DOCSLIB.ORG

Cycling Service by Neighbourhood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cycling Service by Neighbourhood CITY OF CITY OF VAUGHAN MARKHAM ± 116 130 21 24 36 50 49 48 2 35 27 37 117 129 CITY OF 22 34 47 46 131 3 25 51 52 PICKERING 132 1 4 38 53 118 128 5 40 26 33 134 23 45 135 39 6 28 29 105 126 113 127 137 31 32 41 42 119 133 8 30 103 7 136 115 112 108 102 43 125 138 100 140 110 109 104 99 44 11 10 9 107 106 101 55 139 111 56 124 54 120 91 92 123 13 90 94 96 97 58 15 114 98 57 93 59 60 12 89 88 95 61 67 66 121 14 83 74 80 79 68 69 62 122 16 87 71 64 84 81 65 86 78 75 72 73 63 85 76 17 82 70 20 CITY OF 77 LAKE 18 MISSISSAUGA 19 ONTARIO 0 3 6 12 Km Legend Notes: KM of Cycling Infrastructure by KM of Cycling Service By Neighbourhood Streets per Neighbourhood 1 - Cycling Service is the proportion of street kilometres in the neighbourhood (excluding highways) Transportation Services Cycling Infrastructure & Programs Unit 0.0% - 2.4% that have cycling routes (cycle tracks, bike lanes, trails, quiet street sharrows), represented as a percentage Data Source: Contains information licensed under 2.5% - 4.5% (out of 100). The more cycling routes that exist, the higher the score. the Open Government License – Toronto 2 - Neighbourhood Equity Index Scores (out of 100) are those identified by City of Toronto Social Development, Projection: NAD 1927 MTM 3 4.6% - 6.9% Finance & Administration Division for the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020. The scores are based on five domains: 7.0% - 9.8% economic opportunities, social development, participation in decision-making, physical surroundings, and healthy lives. 9.9% - 19.6% The greater the opportunities and services, the higher the score. Details at toronto.ca/neighbourhoods Date: July 2019 3 - List of neighbourhood names corresponding to neighbourhood numbers available on page 2. Neighbourhood Improvement Areas C ycling Service by Neighbourhood ID Neighbourhood Name Cycling Ward ID Neighbourhood Name Cycling Ward ID Neighbourhood Name Cycling Ward Service % Service % Service % 1 West Humber – Clairville 4.00 1 48 Hillcrest Village 3.74 17 95 Annex 5.45 11 2 Mount – Olive – Silverstone – Jamestown 5.11 1 49 Bayview Woods – Steeles 9.02 17 96 Casa Loma 7.31 12 3 Thistletown – Beaumond Heights 7.50 1 50 Newtonbrook East 4.03 18 97 Yonge – St. Clair 2.35 12 4 Rexdale – Kipling 5.68 1 51 Willowdale East 2.20 18 98 Rosedale – Moore Park 9.23 11 5 Elms – Old Rexdale 4.19 1 52 Bayview Village 4.38 17 99 Mount Pleasant East 8.62 15 6 Kingsview Village – The Westway 2.55 1,2 53 Henry Farm 2.45 17 100 Yonge – Eglinton 3.39 8,12 7 Willowridge – Martingrove – Richview 1.04 1,2 54 O'Connor – Parkview 11.17 16,19 101 Forest Hill South 3.81 12 8 Humber Heights – Westmount 7.38 1,2 55 Thorncliffe Park 12.31 15 102 Forest Hill North 2.45 8 9 Edenbridge – Humber Valley 5.71 2 56 Leaside – Bennington 7.88 15 103 Lawrence Park South 0.95 8,15 10 Princess – Rosethorn 9.75 2 57 Broadview North 8.4 14 104 Mount Pleasant West 4.41 12,15 11 Eringate – Centennial – West Deane 8.35 2 58 Old East York 15.23 14,19 105 Lawrence Park North 0.00 8,15 12 Markland Wood 8.21 2 59 Danforth – East York 9.64 14,19 106 Humewood – Cedarvale 5.92 12 13 Etobicoke West Mall 8.90 2 60 Woodbine – Lumsden 10.23 19 107 Oakwood Village 2.58 9,12 14 Islington – City Centre West 2.78 2,3 61 Crescent Town (Taylor – Massey) 6.28 19 108 Briar Hill – Belgravia 2.43 8 15 Kingsway South 5.90 2,3 62 East End – Danforth 4.32 19 109 Caledonia – Fairbank 1.77 9 16 Stonegate – Queensway 9.01 3 63 The Beaches 9.11 14,19 110 Keelesdale – Eglinton West 1.07 5,9 17 Mimico 8.55 3 64 Woodbine Corridor 5.13 19 111 Rockcliffe – Smythe 