U.S. Army Field Artillery School Annual History (Rcs Chis-6 [R4])

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S. Army Field Artillery School Annual History (Rcs Chis-6 [R4]) U.S. ARMY FIELD ARTILLERY SCHOOL ANNUAL HISTORY (RCS CHIS-6 [R4]) 1 JANUARY 2010 THROUGH 31 DECEMBER 2010 BY FIELD ARTILLERY BRANCH HISTORIAN’S OFFICE FORT SILL, OKLAHOMA ii COMMANDANT’S INTRODUCTION The 2010 Annual History captures key training and leader development initiatives and combat development accomplishments of the U.S. Army Field Artillery School. While Soldiers and civilians at Fort Sill worked to ensure local security, the Field Artillery School continued to transform to meet future requirements by playing a key role in futures development and integration. Emerging weapons systems, such as the Paladin Integrated Management Program, Field Artillery munitions, such as the Guided MLRS (GMLRS) and the Excalibur Unitary, assured unparalleled precision lethal fires. The Field Artillery School‟s core mission remained training Soldiers and leaders for Field Artillery units of the operational forces. During the year, the Field Artillery School provided Field Artillery Soldiers and leaders with world-class training and instruction. The School furnished assignment-oriented training to prepare leaders and Soldiers better for their next or first assignment. Recognizing the impact of non-standard missions in the Contemporary Operational Environment on Redlegs, the Field Artillery School energetically furnished training programs to retrain individual Redlegs and units in core Field Artillery competencies. The School also engaged the Army through Warfighter Forums, developed an engagement strategy using the social media, such as Facebook, to encourage West Point and Reserve Officer Training Corps cadets to select the Field Artillery as their branch of choice and to tell the School‟s and the Field Artillery‟s story, and conducted a Cultural and Foreign Language Program to develop leaders with an understanding of foreign cultures and languages and passed an accreditation visit by the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command. In support of the Field Artillery‟s nonlethal effects mission, the Field Artillery School taught the Tactical Information Operations Warfare Course and electronic warfare courses to officers, warrant officers, and noncommissioned officers to develop Soldiers and leaders with the abilities of providing nonlethal effects. As part of the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission‟s effort to co- locate Field Artillery and Air Defense Artillery training at one location, the Field Artillery School participated in the full operational capability of the Fires Center of Excellence at Fort Sill and in growing the next generation Fires force. Around the world, Redleg Soldiers are the pride of the Nation‟s forces. At home, Field Artillery units continue to train to unprecedented levels of high-quality performance -- preparing for whatever challenges wait them. Now more than ever, the Caissons are indeed rolling along. Artillery Strong! (original signed) THOMAS S. VANDAL Brigadier General, USA Commandant iii PREFACE The 2010 Annual History for the U.S. Army Field Artillery School follows the decision-making process as closely as possible. Through interviews, email, messages, staff reports, fact sheets, correspondence, briefings, and other documentation, the Field Artillery School Historian‟s Office has recreated as closely as possible how the Field Artillery School made key decisions concerning joint issues, training, leader development, doctrine, force design, and equipment requirements. Because the Field Artillery School was involved in many diverse activities during the year, the Historian‟s Office under the direction of the School Commandant selected only those activities deemed to be the most historically significant to include in the History. Preserving historical documents forms a vital part of the historian‟s work. After they are collected from the various School organizations during the process of researching, they are filed in the historical records and documents collection in the Historian‟s Office. All documents are available for use by School staff, other U.S. governmental agencies, and private individuals upon request. Because new documents are often found after research and writing has been completed, this contemporary history is subject to revision. As new documents are discovered, interpretations and conclusions will change. Comments