The 2018 G7 Summit: Issues to Watch
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Potential Partnership in Global Economic Governance: Canada’S G20 Summit from Toronto to Turkey John Kirton Co-Director, G20 Research Group
Potential Partnership in Global Economic Governance: Canada’s G20 Summit from Toronto to Turkey John Kirton Co-director, G20 Research Group Paper prepared for a presentation at TEPAV, Ankara, and DEIK, Istanbul, Turkey, June 7-8, 2010. Version of June 13, 2010. Introduction The Challenge In less than two weeks the most powerful leaders of the world’s 20 most systemically significant countries arrive in Toronto, Canada for their fourth summit of the Group of Twenty (G20). It will be their first meeting of the newly proclaimed permanent priority centre of international economic co-operation, the first co-chaired by an established and emerging economy, and the first held in tight tandem with the older, smaller Group of Eight (G8) major power democracies. In Toronto the G20 leaders will confront several critical global challenges. The first is the European-turned-global financial crisis, erupting in May even before the previous American-turned-global financial crisis of 2007-9 had been solved. The second is the devastation to trade, investment and development that these financial-turned-economic crises cause. The third is the environmental and social problems they exacerbate, from climate change and energy to food and health. And the fourth is strengthening the G20 itself and the international financial institutions and other global bodies more generally, to govern more effectively, equitably and accountably today’s complex, uncertain, intensely interconnected world. Can Canada and Turkey work together at Toronto to cope with these and other challenges that the world confronts? At first glance, Canada and Turkey would appear to be distinctly different countries, within the global community and as members of the G20, the institutionalized club of systemically significant countries that was created in 1999 in response to the Asian-turned-global financial crisis then and that leapt to the leaders’ level in response to the American-turned-global financial crisis continuing today. -
FROM the G7 to a D-10: Strengthening Democratic Cooperation for Today’S Challenges
FROM THE G7 TO THE D-10 : STRENGTHENING DEMOCRATIC COOPERATION FOR TODAY’S CHALLENGES FROM THE G7 TO A D-10: Strengthening Democratic Cooperation for Today’s Challenges Ash Jain and Matthew Kroenig (United States) With Tobias Bunde (Germany), Sophia Gaston (United Kingdom), and Yuichi Hosoya (Japan) ATLANTIC COUNCIL A Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. Democratic Order Initiative This report is a product of the Scowcroft Center’s Democratic Order Initiative, which is aimed at reenergizing American global leadership and strengthening cooperation among the world’s democracies in support of a rules-based democratic order. The authors would like to acknowledge Joel Kesselbrenner, Jeffrey Cimmino, Audrey Oien, and Paul Cormarie for their efforts and contributions to this report. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. © 2021 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. -
Building Better Global Economic Brics
Economics Global Economics Research from the GS Financial WorkbenchSM at https://www.gs.com Paper No: 66 Building Better Global Economic BRICs n In 2001 and 2002, real GDP growth in large emerging market economies will exceed that of the G7. n At end-2000, GDP in US$ on a PPP basis in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) was about 23.3% of world GDP. On a current GDP basis, BRIC share of world GDP is 8%. n Using current GDP, China’s GDP is bigger than that of Italy. n Over the next 10 years, the weight of the BRICs and especially China in world GDP will grow, raising important issues about the global economic impact of fiscal and monetary policy in the BRICs. n In line with these prospects, world policymaking forums should be re-organised and in particular, the G7 should be adjusted to incorporate BRIC representatives. Many thanks to David Blake, Paulo Leme, Binit Jim O’Neill Patel, Stephen Potter, David Walton and others in the Economics Department for their helpful 30th November 2001 suggestions. Important disclosures appear at the end of this document. Goldman Sachs Economic Research Group In London Jim O’Neill, M.D. & Head of Global Economic Research +44(0)20 7774 1160 Gavyn Davies, M.D. & Chief International Economist David Walton, M.D. & Chief European Economist Andrew Bevan, M.D. & Director of International Bond Economic Research Erik Nielsen, Director of New European Markets Economic Research Stephen Potter, E.D. & Senior Global Economist Al Breach, E.D & International Economist Linda Britten, E.D. -
North Minneapolis—A Welcoming Home for Business Welcome
