DOCSLIB.ORG

J33. Journal of the Simplified Spelling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
J33. Journal of the Simplified Spelling the simplified Founded 1908 in London, England Working for planned change in English spelling for spelling society the benefit of learners and users everywhere Spelcon 2005 Conference Report International English for Global Literacy University of Mannheim – First International Conference, 29th–31st July 2005 Report compiled by Bernadette Hughes, SSS Business Secretary This report was intended to be Journal 33, but was not published at the time. Contents 1. List of Attendees 2. Speaker abstracts 3. Opening of the conference 4. Papers presented 4.1 ‘The worst aspects of English Spelling’ Mrs. Masha Bell 4.2 'Why the Internet age will not accept simplified English spelling’ Dr. Christopher Rollason 4.3 ‘How to prepare for, select and implement a reformed spelling scheme for global English’ Mr. Niall Waldman 4.4 ‘The German spelling reform – An example for the Simplified Spelling Society’ Prof. Gerhard Augst 4.5 ‘Report on the Spelling Bee Contest in Washington Challenges with English spelling while teaching English in Germany’ Mr. Adrian Alphohziel 4.6 ‘Spelling in Indian English – English spelling simplification activity in ‘my’ country: The classroom experience’ Dr. Jenny Bayer 4.7 ‘Strategies for implementing spelling reforms’ Mr. Christopher Jolly 4.8 ‘Centre of power in educational change’ Mrs.Isobel Raven 5. Final announcement by the Chairman 6. De-Briefing session 7. Additional papers 7.1 ‘An alphabet for English – XVIII’ Dr. J Conrad Crown 7.2 ‘Strategies for English spelling reforms’ Dr. L. Devaki 7.3 ‘A practical plan for achieving spelling reform’ Mr. J.Carter 7.4 ‘How systematic repair is possible’ Dr. Valerie Yule, SSS Vice-President 7.5 ‘The case for an International Commission on English Spelling Dr. Valerie Yule, SSS Vice-President 7.6 ‘Working Party for an International English Spelling Commission (IESC)’ Dr. Valerie Yule, SSS Vice-President 1. List of Attendees Those present at the conference travelled from 11 countries (UK, USA, Australia, Czech Republic, Switzerland, India, France, Canada, Germany, Japan and Ukraine) Name Country Background / Interest Jack Bovill UK Chairman John Dalby UK Committee member and trustee John Gledhill UK Hon. Treasurer & Membership Secretary Masha Bell UK Committee member Isobel Raven Canada Society member Niall Waldman Canada Society member Ze Do Rock Germany Committee member Robert McGhee Czech Republic Society member Christopher Rollason France Speaker Gerhard Augst Germany Speaker Adrian Alphohziel Germany Committee member Chris Jolly UK Committee member and trustee Gilbert Jolly UK General interest Roy Blain Germany Society member Jenny Bayer India Speaker Ursula Nicklas Germany Conference Organiser Nicholas Cole Australia General interest /Speaks several languages Jason Embley USA Student /Thesis on English language Parag Mehta Germany Conference helper /Saispel Bernadette Hughes UK SSS Business Secretary Gabbie Blain Switzerland General interest Esther Blain Switzerland General interest Edward Marchant UK Society member Ishi Yasuko Japan Student / Studying English writing reform Skye Hendrix USA Business Student Ruth Ann Hendrix USA Society member Terje Hetland Nigel Hilton UK Society member Jeanette Richeer Germany Student Regina Baitnik General interest Anna Germany Student Mrs Haberling Germany Graphic Designer for Spelcon Age Analysis Below 20 years 1% 20–29 years 2% 30–49 years 40% 50 + 57% 2. Speaker Abstracts Mrs. Masha Bell, Keynote speaker Writer and researcher, author of ‘Understanding English Spelling’ (2004), is a European who had to learn English as a third language. Dr.Christopher Rollason, European Parliament official –Works in the Translation Service of the European Parliament. Published a considerable number of articles Mr. Niall McLeod Waldman, author of ‘Spelling Dearest’, spelling reformist Prof. Gerhard Augst, Chairman of the German spelling commission and writer on psycholinguistics-language and languages-orthography and spelling – German language, orthography and spelling and graphemics. Editor of new trends in graphemics and orthography, 1986. Mr. Adrian Alphohziel, Translator, Englishman teaching in Germany Dr. Jenny Bayer, Research officer of sociolinguistics language and educational institutional development department in Mysore, India. Writer and author of 26 books. Presented seminars and given papers in international linguistic conferences in over 15 countries. Mr. Christopher Jolly, Former SSS Chairman, Publisher of the Jolly Phonics programme Mrs. Isobel Raven, Teacher, writer, author of The Future of Fonics (2005) 3. Opening of the conference. Saturday 30 July 2005. 