and suggested changes should be directed to the Historian‟s Office. In the process of researching and writing the History, the historian becomes indebted to many people for their advice and assistance. The Field Artillery School Historian‟s Office would like to thank the people who provided their technical expertise. Without their help writing the history would have been far more difficult. (original signed) BOYD L. DASTRUP, Ph.D. Field Artillery Branch Historian U.S. Army Field Artillery School iv TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE i COMMANDER’S INTRODUCTION ii PREFACE iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv CHAPTER ONE: MISSION, ORGANIZATION, AND PERSONNEL Mission 1 Organization 1 New Commandant 1 Fires Center of Excellence Regulation 10-5 2 Social Media 3 Personnel 3 Engagement Strategy 3 Radar Maintenance Training for MOS 13R 7 Warfighter Forums 9 Fires Center of Excellence and Field Artillery School Accreditation 10 CHAPTER TWO: LEADER DEVELOPMENT: TRAINING AND EDUCATION Introduction 11 Training Guidance for Fiscal Year 2011 11 Joint and Combined Fires University 11 Gaming 15 Army Learning Concept 2015 16 Cultural and Foreign Language Program 16 Reset, Mobile Training Teams, Battery and Below and Collective Training Evaluation Teams 20 Distance Learning 24 Army National Guard Regional Training Institutes 24 Training Aids, Devices, Simulators, and Simulations 25 Joint Fires and Effects Training System 25 Call for Fire Trainer 25 Noncommissioned Officer Education System and Noncommissioned Officer Academy 26 Warrior Leader Course 28 Advanced Leader Course 29 Senior Leader Course 29 Warrant Officer Education System 30 Warrant Officer Basic Course 30 Warrant Officer Advance Course 31 Officer Education System 31 Basic Officer Leader Courses 31 Basic Officer Leader Course B 32 Field Artillery Captain‟s Career Course 32 Field Artillery Captain‟s Career Course-Reserve v Component 33 Intermediate Level Education Brigade/Division Full Spectrum Fire Support Course 34 Pre-command Course 35 Joint and Combined Integration Directorate 36 Precision Fires Course 36 Joint Fires Observer Course 37 Joint Operational Fires and Effects Course 38 The 138th Combat Training Squadron 39 Joint Fires Support Executive Steering Committee 39 Nonlethal Training 40 Electronic Warfare Courses 40 Tactical Information Operations Course 42 CHAPTER THREE: COMBAT DEVELOPMENTS: FORCE DESIGN, DOCTRINE, AND REQUIREMENTS Introduction 43 Force Design 43 Army Capstone Concept 43 Army Operating Concept 44 The United States Army Functional Concept for Fires: 2016-2028 44 Joint Air Ground Integration Cell 44 Tactical Wheeled Vehicles Studies 45 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Studies I and II 46 Precision Effects 47 Precision Fires 47 Precision Munitions 49 Cluster Munitions Assessment 50 TRADOC Capabilities Managers Fires Brigade and Brigade Combat Team-Fires 52 TRADOC Brigade Combat Team-Fires 52 Excalibur Extended-Range Guided Projectile 52 Precision Guidance Kit 58 Future Cannon Munitions Suite 60 Lightweight Towed 155-mm. Howitzer 61 M119 Towed 105-mm. Howitzer 72 Paladin Integrated Management Program 76 Bradley Fire Support Vehicle 78 Knight 79 Joint Effects Targeting System 81 Lightweight Laser Designator Rangefinder 82 Improved Position and Azimuth Determining System 84 Profiler 85 TRADOC Fires Brigade 86 Multiple-Launcher Rocket System 86 vi High Mobility Artillery Rocket System 97 Army Tactical Missile System 105 Non-Line-of-Sight Launch System 110 Firefinder Radars 118 Lightweight Countermortar Radar 119 Command, Control, and Communication Systems 120 Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System 120 Handheld Command and Control Systems 123 Fires Battle Laboratory 124 Glossary 138 Appendix One: Student Production for Fiscal Year 2010 150 Appendix Two: Key USAFAS Personnel 151 Appendix Three: Field Artillery School Commandants 152 Appendix Four: Chiefs of Field Artillery 154 Appendix Five: Assistant Commandants 156 Appendix Six: Command Sergeant Majors of NCOA 158 Appendix Seven: USAFCOEFS Organization Chart 159 Appendix Eight: Field Artillery Commandant‟s Office Chart 160 Appendix Nine: List of Documents 161 Index of Names: 167 CHAPTER ONE MISSION, ORGANIZATION, AND PERSONNEL MISSION Influenced by the new field artillery technology introduced after the Spanish- American War of 1898, the development of indirect fire, and the lack of adequately trained Field Artillerymen, the War Department opened the School of Fire