DOCSLIB.ORG

Blueprint for Balance: a FEDERAL BUDGE T F OR FY 20 18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Blueprint for Balance: A FEDERAL BUDGET FOR FY 2018 The Heritage Foundation © 2017 by The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-0-89195-163-6 Contents Contributors .................................................................................................................................................... ix Introduction: Blueprint for Balance ........................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: Policies for a Congressional Budget ........................................................... 5 Chapter 2: Budget Proposals ..........................................................................................................13 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Repeal the USDA Catfish Inspection Program ........................................................................................16 Eliminate the Conservation Technical Assistance Program..................................................................17 Eliminate the Rural Business Cooperative Service.................................................................................18 Prohibit Funding for National School Meal Standards ............................................................................................ and the Community Eligibility Provision 19 Withhold Funding for Federal Fruit and Vegetable Supply Restrictions ............................................20 Repeal the Agricultural Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage Programs .......................................21 Include Work Requirement for Able-Bodied Adult Food Stamp Recipients ......................................22 End Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility for Food Stamps ....................................................................23 Eliminate the “Heat and Eat” Loophole in Food Stamps ......................................................................24 Eliminate the Federal Sugar Program.......................................................................................................25 Eliminate Revenue-Based Crop Insurance Policies ................................................................................26 Eliminate the Market Access Program .....................................................................................................27 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Eliminate the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services ..........................................................30 Eliminate Grants within the Office of Justice Programs .......................................................................31 Eliminate Violence Against Women Act Grants ......................................................................................32 Eliminate the Legal Services Corporation ...............................................................................................33 Reduce Funding for the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division ..............................................34 Reduce Funding for the Department of Justice’s Environmental and Natural Resources Division ............................................................................................................35 Eliminate the Department of Justice’s Community Relations Services ..............................................36 Reduce Funding for the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives ...................................................................................37 Eliminate the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership ............................................................38 Eliminate the International Trade Administration ................................................................................39 Eliminate the Economic Development Administration .........................................................................40 Eliminate the Minority Business Development Agency ........................................................................41 Eliminate Census Bureau Funding for the Annual Supplemental Poverty Measure Report ...........42 Defense Cut Non-Defense Spending from the Defense Department Budget ....................................................46 Combine Military Exchanges and Commissaries and Reduce Commissary Subsidies .....................48 Close Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools .........................................................49 Blueprint for Balance: A FEDERAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 iii Reform Military Health Care .....................................................................................................................50 Increase Use of Performance-Based Logistics .........................................................................................51 Return Defense Agencies to 2011 Levels .................................................................................................52 Reduce Excess Base Infrastructure ...........................................................................................................53 Reform the Basic Allowance for Housing .................................................................................................54 End Renewable Energy Mandates in the Department of Defense .......................................................55 Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Focus the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration Spending on Weapons Programs ...........................................................................................................58 Return Funding for the DOE Office of Nuclear Physics to FY 2008 Levels .......................................59 Return Advanced Scientific Computing Research to FY 2008 Levels .................................................60 Eliminate the DOE Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy Program .......................................61 Drastically Cut or Eliminate the DOE Biological and Environmental Research Program and Shift Remaining Programs to Office of Science ..........................................................................62 Reduce Funding for the DOE Basic Energy Sciences Program .............................................................64 Eliminate DOE Energy Innovation Hubs .................................................................................................65 Eliminate the DOE Office of Electricity Deliverability and Energy Reliability .................................66 Eliminate the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy ............................................67 Eliminate the DOE Office of Fossil Energy .............................................................................................68 Eliminate the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy and Shift Remaining Activities to Offices of Science and Civilian Radioactive Waste Management ................................................69 Eliminate DOE Funding for Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Programs ..........................................................................71 Liquidate the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and the Northeastern Home Heating and Gasoline Supply Reserves ...............................................................................................................72 Auction Off the Tennessee Valley Authority ............................................................................................73 Auction Off the Four Remaining Power Marketing Administrations ..................................................74 Financial Services and General Government Eliminate the Small Business Administration’s Disaster Loans Program ..........................................78 Reform the Securities and Exchange Commission .................................................................................79 Eliminate the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund ...............................................80 Eliminate the Export–Import Bank ..........................................................................................................81 Eliminate Funding for the Multi-State Plan Program ...........................................................................82 Protect Freedom of Conscience in the District of Columbia ................................................................83 Expand the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program ................................................................................84 Homeland Security Eliminate Fire Grants ..................................................................................................................................88 Reduce Funding for FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund..................................................................................89 Refocus Science and Technology on Meeting DHS Needs and Using Private-Sector Developments .............................................................................................90 Streamline FEMA Grant Programs ...........................................................................................................91 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Eliminate Nine Climate Programs ............................................................................................................94 Eliminate Funding for Two EPA Research Programs ............................................................................95
Recommended publications
  • What's Needed for Health Care Reform

