TABLE 7.1 Relative Dating Techniques

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

TABLE 7.1 Relative Dating Techniques CATEGORY TECHNIQUES Chronological sequencing Law of superposition/stratigraphic dating Stylistic seriation Frequency seriation Fluorine, uranium, nitrogen dating Dating by association Association with animals of known age Association with artifacts of known age Association with geological features of known age Calibrated relative Obsidian hydration Terminus quem Terminus post quem Terminus ante quem © University of Toronto Press 2020 enables archaeologists to determine that site A is older than site B, or one arrowhead is older than another, but without specific dates attached. One of the common methods of chronological sequencing is to apply the law of superposition, sometimes known as stratigraphic dating. This method is based on the fact that layers of sediments are normally laid on top of each other through time. Accordingly, as archaeologists excavate, they are encountering successively older deposits. In other words, the deeper the deposit, the older it is. Of course, archaeologists recognize that deposits can be mixed after initial deposition and sediments are not always deposited in uniform or horizontal layers, so they are cautious when drawing inferences from this technique alone. Seriation, or placing objects in chronological order, is another chronological sequencing method with a long history in archaeology. There are two commonly used types: stylistic seriation and frequency seriation. Stylistic seriation is based on the knowledge that artifact styles change through time, and by knowing what the end or starting styles are, archaeologists can put artifacts in a chronological order. For example, if an archaeologist found 20 clay pots of roughly the same size, shape, and assumed function, she or he should be able to put them in a chronological sequence based on stylistic attributes. As a contemporary analogy, someone provided with a task of putting a collection of 20 automobiles from the past several 142 INTRODUCING ARCHAEOLOGY.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Part II Specialized Studies Chapter Vi
Part II Specialized Studies chapter vi New Sites and Lingering Questions at the Debert and Belmont Sites, Nova Scotia Leah Morine Rosenmeier, Scott Buchanan, Ralph Stea, and Gordon Brewster ore than forty years ago the Debert site exca- presents a model for the depositional history of the site vations signaled a new standard for interdisci- area, including two divergent scenarios for the origins of the Mplinary approaches to the investigation of late cultural materials at the sites. We believe the expanded areal Pleistocene archaeological sites. The resulting excavations extent of the complex, the nature of past excavations, and produced a record that continues to anchor northeastern the degree of site preservation place the Debert- Belmont Paleoindian sites (MacDonald 1968). The Confederacy of complex among the largest, best- documented, and most Mainland Mi’kmaq (the Confederacy) has been increasingly intact Paleoindian sites in North America. involved with the protection and management of the site The new fi nds and recent research have resolved some complex since the discovery of the Belmont I and II sites in long- standing issues, but they have also created new debates. the late 1980s (Bernard et al. 2011; Julien et al. 2008). The Understanding the relative chronologies of the numerous data reported here are the result of archaeological testing site areas and the consequent relationship among the sites associated with these protection eff orts, the development of requires not only understanding depositional contexts for the Mi’kmawey Debert Cultural Centre (MDCC), and the single occupations but tying together varied contexts (rede- passage of new provincial regulations solely dedicated to pro- posited, disturbed, glaciofl uvial, glaciolacustrine, Holocene tecting archaeological sites in the Debert and Belmont area.
[Show full text]
Archaeological Tree-Ring Dating at the Millennium
P1: IAS Journal of Archaeological Research [jar] pp469-jare-369967 June 17, 2002 12:45 Style file version June 4th, 2002 Journal of Archaeological Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 2002 (C 2002) Archaeological Tree-Ring Dating at the Millennium Stephen E. Nash1 Tree-ring analysis provides chronological, environmental, and behavioral data to a wide variety of disciplines related to archaeology including architectural analysis, climatology, ecology, history, hydrology, resource economics, volcanology, and others. The pace of worldwide archaeological tree-ring research has accelerated in the last two decades, and significant contributions have recently been made in archaeological chronology and chronometry, paleoenvironmental reconstruction, and the study of human behavior in both the Old and New Worlds. This paper reviews a sample of recent contributions to tree-ring method, theory, and data, and makes some suggestions for future lines of research. KEY WORDS: dendrochronology; dendroclimatology; crossdating; tree-ring dating. INTRODUCTION Archaeology is a multidisciplinary social science that routinely adopts an- alytical techniques from disparate fields of inquiry to answer questions about human behavior and material culture in the prehistoric, historic, and recent past. Dendrochronology, literally “the study of tree time,” is a multidisciplinary sci- ence that provides chronological and environmental data to an astonishing vari- ety of archaeologically relevant fields of inquiry, including architectural analysis, biology, climatology, economics,
[Show full text]
ARTIFACTS and FEATURES DENDROCHRONOLOGY This
4/28/2004 ARTIFACTS AND FEATURES DENDROCHRONOLOGY This article is one of an occasional series discussing matters archaeological, especially with reference to the Maturango Museum. In previous articles we have talked about why chronologies are important in archaeology, and about a few qualitative techniques for establishing dates or sequences. Today we move on to another topic, quantitative chronological techniques. The first quantitative technique to be developed and applied in archaeology was dendrochronology, or tree-ring dating. It was developed in 1928 by A. E. Douglass of the University of Arizona, an astronomer who was studying sun-spot cycles. He theorized that climatic moisture was affected by the 11-year sun-spot cycle, and concluded that the evidence should be observable in tree rings. In the course of the studies he verified that the climatic sequence of wet and dry years does in fact leave a detectable pattern in the tree ring record: in general, wet years lead to wide rings and dry years to narrow rings. The important byproduct of this for archaeology is that the sequence of wet and dry years in a given locality never repeats itself, so the tree rings contain a unique signature which allows correlating between an old log and a new one, as long as there is some overlap. Douglass, to his credit, realized that his data would be useful to archaeologists, who at that time had no methods for assigning quantitative dates. Qualitative methods such as pottery seriation, stratigraphic excavation, and marker artifacts allow construction of sequences, but not absolute dating. Dendrochronology, for the first time, would allow an archaeologist to assign a date to the event of cutting down a tree to build a structure or use as fuel.
