DOCSLIB.ORG

Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2019 to 2028

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2019 to 2028 CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2019 to 2028 Left to right: © Syda Productions/Anatoliy Lukich/Garry L./Andriy Blokhin/Juanan Barros Moreno/lenetstan/Shutterstock.com DECEMBER 2018 Notes The estimates for the various options shown in this report were completed in November 2018. They may differ from any previous or subsequent cost estimates for legislative proposals that resemble the options presented here. Unless this report indicates otherwise, all years referred to regarding budgetary outlays and revenues are federal fiscal years, which run from October 1 to September 30 and are designated by the calendar year in which they end. The numbers in the text and tables are in nominal (current-year) dollars. Those numbers may not add up to totals because of rounding. In the tables, for changes in outlays, revenues, and the deficit, negative numbers indicate decreases, and positive numbers indicate increases. Thus, negative numbers for spending and positive numbers for revenues reduce the deficit, and positive numbers for spending and negative numbers for revenues increase it. Some of the tables in this report give values for two related concepts: budget authority and outlays. Budget authority is the authority provided by federal law to incur financial obligations that will result in immediate or future outlays of federal government funds. The budget projections used in this report come from various sources. The 10-year spending projections, in relation to which the budgetary effects of spending options are generally calculated, are those in Congressional Budget Office,An Analysis of the President’s 2019 Budget (May 2018, revised August 2018), www.cbo.gov/publication/53884. The 10-year revenue projections, in relation to which the budgetary effects of revenue options are generally calculated, are those in Congressional Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2018 to 2028 (April 2018), www.cbo.gov/publication/53651; the exceptions are the revenue projections shown in Chapter 1, which are those in An Analysis of the President’s 2019 Budget (May 2018, revised August 2018). The longer-term budget projections are those in Congressional Budget Office, The 2018 Long-Term Budget Outlook (June 2018), www.cbo.gov/publication/53919. Budgetary results before 2019 reflect data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and from Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Final Monthly Treasury Statement of Receipts and Outlays of the United States Government for Fiscal Year 2018 Through September 30, 2018, and Other Periods (October 2018), https://go.usa.gov/xPhhG (PDF, 592 KB). As referred to in this report, the Affordable Care Act comprises the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the health care provisions of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, and the effects of subsequent judicial decisions, statutory changes, and administrative actions. CBO’s website includes a search tool that allows users to filter options by major budget category, budget function, topic, and date (www.cbo.gov/budget-options). The website also includes previous editions of this report (https://go.usa.gov/xPdC9). www.cbo.gov/publication/54667 Contents Introduction 1 The Current Context for Decisions About the Budget 2 1 Choices for the Future 4 Caveats About This Report 4 Mandatory Spending Options 11 Trends in Mandatory Spending 11 2 Method Underlying Mandatory Spending Estimates 12 Options in This Chapter 13 Discretionary Spending Options 119 Trends in Discretionary Spending 119 3 Method Underlying Discretionary Spending Estimates 121 Options in This Chapter 122 Revenue Options 197 Trends in Revenues 197 4 Method Underlying Revenue Estimates 198 BOX 4-1. MAJOR PROVISIONS OF THE 2017 TAX ACT 200 Options in This Chapter 202 Appendix: Spending Options With Smaller Budgetary Effects 309 Mandatory Spending Options 309 Discretionary Spending Options 310 List of Tables and Figures 312 About This Document 313 II OPTIONS FOR REDUCING THE DEFICIT: 2019 TO 2028 DECEMBER 2018 Mandatory Spending Natural Resources and Environment Option 1 Limit Enrollment in the Department of Agriculture’s Conservation Programs 15 Agriculture Option 2 Eliminate Title I Agriculture Programs 17 Option 3 Reduce Subsidies in the Crop Insurance Program 19 Option 4 Limit ARC and PLC Payment Acres to 30 Percent of Base Acres 21 Housing Option 5 Raise Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s Guarantee Fees and Decrease Their Eligible Loan Limits 23 Education Option 6 Eliminate or Reduce the Add-On to Pell Grants, Which Is Funded With Mandatory Spending 26 Option 7 Limit Forgiveness of Graduate Student Loans 28 Option 8 Reduce or Eliminate Subsidized Loans for Undergraduate Students 31 Option 9 Reduce or Eliminate Public Service Loan Forgiveness 34 Option 10 Remove the Cap on Interest Rates for Student Loans 36 Health Option 11 Adopt a Voucher Plan and Slow the Growth of Federal Contributions for the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program 38 Option 