GrowNorth! North Minneapolis—A welcoming home for business Welcome If you have any questions or ideas, please contact your personal business development consultant at the City of Minneapolis, Casey Dzieweczynski 612-673-5070 On behalf of the City of Minneapolis, we would like to thank you for considering North Minneapolis as the new location for your business. Today is a great time to invest, and here’s why: • North Minneapolis is conveniently located near downtown, accessible from the entire metro and has great freeway access to Interstates 94 and 394. The area is also served by Olson Highway and Highway 100 with a connection to South Minneapolis via the Van White Memorial Boulevard. • The City’s economic development team can help find the right location for your busi- ness through its site assistance support. Available real estate includes significant areas of industrially zoned land, well-served by freeways and freight rail. • The City offers several business financing programs, ranging from $1,000 to $10 million and development grants to assist business owners in acquiring property, purchasing equipment and making building improvements. • The City’s employment and training program team can assist with workforce recruit- ment and training programs so your staff is knowledgeable and productive the minute they are hired. • The Minneapolis-coordinated development review will help you successfully navigate the regulatory process, which includes Planning/Zoning, Building Plan Review, Permit- ting and Licensing, and other regulatory review agencies. No one knows Minneapolis the way we do. The Department of Community Planning and Economic Development is ready to support you with all your business needs—from finance to site location, to customized training to fit your employment needs—and is here to help you every step of the way. -
WMO Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison--Final Report
W O R L D M E T E O R O L O G I C A L O R G A N I Z A T I O N INSTRUMENTS AND OBSERVING METHODS R E P O R T No. 67 WMO SOLID PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT INTERCOMPARISON FINAL REPORT by B.E. Goodison and P.Y.T. Louie (both Canada) and D. Yang (China) WMO/TD - No. 872 1998 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This report has been produced without editorial revision by the WMO Secretariat. It is not an official WMO publication and its distribution in this form does not imply endorsement by the Organization of the ideas expressed. FOREWORD The WMO Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison was started in the northern hemisphere winter of 1986/87. The field work was carried out in 13 Member countries for seven years. The Intercomparison was the result of Recommendation 17 of the ninth session of the Commission for Instruments and Methods of Observation (CIMO-IX). As in previous WMO intercomparisons of rain gauges, the main objective of this test was to assess national methods of measuring solid precipitation against methods whose accuracy and reliability were known. It included past and current procedures, automated systems and new methods of observation. The experiment was designed to determine especially wind related errors, and wetting and evaporative losses in national methods of measuring solid precipitation. -
Creating Compliance with G20 and G7 Climate Change Commitments Through Global, Regional and Local Actors
Creating Compliance with G20 and G7 Climate Change Commitments through Global, Regional and Local Actors John Kirton, Brittaney Warren and Jessica Rapson University of Toronto Paper prepared for the annual convention of the International Studies Association, April 7–10, 2021. Version of April 1. Key words (three tags): G20, G7, climate change Abstract The greatest global change, where the process of globalization is now complete, is climate change and the existential threats it brings. How do the central global governance institutions of the Group of Seven (G7) major democratic powers from the rich North and the Group of 20 (G20) systemically significant states, including countries of the emerging South, create and comply with commitments to control climate change, by working with key actors at the multilateral, regional, sub-national, local and civil society levels? Using data and previous findings from the Global Governance Program, this paper analyzes how the compliance of G7 and G20 members with their leaders’ summit climate change commitments is affected by invoking the International Monetary Fund and World Bank Group, by invoking the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development, European Union, the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement and the Asia- Pacific Economic Co-operation forum, and by invoking local actors such as sub-national states and provinces, cities, and business, as well as Indigenous Peoples. It identifies ways in which the involvement of such “local” actors can improve compliance, through their inclusion in the substance of G7/G20 commitments and through the civil society engagement groups that seek to shape those commitments. It recommends that, to improve compliance, G7 leaders make more climate change commitments, make more highly binding ones, focus them on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’s Glasgow Summit and link them to sustainable development. -