10:20 hrs The Chairman of ‘The Simplified Spelling Society’, Mr. Jack Bovill, welcomed everyone to the conference and thanked Ursula Nicklas for all her efforts in organising this three-day event. He commenced with an overhead entitled ‘Reform – The fight for the 1832 Reform Act’ (Edward Pearce). He briefly spoke about the Reform Act before presenting a message from the President of the society, Prof. John Wells. “I am sorry not to be able to attend the conference on International Englsh for Global Literacy in Mannheim. I am convinced that all users of English, whether as a first language, a second language, or a foreign language, would benefit from the rationalization of English spelling. Our traditional orthography enables us to infer neither the pronunciation of a written word nor the spelling of a spoken word. This imposes an unnecessary learning burden on everyone who uses English. We need to change our spelling.” John Wells. Professor of Phonetics, University College London. President, Simplified Spelling Society The Chairman then drew a parallel with the ‘Rosetta stone’, which was discovered during the Napoleonic campaign in Egypt. There are three levels of writing systems on the stone, at the top is Egyptian hieroglyphics, middle demotic script and at the bottom Greek. The undecipherable written system at the top based on a centuries-old unreformed format had to be accompanied by a demotic script so that less educated people could understand it. The Chair asked the question, “Do you wish the language to be the master of you or do you want it to be your servant?” He noted that in Germany it is the latter. He then passed the floor to Masha Bell the keynote speaker. 4. PAPERS Saturday 30 July 2005. 10:30 hrs 4.1 Masha Bell – Keynote Speaker The Worst aspects of English spelling I chose this title some time ago – but when I started to prepare for my talk today, I realised that I could not possibly say all that I would like to say about the worst aspects of English spelling. There is just too much wrong with it. So even explaining just the worst parts would take hours. So, I decided to concentrate on two related issues: 1) Why has English Spelling not been reformed since 1700? 2) Changes which are needed to give spelling reform a better chance of success. But before I start on those two themes, I want to explain briefly how I became interested in English spelling and spelling reform. I first began to think that English spelling needed reforming 46 years ago — when I was 14 and when I first started to learn E. in Lithuania. In our 1st English lesson, our teacher explained that English letters were not like Lithuanian and Russian ones which made just one sound per letter. She explained that the English letter A, for example, was called AY and that it sometimes made the AY-sound, but was mostly pronounced as in ‘a cat and a hat’, and sometimes also as in ‘ask’ and ‘answer’. This made me worry right away. I could immediately see that such alphabetic unreliability was going to make learning to read English very difficult. — It meant the teacher would have to tell us how to pronounce every new word we met. — And I did find learning to read English very difficult. And while trying to do so, I was constantly puzzled why English speakers put up with such a system, and especially, HOW THEY COULD BEAR TO PUT THEIR OWN CHILDREN THROUGH SUCH TORTURE? The second time I thought that there was something seriously wrong with English spelling was when I was 20 and I became an au-pair in London in 1964. The family had 3 boys: aged 6, 10 and 14 – and at least one of them was always preparing for a spelling test. Before coming to England I had lived with my uncle and his wife in Germany for a while. They also had 3 young boys, but spelling had been no big deal. It was just something they learned at school. — The English boys and their parents, by contrast, seemed be obsessed and dominated by spelling. Twelve years later I became a teacher of English and German in an English secondary school (the equivalent of a Gymnasium fur Madchen), and I found out again that English spelling was a very big problem. — The younger pupils, aged 11 and 12, all still made lots of spelling mistakes. Quite a few of the older still did too. But what really surprised me was that quite a few of the teachers regularly made spelling mistakes as well. I am letting you into a well-kept secret here: it is not a well-known fact that school reports in England are checked several times for spelling errors before they are sent home. — In that grammar school they were checked at least 3 times: by the form tutor, the deputy head and the head teacher. Each checking picked up a few errors, and some reports had to be completely rewritten. – So even for teachers spelling is a problem, and is recognised as such. In all English schools, teachers have regular discussions about improving pupils’ spelling. At such meetings I began to suggest that this was perhaps because ES was rather illogical and that reforming it might help. – This idea was treated with complete disbelief — as something utterly outlandish and inconceivable. — I was even told that it can’t really be all that bad, because even a foreigner like me had managed to cope.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WRITTEN DIALECTS N Spelling Reforms: History N Alternatives by Kenneth H