12 Establish Caps on Federal Spending for Medicaid 41 Option 13 Limit States’ Taxes on Health Care Providers 52 Option 14 Reduce Federal Medicaid Matching Rates 54 Option 15 Introduce Enrollment Fees Under TRICARE for Life 57 Option 16 Introduce Minimum Out-of-Pocket Requirements Under TRICARE for Life 59 Option 17 Change the Cost-Sharing Rules for Medicare and Restrict Medigap Insurance 61 Option 18 Increase Premiums for Parts B and D of Medicare 65 Option 19 Raise the Age of Eligibility for Medicare to 67 68 Option 20 Reduce Medicare’s Coverage of Bad Debt 72 Option 21 Require Manufacturers to Pay a Minimum Rebate on Drugs Covered Under Part D of Medicare for Low-Income Beneficiaries 74 Option 22 Modify Payments to Medicare Advantage Plans for Health Risk 77 Option 23 Reduce Quality Bonus Payments to Medicare Advantage Plans 82 Option 24 Consolidate and Reduce Federal Payments for Graduate Medical Education at Teaching Hospitals 86 CONTENTS OPTIONS FOR REDUCING THE DEFICIT: 2019 TO 2028 III Mandatory Spending (Continued) Income Security Option 25 Convert Multiple Assistance Programs for Lower-Income People Into Smaller Block Grants to States 89 Option 26 Eliminate Subsidies for Certain Meals in the National School Lunch, School Breakfast, and Child and Adult Care Food Programs 92 Option 27 Reduce TANF’s State Family Assistance Grant by 10 Percent 94 Option 28 Eliminate Supplemental Security Income Benefits for Disabled Children 95 Social Security Option 29 Link Initial Social Security Benefits to Average Prices Instead of Average Earnings 97 Option 30 Make Social Security’s Benefit Structure More Progressive 99 Option 31 Raise the Full Retirement Age for Social Security 101 Option 32 Require Social Security Disability Insurance Applicants to Have Worked More in Recent Years 103 Option 33 Eliminate Eligibility for Starting Social Security Disability Benefits at Age 62 or Later 105 Veterans Option 34 Narrow Eligibility for Veterans’ Disability Compensation by Excluding Certain Disabilities Unrelated to Military Duties 107 Option 35 End VA’s Individual Unemployability Payments to Disabled Veterans at the Full Retirement Age for Social Security 109 Option 36 Reduce VA’s Disability Benefits to Veterans Who Are Older Than the Full Retirement Age for Social Security 111 Option 37 Narrow Eligibility for VA’s Disability Compensation by Excluding Veterans With Low Disability Ratings 113 Multiple Programs or Activities Option 38 Use an Alternative Measure of Inflation to Index Social Security and Other Mandatory Programs 115 Discretionary Spending Defense Option 1 Reduce the Department of Defense’s Budget 123 Option 2 Reduce DoD’s Operation and Maintenance Appropriation (Excluding Funding for the Defense Health Program) 125 Option 3 Cap Increases in Basic Pay for Military Service Members 128 Option 4 Replace Some Military Personnel With Civilian Employees 130 Option 5 Cancel Plans to Purchase Additional F-35 Joint Strike Fighters and Instead Purchase F-16s and F/A-18s 132 Option 6 Stop Building Ford Class Aircraft Carriers 134 IV OPTIONS FOR REDUCING THE DEFICIT: 2019 TO 2028 DECEMBER 2018 Discretionary Spending (Continued) Defense (Continued) Option 7 Reduce Funding for Naval Ship Construction to Historical Levels 136 Option 8 Reduce the Size of the Nuclear Triad 138 Option 9 Cancel the Long-Range Standoff Weapon 141 Option 10 Defer Development of the B-21 Bomber 143 Option 11 Modify TRICARE Enrollment Fees and Cost Sharing for Working-Age Military Retirees 145 Option 12 Reduce the Size of the Bomber Force by Retiring the B-1B 148 Option 13 Reduce the Size of the Fighter Force by Retiring the F-22 150 Option 14 Cancel the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense System 152 Option 15 Reduce the Basic Allowance for Housing to 80 Percent of Average Housing Costs 154 Option 16 Cancel Development and Production of the New Missile in the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent Program 157 International Affairs Option 17 Reduce Funding for International Affairs Programs 159 Option 18 Reduce Appropriations for Global Health to Their Level in 2000 160 Energy, Science, and Space Option 19 Eliminate Human Space Exploration Programs 161 Option 20 Reduce Department of Energy Funding for Energy Technology Development 163 Transportation Option 21 Eliminate Funding for Amtrak and the Essential Air Service Program 165 Option 22 Limit Highway and Transit Funding to Expected Revenues 168 Option 23 Eliminate the Federal Transit Administration 171 Option 24 Increase the Passenger Fee for Aviation Security
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Full Text) with Paragraph Numbers at 23 July 2021
