NOTES ICHTYOLOGIQUES ON THE AUTHORSHIP, IDENTITY AND be determined by re-examination of original TAXONOMIC POSITION OF PLEURONEC- published literature, whereas the question of TES COMMERSONNII LACEPÈDE, 1802 identity of this species can only be resolved by (PLEURONECTIFORMES, SOLEIDAE). referring to the unpublished illustration of this Thomas A. MUNROE, National Marine Fishe- species prepared for Commerson, which provides ries Service National Systematics Laboratory, new information that permits the correct taxo- National Museum of Natural History, Washington, nomic placement for this nominal species. DC 20560-0153, USA. [
[email protected]. Date of authorship, and authorship itself, edu] & Martine DESOUTTER, Laboratoire for Lacepède’s nominal species, Pleuronectes d’Ichtyologie générale et appliquée, Muséum commersonnii, have been the subject of alternative national d’Histoire naturelle, 43 rue Cuvier, 75231 views by subsequent investigators. Contributing to Paris cedex 05, FRANCE. [
[email protected]] confusion surrounding the authorship and taxo- nomic placement of this nominal species are the RÉSUMÉ.!-!Sur la paternité, l’identité et la lack of type specimens and inconsistencies be- position taxinomique de Pleuronectes commer- tween the original description and the published sonnii Lacepède, 1802 (Pleuronectiformes, Solei- illustration of the species. This confusion is dae). largely due to the fact that the illustration of this Les auteurs discutent et démontrent la va- species published one year prior (Lacepède, 1801) lidité taxinomique de l’espèce décrite par Lace- to the description (Lacepède, 1802) was labelled pède, en 1802, sous le nom de Pleuronectes with a vernacular name, which was incorrectly commersonnii. Cette espèce appartient bien à la interpreted as a scientific binomial by some famille des Soleidae et est maintenant placée dans subsequent authors (e.g., Cantor, 1849; Günther, le genre Synaptura.