Planning & Urban Design Rationale

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Planning & Urban Design Rationale PREPARED FOR: PLANNING 248 & 260 HIGH TRAC D EVELOPMENTS I NC . PARK AVENUE 16 & URBAN CITY OF TORONTO DESIGN February 2016 RATIONALE Job Number - 15199 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SITE AND SURROUNDINGS 3 2.1 SITE 3 2.2 SURROUNDING AREA 5 2.3 TRANSIT NETWORK & ROAD CLASSIFICATION 11 3.0 THE PROPOSAL 13 3.1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 13 Site Organization 14 Main Sanctuary 14 New Addition 14 Amenity Space 15 Access, Parking & Loading 15 Site Statistics Summary 15 3.2 REQUIRED APPROVALS 18 4.0 POLICY AND REGULATORY CONTEXT 19 4.1 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT 19 4.2 GROWTH PLAN FOR THE GREATER GOLDEN HORSESHOE 20 4.3 CITY OF TORONTO OFFICIAL PLAN 22 Growth Management Policies 22 Land Use Designation Policies 23 Heritage Policies 25 Built Form Policies 25 Housing Policies 27 Implementation Policies 27 4.4 ZONING 28 Zoning By-law 438-86 28 City-Wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 29 Site Specific Bylaw No. 23-75 29 5.0 PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ANALYSIS 31 5.1 INTENSIFICATION 31 5.2 HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 31 5.3 LAND USE 32 5.4 HEIGHT, MASSING AND DENSITY 33 5.5 BUILT FORM IMPACTS 34 5.6 URBAN DESIGN 35 5.7 TRANSPORTATION CONSIDERATIONS 36 5.8 FUNCTIONAL SERVICING 36 5.9 COMMUNITY SERVICES & FACILITIES STUDY 36 6.0 CONCLUSION 37 APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY SERVICES AND FACILITIES STUDY A1 PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN RATIONALE | 248 and 260 High Park Avenue i MAVERTY STREET MEDLAND STREET AZIEL STREET PASIFIC AVENUE E U T E N E E R V T A S E E D I T S T R E E N B N A M U H HIGH PARK AVENUE SITE SUBJECT QUEBEC AVENUE CLENDON STREET E U N E V A S G N I N N LA E W J ST RE ET Figure 1 - Aerial Photo ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Planning and Urban Design Rationale report has been prepared in support of an application made by TRAC Developments Inc. to amend City of Toronto By-law 438-86, as amended, and City-wide Zoning By-law 569- 2013, as amended, in order to permit the redevelopment of a 0.487-hectare (1.2 acre) site known municipally as Nos. 248 and 260 High Park Avenue in the City of Toronto. (the “subject site”). The subject site is located at the southwest corner of Annette Street and High Park Avenue (see Figure 1, Aerial Photo), which is a major intersection in the Junction/High Park North neighbourhood. It is an area that is characterized by a range of building typologies including other repurposed institutional buildings, apartment buildings, detached, semi-detached and other multi- occupancy buildings. The proposal involves the adaptive reuse of the existing church building in a manner that retains and repurposes those elements that are of historical value, and introduces a new addition that is massed sensitively around the main sanctuary. The development is designed to accommodate 77 residential units, with a gross floor area of approximately 9,850 square metres (106,027square feet) resulting in a density of approximately 2.02 FSI. Two below grade parking levels would provide for 107 vehicular parking spaces and 78 bicycle parking spaces. In our opinion, the height, massing and density of the proposed development conform with the Neighbourhoods designation, and are appropriate and compatible with the surrounding context. The proposed residential use conforms with the Official Plan and is permitted by the applicable Neighbourhoods designation, which permits all forms of low-rise residential uses, including apartment buildings up to 4 storeys in height. The proposal is supportive of numerous policy directions expressed in the Provincial Policy Statement, the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and the Toronto Official Plan, all of which promote the intensification of underutilized sites within built-up areas, particularly in locations which are well served by existing municipal infrastructure, including public transit. The proposal will contribute to the provision of a wider range of housing choices within the neighbourhood, including housing suitable for families, in accordance with the housing policies of the Provincial Policy Statement and the Toronto Official Plan. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and accompanying Site Plan Approval applications are appropriate and desirable and should be approved. PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN RATIONALE | 248 and 260 High Park Avenue 1 Aerial Photo 2 2.0 SITE AND SURROUNDINGS 2.1 Site The subject site is situated at the southwest corner of Annette Street and High Park Avenue on the border between the High Park and Junction neighbourhoods. It has an area of 0.487 Hectares (1.2 acres) with a frontage of 60.93 metres (199.9 feet) along Annette Street and 75.93 metres (279 feet) along High Park Avenue (The subject site is irregular in shape, with a 16.52 by 15.39 metre parcel that extends in the southwest corner, and is located to the rear of No. 246 High Park Avenue. The subject site generally has a flat topography with landscaped areas along both street frontages and a limited number of trees located along or adjacent to the eastern, northern and southern property boundaries. The subject site contains the High Park Alhambra United Church a building that has been listed on the City of Toronto’s Inventory of Heritage Properties since 1990. The church is currently vacant. Having faced decreasing membership as well as rising operations and maintenance costs, the congregation closed in 1996. The original portion of the church was constructed in Looking south at subject site from Annette Street 1907 (the Main Sanctuary) and an addition known as the ‘Sunday School Building’, to the west of the original structure, was constructed later in 1924. In terms or architectural style, the church represents Gothic Revival-Collegiate style and contains military features such as arrow slot windows surrounding the towers and crenellations atop the towers. Looking north from rear of 246 High Park Avenue PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN RATIONALE | 248 and 260 High Park Avenue 3 The Main Sanctuary, generally consists of two towers (A & B) as well as three symmetrical gables on the northern, eastern and southern facades that contain arched stained glass windows original to church. As referenced in the architectural set, Bell Tower B measures approximately 19.21 metres in height from established grade and is located at the northeast corner of the Main Sanctuary. Bell Tower A, measures 14.21 metres from established grade and is located at the southeast corner of the Main Sanctuary. The Sunday School addition was built to accommodate a gymnasium, the Sunday School operations and lodging rooms. This portion of the church building offers less ornamentation than the original building and stands 3-storeys in height with a flat roof. On the south side of the building is an extensive surface parking lot that was previously used by the church congregation. The surface parking lot is accessed via Looking southwest at bell tower and the main sanctuary an existing driveway on High Park Avenue. No. 248 High Park Avenue has been included in the proposal at the suggestion of planning staff. It contains a 2-storety brick dwelling. Looking southeast at Sunday School addition 4 2.2 Surrounding Area The subject site is located between the boundaries of ‘The Junction’ and ‘High Park North’ neighbourhoods. High Park North is mainly residential in nature, containing largely detached and semi-detached homes constructed in the early 20th century. However, with the construction of the Bloor-Danforth subway in the late 1960’s the neighbourhood saw the construction of a number of apartment buildings (low to high rise). The neighbourhood borrows its name from the large 200-acre city park to south, known as High Park. The Junction, originally the Village of West Toronto Junction (1888), gained its name from the intersection of several railway lines within the area, and was a manufacturing community that boomed during the late 1800’s. Around this time Annette Street became an institutional corridor that offered 3 churches, a library and a masonic temple within two city blocks. Today Annette Street contains a variety of building forms and land uses, including small scale commercial uses, some of the original institutional uses, and others that have been repurposed. The subject site is located at the southwest corner of the local neighbourhood’s two primary streets; Annette Street which runs east- west and High Park Avenue which runs north-south. The block on which the subject site it is located is bounded by High Park Avenue to the east, Quebec Avenue to the west, Humberside Avenue to the south and Annette Street to the north. The block is characterized by deep lots (fronting High Park Avenue and Quebec Avenue) with no rear laneway system. The residential lots fronting High Park Avenue are as much as 60.9 metres (200 feet) deep with rear yard setbacks in excess of 35 metres. The lots fronting onto Quebec Avenue are approximately 48 metres (157.5 feet) deep with rear yards setbacks of approximately 30 metres These setbacks represent roughly 3 to 4 times the minimum rear yard setback typically required within a residential zone. Looking west from the subject site towards Quebec Avenue properties PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN RATIONALE | 248 and 260 High Park Avenue 5 Immediately to the south of the subject site is 246 High Park Avenue, which is occupied by a 2 ½ storey brick dwelling, converted to accommodate a multi-family use. The dwelling is setback roughly 10 metres from its front property line, and has a shallower backyard as compared to neighbouring properties, to accommodate the former church’s additional parking area.