for Field Artillery at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, on 15 September 1911. While War Department, General Orders No. 72 of 3 June 1911 tasked the school to furnish practical and theoretical field artillery training to lieutenants, captains, field grade officers, militia officers, and noncommissioned officers, War Department, General Orders No. 73 of 5 June 1911 integrated the school into a sequential and progressive educational system for officers.1 In 2010 the U.S. Army Field Artillery School (USAFAS), the U.S. Army Air Defense Artillery School (USAADAS), the Noncommissioned Officer Academy (NCOA), and the 434th Field Artillery Brigade, composed the training mission of the U.S. Army Fires Center of Excellence (FCoE). During the year, the Field Artillery School trained the field artillery forces of the United States
Recommended publications
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RSAF's Peace Carvin V Detachment Celebrates 10 Years of Training in Idaho, USA
    RSAF's Peace Carvin V Detachment Celebrates 10 Years of Training in Idaho, USA 11 Oct 2019 Senior Minister of State for Defence Mr Heng Chee How inspecting the parade during Peace Carvin V (PC V)'s 10th anniversary celebrations. A very good afternoon to the Mayor of Mountain Home Mr Rich Sykes, Director of Operations at Headquarters Air Combat Command Major General Kevin Huyck, ladies and gentlemen from the United States and Singapore Air Forces, distinguished guests, friends. 1 We are gathered here today to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the Republic of Singapore Air Force's (RSAF) Peace Carvin (PC) V detachment. Thank you for the warm welcome – complete with the Buccaneer's mascot and even cannon fire! I am honoured to be here with you to share in this occasion. This celebration is a testament to the friendship and close partnership between the Singapore and US Armed Forces, and the excellent defence ties between our two countries that have stood the test of time. Reaffirm Strong Relations with the US The US is one of Singapore's strongest and closest defence partners, and bilateral defence relations have grown steadily in breadth and depth. Together, we hold the belief that US presence in the Asia-Pacific is vital for continued peace and stability in the region. It was with this shared understanding that the 1990 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding United States use of facilities in Singapore was inked by Singapore's founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew and then-US Vice-President Mr Dan Quayle. This seminal MOU facilitated the US' access to Singapore's air and naval bases, and underpinned the US' regional presence for almost thirty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate February
    780 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE FEBRUARY. 5. REPORT ON NUMBER OF ENLISTED MEN IN THE ~ families. All farme:r;s now want electric SENATE REGULAR ARMY service. A l'3tter from the Secretary of War, trans­ REA is cutting down our loan appll~ations WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1947 mitting, pursuant to ·law, a report on the because of insufficient loan authoriza.tions. number of men on active duty on Decem­ Our request for an allotmel,lt for 1947 has not The Qhaplain, Rev. Peter Marshall, ber 31, 1946, who enlisted or reenlisted in the yet been approved. We have never had too D. D., offered the following prayer: Regular Army after June 1, 1945 (with an much money. There is always a lag between accompanying report); to the Committee on the time you vote the authorization and the Our Father, in the midst of the compli­ Arme(l Services. time we get it spent, but we can't turn a tap cated situations of life and the unsolved until we get the ~uthorization. AUTHORITY To GRANT EASEMENTS IN LANDS TO As to the program being put on a business problems of the world, deliver Thy serv­ ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS ants from any sense. of futility. Let basis, less than one-half of 1 percent of all A letter from the Administrator, Veterans' REA loans are delinquent, and they are paid them feel the .support of the prayers of Administration, transmitting a draft of pro­ ahead several million dollars. The Govern­ hosts of true patriots throughout this posed legislation to authorize the Adminis­ ment is making enough clear profit on the land and, above all, the uplift of the ever­ trator of Veter;ms' Affairs to grant easements money loaned to us over.
