Public Document Pack
LEGAL & DEMOCRATIC SERVICES
Linda Fisher Service Director
COMMITTEE SERVICES SECTION PO Box 15, Town Hall, Rochdale OL16 1AB
Telephone: Rochdale (01706) 647474 Fax: Rochdale (01706) 924705 www.rochdale.gov.uk
To: All Members of Licensing and Your Ref: Regulatory Committee Our Ref: Enquiries to: Mark Hardman Extension: 4704 Date: 5th July 2011
Dear Councillor
LICENSING AND REGULATORY COMMITTEE
You are requested to attend the meeting of Licensing and Regulatory Committee to be held in Reception Room - Rochdale Town Hall on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 commencing at 6.15 pm.
The agenda and supporting papers are attached.
If you require advice on any agenda item involving a possible Declaration of Interest which could affect your right to speak and/or vote, please contact staff in the Committee Services Section at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
Yours faithfully
Linda Fisher Service Director
Licensing and Regulatory Committee Membership 2010/11
Councillor Daalat Ali Councillor Zulfiqar Ali Councillor Surinder Biant Councillor Malcolm Boriss Councillor Martin Burke Councillor Patricia Ann Flynn Councillor Alan Michael McCarthy Councillor Ann Lynn Metcalfe Councillor Peter Rush Councillor Patricia Sullivan Councillor Carol Elizabeth Wardle
1
ROCHDALE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL
LICENSING AND REGULATORY COMMITTEE
Wednesday, 13 July 2011 at 6.15 pm
Reception Room - Rochdale Town Hall
A G E N D A
Apologies for Absence 1. Declaration Of Interests 2. Submitted Planning Applications 3. Annual Governance Statement 2010/11 4. Statement of Accounts 2010/11 5. Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places
2 Agenda Item 2
ITEM FOR DECISION
HEAD OF PLANNING AND REGULATION SERVICES
REGULATORY COMMITTEE
13 JULY 2011
SUBMITTED PLANNING APPLICATIONS ______Applications submitted for planning or related consents and presented for consideration of Rochdale Township Planning Sub-Committee.
WARDS AFFECTED: As indicated for individual applications.
1. Purpose of Report
1.1 To inform Committee of submitted planning applications and to recommend action.
2. Recommendation
2.1 See recommendations for individual planning applications.
3. Background Papers and Contact Officer
3.1 The background papers relevant to the planning applications to be considered on this are as follows:-
1. The Planning application file and its contents which are listed below:
i) The planning application form, scaled drawings/plans and relevant statutory certificates. ii) Letters of response from statutory and other consultees, as indicated on the front of thefile. iii) Letters and documents from interested parties. iv) Notes of telephone conversations, meetings and information received which are relevant.
2. For any previous planning application referred to in the agenda report or in the application file, the planning application forms and plans of the proposal and the decision to those applications.
3. Such other papers (if any) after the individual reports on planning applications contained within the lists.
3.2 For further information about this report, or if you wish to see any background papers, please contact: Sharon Hill, Senior Business Support Officer, in Planning and Regulation Services, Floor 1 Telegraph House, Baillie Street, Rochdale, OL16 1JH. Telephone (01706) 924305. Page 1
4. Statutory Development Plan
4.1 All planning applications referred to in this report have been assessed against the relevant policies and proposals of the Rochdale Unitary Development Plan (adopted June 2006) and any Supplementary Planning Documents or Guidance which has been adopted by the Council.
5. Reports - see reports on individual applications. Please note that the locations plans included at the end of each report are for information only and are not to scale.
6. Equal Opportunities Implications
6.1 The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) requires Local Planning Authorities to consider planning applications on their individual merits having regard to the development plan and other material considerations.
6.2 The Equality Act protects people from discrimination on the basis of certain characteristics which are known as protected characteristics. Under the public sector equality duty the Council is required to consider the effects of its decisions on different groups protected from discrimination, including a duty to make reasonable adjustments. In taking account of all material planning considerations, including Council policy as set out in the Unitary Development Plan, the Service Director Planning and Regulation has concluded all opportunities to promote equality through the planning process have been taken, or where adjustments cannot be made these are justified on the basis of the planning merits of the development proposal.
6.3 The Access Working Group is consulted on planning applications with the attendance of planning officers at the Group’s weekly meetings. Consideration is given in designing access when dealing with the planning applications. Where applicable, any issues relating to these matters or other equal opportunity matters will be referred to in individual planning application reports.
7. Human Rights Act 1998 considerations
7.1 These applications need to be considered against the provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998. Under Article 6, the applications (and those third parties, including local residents, who have made representations) have the right to a fair hearing and to this end the Committee must give full consideration to their comments.
Article 8 and Protocol 1 Article 1 confer(s) a right of respect for a person’s home, other land and business assets. In taking account of all material considerations, including Council policy as set out in the Unitary Development Plan, the Service Director Planning and Regulation has concluded that some rights conferred by these Articles on the applicant(s)/objectors/residents and other occupiers and owners of nearby land that might be affected may be interfered with but that that interference is in accordance with the law and justified by being in the public interest and on the basis of the planning merits of the development proposal. He believes that any restriction on these rights posed by approval of the application is proportionate to the wider benefits of approval and that such a decision falls within the margin of discretion afforded to the Council under the Town and Country Planning Acts. Page 2 Application Number Application Type Ward 11/D54138 Reserved Matters Hopwood Hall Application
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF RESERVED MATTERS PURSUANT TO OUTLINE APPLICATION D52030 FOR THE APPEARANCE, LANDSCAPING, LAYOUT AND SCALE OF A COLD STORE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
HARESHILL BUSINESS PARK, HILL TOP ROAD, HEYWOOD
For:- THE YEARSLEY GROUP Received 17-Feb-2011
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Committee resolves:
That it is minded to grant planning permission subject to:
1. The conditions set out within the Committee report and subject to the completion of a Deed of Variation relating to the Section 106 planning obligation attached to outline planning permission 09/D52030 in order to:
a) Vary the requirement for the sum of £40,000 to be paid to the Council for the 'bus stop contribution' to instead require this sum to be paid to the Council for improvements to access to the site by walking and cycling;
b) Vary the requirement to pay the Council a highways contribution of £25,000 within nine months of the date of issue of the outline planning permission to payment of this sum upon commencement of development;
2. That the Council enters into an agreement under the provisions of Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and other appropriate legislation with regard to the matters set out above;
3. The Development Manager being authorised to issue the decision notice on completion of the Section 106 Agreement.
Condition(s) and Reason(s): 1. This permission relates to the following plans:-
B2884 P001 C Location Plan B2884 P003 C Proposed Site Plan Site Demise B2884 P004 A Proposed Building Plan B2884 P005 Proposed Floor Plans Accommodation Block B2884 P006 D Proposed Site Sections Sheet 1 B2884 P010 Proposed Site Sections Sheet 2 B2884 P100 Proposed Site Plan (Revision C) B2884 P101 Proposed Elevations (Option 1) 3875-01 Landscape Proposals B2884 P011 Proposed Site Sections Landscaping Scheme
Page 3
and the development shall not be carried out other than in complete accordance with these drawings hereby approved.
Reason: For the avoidance of any doubt and to ensure a satisfactory standard of development in accordance with policies of the Rochdale Unitary Development Plan as listed below on this decision notice.
2. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority the materials to be used externally on the building shall match those of the buildings contained within the site edged blue on plan reference P101.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory appearance in the interests of visual amenity in order to comply with the requirements of Unitary Development Plan policy BE/2.
3. The landscaping scheme shown on the approved plans, (drawing nos.3875-01) shall be carried out during the first planting season after the development is substantially completed. Any trees or shrubs removed, dying, being severely damaged or becoming seriously diseased within three years of planting, shall be replaced by trees or shrubs of similar size and species to those originally requires to be planted. The areas which are landscaped shall be retained as landscaped areas thereafter.
Reason: In order to achieve a satisfactory level of landscaping in the interests of the amenities of the area in accordance with Policies BE/2 and BE/8 of the Council's Unitary Development Plan.
4. Notwithstanding any information contained within the application, full details of any external lighting to be installed on the building or on the site shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to installation. Such details shall include its position and height on the building or site and its luminance, angle of installation and any hoods to be fixed to the lights. Only lighting as approved shall be installed on the site in accordance with the terms of any such approval, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Reason: To ensure that any lighting to be installed on the site does not cause a nuisance and is compatible with the area in order to comply with Unitary Development Plan policies BE/2 and EM/3.
5. The area to the rear of the building identified as 'maintenance area' on the approved plans and the access road leading to it shall only be used for the purpose of access for emergency vehicles or contractors vehicles. There shall be maintenance or repair of vehicles within these areas.
Reason: To safeguard the amenities of neighbouring residents in order to comply with the requirements of Unitary Development Plan policies BE/2, EM/2 and EM/3.
Page 4 6. With the exception of emergencies the area identified as 'maintenance area' on the approved plans to the rear of the building shall not be used outside the hours of 08.00 and 18.00 Monday to Friday and 09.00 to 13.00 on Saturdays and Sundays.
Reason: To safeguard the amenities of neighbouring residents in order to comply with the requirements of Unitary Development Plan policies BE/2, EM/2 and EM/3.
7. No doors or other openings other than those shown on the approved plans shall be inserted within the rear elevation of the building or roofspace unless details of any such insertions have first been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Any doors or other openings shall be installed in accordance with the approved details and the terms of any such approval.
Reason: To safeguard the amenities of neighbouring residents in order to comply with the requirements of Unitary Development Plan policy BE/2.
8. No noise emanating equipment shall be installed on the rear elevation of the building or roofspace unless details of any such equipment, together with details of any necessary noise mitigation measures, have first been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Any equipment shall thereafter be installed in full accordance with the approved details and the terms of any such approval.
Reason: To safeguard the amenities of neighbouring residents in order to comply with the requirements of Unitary Development Plan policies BE/2, EM/2 and EM/3.
9. Before the engine room and water tower hereby approved are first brought into use, a scheme of noise attenuation shall be installed in accordance with details which have first been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall ensure noise leaving these areas does not exceed 74dBA at 1 metre for the engine room and 78 dBA at 1 metre for the water tower. The approved scheme of attenuation shall thereafter be retained unless the Local Planning Authority agrees in writing to its withdrawal or substitution.
Reason: To safeguard the amenities of neighbouring residents in order to comply with the requirements of Unitary Development Plan policies BE/2, EM/2 and EM/3.
Page 5 Reason for Recommendation: 1. The principle of B8 (warehousing) development within the application site has been established through the granting of an extant outline planning permission D52030. This reserved matters application for a cold store and distribution facility proposes a building which would have an appearance that would be compatible with its surroundings and a site which would be well landscaped in the interests of visual amenity. In addition its layout and scale would be compatible with the layout and scale of other neighbouring business premises and would be such that its relationship to nearby residential properties would not be detrimental in terms of overshadowing, outlook, noise or other nuisance.
Internal access and parking arrangements are acceptable. Improvements to access to the site by walking and cycling can be secured through a variation to the planning agreement attached to outline permission D52030. Conditions attached to the outline planning permission will ensure that issues relating to flood risk and contamination are addressed and that the building is constructed in accordance with current sustainability standards.
The development proposed is therefore in compliance with the provisions of the following relevant policies of the Rochdale Unitary Development Plan, its associated Supplementary Planning Guidance or Documents and national policy contained within Planning Policy Statements and Planning Policy Guidance Notes:
G/D/1 Defined Urban Area
G/EC/1 Employment Land Supply EC/2 Primary Employment Zones EC/8(b) Development Sites in Employment Zones
G/A/1 Accessibility A/3 New Development - Access for Pedestrians and Disabled People A/4 New Development - Access for Cyclists A/8 New Development - Capacity of the Highway Network A/9 New Development - Access for General Traffic A/10 New Development - Provision of Parking A/11 New Development - Transport Assessments A/12 Travel Plans and School Travel Plans A/13 Local Walking Route Network A/14 A Strategic Cycling Route Network
G/BE/1 Design Quality BE/2 Design Criteria for New Development BE/8 Landscaping in New Development
G/EM/1 Environmental Protection and Pollution Control EM/3 Noise and New Development
Page 6 EM/4 Contamination EM/7 Development and Flood Risk EM/9 Development Involving Unstable Land
G/EM/12 Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation EM/13 Energy Efficiency and New Development
Energy and New Development SPD
Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development Planning Policy Statement: Planning and Climate Change - Supplement to Planning Policy Statement 1 Planning Policy Statement 4: Planning for Sustainable Economic Growth Planning Policy Statement 9: Biodiversity and Geological Conservation Planning Policy Guidance 13: Transport Planning Policy Guidance 14: Development on Unstable Land Planning Policy Statement 22: Renewable Energy Planning Policy Statement 23: Planning and Pollution Control Planning Policy Guidance 24: Planning and Noise Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk
In summary, the reasons for granting the permission are that Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council is of the opinion that the development is in accordance the relevant national and local planning policies and guidance and that there are no material planning considerations that indicate that an alternative decision should be reached. The planning conditions proposed for this permission and those attached to outline planning permission D52030 would ensure that any material harm that may result from the development can be reasonably mitigated.
______
Report This application was reported to Heywood Township Planning Sub-Committee on the 12 th April 2011. Members of that Committee were minded to refuse planning permission for the development on the basis that the proposed building would be too close to residential dwellings on Gloucester Avenue and that constant noise from the site would be disruptive and harmful to amenity. The application was subsequently referred to Regulatory Committee on the 31 st May 2011 for their decision since a decision to refuse the application would have been contrary to a previous decision of the Council as outline planning permission has been granted for the development and the development proposed under this reserved matter application falls within the parameters established in that outline planning permission. Regulatory Committee were advised that since preparation of the submitted report the Local Planning Authority had received: § A noise report prepared by a consultant on behalf of the residents; § A response to the residents’ noise report from the applicant’s consultant; § A letter from Reverend Paul Daly of Holy Family Church, Heywood raising issues of noise and visual amenity.
Page 7
Further, a solar impact analysis was presented to Committee by residents showing their assessment of the amount of ‘lost’ sunlight to houses on Gloucester Avenue arising from the development at 15:30 hours on the 30 th September.
Committee decided to defer the application in light of the additional information received and to allow officers to consider a question raised by objectors. Following deferral the Council’s solicitor wrote to the residents’ representative to clarify the nature of the query and details of this and the Council’s response are now contained within this report. In addition the applicant has commissioned their own ‘solar study’ to determine the impact that the building would have on sunlight to dwellings on Gloucester Avenue. A copy of the applicant’s study has been placed on the planning application file and on the Council’s website. Letters were sent on the 17 th June 2011 notifying residents and all those who have written in on the application of the existence of the solar study and inviting comments if they wish to make any.
This report has been updated to reflect the above. Any additional comments have been included in the report and any further comments received between completion of this report and the day of Committee will be reported verbally to Committee for their additional consideration.
Site: The application site measures 5.5 hectares in size and is situated to the east of Hill Top Road and to the west of Gloucester Avenue. Hill Top Road runs from Hareshill Road and serves Yearsley’s existing buildings, East Balt Guenther Bakery (formerly Golden West) and a new development of units at ‘Axis Point’ at the end of Hill Top Road.
An earth bund approximately 7 metres high runs along the south western and western boundaries of the site. A field is to the south on the opposite side of the bund and houses of Gloucester Avenue are to the east on the opposite side of the bund. To the north of the site is what is currently an open field beyond which is Higher Broadfield Farm (which is not a working farm)
Rights of Way run adjacent to the site. One runs to the rear of the bund from Hareshill Road (at Hares Hill Farm) through to the railway bridge at Wilton Grove via the rears of properties on Gloucester Avenue, Honiton Close and Shaftesbury Drive. The other runs from Hill Top Road adjacent to Yearsley’s existing site to meet the right of way from Hareshill Farm to Wilton Grove.
Proposal: Outline planning permission was granted by application D52030 for development of the application site and adjacent land in the direction of towards Higher Broadfield Farm for a mix of B1(c) (light industry), B2 (general industry) and B8 (warehousing). Only the means of access to the proposed development was approved, however the application also included a zoning plan which set out scale parameters for buildings on the site. The zoning plan ,which formed part of this outline planning permission, showed that buildings
Page 8 within the current application site could have a height to the eaves of 18.5 metres in a zone with a minimum depth of 30m behind the bund, and a height to the eaves of 21 metres within the remainder of the current application site. The outline permission, including the zoning plan, sets the scope of the reserved matters applications to be made under the outline consent. Applications for reserved matters which accord with the outline planning permission would normally expect to be approved.
The current application seeks approval of reserved matters relating to permission D52030 for the erection of a cold store distribution facility (B8 use). Permission is being sought for the appearance, landscaping, layout and scale of the development.
The cold store building would be sited 98 metres from number 4 Gloucester Avenue and 76 metres from number 30 Gloucester Avenue. Cross sections submitted with the application show that the proposed building would be set at a level 2.6 metres lower than number 16 Gloucester Avenue and 6.5 metres lower than the existing cold store building.
The building would have a basic overall footprint of 202.4m width and 65.6m depth, though there would be projections on three of the elevations for battery charging areas and one for an engine and switch room. The main building would have a height to the eaves of 16.5 metres, with the highest part of the roof being 21 metres above floor level, which equates to the maximum eaves height shown on the approved zoning plan.
Access into the site would be from Hill Top Road as well as via a link that would be created between the application site and the existing Yearsley’s site. Car parking would be located between the building and Hill Top Road. Docking bays would be located only in the front (west facing) elevation of the building. A vehicle circulation route would be created around the building though this would only be used in the event of needing to undertake vehicle maintenance which would take place at the rear of the building. This route would not need to be used by vehicles that do not need to be maintained since space for turning and manoeuvring would be provided at the front of the building, between the building and Hill Top Road.
Policy Background: Regional Spatial Strategy for the North West
Adopted UDP G/D/1 Defined Urban Area
G/EC/1 Employment Land Supply EC/2 Primary Employment Zones EC/8(b) Development Sites in Employment Zones
G/A/1 Accessibility A/3 New Development – Access for Pedestrians and Disabled People
Page 9 A/4 New Development – Access for Cyclists A/8 New Development – Capacity of the Highway Network A/9 New Development – Access for General Traffic A/10 New Development – Provision of Parking A/11 New Development – Transport Assessments A/12 Travel Plans and School Travel Plans A/13 Local Walking Route Network A/14 A Strategic Cycling Route Network
G/BE/1 Design Quality BE/2 Design Criteria for New Development BE/8 Landscaping in New Development
G/EM/1 Environmental Protection and Pollution Control EM/2 Pollution EM/3 Noise and New Development EM/4 Contamination EM/7 Development and Flood Risk EM/8 Protection of Ground and Surface Water EM/9 Development Involving Unstable Land
G/EM/12 Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation EM/13 Energy Efficiency and New Development
SPD and SPG Energy and New Development SPD
PPS and PPG Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development Planning Policy Statement: Planning and Climate Change - Supplement to Planning Policy Statement 1 Planning Policy Statement 4: Planning for Sustainable Economic Growth Planning Policy Guidance 13: Transport Planning Policy Guidance 14: Development on Unstable Land Planning Policy Statement 22: Renewable Energy Planning Policy Statement 23: Planning and Pollution Control Planning Policy Guidance 24: Planning and Noise Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk
Ministerial Statement Written Ministerial Statement: Planning for Growth (23 March 2011) Letter to Chief Planning Officers regarding Planning for Growth (31 March 2011)
Site History: 2000 Industrial development including diversion of existing footpath. Permission granted (D37468). 2005 Erection of warehouse and distribution unit with associated offices, service yard and parking Invalid application (D44751).
Page 10 2005 Erection of production unit with associated two storey offices and formation of earth mound. Withdrawn (D45667). 2008 Screening opinion in respect of a forthcoming outline planning application for mixed use development (B1, B2 and B8). Environmental Impact Assessment not required (D51384). 2008 Outline application (including means of access) for mixed use development B1(c), B2 and B8 (D51578). Refused for following reason:
The site lies within an area designated as an EC/2 Primary Employment Zone in the Rochdale Unitary Development [Plan] and is also subject to policy EC/8 Development Sites in Employment Zones. Policy EC/8 sets out special requirements for the development of sites within Primary Employment Zones. The application site accounts for 9.17 hectares of the 13.7 hectare site which is subject to the special requirements identified at EC/8 b) – Hareshill Road, Heywood. One of the special requirements is that B8 uses will not be permitted at the Hareshill Road site. The application proposal includes an unrestricted proportion of B8 floor space development. Approval of the proposal would therefore be contrary to the provisions of policy EC/8, and the applicant has failed to demonstrate that special circumstances apply which justify a significant departure from this development plan policy to allow approval of the proposed development.
NB Application D51578 included the scale parameters plan which was subsequently also submitted with approved outline application D52030. The proposed scale parameters did not form part of the reason for refusal.
2010 Outline application (including means of access) for mixed use development b1(c), B2 and B8 – resubmission D51578. Permission granted. (D52030)
2011 Screening opinion in respect of a proposal for the erection of a cold store and distribution facility. Issued on 4 th July 2011. Environmental Impact Assessment not required. (D54564)
Publicity Responses: The application has been advertised by way of direct letter, display of site notices and advertisement in the local newspaper. In response to the original publicity that was undertaken letters of representation have been received from forty two separate addresses and six with no addresses. The named and addressed letters are from Councillor Linda Robinson and the residents of the following addresses:
§ Gloucester Avenue – numbers 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 34, 36, 38, 40, 52, 54; § Shaftesbury Avenue – numbers 65, 78, 81, 86, 89, 92, 94, 100, 106; § 1 Oldbury Close; § 4, 8, 6,14 Honiton Close; and § 8 Newbury Grove;
Page 11 § St. Joseph’s Presbytery (Reverend Paul Daly)
The representations are summarised below with officer’s comments following the points:
Land use policy § The proposal does not accord with the current development plan which restricts uses of the site to B1 and B2 uses;
o The development plan does allocate the land for B1 and B2 use though the issue of B8 development on the land and the acceptability of a departure from adopted policy was considered in the granting of outline planning permission D52030;
§ The site was explored fully by the Inspector at the Inquiry into the UDP and the permitted uses on the site were to be restricted to B1 and B2 because of the proximity to houses;
o Development of the site for B8 purposes was restricted because of the anticipated traffic impact of such development. However, in considering outline application D52030 the Council were satisfied that the traffic assessment submitted with the application demonstrated that B8 development could take place without detriment to the local highway network, subject to highway works being carried out as required by planning conditions and contained within the legal agreement attached to the permission;
§ There is no reasoned justification for permitting B8 uses and the issue of a link road which may be subject to an Inquiry at a later date should not be used as justification for allowing B8 uses contrary to the development plan;
o As stated above, the principle of B8 development on the site has been established by the granting of outline planning permission D52030. The applicant has demonstrated that the development can be accommodated with no detriment to the surrounding highway network and is not dependent on the link road being constructed.
Scale § A building of the scale proposed will look vastly out of proportion with properties on Gloucester Avenue – three times as high as an average house;
o Scale parameters for development on the site have been established in the granting of outline planning permission D52030;
§ The building will be a blot on the landscape;
o The proposed warehouse development is on a site allocated in the UDP for employment uses. Notwithstanding that B1 and B2 uses are those which are identified as being acceptable in the UDP and the
Page 12 proposed development is for B8, if B1 or B2 development were to come forward this could also be housed in a building of a similar size and appearance to that now proposed. The appearance of the building is not considered to be unacceptable given its context;
§ The impact of the scale of such a building on the energy consumption of adjacent properties is questioned;
o This is understood to mean that residents will need to use artificial lighting in their properties. The applicant has undertaken a solar study which shows that limited overshadowing would result from the building at certain times of the year. This would not be to such an extent that properties on Gloucester Avenue would be unduly deprived of sunlight or any benefit arising from passive solar gain.
Pollution – noise, light and air § Policy EM/3 (Noise and New Development) seems to preclude a major development such as this given the proximity to private dwellings;
o Policy EM/3 does not preclude development such as that now proposed near to residential development. Policy EM/3 requires the Council to be satisfied that residents would not experience unacceptable levels of noise nuisance;
§ The use of noise data from the existing development is not considered appropriate in assessing the noise impact of the new development as sound from the existing and proposed units will be different; § The anticipated noise levels from the development are only slightly below the parameters set out in condition 12 of the outline permission – it is questioned whether the Council are going to take the risk based on an estimate; § There is no mention of low frequency noise in the report. Just because it falls within the acceptable parameters does not mean that it is not a nuisance; § Noise will be 24/7 for the whole year; § The bund will be ineffective in reducing noise and the trees that have been planted on it will not reduce noise; § The development will affect residents’ enjoyment of their gardens as well as cause unacceptable noise disturbance within houses; § In addition to the above, the findings of an independent noise survey were presented to Committee by residents’ representatives. The survey indicates that existing noise levels are above the levels contained within condition 9 of outline planning permission D52030 and above World Health Organisation levels and those contained within Planning Policy Guidance Note 24 – Planning and Noise.
o Consultation comments from the Council’s Environmental Health Service are included elsewhere in the report and these conclude that the development would not lead to unacceptable levels of noise nuisance for existing residents. In addition, further conditions are now
Page 13 recommended based on the details of the layout and use now proposed;
§ The development will add an unwanted amount of artificial light to the area with lights being set at a higher level than the bund;
o It is recommended that a condition is attached to any planning permission to require details of external lighting proposed on the site to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before installation on site. The Local Planning Authority and Environmental Health are satisfied that any such lighting can be designed and accommodated so as not to cause detriment to residents or the area in general;
§ Increased CO2 emissions will affect quality of life;
o There is no evidence to confirm this assertion.
Loss of views § The development would ruin views from Gloucester Avenue;
o The planning system cannot protect a person’s private enjoyment of a view. The impact of a development on outlook can be considered and the issue is whether the building would not be so prominent as to be harmful or overbearing. § Residents have paid a premium for houses on Gloucester Avenue because of the views. o The planning system does not exist to protect a person’s private property interests including property value.
Loss of sunlight § The proposal would reduce the level of sunlight enjoyed at nearby properties; § The bund has already reduced the level of sunlight at neighbouring properties;
o The applicant has provided a solar analysis as supplementary information to their submission. The analysis shows that the existing bund has an impact in terms of overshadowing and that at 6pm on 21 st September the furthest end of two gardens on Gloucester Avenue would experience some additional overshadowing arising from the building, with this extending to 10 properties by 6.15pm. Whilst acknowledging that some overshadowing would occur it is considered that the additional overshadowing experienced would not be sufficiently detrimental to warrant refusal of the application.
Siting § The building would be too close to houses.
Page 14 o The Council does not have set minimum distances that should be achieved between warehouse buildings and houses. The separation involved is considered to be acceptable in particular when having regard to the screening effect of the existing intervening bund.
Design § The building design is poor and does not enhance the area or contribute to an attractive environment.
o The proposed building would be similar in design and appearance to the existing Yearsley’s building. It is considered that such an appearance is compatible with and not harmful to its surroundings and is typical of a building whose form follows its function.
Highways matters § There is concern about the amount of additional HGV traffic that would be caused on Hareshill Road and surrounding areas; § There will be a greater risk of road traffic accidents if the development is approved;
o The principle of the acceptability of the surrounding highway network for the development proposed has been assessed and established in the consideration and granting of outline planning permission D52030.
Other matters § The request is fantastic for the region and for Yearsley’s and local jobs, but it would like to be known what measures would be put in place to address the risks of additional traffic, noise and blocking of light;
o Officers consider that the proposed development is a positive one in terms of economic development and promotion of Heywood and the wider borough as an attractive place to invest in business. The ‘risks’ of additional traffic, noise and blocking of light have been addressed elsewhere in this report.
§ The application should be refused and the previous application reconsidered as the company have not adhered to previous stipulations regarding noise abatement and maintenance of the surrounding area;
o Members may refuse the application on reasonable planning grounds if they wish. The outline planning permission cannot be reconsidered at this stage as permission has been granted and remains extant at this time.
§ Before the application is approved, Committee should commission from an independent source studies relating to sunlight, noise, light pollution and the impact on utilities such as power, water and drainage;
o Any reports that have been provided within the application have been examined and commented upon by either internal officers of the
Page 15 Council or external consultees. No responses have expressed concerns about the accuracy of these reports and the Council has no reason to dispute the accuracy of the submitted information. It is therefore not necessary to commission additional study.
§ There will be a loss of privacy;
o No windows are proposed within the elevation of the proposed building which would face towards existing dwellings therefore there will be no loss of privacy as there will be no overlooking;
§ There will be no new jobs created – it is common knowledge that Yearsley’s intend to close the Rochdale site and deploy existing staff to the new building. There is no guarantee that local people will get jobs at the site;
o Supporting information within the application states that ‘the proposed cold store building will provide a further 150 direct jobs at the site which will be in addition to the 300 currently employed by Yearsley’s. The jobs created by the development will be well suited and available for local residents.’ In addition the outline planning permission to which this application relates was granted following completion of an agreement between the developer and the Council under S106 of the Town and Country Planning act to secure, amongst other things, the establishment of a Local Employment Partnership (LEP). The LEP is a collaboration between the owner and Jobcentre Plus to use reasonable endeavours to secure employment for those from the Heywood Township area at the development.
§ The safety of the site is questioned in relation to refrigerant to be used;
o The safety of the site would be a matter to be controlled under separate legislation. It is not the role or purpose of the planning system to regulate matters which are controlled through other legislation such as the Health and Safety at Work Act; o The Council’s Public Protection Service has confirmed that all the H&S legislation lays the responsibility clearly on the employer to properly assess the hazard, the likelihood of harm (the risk) and put measures in place to eliminate or reduce as far as possible, provide information, signage and training to employees. o The Council as an enforcing authority can advise businesses but cannot take any enforcement action until an installation is in place and presenting imminent risk; o In terms of the storage of any hazardous substance this may be subject to planning control and require an application under the Hazardous Substances Regulations. Any application, if required, would be dealt with at the appropriate time and would be subject to consultation with the Health and Safety Executive.
Page 16 § It is questioned why property values can not be considered in planning decisions;
o This is an established principle of planning. Paragraph 29 of ‘The Planning System: General Principles’ (a supplement to PPS1) states that ‘The planning system does not exist to protect the private interests of one person against the activities of another.’ This includes the impact of a planning proposal upon property values;
§ The above impacts would be contrary to Human Rights protection;
o Residents have raised the issue of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which was incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998. They also raise the issue of compensation if human rights are infringed. The Human Rights Act requires public authorities to act in a way that is compatible with the Convention rights. Article 8 relates to the right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence. Clearly, Article 8 is engaged by the planning process, but the right is a qualified one in that it can be interfered with if such interference is in accordance with the law and it is necessary in a democratic society in pursuance of six specified aims. One of these aims is the economic well-being of the country, and it is accepted that industrial and commercial development falls within this category. Accordingly, provided that proper procedures are followed and a proper balance struck by the decision making authority, the grant of planning permission will not result in a breach of Article 8.
Letters received in response to additional publicity following receipt of solar study and additional information
At the time of writing this report a further five letters of representation had been received in response to the additional publicity undertaken following receipt of the applicant’s solar study.
Letters have been received from the following addresses:
§ 18 and 36 Gloucester Avenue § 86 Shaftesbury Drive § 6 Honiton Close
The letter are summarised below: § It would take 16-20 years for trees to reach the height of 6 metres that the proposer seems to think is necessary. More vigorous growing trees would certainly block light; § The new sections include blatant misrepresentations with regard to the landscape treatment of the mound; § The tree planting on the mound is sparse, not the dense woodland indicated on the plans; § The drawings do not show the full height of the building as the full height in relation to ground levels is not shown. No ordnance details and ground
Page 17 levels are shown, neither are there to scale drawings of this in comparison with the existing building; § No comment has been made about the noise disturbance already endured by residents. Noise reading undertaken in April show that the existing noise levels are beyond those stipulated in the planning conditions; § There are several clauses in the Human Rights Act which are relevant to this case (including Article 8); § The additional details do not give any further reassurance about other elements of reserved matter details to be considered in this application, namely scale and appearance; § The information should have been provided at the outset and residents been given more time to comment.
Letter from Mr Derbyshire to the Chief Executive and Director of Public Health for NHS Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale
§ The letter is to bring to the attention of the NHS a significant industrial development and recently submitted planning application which will impact severely on the health and wellbeing of local residents. The letter seeks comments and support in respect of the potential impact on health; § It is believed that should the development go ahead it may well cause severe and long term detriment to the health of the nearby community due mainly to the extensive noise pollution that would be generated; § The first Yearsley development has blighted the health and wellbeing of local residents who suffer from noise levels generated from the 24/7 operation. Issues include noise from HGV battery charging, moving, reversing sirens etc and noise generated from the running of such a large distribution facility. The most obvious impact on residents is broken, disturbed and delayed sleep, daytime intrusive noise, inability to open windows in bedrooms and intrusive noise within garden areas. Residents have experienced constant noise for the last 11 years; § Properties have been deprived of two hours sunlight a day as a bund was built 30 metres from property walls in an attempt to mitigate noise from any further development. So far the bund only served to reduce beneficial sunlight to properties and gardens; § In considering what restrictions to impose on any planning permission in terms of noise the Environmental Health department used out of date noise readings; § Noise from the existing facility already exceeds the levels set out in the planning conditions and World Health Organisation standards; § The second cold storage and warehouse building will also operate 24/7 and noise pollution levels will be dramatically increased. Residents will also suffer from artificial light pollution caused by external lighting set at bedroom level along the development; § The letter refers to documents detailing the impact of noise on health and levels of noise that should not be exceeded in order that a good sleep is achieved; § There are no details of the method of refrigeration that will be used or the type of refrigerant;
Page 18 § There are concerns of the safety risk of the amount of gas required to cool the facility; § It is felt that the figures submitted with the application have not been sufficiently challenged; § An emphasis on health and wellbeing should be at the heart of planning decisions to ensure developments impact In a positive way and not in a negative way; § In conclusion it is believed that should a formal health impact assessment be conducted on the planning application then serious concerns and negative impacts would be identified. The application needs to be considered more widely, much more thoroughly and be properly investigated by all those concerned in the respective areas if the planning process. o The Council’s Environmental Health Service has responded separately on this matter, advising that a health impact assessment is not required; o The issue of refrigerant has been raised with the Council’s Environmental Health Service. o The safety of the site would be a matter to be controlled under separate legislation. It is not the role or purpose of the planning system to regulate matters which are controlled through other legislation such as the Health and Safety at Work Act; o The Council’s Public Protection Service has confirmed that all the H&S legislation lays the responsibility clearly on the employer to properly assess the hazard, the likelihood of harm (the risk) and put measures in place to eliminate or reduce as far as possible, provide information, signage and training to employees. o The Council as an enforcing authority can advise businesses but cannot take any enforcement action until an installation is in place and presenting imminent risk; o In terms of the storage of any hazardous substance this may be subject to planning control and require an application under the Hazardous Substances Regulations. Any application, if required, would be dealt with at the appropriate time and would be subject to consultation with the Health and Safety Executive; o Any further information on this matter will be reported verbally to Committee, although these would not constitute grounds for refusal of the details before Committee.
Letter from Mr Henry in response to a letter from the Council’s solicitor querying the exact nature of the issue he raised at Regulatory Committee
Summary § The query related to the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2010 and to Articles 2 and 5; § Article 2 gives the definition of ‘Layout’ and ‘Reserved Matters’ and Article 5 gives the requirements when making an application for the approval of reserved matters; § The point that was trying to be made was that the definition of ‘Layout’ includes the phrase ‘orientated in relation to each other and to buildings
Page 19 and spaces outside the development’ and that the plans and drawings provided by the applicant did not satisfactorily show how the proposed building was orientated in relation to the houses in the area outside the development, those houses being ‘buildings outside the development’ for the purposes of the Order; § The objectors presented an image which showed how the proposed building would be orientated in relation to existing buildings; § The nearest the application gets to showing how the building is orientated to buildings outside the development is in the Contextual Images. However the cold store appears flat as in a plan drawing whereas the other buildings appear to be to scale; § It is submitted that the Committee has every right to take into account all the matters of layout as defined otherwise the legislation would not provide for the ability to take into account how orientation relates to buildings and spaces outside the development; § It therefore follows that if Committee are not satisfied with the layout they can either defer it or show it not approved.
Response o Mr. Henry refers to the Article 2 definition of 'layout' and is asserting that the application plans and drawings submitted do not satisfactorily show how the proposed building was orientated in relation to the houses outside the development site; o Orientation of a building relates to its relative position or direction; o The plans submitted with the reserved matters application do show its orientation with regard to the off-site dwellings. o It is not necessary to submit an artist's impression of the building as constructed, as the officers considering the application can assess the orientation of the building by reference to the plan showing the footprint and the elevational details; o If this information had not been supplied then the Council would be justified in rejecting the application (indeed, the application should not have been accepted). Committee can take matters of layout into account, but if the parameters were set by the outline permission then they could only justify a refusal if the layout departed from those parameters, which is not the case with the current application.
Query from Mr Henry on behalf of residents regarding Environmental Impact Assessment
Summary § The Council is referred to the Department of Communities and Local Government guidance in respect of EIA Development and Reserved Matters at Paragraphs 5 and 6 respectively; § It is requested that the matter not be considered at Committee until residents are advised that the Council has followed the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)(England and Wales) Regulations and that a Screening Opinion has been provided justifying that an EIA is not required
Page 20 Response The Council received an application for a screening opinion on 1 October 2008 (08/D51384) This application was for a screening opinion in respect of a forthcoming outline planning application for a mixed use development of the relevant site and included some details of the scale of development to be brought forward and a justification as to why, in the applicant’s opinion, an Environmental Statement ought not to be required.
The proposed development required screening as Schedule 2 development under the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations 1999, as a Class 10(a) infrastructure project by virtue of the size of the site area and an application for a screening opinion as to whether the proposed development would be likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue of factors such as nature, size or location was correctly submitted.
The Council considered very carefully all the information provided as part of that application. Additional information relating to the maximum height of buildings across the site in relation to neighbouring housing was sought and provided by the applicant. Following the receipt of full information in order to assess this impact, the Council concluded the impacts of the development were not of sufficient scale to require formal Environmental Impact Assessment by submission of an Environmental Statement. In making its decision the Council had regard to the matters set out in Schedule 3 of the Regulations and to the guidance in paragraphs 32-47 of Circular 02/99 This decision was issued to the applicant by notice dated 11 November 2008, the Council concluding that the impacts of the proposal were capable of assessment through the Council’s determination of any subsequent planning application.
Following this decision the Council received two outline applications for the site. Both of these outline planning applications were in respect of the maximum scale of development as screened. No further screening opinion was issued as the new applications fell within the scope of the application which had been screened. The second of those applications was granted outline planning permission in March 2010. (D52030) The current reserved matters application has been submitted pursuant to this outline planning permission and provides details as to how that development as screened and granted at the outline stage could be implemented across part of the site. Notwithstanding the initial screening opinion, the Council has a duty when considering later planning applications to consider, in the light of more detailed information being presented, whether a further screening opinion ought to be made, or indeed whether the development is EIA Development. The DCLG Interim Guidance of 30th June 2006 indicates at paragraphs (5) and (6) that there are broadly three situations where the LPA will have to give consideration to the need for an EIA at reserved matters stage. The second of these, that EIA was considered at outline stage and determined not to be required, applies here. DCLG consider that the LPA ought to screen the development again, and although a formal screening opinion was not issued in this case the application was looked at for previously undisclosed significant effects on the environment. Given that the
Page 21 reserved matters were within the parameters of the outline consent and there had been no material changes in circumstances the Council did not issue a formal screening opinion and did not and does not feel that an EIA is required in this case. Notwithstanding this, the applicant has on the 27 th June 2011 submitted to the Council a request for a screening opinion in respect of the proposed development (ref:11/D54564). The Screening Opinion has been issued and confirms that the development proposed under application D54138 is not EIA development and that an Environmental Statement is not required for the proposed development.
Consultation Responses: Head of Highways and Engineering : - There are no objections in principle to the proposed development. The terms of the agreement attached to the outline planning permission must be complied with to ensure that contributions are made to the Council to carry out improvements to the junctions of Hareshill Road with Pilsworth Road and Manchester Road. The improvements to the junctions are required to make the development acceptable in terms of accommodating additional traffic that will be generated.
In addition, the requirement contained within the original planning agreement relating to bus stop improvements should be amended to require the equivalent sum to be invested in walking and cycling improvements to the site. This is following GMPTE’s comments which state that bus stop improvements are not recommended at this time because of the lack of service on Pilsworth Road and the likelihood that this situation will not change in the future.
Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive : - GMPTE do not consider the site to be very well located in terms of access to public transport with the nearest bus stops being 1km walk from the site Manchester Road or Argyle Street. There is a half hourly ‘hail and ride’ service (X1) from Heywood town centre to Heywood Distribution Park during the early morning peak and the afternoon. Future funding for this service is, however, uncertain and notwithstanding this the route for that service is still beyond reasonable walking distance to the proposed development. Public transport does not therefore offer an attractive alternative to the private car. Given the uncertainty over future funding for the X1 and the width restrictions to Pilsworth Road which would limit opportunities to re-route services, it is not recommended that provision or improvements to bus stops is undertaken at this time. Significant importance must therefore be placed on the Travel Plan
Environmental Health : -
Comments regarding Noise;
The noise levels deemed to be reasonable for this site were first set as part of the conditions of the original outline permission in 2000 (Application number D37468). Similar levels were included as part of the conditions of a further outline planning permission granted in 2009 (Application number D52030).
Page 22 The noise levels set as conditions are in line with the World Health Organisation (WHO) Guidance. Various levels are set at differing times of the day and various levels are set at differing boundary locations. These allow noise protection with changing background noise levels and differing proximity to noise sensitive buildings i.e. residential dwellings.
The WHO guidance suggests that internal noise levels of under 30 dB(A) Leq are maintained for undisturbed sleep. It is generally accepted that with windows open for normal ventilation, this equates to external levels of 45 dB(A) Leq or less. Hence the night-time noise levels at the site boundaries are set at below 45 dB(A). The site boundary with Gloucester Avenue, has the level set at 39 dB(A). This affords the closest residential dwellings on Gloucester Avenue the greatest protection against noise.
The appropriateness of the levels is confirmed by the background noise monitoring submitted with the application. Noise readings are not usually taken by the Service when an application provides an acoustic / noise assessment and when there is already outline permission providing conditions with noise levels already.
The Service is satisfied that the noise reports submitted for both the outline permission granted in 2009 and the current application are consistent with the expectations of noise levels.
The levels set in the original outline permission were based on the background levels at that time. By using the original background levels we are affording maximum noise protection to the residents who believe that development in the interim has increased noise levels.
Residents are concerned that the background levels provided by the applicant are not accurate. They have undertaken their own readings. If the highest night time noise level measured by the residents is added to the permitted out put from the site i.e. 43 dB(A) Leq plus 39 dB(A) Leq a level of 44.5 dB(A) is achieved.
It is appreciated this is almost at the WHO guidance level of up to 45 dB(A) affording internal levels of 30 dB(A) which is required for undisturbed sleep. However a further standard BS 8233 on Noise in Buildings sets out advice that levels of 30 dB(A) Leq in bedrooms at night are ‘good conditions’ and levels of 35dB(A) Leq in bedrooms are ‘reasonable conditions’.
By extrapolating the reductions from external to internal levels it can be concluded that external levels of up to 50 dB(A) would give internal levels of up to 35 dB(A) which are deemed to be reasonable. The conditions imposed on the outline planning permission would provide for a better noise environment than those contained within BS8233.
A different way of comparison is to use an assessment under PPG23 - the planning guidance for the development of new dwellings. We can use this to determine if the proposed factory was in-situ whether it would it be reasonable
Page 23 to permit dwellings to be built adjacent. By using the data held it suggests the properties on Gloucester Avenue fall into NEC category A. This means that noise would not be considered a reason for refusal.
Residents are concerned that the assumptions made by the noise consultants in their calculations are incorrect. If this is the case then further attenuation of the noise sources would be required of the site operators to ensure they meet the noise levels set within the current outline permission. It is easier to attenuate noise when the source is a static source, such as noise from the engine room. It is more difficult to attenuate noise when the source is moving, i.e. vehicles. The orientation of the proposed building is such that vehicle movements as far as possible are shielded by the building itself as well as the 6 metre high mound. The distance between the vehicles and the houses is approximately 70m. The engine room is located behind the 6m mound and further attenuation as required by the recommended conditions will be carried out.
Comments regarding Artificial Light;
It is understood that the operational parts of the site are on the opposite side of the building to the houses and are behind the 6m mound. It should be entirely practical in these circumstances, to ensure that light does not spill beyond the operational area and on to the properties. This is the subject of a recommended planning condition and, if necessary, could be dealt with under the statutory nuisance provisions within the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
Greater Manchester Police Design for Security : - The service is generally supportive of the proposal subject to compliance with the recommendations contained within the Crime Impact Statement.
United Utilities : - All fuel and chemical storage tanks must have adequate bund walls without outlets. The bund must be capable of holding more than the contents of the largest tank within it.
Discharges from yard storage areas likely to be contaminated by spillage should be connected to the foul sewer.
Views of Officer: The proposed development of this site raises a number of planning issues that need to be considered. These are:
1. The planning history of the site and the principle of development in relation to UDP policies G/EC/1 (Employment Land Supply), EC/2 (Primary Employment Zones) and EC/8(b) (Development Sites in Employment Zones);
Page 24 1. The acceptability of the layout of the proposal having regard to UDP policies BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development) and BE/8 (Landscaping in New Development);
2. The acceptability of the scale of the proposal having regard to UDP policy BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development);
3. The acceptability of the appearance of the proposal having regard to UDP policy BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development);
4. The acceptability of the landscaping of the proposal having regard to UDP policies BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development) and BE/8 (Landscaping in New Development);
5. The acceptability of the development in terms of any overshadowing or loss of sunlight that would result from it having regard to UDP policy BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development);
6. The acceptability of the proposal in terms of noise having regard to UDP policies BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development), EM/2 (Pollution) and EM/3 (Noise and New Development and advice contained within Planning Policy Guidance Note 24 – Planning and Noise;
7. The acceptability of the access and parking arrangements of the proposal having regard to UDP policies BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development), A/3 (New Development – Access for Pedestrians and Disabled People), A/4 (New Development – Access for Cyclists), A/8 (New Development – Capacity of the Highway Network), A/9 (New Development – Access for General Traffic), A/10 (New Development – Provision of Parking), A/11 (New Development – Transport Assessments), A/12 (Travel Plans and School Travel Plans), A/13 (Local Walking Route Network), A/14 (A Strategic Cycling Route Network);
8. The acceptability of the proposal in terms of economic development having regard to Planning Policy Statement 4 (Planning for Sustainable Economic Growth), Written Ministerial Statement: Planning for Growth (23 March 2011) and Letter to Chief Planning Officers dated 31 st March 2011 regarding Planning for Growth.
9. Planning Policy Statement 1 (PPS1) – Delivering Sustainable Development
10. Regional Spatial Strategy for the North West.
11. Energy and New Development SPD
12. Other matters
Page 25 13. Summary
The Officer conclusions on these issues and reasoning are addressed in turn as follows:
1. The planning history of the site and the principle of development in relation to UDP policies G/EC/1 (Employment Land Supply), EC/2 (Primary Employment Zones) and EC/8(b) (Development Sites in Employment Zones)
The 5.5 hectares of land to which this application relates forms part of a larger area of land measuring 9.2 hectares which received outline planning permission (D52030) in 2010 for development comprising B1(c) (light industry), B2 (general industry) and B8 (warehouse) uses. The current application seeks approval of reserved matters for B8 (warehouse) development on the 5.5 hectare site and sits within the overall framework of development as approved at the outline stage. The principle of development and use of the site has therefore been established. Approval is now sought for the appearance, landscaping, layout and scale of the development with the means of access already have been approved by the outline permission.
The outline planning permission was granted subject to conditions relating to the following:
§ The time limit in which development must take place; § Approval of reserved matters being given before development takes place; § Thresholds of development which trigger junction improvement requirements; § Provision of parking and servicing areas; § Provision of vehicle turning areas; § No external storage on parking or vehicle turning areas; § Upgrading of the bridleway to Pilsworth Road; § Implementation of the travel plan; § An environmental desk study being undertaken; § Restriction on noise emissions; § A survey of the landscaping of the bund; § Construction details of the bund; § Provision of a surface water regulation scheme; § Development achieving BREEAM very good or excellent standard; § Provision of a transport management plan.
In addition to the requirements of the conditions, a planning obligation was attached to the outline permission. This requires the developer to: a) Make a ‘bus stop contribution’ before any part of the development is first occupied. The agreement sets out that this contribution is a sum of £40,000 for the provision of two bus stops on Pilsworth Road;
Page 26 b) Make a highways contribution. The agreement sets out that this contribution will be used to carry out works to wider transport improvements in the Heywood area and/or to undertake a feasibility study into the provision of a link road from the southern end of Hareshill Road to junction 19 of the M62. The agreement states that the total contribution of £100,000 is to be phased as follows: a. £25,000 within one month of outline permission being granted; a. £25,000 within nine months of outline permission being granted; b. £50,000 on the commencement of development. c) Enter into a Local Employment Partnership with Jobcentre Plus within 12 calendar months of the commencement of development.
If the current application were to be approved, the requirements of the conditions and planning obligation attached to the outline permission still stand.
The principle of developing the site for employment uses, including B8 (warehouse) development, was considered in the report in relation to outline application D52030. For convenience, this is copied below:
The site forms the greater part of a 13.7 hectare allocation for employment uses, B1 and B2 but excluding B8 uses. The remainder of the allocation to the west of the extended access road has mostly been taken up by a development of small (238 sq m) to medium (819sq m) sized B1(c), B2 and B8 units which is now nearing completion (D50253). This proposal also includes B8 uses, and two reports accompanying the application, a supporting planning statement and an employment land assessment, explain why the applicant considers this to be necessary.
The applicant considers it imperative to the success of the site that B8 uses are included in the permitted uses of the proposed employment floorspace. Many potential occupiers are looking for flexibility of use which can include storage and distribution as well as light and general industrial uses, and find it difficult to obtain finance for development which does not include B8 floorspace, or are unwilling to enter long leases if the prospect of reassigning the lease is restricted in this way.
The employment land assessment report contains evidence that the B8 restriction has held up development and job creation on the site. Whilst there has been a lack of demand for B1 and B2 development on the site there has been strong interest in B8 development. Since 1995 when the applicant acquired the site there have been 36 serious proposals for development of the site (totalling 520,000sq m), and details of these are appended to the report. Only two of these were for manufacturing B2 use over the whole of the 13 years. In addition, as the employment land assessment report points out, there is no shortage of B1 and B2 land. At 2007 rates of development across the Borough this would amount to 62 years supply. In contrast to the lack of demand for B2 development
Page 27 opportunities to provide significant new employment have been missed because of the lack of a B8 permission on the application site. A prime example of this is the relocation of the warehouse for a national sports equipment firm to Trafford Park in 2007. This business had a very serious requirement and would have located at the site if there had been a B8 permission creating approximately 180 jobs ranging from warehouse operatives to office, management maintenance and IT.
B8 uses were excluded from the first UDP (1999) to protect the Borough’s supply of industrial land. The policy was carried over to the current UDP and the B8 exclusion maintained for two reasons: firstly because of concerns about the amount and type of employment provided by B8 uses and secondly because of concerns about HGV traffic generation on the surrounding highway network. In terms of employment B8 floorspace has traditionally been regarded as generating a relatively low number of unskilled jobs compared with manufacturing floorspace. However, since the B8 restriction was imposed the general situation has changed. The trend with more integration between manufacturing and distribution, or logistics, is for the gap between the two job types in skills and earnings to narrow. The applicant quotes research to support this and the RDA confirms that the quality of jobs in logistics now often matches those in manufacturing. In terms of numbers of jobs which the proposed development would create based on recognised employment densities this would be between 350 and 500 on the application site. I do not therefore consider that there should now be significant concerns about the type and number of jobs B8 use of the site would create.
Traffic modelling for a variety of floor space mixes (B1/B2/B8) has been carried which confirms requirements for improvements to the key junctions of Hareshill with Pilsworth Road and Manchester Road at various thresholds of the site development. I am confident that concerns about the highway safety effects of traffic generation on the highway network can be fully addressed through planning conditions requiring improvements at certain trigger points if outline planning permission is granted. This view is endorsed by the Head of Highways and Engineering following extensive discussion and negotiation with the applicant’s traffic consultants. Should Members be minded to grant a 10 year period for a start of development then, upon the advice of the Head of Highways and Engineering, it is recommended the planning conditions include a requirement for full junction traffic modelling to be carried out again if the development thresholds have not been reached on site within 5 years from the date of granting of outline planning permission.
The principle of development has already been established by the granting of the outline planning permission and compliance with UDP policies G/EC/1 and EC/2 is not in question.
Page 28 2. The acceptability of the layout of the proposal having regard to UDP policies BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development) and BE/8 (Landscaping in New Development;
Policy BE/2 requires development proposals to demonstrate good design by complying with the relevant criteria contained within the policy. The following criteria of the policy are of relevance to determining the acceptability of the layout of the proposed development: a) Ensuring that they are compatible with or improve their surroundings by virtue of their…layout; e) Appropriate treatment of open spaces between and around buildings, including provision of landscaping as part of the development layout; g) Providing for safe and convenient access and circulation; i) Making adequate provision for natural light within and between buildings; j) Minimising the potential environmental impact of and on the development, including noise, air and water pollution.
Policy BE/8 states that all developments will be required, where appropriate, to incorporate landscape schemes of a high quality.
The applicant’s supporting statement explains that the layout of the proposal has been determined by the operational requirements of Yearsley’s as well as to ensure compliance with the scale parameters which formed part of the outline permission. The proposal complies with the parameters set out in the outline application therefore in this respect the layout of the proposed building is acceptable and compatible with its surroundings in accordance with criterion a) of UDP policy BE/2.
In terms of the layout of the remainder of the scheme, this is to be considered in terms of the proposed parking and manoeuvring areas and areas of landscaping, since this is what surrounds the building.
The layout of the parking and manoeuvring areas is such that loading and unloading and parking will take place to the front of the building. This layout is acceptable as activity associated with the use will be on the opposite side of the building to dwellings on Gloucester Avenue, thus the building will act as a barrier in terms of any noise associated with the use. In addition, the Head of Highways and Engineering has raised no objections in terms of the access and parking arrangements not being safe or convenient. It is therefore considered that the proposal complies with criteria g) and j) of UDP policy BE/2.
The proposal would not affect the existing landscaped bund to the rear of Gloucester Avenue and would provide new landscaped areas around the building including a new wooded area to the rear of the building, tree planting to the site frontage and hedging to the boundary between the application site and the existing cold store site. In accordance with criterion e) of UDP policy
Page 29 BE/2 and policy BE/8 it is considered that the proposed treatment in and around the building is acceptable in that it would not alter the most important element that is the landscaped bund and would also include new landscaping around the site, particularly along the frontage to Hilltop Road.
The impact on natural light arising from the development of the building with the layout proposed is considered below in point 6. In summary it is considered that the proposed building would not unacceptably restrict natural light within and between buildings, with evidence submitted within the application showing that the majority of overshadowing occurs as a result of the existing bund.
For the above reasons the proposal complies with the above relevant criteria of UDP policies BE/2 and BE/8.
3. The acceptability of the scale of the proposal having regard to UDP policy BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development);
Policy BE/2 requires development proposals to demonstrate good design by complying with the relevant criteria contained within the policy. The following criteria of the policy are of relevance to determining the acceptability of the scale of the proposed development: a) Ensuring that they are compatible with or improve their surroundings by virtue of their scale…height [and] massing; i) Making adequate provision for natural light within and between buildings;
The building would measure 16.5 metres high to the eaves and 21 metres to its highest point. As stated above, this falls within the parameters detailed on the zoning plan as approved as part of the outline planning application. The approved zoning plan showed that buildings within the current application site could have a height to the eaves of 18.5 metres in a zone with a minimum depth of 30m behind the bund, and a height to the eaves of 21 metres within the remainder of the current application site. The issue of impact on neighbouring properties of a building of greater height than that now proposed has therefore already been considered and accepted by virtue of the acceptance of this building heights plan supported by cross sections detailing the relationship to properties along Gloucester Avenue as part of the outline planning permission.
It should also be noted that the approved scale parameters referred to an eaves height, not a maximum building height, and that the current proposal is for a building with a total height of 21 metres rather than an eaves height of 21 metres. i.e. the proposed building is several metres lower than that which could be built on the site under the approved parameters. The building would be sited 76m from the nearest dwelling on Gloucester Avenue. A plan submitted with the application (B28847 P011) shows the site in section through to Gloucester Avenue. The plan shows that at present the building would be
Page 30 visible from both ground and first floor windows (the upper 1.5m of the rear elevation from the ground floor windows and the upper 3.5m of the rear elevation from the first floor windows). It also shows that once the landscaping on the bund is semi-mature (at a height of approximately 6 metres) that the line of sight from both ground and first floor windows would be over the roof of the building (i.e. the building would not be visible at all). At the separation proposed it is considered that whilst the building would be visible, it would not be so prominent as to be harmful or overbearing. The visual impact of the massing of the building is reduced as the roof is designed with a shallow curve to rise away from houses on Gloucester Avenue rather than utilising a traditional pitched design. In addition, the landscaped bund means that a significant portion of the elevation facing Gloucester Avenue would be screened with the extent of screening increasing over time to mean that none of the building (including engine room), car parking or maintenance area would be visible.
The unit would be over 200 metres from the dwellings at Higher Broadfield Farm and, as with the dwellings on Gloucester Avenue, it is considered that whilst it would be visible at the separation proposed it would not be harmful or unduly prominent.
In terms of the relationship to the remaining surrounding area this is dominated by other industrial, warehouse and business premises with the existing Yearsley’s buildings and former Golden West building being of a similar scale to that now proposed.
For the above reasons the proposal is considered to be of a scale, height and massing which is compatible with its surroundings and would make adequate provision for natural light within and between buildings in accordance with the requirements of criteria a) and i) of UDP policy BE/2.
4. The acceptability of the appearance of the proposal having regard to UDP policy BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development);
Policy BE/2 requires development proposals to demonstrate good design by complying with the relevant criteria contained within the policy. The following criteria of the policy are of relevance to determining the acceptability of the appearance of the proposed development: a) Ensuring that they are compatible with or improve their surroundings by virtue of their…materials [and] architectural style;
The applicant’s supporting statement explains that the design and materials of the proposed building have been driven by the desire to be compatible with the existing facility. The form of the building follows its function and is considered to be compatible with its surroundings. It is recommended that a condition is attached to any permission requiring the external materials to be used in the construction of the building to match the existing Yearsley’s development. Any signs to be displayed on the building may require an
Page 31 application for Advertisement Consent thereby allowing the Council to exercise control in the interests of visual amenity.
For the above reasons it is considered that the appearance of the proposed building is compatible with its surroundings in terms of materials and architectural style in accordance with the requirements of criterion a) of UDP policy BE/2.
5. The acceptability of the landscaping of the proposal having regard to UDP policies BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development) BE/8 (Landscaping in New Development);
Policy BE/2 requires development proposals to demonstrate good design by complying with the relevant criteria contained within the policy. The following criteria of the policy are of relevance to determining the acceptability of the landscaping of the proposed development: e) Appropriate treatment of open spaces between and around the buildings, including the provision of landscaping as an integral part of the development layout; f) Retaining key natural features, including trees as part of the landscaping of the site.
Policy BE/8 states that all developments will be required, where appropriate, to incorporate landscape schemes of a high quality. The policy sets out several criteria for when the Council will require amenity landscaping as being necessary. The following criteria are of relevance to this application where landscaping is considered necessary to: a) Retain and integrate existing trees, planting or other landscape features (including areas of nature conservation or value); b) Screen or soften a development from adjoining land, or to screen an adjoining use from the site; c) Provide visual enclosure around car parking, storage or plant areas; d) Provide a structure to the development layout to create local character and distinctiveness, or as a setting for individual buildings or groups of buildings. A landscaping scheme has been submitted with the application. This shows the following: § Tree planting to the Hill Top Road boundary and to the rear of the proposed car park; § Hedgerow planting along the length of the south west boundary, adjacent to the bridle path which runs from Hill Top Road between the application site and the existing Yearsley’s site; § Native woodland planting to the rear of the building either side of the vehicle maintenance area.
Page 32 The proposals would have no impact upon the existing landscape bund although in this respect any conditions attached to the outline permission in relation to the bund still apply to the development going forward.
With regard to the current proposals in relation to the relevant criteria of UDP policy BE/8: a) Notwithstanding that the principle of developing the whole site has previously been established and that the permission relating to such development did not require any existing features to be integrated into any proposal, it is confirmed that there are not any existing features on the site which ought to be integrated into the current scheme; b) The proposed landscaping scheme would soften the development, particularly from Hill Top Road. The existing landscaped bund would also soften and screen the proposed development from nearby residential properties; c) The proposed landscaping would enclose the site to the Hill Top Road frontage and the boundary between the application site and the existing Yearsley’s site; d) The proposed landscaping would provide structure to the proposed development, particularly in the absence of built development to the site frontage
The landscaping scheme is acceptable and it is recommended that a condition is attached to any permission to ensure that it is carried out in the first planting season after the development is substantially completed. For the above reasons the proposed landscaping complies with criteria e) and f) of BE/2 and a), b), c) and d) of BE/8.
6. The acceptability of the development in terms of any overshadowing or loss of sunlight that would result from it having regard to UDP policy BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development);
Policy BE/2 requires development proposals to demonstrate good design by complying with the relevant criteria contained within the policy. The following criteria of the policy are of relevance to determining the acceptability of the layout of the proposed development: a) Ensuring that they are compatible with or improve their surroundings by virtue of their scale…height [and] layout; i) Making adequate provision for natural light within and between buildings.
The impact of a building of the scale, height and layout proposed needs to be considered in terms of its impact on the provision for natural light within and between buildings.
An assessment of the impact of the development in terms of overshadowing of properties on Gloucester Avenue on the 30 th September was presented by
Page 33 local residents to Regulatory Committee for their consideration. Following deferral of the application to consider this and other information, the applicant was requested to respond to all these points. The applicant subsequently commissioned their own solar study. Their study uses both the summer solstice and the equinoxes to give an understanding of the sun path throughout the year. The study states that it is unusual to study urban shadow patterns beyond the equinoxes through the winter months because typically residential developments can expect large amounts of self-shadowing from nearby units in the winter months due to low sun.
The solar study draws demonstrates the following:
Shadowing without cold store Detailed study of shading from 4.30pm to dusk: 21 September (baseline):
§ 4.30pm to 5.30pm: Little impact from the existing bund on properties on Gloucester Avenue. § 5.30pm to 5.45pm: Some impact of the bund on the gardens of properties at the southern end of Gloucester Avenue. It is worth noting that during this period, Gloucester Avenue itself is completely self-shaded, with existing houses completely shading the road and front gardens of the other properties. This is common, and in typical residential layouts in the area it is unusual that gardens have sun at this time of day at the equinox. § 5:45pm to dusk: The existing bund shades the sides of the existing housing on Gloucester Avenue, and therefore shades direct sunlight from entering the ground and first floor windows during this period. This is exactly the case with the existing properties on the north side of Gloucester Avenue and is not uncommon.
Shadowing with cold store The study looks at the shadow patterns cast from 4.30pm on 21st September in 15 minute intervals for the baseline combined with the proposed development: § 4.30pm to 5:45pm: The impact of the new proposals are completely contained by the existing bund structure; § 5.45pm to 6pm: Between 5:45pm and 6pm, the shadow of the existing building breaches the bund and has a minor impact on the rear half of approximately three residential buildings; § 6.15pm to dusk: The shading diagrams illustrate the rear gardens of the properties on Gloucester Avenue to be in shade by a combination of the bund and the proposed development. It is not possible to determine the cause of the shadow. It is stated that further comparison of the difference between the baseline and the proposed development are required.
Page 34 Incurred Shadow Overlay (additional shadow caused by the building) The final 4 diagrams in the assessment show the existing baseline shadows in red, with the additional shadow impact of the proposed building in black. This shows the following: § 6:00pm: The additional shading due to the proposals has a minor impact on 2 gardens. This impact is in keeping with the shadowing already existing in these and adjacent gardens; § 6.15pm: The additional shading due to the proposals has a minor impact on 11 gardens. This impact is in keeping with the shadowing already existing in these and adjacent gardens, with all gardens to the south of the Avenue already in full shadow. This is typical of this residential typology In comparison to gardens on the north side of Gloucester Avenue. § 6:30pm: The additional shading due to the proposals has a minor impact on the upper windows of some properties, causing the loss of sun between 5 and 10 minutes earlier than would have been expected without the proposals; § 6:45pm: Low setting sun at this point makes any impact negligible. The existing bund is planted with existing trees and vegetation, as indicated on the updated cross section drawings, but this additional screening has not been included within the analysis, however the minor impact and loss of direct sunlight shown by the analysis may currently be un-detectable due to the shading effect of the deciduous vegetation and certainly will be as the significant landscaping across the bund matures and reaches its anticipated growth height.
The solar study draws the following summary and conclusions: § The shadowing effect of the proposals have been examined from 21st March to 21st September, and there is no overshadowing of adjacent properties between sunrise and 6pm BST; § The impact of the proposals on the adjacent residential development to the east is minor, and only occurs after 6.00pm at the equinoxes; § The vast majority of the shading of adjacent properties is due to the existing landscape mitigation bund; § Greater shading in the baseline condition would be incurred if the existing vegetation was taken into account in the modelling, reducing the impact of the proposals further; § Where there is loss of direct sunlight to the residential properties, it occurs between 5 and 10 minutes earlier than would do in baseline conditions, around 6.30pm. The quality of sunlight at this time is already poor due to the setting sun at 7:11pm; § Any impact is in keeping with the typical residential typologies of the area, and with the properties on the north side of Gloucester Avenue; § The analysis clearly demonstrates that the shadow created by the proposed cold store building will have no materially greater effect than the shadow created by the existing bund. It will be very limited
Page 35 and only in the late evening in the winter months. Any additional shadow created will be de-minimis and clearly not a reason for refusal.
The Council’s policy requires that adequate provision is made for natural light within and between buildings. It does not require that development proposals preserve the existing lighting situation in perpetuity. The policy allows for the situation to change from what may presently experienced, with the issue being whether the resulting lighting is adequate. Adequacy in this case would be determined by consideration of the impact of the proposal in terms of overshadowing when compared to the existing situation.
The solar study is effective in its presentation of the impact of the development in terms of overshadowing and the Local Planning Authority has no reason to dispute its accuracy. Irrespective of the submission of the solar study, a simple analysis of the orientation of the proposed building to dwellings on Gloucester Avenue would be able to conclude that for the majority of daylight hours the development would have no impact because it is located to the west of the houses. Notwithstanding this simplistic assessment, the submitted solar study demonstrates that any overshadowing that does occur later in the day is largely as a result of the existing mound and would not result from the building, except beyond 18:00 on the equinoxes. This impact is limited and the properties would for most of the daylight hours not experience any effect of overshadowing from the proposed building. That is not to say the proposed development would not have some effect, the question for Members to considerer is whether that impact is so adverse as to justify refusal of planning permission in this case. In officer’s view these changes are not so significant as to justify refusal on this point. It is therefore concluded that the proposal accords with UDP policy BE/2 in that it would make adequate provision for natural light within and between buildings.
7. The acceptability of the proposal in terms of noise having regard to UDP policies BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development), EM/2 (Pollution) and EM/3 (Noise and New Development and advice contained within Planning Policy Guidance Note 24 – Planning and Noise;
Policy BE/2 requires development proposals to demonstrate good design by complying with various criteria. Of relevance to noise is criterion j) which requires that development proposals minimise the environmental impact of and on the development, including noise, air and water pollution.
Policy EM/2 states that if the emission of pollutants from a proposed development cannot be readily controlled by other environmental legislation, such development will not be permitted where it would be likely to result in an increase in air, water, noise, light or other pollution, which would be harmful to the environment and to land uses and land users in the area.
Policy EM/3 states that development will not be permitted where:
Page 36 a) It would lead to unacceptable levels of noise nuisance to nearby existing or future occupants of buildings, or users of open space; or b) It would involve a noise sensitive use (such as house, a school or hospital) which would be sited in or close to an area that is, or is likely to become, subject to unacceptably high levels of noise generation.
PPS24 sets out national policy in relation to noise and new development. Paragraph 10 set out development control policy for noisy development, and states:
‘Much of the development which is necessary of the creation of jobs and the construction and improvement of essential infrastructure will generate noise. The planning system should not place unjustifiable obstacles in the way if such development. Nevertheless, local planning authorities must ensure that development does not cause an unacceptable degree of disturbance. They should also bear in mind that a subsequent intensification or change of use may result in greater intrusion and they may wish to consider the use of appropriate conditions.’
The following comments are made in relation to the current proposal in terms of noise.
The noise levels deemed to be reasonable for this site were first established within conditions of the original outline planning permission in 2000 (D37468). Similar levels were included as part of the conditions of a further outline planning permission granted in 2009 (D52030).
The noise levels set as conditions are in line with the World Health Organisation (WHO) Guidance. Various levels are set at differing times of the day and various levels are set at differing boundary locations. These allow noise protection with changing background noise levels and differing proximity to noise sensitive buildings i.e. residential dwellings.
The WHO guidance suggests that internal noise levels of under 30 dB(A) Leq are maintained for undisturbed sleep. It is generally accepted that with windows open for normal ventilation, this equates to external levels of 45 dB(A) Leq or less. Hence the night-time noise levels at the site boundaries are set at below 45 dB(A). The site boundary with Gloucester Avenue, has the level set at 39 dB(A). This affords the closest residential dwellings on Gloucester Avenue the greatest protection against noise.
The appropriateness of the levels is confirmed by the background noise monitoring submitted with the application. Noise readings are not usually taken by the Service when an application provides an acoustic / noise assessment and when there is already outline permission providing conditions with noise levels already.
The Environmental Health Service has confirmed that they are satisfied that the noise reports submitted for both the outline permission granted in 2009
Page 37 and the current application are consistent with the expectations of noise levels.
The levels set in the original outline permission were based on the background levels at that time. By using the original background levels maximum noise protection is being afforded to the residents who believe that development in the interim has increased noise levels.
Residents are concerned that the background levels provided by the applicant are not accurate and have subsequently undertaken their own readings. If the highest night time noise level measured by the residents is added to the permitted out put from the site i.e. 43 dB(A) Leq plus 39 dB(A) Leq a level of 44.5 dB(A) is achieved.
This is almost at the WHO guidance level of up to 45 dB(A) affording internal levels of 30 dB(A) which is required for undisturbed sleep. However a further standard BS 8233 on Noise in Buildings sets out advice that levels of 30 dB(A) Leq in bedrooms at night are ‘good conditions’ and levels of 35dB(A) Leq in bedrooms are ‘reasonable conditions’.
By extrapolating the reductions from external to internal levels it can be concluded that external levels of up to 50 dB(A) would give internal levels of up to 35 dB(A) which are deemed to be reasonable. The conditions imposed on the outline planning permission would therefore provide for a better noise environment than those contained within BS8233.
A different way of comparison is to use an assessment under PPG23 - the planning guidance for the development of new dwellings. This can be used to determine if the proposed factory was in-situ whether it would it be reasonable to permit dwellings to be built adjacent. By using the data held it suggests the properties on Gloucester Avenue fall into NEC category A. This means that noise would not be considered a reason for refusal for any residential development of the adjoining land.
Residents are concerned that the assumptions made by the noise consultants in their calculations are incorrect. If this is the case then further attenuation of the noise sources would be required of the site operators to ensure they meet the noise levels set within the current outline permission. It is easier to attenuate noise when the source is a static source, such as noise from the engine room. It is more difficult to attenuate noise when the source is moving, i.e. vehicles. The orientation of the proposed building is such that vehicle movements as far as possible are shielded by the building itself as well as the 6 metre high mound. The distance between the vehicles and the houses is approximately 70m. The engine room is located behind the 6m mound and further attenuation as required by the recommended conditions will be carried out.
Having regard to the above it is considered that the proposal complies with the relevant criteria of UDP policy BE/2 since the environmental impact of the development in terms of noise would be minimised by virtue of its siting and
Page 38 design. It would also comply with policies EM/2 and EM/3 since it has been demonstrated that it would neither lead to an increase in noise pollution which would be harmful to land uses or users in the area or lead to unacceptable levels of noise nuisance to nearby residents and guidance contained within PPS24 in that the Local Planning Authority is satisfied that the proposal would not cause an unacceptable degree of disturbance.
8. The acceptability of the access and parking arrangements of the proposal having regard to UDP policies BE/2 (Design Criteria for New Development), A/3 (New Development – Access for Pedestrians and Disabled People), A/4 (New Development – Access for Cyclists), A/8 (New Development – Capacity of the Highway Network), A/9 (New Development – Access for General Traffic), A/10 (New Development – Provision of Parking), A/11 (New Development – Transport Assessments), A/12 (Travel Plans and School Travel Plans), A/13 (Local Walking Route Network), A/14 (A Strategic Cycling Route Network);
The outline permission to which this reserved matters application relates included approval for the means of access to the proposed development. It did not however include specific details of the internal access, parking and servicing arrangements. The acceptability of these elements of the proposal now needs to be considered in relation to the above policies.
Criterion g) of UDP policy BE/2 requires development proposals to demonstrate good design by providing for safe and convenient access and circulation.
Policy A/3 states that development proposals will be permitted provided that they facilitate safe and convenient access for pedestrians and disabled people and other people with restricted mobility.
Policy A/4 states that development proposals will be permitted where the design and layout of development schemes facilitates safe and convenient access for cyclists.
Policy A/8 states that new development will be permitted provided that the additional traffic generated will not be detrimental to the safe and efficient operation of the Highways Network, both adjacent to and further from the site.
Policy A/9 states that development proposals will be required to facilitate safe and convenient access for general traffic, which includes cars, motorcycles and commercial vehicles.
Policy A/10 states that development proposals should provide car parking not in excess of the maximum standards outlined in Appendix C of the UDP.
Policy A/11 requires the submission of Transport Assessments alongside planning applications where the development has the potential to lead to a
Page 39 material increase in the volume of road traffic or increased impact because of the type of traffic or where the development is major.
The following comments are made in terms of the proposed access and parking arrangements for the development:
§ The Head of Highways and Engineering has raised no objections in terms of the safety of the proposed accesses into the site (one access into the car park and one access into the service yard, both of which also incorporate adjacent pedestrian footways running from the existing footway on Hill Top Road); § No details of cycle parking are provided in the application though it remains a condition of outline planning permission that details of cycle parking within the site are to be provided before the building is first occupied. There is sufficient space and suitable locations within the site for the condition to be acceptably complied with. In addition, conditions attached to the outline planning permission require the upgrade of cycle facilities outside the site; § The impact of development of the site on the wider highway network has been considered in the granting of the outline planning permission on the site. The transport assessment contained within the outline application demonstrated that the surrounding highways network could accommodate additional traffic on the site, subject to the off site highway works as required by the legal agreement attached to the outline planning permission; § Parking and manoeuvring arrangements for HGVs within the site would be safe and satisfactory. Three turning circles would be provided in addition to ample space reversing and manoeuvring; § The development would provide 184 car parking spaces. This level is deemed appropriate by the applicant and the Local Planning Authority;
For the above reasons the proposed access and parking arrangements are safe, convenient and satisfactory in accordance with the requirements of UDP policies BE/2, A/3, A/4, A/8, A/9, A/10, A/11, A/12, A/13 and A/14.
9. The acceptability of the proposal in terms of economic development having regard to Planning Policy Statement 4 (Planning for Sustainable Economic Growth), Written Ministerial Statement: Planning for Growth (23 March 2011) and Letter to Chief Planning Officers dated 31 st March 2011 regarding Planning for Growth.
Planning Policy Statement 4 (PPS4) sets out the national policy basis against which proposals for economic development should be assessed. Economic development includes those uses which fall within the ‘B’ use class, therefore the current proposal falls within the definition of ‘economic development’. The relevant parts of the policies that apply to the current proposal are as follows:
Page 40 Policy EC10: Determining Planning Applications for Economic Development
EC10.1 Local planning authorities should adopt a positive and constructive approach towards planning applications for economic development. Planning applications that secure economic growth should be treated favourably.
EC10.2 All planning applications for economic development should be assessed against the following impact considerations:
a) Whether the proposal has been planned over the lifetime of the development to limit carbon dioxide emissions, and minimise vulnerability and provide resilience to, climate change;
b) the accessibility of the proposal by a choice of means of transport including walking, cycling, public transport and the car, the effect on local traffic levels and congestion (especially to the trunk road network) after public transport and traffic management measures have been secured;
c) whether the proposal secures a high quality and inclusive design which takes the opportunities available for improving the character and quality of the area and the way it functions;
d) the impact on economic and physical regeneration in the area including the impact on deprived areas and social inclusion objectives;
e) the impact on local employment.
The Coalition Government’s Ministerial Statement ‘Planning for Growth’ dated 21 st March 2011 is a material consideration in determining planning applications. The Statement is copied below, with those parts of most relevance to determining the current application underlined:
‘The Chancellor of the Exchequer has today issued a call to action on growth, publishing an ambitious set of proposals to help rebuild Britain's economy. The planning system has a key role to play in this, by ensuring that the sustainable development needed to support economic growth is able to proceed as easily as possible . We will work quickly to reform the planning system to achieve this, but the Government recognises that many of these actions will take some months to deliver, and that there is a pressing need to ensure that the planning system does everything it can to help secure a swift return to economic growth . This statement therefore sets out the steps the Government expects local planning authorities to take with immediate effect. The Government's top priority in reforming the planning system is to promote sustainable economic growth and jobs. Government's clear expectation is that
Page 41 the answer to development and growth should wherever possible be 'yes' , except where this would compromise the key sustainable development principles set out in national planning policy.