5.46 5 18 New Toronto 18.97 3 65 Greenwood – Coxwell 11.83 14 112 Beechborough – Greenbrook 0.00 5 19 Long Branch 14.50 3 66 Danforth 3.05 14,19 113 Weston 4.83 5 20 Alderwood 4.55 3 67 Playter Estates – Danforth 9.66 14 114 Lambton Baby Point 4.32 4 21 Humber Summit 6.80 7 68 North Riverdale 16.98 14 115 Mount Dennis 0.69 5 22 Humbermede 4.45 7 69 Blake – Jones 14.05 14 116 Steeles 8.60 22 23 Pelmo Park – Humberlea 5.54 5,7 70 South Riverdale 16.80 14 117 L'Amoreaux 3.92 22 24 Black Creek 12.88 7 71 Cabbagetown – South St. James Town 16.49 11,13 118 Tam O'Shanter – Sullivan 1.70 22 25 Glenfield – Jane Heights 9.93 7 72 Regent Park 19.56 13 119 Wexford/Maryvale 2.27 21 26 Downsview – Roding – CFB 6.40 6,7 73 Moss Park 13.21 13 120 Clairlea – Birchmount 1.14 20 27 York University Heights 10.91 6,7 74 North St. James Town 18.50 13 121 Oakridge 2.65 20 28 Rustic 0.96 5 75 Church – Yonge Corridor 13.55 11,13 122 Birchcliffe – Cliffside 0.29 20 29 Maple Leaf 1.05 5 76 Bay Street Corridor 15.57 11,13 123 Cliffcrest 1.68 20 30 Brookhaven – Amesbury 0.00 5 77 Waterfront Communities – The Island 19.35 10,13 124 Kennedy Park 0.40 20 31 Yorkdale – Glen Park 3.76 8 78 Kensington – Chinatown 17.07 10,11 125 Ionview 4.51 20,21 32 Englemount – Lawrence 0.80 8 79 University 13.40 11 126 Dorset Park 0.00 21 33 Clanton Park 0.00 6 80 Palmerston – Little Italy 8.93 9,12 127 Bendale 7.26 21 34 Bathurst Manor 10.58 6 81 Trinity – Bellwoods 7.16 9,10,11 128 Agincourt South – Malvern West 3.10 22,23 35 Westminister – Branson 7.33 6 82 Niagara 18.21 10 129 Agincourt North 6.84 23 36 Newtonbrook West 4.22 18 83 Dufferin Grove 8.46 9 130 Milliken 4.70 22,23 37 Willowdale West 0.00 18 84 Little Portugal 5.85 8 131 Rouge 5.63 23,25 38 Lansing – Westgate 2.51 6,18 85 South Parkdale 16.17 4,10 132 Malvern 4.11 23,25 39 Bedford Park Nortown 0.00 8 86 Roncesvalles 13.61 4 133 Centennial Scarborough 6.90 25 40 St. Andrew – Windfields 3.60 15 87 High Park – Swansea 10.81 4 134 Highland Creek 7.30 25 41 Bridle Path – Sunnybrook – York Mills 5.94 15 88 High Park North 8.41 4 135 Morningside 5.49 24 42 Banbury – Don Mills 9.19 15,16 89 Runnymede – Bloor West Village 7.98 4 136 West Hill 6.07 24,25 43 Victoria Village 6.78 16,19 90 Junction Area 7.46 4,5 137 Woburn 5.16 21,24 44 Flemingdon Park 13.78 15,16,19 91 Weston – Pellam Park 1.71 9 138 Eglinton East 6.68 20,21 45 Parkwoods - Donalda 5.18 16 92 Corso Italia – Davenport 2.90 9 139 Scarborough Village 3.14 20,24 46 Pleasant View 0.00 17 93 Dovercourt – Wallace Emerson - Junction 6.19 9,11 140 Guildwood 1.81 24,25 47 Don Valley Village 4.48 17 94 Wychwood 6.54 9,12 – Neighbourhood Improvement Areas * ID value corresponds to labelled neighbourhoods shown on the provided maps * Lower Equity Index Score indicates greater inequity in areas .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neighbourhood Equity Scores for Toronto Neighbourhoods and Recommended Neighbourhood Improvement Areas
    Appendix B Neighbourhood Equity Scores for Toronto Neighbourhoods and Recommended Neighbourhood Improvement Areas All Scores are out of a maximum 100 points: the lower the Score, the higher the level of total overall inequities faced by the neighbourhood. Neighbourhoods with Scores lower than the Neighbourhood Equity Benchmark of 42.89 face serious inequities that require immediate action. Neighbourhoods marked with "*" in the Rank column were designated by Council as Priority Neighbourhood Areas for Investment (PNIs) under the 2005 Strategy. For neighbourhoods marked with a "+" in the Rank column, a smaller portion of the neighbourhood was included in a larger Priority Neighbourhood Areas for Investment designated by Council under the 2005 