    [Show full text]
  • The Field Artillery Journal Vol
    No. 6, November-December, 1931 A Very Modern Piece of Heavy Field Artillery—The 155mm Gun— 8-inch Howitzer ...................................................................Frontispiece The Annual Report of the Chief of Field Artillery ................................. 577 General Braxton Bragg............................................................................. 600 Lieut. R. T. Bennison, F. A., D. O. L. General Lassiter Retires............................................................................ 612 Field Artillery R. O. T. C. at Oregon State College................................ 615 Major F. W. Bowley, F. A. Type Problems ........................................................................................... 622 Heavy Artillery vs. Rockets ...................................................................... 625 Captain M. A. Stuart, F. A. An Auxiliary Range Disk for Use With 37mm Sub-Caliber Tubes on 75mm Gun, Model of 1897 (French) ................................................ 641 Major J. E. Lewis, F. A. The Field Artillery Pistol Team, 1931...................................................... 646 Foreign Military Journals: A Current Resume ...................................... 647 Field Line Construction ............................................................................ 655 Major W. P. Evans, Signal Corps Old Post Chapel at Fort Sill...................................................................... 659 Chaplain Milton O. Beebe, U. S. Army 155mm Gun—8-inch Howitzer (Illustrations) .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (Excerpt)
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 16, 1982 East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt) Citation: “East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt),” December 16, 1982, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, BStU, Berlin, ZA, HVA, 19, pp. 126-359. Translated from German by Bernd Schaefer; available in original language at the Parallel History Project. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112680 Summary: The Stasi's own preface to the V Corps/U.S. Army 1981 war plan (which recognizes that NATO's concept was defensive in nature in contrast to Warsaw Pact plans, which until 1987 indeed envisioned the mentioned "breakthrough towards the Rhine") Original Language: German Contents: English Translation MINISTRY FOR STATE SECURITY Top Secret! Berlin, 16. Dec 1982 Only for personal use! Nr. 626/82 Return is requested! Expl. 5. Bl. MY Information about Military planning of the USA and NATO for the operation of the V. Army Corps/USA in times of tension and in war Part 1 Preliminary Remarks Through reliable intelligence we received portions of the US and NATO military crisis and wartime planning for the deployment of the V Corps/USA stationed in the FRG. This intelligence concerns the secret Operations Plan 33001 (GDP – General Defense Plan) for the V Corps/USA in Europe. The plan is endorsed by the US Department of the Army and, after consultation with NATO, became part of NATO planning.
    [Show full text]
  • General Lesley J. Mcnair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S
    General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army By [Copyright 2012] Mark T. Calhoun Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson ________________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann ________________________________ Dr. Christopher R. Gabel ________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey P. Moran ________________________________ Dr. Brent J. Steele Date Defended: April 6, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Mark T. Calhoun certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson Date approved: April 6, 2012 ii ABSTRACT General Lesley J. McNair demonstrated an innovative spirit and exceptional intellectual capacity in his efforts to organize and train the U.S. Army for World War II. The influence he exerted on Army doctrine, training, equipment development, unit organization, and combined arms fighting methods placed him among the handful of generals most responsible for both the effectiveness and the flaws of the force that the United States sent to war in 1942. Through his strong views and aggressive leadership, McNair played a key role in guiding the Army’s interwar mechanization and doctrinal development efforts. Many studies of this period have described aspects of his participation in that process. However, no comprehensive study of McNair’s forty-year military career exists, largely because he did not survive the war, and he left behind no personal memoirs or diaries when he died of wounds inflicted by errant American bombs in Normandy on July 25, 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventy-Second Annual Report of the Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, June
    SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT of the Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York June 10, 1941 C-rinted by The Moore Printing Company, Inc. Newburgh, N. Y¥: 0 C; 42 lcc0 0 0 0 P-,.0 r- 'Sc) CD 0 ct e c; *e H, Ir Annual Report, June 10, 1941 3 Report of the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Graduates, U. S. M. A. Held at West Point, N. Y., June 10, 1941 1. The meeting was called to order at 2:02 p. m. by McCoy '97, President of the Association. There were 225 present. 2. Invocation was rendered by the Reverend H. Fairfield Butt, III, Chaplain of the United States Military Academy. 3. The President presented Brigadier General Robert L. Eichel- berger, '09, Superintendent, U. S. Military Academy, who addressed the Association (Appendix B). 4. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the report of the President be dispensed with, since that Report would later be pub- lished in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix A). The motion was passed. 5. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the Report of the Secretary be dispensed with, since that Report would later be pub- lished in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix C.) The motion was passed. 6. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the Report of the Treasurer be dispensed with, since that Report would later be published in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix D).