The Chancellor has today set out further detail on our commitment to introduce a strong presumption in favour of sustainable development in the forthcoming National Planning Policy Framework, which will expect local planning authorities to plan positively for new development; to deal promptly and favourably with applications that comply with up-to-date plans and national planning policies; and wherever possible to approve applications where plans are absent, out of date, silent or indeterminate.
Local planning authorities should therefore press ahead without delay in preparing up-to-date development plans, and should use that opportunity to be proactive in driving and supporting the growth that this country needs. They should make every effort to identify and meet the housing, business and other development needs of their areas , and respond positively to wider opportunities for growth, taking full account of relevant economic signals such as land prices. Authorities should work together to ensure that needs and opportunities that extend beyond (or cannot be met within) their own boundaries are identified and accommodated in a sustainable way, such as housing market requirements that cover a number of areas, and the strategic infrastructure necessary to support growth.
When deciding whether to grant planning permission, local planning authorities should support enterprise and facilitate housing, economic and other forms of sustainable development. Where relevant - and consistent with their statutory obligations - they should therefore: (i) Consider fully the importance of national planning policies aimed at fostering economic growth and employment, given the need to ensure a return to robust growth after the recent recession (ii) Take into account the need to maintain a flexible and responsive supply of land for key sectors, including housing (iii) Consider the range of likely economic, environmental and social benefits of proposals; including long term or indirect benefits such as increased consumer choice, more viable communities and more robust local economies (which may, where relevant, include matters such as job creation and business productivity) (iv) Be sensitive to the fact that local economies are subject to change and so take a positive approach to development where new economic data suggest that prior assessments of needs are no longer up-to-date (v) Ensure that they do not impose unnecessary burdens on development.
In determining planning applications, local planning authorities are obliged to have regard to all relevant considerations. They should ensure that they give appropriate weight to the need to support economic recovery, that applications that secure sustainable growth are treated favourably (consistent with policy in PPS4) , and that they can give clear reasons for their decisions.
Page 42 To further ensure that development can go ahead, all local authorities should reconsider, at developers' request, existing section 106 agreements that currently render schemes unviable, and where possible modify those obligations to allow development to proceed; provided this continues to ensure that the development remains acceptable in planning terms.
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government will take the principles in this statement into account when determining applications that come before him for decision. In particular he will attach significant weight to the need to secure economic growth and employment.
Benefits to the economy should, where relevant, be an important consideration when other development-related consents are being determined, including heritage, environmental, energy and transport consents. The Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change and the Secretary of State for Transport have consequently agreed that to the extent it accords with the relevant statutory provisions and national policies, decisions on these other consents should place particular weight on the potential economic benefits offered by an application. They will reflect this principle in relevant decisions that come before them and encourage their agencies and non departmental bodies to adopt the same approach for the consents for which those other bodies are directly responsible.’
The following comments on the proposal are made in relation to policy EC10 of PPS4: § The proposed development complies with all relevant Council policies and for this reason the Local Planning Authority is adopting a positive approach towards the proposal and its contribution towards economic growth; § As outlined in section 12 of this report the proposed development will comply with the Council’s policies on energy efficiency; § As outlined in section 8 of this report, the proposed development provides for access by a choice of means of transport; § As outlined elsewhere in the report, it is considered that the proposed development is of an acceptable design which is compatible with its surrounding; § The proposal will assist economic regeneration in the area by providing employment opportunities. The legal agreement attached to the outline planning permission requires a Local Employment Partnership to be established with the local job centre to facilitate the employment of as many local people as possible at the new facility.
The following comments on the proposal are made in relation to the recent Ministerial Statement ‘Planning for Growth’: § The Government expects the answer to proposals for economic development to be ‘yes’ except where this compromises sustainable development principles set out in national planning policy. The proposal does not compromise sustainable development principles and is acceptable in all other respects, thus in line with the Government’s
Page 43 expectation to encourage economic development the proposal is recommended for approval.
For the reasons set out above the proposed development complies with the relevant policy in PPS4 and also with guidance contained within the Ministerial Statement ‘Planning for Growth’.
10. Planning Policy Statement 1 (PPS1) – Delivering Sustainable Development
Planning Policy Statement 1 (PPS1) sets out the Government's overarching planning policies on the delivery of sustainable development through the planning system. Paragraph 23 of PPS1 is entitled ‘Sustainable Economic Development’ and states that the Government is committed to promoting a strong, stable and productive economy that aims to bring jobs and prosperity for all. Several actions are set out that planning authorities should follow. Of relevance to this application are that planning authorities should: i) Recognise that economic development can deliver environmental and social benefits; iii) Ensure that suitable locations are available for industrial [and] commercial…development so that the economy can prosper.
In terms of the current application this is for economic development as defined by PPS4 as being development which is, amongst others, within the ‘B’ Use Classes. The application site is within an area which is allocated in the adopted development plan for development falling within the ‘B’ uses. Notwithstanding that the plan allocates the application site for B1 or B2 development, B8 development can be implemented on this site as a result of the outline permission and this also falls within the definition of economic development. The fact that the site is allocated for employment purposes is acknowledgement in itself that the Council has undertaken a process of identifying and allocating suitable locations for economic development and the associated benefits that this can bring to the local area particularly in relation to the social benefits associated with job creation. Having regard to this it is considered that the proposal accords with the relevant requirements of PPS1.
11. Regional Spatial Strategy for the North West.
Following the decision in the Cala Homes case, Regional Spatial Strategy for the North West has been reinstated as part of the Development Plan, at least until the Localism Bill is enacted, although the Government’s expressed intention to revoke RSS is a material consideration in the determination of planning applications. RSS does not, however, contain policies relevant to this application given that the principles of the development have already been permitted and the matters before the Council here relate to the appropriateness of details of its layout, appearance, scale and landscaping. The Council considers that the relevant part of the Development Plan is the
Page 44 Rochdale Unitary Development Plan (‘the UDP’) which was adopted on 15th June 2006.
12. Energy and New Development SPD
The Council’s adopted Energy and New Development Supplementary Planning Document requires that all new non residential developments incorporating gross floorspace of 500sqm or more are required to meet at least BREEAM Very Good standard.
A condition was attached to the outline planning permission to require the development to achieve at least BREEAM Very Good standard and for this to be confirmed to the Local Planning Authority by submission of a post construction certificate. As the current application is a reserved matters application pursuant to the outline permission the requirement will apply to the proposed development.
Subject to compliance with the condition on the outline permission the proposal complies with the requirements of the Council’s adopted Energy and New Development Supplementary Planning Document and with UDP Policy EM/13 (Energy Efficiency and Energy Conservation.)
13. Other matters
Planning obligation It is necessary for there to be a Deed of Variation to the original planning obligation. The original obligation sought contributions for the following:
1. A bus stop contribution of £40,000 prior to the first occupation of the first unit to be constructed; 1. a highways contribution of £100,000 payable in three phases – separate payments of £25,000 within one and nine months of the date of the outline planning permission and the remaining £50,000 on commencement of development.
The deed of variation is recommended for two reasons:
1. GMPTE are recommending that the bus stops required by the existing agreement are not provided. This is because of the future of the existing limited service on Pilsworth Road being uncertain and in any event the service being beyond reasonable walking distance to the site. If the bus stop provision is not to go ahead then alternative provision should be made for access by means other than the private motor car. It is therefore recommended that the original agreement is varied to allow the equivalent sum to be invested in improvements to walking and cycling access to the site;
Page 45 2. The original agreement requires payment of the second £25,000 to be made within nine months of the issue of the outline planning permission. Permission was granted on 11 th March 2010 and the payment has not yet been received and the applicant has sought to renegotiate the terms of this existing agreement as part of this application. It is not considered expedient to take legal action to seek this payment at this time pending the outcome of this particular application. The applicant has proposed that the second payment be paid as part of the final sum on commencement of development i.e. one payment of £75,000 will be made to the Council rather than one payment of £25,000 and one payment of £50,000.
In considering this request, the issue is to what extent the Council would utilise the outstanding payment of £25,000 prior to any development commencing. The Council would need to substantiate this case at any appeal. The proposal would secure the remaining £75,000 on commencement of development and afford the Council a greater period of time in which to consider how this would best be utilised to mitigate the highway impact of any development taking place. It is therefore recommended that the agreement is varied to allow the payment to be made in accordance with an alternative timescale. It is recommended that the alternative is for the payment to be made at the commencement of development.
14. Summary
For the reasons outlined within this report it is considered that the proposal is acceptable and complies with the relevant policies of the Unitary Development Plan and its associated supplementary planning documents as well as policies contained within the relevant Planning Policy Statements and Guidance Notes.
It is recommended that planning permission is granted as it is considered that the development is in accordance the relevant national, regional and local planning policies and guidance and that there are no material planning considerations that indicate that an alternative decision should be reached. The planning conditions proposed would ensure that any impact resulting from the development would be reasonably mitigated.
Delegation Scheme: The Committee have delegated powers to determine the application either way on reasonable planning grounds.
______
Page 46 Page 47 This page is intentionally left blank
Page 48 Agenda Item 3
REPORT FOR APPROVAL
Agenda item no: . Licensing and Regulatory Committee 14 July 2011 Report of the Service Director – Finance and Procurement
Annual Governance Statement 2010/11
Wards affected: All Report author: V Crossland
Telephone: 01706 925452
This report presents the Annual Governance Statement 2010/11 to Licensing and Regulatory Committee Members for approval.
1. It is recommended that: Members approve the Annual Governance Statement 2010/11.
2. Reason for recommendation: To meet the requirements of the Accounts and Audit (England) Regulations 2011.
3 Alternatives and risks considered: Not applicable other than the risk of non-compliance with legislation.
4. Consultation undertaken/ proposed: Not applicable.
5. Equalities impacts There are no workforce equality issues or equality/ community issues arising from this report.
6. Financial and legal implications There are no additional financial or legal implications arising from this report.
7. Background to the Annual Governance Statement The Accounts and Audit (England) Regulations 2011 confirm that the Council is responsible for ensuring that the financial management of the Council is adequate and effective and that the Council has a sound system of internal
Page 49 control which facilitates the effective exercise of the Council’s functions and which include arrangements for the management of risk. As part of this the Council must conduct an annual review of the effectiveness of its system of internal control and then produce an Annual Governance Statement (AGS). The AGS must be prepared in accordance with ‘proper practices’ in relation to internal control and then approved by Members. Various guidance has been issued to define ‘proper practice’ and this guidance has been complied with to produce the AGS. In essence the AGS is the formal statement that recognises, records and publishes an authority’s governance arrangements as defined in the framework set out in the available guidance.
8 The Governance Framework The CIPFA/SOLACE working group has produced guidance on creating a governance framework. It recommends an interrelated system that brings together an underlying set of legislative requirements, governance principles and management processes. Most crucially, however, is the doctrine that good governance relates to the whole organisation.
The governance framework itself remains a discretionary code and is offered to organisations as good practice. It outlines six core principles of good governance focusing on the systems and processes for the direction and control of the organisation and its activities through which it accounts to, engages with and leads the community.
9 The Purpose of the Annual Governance Statement The purpose of the AGS process is to provide a continuous review of the effectiveness of the Council’s internal control and risk management systems, so as to give assurance on their effectiveness and/or to produce a management action plan to address identified weaknesses in either process. At its most effective, the process of preparing the AGS adds value to the corporate governance and internal control framework of the Council.
The Audit Commission’s view is that the arrangements required for gathering assurances for the preparation of the AGS provide an opportunity for Council’s to consider the robustness of their governance arrangements. In doing so, Councils need to recognise that this is a corporate issue, affecting everyone in the organisation. It is also important to recognise that the purpose of the AGS is not just to be ‘compliant’, but also to provide an accurate representation of the arrangements in place during the year and to highlight those areas where improvement is required. This will also demonstrate to stakeholders what those arrangements are.
10 Governance Principles The new CIPFA/SOLACE governance framework clearly sets out the fundamental principles of corporate governance, these are:
1. Focusing on the purpose of the authority and on outcomes for the community and creating and implementing a vision for the local area; 2. Members and officers working together to achieve a common purpose with clearly defined functions and roles; 3. Promoting values for the authority and demonstrating the values of good governance through upholding high standards of conduct and behaviour; 4. Taking informed and transparent decisions which are subject to effective scrutiny and managing risk;
Page 50 5. Developing the capacity and capability of members and officers to be effective; and 6. Engaging with local people and other stakeholders to ensure robust accountability.
11 Annual Governance Statement 2010/11 The AGS relating to 2010/11 is attached as part of the Statement of Accounts, appended to that item on this agenda. It has four key areas, as follows:-
A description of the elements that make up the governance framework in the Council based on the six principles (Section 4) including a review of the effectiveness of the elements, and a summary of areas where improvements to the governance system are required; The annual audit opinion from the Head of Audit and Risk Management (Section 5); External Review and Inspection reports; and An action plan to address issues raised and ensure that there is continuous improvement in the governance systems.
12 Recommendation It is recommended that Members approve the Annual Governance Statement 2010/11.
For further information and background papers: For further information about this report or access to any background papers please contact Vicky Crossland, Head of Corporate Finance, Floor 7, Telegraph House, Baillie Street, Rochdale. Tel: 01706 925443
Page 51 This page is intentionally left blank
Page 52 Agenda Item 4
Subject: STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS Status: For Information 2010/11
Report to : Licensing and Regulatory Date: 13th July 201 1 Committee
Report of: Service Director – Finance Re port Author: Helen Zammit and Procurement Email: [email protected] Tel: (01706) 925413 Cabinet Member: Cabinet Member for Finance and Corporate Management
Comments from Section 151 Officer Statutory Officers: Monitoring Officer
Key Decision: No
Forward Plan General Exception Special Urgency
1. PURPOSE OF REPORT
1.1 To update Members on the Statement of Accounts for 2010/11
2. RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 It is recommended that: 2.1.1 Licensing and Regulatory Committee notes the Authority’s 2010/11 statement of accounts.
2.2 Reasons for recommendation:
2.2.1 Each year, following closure of the Authority’s accounts, the Service Director Finance and Procurement, reports to members on the statement of accounts. This report accompanies the statement of accounts for the financial year ending 31 st March 2011.
3. MAIN TEXT INCLUDING ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED/ CONSULTATION CARRIED OUT
Page 53 3.1 Alternatives and Risks considered: 3.1.1 The submission of the Council’s Statement of Accounts for approval by the Service Director Finance and Procurement by 30th June following the financial year end is a statutory requirement.
3.2 Consultation Undertaken/Proposed: 3.2.1 The accounts and supporting documents are, by arrangement, available for inspection by any person interested from Tuesday 28th June to Monday 25th July 2011.
3.2.2 The accounts are then subject to audit by the Audit Commission who, from Tuesday 26th July 2011 until completion of the audit will, at the request of a local elector, be available to receive questions and objections relating to the accounts.
3.3 Equal Opportunities Implications:
3.3.1 There are no direct equal opportunity implications arising from this report.
3.4 Background
3.4.1 The Accounts and Audit Regulations 2003 require that the Authority’s statement of accounts for 2010/11 are approved by 30 th June 2011.
3.4.2 A copy of the statement of accounts for 2010/11 is attached. This has been certified by the Service Director Finance and Procurement as presenting fairly both the financial position of the Authority at 31 st March 2011 and its income and expenditure for the year.
3.4.3 In accordance with the Accounts and Audit Regulations 2003 the audited accounts will be published by 30 th September 2011. A report regarding the outcome of the audit will be submitted to the September meeting of the Licensing and Regulatory Committee
4. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
4.1 There are no financial implications arising as a result of this report.
5. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
None
6. PERSONNEL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications arising as a result of this report.
7. RISK ASSESSMENT IMPLICATIONS
7.1 There are no specific risk issues for members to consider arising from this report.
Page 54
Backgrou nd Papers See files held in the Central Services Section of Finance Services marked Final Accounts 2010/11 For further information relating to this report please contact Helen Zammit, Finance Manager – Central Services, Finance Services, PO Box 39, Telegraph House, Baillie Street, Rochdale. Tel (01706) 925413. Fax (01706) 924185. External e-mail: [email protected]
Document Place of Inspection
Ruth Hunter Service Director Finance and Procurement PO Box 39 Telegraph House Baillie Street Rochdale OL16 9DJ
Page 55 This page is intentionally left blank
Page 56
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS
2010/11
Page 57
Page 1
CONTENTS
1. REGULATION & INTRODUCTION
o Independent Auditor’s Report 3 o Commentary by the Cabinet Member for Finance and Corporate Management 4 o Service Director, Finance and Procurement’s Foreword & Financial Summary 5 o Statement of Responsibilities 11 o Annual Governance Statement for the year ended 31 st March 2011 12
2. THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS o The Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement 25 o The Movement in Reserves Statement 26 o The Balance Sheet 28 o The Cash Flow Statement 29 o Restatement of the Accounts 30 o Notes to the Accounts 35 o The Collection Fund Statement 97 o Notes to the Collection Fund Statement 98 o The Housing Revenue Income and Expenditure Statement and Statement 100 of Movement on the Housing Revenue Account Balance o Notes to the HRA Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement 101 o The Group Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement 106 o The Group Movement in Reserves Statement 107 o The Group Balance Sheet 110 o The Group Cash Flow Statement 111 o Notes to the Group Accounts 112
3. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION o Trust Funds Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement and Balance Sheet 127 o Glossary of Terms 130
Page 58
Page 2
REGULATION & INTRODUCTION
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO MEMBERS OF ROCHDALE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL
The Independent Auditor’s Report to Members will be added to the Statement of Accounts following completion of the External Audit process.
Page 59
Page 3
COMMENTARY BY THE CABINET MEMBER FOR FINANCE
As Cabinet Member for Finance I am responsible for ensuring that Rochdale Council makes the most effective use of its resources in order to deliver value for money services that local people need. I therefore welcome the opportunity to comment on the Authority’s financial performance for the year ended 31 st March 2011.
The Authority’s Medium Term Financial Strategy was updated in early 2011 to reflect the budget set by Council in February 2011 and reviewed the services provided by the Authority to reflect those areas important to local people. The strategy provides a three year framework for the Authority and its partners to ensure that the value for money offered by Council Services continues to improve and can be sustained within the reduced resources available. The Medium Term Financial Strategy will be completely reviewed in 2011/12 to align the strategy with the vision for the Authority in 2014/15 following the announcement from Central Government regarding the significantly reduced resources the Authority will receive.
The absence of firm local government spending plans beyond 2011/12 and the potential for a change in the methodology in distributing the Formula Grant to Local Authorities means that there is still considerable uncertainty regarding the level of funding that the Authority will receive for the future. At this stage the Authority’s budget plans assume that government funding will reduce in line with the National Figures announced as part of the Comprehensive Spending Review in October 2010. The position will be kept under close review and updated as further information becomes available. It is expected that an announcement regarding the new Formula Grant Methodology including Authorities retaining their National Non Domestic Business Rates will be announced in the Summer of 2011.
There will inevitably be an impact across the Authority where we need to ensure a balanced budget is achieved. In order to realise this, the Authority is working on the vision for 2014/15 and has embarked on a savings programme which requires the achievement of an estimated £64m over a three year period. The Authority embarked on its programme of savings during 2010/11 identifying £27.6m of savings including a non essential spending saving of £4.5m for the financial year.
Rochdale as with most Local Authorities faces above inflationary increases in costs as a result of demographic, social and economic factors. An increasingly aging population and Adults with Learning Disabilities are placing pressures on the Adult Care Service, the increased number of children being looked after by the Authority is adding to budget pressures in the Child Care Service. These examples of pressures coupled with the local impact of the national economic downturn, has increased demand for Council services.
Looking forward, the 2011/12 budget contains a challenging savings programme with resources being targeted towards those services which are statutory and / or provide services which are high priority for the residents of the borough.
During 2010/11 the Authority spent £573m on day to day services. This was partially offset by £421m in income obtained from fees and charges, rents and specific grants. The remainder of the spending was funded by government grants and Council Tax. Residents funded £78.7m, over a tenth of the total Council budget, through Council Tax.
The Authority faced significant challenges in keeping spending within the budget in 2010/11 and through robust budget monitoring the Authority was able to react quickly and efficiently to a forecast deficit position reported in September 2010. The corrective action taken enabled the Authority’s forecast expenditure to be brought back within available resources. This was achieved by redirecting resources to high priority areas and stopping spending on non essential expenditure. The robust budget monitoring arrangements and the hard work of Council services helped to ensure that timely corrective action was taken when necessary. At the year end services under spent by £4.7m which is to be earmarked and used for the Funding Strategy in 2011/12. Further details of our financial performance are outlined in the Service Director, Finance and Procurement’s Foreword and Financial Summary on page 6 and will be reported to the Cabinet in July 2011.
As well as revenue spending on day to day services, the Authority invests a significant amount on improving our assets. In 2010/11 capital spending amounted to £90.4m, of which £9.8m related to housing schemes and £26.8m was invested in schools.
As highlighted above the Authority is experiencing a significant increase in the demand for services and these pressures coupled with a reduction in funding from Central Government will mean the Authority will be required to make some challenging decisions regarding the services it provides.
The Authority is also aware of the pressures facing local people, especially given the current economic uncertainty, and will continue to look for ways to reduce financial pressures and minimise the burden of Council Tax on local people. Residents can also be assured that the Authority has clear plans to ensure that service delivery and resources are directed towards the priorities of local people.
Councillor Farooq Ahmed Cabinet Member for Finance June 2011
Page 60
Page 4
SERVICE DIRECTOR, FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT’S FOREWORD AND FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Foreword
This document is the statement of accounts for Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council and its Group. The purpose of the statement of accounts is to give the reader an understanding of the financial position and to demonstrate that the financial standing of the Authority is secure. It covers the financial year from 1 st April 2010 to 31 st March 2011 and shows the financial position of the Authority and the cost of the services it provides.
This is the first year the Authority has had to produce Financial Statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) which has presented a number of challenges. The main changes to the accounts are: o The format and presentation of the Financial Statements to comply with the Code of Practice. o The restatement of the 2010/11 Statement of Accounts from the statements published in the 2009/10 under UK Accounting Standards, to statements published under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). o The treatment of certain classifications of Income and Expenditure. o The accounting policies for the Council.
The Sections within the statement of accounts provide the detail behind these changes and the impact on the accounts. Note 1 to the accounts details the transition from the Statement of Accounts produced under UK Accounting Standards to the 2010/11 Statement of Accounts produced on an IFRS basis.
The services the Authority provides are: o Central Services to the Public. o Cultural, Environmental, Regulatory & Planning Services. o Corporate and Democratic Core Services. o Highways and Transport Services. o Non distributed costs. o Children’s and Education Services. o Adult Social Care Services. o Housing Services – General Fund and Housing Revenue Account.
The financial activity of the Authority, in relation to these services, is shown through a number of key financial statements and notes. As detailed above there are a number of technical and presentational changes this year to the accounting policies, key statements and notes to the accounts to comply with the new requirements of CIPFA’s Code of Practice under IFRS.
The key financial statements are:
The Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement
This statement shows the accounting cost in the year of providing services in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, rather than the amount to be funded from taxation. Authorities raise taxation to cover expenditure in accordance with regulations; this may be different from the accounting cost. The taxation position is shown in the movement in Reserves Statement.
The Balance Sheet
The balance sheet shows the value at the balance sheet date of the assets and liabilities recognised by the authority. The net assets of the authority (assets less liabilities) are matched by reserves held by the authority. Reserves are reported in two categories. The first category of reserves are useable reserves, i.e. those reserves that the Authority may use to provide services, subject to the need to maintain a prudent level of reserves and any statutory limitations on their use (for example the Capital Receipts Reserves may only be used to fund capital expenditure or repay debt). The second category of reserves include reserves that hold unrealised gains and losses (for example the Revaluation Reserve), where amounts would only become available to provide services if the assets are sold; and reserves that hold timing difference shown in the Movement in Reserves Statement line “Adjustments between accounting basis and funding basis under regulations”.
Page 61
Page 5
The Movement in Reserves Statement (MiRS)
This Statement shows the movement in year on the different reserves held by the Authority, analysed into “Useable reserves” (i.e. those that can be applied to fund expenditure or reduce local taxation) and other reserves. The surplus or (Deficit) on the provision of services line shows the true economic cost of providing the authority’s services, more detail are shown in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. These are different from the statutory amounts required to be charged to the General Fund Balance and the Housing Revenue Account for Council Tax Setting and dwellings rent setting purposes. The Net Increase / Decrease before Transfers to Earmarked Reserves line shows the Statutory General Fund Balance and the Housing Revenue Account Balance before any discretionary transfers to or from earmarked reserves undertaken by the Authority.
The Cash Flow Statement
The Cash Flow Statement shows the changes in cash and cash equivalents of the Authority during the reporting period. The statement shows how the authority generates and uses cash and cash equivalents by classifying cash flows as operating, investing and financing activities. The amount of net cash flows arising from operating activities is a key indicator of the extent to which the operations of the Authority are funded by way of taxation and grant income or from the recipients of services provided by the Authority. Investing activities represent the extent to which cash outflows have been made for resources which are intended to contribute to the Authority’s future service delivery. Cash flows arising from financing activities are useful in predicting claims on future cash flows by providers of capital (i.e. borrowing) to the Authority.
The Housing Revenue Account (HRA )
The HRA Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement shows the economic cost in the year of providing housing services in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, rather than the amount to be funded from rents and government grants. Authorities charge rents to cover expenditure in accordance with regulations; this may be different from the accounting cost. The increase or decrease in the year, on the basis of which rents are raised is shown in the Movement on the HRA Statement.
The Collection Fund
The Collection Fund is an agent’s statement that reflects the statutory obligation for the billing Authority to maintain a separate Collection Fund. The statement shows the transactions of the billing Authority in relation to the collection from taxpayers and distribution to Local Authorities and the Government of Council Tax and Non- Domestic Rates.
The Group Statements
The group accounts contain the accounts of Rochdale Council and its subsidiary, Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBH) Ltd. There are separate disclosures for group figures where these differ from those of Rochdale Council. Any transactions between Rochdale Council and RBH are removed.
Accounting Policies
The Authority’s Key Statements are preceded by an explanation of the accounting policies used by the Authority in preparing the financial statements. In addition, each statement is accompanied by a series of notes to help explain the most significant items of income and expenditure.
The statement of accounts are prepared in accordance with the recommended practice outlined in The Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting (“The Code”), which interprets the relevant International Financial Reporting Standards and prescribes a hierarchy of alternative standards on which the accounting treatment and disclosures should be based for all normal transactions. There have been a number of changes to the accounting policies for Rochdale Council to ensure we comply with the code which include: o Investment Properties. o Non-current Assets Held for Sale. o Employee benefits. o Leases. o Events after the balance sheet date. o Government Grants and Contributions. o Treatment of Impairment. o Component Accounting.
Page 62
Page 6
Investment properties
Investment properties are properties now defined as those held solely for the purposes of income generation or for increases in the value of these assets. This has resulted in some assets moving category from investments to other land and buildings.
Revaluation gains, if they arise, are now charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement, the entries are reversed through the Movement in Reserves Statement. Previously revaluation gains on Investment Properties were dealt with in the Revaluation Reserve and did not affect the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
Revaluation intervals
Investment properties were previously revalued as part of a rolling programme by which all tangible fixed assets were revalued at least every 5 years. As recommended under the IFRS based Guide, Investment Properties will now have their values considered annually, on a beacon basis, according to market conditions at 1 st April.
Non-Current Assets Held for Sale
Assets which are being actively marketed and expected to sell within the next 12 months and are now classified as ‘Assets Held for Sale’ and will appear within current assets on the balance sheet. Previously all assets which were held for disposal were classified as ‘Surplus’ within Tangible Fixed Assets. Surplus Assets that do not meet the conditions of “Held for Sale” will be classified as appropriate within Property Plant and Equipment, and depreciated.
Assets Held for Sale are revalued according to the lower of their: o Carrying amount (less depreciation) before being classified as Assets Held for Sale; and o recoverable amount at the date of the decision not to sell.
Employee benefits
A new employee benefits policy has been prepared to explain the treatment of ‘short-term’ benefits’ and retirement benefit costs.
Short-term employee benefits are those due to be settled within 12 months of the year-end. They include such benefits as outstanding leave and work life benefit entitlements for current employees and are recognised as an expense for services in the year in which employees render service to the Authority. An accrual is made for the cost of holiday entitlements (or any form of leave, e.g. time off in lieu) earned by employees but not taken before the year-end which employees can carry forward into the next financial year. The accrual is made at the wage and salary rates applicable in the following accounting year, being the period in which the employee takes the benefit. The accrual is charged to Surplus or Deficit on the Provision of Services, but then reversed out through the Movement in Reserves Statement so that holiday benefits are charged to revenue in the financial year in which the holiday absence occurs. An accrual for short-term employee benefits was not required previously.
Retirement Benefits are now accounted for under IAS19 rather than FRS17, but there are no changes in the accounting treatment except some minor changes in the format of the notes.
Leases
The policy for treatment of leases under IFRS is not significantly different compared with the treatment under the SORP. A lease may be classified in one of two ways: o Finance lease – the asset being shown on the balance sheet and lease payments treated as repayments of a lease. o Operating lease – the lease payments being treated as a rental or hire payment in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
The definition of ‘finance lease’ has changed under IFRS with the general effect that more leases are now treated as finance leases.
Events after the balance sheet date
This policy replaces the former ‘post balance sheet events’ policy. The previous policy was based on the application of FRS21 which classified significant post-balance sheet events as ‘adjusting’ or ‘non-adjusting’ events. Page 63
Page 7
The new policy is broadly similar and defines the timing situations which may arise at the year-end, and whether these circumstances demand an adjustment to the Statement of Accounts.
Government Grants and Contributions
Capital Grants were previously written off to the Service Revenue Accounts in instalments over the life of the asset. Revenue grants were held on the balance sheet as a Receipt in Advance and recognised in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement when the associated expenditure was incurred.
Under IFRS Capital Grants are recognised in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement in the year they are received, unless they have a ‘condition’ attached that is outstanding.
Where a ‘condition’ is outstanding the grant or contribution will be held as a Capital/Revenue Grant Receipt in Advance. The grant or contribution will be put through the Comprehensive Income & Expenditure Statement once the ‘condition’ has been met.
Capital Grants recognised in the Comprehensive Income & Expenditure Statement are transferred through the Movement in Reserves Statement and either posted to the Capital Grants Unapplied account if they have not been applied or to the Capital Adjustment Account if they have been applied. This treatment is the same as under Statement Of Recommended Practice (SORP).
Revenue Grants where no condition exists are recognised in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement and are contributed to a specific reserve through the Movement in Reserves Statement.
Treatment of Impairment
Impairment occurs when an asset reduces in value. This can be for one of two main reasons:
1. A general fall in prices due to market conditions. 2. A fall in price specific to one particular asset.
Under SORP a fall in the second category was always reflected in the Income and Expenditure Statement of the Authority whilst a fall due to Market conditions would have been first written off against any available revaluation surplus of the asset concerned. Under IFRS a fall in either category will be first offset against available revaluation surpluses and only charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement if there is no available Revaluation surplus.
Component Accounting
There is a greater emphasis under IFRS on component accounting for significant components (in terms of cost) of material assets which have a significantly different useful life to that of the main asset. Significant components will now be separately identified in our asset register and have their own depreciation charge applied. This particular policy only applies prospectively i.e. from when a component is replaced or created. The Authority has thus had to adopt a Policy on: o What is a material asset. o What is a significant component. o Useful lives on separable components. o What is a significantly different useful life.
More detail regarding the Accounting Policies can be found on page 35 to 48.
Future Developments
The Authority is working towards the vision of what the Authority will look like in 2014/15 which will impact on the services provided by the Authority. At the time of the accounts being approved for Audit the detail was not available.
Financial Summary
General Fund: In 2010/11, Rochdale Council planned to spend £222.2m (net of Dedicated Schools Grant of £143.41m). This was to be funded through Government grants (£143.4m) and Council Tax (£78.7m). After taking into account commitments brought forward from 2009/10 (£10.941m), those carried forward to 2010/11 (£23.527m), and a change to the amount of Grants received (£2.707m), the Authority’s budgeted spend for 2010/11 is revised to £206.949m. The carry forward of underPage spend on64 budget (£4.695m) is currently being reported by
Page 8
Services. Cabinet are being asked to carry forward these underspends for the Authority’s Funding Strategy in 2011/12.
The Authority’s actual net expenditure during the year on providing its services amounted to £202.254m and was therefore slightly underspent on budget. Details of the reasons for the budget variations will be reported to Cabinet in July 2011.
The Movement in Reserves shows that the Authority’s total general reserves at 31st March 2011 amount to £33.218m. However this includes commitments into 2011/12 of £28.222m, leaving uncommitted year end balances of £4.996m
The Authority is financially secure and keeps a good level of General Fund Balances to mitigate against the risks not provided for within the Authority’s Financial Plans, Reserves or Provisions. The level of balances are assessed annually to ensure they are adequate to safe guard the Authority against the potential exposure to risk
The risk assessment undertaken as part of the 2011/12 budget setting process estimated that in a worst case scenario the potential maximum unbudgeted costs that the Authority could incur would be £5m. It is therefore estimated that this level of general balances will be sufficient to meet this level of potential liability.
Earmarked Reserves
The Authority earmarks resources for specific issues and these are contained in earmarked reserves. During 2010/11 the level of these reserves reduced by £5.6m to £49.9m
Housing Revenue Account
The total spending on managing and maintaining Council dwellings during 2010/11 was £40.98m and increased to £55.86m when including accounting changes and interest payable / receivable, and capital expenditure funded by revenue. This expenditure was funded from rent income (£40.36m), government grant (£8.06m) and charges for services and facilities (£5.72m) leaving a net in year deficit of £1.7m. As a consequence the HRA balance at 31 st March 2011 is £10.2m. The use of this balance will be determined in accordance with the HRA medium term financial strategy. HRA related Capital spending amounted to £10.7m. The Housing Revenue Account and Notes are provided at pages 101-106.
Trading
The Authority provides a number of services and support services on a trading basis. The net deficit on these activities is £0.213m for 2010/11. Further details are provided at Note 30 to the Accounts.
Capital and Asset Management
Capital expenditure of £90.4m was incurred in 2010/11 and this was financed by a combination of borrowing, grants, asset disposals and revenue. Details of the financing of capital expenditure in 2010/11 are provided at Note 40 to the accounts. Loans totalling £369.3m which have been used primarily to finance previous year’s capital expenditure were outstanding at 31 st March 2011.
The Capital programme is a three year programme. Government capital allocations are only given on an annual basis and the resources for 2012 to 2014 have therefore been prudently based on the 2011/12 Forecast. Forecasts of capital receipts have been re-profiled to take account of the economic climate.
Local Taxes and Tax Collection
The 2010/11 Council Tax bill for a Band D property was £1,482.36. This represents an increase of 3.93% compared to 2009/10. From this £1,285.38 (3.6% increase on 2009/10) related to charges for Council services and £196.98 (6.11% increase on 2009/10) for charges for police and fire services. 95.1% (2009/10 96%) of Council Tax bills and 96.8% (2009/10 97.08%) of business rate demands were paid during the year.
Pension Fund
The value of the balance sheet for the Authority has increased by £254m; this is mainly due to a decrease in the Pension Liability of the Authority. This will be the situation for the vast majority of Authorities and is due to the Chancellors decision in June 2010 to link pension valuations to the CPI (Consumer Based Index) rather than RPI (Retail Price Index). The investment return on the pension fund assets has also increased which added together with the index price has resulted in the reduction in Pension Liability for Rochdale. Page 65
Page 9
Economic Climate
2010/11 has been a challenging year with an increase in service demand being experienced due to the economic downturn, local businesses struggling and shops within the Town Centre closing. Rochdale MBC has taken decisive steps to mitigate the impact on the Authority’s financial position by services not incurring spend on non essential expenditure, implementing a robust saving programme and realigning budgets to priority areas. This has enabled Rochdale MBC to achieve an underspend budget position in 2010/11 which will be used for the Funding Strategy.
2011/12 will bring new challenges as this is the first year of the Finance Settlement which significantly reduced the resources available to the Authority. Rochdale MBC has set a robust 2011/12 budget in February 2011, which included savings of £63.597m. This is a major challenge and will require excellent governance arrangements to be in place, to ensure Services achieve the proposals they have signed up to. Rochdale MBC are modelling the potential changes in how Local Authorities are resourced following the consultation document issued by Central Government earlier this year. The impact of any changes in the funding methodology should be known in early Autumn.
The Statement of Accounts were authorised for issue on 27 th June 2011 and is the date which events after this date will not have been included in the Statement of Accounts.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the information contained in the Statement of Accounts please contact Vicky Crossland, Head of Corporate Finance, Finance Services, Telegraph House, Baillie Street, Rochdale OL16 1JA (Telephone 01706 925409).
Ruth Hunter, Service Director, Finance and Procurement June 2011
Page 66 Page 10
STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES
The Metropolitan Borough Council’s Responsibilities:- o To make arrangements for the proper administration of its financial affairs and to secure that one of its officers has the responsibility for the administration of those affairs. In this Authority, that officer is the Service Director, Finance and Procurement. o To manage its affairs to secure economic, efficient and effective use of resources and safeguard its assets. o To approve the Statement of Accounts.
The Service Director, Finance & Procurement’s Responsibilities:-
The Service Director, Finance and Procurement is responsible for the preparation of the Authority’s Statement of Accounts which, in terms of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in Great Britain (“the Code of Practice”), is required to present a true and fair view of the financial position of the Authority at the accounting date and its income and expenditure for the year.
In preparing this Statement of Accounts, the Service Director, Finance and Procurement has: o Selected suitable accounting policies and then applied them consistently. o Made judgements and estimates that were reasonable and prudent. o Complied with the Code of Practice. o Kept proper accounting records which were up to date. o Taken reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Certification of Accounts
I certify that this Statement of Accounts presents a true and fair view of the financial position of the Authority as at the 31 st of March 2011 and its income and expenditure for that year.
Ruth Hunter, Service Director, Finance and Procurement June 2011
Page 67 Page 11
GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
ANNUAL GOVERNANCE STATEMENT YEAR ENDED 31 st MARCH 2011
Section Detail Page
1 Introduction and Scope of Responsibility 13
2 The Purpose of the Governance Statement 13
3 The Accounts and Audit (England) Regulations 2011 - Regulation 6 13
4 The Governance Framewor k and its Effectiveness 13
4.1 Focusing on the purpose of the authority and on outcomes for the community 14 and creating and implementing a vision for the local area
4.2 Members and officers working together to achieve a common purpose with 15 clearly defined functions and roles
4.3 Promoting values for the authority and demonstrating the values of good 17 governance through upholding high standards of conduct and behaviour
4.4 Taking informed and transparent decisions which are subject to effectiv e 18 scrutiny and managing risk
4.5 Developing the capacity and capability of Members and O fficers to be effective 20
4.6 Engaging with local people and other stakeholders to ensure robust 21 accountability
5 Internal Audit and the Opinion on Intern al Control 2010/11 22
6 External Audit and Inspection Reports 22
7 Action Plan to ensure continuous improvement of the Governance Framework 23
Signed on behalf of Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council by Service Director – Finance & Procurement – Section 151 Officer 24 Chief Executive 24 Leader of the Council 24
Page 68 Page 12
1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITY
Rochdale MBC is responsible for ensuring that its business is conducted in accordance with the law and proper standards, that public money is safeguarded and properly accounted for, and used economically, efficiently and effectively. Rochdale MBC also has a duty under the Local Government Act 1999 to make arrangements to secure continuous improvement in the way in which its functions are exercised, having regard to a combination of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
In discharging this overall responsibility Rochdale MBC is responsible for putting in place proper arrangements for the governance of its affairs, facilitating the effective exercise of its functions, which includes arrangements for the management of risk.
Rochdale MBC has approved and adopted a code of corporate governance, which is consistent with the principles of the CIPFA / SOLACE Framework Delivering Good Governance in Local Government. This statement explains how Rochdale MBC has complied with “The Code” and also meets the requirements of regulation 4(3) of the Accounts and Audit (England) Regulations 2011 in relation to the publication of an annual governance statement.
2. THE PURPOSE OF THE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
The governance framework comprises of the systems and processes, and culture and values, by which the Authority is directed and controlled and its activities through which it accounts to, engages with and leads the community. It enables the Authority to monitor the achievement of its strategic objectives and to consider whether those objectives have led to the delivery of appropriate, cost-effective services.
The system of internal control is a significant part of that framework and is designed to manage risk to a reasonable level. It cannot eliminate all risk of failure to achieve policies, aims and objectives and can therefore only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance of effectiveness. The system of internal control is based on an ongoing process designed to identify and prioritise the risks to the achievement of Rochdale MBC policies, aims and objectives, to evaluate the likelihood of those risks being realised and the impact should they be realised, and to manage them efficiently, effectively and economically.
The governance framework has been in place at Rochdale MBC for the year ended 31 st March 2011 and up to the date of approval of the Statement of Accounts. The findings of the review of the system of internal control will be reported to the Audit Committee (the responsibilities of which will now be fulfilled by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee) on the 28 th July 2011 along with the Statement of Accounts.
3. THE ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT (ENGLAND) REGULATIONS 2011 – REGULATION 6
In order to comply with the Accounts and Audit (England) Regulations 2011, the Authority must, at least once a year, conduct a review of the effectiveness of its internal audit.
The Internal Audit Annual Report provides an overview of the work and performance of the team. Details of work completed and the performance of Internal Audit during the year is summarised in quarterly reports to the Audit Committee, providing an ongoing view of the effectiveness of the overall internal control environment and providing the Members with an opportunity to challenge specific issues identified within each service area.
Internal Audit has completed a self-assessment against the CIPFA Code of Practice for Internal Audit in Local Government in the United Kingdom 2006. This confirmed a compliance rate of 99% against the Code, which compares favourably with the average of AGMA authorities of 96%. This self assessment was verified and signed off by the Section 151 Officer.
Internal Audit was last reviewed by our external auditors, the Audit Commission, during 2009/10; their report was very positive about the quality and effectiveness of the service and there were no recommendations made.
4. THE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK AND ITS EFFECTIVENESS
The key elements of the system and processes that comprise the Authority’s governance arrangements are detailed in this section. The elements are based on the six principles of Corporate Governance, which tie in with our Code Page 69 Page 13 of Corporate Governance, the Governance Framework and the assurance gathering principles laid out in the CIPFA Finance Advisory Network “Rough Guide for Practitioners”.
The six principles are detailed below in RMBC terminology:
1. Focusing on the purpose of the authority and on outcomes for the community and creating and implementing a vision for the local area. 2. Members and officers working together to achieve a common purpose with clearly defined functions and roles. 3. Promoting values for the Authority and demonstrating the values of good governance through upholding high standards of conduct and behaviour. 4. Taking informed and transparent decisions which are subject to effective scrutiny and managing risk. 5. Developing the capacity and capability of members and officers to be effective. 6. Engaging with local people and other stakeholders to ensure robust accountability.
Rochdale MBC has responsibility for conducting, at least annually a review of the effectiveness of its governance framework including the system of internal control. The review of effectiveness is informed by the work of the executive managers within the Authority who have responsibility for the development and maintenance of the governance environment, the Head of Audit and Risk Management’s annual report, external scrutiny by the external auditors and other review agencies and inspectorates.
The following paragraphs detail the governance framework of Rochdale MBC, which collectively firmly underpin the six principles; at the end of each section there is an analysis on the effectiveness of each element of the framework followed by highlighted areas where improvements are required. These areas flow through to the action plan at the end of the statement.
4.1 FOCUSING ON THE PURPOSE OF THE AUTHORITY AND ON OUTCOMES FOR THE COMMUNITY AND CREATING AND IMPLEMENTING A VISION FOR THE LOCAL AREA
Why is this important?
All Local Authorities have a “well being” duty. This means we are responsible for helping to achieve the best quality of life and outcomes for people locally.
We do this through:
The Local Strategic Partnership “The Pride Partnership” - we work with and lead our key partners across the borough to engage our local communities in priority partnerships and develop a shared vision, Pride of Place.
To ensure that we focus on the priorities that have been identified in Pride of Place the Authority produces a corporate plan, Aiming High , which sets out what we will do to support the achievement of the vision.
Our Partnership Framework that ensures our partnerships are effective and that we maximise the contribution that they make. We have four significant strategic partners, Impact, Rochdale Boroughwide Housing, Rochdale Boroughwide Cultural Service (Link4Life) and Rochdale Development Agency (RDA).
Our Value for Money (VFM) approach and Efficiency Programme that sets challenging savings requirements that we expect from our services – low cost, high performance, successful outcomes and satisfied customers. We set these standards out in our corporate plan so it is clear what we are aiming to achieve and this is reflected as one of our Stepping Up strands.
How effective is this?
Each priority partnership has a full understanding, clear ownership and accountability for its indicators and targets and understands the contributions these make to the delivery of our borough-wide priorities and Pride of Place . We have a Local Public Service Board and Performance Framework already established and we recently set up a quarterly LSP Performance Board. Our LAA performance targets are managed through out partnerships and the level of reward grant received by Rochdale in 2010/11 was one of the highest nationally.
Aiming High’s priorities reflect those of Pride of Place, and are supported by factors such as employment, earnings, health, education, and crime in the borough. These indicators are monitored by ELT and Performance Scrutiny Committee (the functions of which are now fulfilled by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee) and action Page 70 Page 14 taken to ensure they are achieved. Service plans and updates reflect the Authority’s priorities and ambitions. The current plan is dated 2007-2010 and was due to be renewed to be effective from 1 st April 2010. A strategic decision has been taken to extend the current plans for 2 years due to the scale of change the Authority is currently undergoing.
We have established reporting processes to manage the partnership relationships and a framework to monitor outcomes. We have continued to roll out our partnership toolkit which captures good practice guidance in all elements of setting up and operating in a partnership environment. Eleven partnerships have been evaluated and outcomes can by found on the Council website. We engage effectively with all partners on the identification and agreement of key priorities and we have good cooperation and focused attention on achieving priority outcomes for citizens.
The VFM approach and Savings Programme has increased in pace and profile and is now one of the main focus areas for the Authority due to the current economic climate and a significant reduction in Government funding, leading to critical budget pressures.
Areas for Further Development
There should be new versions of Pride of Place and Aiming High from 2010, however, this has been extended until 2011 to 2014, to align with the new Government’s financial settlement and priorities and react to the degree of change the Authority is currently experiencing. The Aiming High indicators and targets will be monitored for a further year until 31 st March 2012. Community consultation is ongoing on the priorities for the refreshed Aiming High III.
Between April and June 2011 the cost and performance of all services is being reviewed as part of a strategic approach to the spending reductions. A new set of priorities is in development that will be proportionate to the stepped change in the size of the Authority and the services it provides. As part of this work all strategic partnerships will come under review. The 2012 governance statement will be focusing on the effectiveness of the arrangements in place to manage this change and the ongoing arrangements to ensure outcomes are delivered in the context of the new strategic goals the organisation sets itself for the future.
4.2 MEMBERS AND OFFICERS WORKING TOGETHER TO ACHIEVE A COMMON PURPOSE WITH CLEARLY DEFINED FUNCTIONS AND ROLES
Why is this important?
As an organisation we will be better and achieve more if we all want to achieve the same things. It is important that everyone within our organisation understands their role, what they are responsible for and how they contribute.
We do this through:
The Constitution sets out how we operate as an organisation, how decisions are made and the procedures which are followed to ensure we are efficient, transparent and accountable to local people.
Political leadership provides an important link between the strategic goals of the Authority and outcomes for the community. Elected Members responsible for decision making on the Authority’s Cabinet have lead portfolio holder responsibilities for services. This ensures appropriate links are made with senior officers to guide strategy and decision making. Rochdale has a positive record of political cooperation in the interests of the borough. Four party leaders meetings and key strategic decisions primarily operate through an all party decision making forum. Collective briefings are held with portfolio holders and opposition portfolio holders on key reports requiring decision.
Our Section 151 Officer, Service Director, Finance & Procurement, is responsible for ensuring the Authority receives good financial advice, that we keep proper financial records and there are effective financial controls. Close working relationships exist between the Section 151 Officer and Monitoring Officer. Both officers attend the meetings of the ELT.
The role of our Monitoring Officer , Borough Solicitor, is critical in promoting and maintaining high standards of conduct and ensuring that decision making processes and services are provided in accordance with legislation and within the powers of the Authority. The Monitoring Officer also has responsibility to review the content, coverage and operation of the Constitution to ensure that it remains current and meets all legal and good practice requirements. Page 71 Page 15
Capacity has been strengthened by the investment in a new Performance Management system corporately. We have balanced scorecards for all services with key performance indicators to tackle under-performance. The Performance Scrutiny Committee and ELT provide Member and senior management input to the process and the Annual Report, which is shared with our communities, sets out our progress.
Our Members Code of Conduct is a stand alone document and is part of the Constitution. It was updated to reflect the new Model Code of Conduct.
The Member / Officer Protocol maintains and enhances the integrity of the Authority and emphasises the need for Members and Officers to respect the roles and duties of each other.
Staff Development and Conduct - to ensure that experienced and appropriately qualified people deliver services, job descriptions and person specifications are designed in a standard format. All officers are entitled to annual Performance Development Reviews (PDR) and action plans, with monthly meetings with their managers to review and update progress towards targets.
Job roles are set out within comprehensive job descriptions and person specifications . All roles are subject to approval through Human Resource (HR) business panels. Amendments to reflect changing work requirements are accommodated through a consultation process that incorporates trade union and HR sign off and Member led delegated decision making for significant changes. Service Directors have delegated approval to establish temporary posts and award honorarium to manage short term changes in responsibilities needed to deliver service objectives.
How effective is this?
The Constitution is at the heart of our decision making. The Standards Committee uphold the Constitution. We see the Constitution as a living document and encourage all Councillors and Officers to be familiar with its contents. Regular reviews and updates or amendment reports are produced. The constitution was updated in 2010/11. There is an AGMA study also being carried out on constitution issues.
Political leadership in Rochdale operates on a minority Cabinet with cooperation from all parties to make key Council decisions, for example budget setting. Whilst this could provide a greater degree of political instability, the scale of challenges facing the Authority have resulted in a higher level of collective agreement in respect of the most significant strategic decisions than has been experienced previously.
A Section 151 protocol has been established which covers working arrangements between the Section 151 Officer and other senior officers and elected members. The Section 151 Officer has access to a significant resource of guidance and professional standards from the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy. This includes best professional practice in relation to the role of the Chief Finance Officer and Chief Internal Auditor.
The Monitoring Officer has a series of sources of information which are used to ensure that we comply with laws and regulations such as a record of statutory obligations, membership of legal publishers and electronic legal resources, legal encyclopaedias, law manuals and copies of statute and case law.
The Authority has a clear framework for Performance Management and has introduced a range of policies and procedures to support the process. A new performance manager system has been introduced and significant amounts of training have taken place. The Authority is currently developing a new performance framework which will include new priorities, indicators and outcomes. This was launched in April 2011.
Member / Officer Protocol. Significant political changes have been experienced this year including the formation of a new independent alliance and change in the leading party in December 2010 and a new leader.
Performance Development Reviews analyse skills gaps and feed into development plans and identify training or skills attainment processes to fill the gap. Individual’s objectives in their PDR tie into the team and service plans, which in turn feed into and align with the corporate objectives of Aiming High and the community strategy (Pride of Place). This is referred to as the Golden Thread.
Areas for Further Development
Continue contribution to the AGMA Constitution study group to gain an independent review of its strengths against good practice and legislative requirements.
Page 72 Page 16 For Members, a breach of the Member / Officer Protocol may lead to a formal complaint if it relates to a breach of the Code of Conduct, while Officers may be subject to disciplinary action. This has not been revised for some time and is to be looked at by the Service Director for Legal & Democratic Services during 2011/12.
Following an Internal Audit review, ongoing consideration is being given to providing additional training to both Members and officers on governance and constitutional areas together with fraud awareness. This will align with the Member development programme.
Organisational development strategy is being reviewed during 2011/12 to ensure it meets the needs of the organisation given the changing financial climate and the implications this has for staffing resources.
4.3 PROMOTING VALUES FOR THE AUTHORITY AND DEMONSTRATING THE VALUES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE THROUGH UPHOLDING HIGH STANDARDS OF CONDUCT AND BEHAVIOUR
Why is this important?
The standards Local Authorities set provide an example to all organisations and individuals as employers, employees and members of their townships and wards. The costs of Council services are met from public funding and it is important that local authorities uphold high standards of conduct and behaviour.
We do this through:
Our Codes of Conduct for Elected Members and Officers commit all those working within the Authority to high standards of personal conduct and behaviour, and to act ethically and with integrity in their dealings with each other and the public. The Constitution also includes job descriptions for Cabinet portfolio holders. This is further supported by our processes for Gifts and Hospitality and Registers of Interests.
Elected Member Induction and Development has been a focus area during 2010/11 through the Stepping Up strand of Maximising the Potential of our People.
Our Organisational Development Strategy sets out our overall framework for transformation and the organisational and people management related interventions that will support change. Our immediate Organisational Development priority is to support the organisation through transformation.
The Corporate Induction Programme gives all our new recruits receive an individual welcome to the Authority by a member of the Executive Leadership Team. A tailored induction programme is also in place for Elected Members, from the point that they become prospective members.
The Stepping Up programme for internal transformation recognises the importance of values and culture to the success of the programme of improvement we aim to make. The programme commits our whole organisation to the three priorities that form the overall Stepping-Up Programme, which are Value for Money, Customer Focus and Maximising the Potential of our People.
Workforce Investment. A leadership framework has been implemented which includes an internally developed 360 degree leadership blueprint for our most senior staff, an enterprising leadership programme and a coaching programme to develop our future leaders.
Standards Committee . The Standards Committee has responsibility for the Authority’s ethical framework and monitoring our codes of conduct ensuring members and officers are held to account for their actions and behaviour.
Anti Fraud and Corruption Strategy combines the Confidential Reporting Policy (whistle-blowing), the Prosecution Policy, the Benefits Prosecution Policy and the Anti Money Laundering Policy into one cohesive strategy.
How effective is this?
The Code of Conduct for Elected Members and Officers is covered under Section 4.2 – Members and officers working together to achieve a common purpose with clearly defined functions and roles. Our processes for Gifts and Hospitality and Registers of Interest have been enhanced, and all Members Interests are now publicly declared and available for viewing through our website.
Page 73 Page 17 Elected Member Induction and Development: During 2010/11 the Authority achieved level one of the Elected Member Development Charter. Other outcomes include - o New induction pack and process. o Pre-election briefings. o Member Development Champion identified.
The significant part of the programme is however efficiency based. Examples include the blueprint for Adult Care services which focuses on changing service delivery towards preventative reablement provision and the cross cutting work streams that have created links alongside significant reductions in management and administration through the development of Halter structures and re-engineered processes. Governance of the programme was managed through a series of savings boards to challenge services on proposals, supported by a cross cutting review team and savings ELT meetings to oversee delivery.
Workforce Investment is helping the Authority to strengthen its capacity. A significant number of officers have participated in the Enterprising Leadership Programme. A staff coaching programme is also in place as well as a number of apprenticeships, internships and graduate placements.
The Standards Committee operates within the national regime for the local assessment of allegations of breaches of the Code of Conduct and ethics and behaviours for Councillor and Voting Co-Opted members. Independent Standards Committee Members operate to sustain and strengthen the local process. The Standards Committee has a clear work plan that is monitored at each meeting. Nationally the new Government have announced the winding down of the Standards Board for England, further promulgating the local agenda. There is work going on at AGMA level to produce a local code of conduct for all involved Authorities to sign up to.
We have rolled out our Anti Fraud and Corruption Strategy to our staff. The strategy has been cascaded through Service Directors to all staff both in full and in a summarised plain English version. We also distributed the AFACS to some of our major partnerships such as Impact Partnership as well as Link4Life and included them in the promotion campaigns.
Areas for Further Development
Standards committee: Continue to work with AGMA to produce a local code of conduct for Standards Committee Members.
Savings governance: Work will continue to develop the governance process for savings to manage the budget process in 2012/13 and onwards. The focus of the process will be a stronger understanding of mandatory requirements and a fundamental review of cost against outcomes for all major areas of Council spend.
Council Values: Council values set out the behaviours expected by staff in carrying out their roles. These are seen as a key driver for organisational culture and integral to job roles in ensuring that staff operate effectively to achieve targets and outcomes.
Anti Fraud and Corruption: Work will continue to maintain awareness of the Authority’s approach and response to fraud and whistle-blowing and also to integrate relevant requirement from the Bribery Act 2011 into current strategies and procedures. The development of fraud risk assessments will also continue to inform the evaluation of the effectiveness of counter fraud procedures.
4.4 TAKING INFORMED AND TRANSPARENT DECISIONS WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO EFFECTIVE SCRUTINY AND MANAGING RISK
Why is this important?
Managing our risks is important to ensure we take advantage of our opportunities (positive risks) and that we do everything we can to ensure that negative risks do not reduce our chances of success. Understanding risk also helps us to make better decisions about the best course of action to take to achieve our vision and purpose.
We do this through:
Our system for Committee Reporting ensures that decisions with legal or financial implications can only be made after seeking the advice of the Service Director, Finance & Procurement and Borough Solicitor.
The Scrutiny process - There are two Scrutiny Committees which are supported by the Standards Committee.
Page 74 Page 18 The Governance Framework and Code of Corporate Governance set out the Council’s internal structures, roles and responsibilities for governance and are part of the framework we have to support good governance. Both these documents are supported by a Governance Board which meets quarterly.
The Audit Committee provides assurance on the adequacy of the internal control environment and risk management framework. It has a responsibility to consider and approve our Internal Audit Activity and Risk Management Strategy. Other key inputs to our Committee agenda are reports from External Audit.
Our aims in relation to Risk Management and internal control are to establish and maintain a systematic strategy, framework and process for managing risk. The Risk Management Group supports and is supported by the new Risk Management Strategy. All Services and strategic partners identify and manage their own risks on the risk register with associated action plans and ELT identify and manage the strategic risks. This is managed through an integrated Risk and Performance Management System.
Information Governance - There is an agreed Data Quality strategy and all services are reviewed based on a self assessment and action plan process, scheduled on a risk based approach. In order for the Council to meet its legal obligations and ambitions, a centralised Information Governance (IG) Unit was created in 2010 to implement the Information Governance Policy and Management Framework on all aspects of information management and security for the Council. The Audit Committee receives updates on progress against an information governance plan at each of its meetings.
The Internal Audit team has a remit which includes examining and evaluating the whole system of internal controls established by management against an assessment of the risks facing the Council to determine their adequacy, reliability and effectiveness.
How effective is this?
Committee Reporting formats have been updated recently and now include comments from the Monitoring Officer and the Section 151 Officer to ensure that legal and financial compliance issues are considered, as well as risk, before Councillors make their decisions. Protocols exist for the route through which reports must take before reaching member decision making. The Section 151 Officer advises the ELT through attendance at their meetings.
Once a decision has been made by the Cabinet, the Council’s call-in process enables executive decisions to be examined by the Performance Scrutiny Committee . Policy Committee provides challenge against policy and strategy ahead of Cabinet decisions being made where appropriate e.g. Budget. Going forward, the functions of both these Committees will be fulfilled by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee.
Our Governance Framework covers roles of Elected Members, the Governance Board, Senior and key officers, Internal Audit and external assessment and inspection agencies. Our Code of Corporate Governance outlines six core principles of good governance focusing on the systems and processes for the direction and control of the organisation. The Governance Board was re-established during 2010/11 led by the Service Director for Legal and Democratic Services and attended by Governance Champions. A number of meetings of the Board were cancelled during 2010/11 to focus on the savings board governance process in view of the level of risk.
The Audit Committee provides Members with the ability to challenge senior officers on any areas where weaknesses are identified within the internal control framework and seek assurances that agreed actions are being completed within agreed timescales. There have been two successive reviews of the effectiveness of the Committee after which action plans was created and agreed by the Committee, and are monitored during the year. Going forward the functions of the Audit Committee will be fulfilled by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee.
Risk Management has been further enhanced by the revision of the service based self assessment process, the introduction of an enhanced Risk Register system which forms part of the performance management monitoring system and a new Risk Management Strategy. The Strategy has been revised during 2010/11. It now clearly encompasses partnership and project risk as issues for the future. We have also strengthened the Internal Audit and Risk Management team with a dedicated Risk Manager post.
The Audit Committee have been monitoring progress being made in the area of Information Governance following an adverse report that was issued by Internal Audit in 2009/10 and significant improvements have been made in this area. The new unit manages the following inter-related areas - Data Protection and Freedom of Information, Records Management, Data Quality, Information Security, and Information Sharing.
In consultation with each Service Director, the Internal Audit Team produces an annual audit needs assessment which embraces financial and non-financial risks in each audit area. The Internal Audit plan and strategic plan for 2010/11 were reviewed and approved by the Section 151 Officer and Audit Committee. The team has undergone some structural change during the year to amalgamate the risk function under joint management arrangements. Page 75 Page 19
Areas for Further Development
Governance Board - The re-launched board should produce a clear terms of reference, objectives and direction. Arrangement for deputy officers should ensure continuity of board activity in the event of capacity issues at Service Director level.
Audit Committee - Ensure that new Committee members have Performance development plans in place and clear training opportunities to assist their execution of the role.
Information Security - Continue to implement all the recommendations of the Internal Audit report and finalise the key documents currently being produced including: o Information Governance Policy. o Information Security Policies Overview. o SIRO Statement of Intent. o Information Security Incident Management Policy. o Records Management Policy.
These will support other documents already produced in these areas. The unit is also reviewing the ICT Strategy and governance arrangements.
4.5 DEVELOPING THE CAPACITY AND CAPABILITY OF MEMBERS AND OFFICERS TO BE EFFECTIVE
Why is this important?
The achievement of corporate objectives and sound decision making processes is dependant on staff and Members who are well trained and capable to fulfil their roles effectively.
How effective is this?
Our Organisational Development Strategy aims to ensure we have a workforce that is broadly representative of the community of Rochdale in terms of age, ethnicity, disability, gender with the right skills, support the development process, and constantly strive to be more efficient in meeting the needs of our customers.
We have done a lot of work around skills development and taking a much more strategic approach to training that means it is linked to organisational priorities. We are also working on workforce planning guidance/systems linked to Cross-Cutting Reviews.
The new Corporate Induction Programme has been well received, with far improved satisfaction ratings then the previous programme. Newly elected members are more inclined to sign up to the PDP programme as they have been aware of this as a requirement from the prospective Member’s briefings.
ELT continue to drive a number of our strategic and transformation projects including the Stepping Up programme, the new buildings programme and business transformation. The creation of the dedicated team strengthens monitoring of the benefits realisation of the projects within the programmes.
Areas for Further Development
Significant progress has been made in the area of Elected Member Induction and Development . There is still a great deal to be done, particularly the completion of development reviews. From April 2011 the provision will be delivered differently as there is no longer to be a dedicated Member Development Officer. It will be important to ensure arrangements continue to be effective.
Page 76 Page 20
4.6 ENGAGING WITH LOCAL PEOPLE AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS TO ENSURE ROBUST ACCOUNTABILITY
Why is this important?
The Council has an approach to consultation and engagement that reflects the Council’s aspirations and commitment to ensure that we understand the needs and issues that matter to our citizens, including those from vulnerable, minority and deprived groups.
We do this through:
Consultation on the Budget proposals is undertaken in various ways including meeting with Service Directors, ELT, Township Committees, the Local Strategic Partnership and Trade Unions as well as various types of media including press releases. Cabinet are provided with details of the outcome from consultation before they formulate their recommendations to Budget Fixing Council. Summary financial information relating to the approved budget is then provided to every household that receives a Council Tax bill.
Consultation with the public has included summary information on all Council savings proposals. Internally, impact assessment at corporate and individual proposal level is part of this process.
Services are consulted on the Medium Term Financial Strategy and lead / sign off the financial and operational plans for their Services. The impact of the strategy ensures all key stakeholders have a clear vision of the direction we and our partners are moving in.
Wide consultation has taken place to review and update the Community Strategy Pride of Place and the corporate strategy Aiming High . They have reflective priorities and are supported by a range of research information and consultation processes relating to factors such as employment, earnings, health, education, and crime in the borough.
Clear terms of reference are set for the preparation of Service Plans . Service Plans reflect corporate objectives and match approved funding. Quarterly and annual reports are produced on the outcome of departmental and/or service plans.
Provider Forums are used to present and discuss service changes to existing service providers, or attract new providers. The Council’s website provides information about accessing services and also provides the community the opportunity to make comments, complaints or compliments about services. In addition to this there are a range of mechanisms used for the public and service users to convey information about services and changes. These include: o User consultation and feedback mechanisms, e.g. user forums, telephone, email and snail mail consultation. These may be used to gather user’s views about services or potential changes. o Residents Satisfaction Surveys – conducted every few years to gather the views of local people regarding how satisfied they are with services. o Other web-based and hard copy documents are published on our website or provided in public buildings such as libraries. These are used to make the public aware of our corporate ambitions, our services and their achievements and changes.
How effective is this?
There are a number of ways that we demonstrate effective consultation and communication with internal and external stakeholders including staff and budget managers, residents and other external stakeholders around the Budget process. We engage local people in spending decisions which empowers them to identify their priorities.
Our strategic plan Aiming High takes account of all consultation and national and local priorities. The Corporate priorities and objectives are clearly set out in the Strategic Plan which takes account of annual budget and medium term financial strategy. Strategic decisions on savings proposals requiring a reduction in service levels take account of these priorities.
Service Plans reflect our and the Pride Partnership’s priorities and ambitions and include details of actions to ensure they are achieved. By this means, Services directly set targets and objectives to achieve Aiming High’s priorities, which in turn contribute to the Pride Partnership’s priorities and vision for the borough. The cascading of Aiming High’s action plan targets and indicators into service plans and their updates ensures annual scrutiny by political leadership.
Page 77 Page 21 Provider Forums ensure that the public are better informed about services, how to contact them and access them, and residents, service users and providers have input into the service they receive and provide. The quality of and access to services for the Borough's vulnerable citizens has improved. People with learning disabilities and their carers have been engaged through a variety of user forums and this has influenced changes to service provision.
Areas for Further Development
In terms of the Strategic Partnership, there is a need to ensure that the client team have clear objectives and processes for assessing performance of the IT provider to ensure continued efficiency and effectiveness.
5. INTERNAL AUDIT AND THE OPINION ON INTERNAL CONTROL 2010/11
The scope of Internal Audit includes examining and evaluating the whole system of internal control established by management. It involves an evaluation of the controls against an assessment of the risks facing the Council to determine their adequacy, reliability and effectiveness and how well the responsibilities assigned to managers are being carried out in practice. In consultation with each Service Director the Internal Audit Team produces an annual audit needs assessment using a risk indices methodology, which embraces financial and non-financial risks in each audit area.
The Internal Audit plan and strategic plan for 2010/11 were reviewed and approved by the Finance Director as Section 151 Officer. The audit plan was reported to the Audit Committee on 25 th March 2010 and adopted.
The Audit Plan for 2010/11 comprised a range of assignments including reviews of all material financial systems as part of our managed audit arrangements with the Audit Commission and a range of non-financial risk based audits and establishment visits.
The planned audit coverage for the year was based on an assessment of risks. Of the planned audit work completed during 2010/11 (i.e. final report issued), audit opinions issued on the adequacy of the internal controls were recorded as “adequate” or better in 95.2% of cases (93.2% in 2009/10). Three pieces of work were awarded opinions below the “adequate” opinion, of which two were scored with opinion four “marginal” (four in 2009/10) and one was scored with opinion five “unsatisfactory” (none in 2009/10). The details of these pieces of audit work and any follow-up activity has previously been reported to the Audit Committee in the quarterly work activity reports.
The two “marginal” and one “unsatisfactory” opinions are not considered to be significant in the wider context of the overall system of internal control. The audit reviews which attracted the “marginal” opinions related to service specific systems or establishments and none related to the programme of material system audit reviews. In all cases an action plan has been agreed to remedy the weaknesses and follow up work by Internal Audit is ongoing in order to monitor progress in implementing the recommendations made. Therefore, within the limitations of the audit work carried out, it is concluded that the Council's overall control framework remains adequate, and generally being complied with.
6. EXTERNAL REVIEW AND INSPECTION REPORTS
The Audit Commission Annual Audit Letter (November 2010) summarises their findings from the 2009/10 audit. The audit comprises of two elements: the audit of the financial statements and the assessment or the arrangements for the Council to achieve Value for Money.
Audit of accounts and Value for Money - The External auditor has reported to the Audit Committee on two December 2010 about the issues arising from the 2009/10 audit and gave an unqualified opinion on the accounts and a conclusion on Value for Money arrangements to say that these arrangements are adequate.
The following external inspections also took place during the 2010/ 2011 financial year: o Children’s Services Annual Performance Assessment 2010. o Children’s Services Performance Profile 2010. o Children’s Services Unannounced Inspection 2010. o Safeguarding and Looked After Children Inspection 2010. o Adoption Agency Inspection 2010. o Adult Care Annual Performance Assessment.
Page 78 Page 22
7. ACTION PLAN TO ENSURE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT IN THE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK
Issues Action Required Lead Implementation by
Good Governance Principle 1 Focusing on the purpose of the Authority and on outcomes for the community and creating and implementing a vision for the local area Aiming High and Pride of Ensure that the new versions of Pride of Place and Aiming High Performance & 31 st March 2012 Place are available from 2012, and that adequate arrangements are Transformation in place to monitor the indicators and targets in the intervening 12 months.
Good Governance Principle 2 Members and Officers working together to achieve a common purpose with clearly defined functions and roles Constitution Continue to monitor the progress of the AGMA constitution Legal & Democra tic 31 st March 2012 review, to gain a benchmark to check the Constitution’s Services strengths against good practice and legislative requirements.
Member / Officer The Member / Officer Protocol revision. Legal & Democratic 31 st March 2012 Protocol Services Page 79
Good Governance Principle 3 Promoting values for the Authority and demonstrating the values of good governance through upholding high standards of conduct and behaviour Standards Committee Continue to work with AGMA to produce a local code of Legal & Democratic 31 st March 2012 conduct for Standards Committee members Services
Good Governance Principle 4 Taking informed and transparent decisions which are subject to effective scrutiny and managing risk Governance Board The re -launched board should produce a clear terms of Legal & Democratic 31 st March 2012 reference, objectives and direction. Services
Audi t Committee Ensure that new Comm ittee members have Performance Finance Services 31 st March 2012 Development Plans in place and clear training opportunities to assist their execution of the role. Information Security Continue to implement all the recommen dations of the Internal Performance & 31 st March 2012 Audit report and finalise the key documents currently being Transformation produced. Savings Governance Continue to develop the governance process for savings to Finance Services 31 st March 2012 manage the budget process in 2012/13 and onwards.
Page 23
We propose over the coming year to take steps to address the above matters to further enhance our governance arrangements. We are satisfied that these steps will address the need for improvements that were identified in our review of effectiveness and will monitor their improvements as part of our next annual review.
Signed: Ruth Hunter Service Director – Finance & Procurement
Signed: Roger Ellis Chief Executive
Signed: Councillor C Lambert Leader of the Council
PagePage 80 24
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE STATEMENT
This statement shows the accounting cost in the year of providing services in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, rather than the amount to be funded from taxation. Authorities raise taxation to cover expenditure in accordance with regulations; this may be different from the accounting cost. The taxation position is shown in the Movement in Reserves Statement.
31 st March 31 st March 31 st March Comprehensive Income and 31 st March 31 st March 31 st Marc h 2010 2010 2010 Expenditure Statement 2011 2011 2011 2009/10 2009/10 2009/10 2010/11 2010/11 2010/11 Gross Gross Net Gross Gross Net Expenditure Income Expenditure Income £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's 30,141 (23,909) 6,232 Central services to the public 31,838 (24,865) 6,973 6,694 (149) 6,545Corporate and democratic core 6,155 (21) 6,134 13,814 (820) 12,994Non distributed costs (75,041) (860) (75,901) 62,793 (12,182) 50,611 Cultural, environmental, regulatory and 75,107 (24,894) 50,213 planning services 256,606 (194,476) 62,130 Children's and education services 273,501 (207,867) 65,634 27,353 (2,586) 24,767 Highways and transport services 28,402 (2,425) 25,977 115,376 (85,094) 30,282 Housing services - Housing general 105,536 (82,814) 22,722 fund 58,396 (56,891) 1,505Housing revenue account 41,108 (54,168) (13,060) 78,225 (19,619) 58,606Adult Social Care 86,538 (22,643) 63,895 649,398 (395,726) 253,672 COST OF SERVICES - CONTINUING 573,144 (420,557) 152,587 OPERATIONS
1,031 (892) 139 Other operating expenditure (Note 9) 1,612 (1,484) 128
60,795 (31,517) 29,278 Financing and investment income and 74,473 (45,223) 29,250 expenditure (note 10)
(259,699) (259,699) Taxation and non-specific grant income (282,392) (282,392) (note 11)
711,224 (687,834) 23,390 (SURPLUS) OR DEFICIT ON PROVISION 649,229 (749,656) (100,427) OF SERVICES
(19,131) (Surplus) or deficit on revaluation of (1,544) non current assets 212,500 Actuarial (gains) / losses on pension (151,600) asset/liabilities
193,369 OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND (153,144) EX PENDITURE 216,759 TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND (253,571) EX PENDITURE
I certify that the above statement presents a true and fair view of the Income and Expenditure of Rochdale MBC for the year ended 31 st March 2011.
Ruth Hunter, Service Director, Finance and Procurement June 2011
PagePage 81 25
MOVEMENT IN RESERVES STATEMENT
This statement shows the movement in the year on the different reserves held by the Authority, analysed into ‘usable reserves’ (i.e. those that can be applied to fund expenditure or reduce local taxation) and other reserves. The Surplus or (Deficit) on the Provision of Services line shows the true economic cost of providing the authority’s services, more details of which are shown in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. These are different from the statutory amounts required to be charged to the General Fund Balance and the Housing Revenue Account for council tax setting and dwellings rent setting purposes. The Net Increase /Decrease before Transfers to Earmarked Reserves line shows the statutory General Fund Balance and Housing Revenue Account Balance before any discretionary transfers to or from earmarked reserves undertaken by the council.
Usable Reserves Unusable Reserves 31 st March 2010 Reserve Account Account Account Receipts Reserves Reserves Capital Grants Grants Capital Collection Fund Fund Collection Total Unusable Unusable Total Pension Reserve Pension Capital Receipts Receipts Capital Total Authority Authority Total Deferred Capital Capital Deferred Housing Revenue Revenue Housing Unapplied Reserve Unapplied Capital Adjustment Adjustment Capital Revaluation Reserve Revaluation Account Adjustment Account Adjustment General Fund Balance Fund General Financial Instruments Instruments Financial Accumulated Absences Absences Accumulated Total Usable Reserves Usable Total Earmarked GF Reserves GF Earmarked Earmarked HRA Reserve HRA Earmarked £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's
Page 82 Balance as at 31 st March 2009 13,059 47,622 9,607 42 1,471 4,998 76,799 0 561,669 105,009 ( 915) (137,500) (1,485) (7,220) 519,558 596,357
Surplus or (deficit) on provision of services (accounting basis) (11,748) (11,642) (23,390) 0 (23,390) Other Comprehensive Expenditure and Income 0 19,131 (212,500) (193,369) (193,369) Total Comprehensive Expenditure and Income (11,748) 0 (11,642) 0 0 0 (23,390) 0 0 19,131 0 (212,500) 0 0 (19 3,369) (216,759)
Adjustments between accounting basis & funding basis under regulations (note 7) 22,154 13,95 2 342 (1,538) 34,910 (22,667) (4,538) 257 (7,300) 364 (1,026) (34,910) 0
Net Increase/ Decrease before Transfer to / from Earmarked Reserves 10,406 0 2,310 0 342 (1,538) 11,52 0 0 (22,667) 14,593 257 (219,800) 364 (1,026) (228,279) (216 ,759)
Transfer to / from Earmarked Reserves (note 8) (7,52 9) 7,900 (19) (42) (310) 0 0 0 Increase / Decrease in Year 2,877 7,900 2,291 (42) 342 (1,848) 11,520 0 (22,667) 14,593 2 57 (219,800) 364 (1,026) (228,279) (216,759)
st Balance at 31 March 2010 15,936 55,522 11,898 0 1,813 3,150 88,319 0 539, 002 119,602 (658) (357,300) (1,121) (8,246) 291,279 379,59 8
Page 26
Usable Reserves Unusable Reserves 31 st March 2011 Reserve Account Account Account Receipts Reserves Reserves Capital Grants Grants Capital Collection Fund Fund Collection Total Unusable Unusable Total Capital Receipts Receipts Capital Pension Reserve Pension Deferred Capital Capital Deferred Total Authority Authority Total Housing Revenue Revenue Housing Unapplied Reserve Unapplied Capital Adjustment Adjustment Capital Revaluation Reserve Revaluation Account Adjustment Account Adjustment General Fund Balance Fund General Financial Instruments Instruments Financial Accumulated Absences Absences Accumulated Total Usable Reserves Usable Total Earmarked GF Reserves GF Earmarked Reserve HRA Earmarked £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's
Balance as at 31 st March 2010 15,936 55,522 11,898 0 1,813 3,150 88,319 0 539,002 119,602 ( 658) (357,300) (1,121) (8,246) 291,279 379,598
Surplus or (deficit) on provision of services (accounting basis) 97,339 3,088 100,427 0 100,427 Other Comprehensive Expenditure and Income 0 1,544 151,600 153,144 153,144 Total Comprehensive Expenditure and Income 97,339 0 3,088 0 0 0 100,427 0 0 1,544 0 151,600 0 0 153,144 253,5 71
Adjustments between accounting basis & funding basis under regulations (note 7) (85,607) (4, 732) 4,600 1,337 (84,402) 766 12,190 (7,702) (94) 74,100 772 4,370 84,402 0
Page 83 Net Increase/ Decrease before Transfer to / 11,732 0 (1,644) 0 4,600 1,337 16,025 766 12,190 (6,158) (94) 225,700 772 4,370 237,546 253,571 from Earmarked Reserves
Transfer to / from Earmarked Reserves (note 8) 5,549 (5,574) (76) 101 0 0 0 Increase / Decrease in Year 17,281 (5,574) (1,720) 101 4,600 1,337 16,025 766 12,190 (6, 158) (94) 225,700 772 4,370 237,546 253,571
st Balance at 31 March 2011 33,217 49,948 10,178 101 6,413 4,487 104,344 76 6 551,192 113,444 (752) (131,600) (349) (3,876) 528,825 633 ,169
I certify that the above Statement of Movement in Reserves presents a true and fair view of the position of Rochdale MBC as at 31 st March 2011.