Recommended publications
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • Progress on Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020
    CD18.4 REPORT FOR ACTION Activating People, Resources and Policies: Progress on Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020 Date: February 8, 2017 To: Community Development and Recreation Committee From: Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration Wards: All SUMMARY Since the inception of the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy (TSNS) 2020 in 2014, over 24,000 residents, 1,700 stakeholders and 21 City Divisions and Agencies have been engaged in coordinated service planning and delivery in 31 Neighbourhood Improvement Areas (NIAs). TSNS has provided a new mechanism for residents, who historically have been disconnected from civic participation, to influence policies and decision making at the citywide level. Fifteen neighbourhood planning tables across the 31 NIAs consisting of residents, businesses, community agencies, Councillors and City staff meet regularly to identify priorities and actions in support of neighbourhood well-being. Each of the tables is supported by a Community Development Officer (CDO) whose role is to connect residents with decision makers so that neighbourhood goals and priorities are addressed through responsive policies and programs, and resident-led initiatives. This engagement has strengthened relationships between residents, City staff and community stakeholders. The TSNS 2020 implementation plan, developed in partnership with residents, community agencies, funders, and Toronto Public Library (TPL), Toronto Public Health (TPH), Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC), and City divisions has three key objectives: • Activating People • Activating Resources • Activating Neighbourhood-Friendly Policies The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the implementation of the TSNS 2020 in the designated 31 Neighbourhood Improvement Areas (NIAs) and recommended projects for the Partnership Opportunities Legacy (POL) funding for 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 260 High Park Avenue, Toronto
    ATTACHMENT NO. 4 HERITAGE PROPERTY RESEARCH AND EVALUATION REPORT HIGH PARK-ALHAMBRA UNITED CHURCH 260 HIGH PARK AVENUE, TORONTO Prepared by: Heritage Preservation Services City Planning Division City of Toronto March 2016 1. DESCRIPTION Above: archival photograph, High Park Avenue United Church, 1954 (Toronto Public Library, Item 2638); cover: current photograph, 260 High Park Avenue, 2016 (Heritage Preservation Services) 260 High Park Avenue: High-Park Alhambra United Church ADDRESS 260 High Park Avenue (southwest corner of Annette Street) WARD Ward 13 (Parkdale-High Park) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plan 795, Lots 1-4 NEIGHBOURHOOD/COMMUNITY West Toronto Junction HISTORICAL NAME High-Park Alhambra United Church1 CONSTRUCTION DATE 1908 (completed), church ORIGINAL OWNER Trustees, Annette Street Methodist Church ORIGINAL USE Church and Sunday School CURRENT USE* Vacant * This does not refer to permitted use(s) as defined by the Zoning By-law ARCHITECT/BUILDER/DESIGNER Burke, Horwood and White, architects2 DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION/MATERIALS Brick cladding with brick, stone, wood & glass detailing ARCHITECTURAL STYLE Neo-Gothic ADDITIONS/ALTERATIONS 1925 (completed), Sunday School wing CRITERIA Design/Physical, Historical/Associative and Contextual HERITAGE STATUS Listed on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register RECORDER Heritage Preservation Services: Kathryn Anderson REPORT DATE March 2016 1 The church building at 260 High Park Avenue was designed as Annette Street Methodist Church, opened as High Park Avenue Methodist Church, known as High Park Avenue United Church after 1925, and renamed High-Park Alhambra United Church in 1970 when it merged with Alhambra Avenue United Church. The history of the site is outlined in Section 2 of this report 2 The church was designed in 1907 by Burke and Horwood, but completed the next year when the partners were joined by Murray White, who is credited in the program marking its official unveiling 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2843 DUNDAS STREET WEST, TORONTO Cushman & Wakefield Urban Retail Services