    Oxfordshire Plan – Regulation 18 (Part 2) Consultation Document VERSION 30 (Full Text) with paragraph numbers At 23 July 2021 1 Foreword 1. Oxfordshire is a unique and special place shaped by its beautiful and varied landscapes, rich cultural heritage and areas important to nature conservation. Its towns, villages and the City of Oxford form part of a dynamic network of places that have grown to support an innovation-driven economy that is nationally and internationally significant, with Oxfordshire forming part of the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. These characteristics, together with Oxfordshire's connections to other places, mean that, for many, Oxfordshire is a prosperous and healthy place to live. But there are also persistent, multi-faceted inequalities in some of our places, and challenges linked to climate change, congestion, housing affordability and threats to the natural, built and historic environments. 2. The Oxfordshire Plan will change the way we plan for Oxfordshire's future. To fully make the most of our opportunities and to more effectively tackle the challenges that Oxfordshire faces requires a new partnership-based approach to planning: one that continues to value the vital role played by local and neighbourhood plans, but which also recognises that some issues require transformative change through concerted effort over the medium and longer- term, are better considered on a wider geographical scale and best tackled through joined-up policy responses that build resilience. 3. Climate change is one example. Decisions made locally have the potential to impact on outcomes in that area, but also more widely within Oxfordshire as well as beyond the county's boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Tax Policy: a Pathway to Reform? Nancy J
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 9 | Issue 2 Article 2 2014 Critical Tax Policy: a Pathway to Reform? Nancy J. Knauer Recommended Citation Nancy J. Knauer, Critical Tax Policy: a Pathway to Reform?, 9 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y. 206 (2014). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol9/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2014 by Northwestern University School of Law Vol. 9, Issue 2 (2014) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy CRITICAL TAX POLICY : A PATHWAY TO REFORM ? ∗ Nancy J. Knauer TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 207 I. THE COSTS OF FALSE NEUTRALITY ............................................................... 214 A. All Part of a Larger “Blueprint” ............................................................ 215 B. Hidden Choices and Embedded Values .................................................. 218 Taxpayer neutrality ..................................................................................... 219 Equity and efficiency .................................................................................. 221 C. Critical Tax Theory and Scholarship ...................................................... 223 II. CHOOSING A CRITICAL
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Capital Gains Taxes FISCAL Erica York FACT Economist No
    An Overview of Capital Gains Taxes FISCAL Erica York FACT Economist No. 649 Apr. 2019 Key Findings • Comparisons of capital gains tax rates and tax rates on labor income should factor in all the layers of taxes that apply to capital gains. • The tax treatment of capital income, such as capital gains, is often viewed as tax-advantaged. However, capital gains taxes place a double-tax on corporate income, and taxpayers have often paid income taxes on the money that they invest. • Capital gains taxes create a bias against saving, which encourages present consumption over saving and leads to a lower level of national income. • The tax code is currently biased against saving and investment; increasing the capital gains tax rate would add to the bias against saving and reduce national income. The Tax Foundation is the nation’s leading independent tax policy research organization. Since 1937, our research, analysis, and experts have informed smarter tax policy at the federal, state, local, and global levels. We are a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. ©2019 Tax Foundation Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0 Editor, Rachel Shuster Designer, Dan Carvajal Tax Foundation 1325 G Street, NW, Suite 950 Washington, DC 20005 202.464.6200 taxfoundation.org TAX FOUNDATION | 2 Introduction The tax treatment of capital income, such as from capital gains, is often viewed as tax-advantaged. However, viewed in the context of the entire tax system, there is a tax bias against income like capital gains. This is because taxes on saving and investment, like the capital gains tax, represent an additional layer of tax on capital income after the corporate income tax and the individual income tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 10 – Overview of the Budget Process
