Ontario Court of Justice – Courthouse Email Addresses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

2020-04-25, 12:22 PM Page 1 of 3 Ontario Court of Justice – Courthouse Email Addresses The locations of all Ontario Court of Justice courthouses are posted on the Ministry of the Attorney General website. Region City Email address Northeast Sudbury [email protected] Gore Bay [email protected] North Bay [email protected] Parry Sound [email protected] Elliot Lake [email protected] Sault Ste. Marie [email protected] Timmins [email protected] Cochrane [email protected] Haileybury [email protected] Central East Barrie [email protected] Bracebridge [email protected] Orillia [email protected] Cobourg [email protected] Durham (Oshawa) [email protected] Lindsay [email protected] Newmarket [email protected] Peterborough [email protected] Central West Brampton [email protected] Brantford [email protected] Cayuga [email protected] Hamilton [email protected] Milton [email protected] Orangeville [email protected] Simcoe [email protected] St. Catharines [email protected] Welland [email protected] 2020-04-25, 12:22 PM Page 2 of 3 Northwest Dryden [email protected] Kenora [email protected] Fort Frances [email protected] Red Lake [email protected] Sioux Lookout [email protected] Thunder Bay [email protected] East Cornwall [email protected] Ottawa [email protected] Belleville [email protected] Picton [email protected] Brockville [email protected] Perth [email protected] Pembroke [email protected] L’Orignal [email protected] Kingston [email protected] Napanee [email protected] Toronto Old City Hall [email protected] College Park [email protected] 2201 Finch [email protected] 1000 Finch [email protected] 1911 Eglinton [email protected] 311 Jarvis [email protected] 47 Sheppard Family [email protected] West Chatham [email protected] Goderich [email protected] Guelph [email protected] Kitchener [email protected] London [email protected] Owen Sound [email protected] Sarnia [email protected] St. Thomas [email protected] 2020-04-25, 12:22 PM Page 3 of 3 Stratford [email protected] Walkerton [email protected] Windsor [email protected] Woodstock [email protected].

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Brief History of Architecture in N.C. Courthouses
MONUMENTS TO DEMOCRACY Architecture Styles in North Carolina Courthouses By Ava Barlow The judicial system, as one of three branches of government, is one of the main foundations of democracy. North Carolina’s earliest courthouses, none of which survived, were simple, small, frame or log structures. Ancillary buildings, such as a jail, clerk’s offi ce, and sheriff’s offi ce were built around them. As our nation developed, however, leaders gave careful consideration to the structures that would house important institutions – how they were to be designed and built, what symbols were to be used, and what building materials were to be used. Over time, fashion and design trends have changed, but ideals have remained. To refl ect those ideals, certain styles, symbols, and motifs have appeared and reappeared in the architecture of our government buildings, especially courthouses. This article attempts to explain the history behind the making of these landmarks in communities around the state. Georgian Federal Greek Revival Victorian Neo-Classical Pre – Independence 1780s – 1820 1820s – 1860s 1870s – 1905 Revival 1880s – 1930 Colonial Revival Art Deco Modernist Eco-Sustainable 1930 - 1950 1920 – 1950 1950s – 2000 2000 – present he development of architectural styles in North Carolina leaders and merchants would seek to have their towns chosen as a courthouses and our nation’s public buildings in general county seat to increase the prosperity, commerce, and recognition, and Trefl ects the development of our culture and history. The trends would sometimes donate money or land to build the courthouse. in architecture refl ect trends in art and the statements those trends make about us as a people.
