Aids/Queerness
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON FELIX This Week’S Issue
www.felixonline.co.uk @felixImperial /FelixImperial [email protected] Keeping the cat free since 1949 Issue No. 1585 October 24th 2014 2 24.10.2014 THE STUDENT PAPER OF IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON FELIX This week’s issue... [email protected] Felix Editor Philippa Skett EDITORIAL TEAM CONTENTS Editor-In-Chief A poorly captioned photo of PHILIPPA SKETT News 3–6 Deputy Editor a man sweeping in Metric PHILIP KENT Comment 7–8 Treasurer THOMAS LIM Features 9–10 speaks a thousand words Technical Hero Science 11 LUKE GRANGER-BROWN ast week we ran two stories the night when the newspaper layout News Editors Technology 12 that we were worried (or did gets too much. If anyone needs any AEMUN REZA Lwe hope?) would cause a storm. post-it notes, give us a shout. CECILE BORKHATARIA Music 15 One was covering the amenities funds Finally, we saw the launch of our KUNAL WAGLE cut, and the other was looking at the amazing, brand new website last first non-alocoholic bar night ran by week. Personally, I was dozing in the Comment Editors Television 16–17 TESSA DAVEY Imperial College Union. Surprisingly, corner after a particularly stressful Film 22–23 the latter story is the one that is submission of the paper the night Technology Editors seemingly kicking up a storm. before, but I heard that it all went JAMIE DUTTON Arts 24–27 We are running a whole page this smoothly and was launched on time. OSAMA AWARA week dedicated to the news story that We are still uploading articles onto Science Editors Food 28–29 only warrented about 200 words in the site a few batches at a time. -
4. Representatie Van Ras En Etniciteit in Televisie
Masterproef voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Master in Gender en Diversiteit REPRESENTATION MATTERS! EEN INTERSECTIONELE TEKSTUELE ANALYSE VAN DE TV-SERIE ‘HOW TO GET AWAY WITH MURDER’ Manou Ballyn - 201380754 Promotor: Sofie van Bauwel Academiejaar 2017-2018 Master of Arts in Gender en Diversiteit Klassieke masterproef: 23 761 woorden “Deze masterproef is een examendocument dat niet werd gecorrigeerd voor eventueel vastgestelde fouten. In publicaties mag naar dit werk worden gerefereerd, mits schriftelijke toelating van de promotor(en) die met naam op de titelpagina is vermeld.” Abstract De Amerikaanse televisieserie How To Get Away With Murder volgt Annalise Keating, advocate en professor strafrecht. De serie kent een enorme populariteit en is ondertussen al aan het vierde seizoen toe. Toen het eerste seizoen gelanceerd werd in het najaar van 2014, haalde het een record met meer dan 20 miljoen kijkers in drie dagen tijd (Maloney, 2014). In 2015 won hoofdrolspeelster Viola Davis, die de rol van Annalise Keating vertolkt, een Emmy en werd zo de eerste Afro-Amerikaanse vrouw ooit die een prijs voor Leading Actress in a Drama won (Wieselman, 2016). Heel wat journalisten schrijven dan ook lovend over de serie en argumenteren dat het diversiteitsbarrières doorbreekt. De serie zou progressieve representaties wat betreft vrouwen, minderheden en de LGBTQ-gemeenschap naar voren schuiven, aldus Cohen (2016) en Fallon (2015). Dit inspireerde om te onderzoeken in hoeverre deze veronderstellingen correct zijn. Daarom werd in dit onderzoek de representatie van gender, etniciteit en seksualiteit in de Amerikaanse televisieserie How To Get Away With Murder onderzocht. Dit werd gedaan via een kwalitatieve tekstuele analyse. -
How to Get Away with Colour: Colour- Blindness and the Myth of a Postracial America in American Television Series
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) How to Get Away with Color Color-Blindness and the Post-Racial Illusion in Popular American Television Series Martens, E.; Povoa, D. Publication date 2017 Document Version Final published version Published in Alphaville License CC BY-NC-ND Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Martens, E., & Povoa, D. (2017). How to Get Away with Color: Color-Blindness and the Post- Racial Illusion in Popular American Television Series. Alphaville, 13, 117-134. http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue13/HTML/ArticleMartensPovoa.html General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 How to Get Away with Colour: Colour- Blindness and the Myth of a Postracial America in American Television Series Emiel Martens and Débora Povoa Abstract: The popular American television series How to Get Away with Murder (2014) seems to challenge the long history of stereotypical roles assigned to racial minorities in American media by choosing a multiracial cast to impersonate characters that, while having different racial backgrounds, share a similar socio-economic status and have multidimensional personalities that distance them from the common stereotypes. -
130Mm Tv Time Fans Cast Their Vote on the State of Diversity on Television