    SECTION 21—OVERVIEW OF SCORING LEGISLATION SECTION 21—OVERVIEW OF SCORING LEGISLATION Table of Contents 21.1 What is scoring? 21.2 When does scoring occur during the budget process? 21.3 What are the basic concepts I need to know to score legislation? (a) Overview of budget laws (b) Definition of discretionary spending (c) Definition of mandatory spending (d) Committee of jurisdiction (e) How are scoring estimates measured? (f) Economic and technical assumptions (g) Scoring timeframes 21.4 What are the budget enforcement mechanisms for discretionary and mandatory spending? (a) Caps on discretionary spending (b) Pay-as-you-go for mandatory spending (c) Congressional enforcement procedures 21.5 What resources are available to help me score legislation? 21.6 When are scores of legislation due to OMB? 21.1 What is scoring? Scoring is the process of estimating the change in Government spending and collections resulting from enacted or proposed legislation, compared to what would happen in the absence of that legislation. These estimates are prepared both to inform policy makers of the budgetary effects of proposed legislation, and to inform congressional and statutory budget enforcement procedures. 21.2 When does scoring occur during the budget process? Scoring occurs typically during budget formulation, the consideration of proposed legislation, and after a law has been enacted. Budget formulation. As part of the budget formulation process, agencies submit baseline program levels and discretionary, mandatory, and governmental receipt proposals to OMB for consideration. Agencies work with OMB to determine the effect of proposals on budget authority, collections, and outlays based on the Administration’s economic and technical assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • AMS-LATEX Version 1.0 User's Guide
    e w -LATEX Version 1.0 User’s Guide American Mathematical Society August 1990 0 Contents I General 1 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Notes XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1 e e 2 The w -LTEX project 2 e e 3 Major components of the w -LTEX package 3 II Font considerations 4 4 The font selection scheme of Mittelbach and Schopf¨ 4 5 Basic concepts 4 5.1 Shape XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 5.2 Series XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 5.3 Size XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 5.4 Family XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5.5 Using other font families XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5.6 The oldlfont option XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5.7 Warnings XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 6 Names of math font commands 11 7 The command \newsymbol 16 8 The amssymb option 16 III Features of the amstex option 17 9 Math spacing commands 17 10 Multiple integral signs 17 i 11 Over and under arrows 17 12 Dots 18 13 Accents in math 19 14 Roots 19 15 Boxed formulas 20 16 Extensible arrows 20 17 \overset, \underset and \sideset 20 18 The \text command 21 19 Operator names 21 20 \mod and its relatives 22 21 Fractions and related constructions 22 22 Continued fractions 23 23 Smash options 24 e 24 New LTEX environments 24 24.1 The “cases” environment XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 24 24.2 Matrix XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 25 24.3 The Sb and Sp environments XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 26 24.4 Commutative diagrams XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 26 25 Alignment structures for equations 27 25.1 The align environment XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 28 25.2 The gather environment XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 28 25.3 The
    [Show full text]
  • Uncontrollable Spending Has Been Growing Much More Rapidly Than Total Spending and Thus Accounts for an Ever-Larger Share of the Total
    How much spending is uncontrollable? Spending is generally said to be uncontrollable for political rather than legal reasons. Entitlement spending can always be controlled legally by reforming programs, but when an entitlement is extremely popular, reform may require more political courage than is readily available. The federal budget divides government spending into three categories, discretionary spending, mandatory or direct spending, and net interest. Discretionary spending, set in annual appropriations acts controlled by the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, includes most defense programs as well as spending for education, transportation, environmental protection, law enforcement and border security, and international assistance. Mandatory spending, controlled by laws other than appropriations act, includes spending on entitlement programs including the big three—Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid—and many smaller programs such as supplemental nutrition assistance, federal civilian and military retirement benefits, and unemployment insurance. Government spending on mandatory programs (often called entitlement programs), and net interest on the public debt are often described as “uncontrollable.” Entitlements can be controlled legally by reforming them, but this can be highly unpopular politically. Interest costs can be controlled indirectly by curbing spending growth or raising revenues, but that is also never easy. Uncontrollable spending has been growing much more rapidly than total spending and thus accounts for an ever-larger share of the total. However, most growth has been concentrated in entitlements that serve the elderly and in health insurance. The population has been aging rapidly, and that affects both Social Security and health programs. The latter have grown doubly rapidly because health costs per beneficiary have been growing faster than incomes per capita.