[Show full text]
Meeting Minutes
Meeting Minutes City of Guelph Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) Tuesday, April 19, 2016 City Hall, Meeting Room 112 From 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. Meeting Chair: Brad Howcroft Vice-Chair: Julia Phillips Minutes: Leanne Warren Attendance: Brad Howcroft, Julia Phillips, Brooke Sillaby, Mike Greer, Malcolm McLeod, Julian Murphy, Cathy McCormack, Jason Dodge, Missy Tolton, Sarah Mathison, Marlene Pfaff, Kate Ducak Regrets: Tanya Davies, Ruth Russell, Raminder Kanetkar AGENDA ITEMS Welcome to all 3:00 to 3:05 Item 1 and 2 Item 1. Approval of the Agenda Approved by Julian, seconded by Malcolm All in favor, vote passed Item 2. Approval of Minutes of: • December 2015; and Approved by Michael, seconded by Brooke All in favor vote passed • February 16, 2016 Approved by Jason, seconded by Cathy All in favor, vote passed 3:05 to 4:05 Item 3 Site Plan Sub-Committee Report a. Report on Site Plan Reviews – For Information – Julia Phillips The number of site plans reviewed has increased again due to the nice weather and subsequent construction season. The site plan review sub-committee meets Monday afternoons and Tuesday evenings every other week. City employees are engaging this sub-committee on topics of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, such as rest areas on trails. It is expected that this will be a long process as working out the details can be complex. b. Process of Design of Public Spaces Consultations – For Information – Leanne Warren, Helen White and Janet Sperling Staff reviewed several standards however one stood out as having possible guiding principles to settle on a standard for staff to use.
[Show full text]
To Access Research Guide 206: How to Find a Will in Court Records
Archives of Ontario Research Guide 206 How to Find Wills in Court Records Last Updated: July 2021 Courthouse, Kingston, 1923 F 1075-13, H710 M.O. Hammond photographic negatives 1 In this guide ................................................................................................................... 2 Where do I find these records? .................................................................................... 3 What do I need to get started? ..................................................................................... 3 The Records .................................................................................................................. 4 1. How do I find pre to 1793 estate records? ......................................................... 4 2. How do I find estate files or registers between 1793 and 1858? ........................ 4 3. How do I find estate files and registers between 1859 and 1976? ..................... 5 3.1 How do I find an estate file between 1859 and 1930? .................................... 5 3.2 How do I find an estate file between 1931 and 1976? .................................... 6 3.3 How do I find where the succession was processed? ..................................... 7 4. How do I find estate files and registers after 1976? ........................................... 7 Are there related records? ........................................................................................... 8 What are some of the key words in estate files and registers? ...............................
[Show full text]
Justice Facilities Review Jury Chair Om the Chair the View Fr
JFR JUSTICE FACILITIES13 REVIEW AIA JFRJUSTICE FACILITIES13 REVIEW The American Institute of Architects Academy of Architecture for Justice Washington, D.C. Copyright 2013 The American Institute of Architects All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The project information in this book has been provided by the architecture firms represented in the book. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) has no reason to believe the information is not accurate, but the AIA does not warrant, and assumes no liability for, the accuracy or completeness of the information. It is the responsibility of users to verify the information with the appropriate architecture firm or other source. The American Institute of Architects 1735 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 2013 Academy of Architecture for Justice Advisory Group Linda Bernauer, AIA Catherine Chan, AIA, chair Lorenzo M. Lopez, AIA Elizabeth Minnis, AIA, past chair Amy Ann Phillips, AIA AIA Staff Terri Stewart, CAE, managing director, Design and Practice Operations Douglas Paul, managing director, Practice and Knowledge Resources Kathleen Simpson, director, Knowledge Communities Elizabeth Stepahin, manager, Honors and Awards Virginia Ebbert, manager, Architect’s Knowledge Resource Design: designfarm Editor: Janet Rumbarger Cover photos, top to bottom: Rankin Inlet Healing Facility, Richard E. Arnason Justice Center, Waterloo Region Courthouse CONTENTS Jury Members ....................................................................................... iv Court Facilities
[Show full text]
HERITAGE MASTER PLAN Final Report
CAMBRIDGE HERITAGE MASTER PLAN Final Report Prepared for The Corporation of the City of Cambridge Prepared by BRAY Heritage with ERA Architects Inc. Archaeological Services Inc. Maltby & Associates Inc. the Tourism Company June 2008 USER GUIDE 3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 PART A: STUDY PURPOSE 15 1. Making a Case for Heritage Master Planning 1.1 What is “Heritage”? 17 1.2 Why Make a Heritage Master Plan? 18 1.3 What are the Plan’s Terms of Reference? 20 2. Producing a Heritage Master Plan 2.1 Study Method 23 2.2 Study Team 25 PART B: HERITAGE RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES 27 3. The Range of Heritage Resources to be Considered 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Context for Conservation 30 3.3 Built Heritage Resources 33 3.4 Cultural Heritage Landscapes 36 3.5 Archaeological Resources 40 4. Valued Aspects of Cambridge’s Past 4.1 Introduction 41 4.2 The First Setting 41 4.3 Rural Beginnings 43 4.4 Historical Development of the Component Communities 54 4.5 Patterns of Urban Development 68 4.6 Industrial Heart 73 4.7 Public Spaces 74 5. Shared Community Values Expressed in Place 5.1 What People Said About Cambridge 79 5.2 Current Values for Place 80 5.3 Common Values 86 5.4 From Values to Themes 88 6. A Toolkit of Ways of Celebrating the Past 6.1 Good Ideas from Elsewhere 93 1 6.2 Conservation and Development Tools 98 6.3 Character Areas 106 6.4 Individual Resources 134 6.5 Personal Histories 136 PART C: OPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 139 7.