Strategy. Neighbourhood Recommended Rank Neighbourhood Number and Name Equity Score as NIA 1* 24 Black Creek 21.38 Y 2* 25 Glenfield-Jane Heights 24.39 Y 3* 115 Mount Dennis 26.39 Y 4 112 Beechborough-Greenbrook 26.54 Y 5 121 Oakridge 28.57 Y 6* 2 Mount Olive-Silverstone-Jamestown 29.29 Y 7 5 Elms-Old Rexdale 29.54 Y 8 72 Regent Park 29.81 Y 9 55 Thorncliffe Park 33.09 Y 10 85 South Parkdale 33.10 Y 11* 61 Crescent Town 33.21 Y 12 111 Rockcliffe-Smythe 33.86 Y 13* 139 Scarborough Village 33.94 Y 14* 21 Humber Summit 34.30 Y 15 28 Rustic 35.40 Y 16 125 Ionview 35.73 Y 17* 44 Flemingdon Park 35.81 Y 18* 113 Weston 35.99 Y 19* 22 Humbermede 36.09 Y 20* 138 Eglinton East 36.28 Y 21 135 Morningside 36.89 Y Staff report for action on the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020 1 Neighbourhood Recommended
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Safety At
    Branching Out Fall 2019 Enhancing Safety at ESS Walking into our South Adult Day Program, you will be immediately greeted by friendly smiles and cheerful waves from staff, volunteers and seniors attending program. Located in a quiet residential area of South Etobicoke, this program provides a welcoming, inclusive and comfortable home-like space which supports the health and daily living needs of adults and seniors living with Alzheimer's and other dementias. Our program is a special place and a much-needed community resource. With the help of funding from the Central Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) and fundraising dollars from Home Instead Foundation of Canada's 2018 GIVE65 online giving campaign, we have been able to make safety improvements, as well as enhancements to the daily comfort and enjoyment of the individuals attending the program. Using funding received from the Central LHIN, we have: ■ Installed coded security systems to prevent seniors attending the program from wandering outside unattended and emergency call systems in the washrooms; ■ Replaced aging furniture with durable, senior-friendly chairs which are easy for staff to slide and provide assistance, and for seniors to safely move from a seated to standing position; ■ Hired a local artist “Murals by Marg” through Lakeshore Arts to paint a beautiful mural to camouflage door exits and divert seniors seeking an exit. Before After Continued on next page Continued from cover With the donations raised through the support of our local Home Instead Senior Care Chapter (Etobicoke & Mississauga) and GIVE65, we have begun the process of landscaping the back yard to create a safe and usable outdoor program space.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • Fixer Upper, Comp
    Legend: x - Not Available, Entry - Entry Point, Fixer - Fixer Upper, Comp - The Compromise, Done - Done + Done, High - High Point Stepping WEST Get in the Game The Masses Up So-called Luxury Luxury Neighbourhood <$550K 550-650K 650-750K 750-850K 850-1M 1-1.25M 1.25-1.5M 1.5-2M 2M+ High Park-Swansea x x x Entry Comp Done Done Done Done W1 Roncesvalles x Entry Fixer Fixer Comp Comp Done Done High Parkdale x Entry Entry x Comp Comp Comp Done High Dovercourt Wallace Junction South Entry Fixer Fixer Comp Comp Done Done Done x High Park North x x Entry Entry Comp Comp Done Done High W2 Lambton-Baby point Entry Entry Fixer Comp Comp Done Done Done Done Runnymede-Bloor West Entry Entry Fixer Fixer Comp Done Done Done High Caledonia-Fairbank Fixer Comp Comp Done Done High x x x Corso Italia-Davenport Fixer Fixer Comp Comp Done Done High High x W3 Keelesdale-Eglinton West Fixer Comp Comp Done Done High x x x Rockcliffe-Smythe Fixer Comp Done Done Done High x x x Weston-Pellam Park Comp Comp Comp Done High x x x x Beechborough-Greenbrook Entry Fixer Comp Comp Done High High x x BriarHill-Belgravia x Fixer Comp Comp Done High High x x Brookhaven--Amesbury Comp Comp Done Done Done High High High high Humberlea-Pelmo Park Fixer Fixer Fixer Done Done x High x x W4 Maple Leaf and Rustic Entry Fixer Comp Done Done Done High Done High Mount Dennis Comp Comp Done High High High x x x Weston Comp Comp Done Done Done High High x x Yorkdale-Glen Park x Entry Entry Comp Done Done High Done Done Black Creek Fixer Fixer Done High x x x x x Downsview Fixer Comp