Ruth Hunter, Service Director, Finance and Procurement June 2011
Page 27
BALANCE SHEET
The Balance Sheet shows the value as at the Balance Sheet date of the assets and liabilities recognised by the authority. The net assets of the authority (assets less liabilities) are matched by the reserves held by the Authority. Reserves are reported in two categories. The first category of reserves are usable reserves, i.e. those reserves that the Authority may use to provide services, subject to the need to maintain a prudent level of reserves and any statutory limitations on their use (for example the Capital Receipts Reserve that may only be used to fund capital expenditure or repay debt). The second category of reserves is those that the Authority is not able to use to provide services. This category of reserves includes reserves that hold unrealised gains and losses (for example the Revaluation Reserve), where amounts would only become available to provide services if the assets are sold; and reserves that hold timing differences shown in the Movement in Reserves Statement line ‘Adjustments between accounting basis and funding basis under regulations’.
31 st March 2009 31 st March 2010 Balance Sheet Notes 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's £000's
1,071,214 1,078,457 Property, Plant and Equipment 12 1,091,702 25,085 24,164 Investment Property 13 23,578 4,215 5,237 Intangible Assets 14 7,050 10,315 10,315 Long-Term Investments 15 10,315 11,141 13,069 Long-Term Debtors 15 15,400 1,121,970 1,131,242 TOTAL LONG TERM ASSETS 1,148,045 CURRENT ASSETS 32,609 65,462 Short Term Investments 15 35,600 654 585 Inventories 16 825 40,846 42,625 Short Term Debtors - External 18 44,157 22,764 33,670 Cash and Cash Equivalents 19 55,639 3,686 1,226 Assets Held for Sale 20 3,924 100,559 143,568 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 140,145 CURRENT LIABILITIES (10,369) (12,307) Short Term Borrowing 15 (26,786) (48,668) (50,333) Short Term Creditors - External 21 (43,364) (5,682) (8,053) Provisions (<1 Year) 22 (4,472) (2,275) (4,891) Capital Grants Receipts in Advance 38 (10,814) (66,994) (75,584) TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES (85,436) 0 0 Long Term Creditors 15 (102) (18,429) (12,044) Long Term Provisions 22 (14,738) (352,965) (395,947) Long Term Borrowing 15 (369,318) (47,681) (49,658) Other Long Term liabilities 15 (48,052) (137,500) (357,300) Pension Liability 47 (131,600) (2,603) (4,679) Capital Grants Receipts in Advance 38 (5,775) (559,178) (819,628) TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES (569,585) 596,357 379,598 NET ASSETS 633,169
76,799 88,319 Useable Reserves 7 & 8 104,344 519,558 291,279 Unusable Reserves 24 528,825
596,357 379,598 TOTAL NET WORTH 633,169
I certify that the above Balance Sheet presents a true and fair view of the position of Rochdale MBC as at 31 st March 2011.
Ruth Hunter, Service Director, Finance and Procurement June 2011
PagePage 84 28
CASH FLOW STATEMENT
The Cash Flow Statement shows the changes in cash and cash equivalents of the authority during the reporting period. The statement shows how the authority generates and uses cash and cash equivalents by classifying cash flows as operating, investing and financing activities. The amount of net cash flows arising from operating activities is a key indicator of the extent to which the operations of the authority are funded by way of taxation and grant income or from the recipients of services provided by the authority. Investing activities represent the extent to which cash outflows have been made for resources which are intended to contribute to the authority’s future service delivery. Cash flows arising from financing activities are useful in predicting claims on future cash flows by providers of capital (i.e. borrowing) to the authority.
31 st March 2010 Cash Flow Statement 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 23,390 Net (surplus) or deficit on the provision of services (100,427)
(46,898) Adjustments to net surplus or deficit on the provision of services for non cash movements. (69,590)
Adjustments for items included in the net surplus or deficit on the provision of services that (17,711) are investing and financing activities. 62,606
(41,219) Net Cash flows from operating activities (note 25). (107,411)
17,818 Investing Activities (Note 26) 70,621
12,495 Financing Activities (Note 27) 14,821
(10,906) Net (Increase) or decrease in cash and cash equivalents (21,969)
(22,764) Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the reporting period (33,670)
(33,670) Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the reporting period (55,639)
I certify that the above Cash Flow Statement presents a true and fair view of the position at Rochdale MBC as at 31 st March 2011.
Ruth Hunter, Service Director, Finance and Procurement June 2011
PagePage 85 29
RESTATEMENT OF THE ACCOUNTS
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (IFRS)
The Statement of Accounts for 2010/11 is the first to be prepared on an IFRS basis. Adoption of the IFRS based Code has resulted in the restatement of various balances and transactions, with the result that some amounts presented in the financial statements are different from the equivalent figures presented in the Statement of Accounts for 2009/10.
The following tables explain the material differences between the amounts presented in the 2009/10 financial statements and the equivalent amounts presented in the 2010/11 financial statements.
1. Short-term accumulating compensated absences Short-term accumulating compensated absences refers to benefits that employees receive as part of their contract of employment entitlement which is built up as they provide services to the council. The most significant benefit covered by this heading is holiday pay. Employees build up an entitlement to paid holidays as they work. Under the Code, the cost of providing holidays and similar benefits is required to be recognised when employees render services that increase their entitlement to future compensated absences. As a result, the council is required to accrue for any annual leave earned but not taken at 31 st March each year. Under the previous accounting arrangements, no such accrual was required. The government has issued regulations that mean local authorities are only required to fund holiday pay and similar benefits when they are used, rather than when employees earn the benefits. Amounts are transferred to the Accumulated Absences Account until the benefits are used.
Accruing for short-term accumulating compensated absences has resulted in the following changes being made to the 2009/10 financial statements:
2009/10 Adjustments Opening 1 st April 2009 Balance Sheet 2009/10 Statements Made £000's £000's Creditor (59,692) (7,220) Accumulated Absences Account 7,220
2009/10 Adjustments 31 st Marc h 2010 Balance Sheet Statements Made £000's £000's Creditor (63,369) (8,246) Accumulated Absences Account 8,246
2009/10 Comprehensive Income and Expenditure 2009/10 Adjustments Statement Cost of Services (Net) Statements Made £000's £000's Central Services to the public 6,163 7 Corporate and democratic core 6,525 (6) Non Distributed costs 13,054 (5)
Cultural, environmental, regulatory and planning services 48,698 9 Children's and Education Services 56,652 938 Highways and transport services 24,731 (7) Housing services - Housing General Fund 14,072 15 - Housing Revenue Account 1,461 0 Adult Social Care 58,088 192 (Surplus) / Deficit on trading undertakings (571) (117) 1,026
2. Leases Under the Code, leases of property are accounted for as separate leases of land and buildings. Previously, each property lease would have been accounted for as a single lease. The change in accounting treatment can result in
PagePage 86 30
the land or buildings element of the lease being accounted for as an operating lease where it was previously treated as a finance lease; or as a finance lease where it was previously treated as an operating lease. The government has issued regulations and statutory guidance in relation to accounting for leases. Under these arrangements, the annual charge to the General Fund (where the council is the lessee) will be unchanged. Where the council is the lessor, the regulations allow the council to continue to treat the income from existing leases in the same way as it accounted for the income prior to the introduction of the Code.
There are no property leases where the accounting treatment has changed following the introduction of the Code this year.
Adoption of IFRS accounting has also required a re-evaluation of leases to consider whether they are operating leases (the same as rentals) or finance leases (the same as a loan) under IAS 17 and SIC 15 which places more emphasis on substance over legal form. As a consequence a small number of equipment leases previously treated as operating leases have been re-categorised as finance leases As a consequence of adopting the accounting policy required by the code, the financial statements have been amended as follows:-
2009/10 Adjustments Opening 1 st April 2009 Balance Sheet 2009/10 Statements Made £000's £000's Property Plant and equipment - Plant vehicles and equipment 17,039 233 Deferred liabilities (47,192) (166) Capital Adjustment Account (480,361) (67)
2009/10 Adjustments 31 st Marc h 2010 Balanc e Sheet Statements Made £000's £000's Property Plant and equipment - Plant vehicles and equipment 18,887 144 Deferred liabilities (49,334) (67) Capital Adjustment Account (421,923) (77)
2009/10 Comprehensive Inc ome and Expenditure 2009/10 Adjustments Statement Statements Made £000's £000's
Net Cost of Services 229,444 (8) (Surplus) / Deficit on trading undertakings (571) (9) Interest Payable and similar charges 21,201 7
3. Government grants Under the Code, grants and contributions for revenue are only recognised as a liability where there is a condition attached. If there is no condition they are to be set aside in reserves for the purpose they were intended to be spent on. Previously if not spent they were recognised as a liability.
As a consequence of adopting the accounting policy required by the Code, the financial statements have been amended as follows:
2009/10 Adjustments Opening 1 st April 2009 Balance Sheet 2009/10 Statements Made £000's £000's Creditors (59,692) 11,895 Reserves (11,895)
31 Marc h 2010 Balanc e Sheet 2009/10 Adjustments Statements Made £000's £000's Creditors (63,369) 10,830 Reserves (10,830)
PagePage 87 31
Under the Code, grants and contributions for capital schemes are recognised as income in the Revenue Statements provided there are no conditions attach to the grant. Previously, capital grants were held in a grants deferred account and recognised as income over the life of the assets which they were used to fund. Capital Grants with an outstanding condition will be recognised as a liability.
As a consequence of adopting the accounting policy required by the Code, the financial statements have been amended as follows:
Opening 1 st April 2009 Balance Sheet 2009/10 2009/10 Adjustments Statements Made £000's £000's Government Grants Deferred Account (78,810) 78,810 Capital adjustment account (480,361) (78,810) Creditors (59,692) 6,349 Capital Grants receipts in advance 0 (4,878) Capital Grants Unapplied Account (reserves) 0 (1,471)
2009/10 Adjustments 31 st Marc h 2010 Balance Sheet Statements Made £000's £000's Government Grants Deferred Account (110,604) 110,604 Capital adjustment account (421,923) (110,827) Creditors (63,369) 5,099 Long Term Debtors 12,846 223 Capital Grants receipts in advance 0 (3,286) Capital Grants Unapplied Account (reserves) 0 (1,813)
2009/10 Comprehensive Income and Expenditure 2009/10 Adjustments Statement Statements Made £000's £000's
Net Cost of Services 229,444 24,454 (Surplus) / Deficit on trading undertakings (571) 721 Taxation and non-specific grant income (202,165) (57,534)
The balance on the Government Grants Deferred Account at 31 st March 2009 has been transferred. The amount representing grants with no conditions has been transferred to the Capital Adjustment Account in the opening 1 April 2009 Balance Sheet. The remainder of the Government Grants Deferred Account has been transferred to Creditors.
Some of the government grants deferred were previously recognised as income in 2009/10; these have been removed from the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement in the comparative figures.
Grants received but not applied in 2009/10 have been credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement in 2009/10 and then credited to the Capital Grants Unapplied Account.
There is no change to the General Fund Balance as a consequence of changes to treatment of Government Grants under the Code, as capital grant income is transferred out of the General Fund under both the previous and the current accounting policies.
4. Non Current Assets and Assets Held for Sale
The classification of assets previously categorised as Tangible Fixed Assets have been changed by IFRS. In addition the accounting treatment of revaluation, impairment and depreciation of certain asset categories have been changed with retrospective effect. The main categories, their definitions and changes in accounting treatment are tabulated below:
PagePage 88 32
New asset Definition Change in accounting treatment category In vestment Under IAS 40 and IPSAS 16 • Assets are not depreciated. property Only assets held solely for the purpose of income • Revaluation gains and losses of the generation or capital appreciation are now shown in year pass through Comprehensive investment property. Assets which fulfil a service delivery Income and Expenditure function as well as income earning are classified as Statement. Property Plant and Equipment. • Cumulative revaluation gains at 31 st March 2009 are written off to the Capital Adjustment Account
Assets Held for Under IFRS 5, Criteria include: • Asset is categorised as a current Sale • Asset is being actively marketed at a reasonable price asset • Disposal is expected within the following 12 months • Asset is not depreciated • The sale is highly probable • Asset is valued at lower of market value or book value at point of categorisation as Held for Sale Property Plant Under IAS 16 and IPSAS 17, Comprises all Tangible Fixed All revaluations of PPE are now dealt and assets other than Investment Property and Assets Held for with initially through the revaluation Equipment Sale. Includes Surplus assets that do not meet the reserve. Reductions in value will only classification of held for sale. be taken to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement if and when any surplus on the revaluation reserve reaches a nil balance.
Restatement of Fixed Assets
Opening 1 st April 2009 Balance Sheet 2009/10 2009/10 Adjustments Statements Made £000's £000's Property Plant and Equipment Council Dwellings 379,245 (1,636) HRA Non Dwellings 2,863 317 Other Land & Buildings 585,157 (5,121) Vehicles, Plant, Furniture & Equipment 17,039 233 Infrastructure Assets 59,433 0 Community Assets 4,288 (170) Assets under Construction 4,450 0 Surplus Assets 20,286 4,830
Investment Property 26,991 (1,906)
Assets held for Sale 0 3,686
Deferred liabilities (47,192) 0
Revaluation Reserve (107,440) 2,431
Capital Adjustment Account (480,361) (2,664)
PagePage 89 33
31 st March 2010 Balance Sheet 2009/10 Adjustments Statements Made £000's £000's Property Plant and Equipment Council Dwellings 390,931 0 HRA Non Dwellings 2,589 326 Other Land & Buildings 552,720 (4,168) Vehicles, Plant, Furniture & Equipment 18,887 1 Infrastructure Assets 64,337 1 Community Assets 12,378 (200) Assets under Construction 22,999 219 Surplus Assets 15,754 1,539
Investment Property 22,950 1,214
Assets held for Sale 0 1,226
Revaluation Reserve (125,619) 5,917
Capital Adjustment Account (421,923) (6,075)
2009/10 Comprehensive Income and Expenditure 2009/10 Adjustments Statement Cost of Services (Net) Statements Made £000's £000's Net Cost of Service 229,444 (1,867) Movement in the Market Value of investment properties 0 (530)
There is no change to the General Fund Balance, as the impact of Impairment investment revaluations are reversed in the Movement in Reserves Statements.
PagePage 90 34
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The purpose of this statement is to explain the accounting policies used in compiling the figures shown in the Council’s statement of accounts.
A. General Principles
The Statement of Accounts summarises transactions for the 2010-11 financial year and its position at the year-end of 31 st March 2011. The Council is required to prepare an annual Statement of Accounts by the Accounts and Audit Regulations 2003. These regulations require the Statement of Accounts to be prepared in accordance with proper accounting practices.
These practices primarily comprise the CIPFA Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the United Kingdom 2010-11, and the Best Value Accounting Code of Practice 2010-11, supported by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
The accounting convention adopted in the Statement of Accounts is primarily historical cost, modified by the revaluation of certain non-Current Assets and financial instruments.
B. Changes in Accounting Policies
The Council has adopted for the first time the full requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards, as applicable to Local Authorities. Adoption of the code has required changes in policies in respect of the accounting for: o Investment properties. o Non-current assets held for sale and disposals. o Employee benefits. o Leases. o Events after the balance sheet date. o Government grants and contributions. o Cash and cash equivalents.
The effects of the changes in policy have been applied retrospectively where this is prescribed by the Code of Practice. Further details of the policy changes are provided in the individual policy notes below and in the notes to the accounts.
C. Accounting Concepts
The Statement of Accounts has been prepared in accordance with the following accounting concepts: o Strict compliance to accounting policy has not been applied where the amounts involved are not considered to affect a true and fair presentation of the financial position and transactions of the Council. o The accounts have been prepared on the assumption that the Council will continue to operate and provide services in the foreseeable future. o Accounting policies have been applied consistently within the year and between this and prior years. o The statements have been prepared to reflect the substance of the Council’s transactions over their legal form.
D. Accruals of Income and Expenditure
Activity is accounted for in the year in which it takes place, not simply when cash payments are made or received. Particular situations are described below: o Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when the Authority transfers the significant risks and rewards of ownership to the purchaser and it is probable that economic benefits or service potential associated with the transaction will flow to the Authority.
PagePage 91 35 o Revenue from the provision of services is recognised when the Authority can measure reliably the percentage of completion of the transaction and it is probable that economic benefits or service potential associated with the transaction will flow to the Authority. o Supplies are recorded as expenditure when they are consumed – where there is a gap between the date supplies are received and their consumption, they are carried as inventories on the Balance Sheet. o Income and expenditure has been matched to services provided during the financial year irrespective of when cash has been paid and received. o Expenses in relation to services received (including services provided by employees) are recorded as expenditure when the services are received rather than when payments are made. o Interest receivable on investments and payable on borrowings is accounted for respectively as income and expenditure on the basis of the effective interest rate for the relevant financial instrument rather than the cash flows fixed or determined by the contract. o Revenue and expenditure recognised but cash not received or paid . A debtor or creditor for the relevant amount is recorded in the Balance Sheet. Where debts may not be settled, the balance of debtors is written down and a charge made to revenue for the income that might not be collected. o De minimis level. The level above which individual expenditure/income transactions have been accrued is £5,000, except for the debtors and creditors regarding Rochdale Boroughwide Housing where the de minimis level has not been implemented.
E. Area Based Grant (ABG)
This is a pooled, non-ring-fenced Government grant and was introduced in 2008-09. This does not have separate reporting requirements due to it being awarded for a specific geographical area rather than for a specific purpose. The allocations are given for a three year period in line with the Comprehensive Spending Review. The ABG is accounted for within the General Grants Section of the ‘Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement’.
F. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash is represented by cash in hand and deposits with financial institutions repayable without penalty on notice of not more than 24 hours.
Cash equivalents are investments that are instantly repayable to the council on demand and that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash with insignificant risk of change in value. These balances are held in call accounts. In the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents are shown net of bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Authority’s cash management.
G. Charges to Revenue for Non-Current Assets
Services, support services and trading accounts are debited with the following amounts to record the cost of holding fixed assets during the year: o Depreciation attributable to the assets used by the relevant service. o Revaluation and impairment losses on assets used by the service where there are no accumulated gains in the Revaluation Reserve against which the losses can be written off. o Amortisation of intangible fixed assets attributable to the service.
The Authority is not required to raise Council Tax to fund depreciation, revaluation and impairment losses or amortisations. However, it is required to make an annual contribution from revenue towards the reduction in its overall borrowing requirement equal to either an amount calculated on a prudent basis determined by the authority in accordance with statutory guidance. Depreciation, revaluation and impairment losses and amortisations are therefore replaced by the contribution in the General Fund Balance, by way of an adjusting transaction with the Capital Adjustment Account in the Movement in Reserves Statement for the difference between the two.
H. Collection Fund
Billing authorities in England are required by statute to maintain a separate Collection Fund for the collection and distribution of amounts due in respect of Council Tax and national non-domestic rates (NNDR).
PagePage 92 36
Council Tax income is raised from charges based on the open market value of dwellings as at 31 st March 1991. Note 1 to the Collection Fund Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement explains the calculation used to set the Council Tax base for 2010/11.
Council Tax Income
The annual Council Tax income included in Rochdale’s Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement is the accrued income for the year. The difference between this accrued income and the amount required by regulation to be credited to the Collection Fund is taken to the Collection Fund Adjustment account and included as a reconciling item in the Statement of Movement on the General Fund Balance.
Council acting as collecting agent
In its capacity as the billing authority the Council acts as agent in collecting and distributing Council cash income on behalf of itself and the other major preceptors, GMPA (Greater Manchester Police Authority) and GMFRA (Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority) and itself.
In view of this agency arrangement, the Council Tax cash collected by Rochdale belongs proportionately to the Council, GMPA and GMFRA. The debtor/creditor positions between the Council and GMPA and GMFRA, arise because the net cash paid to GMPA and GMFRA in the year is not the full share of the cash collected from Council Taxpayers.
All cash collected from NNDR Taxpayers by the Council (net of the cost of collection allowance) belongs to the Government and outstanding cash due to the Government at the Balance Sheet date is included in the Balance Sheet as a creditor. If cash paid to the Government exceeds the cash collected from NNDR Taxpayers (net of the cost of collection allowance), the excess is included in the Balance Sheet as a debtor.
Regulations determine when the accrued income should be released from the Collection Fund and be transferred to either the Council’s General Fund or to the major preceptors.
I. Employee Benefits
Short-term employee benefits
‘Short-term’ benefits are remuneration commitments falling within 12 months of the services being provided.
‘Short-term’ cash and non-cash benefits which are transferred to employees outside the financial year in which they are earned have been accrued and charged to the General Fund and /or HRA reserve in the year in which the benefits have been earned. Examples of such benefits include accumulated absences such as untaken holiday leave, and outstanding debits and credits of Work Life Balance at 31 st March.
Retirement benefit costs
The costs of providing pensions for employees have been charged to the accounts in accordance with the requirements of IAS19. This means that the cost of retirement benefits arising in respect of schemes which are treated as defined benefit schemes are recognised in the Net Cost of Services when they are earned by employees rather than when the benefits are eventually paid as pensions. However the charge that the Council is required to make against Council Tax is based on the Employer Contributions payable to the Pension Fund in the year so the real cost of retirement benefits is reversed out of the Movement in Reserves Statement.
The discount rate used to calculate the present value of the fund’s liabilities is the yield available on long dated, high quality corporate bonds (as measured by the yield on iBoxx Sterling Corporate Index, AA over 15 years) at the valuation date.
J. Events After The Balance Sheet Date
Events after the Balance Sheet date are those events, both favourable and unfavourable, that occur between the end of the reporting period and the date when the Statement of Accounts is authorised for issue. Two types of events can be identified:
Conditions existing at the end of the reporting period: The Statement of Accounts would be adjusted to reflect such events
PagePage 93 37
Conditions arising after the end of the reporting period: The Statement of Accounts is not adjusted to reflect such events, but where a category of events would have a material effect, disclosure is made in the notes to the accounts of the nature of the events and their estimated financial effect.
Events taking place after the date of authorisation for issue are not reflected in the Statement of Accounts.
K. Exceptional Items
When items of income and expense are material, their nature and amount is disclosed separately, either on the face of the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement or in the notes to the accounts, depending on how significant the items are to an understanding of the Authority’s financial performance.
L. Financial Instruments
Recognition and Initial Measurement
Financial assets have been recognised on the Balance Sheet at the contractual trade date. Financial liabilities have been recognised when the loan has been received. Initial measurement has been at fair value. Associated transaction costs and internal administrative charges have not been attributed to the assets or liabilities as they are not considered material. Such costs have been charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. We have based our fair value report on the comparable new borrowing/deposit rate for the same financial instrument from a comparable lender. A consistent approach has been applied to assets and liabilities.
Soft Loans
Soft loans have been valued at fair value using discounted present value techniques. Where the loan value exceeds the fair value, the excess has been charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
Classification of Financial Instruments
The Council’s financial assets and liabilities have been classified as follows:
Financial Assets Financial Liabilities Loans and Receivables at Amortised Cost Financial liabilities at amortised cost Available for Sale Financial Assets PFI and Finance lease liabilities Unquoted equity investments at cost Fair value thro ugh profit and loss
Accounting for Financial Liabilities
Where the interest rate applicable to a financial liability has been contractually agreed to change between two given interest rates, the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) method has been used to calculate the amortised cost. In such instances the Effective Interest Rate has been calculated using the contractual life of the liability. For all other liabilities, where interest rates are fixed over the life of the liability, are subject to options or are variable, the nominal interest rate has been taken to equal the Effective Interest Rate for the purpose of calculating the amortised cost.
Premiums and Discounts
The Council is required to undertake a “modification” test on debt restructuring exercises. Where the changes in cashflows resulting from debt restructuring are not significant or are on similar terms to the original loan, any premiums and discounts incurred as a result of the debt restructuring will be included in the calculation of the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) for the replacement loan and amortised across the life of the new loan. Where the change in cashflows is significant or the new loan terms are different the restructuring can be treated as an extinguishment. In such circumstances, any premium or discount is due to be charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement immediately.
Regulation has, however, been introduced to reduce the impact of this change in accounting practice on Council budgets. In relation to premiums, where a loan is extinguished the Council will charge any premium to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement on a straight line basis across the life of the old loan or
PagePage 94 38 replacement loan, whichever is the longer. The balance of any premium will be debited to the Financial Instrument Adjustment Account via the Statement of Movement on the General Fund Balance. In respect of discounts, these will be credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement on a straight line basis across the life of the old loan or replacement loan, whichever is greater, subject to a maximum of 10 years. The balance of any discount will be credited to the Financial Instrument Adjustment Account via the Statement of Movement on the General Fund Balance.
Accounting for Financial Assets Financial assets with fixed or determinable payments have been classified as loans and receivables. The carrying amounts of such assets have been measured using the Effective Interest Rate (EIR). All equity holdings of the Council have been classified as available for sale. Where there is no active market for the shares, the fair value of these investments has been adjudged to be best represented by the historical cost of the shareholding less any impairment. For investments which are classified as available for sale at fair value through profit and loss, where the fair value of the asset differs to the actual value of the investment any gain or loss will be recognised via the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement and taken to the Available for Sale Reserve.
Hedge Accounting The Council has not undertaken any interest rate hedging activity which requires the need to apply hedge accounting.
Financial Guarantee Contracts The Council has not issued any financial guarantees which have become a material risk. No liability has therefore been recognised. The Council’s exposure to financial risk from such guarantees is monitored on a regular basis and any potential financial loss will be reported.
Available for Sale Assets
The Council currently has no financial assets meeting the definition of available for sale.
M. Government Grants and Contributions
Whether paid on account, by instalments or in arrears, government grants and third party contributions and donations are recognised as due to the Authority when there is reasonable assurance that: o The Authority will comply with the conditions attached to the payments, and o the grants or contributions will be received.
Amounts recognised as due to the Council are not credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement until conditions attached to the grant or contribution have been satisfied and there is no event anticipated that would result in those conditions being breached. Conditions are stipulations that specify that the future economic benefits or service potential embodied in the asset acquired using the grant or contribution are required to be consumed by the recipient as specified, or future economic benefits or service potential must be returned to the transferor.
Monies advanced as grants and contributions for which conditions have not been satisfied are carried in the Balance Sheet as creditors. When conditions are satisfied, the grant or contribution is credited to the relevant service line (attributable revenue grants and contributions) or Taxation and Non-Specific Grant Income (non-ringfenced revenue grants and all capital grants) in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
Where capital grants are credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement, they are reversed out of the General Fund Balance in the Movement in Reserves Statement.
Where the grant has yet to be used to finance capital expenditure, it is posted to the Capital Grants Unapplied reserve. Where it has been applied, it is posted to the Capital Adjustment Account. Amounts in the Capital Grants Unapplied reserve are transferred to the Capital Adjustment Account once they have been applied to fund capital expenditure.
N. Intangible Assets
Expenditure on software licences is capitalised when it is expected that future economic benefits or service potential will flow from the intangible asset to the Authority.
PagePage 95 39
Internally generated assets are capitalised where it is demonstrable that the project is technically feasible and is intended to be completed (with adequate resources being available) and the Authority will be able to generate future economic benefits or deliver service potential by being able to sell or use the asset. Expenditure is capitalised where it can be measured reliably as attributable to the asset and is restricted to that incurred during the development phase.
Intangible assets are measured initially at cost. Amounts are only revalued where the fair value of the assets held by the Authority can be determined by reference to an active market. In practice, no intangible asset held by the Authority meets this criterion, and they are therefore carried at amortised cost. The depreciable amount of an intangible asset is amortised over its useful life (5 years) to the relevant service line(s) in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. An asset is tested for impairment whenever there is an indication that the asset might be impaired – any losses recognised are posted to the relevant service line(s) in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. Any gain or loss arising on the disposal or abandonment of an intangible asset is posted to the Other Operating Expenditure line in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. Where expenditure on intangible assets qualifies as capital expenditure for statutory purposes, amortisation, impairment losses and disposal gains and losses are not permitted to have an impact on the General Fund Balance. The gains and losses are therefore reversed out of the General Fund Balance in the Movement in Reserves Statement and posted to the Capital Adjustment Account and (for any sale proceeds greater than £10,000) the Capital Receipts Reserve.
O. Interests in Companies and Other Entities (Group Accounts)
The Authority has material interests in companies and other entities that have the nature of subsidiaries, associates and jointly controlled entities and require it to prepare group accounts. In the Authority’s own single-entity accounts, the interests in companies and other entities are recorded as financial assets at cost, less any provision for losses.
Introduction
The Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the United Kingdom requires that Councils with material interests in companies and other entities that have the nature of subsidiaries, associates and jointly controlled entities prepare group accounts. The Group Accounts consolidate the accounting statements of the Council with those of any subsidiaries, associates and/or joint ventures. Provision of group financial statements enables users of the accounts to obtain a better understanding of the full range of activities in which the Council has a material interest including those delivered through subsidiary, associates and joint ventures.
Basis of consolidation
The Group Accounts are prepared by consolidating the accounts of the Council with those of any subsidiary and associated companies. The method of consolidation is determined by reference to the nature of the involvement of the Council with the company. The Group Accounts have been prepared by consolidating on a line by line basis. It should be noted that the accounts of any group companies will be prepared under their own accounting policies, which may differ in some respects from the Council’s accounting policies, particularly in those areas where the legislative requirements for Local Authority accounts differ from those for companies. The notes to the accounts provide separate disclosure of the Group position where this differs from the Council position.
Details of subsidiary and associated companies
The Council has one subsidiary company, Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Ltd (RBH) (Company registration No. 4394435), details of which are given in the Group Accounts section of the Statement of Accounts.
P. Inventories and Long Term Contracts
Inventories o Inventory or groups of similar items are included in the Balance Sheet at the lower of cost and net realisable value of the separate items of stock or groups of similar items. o Inventories acquired through non-exchange transactions are measured at their fair value as at the date of acquisition. o Inventories provided at no charge or for a nominal charge are held at the lower of cost and current replacement cost.
PagePage 96 40
Work In Progress is generally valued at cost price/average cost.
Long-Term Contracts
These are accounted for in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Practice. This involves charging the Surplus or Deficit on the Provision of Services with the value of works and services received under the contract during the financial year.
Long-term contracts are defined as:
“A contract entered into for the design, manufacture or construction of a single substantial asset or the provision of a service (or of a combination of assets or services which together constitute a single project) where the time taken substantially to complete the contract is such that the contract activity falls into different accounting periods.”
Q. Investment Properties
Investment properties are those that are used solely to earn rentals and/or for capital appreciation. The definition is not met if the property is used in any way to facilitate the delivery of services or production of goods or is held for sale.
Investment properties are measured initially at cost and subsequently at fair value, based on the amount at which the asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable parties at arm’s-length. Properties are not depreciated but have their values considered annually on a beacon basis according to market conditions at the year-end. Gains and losses on revaluation are posted to the Financing and Investment Income and Expenditure line in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. The same treatment is applied to gains and losses on disposal. Rentals received in relation to investment properties are credited to the Financing and Investment Income line and result in a gain for the General Fund Balance. However, revaluation and disposal gains and losses are not permitted by statutory arrangements to have an impact on the General Fund Balance. The gains and losses are therefore reversed out of the General Fund Balance in the Movement in Reserves Statement and posted to the Capital Adjustment Account and (for any sale proceeds greater than £10,000) the Capital Receipts Reserve.
R. Leases
Leases are classified as finance leases where the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the property, plant or equipment from the lessor to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
Where a lease covers both land and buildings, the land and buildings elements are considered separately for classification.
Arrangements that do not have the legal status of a lease but convey a right to use an asset in return for payment are accounted for under this policy where fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of specific assets.
The Authority as Lessee
Finance Leases Property, plant and equipment held under finance leases is recognised on the Balance Sheet at the commencement of the lease at its fair value measured at the lease’s inception (or the present value of the minimum lease payments, if lower). The asset recognised is matched by a liability for the obligation to pay the lessor. Initial direct costs of the Authority are added to the carrying amount of the asset. Premiums paid on entry into a lease are applied to writing down the lease liability. Contingent rents are charged as expenses in the periods in which they are incurred.
Lease payments are apportioned between: o A charge for the acquisition of the interest in the property, plant or equipment – applied to write down the lease liability; and
PagePage 97 41 o a finance charge (debited to the Financing and Investment Income and Expenditure line in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement).
Property, Plant and Equipment recognised under finance lease is accounted for using the policies applied generally to such assets, subject to depreciation being charged over the lease term if this is shorter than the asset’s estimated useful life (where ownership of the asset does not transfer to the authority at the end of the lease period). The Authority is not required to raise council tax to cover depreciation or revaluation and impairment losses arising on leased assets. Instead, a prudent annual contribution is made from revenue funds towards the deemed capital investment in accordance with statutory requirements. Depreciation and revaluation and impairment losses are therefore substituted by a revenue contribution in the General Fund Balance, by way of an adjusting transaction with the Capital Adjustment Account in the Movement in Reserves Statement for the difference between the two.
Operating Leases
Rentals paid under operating leases are charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement as an expense of the services benefiting from use of the leased property, plant or equipment. Charges are made on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease; even if this does not match the pattern of payments (e.g. there is a rent-free period at the commencement of the lease).
The Authority as Lessor
Finance Leases Where the Authority grants a finance lease over a property or an item of plant or equipment, the relevant asset is written out of the Balance Sheet as a disposal. At the commencement of the lease, the carrying amount of the asset in the Balance Sheet (whether Property, Plant and Equipment or Assets Held for Sale) is written off to the ‘Other Operating Expenditure’ line in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement as part of the gain or loss on disposal. A gain, representing the Authority’s net investment in the lease, is credited to the same line in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement also as part of the gain or loss. on disposal (netted off against the carrying value of the asset at the time of disposal), matched by a lease (long-term debtor) asset in the Balance Sheet.
Lease rentals receivable are apportioned between: o A charge for the acquisition of the interest in the property – applied to write down the lease debtor (together with any premiums received). o Finance income (credited to the Financing and Investment Income and Expenditure line in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement).
The gain credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement on disposal is not permitted by statute to increase the General Fund Balance and is required to be treated as a capital receipt. Where a premium has been received, this is posted out of the General Fund Balance to the Capital Receipts Reserve in the Movement in Reserves Statement. Where the amount due in relation to the lease asset is to be settled by the payment of rentals in future financial years, this is posted out of the General Fund Balance to the Deferred Capital Receipts Reserve in the Movement in Reserves Statement. When the future rentals are received, the element for the capital receipt for the disposal of the asset is used to write down the lease debtor. At this point, the deferred capital receipts are transferred to the Capital Receipts Reserve.
The written-off value of disposals is not a charge against council tax, as the cost of fixed assets is fully provided for under separate arrangements for capital financing. Amounts are therefore appropriated to the Capital Adjustment Account from the General Fund Balance in the Movement in Reserves Statement.
Operating Leases
Where the Authority grants an operating lease over a property or an item of plant or equipment, the asset is retained in the Balance Sheet. Rental income is credited to the Other Operating Expenditure line in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. Credits are made on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease, even if this does not match the pattern of payments (e.g. there is a premium paid at the commencement of the lease). Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating and arranging the lease are added to the carrying amount of the relevant asset and charged as an expense over the lease term on the same basis as rental income.
PagePage 98 42
S. Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Disposals
Assets are recognised as Held for Sale when it becomes probable that their future economic benefit will be recovered primarily through a sale transaction. The asset is revalued at this point to the lower of its existing fair value and sale value less costs of sales. Any resultant loss is charged to ‘Other Operating expenditure’ in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. Gains would only be recognised to the extent that earlier losses have been included in the Surplus or Deficit on the Provision of Services. No depreciation is charged on Assets Held for Sale.
Assets which fail to meet the criteria of Assets Held for Sale are reclassified to Non Current Assets and revalued at the lower of their carrying amount before they were classified as Assets Held for Sale (adjusted for depreciation) and their recoverable amount at the date of the decision not to sell.
Assets held pending development decisions are not classified as Assets Held for Sale.
When any asset is disposed or otherwise realised, the carrying amount is written off to ‘Other Operating Expenditure’ in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement as part of the gain/loss on disposal with receipts and selling costs being credited to the same line. The amount written off is not a charge against Council Tax and the amount is transferred to the Capital Adjustment Account from the General Fund Balance in the Movement in Reserve Statement.
The balance of Capital Receipts, less a reasonable allowance for disposal costs, is required to be credited to the Capital Receipts Reserve and can only be used to for new capital investment or to reduce the Council’s underlying need to borrow. Receipts are transferred to the reserve from the general fund as shown in the Movement in Reserve Statement.
Any accumulated revaluation surplus in the Revaluation Reserve attributable to the asset is transferred to the Capital Adjustment Account.
T. Overheads and Support Services
The costs of management, administration and support services are charged to the beneficiaries of the supplies or services in accordance with the costing principles of the CIPFA Best Value Accounting Code of Practice 2010/11 (BVACOP).
U. Prior Period Adjustments
Prior period adjustments are the correction of material errors or changes required to reflect changes in accounting policies. Material adjustments applicable to prior periods are included in the accounts by restating comparative figures for the previous period and adjusting the opening balances on the balance sheet.
V. Private Finance Initiatives (PFI) and Similar Contracts
PFI properties used to deliver PFI services are required to be recognised on the Council’s Balance Sheet together with a liability for the financing provided by the PFI operator. Regulations to mitigate the financial impact on the Council’s funding position have been issued
For PFI assets and similar Service Concessions to be recognised on the Council’s Balance Sheet the following tests must be applied:-
1. The overall transaction must meet the general description of a service concession for the provision of infrastructure. 2. The assets must be controlled by the public sector as defined by IFRIC 12.
The Council has analysed its contracts and has identified two PFI contracts that are required to be accounted for under IFRIC 12 and therefore recognised on the Council’s Balance Sheet. The schemes are Schools PFI and the Heywood Joint Service Centre. More details of these two contracts can be found in the notes to the accounts (Long Term Contracts – Undischarged Obligations and PFI and Similar Contracts) , which show the assets and liabilities which have been recognised in the Council’s account.
PagePage 99 43
W. Property, Plant and Equipment
These are assets having physical substance and being held for use in the production or supply of goods or services for rental to others as part of Council service delivery, or for administrative purposes and that are expected to be used during more than one financial year.
Recognition
Assets are recognised in Property, Plant and Equipment on an accruals basis at cost provided that it is probable an economic benefit will flow to the Council. and they fall into one of the operational or development categories as: o Council Dwellings. o Other Land and Building. o Vehicles, Plant, Furniture & Equipment. o Infrastructure Assets. o Assets under Construction. o Community Assets. o Surplus assets (which includes assets awaiting development).
Expenditure that does not enhance an asset is charged as an expense when it is incurred.
Initial Measurement
Items which are capitalised are recognised at the cost of bringing the asset to its current location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management.
Assets acquired under finance leases are recognised at the lower of the fair value of the property or the Net Present Value of the minimum lease payments.
Donated assets are valued at the fair value of the assets at the date of acquisition. Assets acquired by exchange for a non-monetary asset are recognised at fair value at the date of exchange. Fair values are determined as: o Land and non-specialised buildings – market value for existing use. o Specialised buildings – depreciated replacement cost.
Capitalisation of Interest
The Council has a general policy of not capitalising interest costs in respect of the construction of non-current assets. The Council will consider capitalisation of interest in circumstances where: o There is a separately identifiable project with probable future economic benefits. o There is a significant construction period before the asset becomes operational. o The costs of borrowing are significant in relation to overall costs. o A whole life cost assessment (or similar evaluation) of the capital project, including the capitalisation of interest demonstrates the affordability of the project. o The capital cost of the asset concerned, including capitalised interest, will be charged to the Comprehensive Income & Expenditure Statement on a prudent basis once the asset becomes operational.
No interest has been capitalised this year by applying the above policy.
Measurement after Recognition
All assets are represented in the Balance Sheet at their net book value. Properties are valued in accordance with the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) Appraisal and Valuation Standards (commonly known as the Red Book) and the IFRS Code of Practice. All land and property assets are valued at least every five years as part of a rolling programme of valuations conducted by a qualified member of RICS. The basis of valuation of asset classes is as follows:
All Property, Plant and Equipment assets required to be measured other than at cost are valued at fair value. The particular basis used, agreed between the valuer and the Head of Finance Services is:
PagePage 100 44
Historical cost o Infrastructure. o Community Assets. o Assets under Construction
Fair Value Existing Use o All other Property Plant and Equipment o Social Housing
Where there is no market based evidence of fair value because of the specialist nature of an asset, depreciated replacement cost is used as a proxy for fair value.
For non property assets with a low value or short useful life, depreciated historical cost is used as a proxy for fair value.
Increases in value are matched by credits to the Revaluation Reserve. Decreases arising from valuations are accounted for by: o Where there is a balance of revaluation gains for the asset in the Revaluation Reserve the carrying amount of the asset is written down against that balance until it become nil or the revaluation loss is exhausted. o Where there is no balance on the Revaluation Reserve or an insufficient balance the carrying amount of the asset is written down against the relevant service line(s) in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
The Revaluation Reserve represents only revaluation gains that have arisen since 1 April 2007. Earlier gains were absorbed into the Capital Adjustment Account at that date.
Impairment
Each year the Council considers whether there is evidence for impairment of individual assets or classes of asset. Where evidence exists and any possible differences are considered to be material in relation the tangible assets, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated and where this is less than the carrying amount of the asset an impairment loss is recognised.
Where an impairment loss is recognised they are accounted for by: o Where there is a balance of revaluation gains for the asset in the Revaluation Reserve the carrying amount of the asset is written down against that balance until it become nil or the revaluation loss is exhausted. o Where there is no balance on the Revaluation Reserve or an insufficient balance the carrying amount of the asset is written down against the relevant service line(s) in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement. o Where an impairment loss is subsequently reversed, the reversal will be credited to the relevant service line(s) in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement, up to the amount of the original loss, adjusted for the depreciation that would have been charged if the loss had not been recognised.
Depreciation
Depreciation is charged to Services for all Property, Plant and Equipment they use to deliver services, except for land and community assets with an unlimited useful life and assets that are not yet available (i.e. assets under construction). Provisions for all depreciation are calculated on a straight-line basis using the asset or component’s useful life.
Depreciation is calculated on the following bases:
Tangible Fixed Asset Maximum Depreciation Period Dwellings 80 Standard buildings 40 Listed buildings 50 Recreational equipment e.g. kickpitches 10 Infrastructure asset s 40 Vehicle, Plant and Equipment 10
With effect only from 1 April 2010, major components of assets acquired or constructed and whose cost is significantly different in relation to the total cost of the main assets will be depreciated separately. Major component categories have been identified as:
PagePage 101 45
Component No. of Years Flat Roof 15 Internal Services (electrical, plumbing, heating) 10 -20 Structure 40 Lifts / Boilers 10 -20
Revaluation gains are also depreciated with an amount equal to the difference between the current value of depreciation charged on assets and the depreciation that would have been chargeable based on their historical cost being transferred each year from the Revaluation Reserve to the Capital Adjustment Account.
Asset Components are derecognised on disposal, or when no future economic benefits are expected. The gain or loss arising from derecognition is included in the Surplus or Deficit on the Provision of Services.
X. Provisions, Contingent Liabilities, and Contingent Assets
Provisions
Where there is a legal or constructive obligation to transfer economic benefits as a result of a past event, the Council has set aside certain provisions to meet the specific future expenditure which is likely to incur. Provisions are charged as an expense to the appropriate service line in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement in the year that the authority becomes aware of the obligation, and are measured at the best estimate at the balance sheet date of the expenditure required to settle the obligation, taking into account relevant risks and uncertainties. The purpose of these provisions is outlined in the note to the accounts regarding Provisions.
Provision for Insurance
An insurance provision and reserve have been established to meet the Council’s obligations arising in respect of Employers and Public Liability Claims.
Provision for Redemption of Debt
A charge to revenue for each financial year’s Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) has been made to account for the cost of repaying debt in that financial year. Following the publication of the Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (England) Regulations, the Council is required to determine the annual policy for making a Minimum Revenue Provision which the Council considers to be prudent. The Council’s MRP Policy is as follows:-
Assets acquired using Supported Borrowing
For debt which is supported by the Government through the Regional Support Grant system (RSG), the Council will continue to use the formulae in the current regulations, the “Regulatory Method” as described in the Guidance. This charges MRP at the rate of 4% per annum on a reducing balance, based on the original cost of assets, with certain permissible adjustments.
It is proposed to use this option for the calculation of MRP for existing assets acquired through supported borrowing for the following reasons: o This is in line with existing policies and Communities and Local Government (CLG) guidance. o As the method follows that used in preparation of current three year budgets, there will be no financial impact. o The method is considered prudent.
Other balances brought forward at 1 April 2008
For assets in existence at 31 st March 2008 not supported through RSG, the Council will continue to provide MRP at the level set at the time the asset was acquired. This will be at least 4% per annum.
Asset acquired during the year For assets acquired during the year not supported through RSG the Council will consider individual circumstances. MRP will be charged to revenue so as to fully provide for the amount borrowed over the expected useful life of the asset concerned, as a minimum. This may be on a straight line basis but may also, where circumstances
PagePage 102 46 recommend, be related to income streams or savings generated by the asset concerned. Individual basis will be discussed with auditors and where necessary, other external advisors.
It is proposed to use this option – Asset Life Method for the following reasons: o This category relates to assets which were previously leased but are now funded via borrowing. o The proposed method represents a continuation of the existing policy with regards to the calculation of MRP. o The method will have no financial impact on Council Budgets.
Deferral of Minimum Revenue Provision It is permitted under the Local Government Regulations to defer charging MRP on projects where lending is not supported by RSG until the asset becomes operational, for example until a building under construction is available for occupation. Where it is possible to clearly identify the transition from asset under construction to operational asset, where the construction period is likely to extend beyond 12 months and where the amount of MRP is material the Council will consider deferral of MRP.
Contingent Liabilities Where there is a possible obligation to make a payment relating to an event prior to the balance sheet date, but the amount and timing are not certain, no provision is required to be made in the accounts.
For each class of contingent liability the Council has identified the nature of the contingency, a brief description, an estimate of the financial effect where practicable, an indication of the uncertainties relating to the amounts or timing, and the possibility of any reimbursement are disclosed.
Contingent liabilities are not recognised in the Balance Sheet but disclosed in a note to the accounts.
Contingent Assets Where there is a possible obligation to receive a payment relating to an event prior to the balance sheet date, but the amount and timing are not certain, no provision is required to be made in the accounts.
For each class of contingent asset the Council has identified the nature of the contingency, a brief description, an estimate of the financial effect where practicable, an indication of the uncertainties relating to the amounts or timing, and the possibility of any payment are disclosed.
Y. Reserves
Amounts set aside for purposes falling outside the definition of provisions are considered as reserves and transfers to and from them are distinguished separately from service expenditure disclosed in the Statement of Accounts.
In addition to statutory reserves such as the General Fund and Housing Revenue Account surplus, the Council maintains certain other reserves to meet specific, rather than general future expenditure. Further details are provided in the notes to the accounts (Statement of Total Movement in Reserves).
Z. Revaluation Reserve
Unrealised gains and losses from an increase / decrease in value of fixed assets as a result of inflation or the economic climate are recorded in the Revaluation Reserve. Revaluation losses are only decreased to the reserve to the extent that there is a sufficient balance in the reserve for the asset concerned. If there is no balance in the reserve or if the revaluation decrease exceeds the reserve balance then the amount of decrease after exhausting the reserve balance will be charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
Aa. Revenue Expenditure Funded from Capital Resources under Statute (REFCUS)
Expenditure incurred during the year that may be capitalised under statutory provisions but that does not result in the creation of a non-current asset has been charged as expenditure to the relevant service in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement in the year. Where the Authority has determined to meet the cost of this expenditure from existing capital resources or by borrowing, a transfer in the Movement in Reserves Statement from the General Fund Balance to the Capital Adjustment Account then reverses out the amounts charged so that there is no impact on the level of council tax.
PagePage 103 47
Ab. Treasury Management Policy
The Treasury Management Policy is to: ‘Achieve budgets and targets and proactively manage the Council’s debt and investment portfolios, whilst ensuring that the Council is not placed at undue financial risk’.
The Treasury Management Policy is based on 6 key objectives which dictate the approach taken by the Council in managing its investments and debts. These are:
Investment Activity Objectives 1. To give priority to the security of Capital and Liquidity when investing funds. 2. To achieve the investment budgets and targets set, whilst seeking opportunities to outperform them. 3. To maximise investment returns whilst maintaining prudence and managing risk.
Borrowing Activity Objectives 4. To minimise the impact of the Council’s debt portfolio upon Council budgets. 5. To achieve the debt related budgets and targets set, whilst seeking opportunities to outperform them. 6. Give due consideration to the impact of new borrowing or debt restructuring on the Council’s debt maturity profile and the associated implications for interest rate risk and the Council’s Balance Sheet.
Ac. Value Added Tax (VAT)
VAT is included within the accounts only to the extent that it is irrecoverable and therefore charged to revenue or capital expenditure as appropriate.
2. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ISSUED, NOT ADOPTED
Heritage Assets: Impact of the Adoption of the New Standard on the 2011/12 Financial Statements
The Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the United Kingdom 2011/12 (the Code) has introduced a change in accounting policy in relation to the treatment of heritage assets held by the Authority, which will need to be adopted fully by the authority in the 2011/12 financial statements.
The authority is required to disclose information relating to the impact of the accounting change on the financial statements as a result of the adoption by the Code of a new standard that been issued, but is not yet required to be adopted by the Authority, in this case, heritage assets.
As is set out above, full adoption of the standard will be required for the 2011/12 financial statements. However, the Authority is required to make disclosure of the estimated effect of the new standard in these financial statements. The new standard will require that a new class of asset, heritage assets, is disclosed separately on the face of the Authority’s Balance Sheet in the 2011/12 financial statements.
Heritage assets are assets that are held by the authority principally for their contribution to knowledge or culture. The heritage assets held by the authority are the collections of assets and artefacts either exhibited or stored in the local authority museum and gallery as well as in the various outreach exhibition points throughout the borough. The three principal collections of heritage assets held in the museum, galleries and exhibitions include: o Art collections. o Other items of artwork including prints, drawings and embroidery. o Artefacts of local historical significance held as museum pieces. The collection of around 1,600 items is not currently recognised in the financial statements as no information is available on the cost of the assets. The assets are held in the catalogues of the Authority and detailed records are kept on each asset by the curators of the museum and gallery. Details of some of these are available on the Councils website.
Rochdale Town Hall, though a building of great artistic and cultural significance, still fulfils its primary role as a Council administrative building and is valued and recorded as such in the notes to the accounts
The Code will require that heritage assets are measured at valuation in the 2011/12 financial statements (including the 2010/11 comparative information). The 2011/12 Code will permit some relaxations in the valuation
PagePage 104 48 requirements of heritage assets and this will mean that the authority is able to recognise more of its collections of heritage assets in the Balance Sheet. The Authority anticipates that it will be able to recognise its art collections and some historical artefacts using as its base detailed insurance valuations (which are based on market values) held by the Authority in respect of the collection though these cannot be taken as an indication of the collections realisable value. The authority is unlikely to be able to recognise all of the historical artefacts in future financial statements as it is of the view that obtaining valuations for the vast majority of the collection would involve a disproportionate cost of obtaining the information in comparison to the benefits to the users of the Authority’s financial statements – this exemption is permitted by the 2011/12 Code.
It is estimated that the total value of heritage assets to be recognised in the Balance Sheet at 1 April 2010 (under the requirements of the 2011/12 Code) will be £12.2m. As the assets will be recorded in fixed assets for the first time this will result in a total revaluation gain recognised in the Revaluation Reserve of £12.2 million.
The Authority considers that the heritage assets held by the Authority will have indeterminate lives and a high residual value; hence the Authority does not consider it appropriate to charge depreciation for the assets. There will therefore be no change to the depreciation charged in the financial statements in relation to the Authority’s heritage assets.
3. CRITICAL JUDGEMENTS IN APPLYING ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In applying the accounting policies set out in Note 1, the Authority has had to make certain judgements about complex transactions or those involving uncertainty about future events. The critical judgements made in the Statement of Accounts are:
There is a high degree of uncertainty about future levels of funding for local government. However, the Authority has determined that this uncertainty is not yet sufficient to provide an indication that the assets of the Authority might be impaired as a result of a need to close facilities and reduce levels of service provision.
4. ASSUMPTIONS MADE ABOUT THE FUTURE AND OTHER MAJOR SOURCES OF ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY
The Statement of Accounts contains estimated figures that are based on assumptions made by the Authority about the future or that are otherwise uncertain. Estimates are made taking into account historical experience, current trends and other relevant factors. However, because balances cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could be materially different from the assumptions and estimates.
The items in the Authority’s Balance Sheet at 31 st March 2011 for which there is a significant risk of material adjustment in the forthcoming financial year are as follows:
Depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment
Assets are depreciated over useful lives that are dependent on assumptions about the level of repairs and maintenance that will be incurred in relation to individual assets. The current economic climate makes it uncertain that the Authority will be able to sustain its current spending on repairs and maintenance, bringing into doubt the useful lives assigned to assets. If the useful life of assets is reduced, depreciation increases and the carrying amount of the assets falls. It is estimated that the annual depreciation charge for buildings would increase by approximately £650k for every year that useful lives had to be reduced.
Property Valuations and Impairments Assessments
The Council obtains professional valuations of all its land and property assets in accordance with Accounting Guidance. In practice this is done on a rolling 5 year basis with each asset being valued at least once every 5 years. Before the recession the trend had been upwards but in recent years some assets have reduced in value between valuations, whilst others have increased in value. In the opinion of our valuers, there is no trend that would recommend a general impairment of Council property. If such a trend were to appear this would be reflected by a reduced asset value and a reduction in either the Capital Adjustment Account or the Revaluation Reserve. A 1% reduction in asset values would generate a reduction of around £9.8 m.
PagePage 105 49
Pensions Liability
Estimation of the net liability to pay pensions depends on a number of complex judgements relating to the discount rate used, the rate at which salaries are projected to increase, changes in retirement ages, mortality rates and expected returns on pension fund assets. A firm of consulting actuaries is engaged to provide the Council with expert advice about the assumptions to be applied. During 2010/11, the actuaries advised that the net pensions liability had reduced as a result of estimates being corrected due to the Chancellors decision in June 2010 to link pension valuations to the CPI (Consumer Based Index) rather than RPI (Retail Price Index). The investment return on the pension fund assets has also increased which added together with the index price has resulted in the reduction in Pension Liability for Rochdale.
5. MATERIAL ITEMS OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
The Authority does not have any material items of income and expenditure.
6. EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE
The Statement of Accounts was issued for audit on the 27 th June. Events taking place after this date are not reflected in the financial statements or notes. Where events taking place before this date provided information about conditions existing at 31 st March 2011, the figures in the financial statements and notes have been adjusted in all material respects to reflect the impact of this information.
The financial statements and notes have not been adjusted for the following event which took place after 31 st March 2011 as they provide information that is relevant to an understanding of the Authority’s financial position but do not relate to conditions at that date:
On 19 April 2011 Rochdale Council signed the Oldham and Rochdale Joint Street Lighting Initiative. This is a PFI funded 20 year deal with the Community Lighting Partnership (CLP) to supply the two boroughs with street lighting at an overall value of £150m. The Council will pay a monthly amount, the “unitary charge” in return for the supply of equipment, services and electricity necessary to maintain street lighting at an agreed level by a consortia, led by CLP. The Council receives subsidy in the form of a PFI credit from government to fund the project. The Scheme becomes operational in July 2011. Existing Council assets will not be introduced into the scheme. The PFI scheme will be evaluated for correct accounting treatment under section 4.3 of the Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting and it is likely that new assets created by the CLP will be treated as assets of the Council whilst Rochdale’s’ Share of the service element of the contract will pass through the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
PagePage 106 50
7. ADJUSTMENTS BETWEEN ACCOUNTING BASIS AND FUNDING BASIS UNDER REGULATIONS
This note details the adjustments that are made to the total comprehensive income and expenditure recognised by the Authority in the year in accordance with proper accounting practice to the resources that are specified by statutory provisions as being available to the Authority to meet future capital and revenue expenditure.
31 st March 2011 Usable Reserves Reserve Account Account Reserves Unapplied Capital Grants Grants Capital Capital Receipts Receipts Capital Housing Revenue Revenue Housing General Fund Balance Fund General Major Repairs Reserve Repairs Major Unusable in Movement £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Adjustments primarily involving the Capital Adjustment Account: Reversal of items debited or credited to the CI&E Statement: Charges for Depreciation and impairment of non-current 44,027 2,438 4,199 (50,664) assets Movements in the market value of Investment Properties 465 (465) Amortisation of intangible assets 1,407 (1,407) Capital grants and contributions applied (54,489) 54,489 Revenue expenditure funded from capital under statute 19,458 (19,458)
Amounts of non-current assets written off on disposal or sale 1,614 1,120 (2,734) as part of the gain/loss on disposal to the CI&E Statement Insertion of items not debited or credited to the CI&E Statement: Statutory Provision for the Financing of Capital Investment (11,536) 11,536 Voluntary Provision for the Financing of Capital Investment (1,867) 1,867 Capital expenditure charged against the General Fund and (645) (2,988) 3,633 HRA balances Adjustments primarily involving the Capital Grants Unapplied Account: Capital grants and contributions unapplied credited to the (5,259) 5,259 0 CI&E Statement Application of grants to capital financing transferred to the 659 (659) 0 Capital Adjustment Account Adjustments primarily involving the Capital Receipts Reserve: Transfer of cash sale proceeds credited as part of the (1,203) (2,353) 3,556 0 gain/loss on disposal to the CI&E Statement Use of the Capital Receipts Reserve to finance new capital (502) 502 expenditure Contribution from the Capital Receipts Reserve towards 105 (105) 0 administrative costs of non-current asset disposals Contribution from the Capital Receipts Reserve to finance 1,612 (1,612) 0 the payments to the Government capital receipts pool Adjustments primarily involving the Deferred Capital Receipts Reserve (England and Wales): Transfer of deferred sale proceeds credited as part of the (766) 766 gain/loss on disposal to the CI&E Statement Adjustments primarily involving the Major Repairs Reserve: Reversal of Major Repairs Allowance credited to the HRA (2,990) 2,990 0 Use of the Major Repairs Reserve to finance new capital (7,189) 7,189 expenditure
PagePage 107 51
31 st March 2011 Cont' Usable Reserves Balance Housing Reserve Reserve Account Account Unusable Unusable Reserves Revenue Revenue Unapplied Movement in in Movement General Fund Fund General Major Repairs Repairs Major Capital Grants Grants Capital Capital Receipts Receipts Capital £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Adjustment primarily involving the Financial Instruments Adjustment Account: Amount by which finance costs charged to the CI&E Statement are different from finance costs chargeable in 53 41 (94) the year in accordance w ith statutory requirements Adjustments primarily involving the Pensions Reserve: Reversal of items relating to retirement benefits debited (52,100) 52,100 or credited to the CI&E Statement (see Note 47) Employer's pensions contributions and direct payments to (22,000) 22,000 pensioners payable in the year Adjustments primarily involving the Collection Fund Adjustment Account: Amount by which Council Tax income credited to the CI&E Statement is different from Council Tax income (772) 772 calculated for the year in accordance with statutory requirements Adjustment primarily involving the Accumulated Absences Account: Amount by which officer remuneration charged to the CI&E Statement on an accruals basis is different from (4,370) 4,370 remuneration chargeable in the year in accordance with statutory requirements Total Adjustments (85,607) (4,732) 4,600 1,337 0 84,402
PagePage 108 52
31 st March 2010 Comparative Figures Usable Reserves Balance Reserve Reserve Account Account Unapplied Movement in in Movement General Fund Fund General Major Repairs Repairs Major Capital Grants Grants Capital Capital Receipts Receipts Capital Housing Revenue Revenue Housing Unusable Reserves Unusable £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Adjustments primarily involving the Capital Adjustment Ac count: Reversal of items debited or credited to the CI&E Statement: Charges for Depreciation and impairment of non-current assets 65,160 20,944 3,942 (90,046) Movements in the market value of Investment Properties (530) 530 Amortisation of intangible assets 1,112 (1,112) Capital grants and contributions applied (56,435) 56,435 Revenue expenditure funded from capital under statute 16,969 (16,969) Amounts of non-current assets written off on disposal or sale as part of 2,397 1,184 (3,581) the gain/loss on disposal to the CI&E Statement Statutory Provision for the Financing of Capital Investment (9,996) 9,996 Voluntary Provision for the Financing of Capital Investment (2,042) 2,042 Capital expenditure charged against the General Fund and HRA balances (233) 233 Adjustments primarily involving the Capital Grants Unapplied Account:
(1,099) 1,099 0 Capital grants and contributions unapplied credited to the CI&E Statement Application of grants to capital financing transferred to the Capital 757 (757) 0 Adjustment Account Adjustments primarily involving the Capital Receipts Reserve: Transfer of cash sale proceeds credited as part of the gain/loss on disposal (2,903) (1,604) 4,507 0 to the CI&E Statement Use of the Capital Receipts Reserve to finance new capital expenditure (5,014) 5,014 Contribution from the Capital Receipts Reserve towards administrative 0 costs of non-current asset disposals Contribution from the Capital Receipts Reserve to finance the payments to 1,031 (1,031) 0 the Government capital receipts pool Adjustments primarily involving the Deferred Capital Receipts Reserve (England and Wales): Transfer of deferred sale proceeds credited as part of the gain/loss on 0 disposal to the CI&E Statement Adjustments primarily involving the Major Repairs Reserve: Reversal of Major Repairs Allowance credited to the HRA (6,311) 6,311 0 Use of the Major Repairs Reserve to finance new capital expenditure (10,253) 10,253 Adjustment primarily involving the Financial Instruments Adjustment Account: Amount by which finance costs charged to the CI&E Statement are different from finance costs chargeable in the year in accordance with 4 (261) 257 statutory requirements Adjustments primarily involving the Pensions Reserve: Reversal of items relating to retirement benefits debited or credited to 26,200 (26,200) the CI&E Statement (see Note 47) Employer's pensions contributions and direct payments to pensioners (18,900) 18,900 payable in the year Adjustments primarily involving the Collec tion Fund Adjustment Account: Amount by which Council Tax income credited to the CI&E Statement is different from Council Tax income calculated for the year in accordance (364) 364 with statutory requirements
Adjustment primarily involving the Acc umulated Absences Account: Amount by which officer remuneration charged to the CI&E Statement on an accruals basis is different from remuneration chargeable in the year in 1,026 (1,026) accordance with statutory requirements Total Adjustments 22,154 13,952 342 (1,538) 0 (34,910)
PagePage 109 53
8. TRANSFERS TO / FROM EARMARKED RESERVES
This note sets out the amounts set aside from the General Fund and HRA balances in earmarked reserves to provide financing for future expenditure plans and the amounts posted back from earmarked reserves to meet General Fund and HRA expenditure in 2010/11.
The following table and note explains the amount and purpose of the earmarked reserves held by the Council.
Balance at Transfers Balance at Transfers Balance at 1st April Out Transfers 31 st March Out Transfers 31 st March 2009 2009/10 In 2009/10 2010 2010/11 In 2010/11 2011 £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's General Fund:
Local Management of Schools 8,319 (47) 1,823 10,095 (1,904) 3,021 11,212 Insurance Reserve 16,469 (3,979) 8 12,498 (4,595) 37 7,940 Schools PFI 6,276 (179) 798 6,895 (28) 737 7,604 Holding in Manchester Airport PLC 5,701 5,701 5,701 Early Retirement Reserve 3,874 3,874 (5,772) 4,721 2,823 Schools Devolved Standards Fund 1,565 (1,565) 2,166 2,166 (2,166) 2,743 2,743 Dedicated Schools grant central 2,978 (832) 2,146 (386) 656 2,416 Standards Fund central 676 (676) 1,485 1,485 (1,485) 1,654 1,654 Supporting People 4,485 (3,037) 1,448 90 1,538 GMWDA Smoothing Levy 559 435 994 508 1,502 Other Reserves 1,567 (909) 711 1,369 (632) 422 1,159 Maskew Bequest 529 (7) 4 526 (44) 3 485 Surface Water 225 225 250 475 Schools Insurance 453 453 (54) 399 Manchester Airport Debt 295 295 (277) 367 385 Winter Maintenance 0 330 330 Reserved rental Income 0 323 323 Housing Planning Delivery 670 (237) 433 (201) 232 S106 grounds maintenance 242 (23) 219 (23) 30 226 Asylum Seekers 787 29 816 (602) 214 Kitchen Maintenance 0 179 179 179 Managed Transfers 24 24 108 132 Systems Development 850 35 885 (765) 9 129 Exit Strategy Reserve 373 373 (290) 83 Pupil Referral Service 185 (93) 92 (28) 64 Future Potential Liabilities Reserve 1,725 1,725 (1,725) 0 Learning Skills 749 (749) 0 0 Modernisation Programme 668 (299) 369 (369) 0 Communities for Health 182 55 237 (237) 0 Equal Pay Back Pay Reserve (7,933) 7,933 0 0
Total 47,622 (12,632) 20,532 55,522 (21,583) 16,009 49,948
HRA Other Reserves 42 (42) 0 101 101
Total 42 -42 0 0 0 101 101
PagePage 110 54 o Local Management of schools and Community Schools - In accordance with the Education Reform Act, 1988 the scheme of Local Management of Schools provides for the carry forward of individual school surpluses/deficits. These balances are available to be spent on the education service in schools and cannot be used by the Council for general use. o Insurance Reserve - This reserve represents the need to finance costs (e.g. claims and premium payments) associated with insurable risk. This reserve relates to the self-funding of general corporate risks, insurance risks and fire risks at education establishments. o Schools PFI – This reserve is the cumulative amount of unapplied funding received to date which will be utilised to finance the schools PFI over the whole life of the project. There is also an amount set aside to guard against uncertainties in future Retail Price Index increases, interest rate fluctuations and back-dated contractor claims in relation to the Schools PFI Scheme. o Holding in Manchester Airport PLC - This reserve represents the share in the net assets of Manchester Airport PLC which the Council received at nil cost. This reserve will only be available to finance expenditure in the event of disposal of these shares. o Early retirement - This reserve has been created to fund possible future capital costs arising from early retirements/redundancies. o Schools Devolved Standards Fund – Schools have 17 months to spend their Standards Fund allocations – this balance represents that funding which will be spent between April to August 2011. o Dedicated Schools Grant – Central - the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) is ring fenced and can only be applied to meet expenditure properly included in the Schools Budget – refer to note 37. o Standards Fund – Central – This reserve is the carry forward of unspent Standards Fund Revenue Grants which must be spent by the 31 st August 2011. The reserve includes grants still to be devolved to schools, and grants held centrally. o Supporting People – This reserve has been created to allow for unspent Supporting People grant to be used to pay for providers in future years. o GMWDA Smoothing – This reserve has been established to allow for a significant increase in the levy in future years. It has been considered more appropriate for individual authorities to provide their own reserves as opposed to a smoothing pot being held by GMWDA. o Other Reserves – This combined reserve consists of a number of miscellaneous reserves all with balances below £125k. o Maskew Bequest – This reserve represents a bequest left to the Council to spend on certain activities within the Libraries service. o Surface Water – This reserve has been established for the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment due to be completed by June 2015. o Schools Insurance – The Authority operates two shared cost insurance schemes on behalf of schools. These cover property related risks not covered centrally, including damage to buildings, vandalism and theft cover for the cost of employing additional staff due to illness. o Manchester Airport Debt – This reserve has been set up following the conversion of Manchester Airport debt into an equity instrument. Although the return on the investment has increased this year, the Council can defer receiving the income in the event of Manchester Airport’s profits falling below a certain threshold. This reserve is being built up to reduce the impact of such an eventuality. o Winter Maintenance - This reserve has been created to meet possible increases in future years costs in Winter Maintenance due to severe winters. o Reserved Rental Income – This reserve is created from rental income received from properties purchased or built with ring fenced funding and at present has to be spent in line with the original purposes of that funding/receipt. o Housing Planning Delivery – This reserve has been created for the Housing Planning Delivery Grant which is specifically for improvements to the planning delivery function. o S106 Grounds Maintenance – This reserve has been created to hold contributions from developers to pay for future years grounds maintenance costs relating to specific S106 agreements. o Asylum Seekers – This reserve represents the accumulated surplus on the NW Consortium for Asylum Seekers contract with the Home Office, which is ring-fenced to providing support to asylum seekers.
PagePage 111 55 o Kitchen Maintenance – Schools have an option to pay into a pooled kitchen maintenance fund. Works are allocated in year via a prioritised programme. This reserve represents the balance within the fund at the year end. o Managed Transfers - This is a reserve that schools pay in to when they permanently exclude pupils. Each time a school enrols a pupil that was previously permanently excluded from a different school it can draw from the reserve. o Systems Development – This reserve has been set up for the purchase of new revenue & benefits service computer system and an electronic data records management system (EDRMS). o Exit Strategy – This reserve has been established for those areas within the Learners and Young People service that are funded from external resources and may at some point in the future no longer be required or lose that source of funding. The reserve is set aside to deal with any implications (e.g. redundancy costs, withdrawal from buildings) that may arise as a result of funding being withdrawn. o Pupil Referral Service – The pupil referral service is managed in the same way as a school and as such any unspent balances within the current year are carried forward to be utilised in the future. o Future Potential Liabilities Reserve – This reserve represents the need to meet possible additional costs arising from issues identified in risk assessments undertaken by the Service Director, Finance and Procurement as part of the annual budget setting process. o Learning Skills - This reserve is the carry forward of income that is connected to an academic year which must be spent by the 31 st August. o Modernisation Programme – This reserve was established in 2008/09 to finance the Adult Care Modernisation Programme which is made up of a number of one off improvement schemes. o Communities for Health – This reserve has been created for PCT funding which is specifically for joint initiatives relating to reducing health inequalities. o Equal Pay Back Pay Reserve - This reserve represented the amount of equal pay that the Council had made a provision for but hadn’t charged to Council Tax. This was a negative reserve which, now that settlements of the equal pay claims have been completed, has been appropriated back to revenue.
9. OTHER OPERATING EXPENDITURE
This note provides an analysis of other operating expenditure within the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 1,031 Payments to the Government Housing Capital Receipts Pool 1,612 (892) Gains/Losses on the disposal of non-current assets (1,484) 139 Total 128
10. FINANCING AND INVESTMENT INCOME AND EXPENDITURE
This note provides an analysis of financing and investment income and expenditure within the Comprehensive income and Expenditure Statement.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 21,307 Interest Payable and similar Charges 23,965 11,900 Pensions interest costs and expected returns on pensions assets 8,000 (3,490) Interest receivable and similar income (3,393) (530) Income and expenditure in relation to investment properties and 465 changes in their fair value 91 (Surplus) or deficit on trading undertakings 213 29,278 Total 29,250
PagePage 112 56
11. TAXATION AND NON-SPECIFIC GRANT INCOME
This note provides an analysis of taxation and non-specific grant income within the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's 75,715 Council tax income 78,713 86,194 Non domestic rates 95,778 40,256 Non-ringfenced government grants 48,811 57,534 Capital grants and contributions 59,090 259,699 Total 282,392
PagePage 113 57
12. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The table below shows the movement in the Authority’s Property, Plant and Equipment:
Other Vehicles, Council Land and plant & Surplus Community Assets under Comparative Movements in 2009/10 Dwellings Buildings equipment Infrastructure Assets assets Construction Total £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Movements in Cost/valuation: st April 2009 377,609 600,947 22,685 67,272 25,417 4,109 4,448 1,102,487 Amount at 1 Additions 12,958 18,444 6,416 6,486 5,778 2,305 25,526 77,913 Revaluation increases/ (decreases) recognised in th e Revaluation Reserve 25,842 (5,941) 15 (1,104) 18,812 Impairments and Revaluation increases/ (decreases) recognised in the Surplus Deficit on the Provision of Services (20,483) (29,747) (517) (14,374) (254) (6,756) (72,131) De-recognition - disposals (1,184) (24) (1,667) (40) (2,915) Reclassifications (8,410) 1,724 99 1,813 6,018 1,244 Page 114 st Amount at 31 March 2010 394,742 575,269 28,656 73,857 17,490 12,178 23,218 1,125,4 10 Movements in Depreciation and Impairment st Amount at 1 April 2009 0 17,731 5,412 7,839 300 (9) 31,273 Charge for 2009-10 3,811 10,364 4,062 1,680 80 19,997 Disposals 0 Depreciation written out to the revaluation reserve ( 174) (146) (320) Depreciation written out to Surplus /Deficit on the Provision of Services (2,107) (414) (1,315) (43) (3,879) Reclassifications (2,012) 710 1,132 52 (118) st Amount at 31 March 2010 3,811 23,802 9,624 9,519 197 0 0 46,953 Net Book Value st at 31 March 2010 390,931 551,467 19,032 64,338 17,293 12,178 23,218 1,078,4 57 at 31 st March 2009 377,609 583,216 17,273 59,433 25,117 4,118 4,448 1,071,214
Nature of asset holding at 31 st March 2010 Owned 390,931 492,479 18,888 64,338 17,293 12,178 23,218 1,019,3 25 Finance Lease 0 0 144 0 0 0 0 144 PFI and similar arrangements 0 58,988 0 0 0 0 0 58,988 Total 390,931 551,467 19,032 64,338 17,293 12,178 23,218 1,078,4 57
Page 58
Other Vehic les, Infrastructure Surplus Community Assets under Total Counc il Land and plant & Assets assets Construction Dw ellings Buildings equipment
£000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Movements in Cost/valuation: Amount at 1 st April 2010 394,742 575,269 28,656 73,857 17,490 12,178 23,218 1,125,4 10 Additions 6,984 17,211 10,787 12,291 113 926 19,352 67,664 Revaluation increases/ (decreases) recognised in th e Revaluation Reserve (1,823) (5,183) (262) 1,242 (6,026) Impairments and Revaluation increases/ (decreases) recognised in the Surplus Deficit on the Provision of Services (1,780) (27,353) (448) (1,193) (300) (1) (31,075) De-recognition - disposals (1,120) (211) (788) (3) (2,122) De-recognition - other 0 Reclassifications (1,693) 5,787 6,673 526 (14,481) (3,188) Amount at 31 st March 2011 395,310 565,520 46,116 85,700 15,886 14,043 28,088 1,150,6 63
Movements in Depreciation and Impairment Amount at 1 st April 2010 3,811 23,802 9,624 9,519 197 46,953 Charge for 2010-11 3,783 10,374 4,657 1,936 203 20,953 Page 115 Depreciation written out to the revaluation reserve (7,510) (60) (7,570) Depreciation written out to Surplus /Deficit on the Provision of Services (1,374) (1,374) De-recognition - disposals (1) (1) Amount at 31 March 2011 7,594 25,291 14,281 11,455 340 0 0 58,961
Net Book Value at 31 st March 2011 387,716 540,229 31,835 74,245 15,546 14,043 28,088 1,091,7 02 st at 31 March 2010 390,931 551,467 19,032 64,338 17,293 12,178 23,218 1,078,4 57
Nature of asset holding at 31 st Marc h 2011 Owned 387,716 482,812 31,780 74,245 15,546 14,043 28,088 1,034,2 30 Finance Lease 55 55 PFI and similar arrangements 57,417 57,417 Total 387,716 540,229 31,835 74,245 15,546 14,043 28,088 1,091,7 02
Page 59
Revaluations
RMBC carries out a rolling programme that ensures that all Property, Plant and Equipment required to be measured at fair value is revalued at least every five years. All valuations were carried out internally. Valuations of land and buildings were carried out in accordance with the methodologies and bases for estimation set out in the professional standards of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. Valuations of vehicles, plant, furniture and equipment are based on current prices.
Council Dwellings Vehicles, Plant & Equipment Surplus Assets Other PPE Total £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Carried at historic cost: 0 31,835 0 102,333 134,169 Valued at fair value as at: 0 0 0 0 0 31/03/2011 0 0 1,606 4,843 6,449 31/03/2010 387,716 0 5,352 30,912 423,979 31/03/2009 0 0 160 20,811 20,971 31/03/2008 0 0 2,336 367,178 369,514 31/03/2007 0 0 6,092 130,528 136,620 Page 116 Total 387,716 31,835 15,546 656,605 1,091,702
Capital Commitments
At 31 st March 2011, the Authority has entered into a number of contracts for the construction or enhancement of Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangibles in 2011/12 and future years budgeted to cost £28.6m. Similar commitments at 31 st March 2010 were £37.8m. The major commitments for Property Plant and Equipment are:
Metrolink £2.5m Siddall Moor £4.9m Cardinal Langley £8.6m Matthew Moss £4.7m Little Heaton Primary £1.2m Deeplish Primary £3.0m Other Schemes £3.7m Total £28.6m
Page 60
13. INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
The following table identifies items of income and expense that have been accounted for in the Financing and Investment Income and Expenditure line in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement, and also summarises the movement in the fair value of investment properties over the year:
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Rental income from investment property 889 963
Direct operating expenses arising from investment property (98) (89) Net gain 791 874
Balance at start of the year 25,085 24,164
Additions -Acquisitions 112 1
Disposals (122)
Net gains losses from fair value adjustments 530 (465)
Transfers to/from Property Plant & Equipment (1,563) 0
Balanc e at end of year 24,164 23,578
14. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The authority accounts for its software as intangible assets where such software has been implemented separately and, its cost is separately identifiable from, a particular IT system. All software is given a finite useful life based on the assessments of the period that the software is expected to be of economic benefit to the Authority. This life is estimated initially as five years for most software.