[Show full text]
Class Action! News Prisoners Justice Day Issue #10 Summer 2018
- 1 - CLASS ACT ION! NEWS PRISONERS J USTICE DAY ISSUE #10 SUMMER 2018 2 > CAN-#10 < Editor’s Note > < Contents > It is Summer & Issue Letters ……………………….…... 3 #10 of ‘Class Action News …………………... 4-7, 10-13 News’. Poems …………………………. 8-9 This magazine is by & Health & Harm Reduction …..…. 14 for the Prisoner Class in Resources …………………... 15-16 Canada. In every Issue we provide a safe space for < Artists in this Issue > creative expression and literacy development. These zines feature art, poetry, stories, news, Cover: Rocky Dobey observations, concerns, and anything of interest Prisoner Justice Day – August 10 – ‘13½’ to share. 12 Jurors + 1 Judge + ½ a Fucking Chance Health & Harm Reduction info will always be provided – Be Safe! Page 7: Gord Hill – Prison Justice Day Quality & Quantity: Items printed are those that are common for diverse readers, so no religious items please. Artwork: Black pen (tat-style) works the best. Cover Artist will receive a $25 donation. Writings: only short poems, news, stories, … Items selected are those that fit nicely & allow space for others (½ page = 325 words max). For author protection, letters & story credits will all be 'Anonymous'. ‘Class Action News' is published 4 times a year & is free for prisoners in Canada. If you are on the outside or an organization, please send a donation. We do not have any funding so it really helps to get this inside ! Editor: Tom Jackson Publication: Class Action News Publisher: PrisonFreePress.org PO Box 39, Stn P Toronto, ON, M5S 2S6 Email: [email protected] Circulation: 350+ Recirculation: ???? All original artwork, poems & writings are the sole/soul property of the artist & author.
[Show full text]
Meeting Minutes
Meeting Minutes MEETING: City of Guelph Accessibility Advisory Committee ( AAC) DATE: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 LOCATION City Hall, 112 : TIME: 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. CHAIR: Jennifer Popkey Bergen PRESENT: Brad Howcroft, Paul Reeve, Doug Grove, Janice Pearce Faubert, Cathy McCormack, Laurie Lanthier, Mary Grad, Julia Phillips, Missy Tolton, Jane McNamee, Lynne Briggs (Staff), Cory Chisholm, Leanne Warren (Liaison), Chelsea Crocker (Minutes), Michael Anders (Transit staff), Charlene Sharpe (Transit staff), Mario Petricevic (Staff) REGRETS: Tom Goettler, Tanya Davies MEETING MINUTES ITEM # DESCRIPTION 1 Welcome 2 Approval of the Agenda New Business #1: Exterior door at City Hall New Business – Jane New Business# 5: Appreciation idea – Jennifer Popkey Bergen Motion: Jane 2nd: Cory All in favour: Carried Approval of Minutes of October 16, 2012 Motion: Julia 2nd: Janice All in favour: Carried Page 1 of 8 CITY OF GUELPH MEETING MINUTES 3 Business Arising: 1. Transit Concerns – For Recommendations – a. Follow up regarding Flaherty Dr and Waverly Dr Routes Flaherty Dr and Waverly Dr Routes were included in the presentation to Council that Jen and Brad will present in October A map that shows that several bus stops have been removed in the Waverly Dr area has been prepared as a resource for the presentation The concern is that some residence are nearly a mile from a regularly running stop that offers full service Stops are supposed to be 500m from each other but committee members report that this seems to be “as the crow flies” and does not take into consideration pedestrian route distances, grades, snow clearing which result in concerns about the health and safety of passengers with a disability Transit was contacted regarding these concerns by citizens and the Accessibility Coordinator however no further discussion took place.