United Nations United Nations Environment Programme
UNITED NATIONS UNEP(DEPI)/MED BUR.85/Inf.3 UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 16 March 2018 Original: English 85th Meeting of the Bureau of the Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and its Protocols Athens, Greece, 18-19 April 2018 Agenda Item 6: Calendar of Meetings and Events, including Date and Venue of the 86th Meeting of the Bureau Tentative Calendar of UNEP/MAP Meetings and Major International Events For environmental and cost-saving reasons, this document is printed in a limited number. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/MAP Athens, 2018 UNEP(DEPI)/MED BUR.85/Inf.3 Page 1 Tentative Calendar of UNEP/MAP Meetings and Major International Events in 2018-2019 (As of 16 March 2018) SECTION I Legenda: Main MAP-Barcelona Convention governance meetings Main MAP Components’ technical meetings/events ORGANIZERS MEETING DATE VENUE 2018 Secretariat 34th ECP Meeting 5-7 February Sofia Antipolis, France SPA/RAC 1st Meeting of the Ad hoc Group of 22-23 February Tunis, Tunisia Experts for Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean Secretariat / MedProgramme 1st Regional 7-9 March Athens, Greece MAP Consultation and Coordination Components meetings PAP/RAC 1st Meeting of the Drafting Group 13-14 March Split, Croatia on Common Regional Framework for ICZM MED POL, Plan Regional Meeting on H2020 / NAP 17-18 April Athens, Greece Bleu indicators and NBB guidelines -
Tillerson-TNSR-Vol-1-Issue-2-.Pdf (1.375Mb)
128 The Strategist U.S. Engagement in the Western Hemisphere Rex Tillerson Texas National Security Review: Volume 1, Issue 2 (March 2018) Print: ISSN 2576-1021 Online: ISSN 2576-1153 129 Secretary of State Rex Tillerson delivered the following remarks at the University of Texas at Austin, on February 1, 2018, ahead of his first trip as secretary of state to South America. This trip comes at an important time for the So today I want to focus on three pillars of Western Hemisphere. This diverse region — which engagement to further the cause of freedom includes Canada, Mexico, South America, and the throughout our region in 2018 and beyond: economic Caribbean — is a priority for the United States growth, security, and democratic governance. for reasons other than simply our geographic The hemisphere has significant potential for proximity. We share an interwoven history and greater economic growth and prosperity. We chronology. Our nations still reflect the New World will build upon the solid foundation of economic optimism of limitless discovery. And importantly, cooperation with our Latin American and we share democratic values — values that are at Caribbean partners. Brazil, for instance, is the the core of what we believe, regardless of the color region’s largest economy and the ninth largest in of our passport. the world. The United States is Brazil’s second- And for generations, U.S. leaders have understood largest trading partner, with two-way trade at that building relationships with Latin American record highs in recent years totaling more than and Caribbean partners is integral to the success $95 billion in 2015. -
Paper 20 Peter Hajnal.Qxp
The Centre for International Governance Innovation WORKING PAPER International Institutional Reform Summitry from G5 to L20: A Review of Reform Initiatives PETER I. HAJNAL Working Paper No. 20 March 2007 An electronic version of this paper is available for download at: www.cigionline.org Building Ideas for Global ChangeTM TO SEND COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR PLEASE CONTACT: Peter I. Hajnal Research Fellow, Munk Centre for International Studies University of Toronto [email protected] If you would like to be added to our mailing list or have questions about our Working Paper Series please contact [email protected] The CIGI Working Paper series publications are available for download on our website at: www.cigionline.org The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Centre for International Governance Innovation or its Board of Directors and /or Board of Governors. Copyright © 2007 Peter I. Hajnal. This work was carried out with the support of The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (www.cigionl ine.org). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non-commercial - No Derivatives License. To view this license, visit (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/2.5/). For re-use or distribution, please include this copyright notice. CIGI WORKING PAPER International Institutional Reform Summitry from G5 to L20: A Review of Reform Initiatives* Peter I. Hajnal Working Paper No.20 March 2007 * Another version of this paper will appear in Peter I. Hajnal, The G8 System and the G20: Evolution, Role and Documentation, to be published by Ashgate Publishing in 2007. -