[Show full text]
Strategies and Activities: Preschool
Arkansas Child Development and Early Learning Standards Strategies and Activities: Preschool November 2017 Published 2017 by Early Care and Education Projects Fayetteville, AR 72701 ©Early Care and Education Projects College of Education and Health Professions University of Arkansas All rights reserved December 2017 Strategies and Activities: Preschool page |ii Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... v Reading and Using Strategies and Activities: Preschool ...................................................................................... vii Books That Support Strategies and Activities: Preschool .................................................................................. 109 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................................................... 115 Resources ........................................................................................................................................................... 117 Social and Emotional Development ........................................................................................................................... 1 Cognitive Development ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Physical Development and Health ..........................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
MJ O'brien, RL Lyman
M.J. O'Brien, R.L. Lyman Seriation, Stratigraphy, and Index Fossils The Backbone of Archaeological Dating It is difficult for today's students of archaeology to imagine an era when chronometric dating methods were unavailable. However, even a casual perusal of the large body of literature that arose during the first half of the twentieth century reveals a battery of clever methods used to determine the relative ages of archaeological phenomena, often with considerable precision. Stratigraphic excavation is perhaps the best known of the various relative-dating methods used by prehistorians. Although there are several techniques of using artifacts from superposed strata to measure time, these are rarely if ever differentiated. Rather, common practice is to categorize them under the heading `stratigraphic excavation'. This text distinguishes among the several techniques and argues that stratigraphic excavation tends to result in discontinuous measures of time - a point little appreciated by modern archaeologists. 1999, XIII, 253 p. Although not as well known as stratigraphic excavation, two other methods of relative dating have figured important in Americanist archaeology: seriation and the use of index fossils. The latter (like stratigraphic excavation) measures time discontinuously, while Printed book the former - in various guises - measures time continuously. Perhaps no other method used in archaeology is as misunderstood as seriation, and the authors provide detailed Hardcover descriptions and examples of each of its three different techniques. ▶ 109,99 € | £99.99 | $139.99 ▶ *117,69 € (D) | 120,99 € (A) | CHF 130.00 Each method and technique of relative dating is placed in historical perspective, with particular focus on developments in North America, an approach that allows a more eBook complete understanding of the methods described, both in terms of analytical technique and disciplinary history.
[Show full text]
Dating and Chronology Building - R
ARCHAEOLOGY – Dating and Chronology Building - R. E. Taylor DATING AND CHRONOLOGY BUILDING R. E. Taylor University of California, USA Keywords: Dating methods, chronometric dating, seriation, stratigraphy, geochronology, radiocarbon dating, potassium-argon/argon-argon dating, Pleistocene, Quaternary. Contents 1. Chronological Frameworks 1.1 Relative and Chronometric Time 1.2 History and Prehistory 2. Chronology in Archaeology 2.1 Historical Development 2.2 Geochronological Units 3. Chronology Building 3.1 Development of Historic Chronologies 3.2 Development of Prehistoric Chronologies 3.3 Stratigraphy 3.4 Seriation 4. Chronometric Dating Methods 4.1 Radiocarbon 4.2 Potassium-argon and Argon-argon Dating 4.3 Dendrochronology 4.4 Archaeomagnetic Dating 4.5 Obsidian Hydration Acknowledgments Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary One of the purposes of archaeological research is the examination of the evolution of human cultures.UNESCO Since a fundamental defini– tionEOLSS of evolution is “change over time,” chronology is a fundamental archaeological parameter. Archaeology shares with a number of otherSAMPLE sciences concerned with temporally CHAPTERS mediated phenomenon the need to view its data within an accurate chronological framework. For archaeology, such a requirement needs to be met if any meaningful understanding of evolutionary processes is to be inferred from the physical residue of past human behavior. 1. Chronological Frameworks Chronology orders the sequential relationship of physical events by associating these events with some type of time scale. Depending on the phenomenon for which temporal placement is required, it is helpful to distinguish different types of time scales. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) ARCHAEOLOGY – Dating and Chronology Building - R. E. Taylor Geochronological (geological) time scales temporally relates physical structures of the Earth’s solid surface and buried features, documenting the 4.5–5.0 billion year history of the planet.