    What's Needed for Health Care Reform

    What’s Needed for Health Care Reform: Personalized Care That Puts You and Your Doctor in Charge THE DAILY SIGNAL | Marie Fishpaw / Grace-Marie Turner / @gracemarietweet / September 22, 2020 A patient-focused approach to health care reform would make insurance and care more affordable, while better protecting those with preexisting conditions and chronic health challenges. (Photo: Pabradyphoto/ iStock/Getty Images Plus) COMMENTARY BY Marie Fishpaw Grace-Marie Turner | @gracemarietweet Marie Fishpaw is director of domestic policy Grace-Marie Turner is president of studies at The Heritage Foundation’s the Galen Institute. Institute for Family, Community and Opportunity. The following is an open letter to the American people from 68 leaders participating in the Health Policy Consensus Group. The full list of signatories follows the letter. The nation faces a clear choice between two paths for America’s health care future: • One path is largely controlled by the government, where you get few choices and no options to escape. • The other is controlled by you and doctors, leading to more choices, lower costs, and improved quality and access. The first path builds on failure. Approaches like a public option—”Medicare for All” on the installment plan—double down on Obamacare’s failures, especially its soaring costs and tightening restrictions on access to the doctors and hospitals you want and need. Make no mistake: No matter how their ideas are packaged, the left’s ultimate goal is Medicare for All—legislation sponsored by a majority of House Democrats that is full of empty promises and that would outlaw your existing coverage and put you on a government-run plan.
  • Smart Growth (Livability), Air Pollution and Public Health by Wendell Cox 09/29/2011

    Smart Growth (Livability), Air Pollution and Public Health by Wendell Cox 09/29/2011

    Smart Growth (Livability), Air Pollution and Public Health by Wendell Cox 09/29/2011 In response to the outcry by job creators about proposed new Nitrogen Oxides emission regulations, the Obama Administration has suspended a planned expansion of these rules. The Public Health Risks of Densification The purpose of local air pollution regulation is to improve public health. For years, regional transportation plans, public officials, and urban planners have been seeking to densify urban areas, using strategies referred to as “smart growth” or “livability.” They have claimed that densifying urban areas would lead to lower levels of air pollution, principally because it is believed to reduce travel by car. In fact, however, EPA data show that higher population densities are strongly associated with higher levels of automobile travel and more intense air pollution emissions from cars and other highway vehicles. In short, higher emissions cause people to breathe more in air pollution, which can be unhealthful. To use a graphic example, a person is likely to encounter a greater chance of health risk by breathing intense smoke from a fire than if they are far enough from the fire to dilute the intensity of the smoke. Overall, more intense air pollution detracts from public health. To put in the economic terms that appear so often in planning literature on "urban sprawl," more intense traffic congestion and the consequent higher air pollution emissions are negative externalities of smart growth and densification. This is illustrated by county-level data for nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions, which is an important contributor to ozone formation.
  • Congressional Testimony

    Congressional Testimony

    CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY H.R. 51, "Washington, D.C. Admission Act" Testimony before the Committee on Oversight and Reform United States House of Representatives March 22, 2021 Zack Smith Legal Fellow Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies The Heritage Foundation Table of Contents I. The District of Columbia cannot be converted into our nation's 51st state without a constitutional amendment 3 II. Former Washington, DC Mayor Walter E. Washington raised practical concerns about making the District a state, and former Delegate Walter Fauntroy raised constitutional concerns 4 III. The historical reasons for securing full federal control over the seat of government, for preventing one state from having outsized influence on the federal government, and for the important symbolic value of having a national capital free from a single state's influence remain true today 6 IV. Both Democratic and Republican Justice Departments have reached the same conclusion that DC statehood requires a constitutional amendment 8 A. The fact that Congress has used its authority under Article IV, section 3 of the Constitution to admit 37 other states is constitutionally irrelevant. The District owes its existence to the fact that Congress exercised its CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY authority under Article I, section 8, clause 17 of the Constitution to create it. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 l. The prior retrocession of part of the District to Virginia should not be used as precedent 1O 2. Maryland's consent is needed before a new state can be created from the land it donated to create the federal seat of government 10 B. The Twenty-Third Amendment provides the most serious constitutional obstacle to the District's becoming a state via simple legislation.
  • Wendell Cox Set to Make a Special Address

