 2004.[31] Nupedia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15 July 2011 Page 1 of 17
    Radio 4 Listings for 9 – 15 July 2011 Page 1 of 17 SATURDAY 09 JULY 2011 events company Endurance Life in partnership with Natural Edwards had barely arrived in Montserrat in 1995 when the England to allow runners to take up the challenge of a long volcanic eruptions took place that were to cover most of the SAT 00:00 Midnight News (b0128qd7) distance route whenever they want to rather than as part of a island in ash. He went back 16 years later to see how life has The latest national and international news from BBC Radio 4. large event. The aim is to run as far as they would like to go, changed for both visitors and residents. Language teacher Followed by Weather. whenever they choose, and enter an electronic timing tag into Elisabeth Smith tells Sandi why the British are so bad at boxes fitted at points along the way which records their speaking foreign languages when travelling - and what they can progress. The scheme is currently operating on several of our do about it. SAT 00:30 Book of the Week (b0128l70) national trails and the organisers say that this has been created Constance: The Tragic and Scandalous Life of Mrs Oscar Wilde by a team of trail runners who feel that the joy of running is Producer: Harry Parker. increased greatly when it takes place in a stunning landscape. Episode 5 But walkers and outdoor enthusiasts are questioning the need for this scheme. Many people are concerned about the SAT 10:30 Found in Translation (b012f5qj) Written by Franny Moyle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Culture of Wikipedia
    Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Good Faith Collaboration The Culture of Wikipedia Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. Foreword by Lawrence Lessig The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Web edition, Copyright © 2011 by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. CC-NC-SA 3.0 Purchase at Amazon.com | Barnes and Noble | IndieBound | MIT Press Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been lauded, lambasted, and satirized. Despite unease over its implications for the character (and quality) of knowledge, Wikipedia has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the centuries-old Author Bio & Research Blog pursuit of a universal encyclopedia. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a rich ethnographic portrayal of Wikipedia's historical roots, collaborative culture, and much debated legacy. Foreword Preface to the Web Edition Praise for Good Faith Collaboration Preface Extended Table of Contents "Reagle offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself — rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the 1. Nazis and Norms project, even if it means setting aside personal differences. Reagle's position as a scholar and a member of the community 2. The Pursuit of the Universal makes him uniquely situated to describe this culture." —Cory Doctorow , Boing Boing Encyclopedia "Reagle provides ample data regarding the everyday practices and cultural norms of the community which collaborates to 3. Good Faith Collaboration produce Wikipedia. His rich research and nuanced appreciation of the complexities of cultural digital media research are 4. The Puzzle of Openness well presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Free John Finnemore's Souvenir Programme: Series 6: BBC
    Ebook Free John Finnemore's Souvenir Programme: Series 6: BBC Radio 4 Comedy Sketch Show The award-winning BBC Radio 4 sketch show returns, written by and starring John Finnemore. Winner of the 2015 BBC Audio Drama Award for 'Best Scripted Comedy with Live Audience', the programme was described as 'one of the most consistently funny sketch shows for quite some time' by The Guardian. The sketches and skits feature Margaret Cabourn-Smith, Simon Kane, Lawry Lewin and Carrie Quinlan. Duration: 2 hours 50 mins approx. Series: John Finnemore's Souvenir Programme Audio CD: 1 pages Publisher: BBC Books; Unabridged edition (June 1, 2017) Language: English ISBN-10: 1785295950 ISBN-13: 978-1785295959 Product Dimensions: 4.9 x 0.9 x 5.6 inches Shipping Weight: 5 ounces (View shipping rates and policies) Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review Best Sellers Rank: #746,866 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) #145 in Books > Books on CD > Radio Shows #360 in Books > Humor & Entertainment > Radio > General Broadcasting #663 in Books > Humor & Entertainment > Humor > Comedy "One of the most consistently funny sketch shows for quite some time" -- Tom Meltzer The Guardian "Combination of witty writing and fine performers" -- Lisa Martland The Stage "Sparklingly clever" The Daily Telegraph John Finnemore is a British comedy writer and actor, best known for his radio sitcom Cabin Pressure and his radio sketch show John Finnemore's Souvenir Programme, as well as for frequent appearances on other BBC Radio 4 comedy shows such as The Now Show.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 August 2011 Page 1 of 17 SATURDAY 30 JULY 2011 How the Price Paid for Milk by Retailers and Processors Is Set
    Radio 4 Listings for 30 July – 5 August 2011 Page 1 of 17 SATURDAY 30 JULY 2011 how the price paid for milk by retailers and processors is set. SAT 11:30 From Our Own Correspondent (b012w946) Many say the price they're paid is still well below that of their BBC foreign correspondents with the stories behind the world's SAT 00:00 Midnight News (b012r7w3) European counterparts and the rise in prices of commodities headlines. The latest national and international news from BBC Radio 4. like cheese, butter and milk powder should be better reflected Followed by Weather. in their profits. SAT 12:00 Poorer Than Their Parents (b012w9sr) Sarah hears what retailers, processors and the Government are Pensions SAT 00:30 Book of the Week (b012tn9j) doing to resolve the situation, and visits a farmer in Stafford Hood Rat who has invested half a million in a brand new farm. In this second part of our series on inter-generational finance, Alvin Hall talks to young people about their attitudes towards Episode 5 Presented by Sarah Swadling. Produced by Anne-Marie pensions. Bullock. Written by Gavin Knight. The reader is Siobhan Redmond. Fewer than 40% of under 30 year olds contribute to pension schemes offered by their employer. Alvin accompanies the Discovering an innovative new way of confronting gang crime SAT 06:57 Weather (b012r7wk) Pensions Advisory Service for a session educating young which has been developed in the US, Karyn McCluskey decides The latest weather forecast. workers at a hire car firm about the benefits of their scheme to try it out in Glasgow.