    [Show full text]
  • Round 2 Consultation Report 2020-2021, TO360
    Consultation Report TO360 Wayfinding Strategy 2020-2021 Public Consultation Round Two March 2021 Table of Contents Background .................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of the local map consultation ................................................................................... 2 Outreach and notification ........................................................................................................... 5 Summary of engagement statistics ........................................................................................... 9 Detailed feedback by local map area....................................................................................... 10 Other feedback about TO360 maps, in general ..................................................................... 19 Next steps ................................................................................................................................... 19 Attachment A: List of organizations invited to participate Attachment B: Round Two Draft Wayfinding Maps Background The Toronto 360 (“TO360”) Wayfinding project is a pedestrian wayfinding system which is a central component of the City’s ambition to make Toronto a more walkable, welcoming and understandable place for visitors and residents alike. TO360 provides consistent wayfinding information through a unified signage and mapping system delivered by the City and project partners. Following the successful completion of
    [Show full text]
  • Community Check-Up: Downsview-Roding-Cfb Get to Know North York! | NORTH YORK MIRROR W |
    9 community check-up: downsview-roding-cfb get to know north york! YORK MIRROR w | | NORTH As part of a Summer 020304050607080910 07080910 Snapshot feature, 2001 2011 2006 2011 The North York Mirror looks at the COMMUNITY DIFFERENCE FIVE-YEAR changing trends and demographics in of a decade change its local neighbour- check-up hoods. Data courtesy This week: Downsview-Roding-CFB August 27, 2013 Tuesday, Statistics Canada via the City of Toronto. >3x -21.9% Downsview-Roding- Between 2001 and 2011, the number While Italian remains the top CFB: Population Allen Road and Sheppard Avenue of people in Downsview-Roding-CFB non-official Home Language in the (2011): 34,655 West. who listed Tagalog as their Home neighbourhood the number of people Language more than tripled (295 in Downsview-Roding-CFB who people to 895). listed Italian as their Home Language LANGUAGES dropped by 21.9 per cent between 2006 and 2011. Italian is the most common non- official language in Downsview- Roding-CFB. In the 2011 census, 14.6 -6.7% per cent of residents listed Italian CITY While the number of people in the +51.8% as their Mother Tongue, and 8.4 per 0-14 age group (Children) has grown LIVING ARRANGEMENTS cent listed Italian as their Home between 2006 to 2011, the group’s The number of people in Downsview- CONTEXT FOR SENIORS (age 65+) Language. overall population is still down 6.7 Roding-CFB who listed Portuguese In the 2011 census, the percentage of A comparison of a per cent from its 2001 total.
