DOCSLIB.ORG

Calendar No. 80

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calendar No. 80 Calendar No. 80 112TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session SENATE 112–26 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 REPORT [TO ACCOMPANY S. 1253] ON TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PER- SONNEL STRENGTHS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE JUNE 22, 2011.—Ordered to be printed VerDate Mar 15 2010 16:15 Jun 23, 2011 Jkt 066986 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\SR026.XXX SR026 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS congress.#13 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 VerDate Mar 15 2010 16:15 Jun 23, 2011 Jkt 066986 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\SR026.XXX SR026 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS with DSK4VPTVN1PROD on mstockstill Calendar No. 80 112TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session SENATE 112–26 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 REPORT [TO ACCOMPANY S. 1253] ON TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PER- SONNEL STRENGTHS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE JUNE 22, 2011.—Ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 66–986 WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. VerDate Mar 15 2010 17:56 Jun 23, 2011 Jkt 066986 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 E:\HR\OC\SR026.XXX SR026 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES (112th Congress, 1st Session) CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut JOHN McCAIN, Arizona JACK REED, Rhode Island JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama E. BENJAMIN NELSON, Nebraska SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia JIM WEBB, Virginia ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi CLAIRE McCASKILL, Missouri SCOTT P. BROWN, Massachusetts MARK UDALL, Colorado ROB PORTMAN, Ohio KAY R. HAGAN, North Carolina KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire MARK BEGICH, Alaska SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JOHN CORNYN, Texas KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, New York DAVID VITTER, Louisiana RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut RICHARD D. DEBOBES, Staff Director DAVID M. MORRISS, Minority Staff Director (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 16:15 Jun 23, 2011 Jkt 066986 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 E:\HR\OC\SR026.XXX SR026 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS C O N T E N T S Page Purpose of the Bill ................................................................................................... 1 Committee overview .................................................................................. 2 Scoring of budgetary effects (sec. 4) ......................................................... 3 Explanation of funding summary ............................................................ 3 Summary of National Defense Authorizations For Fiscal Year 2012 Table ....................................................................................... 4 National Defense Budget Authority Implication Table .................. 8 Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations ............................................ 10 Title I—Procurement ............................................................................................... 10 Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 10 Explanation of tables ................................................................................ 10 Authorization of appropriations (sec. 101) .............................................. 10 Subtitle B—Navy Programs ............................................................................ 10 Multiyear procurement authority for mission avionics and common cockpits for Navy MH–60R/S helicopters (sec. 121) ............................ 10 Subtitle C—Air Force Programs ...................................................................... 10 Procurement of advanced extremely high frequency satellites (sec. 131) ......................................................................................................... 10 Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds for research and development relating to the B–2 bomber aircraft (sec. 132) .................................... 11 Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds to support alternative options for the extremely high frequency terminal Increment 1 program of record (sec. 133) ................................................................................. 12 Limitations on use of funds to retire B–1 bomber aircraft (sec. 134) ... 12 Limitation on the retirement of U–2 aircraft (sec. 135) ......................... 12 Subtitle D—Joint and Multiservice Matters .................................................. 13 Inclusion of information on approved Combat Mission Requirements in quarterly reports on use of Combat Mission Requirements funds (sec. 151) ................................................................................................. 13 F–35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (sec. 152) .......................................... 13 Report on plan to implement Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 measures within the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft pro- gram (sec. 153) ....................................................................................... 14 Multiyear procurement authority for airframes for Army UH–60M/ HH–60M helicopters and Navy MH–60R/MH–60S helicopters (sec. 154) ......................................................................................................... 15 Designation of undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States Special Operations Command as a Major Defense Acquisi- tion Program (sec. 155) ......................................................................... 15 Transfer of Air Force C–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft to the Army (sec. 156) .................................. 16 Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft re-engining program (sec. 157) .................................................................................. 17 Budget Items ..................................................................................................... 18 Army ........................................................................................................... 18 Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System ............................................................................................. 18 Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System .......................................... 18 Stinger air defense missile system modifications ............................ 19 Abrams upgrade program .................................................................. 19 Integrated air burst weapons system family ................................... 19 M2 .50 caliber machine gun .............................................................. 20 Lightweight .50 caliber machine gun ............................................... 20 Joint Tactical Radio System .............................................................. 