[Show full text]
Refugees and Root Causes PAGE 10
Refugees and root causes PAGE 10 $6.50 Vol. 24, No. 5 June 2016 ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: DEATHS BEHIND BARS • DIGITAL DISRUPTION • HAITIAN MONTREAL PLUS: NON-FICTION Clive Veroni on political brands + Bruce Little on disability thresholds + Jim Roots on urban photography + Jeffrey Collins on floundering Newfoundland + Shelley Peterson on a dud horse + John Bell on informal diplomacy FICTION Publications Mail Agreement #40032362 Miranda Newman on Yann Martel’s High Mountains of Portugal + Bronwyn Drainie on Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to LRC, Circulation Dept. Madeleine Thein’s Do Not Say We Have Nothing PO Box 8, Station K Toronto, ON M4P 2G1 POETRY Anna Wärje + Rebecca Pa˘pucaru + Lisa McCreary + William Buchan New from University of Toronto Press Freedom and Indigenous Constitutionalism by John Borrows In this book, John Borrows focuses Backrooms and Beyond on Ojibwe law, stories, and principles Partisan Advisers and the Politics of Policy to suggest alternative ways in which Work in Canada Indigenous peoples can work to by Jonathan Craft enhance freedom. Backrooms and Beyond is a rich and rigorous look at how political staff influences the policy making process of government at the federal and provincial level. Unbound Ukrainian Canadians Writing Home edited by Lisa Grekul and Lindy Obesity in Canada Ledohowski Critical Perspectives What does it mean to be Ukrainian edited by Jenny Ellison, Deborah in contemporary Canada? Unbound McPhail, and Wendy Mitchinson presents a collection of new, thought provoking and poignant Ukrainian Obesity in Canada asks how we Canadian literature in English. measure health and wellness, where our attitudes to obesity develop from, and what are the consequences of targeting those whose weights do not match our expectations.
[Show full text]
General Committee Agenda Be Adopted As Recommended
Corporation of the City of Cambridge General Committee Meeting No. 08-19 Historic City Hall - 46 Dickson Street Tuesday, September 3, 2019 7:00 p.m. AGENDA Meeting Called to Order Disclosure of Interest Presentations Delegations 1. Sheri-Lyn Roberts, Chair – Accessibility Advisory Committee, re: item 8, Dynamic Symbol of Access Consent Procedure THAT all items listed under the heading of Consent Procedure for Tuesday, September 3, 2019, General Committee Agenda be adopted as recommended. Items # 1. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, March 28, 2019 2. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, May 2, 2019 3. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, June 6, 2019 4. Beverly Street (Dundas Street North to Elgin Street North) – Detailed Design and Project Scope Change 5. Riverside Dam Design Update 6. Doors Open Waterloo Region Application NOTE: General Committee Members, if you wish an item to be pulled from the Consent Agenda, please notify the City Clerk so the item can be listed on the Other Business Memo for 1 tonight's meeting to be dealt with separately by General Committee. You will also have the opportunity to pull an item at the Meeting. Minutes of Advisory Committee Meetings 1. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, March 28, 2019 PP. 5-8 Recommendation – That the Committee recommends to Council: THAT the minutes from the Archives Board meeting held on Thursday, March 28, 2019 be approved. 2. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, May 2, 2019 PP. 9-12 Recommendation – That the Committee recommends to Council: THAT the minutes from the Archives Board meeting held on Thursday, May 2, 2019 be approved. 3. Archives Board Minutes – Thursday, June 6, 2019 PP.