The carrying amount of intangible assets is amortised on a straight line basis. Total IT costs are allocated to services by apportionment thus it is not possible to state accurately how much amortisation is attributable to each service heading.
The annual review of software values has not resulted in any impairment of software in the current year.
The movement on Intangible Asset balances during 2010/11 is as follows:
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 Total Total £000's £000's Balance at start of year: Gross carrying amounts 5,750 8,018 Accumulated amortisation (1,535) (2,781) Net carrying amount at start of year 4,215 5,237 Purchases 1,933 3,220 Assets reclassified from PVE 201 0 Amortisation for the period (1,112) (1,407) Net carrying amount at end of year 5,237 7,050
Comprising: Gross carrying amounts 8,018 11,238 Accumulated amortisation (2,781) (4,188) 5,237 7,050 o No internally generated assets are included in the above totals.
PagePage 117 61
Significant individual items of software contained in the above balances are:-
Carrying Amount 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 Remaining £000's £000's Amortisation Period
Common Assessment Framework Demo software 65 1,167 5 years
15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial instruments include the financial assets and liabilities of the Council. These appear in different sections of the balance sheet depending on their characteristics.
Note 15a - Investments
The following table identifies investments held by the Council at 31 st March 2011:
Investments 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Long Term Investments Manchester Airport PLC 10,214 10,214 Denehurst Park (Rochdale) Ltd 100 100 War Stock 1 1 Total Long Term Investments 10,315 10,315
Short Term Investments General Investments - Banks & Building Societies 65,300 35,500 Accrued Interest 162 100 Total Short Term Investments 65,462 35,600
Total Investments 75,777 45,915
The Council’s long term investments are: o Manchester Airport Group PLC – Holding of 10,214,000 fully paid ordinary £1 shares which represents 5% of the issued capital. The Council received £1,000,000 of dividends in 2010/11. The company’s most recent accounts for the year ending 31 st March indicated that the company had net assets of £769.1m and made a profit after taxation of £36.9m. This investment is classed as long term and is intended to be held for at least 2-5 years. Further information on Manchester Airport Accounts can be obtained from the Director of Finance, Manchester Airport (Tel. 0161 489 3000). o Denehurst Park (Rochdale) Ltd - The Council has 99,998 shares which were acquired in March 1991. o War Stock – The Council holds £1,000 of 3.5% War Stock o Impact Partnership (Rochdale) Ltd – The Council has 19 shares which were acquired in April 2006. The Council entered into a contract with Impact Partnership to provide a number of services for the Council for a fixed contract charge. This contractual arrangement commenced on 1 st April 2006. o Short term investments – fixed term deposits of less than one year with approved banks and building societies.
PagePage 118 62
Note 15b – Long Term Debtors
Long-term debtors are amounts owed to the Council that will be repaid over periods of longer than one year.
Long Term Debtors 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Manchester Airport Loans 7,573 7,295 Manchester Airport Loans - Tameside Element 1,323 1,323 Park Road Developments 970 970 Mortgage Advances for Private Property 303 225 Loans re sale of Council Houses 257 218 Car Loans 243 187 Adult Care Loans 1,323 1,781 Brighter Horizons Loans 195 1,689 Schools PFI Lifecycle prepayment 1,341 1,786 Heywood Joint Service Centre Lifecycle Prepayment 25 64 Denehurst Park Ltd 0 459 Forward Funding Loan - Heart of Heywood 4 4 Total Long Term Debtors 13,557 16,001 Provision for Bad Debt on Adult Care Loans (488) (601) Total 13,069 15,400
The Council’s long term debtors relate to: o Manchester Airport Loans - Loans made to Manchester Airport to help finance capital expenditure. These have now been transferred into an equity instrument repayable after 25 years. o Manchester Airport Loan – Tameside Element - This debt has been transferred from Tameside Council and will be repaid by Manchester Airport under the new arrangement as with the loans listed above. o Park Road Developments – Loan made to Park Road Developments to help finance capital expenditure. o Mortgage Advances for Private Property - Loans made to individuals to help with the purchase of private dwellings. o Loans re Sale of Council Houses - Loans made to individuals to help with the purchase of Council Houses. o Car Loans - loans provided to employees who need access to a vehicle for work purposes. o Adult Care Loans – These loans relate to deferred charges to service users for the provision of care. o Brighter Horizon Loan – Loans made to Brighter Horizons for the construction and redevelopment of houses in the borough. o Schools PFI Lifecycle Prepayment – Payment made for Lifecycle costs not yet Iincurred. These will be charged to the I&E as incurred over the life of the scheme . o Heywood Joint Service Centre Lifecycle Prepayment - Payment made for Lifecycle costs not yet incurred. These will be charged to the I&E as incurred over the life of the scheme. o Denehurst Park Ltd - Loan made under well being powers to enable the company (which operates Rochdale Football Cub & Rochdale Hornets RLFC) to consolidate its debt. o Regeneration Forward Funding Loan – Loan made to support activity of community based organisation.
PagePage 119 63
Note 15c – Borrowings
The Council borrows to finance capital expenditure. The table below summarises borrowings at 31 st March 2011:
Long Term Current Borrowings 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's £000's £000's Financial Liabilities at Amortised Costs PWLB Loans 255,756 234,402 12,230 21,354 PWLB Accrued Interest 2,661 2,350 77 317 Loans from Commercial Banks 135,000 130,000 0 5,000 Commercial Banks Accrued Interest 1,551 1,475 0 75 Commercial Banks Effective Interest Adjustments 979 971 0 0 Other Loans 0 120 0 40 Total Borrowings 395,947 369,318 12,307 26,786
o Long-term borrowing represents amounts owed by the Council that are not due to be repaid within the next year. o Current or short term borrowings are those loans that are repayable within 12 months.
The table below shows an analysis of the maturity date of the Authority’s long term borrowing.
31 st March 2010 Long-term borrowing 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 26,354 Between 1 and 2 years' time 21,964 34,015 Between 2 and 5 years' time 30,418 40,237 Between 5 and 10 years' time 26,990 291,129 Between 10 years and above 286,121 391,735 Total 365,493
Note 15d – Other Long Term Liabilities
Long Term Long Term Liabilities 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's PFI and Finance Lease Liabilities Schools PFI Finance Lease 37,243 36,500 Joint Service Centre PFI Finance Lease 1,847 1,815 Vehicles and IT Equipment 282 63 Total PFI & Finance Leases 39,372 38,378
Other Long Term Liabilities Former Greater Manchester Council Debt 8,715 8,219 Airport Debt - Tameside Element 1,314 1,237 Deferred Credit - Mortgages 257 218 Total Other Liabilities 10,286 9,674
Total Other Long Term Liabilities 49,658 48,052
Long Term or Deferred Liabilities are amounts owed by the Council that are not due within the next twelve months. o Finance Lease-Schools PFI – The Council entered into a PFI scheme in 2006/07 for the provision of 4 schools to be built/renovated and maintained over a 25 year period. Following new Accounting rules, the Council must recognise the liability within the contract for the assets received. o Finance Lease-Heywood Joint Service Centre - The Council entered into a contract for the provision of a new purpose built building which is shared with the NHS PCT in 2009/10. The contract is for 25 years and the Council must recognise the liability within the contract for the assets received.
PagePage 120 64 o Finance Lease-Vehicles – The Council entered into a finance lease for the purchase of vehicles during 2005/06. This liability, which relates to the Council’s commitment arising from this agreement, will be discharged over the period of the lease. o Former GMCC Debt - The Greater Manchester CC ceased to exist on 31 st March 1986. The debt associated with the fixed assets of the GMCC passed to the successor authorities with debt administration being managed by Tameside MBC. This balance sheet shows the proportion of outstanding debt transferred directly to Rochdale. o Manchester Airport Loan – This debt has been transferred from Tameside Council and will be repaid by Manchester Airport to the Council on maturity. The Council will repay the debt to Tameside Council annually over the remainder of the term. o Council House Mortgages – The balance represents Council house “right to buy” sales where the Authority is granted a mortgage rather than making a cash sale. This amount is written down as the mortgages are repaid.
Note 15e – Financial Instruments – Expense and Interest
The table below shows the total interest income and total interest expense for the financial assets and liabilities identified previously in this note.
The figures calculated for interest income and expense at EIR do not differ significantly to actual interest income and expense recognised in the income and expenditure account. This is because the majority of the Council’s borrowings and investment is undertaken at fixed interest rates with no premiums or discounts.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 Financial Financial Liabilities Financial Assets Liabilities Financial Assets
Liabilities at Long Term Liabilities at Long Term Amortised Short Term Equity Amortised Short Term Equity Cost Investments Investment Total Cost Investments Investment Total £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Financial Liabilities Interest Expense Interest on Loans - PWLB & Commercial Banks 18,075 18,075 19,908 19,908 Interest - Airport PWLB Debt 20 20 689 689 Interest - Former Greater Manchester & Probation Debt 630 630 643 643 PFI Notional Interest Charges 2,659 2,659 2,636 2,636 Other (77) (77) 89 89
Expense Included in Surplus or Deficit on the Provision of 21,307 0 0 21,307 23,965 0 0 23,965 Services
Financial Assets Interest Income Short Term Investments & Cash Equivalents (1,170) (1,170) (833) (833) School Bank Accounts (6) (6) (3) (3) Interest Receipt - Manchester Airport / Other (894) (894) (1,147) (1,147) 0 0 Income from Long Term Investments 0 0 Manchester Airport Dividend & Land Rental (1,420) (1,420) (1,410) (1,410)
Income Included in Surplus or Deficit on the Provision of Services (894) (1,176) (1,420) (3,490) (1,147) (836) (1,410) (3,393) Net Cost Interest Cost for the Year 20,413 (1,176) (1,420) 17,817 22,818 (836) (1,410) 20,572
PagePage 121 65
This note summarises the financial instruments of the Council and compares their Fair Value with the current value on the balance sheet.
The fair value of Loans and receivables (excluding soft loans) and financial assets at fair value through profit and loss (FVTPL) have been measured by calculating the present values of the future cash flows with reference to available market rates for equivalent investments.
For loans from the PWLB and other loans payable, borrowing rates from the PWLB have been applied. No early repayment or impairment has been recognised.
Soft loans included within loans and receivables have been measured at fair value using interest rates available to the Council for investments of equivalent duration with an additional percentage increase representing the price of default risk. The fair value of the soft loans is less than the carrying value as the fair value takes into consideration the impact of the interest charge on the actual market value of the loans.
In respect of FVTPL investments gains or losses will be recognised in the Income & Expenditure Account.
The Council’s Long Term Investment in Manchester Airport is an unquoted equity holding (all shares are held by the 10 Greater Manchester local authorities) and as such there is no active market or history of trading. Although various valuation techniques are available, these give wide variations in possible values. Therefore, the shares have been included at a fair value which is the original cost less any impairment of the shareholding (there has been no impairment). The Council does not intend to dispose of these investments.
Overall, the fair value of financial assets is more than the carrying amount because the Council’s portfolio of financial assets includes a number of fixed term loan investments where the interest rate paid is higher than the interest rate available for similar investments at the balance sheet date.
The fair value of liabilities is more than the carrying amount because the Council’s portfolio of liabilities includes fixed term loan debt where the interest rate paid is higher than interest rate available for similar loans at the balance sheet date.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 Carrying Fair Fair Value Value Value Carrying Value Fair Value Current Long Term Current Long Term £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Long Term Financial Liabilities PWLB Loans 267,986 293,471 21,354 234,402 22,515 239,071 Commercial Loans 135,979 160,234 5,000 130,971 4,546 150,128 Other Loans 0 0 40 120 49 147 Finance Leases 39,484 39,484 0 38,378 38,378 Former GMC Debt 10,029 10,029 0 9,456 9,456 Long Term Creditors 0 102 102 Total Long Term Financial Liabilities 453,478 503,218 26,394 413,429 27,110 437,282
Long Term Financial Assets Short Term Investments 65,300 65,539 35,500 0 35,618 0 Shares in Manchester Airport 10,214 10,214 0 10,214 0 10,214 Manchester Airport Loan 7,350 9,378 0 7,295 0 9,445 Brighter Horizons Loans 195 197 0 1,689 0 1,641 Park Road Development Loan 970 1,050 970 0 1,007 Denehurst Park Loan 0 459 0 441 Adult Care Soft Loans 1,338 1,105 0 1,781 0 1,662 Shares in Denehurst Park (Rochdale) Ltd 100 100 0 100 0 100 War Stock 1 1 0 1 0 1 Tameside Element - Airport Loan 1,323 1,323 0 1,323 0 1,323 PFI Prepayments 1,366 1,366 0 1,850 0 1,850 Other Long Term Debtors 807 807 0 634 0 634 Total Long Term Financial Assets 88,964 91,080 36,470 25,346 36,625 27,311
PagePage 122 66
16. INVENTORIES
This table sets out the materials or supplies that were purchased and used by the council in providing services or sold as part of the council’s ordinary business during the year.
Raw Materials Goods for Resale Total Total
31 st Marc h 2010 31 st Marc h 2011 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 31 st Marc h 2010 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Opening Balance 532 500 122 86 654 586 New Stock Purchases 2,621 3,246 171 71 2,792 3,317 Stock Issued 2,653 3,009 192 73 2,845 3,082 Stock Written Off 0 25 16 (29) 16 (4) Closing Balanc e 500 712 85 113 585 825
17. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
The Authority has no specific construction contracts to report.
18. DEBTORS
Debtor balances represent amounts which are due at the financial year end but for which the cash has not been received. All debtor amounts are expected to be paid within the following year.
31st March 2010 Debtors 31st March 2011 £000's £000's
16,365 Central government bodies 12,944 309 Other local authorities 8,022 0 NHS bodies 298 0 Public corporations and trading funds 12 25,951 Other entities and individuals 22,881 42,625 Total 44,157
19. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash is represented by cash in hand, petty cash balances and the Council’s operating bank accounts. In addition, under the Council’s scheme of delegation, schools hold their own separate individual bank accounts.
Cash equivalents are investments that are instantly repayable to the Council on demand and that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash with insignificant risk of a change in value. These are balances held in interest bearing call accounts and money market funds with institutions meeting our required credit ratings.
31 st March 2010 Cash & Cash Equivalents 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 1,322 Cash Held by the Authority 2,902
10,633 School Bank Accounts 12,200
74 Petty Cash Balances 71
21,641 Cash Equivalent Short Term Investments 40,466 33,670 Total Cash & Cash Equivalents 55,639
PagePage 123 67
20. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
The table below shows the balance of assets held for sale that are owned by the Authority:
Non-Current 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Balance outstanding at start of year 3,686 1,226 Assets newly classified as held for sale: Property, Plant and Equipment 0 3,188 Revaluation losses (1,795) 0 Revaluation gains 0 0 Additions 0 13 Impairment Losses 0 (13) Assets sold (665) (490) Balance outstanding at year-end 1,226 3,924
21. CREDITORS
Since the Balance Sheet represents the financial position at the end of the financial year, there are outstanding monies owed at that date which have yet to be paid. The following analysis shows the amounts owed which had not yet been paid as at 31 st March 2011.
31st March 2010 Creditors 31st March 2011 £000's £000's
10,353 Central Government Bodies 4,712 1,337 Other Local Authorities 1,294 275 NHS Bodies 199 135 Public Corporations and Trading Funds 89 38,233 Other Entities and Individuals 37,070 50,333 Total Creditors 43,364
22. PROVISIONS
Provisions are amounts set aside by the Council to meet the cost of a future liability, for which the timing of the payment is uncertain. The amounts represent the best estimate of that liability where an exact cost is not able to be determined. In line with the Code of Practice, the provision is charged to service revenue accounts in the year it is established. When the liability falls due, the costs are charged directly to the provision.
1st April 2010 Provisions Additions in Amounts used Unused Amounts 31 st March 2011 Year in year reversed in year £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's 12,396Insurances 4,170 (1,839) (75) 14,652 4,416 Equal Pay (2,003) 2,413 711 Off street Car parking 711 1,444 Early Retirements 432 (1,425) (19) 432 414 Schools PFI (283) 131 716 Miscellaneous 550 (155) (240) 871
20,097 Total 5,152 (5,705) (334) 19,210 o Insurances – This represents amounts set aside by the Council to meet obligations arising in respect of Employers and Public Liability claims and motor vehicle insurance. The Council’s liability is limited to a maximum amount in any one year. Claims in excess of this maximum are met by external insurers. The total provision of £14.652m is comprised of a number of individual provisions (one for each financial year for which employer and public liability
PagePage 124 68
claims have yet to be settled) plus one provision relating to motor vehicle insurance claims. Payments will be made from these provisions as claims are settled. Whilst the majority of claims are settled within 2 to 3 years of being submitted a number of more complicated claims can take considerably longer to resolve. The adequacy of the level of individual provisions is reviewed by an independent firm of actuaries based on information and estimates relating to the number and value of claims. o Equal Pay Provision - Provision for potential claims brought against the Council for back pay arising from the Equal Pay Initiative. This is based on the number of claims received and an average settlement amount. o Off street car parking – This provision represents VAT on income from off street car parking retained pending conclusion of legal action by HM Revenue and Customs to determine VAT liability of this service. o Early Retirements/Redundancy – This provision is made to allow for (a) any additional contributions that may need to be made to pension funds for early retirements, and (b) any future redundancy costs arising from decisions made within the current year. Existing contributions to meet the cost of early retirements are based on actuarial estimates of what that cost will be. Where actual costs exceed this estimate, the additional amounts are charged to this provision. The adequacy of the provision is reviewed annually in consultation with the Greater Manchester Pension Fund. The amount and timing of future payments from the provision will also be dependent on the levels of early retirement which are approved by the Council in future years. o Schools PFI – Provision for unresolved contractor claims in relation to utility usage, price, and additional works. o Miscellaneous – These are individually insignificant.
23. USABLE RESERVES
Movements in the Authority’s usable reserves are detailed in the Movement in Reserves Statement and Note 8.
24. UNUSABLE RESERVES
Unusable Reserves are those that the Authority is not able to utilise to provide services. The table below summarises the movement of the Authority’s Unusable Reserves:
31 st Marc h 2010 Reserve 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 119,602 Revaluation reserve 113,444 (658) Financial Instruments Adjustment Account (752) 539,002 Capital Adjustment Account 551,192 (357,300) Pension Reserve (131,600) (1,121) Collection Fund Adjustment Account (349) 0 Deferred Capital Receipts 766 (8,246) Accumulated Absences Account (3,876) 291,279 TOTAL 528,825 a) Revaluation Reserve
The Revaluation Reserve contains the gains made by the Authority arising from increases in the value of Property Plant and Equipment. The balance is reduced when assets with accumulated gains are: o Revalued or impaired and the gains are written off. o Used in the provision of services and the gains are consumed through depreciation; or o disposed of, and the gains are realised.
The reserve contains only gains accumulated since 1 April 2007, the date that the reserve was created.
PagePage 125 69
Accumulated gains arising before that date are consolidated into the balance on the Capital adjustment Account.
31 st March 2010 Revaluation Reserve 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 105,009 Balance at 1 st April 119,602
29,312 Upward revaluation of assets 5,345
761Asset not previously recognised 0
(10,942) Downward revaluation of assets and Impairment (3,801) not charged to the Surplus/Deficit on the Provision of Services
19,131 Surplus/(deficit) on the revaluation of non 1,544 current assets not posted to the Surplus/Deficit on the Provision of Services
(2,428) Difference between fair value depreciation and (2,463) historical cost depreciation
(2,110) Accumulated gains on assets sold or scrapped (5,239) (4,538) Amounts written off to the capital adjustment (7,702) account
119,602 Balance at 31st March 113,444
b) Financial Instruments Adjustment Reserve
This account holds the accumulated differences between the financing costs included in the Income and Expenditure Account and the accumulated financing costs required in accordance with regulations to be charged to the Income & Expenditure Account
31 st March 2010 Financial Instruments Adjustment Account 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (915) Balance Brought Forward (658)
530 Premiums Charged 232
(312) Discounts Received (317)
7 Effective Interest Rate Adjustment 7
32 Soft Loans (16) (658) Balance Carried Forward (752)
c) Capital Adjustment Account
The Capital Adjustment Account absorbs the timing differences arising from the different arrangements for the consumption of non-current assets and for financing the acquisition, construction or enhancement of these assets under statutory provisions. The account is debited with the cost of acquisition, construction or enhancement as depreciation; impairment losses and amortisation are charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement (with reconciling postings from the Revaluation Reserve to convert fair value figures to a historical cost basis). The Account is credited with the amounts set aside by the Authority as finance for the costs of acquisition, construction and enhancement.
PagePage 126 70
The account contains accumulated gains and losses on Investment Properties that have yet to be consumed by the Authority. The account also contains revaluation gains accumulated on Property Plant and Equipment from periods prior to 1 April 2007, the date on which the Revaluation Reserve was created to hold such gains. Note 7 contains details of the sources of all the transactions posted to the Account, apart from those involving the Revaluation Reserve, see note 24 a).
31 st March 2010 Capital Adjustment Acc ount 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 561,669 Balance at 1 st April 539,002 Reversal of items credited to capital expenditure and debited or credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement (90,046) Charges for depreciation and impairment of non current assets (50,664)
0 Revaluation losses on Property Plant and Equipment (1,112) Amortisation of Intangible assets (1,407) (16,969) Revenue expenditure funded from Capital under Statute (19,458) (3,581) Amounts of non-current assets written off on disposal as part (2,734) of gain loss on disposal to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement (111,708) (74,263) 4,538 Adjusting amounts written out of Revaluation Reserve 7,702 (107,170) Net amount written out of the cost of non-current assets (66,561) consumed in the year
Capital financing applied in the year: 5,014 Use of Capital receipts reserve to finance new capital 502 expenditure 10,253 Use of the major repairs reserve to finance new capital 7,189 expenditure 55,678 Grants and capital contributions credited to the 53,830 Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement that have been applied to capital financing 757 Application of grants to capital financing from the Capital 659 Grants Un-Applied Account 12,038 Statutory Provision for the financing of capital investment 13,403 charged against the general fund and HRA balances 233 Capital expenditure charged against the general fund and HRA 3,633 balances 83,973 Total capital financing applied in the year 79,216
530 Movement in the Market value of Investment Properties (465) debited or credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement
st 539,002 Balance at 31 March 551,192
d) Pensions Reserve The pensions reserve absorbs the timing differences arising from different arrangements for accounting for post employment benefits and funding benefits in accordance with statutory provisions. The Council accounts for post employment benefits in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement as the benefits are earned by employees accruing years of service, updating the liabilities recognised to reflect inflation, changing assumptions and investment returns on any resources set aside to meet the costs. However statutory arrangements require benefits earned to be financed, as the Council makes employer’s contributions to pension funds or eventually pays any pensions for which it is directly responsible. The debit balance on the pensions reserve therefore shows a substantial shortfall in the benefits earned by past and current employees and the resources the council has set aside to meet them. The statutory arrangements will ensure that funding will have been set aside by the time the benefits come to be paid.
PagePage 127 71
31 st March 2010 Pension Reserve 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (137,500) Balance Brought Forward (357,300) (11,200)Current service cost (21,300) 16,100Employer contributions 19,200 2,800 Contributions for unfunded benefits 2,800 (900) Past service costs 84,800 (2,200) Settlements and curtailments (3,400) (11,900)Net return on assets (8,000) (212,500)Actuarial Gain/Loss 151,600 (357,300) Balance Carried Forward (131,600)
e) Collection Fund Adjustment Account The Collection Fund Adjustment Account manages the differences arising from the recognition of council tax income in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement as it falls due from the council tax payers compared with the statutory arrangements for paying across amounts to the General fund from the Collection Fund.
31 st March 2010 Collection Fund Adjustment Account 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (1,485) Balance Brought Forward (1,121)
364 Amount by which council tax income credited to the 772 Comprehensive Income and Expenditure statement is different from council tax income calculated for the year in accordance with statutory requirements.
(1,121) Balance Carried Forward (349)
f) Deferred Capital Receipts Reserve Deferred Capital Receipts Reserve holds the gains recognised on the disposal of non-current assets but for which the cash settlement has yet to take place.
Deferred Capital Receipts Reserve £000's Opening balance 2010/11 0 Transfer of deferred sale proceeds credited as part of the gain/loss on disposal to the 766 Comprehensive Income & Expenditure Statement Transfer to the Capital Receipts Reserve upon 0 receipt of cash 766 Closing Balanc e 2010/11
PagePage 128 72
g) Accumulated Absences Account The accumulated absences account absorbs the differences that would otherwise arise on the General fund Balance from accruing for compensated absences earned but not taken in the year e.g. annual leave entitlement carried forward at 31 st March. Statutory arrangements require that the impact on the general fund balance is neutralised by transfers to or from the Account.
31 st March 2010 Accumulated Absences Account 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (7,220) Balance Brought Forward (8,246) Settlement or cancellation of accrual made at the end of the preceding 7,220 8,246 year (8,246) Amounts accrued at the end of the current year (3,876) Amount by which officer remuneration charged to the comprehensive income and expenditure statement on an accruals basis is different from (1,026) 4,370 remuneration chargeable in the year in accordance with statutory requirement
(8,246) Balance Carried Forward (3,876)
25. CASH FLOW STATEMENT - OPERATING ACTIVITIES
The cash flows for operating activities include the following items:
31 st March 2010 The cash flows for operating activities include the following items: 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (2,490) Interest received (2,151) 21,201 Interest paid 24,020 (1,000) Dividends received (1,410)
26. CASH FLOW STATEMENT - INVESTING ACTIVITIES
The cash flows for investing activities include the following items:
31 st March 2010 Investing Activities 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's
70,944 Purchase of property, plant and equipment, investment property and 73,470 intangible assets
(424) Purchase of short-term and long-term investments 61,500
20,918 Other payments for investing activities 2,264
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment, investment (65,779) (7,682) property and intangible assets
(7,841) Other receipts and investing activities (58,931) 17,818 Net Cash flows from Investing Activities 70,621
PagePage 129 73
27. CASH FLOW STATEMENT - FINANCING ACTIVITIES
The cash flows for financing activities include the following items:
31 st March 2010 Financing Activities 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's
(106,500) Cash receipts of short and long-term borrowing (160)
7,541 Cash payments for the reduction of the outstanding liabilities 994 relating to finance leases and on balance sheet PFI contracts 62,354 Repayments of short and long-term borrowing 12,828
49,100 Other payments for financing activities 1,159 12,495 Net Cash flows from Financing Activities 14,821
PagePage 130 74
28. AMOUNTS REPORTED FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION DECISIONS
The analysis of income and expenditure by service on the face of the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement is that specified by the Best Value Accounting Code of Practice . However, decisions about resource allocation are taken by Cabinet on the basis of budget reports analysed across services. These reports are prepared on a different basis from the accounting policies used in the financial statements.
The income and expenditure of the Council’s principal services recorded in the budget reports for the year is as follows:-
Total People People Schools Business Business 31 st March 2010 Account Adult Care Adult Management Partnerships Regeneration Care Services Care Environmental Environmental Customers and and Customers Communications Children's Social Social Children's Strategic Housing Housing Strategic Housing Revenue Revenue Housing Learners & Young Young & Learners Vulnerable Adults Vulnerable £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's £000's £000's £000's Fees, charges & other service income (3,839) (2,100) (56,863) (3,873) (471) (3,895) (897) (10,7 10) (15,518) (978) (1,524) (100,669) Government Grants & Contributions (164,371) (93,166) (30) (2,720) (23,801) (2,317) (19,012) (128) (155) (3,362) (773) (309,834)
Total Income (168,210) (95,266) (56,893) (6,593) (24,272) (6,212) (19, 909) (10,838) (15,673) (4,340) (2,297) (410,503) Page 131
Employee Expenses 132,521 4,926 329 15,318 16,004 4,347 1,010 11,204 7,111 4,0 53 9,776 206,599 Other Operating Expenses 51,660 95,214 58,067 31,323 19,931 27,655 33,306 19,815 22, 611 22,210 14,009 395,801 Support Service Recharges 2,986 3,822 0 2,574 2,093 1,314 418 1,922 2,259 1,463 2,206 21,057 Total Operating Expenses 187,167 103,962 58,396 49,215 38,028 33,316 34,734 32,941 3 1,981 27,727 25,991 623,458
Net Cost of Services 18,957 8,696 1,503 42,622 13,756 27,104 14,825 22,103 16,30 8 23,387 23,694 212,955
Page 75
Total People People Schools Business Business 31 st March 2011 Account Adult Care Adult Partnerships Management Regeneration Care Services Care Environmental Environmental Customers and and Customers Communications Children's Social Social Children's Housing Revenue Revenue Housing Strategic Housing Housing Strategic Learners & Young Young & Learners Vulnerable Adults Vulnerable £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's £000's £000's £000's Fees, charges & other service income (5,579) (1,082) ( 54,146) (8,893) (2,619) (4,713) (1,816) (10,762) (26,334) (2,798) (1,488) -120,230 Government Grants & Contributions (168,711) (99,412) 0 (2,684) (25,283) (575) (7,808) (89) (318) (3,659) (720) -309,259 Total Income (174,290) (100,494) (54,146) (11,577) (27,902) (5,288) (9 ,624) (10,851) (26,652) (6,457) (2,208) -429,489
Employee Expenses 137,194 8,864 426 21,886 15,853 4,253 1,842 10,784 11,128 4, 878 11,323 228,431 Other Operating Expenses 46,561 98,885 33,527 35,201 20, 311 12,360 27,801 18,864 24,014 23,677 15,156 356,357 Support Service Recharges 3,442 2,215 392 2,290 1,749 493 604 1,229 2,536 1,077 2,016 18,043 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment 19,362 970 6 ,638 4,839 631 286 21 1,803 7,358 1,062 1,096 44,066 Total Operating Expenses 206,559 110,934 40,983 64,216 3 8,544 17,392 30,268 32,680 45,036 30,694 29,591 646,897
Net Cost of Servic es 32,269 10,440 (13,163) 52,639 10,642 12,104 20,644 21,829 1 8,384 24,237 27,383 217,408 Page 132
Page 76
Reconciliation of service Income and Expenditure to Cost of Services in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement
This reconciliation shows how the figures in the analysis of the service income and expenditure relate to the amounts included in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
31 st Marc h 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Net Expenditure in the Service Analysis 212,955 217,408
38,882 24,563 Net Expenditure of services and support services not included in the analysis Amount in the Comprehensive Income & Expenditure Statement not reported to 1,926 (89,171) management in the analysis Amounts included in the analysis not included in the comprehensive Income and (91) (213) Expenditure Statement Cost of Services in Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement 253,672 152,587
Reconciliation to Subjective Analysis
This reconciliation shows how the figures in the analysis of the service income and expenditure relate to a subjective analysis of the Surplus or Deficit on the Provision of Services included in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
31 st Marc h 2010 Total not in analysis in not Cost of Services of Cost Corporate Amount Corporate Directorate Analysis Directorate Amounts not reported to to reported not Amounts Amounts not included in I&E in included not Amounts Services and Support Services Services Support and Services management for decision making decision for management £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's
Fees, Charges, & Other Service Income (100,669) (2,981) (103,650) (103,650) Interest and Investment Income 0 (31,517) (31,517) Income from Council Tax 0 (75,715) (75,715) Government Grants & Contributions (309,834) (1,141) (310,975) (183,984) (494,959) Gain or loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets 0 (892) (892) Total Inc ome (410,503) (4,122) 0 0 (414,625) (292,108) (706,733)
Employee Expenses 206,600 10,457 1,926 218,983 218,983 Other Service Expenses 317,896 11,495 (91) 329,300 91 329,391 Support Service Recharges 21,057 9,133 30,190 30,190 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment 77,905 11,919 89,824 89,824 Interest Payments 0 60,704 60,704 Payments to Housing Capital Receipts Pool 0 1,031 1,031 Total Expenditure 623,458 43,004 1,926 (91) 668,297 61,826 730,123
(Surplus) or defic it on the provision of servic es 212,955 38,882 1,926 (91) 253,672 (230,282) 23,390
PagePage 133 77
31 st Marc h 2010 Total in analysis in Cost of Services of Cost Corporate Amount Corporate Directorate Analysis Directorate Amounts not reported to to reported not Amounts Amounts not included in I&E in included not Amounts management for decision making decision for management Services and Support Services not not Services Support and Services £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's
Fees, Charges, & Other Service Income (120,230) (11,441) (131,671) (131,671) Interest and Investment Income 0 (45,223) (45,223) Income from Council Tax 0 (78,713) (78,713) Government Grants & Contributions (309,259) (416) (309,675) (203,679) (513,354) Gain on Disposal of Fixed Assets 0 (1,484) (1,484) Total Inc ome (429,489) (11,857) 0 0 (441,346) (329,099) (770,445)
Employee Expenses 228,431 26,189 (89,171) 165,449 165,449 Other Service Expenses 356,357 (9,410) (213) 346,734 213 346,947 Support Service Recharges 18,043 11,633 29,676 29,676 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment 44,066 8,008 52,074 52,074 Interest Payments 0 74,260 74,260 Payments to Housing Capital Receipts Pool 0 1,612 1,612 Total Expenditure 646,897 36,420 (89,171) (213) 593,933 76,085 670,018
(Surplus) or deficit on the provision of services 217,408 24,563 (89,171) (213) 152,587 (253,014) (100,427)
29. ACQUIRED AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The Authority has nothing to report with regard to acquired and discontinued operations.
30. TRADING OPERATIONS
The Council operates trading accounts for services provided on the basis of a fixed price or schedule of rates. The charges for these services are to other parts of the council and included within the net cost of services for the Council or to other organisations. Only the net deficit/-surplus on trading undertakings is shown in the Income and Expenditure Statement.
31 st March 2010 Trading Service 31 st March 2011
Expenditure Income Deficit/ Expenditure Income Deficit/ (Surplus) (Surplus) £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's
5,336 5,438 (102)Facilities Management Catering 6,494 6,064 430
5,485 6,185 (700)Facilities Management Cleaning 5,969 6,530 (561)
3,587 3,313 274Fleet Management / Vehicle 3,597 3,616 (19) Maintenance 3,107 2,825 282Transport Service 3,586 3,607 (21) 1,476 1,139 337Other trading services 1,356 972 384 18,991 18,900 91 Net Deficit / (Surplus) on trading 21,002 20,789 213 services
Facilities Management Catering
PagePage 134 78
The Council provides catering services to 62 primary schools & nurseries, 5 high schools, welfare catering in two social service units, a meals on wheels service and it manages 2 commercial units. The two commercial units cater for internal and corporate events and operate a lunch time restaurant for public use. Annual price increases for schools and external contracts are agreed with the individual clients based on inflation and level of service, these clients can elect to use RMBC or not for these services. The annual SLA price % increase for social service units and meals on wheels is agreed in line with estimated % rise in costs in providing the service for the new year.
Facilities Management Cleaning The Authority provides cleaning services for 78 schools, 87 internal buildings and 19 external buildings. The annual SLA price % increase for internal cleaning is agreed in line with estimated % rise in costs in providing the service for the new year. Annual price increases for schools and external contracts are agreed with the individual clients based on inflation and level of service; these clients can elect to use RMBC for the cleaning service
Fleet Management / Vehicle Maintenance The authority owns approximately 177 vehicles hired out to internal services. Hire rates are benchmarked against companies offering similar vehicles, with vehicles purchased through an agreed tendering process. Vehicles are also hired in from external hire companies on an ad hoc basis as requested by internal services. The trading objective is to break even, with any surpluses or deficits being returned to the client service at year end. The cost of the vehicle covers leasing or rentals, agreed maintenance, MOT, Licence, Insurance and an administrative overhead
The authority also runs a vehicle maintenance section, with its own stores, to service its fleet of vehicles. It also provides a facility for the licensing of taxis and brings in private work from members of the public and local firms. The section is bench marked against the private sector when ascertaining its hourly rate and the stores purchase contracts are all agreed by a tendering process with Corporate Procurement. The trading objective is to break even with the surplus or deficit being passed onto Fleet Management
Transport Service The authority runs a centralised Transport Services function to provide ambulances from its own in house fleet and orders taxis for clients requested by the following services: Schools, Learners & Young People, Child Care and Adult Care. Prices are reviewed on an annual basis in conjunction with Corporate Procurement and a tendering process takes place once every two years. The service has to take into account individual user's needs, such as wheel chair facilities and escorting. The trading objective is to break even with the surplus or deficit being returned to the client service
Other trading units These represent a number of internal trading units with the council e.g. print unit, grounds maintenance.
31. AGENCY SERVICES
The Authority has nothing to report with regard to agency services.
32. ROAD CHARGING SCHEMES
The Authority does not operate any road charging schemes.
33. POOLED BUDGETS
The Authority does not have any pooled budgets
34. MEMBERS’ ALLOWANCES
PagePage 135 79
The Council makes payments to elected members in the form of allowances. Each member receives a basic allowance in addition to allowances for attendance at quasi-judicial meetings and special allowances for additional work and responsibilities.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Allowances 462 462 Expenses 240 212
Total 702 674
35. OFFICERS REMUNERATION
Officers’ Remuneration above £50,000
This note discloses information on the number of Council employees who have received more than £50,000 in remuneration during the year. This amount excludes any payments made by the Council in relation to employee pensions.
Number of Employees 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 Remuneration Band Teachers RMBC Total Left in Teachers RMBC Total Left in Other year Other year £50,000-£54,999 29 25 54 3 37 31 68 9 £55,000-£59,999 20 15 35 2 12 13 25 4 £60,000-£64,999 22 11 33 2 19 7 26 4 £65,000-£69,999 3 6 9 3 11 5 16 3 £70,000-£74,999 3 7 10 2 2 6 8 2 £75,000-£79,999 3 4 7 2 1 7 8 3 £80,000-£84,999 0 1 1 1 4 1 5 3 £85,000-£89,999 2 1 3 1 0 1 1 2 £90,000-£94,999 0 2 2 1 1 0 1 0 £95,000-£99,999 0 1 1 1 0 2 2 0 £100,000-£104,999 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 £105,000-£109,999 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 £110,000-£114,999 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 £115,000-£119,999 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 £120,000-£124,999 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 £125,000-£129,999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 £130,000-£134,999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 £135,000-£139,999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 £140,000-£144,999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 £145,000-£149,999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 £150,000 + 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 Total 84 77 161 20 88 79 167 32
The 2009/10 figure has been re-stated due to the alteration of the treatment of certain school institutions.
Senior Officers’ Remuneration
PagePage 136 80
This note discloses the remuneration of defined Senior and Statutory Officers’ whose annualised salary is equal to or more than £50,000. ‘Expenses’ disclosures include car and miscellaneous expenses.
The Senior Officers included in the tables below are also included in the previous table (excluding pension contributions).
31 st Marc h 2010 Senior Employee's Remuneration - annualised Salaries between £50,000 and £150,000 Post Title Note Salary Expenses Total Pension Total Remuneration Contributions Remuneration Exc luding Including Pension Pension Contributions Contributions £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Chief Executive - Roger Ellis 149 3 152 22 174 Executive Director A 115 1 116 17 133 Executive Director B 115 1 116 17 133 Executive Director C 91 0 91 13 104 Procurement D 79 0 79 12 91 Executive Director G 62 0 62 9 71 Executive Director E 5 0 5 1 6 Executive Director H 52 0 52 52
Totals 668 5 673 91 764
31 st Marc h 2011 Senior Employee's Remuneration - annualised Salaries between £50,000 and £150,000 Post Title Note Salary Expenses Total Pension Total Remuneration Contributions Remuneration Exc luding Including Pension Pension Contributions Contributions £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Chief Executive - Roger Ellis 149 3 152 23 175 Executive Director A 121 1 122 19 141 Executive Director B 121 1 122 19 141 Executive Director C 98 0 98 15 113 Service Director Finance and D 85 1 86 13 99 Procurement Executive Director E 120 0 120 19 139 Executive Director F 77 1 78 12 90
Executive Director H 76 0 76 12 88
Note A. This Executive Director is responsible for Strategic Housing, Planning and Regulation, and Regeneration. Note B. This Executive Director is responsible for Environmental Management, Legal and Democratic Services, Human Resources, and Business Partnerships. Note C This Executive Director is responsible for Performance and Transformation, Finance, Customer and Communications and the Transformation Programme. Note D The Service Director, Finance and Procurement is responsible for Financial Management, and is the Authority’s designated section 151 Officer.
Note E The newly appointed Executive Director for Children’s Services (re-named in April 2010 to Learners and Young People, Schools Service and Children’s Social Care) commenced on 15th March 2010.
PagePage 137 81
Note F The Executive Director for Adult Services. Note G. This Executive Director for Education (Renamed in April 2010 to Learners and Young People, Schools Service and Child Care) was employed in this capacity for the period 1 st April 2008 to 4 th October 2009.
36. EXTERNAL AUDIT COSTS
The Authority has incurred the following costs in relation to the audit of the Statement of Accounts, certification of grant claims and statutory inspections and to non-audit services provided by the Authority’s external auditors:
31 st March 2010 Fees payable to the Audit Commission with regard to: 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 325 External audit services carried out by the appointed auditor 335 17 Statutory inspection 139 Certification of Grant claims and returns 76 0 Other services provided by the appointed auditor 0 481 Total Cost 411
37. DEDICATED SCHOOLS GRANT
The council’s expenditure on schools is funded primarily by grant monies provided by the Department for Education, the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG). DSG is ring fenced and can only be applied to meet expenditure properly included in the Schools Budget, as defined in the School Finance (England) Regulations 2008. The Schools Budget includes elements for a range of educational services provided on an authority-wide basis and for the Individual Schools Budget, which is divided into a budget share for each maintained school.
Details of the deployment of DSG receivable for 2010/11 are as follows:
Dedicated School Grant 31 st March 2011 Central Individual Total Expenditure Schools budget £000's £000's £000's Final DSG for 2010/11 16,033 127,375 143,408 Plus brought forward from 2009/10 2,011 135 2,146 Less carry forward to 2011/12 agreed in advance
Agreed budgeted distribution in 2010/11 18,194 127,360 145,554
Actual ISB deployed to schools 127,360 127,360 Actual central expenditure 15,778 15,778 Carry forward to 2011/12 2,416 0 2,416
38. GRANT INCOME
PagePage 138 82
The Authority credited the following grants, contributions and donations to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement in 2011/12:
Credited to Taxation and Non Specific Grant Income 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Revenue: Formula Grant 106,089 109,686 Area Based Grant 20,232 31,907 Other Grants 129 2,996 subtotal revenue 126,450 144,589 Capital: Partnership for Schools 20,287 34,616 Housing Market Renewal Fund 12,527 9,752 Department for Transport 4,109 4,789 Regional Housing Pot 3,651 2,875 Surestart 1,803 1,258 Play Pathfinder 1,447 0 New Deal for Communities 5,709 355 Department of Health 589 1,050 Other grants 6,196 3,277
Other contributions 1,216 1,118
Subtotal capital 57,534 59,090
Total 183,984 203,679
Credited to Services within cost of services continuing operations 31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's
Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) 139,270 143,408 Rent Allowances Subsidy 44,145 48,643 Standards Fund 25,901 29,381 Rent Rebates Subsidy 25,836 26,330 Council Tax Benefit Subsidy 19,702 21,092 General Sure Start Grant 9,036 9,135 Private Finance Initiative Credits 4,208 4,562 Housing Subsidy Administration Grant 2,545 2,260 Social Care Reform Grant 922 1,092 Sixth Form (16-19) Grant 3,562 2,968 Adult Education 1,729 178 Supporting People Grant 15,077 0 Other Grants 10,072 10,500 Primary Care Trust contribution to Learning disability pooled budget 7,239 7,777 Other Contributions 1,732 2,349
Total 310,976 309,675
The Authority has received a number of grants that have yet to be recognised as income as they have conditions attached to them that will require the monies to be returned to the giver. The balances at the year-end are as follows:
PagePage 139 83
31st March 2011 £000's Capital Grants Receipts in Advance
Standards Fund Capital Grant 13,905 Homes and Communities Agency Grant 1,000 Other grants 1,629 Other contributions 55
Donated Assets Account 0
Total 16,589
39. RELATED PARTIES
The Authority is required to disclose material transactions with related parties – bodies or individuals that have the potential to control or influence the council or to be controlled or influenced by the council. Disclosure of these transactions allows readers to assess the extent to which the council might have been constrained in its ability to operate independently or might have secured the ability to limit another party’s ability to bargain freely with the Authority.
Central Government Central government has effective control over the general operations of the Authority – it is responsible for providing the statutory framework, within which the Authority operates, provides the majority of its funding in the form of grants and prescribes the terms of many of the transactions that the Authority has with other parties (e.g. council tax bills, housing benefits). Grants received from government departments and grant receipts outstanding at 31 st March 2011 are shown in Note 38.
Members Members of the council have direct control over the council’s financial and operating policies. The total of members’ allowances paid in 2010/11 is shown in Note 34.
During 2010/11, works and services to the value of £23k were commissioned from companies in which three Members had an interest. Contracts were entered into in full compliance with the council’s standing orders.
In addition, RMBC paid grants totalling £793k to voluntary organisations in which sixteen members had positions on the governing body.
All Members’ interests, both pecuniary and non-financial, that could conflict with those of the Council are open to public inspection.
Officers During 2010/11, Executive Directors/Service Directors are required on an annual basis to make a declaration of any related parties. In addition, there is a code of conduct under which such officers must disclose any pecuniary and non-financial interests. No material related party interests were declared for 2010/11
Other Bodies (subject to common control by central government)
Accountable Body
The Council acts as an accountable body administering funding for a number of regeneration initiatives. Expenditure and grant income incurred by the Council concerning these partnerships is included within the Authority’s Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement in accordance with the Best Value Code of Practice.
Entities Controlled or Significantly Influenced by the Authority
1. Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Limited
PagePage 140 84
Responsibility for the management and maintenance of the Council’s HRA property passed to Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Limited (RBH) in an Arms Length Management Organisation (ALMO) whose principal activity during 2010/11 was the management and maintenance of the Council’s HRA property, for which a management fee of £29.97m was paid.
RBH is a company limited by guarantee and does not have any share capital. Rochdale Council is the only member of the Company and its articles of association state that no other person than the Council Member shall be admitted as a member. RBH forms part of Rochdale MBC’s group accounts.
Amounts owed by RBH to the Council totalled £782k at 31 st March 2011; this was offset by amounts totalling £839k which the Council owed at this date.
2. Link 4 Life Trading and Link 4 Life Charitable Trust Link 4 Life are commissioned on behalf of Rochdale MBC to deliver Leisure and Cultural activities. Payment is made by way of a contract fee governed by a Management agreement. The payment of £5.3m was made for services provided in 2011/12.
The Council has no legal obligation to meet the losses of Link 4 Life, although its financial position may be taken into account as part of the annual management fee negotiations. Amounts owed by Link 4 Life to the Council totalled £66.8k at 31 st March 2011; this was offset by amounts totalling £283k which the Council owed at this date.
Trusts are deemed to be influenced significantly by the Authority through its representation on the Trust board.
3. The Impact Partnership (Rochdale Borough) Ltd– This is a company set up and commissioned to deliver Property, Highways Payroll and IT services for Rochdale MBC. The council has a 19.9% interest in the Company but no legal obligation to meet the losses of the Company, although its financial position may be taken into account as part of the annual management fee negotiations. Payment is made by way of a contract fee governed by a Management agreement the payment of £25m was made for services provided in 2011/12. Amounts owed by Impact to the Council totalled £443k at 31 st March 2011; this was offset by amounts totalling £236k which the Council owed at this date.
40. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE AND CAPITAL FINANCING
PagePage 141 85
The total amount of capital expenditure incurred in the year is shown in the table below (including the value of assets acquired under finance leases and PFI/PP contracts), together with the resources that have been used to finance it. Where capital expenditure is to be financed in future years by charges to revenue as assets are used by the Authority, the expenditure results in an increase in the Capital Financing Requirement (CFR), a measure of the capital expenditure incurred historically by the Authority that has yet to be financed. The CFR is analysed in the second part of this note.
31st Marc h 2010 31st March 2011 £000's £000's Opening Capital Financing Requirement 104,678 98,559 Capital investment* Property, Plant and Equipment (and 'Held for Sale') 77,913 67,678 Investment Properties 112 1 Intangible Assets 1,933 3,220 Revenue Expenditure Funded from Capital under Statute 16,969 19,458 96,927 90,357
Sources of finance Capital receipts 5,014 502 Government grants and other contributions 56,435 54,489 Borrowing 24,989 24,544 Major Repairs Reserve 10,253 7,189 Sums set aside from revenue: Direct revenue contributions 236 3,633 [MRP/loans fund principal] Closing Capital Financing Requirement 96,927 90,357
Explanation of movements in year Increase in underlying need to borrowing (supported by government financial assistance) Increase in underlying need to borrowing (unsupported by government financial assistance) (8,135) (8,230) Assets acquired under finance leases 356 0 Assets acquired under PFI/PPP contracts 28 28 Increase/(decrease) in Capital Financing Requirement (7,751) (8,202)
41. LEASES
The Authority as a Lessee
Finance Leases
The assets acquired under Finance Leases are carried as Property, Plant and Equipment in the Balance Sheet at the following net amounts:
31 st Marc h 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Investment and Commercial Property 1,273 984 Vehicles, Plant, Furniture and Equipment 144 55
1,417 1,039
The Authority is committed to making minimum payments under these leases comprising settlement of the long- term liability for he interest in the property, plant and equipment acquired by the Authority and finance costs that will be payable by the Authority in future years while the liability remains outstanding. The minimum lease payments are made up of the following amounts:
PagePage 142 86
31 st Marc h 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Finance lease liabilities (net present value of minimum lease payments): current 41 40 non-current 62 22 Finance costs payable in future years 5 2
Minimum lease payments 108 64
The minimum lease payments will be payable over the following periods:
Not later than 1 Between 1 and 5 Later than 5 year years years Total 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's £000's £000's Lease Payments 41 23 0 64 Finance Charge 1 1 0 2 Net Present Value 40 22 0 62
31 st March 2010 £000's £000's £000's £000's Lease Payments 44 64 0 108 Finance Charge 3 2 0 5
Net Present Value 41 62 0 103 Operating Leases
The future minimum lease payments due under non-cancellable leases in future years are:
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Not later than one year 10 153 Later than one year and not later that five years 447 579 Later than five years 289 262
746 994
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Minimum lease payments 746 994 Contingent rents 88 51
834 1,045
The Authority as Lessor
Finance Leases
The Council does not act as Lessor in any Finance Lease arrangements.
Operating Leases
The Authority leases out property and equipment under operating leases for the following purposes: o For the provision of community services, such as sports facilities, tourism services and community centres. o For economic development purposes to provide suitable affordable accommodation for local businesses.
The future minimum lease payments receivable under non-cancellable leases in future years are:
PagePage 143 87
31st March 2010 31st March 2011 £000's £000's
Not later than one year 491 473 Later than one year and not later than five years 50 48 Later than five years 348 335
889 856
42. PFI AND SIMILAR CONTRACTS
The following note analyses the PFI and similar contracts that the Council has entered into at 31 st March 2011 .The note shows the value of assets, value of liabilities and an analysis of payments due to be made under the contracts.
For each asset that is held in the Council’s accounts, a corresponding liability of equal value is also recognised in the Accounts. The liability is reduced over the life of the contract as part of the payment of the unitary charge.
Payment for Liability Interest Lifecyc le Costs Total Schools PFI scheme Services £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Within 1 Year 795 2,516 472 3,412 7,195 Payable within two to five years 3,765 9,478 1,888 14,629 29,760 Payable within six to ten years 6,363 10,190 2,360 20,685 39,598 Payable within eleven to fifteen years 8,880 7,673 2,360 23,675 42,588 Payable within sixteen to twenty years* 12,393 4,160 2,360 27,060 45,973 Payable within twenty one to twenty five years* 4,304 386 944 8,048 13,682 Total 36,500 34,403 10,384 97,509 178,796
Payment for Liability Interest Lifecyc le Costs Total Heywood Joint Service Centre Services £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Within 1 Year 33 68 39 104 244 Payable within two to five years 146 258 158 495 1,057 Payable within six to ten years 216 290 197 822 1,525 Payable within eleven to fifteen years 259 247 197 1,084 1,787 Payable within sixteen to twenty years* 311 194 197 1,394 2,096 Payable within twenty one to twenty five years* 245 96 133 1,207 1,681 Total 1,210 1,153 921 5,106 8,390 Carrying Value Movement Carrying Value Movement Carrying Value 31 st Marc h 2009 2009/10 31 st March 2010 2010/11 31 st Marc h 2011 Value of Assets Schools PFI scheme 58,636 (1,515) 57,121 (1,538) 55,583 Heywood Joint Service Centre 0 1,867 1,867 (47) 1,820 Total Assets 58,636 352 58,988 (1,585) 57,403
Value of Liabilities Schools PFI scheme 37,938 (695) 37,243 (743) 36,500 Heywood Joint Service Centre 0 1,847 1,847 (32) 1,815 Total Liabilities 37,938 1,152 39,090 (775) 38,315
Schools PFI
The Schools PFI contract is for the provision of the maintenance of certain schools in the borough. In 2006/07, the buildings on 1 school site were transferred into the PFI scheme and in 2007/08, the buildings on a further 3 school sites have been transferred. The schools will be maintained by the PFI provider.
PagePage 144 88
Under this contract, the Council is committed to paying £7.2m in 2011/12 which may increase through additional requirements and price variations, over the course of the year.
Heywood Joint Service Centre PFI
The Heywood Joint Service Centre has been built for the Council and the NHS PCT to deliver services from 2009/10. The building was constructed by and will be maintained by the BRAHM Lift Company. As this is a PFI scheme, the assets in the scheme will be held in the Council’s accounts. The Council is committed to pay £0.24m in 2011/12 which may increase through additional requirements and price variation, over the course of the year.
43. IMPAIRMENT LOSSES
The material impairments made during 2010/11 relate to the Adult Care Service, Business Partnerships (Link 4 Life) and Schools.
The Adult Care assets were last valued in 2005/6 and were therefore due for revaluation in 2010/11 – these are Cherwell Training Centre (impaired by £789k), Springhill Elderly Resource Centre (impaired by £1,901k) and Tudor Court Elderly Resource Centre (impaired by £778k).
The basis of the valuation of the assets for the elderly resource centre assets has changed from depreciated replacement cost to price per bed. Cherwell Training Centre has been impaired by the amount stated as there has generally been a significant fall in land values for assets in fringe residential areas.
The Business Partnership (Link 4 Life) assets are Gaskell Pool (impaired by £2,098k) and Jack Talbot Sports Centre (impaired by £929k). Both assets were demolished due to the construction of a new Leisure Centre on the same site as the previous buildings.
The Schools assets are Langley Primary (impaired by £930k) and Heywood Community High (impaired by £11,722k). Langley Primary forms part of the Langley pooling agreement which will regenerate the Langley area. Heywood Community High was demolished as part of the Building Schools for the Future Programme.
44. CAPITALISATION OF BORROWING COSTS
The Authority has not capitalised any borrowing costs in respect of capital projects.
45. TERMINATION BENEFITS
The Authority terminated the contracts of a number of employees in 2010/11, incurring liabilities of £2.09m (£0.97m in 2009/10). This amount was payable to officers across the council who were made redundant as part of the Council’s requirements to make significant savings.
46. PENSION SCHEMES ACCOUNTED FOR AS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION SCHEMES
Teachers employed by the Council are members of the Teachers Pension Scheme, administered by the Department for Education. This scheme provides teachers with specified benefits on their retirement and the Council contributes towards the costs by making contributions based on a percentage of members’ pensionable salaries.
The scheme is technically a defined benefit scheme. However, the scheme is unfunded and the Department for Education uses a notional fund as a basis for calculating the employers’ contribution rate paid by local authorities. The Council is not able to identify its share of underlying financial position and performance of the scheme with sufficient reliability for accounting purposes. For the purposes of this statement of Accounts, it is therefore accounted for on the same basis as a defined contribution scheme.
In 2010/11, the Council paid £14.024m to teachers’ pensions in respect of teachers’ retirement benefits, representing 20.50% of pensionable pay. The figures for 2009/10 were £13.974m and 20.49%. In addition, the Council is responsible for added years awarded to employees and the related annual increases. In 2010/11 these amounted to £0.029m representing 0.04% of pensionable pay. The figures for 2009/10 were £0.030m and 0.04%.
PagePage 145 89
The Council is responsible for any additional benefits awarded upon early retirement outside of the terms of the teachers’ scheme. These costs are accounted for on a defined benefit basis and detailed in note 47.
47. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION SCHEMES
As part of the terms and conditions of employment of its officers the Council makes contributions towards the cost of post employment benefits. Although these benefits will not actually be payable until employees retire, the Council has a commitment to make the payments and this needs to be disclosed at the time that employees earn their future entitlement.
All employees (except teachers) are, unless they have opted out, members of The Greater Manchester Pension Fund which is administered by Tameside MBC and operates in accordance with the rules of the Local Government Pension Scheme. This is a funded scheme, meaning that the Council and employees pay contributions into a fund, calculated at a level intended to balance the pension liabilities with investment assets.
The cost of retirement benefits are recognised in the Net Cost of Services when they are earned by employees rather than when the benefits are eventually paid as pensions. However the charge that the Council is required to make against Council Tax is based on the cash payable in the year so the real cost of retirement benefits is reversed out of the General fund via the Movement in Reserves Statement. The following transactions have been made in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement and the General fund Balance via the Movement in Reserves Statement during the year:
31 st March 2010 Retirement Benefits 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement Cost of services 11,200 Current Service Cost 21,300 900 Past Service Costs (84,800) 2,200 Settlements and curtailments 3,400 Financing and Investment Income and Expenditure 38,700 Interest cost 48,000 (26,800) Expected return on scheme assets (40,000) 26,200 Total Post Employment Benefit Charged to the Surplus or Deficit on the Provision (52,100) of Services Other Post Employment Benefit Charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement (212,500) Actuarial gains and losses 151,600 (186,300) Total Post Employment Benefit Charged to the Comprehensive Income and 99,500 Expenditure Statement Movement in Reserves Statement (26,200) Reversal of net charges made to the Surplus or Deficit for the Provision of Services for 52,100 post employment benefits in accordance with the code
Ac tual amount charged against the General Fund Balance for pensions in the 18,900 Employers' contributions payable to scheme 22,000 Amounts to be met from Government Grants and Local Taxation (7,300) Movement on Pensions Reserve 74,100
The cumulative amount of actuarial gains and losses recognised in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement to the 31 st March 2010/11 is a loss of £151.6m (£212.5m in 09/10).
B - Assets and Liabilities in Relation to Retirement Benefits
The expected return on scheme assets is based on the long-term future expected investment return for each asset class as at the beginning of the period (i.e. as at 31 st March 2010).
PagePage 146 90
The actual return on scheme assets in the year was £39m (£152.7m in 09/10).
31 st March 2010 Sc heme Liabilities 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (561,300) Balance at 1st of April (936,600) (11,200) Current service cost (21,300) (38,700) Interest cost (48,000) (7,000) Contributions by scheme participants (6,900) (338,400) Actuarial gains/ (losses) 172,800 20,300 Benefits paid 1,200 2,800 Unfunded Benefits Paid 25,100 (900) Past service costs 84,800 (2,200)(Losses)/ gains on curtailments (3,400) st (936,600) Balance as at 31 of March (732,300)
31st March 2010 Sc heme Assets 31st March 2011 £000's £000's 423,800 Balance at 1st of April 579,300 26,800 Expected rate of return 40,000 125,900 Actuarial gains/ (losses) (21,200) 16,100 Employer contributions 19,200 2,800 Contributions in respect of unfunded benefits 2,800 7,000 Contributions by scheme participants 6,900 (20,300) Benefits paid (1,200) (2,800) Unfunded Benefits Paid (25,100) st 579,300 Balance as at 31 of March 600,700
The net liability shows the underlying commitments that the Council has in the long run to pay retirement benefits. The net liability of the Council as at 31 st March 2011 will be made good by increased contributions over the remaining working life of employees as assessed by the scheme actuary.
The total contributions expected to be made to the Greater Manchester Pension Fund by the Council in the year to 31 st March 2012 is £17.5m.
C - Basis for Estimating Assets and Liabilities
Liabilities in respect of the Greater Manchester Pension Fund have been assessed on an actuarial basis using the projected unit method, an estimate of the pensions that will be payable in future years dependent on assumptions about mortality rates, salary levels etc. The Local Government scheme has been assessed by Hymans Robertson, an independent firm of actuaries, estimates for the Local Government Pension Scheme being based on the latest full valuation of the scheme as at 31 st March 2011.
The principal assumptions used in the valuation calculations have been:
PagePage 147 91
31 st March 2010 Assumptions used by the actuary 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Long-term expected rate of return on assets in the scheme: 7.8% Equity investments 7.5% 5.0% Bonds 4.9% 5.8% Property 5.5% 4.8% Cash 4.6% Mortality assumptions: Longevity at 65 for current pensioners: 20.8 Men 20.1 24.1 Women 22.9
Longevity at 65 for future pensioners: 22.8 Men 22.5 26.2 Women 25.0
Inflation 3.8% Rate of inflation 2.8% 5.3% Rate of increase in salaries 4.3% 6.9% Rate of increase in pensions 6.6% 5.5% Rate for discounting scheme liabilities 5.5% Take-up of option to convert annual 50.0% pension into retirement lump sum 50.0%
Assets in the Greater Manchester Pension Fund are valued at fair value, principally market value for investments and consist of the following categories by proportion of the total assets held by the fund.
31 st March 2010 Asset class 31 st March 2011 % % 66.99Equity investments 66.01 16.00 Bonds 17.00 6.01 Property 4.99 11.00Cash 12.00 100.00 Total 100.00
The Council is responsible for the costs of any additional benefits awarded upon early retirement outside of the terms of the Teachers scheme. This liability has been estimated by Hymans Robertson as £22.5m at 31 st March 2011. This amount has been included in the Pension Liability and Pension Reserve shown in the Balance Sheet.
D - Actuarial Gains and Losses
The actuarial losses identified as movements on the pensions reserve in 2010/11, can be analysed into the following categories, as a percentage of assets or liabilities at 31 st March 2011
History of experience gains and losses 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 %%%%% Differences between expected and actual returns on 0.6 (13.8) (28.5) 21.7 (3.5) Experience gains and losses on liabilities 0.1 (0.4) (0.1) 0.0 11.3
48. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Council has identified the following contingent liabilities as at 31 st March 2011:-
Modesole Ltd As a result of the Council receiving a distribution of proceeds from the sale of its entire shareholding in Modesole Ltd, an indemnity was given to the buyer against any future liabilities arising in Modesole which relate to prior to the date of the sale. This indemnity is limited to the value of the sale proceeds received and will last for a period of 10 years from the date of sale (9th August 2006).
PagePage 148 92
Pension Liabilities o Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Ltd The Council has agreed to meet Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Ltd’s (RBH) liabilities to the Greater Manchester Pension Scheme in the unlikely event that RBH could not meet these themselves. This support will be provided until the end of the Council’s contract with RBH on 31 st March 2017 subject to the outcome of a review at the end of 2011/12.
The Council has also agreed to meet the liabilities of the following organisations to the Greater Manchester Pension Scheme in the unlikely event that they could not meet them themselves:
Other Organisations o Capita IT Services (BSF) Limited. o Cloverhall Tenants Association Co-op Ltd. o Council for Voluntary Service Rochdale. o Metro Rochdale Employees Credit Union. o People Print Community Media Workshop. o Rochdale Groundwork Trust. o Rochdale Law Centre. o Rochdale Citizens Advice Bureau. o Rochdale Development Agency. o Sparth Community Centre. o Wardleworth Community Centre. o Greater Manchester Sports Partnership. o Rochdale Boroughwide Cultural Trust. o Alternative Futures Group LTD. o Better Choices LTD (Rochdale). o Balfour Beatty Workplace Ltd. o Macintyre Care.
Grant Claims
The Council submits grant claims for substantial amounts each year. From time to time interpretation of legislation may be a matter of professional and technical judgement. In this context it may lead to possible grant qualifications by the external auditors. It is not possible to produce a reliable forecast for the cost of any grant qualifications.
Municipal Mutual Insurance
In January 1994 the Council’s then insurer, Municipal Mutual Insurance (MMI), made a scheme of agreement with its creditors. Under this scheme claims are initially paid out in full, but if the eventual winding up of the company results in insufficient assets to meet all liabilities a claw back clause will be triggered which could affect claims already paid.
As at 31 st March 2011 £2.283m of claims had already been paid (£2.283m at 31 st March 2010), with outstanding claims of £0.241m (£0.047m at 31 st March 2010).
The Greater Manchester Council’s (GMC) former insurer was also MMI. As at the 31March 2011 £10.7m of claims relating to GMC had already been paid (£10.7m at 31st March 2010), with outstanding claims estimated at £0.025m (£0.1m at 31 st March 2010).
GMC ceased to exist on 31 st March 1986 and any residual liabilities are shared between the ten local authorities of AGMA based on the population estimated by the Registrar General in the 30th June which falls 21 months before the beginning of the financial year in which any sum recoverable falls. Rochdale’s share of this liability is presently 8.19%. Therefore Rochdale’s share of the ex GMC claims paid and outstanding at 31 st March 2011 is £0.878m.
As at June 2010 the MMI Annual Report and accounts stated that the Directors are of the view that if a positive outcome can be achieved in the current litigation case a solvent run off with full payment of claims will be achieved. The litigation case is to be considered by the Supreme Court at the end of 2011 and a decision to be made possibly summer 2012.
PagePage 149 93
At the present time it is not known whether the claw back clause will be invoked, and therefore no provision for the potential liability has been made in the balance sheet.
Manchester Airport Plc
In 2009/10 various loans used to finance capital expenditure that the Airport had agreed to reimburse the Council for were restructured. As a consequence the loans to the airport that were previously secured became unsecured but as a consequence a higher coupon rate is receivable. The loan agreement expires in 2055. No provision has been made in the balance sheet for any potential losses arising from this agreement.
49. CONTINGENT ASSETS
The Authority has nothing to report with regard to contingent assets in the 2010/11 financial year.
50. NATURE AND EXTENT OF RISKS ARISING FROM FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Through its activities Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council is exposed to a variety of financial risks: credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk. The Council is risk aware and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on financial performance. The management of these risks is conducted in accordance with the Council’s Treasury Management Policy in respect of debt and investments.
Credit Risk – Concentration of Investments
Credit risk relates to the possibility that one party to a financial instrument will fail to meet their contractual obligations, causing a loss for the other party.
Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, deposits with banks and financial institutions and credit exposures to trade receivables and other debtors.
In order to minimise credit risk relating to treasury transactions: o The Council uses financial institutions with recognised high credit ratings (Fitch long term AA- or above), Building Societies with high capital funds (+£1,000M) and other Local Authorities for investing; and o the Council’s Treasury Management Strategy for Investment limits the amount of temporarily surplus funds that can be placed with any one institution or organisation at any one time and the duration of those investments.
Credit risk arising from Council Tax and NNDR receivables is minimised as a result of the Council’s statutory collection powers. Credit risk exposure for other financial assets and trade receivables are disclosed in Note 15b Debtors , including the level of provision made against bad debts.
The table below shows the Council’s exposure to credit risk as at the balance sheet date which shows no significant concentrations of risk for treasury transactions.
Fixed Term Deposits at Cash & Cash Equivalents at Institution Long Term Credit Rating 31 March 2011 31 st March 2011 Total £000's £000's £000's SHORT TERM: AAA 0 0 0 AA+ 0 0 0 AA 0 0 0 AA- 31,500 40,100 71,600 A+ 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 A- 4,000 0 4,000 Other: UK Government 0 0 0 Totals 35,500 40,100 75,600
Liquidity Risk
PagePage 150 94
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Council will encounter difficulty raising funds to meet short and long term commitments as they fall due. Prudent liquidity management implies maintaining sufficient cash, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. The Council is able to maintain flexibility in funding by maintaining relationships with banks and brokers and is also able to rely upon lending facilities provided by the Public Works Loans Board (part of HM Treasury). In addition, to manage risks associated with the refinancing of debt as it matures, the Council has a policy of maintaining a spread of maturities for debt repayment. This ensures that the Council is not overexposed to refinancing risk or interest rate movements in one particular year.
Liquidity risk is managed in relation to investing activities by the maintenance of cashflow forecasts.
The maturity profiles of the Council’s debt portfolio can be found at Note 15c Borrowings .
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk relating to the possibility that the value of a financial instrument may vary because of changes in interest rates and market prices.
The risk is mitigated by ensuring a robust Treasury Management Strategy is in place each year, limiting exposure to changes in interest rates by imposing limits on the amount of debt maturing in any one year.
The Council does not currently hold any investments in quoted equity shares or in other equity shares where there is an active market. The Council’s only shareholdings are in unquoted companies with no active equity market. Shares are measured on a historical cost basis less any impairment. The Council is not currently exposed to any market price risk.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Council has no foreign currency risk exposure as at the balance sheet date. The Council is not allowed under statute to enter into financial instruments in currencies other than Sterling.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that, due to adverse movements in market interest rates:
• Debt funding costs will materially exceed or be less than forecast levels of interest costs in approved three year budgets, so as to impact cost control, capital investment decisions, returns and feasibilities; • Interest income will materially over or under perform the interest income projections in the Council’s three year budgets, affecting the Council’s overall financial performance and position; • The fair value of loans and receivables may rise or fall affecting costs or income recognised in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
Fixed rate borrowings and investments are not carried at fair value in the balance sheet; therefore, any nominal gains or losses in fair value do not have an impact on the Council’s budget position. Variable rate borrowings and investments will impact upon the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
The Council is precluded by statue from reducing its exposure to interest rate risk by the use of derivative financial instruments (or hedges).
Interest rate risk is therefore managed, in relation to the Council’s long term funding, in accordance with the maturity limits set out in the Treasury Management Borrowing Strategy, by the use of fixed and variable interest rates borrowing and debt forward purchase agreements. On treasury investments, interest rate risk is managed in accordance with the limits on duration approved in the Treasury Management Investment Strategy, by the use of different investment terms and the use of investment forward purchase contracts.
If interest rates had increased by 0.5 per cent (50 basis points) on 31 st March 2011, the following table displays the financial effect on the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement:
PagePage 151 95
A 0.5 per cent reduction in interest rates would have reduced income to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement by £105k.
£000's Increase in interest payable on variable rate borrowings 0 Increase in interest receivable on variable rate investments 201 Impact on Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement 201 Share of overall impact credited to HRA 105
Market Price Risk
The Council does not currently hold any investments in quoted equity shares or in other equity shares where there is an active market. The Council’s only shareholdings are in unquoted companies with no active equity market. Shares are measured on a historical cost basis less any impairment. The Council is not currently exposed to any market price risk.
COLLECTION FUND
PagePage 152 96
COLLECTION FUND STATEMENT
This account reflects the statutory requirements for the Council to maintain a separate Collection Fund, which shows the transactions in relation to Non-Domestic Rates and the Council Tax.
Council Tax income is raised from charges based on the open market value of dwellings as at 31 st March 1991. Note 1 explains the calculation used to set the Council Tax base for 2010/11.
31 st March 2010 Collection Fund Income and Expenditure Statement Notes 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's INCOME 68,029 Income from Council Tax 2 70,563 58,371 Income from Business Ratepayers 3 52,862 Transfers from General Fund:- 19,610 Council Tax Benefit 20,969 33 Discounts for prompt payments 33 146,043 TOTAL INCOME 144,427
EX PENDITURE Precepts and Demands
76,131 Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council 78,871 8,157 Greater Manchester Police Authority 8,755 3,120 Greater Manchester Fire and Civil Defence Authority 3,192 87,408 TOTAL PRECEPTS 90,818
58,073 Payments to National Non-Domestic Rate Pool 3 52,573 298 Costs of Collection of National Non Domestic Rates 289 629 Increase in provision for bad and doubtful debts 786 0 Contributions towards previous year's estimated surplus 0 146,408 TOTAL EX PENDITURE 144,466 (365) SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) FOR THE YEAR (39)
BALANCES (1,708) Balances at 1st April (1,293) (365) Surplus/(deficit) for the year (39) (2,073) Deficit before distributions (1,332)
780 Transfer to General Fund of previous year's Collection Fund 930
(1,293) Balances at 31 st March 4 (402)
Balances at 31 st March (1,121) Rochdale MBC (349) (126) Greater Manchester Police Authority (39) (46) Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority (14)
(1,293) (402)
NOTES TO THE COLLECTION FUND STATEMENT
PagePage 153 97
Note 1 – Council Tax
Council Tax was introduced from 1 st April 1993. All domestic properties were placed into one of eight valuation bands according to the open market value of that property at the 31 st March 1991. The number of properties in each band is adjusted by a specified fraction to convert the number of dwellings to the equivalent of Band D. Each year the Council must estimate the equivalent number of Band D properties after allowing for discounts and other adjustments. The estimated number of Band D equivalent properties used for the 2010/11 Council Tax Base was 61,360, (62,137 properties reduced to reflect the estimated collection rate in 2010/11). The Band D Council Tax levied for the year was £1,482.36 (£1,426.36 in 2009/10).
An analysis of actual properties as at 31 st March 2011 is shown below. The total of 61,770 represents a reduction of 367 (0.6%) compared to the estimated total of 62,137.
Valuation Range of Values Adjusted Total Number of Factor Band D Equivalent Band Dwellings
A Up to and including 42,364 6/9 28,243 B £40,001 - £52,000 12,719 7/9 9,893 C £52,001 - £68,000 10,176 8/9 9,045 D £68,001 - £88,000 6,753 1 6,753 E £88,001 - £120,000 3,651 11/9 4,463 F £120,001 - £160,000 1,380 13/9 1,993 G £160,001 - £320,000 786 15/9 1,310 H More Than £320,000 35 2 70 77,864 61,770
Note 2 – Income from Council Tax
This represents the Council Tax for the year that is due in the form of cash from Council Taxpayers. It is based on: o Income – The Council Tax charge for each property across the Borough in each property band. The total charge for all bands is the gross income due to the Council. o Reductions to Income – The main area of reductions to income comprises Council Tax benefits. These provide assistance to those needing help with the cost of Council Tax charges. The Council also offers discounts for prompt payment of Council Tax bills.
31 st March 2010 Property Band 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's 40,406 Band A 41,866 13,910 Band B 14,664 12,809 Band C 13,409 9,744 Band D 10,011 6,447 Band E 6,615 2,737 Band F 2,955 1,793 Band G 1,942 104 Band H 103 87,950 TOTAL CHARGES RAISED 91,565 Less: 278 Previous Year's Adjustments 0 19,610 Council Tax Benefits 20,969 33 Discounts for prompt payments 33 68,029 TOTAL INCOME FROM COUNCIL TAX 70,563
PagePage 154 98
Note 3 – Income Collectable from Business Ratepayers
Under the current arrangements for uniform business rates, the Council collects non-domestic rates for its area. These are based on local rateable values multiplied by a uniform rate. The total amount, less certain reliefs and other deductions is paid to a central pool (the NNDR Pool). The pool is managed by Central Government, which in turn pays back to authorities their share of the resources. Each Council’s share is based on a standard amount per head of the local adult population. Under these arrangements the amounts included in these accounts and the income can be analysed as follows:
31 st March 2010 Income Collectable from Business Ratepayers 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's
70,393 Non-domestic rateable value x Uniform Business Rate 68,241 (2010/11 £164.834m x 41.4p) 538 Small Business Rates Supplement 1,052 (12,107) Allowances and other adjustments (15,171) 58,824 Income collectable from Non-Domestic Ratepayers 54,122 233 Discretionary Relief paid by the Council 221 (118) Interest on repayments (188) (568) Adjustment to provision for bad and doubtful debts (1,293) 58,371 Income c ollectable from Non-Domestic Ratepayers net of 52,862 adjustments (298) Costs of Collection (289) 58,073 PAYMENTS TO NATIONAL NON-DOMESTIC RATE POOL 52,573
Discretionary rate relief paid by the Council in 2010/11 has been held in the Collection Fund and will be charged to the General Fund Revenue Account in 2011/12. A significant element of this relief is provided to voluntary aided schools.
Note 4 – Year End Deficit
The deficit on the Collection Fund of £ 402k as at 31 st March 2011 relates to Council Tax. This deficit will be recovered from the precepting authorities in line with Government regulations concerning the application of surplus and deficit balances, as follows:
31 st March 2010 Year End Deficit 31 st March 2011 £'000 £'000 (1,121) Rochdale MBC (349) (126) Greater Manchester Police Authority (39) (46) Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority (14) (1,293) (402)
HRA
PagePage 155 99
THE HOUSING REVENUE ACCOUNT INCOME AND EXPENDITURE STATEMENT
Under section 74 of the Local Government and Housing Act, 1989 the Council is required to maintain a separate account for transactions relating to the provision of council dwellings.
This account shows the income to the Council in respect of rents, housing subsidy (income from the government), interest and charges. It also shows how that money is spent managing and maintaining properties and financing capital expenditure.
In accordance with the Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting the Housing Revenue Account has been split into two parts:
HRA Income and Expenditure Statement – which shows in more detail the income and expenditure on HRA services included in the whole authority Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
Movement on the Housing Revenue Account Statement – which shows how the HRA Income and Expenditure Statement surplus or deficit for the year reconciles to the movement on the Housing Revenue Account Statement for the year.