DNA 23Rd August 2019
Summary of Daily News Analysis - by Jatin Verma 23rd August, 2019 https://www.jatinverma.org Page | 1 ©Jatin Verma All Rights Reserved. https://www.jatinverma.org Page | 2 Important News Articles (Taking Delhi/Noida edition as the base) Page 1: Macron: no space for third party mediation in Kashmir Page 1: Trump suggests India should fight Islamic State in Afghanistan Page 1: Rajasthan’s free medicine scheme gets first rank Page 9: SC refers Oxytocin ban to larger bench Page 10: New norms Page 10: Increasing investment to stimulate growth Page 13: FATF Asia-Pacific Group may blacklist Pakistan Page 13: India-U.S. 2+2 meeting being held in California Page 14: Crucial talks between the US and Taliban begin in Doha Page 15: Rupee hits eight-month low Page 15: Tax holiday only for start-ups with turnover up to ₹25 crore ©Jatin Verma All Rights Reserved. https://www.jatinverma.org Page | 3 Page 1: Macron: no space for third party mediation in Kashmir • Prime Minister Narendra Modi and French President Emmanuel Macron discussed the government’s move to suspend Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir and split the State into two Union Territories. • Mr. Macron said France would support any policy that would give the region “stability”, adding that no one should “provoke violence” there. • Upcoming G7 summit will be hel d in Francewhere India has been invited as a special guest. • PM Modi also said India looks forward to the first delivery of the Rafael fighter jets in September. • G7 is a term that is used to describe the Group of Seven. -
The Group of Seven Doesn't Define Canadian
The Group of Seven Doesn’t Define Canadian Art The Walrus By: Tatum Dooley February 19, 2021 Original URL: https://thewalrus.ca/the-group-of-seven-doesnt-define-canadian-art/ Iceberg by F. H. Varley (1938) | Courtesy of the McMichael Canadian Art Collection ARTS & CULTURE / MARCH/APRIL 2021 The Group of Seven Doesn’t Define Canadian Art After 100 years, is it time to retire the collective as Canada's definitive painters? BY TATUM DOOLEYUPDATED 15:00, FEB. 19, 2021 | PUBLISHED 14:00, FEB. 19, 2021 THE GROUP OF SEVEN’s first exhibition was a bit of a disappointment. It was May 1920, and the founding seven artists—Franklin Carmichael, Lawren Harris, A. Y. Jackson, Frank Johnston, Arthur Lismer, J. E. H. MacDonald, and Frederick Varley—had booked Toronto’s then fledgling Art Gallery of Ontario to share their work. After the nearly three-week run, only five of the 121 works were sold. And, when the reviews came in, some were critical. Compared to the traditional European styles that dominated at the time—think John Constable’s romantic landscapes or the gauzy realism of Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot and Jean-François Millet—the group’s bold takes on the northern landscape provoked strong reaction. “Are these new Canadian painters crazy?” asked a headline in the Canadian Courier, preceding much of the derision that the group would later receive over its thirteen-year-run. One hundred and one years later, the Group of Seven may comprise the most popular artists in this country’s history (matched only by their close associate Tom Thomson, who disappeared during a canoe trip before the group officially formed). -
The Gleneagles Summit: NGO and Civil Society Perspectives on the G8
Report The Gleneagles Summit NGO and Civil society Perspectives on the G8 August 2005 Karin Simonson Ottawa, Canada Programme on NGOs & Civil Society Centre for Applied Studies in International Negotiations Centre d'études pratiques de la négociation internationale The Gleneagles Summit Centre for Applied Studies in Karin Simonson, Research Associate, prepared this report for the Programme on International Negotiations NGOs and Civil Society of the Centre for Applied Studies in International C.P. 1340 Negotiation. Av. de la Paix 7 bis 1211 Geneva 1 The Programme on NGOs and Civil Society Switzerland Worldwide, the role of civil society has been increasing at rapid speed. Non- governmental organizations (NGOs) have become significant and influential T +41 22 730 8675/76 players and generate much interest. Created in 1986, the Programme on Non- F +41 22 730 8690 Governmental Organizations and Civil Society aims at contributing towards a [email protected] better understanding of NGOs and the solutions of complex and conflictive www.casin.ch societal problems involving NGOs. The opinions expressed in this paper reflect only those of the author and not of the institutions to which he/she is or was affiliated. Copyright CASIN © August 2005 1 The Gleneagles Summit Table of Contents SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................