20 (III) VerDate Mar 15 2010 17:49 Jun 23, 2011 Jkt 066986 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\SR026.XXX SR026 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGS IV Page Title I—Procurement—Continued Budget Items—Continued Army—Continued Ground Soldier System ...................................................................... 20 Early-Infantry Brigade Combat Team ............................................. 21 Joint Improvised Explosive Defeat Fund ................................................ 21 Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund ............................. 21 Navy ........................................................................................................... 21 F/A–18E/F ........................................................................................... 21 Mobile User Objective System .......................................................... 21 Consolidated afloat networks and enterprise services .................... 22 Chemical, Biological, Nuclear Incident Response Force ................. 22 Air Force .................................................................................................... 23 HH–60M .............................................................................................. 23 Light attack armed reconnaissance aircraft .................................... 23 F–16 modifications ............................................................................. 24 Family of advanced beyond line of site terminals ........................... 24 GPS III Space Segment ..................................................................... 24 Defense-wide .............................................................................................. 24 Defense Information Systems Agency satellite ................................ 24 High Speed Assault Craft .................................................................. 25 Non-Standard Aviation .....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 28 September 2012
    United Nations A/67/182/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 September 2012 Original: English Sixty-seventh session Agenda item 80 Status of the Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and relating to the protection of victims of armed conflicts Status of the Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and relating to the protection of victims of armed conflicts Report of the Secretary-General Addendum I. Introduction The present addendum contains information from nine additional replies to the request contained in paragraph 11 of General Assembly resolution 65/29, received subsequent to the submission of the main report, from Belgium, France, Madagascar, Mexico, Slovenia, Sweden, Togo, Switzerland and the International Committee of the Red Cross.1 II. Information received from Member States Belgium Belgium referred to its 2008 contribution, summarized in the report of the Secretary-General (A/63/118), and to its 2010 report, summarized in the report of the Secretary-General for the period 2008 to August 2010 (A/65/138/Add.1). Since that report, the most noteworthy events for Belgium have been the following: __________________ 1 The full texts of the replies are available for review on the website of the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly (http://www.un.org/ga/sixth), sixty-seventh session, “Status of the Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and relating to the protection of victims of armed conflicts”, report of the Secretary-General; full texts of the replies. 12-52827 (E) 181012
    [Show full text]
  • Sponsor Statement
    ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE WHILE IN SESSION WHILE IN ANCHORAGE STATE CAPITOL 1500 W BENSON BLVD JUNEAU, AK 99801 ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 (907) 465-3704 (907) 269-0169 May 5, 2020 Mayor Ethan Berkowitz 632 W 6th Avenue Suite 840 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Dear Mayor Berkowitz, Thank you for your leadership during this challenging and unprecedented time. We appreciate your frequent briefings and inclusion of medical professionals, business leaders, and neighbors. We are writing today with deep concern regarding early distribution of the CARES Act funds that did not make it to many small businesses in Anchorage. As of April 16, over 5,000 Alaskan businesses have received emergency relief loan funds through the Federal CARES Act. However, during a recent discussion with Anchorage Community Land Trust (ACLT), we learned that a substantial number of businesses located in Anchorage’s economic opportunity zones have not been able to access those loans. According to a survey conducted by ACLT, many small businesses located in these economic opportunity zones are experiencing significant barriers in qualifying or applying for these federal loans. As the Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loans were specifically created to retain employees, small businesses with less than 50 employees that do not have sophisticated relationships with large financial institutions, a robust bookkeeping system, are seasonal, or are recent start-ups are left unable to access these loans. The net result of the above barriers means many small businesses located in Anchorage’s economic opportunity zones, specifically those that are minority and women-owned, are unable to access the financial resources needed to sustain their operations during the COVID-19 related mandatory closures.
    [Show full text]
  • 01-14-2019 19:25___Executive Summary__The Gnassingbé Clan Has Ruled the Country Since 1967. the Demand
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive BTI -2022 Togo Country Report : political and socio-economic development, 2019-2020 [enhanced author’s version] Kohnert, Dirk Institute of African Affairs, GIGA-Hamburg 28 December 2020 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/107022/ MPRA Paper No. 107022, posted 10 Apr 2021 04:25 UTC Author’s extended and annotated version of BTI 2022 – Togo Country Report’, forthcoming Togo’s Political and Socio-Economic Development (2019 – 2021) Dirk Kohnert 1 Source: “No, to 50 years more”, Africa Youth Movement statement on protest in Togo #TogoDebout/ iDA Abstract: The Gnassingbé clan has ruled the country since 1967. The demand for political alternance, constituted the major contentious issue between the government and the challengers of the Gnassingbé regime throughout the survey period. The first local elections since more than 30 years took finally place on 30 June 2019 and resulted in the victory of the ruling party. Shortly afterwards, in February 2020, the President won also the disputed presidential elections and thus consolidated his power, assisted by the loyal army and security services. The outbreak of the Corona epidemic in Togo in April 2020 and the subsequent economic recession may have contributed to limit popular protest against the Gnassingbé regime. The human rights record of the government has improved but remains poor. Despite undeniable improvements to the framework and appearance of the regime's key institutions during the review period, democracy remains far from complete. However, the international community, notably Togo’s African peers, the AU and ECOWAS, followed a ‘laissez-faire’ approach in the interests of regional stability and their national interests in dealing with Togo.