    RETAIL FOR LEASE 2843 DUNDAS STREET WEST, TORONTO Cushman & Wakefield Urban Retail Services EXTERIOR FACADE UPGRADES TO BE COMPLETED NEWLY RENOVATED RETAIL OPPORTUNITY IN THE HEART OF THE JUNCTION 2843 Dundas Street West Located on the south side of Dundas Street West, just east of Keele Street in the heart of the Junction, 2843 Dundas Street West offers an opportunity to secure a retail location in the centre of one of Toronto’s most dynamic and rapidly developing retail nodes. The space is served by transit immediately on its doorstep and is a 15 minute walk from Keele Subway Station and a 20 minute walk to Bloor GO Station and the new UP Express Airport Link. The space will be receiving a new façade, giving it exceptional street front presence on a bustling retail strip. FLOOR PLAN 900 sq. ft. Area Overview Historically an industrial area of the city, Toronto’s Junction neighbourhood has become a thriving mixed use community and home to some of the city’s most interesting furniture shops, espresso bars, restaurants and a live music venue. The area has managed to maintain much of its original character as new retail and office tenants adopt the area and repurpose existing buildings to create their own unique spaces. The Junction is now one of the city’s fastest growing communities for young families, professionals, and tastemakers. It has also become a destination for craft brewing, dining, and specialty shopping. With the influx of residential development in the area, tenants are poised to benefit from increased foot traffic along Dundas Street West and the growing destination appeal of this rapidly developing community.
    [Show full text]
  • Gentrification Reconsidered: the Case of the Junction
    Gentrification Reconsidered: The Case of The Junction By: Anthony Ruggiero Submitted: July 31th, 2014 A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies (Urban Planning) Faculty of Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada __________________________ ___________________________ Anthony Ruggiero John Saunders, PhD MES Candidate Supervisor ii Abstract This paper examines the factors responsible for the gentrification of The Junction, a west-end neighbourhood located on the edge of downtown Toronto. After years of neglect, degradation and deindustrialization, The Junction is currently in the midst of being gentrified. Through various forms of neighbourhood upgrading and displacement, gentrification has been responsible for turning a number working-class Toronto neighbourhoods into middle-class enclaves. The Junction is unique in this regard because it does not conform to past theoretical perspectives regarding gentrification in Toronto. Through the use of an instrumental case-study, various factors responsible for The Junction’s gentrification are examined and a number of its indicators that are present in the neighbourhood are explored so that a solid understanding regarding the neighbourhood’s gentrification can be realized. What emerges is a form of ‘user-friendly’ or ‘community-driven’ gentrification that places emphasis on neighbourhood revitalization and community inclusion, as opposed to resident displacement
    [Show full text]
  • ORGANIC GARAGE ANNOUNCES the COMMENCEMENT of CONSTRUCTION on ITS LEASIDE STORE November 28, 2019, Toronto, Canada