    [Show full text]
  • The Markland Wood Golf Club Is a Private Member Facility Established in 1964 in the West End of Toronto
    The Markland Wood Golf Club is a private member facility established in 1964 in the west end of Toronto. We are located on the Etobicoke and Mississauga border as the Etobicoke Creek meanders through our property. Our golf course is impeccably groomed and our clubhouse atmosphere is very friendly. Our members and staff are down to earth and enthusiastic to enjoy the game of golf and the camaraderie that comes along with it. We are currently accepting resumes for an Assistant Golf Professional for the 2019 season and beyond. Job Description Assistant Golf Professionals report directly to the Head Professional as an integral part of the Pro Shop team. They will support the team in executing the daily golf operations and providing excellent customer service to the members and guests. Key Responsibilities • Supervise the daily golf operations under the direction of the Head Professional • Tee time management, handle incoming phone calls for bookings or related topics • Carry out the opening and closing details including till reconciliation and site security • Process payments including shop purchases and guest fees • Enforce rules and regulations of the club • Assist in organizing club events • Greet members and guests in a prompt and professional manner • Ensure the golf shop is kept organized, tidy, and is well presented at all times • Regularly update merchandise displays and sale areas • Manage outside services and ensure duties are being completed • Administrative duties as assigned by the Head Professional • Teach lessons and clinics,
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Canopy Study 201
    IE11.1 - Attachment 2 Tree Canopy Study 201 Prepared by: KBM Resources Group Lallemand Inc./BioForest Dillon Consulting Limited 8 With Special Advisors Peter Duinker and James Steenberg, Dalhousie University 2018 Tree Canopy Study Consulting Team Lallemand Inc./BioForest Allison Craig, MFC John Barker, MFC KBM Resources Group Rike Burkhardt, MFC, RPF Ben Kuttner, PhD, RPF Arnold Rudy, MScF Dillon Consulting Limited David Restivo, HBSc, EP John Fairs, HBA Sarah Galloway, HBES Merrilees Willemse, HBA, MCIP, RPP Dalhousie University (Special Advisors) Peter Duinker, PhD James Steenberg, PhD Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the field crews, who recorded the i-Tree data used to generate many of the findings in this report: Lallemand Inc./BioForest: Ahmad Alamad, Laura Brodey, George Chen, Jessica Corrigan, Aurora Lavender, Julia Reale Dillon Consulting Ltd: Trevor Goulet Our thanks go to the City of Toronto Steering Committee members who provided valuable insight and expertise. Daniel Boven, Acting Manager Beth McEwen, Manager Forestry Policy and Planning Forest & Natural Area Management Connie Pinto, Program Standards & Carol Walker, Manager Development Officer Urban Forestry – EWMS Project Forestry Policy and Planning Raymond Vendrig, Manager Ryan Garnett, Manager Urban Forestry Renewal Geospatial Data Integration & Access Page i of 270 2018 Tree Canopy Study Our thanks go also to the key experts who provided input on the draft key findings. Amory Ngan, Project Manager, Tree Planting Strategy, Urban Forestry Andrew Pickett, Urban Forestry Coordinator (A), Urban Forestry Christine Speelman, Sr. Project Coordinator (A), Urban Forestry David Kellershohn, Manager, Stormwater Manager, Toronto Water Jane Welsh, Project Manager, Zoning Bylaw & Environmental Planning, City Planning Jane Weninger, Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • The North York East LIP Strategic Plan and Report
    The North York East LIP Strategic Plan and Report The North York East Strategic Plan has been developed around six areas of focus: Information & Outreach; Civic Engagement; Collaboration & Capacity Building; Language Training & Supports; Labour Market; and Health Services.Six working groups will be established to address these areas of focus. In- depth directions for each working group are outlined in the main body of this report Executive Summary In 2009, Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC), in partnership with the Ontario Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration, launched Local Immigration Partnership (LIP) projects throughout Ontario. LIPs were developed as research initiatives to identify ways to coordinate and enhance local service delivery to newcomers across the province, while promoting efficient use of resources. In October 2009, Working Women Community Centre entered an agreement with CIC to lead a LIP project in the North York East area of Toronto. The North York East LIP is located in the far north of the city, contained by Steeles Avenue to the north, Highway 401 to the south, Victoria Avenue East to the east and the Don Valley River to the west. The area population is almost 80,000, 70% of which are immigrants to Canada. A major priority for the North York East LIP project was to root its research in the real-life experiences of local newcomers and local community organizations. In total, over 400 newcomers & immigrants, and over 100 service providers were consulted and engaged with to identify challenges, solutions and new directions for the settlement sector in the area. Methods of engagement for both newcomers and service providers included focus group research, key-informant interviews, community consultations and advisory panel workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 (Online Meeting) (These Minutes Unapproved by Floor Members)