    Wendell Cox Set to Make a Special Address

    Psychologist/Humorist Wendell Cox Set Spices Up Annual Banquet His job is “to put a smile on faces, informa- tion in minds, motivation in hearts, inspira- To Make A Special Address tion in spirits and to make the program planner look good,” said Dr. Charles Petty, Wendell Cox, a senior fellow with The Los Angeles Transportation Commission, who will be the featured speaker at this Heartland Institute and principal of where he authored the tax amendment that year’s annual RTA banquet. Wendell Cox Consultancy, an internation- provided the initial funding for building Petty will inform attendees about the al public policy firm, is set to make a spe- light rail and the subway. He was elected importance of family, based on his experi- ence from “the school of cial address at the Annual RTA chairman of the American Public Transit hard knocks.” His parents Convention. Association Planning and Policy divorced when he was Cox has provided consulting assistance Committee and Governing Boards six; his mother died three years later; he lived in a to the U.S. Department of Transportation Committee. blended family; his father andW was certified by the Urban Mass More recently, Cox served three years and younger brother were Transportation Administration as an as the director of public policy for the killed in a car accident expert for the duration of its Public- American Legislative Exchange Council, when he was 16; and he ended up in foster care Dr. Charles Petty Private Transportation Network Program where he oversaw the development of before he began an exciting career that (1986-1993).
  • High Speed Rail: Federal

    High Speed Rail: Federal

    HIGH-SPEED RAIL: FEDERAL (HSIPR) PROGRAM AND POLICY ANALYSIS by Wendell Cox Project Director: Robert W. Poole, Jr. December 2020 Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer- reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individuals and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corporations. The views are those of the author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or its trustees. HIGH-SPEED RAIL: FEDERAL (HSIPR) PROGRAM AND POLICY ANALYSIS i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During his presidential campaign, President-elect Joe Biden talked about a “rail revolution” that would include large increases in Amtrak funding and potentially coast-to-coast high- speed rail (HSR) service. If the Senate remains in Republican hands, there may be serious resistance to the fiscal and budgetary impacts of major increases in federal funding of passenger rail. But beyond the federal spending aspects is the question of how much value would be produced by such funding.
  • Congressional Record—Senate S6886

    Congressional Record—Senate S6886

    S6886 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE October 31, 2017 that—exactly the opposite. She wrote EXECUTIVE SESSION preme court justices who were not ap- that if a judge’s personal views were to proved by Republican Senators to move impede that judge’s ability to impar- to the Federal bench: Lisabeth Tabor tially apply the law, then the judge EXECUTIVE CALENDAR Hughes from Kentucky, Myra Selby should recuse herself from the case. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under from Indiana, Don Beatty from South As the coauthor of that article and the previous order, the Senate will pro- Carolina, Louis Butler from Wisconsin, current president of Catholic Univer- ceed to executive session and resume Patricia Timmons-Goodson from North sity recently put it, ‘‘The case against consideration of the Barrett nomina- Carolina. Prof. Barrett is so flimsy, that you tion, which the clerk will report. Senate Republicans turned obstruc- have to wonder whether there isn’t The senior assistant legislative clerk tion of judicial nominees into an art some other, unspoken, cause for their read the nomination of Amy Coney form under President Obama. Yet Sen- objection.’’ Barrett, of Indiana, to be United States ator MCCONNELL, day after day, has It does make you wonder. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit. said: ‘‘I think President Obama has To those using this matter as cover The PRESIDING OFFICER. The as- been treated very fairly by any objec- to oppose Professor Barrett because of sistant Democratic leader. tive standard.’’ her personally held religious beliefs, Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, Senator He comes to the floor now regularly let me remind you, there are no reli- MCCONNELL has come to the floor to to complain about ‘‘obstruction’’ of gious tests—none—for public office in complain about what he calls obstruc- Trump nominees.
  • How to Think About the Foundations of American Conservatism James W