31 st March 2010 Notes 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's
Expenditure 16,669 Repairs and maintenance 3 16,836 12,783 Supervision and management 3 12,955 3,710 Rents, rates, taxes and other charges 4,233 24,886 Depreciation and impairment of non-current assets 4 6,637 99 Debt management costs 101 249 Movement in the allowance for bad debts 5 221 58,396 Total Expenditure 40,983
Income 38,783 Dwelling rents 1 39,557 776 Non-dwelling rents 805 6,090 Charges for services & facilities 5,722 11,286 HRA subsidy receivable 2 8,062 56,935 Total Income 54,146
(1,461) Net Cost of HRA Services as included in the Comprehensive Income and 13,163 Expenditure Statement
(1,461) Net Cost of HRA Services 13,163
HRA share of the operating income and expenditure included in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement:
(420) (Gain) or loss on sale of HRA non-current assets (1,233) 10,767 Interest payable and similar charges 11,445 (166) Interest & investment income (137)
(11,642) Surplus or (Deficit) for the year on HRA Services 3,088
MOVEMENT ON THE HRA STATEMENT
PagePage 156 100
31 st March 2010 Notes 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's
9,606 Balance on the HRA at the end of the previous year 11,897
(11,642) Surplus or (deficit) on the HRA Income and Expenditure Statement 3,088 8 (4,732) 13,952 Adjustments between accounting basis and funding basis under statute 2,310 Net increase or (decrease) before transfers to or from reserves (1,644)
(19) Transfers (to) or from reserves (76)
2,291 Increase or (decrease) in year on the HRA (1,720)
11,897 Balance on the HRA as at the end of the current year 10,177
NOTES TO THE HRA INCOME AND EXPENDITURE STATEMENT
Note 1 – Housing Stock and Average Rents
The Council was responsible for the management of an average of 13,761 dwellings during 2010/11 compared with 13,871 in 2009/10. The stock at 31 st March 2011 of 13,728 dwellings is analysed below by type of property and year of build.
Year of Build Type of Property Pre-1919 1919-1944 1945-1964 Post 1964 Totals
Houses and bungalows with 1 bedroom 6 203 574 621 1,404 Flats with 1 bedroom 0 64 1,222 2,878 4,164 Houses and bungalows with 2 bedrooms 80 1,042 1,379 374 2,875 Flats with 2 bedrooms 0 0 511 530 1,041 Houses and bungalows with 3 bedrooms 11 1,587 1,051 821 3,470 Flats with 3 bedrooms 0 0 14 548 562 Houses with 4 or more bedrooms 0 114 45 33 192 Flats with 4 or more bedrooms 0 0 0 20 20 Totals 97 3,010 4,796 5,825 13,728
Average rents were £60.57 per dwelling per week during 2010/11 an increase of £1.56 (2.6%) on the 2009/10 average rent of £59.01.
The total value of HRA assets at 1 st April 2010 and 31st March 2011 is shown in Notes 12 and 13 to the accounts. The value at 31 st March 2011 of £404.645m comprises:
HRA Asset Categories £000's Operational Assets (Council Dwellings) 387,716 Operational Assets (Other) 10,655 Non Operational Assets 2,765 Investment Assets 3,509 Total HRA Assets 404,645
The vacant possession value of Council dwellings at 1 st April 2011 is £807.565m compared to a balance sheet value of £387.716m. The difference of £419.849m represents the cost of providing social housing at subsidised rents.
PagePage 157 101
Note 2 – HRA Subsidy
This note sets out how the Government calculates the HRA subsidy that the Council receives towards the costs of its housing stock.
HRA subsidy is a reimbursement to make up the shortfall between what the Government estimates the Council needs to spend on its properties and the income that it is estimated that the Council will receive.
The amount of subsidy is calculated by applying ‘notional’ costs and income to the number and type of dwelling properties owned by the Council. It also takes account of the financing costs the Authority incurs in borrowing for capital expenditure.
All the ‘notional’ costs and income that the Authority is expected to incur are added together in a ‘notional’ HRA account. Any deficit on this account is reimbursed to the Council by way of HRA subsidy.
Subsidy of £1.496m in respect of major repairs allowance funding for 2010/11 was brought forward to 2009/10 in agreement with the Government. This funding was used to fund the delivery of decent homes capital expenditure in 2009/10.
31 st March 2010 HRA Subsidy 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's NOTIONAL EX PENDITURE 24,554 Management & Maintenance 25,199 15,534Charges for Capital 15,368 8,757 Major Repairs Allowance 8,685 48,845 49,252 NOTIONAL INCOME 39,046Notional Rents 39,853 26 Interest on Receipts 16 39,072 39,869 9,773 NET NOTIONAL EXPENDITURE 9,383 17 Prior year adjustments 175 1,496 MRA funding b/f from 2010/11 (1,496) 11,286 TOTAL HRA SUBSIDY 8,062
Note 3 – Housing Management Agreement
Rochdale MBC entered into a management agreement with Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Limited (RBH) on the 28th March 2002. Under the terms of this agreement RBH has assumed responsibility for the management and maintenance of all HRA property on behalf of Rochdale MBC from 1 st April 2002. The ownership of the HRA stock remains with Rochdale MBC following the commencement of this management agreement. Further details of the transactions between the Council and RBH are provided at Note 39 Related Party Transactions to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement and in the Group Accounts section.
The management fee in 2010/11 is £29.097m (which is split into £28.191m revenue and £0.906m capital). This compares to a management fee in 2009/10 of £29.140m (£28.184m revenue and £0.956m capital).
In order to comply with the standard presentation of the HRA Income and Expenditure Statement as per the Code the management fee has been split between Repairs and Maintenance (£16.836m in 2010/11) and Supervision and Management (£11.355m in 2010/11). Supervision and Management expenditure also includes other costs charged directly to the HRA in addition to the management fee (£1.600m).
Note 4 – Depreciation and Impairment on Fixed Assets
The Council has calculated depreciation on dwelling properties on a straight line basis using the useful life of each property based on its beacon valuation.
The Code states that the Major Repairs Allowance (MRA) is likely to constitute a reasonable estimate of depreciation for HRA dwellings. The straight line method of depreciation based on the useful life of each property
PagePage 158 102 has been used as it provides a more accurate measure of depreciation on Council dwellings than using the MRA as an estimate of depreciation.
31 st March 2010 Depreciation and Impairment 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Depreciation - Operational Assets: 3,811 Dwellings 4,132 131 Non Dwellings 67 3,942 4,199
20,944 Impairment 2,438
24,886 Total Depreciation and Impairment 6,637
The charge for depreciation is transferred in full to the Major Repairs Reserve. Any difference between the total depreciation charge and the Council's Major Repairs Allowance is adjusted via the Movement on HRA Statement. The balance on the reserve is used to finance capital expenditure. Movements on the major repairs reserve for 2010/11 are shown in note 6.
The impairment charge of £2.439m is transferred to the Capital Adjustment Account. The impairment charge represents impairment in relation to the writing down of capital expenditure (£1.787m) and the writing down of stock demolished (£0.652m).
Note 5 – Provision for Bad Debts / Rent Arrears
The Council makes provision for the amount of rents and service charges (including water charges) which it is estimated are unlikely to be recovered. The total amount set aside at 31 st March 2011 as a provision for debt which the Council may be unable to collect was £2.364m (£2.124m at 31 st March 2010). The total amount of arrears outstanding at 31 st March 2011 was £3.848m (£3.427m at 31 st March 2010). This comprises arrears of £1.287m in respect of rent demands for current tenants and £2.561m in respect of former tenant arrears. A contribution of £0.221m was made from revenue in 2010/11 in order to maintain an adequate level of cover against arrears at 31 st March 2011.
Note 6 – The Major Repairs Reserve
The Major Repairs Reserve is an earmarked fund to which the Council appropriates an annual Major Repairs Allowance for capital spending on Council Dwellings. The allowance is part of the Council's annual Housing Subsidy income. This note shows the amount appropriated to the reserve in 2010/11 and the amount transferred from the reserve to finance capital expenditure.
31 st March 2010 Major Repairs Reserve 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 0 Balance 1 st April 0
Transfers to Reserve 3,811 Depreciation on dwellings 4,132 6,442 Adjustment for MRA in excess of depreciation on dwellings 3,057 131 Depreciation on non-dwellings 67 10,384 7,256
Transfers from Reserve (131) Depreciation on non-dwellings (67)
(10,253) Financing of capital expenditure (MRR) (7,189) st 0 Balance at 31 March 0
In accordance with the Code the difference between the MRA and the depreciation on dwellings is transferred to the Major Repairs Reserve in order to avoid this impacting on the HRA bottom line.
PagePage 159 103
Note 7 – HRA Capital Expenditure
The Council incurred £10.667m of HRA capital expenditure during 2010/11. This note sets out how that expenditure has been financed and analyses capital receipts between those from dwelling property sales and those from the sale of land.
31 st March 2010 Capital Expenditure 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's HRA 13,233 - Houses 7,170 1,795 - Land 2,406 1,215 - Other 1,091
16,243 Total Financing Requirement 10,667
FINANCED BY: 906 Borrowing 0 3,972 Capital Receipts 0 1,112 Capital Grants/Contributions 490 10,253 Major Repairs Reserve 7,189 0 Revenue Contribution 2,988 16,243 Total Capital Financing 10,667
The table below identifies HRA capital receipts received by the Council from the sale of HRA dwellings and land and shows how those receipts were used. Pooled receipts are the portion of capital receipts that must be paid to the Secretary of State under current legislation. Receipts applied are the capital receipts used to finance capital expenditure.
31 st March 2010 HRA Capital Receipts 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's
1,617 Dwellings 2,353 7 Land 0
1,624 Total Receipts 2,353
HRA Capital Receipts were used as follows: 3,399 Opening Balance 0 1,624 Add receipts in year (above) 2,353 (1,051) Less pooled receipts (see note) (1,612) (3,972) Less receipts applied (HRA) 0 0 Less receipts transferred to other reserve (741) (non-HRA) 0 Closing Balance 0
Note 8 – Movement on the HRA Statement
PagePage 160 104
This note sets out the detailed movements within the Movement on the HRA Statement.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's
Adjustments between accounting basis and funding basis under statute
261 Difference between interest payable and similar charges including (41) amortisation of premiums and discounts and the charge for the year determined in accordance with the Code and those determined in accordance with statute
420 Gain or loss on sale of HRA non-current assets 1,233
0 Capital expenditure funded by the HRA 2,988
6,311 Transfer to/from Major Repairs Reserve 2,990
(20,944) Transfer to/from Capital Adjustment Account (2,438)
(13,952) Adjustments between ac counting basis and funding basis under statute 4,732
GROUP ACCOUNTS
PagePage 161 105
GROUP COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE STATEMENT
This statement shows the accounting cost of services provided by Rochdale MBC and Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Ltd. Any transactions between Rochdale and RBH have been removed. The statement details income and expenditure relating to the Group as a whole and the source of funding for the entire Group’s expenditure.
31 st Marc h 31 st March 31 st Marc h Comprehensive Income and Expenditure 31 st March 31 st Marc h 31 st Marc h 2010 2010 2010 Statement 2011 2011 2011 IFRS IFRS IFRS IFRS IFRS IFRS Gross Gross Net Gross Gross Net Expenditure Income Expenditure Income £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's 30,141 (23,909) 6,232 Central services to the public 31,817 (24,865) 6,952 6,694 (149) 6,545Corporate and democratic core 6,155 (21) 6,134 13,868 (820) 13,048 Non distributed costs (75,041) (860) (75,901) 62,593 (12,182) 50,411 Cultural, environmental, regulatory and planning 75,107 (24,894) 50,213 services 256,578 (194,476) 62,102 Children's and education Services 273,495 (207,867) 65,628 27,353 (2,586) 24,767Highways and transport services 28,402 (2,425) 25,977 114,204 (85,094) 29,110 Housing services - Housing general fund 104,272 (82,814) 21,458 62,737 (61,090) 1,647 Housing revenue account 39,006 (58,034) (19,028)
78,135 (19,619) 58,516 Adult social care 86,498 (22,643) 63,855 652,303 (399,925) 252,378 COST OF SERVICES - CONTINUING OPERATIONS 569,711 (424,423) 145,288
1,122 (892) 230 Other Operating Expenditure 1,825 (1,484) 341
63,536 (33,918) 29,618 Financing and Investment Income and Expenditure 74,625 (45,338) 29,287
(260,530) (260,530) Taxation and Non-Specific Grant Income (note 2) (283,510) (283,510)
716,961 (695,265) 21,696 (SURPLUS) OR DEFICIT ON PROVISION OF SERVICES 646,161 (754,755) (108,594)
3 3 Tax expenses of subsidiaries 33 33
716,964 (695,265) 21,699 GROUP (SURPLUS) OR DEFICIT 646,194 (754,755) (108,561)
(19,131) (Surplus) or deficit on revaluation of non current (1,544) assets 0 (Surplus) or deficit on revaluation of available for 233,638 Actuarialsale financial (gains) assets / losses on pension asset/liabilities (169,783)
214,507 OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND (171,327) EXPENDITURE
236,206 TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND (279,888) EXPENDITURE
PagePage 162 106
GROUP MOVEMENT IN RESERVES STATEMENT
This statement shows the movement in the year on the different reserves held by Rochdale MBC and Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Ltd. analysed into ‘usable reserves’ (i.e. those that can be applied to fund expenditure) and other reserves. The Surplus or (Deficit) on the Provision of Services line shows the true economic cost of providing the groups services, more details of which are shown in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
Reserves Reserves Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Subsidiaries of Reserves of of Reserves of Total Reserves Total Unusable Capital Capital Unusable Unusable Pensions Pensions Unusable Authorities share of of share Authorities Authorities share of of share Authorities Authorities share of of share Authorities Authorities share of of share Authorities Useable Reserves of of Reserves Useable Absence Reserves of of Reserves Absence Total Authority Usable Usable Authority Total Total Authorities share share Authorities Total Adjustment Account of of Account Adjustment Unusable Accumulating Accumulating Unusable Reserves of Subsidiaries of Reserves Total Authority Unusable Unusable Authority Total Reserves Authority Total £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's
Balance as at 31 st March 2009 76,799 519,558 596,357 1,561 (41) 0 (4,198) (2,678) 593,679
Surplus or (deficit) on provision of services (acco unting basis) 7,494 0 7,494 (29,193) (29,193) (21,699) Page 163 Other Comprehensive Expenditure and Income 0 (193,369) (193,369) (21,138) (21,138) (214,507) Total Comprehensive Expenditure and Income 7,494 (193 ,369) (185,875) (29,193) 0 0 (21,138) (50,331) (236,206)
Adjustments between Group Accounts and authority ac counts (30,884) 0 (30,884) 30,884 30,884 0
Net Increase/ Decrease before Transfers (23,390) (193 ,369) (216,759) 1,691 0 0 (21,138) (19,447) (236,206)
Adjustments between accounting basis & funding basi s under regulations 34,910 (34,910) 0 (761) 831 (70) 0 0
Net Increase/ Decrease before Transfer to / from Ea rmarked Reserves 11,520 (228,279) (216,759) 930 0 831 (21,208) (19,447) (236 ,206)
Transfer to / from Earmarked Reserves 0 0 0
Increase / Decrease in Year 11,520 (228,279) (216,759) 930 0 831 (21,208) (19,447) (236 ,206)
st Balance at 31 March 2010 88,319 291,279 379,598 2,491 (41) 831 (25,406) (22,125) 357 ,473
Page 107
Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Subsidiaries of Reserves of of Reserves of Total Reserves Total Unusable Capital Capital Unusable Unusable Pensions Pensions Unusable Authorities share of of share Authorities Authorities share of of share Authorities Authorities share of of share Authorities Authorities share of of share Authorities Useable Reserves of of Reserves Useable Absence Reserves of of Reserves Absence Total Usable Reserves Usable Total Total Authorities share share Authorities Total Unusable Accumulating Accumulating Unusable Adjustment Account of of Account Adjustment Reserves of Subsidiaries of Reserves Total Unusable Reserves Unusable Total Total Authority Reserves Authority Total £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's
Balance as at 31 st March 2010 88,319 291,279 379,598 2,491 (41) 831 (25,406) (22,125) 357 ,473
Surplus or (deficit) on provision of services (acco unting basis) 130,855 0 130,855 (22,294) (22,294) 108,561 Other Comprehensive Expenditure and Income 0 153,144 153,144 18,183 18,183 171,327 Total Comprehensive Expenditure and Income 130,855 15 3,144 283,999 (22,294) 0 0 18,183 (4,111) 279,888
Page 164 Adjustments between Group Accounts and authority ac counts (30,428) 0 (30,428) 30,428 30,428 0
Net Increase/ Decrease before Transfers 100,427 153,144 253,571 8,134 0 0 18,183 26,317 279,888
Adjustments between accounting basis & funding basi s under regulations (84,402) 84,402 0 (7,615) (47) 1,079 6,583 0 0
Net Increase/ Decrease before Transfer to / from Ea rmarked Reserves 16,025 237,546 253,571 519 (47) 1,079 24,766 26,317 279,888
Transfer to / from Earmarked Reserves 0 0 0
Increase / Decrease in Year 16,025 237,546 253,571 519 (47) 1,079 24,766 26,317 279,888
st Balance at 31 March 2011 104,344 528,825 633,169 3,010 (88) 1,910 (640) 4,192 637,36 1
Page 108
This statement shows the adjustments between group accounts and authority accounts in the group movement in reserves statement.
Reserves Reserves Subsidiaries Total Reserves Total Total Authority Authority Total Total Authority Authority Total Unusable Reserves Unusable Authorities share of of share Authorities Useable Reserves of of Reserves Useable Total Authority Usable Usable Authority Total £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's
To 31 st March 20010
Purchase of goods and services from subsidiaries (30,884) 0 (30,884) 30,884 0
Total Adjustments between Group Accounts and Authority accounts (30,884) 0 (30,884) 30,884 0
To 31st March 2011
Purchase of goods and services from subsidiaries (30,428) 0 (30,428) 30,428 0
Total Adjustments between Group Accounts and Authority accounts (30,428) 0 (30,428) 30,428 0
PagePage 165 109
GROUP BALANCE SHEET
The Group Balance Sheet shows the value as at the Balance Sheet date of the assets and liabilities recognised by Rochdale MBC and Rochdale Boroughwide Housing Ltd. Any transactions between Rochdale and RBH have been removed. This includes the value of property and assets used to deliver services, how much money is owed by and to the group and the amount of balances and reserves.
31 st March 2009 31 st March 2010 Balance Sheet Notes 31 st March 2011 £'000 £'000 £'000
1,071,214 1,079,788 Property, Plant and Equipment 3 1,095,923 25,085 24,164 Investment Property 23,578 4,215 5,237 Intangible Assets 7,050 10,315 10,315 Long-Term Investments 10,315 11,141 13,069 Long-Term Debtors 13,710 1,121,970 1,132,573 TOTAL LONG TERM ASSETS 1,150,576 CURRENT ASSETS 35,177 68,687 Short Term Investments 37,600 944 818 Inventories 1,034 40,770 43,766 Short Term Debtors - External 4 45,683 22,497 33,732 Cash and Cash Equivalents 57,952 3,686 1,226 Assets Held for Sale (<1 Year) 3,924 103,074 148,229 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 146,193 CURRENT LIABILITIES (10,370) (12,307) Short Term Borrowing (26,786) (49,662) (52,732) Short Term Creditors - External 5 (45,807) (5,682) (8,053) Provisions (<1 Year) (4,595) (2,275) (4,891) Capital Grants Receipts in Advance (11,995) (67,989) (77,983) TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES (89,183) 0 (195) Long Term Creditors (102) (18,429) (12,161) Long Term Provisions (14,738) (352,965) (395,947) Long Term Borrowing (369,318) (47,681) (49,658) Other Long Term liabilities (48,052) (141,698) (382,706) Pension Liability (132,240) (2,603) (4,679) Capital Grants Receipts in Advance (5,775) (563,376) (845,346) TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES (570,225) 593,679 357,473 NET ASSETS 637,361
78,361 90,810 Useable Reserves 107,276 515,318 266,663 Unusable Reserves 6 530,085
593,679 357,473 TOTAL NET WORTH 637,361
PagePage 166 110
GROUP CASH FLOW STATEMENT
The Group Cash Flow Statement shows the changes in cash and cash equivalents of the group during the reporting period. The statement shows how the group generates and uses cash and cash equivalents by classifying cash flows as operating, investing and financing activities. The amount of net cash flows arising from operating activities is a key indicator of the extent to which the operations of the group are funded by way of taxation and grant income or from the recipients of services provided by the Authority. Investing activities represent the extent to which cash outflows have been made for resources which are intended to contribute to the Authority’s future service delivery. Cash flows arising from financing activities are useful in predicting claims on future cash flows by providers of capital (i.e. borrowing) to the Authority.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 21,699 Net (surplus) or deficit on the provision of services (108,561)
(46,185) Adjustments to net surplus or deficit on the provision of services for non cash movements. (62,415)
Adjustments for items included in the net surplus or deficit on the provision of services that (17,724) 62,480 are investing and financing activities.
(42,210) Net Cash flows from operating activities (Note 5). (108,496)
19,807 Investing Activities (Note 6) 72,133
11,167 Financing Activities (Note 7) 12,143
(11,236) Net (Increase) or decrease in cash and cash equivalents (24,220)
22,496 Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the reporting period 33,732
33,732 Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the reporting period 57,952
PagePage 167 111
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS
1. ADJUSTMENTS BETWEEN ACCOUNTING BASIS AND FUNDING BASIS UNDER REGULATIONS
This note details the adjustments that are made to the total comprehensive income and expenditure recognised by RBH in the year in accordance with proper accounting practice to the resources that are specified by statutory provisions as being available to RBH to meet future capital and revenue expenditure. Those of the Authority are detailed in note 7 of the single entity accounts.
31 st Marc h 2011 Usable Usable Reserves Reserves Movement Movement in Unusable Unusable in £000's £000's Adjustments primarily involving the Capital Adjustment Account: Reversal of items debited or c redited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement: Charges for Depreciation and impairment of non-current 39 (39) assets Capital grants and contributions applied (1,118) 1,118 Adjustments primarily involving the Pensions Reserve: Reversal of items relating to retirement benefits debited or credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure (4,599) 4,599 Statement (see Note 47) Employer's pensions contributions and direct payments to (1,984) 1,984 pensioners payable in the year Adjustment primarily involving the Ac cumulated Absences Account: Amount by which officer remuneration charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement on an 47 (47) accruals basis is different from remuneration chargeable in the year in accordance with statutory requirements Total Adjustments (7,615) 7,615
PagePage 168 112
31st March 2010 Usable Usable Reserves Reserves Movement Movement in Unusable Unusable in £000's £000's Adjustments primarily involving the Capital Adjustment Account: Reversal of items debited or credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement: Charges for Depreciation and impairment of non-current assets Capital grants and contributions applied (831) 831 Adjustments primarily involving the Pensions Reserve: Reversal of items relating to retirement benefits debited or credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure 1,881 (1,881) Statement (see Note 47) Employer's pensions contributions and direct payments to (1,811) 1,811 pensioners payable in the year Adjustment primarily involving the Accumulated Absences Account: Amount by which officer remuneration charged to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement on an 0 accruals basis is different from remuneration chargeable in the year in accordance with statutory requirements Total Adjustments (761) 761
2. TAXATION AND NON-SPECIFIC GRANT INCOME
31 st March 2010 Debtors 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's 75,715 Council tax income 78,713 86,194 Non domestic rates 95,778 40,256 Non-ringfenced government grants 48,811 58,365 Capital grants and contributions 60,208 260,530 Total 283,510
PagePage 169 113
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The fixed assets of the group are mainly those of the Council detailed in Note 12 to the single entity accounts.
Comparative Movements in 2009/10 RMBC RBH Group
£000's £000's £000's Movements in Cost/valuation: Amount at 1 st April 2009 1,102,487 0 1,102,487 Additions 77,913 1,331 79,244 Not previously recognised 0 0 Revaluation increases/ (decreases) recognised in the 18,812 18,812 Revaluation Reserve Revaluation increases/ (decreases) recognised in the Surplus (72,131) (72,131) Deficit on the Provision of Services De-recognition - disposals (2,915) (2,915) De-recognition - other 0 0 Reclassifications 1,138 1,138 Other movements in cost or valuations 0 0 Amount at 31 st March 2010 1,125,304 1,331 1,126,635
Movements in Depreciation and Impairment Amount at 1 st April 2009 31,273 31,273 Charge for 2009-10 19,997 19,997 Disposals 0 0 Depreciation written out to the revaluation reserve (320) (320) Depreciation written out to Surplus /Deficit on the Provision (3,879) (3,879) of Services Impairment losses (reversals) recognised in the revaluation 0 0 reserve Impairment losses (reversals) recognised in Surplus Deficit on 0 0 the Provision of services De-recognition - disposals 0 0 De-recognition - other 0 0 Reclassifications (224) (224) Other movements in depreciation and Impairment 0 0 Amount at 31 st March 2010 46,847 0 46,847
Net Book Value at 31 st March 2010 1,078,457 1,331 1,079,788 st at 31 March 2009 1,071,214 0 1,071,214
Nature of asset holding at 31st Marc h 2010 Owned 1,019,325 1,331 1,020,656 Finance Lease 144 0 144 PFI and similar arrangements 58,988 0 58,988 Total 1,078,457 1,331 1,079,788
PagePage 170 114
31 st March 2011 RMBC RBH Group
£000's £000's £000's Movements in Cost/valuation: Amount at 1 st April 2010 1,125,304 1,331 1,126,635 Additions 67,663 2,929 70,592 Donations 0 0 0 Revaluation increases/ (decreases) recognised in the (6,026) 0 (6,026) Revaluation Reserve Impairments & Revaluation increases/ (decreases) (31,074) 0 (31,074) recognised in the Surplus Deficit on the Provision of Services De-recognition - disposals (2,122) 0 (2,122) De-recognition - other 0 0 0 Reclassifications (3,188) 0 (3,188) Other movements in cost or valuations 0 0 0 Amount at 31 st March 2011 1,150,557 4,260 1,154,817
Movements in Depreciation and Impairment Amount at 1 st April 2010 46,847 0 46,847 Charge for 2010-11 20,953 39 20,992 Depreciation written out to the revaluation reserve (7,570) 0 (7,570) Depreciation written out to Surplus /Deficit on the Provision (1,374) 0 (1,374) of Services Impairment losses (reversals) recognised in the revaluation 0 0 0 reserve Impairment losses (reversals) recognised in Surplus Deficit on 0 0 0 the Provision of services De-recognition - disposals (1) 0 (1) De-recognition - other 0 0 0 Other movements in depreciation and Impairment 0 0 0 Amount at 31 March 2011 58,855 39 58,894
Net Book Value at 31 st March 2011 1,091,702 4,221 1,095,923 st at 31 March 2010 1,078,457 1,331 1,079,788
Nature of asset holding at 31 st March 2011 Owned 1,034,230 4,221 1,038,451 Finance Lease 55 0 55 PFI and similar arrangements 57,417 0 57,417 Total 1,091,702 4,221 1,095,923
4. DEBTORS
Debtor balances represent amounts which are due at the financial year end but for which the cash has not been received. All debtor amounts are expected to be paid within the following year.
31 st March 2010 Debtors 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 16,365 Central government bodies 14,586 309 Other local authorities 8,022 0 NHS bodies 298 0 Public corporations and trading funds 12 27,092 Other entities and individuals 22,765 43,766 Total 45,683
PagePage 171 115
5. CREDITORS
Since the Balance Sheet represents the financial position at the end of the financial year, there are outstanding monies owed at that date which have yet to be paid. The following analysis shows the amounts owed which had not yet been paid as at 31 st March 2011.
31 st March 2010 Creditors 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's 10,353 Central Government Bodies 5,563 1,337 Other Local Authorities 1294 275 NHS Bodies 199 135 Public Corporations and Trading Funds 89 40,632 Other Entities and Individuals 38,662 52,732 TOTAL CREDITORS 45,807
6. UNUSABLE RESERVES
The table below summarises the movement of RBH Ltd’s reserves during 2010/11. Those of the Authority are detailed in note 28 of the single entity accounts.
31 st March 2010 Reserve 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's 831 Capital Adjustment Account 1,910 (25,406) Pension Reserve (640) (41) Accumulated Absences Account (88) (24,616) TOTAL 1,182
NOTE A – Capital Adjustment Account The table below summaries the movement of RBH Ltd’s Capital Adjustment Account during 2010/11. Those for the council are detailed in note 28b of the single entity accounts.
31 st March 2010 Capital Adjustment Account 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 0 Balance at 1 st April 831 Reversal of items credited to capital expenditure and debited or credited to the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement 0 Charges for depreciation and impairment of non current assets (39)
0 Net written out amount of the cost of non-current assets (39) consumed in the year
Capital financing applied in the year: 831 Grants and capital contributions credited to the 1,118 Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement that have been applied to capital financing 831 Total capital financing applied in the year 1,118
st 831 Balance at 31 March 1,910
PagePage 172 116
NOTE B – Pension Reserve Pension reserve to the single entity accounts contains details of the assumptions underlying the calculation of the pension liability at 31 st March 2011. The net movement in the balance on RBH Ltd’s pension reserve during 2010/11 is comprised of the following items
31 st March 2010 RBH Pension Reserve 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (4,198) Balance Brought Forward (25,406) (1,329) Current service cost (2,600) 1,811 Employer contributions 1,984 0 Past service costs 7,592 (54) Settlements and curtailments (28) (498) Net return on assets (365) (21,138) Actuarial Gain / - Loss (see below) 18,183 (25,406) Balance Carried Forward (640)
NOTE C - Accumulating Absences Account The table below summaries the movement of RBH Ltd’s accumulating absences account during 2010/11. Those for the council are detailed in note 28f of the single entity accounts.
31 st March 2010 Accumulated Absences Account 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (41) Balance Brought Forward (41) Settlement or cancellation of accrual made at the end of the 41 41 preceding year (41) Amounts accrued at the end of the current year (88) Amount by which officer remuneration charged to the comprehensive income and expenditure statement on an 0 (47) accruals basis is different from remuneration chargeable in the year in accordance with statutory requirement.
(41) Balanc e Carried Forward (88)
7. CASH FLOW STATEMENT - OPERATING ACTIVITIES
The cash flows for operating activities include the following items:
31 st March 2010 The cash flows for operating activities include the following items: 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (2,503) Interest received (2,277) 21,201 Interest paid 24,020 (1,000) Dividends received (1,410)
PagePage 173 117
8. CASH FLOW STATEMENT - INVESTING ACTIVITIES
The cash flows for investing activities include the following items:
31st March 2010 Investing Activities 31st March 2011 £000's £000's
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, investment property 72,276 76,112 and intangible assets
(424) Purchase of short-term and long-term investments 61,500
20,918 Other payments for investing activities 2,359
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment, (65,779) (7,682) investment property and intangible assets
657 Proceeds from short-term and long-term investments (1,225)
(7,841) Other receipts and investing activities (58,931)
19,807 72,133
9. CASH FLOW STATEMENT - FINANCING ACTIVITIES
The cash flows for financing activities include the following items:
31 st March 2010 Financing Activities 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's
(106,695) Cash receipts of short and long-term borrowing (1,655)
(1,133) Other receipts from financing activities (1,183)
7,541 Cash payments for the reduction of the outstanding 994 liabilities relating to finance leases and on balance sheet PFI contracts
62,354 Repayments of short and long-term borrowing 12,828
49,100 Other payments for financing activities 1,159
11,167 12,143
PagePage 174 118
10. AMOUNTS REPORTED FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION DECISIONS
The analysis of income and expenditure by service on the face of the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement is that specified by the Best Value Accounting Code of Practice . However, decisions about resource allocation are taken by Cabinet on the basis of budget reports analysed across services. These reports are prepared on a different basis from the accounting policies used in the financial statements.
The income and expenditure of the Council’s principal services recorded in the budget reports for the year is as follows:-
Resource Allocation Service Income & Expenditure st 31 March 2010 s Total Adults Schools Account Housing Housing Housing Services Revenue Revenue Strategic Strategic Business Business Children's Children's Adult Care Adult Vulnerable Vulnerable Social Care Care Social Learners & & Learners Management Partnerships Regeneration Young People People Young Environmental Environmental Customers and and Customers Communication £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's £000's £000's £000's Fees, charges & other service income (3,839) (2,100) ( 56,863) (3,873) (471) (3,895) (897) (10,710) (15,518) (978 ) (1,524) (100,669) Government Grants & Contributions (164,371) (93,166) ( 30) (2,720) (23,801) (2,317) (19,012) (128) (155) (3,362) ( 773) (309,834) Page 175
Total Income (168,210) (95,266) (56,893) (6,593) (24,272 ) (6,212) (19,909) (10,838) (15,673) (4,340) (2,297) (410, 503)
Employee Expenses 132,522 4,926 329 15,318 16,004 4,347 1, 010 11,204 7,111 4,053 9,776 206,600 Other Operating Expenses 51,660 95,214 58,067 31,323 19, 931 27,655 33,306 19,815 22,611 22,210 14,009 395,801 Support Service Recharges 2,986 3,822 0 2,574 2,093 1,314 418 1,922 2,259 1,463 2,206 21,057 Total Operating Expenses 187,168 103,962 58,396 49,215 3 8,028 33,316 34,734 32,941 31,981 27,726 25,991 623,458
Net Cost of Services 18,958 8,696 1,503 42,622 13,756 27, 104 14,825 22,103 16,308 23,386 23,694 212,955
Page 119
Resource Allocation Service Income & Expenditure 31 st March 2011 Total People People Schools Account Services Business Business Adult Care Adult Management Partnerships Regeneration Environmental Environmental Customers and and Customers Communications Housing Revenue Revenue Housing Strategic Housing Housing Strategic Vulnerable Adults Vulnerable Learners & Young Young & Learners Children's Social Care Care Social Children's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's £000's £000's £000's Fees, charges & other service income (5,579) (1,082) ( 54,146) (8,893) (2,619) (4,713) (1,816) (10,762) (26,334) (2,798) (1,488) (120,230) Government Grants & Contributions (168,711) (99,412) 0 (2,684) (25,283) (575) (7,808) (89) (318) (3,659) (720) (309,259) Total Income (174,290) (100,494) (54,146) (11,577) (27,9 02) (5,288) (9,624) (10,851) (26,652) (6,457) (2,208) (429 ,489)
Employee Expenses 137,194 8,864 426 21,886 15,853 4,253 1, 842 10,784 11,128 4,878 11,323 228,431 Other Operating Expenses 46,561 98,885 33,527 35,201 20, 311 12,360 27,801 18,864 24,014 23,677 15,156 356,357
Page 176 Support Service Recharges 3,442 2,215 392 2,290 1,749 493 604 1,229 2,536 1,077 2,016 18,043 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment 19,362 970 6 ,638 4,839 631 286 21 1,803 7,358 1,062 1,096 44,066 Total Operating Expenses 206,559 110,934 40,983 64,216 3 8,544 17,392 30,268 32,680 45,036 30,694 29,591 646,897
Net Cost of Services 32,269 10,440 (13,163) 52,639 10,64 2 12,104 20,644 21,829 18,384 24,237 27,383 217,408
Reconciliation of service Income and Expenditure to Cost of Services in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement
This reconciliation shows how the figures in the analysis of the service income and expenditure relate to the amounts included in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's Net Expenditure in the Service Analysis 212,955 217,408 Net Expenditure of services and support services no t included in the analysis 38,882 24,563 Amount in the Comprehensive Income & Expenditure St atement not reported to management in the analysis 1,926 (89,171) Subsidiaries amount in the Comprehensive Income & E xpenditure Statement not reported to management in the analysis (1,294) (7,299) Amounts included in the analysis not included in th e comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement (91) (213)
Cost of Services in Comprehensive Income and Expend iture Statement 252,378 145,288
Page 120
Reconciliation to Subjective Analysis
This reconciliation shows how the figures in the analysis of the service income and expenditure relate to a subjective analysis of the Surplus or Deficit on the Provision of Services included in the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement
31 st March 2010 Total making decision making decision Services of Cost Corporate Amount Corporate Directorate Analysis Directorate Subsidiary Amounts Subsidiary Services and Support Support and Services Services not in analysis in not Services Subsidiary Amounts not not Amounts Subsidiary Amounts not reported to to reported not Amounts management for decision decision for management Amounts not included in I&E in included not Amounts reported to management for for management to reported £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's
Fees, Charges, & Other Service Income (100,669) (2,98 1) (103,650) (103,650) Page 177 Interest and Investment Income 0 (31,517) (2,334) (33,851) Income from Council Tax 0 (75,715) (67) (75,782) Government Grants & Contributions (309,834) (1,141) (310,975) (183,984) (831) (495,790) Gain or loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets 0 (892) (892) Change in the fair value of investment properties 0 0 Total Income (410,503) (4,122) 0 0 0 (414,625) (292,108) (3,232) (709,96 5)
Employee Expenses 206,600 10,457 1,926 218,983 218,983 Other Service Expenses 317,896 11,495 (1,294) (91) 328,006 91 328,097 Support Service Recharges 21,057 9,133 30,190 30,190 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment 77,905 11,9 19 89,824 89,824 Interest Payments 0 60,704 2,832 63,536 Payments to Housing Capital Receipts Pool 0 1,031 1,031 Total Expenditure 623,458 43,004 1,926 (1,294) (91) 667,003 61,826 2,832 731, 661
(Surplus) or deficit on the provision of services 21 2,955 38,882 1,926 (1,294) (91) 252,378 (230,282) (400) 21, 696
Page 121
Reconciliation to Subjective Analysis 31 st March 2011 Total making decision making decision Services of Cost Corporate Amount Corporate Directorate Analysis Directorate Subsidiary Amounts Subsidiary Services and Support Support and Services Services not in analysis in not Services Subsidiary Amounts not not Amounts Subsidiary Amounts not reported to to reported not Amounts management for decision decision for management Amounts not included in I&E in included not Amounts reported to management for for management to reported £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £00 0's
Fees, Charges, & Other Service Income (120,230) (11,4 41) (131,671) (131,671) Interest and Investment Income 0 (45,223) (3,700) (48,923) Income from Council Tax 0 (78,713) (78,713) Government Grants & Contributions (309,259) (416) (309,675) (203,679) (1,118) (514,472)
Page 178 Gain on Disposal of Fixed Assets 0 (1,484) (1,484) Total Income (429,489) (11,857) 0 0 0 (441,346) (329,099) (4,818) (775,2 63)
Employee Expenses 228,431 26,189 (89,171) 165,449 165,449 Other Service Expenses 356,357 (9,410) (7,299) (213) 339,435 213 339,648 Support Service Recharges 18,043 11,633 29,676 29,676 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment 44,066 8,00 8 52,074 52,074 Interest Payments 0 74,260 3,950 78,210 Payments to Housing Capital Receipts Pool 0 1,612 1,612 Total Expenditure 646,897 36,420 (89,171) (7,299) (213) 586,634 76,085 3,950 666,669
(Surplus) or deficit on the provision of services 21 7,408 24,563 (89,171) (7,299) (213) 145,288 (253,014) (868 ) (108,594)
Page 122
11. OFFICERS REMUNERATION
Officers’ Remuneration above £50,000
This note discloses information on the number of Group employees who have received more than £50,000 in remuneration during the year. This amount excludes any payments made by the Group in relation to employee pensions.
Number of Group employees Number of Group employees 31 st March 2010 Remuneration Band 31 st March 2011 54 £50,000-£54,999 70 35 £55,000-£59,999 27 33 £60,000-£64,999 26 9 £65,000-£69,999 16 12 £70,000-£74,999 10 7 £75,000-£79,999 8 2 £80,000-£84,999 6 3 £85,000-£89,999 1 2 £90,000-£94,999 1 1 £95,000-£99,999 2 2 £100,000-£104,999 0 0 £105,000-£109,999 1 2 £110,000-£114,999 2 2 £115,000-£119,999 1 0 £120,000-£124,999 3 0 £125,000-£129,999 0 0 £130,000-£134,999 0 0 £135,000-£139,999 0 0 £140,000-£144,999 0 0 £145,000-£149,999 0 1 £150,000 + 1 165 Total 175
Senior Officers’ Remuneration
This note discloses the remuneration of defined Senior and Statutory Officers’ whose annualised salary is equal to or more than £50,000. ‘Expenses’ disclosures include car and miscellaneous expenses.
The Senior Officers included in the tables below are also included in the previous table (excluding pension contributions).
31 st March 2010 RBH Senior Employee's Remuneration - annualised Salaries between £50,000 and £150,000 Post Title Salary Expenses Total Pension Total Remuneration Contributions Remuneration Excluding Including Pension Pension Contributions Contributions £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Chief Executive 110 0 110 17 127 Director of Property Services 82 0 82 13 95 Director of Operations 74 0 74 12 86 Director of Resources 74 0 74 12 86
Totals 340 0 340 54 394
PagePage 179 123
31 st March 2011 RBH Senior Employee's Remuneration - annualised Salaries between £50,000 and £150,000 Post Title Salary Expenses Total Pension Total Remuneration Contributions Remuneration Excluding Including Pension Pension Contributions Contributions £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Chief Executive 0 17 17 Director of Property Services 0 13 13 Director of Operations 0 12 12 Director of Resources 0 12 12
Totals 0 0 0 54 54
12. GRANT INCOME
RBH credited £1.1m from the Home Communities Agency in 2010/11 (£0.831m in 2009/10). Those of the Authority are shown in the single entity accounts note 38.
RBH has received a grant in 2010/11 of £1.2m that is yet to be recognised.
13. LEASES
The Council and RBH use various assets financed under the terms of operating leases. RBH is committed to making operating lease payments of £0.292m in2011/12 taking the group position to £1.28m. An analysis of the group commitments by expiry date is shown below:
RMBC RBH GROUP 31st March 2011 31st March 2010 31st March 2011 31st March 2010 31st March 2011 31st March 2010 Operating Lease Expiry Dates £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's £000's Not later than one year 153 10 10 8 163 18 Later than one year and not later that five years 579 447 282 347 862 794 Later than five years 262 289 - 39 262 328 994 746 292 394 1,287 1,140
PagePage 180 124
14. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION SCHEMES
All employees of RBH are, unless they have opted out, also members of The Greater Manchester Pension Fund which is administered by Tameside MBC and operates in accordance with the rules of the Local Government Pension Scheme. The following transactions relating to pension benefits have been made in the accounts of RBH Ltd.
31 st Marc h 2010 31 st March 2011
£000's £000's Net cost of services 1,329 Current Service Cost 2,600 0 Past Service Cost (7,592) 54 Settlements and curtailments 28 Net operating expenditure 2,832 Interest cost 3,950 (2,334) Expected return on assets in the scheme (3,585) 1,881 Net Charge to the Comprehensive Income & Expenditure Statement (4,599) Amounts to be Financed (70) Movement on Pensions Reserve 6,583 Actual amount charged against profits
1,811 Employers contributions payable to scheme 1,984
Note 47 defined benefit pension schemes to the single entity accounts contain details of the assumptions made in estimating the figures included in this note.
B - Assets and Liabilities in Relation to Retirement Benefits
Reconciliation of present value of the scheme liabilities
31 st March 2010 Scheme Liabilities 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's (40,450) Balance at 1st April (76,587) (1,329) Current service cost (2,600) (2,832) Interest cost (3,950) (777) Contributions by scheme participants (812) (32,093) Actuarial gains/ (losses) 14,997 948 Benefits paid 1,131 0 Unfunded Benefits Paid 0 Past service costs 7,592 (54) (Losses)/ gains on curtailments (28) (76,587) Balance as at 31st March (60,257)
Reconciliation of fair value of the scheme assets:
31 st March 2010 Scheme Assets 31 st March 2011 £000's £000's 36,252 Balance at 1 st April 51,181 2,334 Expected rate of return 3,585 10,955 Actuarial gains/ (losses) 3,186 1,811 Employer contributions 1,984 0 Contributions in respect of unfunded benefits 777 Contributions by scheme participants 812 (948) Benefits paid (1,131) 0 Unfunded Benefits Paid 0 Balance as at 31 st March 51,181 59,617
PagePage 181 125
C - Basis for Estimating Assets and Liabilities See note 47c Basis for Estimating Assets and Liabilities to the single entity accounts for details on the underlying assumptions used to estimate the asses and liabilities on the scheme.
D - Actuarial Gains and Losses The actuarial losses identified as movements on the pensions reserve in 2010/11, can be analysed into the following categories, as a percentage of assets or liabilities at 31 st March 2011
History of experience of gains and losses 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 %%%%% Differences between expected and actual return on assets 0.6 (13.8) (28.5) 21.7 (3.5) Experience gains and losses on liabilities 0.1 (0.4) (0.1) 0.0 11.3
PagePage 182 126
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
TRUST FUNDS COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE STATEMENT
The Council is responsible for the administration of a number of Trust Funds on behalf of their trustees. This statement sets out the income and expenditure in relation to those funds.
Notes Balance Income in Expenditure in Capital Net Balance 31 st 31 st Marc h the year the year Movement in Movement Marc h 2011 2010 the year in the year Trust Funds £ £ £ £ £ £ Rochdale Educational Trust 2 150,136 5,618 (5,744) (150,010) (150,136) 0 Rochdale Ancient Parish Educational 2 399,975 19,368 (9,931) 156,982 166,419 566,394 Trusts The Heywood Educational Trust 2 43,378 1,884 (2,316) 1,049 617 43,995 Middleton Educational Trust 2 142,848 7,695 (6,522) 1,098 2,271 145,119 Norcross Scholarship Fund 2 158,805 8,486 (10,128) 742 (900) 157,905 Rochdale United Charity 2 264,246 14,513 (14,584) 1,106 1,035 265,281 The Norman Barnes Fund 2 247,992 13,033 (14,180) 3,506 2,359 250,351 Heywood Relief in Need Trust Fund 2 134,691 6,610 (7,793) 2,501 1,318 136,009 The Middleton Relief in Need Charity 2 33,233 1,670 (1,518) 365 517 33,750 The War Memorial Fund and Others 2 12,387 401 (1,070) 217 (452) 11,935 James Handley Bequest 1,2 94,193 3,185 (8,194) 1,873 (3,136) 91,057 Doctor Chadwick Trust Fund 1,2 31,990 896 (461) 703 1,138 33,128 Robinsons Common 1,2 48,500 3,382 (3,382) 0 0 48,500 Total Trust Funds 1,762,374 86,741 (85,823) 20,132 21,050 1,783,424
TRUST FUNDS BALANCE SHEET
PagePage 183 127
This statement shows the cumulative financial position of all of the Trust Funds managed by the Council. It includes the value of trust assets and how those assets have been accumulated through original bequests and accumulated income. These balances do not form part of the Council’s Balance Sheet.
31 st March 2010 31 st March 2011 £ £ 136,373 Fixed Assets 136,373 Current Assets 1,540,774 Investments 1,572,906 85,227 Cash 74,145 1,626,001 Net Current Assets 1,647,051 1,762,374 Total Net Assets 1,783,424 Represented by 277,899Original Bequests 277,899 1,484,475 Unrestricted/Endowment Funds 1,505,525
1,762,374 Total 1,783,424
NOTES TO THE TRUST FUNDS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – Council as Trustee
The following are Trust Funds, administered by the Council, where the Council acts as sole Trustee: o James Handley Bequest. o Doctor Chadwick Trust Fund o Robinsons Common
NOTE 2 – Trust Fund Objectives
These notes provide a brief summary of the main objectives of each Charity. For each Charity, the registration number stated is the number assigned to it by the Charity Commission, further details about each individual charity can be found on its website (www.charity-commission.gov.uk).
o Rochdale Educational Trust (Registration No 526656). The objectives of this Charity are to promote the education (including social and physical training) of persons resident in, or who attend any school in the area of the former County Borough of Rochdale. This Trust was formally closed on 31 December 2010 and all the assets transferred to Rochdale Ancient Parish Educational Trusts (listed below).
o Rochdale Ancient Parish Educational Trusts (Registration No 526318). This Charity aims to promote the education (including social and physical training) of persons resident in, or who attend any school in the area of the Ancient Parish of Rochdale.
o The Heywood Educational Trust (Registration No 526690). The objective of this Charity is to promote the education (including social and physical training) of persons resident in, or who attend any school in the area of the former Borough of Heywood or the Village of Birch.
o Middleton Educational Trust (Registration No 510495). This Charity aims to promote the education (including social and physical training) of persons resident in, or who attend any school in the area of the former Borough of Middleton.
o Norcross Scholarship Fund (Registration No 526666). This Charity awards scholarships or grants to people less than 30 years of age who have already qualified but wish to continue with their education. Applicants must be resident in the former County of Lancashire or the former County Borough of Rochdale.
o Rochdale United Charity (Registration No 224461). This Charity aims to provide relief, either generally or individually, to persons resident in the area of the Ancient Parish of Rochdale, who are in conditions of need, hardship or distress.
PagePage 184 128
o The Norman Barnes Fund (Registration No 511646). This Charity was created for the welfare of the aged in the area of the former County Borough of Rochdale. o Heywood Relief in Need Trust Fund (Registration No 517114). This Charity aims to provide relief, either generally or individually, to persons resident in the area of the former Municipal Borough of Heywood who are in conditions of need, hardship or distress. o The Middleton Relief in Need Charity (Registration No 200079). The object of the Charity is to provide relief, either generally or individually, to persons resident in the area of the former Borough of Middleton, who are in conditions of need, hardship or distress. o The War Memorial Fund and Others (Registration No 222476). The object of the Charity is to contribute towards the upkeep of the Heywood War Memorial and the surrounding gardens and to assist in the work of the Royal British Legion and associated events. o James Handley Bequest – Charities in Connection with Rochdale Art Gallery (Registration No 526211). The purpose of the Charity is the development and care of the permanent collections of Rochdale Art Gallery. o Doctor Chadwick Trust Fund (Registration No 1081975). This Charity exists for the acquisition and/or laying out of playing fields or a public park within the former Milnrow Urban District Council and the upkeep thereof, or in or towards the endowment of a Nursing Association within the said District. o Robinsons Common (Registration No 521302). This Charity owns a piece of land off Dodgson Street, Rochdale, adjacent to the former Robinson’s Foundry. The piece of land is covenanted to be held as a public recreation ground.
PagePage 185 129
Audit Commission – statutory body be used to finance new capital that oversees the conduct of local expenditure or to repay outstanding authority statutory audits. loan debt as laid down within rules set by Government. GLOSSARY Capital Receipts Unapplied - B Proceeds received from the sale of Bad (and doubtful) debts – debts fixed assets, which have not yet which may be uneconomic to been used to finance capital collect or un-enforceable. expenditure or repay debt. OF TERMS Balances – the reserves of the Capitalised – transferred from Council, both revenue and capital, revenue to capital. which represent the accumulated Cash and Cash Equivalents – this surplus of income over expenditure comprises cash in hand, cash A on any of the funds overdrawn and short-term Accounting Period – the period of Balance sheet – A statement of the investments, which are readily time covered by the accounts, recorded assets, liabilities and convertible into known amounts of normally twelve months other balances at the end of an cash. commencing on 1 st April. The end of accounting period. Cash Flow – movement in money the accounting period i.e. 31 st Beacon Valuations – This method of received and paid by the Council in March is the balance sheet date. valuation uses one archetype as a the accounting period. Accounting Policies – within the standard by which all assets of a CIPFA – The Chartered Institute of range of possible methods of similar nature can be valued. This Public Finance and Accountancy. accounting, a statement of the avoids the cost of repetitive Collection Fund (CF) – a statutory actual methods chosen locally and valuations of identical assets. account which billing authorities used to prepare these accounts. Best Value – Government initiative have to maintain for the collection Accruals – the method of including which places a duty on local and distribution of amounts due in amounts in accounts to cover authorities to achieve, economy, respect of Council Tax, Non- income or expenditure attributable efficiency, effectiveness and Domestic Rates. to an accounting period but for quality of services delivered to Community Assets – assets that the which payment has not been local people. This is to be achieved Council intends to hold forever, received or made by the end of the by finding out the needs of local have no determinable finite useful accounting period. This is based on people and aiming to meet these life and in addition may have the concept that income and needs. To Challenge, Compare, restrictions on their disposal. expenditure are recognised as they Consult and Compete in service Example of a community asset is a are earned or incurred, not as provision and to seek continuous Park money is received or paid. improvement with performance Comprehensive Income and Adjustment between accounting targets benchmarking against the Expenditure Statement - The basis and funding basis – these are best, is another main objective of statement details income and adjustments that are made to the Best Value. expenditure relating to the Council total comprehensive income and Billing Authority – Rochdale as a whole and the source of expenditure recognised by the Metropolitan Borough Council is the funding for all the Councils Authority in the year in accordance billing authority for Rochdale expenditure. with proper accounting practice to responsible for the collection of the Consistency – the concept that the the resources that are specified by Council Tax and Non-Domestic accounting treatment of like items statutory provisions as being Rates. within an accounting period and available to the Authority to meet from one period to the next should future capital and revenue C be the same. expenditure. Consolidated – added together with Capital Expenditure – expenditure – Association of Greater adjustments to avoid double AGMA on the acquisition of a fixed asset Manchester Authorities. counting of income, expenditure or or expenditure, which adds to and Area Based Grant (ABG) - a pooled, to avoid exaggeration e.g. debtors, not merely, maintains the value of creditors as a result of trading non-ring-fenced government grant an existing fixed assets. with no separate reporting between services within the Council Capital Adjustment Account (CAA) requirements due to it being which are reported on as a whole in –The balance on this Account awarded for a specific geographical the section on consolidated represents timing differences financial accounts. area rather than for a specific between the amount of the purpose. Contingent Liabilities – potential historical cost of fixed assets that – something of value which is liabilities at the balance sheet date Asset has been consumed and the amount measurable in monetary terms. which depend on the occurrence or that has been financed in non-occurrence of one or more Assets Held for Sale - Assets which accordance with statutory are being actively marketed and uncertain future events. The requirements. expected to sell within the next 12 liabilities should be included in the Capital Receipts - Monies received months. balance sheet where it is probable from the sale of assets, which may that a loss will be incurred which
PagePage 186 130 can be estimated reasonably installments over a predetermined year, e.g. land, buildings, accurately at the time the accounts period of time in excess of one year equipment. are prepared. Otherwise, where the Deferred Liabilities – these are Formula Spending Share - An contingencies are likely to be liabilities which are payable beyond assessment by Central Government material, the fact that they exist the next year at some point in the of how much a Local Authority are disclosed as a note to the future or paid off by an annual sum should spend in providing a common accounts. over a period of time e.g. Deferred level of service, having regard to its Council Tax – a banded property purchase arrangements. individual circumstances and tax which is levied on domestic Depreciation - The measure of the responsibilities properties throughout the country. wearing out, consumption or other The banding is based on estimated reduction in the useful economic property values as at 1 st April 1991. life of a fixed asset. G The level of tax is set annually by GAAP – ‘Generally Accepted each local authority for the Accounting Principles’ . The properties in its area. E standard framework of accounting Council Tax Benefit – financial Earmarked Reserves - these principles. assistance available to residents on reserves represent the monies set General Fund (GF) – the main a low income that are liable for aside that can only be used for a revenue account of the Council, Council Tax. The majority of the specific usage or purpose. which brings together all income cost to the Council of these benefit Expenditure – costs incurred by the and expenditure other than payments is reimbursed by Central Council for goods received services recorded in the Housing Revenue Government grant. rendered or other value consumed Account, and the Collection Fund. Creditors – amounts owed by the during the accounting period, Government support/grants – Council for work done, goods irrespective of whether or not any assistance by Government and received or services rendered to the movement of cash has taken place. inter-government agencies and Council during the accounting similar bodies, whether local, period, but for which payment has national or international, in the not been made by the balance F form of cash or transfer of assets to sheet date. Financial Instrument Adjustment an authority in return for past or Current Assets - An asset where Account – provides a balancing future compliance with certain the value changes because the mechanism between the different conditions relating to the activities volume held varies from day to day, rates at which gains and losses of the Council. for example, stock. It is reasonable (such as premiums on the early to expect that these assets will repayment of debt) are recognised either be consumed or realised under IFRS and are required by H during the next accounting period. statute to be met from the General Historical Cost - the actual cost of Current Liabilities-An amount Fund. assets, goods or services, at the which will become payable or could Finance Lease – a lease that time of their acquisition. be called in within the next transfers the risks and rewards of HMRF - Housing Market Renewal accounting period. ownership of a fixed asset to the Fund. lessee. Such a transfer of risks and Housing Benefits – financial rewards may be presumed to occur assistance paid to tenants on a low D if at the inception of the lease the income to help pay their rent and Debtors – amounts due to the present value of the minimum lease service charges. Council that relate to the payments, including any initial Housing Revenue Account (HRA) - accounting period and have not payment, amount to substantially Local Authorities are required to been received by the balance sheet all the fair value of the leased keep a separate account for date. asset. Housing which includes the Deferred Capital Receipts – Financial Liabilities at amortised expenditure and income arising in amounts derived from asset sales, cost – The Balance Sheet value of connection with the provision of which will be received in the liability, usually a loan, after housing accommodation by a local installments over a period of years. taking account of future changes in authority. (e.g. mortgages on the sale of the internal rate payable on the Housing Subsidy – a grant from or Council houses). liability. payment to Central Government in Deferred Creditors -These are Financial Liabilities at Fair Value – connection with the operation of amounts owing by the Council The balance sheet value of the the Housing Revenue Account. where payment is to be made in liability, usually a loan, after taking instalments over a predetermined account of adjustments to reflect period of time in excess of one fair value at the balance sheet I year. date. Income – amounts due to the Deferred Debtors -These are Fixed Assets – tangible and Council in respect of services amounts due to the Council where intangible assets which have value performed, taxes levied or grants payment is to is to be made in to the Council for more than one receivable during the accounting period, irrespective of whether or
PagePage 187 131 not any movement of cash has statements of account should not surplus to requirements pending taken place. be large enough to affect the sale or redevelopment. Impairment -The amount by which understanding of those statements stated capital is reduced by quality by a reader. and value Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) O Infrastructure Assets – Fixed assets – The Council is required by statute Operating lease – a lease where the belonging to the Council which are to set aside minimum revenue risks and rewards of ownership of a not readily sold, do not necessarily provision for the redemption of fixed asset remain with the lessor. have a resale value, and for which a external debt. The method of Such a lease will be for a fixed useful life span cannot be readily calculating the provision is also period, which is significantly less assessed, for example highways. defined by statute. than the useful economic life of the Intangible Assets - are defined as Movement in Reserves Statement - asset. assets that are not physical in the movement in the year on the Operational assets – fixed assets nature. different reserves held by the occupied, used or consumed by the International Financial Reporting Authority, analysed into ‘usable Council in direct delivery of its Standards (IFRS) - A set of reserves’ (i.e. those that can be services. international financial accounting applied to fund expenditure or standards stating how particular reduce local taxation) and other types of transactions and other reserves. P events should be reported in Payments in Advance - Amounts financial statements. IFRS actually paid in an accounting are issued by the International N period prior to the period in which Accounting Standards Board to National Non-Domestic Rates they are due make international comparisons as (NNDR) – a tax levied on business Post Balance Sheet Event - Events easy as possible. properties, and sometime known as both favourable and unfavourable Investment Properties – interests Business Rates. A NNDR poundage is which occur between the balance in land and/or buildings in respect set annually by the government. sheet date and the date on which of which construction work and Rates based on properties’ rateable the financial statements are development have been completed values are collected by billing approved and which are held solely for their authorities and paid into a national Precept – An amount determined by income generating or investment pool. The proceeds are then one authority which is collected on potential rather than for redistributed by central government its behalf by another e.g. Rochdale operational purposes, any rental as a grant to local authorities in MBC Greater Manchester Police income being negotiated at arm’s proportion to adult population after Authority precept. length. deducting certain expenses on the Prior Year Adjustments – material Investments – items such as basis of relevant population. adjustments to the accounts of company shares, other securities Net Book Value – the amount at earlier years arising from changes in and money deposited with financial which fixed assets are included in accounting policies or from the institutions (other than bank the balance sheet, i.e. their correction of fundamental errors. current accounts). historical cost or current value less They do not include normal the cumulative amounts provided recurring corrections or by depreciation. adjustments of accounting L Net Current Replacement Cost - estimates made in prior years. Leasing – a method of acquiring the The cost of replacing or recreating Provisions – amounts set aside in use of an asset by paying a rental the particular asset in its existing the accounts for liabilities or losses for a specified period of time, condition and in its existing use, which are certain or very likely to rather than purchasing it outright. that is, the cost of its replacement occur but where there is Liabilities – amounts due to or of the nearest equivalent asset uncertainty as to the amounts individuals or organisations, which adjusted to reflect the current involved or the dates on which they will have to be paid at some time in condition of the existing asset. will arise. the future. Net Realisable Value – The open Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) – Loans and Receivables – Financial market value of the asset in its A central Government agency, Assets that will not be traded and existing use (or open market value which lends money to local where amounts due to the Council in the case of non-operational authorities at lower, rates than are known. These assets arise when assets), less the expenses to be those generally available from the money, goods or services are incurred in realising the asset. private sector. Local authorities are provided to an external Non-Operational Assets – Fixed able to borrow a proportion of their organisation or individual assets held by the Council but not requirements to finance capital customers. directly occupied, used or expenditure from this source. consumed in the delivery of services. Examples of non- M operational assets are investment R Material – the concept that any properties and assets that are Receipts in Advance - Amounts omission from or inaccuracy in the actually received in an accounting
PagePage 188 132 period prior to the period in which they are due. U Revenue Expenditure funded by Unquoted Equity Investment at Capital under statute (REFCUS) - Cost – Investment in an unquoted This represents expenditure that company, where a reliable fair may be classified under legislation value cannot be established. as capital, but does not result in the creation of a fixed asset on the Balance Sheet. W Reserves – amounts set aside in the Work In Progress – the cost of work accounts to meet expenditure done up to a specified date on an which the Council may decide to uncompleted project incur in future periods, but not allocated to specific liabilities which are certain or very likely to occur. Earmarked reserves are allocated to a specific purpose or area of spending. Revenue Contributions – the method of financing capital expenditure directly from revenue. Revenue Expenditure - Day to day expenses, mainly salaries and wages, and general running costs. Revenue Support Grant (RSG) – a central Government grant paid to each local authority to help to finance its general expenditure. The distribution of the grant between authorities is intended to allow the provision of similar standards of service throughout the country for a similar Council Tax. Ring fenced – this refers to the statutory requirement that certain accounts such as the Housing Revenue Account must be maintained separately from the General Fund.
S Soft Loans – Loans made with an interest rate below the market rate for a loan of that type. Stocks and Stores – Raw materials and consumable items which the Council has procured to use on a continuing basis and have not been used by the end of the accounting period. T Temporary Loans - This represents money borrowed for an initial period of less than one year. Trust Funds – funds administered by the Council on behalf of charity trustees for such purposes as prizes and specific projects.
PagePage 189 133 This page is intentionally left blank
Page 190 Agenda Item 5
REPORT FOR CONSULTATION
Regulatory Committee 13 th July 2011
Report of Director of Legal & Democratic Services
Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places
Wards affected: All Report Author: Clare Poole
Telephone: (01706) 92 4759
This report is to inform and consult Members on the statutory review of polling districts and polling places.
1. It is recommended that:
1.1 Regulatory Committee assesses the make-up of polling districts within the 20 wards of the Borough and considers the recommendations and provides views on any recommendations made by the Acting Returning Officer and Electoral Services Officer attached at Appendix 2. 1.2 A further report will be presented to the next meeting of the Regulatory Committee on 22 August following the code of consultation.
2. Reasons for recommendation:
2.1 Following the introduction of the review of Polling Districts and Polling Places (Parliamentary Elections) Regulations in 2006, each local authority is required to carry out these reviews on a regular four-yearly cycle. 2.2 It is recommended that alterations to polling districts be timed to coincide with the annual revision of the register of electors on 1 December which will help to avoid confusion for recipients of the register. 2.2 This review must be completed and implemented by the end of December 2011, so for the changes to be included in the register on 1 December this year, Full Council must consider and confirm the proposals at their meeting on 19 October 2011.
3. Alternatives considered:
3.1 Any alternative polling districts or polling stations proposed during the consultation period will be considered.
1
Page 191
4. Consultation undertaken/proposed:
4.1 Public consultation will start on Friday 1 July until Monday 1 August. 4.2 All elected members, MP’s and local political party offices will be contacted during the consultation period inviting them to make submissions. 4.3 Other interested parties will be contacted inviting them to make submissions – disability groups, community groups, voluntary organisations etc. 4.4 Details of the consultation including large scale maps of all polling districts are on public deposit at the Town Hall reception, Customer Service Centres in Heywood, Middleton, Milnrow and Littleborough and available to view on the council’s website. 4.5 The report will also be taken to Township Committees at the meetings at the beginning of September for their consideration and input. 4.6 Licensing and Regulatory Committee will consider any submissions made, make alternative recommendations and ultimately make the final recommendations for Full Council approval on 19 th October.
5. Main text of report:
5.1 Appendix 1 is the background report regarding the review of polling districts and polling places. 5.2 Appendix 2 is the recommendations from the Electoral Services Officer regarding the review. 5.3 Appendix 3 is the list of current polling stations. 5.4 Appendix 4 is a list of electorates per street.
6. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
No direct financial implications .
7. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
7.1 Following the introduction of the review of Polling Districts and Polling Places (Parliamentary Elections) Regulations in 2006, each local authority is required to carry out these reviews on a regular four-yearly cycle.
8. RISK ASSESSMENT IMPLICATIONS
8.1 There are no specific risk issues for members to consider arising from this report.
9. EQUALITIES IMPACTS
9.1 Workforce Equality Impacts Assessment
There are no workforce equality issues arising form this report.
2
Page 192 9.2 Equality/Community Impact Assessments
There will be equality/community impact assessments completed during the consultation process on the proposals made – details to be made available at a later meeting.
For further Information and Background Papers: For further information about this report or access to any background papers or maps please contact Clare Poole Ext 4759
3
Page 193 This page is intentionally left blank
Page 194
APPENDIX 1
A Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places
Page 195
Index 1. What is the difference between a polling district, polling place and polling station? 2. Polling districts 2.1 Who is responsible for designating polling districts? 2.2 What is the definition of a relevant authority? 2.3 What are the rules? 2.4 What is the Electoral Registration Officers responsibility? 3. Polling places 3.1 Who is responsible for designating polling places? 3.2 What are the rules? 4. Polling Stations 4.1 Who is responsible for designating polling stations? 4.2 What are the rules? 5. Review of polling districts and polling places 5.1 General background 5.2 First review 5.3 Subsequent reviews 5.4 The review process 5.5 Notice of the holding of a review 6. The Role of the Returning Officer 7. Other representations 8. Evaluating the suitability of potential polling places 9. Administration of the review 10. Completion of the review 11. The role of the Electoral Commission 11.1 Who may make representation to the Electoral Commission? 11.2 Review by the Electoral Commission 12. Non compliance 13. Other accessibility issues to consider 13.1 Polling stations 13.2 Assistance to voters 13.3 Translations 13.4 Other assistance 13.5 Accessibility checklist
Appendices
Appendix A – Legislation Appendix B – Extract from the RPA 1983 (as inserted by Section 16 of the EAA 2006) Appendix C – Extract from Statutory Instrument 2006 No. 2965
Page 196
1. What is the difference between a polling district, a polling place and a polling station?
A polling district is a geographical sub-division of an electoral area, i.e. a UK Parliamentary constituency, a European Parliamentary electoral region, a ward or an electoral division.
A polling place is a geographical area in which a polling station is located. However, as there is no legal definition of what a polling place is the geographical area could be defined as tightly as a particular building or as widely as the entire polling district.
A polling station is the actual area where the process of voting takes place, and must be located within the polling place designated for the particular polling district.
2. Polling districts
2.1 Who is responsible for designating polling districts?
Every relevant authority in the UK is responsible for dividing its area into polling districts for UK Parliamentary elections for so much of any constituency as is situated in its area (1), and for keeping the polling districts under review.
For European Parliamentary elections, the same polling districts as designated for UK Parliamentary elections are to be used unless the relevant authority considers that there are special circumstances that make alternative designations appropriate (2)
For local government elections, a local authority may divide its designated electoral areas (i.e. wards or electoral divisions) into polling districts (3)
Although there is no requirement to sub-divide local government electoral areas into polling districts, it is recognised good practice to do so. When doing so, every effort must be made to ensure that the polling district scheme for local government elections mirrors as closely as possible that agreed for parliamentary elections (4)
2.2 What is the definition of a relevant authority? a) In England, the council of a district or London borough; b) In Scotland, a local authority; and c) In Wales, the council of a county or county borough (5)
2.3 What are the rules?
When designating polling districts, relevant authorities must seek to ensure that all the electors in the constituency have such reasonable facilities for voting as are practicable in the circumstances.
In addition, and unless there are special circumstances that lead the authority to determine otherwise, each parish in England and each community in Wales must be in a separate polling district.
Similarly in Scotland, each electoral ward must be divided into two or more separate polling districts.
Page 197
2.4 What is the Electoral Registration Officer’s responsibility?
Where a relevant authority makes any alterations to the polling districts within its area, the Electoral Registration Officer must amend their register of electors accordingly.
The changes to the register take effect on the date that the Electoral Registration Officer publishes a notice stating that the adaptations have been made (6)
It is recommended that alterations to polling districts be timed to coincide with the annual revision of the register of electors on 1 December. This will help to avoid confusion both for electoral professionals and other recipients of the register. (This would mean consideration at full Council on 19 October 2011)
However, there may be instances where alterations must be made at other times of the year.
In such cases, the Electoral Registration Officer will need to publish a notice fourteen calendar days before the publication of the revised version of the register in a local newspaper, at their office and at some other conspicuous place or places in the area (7)
3. Polling Places
3.1 Who is responsible for designating polling places?
Every relevant authority in the UK must designate a polling place for every polling district in the parliamentary constituency (8) unless the size or other circumstances of the polling district are such that the situation of the polling station does not materially affect the convenience of the electorate.
The relevant authority must also keep the polling places under review.
3.2 What are the rules?
Relevant authorities must: a) Seek to ensure that all the electors in the constituency have such reasonable facilities for voting as are practicable in the circumstances; b) Seek to ensure that so far as is reasonable and practicable, the polling places they are responsible for are accessible to all electors, including those who are disabled, and when considering the designation of a polling place, must have regard to the accessibility needs of disabled persons (9)
In addition, the polling place for a polling district must be within the area of the district unless special circumstances make it desirable to designate an area either wholly or partly outside of the polling district.
The polling place must also be small enough to indicate to electors in different parts of the polling district how they will be able to reach their designated polling station.
Should a relevant authority fail to designate a polling place, the entire polling district will be classed as the polling place for that district.
4. Polling Stations
4.1 Who is responsible for designating polling stations?
The Returning Officer for the particular election must provide a sufficient number of polling stations, and allocate the electors to those polling stations in such manner as they think is the most convenient
(At the 2011 Referendum this was overridden by direction from the Chief Counting Officer at the Electoral Commission who specified the ratio of electors to each polling station).
4.2 What are the rules? Page 198
Polling stations must be located within the polling places designated by the relevant authority.
In a UK Parliamentary constituency in Scotland that comprises the whole or any part of more than one local government area, there must be at least one polling station in each of those local government areas.
The election rules permit the Returning Officer to provide one or more polling stations within the same room, and must supply each with a sufficient number of voting compartments.
5. Review of polling districts and polling places
5.1 General background
Section 16 of the Electoral Administration Act 2006 introduced a number of changes to the Representation of the People Act 1983 in respect of the way in which reviews of polling districts and polling places must be undertaken.
5.2 First review
The most important thing to note is that by 31 December 2011, every relevant authority must have undertaken and completed a review of all of the polling districts and polling places in its area (10), except in the circumstances where a polling district or polling place is created in 2011 (11) (when in such circumstances, the first review of the polling district or polling place must be completed before the end of the period of four years starting with the date on which the designation is made) (12).
This does not apply to Rochdale MBC who last amended their Polling Places and Districts in 2007
5.3 Subsequent reviews
Following the first review, the relevant authority must then complete a further review of every polling district and polling place before the end of the period of four years starting with the completion of the previous review (13). In effect, this means that by 31 December 2011, every relevant authority must have undertaken two full reviews of the electoral arrangements in its area.
It is important to note that if it wishes to do so, the relevant authority may undertake reviews of all or some of the designated polling districts and polling places at any time (14), but must undertake a review of each within four years of the previous review.
For administrative convenience, it would seem sensible to review all polling districts and polling places on a regular four-yearly cycle, regardless of whether or not a particular polling district or polling place has been reviewed for some reason e.g. because of an influx of electors in an area or the non availability of a building designated as a polling place in the intervening period.
This will help in ensuring that a consistent approach is taken across the relevant authority’s area.
5.4 The review process
Schedule A1 to the Representation of the People Act 1983 sets out the steps relevant authorities must follow in undertaking any review of polling districts and/or polling places.
Prior to commencing the review, the electoral administrator will need to compile a great deal of the background information necessary for informed decisions to be made by Councillors.
This information will include:
• electorate figures, broken down to street level;
• details of existing polling places;
• detailed and up to date maps of a scale that will assist in the designation of polling district boundaries.
Page 199 5.5 Notice of the holding of a review
The relevant authority is required to publish notice of the holding of a review (15)
Schedule A1 does not specify in what manner the relevant authority is required to publish this notice, but it would seem reasonable to follow the principles set out in the Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places (Parliamentary Elections) Regulations 2006 for the publication of a Returning Officer’s representations.
6. The role of the Returning Officer
The relevant authority is required to consult the Returning Officer for every parliamentary election held in a constituency that is wholly or partly within its area.
The Returning Officer is required to make representations to the relevant authority, which must include information as to the location of polling stations (both existing and proposed) within polling places (both existing and proposed) (16)
Within thirty calendar days of their receipt, the relevant authority is required to publish the Returning Officer’s representations as a minimum:
• at the relevant authority’s office;
• at least one other conspicuous place in the area; and
• on the relevant authority’s website (17)
7. Other representations
In reviewing polling places, the relevant authority is required to actively seek representations from such persons as it thinks have particular expertise in relation to:
• access to premises; or
• facilities for persons who have different forms of disability (18)
Such persons must be given the opportunity to make representations and to comment on the representations made by the Returning Officer.
A key factor the relevant authority will have to consider at the outset of the review is the identification of those persons it feels has particular expertise in accessibility issues.
In addition, any elector in a constituency may make representations on the designation of polling places to the relevant authority (19).
Although not specifically provided for in the review rules, it would seem sensible to actively encourage representations from local constituency political parties and independent candidates. By doing so, the relevant authority will be giving key stakeholders in the electoral process the opportunity to participate.
Further sources of expertise from which representations might be sought include the relevant authority’s own planning and property services departments. Each will be able to provide technical guidance on the availability and suitability of locations or premises, and details of residential developments that might have future implications on electoral arrangements.
Administrators may wish to model possible arrangements by utilising mapping and planning tools available within the authority. Local authorities now have access to GIS mapping services, many of which combine data from different services that may be of use in testing the suitability of a proposed scheme.
In addition, the relevant authority might wish to obtain up to date mapping information from the Ordnance Survey prior to formally considering the suitability of any representations received.
An extremely practical way of undertaking the review is to consider the suitability of the available polling places first, i.e. to identify what premises are available, and then to designate the polling district boundaries and allocate the electors to what is actually available. Although the rules are drafted to require the relevant Page 200 authority to sub-divide its area into polling districts and to then consult on the allocation of the associated polling places, there seems little sense in designating polling districts that are devoid of suitable polling places.
It is important to note that representations made by any person in connection with the review of polling places may include proposals for alternative polling places, which must then be considered by the relevant authority.
8. Evaluating the suitability of potential polling places
Regardless of the expert advice the relevant authority is required to seek, it is important that the accessibility needs of all voters are considered when designating polling places.
There are a number of steps that can be taken to facilitate this process (20):
Consider the location of the polling place Accessibility Availability of parking Approaches to the polling station Entrance to the polling station Inside the building
Another key factor to consider when assessing the suitability of a particular building or location is the facilities available to polling station staff.
It must not be overlooked that staff will be on duty for approximately sixteen hours, and not permitted to leave the premises. Their basic human needs must not be discounted.
9. Administration of the review
It is important to note that the relevant authority is responsible for dividing its area into polling districts, so a decision will need to be taken before the review commences as to how the authority wishes to consider the representations made, and ultimately designate the polling districts and polling places within its area.
For Rochdale MBC, this task will be delegated to the Licensing and Regulatory committee who will meet on 14/07, 22/08, 15/09 and 06/10 to consider all appropriate representations.
At the end of the review process, the committee then makes its recommendations to a meeting of the full council for ratification (19/10) following which the polling districts and polling places are formally designated and come into being.
10. Completion of the review
On completion of a review, the relevant authority is required to give reasons for its decisions in respect of the designation of both polling districts and polling places (21)
In addition, the authority must publish:
• all correspondence sent to a Returning Officer in connection with the review, and
• all correspondence sent to any person whom the authority thinks has particular expertise in relation to access to premises or facilities for persons who have different forms of disability;
• all representations made by any person in connection with the review;
• the minutes of any meetings held by the authority where details of the review have been considered;
• details of the actual designations of polling districts and polling places agreed as a result of the review; and
• Details of where the results of the review have been published (22).
Page 201 Schedule A1 does not specify in what manner the relevant authority is required to publish this notice, but it would seem reasonable to follow the principles set out in the Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places (Parliamentary Elections) Regulations 2006 for the publication of a Returning Officer’s representations.
11. The role of the Electoral Commission
The Electoral Commission has no role in the review process itself, although guidance has been issued to assist relevant authorities in the administration of the reviews in the form of a circular distributed in 2010 - EC19 (2010)
However, the Commission has an extremely important role in respect of considering representations and observations made that a relevant authority has not conducted a review so as to:
• meet the reasonable requirements of the electors in the constituency, or a body of them (i.e. the reasonable requirements of a particular area of the authority have not been satisfactorily met); or
• take sufficient account of the accessibility to disabled persons of polling stations within a designated polling place (23)
11.1 Who may make representation to the Electoral Commission?
Section 18D (1) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 sets out who may make representations to the Electoral Commission, namely:
• in England, any parish council which is wholly or partly situated within the constituency (or parish meeting where there is no such council);
• in Wales, any community council which is wholly or partly situated within the constituency;
• not less than thirty registered electors in the constituency (although electors registered anonymously cannot make such a representation (24)
• any person (except the Returning Officer) who made representations to the authority when the review was being undertaken; and
• any person who is not an elector in a constituency in the authority’s area who the Commission feels has sufficient interest in the accessibility of disabled persons to polling places in the area or has particular expertise in relation to the access to premises or facilities of disabled persons.