1 130MM TV TIME FANS CAST THEIR VOTE ON THE STATE OF DIVERSITY ON TELEVISION Television viewers are overwhelmingly voicing their desire for shows with diverse and strong characters. TV Time conducted this study to better understand how television audiences are responding to casting decisions across race, gender and sexual orientation. Gone are the days when our favorite characters were predominantly white, straight and male. A super- charged social consciousness is driving people to want to see characters on television who resemble themselves. Television is answering that call to action and fans are responding in overwhelming favor. TV Time is uniquely poised with volumes of fan data from people who have watched a television program and voted on their favorite characters in the TV Time app. For this global study, TV Time analyzed the top 100 favorite characters from 2015-2017, chosen by its community of 12 million registered app users. In an eff ort to understand how fans are reacting to diversity characters, TV Time tabulated 130 million character votes over the last three years. Acknowledging that there are several ways to segment the US population (and television characters) into diversity groups, this study focused on gender, ethnicity and sexual orientation. Overall, diversity among favorite characters remains relatively fl at over the past three years. However, some diversity groups are experiencing meaningful growth and appear to be leading the cultural movement toward embracing fundamental changes in the way we experience television. Published on April 23, 2018 2 CHARACTERS OF COLOR Overall, characters of color saw a 20% increase, jumping from 15% of the overall favorite characters in 2015, to 18% of the favorite character vote in 2017. -
A Feminist Rhetorical Analysis of Legally Blonde and How to Get Away with Murder
Abilene Christian University Digital Commons @ ACU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-2017 From Blonde to Brutal: A Feminist Rhetorical Analysis of Legally Blonde and How to Get Away With Murder Jazmine M. Moreno [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Moreno, Jazmine M., "From Blonde to Brutal: A Feminist Rhetorical Analysis of Legally Blonde and How to Get Away With Murder" (2017). Digital Commons @ ACU, Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 50. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ ACU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ ACU. ABSTRACT Feminism is a word that strikes up many connotations, but has no set definition. Though it might take on different definitions, its overall goal is equality. Feminism has appeared throughout history in various waves, the third-wave is currently in progress. Two artifacts from this wave of feminism include Legally Blonde and How to Get Away With Murder. This thesis utilizes feminist rhetorical criticism to analyze how third-wave feminism appears in each artifact, and what implications that has for the progression of feminism. The research identified two types of feminism, girlie feminism in Legally Blonde, and intersectional in How to Get Away With Murder, respectively. The different types of feminism in each artifact lead to the finding that each is indicative of what third wave feminism was concerned with at the time. Legally Blonde and girlie feminism were geared towards making femininity acceptable in the workplace and compatible with feminism. -
Review of "How to Get Away with Murder"
Lynette Payne, [email protected] December 3, 2015 Advanced Comp Revision Murder 101: A Review of How to Get Away with Murder ABC’s How to Get Away wijth Murder began as the underdog of the Fall 2014 American broadcast network pilot season, but as it now launches its second season, the legal drama is rolling in great ratings. Producer Shonda Rimes (of Scandal and Grey’s Anatomy fame) lead the current season to eight million viewers in September, 2015. After ending the previous season in February with the shocking revelation of who killed Lila Stangard, along with yet another dead body, How to Get Away with Murder continues to captivate its viewers. How to Get Away with Murder centers on Annalise Keating, played by Viola Davis, as she teaches criminal law at the fictional college of Middleton University in Philadelphia, and takes a special interest in five of her students. The pilot episode begins in medias res, as these six characters become entangled in the plots of not one, but two separate murders. While Annalise continues to teach and represent clients at her own law firm, she and her students work through the homicides, more personally involved than ever. Davis’ character of Annalise Keating, a defense attorney and law professor, is the driving force behind the show. From the first episode, Annalise is the head bitch in charge, intimidating, cold, and utterly fascinating. Even her opening monologue is ominous: “Good morning. I don’t know what terrible things you’ve done in your life up to this point, but clearly your karma’s out of balance to get assigned to my class. -