[Show full text]
V Semester Zoology Fossils and Fossil Dating
V SEMESTER ZOOLOGY FOSSILS AND FOSSIL DATING Fossils can include anything that gives an indication of the existence of prehistoric organisms. The Latin word Fossilium means ‘dug out’, which in earlier times meant to include any traces of body of animals and plants buried and preserved by natural causes. George Curvier (1769-1832) is considered ‘Father of palaeontology’, who studied fossils scientifically to develop phylogenies. Types of fossils Based on the mode of formation of fossils, they can be categorised in several types. Fossilisation is a rare phenomenon, which takes place under specialised conditions. The study of natural process of death, burial, decomposition, preservation and transformation into fossil is called taphonomy. Fossils are the only direct evidence of the biological events in the history of earth and hence important in the understanding and construction of the evolutionary history of different groups of animals and plants. 1. Petrifaction Petrifaction is molecule-by-molecule replacement of organic matter by inorganic compounds, viz. silica, calcium carbonate or iron pyrites. It literally means “turned into stone” and takes place in buried situations, particularly at the bottom of lakes, ponds or sea, where there are sediments rich in calcium carbonate and silica. Over millions of years, inorganic matter replaces the entire bony material, making an exact replica of the original. By this time sediments transform into sedimentary rocks, in which fossils can remain preserved for a long time. Most of the old fossils are petrified, e.g. shells of molluscs, arthropods and fish skeletons. 2. Preservation of footprints When animals walk on wet soil and sand, they leave trail of footprints or limbless animals and worms may leave tracks and trails in mud.
[Show full text]
Americanist Stratigraphic Excavation and the Measurement of Culture Change
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1999 Americanist Stratigraphic Excavation and the Measurement of Culture Change R. Lee Lyman1 and Michael J. O'Brien1 Many versions of the history of Americanist archaeology suggest there was a "stratigraphic revolution" during the second decade of the twentieth century—the implication being that prior to about 1915 most archaeologists did not excavate stratigraphically. However, articles and reports published during the late nineteenth century and first decade of the twentieth century indicate clearly that many Americanists in fact did excavate stratigraphically. What they did not do was attempt to measure the passage of time and hence culture change. The real revolution in Americanist archaeology comprised an analytical shift from studying synchronic variation to tracking changes in frequencies of artifact types or styles—a shift pioneered by A. V. Kidder, A. L. Kroeber, Nels C. Nelson, and Leslie Spier. The temporal implications of the analytical techniques they developed—frequency seriation and percentage stratigraphy—were initially confirmed by stratigraphic excavation. Within a few decades, however, most archaeologists had begun using stratigraphic excavation as a creational strategy—that is, as a strategy aimed at recovering superposed sets of artifacts that were viewed as representing occupations and distinct cultures. The myth that there was a "stratigraphic revolution" was initiated in the writings of the innovators of frequency seriation and percentage stratigraphy. KEY WORDS: chronology; culture change; stratigraphic excavation; stratigraphic revolution. INTRODUCTION As far as we are aware, Willey (1968, p. 40) was the first historian of Americanist archaeology to use the term "stratigraphic revolution"—in quotation marks—to characterize the fieldwork of, particularly, Manuel 1Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211.