    WRITTEN DIALECTS N Spelling Reforms: History N Alternatives by Kenneth H. Ives © 1979 PROGRESIV PUBLISHR, Chicago IL [112pp. A5 in the printed version] Library of Congress Catalog Card # 78-54745 ISBN 0-89670-004-6 Kenneth Ives is a sociologist and social worker, currently director of research and statistics for a family counseling agency. For the past 10 years he has been studying various aspects of spelling and spelling reform - history, phonetics, readability, writeability, acceptability, and problems of adoption. [Words originally underlined are now in italics. The spellings are as in the original.] Preface In recent years the variety of spoken dialects in English has become a subject for study and appreciation, replacing the former scorn and depreciation for "non-standard English." (Shuy, 1967; Labov, 1970, Butler, 1974) Similarly, differing but consistent ways of writing standard (or even non-standard) English may be viewed as differing written dialects. These include the standard "traditional orthography," (TO), accepted alternate spellings found in dictionaries (Emery, 1973) such as "altho, thru, dropt, fixt, catalog," Pitman's Initial Teaching Alphabet (ITA), and the 50 or more proposals for spelling reform. They also include earlier spellings such as Chaucer used, with the Anglo-Saxon thorn symbol for "th" (still used in Icelandic), and the alphabetic shorthand systems. Our traditional spelling became largely frozen with the rise of printing four centuries ago, and dictionaries and grammars two centuries ago, but our spoken language has had a "great vowel shift" and other changes. Hence the correspondence between our spoken and written dialects has become more complex, irregular, and confusing.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthographies in Early Modern Europe
    Orthographies in Early Modern Europe Orthographies in Early Modern Europe Edited by Susan Baddeley Anja Voeste De Gruyter Mouton An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org ISBN 978-3-11-021808-4 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-021809-1 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-021806-2 ISSN 0179-0986 e-ISSN 0179-3256 ThisISBN work 978-3-11-021808-4 is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License, ase-ISBN of February (PDF) 978-3-11-021809-1 23, 2017. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-021806-2 LibraryISSN 0179-0986 of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ae-ISSN CIP catalog 0179-3256 record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. ISBN 978-3-11-028812-4 e-ISBNBibliografische 978-3-11-028817-9 Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliogra- fie;This detaillierte work is licensed bibliografische under the DatenCreative sind Commons im Internet Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs über 3.0 License, Libraryhttp://dnb.dnb.deas of February of Congress 23, 2017.abrufbar.
    [Show full text]
  • A.40. GERMAN1 A.40A. Nouns A.40A1. Capitalize All Nouns And
    CC:DA/Croissant/2003/1 February 12, 2003 page 1 To: American Library Association ALCTS/CCS Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access From: Charles R. Croissant, Saint Louis University John Hostage, Harvard Law School Library Subject: Revision of AACR2 Appendix A, Capitalization, A.40. German. Background: After several decades of work by an international commission of representatives from the German-speaking nations, a new set of rules for German orthography, including capitalization, was officially accepted by the governments of these countries at a meeting in Vienna on July 1, 1996. The rules were officially introduced on August 1, 1998. A period of transition, during which both the old and the new orthography are valid, is scheduled to end on August 1, 2005. Although the new orthography cannot, of course, be imposed on private persons, it becomes the de facto standard for German orthography, since it must now be taught to all schoolchildren in German-speaking countries and must be adhered to in all government publications. The intent of the new rules is to make German orthography more consistent and reduce the number of exceptions to the rules, so as to make German orthography easier to learn. With regard to capitalization, the intent of the rules is to apply as consistently as possible the principle that nouns and words that function as nouns are capitalized, and to make the remaining exceptions to this principle easier to understand. One consequence of the spelling reform is that the guidelines for German capitalization given in Appendix A, rule A.40, no longer accurately reflect correct German capitalization according to the new rules.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of English Spelling
    9781405190237_1_pre.qxd 6/15/11 9:00 Page iii The History of English Spelling Christopher Upward and George Davidson A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication 9781405190237_1_pre.qxd 6/15/11 9:00 Page vi 9781405190237_1_pre.qxd 6/15/11 9:00 Page i The History of English Spelling 9781405190237_1_pre.qxd 6/15/11 9:00 Page ii THE LANGUAGE LIBRARY Series editor: David Crystal The Language Library was created in 1952 by Eric Partridge, the great etymologist and lexicographer, who from 1966 to 1976 was assisted by his co-editor Simeon Potter. Together they commissioned volumes on the traditional themes of language study, with particular emphasis on the history of the English language and on the individual linguistic styles of major English authors. In 1977 David Crystal took over as editor, and The Language Library now includes titles in many areas of linguistic enquiry. The most recently published titles in the series include: Christopher Upward and The History of English Spelling George Davidson Geoffrey Hughes Political Correctness: A History of Semantics and Culture Nicholas Evans Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us Amalia E. Gnanadesikan The Writing Revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet David Crystal A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, Sixth Edition Viv Edwards Multilingualism in the English- speaking World Ronald Wardhaugh Proper English: Myths and Misunderstandings about Language Gunnel Tottie An Introduction to American English Geoffrey Hughes A History of English Words Walter Nash Jargon Roger Shuy Language