    [Show full text]
  • 02.14.13 Nndiana Layout 1
    Photo by Rhoda Nanouk PAUL JOHNSON MEMORIAL SLED DOG RACE— Aaron Burmeister arrives in Unalakleet from Kaltag during last week’s Paul Johnson Memorial sled dog race. C VOLUME CXIII NO. 7 February 14, 2013 Council mulls change in election rules By Sandra L. Medearis renewable at the end of the term The Nome Common Council based on agreement of both parties. made final on Feb. 11 a sale of land Several issues were tabled pend- to Bonanza Fuel Inc. ing a full Council in attendance. The distributor will use the ap- Four council members attended proximately four acres at the north the Feb. 11 meeting—Josie Stiles, end of the port industrial area to ex- Jerald Brown, Louis Green Sr. and pand its adjacent tank farm. BFI will Randy Pomeranz who led the meet- pay the market value of the land, as ing in the absence of Mayor Denise verified by the City’s assessor at Michels. $348,017. Shelved until the next meeting In new business, the Council was a measure to decrease the num- voted into first reading a handful of ber of votes required to declare a budget revisions for spending year winner in Nome municipal elections 2013: general fund municipal from the current 50 percent plus one budget; construction capital projects down to 40 percent plus one. fund budget; special revenue fund None of the candidates for two budget; capital projects fund budget; expired seats in the October election and port operating fund budget. The received 50 percent plus one. money issues will come up for sec- Therefore, incumbents Council- ond reading and discussion by the man Stan Andersen and Councilman Council as well as public hearing at Randy Pomeranz had to face a runoff the next regular meeting on Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Governor's Solution
    Gov. Jay Hammond | Scott Gold SmitH | nancy BirdSall | arvind SuBramanian | JoHnny WeSt Moss Reliance on natural resource revenues, particularly oil, is often associated with bad governance, corruption, and poverty. Worried about the effect of oil on Alaska, Governor Jay Hammond had a simple yet revolutionary idea: let citizens have a direct stake. The Governor’s Solution features his firsthand account that describes, The Governor’s with brutal honesty and piercing humor, the birth of the Alaska Permanent Fund dividend, which has been paid to each resident every year since 1982. Thirty years later, Hammond’s vision is still influencing oil policies throughout the world. This reader, part of the Center for Global Development’s oil-to-Cash initiative, includes recent scholarly work The Governor’s examining Alaska’s experience and how other oil-rich societies, particularly Iraq, might apply some of the lessons. It is as a powerful s soluTion reminder that the combination of new ideas and determined olu individuals can make a tremendous difference—even in issues as seemingly complex and intractable as fighting the oil curse. T ion Todd Moss is the vice president for programs and a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development and former deputy assistant secretary in the Bureau of African Affairs at the Us Department of state. Global Development for Center @toddjmoss How Alaska’s Oil Dividend Could Work in Iraq and Other Oil-Rich Countries An OIl-tO-CAsH ReADeR Todd Moss, editor Center for Global Development oct10_GovSol_book coverRev.indd 2 10/17/12 3:21 PM 00-933286-70-9 FM:0559-8 10/4/12 11:37 AM Page i The Governor’s Solution 00-933286-70-9 FM:0559-8 10/4/12 11:37 AM Page ii 00-933286-70-9 FM:0559-8 10/4/12 11:37 AM Page iii AN OIL-TO-CASH READER The Governor’s Solution How Alaska’s Oil Dividend Could Work in Iraq and Other Oil-Rich Countries TODD MOSS Editor CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations
    S. HRG. 113–631 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Fiscal Year 2015 113th CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION H.R. 5171 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations, 2015 (H.R. 5171) S. HRG. 113–631 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON H.R. 5171 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE IN- TERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2015, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Agriculture Department of the Interior Environmental Protection Agency Nondepartmental Witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ committee.action?chamber=senate&committee=appropriations U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 87–250 PDF WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland, Chairwoman PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama, Vice TOM HARKIN,
    [Show full text]
  • TOGOLESE REPUBLIC Work-Liberty-Fatherland 6Th, 7Th and 8Th PERIODIC REPORTS of the STATE of TOGO on the IMPLEMENTATION of the A