[Show full text]
Proceedings the Symposium On
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. PROCEEDINGS THE SYMPOSIUM ON ( . PRETRIAL SERVICES 1981 a SPONSORS OF THE 1981 SYMPOSIUM ON PRETRIAL SERVICES PRETRIAL SERVICES RESOURCE CENTER) WASHINGTON) DC Madeleine Crohn~ Director Bruce Beaudin~ Chairman~ Board of Trustees MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL CANADA The Honourable Bob Kaplan~ SoZicitor General ONTARIO MINISTRY OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES The Honourable Nicholas Leluk~ Minister ONTARIO MINISTRY OF COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL SERVICES The Honourable Frank Drea~ Minister Funding for the 1981 Symposium on Pretrial Services and for these Proceedings was provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration under its grant #79-MU-AX-0033 to the Pretrial Services Resource Center, and by the Solicitor General Canada, the Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services, and the Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. Additional copies of the Proceedings can be requested of the: Pretrial Services Resource Center Consultation Centre 918 F Street N.W., Suite 500 Ministry of ·the Solicitor General Washington, D.C. 20004 2 St. Clair Ave. West, Suite 12A8 Toronto, Ontario, M4V lL5 Proceedings of the Symposium on Pretrial Services 1981 Park Plaza Hotel Toronto, Ontario July 26-29, 1981 U.S. Department of Justice 143467 National Institute of Justice f.f I This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this "'~ material has been granted by / Public Domain LEAA u .
[Show full text]
CPS/PWC/NPS: Sharing Information and Experiences Randall J
CPS/PWC/NPS: Sharing Information and Experiences Randall J. Biallas he report to the Director from the steering committee of the VOLUME 15 • NO. 6 U.S. National Park Service's (NPS) 75th Anniversary Symposium held last year at Vail, Colorado recommended 19 9 2 under the strategic objective dealing with resource steward ship and protection that: T"The National Park Service should reinforce its role as a world leader in Cultural Resources Management the national park movement through ... actions to facilitate the Information for exchange of information ... and protection of critical world resources." Parks, Federal Agencies, Further, one of the steps that the working group on park use and enjoy Indian Tribes, States, ment called for to implement this recommendation is: Local Governments and the Private Sector "The NPS should exchange with interested parties around the world, information, methods and technology to conserve, interpret, and manage protected areas. The agency should implement a strategy that relates the results of international cooperation to the domestic mission of the NPS and its allied organizations." In support of this recommendation, the NPS park historic architecture program held a joint "Workshop in Historic Structures" with the Canadian Parks Service (CPS) and Public Works Canada Workshop (PWC) at Waterton/Glacier in Historic Structures International Peace Park, June 15-18,1992. The purpose of CPS/MPS Waterton/Glacier the workshop was to improve International Peace Park June 15-18, 1992 the exchange of technical information and experiences between the Service's historic preservation professionals and those from the Canadian Parks Service and Public Environment Canada (continued on page 7) Parks Service Public Works Canada En.
[Show full text]
Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal D’Appel De L’Aménagement Local
Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d’appel de l’aménagement local ISSUE DATE: January 17, 2020 CASE NO(S).: PL190309 The Ontario Municipal Board (the “OMB”) is continued under the name Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the “Tribunal”), and any reference to the Ontario Municipal Board or Board in any publication of the Tribunal is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal. PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 45(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Applicant and Appellant: Annamaria Bartolomucci Subject: Minor Variance Variance from By-law No.: (1995) - 14864 Property Address/Description: 58 Memorial Crescent Municipality: City of Guelph Municipal File No.: A-52/19 LPAT Case No.: PL190309 LPAT File No.: PL190309 LPAT Case Name: Bartolomucci v. Guelph (City) Heard: November 6, 2019 in Guelph, Ontario APPEARANCES: Parties Counsel*/Representative Annamaria Bartolomucci Self-represented City of Guelph Alex Ciccone* DECISION DELIVERED BY DOUGLAS A. JOYNER AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL 2 PL190309 INTRODUCTION [1] The Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) held a hearing on November 6, 2019 at Old City Hall in Guelph, Ontario. Annamaria Bartolomucci (the “Applicant”) represented herself and gave evidence which included numerous surveys and pictures of her property and the surrounding neighbourhood. The City of Guelph (“City”) appeared and was represented by Alex Ciccone, counsel for the City. [2] Ms. Bartolomucci has appealed the decision of the City of Guelph Committee of Adjustment (the “COA”) to deny the application A-52/19 for a minor variance for the property at 58 Memorial Crescent Guelph, Ontario (the “Subject Property”).
[Show full text]