In addition, the Returning Officer may make observations on any representations made to the Commission (25)
11.2 Review held by the Electoral Commission
The Electoral Commission is required to consider any such representations and observations, and after doing so, may direct the relevant authority to make any alterations it sees necessary to the polling places designated by the review (26)
Should an authority fail to make the alterations within two months of the direction being given, the Commission may make the alterations itself.
12. Non-compliance
It is important to note that the outcome of an election cannot be questioned simply because a relevant authority, an Electoral Registration Officer, a Returning Officer or the Electoral Commission fails to comply with any or all aspects of a review process (27)
Page 202 13. Other accessibility issues to consider
13.1 Polling stations
As detailed above, it is the responsibility of the Returning Officer to provide a sufficient number of polling stations within the polling places designated by the relevant authority, and to allocate the electors to those polling stations in such manner as they think is most convenient (28)
However, in complying with this requirement, the Returning Officer should have regard to the accessibility needs of all voters. In this respect, accessibility not only means entering and moving around a polling station, but also the facilities available to assist electors in casting their votes. Unless there are extenuating circumstances that make it impractical to do so, the polling places designated by relevant authorities should be accessible to all voters.
However, prior to an election being held, the Returning Officer should ensure that there is level access to both the polling place and the polling station(s), and where there is not, suitable adaptations, such as temporary ramping made available.
13.2 Assistance to voters
Within the polling station, the Returning Officer is required to provide a number of facilities specifically designed to assist voters.
The most important of these is the staff, who should be fully trained in their roles and responsibilities, and understand what facilities must be provided.
In summary, at least one copy of the following must be provided, subject to direction, inside the polling station (29)
• directions for the guidance of voters;
• enlarged version of the ballot paper for the assistance of partially-sighted voters;
• device to enable blind and partially-sighted voters to vote unaided, i.e. a Braille template;
• inside every voting compartment, “vote for one candidate only …” or “vote for no more than X candidates” notices, as appropriate;
• hand-held copy of the enlarged ballot paper for the assistance of partially-sighted voters (30)
In addition, a copy of the directions for the guidance of voters must be displayed outside the polling station.
13.3 Translations
The Returning Officer is now authorised to make available in alternative formats any document published in connection with an election as he or she thinks appropriate, except nomination papers and the ballot papers (31)
This means that the Returning Officer may, in addition to the copies above, make the polling station notices available in:
• Braille;
• languages other than English;
• graphical representations;
• other means of making the information accessible to persons who might otherwise have reasonable access, e.g. audio.
Page 203 13.4 Other assistance
Presiding Officers may (in the presence of any polling agents present) assist voters who are incapacitated by blindness or other disability.
Similarly, a blind or disabled voter may be assisted by a companion, who must either be directly related to them, or be entitled themselves to vote at that election.
Where the Presiding Officer assists a voter, the appropriate details must be entered on the “list of votes marked by the presiding officer”. Where a companion assists a voter, the companion must complete a “declaration made by the companion of a voter with disabilities”.
13.5 Accessibility checklist
It is good practice for the Returning Officer to check that every polling station is, and remains, accessible throughout polling day, and is set up correctly.
Page 204
Appendix A
References
(1) Section 18A (2) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (2) Regulation 8 of the European Parliamentary Elections Regulations 2004 (3) Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (4) Sections 31(2) and (3) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (5) Section 18E (3) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (6) Section 18A (5) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (7) Section 13 (3) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 and Regulation 36 (1) of the Representation of the People (England and Wales) Regulations 2001 and Regulation 36 (1) of the Representation of the People (Scotland) Regulations 2001 (8) Section 18B (1) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (9) Section 18B (4) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (10) Section 18C (1) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (11) Section 18C (2) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (12) Section 18C (3) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (13) Section 18C (4) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (14) Section 18C (5) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (15) Paragraph 1 of Schedule A1 to the Representation of the People Act 1983 (16) Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Schedule A1 to the Representation of the People Act 1983 (17) Regulation 3 of the Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places (Parliamentary Elections) Regulations 2006 (18) Paragraph 4 of Schedule A1 to the Representation of the People Act 1983 (19) Paragraph 5 of Schedule A1 to the Representation of the People Act 1983 (20) Adapted from Section 5 of Part B of managing a local government election – a good practice manual (2007) issued by the Electoral Commission (21) Paragraph 7 of Schedule A1 to the Representation of the People Act 1983 (22) Regulation 4 of the Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places (Parliamentary Elections) Regulations 2006 (23) Section 18D (2) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (24) Section 18D (7) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (25) Section 18D (3) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (26) Section 18D (4) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (27) Section 18E (2) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (28) See the appropriate election rules: for example, at UK Parliamentary elections, Rule 25 of the Parliamentary Elections Rules (Schedule 1 to the Representation of the People Act 1983) applies (29) See the appropriate election rules: for example, at UK Parliamentary elections, Rule 29 of the Parliamentary Elections Rules (Schedule 1 to the Representation of the People Act 1983) applies (30) Section 199B of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (31) Section 199B of the Representation of the People Act 1983
Page 205
Appendix B
Extract from the Representation of the People Act 1983 (as inserted by Section 16 of the Electoral Administration Act 2006)
18A - Polling districts at parliamentary elections
(1) Every constituency is to be divided into polling districts. (2) A relevant authority must— (a) divide its area into polling districts for the purpose of parliamentary elections for so much of any constituency as is situated in its area, and (b) keep the polling districts under review. (3) The following rules apply— (a) the authority must seek to ensure that all electors in a constituency in its area have such reasonable facilities for voting as are practicable in the circumstances; (b) in England, each parish is to be a separate polling district; (c) in Wales, each community is to be a separate polling district; (d) in Scotland, each electoral ward (within the meaning of section 1 of the Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004) is to be divided into two or more separate polling districts. (4) Subsection (3) (b) to (d) does not apply if, in any case, there are special circumstances. (5) If an alteration of polling districts in an area is made under this section— (a) the registration officer who acts for the area must make such adaptations of his register of parliamentary electors as are necessary to take account of the alteration, and (b) the alteration is effective on the date on which the registration officer publishes a notice stating that the adaptations have been made by him.
18B Polling places at parliamentary elections
(1) A polling place is to be designated for each polling district in a constituency. (2) But subsection (1) does not apply if the size or other circumstances of a polling district are such that the situation of the polling stations does not materially affect the convenience of the electors or any body of them. (3) A relevant authority must— (a) designate the polling places for the polling districts in its area, and (b) keep the polling places in its area under review. (4) The following rules apply— (a) the authority must seek to ensure that all electors in a constituency in its area have such reasonable facilities for voting as are practicable in the circumstances; (b) the authority must seek to ensure that so far as is reasonable and practicable every polling place for which it is responsible is accessible to electors who are disabled; (c) the authority must have regard to the accessibility to disabled persons of potential polling stations in any place which it is considering designating as a polling place or the designation of which as a polling place it is reviewing; (d) the polling place for a polling district must be an area in the district, unless special circumstances make it desirable to designate an area wholly or partly outside the district; (e) the polling place for a polling district must be small enough to indicate to electors in different parts of the district how they will be able to reach the polling station. (5) If no polling place is designated for a polling district the polling district is to be taken to be the polling place.
18C Review of polling districts and places
(1) Each relevant authority must complete a review under sections 18A and 18B of all of the polling districts and polling places in its area before the end of the period of 12 months starting with the date on which section 16 of the Electoral Administration Act 2006 comes into force. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply in the case of a polling district or polling place (as the case may be) which is designated for the first time during that period. (3) In such a case, the first review of the polling district or polling place must be completed before the end of the period of four years starting with the date on which that designation is made. Page 206 (4) The authority must complete a further review of each polling district and polling place in its area before the end of the period of four years starting with the completion of the previous such review. (5) Subsections (1) to (4) do not prevent a relevant authority carrying out at any time a review of a particular polling district or polling place. (6) Schedule A1 has effect in relation to a review.
18D Review of polling districts and places: representations to Electoral Commission
(1) This section applies if in relation to a constituency in the area of a relevant authority a relevant representation is made to the Electoral Commission by— (a) an interested authority in England and Wales; (b) not less than 30 electors in the constituency; (c) a person (other than the returning officer) who has made representations under Schedule A1; (d) a person who is not an elector in a constituency in the authority’s area but who the Commission think has sufficient interest in the accessibility of disabled persons to polling places in the area or has particular expertise in relation to the access to premises or facilities of disabled persons. (2) A relevant representation is a representation that a review under section 18A or 18B has not been conducted by a relevant authority so as to— (a) Meet the reasonable requirements of the electors in the constituency or any body of those electors, or (b) Take sufficient account of the accessibility to disabled persons of polling stations within a designated polling place. (3) The returning officer for the constituency may make observations on representations made under this section. (4) The Electoral Commission must consider such representations and observations and may if they think fit- (a) Direct the relevant authority to make any alterations to the polling places designated by the review which the Commission thinks necessary in the circumstances; (b) If the authority fails to make the alterations before the end of the period of two months starting on the day the direction is given, make the alterations themselves. (5) Alterations made by the Electoral Commission under subsection (4) have effect as if they had been made by the relevant authority. (6) An interested authority in relation to a constituency in England and Wales is - (a) In England, the council of a parish, or where there is no such council the parish meeting of a parish, which is wholly or partly situated within the constituency; (b) In Wales, the council of a community which is so situated. (7) The reference in subsection (1) (b) to electors does not include persons who have an anonymous entry in the register of parliamentary electors or local government electors.
18E Sections 18A to 18D: supplemental
(1) This section applies for the purposes of sections 18A to 18D. (2) No election is to be questioned by reason of - (a) any non-compliance with the provisions of those sections, or (b) any informality relative to polling districts or polling places. (3) Each of the following is a relevant authority - (a) in relation to England, the council of a district or London borough; (b) in relation to Scotland, a local authority; (c) in relation to Wales, the council of a county or county borough. (4) The following do not apply to Northern Ireland - (a) section 18A (2) to (5); (b) section 18B (2) to (5); (c) sections 18C and 18D, and in Northern Ireland the polling districts and polling places are those for the time being established under the law relating to local elections within the meaning of section 130 of the Electoral Law Act (Northern Ireland) 1962.
Page 207
SCHEDULE A1 (Section 18C)
REVIEW OF POLLING DISTRICTS AND POLLING PLACES
(1) The relevant authority must publish notice of the holding of a review. (2) The authority must consult the returning officer for every parliamentary election held in a constituency which is wholly or partly in its area. (3) (1) every such returning officer must make representations to the authority. (2) The representations must include information as to the location of polling stations (existing or proposed) within polling places (existing or proposed). (3) The representations must be published in such manner as is prescribed. (4) (1) The authority must seek representations from such persons as it thinks have particular expertise in relation to access to premises or facilities for persons who have different forms of disability. (2) Such persons must have an opportunity - (a) To make representations; (b) To comment on the returning officer’s representations. (5) Any elector in a constituency situated in whole or in part in the authority’s area may make representations. (6) Representations made by any person in connection with a review of polling places may include proposals for specified alternative polling places. (7) On completion of a review the authority must - (a) Give reasons for its decisions in the review; (b) Publish such other information as is prescribed.
Page 208 Appendix C
Extract from Statutory Instrument 2006 No. 2965
The Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places (Parliamentary Elections) Regulations 2006 Citation, commencement and extent
1. These Regulations may be cited as the Review of Polling Districts and Polling Places (Parliamentary Elections) Regulations 2006 and shall come into force on 1 January 2007. 2. These Regulations extend to England and Wales and Scotland only.
Manner of publication of representations
3. A relevant authority must, within 30 days of receipt, publish representations made by a returning officer for the purposes of the review of polling districts or polling places - (a) by posting a copy of them at its office and in at least one conspicuous place in their area; and (b) if the authority maintains a website, by placing a copy on the authority's website.
Information to be published on completion of a review
4. On completion of a review the authority must publish the following - (a) all correspondence sent to a returning officer in connection with the review; (b) all correspondence sent to any person whom the authority thinks has particular expertise in relation to access to premises or facilities for persons who have different forms of disability; (c) all representations made by any person in connection with the review; (d) the minutes of any meeting held by the authority to consider any revision to the designation of polling districts or polling places within its area as a result of the review; (e) details of the designation of polling districts or polling places within its area as a result of the review; (f) details of the places where the results of the review have been published.
Page 209 This page is intentionally left blank
Page 210 Appendix 2
Recommendations of Electoral Services Officer and Acting Returning Officer
1. To identify (where possible) alternative polling stations where mobile polling stations are used as listed below-
a. AB Chatsworth Street, Rochdale b. AD Bentley Street/Tintern Avenue, Rochdale c. GD Heybrook School, Park Road, Rochdale d. HD Elephant & Castle, Bury Road, Rochdale e. IF Ryefields, Braddocks Close, Rochdale f. QE James Andrew Street/Oldham Road, Middleton g. QF Middleton Arena, Corporation Street, Middleton h. SD Ogden Baptist Church, Cedar Lane, Newhey i. TD Ryefields, Braddocks Close, Rochdale
2. To identify alternative polling stations for polling district SA – Milnrow Cricket Club, Harbour Lane - and polling district BB – Newbold Housing Office, Witley Road (possibly use the Catholic Church on Kingsway).
3. To merge polling district CF (265 electors) with polling district CE or identify an alternative polling station for polling district CF – Champness Hall, Drake Street. Possibly use a room in the Town Hall?
4. To merge polling district ED (879 electors) with polling district EE and use the Bowls Pavilion in Chesham Gardens as the polling station.
5. To merge polling district FF (551 electors) with polling district FG with 2 polling stations instead of 3.
6. To merge polling district KC (1611 electors) with polling district KD and use Darnhill Library as the polling station or identify an alternative polling station for polling district KD – Heywood & Darnhill Boxing Club.
7. To merge polling district MD (31 electors) with polling district MC. The electors of polling district MD currently vote at the same station as the electors for polling district PB (St Mary’s Church, Langley Lane) which initially would seem the more
Page 211 obvious option. This cannot be considered in this review as the local authority is unable to change ward boundaries – this has to be done by the Boundary Commission.
8. To merge polling district PB (621 electors) with polling district PC and use Langley Library as the polling station.
9. To merge polling district QA (563 electors) with polling district QB.
10. To merge polling district QF (274 electors) with polling district QE and possibly use a space in Middleton Sports Arena as the polling station.
11. To merge polling district RF (45 electors) with polling district RE.
Page 212 Description of No. of No. of Situation of each Polling Station 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PO’s PC’s General Local Local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref
1578 1 2 Thrum Hall Methodist Church 915 505 444 NO NO 508 2931 1 2 Thrum Hall Lane, Rochdale 752 452 348 INFO INFO 406
2288 1 3 Mobile Unit on Chatsworth Street 1040 431 443 482 Rochdale (mobile phone required)
- 1243 1 2 Falinge Park Bowling Club 649 608 322 372 Falinge Park, Heights Lane, Rochdale
- 1607 1 2 Mobile Unit on corner of Bentley Street 845 472 356 442 And Tintern Avenue, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
- 1897 1 3 Newbold Housing Office 724 494 519 535 NO 519 574 Witley Road, Rochdale INFO
Page 213 - 1316 1 2 Newbold Housing Office 500 285 284 242 284 317 Witley Road, Rochdale
- 1162 1 2 Turf Hill Initiative Centre 481 276 232 249 232 254 Neston Road, Rochdale
- 1225 1 2 Lowerplace Primary School, 534 302 276 304 276 356 Kingsway Entrance, Rochdale
1326 1 2 677 370 333 322 333 381 Buersil Bowling Club Crowther Street, Rochdale - 1404 1 2 647 435 413 436 413 487 Belfield Community School Samson Street, Rochdale
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc
Description of No. of No. of Situation of each Polling Statio n 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PO’s PC’s General Local Local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref
- 799 1 1 Deeplish Community Centre 428 389 389 391 NO 389 387 Hare Street, Rochdale INFO
- 1791 1 2 Sudden & Brimrod Community Centre 878 603 600 542 599 572 Cheltenham Street, Rochdale
- 1810 1 2 St Luke’s Church Schoolroom 928 728 825 681 824 723 Salkeld Street, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
- 647 1 1 Sparth Community Centre 331 249 258 241 258 262 Norman Road, Rochdale
Page 214 - 1195 1 2 Ukrainian Cultural Centre, Elmfield House 548 400 396 328 396 351 - 2483 1 2 Mere Street, Rochdale 614 495 566 488 565 422
265 1 1 Champness Hall (Noah’s Ark Children’s Centre) 73 57 49 45 49 45 Drake Street, Rochdale
- 1063 1 2 Trinity Methodist Church 429 223 218 226 NO 218 273 William Henry Street, Rochdale (mobile phone required) INFO
- 1072 1 2 St Thomas’ Church 361 176 171 147 171 177 Gainsborough Drive, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
- 1238 1 2 Kirkholt Community Church (Formerly Methodist Church) 446 178 195 137 193 225 Daventry Road/Rhodes Crescent , Rochdale
- 2056 1 3 Balderstone Library 946 502 467 492 466 493 Balderstone Park, Rochdale
400 250 196 253 195 249 - 655 1 1 Room at rear of St James Church Off Thornham Lane, Rochdale (mobile phone required) 519 212 232 231 232 196 1401 1 2 TRAK Office 30 The Strand, Kirkholt, Rochdale
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc
Description of No. of No. of Situation of each P olling Station 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PO’s PC’s General Local local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref 2063 1 3 Castleton Community Centre 884 436 445 467 NO 445 565 Manchester Road, Rochdale (mobile phone required) INFO
2090 1 3 Matthew Moss Youth Centre 591 583 531 449 531 505 Matthew Moss Lane, Rochdale 542
- 1827 1 3 St Martin’s Church Hall 921 496 460 480 460 539 Vicarage Road North, Rochdale
- 879 1 2 Bowls Pavilion 448 259 230 236 230 252 Chesham Gardens, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
428 1 1 Thornham Cricket Club 242 141 146 140 146 155 Rochdale Road, Slattocks, Middleton
Page 215 447 1 1 Woolworths Sports & Social Club 132 142 Gipsy Lane, Castleton, Rochdale 456 1 1 731 Rooley Moor Road 283 170 182 186 NO 181 183 Rochdale INFO
1229 1 2 Brotherod Tenants' Association 467 194 245 219 245 280 8/10 Daniel Fold, Rochdale
893 1 1 Cutgate Methodist Church, Cutgate Precinct 400 189 198 167 197 228 Edenfield Road, Rochdale
1986 1 3 Spotland Methodist Church Hall 992 463 409 428 468 541 Rooley Moor Road, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
1434 1 2 Greave Community Base 591 282 307 278 306 329 35 Denehurst Road, Rochdale
551 1 1 Spotland Community Centre 367 204 257 282 204 215 92/96 Spotland Road, Rochdale
- 881 1 1 Spotland Community Centre 808 553 696 336 687 303 -1613 1 1 92/96 Spotland Road, Rochdale (with FF) 292 276
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc
Description of No. of No. of Situation of each Polling Station 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PO’s PC’s General Local Local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref
- 1388 1 2 Rochdale Unitarian Church 427 218 224 193 NO 224 224 Clover Street, Rochdale INFO
- 1668 1 3 J D Dance Club (Old Mission) 754 525 509 474 508 557 Milford Street/Whitehall Street, Rochdale
- 1064 1 2 Pennine Suite, St Patrick’s R C Primary School 492 325 313 327 313 334 Foxholes Road, Rochdale
- 1857 1 2 Mobile Unit adjacent to Heybrook CP School 1063 880 978 924 978 810 Park Road, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
Page 216 - 721 1 1 Good Shepherd (Old) Sunday School 580 524 549 476 549 408 Entwisle Road, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
- 1123 1 2 Wardleworth Community Centre 650 596 588 612 588 601 South Street, Rochdale NO -2214 1 3 Brimrod Methodist Church 1052 596 521 510 INFO 520 567 Roch Valley Way, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
- 698 1 1 St George’s Church Hall 290 176 158 193 158 175 Bury Road, Rochdale
- 1527 1 2 Bamford Primary School 850 488 518 557 518 495 - 3085 1 2 Belgium Street, Rochdale 826 485 501 504 499 525
- 1889 1 3 Mobile Unit at Elephant & Castle 1040 673 636 657 636 671 Bury Road, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc
Description of No. of No. of Situation of each Polling Station 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PO’s PC’s General Local Local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref
IA1 0001- 1053 1 2 Moorhouse Methodist Church 182 164 150 144 NO 150 179 Rochdale Road, Milnrow (mobile phone required) INFO
IB1 0001- 1717 1 2 St Ann’s School (Parish Hall) 665 281 224 249 224 340 Brocklebank Road, Rochdale ( mobile phone required)
IC1 0001- 834 1 1 Meadowfield Community Centre 195 101 160 167 160 224 Eafield Road, Rochdale
ID1 0001- 1314 1 2 Smallbridge Methodist Church 600 453 460 524 459 510 Wesley Close, Rochdale
IE1 0001- 1273 1 2 Smallbridge Tenants’ & Residents’ Association 468 257 263 275 263 326
Page 217 5 Stevenson Square, Rochdale
IF1 0001- 1847 1 3 Mobile Unit on Car Park of Ryefields 672 241 229 248 229 334 (with TD) Braddocks Close, Rochdale (mobile phone required) NO JA1 0001- 2188 1 3 Caldershaw Primary School 960 431 461 575 INFO 460 549 Off Edenfield Road, Rochdale
JB1 0001-2312 1 3 Whittaker Moss C P School (Nursery) 581 716 713 717 713 663 Highwood, Norden, Rochdale 771
JC1 0001- 2821 1 3 Norden Community School 630 374 313 455 312 898 Shawfield Lane, Rochdale 761 449 414 451 415
JD1 0001- 511 1 1 Jericho Methodist Church (mobile phone required) 275 169 173 155 173 153 Bury & Rochdale Old Road, Heywood
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc
Description of No. of No. of Situation of each Polling Station 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PO’s PC’s General Local Local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref
KA1 0001-334 1 1 Heap Bridge Social Club 128 55 65 75 NO 65 87 Waterfold Lane, Bury INFO
KB1 0001- 1999 1 3 Heady Hill Community Centre 972 722 683 653 683 427 KB2 2000- 3858 1 2 Whalley Road, Heywood 726 316
KC1 0001- 1611 1 2 Darnhill Library 598 238 257 254 257 291 Argyle Parade, Heywood
KD1 0001- 986 1 2 Heywood & Darnhill Boxing Club, 402 185 161 176 161 179 Argyle Street Heywood
Page 218 KE1 0001- 2050 1 3 Bullough Moor Bowling Club 734 301 295 324 295 361 Regent Street, Heywood (mobile phone required) NO LA1 0001- 1720 1 2 All Souls Church (Parish Room) 784 503 401 418 INFO 401 432 Rochdale Road East, Heywood (mobile phone required)
LB1 0001- 2072 1 3 The Civic Hall 842 413 385 394 385 476 Wood Street, Heywood
LC1 0001- 630 1 1 Crimble Croft Community Centre 293 143 119 126 119 137 Aspinall Street, Heywood
LD1 0001- 1379 1 2 Heywood Sports Village 592 288 274 290 274 328 West Starkey Street, Heywood
LE1 0001- 1008 1 2 Back O’th’ Moss Community Centre 387 185 165 184 165 211 52 Peel Lane, Heywood
LF1 0001- 766 1 1 St James’ Hall (Use side door) 285 137 134 140 134 159 (with MA) Tower Street, Heywood (mobile phone required)
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc
Description of No. of No. of Situation of each Polling Station 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 voters PO’s PC’s General Local Local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref NO MA1 0001- 910 1 2 St James’ Hall (Use side door) 303 181 212 192 INFO 211 195 (with LF) Tower Street, Heywood (mobile phone required)
MB1 0001- 2002 1 3 St Johns Church Hall 912 442 473 435 471 531 Manchester Road, Heywood
MC1 0001- 2632 1 3 Hopwood Rec Bowling Club 1236 625 697 655 697 664 Coronation Ave/Manchster Rd, Heywood
MD1 0001- 31 0 0 St Mary’s Church 10 6 6 4 5 7 (With PB) Langley Lane, Birch, Middleton (mobile phone required)
ME1 0001- 2078 1 3 Hollin SureStart Children’s Centre 673 343 364 366 364 396
Page 219 Tintern Road, Middleton
MF1 0001- 833 1 1 Hollin Estate Management Office 366 235 235 236 235 239 48 Nowell Road, Middleton NO NA1 0001- 2165 1 3 Function Room at Lancashire Fold Pub 1154 652 667 580 INFO 667 648 Kirkway, Middleton
NB1 0001- 2347 1 3 Jumbo Social Centre 972 415 467 475 467 535 Grimshaw Lane, Middleton
NC1 0001- 1922 1 3 Brookside Community Centre 831 427 412 390 412 431 Mainway East, Middleton (mobile phone required)
ND1 0001- 1653 1 2 Elm Street Community Centre 643 311 305 283 305 327 Elm Street, Middleton
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc
Description of No. of No. of Situation of each Polling Station 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PO’s PC’s General Local Local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref
OA1 0001- 1806 1 3 All Saints’ Church (mobile phone required) 815 466 466 431 NO 466 466 Manchester Old Road, Rhodes, Middleton INFO
OB1 0001- 1270 1 2 Parkfield C P School 563 309 297 309 297 336 Harold Street, Middleton
OC1 0001- 1729 1 3 United Reformed Church 1017 567 543 562 543 610 (With OE) Manchester New Road, Alkrington, Middleton
OD1 0001- 1730 1 3 Alkrington Youth Centre 1062 608 628 644 627 664 Kirkway, Middleton
Page 220 OE1 0001- 1300 1 2 United Reformed Church 758 411 392 379 392 404 (With OC) Manchester New Road, Alkrington, Middleton NO PA1 0001- 147 1 1 St Thomas’ Church 82 55 50 47 INFO 50 62 Ellis Lane, Middleton (mobile phone required)
PB1 0001- 621 1 1 St Mary’s Church 288 152 141 128 141 149 (With MD) Langley Lane, Birch, Middleton (mobile phone required)
PC1 0001- 1609 1 2 Langley Library 349 161 206 195 206 240 Windermere Road, Langley, Middleton
PD1 0001- 1730 1 2 Middleton Community Training Centre 544 207 234 215 234 270 111A Long Street, Middleton (next to the Olde Boars Head)
PE1 0001- 1760 1 2 Demesne Community Centre 498 231 298 218 298 275 Asby Close, Middleton
PF1 0001- 2683 1 3 Burnside Youth & Community Centre 445 329 403 309 403 435 38 Burnside Crescent, Langley, Middleton 387
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc
Description of No. of No. of Situation of each Polling Station 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PO’s PC’s General Local Local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref
QA1 0001- 563 1 1 Cleworth Road Children’s Activity Centre 367 195 196 177 NO 196 213 Cleworth Road, Middleton INFO
QB1 0001- 1117 1 2 St Stephen’s Church Hall 617 266 247 203 247 251 High Street, Middleton (mobile phone required)
QC1 0001- 898 1 2 The Old Grammar School 355 148 134 135 134 170 Boarshaw Road, Middleton
QD1 0001- 1979 1 3 Stanycliffe Social Centre 912 608 582 581 582 454 QD2 1980- 3556 1 2 Stanycliffe Lane, Middleton 721 321
QE1 0001- 1599 1 2 Mobile unit on corner of James Andrew Street 596 285 205 167 205 297
Page 221 And Oldham Road, Middleton (mobile phone required)
QF1 0001- 274 1 1 Mobile unit on car park at front of Middleton Arena 32 61 Corporation Street, Middleton (mobile phone required)
NO RA1 0001- 747 1 1 The Coach House 406 198 174 185 INFO 174 178 Victoria Street, Littleborough
RB1 0001- 1264 1 2 Littleborough Community School (Info Room) 662 316 326 293 326 328 (with TA) Calderbrook Road, Littleborough
RC1 0001- 1257 1 2 Stansfield Hall Primary School 564 265 245 278 245 252 Barnes Meadows, Littleborough
RD1 0001- 1853 1 3 United Reformed Church 937 435 442 470 442 524 Victoria Street, Littleborough (mobile phone required)
RE1 0001- 1346 1 2 Smithy Bridge Methodist Church Hall 811 788 684 742 684 424 RE2 1347- 2686 1 2 Smithybridge Road, Littleborough (mobile phone required) 751
RF1 0001- 45 0 0 Smithy Bridge Methodist Church Hall 182 (With RE) Smithybridge Road, Littleborough
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc
Description of No. of No. of Situation of each Polling Station 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PO’s PC’s General Local Local Local Euro Loc & Loc & Parl AV Ref
1020 1 2 Milnrow Cricket Club 551 147 119 158 NO 119 184 Harbour Lane, Milnrow INFO
1216 1 2 Milnrow Cricket Club 552 298 305 313 305 358 Harbour Lane, Milnrow (mobile phone required)
1781 1 3 Butterworth Hall Community Centre 1696 800 739 806 739 455 3339 1 2 22 New Street, Milnrow (mobile phone required) 426
- 2431 1 3 Mobile unit on car park of Ogden Baptist Church 1079 541 504 504 504 538 Cedar Lane, Newhey
Page 222 NO TA1 0001- 986 1 2 Littleborough Community School (Info Room) 524 237 200 211 INFO 200 216 (with RB) Calderbrook Road, Littleborough
TB1 0001- 1345 1 2 Dearnley Spiritualist Church 674 287 272 347 272 316 (With TE) 14/16 New Road, Littleborough (mobile phone required)
TC1 0001- 1078 1 2 Wardle Library 1141 649 643 657 643 338 TC2 1079- 2121 1 2 Ramsden Road/Birch Road, Wardle 274
TD1 0001- 2431 1 3 Mobile Unit on Car Park of Ryefields 695 312 284 357 284 378 (With IF) Braddocks Close, Rochdale (mobile phone required)
TE1 0001- 1468 1 2 Dearnley Spiritualist Church 816 451 439 525 439 456 (With TB) 14/16 New Road, Littleborough (mobile phone required)
E:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\5\0\9\AI00002905\$3ubim4jh.doc Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
DA - ANNE LINE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 16 0 0 0 16 DEANCOURT 41 0 0 41 99 0 1 (1.01%) 0 98 (-1.01%) DENHOLME ROAD 21 0 0 21 35 0 0 0 35 DENVER ROAD 23 0 0 23 51 0 1 (1.96%) 0 50 (-1.96%) DICKEN GREEN LANE 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 STONEYVALE COURT, DICKEN 73 0 0 73 102 1 (0.98%) 0 0 103 (0.98%) GREEN LANE DICKEN GREEN 24 0 0 24 35 0 2 (5.71%) 0 33 (-5.71%) DIGBY ROAD 34 0 0 34 70 0 0 0 70 DUNLOP AVENUE 34 0 0 34 59 0 0 0 59 EDINBURGH WAY 10 0 0 10 14 0 2 (14.29%) 0 12 (-14.29%) GREEN BRIDGE CLOSE 30 0 0 30 44 1 (2.27%) 0 0 45 (2.27%) Page 223 HARTLEY LANE 17 0 0 17 28 0 0 0 28 HURST STREET 13 0 0 13 13 0 1 (7.69%) 0 12 (-7.69%) LABURNUM TERRACE 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 LOWTHER ROAD 42 0 0 42 69 2 (2.90%) 1 (1.45%) 0 70 (1.45%) MARGARET WARD COURT 30 0 0 30 32 0 0 0 32 OLDHAM ROAD 17 0 0 17 24 0 0 0 24 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 IAN FRASER COURT, QUEENSWAY 38 0 0 38 43 0 1 (2.33%) 0 42 (-2.33%) QUEENSWAY 59 0 0 59 120 0 0 0 120 SCHOFIELD STREET 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 WELL I'TH' LANE 37 0 0 37 65 3 (4.62%) 6 (9.23%) 0 62 (-4.62%) WELL STREET 28 0 0 28 48 0 0 0 48 WELLFIELD MEWS 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 WELLFIELD PLACE 11 0 0 11 27 0 2 (7.41%) 0 25 (-7.41%) WELLFIELD STREET 15 0 0 15 19 1 (5.26%) 2 (10.53%) 1 18 (-5.26%) WILLIAM HENRY STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 6otl 7or 8 9 232 ) ) 232 01)23 5 B)CF@DE 04 B0CF4DE 0 01)@A B90C)3DE
DB - ALDWYCH 30 0 0 30 43 0 3 (6.98%) 0 40 (-6.98%) ARKWRIGHT WAY 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 BALDERSTONE ROAD 52 0 0 52 73 0 2 (2.74%) 0 71 (-2.74%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 1 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
DB - CHURCH WALK NURSING HOME, 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 CAVENDISH ROAD CAVENDISH ROAD 53 0 0 53 93 1 (1.08%) 1 (1.08%) 0 93 CUMBERLAND ROAD 34 0 0 34 50 0 1 (2.00%) 0 49 (-2.00%) CURZON ROAD 64 0 0 64 88 1 (1.14%) 1 (1.14%) 0 88 DAVENTRY ROAD 69 0 0 69 72 0 0 0 72 DOBBIN DRIVE 34 0 0 34 55 0 0 0 55 GAINSBOROUGH DRIVE 8 0 0 8 13 0 1 (7.69%) 0 12 (-7.69%) GISBURN DRIVE 22 0 0 22 27 0 0 0 27 GLADSTONE CRESCENT 36 0 0 36 42 0 1 (2.38%) 0 41 (-2.38%)
Page 224 GREAT GATES ROAD 69 0 0 69 89 1 (1.12%) 2 (2.25%) 0 88 (-1.12%) HILL TOP DRIVE 70 0 0 70 123 0 1 (0.81%) 0 122 (-0.81%) HOGARTH ROAD 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 KEW ROAD 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 KIRKWAY 52 0 0 52 77 0 3 (3.90%) 0 74 (-3.90%) MORNINGTON ROAD 57 0 0 57 80 0 1 (1.25%) 0 79 (-1.25%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 RHODES CRESCENT 12 0 0 12 13 0 2 (15.38%) 0 11 (-15.38%) ROMNEY AVENUE 12 0 0 12 18 0 0 0 18 RUSKIN ROAD 14 0 0 14 25 0 0 0 25 TAVISTOCK ROAD 29 0 0 29 42 0 0 0 42 THE STRAND 25 0 0 25 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) 6otl 7or 8 G 9 FF4 ) ) FF4 01)FA 3 B)CA5DE A) B0C5FDE ) 01)@@ B90C@4DE
DC - CAVENDISH ROAD 12 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 19 DACRE ROAD 15 0 0 15 24 0 0 0 24 DALMENY TERRACE 10 0 0 10 24 0 0 0 24 DARLEY ROAD 38 0 0 38 69 1 (1.45%) 2 (2.90%) 0 68 (-1.45%) DARLINGTON ROAD 66 0 0 66 115 0 4 (3.48%) 0 111 (-3.48%) DATCHET TERRACE 14 0 0 14 25 0 0 0 25 DAVENTRY ROAD 86 0 0 86 169 0 5 (2.96%) 0 164 (-2.96%) DAVENTRY WAY 8 0 0 8 11 1 (9.09%) 0 0 12 (9.09%) GAINSBOROUGH DRIVE 82 0 0 82 136 0 0 0 136 GREAT GATES CLOSE 17 0 0 17 30 0 0 0 30
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 2 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
DC - GREAT GATES ROAD 33 0 0 33 61 0 2 (3.28%) 0 59 (-3.28%) HARDY CLOSE 19 0 0 19 37 0 0 0 37 HARTLEY LANE 47 0 0 47 83 2 (2.41%) 1 (1.20%) 0 84 (1.20%) HARTLEY TERRACE 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 HOGARTH ROAD 8 0 0 8 13 0 1 (7.69%) 0 12 (-7.69%) MOORCROFT 18 0 0 18 29 0 0 0 29 MOORSIDE 34 0 0 34 69 0 3 (4.35%) 0 66 (-4.35%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 QUEEN VICTORIA STREET 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 QUEENS DRIVE 45 0 0 45 55 0 1 (1.82%) 0 54 (-1.82%) QUEENSWAY 47 0 0 47 100 0 0 0 100 RHODES CRESCENT 79 0 0 79 160 2 (1.25%) 4 (2.50%) 0 158 (-1.25%) Page 225 6otl 7or 8 ( 9 243 ) ) 243 01A35 2 B)CH5DE A3 B0C52DE ) 01AA0 B90C3FDE
DD - ARNOLD BAGNALL COURT 30 0 0 30 31 0 1 (3.23%) 0 30 (-3.23%) BADGER CLOSE 23 0 0 23 56 0 0 0 56 BADGER LANE 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 BALDERSTONE ROAD 20 0 0 20 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) BLACKCHAPEL DRIVE 17 0 0 17 42 0 0 0 42 CHAPEL ROW, BROAD LANE, 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 BURNEDGE BROAD LANE, BURNEDGE 58 0 0 58 95 0 0 0 95 WHITE HORSE MEADOW, BROAD 3 0 0 3 10 0 0 0 10 LANE, BURNEDGE BROAD LANE 32 0 0 32 56 0 0 0 56 SPRING HILL RESOURCE CENTRE, 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 (50.00%) 0 1 (-50.00%) BROAD LANE BROCKWAY 15 0 0 15 37 0 0 0 37 BROW STREET 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 BURLINGTON STREET 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 CALF HEY HOUSE, CALF HEY SOUTH 3 0 1(33.33%) 2 6 0 2 (33.33%) 0 4 (-33.33%) CANBERRA WAY 70 0 0 70 93 1 (1.08%) 9 (9.68%) 0 85 (-8.60%) CLEVELEYS AVENUE 29 0 0 29 54 0 0 0 54 KENSINGTON PLACE, CONNAUGHT 15 0 0 15 15 2 (13.33%) 0 0 17 (13.33%) AVENUE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 3 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
DD - CONNAUGHT AVENUE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 CRAIGLANDS 85 0 0 85 180 0 3 (1.67%) 0 177 (-1.67%) CROMPTON AVENUE 23 0 0 23 50 0 0 0 50 CULVERT STREET 18 0 0 18 25 0 0 0 25 DODD CROFT 6 0 0 6 13 3 (23.08%) 0 0 16 (23.08%) FAIRLANDS STREET 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 1 5 FAIRLANDS VIEW 9 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 9 FARLANDS RISE 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 FIELDWAY 52 0 0 52 61 0 4 (6.56%) 0 57 (-6.56%) GILBROOK WAY 37 0 0 37 74 0 0 0 74 Page 226 GREENFIELD STREET 21 0 0 21 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) HARVARD STREET 17 0 0 17 28 0 0 0 28 HOLLY STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 HORNET CLOSE 24 0 0 24 35 0 1 (2.86%) 0 34 (-2.86%) HURST MEADOW 29 0 0 29 62 3 (4.84%) 1 (1.61%) 0 64 (3.23%) MAY PLACE 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 MEADOWFIELD 9 0 0 9 22 0 0 0 22 MELBOURNE CLOSE 42 0 0 42 85 0 0 0 85 MIDGLEY DRIVE 23 0 0 23 51 0 0 0 51 MILNGATE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 22 0 0 0 22 NALL GATE 16 0 0 16 40 0 0 0 40 NEW BROAD LANE 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 BROADVIEW COURT, OFF BROAD 20 0 0 20 27 1 (3.70%) 4 (14.81%) 0 24 (-11.11%) LANE OLDHAM ROAD 135 0 0 135 240 0 3 (1.25%) 0 237 (-1.25%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PARKFIELD CLOSE 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 PARKFIELD STREET 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 PERTH ROAD 72 0 0 72 89 0 3 (3.37%) 0 86 (-3.37%) PLATTING LANE 24 0 0 24 35 0 1 (2.86%) 0 34 (-2.86%) QUEEN VICTORIA STREET 29 0 0 29 41 0 0 0 41 ROCHDALE ROAD, BURNEDGE 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 SEYMOUR GROVE 19 0 0 19 42 0 0 0 42 SUNHILL CLOSE 31 0 0 31 65 0 2 (3.08%) 0 63 (-3.08%) TURN HILL ROAD 5 0 0 5 13 0 0 0 13
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 4 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
DD - VERDANT WAY 16 0 0 16 43 0 1 (2.33%) 0 42 (-2.33%) WADDINGTON FOLD 9 0 0 9 22 0 0 0 22 WASP AVENUE 12 0 0 12 16 1 (6.25%) 1 (6.25%) 0 16 WELL I'TH' LANE 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 6otl 7or 8 9 010FA ) 0 B)C)4DE 010F0 A1)@2 00 B)C@HDE 34 B0C4)DE 0 A1)A5 B90C32DE
DE - ASH GROVE 8 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 17 CLIFTONVILLE ROAD 29 0 0 29 49 0 1 (2.04%) 0 48 (-2.04%) COLLIER'S COURT 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 DEAN BANK DRIVE 7 0 0 7 22 2 (9.09%) 0 0 24 (9.09%) FERNDALE AVENUE 16 0 0 16 36 0 0 0 36
Page 227 KENILWORTH ROAD 18 0 0 18 37 0 0 0 37 LANGDALE AVENUE 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 MARSDEN CLOSE 12 0 0 12 20 0 0 0 20 OLDHAM ROAD 133 0 0 133 262 0 1 (0.38%) 0 261 (-0.38%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PIT LANE 1 0 0 1 2 1 (50.00%) 0 0 3 (50.00%) SHAW ROAD 56 0 0 56 116 1 (0.86%) 1 (0.86%) 0 116 ST JAMES CLOSE 14 0 0 14 29 0 0 0 29 TANDLE HILL TERRACE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 THORNHAM COURT 7 0 0 7 6 0 0 0 6 THORNHAM LANE 15 0 0 15 34 0 0 0 34 THORNHAM NEW ROAD 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 YEW TREE CLOSE 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 6otl 7or 8 E 9 330 ) ) 330 2@@ H B)C20DE 3 B)CH2DE ) 2@2 B)C0@DE
DF - ARKWRIGHT WAY 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 BALDERSTONE ROAD 49 0 0 49 77 0 5 (6.49%) 0 72 (-6.49%) CAESAR STREET 44 0 0 44 67 0 3 (4.48%) 0 64 (-4.48%) CUMBERLAND ROAD 40 0 0 40 26 0 0 0 26 CURZON CLOSE 19 0 0 19 24 0 1 (4.17%) 0 23 (-4.17%) CURZON ROAD 38 0 0 38 35 0 2 (5.71%) 0 33 (-5.71%) DEVONSHIRE ROAD 32 0 0 32 46 4 (8.70%) 4 (8.70%) 0 46
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 5 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
DF - EVEREST STREET 19 0 0 19 34 0 0 0 34 FRIARS CRESCENT 72 0 0 72 106 0 3 (2.83%) 0 103 (-2.83%) GERRARD STREET 45 0 0 45 78 0 1 (1.28%) 0 77 (-1.28%) GREAT GATES ROAD 45 0 0 45 51 0 5 (9.80%) 0 46 (-9.80%) HILL TOP DRIVE 263 0 0 263 383 0 7 (1.83%) 0 376 (-1.83%) KILDARE CRESCENT 104 0 0 104 156 0 1 (0.64%) 0 155 (-0.64%) LILAC ROAD 4 0 0 4 11 0 3 (27.27%) 0 8 (-27.27%) LUDGATE ROAD 48 0 0 48 71 0 2 (2.82%) 0 69 (-2.82%) MELBOURNE ROAD 12 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 21 NEVIS STREET 32 0 0 32 35 0 2 (5.71%) 0 33 (-5.71%) Page 228 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 RANELEY GROVE 30 0 0 30 44 0 1 (2.27%) 0 43 (-2.27%) RUDYARD GROVE 24 0 0 24 34 0 1 (2.94%) 0 33 (-2.94%) RUSKIN ROAD 14 0 0 14 23 0 2 (8.70%) 0 21 (-8.70%) SNOWDON STREET 26 0 0 26 42 0 1 (2.38%) 0 41 (-2.38%) TELFORD WAY 14 0 0 14 24 0 2 (8.33%) 0 22 (-8.33%) 6otl 7or 8 ! 9 453 ) ) 453 01H)0 H B)CA4DE H2 B3CA5DE ) 013@4 B93C))DE GIE$S6PQE Q RS$RPI6 H1@4H ) 0B)C)ADE H1@43 F1H5@ 32 B)CH5DE 0@) BAC))DE A F13F0 B90C@ADE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 6 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
HA - ARBURY AVENUE 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 BIRCHFIELD DRIVE 65 0 0 65 129 0 0 0 129 BLACKSMITH LANE 7 0 0 7 22 0 0 0 22 BOLTON ROAD 71 0 0 71 112 0 3 (2.68%) 0 109 (-2.68%) BRIMROD LANE 56 0 0 56 90 0 0 0 90 BURNABY STREET 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 CONVENT GROVE 12 0 0 12 25 2 (8.00%) 0 0 27 (8.00%) DERRICK WALKER COURT 28 0 0 28 30 0 2 (6.67%) 0 28 (-6.67%) DISLEY STREET 26 0 0 26 40 0 0 0 40 FARRIERS LANE 16 0 0 16 35 0 0 0 35 FINSBURY STREET 27 0 0 27 37 0 0 0 37 HOLBORN GARDENS 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 Page 229 HOLBORN SQUARE 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 HOLBORN STREET 160 0 0 160 256 1 (0.39%) 4 (1.56%) 1 253 (-1.17%) JOHNSON STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 KEMP AVENUE 11 0 0 11 19 0 2 (10.53%) 0 17 (-10.53%) LAMBETH TERRACE 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 LAW STREET 33 0 0 33 46 0 0 0 46 LIME STREET 8 0 0 8 13 2 (15.38%) 0 0 15 (15.38%) LOWER BEECHWOOD 10 0 0 10 24 0 0 0 24 JOHN KEMBLE COURT, 18 0 0 18 20 0 0 0 20 MANCHESTER ROAD LAURISTON, MANCHESTER ROAD 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 MANCHESTER ROAD 91 0 0 91 135 1 (0.74%) 0 0 136 (0.74%) MARLAND CLOSE 14 0 0 14 22 0 0 0 22 MARLAND FOLD 86 0 0 86 176 0 0 0 176 MARLAND GREEN 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 MARLAND HILL ROAD 72 0 0 72 141 0 3 (2.13%) 0 138 (-2.13%) MARLAND MILL FARM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 MARLAND MILL HOUSE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 BRANKSOME, MARLAND OLD ROAD 1 0 0 1 19 1 (5.26%) 1 (5.26%) 0 19 MARLAND OLD ROAD 30 0 0 30 58 0 0 0 58 MARLAND RISE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 MAYFAIR GARDENS 30 0 0 30 50 0 0 0 50 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 7 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
HA - PALLOTINE WALK 6 0 0 6 17 0 0 0 17 PERRY CLOSE 14 0 0 14 19 0 0 0 19 ROCH MILLS CRESCENT 58 0 0 58 84 0 1 (1.19%) 0 83 (-1.19%) ROCH MILLS GARDENS 12 0 0 12 16 0 0 0 16 LAUREL GROVE NURSING HOME, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ROCH VALLEY WAY ROCH VALLEY WAY 51 0 0 51 97 0 1 (1.03%) 0 96 (-1.03%) ROUSE STREET 39 0 0 39 72 0 0 0 72 SOUTHDOWN CLOSE 37 0 0 37 68 0 0 0 68 SPRINGFIELD COTTAGES 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7
Page 230 NURSING HOME, BOLTON ROAD, 1 0 0 1 62 0 5 (8.06%) 0 57 (-8.06%) SPRINGFIELD PARK SPRINGFIELD PARK 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 ST AIDANS CLOSE 28 0 0 28 47 0 1 (2.13%) 0 46 (-2.13%) SUDDEN STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 SUDLEY ROAD 24 0 0 24 36 0 0 0 36 THOMAS HENSHAW COURT 26 0 0 26 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) UTTLEY STREET 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 WESTMINSTER STREET 35 0 0 35 48 0 0 0 48 WHEELWRIGHT CLOSE 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 WIMBLEDON DRIVE 12 0 0 12 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) 6otl 7or 8 9 01AF0 ) ) 01AF0 A1A0H F B)C3ADE A@ B0C03DE 0 A1042 B9)C50DE
HB - BROOKLANDS COURT 24 0 0 24 82 0 0 0 82 OAKLAND PRIVATE NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 40 0 5 (12.50%) 0 35 (-12.50%) BURY ROAD BURY ROAD 115 0 0 115 210 2 (0.95%) 1 (0.48%) 0 211 (0.48%) PEGASUS COURT, BURY ROAD 61 0 0 61 58 0 0 0 58 CHADWICK STREET 16 0 0 16 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) CROWNEAST STREET 30 0 0 30 38 1 (2.63%) 0 0 39 (2.63%) DOVE STREET 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 GLENCOE PLACE 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 HALF ACRE DRIVE 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 LEOPOLD STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 LINNET HILL 29 0 0 29 51 0 1 (1.96%) 0 50 (-1.96%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 8 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
HB - MALVERN STREET EAST 16 0 0 16 24 0 0 0 24 MALVERN STREET WEST 30 0 0 30 39 0 0 0 39 OAKENROD HALL 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 OAKENROD HILL 15 0 0 15 27 0 0 0 27 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 HALF ACRE HOUSE H.F.E., ROCH 1 0 0 1 23 0 3 (13.04%) 0 20 (-13.04%) VALLEY WAY ROSSMERE AVENUE 13 0 0 13 37 0 1 (2.70%) 0 36 (-2.70%) 6otl 7or 8 G 9 3F4 ) ) 3F4 245 3 B)CH3DE 0A B0CFADE ) 254 B90CA4DE
HC - AINTREE DRIVE 9 0 0 9 26 0 0 0 26
Page 231 ARNSIDE DRIVE 24 0 0 24 45 0 0 0 45 ASCOT CLOSE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 BAGSLATE MOOR ROAD 6 0 0 6 16 0 0 0 16 WILLOW BANK, BAGSLATE MOOR 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 ROAD BAMFORD WAY 42 0 0 42 119 0 1 (0.84%) 0 118 (-0.84%) BEECHFIELD CLOSE 14 0 0 14 27 0 0 0 27 BEECHFIELD 13 0 0 13 24 0 0 0 24 BELGIUM STREET 8 0 0 8 10 1 (10.00%) 0 0 11 (10.00%) BELL MEADOW DRIVE 9 0 0 9 17 0 2 (11.76%) 0 15 (-11.76%) BITTERN CLOSE 17 0 0 17 48 1 (2.08%) 0 0 49 (2.08%) BOWLING GREEN WAY 12 0 0 12 37 2 (5.41%) 0 0 39 (5.41%) BRAMLEY ROAD 21 0 0 21 41 0 0 0 41 BROADOAK ROAD 17 0 0 17 31 0 0 0 31 BURNTHORPE CLOSE 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 BURY AND ROCHDALE OLD ROAD 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 0 19 BURY ROAD 57 0 0 57 92 2 (2.17%) 2 (2.17%) 0 92 BYRON GROVE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAIRN DRIVE 9 0 0 9 16 0 1 (6.25%) 0 15 (-6.25%) CAITHNESS ROAD 18 0 0 18 32 0 0 0 32 CHEPSTOW CLOSE 14 0 0 14 30 0 0 0 30 NORDEN LODGE, CLAY LANE 18 0 0 18 20 0 0 0 20 CLAY LANE 15 0 0 15 27 0 0 0 27
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 9 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
HC - COACH LANE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 CRANBOURNE ROAD 27 0 0 27 55 0 2 (3.64%) 0 53 (-3.64%) CURLEW CLOSE 18 0 0 18 40 0 0 0 40 DIXON CLOSES 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 DIXON FOLD 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 DUNLIN CLOSE 11 0 0 11 33 0 0 0 33 EDGEMOOR DRIVE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 EPSOM CLOSE 13 0 0 13 29 2 (6.90%) 2 (6.90%) 0 29 FULMAR GARDENS 10 0 0 10 26 0 0 0 26 FUR BARN LANE 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 Page 232 FURBARN ROAD 5 0 0 5 17 0 0 0 17 GLENMORE CLOSE 7 0 2(28.57%) 5 11 0 1 (9.09%) 0 10 (-9.09%) GNAT BANK FOLD 8 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 17 GREENSHANK CLOSE 18 0 0 18 42 0 0 0 42 GREENVALE 51 0 0 51 101 2 (1.98%) 2 (1.98%) 0 101 GREENWICH CLOSE 15 0 0 15 39 0 0 0 39 HAWTHORN ROAD 42 0 0 42 110 0 0 0 110 HIGHLANDS ROAD 26 0 0 26 47 0 0 0 47 HINTON CLOSE 16 0 0 16 22 0 0 0 22 HOLLIN LANE 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 TOP O'TH'LANE, HOLLIN LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HOPWOOD FARM, BAMFORD 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 KENYON FOLD 10 0 0 10 15 0 0 0 15 LAPWING CLOSE 7 0 0 7 14 2 (14.29%) 0 0 16 (14.29%) LINNELL DRIVE 22 0 0 22 51 0 0 0 51 MANSFIELD ROAD 38 0 0 38 55 0 2 (3.64%) 0 53 (-3.64%) MURRAYFIELD 20 0 0 20 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) BAMFORD MEWS, NORDEN ROAD 32 0 0 32 47 0 4 (8.51%) 0 43 (-8.51%) BURNS COURT, NORDEN ROAD 15 0 0 15 26 0 2 (7.69%) 0 24 (-7.69%) NORDEN ROAD 117 0 0 117 186 1 (0.54%) 0 0 187 (0.54%) NORFORD WAY 48 0 0 48 100 0 1 (1.00%) 0 99 (-1.00%) NORTHDENE DRIVE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PARTRIDGE CLOSE 11 0 0 11 17 0 0 0 17
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 10 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
HC - PETREL CLOSE 26 0 0 26 62 0 1 (1.61%) 0 61 (-1.61%) PLOVER CLOSE 50 0 0 50 115 0 0 0 115 PORRITT CLOSE 28 0 0 28 43 0 2 (4.65%) 0 41 (-4.65%) ROCHBURY CLOSE 14 0 0 14 31 0 0 0 31 RYBURN SQUARE 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 SAND HOLE LANE 9 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 15 SANDPIPER CLOSE 17 0 0 17 38 0 0 0 38 SOUTH VIEW 27 0 0 27 39 0 0 0 39 SPENCER LANE 31 0 0 31 51 1 (1.96%) 1 (1.96%) 0 51 SPRING BANK LANE 28 0 0 28 73 0 2 (2.74%) 0 71 (-2.74%) SPRINGS 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 SWALLOW DRIVE 21 0 0 21 35 0 1 (2.86%) 0 34 (-2.86%) Page 233 SWIFT ROAD 19 0 0 19 34 0 0 0 34 TEAL COURT 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 TERN CLOSE 12 0 0 12 27 0 0 0 27 TYRONE DRIVE 45 0 0 45 95 0 1 (1.05%) 0 94 (-1.05%) WAR OFFICE ROAD 63 0 0 63 119 0 0 0 119 WINSFORD DRIVE 15 0 0 15 28 0 0 0 28 WINSTON AVENUE 25 0 0 25 55 0 0 0 55 WOODCOCK CLOSE 30 0 0 30 69 0 0 0 69 WOODTOP AVENUE 39 0 0 39 72 0 0 0 72 WORDSWORTH WAY 58 0 0 58 138 0 2 (1.45%) 0 136 (-1.45%) 6otl 7or 8 ( 9 01@@3 ) A B)C03DE 01@@0 31)5@ 0H B)CH@DE 33 B0C)FDE ) 31)22 B9)C2ADE
HD - BAMFORD WAY 21 0 0 21 75 0 0 0 75 BATTERSBY STREET 19 0 0 19 36 0 0 0 36 BEAUMONDS WAY 13 0 0 13 32 0 0 0 32 BEAUMONDS 4 0 0 4 5 2 (40.00%) 0 0 7 (40.00%) BROADHALGH AVENUE 23 0 0 23 44 0 1 (2.27%) 0 43 (-2.27%) BROADHALGH ROAD 13 0 0 13 27 0 0 0 27 BROADHALGH 15 0 0 15 35 0 0 0 35 BURY ROAD 128 0 0 128 250 0 1 (0.40%) 0 249 (-0.40%) RYEFIELDS, BURY ROAD 4 0 0 4 11 0 0 0 11 BYRON GROVE 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 11 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
HD - CAMBERLEY DRIVE 70 0 0 70 157 1 (0.64%) 0 0 158 (0.64%) CAMBRIDGE AVENUE 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9 CANTERBURY CLOSE 16 0 0 16 39 2 (5.13%) 2 (5.13%) 0 39 CHADWICK HALL ROAD 14 0 0 14 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) CHESTER AVENUE 18 0 0 18 42 0 0 0 42 CLUBHOUSE CLOSE 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 ETON CLOSE 11 0 0 11 24 0 0 0 24 FIELDCROFT 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 FIELDHEAD AVENUE 30 0 0 30 54 0 1 (1.85%) 0 53 (-1.85%) FIELDHEAD COTTAGES 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 Page 234 FORD GARDENS 32 0 0 32 34 0 4 (11.76%) 0 30 (-11.76%) GLEN MORAG GARDENS 14 0 0 14 19 0 0 0 19 HALF ACRE LANE 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 BAMFORD COURT, HALF ACRE 28 0 0 28 28 0 0 0 28 MEWS HALF ACRE MEWS 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 ROBERT SAVILLE COURT, HALF 12 0 0 12 16 0 0 0 16 ACRE MEWS HALF ACRE ROAD 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 0 19 HANDS LANE 11 0 0 11 20 0 0 0 20 HARROW AVENUE 20 0 0 20 38 1 (2.63%) 0 0 39 (2.63%) KENION ROAD 16 0 0 16 31 0 1 (3.23%) 0 30 (-3.23%) LINKS VIEW 55 0 0 55 96 0 2 (2.08%) 0 94 (-2.08%) MARCLIFFE DRIVE 14 0 0 14 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) MEADOWCROFT HOUSE, 13 0 0 13 17 2 (11.76%) 1 (5.88%) 0 18 (5.88%) MEADOWCROFT LANE MEADOWCROFT LANE 15 0 0 15 25 0 0 0 25 MIDGE HALL DRIVE 38 0 0 38 76 0 1 (1.32%) 0 75 (-1.32%) MOORGATE AVENUE 31 0 0 31 66 0 0 0 66 NORTHDENE DRIVE 10 0 0 10 26 0 0 0 26 NORWICH AVENUE 23 0 0 23 47 0 2 (4.26%) 0 45 (-4.26%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 OULDER HILL DRIVE 70 0 0 70 144 0 1 (0.69%) 0 143 (-0.69%) OULDER HILL 11 0 0 11 24 0 0 0 24 OXFORD AVENUE 9 0 0 9 23 0 0 0 23
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 12 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
HD - ROCH VALLEY WAY 3 0 0 3 10 0 0 0 10 TAUNTON AVENUE 25 0 0 25 52 0 0 0 52 WINCHESTER CLOSE 11 0 0 11 26 0 0 0 26 WOODGATE AVENUE 25 0 0 25 51 0 0 0 51 WOODLANDS AVENUE 14 0 0 14 30 0 0 0 30 YEALAND CLOSE 9 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 15 YORK AVENUE 17 0 0 17 35 0 0 0 35 6otl 7or 8 9 420 ) ) 420 01554 5 B)CHADE 04 B0C)0DE ) 015F5 B9)C@5DE GT!P$ H102H ) AB)C)@DE H102A F1552 3A B)CH0DE 54 B0C03DE 0 F15A4 B9)CFADE Page 235
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 13 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
EA - ADAIR STREET 13 0 0 13 24 0 1 (4.17%) 0 23 (-4.17%) ALEXANDER STREET 28 0 0 28 43 0 0 0 43 ASH STREET 8 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 13 ATKINSON STREET 7 0 0 7 6 0 0 0 6 BUCKLEY BARN COURT 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9 CASTLEWAY 21 0 0 21 44 0 0 0 44 CASTLE HAWK GOLF CLUB, 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 CHADWICK LANE HEYS BARN, CHADWICK LANE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COBDEN LODGE 40 0 0 40 43 0 0 0 43
Page 236 COLWYN STREET 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 0 17 COVER DRIVE 18 0 0 18 40 0 0 0 40 DURBAN STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 FAIRWAY 141 0 0 141 276 0 2 (0.72%) 0 274 (-0.72%) THE OAKLANDS, FAIRWAY 16 0 0 16 20 0 0 0 20 FAREWELL CLOSE 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 GREENWAY 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 HANOVER STREET 66 0 0 66 99 0 1 (1.01%) 0 98 (-1.01%) HEAPE STREET 12 0 0 12 18 1 (5.56%) 0 0 19 (5.56%) HEYS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 HEYWOOD ROAD 100 0 0 100 173 2 (1.16%) 1 (0.58%) 0 174 (0.58%) THE DIRECTORS, HEYWOOD ROAD 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 KESWICK STREET 39 0 0 39 68 0 2 (2.94%) 2 66 (-2.94%) KNOLL STREET 43 0 0 43 76 0 1 (1.32%) 0 75 (-1.32%) MANCHESTER ROAD 97 0 0 97 118 1 (0.85%) 1 (0.85%) 0 118 MANCHET STREET 32 0 0 32 51 0 4 (7.84%) 0 47 (-7.84%) MAVIS STREET 12 0 0 12 24 0 0 0 24 MILNE STREET 6 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 3 MOOR PARK AVENUE 79 0 0 79 147 0 0 0 147 MOWBRAY STREET 30 0 0 30 50 0 0 0 50 NIXON STREET 10 0 0 10 14 0 0 0 14 OAKLAND TERRACE 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 OGDEN STREET 29 0 0 29 40 0 0 0 40 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PARTINGTON MEWS 9 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 4
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 14 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
EA - PARTINGTON STREET 91 1(1.10%) 0 92 134 1 (0.75%) 2 (1.49%) 0 133 (-0.75%) PEMBERTON STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 PLEASANT COURT 18 0 0 18 20 0 0 0 20 PLEASANT STREET 34 0 0 34 62 0 0 0 62 PROGRESS STREET 18 0 0 18 30 0 0 0 30 RAILWAY APPROACH 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 RODNEY STREET 39 0 0 39 57 0 0 0 57 ROYLE BARN ROAD 12 0 0 12 17 0 0 0 17 SACKVILLE STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 SAMUEL STREET 23 0 0 23 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) SHIRLEY STREET 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 SMALLEY STREET 47 0 0 47 78 0 2 (2.56%) 0 76 (-2.56%) Page 237 ST GABRIELS COURT 30 0 0 30 29 0 2 (6.90%) 0 27 (-6.90%) STOCKS STREET 21 0 0 21 27 0 1 (3.70%) 0 26 (-3.70%) STREET LODGE 23 0 0 23 29 1 (3.45%) 1 (3.45%) 0 29 SYDNEY BARNES CLOSE 13 0 0 13 21 1 (4.76%) 0 0 22 (4.76%) THE WESTCOMBE BUILDING, 24 0 0 24 28 0 0 0 28 SYDNEY BARNES CLOSE THE LIMES 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 TUDOR HALL STREET 7 0 0 7 16 0 0 0 16 6otl 7or 8 E 9 013A) 0B)C)5DE ) 013A0 A1)23 F B)C3HDE AA B0C)FDE A A1)H5 B9)CF3DE
EB - ABBOTT STREET 36 0 0 36 69 0 0 0 69 AJAX STREET 28 0 0 28 33 0 0 0 33 BARATHEA CLOSE 9 0 0 9 19 0 0 0 19 BIDEFORD ROAD 16 0 0 16 18 0 0 0 18 BLUEBELL DRIVE 17 0 0 17 41 0 0 0 41 BOLTON ROAD 71 0 0 71 121 0 1 (0.83%) 0 120 (-0.83%) BORROWDALE DRIVE 66 0 0 66 108 2 (1.85%) 1 (0.93%) 0 109 (0.93%) BROCHE CLOSE 3 0 0 3 8 0 2 (25.00%) 0 6 (-25.00%) BRUCE STREET 32 0 0 32 44 0 0 0 44 BUTTERCUP DRIVE 21 0 0 21 46 0 0 0 46 CHAMBER HOUSE DRIVE 47 0 36(76.60%) 11 147 1 (0.68%) 7 (4.76%) 0 141 (-4.08%) CHEVRON CLOSE 19 0 0 19 49 0 0 0 49
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 15 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
EB - CLOVELLY STREET 40 0 0 40 84 1 (1.19%) 0 0 85 (1.19%) COTALINE CLOSE 15 0 0 15 26 0 0 0 26 CRESCENT ROAD 86 0 0 86 148 0 3 (2.03%) 0 145 (-2.03%) ELIZABETH STREET 17 0 0 17 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) ENNERDALE ROAD 42 0 0 42 60 0 0 0 60 ESKDALE AVENUE 43 0 0 43 74 0 1 (1.35%) 0 73 (-1.35%) GRISEDALE ROAD 24 0 0 24 29 0 0 0 29 HARGREAVES STREET 11 0 0 11 20 0 0 0 20 HARRY STREET 26 0 0 26 49 0 1 (2.04%) 0 48 (-2.04%) HONISTER WAY 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 Page 238 HYDON BROOK WALK 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 ARKWRIGHT HOUSE, CARDERS 1 0 0 1 14 1 (7.14%) 2 (14.29%) 0 13 (-7.14%) COURT, IVOR STREET BROOKFIELD HOUSE, CARDERS 1 0 0 1 30 1 (3.33%) 4 (13.33%) 0 27 (-10.00%) COUR, IVOR STREET GARFIELD HOUSE, CARDERS 1 0 0 1 15 0 0 0 15 COURT, IVOR STREET LINDEN HOUSE, CARDERS COURT 1 0 0 1 14 8 (57.14%) 2 (14.29%) 0 20 (42.86%) NU, IVOR STREET IVOR STREET 33 0 0 33 59 0 0 0 59 RAKEWOOD HOUSE, CARDERS 1 0 0 1 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) COURT, IVOR STREET KINGSLAND ROAD 79 0 0 79 133 0 1 (0.75%) 0 132 (-0.75%) LOISINE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 19 0 0 0 19 LYNTON AVENUE 22 0 0 22 45 0 0 0 45 MANCHESTER ROAD 56 0 0 56 108 0 0 0 108 MANLEY ROAD 15 0 0 15 28 0 0 0 28 MARLAND AVENUE 15 0 0 15 22 0 0 0 22 MATTHEW MOSS LANE 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 MEADWAY 50 0 0 50 90 0 2 (2.22%) 0 88 (-2.22%) NIXON STREET 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 ONSLOW STREET 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PATTERDALE CLOSE 14 0 0 14 17 0 0 0 17 ROOKSWOOD DRIVE 7 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 13 SWALLOW BANK DRIVE 11 0 0 11 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 16 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
EB - THIRLMERE ROAD 45 0 0 45 80 1 (1.25%) 1 (1.25%) 0 80 HILLHOUSE COURT, TREVOR 13 0 0 13 18 0 0 0 18 STREET TREVOR STREET 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 TROUTBECK WAY 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 YEW DALE GARDENS 18 0 0 18 29 0 0 0 29 6otl 7or 8 EG 9 010)@ ) 32 B3CA2DE 01)24 A1)4) 0@ B)CFADE 30 B0CH5DE ) A1)FH B9)CFFDE
EC - ALBION STREET 55 0 0 55 99 0 3 (3.03%) 0 96 (-3.03%) ALDER ROAD 62 0 0 62 98 0 1 (1.02%) 0 97 (-1.02%) BATES CLOSE 24 0 0 24 41 0 1 (2.44%) 0 40 (-2.44%)
Page 239 CASTLETON ROAD SOUTH 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 CHAUCER STREET 16 0 0 16 33 0 0 0 33 COLNE STREET 21 0 0 21 36 0 0 0 36 COWM TOP LANE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 CROSS STREET 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 GRANT STREET 18 0 0 18 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) GROSVENOR STREET 26 0 0 26 41 0 0 0 41 HILARY STREET 11 0 0 11 18 0 0 0 18 HILLCREST ROAD 61 0 0 61 110 0 2 (1.82%) 0 108 (-1.82%) KIRKLEE ROAD 96 0 0 96 155 0 1 (0.65%) 0 154 (-0.65%) LEANDER DRIVE 147 0 0 147 313 0 4 (1.28%) 0 309 (-1.28%) MACAULAY STREET 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 MALCOLM STREET 15 0 0 15 19 0 0 0 19 MANCHESTER ROAD 70 0 0 70 97 0 0 0 97 MELVILLE STREET 38 0 0 38 56 1 (1.79%) 2 (3.57%) 0 55 (-1.79%) MINOR STREET 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 NEWCHURCH STREET 78 0 0 78 131 0 0 0 131 OLIVE STREET 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 QUEENSWAY 49 0 0 49 67 0 0 0 67 RAGLAN STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 SCHOLES STREET 5 0 0 5 5 1 (20.00%) 0 0 6 (20.00%) SHERWIN WAY 33 0 0 33 64 0 1 (1.56%) 0 63 (-1.56%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 17 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
EC - SHERWOOD STREET 9 0 0 9 11 1 (9.09%) 0 0 12 (9.09%) ST GABRIELS CLOSE 30 0 0 30 62 0 0 0 62 ST MARTINS STREET 88 0 0 88 128 2 (1.56%) 0 0 130 (1.56%) TROWS LANE 13 0 0 13 21 0 0 0 21 VICARAGE ROAD NORTH 32 0 0 32 60 0 1 (1.67%) 0 59 (-1.67%) VICARAGE ROAD SOUTH 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 VICARAGE VIEW 18 0 0 18 30 0 0 0 30 WASDALE STREET 17 0 0 17 28 0 0 0 28 WAVERLEY STREET 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 6otl 7or 8 E( 9 01)FF ) ) 01)FF 015AF @ B)CAFDE 0F B)C43DE ) 0150@ B9)C22DE Page 240 ED - BOWDEN CLOSE 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 CARNFORTH AVENUE 64 0 0 64 122 0 0 0 122 CARNFORTH SQUARE 10 0 0 10 21 0 0 0 21 CHATBURN AVENUE 43 0 0 43 80 0 0 0 80 CHATBURN SQUARE 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 CHERRINGTON DRIVE 70 0 0 70 131 0 0 0 131 CHESHAM AVENUE 18 0 0 18 33 0 0 0 33 COLLINGWOOD STREET 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 CROYDON AVENUE 45 0 0 45 79 0 1 (1.27%) 0 78 (-1.27%) CROYDON SQUARE 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 FOXHILL ROAD 4 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 10 LYNDHURST AVENUE 9 0 0 9 25 0 0 0 25 MADEN VIEW 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 AVONDALE COURT, MANCHESTER 30 0 0 30 36 1 (2.78%) 1 (2.78%) 0 36 ROAD CASTLETON H.F.E., MANCHESTER 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ROAD MEADOW VIEW NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 MANCHESTER ROAD MANCHESTER ROAD 68 0 0 68 133 0 4 (3.01%) 1 129 (-3.01%) PARTINGTON'S PARK HOMES, 14 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 14 MANCHESTER ROAD OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PARKFIELD EARL STREET 2 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 7