    ORGANIC GARAGE ANNOUNCES THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ON ITS LEASIDE STORE November 28, 2019, Toronto, Canada - Organic Garage Ltd. (TSXV: OG) (“Organic Garage” or the “Company”), an independent organic and natural foods grocery chain, is pleased to announce that developer construction has commenced on its long-awaited Leaside location. Once completed, Organic Garage anticipates that it will take possession of the facility to complete the store’s fit out phase by the middle of next year. The store will be the Company’s 5th location. Rendering of Organic Garage’s Leaside location / Source: Organic Garage Maintaining the aesthetic appeal of the Company’s most recently opened two locations in the Junction and Liberty Village, Organic Garage’s Leaside store will retain a historic quality and measure approximately 12,000 square feet in size. Due to the delay in construction of the project in which the store is to be situated, Organic Garage has been able to obtain significant concessions from the developer as compensation. The Leaside neighbourhood ideally suits the Company’s mandate of expanding its store footprint into high population density locations in both established and growing markets within the Greater Toronto Area. Leaside is located northeast of Toronto’s downtown core and consists of over 229,000 households with an average household income of over $139,000 per year within a 5km radius according to the developer’s data. “I am pleased that the development is finally under construction,” commented Matt Lurie, CEO of Organic Garage. “This location will be a great market for Organic Garage and we look forward to getting the store finished and opened for our customers who have been eagerly and patiently waiting.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling Service by Neighbourhood
    CITY OF CITY OF VAUGHAN MARKHAM ± 116 130 21 24 36 50 49 48 2 35 27 37 117 129 CITY OF 22 34 47 46 131 3 25 51 52 PICKERING 132 1 4 38 53 118 128 5 40 26 33 134 23 45 135 39 6 28 29 105 126 113 127 137 31 32 41 42 119 133 8 30 103 7 136 115 112 108 102 43 125 138 100 140 110 109 104 99 44 11 10 9 107 106 101 55 139 111 56 124 54 120 91 92 123 13 90 94 96 97 58 15 114 98 57 93 59 60 12 89 88 95 61 67 66 121 14 83 74 80 79 68 69 62 122 16 87 71 64 84 81 65 86 78 75 72 73 63 85 76 17 82 70 20 CITY OF 77 LAKE 18 MISSISSAUGA 19 ONTARIO 0 3 6 12 Km Legend Notes: KM of Cycling Infrastructure by KM of Cycling Service By Neighbourhood Streets per Neighbourhood 1 - Cycling Service is the proportion of street kilometres in the neighbourhood (excluding highways) Transportation Services Cycling Infrastructure & Programs Unit 0.0% - 2.4% that have cycling routes (cycle tracks, bike lanes, trails, quiet street sharrows), represented as a percentage Data Source: Contains information licensed under 2.5% - 4.5% (out of 100). The more cycling routes that exist, the higher the score. the Open Government License – Toronto 2 - Neighbourhood Equity Index Scores (out of 100) are those identified by City of Toronto Social Development, Projection: NAD 1927 MTM 3 4.6% - 6.9% Finance & Administration Division for the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Street West in Toronto's Parkdale Neighbourhood
    Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business A Study of Queen Street West in Toronto’s Parkdale Neighbourhood Report Authors: Maxine Chan, Greg Gapski, Kevin Hurley, Estuardo Ibarra, Laura Pin, Aliza Shupac and Eva Szabo Report Designed By: Estuardo Ibarra Advisors: Anna Bartula (PVBIA) and Nancy Smith Lea (TCAT) Release Date: December 2016 Please cite as: Chan, M., Gapski, G., Hurley, K., Ibarra, E., Pin, L., Shupac, A. & Szabo, E. (November 2016). Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business in Parkdale: A study of Queen Street West in Toronto’s Parkdale Neighbourhood. Toronto, Ontario. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to acknowledge the contributions of the Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT), the Parkdale Village Business Improvement Area (PVBIA), and Cycle Toronto in supporting our study. We also appreciate the technical consultation provided by Mikey Bennington and Daniel Arancibia from the University of Toronto, and the assistance of Jared Ong in generating maps. We are greatly indebted to the many volunteers from the Parkdale community and beyond who helped with the surveying. A special thank you to Lois Bennett and the Parkdale Collegiate Institute student volunteers for their enthusiastic assistance through all sorts of weather. We appreciate the Centre for Social Innovation (CSI) Annex providing meeting space during the report writing process. The final survey report represents the collective view of the report authors, but not necessarily those of any one of these partner organizations. Bike Lanes, On-Street Parking and Business | A Study of Queen Street West in Toronto’s Parkdale Neighbourhood TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 Background 2.0.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Other* Dwelling Density Availability of Destinations