    How to Think About the Foundations of American Conservatism James W

    No. 22 How to Think About the Foundations of American Conservatism James W. Ceaser, Ph.D. ontemporary American conservatism, which is Reagan. The remarkable diversity of this coalition has Cnotorious for its internal factionalism, is held been both a source of strength and a source of weak- together by a self-evident truth: conservatives’ shared ness for the conservative movement. Each part came antipathy to modern liberalism. Their main objections into existence at a different time and under differ ent are well-known. circumstances, and each has been guided by a different Almost to a man or woman, conservatives oppose principle by which it measures what is good or right. using government authority to enforce a vision of greater equality labeled by its supporters, with great • For religious conservatives, that principle is seduction, as “social justice.” Nearly as many conser- biblical faith. vatives object to the use of government authority—or, • For libertarians, it is the idea of “spontaneous alternatively, to the denial of government authority order,” the postulate that a tendency is opera- where it is natural, legal, and appropriate—to pro- tive in human affairs for things to work out for mote a worldview of individualism, expressivism, and themselves, provided no artificial effort is made secularism. Finally, most conservatives want nothing to impose an overall order. to do with an airy internationalism, frequently suspi- • For neoconservatives, it is a version of “natural cious of the American nation, that has shown itself so right,” meaning a standard of good in political inconstant in its support for the instruments of secu- affairs that is discoverable by human reason.
  • Section 10 – Overview of the Budget Process

    Section 10 – Overview of the Budget Process

    SECTION 21—OVERVIEW OF SCORING LEGISLATION SECTION 21—OVERVIEW OF SCORING LEGISLATION Table of Contents 21.1 What is scoring? 21.2 When does scoring occur during the budget process? 21.3 What are the basic concepts I need to know to score legislation? (a) Overview of budget laws (b) Definition of discretionary spending (c) Definition of mandatory spending (d) Committee of jurisdiction (e) How are scoring estimates measured? (f) Economic and technical assumptions (g) Scoring timeframes 21.4 What are the budget enforcement mechanisms for discretionary and mandatory spending? (a) Caps on discretionary spending (b) Pay-as-you-go for mandatory spending (c) Congressional enforcement procedures 21.5 What resources are available to help me score legislation? 21.6 When are scores of legislation due to OMB? 21.1 What is scoring? Scoring is the process of estimating the change in Government spending and collections resulting from enacted or proposed legislation, compared to what would happen in the absence of that legislation. These estimates are prepared both to inform policy makers of the budgetary effects of proposed legislation, and to inform congressional and statutory budget enforcement procedures. 21.2 When does scoring occur during the budget process? Scoring occurs typically during budget formulation, the consideration of proposed legislation, and after a law has been enacted. Budget formulation. As part of the budget formulation process, agencies submit baseline program levels and discretionary, mandatory, and governmental receipt proposals to OMB for consideration. Agencies work with OMB to determine the effect of proposals on budget authority, collections, and outlays based on the Administration’s economic and technical assumptions.
  • Why You Didn't Get a Raise in 2015, Clinton Campaign Pulls in $55M

    Why You Didn't Get a Raise in 2015, Clinton Campaign Pulls in $55M

    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2016/01/01/why-you-didnt-get-a-raise-in-2015-clinton-campaign-pulls-in-55m-and-will-trumps- supporters-show-and-vote-us-national-blog-roundup-for-26-december-1-january/ Why you didn’t get a raise in 2015, Clinton campaign pulls in $55m, and will Trump’s supporters show and vote? : US national blog roundup for 26 December – 1 January USAPP Managing Editor, Chris Gilson looks at the best in political blogging from around the Beltway. Jump to Elections and the road to 2016 The Democrats’ 2016 campaign The Republican Party’s 2016 campaign Government, the Beltway and Congress’ agenda Foreign policy, defense and trade Obamacare and health policy The economy and society President Obama, the Democratic Party, and the GOP On Sunday, Red State comments that President Obama does not understand billionaire – and GOP presidential frontrunner – Donald Trump any better than the Republican Party establishment does. They say that while Trump is a creation of the GOP, he is more specifically a creation of the way that the party has dealt with the Obama administration. On New Year’s Day, Post Politics has the news that Obama is planning new curbs on guns via executive action, and on Monday will meet with the Attorney General, Loretta Lynch to finalize these measures. Townhall writes that if Obama does move forward with gun control measures, then his bill which would ease sentences for those convicted of drug trafficking offenses should be killed. Moving on to the Democratic Party more generally, Political Animal examines the role of black women in the party, writing Monday that they are playing an Credit: Elvert Barnes (Creative Commons BY SA) increasingly active role in the political system, something that Democrats should not ignore.
  • Jennifer Groysman February 18Th President@Planorepublicanwomen.Org GPO Chair Debate February 19Th