    [Show full text]
  • WMF Advisory Board Beesley Starling
    Advisory Board interviews conducted at Wikimania: Angela Beesley Starling August 24-28, 2009 Key themes: . Need for experimentation/innovation within Wikimedia . Need for prioritization and rationalization of Wiki projects . Need for renewed efforts towards the charitable mission What is your history with Wikimedia? . Was on the first Board of Trustees, joined in 2003. Stepped down from that role and became Chair of the Advisory Board when that was set up. Husband is a MediaWiki developer on staff at Wikimedia (Tim Starling). Now working with Jimmy on Wikia. What are your major concerns in thinking about Wikimedia’s development over the next five years? . Concern that as the WMF gets bigger, the connection to the community will be weaker. Big software challenges; and it is harder to try out new things since the site is so big o Difficulty trying out new things; concerned that the community will object to change o We need new processes, a way for the Foundation to say they need to try something out. For example, with flagged revisions, it was not clear how or whether it would will get rolled out, when it might live, who would be responsible for it, and whether it would be for a trial period only, and if so what metrics would determine success of the trial. o Too few technical staff at Wikipedia, and too few people to review the code of volunteers. Major changes, particularly user-facing ones, are less likely to happen. The tech staff is focused on management of volunteers – filling in other bits around the edges.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia's Labor Squeeze and Its Consequences Eric Goldman Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected]
    Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2010 Wikipedia's Labor Squeeze and Its Consequences Eric Goldman Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs Part of the Internet Law Commons Recommended Citation 8 J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 157 (2010) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WIKIPEDIA'S LABOR SQUEEZE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES ERIC GOLDMAN* INT RO D U CTIO N ................................................................................... 158 I. MEASURING WIKIPEDIA'S SUCCESS ....................................... 159 II. THREATS TO WIKIPEDIA ......................................................... 161 III. WIKIPEDIA'S RESPONSE TO THE VANDAL AND SPAMMER T H REA T S ................................................................................... 164 A. Increased TechnologicalBarriers to Participation.................... 164 B. Increased Social Barriersto Participation............................... 167 IV. WIKIPEDIA'S LOOMING LABOR SUPPLY PROBLEMS ............. 170 A . E ditor Turnover ................................................................... 170 B. Wikipedia's Limited Toolkit to Attract New Editors..............