    [Show full text]
  • Ucla Law Personal Reminiscences ✯ Ucla L Aw R Eminis Cences N Orman a Brams 385
    SECTION 3 UCLA LAW PERSONAL REMINISCENCES ✯ UCLA L AW R EMINIS CENCES N ORMAN A BRAMS 385 THE UCLA LAW SCHOOL Reminiscences from Its Second Decade N ORMAN A BRAMS* . he UCLA Law School was founded in . I, along with several T others, joined the faculty in the summer of , just as the school’s second decade began. It was still a very small school with a faculty of twelve (prior to our arrival), but it was already on its way to becoming the newest major law school in the country. In the almost six decades since, the school has undergone remarkable changes — in number of faculty, the physical plant, the curriculum, the size and makeup of the student body, the number and kinds of programs, projects and centers, and above all else, in its stature as one of the top-ranked law schools in the country. But some things have not changed. I arrived in August, along with three other new faculty (Bill Warren, Bob Jordan, and Bill Cohen). We referred to ourselves as the “class” of ’. Herb Morris also eectively joined the law school that year. (He had been a junior member of the Philosophy Department faculty doing some teaching * Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus, UCLA. For further information, see the Editor-in-Chief’s introduction on page of this volume: C. L H. (). 386 C ALIFORNIA L EGAL HIS TORY ✯ VOLUME 11, 2016 in the law school, but around that time he began to make the law school his primary academic home.) e core faculty then was a mixture of some dis- tinguished middle and senior faculty enticed from other institutions and a couple of very junior academics at the beginning of their teaching careers.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record- Senate.- .243
    1907c CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- SENATE.- .243 Also, petition of Jerome E. Morse, for Dick-Capron pay bill­ By Mr. THOMAS of North Carolina: Paper to accompany, to the Committee on Naval Affairs. bill for relief af Annie B. Berry, widow of Richard Berry-to Also, petition of Robert Stewart, for bill to equalize and fix the Committee on Invalid Pensions. pay of Army and Navy-to the Committee on Naval Affairs. By Mr.-TIRRELL: Paper to accompany bill for relief of Eli Also, paper to accompany bill for relief of George Milton S. Dunklee-to the Committee on Invalid Pensions. Frye-to the Committee on rnvalid Pensions. By Mr. WANGER: Resolution of the Board of Trade of the Also, petition of Junior Order United American Mechanics, city of Chicago, against Federal uniform inspection of grain­ favoring restriction of immigration-to the Committee on Immi­ to the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. gration and Naturalization. By Mr. WASHBURN : Paper to accompany bill for relief of By Mr. LIVINGSTON: Paper to accompany bill for relief o~ Mary E. Cook, Edw. M. Frissell, Joseph W. Preston, and Calvin heirs of David L. Duffey-to the Committee on War Claims. E. Breed-to the Committee on Invalid Pensions. Also, papers to accompany bills for relief or Samuel E. Brat­ Also, paper to accompany bill for relief of John A. Taft-to ton and Elizabeth Smith-to the Committee on War Claims. the Committee on Invalid Pensions. By Mr. 1\lcKIN!\TEY: Petition of Illinois Pharmaceutical Also, paper to accompany bill for relief of Charles S.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Army Field Artillery School Annual History
    U.S. ARMY FIELD ARTILLERY SCHOOL ANNUAL HISTORY (RCS CHIS-6 [R4]) 1 JANUARY 2013 THROUGH 31 DECEMBER 2013 BY FIELD ARTILLERY BRANCH HISTORIAN’S OFFICE FORT SILL, OKLAHOMA ii COMMANDANT’S INTRODUCTION The 2013 Annual History captures key training and leader development initiatives and combat development accomplishments of the U.S. Army Field Artillery School. During the year, the Field Artillery School continued to meet future requirements by playing a key role in futures development and integration. Emerging weapons systems, such as the Paladin Integrated Management, and Field Artillery munitions, such as the Precision Guidance Kit (PGK), Guided MLRS and the Excalibur, assured unparalleled precision lethal fires, while the School’s ground work on Army Doctrine 2015 prepared the School and the Field Artillery to move into the future. The Field Artillery School’s core mission remained training Soldiers and leaders for Field Artillery units of the operational forces. During the year, the Field Artillery School provided