    21 24 116 130 2 35 36 50 49 48 27 131 22 34 37 117 129 3 25 51 52 47 46 4 132 26 38 53 118 1 5 33 40 128 135 134 23 39 45 6 29 113 28 32 105 133 31 41 42 119 126 137 7 8 30 103 127 136 115 112 108 102 43 125 100 138 140 11 10 110 109 101 99 44 9 111 107 104 56 55 139 106 124 Dwelling Availability of 91 92 97 54 120 density destinations 13 90 94 96 58 123 15 89 98 57 High - High 12 114 93 59 60 14 88 95 67 61 121 83 74 66 High - Low 87 80 79 71 68 69 62 16 75 64 122 86 84 81 78 76 65 Low - High 7372 63 85 70 Low - Low 20 17 82 77 Other* 18 19 0 2.5 5 km * Indicates DB belonged to the middle quintile of Neighbourhoods dwelling density and/or availability of destinations 1 West Humber-Clairville 25 Glenfield-Jane Heights 49 Bayview Woods-Steeles 73 Moss Park 96 Casa Loma 121 Oakridge 2 Mount Olive-Silverstone- 26 Downsview-Roding-CFB 50 Newtonbrook East 74 North St. James Town 97 Yonge-St.Clair 122 Birchcliffe-Cliffside Jamestown 27 York University Heights 51 Willowdale East 75 Church-Yonge Corridor 98 Rosedale-Moore Park 123 Cliffcrest 3 Thistletown-Beaumond Heights 28 Rustic 52 Bayview Village 76 Bay Street Corridor 99 Mount Pleasant East 124 Kennedy Park 4 Rexdale-Kipling 29 Maple Leaf 53 Henry Farm 77 Waterfront Communities- 100 Yonge-Eglinton 125 Ionview 5 Elms-Old Rexdale 30 Brookhaven-Amesbury 54 O'Connor-Parkview The Island 101 Forest Hill South 126 Dorset Park 6 Kingsview Village-The Westway 31 Yorkdale-Glen Park 55 Thorncliffe Park 78 Kensington-Chinatown 102 Forest Hill North 127 Bendale 7 Willowridge-Martingrove-Richview 32 Englemount-Lawrence
    [Show full text]
  • The Most 'Attractive .Resort
    '" : .. The Most 'Attractive .Resort & 'in Town: " .. ,.1; . Public Library Service 'in West Toronto Junction~ . 1888-1989 . Barbara ~orsyth and Barbara Myrvold TorontOPublic TJi Library The Most Attractive Resort in Town: -""'" - - ..-c> ] II 1101 I ~ 101 11 ] , I h. 1:" ;ID: \\ \\ \\ If III; ~ '~7-n. ~ . \ \ \ \1 If r11 ~ [l~IIJ U OJ )Jl~IIJ ! ~-=-L g~ "= ! =-- '-- '-- Mt 1M I!!I! ffI I fElt: Pl~ 'Fl:~ gg if~Fl ~E1fEl~ -l -I Public Library Service in West Toronto Junction ~ 1888-1989 Barbara Forsyth and Barbara Myrvold • .J ~W~O •• Ubrary 1989 Copyright © 1989 Toronto Public Library Board ISBN 0-920601-10-3 Typesetting, design and layout: Peter B. Merey/ Pro Familia Publishing Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Forsyth, Barbara, 1951· The most attractive resort in town: public library service in West Toronto Junction, 1888·1989 Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-920601-10-3 1. Toronto Public Library. Annette Street Branch­ History. 2. Public libraries - Ontario - Toronto - History. 3. West Toronto (Toronto, Ont.) - History. I. Myrvold, Barbara. II. Toronto Public Library Board. III. Title. Z736.A55F61989 027.4713'541 C89-095176-4 Guide to Abbreviations AO Archives of Ontario CTA City of Toronto Archives MTLB Metropolitan Toronto Library Board TBE Records, Archives and Museum, Toronto Board of Education TPLA Toronto Public Library Archives TPLAS Toronto Public Library, Annette Street Library Printed and bound in Canada TPLD/S Toronto Public Library, DufferinjSt. Clair Library WTJHS West Toronto Junction Historical Society Table of Contents Preface .................................. 5 Introduction............................... 7 West Toronto Junction Mechanics' Institute, 1888-95 ................................ 7 Toronto Junction Public Library, 1895-1904: Financial Crisis and Recovery .................