    [Show full text]
  • 2 December 2016 Page 1 of 9
    Radio 4 Extra Listings for 26 November – 2 December 2016 Page 1 of 9 SATURDAY 26 NOVEMBER 2016 SAT 02:30 15 Minute Drama (b009fs0d) back a bit, Radio Active. His TV credits include Paul Merton - Amanda Whittington - Bollywood Jane, Episode 5 The Series, Spitting Image, Absolutely, The Paul & Pauline Calf SAT 00:00 Doctor Who (b0185cks) Amanda Whittington©s story of a young woman who discovers the Video Diaries, Coogan©s Run, The Tony Ferrino Phenomenon and Hornets© Nest, The Circus of Doom, part 1 magic of Indian cinema. exec producing Victoria Wood©s dinnerladies. Continuing with their cottage encounter, Mike Yates listens 5/5. Jane discovers the truth about her father and Kate makes an Producer: David Tyler eagerly as the Doctor recalls his early 19th century encounter unexpected decision. A Pozzitive Television production for BBC Radio 4. with the alien swarm in a small English rural town... Jane ...... Joanne Froggatt SAT 04:30 The Phenomenon Squad (b083m047) Part of a five-story adventure written by Paul Magrs. Kate ...... Katherine Dow Blyton Episode 1 Starring Tom Baker as the Fourth Doctor, Richard Franklin as Dini ...... Sacha Dhawan 4 Extra Debut. Brabazon investigates his superiors with coppers Mike Yates, Susie Ridell as Sally, Michael Maloney as Dr Adam Aamir ...... Pal Aron hand-picked...by his boss! Stars Roy Kinnear and Simon Cadell. Farrow, Stephen Thorne as Antonio and Jilly Bond as Francesca. Mac ...... Sean Connolly From October 1986. Producer: Kate Thomas Directed by Kate Chapman. SAT 05:00 London Calling (b05ps2ns) Made by BBC Audio. SAT 02:45 Book of the Week (b01bbb64) Little Willie Saves the Day SAT 00:30 The Tingle Factor (b04mhkrv) The Train in the Night: A Story of Music and Loss, Episode 5 Back to the BBC©s early wireless days of 1922.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Wikipedia Vandalism Using Wikitrust*
    Detecting Wikipedia Vandalism using WikiTrust? Lab Report for PAN at CLEF 2010 B. Thomas Adler1, Luca de Alfaro2, and Ian Pye3 1 [email protected], Fujitsu Labs of America, Inc. 2 [email protected], Google, Inc. and UC Santa Cruz (on leave) 3 [email protected], CloudFlare, Inc. Abstract WikiTrust is a reputation system for Wikipedia authors and content. WikiTrust computes three main quantities: edit quality, author reputation, and content reputation. The edit quality measures how well each edit, that is, each change introduced in a revision, is preserved in subsequent revisions. Authors who perform good quality edits gain reputation, and text which is revised by sev- eral high-reputation authors gains reputation. Since vandalism on the Wikipedia is usually performed by anonymous or new users (not least because long-time vandals end up banned), and is usually reverted in a reasonably short span of time, edit quality, author reputation, and content reputation are obvious candi- dates as features to identify vandalism on the Wikipedia. Indeed, using the full set of features computed by WikiTrust, we have been able to construct classifiers that identify vandalism with a recall of 83.5%, a precision of 48.5%, and a false positive rate of 8%, for an area under the ROC curve of 93.4%. If we limit our- selves to the set of features available at the time an edit is made (when the edit quality is still unknown), the classifier achieves a recall of 77.1%, a precision of 36.9%, and a false positive rate of 12.2%, for an area under the ROC curve of 90.4%.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia Data Analysis
    Wikipedia data analysis. Introduction and practical examples Felipe Ortega June 29, 2012 Abstract This document offers a gentle and accessible introduction to conduct quantitative analysis with Wikipedia data. The large size of many Wikipedia communities, the fact that (for many languages) the already account for more than a decade of activity and the precise level of detail of records accounting for this activity represent an unparalleled opportunity for researchers to conduct interesting studies for a wide variety of scientific disciplines. The focus of this introductory guide is on data retrieval and data preparation. Many re- search works have explained in detail numerous examples of Wikipedia data analysis, includ- ing numerical and graphical results. However, in many cases very little attention is paid to explain the data sources that were used in these studies, how these data were prepared before the analysis and additional information that is also available to extend the analysis in future studies. This is rather unfortunate since, in general, data retrieval and data preparation usu- ally consumes no less than 75% of the whole time devoted to quantitative analysis, specially in very large datasets. As a result, the main goal of this document is to fill in this gap, providing detailed de- scriptions of available data sources in Wikipedia, and practical methods and tools to prepare these data for the analysis. This is the focus of the first part, dealing with data retrieval and preparation. It also presents an overview of useful existing tools and frameworks to facilitate this process. The second part includes a description of a general methodology to undertake quantitative analysis with Wikipedia data, and open source tools that can serve as building blocks for researchers to implement their own analysis process.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 July 2017 Page 1 of 8