    [Show full text]
  • PIN 5470.22 – DDR/DEIS/Draft 4(F) Evaluation – Volume 12
    TRANSPORTATION PROJECT REPORT DRAFT DESIGN REPORT / DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT / DRAFT 4(f) EVALUATION APPENDIX H Public Comments and Responses November 2016 PIN 5470.22 NYS Route 198 (Scajaquada Expressway Corridor) Grant Street Interchange to Parkside Avenue Intersection City of Buffalo Erie County DRAFT DESIGN REPORT / DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT / DRAFT 4(f) EVALUATION November 2016 Public Comments PIN 5470.22 NYS Route 198 (Scajaquada Expressway Corridor) Grant Street Interchange to Parkside Avenue Intersection City of Buffalo Erie County NYS Route 198 (Scajaquada Expressway Corridor) Project PIN 5470.22 Public Comments As of September 1, 2016 Date How Source ID Comment ID Record Affiliation Comment Received Received I think some representative of the trucking industry should be a part of the stakeholder group and mentioned it at the meeting. If the trucking group you originally invited doesn't exist anymore, you should find another representative organization. You might also want to get someone from the Buffalo Niagara Convention and Visitors Bureau or Advancing Arts & Culture to attend the meetings. These two organizations are investing a lot in marketing the None Delaware Park cultural institutions to out of town visitors and we want to make sure that visitors 1 1 x 6/7/2007 (Member of the E-mail from Niagara Falls find it easy to get to and from the cultural venues. I don't want the Community) stakeholder group to only represent supporters of the downgrading of the Scajaquada or you will defeat the whole purpose of having the stakeholder meetings in the first place. I know that our visitors are going to be unhappy with this change if it leads to greater wait times to get to our parking lot.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Mandatory Spending for Means-Tested Programs, 2009 to 2029
    JUNE 2019 Federal Mandatory Spending for Means-Tested Programs, 2009 to 2029 Means-tested programs (which provide cash payments growth rates have been adjusted to exclude the effects of or other forms of assistance to people with relatively low shifts in the timing of certain federal payments.3 income or few assets) currently account for a little more than a quarter of all mandatory spending.1 The largest Comparing Historical and Projected means-tested mandatory programs are Medicaid, the Growth Rates earned income and child tax credits (which are refund- Historical and projected growth rates are affected by able and thus affect outlays), the Supplemental Nutrition changes in law and the economy. For example, several Assistance Program (SNAP), and the Supplemental mandatory programs have been or are scheduled to be Security Income program. The largest non–means- significantly affected by changes specified in law over the tested mandatory programs are Social Security, most of next 10 years. The 2007–2009 recession and the ensuing Medicare, and the federal civilian and military retirement recovery also have influenced growth rates. As a result, programs. important aspects of the programs may differ signifi- cantly from their past, and those differences may be the In its May 2019 baseline, the Congressional Budget Office projected that if current laws generally remained the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program), which are unchanged, mandatory spending on means-tested pro- controlled by annual appropriation acts. However, each table grams would grow more slowly than spending for non– shows discretionary spending for the Federal Pell Grant Program means-tested programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Guiding Principles of Good Tax Policy: a Framework for Evaluating Tax Proposals
    Tax Policy Concept Statement 1 Guiding principles of good tax policy: A framework for evaluating tax proposals i About the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants The Association of International Certified Professional Accountants (the Association) is the most influential body of professional accountants, combining the strengths of the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) and The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) to power opportunity, trust and prosperity for people, businesses and economies worldwide. It represents 650,000 members and students in public and management accounting and advocates for the public interest and business sustainability on current and emerging issues. With broad reach, rigor and resources, the Association advances the reputation, employability and quality of CPAs, CGMAs and accounting and finance professionals globally. About the American Institute of CPAs The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) is the world’s largest member association representing the CPA profession, with more than 418,000 members in 143 countries, and a history of serving the public interest since 1887. AICPA members represent many areas of practice, including business and industry, public practice, government, education and consulting. The AICPA sets ethical standards for its members and U.S. auditing standards for private companies, nonprofit organizations, federal, state and local governments. It develops and grades the Uniform CPA Examination, offers specialized credentials, builds the pipeline of future talent and drives professional competency development to advance the vitality, relevance and quality of the profession. About the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), founded in 1919, is the world’s leading and largest professional body of management accountants, with members and students operating in 176 countries, working at the heart of business.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Federal Income Tax Rates Work? XXXX