    [Show full text]
  • 1600 Bloor Street West for Sale & for Lease
    1600 BLOOR STREET WEST FOR SALE & FOR LEASE ALEX PROTOMANNI* FRANK PROTOMANNI** BROCK MEDDICK RYAN BOBYK* Sales Associate Senior Vice President Sales Representative Sales Associate T +1 416 495 6284 T +1 416 495 6299 T +1 416 815 2305 T +1 416 495 6200 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] *Sales Representative **Broker N 1600 BLOOR STREET WEST 29 STOREY MIXED AUTO BLDG USE CONDO AND MOCA AT THE OFFERING BY TRINITY LOWER JCT BY CASTLEPOINT DUFFERIN STATION DEVELOPMENT CBRE Limited is pleased to offer for sale 1600 Bloor Street West, GROUP INC. AND HOWARD PARK GREYBROOK Toronto. This two-storey building has a mix of retail and two RESIDENCES BY renovated apartment units. The property is located in the City’s LANSDOWNE STATION TRIUMPH WEST TWNS AT CHOICE DEVELOPMENTS well-known High Park North neighbourhood, just west of the LOWER JARVIS PROPERTIES intersection of Bloor Street West and Dundas Street West. BLOOR BY CASTLEPOINT STATION DEVELOPMENT FOR AND A MAJOR MIXED USE RONCESVALLES The Site is currently improved with 4,006 sq. ft. of building including GREYBROOK CENTRE INCLUDING LOFTS BY THE RONCY BY 24 STOREY 2,600 RESIDENTIAL the basement, and 17.08 ft. of frontage along Bloor Street West. TRIUMPH WORSLEY URBAN RENTAL UNITS The two-storey property is currently vacant, giving purchasers DEVELOPMENTS DEVELOPMENT BY unparalleled flexibility and an opportunity to achieve above market LORMEL HOMES DUNDAS WEST STATION rents. The property has a renovated 2-bedroom apartment on the second floor with a rooftop patio and a renovated 1-bedroom V6 BY OLD STONEHENGE apartment below grade.
    [Show full text]
  • 33 Laird Drive Historical Chronology
    ATTACHMENT NO. 4 RESEARCH AND EVALUATION SUMMARY: 33 LAIRD DRIVE Above: Sheridan Equipment Ltd., (1945-6), 33 Laird Drive, photographed by Panda Associates, 1956, (Canadian Architectural Archives) HISTORICAL CHRONOLOGY Key Date Historical Event 9,500 The property is situated at a series of junctions and edge conditions that have existed BCE over time and find their roots in the neighbourhood's ancient geography. At approximately 9,500 BCE the shoreline of Lake Iroquois (now known as Lake Ontario) extended as far north as the Davenport Road and the Village of Leaside and is still present in the great ridge running east-west to the north of the city and extending as far east as the Scarborough Bluffs. 1793 The town of York is founded and the area including the adjacent York Township is surveyed and divided into 100 and 200 acre park lots set in a series of concessions roughly parallel with Lake Ontario. 1819-20 John Lea purchases Lot 13 in the Third Concession from Alexander McDonnell. 1841 William Lee purchases Lot 12. 1854 John Lee dies, leaving Lot 13 to his sons William and John Jr. Inclusion on the Heritage Inventory – 33 Laird Drive - Attachment 4 1 William builds the octagonal house known as Leaside and founds the village of Leaside becoming the town's chief magistrate. 1881 The Ontario and Quebec Railway is chartered by the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) to build a line across the then northern boundary of the city. Expediency leads the line across the Lea family farm. 1884 The CPR now operating the O&Q line, creates a maintenance shop and sidings at Leaside and builds a line following the Don River to Union Station.
    [Show full text]