    1 GENERAL MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 (online meeting) (These Minutes unapproved by Floor Members) The meeting convened at 8:15 p.m. with a moment of silence followed by the Serenity Prayer. Dave H. (Beaches) read the Twelve Traditions. MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERGROUP REP/ALT: Anniversary, Aurora, Bayview, Beaches, Beyond Belief (Sub. West), Birds of a Feather, Bloordale, Church Street, Danforth, Deer Park, Dry on the Danforth, East York, Erin Mills, Fifth Tradition (Scarborough), Freedom, Gay Sober Men, Glenholme, Half Century, High Park, Hill, Keep It Simple (Scarborough), Kipling, Lakeshore, Living Sober, Long Branch, Love & Tolerance, Markland Wood, Midtown, Mississauga, Morning Discussion, Mount Royal-York, North Toronto, One Paragraph at a Time, Open Hands, Parkway, Port Credit, Queensville, Saturday Morning Discussion, Scarborough, Shepherd, Silverbirch, Sisters in Sobriety, Six Points, Spiritual Kindergarten, St. Clements, Steps to Serenity, Streetsville St. Andrews, Streetsville, Sunnyside, Tuesday Men’s Solution, Twelfth Tradition, Welcome, and Yorkville. DISTRICT LIAISONS: Districts 06, 10, 12, 14, and 18. OPERATING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Dave H., Gord H., Gord T., Graham D., Jeanette E., Marvyn W. (OC Vice-Chair), Nina L. (OC Chair), and Seán D. SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRS: Archives, Communications, Twelfth Step, CPC, Public Information, and Treatment. CHAIRPERSON’S OPENING REMARKS / HOUSEKEEPING: Nina L. (Sisters in Sobriety), Operating Committee Chairperson: After welcoming everyone to the assembly, Nina thanked everyone for their attendance. She outlined the following: This meeting will be recorded, by audio-only, as an aide memoir for the person preparing the Minutes. We have to take every precaution to ensure the attendee's anonymity is protected. Whether the proceedings are electronically recorded or recorded through hand-written notetaking, only first names are recorded and only first names appear in the Minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Orking Rough, Living Poor
    Working Rough, Living Poor Employment and Income Insecurities faced by Racialized Groups and their Impacts on Health Published by Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services, 2011 Study funded by: To be cited as: Wilson, R.M., P. Landolt, Y.B. Shakya, G. Galabuzi, Z. Zahoorunissa, D. Pham, F. Cabrera, S. Dahy, and M-P. Joly. (2011). Working Rough, Living Poor: Employment and Income Insecurities Faced by Racialized Groups in the Black Creek Area and their Impacts on Health. Toronto: Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services. The content for this report was collaboratively analyzed and written by the core team of the Income Security, Race and Health research working group. The research was designed and implemented with valuable feedback from all our Advisory Committee members and other community partners (see list in Acknowledgement section) The views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of The Wellesley Institute or the Metcalf Foundation. Requests for permission and copies of this report should be addressed to: Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services 500-340 College Street Toronto, ON M5S 3G3 Telephone: (416) 324-8677 Fax: (416) 324-9074 www.accessalliance.ca © 2011 Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services About the Income Security, Race and Health Research Working Group The Income Security, Race and Health (ISRH) Research Working Group is a interdisciplinary research group comprising of academics, service providers, and peer researchers interested in examining racialized economic and health inequalities. The group was established in Toronto in 2006 under the leadership of Access Alliance. The key goals of the ISRH team are to investigate the systemic causes of growing racialized inequalities in employment and income, and to document the health impacts of these inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Epidemic a Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto
    THE HIDDEN EPIDEMIC A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto The hidden epidemic A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto November 2014 1 Acknowledgements This report was researched and written by a working group consisting of: Michael Polanyi Children’s Aid Society of Toronto and Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto Lesley Johnston Social Planning Toronto Anita Khanna Family Service Toronto/Ontario Campaign 2000 Said Dirie Children’s Aid Society of Toronto and Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto michael kerr Colour of Poverty – Colour of Change and Alliance for a Poverty-Free Toronto Research and data analysis support provided by the City of Toronto is gratefully acknowledged. Financial support was provided by the Children’s Aid Society of Toronto and the Children’s Aid Foundation’s Community Initiatives Program. Editing and design support was provided by Tilman Lewis and Peter Grecco. We thank Ann Fitzpatrick, Christa Freiler, Skylar Maharaj, Laurel Rothman and Alex Tranmer for their review of and assistance with the paper. THE HIDDEN EPIDEMIC A Report on Child and Family Poverty in Toronto Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Current Levels of Child and Family Poverty in Toronto and Beyond 6 3. Which Toronto Children Are Affected by Poverty? 9 Geography 9 Ethno-racial Background 12 Indigenous Communities 13 Immigration or Citizenship Status 13 Disability 13 Family Structure 13 4. Growing Up in poverty – Reality and impacts on children in Toronto 14 Access to Nutrition 14 Access to Housing 16 Access to Education 17 Access to Recreation 19 5. Underlying Causes of Family Poverty 20 Inadequate Employment Income 20 Inadequate Income Supports and Community Services 22 Lack of Access to Affordable Public Services 24 6.
    [Show full text]