    TAX POLICY CENTER BRIEFING BOOK Key Elements of the U.S. Tax System INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX How do federal income tax rates work? XXXX Q. How do federal income tax rates work? A. The federal individual income tax has seven tax rates that rise with income. Each rate applies only to income in a specific range (tax bracket). CURRENT INCOME TAX RATES AND BRACKETS The federal individual income tax has seven tax rates ranging from 10 percent to 37 percent (table 1). The rates apply to taxable income—adjusted gross income minus either the standard deduction or allowable itemized deductions. Income up to the standard deduction (or itemized deductions) is thus taxed at a zero rate. Federal income tax rates are progressive: As taxable income increases, it is taxed at higher rates. Different tax rates are levied on income in different ranges (or brackets) depending on the taxpayer’s filing status. In TAX POLICY CENTER BRIEFING BOOK Key Elements of the U.S. Tax System INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX How do federal income tax rates work? XXXX 2020 the top tax rate (37 percent) applies to taxable income over $518,400 for single filers and over $622,050 for married couples filing jointly. Additional tax schedules and rates apply to taxpayers who file as heads of household and to married individuals filing separate returns. A separate schedule of tax rates applies to capital gains and dividends. Tax brackets are adjusted annually for inflation. BASICS OF PROGRESSIVE INCOME TAXATION Each tax rate applies only to income in a specific tax bracket. Thus, if a taxpayer earns enough to reach a new bracket with a higher tax rate, his or her total income is not taxed at that rate, just the income in that bracket.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint for Balance: a FEDERAL BUDGE T F OR FY 20 18
    Blueprint for Balance: A FEDERAL BUDGET FOR FY 2018 The Heritage Foundation © 2017 by The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-0-89195-163-6 Contents Contributors .................................................................................................................................................... ix Introduction: Blueprint for Balance ........................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: Policies for a Congressional Budget ........................................................... 5 Chapter 2: Budget Proposals ..........................................................................................................13 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Repeal the USDA Catfish Inspection Program ........................................................................................16 Eliminate the Conservation Technical Assistance Program..................................................................17 Eliminate the Rural Business Cooperative Service.................................................................................18 Prohibit Funding for National School Meal Standards ............................................................................................ and the Community Eligibility Provision 19 Withhold Funding for Federal Fruit and Vegetable Supply Restrictions ............................................20 Repeal
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Education Funding: Key Concepts and FAQ
    Department of Education Funding: Key Concepts and FAQ Updated February 19, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44477 Department of Education Funding: Key Concepts and FAQ Summary Like most federal agencies, the Department of Education (ED) receives funds in support of its mission through various federal budget and appropriations processes. While not unique, the mechanisms by which ED receives, obligates, and expends funds can be complex. For example, ED receives both mandatory and discretionary appropriations; ED is annually provided forward funds and advance appropriations for some—but not all—discretionary programs; ED awards both formula and competitive grants; and a portion of ED’s budget subsidizes student loan costs (direct loans and loan guarantees). As such, analyzing ED’s budget requires an understanding of a broad range of federal budget and appropriations concepts. This report provides an introduction to these concepts as they are used specifically in the context of the congressional appropriations process for ED. The first section of this report provides an introduction to key terms and concepts in the federal budget and appropriations process for ED. In addition to those mentioned above, the report includes explanations of terms and concepts such as authorizations versus appropriations; budgetary allocations, discretionary spending caps, and sequestration; transfers and reprogramming; and matching requirements. The second section answers frequently asked questions about federal funding for
    [Show full text]