[Show full text]
Teaching Archaeology in the Classroom
Beyond Artifacts: Teaching Archaeology in the Classroom Florida Unearthed, pg. 36 Peanut Butter & Jelly Archaeology, pg. 30 Summer 2008 This page left intentionally blank (ish). Table of Contents Introduction iv Activities General Archaeology (1 class period) Cookie Excavation 1 Cookie Grid 3 Excavación en la galleta 4 Archaeology Jeopardy 6 Archaeology and Pseudoscience 7 Ancient Graffiti 9 Archaeology & the Media 12 Archaeology Goes to the Movies 19 Indiana Jones Script 21 Lara Croft Script 22 Archaeologist Script 23 Prehistoric Archaeology (1 class period) Archaeology Crossword Relay Race 24 Crossword Puzzle 26 What’s Missing ? 27 Worksheet 28 PowerPoint slide 29 Peanut Butter and Jelly Archaeology 30 Arqueología con Crema de Maní y Mermelada 33 Florida Unearthed for Elementary Students 36 Florida Unearthed Board Construction 38 Atlatl Antics 40 Sheet for Throwing Dart by Hand 42 Sheet for Throwing Dart with Atlatl 43 How to make an Atlatl and a Dart 44 Historic Archaeology (1- 2 class periods) Arcadia Sample Lesson: Introduction to Archaeology 47 Arcadia Sample Lesson: Invisible People 49 Arcadia Sample Lesson: Predictive Modeling & 51 the Natural Environment i Underwater Archaeology (1 class period) Build A Boat 53 You Sunk My Battleship! 57 Integrated (multiple class periods/ multiple disciplines) Enriching Traditional Subjects through the Teaching 59 of Archaeology (grades 6-8) Table for Core Courses 61 Sample Math Worksheet 63 Sample Science Worksheet 64 Curriculum (framework) 9-week Archaeology Class for 6th Graders Introduction
[Show full text]
An Annotated Select Bibliography of the Piltdown Forgery
An annotated select bibliography of the Piltdown forgery Informatics Programme Open Report OR/13/047 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY INFORMATICS PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/13/47 An annotated select bibliography of the Piltdown forgery Compiled by David G. Bate Keywords Bibliography; Piltdown Man; Eoanthropus dawsoni; Sussex. Map Sheet 319, 1:50 000 scale, Lewes Front cover Hypothetical construction of the head of Piltdown Man, Illustrated London News, 28 December 1912. Bibliographical reference BATE, D. G. 2014. An annotated select bibliography of the Piltdown forgery. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/13/47, iv,129 pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. © NERC 2014. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2014 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www. geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation. email [email protected] We publish an annual catalogue of our maps and other publications; this catalogue is available online or from any of the Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham BGS shops.
[Show full text]
How to Get a Date
How to get a date: establishing chronologies (relative and absolute) change change change change change change Later than last week (relative) March 3, 2010 (absolute) Temporal, or chronological, order • Relative dating – lining things up (before, after) – ‘it is all relative’ • Absolute dating – chronometric dating – actual chronological date assigned – allows measurement of ‘how much’ time has passed between two points Expression of Absolute Dates (culturally specific!) • B.C./A.D. (Before Christ, Anno Domini) • Islamic calendar from A.D. 622 (the Hegira, Mecca to Medina) • B.C.E./C.E. (Before Common Era, Common Era) • B.P. (Before Present) Relative Dating Principle of stratigraphic succession Law of ‘superposition’ (the lower you go, the older you get) Important concepts in geology too Relative Dating Principle of stratigraphic succession Law of ‘superposition’ (the lower you go, the older you get) Typology • Artifact classification into types on the basis of certain similarities… Pots vs. baskets Fine ceramics vs. cooking wares (multiple typologies possible!) • Assumes products of a given place and time have a recognizable style • Styles tend to change through time, but gradually… Unchanging… Constantly changing… Unchanging… Constantly changing… Seriation • Relative dating method involving arranging archaeological materials into a presumed chronological sequence based on cultural and stylistic change • As long as items are gathered from the same cultural tradition, archaeologists assume that stylistic change occurs relatively gradually over time • By tracing similarities and differences in styles and by measuring the relative popularity of these differing styles, one can reconstruct a relative sequence (battleship curve) Seriation ? ? James Deetz seriation studies in New England graveyards Death’s head Cherub Willow and urn ‘battleship curves’ Problems? • Heirlooms • Archaism (‘retro’ looks) (actually a serious issue) Absolute dates Pompeii 24 August A.D.
[Show full text]
Relative Dating
Relative Dating Introduction: In the early stage of prehistoric studies, dating of any event or site was obtained tentatively. A particular event or specimen is dated in relation to other event or some reference point. Such type of dating techniques are known as relative dating by which one can know or understand whether a particular culture is younger or older than the other one. That is, through relative dating, it is known that culture A is older than culture B but how old A and B are, or how much later B is than A in terms of number of years is unknown. These dating methods have never been able to provide a date in terms of numerical value or years, nor it can calculate the total time span involved in each cultural period. However, with the help of such dating methods a series of events or things can be arranged in a sequential time frame. The relative chronology, in the words of Wheeler (1956), is “... the arrangement of the products of non-historic societies into a time relationship which may not have any dates but which has a sequence....” Types of Relative Dating: Till the early part of 19th century quite a good number of relative dating methods have been in used in archaeological studies. These relative dating methods are basically depending upon stratigraphic position of the site or kind of remains associated with the site. Some of the relative dating methods are: 1 i) Stratigraphy ii) Typology iii) Fluorine test iv) Uranium and nitrogen analysis v) Palaeontology vi) Palynology vii) Cross dating viii) Sequence dating All these relative dating methods tend to compare a given event with some other events in a time sequence.
[Show full text]