    TOGOLESE REPUBLIC Work-Liberty-Fatherland 6th, 7th and 8th PERIODIC REPORTS OF THE STATE OF TOGO ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN CHARTER ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS (Article 62 of the Charter) August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 14 PART ONE ........................................................................................................................................ 15 OVERALL LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION . .............................. 15 PART TWO ...................................................................................................................................... 17 NATIONAL MEASURES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHARTER . ........................ 17 Articles 2 and 3 : The right to the enjoyment of rights and freedoms recognised and guaranteed by the Charter without distinction of any kind and equality before the law .......................................... 17 Article 4 : The protection of the right to life ..................................................................................... 17 The Death Penalty .............................................................................................................................. 17 Articles 6 : The right to liberty and to the security of the person, prohibition from arrests or arbitrary detentions .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diapering the Devil: How Alaska Helped Staunch Befouling by Mismanaged Oil Wealth: a Lesson for Other Oil Rich Nations JAY HAMMOND
    02-933286-70-9 CH 2:0559-8 10/4/12 11:37 AM Page 5 2 Diapering the Devil: How Alaska Helped Staunch Befouling by Mismanaged Oil Wealth: A Lesson for Other Oil Rich Nations JAY HAMMOND Preface “I call petroleum the devil’s excrement. It brings trouble. Look at this locura—waste, corruption, consumption, our public services falling apart. And debt, debt we shall have for years.” So warned Juan Pablo Pérez Alfonso, a Venezuelan founder of OPEC. A September 24, 2004, article in the British magazine The Economist elaborates further on Pérez Alfonso: During the heady oil boom of the mid-1970s . he was seen as an alarmist. In fact, he was astonishingly prescient. Oil producers vastly expanded domestic spending, mostly on gold- plated infrastructure projects that set inflation roaring and left mountains of debt. Worse, this did little for the poor. Venezuela had earned over $600 billion in oil revenues since the mid- 1970s but the real income per person of Pérez Alfonso’s compatriots fell by 15% in the decade after he expressed his disgust. The picture is similar in many OPEC countries. So bloated were their budgets that when oil prices fell to around Editor’s note: This chapter has kept as much as possible Hammond’s original text even though it was an unfinished manuscript. 5 02-933286-70-9 CH 2:0559-8 10/4/12 11:37 AM Page 6 6 Jay Hammond Acknowledgments from Larry Smith, coordinator The Hammond Family: Bella Gardiner Hammond, Jay’s wife, who keeps the home fires burning and who asked her granddaughter, Lauren Stanford, to send me the author's last draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Influences and Intergovernmental Relations: Constraints, Conflicts, and Benefits
    Federal Influences and Intergovernmental Relations: Constraints, Conflicts, and Benefits Item Type Book chapter Authors Thomas, Clive S.; Boyer, Michael L. Citation Thomas, Clive S. and Boyer, Michael L. “Federal Influences and Intergovernmental Relations: Constraints, Conflicts, and Benefits,” in Alaska Politics and Public Policy, edited by Clive Thomas et al. (Fairbanks, University of Alaska Press, 2016): 313-345. Publisher University of Alaska Press Download date 02/10/2021 05:04:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/8362 University of Alaska Southeast From the ScholarWorks@UA collection of Michael Boyer May 1, 2018 Federal Influences and Intergovernmental Relations: Constraints, Conflicts, and Benefits Clive S. Thomas and Michael L. Boyer Originally published: Thomas, Clive S. and Boyer, Michael L. “Federal Influences and Intergovernmental Relations: Constraints, Conflicts, and Benefits,” in Alaska Politics and Public Policy, edited by Clive Thomas et al. (Fairbanks, University of Alaska Press, 2016): 313-345. Available at: https://scholarworks.alaska.edu/handle/11122/8360 CHAPTER 10 Federal Influences and Intergovernmental Relations: Constraints, Conflicts, and Benefits Clive S. Thomas and Michael L. Boyer Much of what Alaska’s state government does, and much of what it is unable to do, are influenced by other governments, particularly the federal government. Local governments across the state, as well as Alaska Native governments, also play a role. Consequently, the character of Alaska politics, the political issues that arise, and the day-to-day operations of state government are, in significant ways, a product of these ongoing relations with other governments. Issues such as the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) for oil and gas development, subsistence hunting and fishing rights, commer- cial and sports fishing, the funding and delivery of K–12 education, aspects of health and welfare, economic development, and transportation policies, among many others, involve some form of intergovernmental relations (IGR).