    [Show full text]
  • Written Text
    1 Swimming against the current Text of a “keynote address” for video delivery at the first World Congress of Korean Language, October 2020 신사 숙녀 여러분: 만나서 반갑습니다 ! I want to talk today (in English, I’m afraid) about what I believe is a consistent tendency in the historical evolution of scripts around the world. I shan’t call it a “linguistic universal”, because I don’t believe in Chomskyan biological universals of language. Languages are purely cultural products, and like other cultural products their development isn’t controlled by scientific laws. But the tendency I have in mind does seem to hold quite widely, and it can be explained, in terms of the demographic changes we associate with modernity. The reason why this topic may make a suitable opening for your conference is that the one unexplained exception to the tendency which I know of is in fact Korean script. But I’ll come to the case of Korean after I’ve spent some time discussing the tendency more generally. What I believe to be generally true, as I discuss in my book The Linguistics Delusion, is that in newly literate societies writing tends to be a matter of phonetic transcription – if the script is alphabetic, a newly-devised orthography will conform pretty closely to the principle “one sound, one symbol”; while as the script matures and the society modernizes, the orthography tends to evolve in the direction of what I’ll call “contrastiveness”, in the sense that the meaningful units of the language have consistent written shapes which are well-differentiated from the written forms of other meaningful units.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Free Trial Version of the British West Indies 4 Standard Version Please Visit My Website At
    In this issue Legislative drafting Master class in English, for Clarity’s conference in Boulogne: writing the law in plain language— three versions 4 Conrad Dehn Clarity Instructions for Queues Bill 4 Number 55 May 2006 Version 1—by Don Macpherson Queues Bill 2005 6 Version 2—by Robin Dormer Journal of the Commentary and Queues Bill 2005 9 international association Version 3—by Ben Piper promoting plain legal language Queues Bill 2005 12 Vicki Schmolka Drafting master classes: plain language styles are not consistent 15 Other articles Introduction to the international roundtable at the Fifth Plain Language Association INternational (PLAIN) Conference 19 Neil James Plain language developments in Australia 19 Claudia Poblete Olmedo Plain language in the Senate of Chili 22 Cristina Gelpi Plain language in Spain 23 Anne-Marie Hasselrot What’s on in plain Swedish 26 Sarah Carr Recent plain-language progress in the U.K. 27 Annetta Cheek Plain language in the United States government 30 More from the PLAIN Conference Removing barriers to food stamp assistance— one complex form at a time 32 Health literacy: the importance of clear communication for better health 39 Making things clear: how we are winning— 6 strategies and themes to our work 43 Catherine Rawson You can fix your own English 50 Sarah Carr Editor in chief: Technical jargon: an approach, an idea and Julie Clement an offering 55 Mark Adler Guest editor for this issue: Taking an overview: three rules of thumb 60 Annetta Cheek Clarity and general news 62–63 Patrons The Rt Hon Sir Christopher Staughton, The Hon Justice Michael Kirby, and H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Plain English Lexicon
    second edition Plain English Lexicon A guide to whether your words will be understood Martin Cutts Foreword by Christine Mowat, past Chair of Plain Language Association InterNational ( plain ) June 2011 Plain English Lexicon Martin Cutts Plain Language Commission, www.clearest.co.uk Acknowledgements Copyright and permissions Your comments are welcome I’m grateful to World Book, Inc for permission to use content Copyright: Martin Cutts, 2011. If you have comments on the lexicon, including suggestions from the ‘Living Word Vocabulary’*; the British National *Content from the living word vocabulary by permission for words to include, please send them to the author at Corpus Consortium**; my lexicographer colleague Christina of World Book, Inc. www.worldbook.online.com . All rights Plain Language Commission, The Castle, 29 Stoneheads, Gleeson for spending so many hours interrogating the British reserved. This publication may not be reproduced in whole or Whaley Bridge, High Peak SK23 7BB, UK. e w National Corpus and commenting on the draft of the lexicon; in part without permission from the publisher. [email protected] www.clearest.co.uk Sarah Carr, Marianne Holmes and Judy Brown for their many Key to abbreviations wise suggestions; and Bill DuBay for drawing attention to the **‘The British National Corpus’, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). ‘Living Word Vocabulary’ in his book ‘Smart Language’ and 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on adj = adjective; Brit E = British English; n = noun; predet = his posts to the Plain Language Association InterNational behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/ predeterminer (a word or phrase that quantifies a noun (plain ) forum, http://www.plainlanguagenetwork.org .