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 18 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
ED - SAXONHOLME ROAD 13 0 0 13 25 0 0 0 25 THORNHAM NEW ROAD 43 0 0 43 81 0 0 0 81 WESTBROOK CLOSE 12 0 0 12 27 0 0 0 27 6otl 7or 8 E 9 HF4 ) ) HF4 5F4 0 B)C00DE 2 B)C25DE 0 5FH B9)C@FDE
EE - BENTLEY AVENUE 20 0 0 20 33 0 0 0 33 CHURCH AVENUE 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 CLIFTON ROAD 14 0 0 14 28 0 0 0 28 GRANGE ROAD 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 0 19 HOUGH LANE 4 0 0 4 11 0 0 0 11 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Page 241 ROCHDALE ROAD 107 0 0 107 192 1 (0.52%) 0 0 193 (0.52%) SAUTRIDGE CLOSE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 STAKEHILL LANE 30 0 0 30 52 0 0 0 52 THORNHAM LANE 33 0 0 33 66 0 0 0 66 6otl 7or 8 EE 9 A3A ) ) A3A HA5 0 B)CA3DE ) ) HA4 B)CA3DE
EF - ASHLEY CLOSE 54 0 0 54 108 0 2 (1.85%) 0 106 (-1.85%) GIPSY LANE 6 0 0 6 14 0 0 0 14 WOOLWORTHS SPORTS & SOCIAL, 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 GIPSY LANE LAWNSWOOD 47 0 0 47 89 0 2 (2.25%) 0 87 (-2.25%) MANCHESTER ROAD 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 ROYLELANDS BUNGALOWS, 30 0 0 30 35 0 3 (8.57%) 0 32 (-8.57%) MANCHESTER ROAD ROYLE ROAD 36 0 0 36 61 1 (1.64%) 0 0 62 (1.64%) THE GREEN 30 0 0 30 58 0 0 0 58 THE WOODS 13 0 0 13 31 0 0 0 31 TOMLINSON STREET 29 0 0 29 47 0 0 0 47 6otl 7or 8 E! 9 AHF ) ) AHF HHF 0 B)CAADE F B0C@FDE ) HH0 B90C3HDE (S6IE6PQ H1H2) 0B)C)ADE 32B)C50DE H1HA@ F1F3H 3) B)C34DE 53 B0C)FDE 3 F1250 B9)C24DE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 19 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
GA - DUNKIRK RISE, COLLEGE BANK 119 0 0 119 154 1 (0.65%) 3 (1.95%) 0 152 (-1.30%) HOLLAND RISE, COLLEGE BANK 93 0 0 93 101 1 (0.99%) 0 0 102 (0.99%) MARDYKE, COLLEGE BANK 96 0 0 96 101 0 0 0 101 MITCHELL HEY, COLLEGE BANK 120 0 0 120 154 0 0 0 154 TENTERCROFT, COLLEGE BANK 120 0 0 120 155 0 0 0 155 TOWN MILL BROW, COLLEGE BANK 120 0 0 120 144 4 (2.78%) 3 (2.08%) 0 145 (0.69%) UNDERWOOD, COLLEGE BANK 97 0 0 97 100 0 1 (1.00%) 0 99 (-1.00%) ABBEYDALE, LOWER FALINGE 19 0 0 19 21 0 2 (9.52%) 0 19 (-9.52%) EXBURY, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 20 2 (10.00%) 0 0 22 (10.00%) IBSLEY, LOWER FALINGE 20 0 0 20 23 0 0 0 23 Page 242 JOHNSTON, LOWER FALINGE 23 0 0 23 31 1 (3.23%) 0 0 32 (3.23%) KIRKSTALL, LOWER FALINGE 12 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 12 LINDISFARNE, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 11 0 0 0 11 MELROSE, LOWER FALINGE 32 0 0 32 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) NEWSTEAD, LOWER FALINGE 25 0 0 25 33 1 (3.03%) 1 (3.03%) 0 33 OLLERTON, LOWER FALINGE 12 0 0 12 17 0 0 0 17 PERSHORE, LOWER FALINGE 43 0 0 43 56 3 (5.36%) 1 (1.79%) 0 58 (3.57%) QUINTON, LOWER FALINGE 27 0 0 27 34 1 (2.94%) 0 0 35 (2.94%) ROMSEY, LOWER FALINGE 12 0 0 12 15 0 4 (26.67%) 0 11 (-26.67%) STAVORDALE, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 20 0 0 0 20 THETFORD, LOWER FALINGE 18 0 0 18 24 0 2 (8.33%) 0 22 (-8.33%) ULLESTHORPE, LOWER FALINGE 15 0 0 15 20 2 (10.00%) 0 0 22 (10.00%) VAYNOR, LOWER FALINGE 28 0 0 28 36 1 (2.78%) 1 (2.78%) 0 36 WAVERLEY, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 22 0 2 (9.09%) 0 20 (-9.09%) YARWELL, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 22 0 0 0 22 ZEDBURGH, LOWER FALINGE 24 0 0 24 32 0 3 (9.38%) 0 29 (-9.38%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6otl 7or 8 U 9 010@2 ) ) 010@2 01355 0F B0CAADE AH B0CF3DE ) 01350 B9)C@)DE
GB - ALMA STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 PEMBROKE COURT, ALMA STREET 37 0 0 37 8 0 6 (75.00%) 0 2 (-75.00%) CASSON GATE 16 0 0 16 27 0 0 0 27 CENTURY GARDENS 14 0 0 14 22 0 0 0 22 CROMER STREET 21 0 0 21 31 0 0 0 31
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 20 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
GB - CRONKEYSHAW ROAD 49 0 0 49 84 0 0 0 84 DAWSON STREET 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 DENTON STREET 14 0 0 14 22 0 0 0 22 DERWENT STREET 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22 DUKE STREET 59 0 0 59 109 3 (2.75%) 2 (1.83%) 0 110 (0.92%) FALINGE ROAD 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 GOOSE LANE 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 GRASMERE STREET 21 0 0 21 35 0 0 0 35 GREEN LANE 2 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 8 GREENLEES STREET 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 GROUSE STREET 53 0 0 53 90 1 (1.11%) 2 (2.22%) 0 89 (-1.11%) HEIGHTS COURT, HEIGHTS LANE 12 0 0 12 20 1 (5.00%) 0 0 21 (5.00%) Page 243 HEIGHTS LANE 33 0 0 33 59 0 0 0 59 HENDRIFF PLACE 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 HIGH STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PROVIDENCE HOUSE, HIGH STREET 1 0 0 1 58 0 54 (93.10%) 0 4 (-93.10%) HOPE COURT, HOPE STREET 12 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 12 HOPE STREET 24 0 0 24 47 0 0 0 47 HOWARD STREET 33 0 0 33 53 1 (1.89%) 0 0 54 (1.89%) INDUSTRY ROAD 43 0 0 43 67 2 (2.99%) 1 (1.49%) 0 68 (1.49%) KERSHAW STREET 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 KNOWSLEY STREET 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 LAURIE PLACE 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 LEAMINGTON STREET 22 0 0 22 38 0 0 0 38 ATHERSTONE, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 19 0 0 0 19 BROMFIELD, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 17 0 0 0 17 CARTMEL, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 20 0 1 (5.00%) 0 19 (-5.00%) DUNSTABLE, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 20 0 0 0 20 EDINGTON, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 21 0 5 (23.81%) 0 16 (-23.81%) FRIESTON, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 19 0 0 0 19 GLASTONBURY, LOWER FALINGE 16 0 0 16 13 0 0 0 13 HINTON, LOWER FALINGE 15 0 0 15 17 2 (11.76%) 0 0 19 (11.76%) MEDLEY STREET 34 0 0 34 64 2 (3.13%) 0 0 66 (3.13%) MILFORD STREET 15 0 0 15 20 3 (15.00%) 0 0 23 (15.00%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 21 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
GB - MOORFIELD PLACE 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 MOORLAND STREET 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9 NOON SUN STREET 8 0 0 8 20 2 (10.00%) 0 0 22 (10.00%) OLD MILL STREET 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 QUARRY STREET 19 0 0 19 39 1 (2.56%) 0 0 40 (2.56%) REDCAR STREET 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 REDCROSS STREET 37 1(2.70%) 0 38 62 0 1 (1.61%) 0 61 (-1.61%) REFORM STREET 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 ROPE STREET 24 0 0 24 28 1 (3.57%) 3 (10.71%) 0 26 (-7.14%) Page 244 SAWYER STREET 15 0 0 15 20 0 0 0 20 SHERIFF STREET 26 0 0 26 59 3 (5.08%) 2 (3.39%) 0 60 (1.69%) SLADEN STREET 10 0 0 10 25 0 0 0 25 STANLEY STREET 46 0 0 46 86 0 2 (2.33%) 0 84 (-2.33%) SWAIN STREET 12 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 19 TIFLIS STREET 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 TURNER STREET 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 WALKDEN STREET 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 WHITEHALL STREET 73 0 0 73 106 0 1 (0.94%) 0 105 (-0.94%) ROCHDALE INFIRMARY, WHITEHALL 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 STREET WHITWORTH ROAD 15 0 0 15 18 5 (27.78%) 1 (5.56%) 0 22 (22.22%) WILSON STREET 6 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 12 6otl 7or 8 UG 9 01)H) 0B)C0)DE ) 01)H0 01225 AF B0C2ADE 50 BHC52DE ) 0120H B93CAHDE
GC - ADA STREET 32 0 0 32 46 0 0 0 46 BANTRY STREET 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 BAY STREET 29 0 0 29 54 2 (3.70%) 2 (3.70%) 0 54 BLANCHE STREET 28 0 0 28 32 1 (3.13%) 1 (3.13%) 0 32 CEDAR STREET 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 DAVID STREET NORTH 6 0 0 6 14 0 0 0 14 DAVID STREET 14 0 0 14 20 0 0 0 20 ELLIOTT STREET 22 0 0 22 35 0 0 0 35 ELM STREET 10 0 0 10 14 0 0 0 14
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 22 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
GC - FLANNEL STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 FOLLY WALK 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 FOXHOLES CLOSE 15 0 0 15 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) FOXHOLES ROAD 37 0 0 37 58 0 0 0 58 GREENBANK ROAD 52 0 0 52 95 1 (1.05%) 0 0 96 (1.05%) JAMES STREET 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 JARVIS STREET 25 0 0 25 35 0 0 0 35 JEPHEYS STREET 15 0 0 15 22 0 0 0 22 JERMYN STREET FLATS 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 JERMYN STREET 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 8 LOMAX STREET 15 0 0 15 35 0 0 0 35 MARGROY CLOSE 32 0 0 32 61 0 0 0 61 Page 245 MAUD STREET 50 0 0 50 88 0 0 0 88 MAUREEN STREET 12 0 0 12 16 0 0 0 16 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PARK HILL 4 0 0 4 14 0 0 0 14 PRINCESS STREET 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 REGENT STREET 14 0 0 14 27 0 0 0 27 RIVINGTON STREET 21 0 0 21 60 0 0 0 60 ROSSALL ROAD 23 0 0 23 55 0 0 0 55 RUGBY ROAD 49 0 0 49 69 1 (1.45%) 0 0 70 (1.45%) STOTT STREET 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 TAYLOR STREET 30 0 0 30 60 0 0 0 60 PARK HILL MEWS, TAYLOR STREET 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 WATTS STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 WELLINGTON STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 WHITWORTH ROAD 27 0 0 27 18 0 0 0 18 YORKSHIRE STREET 13 0 0 13 44 0 0 0 44 6otl 7or 8 U( 9 20F ) ) 20F 01)2H @ B)CHFDE H B)C35DE ) 01)2@ B)C)4DE
GD - ALICE STREET 43 0 0 43 71 1 (1.41%) 1 (1.41%) 0 71 ALL SAINTS TERRACE 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9 ATHOL COURT, ATHOL STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 ATHOL STREET 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 23 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
GD - BRITON STREET 6 0 0 6 16 0 2 (12.50%) 0 14 (-12.50%) CLAYTON STREET 6 0 0 6 14 0 0 0 14 CLIFF STREET 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 COLLEY STREET 16 0 0 16 47 0 0 0 47 COOK STREET 24 0 0 24 39 0 1 (2.56%) 0 38 (-2.56%) DAVYHULME STREET 31 0 0 31 48 0 0 0 48 DEAN STREET 25 0 0 25 41 0 3 (7.32%) 0 38 (-7.32%) DENMARK STREET 7 0 0 7 23 0 0 0 23 DIVISION STREET 27 0 0 27 46 0 0 0 46 ENTWISLE ROAD 82 0 0 82 156 0 1 (0.64%) 0 155 (-0.64%) Page 246 ERNEST TERRACE 29 0 0 29 65 0 0 0 65 GOWERS STREET 26 0 0 26 73 0 0 0 73 HALIFAX ROAD 48 0 0 48 78 0 1 (1.28%) 0 77 (-1.28%) TUDOR COURT, HALIFAX ROAD 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 HAMER HALL CRESCENT 26 0 0 26 32 0 1 (3.13%) 0 31 (-3.13%) HAMER LANE 26 0 0 26 59 0 1 (1.69%) 0 58 (-1.69%) HARVEY STREET 9 0 0 9 12 0 0 0 12 HECTOR AVENUE 17 0 0 17 39 0 0 0 39 HEYBROOK HOUSE 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 HEYBROOK STREET 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 0 19 JACK TAYLOR COURT 12 0 0 12 14 0 1 (7.14%) 0 13 (-7.14%) MARK STREET 13 0 0 13 26 0 0 0 26 MAYFIELD STREET 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 MORLEY STREET 48 0 0 48 132 2 (1.52%) 0 0 134 (1.52%) OSWALD STREET 91 0 0 91 279 2 (0.72%) 1 (0.36%) 0 280 (0.36%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PARK ROAD 106 0 0 106 225 1 (0.44%) 2 (0.89%) 0 224 (-0.44%) RED LANE 27 0 0 27 41 1 (2.44%) 0 0 42 (2.44%) ROTHWELL STREET 23 0 0 23 47 1 (2.13%) 0 0 48 (2.13%) SELBY STREET 15 0 0 15 37 0 0 0 37 SHAW STREET 18 0 0 18 25 1 (4.00%) 0 0 26 (4.00%) WARWICK STREET 14 0 0 14 17 0 0 0 17 YEW COURT, WARWICK STREET 33 0 2(6.06%) 31 35 0 2 (5.71%) 0 33 (-5.71%) WEEDON STREET 3 0 0 3 10 0 0 0 10
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 24 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
GD - YORKSHIRE STREET 18 0 0 18 58 0 0 0 58 6otl 7or 8 U 9 4)5 ) A B)CAADE 4)2 015@F 4 B)CH5DE 0F B)C4ADE ) 015H4 B9)CH3DE
GE - ARTHINGTON STREET 9 0 0 9 11 0 0 0 11 BEVERLEY PLACE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BLAKE STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COPENHAGEN SQUARE 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 COPENHAGEN STREET 14 0 0 14 33 0 0 0 33 ENTWISLE ROAD 65 0 0 65 184 1 (0.54%) 1 (0.54%) 0 184 GOOD SHEPHERD CLOSE 27 0 0 27 88 1 (1.14%) 0 0 89 (1.14%) HEY STREET 43 0 0 43 99 1 (1.01%) 0 0 100 (1.01%)
Page 247 JACKSONS PLACE 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 KELLETT STREET 27 0 0 27 62 2 (3.23%) 2 (3.23%) 0 62 NILE STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 RAMSAY PLACE 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 RAMSAY STREET 54 0 0 54 149 0 0 0 149 RAMSAY TERRACE 18 0 0 18 38 1 (2.63%) 0 0 39 (2.63%) TRAFALGAR STREET 20 0 0 20 41 0 0 0 41 6otl 7or 8 UE 9 A54 ) ) A54 FA0 2 B)C53DE 3 B)CHADE ) FAH B)CHADE
GF - ABOUKIR STREET 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 BRUNSWICK STREET 13 0 0 13 41 0 2 (4.88%) 0 39 (-4.88%) BUCKINGHAM STREET 18 0 0 18 63 0 0 0 63 BULWER STREET 7 0 0 7 21 0 0 0 21 CORBETT STREET 16 0 0 16 50 0 0 0 50 EAST STREET 33 0 0 33 68 0 0 0 68 PENNINE VIEW, EAST STREET 26 0 0 26 29 0 0 0 29 EDWARD STREET 19 0 0 19 38 0 0 0 38 FITTON STREET 25 0 0 25 56 0 0 0 56 GEORGE STREET 6 0 0 6 12 0 1 (8.33%) 0 11 (-8.33%) JOHN STREET 24 0 0 24 34 0 3 (8.82%) 0 31 (-8.82%) NORTH STREET 12 0 0 12 37 1 (2.70%) 0 0 38 (2.70%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 25 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
GF - OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 RAMSAY STREET 56 0 0 56 149 1 (0.67%) 0 0 150 (0.67%) ROACH PLACE 8 0 0 8 25 1 (4.00%) 0 0 26 (4.00%) ROBERT STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 SOUTH PLACE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 SOUTH STREET 66 0 0 66 207 2 (0.97%) 0 0 209 (0.97%) SOUTH COURT, SOUTH STREET 10 0 0 10 27 0 0 0 27 TRAFALGAR STREET 18 0 0 18 35 0 0 0 35 JACK MCCANN COURT, TRAFALGER 44 0 0 44 48 2 (4.17%) 3 (6.25%) 0 47 (-2.08%) STREET
Page 248 WEST STREET 22 0 0 22 86 0 0 0 86 YORKSHIRE STREET 47 0 0 47 88 0 3 (3.41%) 0 85 (-3.41%) 6otl 7or 8 U! 9 HF2 ) ) HF2 010A3 F B)C2ADE 0A B0C)FDE ) 01005 B9)CH@DE (EQ6$I $P(IE H1H52 0B)C)ADE AB)C)HDE H1H5@ F15A0 F0 B)C40DE 0H0 B0C5)DE ) F1F@0 B9)C4)DE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 26 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
NA - APPLE WAY 26 0 0 26 44 0 0 0 44 BANK TOP 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 BIRCH AVENUE 24 0 0 24 38 0 0 0 38 BRIERLEY DRIVE 34 0 0 34 58 0 0 0 58 BROOKBANK CLOSE 9 0 0 9 23 1 (4.35%) 0 0 24 (4.35%) COLWYN AVENUE 8 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 17 EAST CRESCENT 7 0 0 7 16 0 0 0 16 EASTFIELD AVENUE 25 0 0 25 39 0 0 0 39 EVANS STREET 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 FARMWAY 80 0 0 80 145 1 (0.69%) 1 (0.69%) 0 145 FRAMPTON CLOSE 18 0 0 18 37 0 0 0 37 HIGH BARN ROAD 35 0 0 35 59 0 0 0 59 Page 249 HIGHFIELD DRIVE 31 0 0 31 56 0 0 0 56 KINGSWAY 38 0 0 38 84 0 0 0 84 KIRKWAY 61 0 0 61 95 0 0 0 95 LEVER WALK 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 MANCHESTER NEW ROAD 14 0 0 14 28 0 0 0 28 DANE HOUSE, MIDDLETON VIEW 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 MIDDLETON VIEW 9 0 0 9 14 0 0 0 14 MILL FOLD ROAD 67 0 0 67 111 2 (1.80%) 5 (4.50%) 0 108 (-2.70%) MOUNT FOLD 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 MOUNT ROAD 117 0 0 117 233 3 (1.29%) 2 (0.86%) 0 234 (0.43%) NAUNTON ROAD 56 0 0 56 97 0 1 (1.03%) 0 96 (-1.03%) OAK AVENUE 18 0 0 18 25 0 0 0 25 OLDHAM ROAD 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 TONGE COURT, OLDHAM ROAD 33 0 0 33 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) ORME AVENUE 26 0 0 26 53 0 1 (1.89%) 0 52 (-1.89%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PEAR CLOSE 15 0 0 15 27 0 0 0 27 PENRHYN AVENUE 65 0 0 65 120 0 0 0 120 RHOS AVENUE 26 0 0 26 45 0 0 0 45 ROUNDTHORN ROAD 78 0 0 78 141 0 0 0 141 RUTHIN AVENUE 69 0 0 69 123 0 0 0 123 SAVIO WAY 19 0 0 19 42 0 0 0 42
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 27 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
NA - SAXON STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 SILK MILL WAY 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 ST DOMINICS WAY 46 0 0 46 95 0 0 0 95 STANWAY CLOSE 17 0 0 17 25 2 (8.00%) 0 0 27 (8.00%) TONGE HALL CLOSE 2 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 7 WESTFIELD AVENUE 20 0 0 20 34 0 0 0 34 WHITECROFT MEADOW 62 0 0 62 82 0 6 (7.32%) 0 76 (-7.32%) WINCE BROOK 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 WYCHWOOD CLOSE 15 0 0 15 28 0 0 0 28 6otl 7or 8 Q 9 01A3H ) ) 01A3H A102@ 4 B)CHADE 0F B)CF4DE ) A10@F B9)C3FDE Page 250 NB - ALBANY STREET 22 0 0 22 35 1 (2.86%) 2 (5.71%) 0 34 (-2.86%) ANDREW STREET 58 0 0 58 102 2 (1.96%) 1 (0.98%) 0 103 (0.98%) ASPINALL GARDENS 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 AVRO COURT, ASPINALL STREET 37 0 0 37 35 0 0 0 35 ASPINALL STREET 55 0 0 55 98 1 (1.02%) 0 0 99 (1.02%) BIRCHWOOD ROAD 37 0 0 37 70 0 0 0 70 BISHOP STREET 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 BRADSHAW STREET 15 0 0 15 22 0 0 0 22 BUTTERWORTH STREET 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 CASTLE STREET 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 CEDAR ROAD 54 0 0 54 115 0 2 (1.74%) 0 113 (-1.74%) CHALE DRIVE 25 0 0 25 46 0 0 0 46 CHILTON DRIVE 25 0 0 25 53 0 0 0 53 LANCASTER HOUSE, CHURCH ROAD 12 0 0 12 10 0 0 0 10 CHURCH ROAD 17 0 0 17 30 0 0 0 30 COMPTON WAY 85 0 0 85 176 0 1 (0.57%) 0 175 (-0.57%) CYPRESS STREET 56 0 0 56 108 0 0 0 108 DANE BANK 23 0 0 23 50 1 (2.00%) 1 (2.00%) 0 50 DAVIDS FARM CLOSE 28 0 0 28 59 0 0 0 59 EASTON CLOSE 6 0 0 6 16 0 0 0 16 GABRIEL'S TERRACE 19 0 0 19 39 0 2 (5.13%) 0 37 (-5.13%) GLEN GROVE 13 0 0 13 25 0 0 0 25 GREENHILL ROAD 68 0 0 68 119 2 (1.68%) 3 (2.52%) 0 118 (-0.84%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 28 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
NB - GREENHILL TERRACE 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 DOVEDALE COURT H.F.E., 1 0 0 1 18 0 0 0 18 GRIMSHAW LANE GRIMSHAW LANE 120 0 0 120 178 2 (1.12%) 3 (1.69%) 0 177 (-0.56%) WINCE BROOK COURT, GRIMSHAW 51 0 0 51 59 0 1 (1.69%) 0 58 (-1.69%) LANE HOYLE STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 JOSHUA LANE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 KENYON LANE 31 0 0 31 56 0 0 0 56 LANCASTER AVENUE 30 0 0 30 44 0 2 (4.55%) 0 42 (-4.55%) MALTA CLOSE 18 0 0 18 43 0 0 0 43 MARSDEN STREET 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7
Page 251 NEILSON CLOSE 27 0 0 27 58 0 0 0 58 NELSON STREET 60 0 0 60 91 0 1 (1.10%) 0 90 (-1.10%) NEWBANK CLOSE 11 0 0 11 23 0 0 0 23 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PHYLLIS STREET 31 0 0 31 74 0 0 0 74 PINE STREET 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 POPLAR STREET 27 0 0 27 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) WATERS EDGE, RIVER VIEW 9 2(22.22%) 2(22.22%) 9 6 0 0 0 6 SANDY LANE 33 0 0 33 57 0 0 0 57 SEDGLEY CLOSE 21 0 0 21 32 0 0 0 32 LONSDALE COURT, SEDGLEY 33 0 0 33 34 0 0 0 34 STREET SEDGLEY STREET 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 SMETHURST STREET 27 0 0 27 38 0 1 (2.63%) 0 37 (-2.63%) ST GABRIELS MEWS 21 0 0 21 24 0 0 0 24 TONGE ROUGHS 11 0 0 11 24 0 0 0 24 WADE STREET 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 WATERS EDGE 9 1(11.11%) 0 10 2 3 (150.00%) 0 0 5 (150.00%) RIVER VIEW, WATERS EDGE 19 1(5.26%) 0 20 15 2 (13.33%) 0 0 17 (13.33%) WHITELEY DRIVE 15 0 0 15 36 0 0 0 36 WILLOW AVENUE 58 0 0 58 95 2 (2.11%) 1 (1.05%) 0 96 (1.05%) WOOD LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 6otl 7or 8 QG 9 013F4 HB)CA4DE A B)C0@DE 01350 A13HF 02 B)C25DE AA B)C4HDE ) A13H0 B9)CA2DE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 29 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
NC - ALKRINGTON COURT 24 0 0 24 26 0 0 0 26 ANDOVER AVENUE 141 0 0 141 267 0 2 (0.75%) 0 265 (-0.75%) ARDEN AVENUE 40 0 0 40 67 0 0 0 67 BROOKSIDE CRESCENT 36 0 0 36 62 0 2 (3.23%) 0 60 (-3.23%) BROW AVENUE 37 0 0 37 72 0 0 0 72 DAVIDSON DRIVE 25 0 0 25 44 0 0 0 44 EVESHAM ROAD 79 0 0 79 145 0 3 (2.07%) 0 142 (-2.07%) EVESHAM WALK 49 0 0 49 65 0 0 0 65 KINGSWAY 9 0 0 9 18 0 0 0 18 LINCOLN ROAD 33 0 0 33 55 0 0 0 55 Page 252 LOWLANDS CLOSE 24 0 0 24 41 0 1 (2.44%) 0 40 (-2.44%) LYMINGTON CLOSE 18 0 0 18 48 0 0 0 48 MAINWAY EAST 47 0 0 47 100 0 2 (2.00%) 0 98 (-2.00%) MAYBURN CLOSE 41 0 0 41 52 0 0 0 52 MOSS FARM CLOSE 13 0 0 13 16 0 1 (6.25%) 0 15 (-6.25%) MOSSYLEA CLOSE 10 0 0 10 21 0 0 0 21 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 THE COPPICE 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 THE DOWNS 95 0 0 95 130 4 (3.08%) 0 0 134 (3.08%) THE GLEN 39 0 0 39 61 1 (1.64%) 0 0 62 (1.64%) THE HEATH 77 0 0 77 100 0 1 (1.00%) 0 99 (-1.00%) THE MEADOWS 89 0 0 89 130 0 0 0 130 THE MOSS 53 0 0 53 73 0 1 (1.37%) 0 72 (-1.37%) BLACKLEY GOLF CLUB, VICTORIA 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 AVENUE EAST,BL WINCE CLOSE 51 0 0 51 101 0 0 0 101 YORK ROAD EAST 76 0 0 76 125 0 0 0 125 YORK ROAD WEST 51 0 0 51 98 0 0 0 98 6otl 7or 8 Q( 9 0102H ) ) 0102H 014AA @ B)CA2DE 03 B)C25DE ) 0140H B9)CHADE
ND - ASH STREET 53 0 0 53 81 0 0 0 81 ASPINALL STREET 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 BAYTREE LANE 69 0 0 69 100 2 (2.00%) 0 0 102 (2.00%) BERWYN AVENUE 24 0 0 24 49 0 0 0 49
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 30 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
ND - BIRCHWOOD ROAD 18 0 0 18 34 0 0 0 34 CHEVIOT CLOSE 39 0 0 39 61 0 0 0 61 COLLINGE AVENUE 10 0 0 10 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) COWPER STREET 34 0 0 34 51 3 (5.88%) 1 (1.96%) 0 53 (3.92%) DAMSON GREEN 8 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 13 ELM BANK ROAD 33 0 0 33 62 0 1 (1.61%) 0 61 (-1.61%) ELM STREET 52 0 0 52 110 0 0 0 110 FERN CLOSE 70 0 0 70 100 1 (1.00%) 2 (2.00%) 0 99 (-1.00%) KENYON LANE 69 0 0 69 124 0 0 0 124 PORTAL COURT, KENYON LANE 46 0 0 46 56 1 (1.79%) 1 (1.79%) 0 56 LABURNUM ROAD 13 0 0 13 23 0 0 0 23 LARCH VIEW ROAD 50 0 0 50 95 0 0 0 95 Page 253 LAUREL STREET 12 0 0 12 18 0 1 (5.56%) 0 17 (-5.56%) MAPLE CLOSE 28 0 0 28 32 0 1 (3.13%) 0 31 (-3.13%) MILLS HILL ROAD 35 0 0 35 61 3 (4.92%) 2 (3.28%) 0 62 (1.64%) MONMOUTH STREET 63 0 0 63 115 0 1 (0.87%) 0 114 (-0.87%) OAKDENE ROAD 27 0 0 27 50 0 0 0 50 OAKWOOD MEWS 8 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 9 OLD MILLS HILL 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 OLDHAM ROAD 127 1(0.79%) 0 128 204 2 (0.98%) 1 (0.49%) 0 205 (0.49%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PEMBRIDGE FOLD 10 0 0 10 22 0 0 0 22 QUEEN STREET 23 0 0 23 42 0 0 0 42 ARCHMOOR, SANDY LANE 1 0 0 1 22 0 7 (31.82%) 0 15 (-31.82%) SANDY LANE 22 0 0 22 31 0 2 (6.45%) 0 29 (-6.45%) SAVILLE STREET 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 STUART STREET 12 0 0 12 15 0 1 (6.67%) 0 14 (-6.67%) TREGAER FOLD 18 0 0 18 38 0 0 0 38 6otl 7or 8 Q 9 45A 0B)C0)DE ) 453 012@3 0A B)CF3DE AA B0C33DE ) 012H3 B9)C2)DE ES6 TSIE6PQ H1F@4 @B)C00DE AB)C)HDE H1F2A 51)5F HA B)C@ADE FH B)C4ADE ) 51)@@ B9)CH)DE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 31 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
AA - ABERDEEN GARDENS 11 0 0 11 24 0 1 (4.17%) 0 23 (-4.17%) ASHDENE 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 BEIGHTONS WALK 34 0 0 34 60 0 0 0 60 BERNARD STREET 17 0 0 17 20 0 0 0 20 BETONY CLOSE 25 0 0 25 46 0 0 0 46 BROOKDALE 95 0 0 95 183 0 0 0 183 BURWELL CLOSE 9 0 0 9 25 0 0 0 25 CAMPION WAY 23 0 0 23 64 0 0 0 64 CHADWICK TERRACE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 COLUMBINE CLOSE 12 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 21 Page 254 COTTAGE WALK 12 0 0 12 26 0 0 0 26 CROWSHAW DRIVE 49 0 0 49 98 0 0 0 98 DAFFODIL CLOSE 14 0 0 14 25 0 1 (4.00%) 0 24 (-4.00%) DAHLIA CLOSE 13 0 0 13 23 0 0 0 23 DELL ROAD 37 0 0 37 51 0 2 (3.92%) 0 49 (-3.92%) DUFFINS CLOSE 24 0 0 24 39 0 0 0 39 EARNSHAW AVENUE 14 0 0 14 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) FOXGLOVE COURT 52 0 0 52 93 0 0 0 93 GLENAVON DRIVE 25 0 0 25 44 0 0 0 44 HAREBELL CLOSE 26 0 0 26 48 0 1 (2.08%) 0 47 (-2.08%) HARRIDGE AVENUE 41 0 0 41 85 0 0 0 85 HARRIDGE BANK 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 HARRIDGE STREET 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 HARWIN CLOSE 15 0 0 15 33 0 0 0 33 HEALD CLOSE 21 0 0 21 54 0 0 0 54 HEALD COTTAGES 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 HEALD DRIVE 16 0 0 16 43 0 1 (2.33%) 0 42 (-2.33%) HEALEY AVENUE 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 HEALEY DELL 9 0 0 9 18 0 0 0 18 HEALEY HALL MEWS 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 QUARRY VIEW, HEALEY LANE 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 HEALEY STONES 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 HILLKIRK DRIVE 14 0 0 14 36 0 0 0 36 HILLSIDE WALK 47 0 0 47 96 0 0 0 96
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 32 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
AA - HILLSTONE AVENUE 39 0 0 39 79 0 2 (2.53%) 0 77 (-2.53%) HOLBECK AVENUE 12 0 0 12 26 0 0 0 26 HOLSTEIN AVENUE 48 0 0 48 74 0 1 (1.35%) 0 73 (-1.35%) HONEYSUCKLE WAY 34 0 0 34 37 0 3 (8.11%) 0 34 (-8.11%) JUDITH STREET 20 0 0 20 34 0 1 (2.94%) 0 33 (-2.94%) LEAF TERRACE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 LOWER HEALEY 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 LOWERFOLD CLOSE 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 LOWERFOLD CRESCENT 14 0 0 14 34 0 0 0 34 LOWERFOLD DRIVE 28 0 0 28 72 0 0 0 72 LOWERFOLD WAY 13 0 0 13 38 0 0 0 38 LYTHAM STREET 12 0 0 12 17 0 0 0 17 Page 255 GANDY LANE, MIDDLE HEALEY 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 MIDDLE HEALEY 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 MOUNTSIDE VIEW 24 0 0 24 24 1 (4.17%) 1 (4.17%) 0 24 OFF ROAD LANE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 ORCHID WAY 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 OVERDELL DRIVE 30 0 0 30 57 0 1 (1.75%) 0 56 (-1.75%) PATON STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PATTISON CLOSE 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 QUARRY HILL 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 ROAD LANE 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 SHAWCLOUGH CLOSE 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 SHAWCLOUGH DRIVE 11 0 0 11 23 0 0 0 23 SHAWCLOUGH ROAD 54 0 0 54 108 0 1 (0.93%) 0 107 (-0.93%) SHAWCLOUGH WAY 137 0 0 137 262 1 (0.38%) 3 (1.15%) 0 260 (-0.76%) ST WILFREDS DRIVE 16 0 0 16 33 0 0 0 33 SYDENHAM TERRACE 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 THE FLASH 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 THE HARRIDGE 9 0 0 9 18 1 (5.56%) 0 0 19 (5.56%) THRUM HALL LANE, THE SPINNEY 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 THE WINDRUSH 40 0 0 40 91 0 0 0 91 THRUM FOLD 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 33 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
AA - THRUM HALL LANE 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 TOAD LEACH LANE 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 TULIP GROVE 29 0 0 29 53 0 0 0 53 WHAM BOTTOM LANE 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 WHITE HILL CLOSE 15 0 0 15 42 0 0 0 42 TURNERS PLACE, 433 WHITWORTH 14 0 0 14 7 0 0 0 7 ROAD WHITWORTH ROAD 165 0 0 165 270 0 1 (0.37%) 0 269 (-0.37%) STRETFORD PLACE, WHITWORTH 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 ROAD
Page 256 TURNERS PLACE, WHITWORTH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ROAD 6otl 7or 8 9 01@23 ) ) 01@23 A1430 3 B)C0)DE A0 B)CFADE ) A1403 B9)C20DE
AB - BARNFIELD LANE 9 0 0 9 25 0 2 (8.00%) 0 23 (-8.00%) BERNARD STREET 14 0 0 14 29 0 0 0 29 BINNS NOOK ROAD 14 0 0 14 27 0 0 0 27 BOND STREET 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 BOWLERS WALK 19 0 0 19 45 0 0 0 45 BUCKLEY FARM LANE 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 BUCKLEY PASTURES, HEY BOTTOM 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 L BUCKLEY ROAD 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BUCKLEY TERRACE 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 CALVERLEY WAY 8 0 0 8 17 0 3 (17.65%) 0 14 (-17.65%) CARLISLE STREET 11 0 0 11 16 0 0 0 16 CHATSWORTH STREET 30 0 0 30 45 0 0 0 45 COPTROD HEAD CLOSE 5 0 0 5 13 0 0 0 13 CROSBY STREET 23 0 0 23 46 0 0 0 46 CROSS LEES 5 0 0 5 7 1 (14.29%) 0 0 8 (14.29%) DEWHIRST ROAD 89 0 0 89 156 3 (1.92%) 3 (1.92%) 0 156 DEWHIRST WAY 7 0 0 7 15 0 1 (6.67%) 0 14 (-6.67%) FERGUSON GARDENS 16 0 0 16 28 0 0 0 28 FIELDHOUSE ROAD 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 GALE STREET 97 0 0 97 167 0 1 (0.60%) 0 166 (-0.60%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 34 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
AB - GLEN GARDENS 18 0 0 18 27 0 1 (3.70%) 0 26 (-3.70%) HEY BOTTOM LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HIGHCROFT WAY 31 0 0 31 62 0 1 (1.61%) 0 61 (-1.61%) ISABELLA STREET 24 0 0 24 35 0 0 0 35 JEFFERSON WAY 23 0 0 23 35 0 0 0 35 JOY STREET 73 0 0 73 100 0 3 (3.00%) 0 97 (-3.00%) LEYTON STREET 25 0 0 25 43 2 (4.65%) 1 (2.33%) 0 44 (2.33%) MIDDLE HILL 10 0 0 10 20 0 2 (10.00%) 0 18 (-10.00%) MILL NOOK 15 0 0 15 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) NANTWICH AVENUE 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 NETLEY AVENUE 18 0 0 18 32 0 0 0 32 NEWARK SQUARE, NEWARK ROAD 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 Page 257 NEWARK ROAD 99 0 0 99 173 1 (0.58%) 3 (1.73%) 0 171 (-1.16%) NEWLANDS AVENUE 56 0 0 56 109 0 0 0 109 NEWLANDS CLOSE 19 0 0 19 23 0 0 0 23 NICK ROAD LANE 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 NOOK FARM AVENUE 26 0 0 26 45 0 0 0 45 NOOK SIDE 3 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 8 NOOK TERRACE 11 0 0 11 19 0 1 (5.26%) 0 18 (-5.26%) NORTON ROAD 81 0 0 81 164 0 1 (0.61%) 0 163 (-0.61%) ODDIES YARD 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 (100.00%) 0 0 (-100.00%) OVERFIELD WAY 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 0 17 PAVILION CLOSE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 POOT HALL 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 POT HOUSE LANE 8 0 0 8 25 0 0 0 25 RINGLOWS LANE 3 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 8 RYDINGS LANE 5 0 0 5 14 0 2 (14.29%) 0 12 (-14.29%) SCARR DRIVE 39 0 0 39 54 0 0 0 54 FIELDHOUSE NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 21 0 1 (4.76%) 0 20 (-4.76%) SPINNERS GREEN SPINNERS GREEN 9 0 0 9 24 0 0 0 24 SYKE LANE 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 SYKE ROAD 94 0 0 94 170 0 4 (2.35%) 0 166 (-2.35%) WAINGAP RISE 58 0 0 58 109 0 0 0 109
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 35 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
AB - WHITWORTH ROAD 29 0 0 29 36 0 0 0 36 GALE COURT, WHITWORTH ROAD 10 0 0 10 14 0 0 0 14 WOOD HEY GROVE 62 0 0 62 124 0 1 (0.81%) 0 123 (-0.81%) WOODLAND STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 6otl 7or 8 G 9 01AFA ) ) 01AFA A1A55 F B)C30DE 33 B0CHHDE ) A1A2A B90C0HDE
AC - ALICIA COURT, ALICIA DRIVE 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 ALICIA DRIVE 26 0 0 26 54 0 0 0 54 ASHMOUNT DRIVE 40 0 0 40 75 0 0 0 75
Page 258 AUGUSTA CLOSE 49 0 0 49 106 0 0 0 106 AUGUSTA STREET 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 BAMFORD PLACE 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 BELMONT WAY 47 0 0 47 145 0 1 (0.69%) 0 144 (-0.69%) BENCH CARR 27 0 0 27 47 0 0 0 47 BENTMEADOWS 42 0 0 42 58 0 0 0 58 THE OLD MANOR, BENTMEADOWS 10 0 0 10 7 0 0 0 7 CRONKEYSHAW AVENUE 22 0 0 22 62 0 0 0 62 DEW MEADOW CLOSE 19 0 0 19 29 2 (6.90%) 0 0 31 (6.90%) FALINGE MANOR MEWS, FALINGE 16 0 0 16 24 0 2 (8.33%) 0 22 (-8.33%) ROAD FALINGE MANOR NEWS, FALINGE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 ROAD FALINGE ROAD 4 0 0 4 11 0 0 0 11 FURTHER HEIGHTS ROAD 12 0 0 12 18 0 0 0 18 HEADLANDS STREET 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 HEIGHTS AVENUE 87 0 0 87 173 0 0 0 173 HEIGHTS CLOSE 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 HEIGHTS LANE 35 0 0 35 72 2 (2.78%) 0 0 74 (2.78%) HOLTS TERRACE 9 0 0 9 12 0 0 0 12 LARK HILL PLACE 5 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 3 MIZZY ROAD 55 0 0 55 122 0 2 (1.64%) 0 120 (-1.64%) MOUNTSIDE CLOSE 18 0 0 18 30 0 0 0 30 ONE ASH CLOSE 11 0 0 11 20 0 0 0 20 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 (50.00%) 0 1 (-50.00%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 36 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
AC - JACOB BRIGHT MEWS, WHITWORTH 48 0 0 48 62 1 (1.61%) 0 0 63 (1.61%) ROAD WHITWORTH ROAD 21 0 0 21 43 1 (2.33%) 0 0 44 (2.33%) WOODFIELD AVENUE 14 0 0 14 32 0 0 0 32 6otl 7or 8 ( 9 23F ) ) 23F 01AH3 2 B)CH5DE 2 B)CH5DE ) 01AH3 B)C))DE
AD - BASSETT CLOSE 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 BASSETT GARDENS 16 0 0 16 22 0 0 0 22 BASSETT WAY 12 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 19 BENTLEY MEWS 10 0 0 10 16 0 0 0 16 BENTLEY STREET 54 0 0 54 66 0 0 0 66
Page 259 BLACKTHORN CLOSE 56 0 0 56 102 0 0 0 102 BLACKTHORN MEWS 9 0 0 9 14 0 0 0 14 BRADLEY SMITHY CLOSE 32 0 0 32 60 0 1 (1.67%) 0 59 (-1.67%) BROADLEA GROVE 6 0 0 6 11 0 1 (9.09%) 0 10 (-9.09%) CLARENCE STREET 26 0 0 26 37 0 0 0 37 DELLSIDE WAY 27 0 0 27 60 0 1 (1.67%) 0 59 (-1.67%) EDWIN WAUGH GARDENS 16 0 0 16 23 1 (4.35%) 1 (4.35%) 0 23 FALINGE FOLD 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22 FALINGE ROAD 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 FALLOWFIELD DRIVE 77 0 0 77 141 0 2 (1.42%) 0 139 (-1.42%) FLETTON CLOSE 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 0 15 FLETTON MEWS 12 0 0 12 30 0 0 0 30 FOOT MILL CRESCENT 20 0 0 20 51 0 0 0 51 FOOT WOOD CRESCENT 39 0 0 39 98 0 0 0 98 FOREST VIEW 17 0 0 17 38 0 0 0 38 GARDEN ROW 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 GLENDEN FOOT 12 0 0 12 15 0 0 0 15 GREAT LEE WALK 34 0 0 34 41 0 1 (2.44%) 0 40 (-2.44%) GREAT LEE 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 8 HAWLEY GREEN 17 0 0 17 26 0 0 0 26 HEIGHTS LANE 3 0 0 3 13 0 0 0 13 HOLLOW BROOK WAY 17 0 0 17 33 0 0 0 33 HOLLOWS FARM AVENUE 14 0 0 14 31 0 0 0 31
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 37 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
AD - JOSEPH STREET 11 0 0 11 17 0 0 0 17 KILN WALK 17 0 0 17 35 0 0 0 35 LEASIDE CLOSE 12 0 0 12 17 0 0 0 17 MABEL STREET 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 0 15 NEW STREET 25 0 0 25 41 0 2 (4.88%) 0 39 (-4.88%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 OXFORD WAY 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 ROPEFIELD WAY 12 0 0 12 23 0 0 0 23 RUDMAN STREET 9 0 0 9 18 0 0 0 18 SHAWCLOUGH RISE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 Page 260 SHAWCLOUGH ROAD 58 0 0 58 95 2 (2.11%) 1 (1.05%) 0 96 (1.05%) SIEBERS BANK, SHAWCLOUGH 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 ROAD STOCK CLOSE 20 0 0 20 40 0 0 0 40 SUN BANK CLOSE 10 0 0 10 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) SWEETBRIAR CLOSE 12 0 0 12 26 0 0 0 26 SWEETBRIAR LANE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 THRUM HALL LANE 29 0 0 29 50 0 0 0 50 TINTERN AVENUE 16 0 0 16 18 1 (5.56%) 1 (5.56%) 0 18 TURNPIKE CLOSE 31 0 0 31 20 4 (20.00%) 0 0 24 (20.00%) TWINEGATE 25 0 0 25 56 0 1 (1.79%) 0 55 (-1.79%) WATSON GARDENS 25 0 0 25 31 0 0 0 31 WOODBRIDGE GARDENS 11 0 0 11 23 0 0 0 23 WORRALL STREET 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 6otl 7or 8 9 4AF ) ) 4AF 012)F 5 B)C@)DE 03 B)C50DE ) 012)A B9)C30DE EIEV H1344 ) ) H1344 51)24 AH B)C3)DE F3 B)C4)DE ) 51)A) B9)C20DE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 38 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
MA - ARAGON DRIVE 38 0 0 38 64 0 3 (4.69%) 0 61 (-4.69%) BARNET COURT 30 0 0 30 34 0 0 0 34 BELGRAVE STREET 6 0 0 6 8 0 2 (25.00%) 0 6 (-25.00%) BOLEYN COURT 29 0 0 29 44 0 0 0 44 CARTRIDGE STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 2 (40.00%) 0 3 (-40.00%) CHESTNUT GARDENS 11 0 0 11 23 0 0 0 23 CLEVES COURT 20 0 0 20 31 0 0 0 31 CLIFTON CLOSE 16 0 0 16 23 0 0 0 23 COOMASSIE STREET 21 0 0 21 34 0 0 0 34 COVERDALE CLOSE 19 0 0 19 29 1 (3.45%) 0 0 30 (3.45%) CRANMER COURT 25 0 0 25 35 0 0 0 35 DENTON STREET 12 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 21 Page 261 EGERTON CRESCENT 7 0 0 7 19 0 0 0 19 EGERTON STREET 99 0 0 99 158 0 1 (0.63%) 0 157 (-0.63%) GROSVENOR STREET 13 0 0 13 22 0 0 0 22 HIND HILL STREET 25 0 0 25 39 0 2 (5.13%) 0 37 (-5.13%) LYTHAM DRIVE 68 0 0 68 117 0 0 0 117 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PILSWORTH ROAD 17 0 0 17 22 0 2 (9.09%) 0 20 (-9.09%) SEYMOUR STREET 8 0 0 8 8 0 1 (12.50%) 0 7 (-12.50%) TUDOR COURT, SEYMOUR STREET 1 0 0 1 3 0 1 (33.33%) 0 2 (-33.33%) TOWER STREET 31 0 0 31 36 1 (2.78%) 0 0 37 (2.78%) WILTON GROVE 20 0 0 20 32 0 0 0 32 WOLSEY STREET 51 0 0 51 103 0 0 0 103 6otl 7or 8 T 9 @F0 ) ) @F0 40) A B)CAADE 0H B0C@HDE ) 545 B90C3ADE
MB - ALEXANDRA STREET 21 0 0 21 28 0 0 0 28 ASHWORTH STREET 28 0 0 28 42 0 0 0 42 BANK'S CROFT 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 BIRKDALE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 0 17 BUTTERMERE AVENUE 25 0 0 25 48 0 0 0 48 CONISTON GROVE 18 0 0 18 34 0 0 0 34 DERWENT AVENUE 45 0 0 45 96 0 3 (3.13%) 0 93 (-3.13%) DORCHESTER GROVE 32 0 0 32 72 0 0 0 72
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 39 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
MB - FARM STREET 20 0 0 20 30 0 0 0 30 GLENEAGLES AVENUE 13 0 0 13 24 0 0 0 24 GLOUCESTER AVENUE 43 0 0 43 85 0 0 0 85 GOODEN STREET 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 GRASMERE AVENUE 48 0 0 48 77 0 2 (2.60%) 0 75 (-2.60%) GRUNDY STREET 19 0 0 19 34 0 0 0 34 HONITON CLOSE 33 0 0 33 45 0 0 0 45 HOPWOOD AVENUE 41 0 0 41 83 0 1 (1.20%) 0 82 (-1.20%) ISHERWOOD STREET 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 KENDAL CLOSE 12 0 0 12 13 0 0 0 13 Page 262 LINKS ROAD 35 0 0 35 65 0 0 0 65 BEECH HOUSE, MANCHESTER ROAD 1 0 0 1 13 0 0 0 13 HIGHFIELD HOUSE REST HOME, 1 0 0 1 22 0 0 0 22 MANCHESTER ROAD HOLLY BANK, MANCHESTER ROAD 1 0 0 1 16 0 2 (12.50%) 0 14 (-12.50%) HOPWOOD MANOR, 126/128, 16 0 0 16 23 0 0 0 23 MANCHESTER ROAD MANCHESTER ROAD 32 0 0 32 80 2 (2.50%) 1 (1.25%) 0 81 (1.25%) GLENEAGLES AVENUE, MELLERTS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PLACE NEWBURY GROVE 36 0 0 36 67 0 0 0 67 NEWHOUSE ROAD 71 0 0 71 165 0 2 (1.21%) 0 163 (-1.21%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PILSWORTH ROAD 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 PROSPECT STREET 49 0 0 49 93 0 0 0 93 RYDAL GROVE 22 0 0 22 42 0 0 0 42 SALISBURY AVENUE 47 0 0 47 99 0 0 0 99 SHAFTSBURY DRIVE 102 0 0 102 226 0 0 0 226 SIDDALL STREET 21 0 0 21 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) SNOWDEN STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 SPRINGFIELD CLOSE 24 0 0 24 27 3 (11.11%) 0 0 30 (11.11%) SUNNINGDALE DRIVE 26 0 0 26 58 0 0 0 58 THE WOODLANDS 5 0 0 5 13 0 0 0 13 ULLSWATER GROVE 16 0 0 16 26 0 0 0 26 WALTON CLOSE 26 0 0 26 29 0 0 0 29
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 40 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
MB - WALTON STREET 35 0 0 35 57 0 0 0 57 WENTWORTH AVENUE 13 0 0 13 34 0 0 0 34 WINCHESTER AVENUE 18 0 0 18 36 0 0 0 36 6otl 7or 8 TG 9 01)3) ) ) 01)3) A1))A @ B)CA@DE 0A B)C2)DE ) 0144@ B9)C3@DE
MC - ARNOLD AVENUE 17 0 0 17 29 0 1 (3.45%) 0 28 (-3.45%) BADER DRIVE 51 0 0 51 104 0 1 (0.96%) 0 103 (-0.96%) BAKER STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 BARLOW STREET 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 BIGGIN GARDENS 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 BRACKEN CLOSE 11 0 0 11 26 0 1 (3.85%) 0 25 (-3.85%)
Page 263 BYNG STREET 27 0 0 27 48 0 0 0 48 CANAL STREET 37 0 0 37 56 0 1 (1.79%) 0 55 (-1.79%) CHARLES STREET 18 0 0 18 31 0 0 0 31 CHURCHILL CLOSE 11 0 0 11 28 0 0 0 28 COLLOP DRIVE 15 0 0 15 31 0 0 0 31 COPTHORNE CLOSE 14 0 0 14 31 0 0 0 31 CORONATION AVENUE 18 0 0 18 31 0 0 0 31 DOCTOR FOLD LANE 10 0 0 10 25 0 0 0 25 STOCK NOOK, DOCTOR FOLD LANE 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 EAST CHURCH WAY 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 EXCELSIOR GARDENS 16 0 0 16 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) FOLEY GARDENS 22 0 0 22 35 0 0 0 35 GLAMIS AVENUE 80 0 0 80 143 2 (1.40%) 1 (0.70%) 0 144 (0.70%) GREEN LANE 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 GREENMOUNT DRIVE 15 0 0 15 20 0 1 (5.00%) 0 19 (-5.00%) GREGGE STREET 50 0 0 50 85 0 0 0 85 SANDPITS FARM, GREGGE STREET 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 HARESHILL ROAD 10 0 0 10 20 0 0 0 20 HEATHER CLOSE 12 0 0 12 28 0 0 0 28 HENDON GROVE 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 HOPWOOD COURT 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 HOPWOOD HALL FARM 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 HORNCHURCH COURT 29 0 0 29 60 0 0 0 60
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 41 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
MC - JACKMAN AVENUE 7 0 0 7 16 0 0 0 16 KENLEY DRIVE 18 0 0 18 33 0 0 0 33 HOPE COTTAGE, LANE END 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 LANE END 5 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 11 LENTEN GROVE 50 0 0 50 121 0 0 0 121 LEY DRIVE 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22 LOCK CLOSE 48 0 0 48 66 2 (3.03%) 2 (3.03%) 0 66 LORRAINE CLOSE 9 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 15 MAGDALA STREET 18 0 0 18 30 1 (3.33%) 0 0 31 (3.33%) BURNELL COURT, MANCHESTER 42 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 42 Page 264 ROAD MANCHESTER ROAD 88 0 0 88 148 0 0 0 148 MARLBOROUGH STREET 45 0 0 45 73 0 0 0 73 MAY STREET 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 MERCERS ROAD 15 0 0 15 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) MIDDLETON ROAD 172 0 0 172 296 0 2 (0.68%) 0 294 (-0.68%) MOSSLAND CLOSE 9 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 20 NEWHOUSE ROAD 10 0 0 10 24 0 0 0 24 NORTHOLT FOLD 8 0 0 8 21 0 0 0 21 OAKENBANK ROAD 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 OAKLEIGH CLOSE 10 0 0 10 21 0 0 0 21 OLDBURY CLOSE 30 0 0 30 63 0 0 0 63 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 (100.00%) 0 0 (-100.00%) PLAYFAIR CLOSE 6 0 0 6 15 0 0 0 15 RIBBLESDALE CLOSE 11 0 0 11 17 0 0 0 17 ROBERT STREET 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 SALTHILL AVENUE 19 0 0 19 43 0 0 0 43 SPINNINGFIELD WAY 14 0 0 14 32 0 0 0 32 SYCAMORE AVENUE 42 0 0 42 64 0 0 0 64 TANGMERE AVENUE 78 0 0 78 139 1 (0.72%) 0 0 140 (0.72%) THORNBANK CLOSE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 TORRINGTON STREET 25 0 0 25 39 0 2 (5.13%) 0 37 (-5.13%) VICTOR STREET 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 WEST MALLING CLOSE 19 11(57.89%) 0 30 7 5 (71.43%) 0 1 12 (71.43%) WHITEHOUSE CLOSE 24 0 0 24 48 0 1 (2.08%) 0 47 (-2.08%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 42 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
MC - WHITTLE BROOK GROVE 11 0 0 11 25 0 0 0 25 WICKEN BANK 14 0 0 14 37 0 0 0 37 WINGS GROVE 15 0 0 15 27 0 0 0 27 WITHINGTON STREET 22 0 18(81.82%) 4 30 0 2 (6.67%) 0 28 (-6.67%) WORTHINGTON AVENUE 32 0 0 32 58 0 1 (1.72%) 0 57 (-1.72%) 6otl 7or 8 T( 9 01H4) 00B)CFHDE 05 B0CA0DE 01H53 A123A 00 B)CHADE 04 B)CFADE 0 A12AH B9)C3)DE
MD - DOCTOR FOLD LANE 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 WHITTLE FOLD 3 0 0 3 11 0 0 0 11 WHITTLE LANE 6 1(16.67%) 0 7 17 0 0 0 17
Page 265 6otl 7or 8 T 9 00 0B4C)4DE ) 0A 30 ) ) ) 30 B)C))DE
ME - ABBEY ROAD 124 0 0 124 203 1 (0.49%) 3 (1.48%) 0 201 (-0.99%) BUCKFAST ROAD 12 0 0 12 25 0 0 0 25 CARRICK GARDENS 10 0 0 10 26 0 0 0 26 COOPER FOLD 43 0 0 43 71 1 (1.41%) 0 0 72 (1.41%) COOPER LANE 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 EASBY ROAD 30 0 0 30 39 0 0 0 39 GILWOOD GROVE 36 0 0 36 59 0 0 0 59 HAZELHURST DRIVE 50 0 0 50 121 0 2 (1.65%) 0 119 (-1.65%) HOLLIN LANE 64 0 0 64 117 0 1 (0.85%) 0 116 (-0.85%) HOLLIN WELL CLOSE 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 CARETAKERS HOUSE, HOPWOOD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HALL COLLEGE HOPWOOD ROAD 157 0 0 157 237 3 (1.27%) 3 (1.27%) 0 237 KIELDER HILL 20 0 0 20 36 0 0 0 36 KINGSWOOD ROAD 28 0 0 28 47 0 0 0 47 KIRKSTALL ROAD 70 0 0 70 123 0 1 (0.81%) 0 122 (-0.81%) LAWSON CLOSE 23 0 0 23 48 0 0 0 48 LYME CLOUGH WAY 52 0 0 52 99 0 2 (2.02%) 0 97 (-2.02%) HOPWOOD COURT, MOORFIELDS 81 0 0 81 99 0 6 (6.06%) 0 93 (-6.06%) OAKWAY 17 0 0 17 35 0 0 0 35 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 43 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
ME - PENROSE WALK 19 0 0 19 34 0 0 0 34 ROCHDALE ROAD 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 ROMSEY AVENUE 19 0 0 19 38 0 0 0 38 ROSE THORNS CLOSE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 SCHOFIELD CLOSE 12 0 0 12 18 0 0 0 18 SELBY ROAD 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 STOTT LANE 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 TEWKESBURY AVENUE 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 TINTERN ROAD 120 0 0 120 207 0 1 (0.48%) 0 206 (-0.48%) HEBERS COURT, WHALLEY ROAD 36 0 0 36 39 0 2 (5.13%) 0 37 (-5.13%) Page 266 WHALLEY ROAD 93 0 0 93 145 0 0 0 145 ST AGNES CHURCH, WHALLEY 24 0 0 24 30 0 0 0 30 ROAD WINWOOD FOLD 12 0 0 12 28 0 0 0 28 WITHINGTON GREEN 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 WOODVALE, WOODSIDE CLOSE 52 0 0 52 70 0 1 (1.43%) 0 69 (-1.43%) HOPWOOD, WOODSIDE FARM 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 6otl 7or 8 TE 9 01A@H ) ) 01A@H A1)F5 @ B)CAHDE AA B0C)2DE ) A1)20 B9)C5ADE
MF - LANGLEY HOUSE, FURNESS ROAD 30 0 0 30 29 0 0 0 29 FURNESS ROAD 54 0 0 54 77 0 0 0 77 HOLLIN LANE 48 0 0 48 88 0 0 0 88 HOLLINS GREEN 34 0 0 34 39 0 0 0 39 HOLLIN HOUSE, NOWELL ROAD 16 0 0 16 15 0 0 0 15 NOWELL ROAD 44 0 0 44 69 0 1 (1.45%) 0 68 (-1.45%) NOWELL HOUSE, NOWELL ROAD 16 0 0 16 17 0 0 0 17 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PERSHORE ROAD 53 0 0 53 89 0 1 (1.12%) 0 88 (-1.12%) GLEBE HOUSE, ROCHDALE ROAD 16 0 0 16 19 0 0 0 19 NOWELL COURT, ROCHDALE ROAD 62 0 0 62 73 0 1 (1.37%) 0 72 (-1.37%) SCOUT GREEN 10 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 12 SELBY ROAD 12 0 0 12 24 0 0 0 24 SHERBOURNE ROAD 63 0 0 63 112 0 2 (1.79%) 0 110 (-1.79%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 44 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
MF - SHERBOURNE HOUSE, 16 0 0 16 14 1 (7.14%) 0 0 15 (7.14%) SHERBOURNE ROAD TEWKESBURY AVENUE 14 0 0 14 26 0 0 0 26 TORRE CLOSE 38 0 0 38 50 0 1 (2.00%) 0 49 (-2.00%) WAVERLEY ROAD 25 0 0 25 49 0 1 (2.04%) 0 48 (-2.04%) WHALLEY ROAD 17 0 1(5.88%) 16 31 0 4 (12.90%) 0 27 (-12.90%) 6otl 7or 8 T! 9 @24 ) 0 B)C05DE @25 533 0 B)C0ADE 00 B0C3ADE ) 5A3 B90CA)DE PWPP II H14A@ 0AB)CAHDE 04B)C34DE H1405 51H52 AH B)CA5DE F5 B)C4ADE 0 51H3A B9)C2HDE Page 267
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 45 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
BA - AINSWORTH STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ASHIA CLOSE 7 0 0 7 19 0 0 0 19 BASIL COURT, BASIL STREET 19 0 0 19 23 0 0 0 23 GRAFTON COURT, BASIL STREET 20 0 0 20 32 0 0 0 32 BERWICK STREET 35 0 0 35 83 0 1 (1.20%) 0 82 (-1.20%) BILBERRY STREET 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 BURNSIDE ROAD 4 0 0 4 12 0 0 0 12 CHANNING SQUARE 16 0 0 16 31 0 0 0 31 CHANNING STREET 21 0 0 21 34 0 0 0 34 IVEAGH COURT, CHURCH ROAD 35 0 0 35 37 0 1 (2.70%) 0 36 (-2.70%) Page 268 CHURCH ROAD 14 0 0 14 25 0 0 0 25 COTTON FOLD 12 0 0 12 16 0 0 0 16 CRAWFORD STREET 34 0 0 34 73 0 0 0 73 DAVID LEWIS CLOSE 12 0 0 12 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) DEEPDALE AVENUE 16 0 0 16 33 0 0 0 33 CLEMENTS COURT, ETHEL STREET 17 0 0 17 19 0 0 0 19 ETHEL COURT, ETHEL STREET 21 0 0 21 28 0 2 (7.14%) 0 26 (-7.14%) GRAFTON STREET 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 HOUGHTON CLOSE 15 0 0 15 22 0 0 0 22 CLARA GORTON COURT, JAMES 28 0 0 28 36 3 (8.33%) 1 (2.78%) 0 38 (5.56%) BUTTERWORTH STREET KINGSWAY 37 0 9(24.32%) 28 87 0 2 (2.30%) 0 85 (-2.30%) LEACH STREET 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 LYEFIELD WALK 14 0 0 14 22 0 0 0 22 MACNAUGHT STREET 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 MILLFIELD GROVE 33 0 0 33 51 2 (3.92%) 2 (3.92%) 0 51 MILNROW ROAD 35 0 0 35 63 1 (1.59%) 1 (1.59%) 0 63 SHEPHERD COURT, MILNROW ROAD 21 0 0 21 13 0 0 0 13 MORNINGSIDE CLOSE 24 0 0 24 27 1 (3.70%) 0 0 28 (3.70%) MOSS STREET 52 0 0 52 108 0 1 (0.93%) 0 107 (-0.93%) MOSS TERRACE 4 0 0 4 9 0 1 (11.11%) 0 8 (-11.11%) OLDHAM ROAD 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 OULDFIELD CLOSE 20 0 0 20 16 0 2 (12.50%) 0 14 (-12.50%) PARES LAND WALK 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 46 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
BA - PENISTONE AVENUE 36 0 0 36 76 0 1 (1.32%) 0 75 (-1.32%) ROUGH HEY WALK 7 0 0 7 32 0 0 0 32 CHANNING COURT, ROWLAND 20 0 0 20 30 2 (6.67%) 0 0 32 (6.67%) STREET ROWLAND COURT, ROWLAND 20 0 0 20 29 0 0 0 29 STREET SARAH BUTTERWORTH STREET 18 0 0 18 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) SPRUCE STREET 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 ST JOHN COURT, ST JOHN DRIVE 19 0 0 19 27 0 1 (3.70%) 0 26 (-3.70%) VAVASOUR COURT, ST JOHN DRIVE 18 0 0 18 26 0 0 0 26 ST PETERS STREET 15 0 0 15 31 0 0 0 31 STAMFORD STREET 29 0 0 29 53 0 0 0 53
Page 269 STAMFORD HOUSE, STAMFORD 1 0 0 1 10 0 1 (10.00%) 0 9 (-10.00%) STREET SURMA CLOSE 35 0 0 35 93 0 0 0 93 SYKES COURT, SYKES STREET 21 0 0 21 23 0 0 0 23 THAMES STREET 28 0 0 28 53 1 (1.89%) 1 (1.89%) 0 53 LAUREL COURT, VAVASOUR WALK 17 0 0 17 27 0 2 (7.41%) 0 25 (-7.41%) WAITHLANDS ROAD 116 0 0 116 171 5 (2.92%) 1 (0.58%) 0 175 (2.34%) WENSLEY WAY 42 0 0 42 79 0 0 0 79 WINDMILL COURT, WINDMILL 19 0 0 19 29 0 1 (3.45%) 0 28 (-3.45%) STREET WITLEY ROAD 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 WORSLEY PLACE 8 0 0 8 13 1 (7.69%) 0 0 14 (7.69%) WORSLEY STREET 6 0 0 6 7 0 2 (28.57%) 0 5 (-28.57%) WRAY PLACE 32 0 0 32 31 0 2 (6.45%) 0 29 (-6.45%) WREN GREEN 16 0 0 16 21 0 0 0 21 YORK STREET 6 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 12 6otl 7or 8 G 9 01032 ) 4 B)CF4DE 010AF 0154F 02 B)C5HDE A5 B0CH5DE ) 0155@ B9)C23DE
BB - ADRIAN TERRACE 27 0 0 27 53 0 0 0 53 BELFIELD LANE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERTHA ROAD 43 0 0 43 88 0 0 0 88 BINGLEY ROAD 42 0 0 42 73 0 2 (2.74%) 0 71 (-2.74%) BINGLEY SQUARE 12 0 0 12 20 0 0 0 20
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 47 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
BB - BINGLEY TERRACE 12 0 0 12 24 0 0 0 24 HYDE PARK PLACE 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 KATHAN CLOSE 22 0 0 22 32 0 0 0 32 KENWORTHY STREET 9 0 0 9 12 0 0 0 12 KENWORTHY TERRACE 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9 KINGSWAY 17 0 0 17 35 0 1 (2.86%) 0 34 (-2.86%) MARGARET AVENUE 31 0 0 31 52 0 0 0 52 MERINALL CLOSE 15 0 0 15 30 0 0 0 30 CANON FLYNN COURT, MILNROW 24 0 0 24 30 2 (6.67%) 1 (3.33%) 0 31 (3.33%) ROAD
Page 270 MILNROW ROAD 114 0 0 114 197 2 (1.02%) 0 0 199 (1.02%) MOSS AVENUE 44 0 0 44 77 4 (5.19%) 2 (2.60%) 0 79 (2.60%) NEWBOLD HALL DRIVE 109 3(2.75%) 0 112 162 2 (1.23%) 0 0 164 (1.23%) NEWBOLD HALL GARDENS 33 0 0 33 59 1 (1.69%) 0 0 60 (1.69%) NEWBOLD STREET 49 0 0 49 74 0 0 0 74 ONE COURT, NEWBOLD STREET 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 NIGHER MOSS AVENUE 9 0 0 9 21 0 0 0 21 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PALATINE STREET 38 0 0 38 60 0 0 0 60 RATHBONE STREET 45 0 0 45 75 2 (2.67%) 1 (1.33%) 0 76 (1.33%) ROSEFIELD CRESCENT 58 0 0 58 109 0 1 (0.92%) 0 108 (-0.92%) WINDSOR TERRACE 9 0 0 9 16 0 3 (18.75%) 0 13 (-18.75%) 6otl 7or 8 GG 9 FF@ 3B)C34DE ) FF5 01302 03 B)C44DE 00 B)C5HDE ) 01305 B)C0@DE
BC - ANSDELL ROAD 67 0 0 67 124 0 2 (1.61%) 0 122 (-1.61%) BIRKDALE ROAD 13 0 0 13 37 0 0 0 37 BISHOPSGATE WALK 9 0 0 9 24 0 0 0 24 BROAD LANE 14 0 0 14 32 0 0 0 32 BURNET CLOSE 7 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 13 BUXTON CRESCENT 61 0 0 61 107 0 0 0 107 DELAMERE ROAD 52 0 0 52 87 0 1 (1.15%) 0 86 (-1.15%) FURZEGATE 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 0 17 KINGSWAY 19 0 0 19 49 0 1 (2.04%) 0 48 (-2.04%) LICHFIELD TERRACE 26 0 0 26 58 0 0 0 58
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 48 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
BC - LOMOND TERRACE 24 0 0 24 53 1 (1.89%) 0 0 54 (1.89%) LOWER LANE 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 MALLOW CROFT 9 0 0 9 23 0 0 0 23 NESTON ROAD 48 0 0 48 85 1 (1.18%) 2 (2.35%) 0 84 (-1.18%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 RICHMOND CLOSE 19 0 0 19 45 0 0 0 45 ROTHESAY TERRACE 22 0 0 22 36 0 0 0 36 STIUPS LANE 25 0 0 25 50 0 0 0 50 TURF HILL ROAD 91 0 0 91 173 0 1 (0.58%) 0 172 (-0.58%) WELBECK ROAD 19 0 0 19 38 0 0 0 38 WESTON AVENUE 3 0 0 3 9 0 0 0 9 WRENBURY DRIVE 39 0 0 39 87 0 0 0 87 Page 271 6otl 7or 8 G( 9 @50 ) ) @50 0102A A B)C0FDE F B)C2)DE ) 010@F B9)CH3DE
BD - COUNT STREET 24 0 0 24 36 1 (2.78%) 2 (5.56%) 0 35 (-2.78%) CROWN GARDENS 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 CROWN STREET 62 0 0 62 97 0 1 (1.03%) 0 96 (-1.03%) ELDER STREET 28 0 0 28 55 0 0 0 55 FRANKLIN STREET 14 0 0 14 31 0 0 0 31 KINGS ROAD 34 0 0 34 63 0 0 0 63 KINGSWAY 39 0 0 39 93 0 2 (2.15%) 0 91 (-2.15%) LOCKHART STREET 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 LONSDALE AVENUE 32 0 0 32 73 0 0 0 73 MOSS MILL STREET 22 0 0 22 30 1 (3.33%) 0 0 31 (3.33%) MURIEL STREET 29 0 0 29 54 2 (3.70%) 0 0 56 (3.70%) NEWTON STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 OLDHAM ROAD 19 0 0 19 37 0 0 0 37 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PERCY STREET 41 0 0 41 67 0 2 (2.99%) 0 65 (-2.99%) PRINCE STREET 111 0 0 111 184 0 2 (1.09%) 0 182 (-1.09%) ROYDS STREET WEST 27 0 0 27 58 0 1 (1.72%) 0 57 (-1.72%) ROYDS STREET 99 0 18(18.18%) 81 170 0 3 (1.76%) 0 167 (-1.76%) SANDFIELD ROAD 26 0 0 26 39 0 0 0 39 WOODBINE STREET EAST 43 0 0 43 72 0 0 0 72
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 49 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
BD - WOODBINE STREET 24 0 0 24 41 0 0 0 41 6otl 7or 8 G 9 255 ) 05 BAC2ADE 2F) 01AA@ H B)C33DE 03 B0C)2DE ) 01A02 B9)CF3DE
BE - ARGYLE STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY DRIVE 24 0 0 24 52 0 0 0 52 BROAD LANE 32 0 0 32 58 0 0 0 58 BROOKLAND STREET 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 BUERSIL AVENUE 116 0 0 116 219 1 (0.46%) 4 (1.83%) 0 216 (-1.37%) CARPENTERS WAY 13 0 0 13 25 0 0 0 25
Page 272 CHARLOTTE STREET 84 0 0 84 155 1 (0.65%) 2 (1.29%) 0 154 (-0.65%) CHARTER STREET 21 0 0 21 43 0 0 0 43 CLARENDON STREET 55 0 0 55 89 2 (2.25%) 4 (4.49%) 0 87 (-2.25%) CROWTHER STREET 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 EXMOUTH PLACE 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 EXMOUTH STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 FRASER STREET 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 KINGSWAY 12 0 0 12 23 0 0 0 23 LOWER STREET 9 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 9 OLDHAM ROAD 54 0 0 54 65 2 (3.08%) 0 0 67 (3.08%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 RETFORD AVENUE 16 0 0 16 34 0 2 (5.88%) 0 32 (-5.88%) RYELANDS CLOSE 26 0 0 26 41 0 0 0 41 SEDGLEY AVENUE 70 0 0 70 144 0 2 (1.39%) 0 142 (-1.39%) ST. JOSEPHS DRIVE 19 0 0 19 40 2 (5.00%) 1 (2.50%) 0 41 (2.50%) ST. MARYS CLOSE 13 0 0 13 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) STIUPS LANE 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 0 15 TURF HILL ROAD 21 0 0 21 50 0 2 (4.00%) 0 48 (-4.00%) WATKIN STREET 73 0 0 73 101 0 1 (0.99%) 0 100 (-0.99%) WESTON AVENUE 47 0 0 47 88 0 0 0 88 6otl 7or 8 GE 9 FHF ) ) FHF 013A2 5 B)C2)DE 04 B0CH3DE ) 0130@ B9)C53DE
BF - ALBERT ROYDS STREET 43 0 0 43 74 0 2 (2.70%) 0 72 (-2.70%) BELFIELD CLOSE 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 50 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
BF - BELFIELD LANE 38 0 0 38 70 0 0 0 70 BELFIELD OLD ROAD 12 0 0 12 22 0 0 0 22 BELFIELD ROAD 94 0 0 94 148 0 0 0 148 BESWICKE ROYDS STREET 65 0 0 65 107 0 0 0 107 RATHBONE COURT, BESWICKE 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 ROYDS STREET BURCHALL FIELD 11 0 0 11 27 0 0 0 27 CLOVER VIEW 12 0 0 12 22 0 0 0 22 CROXTON AVENUE 116 0 0 116 213 0 0 0 213 DALE STREET 16 0 0 16 26 0 0 0 26 ECLIPSE CLOSE 22 0 0 22 41 1 (2.44%) 0 0 42 (2.44%) GIBSON STREET 9 0 0 9 24 0 0 0 24 Page 273 HIGHER WHEAT LANE 23 0 0 23 40 0 2 (5.00%) 0 38 (-5.00%) LISKEARD CLOSE 12 0 0 12 14 0 0 0 14 LOWER WHEAT END 18 0 0 18 34 0 0 0 34 MILLOM CLOSE 20 0 0 20 17 0 0 0 17 NEWBOLD MOSS 19 0 0 19 29 0 1 (3.45%) 0 28 (-3.45%) NEWFIELD CLOSE 12 0 0 12 20 0 0 0 20 NURSERY GARDENS 8 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 13 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 RESERVOIR STREET 39 0 0 39 97 1 (1.03%) 0 0 98 (1.03%) SAMSON STREET 13 0 0 13 22 0 0 0 22 STANNEY BROOK CLOSE 44 0 0 44 77 1 (1.30%) 0 0 78 (1.30%) THORNBUSH WAY 24 0 0 24 35 0 0 0 35 TOLLGATE WAY 15 0 0 15 22 0 0 0 22 UPPER HAYES CLOSE 14 0 0 14 19 0 0 0 19 WATERMAN VIEW 32 0 0 32 75 0 0 0 75 WATERSIDE LANE 20 0 0 20 46 0 3 (6.52%) 0 43 (-6.52%) WHITEWELL CLOSE 14 0 0 14 28 1 (3.57%) 0 0 29 (3.57%) WOODLANDS VIEW 13 0 0 13 22 2 (9.09%) 0 0 24 (9.09%) 6otl 7or 8 G! 9 F55 ) ) F55 01H)H 2 B)CH3DE 5 B)C@FDE ) 01H)A B9)C0HDE RSQUSWV H1F0@ 3B)C)2DE AFB)C@FDE H1240 5133) H4 B)C@4DE 52 B0C)3DE ) 51A43 B9)CHHDE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 51 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RA - ALBERT STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 BLACKSTONE EDGE OLD ROAD 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 WHITTAKER HAMLET, BLACKSTONE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EDGE OLD ROAD BOX STREET 23 0 0 23 37 0 0 0 37 BROWN STREET 13 0 0 13 21 0 0 0 21 CANAL BANK 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 THE CANAL WHARF, CANAL STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 CHARLES STREET 18 0 9(50.00%) 9 27 0 2 (7.41%) 0 25 (-7.41%) CHURCH STREET 50 0 0 50 72 1 (1.39%) 5 (6.94%) 0 68 (-5.56%)
Page 274 RIVERSIDE NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 CHURCH STREET EASTWOOD STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 GARDEN MEWS 10 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 12 GREENWOOD PLACE 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 GREENWOOD STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 HARE HILL ROAD 40 0 0 40 56 0 0 0 56 HARTLEY STREET 10 0 0 10 14 0 0 0 14 HIGHER CLEGGSWOOD 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 HOLLINGWORTH FOLD 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 CARAVAN PARK, HOLLINGWORTH 34 0 0 34 47 0 1 (2.13%) 0 46 (-2.13%) LAKE HOLLINGWORTH ROAD 54 0 0 54 85 0 3 (3.53%) 0 82 (-3.53%) INGHAMS LANE 9 0 0 9 13 0 0 0 13 LONGDEN END 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 MORGAN STREET 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PEEL STREET 14 0 0 14 26 0 0 0 26 PEMBROKE STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 PROSPECT STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 QUEEN STREET 11 0 0 11 19 0 0 0 19 OLIVIA MAYA COURT, QUEEN 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 STREET THE BAKERY, QUEEN STREET 12 0 0 12 14 0 0 0 14 QUEENS ROAD TERRACE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 52 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RA - RAILWAY STREET 14 0 0 14 22 1 (4.55%) 0 0 23 (4.55%) RAKEWOOD ROAD 27 0 0 27 46 0 0 0 46 RAKEWOOD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 LITTLEBOROUGH HOME, REGENT 1 0 0 1 17 0 0 0 17 STREET REGENT STREET 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 SCHOFIELD HALL ROAD 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 SPRING VALE TERRACE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 SYKE ROAD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 VICTORIA STREET 41 0 0 41 56 1 (1.79%) 0 0 57 (1.79%) WELLINGTON STREET 15 0 0 15 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) WHITTAKER HAMLET 11 0 0 11 20 0 0 0 20 Page 275 WINTON STREET 13 0 0 13 27 0 0 0 27 WOOD STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 6otl 7or 8 $ 9 H50 ) 4 B0C5FDE HFA FHF 3 B)CH)DE 0A B0C20DE ) F35 B90CA)DE
RB - ASHWORTH CLOSE 8 0 0 8 9 0 1 (11.11%) 0 8 (-11.11%) BALLARD CLOSE 28 0 0 28 45 0 1 (2.22%) 0 44 (-2.22%) BROOKLYN AVENUE 11 0 0 11 25 0 1 (4.00%) 0 24 (-4.00%) CALDER AVENUE 43 0 0 43 80 0 0 0 80 HEY HEAD LANE, CALDERBROOK 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 ROAD HEYHEAD LANE, CALDERBROOK 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 ROAD LOWER NEWGATE, CALDERBROOK 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 ROAD MIDDLE NEWGATE, CALDERBROOK 9 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 20 ROAD CALDERBROOK ROAD 108 0 0 108 189 0 1 (0.53%) 0 188 (-0.53%) CLAY CROFT TERRACE 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 GREENHILL, CLOUGH ROAD 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 CLOUGH ROAD 32 0 0 32 54 0 0 0 54 ERIC STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 FURNESS AVENUE 16 0 0 16 33 0 0 0 33 HARE HILL COURT 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 53 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RB - HARE HILL ROAD 23 0 0 23 41 0 0 0 41 HENDERVILLE STREET 21 0 0 21 29 0 2 (6.90%) 0 27 (-6.90%) KIRKSTALL AVENUE 18 0 0 18 43 0 1 (2.33%) 0 42 (-2.33%) LANESIDE CLOSE 30 0 0 30 42 0 0 0 42 LOMAX STREET 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 LOWER SHORE 1 0 0 1 2 1 (50.00%) 0 0 3 (50.00%) LOWER TOWNHOUSE 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 LYNDALE DRIVE 12 0 0 12 20 0 0 0 20 MELROSE AVENUE 16 0 0 16 33 0 0 0 33 MOORFIELD AVENUE 12 0 0 12 14 0 0 0 14 Page 276 MOUNT AVENUE 24 0 0 24 48 0 0 0 48 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 3 0 1 (33.33%) 0 2 (-33.33%) SAWLEY AVENUE 14 0 0 14 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) SHORE ROAD 59 0 0 59 101 0 0 0 101 SPRINGFIELD AVENUE 24 0 0 24 51 0 0 0 51 TINTERN AVENUE 32 0 0 32 67 0 1 (1.49%) 0 66 (-1.49%) TOWNHOUSE 14 0 0 14 19 2 (10.53%) 0 0 21 (10.53%) TURF HOUSE CLOSE 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 TURF HOUSE 13 0 0 13 14 0 0 0 14 WELBECK AVENUE 18 0 0 18 34 0 0 0 34 WHALLEY AVENUE 88 0 0 88 136 0 3 (2.21%) 1 133 (-2.21%) WHITELEES ROAD 16 0 0 16 28 0 0 0 28 6otl 7or 8 $G 9 F35 ) ) F35 01A2H 3 B)CAHDE 03 B0C)3DE 0 01A@H B9)CF4DE
RC - BARNES MEADOWS 60 0 0 60 109 0 0 0 109 BETHEL GREEN 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 BLACKSTONE EDGE 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 CALDERBROOK ROAD 28 0 0 28 52 0 0 0 52 REAR OF HANDLE HALL BARN, 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 CALDERBROOK ROAD SUMMIT, CALDERBROOK ROAD 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 CALDERBROOK TERRACE 15 0 0 15 23 0 0 0 23 CHAPEL STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 CHELBURN VIEW 20 0 0 20 34 0 0 0 34
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 54 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RC - CLIFFE STREET 11 0 0 11 12 0 2 (16.67%) 0 10 (-16.67%) DRAKE ROAD 67 0 0 67 129 0 0 0 129 FIELDEN STREET 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 FROBISHER ROAD 16 0 0 16 31 0 0 0 31 GRENVILLE WALK 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 GROVE COTTAGES 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 0 15 HANDLE HALL 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 HAWKINS WAY 15 0 0 15 25 0 0 0 25 HIGHER CALDERBROOK ROAD 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 HIGHER CALDERBROOK 10 0 0 10 20 0 0 0 20 HOLME HOUSE STREET 10 0 0 10 20 0 0 0 20 HOLME HOUSE YARD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 Page 277 CANAL VIEW HOUSE, HOLME HOUSE 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 HOLME HOUSE 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 HOLME TERRACE 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 HOLT STREET 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 HOWARD WAY 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 LONGLEY HEYS FARM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 LOWER CALDERBROOK 9 0 0 9 17 0 1 (5.88%) 0 16 (-5.88%) MIDDLE CALDERBROOK 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 NORFOLK CLOSE 13 0 0 13 32 0 1 (3.13%) 0 31 (-3.13%) OAK TERRACE 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PAUL ROW 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 PENNINE VIEW 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 POLLARD GROVE 7 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 13 RALEIGH GARDENS 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 REDDY SHORE BROW 23 0 0 23 52 0 1 (1.92%) 0 51 (-1.92%) ROBERTS PASSAGE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 ROCK NOOK 18 0 0 18 27 0 0 0 27 SALLEY STREET 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 SCHOFIELD PLACE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 SCHOFIELD STREET 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 SHAKESPEARE CLOSE 19 0 0 19 31 1 (3.23%) 4 (12.90%) 0 28 (-9.68%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 55 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RC - SHOTTWOOD FOLD 13 0 0 13 26 0 0 0 26 SLADEN FOLD FARM 6 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 5 SMITHY NOOK 7 0 0 7 6 0 0 0 6 TEMPLE LANE, STANSFIELD HALL 1 0 0 1 9 0 2 (22.22%) 0 7 (-22.22%) REST HO STANSFIELD HALL 8 0 0 8 20 0 0 0 20 SUMMIT 104 0 0 104 156 0 0 0 156 SYDNEY GARDENS 14 0 0 14 28 0 0 0 28 TEMPLE LANE 31 0 0 31 54 0 0 0 54 TETLOWS YARD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2