    Jennifer Groysman February 18Th [email protected] GPO Chair Debate February 19Th

    Page 1 Plano Republican Women TFRW Region No: 3 Senate District No: 8 January 2020 President’s Byline: Is Peace between Israel and the Palestinians Possible? Presidents Message 1 On January 28th, President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu unveiled a new Peace plan for Israel and a future Palestinian state. It is the most detailed Middle January Meeting 2 East Peace plan to be suggested, but will it finally bring peace? December Photos 3 Americanism The Middle East Peace Plan: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/ By Anne Logan 4-5 uploads/2020/01/Peace-to-Prosperity-0120.pdf Political Cartoons 6 This is the most detailed plan that has been suggested in recent history. It is 181 Legislative Report 7-9 pages and gives a suggested map with boarders of the two states, as well as out- lines the things both sides must do for this plan to begin and stay in place. Howev- December Photos 10 er, the question is will this plan work? 7 Big Moments By Fred Lucas 11-13 Peace plans have been made and agreed to by both sides in the past; Israel has given up land for Political Cartoons 14 peace before. The most recent land for peace exchange was when Israel gave the Gaza Strip to the Palestinians. Shortly after the land was given, however, rockets from Gaza were fired into Israel. That 19 Arrests Later sums up how all past peace deals have gone. The Palestinians abide by the deal long enough to get By Fred Lucas 15-18 land from Israel, but once they get what they want, they attack it.
  • Uncontrollable Spending Has Been Growing Much More Rapidly Than Total Spending and Thus Accounts for an Ever-Larger Share of the Total

    Uncontrollable Spending Has Been Growing Much More Rapidly Than Total Spending and Thus Accounts for an Ever-Larger Share of the Total

    How much spending is uncontrollable? Spending is generally said to be uncontrollable for political rather than legal reasons. Entitlement spending can always be controlled legally by reforming programs, but when an entitlement is extremely popular, reform may require more political courage than is readily available. The federal budget divides government spending into three categories, discretionary spending, mandatory or direct spending, and net interest. Discretionary spending, set in annual appropriations acts controlled by the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, includes most defense programs as well as spending for education, transportation, environmental protection, law enforcement and border security, and international assistance. Mandatory spending, controlled by laws other than appropriations act, includes spending on entitlement programs including the big three—Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid—and many smaller programs such as supplemental nutrition assistance, federal civilian and military retirement benefits, and unemployment insurance. Government spending on mandatory programs (often called entitlement programs), and net interest on the public debt are often described as “uncontrollable.” Entitlements can be controlled legally by reforming them, but this can be highly unpopular politically. Interest costs can be controlled indirectly by curbing spending growth or raising revenues, but that is also never easy. Uncontrollable spending has been growing much more rapidly than total spending and thus accounts for an ever-larger share of the total. However, most growth has been concentrated in entitlements that serve the elderly and in health insurance. The population has been aging rapidly, and that affects both Social Security and health programs. The latter have grown doubly rapidly because health costs per beneficiary have been growing faster than incomes per capita.
  • Lee Edwards Papers

    Lee Edwards Papers

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt5q2nf31k No online items Preliminary Inventory of the Lee Edwards papers Finding aid prepared by Hoover Institution Library and Archives Staff Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2009, 2013 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Preliminary Inventory of the Lee 2010C14 1 Edwards papers Title: Lee Edwards papers Date (inclusive): 1878-2004 Collection Number: 2010C14 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 389 manuscript boxes, 12 card file boxes, 2 oversize boxes, 5 film reels, 1 oversize folder(146.4 Linear Feet) Abstract: Correspondence, speeches and writings, memoranda, reports, studies, financial records, printed matter, and sound recordings of interviews and other audiovisual material, relating to conservatism in the United States, the mass media, Grove City College, the Heritage Foundation, the Republican Party, Walter Judd, Barry Goldwater, and Ronald Reagan. Includes extensive research material used in books and other writing projects by Lee Edwards. Also includes papers of Willard Edwards, journalist and father of Lee Edwards. Creator: Edwards, Lee, 1932- Creator: Edwards, Willard, 1902-1990 Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please