    [Show full text]
  • The Rechtschreibreform – a Lesson in Linguistic Purism
    The Rechtschreibreform – A Lesson in Linguistic Purism Nils Langer, University of Bristol The Rechtschreibreform – A Lesson in Linguistic Purism 15 The Rechtschreibreform – A Lesson in Linguistic Purism1 Nils Langer The German spelling reform of 1998 generated an amazing amount of (mostly negative) reaction from the German public. Starting with a general overview of the nature of linguistic purism and the history of German orthography, this article presents a wide range of opinions of the spelling reform. The data is mostly taken from the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, either in the form of newspaper articles or letters to the editor, showing that the reform is rejected by untrained linguists (folk) for various political and pseudo-linguistic reasons, which, however, have in common a fundamenal misconception of the nature and status of both orthography in general and the 1998 spelling reform in particular. This articles argues, therefore, that the vast majority of objections to the spelling reform is not based on linguistic issues but rather based on a broadly politically defined conservative view of the world. On 1 August 2000 one of the leading German broadsheets, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), returned to using the old ‘bewährten’ spelling rules after one year of working with the new rules, arguing that the new rules had not achieved what they set out to do. The FAZ is on its own in this assessment, no other German newspaper followed its lead, and only two intellectual societies, the Hochschullehrerverband and the Deutsche Akademie für Sprache und Dichtung, returned to the old spelling after the FAZ’s decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The English Spelling Reform in the Light of the Works of Richard Mulcaster and John Hart
    The English Spelling Reform in the Light of the Works of Richard Mulcaster and John Hart Susana Doval Suárez UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA 1. INTRODUCTION This study is an approach to the works of Richard Mulcaster and John Hart, who can be con- sidered as the best representatives of the English Renaissance spelling debate. Since the controversy over the adequacy or inadequacy of English orthography is still alive, a comparison between present and past reform proposals is suggested. The starting point of the discussion is the assumption that many of the so-called “modern” linguistic disciplines can be traced back to the Renaissance, as is the case with Language Planning. In fact, the English Renaissance meant the emergence of an intensive Language Planning activity entailing both standardization and normalization processes. Thus, using Haugen’s 1984 terms, both Corpus and Status Planning were developed at this stage of the history of the English language. However, the extent to which past and present activities can be compared has to do with the pre- scriptive character of the former as opposed to the more “social” character of the latter (cf. Fernández Pérez, 1994). In the case of Spelling Reform the difference is assumed to lie in the interdisciplinary approach of modern script reformers in contrast with the more unidirectional proposals made in the past. 2. THE RENAISSANCE SPELLING DEBATE 2.1. THE EMERGENCE OF SPELLING REFORM By the middle of the 16thc the inconsistency perceived in the English Orthography gives rise to the first spelling reform treatises based on phonological principles. The English reform movement is vinculated to the French orthographic reform, carried out by Meigret1 and to the controversy over the pronunciation of Classical Greek confronting Sir John Cheke and Sir Thomas Smith on the one hand, and Bishop Gardiner on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • J32. Journal of the Simplified Spelling
    Journal of the Simplified Spelling Society J32, 2003/1. Editor: Steve Bett. Contents. 1. Editorial. Articles. 2. The Two Stage Approach to Spelling Reform. Steve Bett. 3. English Accents and their Implications for Spelling Reform. John C. Wells. 4. How Phonemic is English Spelling? Godfrey Dewey. 5. Could English spelling be made regular without drastic change? Valerie Yule. 6. Orthographic Goals. Steve Bett. 7. Comparing Spelling Schemes. Roy W. Blain. 8. Reform of Chemical Language as a Model for Spelling Reform. Hans-Richard Sliwka. 9. The End of the Reading Wars? Isobel Raven. 10. Review of Jean Meron's Orthotypographie. John M. Gledhill. 11. Letters & Summaries of On-Line Discussions. 12. A Message from the new president: John Wells. 