Who Got Away with Murder? an Analysis and Discussion About the Death of Sam Keating in Season 1 of ABC’S “How to Get Away with Murder”
Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum Volume 7 Issue 1 Spring 2017 Article 10 June 2017 Who Got Away With Murder? An Analysis and Discussion About the Death of Sam Keating in Season 1 of ABC’s “How to Get Away With Murder” Katelyn Squicciarini Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pipself Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Katelyn Squicciarini, Who Got Away With Murder? An Analysis and Discussion About the Death of Sam Keating in Season 1 of ABC’s “How to Get Away With Murder”, 7 Pace. Intell. Prop. Sports & Ent. L.F. 308 (2017). Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pipself/vol7/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Who Got Away With Murder? An Analysis and Discussion About the Death of Sam Keating in Season 1 of ABC’s “How to Get Away With Murder” Abstract This article will address the individuals present in the home and the events surrounding the death of Sam Keating to see if anyone actually got away with murder. The remainder of the article will outline the details surrounding Sam’s death and will address the Felony Murder Rule and accomplice liability. -
Colour- Blindness and the Myth of a Postracial America in American Television Series
How to Get Away with Colour: Colour- Blindness and the Myth of a Postracial America in American Television Series Emiel Martens and Débora Povoa Abstract: The popular American television series How to Get Away with Murder (2014) seems to challenge the long history of stereotypical roles assigned to racial minorities in American media by choosing a multiracial cast to impersonate characters that, while having different racial backgrounds, share a similar socio-economic status and have multidimensional personalities that distance them from the common stereotypes. However, although it has been praised for its portrayal of racial diversity, the series operates within a problematic logic of racial colour-blindness, disconnecting the main characters from any sign of racial specificity and creating a fictional world in which racism is no longer part of American society. This case study aims to demonstrate to which extent the “colour-blind approach” of the TV show reinforces the postracial illusion in the United States, i.e. the idea that the country has overcome its past of racial segregation and now offers the same opportunities for everyone, regardless of colour and race. Through a narrative analysis of the first season of the series, this chapter will argue that the depiction of race in How to Get Away with Murder is highly ambivalent. On the one hand, the show does not completely ignore race by inserting topics such as racism in the plot, giving these issues at least some visibility. On the other hand, its more general panorama reveals an intent to deracialise its main characters in a colour-blind manner. -
Defense Mechanism in the Tv Series How to Get Away with Murder Season 1
DEFENSE MECHANISM IN THE TV SERIES HOW TO GET AWAY WITH MURDER SEASON 1 A THESIS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Thesis of American Studies of English Department Faculty of Humanities Diponegoro University Submitted by: Nida Luthtiyyah 13020113140069 FACULTY OF HUMANITIES DIPONEGORO UNIVERSITY SEMARANG 2017 ii PRONOUNCEMENT The writer honestly confirms that she compiles this thesis by herself and without taking any results from other researchers in S-1, S-2, S-3 and in diploma degree of any university. The writer ascertains also that she does not quote any material from other publications or someone‘s paper except from the references mentioned. Semarang, 31 May 2017 Nida Luthtiyyah ii MOTTO AND DEDICATION ―The world may be moving faster than us, but it doesn‘t always mean you gotta rush to catch up. As long as we‘re rotating in the same direction. Enjoy life in our own speed.‖ - Diana Rikasari ―When you live for a strong purpose, then hard work isn‘t an option. It‘s a necessity.‖ - Steve Pavlina ―We must accept finite disappointment, but we must never lose infinite hope.‖ - Martin Luther King Jr. I dedicated this thesis to my beloved parents and sister who always support me during the accomplishment of this thesis. iii DEFENSE MECHANISM IN THE TV SERIES HOW TO GET AWAY WITH MURDER SEASON 1 Written by: Nida Luthtiyyah NIM. 13020113140069 is approved by the thesis advisor On 26th May, 2017 Thesis Advisor M. Irfan Zamzami, S.S., M.Hum NIK. 198609230115091000 The Head of the English Department Dr. Agus Subiyanto, M.A. -
Did Michigan RFRA Prevent Battle Creek Couple from Adopting?