    [Show full text]
  • "National Integration and the Vicissitudes of State Power in Ghana: the Political Incorporation of Likpe, a Border Community, 1945-19B6"
    "National Integration and the Vicissitudes of State Power in Ghana: The Political Incorporation of Likpe, a Border Community, 1945-19B6", By Paul Christopher Nugent A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. October 1991 ProQuest Number: 10672604 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10672604 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract This is a study of the processes through which the former Togoland Trust Territory has come to constitute an integral part of modern Ghana. As the section of the country that was most recently appended, the territory has often seemed the most likely candidate for the eruption of separatist tendencies. The comparative weakness of such tendencies, in spite of economic crisis and governmental failure, deserves closer examination. This study adopts an approach which is local in focus (the area being Likpe), but one which endeavours at every stage to link the analysis to unfolding processes at the Regional and national levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Comp Plan-2007
    Destination Downtown: DOWNTOWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Adopted | December 11, 2007 Assembly Ordinance 2007-113 This publication was released by the Municipality of Anchorage’s Planning Department for the purpose of public information. It was produced in Anchorage, Alaska, by Service Business Printing at a cost of $14.70. anchorage downtown comprehensive plan Destination Downtown: Adopted December 11, 2007 Assembly Ordinance 2007 - 113 MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE MARK BEGICH, MAYOR anchorage downtown comprehensive plan Acknowledgements Th e Downtown Comprehensive planning process is a joint eff ort led by the Municipality of Anchorage and the Anchorage Downtown Partnership. Th e following groups and committees have provided much time, work and inspiration in guiding the process. In addition to these representatives, a wide range of other stakeholders and community members have also been invaluable participants in the process for ensuring future success in Downtown. Mayor’s Office Project Management Group Downtown Advisory Group Mark Begich, Mayor Tom Nelson, Municipality of Chris Anderson, Ristorante Orso/ Anchorage Planning Director Glacier Brewhouse Mary Jane Michael, Economic & Hazel Blackmore, Anchorage Community Development Director Sheila Selkregg, Sheila Selkregg and Neighborhood Housing Services Associates, Project Manager Robin Ward, Anchorage Community Daphne Brown, Kumin & Associates Development Authority Director Becky Beck, Anchorage Downtown Partnership, Ltd. Executive Director Nick Coltman, Small Business Owner Judith Crotty, Wells
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics of Nested Districts: the Case of Alaska
    Mathematics of Nested Districts: The Case of Alaska Sophia Caldera∗ Harvard University Daryl DeFord CSAIL, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Moon Duchin Department of Mathematics, Tufts University Samuel C. Gutekunst Cornell University Cara Nix University of Minnesota October 15, 2019 Abstract In eight states, each state Senate district is required to be exactly composed of two state House districts–this is sometimes known as a nesting rule. In this paper we investigate the potential impacts of these nesting rules with a focus on Alaska, where Republicans have a 2/3 majority in the Senate while a Democratic-led coalition controls the House. If we treat the current House districts as fixed and consider all possible pairings, we find that the Senate plan has a Republican advantage compared to a typical valid pairing, amounting to about one seat out of 20. The analysis enables other insights into Alaska districting, including the partisan latitude available to districters with and without strong rules about nesting and contiguity. Keywords: Redistricting, Gerrymandering, Markov Chains, Nesting ∗Author order is alphabetical. The authors acknowledge the Prof. Amar G. Bose Research Grant at MIT and the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life at Tufts University for ongoing support. MD is partially supported by NSF DMS-1255442. SG is partially supported by NSF DGE-1650441. SG thanks David P. Williamson and Kenrick Bjelland for helpful discussions. We thank Coly Elhai, Mallory Harris, Claire Kelling, Samir Khan, and Jack Snoeyink for substantial joint work and conversations on other approaches to modeling Alaska redistricting, and particularly acknowledge Samir Khan for his initial implementation of prune-and-choose.
    [Show full text]