Field Artillery Soldiers and leaders with world-class training and instruction. The School furnished assignment-oriented training to prepare leaders and Soldiers for their next or first assignment and worked to introduce Army Learning Model 2015 and to modernize Field Artillery Fires. The School also engaged the Army through Warfighter Forums, and developed an engagement strategy to encourage West Point and Reserve Officer Training Corps cadets to select the Field Artillery as their branch of choice and to tell the School’s and the Field Artillery’s story. As part of the Fires Center of Excellence, the Field Artillery School participated in growing the next generation Fires force.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington National Guard Pamphlet
    WASH ARNG PAM 870-1-7 WASH ANG PAM 210-1-7 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD PAMPHLET THE OFFICIAL HISTORY OF THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD VOLUME 7 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN POST WORLD WAR II HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DEPARTMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL CAMP MURRAY, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98430 - i - THIS VOLUME IS A TRUE COPY THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ROSTERS HEREIN HAVE BEEN REVISED BUT ONLY TO PUT EACH UNIT, IF POSSIBLE, WHOLLY ON A SINGLE PAGE AND TO ALPHABETIZE THE PERSONNEL THEREIN DIGITIZED VERSION CREATED BY WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY - ii - INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME 7, HISTORY OF THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD BY MAJOR GENERAL HOWARD SAMUEL McGEE, THE ADJUTANT GENERAL Volume 7 of the History of the Washington National Guard covers the Washington National Guard in the Post World War II period, which includes the conflict in Korea. This conflict has been categorized as a "police action", not a war, therefore little has been published by the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army or by individuals. However, the material available to our historian is believed to be of such importance as to justify its publication in this volume of our official history. While Washington National Guard units did not actually serve in Korea during this "police action", our Air National Guard and certain artillery units were inducted into service to replace like regular air and army units withdrawn for service in Korea. However, many Washington men participated in the action as did the 2nd and 3rd Infantry Divisions, both of which had been stationed at Fort Lewis and other Washington military installations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Military Activities Corps Of
    NO INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT, WiLL BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT- PRIOR AUTHORITY FROM THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS ANNUAL REPORT COVERING MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1941 ANNUAL REPORT COVERING IHLITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1941. SUBMITTED TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS BY BRIGADIER GENERAL JOHN J. KINGMAN ASSISTANT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS OFFICE, CHIEF OF ENGINEERS 42/261 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I - Personnel: Page Par. 1 Expansion of Corps of Engineers 1 2 Commissioned Officers 5 3 Warrant Officers 8 4 Enlisted Personnel, Corps of Engineers 9 5 Expansion of Personnel Section, O.C.E. 10 .Section II - Intelligence: Par. 6 General 25 7 Domestic Mapping Branch 25 8 Geodetic Branch 31 9 Information Branch 31 10 Foreign Map Branch 32 Section III - Operations and Training: Par. 11 Regular Army 33 12 Tables of Organization 36 13 National Guard 36 14 Organized Reserves 38 15 R.O.T.C. 39 16 Training Publications 41 17 Education 42 18 Equipment 48 19 Camouflage 50 20 Activities of the Engineer Board 50 Section IV ■ - Supply: Par. 21 General 52 22 Requirements 52 23 Procurement 53 24 -Storage and Issue . 54 25 Electric Power Survey 58 26 Research and Development 58 27 Financial Statement 62 Section V - Fortification: Par. 28 Plans and Development 69 29 Design and Operations 70 Section VI • - Railway: Par. 30 Railway Information 77 31 Railway Plans 77 32 Railway Equipment 78 33 711th Engineer Battalion (Railway Operating) 78 34 Defense Aid 79 SECTION I - FENSONHEL 1; Expansion of Corps,of Engineers.
    [Show full text]