LGBT College Students Face Did Michigan RFRA Prevent More Sexual Violence Battle Creek Couple From The GOP Prez Debates Still Adopting? – pg. 6 Anti-gay After All These Years WWW.PRIDESOURCE.COM SEPT. 24, 2015 | VOL. 2339 | FREE Michigan didn’t prepare for this. Our governor, our legislators and our attorney general were fighting a case trying to keep the (same-sex marriage) ban going, and they didn’t think about what the ramifications would be if they lost. - Jennifer LaTosch The Legal Ripple Effect From Marriage Equality See page 12 COVER 20 The Riot’s Riot FEATURES 6 The legacy of Michigan’s anti-gay adoption law OPENING:THE WHALE CRISIS ON CAMPUS HAPPENINGS 8 LGBT college students face more sexual violence 10 Ruth Ellis Center announces changes at Voices 2015 12 The legal ripple effect from marriage equality 12 Affirmations names new director of operations, youth program manager 13 Trans activist to speak at V to Shining Teen Actors Are Totally Convincing In 16 Fiorina wins GOP debate, LGBT issues ‘BFs!’ get discussed “The Whale” of this show is a 600-pound gay man See page 31 19 AP: Man claims bias over use of HIV- from Idaho named Charlie. His health failing, and blocking drug having lost his husband to a tragic death, he’s LGBT College Students Nearly Twice As Likely To reaching out for love and acceptance from others, Experience Sexual Violence OPINION including an estranged daughter. See page 8 Check Out This Week’s 14 Parting Glances: Candles at both ends 14 Transmissions: Rocky Road UDM Theatre Company Takes A Message Of Love Happenings 17 Creep of the Week: Mike Huckabee On The Road See page 30 LIFE See page 24 Be sure to head over to 24 UDM Theater Company takes a Pridesource.com/calendar.html message of love on the road for hundreds more events from 26 Cool Cities: Royal Oak arts to theater to LGBTQ friendly events around Michigan. -
2015 NETWORK RESPONSIBILITY INDEX Network .ETWORK Responsibility 2ESPONSIBILITY Index )NDEX
2015 NETWORK RESPONSIBILITY INDEX Network .ETWORK Responsibility 2ESPONSIBILITY Index )NDEX 0RIMETIME0ROGRAMMING Primetime Programming 2008-2009 !30%#)!,2%0/24&2/-4(%'!9,%3")!.!,,)!.#%!'!).34$%&!-!4)/. A SPECIAL REPORT FROM THE GAY & LESBIAN ALLIANCE AGAINST DEFAMATION www.glaad.org words & images matter celebrating 25 years 2009- 2010 network responsibility index nri 2011 network responsibility index Page 1 glaad network responsibility index www.glaad.org glaad network responsibility index 2011 Page 1 GLAAD.ORG 1 2014 NETWORK RESPONSIBILITY INDEX 2013NETWORK RESPONSIBILTY INDEX glaad.org/nri2013 Network Responsibility Index The GLAAD Network Responsibility Index (NRI) is an Primetime Programming 2008-2009 A SPECIAL REPORT FROM THE GAY & LESBIAN www.glaad.org ALLIANCE AGAINST DEFAMATION evaluation of the quantity and quality of images of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people on television. The NRI is a key measurement for inclusive programming and spurs increased numbers of fair and accurate LGBT media representations, which is the core of GLAAD’s work. Network .ETWORK Responsibility 2ESPONSIBILITY Index )NDEX 0RIMETIME0ROGRAMMING Primetime Programming 2008-2009 !30%#)!,2%0/24&2/-4(%'!9,%3")!.!,,)!.#%!'!).34$%&!-!4)/. A SPECIAL REPORT FROM THE GAY & LESBIAN ALLIANCE AGAINST DEFAMATION www.glaad.org words & images matter celebrating 25 years 2009- 2010 network responsibility index nri 2011 network responsibility index A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF TELEVISION’S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER IMAGES. words and images -
Univerzita Palackého V Olomouci Bakalářská Práce
UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI PEDAGOGICKÁ FAKULTA Ústav cizích jazyků BAKALÁŘSKÁ PRÁCE Hana Kotonská LGBT Representation in American and British TV Shows and Movies Olomouc 2016 Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Blanka Babická, Ph.D. Prohlašuji, že jsem závěrečnou práci vypracovala samostatně a použila jen uvedených pramenů a literatury. V Olomouci 20. 4. 2016 ……………………………………………… vlastnoruční podpis I would like to thank Mgr. Blanka Babická, Ph.D. for her support and valuable comments on the content and style of my bachelor thesis. Contents page Introduction ................................................................................................................................. - 1 - 1 Human Sexuality and LGBT ....................................................................................................... - 3 - 1.1 Sexuality as a spectrum ..................................................................................................... - 3 - 1.2 Attitude toward Sexuality .................................................................................................. - 4 - 1.3 Queer Theory ..................................................................................................................... - 5 - 1.4 Gender Identity .................................................................................................................. - 8 - 1.5 Homophobia and Transphobia .......................................................................................... - 9 - 1.6 Homosexuality and AIDS ................................................................................................