    Radio 4 Extra Listings for 15 – 21 July 2017 Page 1 of 8 SATURDAY 15 JULY 2017 Burying The Typewriter is Carmen Bugan©s memoir of growing SAT 07:30 Painting the Clouds with Sunshine (b0076vq0) up in Romania in the 1970s and 1980s when the country was Episode 3Jazz musician and broadcaster Humphrey Lyttelton SAT 00:00 Paradise Lost in Cyberspace (b007jpgs) governed by Ceausescu, and his network of agents and informers, explores the troubled world of British band leaders after 1945. Episode 5Now a fully-fledged OAP, George Smith is set for a the Securitate, exerted a malign influence in every sphere of From November 2005. special mission with Andrea Sunbeam and Mrs Cookson. society. SAT 08:00 The Noble Years (b08y6wtz) Colin Swash©s dystopian comedy stars Stephen Moore as George, Carmen Bugan was educated at the University of Michigan (Ann "You can©t have suspense without information" - Alfred Patsy Byrne as Doris, Geoffrey McGivern as O©Connell, Edna Arbor) and Balliol College, Oxford, where she was awarded a Hitchcock on making films Dore as Mrs Cookson, Lorelei King as Andrea Sunbeam, Melanie doctorate. Her first book of poetry, Crossing The Carpathians, "At first I thought they©re going to need subtitles in the picture" - Hudson as Wilma P Random. With Christopher, Lewis MacLeod was published by Oxford Poets/Carcanet in 2004. Shelley Winters on Michael Caine©s cockney accent in ©Alfie©. and Peter Serafinowicz. "A beautiful, vivid memoir..." "Milligan and I are both manic depressives" - Peter Sellers. Producer: Richard Wilson. The Guardian Alfred Hitchcock, Shelley Winters, Peter Sellers, Sammy Davis First broadcast on BBC Radio 4 in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches to NLP-Supported Information Quality Management in Wikipedia
    The Quality of Content in Open Online Collaboration Platforms Approaches to NLP-supported Information Quality Management in Wikipedia Vom Fachbereich Informatik der Technischen Universität Darmstadt genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor-Ingenieur (Dr.-Ing.) vorgelegt von Oliver Ferschke, M.A. geboren in Würzburg Tag der Einreichung: 15. Mai 2014 Tag der Disputation: 15. Juli 2014 Referenten: Prof. Dr. Iryna Gurevych, Darmstadt Prof. Dr. Hinrich Schütze, München Assoc. Prof. Carolyn Penstein Rosé, PhD, Pittsburgh Darmstadt 2014 D17 Please cite this document as URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-40929 URL: http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/4092 This document is provided by tuprints, E-Publishing-Service of the TU Darmstadt http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de [email protected] This work is published under the following Creative Commons license: Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivative Works 2.0 Germany http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/de/deed.en Abstract Over the past decade, the paradigm of the World Wide Web has shifted from static web pages towards participatory and collaborative content production. The main properties of this user generated content are a low publication threshold and little or no editorial control. While this has improved the variety and timeliness of the available information, it causes an even higher variance in quality than the already heterogeneous quality of traditional web content. Wikipedia is the prime example for a successful, large-scale, collaboratively- created resource that reflects the spirit of the open collaborative content creation paradigm. Even though recent studies have confirmed that the overall quality of Wikipedia is high, there is still a wide gap that must be bridged before Wikipedia reaches the state of a reliable, citable source.
    [Show full text]
  • Criticism of Wikipedia from Wikipidia.Pdf
    Criticism of Wikipedia from Wikipidia For a list of criticisms of Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Criticisms. See also Wikipedia:Replies to common objections. Two radically different versions of a Wikipedia biography, presented to the public within days of each other: Wikipedia's susceptibility to edit wars and bias is one of the issues raised by Wikipedia critics http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Criticism%20of%20Wikipedia%20from%20Wikipidia.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Examples%20of%20Bias%20in%20Wikipedia.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Wikipedia%20is%20Run%20by%20Latent%20Homosexual%20Homophob ics.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Bigotry%20and%20Bias%20in%20Wikipedia.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Dear%20Wikipedia%20on%20Libelous%20lies%20against%20Desire%20 Dubounet.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Desir%c3%a9%20Dubounet%20Wikipidia%20text.pdf Criticism of Wikipedia—of the content, procedures, and operations, and of the Wikipedia community—covers many subjects, topics, and themes about the nature of Wikipedia as an open source encyclopedia of subject entries that almost anyone can edit. Wikipedia has been criticized for the uneven handling, acceptance, and retention of articles about controversial subjects. The principal concerns of the critics are the factual reliability of the content; the readability of the prose; and a clear article layout; the existence of systemic bias; of gender bias; and of racial bias among the editorial community that is Wikipedia. Further concerns are that the organization allows the participation of anonymous editors (leading to editorial vandalism); the existence of social stratification (allowing cliques); and over-complicated rules (allowing editorial quarrels), which conditions permit the misuse of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is described as unreliable at times.
    [Show full text]