13. Tribute to Don Scragg on his retirement as the Society's president. 14. Inside front cover. We spell a spoken sound in as many as 20 different ways. [Journal of the Simplified Spelling Society, J32, 2003/1, pp2,3 in the printed version.] [Steve Bett: see Journals, Newsletters] 1. Editorial. Steve Bett. Moving from logographic lexical spelling to phonemic spelling. The proposals of the Simplified Spelling Board of 1906 and the Simplified Spelling Society of 1908 were attempts to seek out the lines of least resistance to spelling change. Earlier phonemic spelling associations were thought to advocate reform proposals that were too radical for any popular acceptance. The first compromise, suggested by Alexander Ellis, was to retain the shifted long vowels. In England, this led to the endorsement of New Spelling which became the house style for most internal publications of the society until around 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Spelling Reform Anthology Edited by Newell W. Tune §6. Which Way To
    Spelling Reform Anthology edited by Newell W. Tune §6. Which way to go in Spelling Reform This section presents various ideas for the kind and extent of reform, from the most modest to the more extreme and suggests criteria for deciding on reform. Contents 1. Cook, Walter F. A Practical Approach to Spelling Reform. 2. Yule, Valerie, Let Us be Practical About Spelling Reform. 3. Pitman, Sir Jas. Some Principles Governing Imp. of the Visible Lang. 4. Tune, Newell, The Real Problem of Spelling Reform. 5. Ives, Kenneth H. Acceptability of Proposed Spelling Reforms. 6. Bisgard, Helen, Reaction to Ives' Acceptability. 7. Smoker, Barbara, G.B.S. & the ABC's. 8. Yule, Valerie, A Transitional Spelling Reform. 9. du Feu, Frank. On Devising a Minimal Change System of Reform. 10. Pei, Mario, Preface to: Better English Thru Simplified Spelling 11. Read, Kingsley, Quo Vadis? 12. Hildreth, Gertrude, Which Way to Go in Spelling Reform? 13. Tune, Newell, Introspection or Retrospection? [Spelling Reform Anthology §6.1 pp86,87 in the printed version] [Spelling Progress Bulletin Spring 1980 pp19,20 in the printed version] 1. A Practical Approach to Spelling Reform by Walter F. Cook * * Phoenix, Az.. I appreciate the opportunity to contribute some new ideas for implementation of a spelling reform. As a businessman running a small computer company, I am undoubtedly in a very small minority among a group of educators. Yet I have been irritated by the difficulty of English spelling and have been interested in spelling reform for many years. I had actually started an independent development of a set of rationalized rules for spelling reform before I became aware of the large amount of work done by this group and other groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of the English Spelling System
    Sveučilište J.J. Strossmayera u Osijeku Filozofski fakultet Diplomski studij engleskoga jezika i književnosti i njemačkoga jezika i književnosti Dragana Jurić The historical development of the English spelling system Diplomski rad doc.dr.sc. Tanja Gradečak-Erdeljić Osijek, 2013. Summary The English language is a complex system and it is difficult to know what to expect, when a language develops a worldwide presence to the extent that English has. The history of English is a fascinating system of its own. The sound, spelling, grammar, and vocabulary – every aspect of the language has a rich history of development, influenced by other languages during its journey towards standardization. This paper focuses on one aspect – the spelling. Its development will be traced through all the important periods of the English language (Old English, Middle English, Early Modern English, and Modern English) in section two (The English language). The Early Modern English period was the period of the English Renaissance and the spelling reforms. The wish for standardization was at its highest state. In section three, some of the changes that occured in the spelling system, will be taken from some of the most important works of English literature (Beowulf, The Peterborough Chronicles, The Ormulum, The Canterbury Tales) and language development (A Guide to the English Tongue, The Universal Spelling-Book or, A New and Easy Guide to the English Language, The American Spelling Book: Containing the Rudiments of the English Language, for the Use of Schools in the United States), as well as named and compared. In the conclusion, all the important facts connected with the history of the English language and the historical development of its spelling system, will be briefly summarized.
    [Show full text]