Page 278 TIMBERCLIFFE 48 0 0 48 89 0 0 0 89 DEANHEAD, TODMORDEN ROAD 38 0 1(2.63%) 37 73 0 3 (4.11%) 0 70 (-4.11%) GREEN CLOUGH, TODMORDEN 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 ROAD TODMORDEN ROAD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 WARLAND,(WALSDEN) 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 6otl 7or 8 $( 9 F)4 ) 0 B)C0HDE F)5 01A@F 0 B)C)5DE 0H B0C00DE ) 01AHH B90C)3DE
RD - BARE HILL STREET 31 0 0 31 53 0 1 (1.89%) 0 52 (-1.89%) BINNS TERRACE 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 BLACKSTONE EDGE COURT 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 BARNFIELD, BLACKSTONE EDGE 5 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 11 OLD ROAD GATEHOUSE, BLACKSTONE EDGE 15 0 0 15 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) OLD ROAD HIGH PEAK, BLACKSTONE EDGE 10 0 0 10 14 0 0 0 14 OLD ROAD LYDGATE COURT, BLACKSTONE 8 0 0 8 15 0 1 (6.67%) 0 14 (-6.67%) EDGE OLD ROAD MONA CLIFFE NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 9 BLACKSTONE EDGE OLD ROAD MOORSIDE, BLACKSTONE EDGE 8 0 0 8 17 0 1 (5.88%) 0 16 (-5.88%) OLD ROAD BLACKSTONE EDGE OLD ROAD 36 0 0 36 65 0 0 0 65 BLACKSTONE EDGE 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 BROOK STREET 7 0 0 7 6 0 0 0 6
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 56 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RD - CALDERBROOK 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 WHITFIELD FARM, CALDERBROOK 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 CARRIAGE DRIVE 9 0 0 9 18 0 0 0 18 CENTRAL AVENUE 19 0 0 19 35 0 0 0 35 CENTRE VALE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 12 0 1 (8.33%) 0 11 (-8.33%) CHAPEL HILL 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 ROCKLEY HOUSE, CHAPEL STREET 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 7 CHURCH STREET 10 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 5 CLEMENTS PLACE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 DEARDEN STREET 22 0 0 22 37 1 (2.70%) 0 0 38 (2.70%) DURNLAW CLOSE 22 0 0 22 40 0 1 (2.50%) 0 39 (-2.50%) EALEES 14 0 0 14 27 0 0 0 27 Page 279 EALEES ROAD 18 0 0 18 28 0 0 0 28 EAST STREET 12 0 0 12 18 0 1 (5.56%) 0 17 (-5.56%) EGERTON STREET 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 ELIM STREET 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 FAIR VIEW 12 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 21 FERN GROVE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 FERRAND ROAD 35 0 0 35 60 0 0 0 60 FLETCHERS SQUARE,BARE HILL 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 STR FOUR SEASONS REST HOME, FOUR 1 0 0 1 10 0 1 (10.00%) 0 9 (-10.00%) SEASONS GALE CLOSE 56 0 0 56 68 1 (1.47%) 3 (4.41%) 0 66 (-2.94%) GEORGE STREET 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 GORSEY BANK 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 BENT HOUSE CROFT, HALIFAX 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 ROAD HEATHER BANK, HALIFAX ROAD 8 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 17 HONRESFELD, HALIFAX ROAD 2 0 0 2 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) HALIFAX ROAD 102 0 0 102 190 2 (1.05%) 5 (2.63%) 0 187 (-1.58%) HALLIWELL STREET 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 HARE HILL ROAD 13 0 0 13 18 0 0 0 18 HOWARTH STREET 22 0 0 22 30 1 (3.33%) 1 (3.33%) 0 30 JERROLD STREET 8 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 9
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 57 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RD - JOSEPH STREET 23 0 9(39.13%) 14 31 0 2 (6.45%) 0 29 (-6.45%) LANE FOOT FARM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 LEAH STREET 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 LEE STREET 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 LIGHTOWLERS LANE 15 0 0 15 24 0 0 0 24 LIMEFIELD TERRACE 9 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 15 WELLINGTON TERRACE, LODGE 8 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 13 STREET LORD STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 MADEN'S SQUARE,TODMORDEN 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4
Page 280 ROAD MILFORD CRESCENT 11 0 0 11 18 0 0 0 18 MOORLAND STREET 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 NELSON STREET 12 0 0 12 11 0 0 0 11 NEWALL STREET 34 0 0 34 63 0 1 (1.59%) 0 62 (-1.59%) NORTH STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 OAK STREET 10 0 0 10 13 0 0 0 13 HUDSONS PASSAGE, OFF 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 TODMORDEN ROAD OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 PARK ROAD 3 0 0 3 7 0 2 (28.57%) 0 5 (-28.57%) PARK VIEW 15 0 0 15 24 0 0 0 24 PHOENIX STREET 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 PHOENIX COURT, PHOENIX STREET 6 0 0 6 5 1 (20.00%) 0 0 6 (20.00%) PINE STREET 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 PIONEER STREET 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 RAKE TERRACE 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 REDLAND CLOSE 20 0 0 20 28 0 0 0 28 SALE STREET 15 0 0 15 27 0 3 (11.11%) 0 24 (-11.11%) SAXON HOUSE,WEST VIEW 17 0 0 17 18 0 0 0 18 SCHOFIELD STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 SHORE HILL 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 SMITH STREET 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 SPENCER STREET 8 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 9 SUN DRIVE 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 58 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RD - SUTCLIFFE STREET 12 0 0 12 20 0 0 0 20 TAYLOR TERRACE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 CENTRE VALE, TODMORDEN ROAD 19 0 0 19 28 0 0 0 28 ELIM TERRACE, TODMORDEN ROAD 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 FERRAND LODGE, TODMORDEN 12 0 0 12 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) ROAD GALE, TODMORDEN ROAD 9 0 0 9 19 0 0 0 19 GLEN VIEW, TODMORDEN ROAD 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 TODMORDEN ROAD 84 0 0 84 143 1 (0.70%) 2 (1.40%) 0 142 (-0.70%) WHITFIELD BROW, TODMORDEN 12 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 19 ROAD WINGFIELD VILLAS, TODMORDEN 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6
Page 281 ROAD TOWNHOUSE ROAD 24 0 0 24 36 0 0 0 36 VICTORIA STREET 24 0 0 24 37 0 0 0 37 WARLEY STREET 8 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 13 OLIVE STANDRING HOUSE, WATER 27 0 0 27 28 0 2 (7.14%) 0 26 (-7.14%) STREET WELLINGTON LODGE 15 0 0 15 24 0 0 0 24 WEST STREET 7 0 0 7 9 0 1 (11.11%) 0 8 (-11.11%) WEST VIEW 31 0 0 31 41 0 1 (2.44%) 0 40 (-2.44%) 6otl 7or 8 $ 9 010HH ) 4 B)CF4DE 0103@ 015@3 F B)C35DE 33 B0CF5DE ) 015AF B90CH)DE
RE - ABBEY DRIVE 50 0 0 50 98 2 (2.04%) 0 0 100 (2.04%) BANK CLOSE 10 0 0 10 27 0 0 0 27 BARKE STREET 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 BEECHWOOD AVENUE 29 0 0 29 50 0 0 0 50 BLYTH AVENUE 10 0 0 10 17 0 2 (11.76%) 0 15 (-11.76%) BRENTWOOD CLOSE 12 0 0 12 26 0 0 0 26 BRIDGE BANK ROAD 61 0 0 61 117 0 0 0 117 BRIDGENORTH DRIVE 13 0 0 13 25 0 0 0 25 BROADFIELD DRIVE 18 0 0 18 31 0 1 (3.23%) 0 30 (-3.23%) BROWN BANK ROAD 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 BROWN LODGE DRIVE 27 0 0 27 55 0 1 (1.82%) 0 54 (-1.82%) BROWN LODGE STREET 51 0 0 51 95 0 1 (1.05%) 0 94 (-1.05%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 59 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RE - CHICHESTER CLOSE 50 0 0 50 100 0 0 0 100 CLEGGSWOOD AVENUE 47 0 0 47 101 0 5 (4.95%) 0 96 (-4.95%) COLERIDGE DRIVE 16 0 0 16 33 0 0 0 33 DALE VIEW 30 0 0 30 64 0 0 0 64 DERWENT DRIVE 37 0 0 37 84 0 0 0 84 EAFIELD ROAD 9 0 0 9 13 0 0 0 13 EDWARD AVENUE 10 0 0 10 21 0 0 0 21 ELM STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 EXCELSIOR TERRACE 4 0 0 4 7 0 1 (14.29%) 0 6 (-14.29%) FAIRFAX DRIVE 14 0 0 14 30 0 0 0 30 Page 282 FIELDEN STREET 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 GARDEN CLOSE 10 0 0 10 23 0 0 0 23 GARDEN WAY 24 0 0 24 45 0 0 0 45 GREENBANK DRIVE 13 0 0 13 27 0 0 0 27 HEALD CLOSE 42 0 0 42 82 0 0 0 82 HEALD LANE 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 HENRY STREET 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 HIGHER BANK ROAD 14 0 0 14 27 0 0 0 27 HIGHER CLEGGSWOOD AVENUE 29 0 0 29 49 0 0 0 49 HIGHLANDS 18 0 0 18 39 0 0 0 39 HOLLINGWORTH LAKE 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 JOHNSTON AVENUE 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 KAY STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 KNOWL VIEW 17 0 0 17 33 0 0 0 33 LAKE BANK 36 0 0 36 52 0 3 (5.77%) 0 49 (-5.77%) LAKE SIDE 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 LAURELS DRIVE 28 0 0 28 59 0 0 0 59 LEIGHTON AVENUE 23 0 0 23 42 0 0 0 42 LINCOLN DRIVE 22 0 0 22 53 0 0 0 53 CLEGGSWORTH HOUSE REST HOME 1 0 0 1 32 0 2 (6.25%) 0 30 (-6.25%) 7, LITTLE CLEGG ROAD LITTLE CLEGG ROAD 55 0 0 55 111 1 (0.90%) 0 0 112 (0.90%) LODGE BANK ROAD 17 0 0 17 41 0 0 0 41 MERLIN CLOSE 15 0 0 15 25 1 (4.00%) 0 0 26 (4.00%) MILBURY DRIVE 38 0 0 38 73 0 0 0 73
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 60 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RE - MILL STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 MILNROW ROAD 26 0 0 26 41 0 0 0 41 OAK STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 3 1 (33.33%) 0 0 4 (33.33%) PEANOCK LANE 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 QUEEN'S VIEW 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 8 ROSE AVENUE 57 0 0 57 106 0 1 (0.94%) 0 105 (-0.94%) SHAFTESBURY AVENUE 25 0 0 25 50 0 0 0 50 ELLENS PLACE, SMITHY BRIDGE 7 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 4 ROAD LAKESIDE NURSING HOME, SMITHY 1 0 0 1 21 0 4 (19.05%) 0 17 (-19.05%) BRIDGE ROAD
Page 283 SMITHY BRIDGE ROAD 117 2(1.71%) 4(3.42%) 115 183 2 (1.09%) 0 0 185 (1.09%) ROBERTS PLACE, SMITHY BRIDGE 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 ROAD WESLEY COURT, SMITHY BRIDGE 10 0 0 10 13 0 2 (15.38%) 0 11 (-15.38%) ROAD SOUTHEY CLOSE 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 STARFIELD AVENUE 11 0 0 11 24 0 0 0 24 WALMSLEY AVENUE 26 0 0 26 45 0 0 0 45 WHITTAKER DRIVE 28 0 0 28 54 0 0 0 54 WILLOW RISE 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 0 15 WOODBANK ROAD 32 0 0 32 63 0 0 0 63 WOODHEYS ROAD 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 WORDSWORTH CRESCENT 49 0 0 49 102 0 0 0 102 WRIGLEY PLACE 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 YEA FOLD 11 0 0 11 18 0 0 0 18 6otl 7or 8 $E 9 01340 AB)C0HDE H B)CA4DE 01354 A1252 F B)CA2DE A3 B)C52DE ) A12F) B9)C2)DE
RF - BRANCH ROAD FARM, BRANCH 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 ROAD SUNGATE, BRANCH ROAD 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 CLEGG HALL COTTAGES 4 0 0 4 9 2 (22.22%) 0 0 11 (22.22%) CLEGG HALL FARM 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 CLEGG HALL ROAD 24 0 0 24 9 0 0 0 9
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 61 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
RF - HOLLINGWORTH LAKE 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 LITTLE CLEGG 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 SHAW LANE 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 6otl 7or 8 $! 9 H@ ) ) H@ H@ A BHCHHDE ) ) HF BHCHHDE IS66IEGP$PXU IRESSE H1@)5 AB)C)HDE A3B)C@0DE H1H5F F15@A A3 B)CA4DE 4@ B0CA0DE 0 F1F5) B9)C4ADE Page 284
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 62 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
CA - DERBY STREET 29 0 0 29 59 1 (1.69%) 2 (3.39%) 0 58 (-1.69%) DURHAM STREET 43 0 0 43 81 5 (6.17%) 0 0 86 (6.17%) EQUITABLE STREET 31 0 0 31 83 2 (2.41%) 0 0 85 (2.41%) EXETER GROVE 12 0 0 12 23 1 (4.35%) 0 0 24 (4.35%) EXETER STREET 39 0 0 39 117 0 2 (1.71%) 0 115 (-1.71%) MEAVY HOUSE, HARE STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HARE STREET 21 0 0 21 76 0 0 0 76 HAREFIELD AVENUE 8 0 0 8 22 0 0 0 22 HEREFORD STREET 40 0 0 40 67 1 (1.49%) 1 (1.49%) 0 67 IPSWICH STREET 16 0 0 16 39 0 0 0 39 LEICESTER STREET 9 0 0 9 19 0 1 (5.26%) 0 18 (-5.26%) MALDON STREET 37 0 0 37 79 0 1 (1.27%) 0 78 (-1.27%) Page 285 MIALL STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 MILKSTONE ROAD 19 0 0 19 55 2 (3.64%) 0 0 57 (3.64%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PIONEER STREET 15 0 0 15 26 0 0 0 26 TENNYSON STREET 20 0 0 20 37 1 (2.70%) 3 (8.11%) 0 35 (-5.41%) WHITBY STREET 7 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 13 6otl 7or 8 ( 9 3H4 ) ) 3H4 F44 03 B0C23DE 0) B0CA@DE ) 5)A B)C35DE
CB - ABINGDON CLOSE 30 0 0 30 36 1 (2.78%) 0 0 37 (2.78%) ARUNDEL AVENUE 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 ARUNDEL STREET 10 0 0 10 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) ASHFIELD ROAD 122 0 18(14.75%) 104 230 1 (0.43%) 3 (1.30%) 0 228 (-0.87%) ASHTON GARDENS 13 0 0 13 37 0 0 0 37 ASHTON STREET 12 0 0 12 19 0 3 (15.79%) 0 16 (-15.79%) BARCLYDE STREET 13 0 0 13 23 0 2 (8.70%) 0 21 (-8.70%) BOSWORTH SQUARE 12 0 0 12 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) BOSWORTH STREET 33 0 0 33 63 2 (3.17%) 0 0 65 (3.17%) CHELTENHAM STREET 27 0 0 27 49 0 0 0 49 CRAVEN GARDENS 3 0 0 3 6 1 (16.67%) 0 0 7 (16.67%) DUNSTER AVENUE 46 0 0 46 123 0 0 0 123 DUNSTERVILLE TERRACE 16 0 0 16 27 0 1 (3.70%) 0 26 (-3.70%) ELM GROVE 13 0 0 13 25 0 0 0 25
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 63 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
CB - GALES TERRACE 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 GRANDIDGE STREET 13 0 0 13 24 0 0 0 24 GREENROYD 16 0 0 16 39 0 1 (2.56%) 0 38 (-2.56%) HARDWICKE STREET 27 0 18(66.67%) 9 43 0 3 (6.98%) 0 40 (-6.98%) HARPER STREET 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 HENLEY TERRACE 12 0 0 12 11 0 0 0 11 HIGH BARN CLOSE 30 0 0 30 64 2 (3.13%) 0 0 66 (3.13%) JOHN ROBERTS CLOSE 14 0 0 14 30 0 0 0 30 KENSINGTON STREET 58 0 0 58 88 1 (1.14%) 1 (1.14%) 0 88 KING STREET SOUTH 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 Page 286 LANGTON TERRACE 6 0 0 6 20 0 0 0 20 LLOYD STREET 10 0 0 10 18 0 2 (11.11%) 0 16 (-11.11%) LONG HILL 44 0 0 44 89 0 0 0 89 MANCHESTER ROAD 26 0 0 26 70 0 2 (2.86%) 0 68 (-2.86%) MEREFIELD AVENUE 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 MEREFIELD STREET 45 0 0 45 96 0 3 (3.13%) 1 93 (-3.13%) MEREFIELD TERRACE 7 0 0 7 25 0 0 0 25 MULBERRY CLOSE 29 0 0 29 36 0 2 (5.56%) 0 34 (-5.56%) NEW BARN LANE 58 0 0 58 95 1 (1.05%) 1 (1.05%) 0 95 OSBORNE STREET 45 0 0 45 69 1 (1.45%) 0 0 70 (1.45%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PROSPECT STREET 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 RIBBLE STREET 6 0 0 6 15 0 0 0 15 RUFFORD AVENUE 14 0 0 14 33 0 0 0 33 SANDBROOK WAY 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 (100.00%) 0 0 (-100.00%) SPARTHFIELD AVENUE 18 0 0 18 53 0 0 0 53 STRATFORD AVENUE 17 0 0 17 48 0 0 0 48 ULSTER AVENUE 11 0 0 11 19 0 0 0 19 VIVIAN STREET 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 WORCESTER STREET 23 0 0 23 50 0 0 0 50 6otl 7or 8 (G 9 4AA ) 32 B3C4)DE 552 01F40 0) B)C@2DE A5 B0C@2DE 0 01FF3 B90C)0DE
CC - ASHFIELD ROAD 73 0 0 73 170 2 (1.18%) 1 (0.59%) 0 171 (0.59%) AUBREY STREET 24 0 0 24 42 1 (2.38%) 1 (2.38%) 0 42
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 64 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
CC - BROOMFIELD SQUARE 5 0 0 5 12 0 1 (8.33%) 0 11 (-8.33%) CECIL STREET 12 0 0 12 36 0 0 0 36 CLARA STREET 15 0 0 15 29 1 (3.45%) 2 (6.90%) 0 28 (-3.45%) CLIFFORD STREET 32 0 0 32 66 1 (1.52%) 2 (3.03%) 0 65 (-1.52%) DEEPLISH ROAD 74 0 0 74 296 0 1 (0.34%) 0 295 (-0.34%) DEEPLISH STREET 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 GATE STREET 14 0 0 14 33 0 0 0 33 HASTINGS STREET 8 0 0 8 15 1 (6.67%) 2 (13.33%) 0 14 (-6.67%) LETCHWORTH AVENUE 20 0 0 20 43 0 0 0 43 LINCOLN LEACH COURT 9 0 0 9 27 0 0 0 27 LUCKNOW STREET 20 0 0 20 31 0 0 0 31 MARIGOLD STREET 54 0 0 54 122 0 3 (2.46%) 0 119 (-2.46%) Page 287 MIDHURST STREET 36 0 0 36 67 4 (5.97%) 1 (1.49%) 0 70 (4.48%) ASHFIELD HOUSE, MILKSTONE 25 0 0 25 18 0 1 (5.56%) 0 17 (-5.56%) ROAD LEIGHTON HOUSE, MILKSTONE 1 0 0 1 18 0 1 (5.56%) 0 17 (-5.56%) ROAD MEAVY VIEW, MILKSTONE ROAD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 MILKSTONE ROAD 31 0 0 31 88 0 0 0 88 NICHOLSON STREET 12 0 0 12 25 2 (8.00%) 0 0 27 (8.00%) ORIEL STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 OSBORNE STREET 27 0 0 27 48 1 (2.08%) 0 0 49 (2.08%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 OVERT STREET 13 0 0 13 36 1 (2.78%) 0 0 37 (2.78%) PENRITH STREET 18 0 0 18 26 0 1 (3.85%) 0 25 (-3.85%) PHILIP STREET 17 0 0 17 42 0 0 0 42 PIKE STREET 26 0 0 26 45 1 (2.22%) 0 0 46 (2.22%) POMONA STREET 33 0 0 33 65 1 (1.54%) 0 0 66 (1.54%) PULLMAN STREET 33 0 0 33 105 0 4 (3.81%) 0 101 (-3.81%) SALIK GARDENS 12 0 0 12 39 0 0 0 39 SALKELD STREET 9 0 0 9 22 0 0 0 22 ST LUKE STREET 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 STANHOPE STREET 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 VENTNOR STREET 30 0 0 30 78 2 (2.56%) 0 0 80 (2.56%) VINE PLACE 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 65 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
CC - WELBURN STREET 21 0 0 21 41 0 2 (4.88%) 0 39 (-4.88%) YARROW CLOSE 26 0 0 26 69 2 (2.90%) 2 (2.90%) 0 69 6otl 7or 8 (( 9 F2@ ) ) F2@ 0150) A) B0C0)DE A@ B0C35DE ) 015)@ B9)CA5DE
CD - ALBION ROAD 32 0 0 32 66 0 0 0 66 BRIAR STREET 26 0 0 26 47 2 (4.26%) 0 0 49 (4.26%) BRIDGEFIELD STREET 22 0 0 22 37 1 (2.70%) 1 (2.70%) 0 37 CASTLE AVENUE 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 0 19 CASTLE HILL CRESCENT 15 0 0 15 26 1 (3.85%) 0 0 27 (3.85%)
Page 288 CORPORATION ROAD 13 0 0 13 20 0 2 (10.00%) 0 18 (-10.00%) FENWICK STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 FERN STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HEATH STREET 43 0 0 43 78 0 1 (1.28%) 0 77 (-1.28%) MANCHESTER ROAD 42 0 0 42 59 0 0 0 59 MAPLE STREET 28 0 0 28 59 2 (3.39%) 0 0 61 (3.39%) MELLOR STREET 17 0 0 17 47 0 0 0 47 NORMAN ROAD 8 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 17 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 SPARTHBOTTOMS ROAD 28 0 0 28 36 1 (2.78%) 0 0 37 (2.78%) ST ALBANS COURT 18 0 0 18 28 0 2 (7.14%) 0 26 (-7.14%) ST ALBANS TERRACE 22 0 0 22 42 0 0 0 42 WEST HILL, CASTLE AVENUE 46 0 0 46 61 1 (1.64%) 2 (3.28%) 0 60 (-1.64%) 6otl 7or 8 ( 9 3FA ) ) 3FA 2HF 5 B0CAHDE 5 B0CAHDE ) 2HF B)C))DE
CE - ANN STREET 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 BOUNDARY STREET 28 0 0 28 84 0 0 0 84 BOUNDARY WALK 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 KHUBSURET HOUSE, CASTLEMERE 35 0 9(25.71%) 26 39 1 (2.56%) 1 (2.56%) 0 39 STREET CASTLEMERE STREET 38 0 0 38 93 1 (1.08%) 1 (1.08%) 0 93 DORSET STREET 3 0 0 3 10 0 0 0 10 DOWLING STREET 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 DRAKE STREET 68 0 0 68 114 1 (0.88%) 2 (1.75%) 0 113 (-0.88%) PARK COURT, DRAKE STREET 14 0 0 14 15 0 0 0 15
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 66 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
CE - EASTBOURNE STREET 11 0 0 11 23 0 0 0 23 ELLESMERE STREET 13 0 0 13 41 0 0 0 41 ESSEX STREET 17 0 0 17 27 1 (3.70%) 2 (7.41%) 0 26 (-3.70%) FENTON MEWS 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 FENTON MEWS NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 43 0 2 (4.65%) 0 41 (-4.65%) FENTON STREET FENTON STREET 40 0 0 40 111 1 (0.90%) 0 0 112 (0.90%) FIRE STATION YARD,MACLURE 9 0 0 9 28 0 0 0 28 ROAD ALLINGTON, FREEHOLD ESTATE 24 0 0 24 33 3 (9.09%) 0 0 36 (9.09%) BEVERSTON, FREEHOLD ESTATE 15 0 0 15 22 0 0 0 22 CONISBOROUGH, FREEHOLD 36 0 0 36 46 1 (2.17%) 1 (2.17%) 0 46
Page 289 ESTATE DONNINGTON, FREEHOLD ESTATE 20 0 0 20 14 0 0 0 14 EDLINGHAM, FREEHOLD ESTATE 20 0 0 20 26 0 0 0 26 FARINGDON, FREEHOLD ESTATE 11 0 0 11 12 0 0 0 12 GOODRICH, FREEHOLD ESTATE 20 0 0 20 23 0 0 0 23 HARTLEBURY, FREEHOLD ESTATE 20 0 0 20 26 0 0 0 26 ILMINSTER, FREEHOLD ESTATE 36 0 0 36 38 0 1 (2.63%) 0 37 (-2.63%) KENILWORTH, FREEHOLD ESTATE 24 0 1(4.17%) 23 27 0 1 (3.70%) 0 26 (-3.70%) LYDFORD, FREEHOLD ESTATE 24 0 0 24 25 0 2 (8.00%) 0 23 (-8.00%) MONTGOMERY, FREEHOLD ESTATE 18 0 0 18 23 0 2 (8.70%) 0 21 (-8.70%) OLNEY, FREEHOLD ESTATE 20 0 0 20 21 0 0 0 21 PENDENNIS, FREEHOLD ESTATE 16 0 0 16 19 0 0 0 19 RUTLAND, FREEHOLD ESTATE 16 0 0 16 17 0 0 0 17 SHIRBURN, FREEHOLD ESTATE 16 0 0 16 21 0 0 0 21 THORNBURY, FREEHOLD ESTATE 12 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 19 UPTON, FREEHOLD ESTATE 31 0 0 31 48 0 0 0 48 WOLVESEY, FREEHOLD ESTATE 28 0 1(3.57%) 27 40 0 5 (12.50%) 0 35 (-12.50%) FREEHOLD STREET 2 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 9 FREETRADE STREET 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9 GROVE STREET 10 0 0 10 13 0 0 0 13 HAMPDEN STREET 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 HEALEY STREET 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 NO.3 COURT, HENRY STREET 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 67 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
CE - HENRY STREET 17 0 0 17 35 1 (2.86%) 0 0 36 (2.86%) HUTTON HOUSE 19 0 0 19 18 0 1 (5.56%) 0 17 (-5.56%) KENT STREET 20 0 0 20 46 0 0 0 46 KILNERDEYNE TERRACE 9 0 0 9 18 0 0 0 18 KING STREET EAST 41 0 0 41 136 1 (0.74%) 0 0 137 (0.74%) KING STREET SOUTH 42 0 0 42 145 0 0 0 145 LAKE STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 CUTHBERT MAYNE COURT, LATIN 26 0 0 26 31 0 3 (9.68%) 0 28 (-9.68%) STREET LOWER TWEEDALE STREET 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6
Page 290 MACLURE ROAD 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 STATHAM HOUSE, MACLURE ROAD 9 0 0 9 6 0 3 (50.00%) 0 3 (-50.00%) MERE LANE 16 0 18(112.50%) -2 51 0 2 (3.92%) 0 49 (-3.92%) MERE STREET 39 0 0 39 93 0 0 1 93 MILK STREET 8 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 9 MILKSTONE PLACE 10 0 0 10 20 0 0 0 20 MILKSTONE ROAD 17 0 0 17 24 5 (20.83%) 0 0 29 (20.83%) MONMOUTH STREET 11 0 0 11 20 0 0 0 20 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 RICHARD STREET 16 0 0 16 49 0 0 0 49 RUSSELL STREET 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 ST ALBANS STREET 20 0 0 20 52 0 0 0 52 CARDINAL VAUGHAN COURT, 10 0 0 10 11 0 0 0 11 SUFFOLK STREET SUFFOLK STREET 7 0 1(14.29%) 6 17 0 0 0 17 SUSSEX STREET 34 0 0 34 107 1 (0.93%) 0 0 108 (0.93%) TALBOT STREET 29 0 0 29 56 0 0 0 56 TRAFFORD STREET 14 0 0 14 19 0 1 (5.26%) 0 18 (-5.26%) TWEEDALE STREET 64 0 0 64 168 0 3 (1.79%) 0 165 (-1.79%) WICKLIFFE PLACE 7 0 0 7 12 0 1 (8.33%) 0 11 (-8.33%) WILLIAM STREET 31 0 0 31 106 0 0 0 106 6otl 7or 8 (E 9 01AFA ) 3) BAC32DE 01AHA A1H53 0F B)C25DE 3H B0C3FDE 0 A1H22 B9)C25DE
CF - ANN STREET 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 68 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
CF - ST CLARES HOUSE, ANN STREET 15 0 0 15 10 0 0 0 10 BACK DRAKE STREET 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 BAILLIE STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 BARLOW STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 CHANCEL PLACE 12 0 0 12 13 1 (7.69%) 1 (7.69%) 0 13 CHEETHAM STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 CHURCH STILE 18 0 0 18 26 0 0 0 26 DRAKE STREET 23 0 0 23 14 0 0 0 14 THE CRESCENT, DRAKE STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 FLEECE STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 GREAT GEORGE STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 GREENWOOD STREET 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 Page 291 HOLROYD STREET 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 HOWARD PLACE 13 0 0 13 13 0 1 (7.69%) 0 12 (-7.69%) LIVSEY STREET 7 0 0 7 14 1 (7.14%) 0 0 15 (7.14%) MILNROW ROAD 24 0 0 24 12 0 0 0 12 MOLESWORTH STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 MOORE STREET 10 0 0 10 11 0 1 (9.09%) 0 10 (-9.09%) OAK STREET 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 OLDHAM ROAD 21 0 0 21 14 0 0 0 14 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PACKER STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PICKUP STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 REED HILL 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 RICHARD STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 RIVER STREET 1 0 0 1 10 0 1 (10.00%) 0 9 (-10.00%) ROCH VALE CARAVAN PARK 27 0 0 27 38 0 0 0 38 SCHOOL LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 SPARROW HILL 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 ST MARYS GATE 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 ST. CHADS CLOSE 25 0 0 25 31 0 1 (3.23%) 0 30 (-3.23%) THE BUTTS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TONGE STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 UNION STREET 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 69 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
CF - WALKER HOUSE, WALKER STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 WOOD STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 YORKSHIRE STREET 5 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 4 6otl 7or 8 (! 9 A@) ) ) A@) A2@ A B)CF@DE @ B0C54DE ) A2A B90C03DE TSIRS6PQE Q EEISS 3143) ) 22B0C25DE 3152H F1F4@ F) B)C4)DE 00) B0CH0DE A F1F@@ B9)C@0DE Page 292
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 70 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
SA - ASHES LANE 13 0 0 13 22 0 0 0 22 BEALCROFT CLOSE 27 0 0 27 56 0 0 0 56 BEALCROFT WALK 2 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 9 BRIDGE STREET 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 COLLIER AVENUE 29 0 0 29 59 2 (3.39%) 2 (3.39%) 0 59 CROFT HEAD DRIVE 72 0 0 72 145 4 (2.76%) 3 (2.07%) 0 146 (0.69%) EAFIELD AVENUE 60 0 0 60 140 1 (0.71%) 0 0 141 (0.71%) EAFIELD CLOSE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 KILN LANE 19 0 0 19 39 0 0 0 39 LANESIDE WALK 7 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 13 LILY STREET 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 LOWOOD CLOSE 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 Page 293 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PARSONAGE WALK 13 0 0 13 28 0 0 0 28 PARSONAGE TERRACE, 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 PARSONAGE WALK PEARSON CLOSE 12 0 0 12 29 0 0 0 29 THE GRANGE, PEARSON CLOSE 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 RIVER PLACE 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 ROADS FORD AVENUE 19 0 0 19 39 0 0 0 39 SANDSTONE ROAD 9 0 0 9 21 0 0 0 21 SHOREFIELD CLOSE 11 0 0 11 25 0 0 0 25 SILVER HILL 15 0 0 15 32 0 0 0 32 STOCK GROVE 18 0 0 18 46 0 0 0 46 TURNOUGH ROAD 13 0 0 13 23 0 0 0 23 WEIR ROAD 67 0 0 67 140 0 3 (2.14%) 0 137 (-2.14%) WILDHOUSE LANE 22 0 0 22 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) WILDHOUSE COURT, WILDHOUSE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 LANE YEOMANS CLOSE 27 0 0 27 60 0 0 0 60 6otl 7or 8 S 9 H55 ) ) H55 01)A) F B)C24DE 4 B)C55DE ) 01)05 B9)CA)DE
SB - ASHFIELD LANE 37 0 0 37 79 0 0 0 79 BEECHFIELD ROAD 79 0 0 79 149 0 2 (1.34%) 0 147 (-1.34%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 71 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
SB - BOWLAND GROVE 16 0 0 16 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) BRAMHALL CLOSE 51 0 0 51 81 0 0 0 81 BUCKLEY CHASE 44 0 0 44 95 0 0 0 95 BUCKLEY HILL LANE 41 0 0 41 86 0 0 0 86 CARTMEL AVENUE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 CHADWICK FOLD 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 CLAREMONT ROAD 30 0 0 30 49 0 0 0 49 CRICKET VIEW 11 0 0 11 24 0 0 0 24 EGREMONT ROAD 94 0 0 94 175 0 1 (0.57%) 0 174 (-0.57%) GRANGE AVENUE 8 0 0 8 14 0 1 (7.14%) 0 13 (-7.14%) Page 294 HARBOUR LANE 83 0 0 83 159 1 (0.63%) 4 (2.52%) 2 156 (-1.89%) REBECCA COURT, HARBOUR LANE 17 0 0 17 21 0 0 0 21 LADYHOUSE LANE 9 0 0 9 12 0 0 0 12 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 SHEPHERDS WAY 17 0 0 17 42 0 0 0 42 STANNEY CLOSE 22 0 0 22 46 1 (2.17%) 0 0 47 (2.17%) STOTT STREET 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 WHITFIELD DRIVE 14 0 0 14 33 0 0 0 33 WOODLANDS ROAD 64 0 0 64 110 0 0 0 110 6otl 7or 8 SG 9 2HF ) ) 2HF 01A02 A B)C02DE 4 B)CFHDE A 01A)4 B9)C@5DE
SC - ALBERT STREET 35 0 0 35 46 0 1 (2.17%) 0 45 (-2.17%) ALPINE DRIVE 34 0 0 34 65 0 0 0 65 AVON CLOSE 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 0 15 BACK DALE STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 BALMORAL CLOSE 21 0 0 21 45 0 1 (2.22%) 0 44 (-2.22%) BEAL TERRACE 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 BILSON SQUARE 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 BOTESWORTH GREEN 29 0 0 29 65 0 0 0 65 BUTTERWORTH CLOSE 13 0 0 13 25 0 0 0 25 BUTTERWORTH HALL 10 0 0 10 13 0 0 0 13 CAMBRIAN DRIVE 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 CARR GROVE 14 0 0 14 27 0 0 0 27 CHADWICK CLOSE 21 0 0 21 32 0 0 0 32
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 72 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
SC - CHAPEL GATE 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 CHARLES MEWS, CHARLES LANE 18 0 0 18 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) CHARLES LANE 21 0 0 21 32 0 0 0 32 CHEVIOT CLOSE 31 0 0 31 58 0 0 0 58 CHIPPING FOLD 12 0 0 12 32 0 0 0 32 CHURCH TERRACE 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 CLEGG STREET 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 CLEVELAND DRIVE 40 0 0 40 81 0 0 0 81 CLIFTON STREET 10 0 0 10 11 0 0 0 11 CORNFIELD STREET 45 0 0 45 70 0 0 0 70 COTSWOLD CRESCENT 22 0 0 22 45 0 0 0 45 CROSS GATES ROAD 38 0 0 38 79 0 1 (1.27%) 0 78 (-1.27%) Page 295 CROSSBROOK WAY 33 0 0 33 61 0 0 0 61 DALE STREET 55 0 18(32.73%) 37 81 0 2 (2.47%) 0 79 (-2.47%) DELPH STREET 13 0 0 13 30 0 0 0 30 DERWENT AVENUE 29 0 0 29 60 0 0 0 60 EDMUND STREET 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 EQUITABLE STREET 40 0 0 40 60 0 0 0 60 FAIRWAY 18 0 0 18 29 0 0 0 29 GOOD INTENT 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 GORSE ROAD 22 0 0 22 42 0 0 0 42 HARDMAN STREET 8 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 9 HEATON STREET 13 0 0 13 22 0 0 0 22 HEYS CLOSE 17 0 0 17 31 0 0 0 31 HIGHFIELD ROAD 18 0 0 18 33 0 0 0 33 HILLSIDE VIEW 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 HOLT STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 HUMBER ROAD 13 0 0 13 24 0 0 0 24 HURSTED ROAD 62 0 0 62 114 2 (1.75%) 0 0 116 (1.75%) KENSINGTON CLOSE 16 0 0 16 29 0 0 0 29 KILN LANE 64 0 0 64 121 0 0 0 121 KILN MOUNT 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 LADYHOUSE CLOSE 44 0 0 44 70 0 1 (1.43%) 0 69 (-1.43%) LADYHOUSE LANE 18 0 0 18 26 1 (3.85%) 0 0 27 (3.85%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 73 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
SC - LAMBOURNE GROVE 27 0 0 27 56 1 (1.79%) 0 0 57 (1.79%) LEACH STREET 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 LOWER TUNSHILL 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 LOWHOUSE CLOSE 14 0 0 14 26 0 0 0 26 MAJOR STREET 27 0 0 27 42 0 0 0 42 MALVERN CLOSE 18 0 0 18 34 0 0 0 34 MAVIS GROVE 8 0 0 8 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) MENDIP DRIVE 18 0 0 18 35 0 0 0 35 MERLIN ROAD 18 0 0 18 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) MILNE GROVE 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 Page 296 MILNES YARD 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 MOORLAND AVENUE 38 0 0 38 80 0 2 (2.50%) 0 78 (-2.50%) MOY HILL 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 NEW STREET 13 0 0 13 20 0 0 0 20 NEWFIELD VIEW 35 0 0 35 75 0 4 (5.33%) 0 71 (-5.33%) NEWHEY ROAD 67 0 0 67 90 1 (1.11%) 2 (2.22%) 0 89 (-1.11%) ROSEMARY CARE HOME, NEWHEY 1 0 0 1 3 1 (33.33%) 0 0 4 (33.33%) ROAD OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PENNINE DRIVE 62 0 0 62 124 2 (1.61%) 5 (4.03%) 0 121 (-2.42%) PLATT CLOSE 11 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 15 RAINES CREST 36 0 0 36 61 0 1 (1.64%) 0 60 (-1.64%) RONNIE TAYLOR CLOSE 62 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 CLOCK TOWER COURT, ROYDS 27 0 0 27 30 0 2 (6.67%) 0 28 (-6.67%) STREET ROYDS STREET 31 0 0 31 41 1 (2.44%) 1 (2.44%) 0 41 SANDRINGHAM DRIVE 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 SCHOFIELD CLOSE 16 0 0 16 17 0 1 (5.88%) 0 16 (-5.88%) SCHOFIELD STREET 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 SEVERN DRIVE 31 0 0 31 71 0 0 0 71 SHERIFF STREET 18 0 0 18 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) SIMEON STREET 32 0 0 32 57 2 (3.51%) 0 0 59 (3.51%) SLAIDBURN CLOSE 14 0 0 14 31 0 0 0 31 SMITH HILL 57 0 0 57 97 0 0 0 97 ST JAMES STREET 47 0 0 47 85 0 0 0 85
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 74 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
SC - PIONEER COURT, STATION ROAD 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 7 STONE STREET 9 0 0 9 18 0 0 0 18 STONEFIELD STREET 17 0 0 17 23 1 (4.35%) 1 (4.35%) 0 23 TAME BARN CLOSE 15 0 0 15 20 0 0 0 20 THAMES ROAD 41 0 0 41 75 0 1 (1.33%) 0 74 (-1.33%) TIMS TERRACE 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 TOWNLEY ROAD 44 0 0 44 94 0 1 (1.06%) 0 93 (-1.06%) TRENT AVENUE 19 0 0 19 36 1 (2.78%) 0 0 37 (2.78%) TUNSHILL GROVE 14 0 0 14 24 0 1 (4.17%) 0 23 (-4.17%) TUNSHILL LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 TYDEMAN WALK 15 0 0 15 31 0 0 0 31 VICTORIA TERRACE 11 0 0 11 13 1 (7.69%) 0 0 14 (7.69%) Page 297 WATER LANE 6 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 12 WELLINGTON STREET 28 0 0 28 46 0 0 0 46 WESTWARD HO 18 0 0 18 35 0 1 (2.86%) 0 34 (-2.86%) 6otl 7or 8 S( 9 01420 ) 05 B)C4ADE 014H3 31334 0H B)CHADE 33 B)C44DE ) 313A) B9)C@FDE
SD - ASH GROVE 10 0 0 10 13 0 0 0 13 BACK BROOM STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 BACK PINE STREET 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 BEAL BANK CLOSE 17 0 0 17 30 0 0 0 30 BEECH STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 BENTFIELD CRESCENT 13 0 0 13 28 0 0 0 28 BENTGATE CLOSE 10 0 0 10 15 0 0 0 15 BENTGATE STREET 59 0 0 59 101 0 0 0 101 BETHANY LANE 16 0 0 16 34 0 2 (5.88%) 0 32 (-5.88%) BIRCH CRESCENT 74 0 0 74 126 1 (0.79%) 3 (2.38%) 0 124 (-1.59%) BONE HEYS FARM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 BRADLEY LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 BRADLEY FARM, BRADLEY LANE 2 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 7 BROOK TERRACE 9 0 0 9 13 0 0 0 13 BROOM STREET 9 0 0 9 16 0 2 (12.50%) 0 14 (-12.50%) BROOMFIELD TERRACE 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 CARR MEADOW 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 75 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
SD - CEDAR LANE 59 0 0 59 96 0 2 (2.08%) 0 94 (-2.08%) CHATWELL COURT 16 0 0 16 18 0 0 0 18 CHURCH STREET 9 0 0 9 13 0 0 0 13 COLD GREAVE CLOSE 25 0 0 25 51 0 0 0 51 DIGGATE LANE 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 ELLENROAD FARM 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 ELM GROVE 16 0 0 16 30 0 0 0 30 GARDEN STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 GARSIDE FARM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 GORDON STREET 27 0 0 27 42 0 1 (2.38%) 0 41 (-2.38%) Page 298 GRANVILLE COURT 26 0 0 26 33 0 3 (9.09%) 0 30 (-9.09%) HANGING LEES CLOSE 20 0 0 20 41 0 0 0 41 HAUGH FOLD 24 0 0 24 39 2 (5.13%) 0 0 41 (5.13%) HAUGH LANE 37 0 0 37 64 0 0 0 64 HAUGH SQUARE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 HAUGH 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 HAWTHORN LANE 16 0 0 16 17 0 0 0 17 HAZEL AVENUE 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 HIGHBANK ROAD 19 0 0 19 32 0 0 0 32 HIGHER OGDEN 16 0 0 16 35 0 0 0 35 NEWHEY MANOR H F E, 1 0 0 1 13 0 0 0 13 HUDDERSFIELD ROAD HUDDERSFIELD ROAD 204 0 0 204 351 0 3 (0.85%) 0 348 (-0.85%) KILN GARDENS 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 KITCLIFFE FARM 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 LABURNUM LANE 49 0 0 49 88 1 (1.14%) 3 (3.41%) 0 86 (-2.27%) LANEBOTTOM 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 PIONEER'S VILLA, LANEBOTTOM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 LILAC AVENUE 44 0 0 44 77 0 0 0 77 LOWER OGDEN 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 MEADOWSIDE 9 0 0 9 23 0 0 0 23 NEWFIELD HEAD LANE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 NEWHEY ROAD 61 0 0 61 109 0 2 (1.83%) 0 107 (-1.83%) LARK HILL FARM, NEWHEY 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 NORTH PARADE 23 0 0 23 41 0 0 0 41
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 76 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
SD - OAK STREET 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 TAME BARN FARM, OFF 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HUDDERSFIELD ROAD WHITFIELD BOTTOMS, OFF SHAW 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 ROAD OGDEN LANE 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 OGDEN ROAD 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 PIONEERS VILLA, OGDEN 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 (50.00%) 0 1 (-50.00%) SMITHY GREEN, OGDEN 6 0 0 6 15 0 0 0 15 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PEPPERMINT CLOSE 12 0 0 12 20 0 0 0 20 PIETHORNE CLOSE 36 0 0 36 58 0 0 0 58
Page 299 PINE STREET 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 RAILWAY STREET 36 0 0 36 56 0 0 0 56 RAKEWOOD ROAD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 DENSHAW, RIPPONDEN ROAD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 RIVER MEADE 9 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 15 ROUGH BANK 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 ROUGH COTTAGES 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 ROUGH FARM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 SCHOOL MEWS 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 SHAW ROAD 70 0 0 70 103 0 0 0 103 SPRING MILL 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 SPRING TERRACE 7 0 1(14.29%) 6 12 0 2 (16.67%) 0 10 (-16.67%) STEWART STREET 10 0 0 10 15 0 0 0 15 SYCAMORE AVENUE 50 0 0 50 99 0 0 0 99 SYKES STREET 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22 TRAVIS STREET 13 0 0 13 20 0 0 0 20 TUNSHILL LANE 5 0 0 5 12 0 0 0 12 TWO BRIDGES ROAD 29 0 0 29 51 0 1 (1.96%) 0 50 (-1.96%) WATERVIEW CLOSE 9 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 20 WHITE SLACK FARM 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 WHITEBEAM CLOSE 33 0 0 33 81 0 0 0 81 WHITFIELD BOTTOMS 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 WHITFIELD CRESCENT 14 0 0 14 25 0 0 0 25
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 77 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
SD - WOLSELEY STREET 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 WOODSIDE 7 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 13 6otl 7or 8 S 9 0134) ) 0 B)C)FDE 01354 A1H30 H B)C02DE A@ B0C)3DE ) A1H0) B9)C52DE TSIQ$PW Q QEWEV H1H52 ) 04B)CHADE H1H2F 51))2 AF B)C3HDE F2 B)C4@DE A F14@F B9)C20DE Page 300
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 78 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
JA - ALDERMAN FOLEY DRIVE 21 0 0 21 28 0 0 0 28 ALDERMEADOW CLOSE 14 0 0 14 30 0 0 0 30 ASPEN GARDENS 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 BAGSLATE MOOR ROAD 23 0 0 23 62 0 0 0 62 BRACKENLEA FOLD 20 0 0 20 35 0 0 0 35 BRIAR CLOSE 9 0 0 9 21 2 (9.52%) 0 0 23 (9.52%) BROADSTONE CLOSE 6 0 0 6 15 0 0 0 15 BRONTE CLOSE 17 0 0 17 37 0 0 0 37 BURDETT AVENUE 19 0 0 19 33 0 0 0 33 CALDERSHAW LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 CALDERSHAW ROAD 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 CARFAX FOLD 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 Page 301 CHARLES WHITTAKER STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 COPPINGFORD CLOSE 29 0 0 29 53 0 0 0 53 CROSSMEADOW CLOSE 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 CUT LANE 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 DOWNLEY CLOSE 19 0 0 19 31 0 0 0 31 EDENFIELD ROAD 62 0 0 62 114 0 0 0 114 ELLENROD DRIVE 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 ELLENSHAW CLOSE 21 0 0 21 51 0 0 0 51 FEARN DENE 18 0 0 18 31 0 1 (3.23%) 0 30 (-3.23%) FERNLEA CLOSE 5 0 0 5 13 0 0 0 13 FERNSIDE WAY 11 0 0 11 28 0 0 0 28 FISHERFIELD 66 0 0 66 138 0 0 0 138 GREENVIEW DRIVE 24 0 0 24 48 0 0 0 48 GRIMES STREET 20 0 0 20 41 0 2 (4.88%) 0 39 (-4.88%) HALCYON CLOSE 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 HARGATE AVENUE 27 0 0 27 50 0 0 0 50 HARLAND WAY 32 0 0 32 63 0 0 0 63 HARRISON CLOSE 16 0 0 16 29 0 0 0 29 HEAP FOLD 42 0 0 42 81 0 0 0 81 KEATS AVENUE 24 0 0 24 56 0 0 0 56 LAWRENCE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 15 0 3 (20.00%) 0 12 (-20.00%) LOWER STANDRINGS 5 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 11
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 79 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
JA - MARSETT CLOSE 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 OAKSHAW DRIVE 77 0 0 77 159 0 0 0 159 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PALATINE AVENUE 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 0 17 PARGATE CHASE 40 0 0 40 79 0 1 (1.27%) 0 78 (-1.27%) PINTAIL CLOSE 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 REDFEARN WOOD 49 0 0 49 99 0 2 (2.02%) 0 97 (-2.02%) REGENCY COURT 5 0 0 5 15 0 0 0 15 SAXWOOD CLOSE 13 0 0 13 26 0 0 0 26 SHADDOCK AVENUE 20 0 0 20 38 0 0 0 38 Page 302 SHEARING AVENUE 27 0 0 27 76 0 0 0 76 SOUTH TERRACE 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 ST GEORGES ROAD 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 STOCKSGATE 26 0 0 26 44 0 0 0 44 TAYLOR AVENUE 5 0 0 5 12 0 0 0 12 THORNLEA DRIVE 36 0 0 36 58 0 0 0 58 TRAYLEN WAY 7 0 0 7 30 0 0 0 30 VANDYKE STREET 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 WELLBANK VIEW 31 0 0 31 87 0 0 0 87 WHITEMOSS 25 0 0 25 43 1 (2.33%) 3 (6.98%) 0 41 (-4.65%) WHITESIDE FOLD 14 0 0 14 35 0 0 0 35 WICKENTREE HOLT 32 0 0 32 62 0 0 0 62 WILLOWMEAD WAY 30 0 0 30 64 0 0 0 64 6otl 7or 8 Y 9 01)F2 ) ) 01)F2 A1055 3 B)C0HDE 0A B)C@@DE ) A10F4 B9)CH0DE
JB - ACER CLOSE 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 BAGSLATE MOOR LANE 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 BAGSLATE MOOR ROAD 29 0 0 29 46 0 1 (2.17%) 0 45 (-2.17%) BANKFIELD LANE 45 0 0 45 93 0 2 (2.15%) 0 91 (-2.15%) BETULA MEWS 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 0 19 BOWKER CLOSE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 BROOKS END 37 0 0 37 67 0 1 (1.49%) 0 66 (-1.49%) CHRISTOPHER ACRE 12 0 0 12 32 0 0 0 32 CLAY LANE 53 1(1.89%) 0 54 90 1 (1.11%) 1 (1.11%) 0 90
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 80 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
JB - CLAYFIELD DRIVE 25 0 0 25 57 0 0 0 57 CLAYMERE AVENUE 38 0 0 38 83 0 0 0 83 EDENFIELD ROAD 28 0 0 28 48 1 (2.08%) 2 (4.17%) 0 47 (-2.08%) ELMSFIELD AVENUE 128 0 0 128 252 0 2 (0.79%) 0 250 (-0.79%) ENFIELD CLOSE 13 0 0 13 28 0 0 0 28 FURTHER FIELD 35 0 0 35 93 0 0 0 93 GALBRAITH WAY 14 0 0 14 31 1 (3.23%) 2 (6.45%) 0 30 (-3.23%) GARFIELD CLOSE 12 0 0 12 26 0 0 0 26 HIGHFIELD ROAD 46 0 0 46 98 0 0 0 98 HIGHWOOD 38 0 0 38 70 0 1 (1.43%) 0 69 (-1.43%) HOLLOWFIELD 12 0 0 12 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) INCHFIELD CLOSE 14 0 0 14 26 0 0 0 26 Page 303 INGLEFIELD 36 0 0 36 71 0 0 0 71 MERCER LANE 24 0 0 24 55 0 0 0 55 MEREBANK CLOSE 8 0 0 8 20 0 0 0 20 MIDDLEFIELD 8 0 0 8 22 0 0 0 22 MILLBROOK BANK 5 0 0 5 13 0 0 0 13 MINORCA CLOSE 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 MOOR HILL 34 0 0 34 78 0 0 0 78 MOORLAND AVENUE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 NETHERCROFT 5 0 0 5 16 0 0 0 16 NEWHOUSE CRESCENT 44 0 0 44 82 0 0 0 82 OLD DELPH ROAD 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PIPERS CLOSE 8 0 0 8 18 1 (5.56%) 0 0 19 (5.56%) POPPYFIELD VIEW 10 0 0 10 26 0 0 0 26 REDFERN WAY 14 0 0 14 27 0 0 0 27 RILLDENE WALK 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22 ROSEWOOD 18 0 0 18 37 0 0 0 37 RUSHLAKE GARDENS 5 0 0 5 12 0 0 0 12 SCARFIELD DRIVE 27 0 0 27 53 2 (3.77%) 2 (3.77%) 0 53 SHELFIELD CLOSE 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 SHELFIELD LANE 107 0 0 107 211 0 0 0 211 SHELFIELD COTTAGES, SHELFIELD 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 LANE ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 81 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
JB - STANSFIELD DRIVE 10 0 0 10 25 0 0 0 25 TOP O'TH' LANE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 WALLWORK CLOSE 9 0 0 9 13 0 0 0 13 WATER CROFT 11 0 0 11 27 0 0 0 27 WESTFIELD CLOSE 22 0 0 22 45 0 2 (4.44%) 0 43 (-4.44%) WHITEFIELD AVENUE 36 0 0 36 83 0 0 0 83 WHITTAKER LANE 38 0 0 38 83 0 0 0 83 6otl 7or 8 YG 9 010A4 0B)C)4DE ) 0103) A130A 2 B)CA2DE 0F B)CFHDE ) A13)0 B9)CH5DE
JC -
Page 304 ALBURY DRIVE 29 0 0 29 76 0 0 0 76 ASHBOURNE NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 14 0 4 (28.57%) 0 10 (-28.57%) ASHBOURNE STREET ASHBOURNE STREET 15 0 0 15 21 0 0 0 21 BACK LANE 3 0 1(33.33%) 2 4 0 4 (100.00%) 0 0 (-100.00%) BAGNALL CLOSE 9 0 0 9 26 0 0 0 26 BAITINGS CLOSE 10 0 0 10 20 0 0 0 20 BAITINGS ROW 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 BANK HOUSE FARM, NORDEN 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 BANK HOUSE, NORDEN 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 BARLOW MOOR CLOSE 12 0 0 12 25 0 0 0 25 BLACKPITS ROAD 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 BRICKGROUND 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 BROAD ACRE 20 0 0 20 42 0 0 0 42 CHURCH VIEW 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 CLAPGATE ROAD 15 0 0 15 19 0 0 0 19 COAL BANK FOLD 14 0 0 14 28 0 0 0 28 DURNFORD CLOSE 21 0 0 21 48 0 0 0 48 EDENFIELD ROAD 191 0 0 191 291 0 3 (1.03%) 0 288 (-1.03%) PROSPECT TERRACE, EDENFIELD 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 ROAD SUNNYSIDE COTTAGES, EDENFIELD 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 ROAD ELLIS FOLD 38 0 1(2.63%) 37 74 0 3 (4.05%) 0 71 (-4.05%) FAIR VIEW CLOSE 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 FALCON CLOSE 20 0 0 20 38 0 0 0 38
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 82 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
JC - FARNLEY CLOSE 13 0 0 13 35 0 0 0 35 FORDOE LANE 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 FORSYTH STREET 18 0 0 18 28 0 0 0 28 FOUR LANES WAY 12 0 0 12 27 0 0 0 27 GREENBOOTH ROAD 7 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 8 HAREWOOD AVENUE 20 0 0 20 43 0 0 0 43 HAREWOOD CLOSE 11 0 0 11 26 0 0 0 26 HAREWOOD DRIVE 28 0 0 28 65 0 0 0 65 HAREWOOD ROAD 48 0 0 48 104 0 1 (0.96%) 0 103 (-0.96%) HAREWOOD WAY 17 0 0 17 40 0 0 0 40 HEAP ROAD 7 0 0 7 24 0 3 (12.50%) 0 21 (-12.50%) HIBSON AVENUE 37 0 0 37 84 3 (3.57%) 0 0 87 (3.57%) Page 305 HIGHER LODGE 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 HIGHER TENTERFIELD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HUTCHINSON ROAD 48 0 0 48 98 1 (1.02%) 1 (1.02%) 0 98 INDUSTRY STREET 19 0 0 19 23 0 0 0 23 KEEPERS COTTAGES 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 KEEPERS DRIVE 62 0 0 62 112 0 0 0 112 KENDAL AVENUE 16 0 0 16 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) KNOWL FARM, NORDEN 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 LANCASTER TERRACE 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 LOWER TENTERFIELD 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 MARCROFT GATE, NORDEN 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 MARTINS FIELD 24 0 0 24 42 0 0 0 42 MEADOW HEAD FARM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 MEADOWHEAD LANE 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 MILL CROFT CLOSE 10 0 0 10 16 0 0 0 16 MOOR VIEW CLOSE 7 0 0 7 26 0 0 0 26 NADEN VIEW 13 0 0 13 23 0 0 0 23 NORDALE PARK 61 0 0 61 137 0 2 (1.46%) 0 135 (-1.46%) NORDEN CLOSE 20 0 0 20 45 0 0 0 45 NORDEN WAY 33 0 0 33 64 2 (3.13%) 0 0 66 (3.13%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 3 0 1 (33.33%) 0 2 (-33.33%) OVERTOWN LANE 6 0 0 6 17 0 0 0 17
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 83 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
JC - PAPERHOUSE CLOSE 36 0 0 36 44 0 0 0 44 PITSHOUSE LANE 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 MOSS ROW, RAVEN STREET 26 0 0 26 30 0 0 0 30 RAVEN STREET 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 RED LUMB 23 0 0 23 42 1 (2.38%) 0 0 43 (2.38%) THE MEADOWS, RED LUMB 30 0 0 30 27 1 (3.70%) 0 0 28 (3.70%) REDFERN COTTAGES 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 RIVIERA COURT 5 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 11 ROODS LANE 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 ROSE AVENUE 15 0 0 15 21 0 0 0 21 Page 306 SEVEN ACRES LANE 84 0 0 84 154 0 3 (1.95%) 0 151 (-1.95%) SHAWFIELD GROVE 9 0 0 9 18 0 0 0 18 SHAWFIELD LANE 52 1(1.92%) 0 53 97 2 (2.06%) 2 (2.06%) 0 97 SHEPHERD STREET 31 0 0 31 60 0 0 0 60 SLAUNT BANK 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 STORE STREET 16 0 0 16 20 0 0 0 20 TENTERHILL LANE 16 0 0 16 32 0 0 0 32 TOP O'TH'HILL FARM, NOR 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 TRINITY STREET 8 0 0 8 9 0 1 (11.11%) 0 8 (-11.11%) WHITTAKER STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 WINGATE STREET 14 0 0 14 24 0 0 0 24 WOLSTENHOLME 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 WOLSTENHOLME FOLD 12 0 0 12 17 0 0 0 17 WOLSTENHOLME HALL FARM 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 WOLSTENHOLME LANE 16 0 0 16 37 0 0 0 37 WOODHOUSE LANE 64 0 0 64 116 0 0 0 116 RIGBY COURT, WOODHOUSE LANE 8 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 9 THE FARMHOUSE, ELLIS FOLD 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 FARM, WOODHOUSE LANE ZION TERRACE 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 6otl 7or 8 Y( 9 01@05 0B)C)FDE A B)C03DE 01@0F A15A0 0) B)C3@DE A4 B0C)3DE ) A15)A B9)C2FDE
JD - CHAPEL LANE, ASHWORTH ROAD 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 ASHWORTH ROAD 28 0 0 28 53 0 2 (3.77%) 0 51 (-3.77%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 84 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
JD - BIRTLE MOOR 8 0 0 8 17 0 2 (11.76%) 0 15 (-11.76%) BIRTLE GREEN FARM, BIRTLE ROAD 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 BIRTLE ROAD 21 0 0 21 36 0 0 0 36 THE RHYDDINGS, BIRTLE ROAD 18 0 0 18 24 0 0 0 24 BURY AND ROCHDALE OLD ROAD 62 0 0 62 98 0 0 0 98 CARR WOOD 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 CASTLE HILL 5 0 0 5 16 0 0 0 16 CHURCH LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 CHURCH ROAD 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 EDENFIELD ROAD 8 0 1(12.50%) 7 13 0 1 (7.69%) 0 12 (-7.69%) ELBUT LANE 21 0 0 21 45 0 1 (2.22%) 0 44 (-2.22%) CARAVAN PARK, GELDER CLOUGH 24 0 0 24 25 0 0 0 25 Page 307 GELDER CLOUGH 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 GRISTLEHURST LANE 3 0 0 3 9 0 1 (11.11%) 0 8 (-11.11%) HARWOOD FIELDS, BIRTLE 4 0 0 4 11 0 0 0 11 HIGHER MOULDING 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 JOWKIN LANE 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 MILLETT TERRACE 5 0 0 5 12 0 0 0 12 MOULDING MOSS HOUSE, BIRTLE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 NORDEN ROAD 6 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 12 OFF ASHWORTH ROAD 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 RED BANK, BIRTLE 6 0 0 6 10 0 1 (10.00%) 0 9 (-10.00%) SCHOOL LANE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 SPRING VIEW, BIRTLE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 THE ORMRODS, BIRTLE 6 0 0 6 16 0 0 0 16 WEYTHORNE DRIVE 29 0 0 29 52 0 2 (3.85%) 0 50 (-3.85%) WHITE ASH TERRACE 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 WHITE ASH 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 WOODHOUSE LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 6otl 7or 8 Y 9 A4H 0B)C3HDE 0 B)C3HDE A4H @03 @ B)C4FDE 0) B0C4@DE ) @)5 B9)C4FDE QP$EQ H1)0F 3B)C)FDE 3B)C)FDE H1)0F F153H AH B)C30DE 25 B)C5FDE ) F1F4) B9)C@2DE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 85 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
LA - ADELAIDE STREET EAST 34 0 0 34 50 1 (2.00%) 1 (2.00%) 0 50 ASPINALL STREET 21 0 0 21 28 0 0 0 28 BARLEY HALL STREET 58 0 0 58 103 0 1 (0.97%) 0 102 (-0.97%) COACHMANS COURT, BARLEY HALL 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 STREET BARNFIELD STREET 8 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 13 BLENHEIM CLOSE 14 0 0 14 24 0 0 0 24 CARRUTHERS CLOSE 5 0 0 5 13 0 0 0 13 CHADWICK LANE 40 0 0 40 63 0 1 (1.59%) 0 62 (-1.59%) CONNELL WAY 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 0 17
Page 308 CORRY STREET 24 0 0 24 40 0 0 0 40 CRIMBLE LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 DEWHIRST STREET 4 0 0 4 4 2 (50.00%) 0 0 6 (50.00%) DUMFRIES HOLLOW 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 FOLD STREET 14 0 0 14 22 0 0 0 22 GORTON STREET 36 0 0 36 53 0 0 0 53 HEYWOOD COURT CARE CENTRE, 1 0 0 1 30 0 6 (20.00%) 0 24 (-20.00%) GREEN LANE GREEN LANE 21 0 0 21 38 0 1 (2.63%) 0 37 (-2.63%) GROVE STREET 15 0 0 15 28 0 0 0 28 HAREFIELD DRIVE 16 0 0 16 34 0 0 0 34 HAROLD LEES ROAD 33 0 0 33 71 0 0 0 71 HEALEY AVENUE 14 0 0 14 34 0 0 0 34 INGOE CLOSE 5 0 0 5 13 0 0 0 13 LINDUM COURT, ASPINALL STREET 29 0 0 29 29 1 (3.45%) 1 (3.45%) 0 29 MATHEW MOSS LANE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 MURIEL STREET 11 0 0 11 14 0 0 0 14 MUTUAL STREET 16 0 0 16 23 0 0 0 23 OLIVE STREET 24 0 0 24 36 0 0 0 36 CAPTAIN FOLD, ORCHARD STREET 21 0 0 21 34 2 (5.88%) 0 0 36 (5.88%) ORCHARD STREET 34 0 0 34 57 0 0 0 57 THE ORCHARDS, ORCHARD STREET 22 0 0 22 30 0 0 0 30 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PROMENADE STREET 58 0 0 58 106 0 4 (3.77%) 0 102 (-3.77%) RAILWAY STREET 36 0 0 36 75 0 0 0 75
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 86 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
LA - ROCHDALE ROAD EAST 127 0 0 127 229 0 2 (0.87%) 0 227 (-0.87%) SPRINGBANK HOME, ROCHDALE 1 0 0 1 16 0 3 (18.75%) 0 13 (-18.75%) ROAD EAST RYE STREET 14 0 0 14 24 0 0 0 24 RYECROFT AVENUE 24 0 0 24 50 0 0 0 50 ST ANNES MEWS, RYECROFT 3 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 8 AVENUE SANDIWAY 37 0 0 37 75 0 0 0 75 SIMPSON HILL CLOSE 12 0 0 12 26 0 0 0 26 SLAWSON WAY 4 0 0 4 11 0 0 0 11 SMITHIES STREET 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 ST ANNES GARDENS 11 0 0 11 23 0 0 0 23
Page 309 WILD STREET 23 1(4.35%) 0 24 36 2 (5.56%) 1 (2.78%) 0 37 (2.78%) WOODLAND ROAD 25 0 0 25 45 2 (4.44%) 0 0 47 (4.44%) WOODSTOCK CLOSE 16 0 0 16 33 0 1 (3.03%) 0 32 (-3.03%) YARWOOD CLOSE 12 0 0 12 24 0 0 0 24 YORK STREET 5 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 6otl 7or 8 I 9 4@4 0B)C0)DE ) 42) 01FA) 0) B)C@5DE AA B0CA5DE ) 01F)5 B9)CF)DE
LB - BEDFORD STREET 14 0 0 14 16 0 0 0 16 BENFIELD STREET 15 0 0 15 25 0 0 0 25 BIRCH STREET 15 0 0 15 17 0 0 0 17 BOWLING GREEN STREET 22 0 0 22 29 0 2 (6.90%) 0 27 (-6.90%) BRADSHAW STREET 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 BRIERLEY STREET 15 0 0 15 20 0 0 0 20 BURNS STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BURNSIDE CLOSE 18 0 0 18 35 0 0 0 35 BUXTON STREET 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 CAXTON STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 CHURCH STREET 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 COBDEN STREET 33 0 0 33 59 0 2 (3.39%) 0 57 (-3.39%) CROMWELL STREET 28 0 0 28 40 0 0 0 40 EGERTON CLOSE 10 0 0 10 13 0 0 0 13 FIR STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 87 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
LB - FLETCHER CLOSE 16 0 0 16 17 0 0 0 17 GAS STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 GLENDALE CLOSE 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 GOLDBROOK CLOSE 29 0 0 29 43 0 2 (4.65%) 0 41 (-4.65%) GOLDCRAFT CLOSE 21 0 0 21 40 0 3 (7.50%) 0 37 (-7.50%) GORSEY HILL STREET 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 GREEN LANE 30 0 0 30 65 0 1 (1.54%) 0 64 (-1.54%) GREGGE STREET 4 0 0 4 5 1 (20.00%) 0 0 6 (20.00%) HALL STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 HAMPDEN STREET 26 0 0 26 45 1 (2.22%) 3 (6.67%) 0 43 (-4.44%) Page 310 HARDFIELD STREET 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 HARWOOD GARDENS 24 0 0 24 34 0 0 0 34 HIND HILL STREET 36 0 0 36 70 0 0 0 70 HORNBY STREET 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 ISHERWOOD CLOSE 19 0 0 19 19 0 0 0 19 KING STREET 78 0 0 78 124 0 0 0 124 LLOYD STREET 14 0 0 14 29 0 0 0 29 MANCHESTER ROAD 44 0 0 44 66 0 2 (3.03%) 0 64 (-3.03%) MANCHESTER STREET 31 1(3.23%) 1(3.23%) 31 24 1 (4.17%) 1 (4.17%) 0 24 MILLFIELD, HORNBY STREET 14 0 0 14 18 0 1 (5.56%) 0 17 (-5.56%) MOUNT STREET 53 0 0 53 79 0 0 0 79 MUIRFIELD CLOSE 19 0 0 19 38 0 0 0 38 NELSON STREET 29 0 0 29 51 0 0 0 51 NEWHOUSE ROAD 21 0 0 21 48 0 0 0 48 ORMEROD STREET 10 0 0 10 9 0 0 0 9 OSBORNE STREET 26 0 0 26 41 0 0 0 41 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PENN STREET 13 0 0 13 14 0 2 (14.29%) 0 12 (-14.29%) PINE STREET 22 2(9.09%) 0 24 35 4 (11.43%) 2 (5.71%) 0 37 (5.71%) PRINCE STREET 11 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 15 PRINCESS CLOSE 7 0 0 7 15 1 (6.67%) 0 0 16 (6.67%) PYM STREET 31 0 0 31 42 0 0 0 42 RAILWAY STREET 38 0 0 38 66 0 1 (1.52%) 0 65 (-1.52%) RAILWAY TERRACE 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 88 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
LB - ROCHDALE LANE 13 1(7.69%) 0 14 24 2 (8.33%) 0 0 26 (8.33%) ROCHDALE ROAD EAST 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 ROCHDALE ROAD 6 0 0 6 9 0 1 (11.11%) 0 8 (-11.11%) PEACOCK TERRACE, ROCK STREET 6 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 6 ROEACRE COURT 31 0 0 31 35 0 0 0 35 ROYAL AVENUE 51 0 0 51 108 0 1 (0.93%) 0 107 (-0.93%) RUSSELL STREET 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 RYDER STREET 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 MAKIN COURT, SCHOFIELD STREET 42 0 0 42 45 0 0 0 45 SCHOFIELD STREET 29 0 0 29 34 0 0 0 34 SMITH STREET 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 ST ANDREWS DRIVE 18 0 0 18 40 0 0 0 40 Page 311 STAMFORD STREET 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 STANLEY STREET 36 0 0 36 68 0 0 0 68 SUMMERSGILL CLOSE 29 0 0 29 51 0 1 (1.96%) 0 50 (-1.96%) SUNDEW CLOSE 13 0 0 13 8 0 0 0 8 TEMPLE STREET 15 0 0 15 11 0 0 0 11 TWIN STREET 17 0 0 17 21 0 2 (9.52%) 0 19 (-9.52%) UNSWORTH COURT 36 0 0 36 40 1 (2.50%) 2 (5.00%) 0 39 (-2.50%) VALE STREET 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 VICTORIA STREET 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 VIGO STREET 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 7 WALTON STREET 59 0 0 59 102 0 0 0 102 WILTON GROVE 24 0 0 24 35 0 1 (2.86%) 0 34 (-2.86%) YORK STREET 7 0 0 7 2 1 (50.00%) 0 0 3 (50.00%) 6otl 7or 8 IG 9 013@@ HB)C3)DE 0 B)C)FDE 013@5 A1)FA 0A B)C@5DE 3) B0CH@DE ) A1)@H B9)C5FDE
LC - ADELAIDE STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 ANN STREET 16 0 0 16 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) ASPINALL STREET 19 0 0 19 37 0 0 0 37 BUCKLEY STREET 14 0 0 14 24 0 0 0 24 CLARKE STREET 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 ELM STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 HEYWOOD HALL ROAD 27 0 0 27 56 0 0 0 56
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 89 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
LC - JAMES STREET 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 JOHN STREET 30 0 0 30 41 0 0 0 41 MILLER STREET 60 0 0 60 87 0 0 0 87 MILLERS BROOK CLOSE 14 0 0 14 33 0 0 0 33 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PARK TERRACE 6 0 0 6 15 0 0 0 15 PROSPECT PLACE 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 QUEENS PARK ROAD 31 0 0 31 43 1 (2.33%) 1 (2.33%) 0 43 RUTLAND STREET 7 0 0 7 16 0 0 0 16 SHADWELL STREET EAST 11 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 15 Page 312 STARKEY STREET 53 0 0 53 83 2 (2.41%) 1 (1.20%) 0 84 (1.20%) TONGE STREET 35 0 0 35 65 0 0 0 65 WILLOW STREET 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 WOODFIELD TERRACE 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 YORK STREET 9 0 0 9 8 0 2 (25.00%) 0 6 (-25.00%) 6otl 7or 8 I( 9 3FF ) ) 3FF 23) 3 B)CH5DE @ B)CF4DE ) 2A5 B9)C3ADE
LD - ADELAIDE STREET 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 ADELAIDE HOUSE, ADELAIDE 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 STREET ARLEN WAY 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 ARTHUR STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 BAMFORD ROAD 106 0 0 106 182 3 (1.65%) 3 (1.65%) 0 182 BANK TOP STREET 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 BRIDGE STREET 16 0 0 16 10 0 0 0 10 HAZLEHURST DRIVE, BURY AND 2 0 0 2 3 0 1 (33.33%) 0 2 (-33.33%) ROCHDALE OLD ROAD BURY AND ROCHDALE OLD ROAD 15 0 0 15 31 2 (6.45%) 0 0 33 (6.45%) CHERWELL COURT 34 0 0 34 36 0 2 (5.56%) 0 34 (-5.56%) CIVIC WALK 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 CLITHEROE CLOSE 35 0 0 35 63 0 1 (1.59%) 0 62 (-1.59%) CLOUGH LANE 2 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 8 COLLINGE STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 CORCORAN CLOSE 57 0 0 57 59 1 (1.69%) 2 (3.39%) 0 58 (-1.69%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 90 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
LD - COURTHOUSE WAY 9 0 0 9 11 0 0 0 11 CRIMBLE LANE 3 0 0 3 7 0 1 (14.29%) 0 6 (-14.29%) DANIEL STREET 10 0 0 10 22 1 (4.55%) 0 0 23 (4.55%) DAWSON STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 DERBY STREET 15 0 0 15 28 0 0 0 28 ELIZABETH STREET 8 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 9 GARDEN STREET 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 GEORGE STREET 12 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 21 HARTLAND STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HEYWOOD HALL ROAD 31 0 0 31 60 0 0 0 60 WHITE GATE MANOR, HEYWOOD 13 0 0 13 17 0 0 0 17 HALL ROAD Page 313 HILDA STREET 22 0 0 22 38 0 0 0 38 HOLLAND STREET 9 0 0 9 18 0 0 0 18 HOOLEY CLOUGH 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 LANGTON FOLD 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 LANGTON STREET 24 0 0 24 38 0 0 0 38 LEVER STREET 41 0 0 41 79 0 0 0 79 LONGFORD STREET 16 0 0 16 21 0 0 0 21 LOWER CRIMBLE COTTAGES 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 MARKET PLACE 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 MILLBANK COURT 14 0 0 14 16 0 2 (12.50%) 0 14 (-12.50%) MILLBANK STREET 28 0 0 28 46 0 1 (2.17%) 0 45 (-2.17%) MINE STREET 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 MUNICIPAL CLOSE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 NELLIE STREET 14 0 0 14 27 0 0 0 27 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PEEL STREET 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 PLEASANT STREET 37 0 0 37 65 0 0 0 65 QUEEN STREET 24 0 0 24 31 0 0 0 31 QUEENS PARK ROAD 62 0 18(29.03%) 44 122 0 3 (2.46%) 0 119 (-2.46%) QURESHI HOUSE, QUEENS PARK 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 ROAD SMETHURST STREET 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 STARKEY STREET 57 0 0 57 91 2 (2.20%) 0 0 93 (2.20%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 91 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
LD - VICTORIA TERRACE 17 0 0 17 23 0 0 0 23 WEST STARKEY STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 LYNDENE COURT, WEST STARKEY 22 0 0 22 27 0 0 0 27 STREET WEST STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 WILLIAM GREENWOOD CLOSE 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 8 WOOD VIEW 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 WOODLAND STREET 16 0 0 16 26 2 (7.69%) 0 0 28 (7.69%) YORK STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 6otl 7or 8 I 9 5F0 ) 05 BAC)FDE 5@3 013F4 00 B)C5)DE 02 B0C02DE ) 013FH B9)C32DE Page 314 LE - ABBEY CRESCENT 89 0 0 89 151 2 (1.32%) 1 (0.66%) 0 152 (0.66%) APPLETON COURT 8 0 0 8 6 1 (16.67%) 0 0 7 (16.67%) ASH STREET 10 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 12 BAY STREET 10 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 12 BURY AND ROCHDALE OLD ROAD 14 0 0 14 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) CEDAR AVENUE 107 0 0 107 149 0 2 (1.34%) 0 147 (-1.34%) CLAYBANK STREET 93 0 0 93 134 2 (1.49%) 4 (2.99%) 0 132 (-1.49%) FURNESS AVENUE 25 0 0 25 37 0 1 (2.70%) 0 36 (-2.70%) GEORGE STREET 18 0 0 18 34 0 0 0 34 GORSES 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 KIRKSTALL AVENUE 61 0 0 61 107 0 3 (2.80%) 0 104 (-2.80%) LIME GROVE 8 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 17 MELROSE AVENUE 26 0 0 26 55 0 0 0 55 MOSS BANK GROVE 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 OAK STREET 10 0 0 10 13 0 4 (30.77%) 0 9 (-30.77%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PEEL LANE 85 0 0 85 117 1 (0.85%) 2 (1.71%) 0 116 (-0.85%) THORN CLOSE 24 0 0 24 42 0 0 0 42 TINTERN AVENUE 30 0 0 30 33 1 (3.03%) 1 (3.03%) 0 33 TINTERN PLACE 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 WEST STARKEY STREET 8 0 0 8 10 1 (10.00%) 1 (10.00%) 0 10 WHITBY AVENUE 16 0 0 16 18 0 0 0 18 6otl 7or 8 IE 9 220 ) ) 220 01))5 5 B)CF4DE A) B0C45DE ) 442 B90C04DE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 92 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
LF - BEECHES 3 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 8 BRIDGE STREET 6 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 5 BROOK GARDENS 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22 BRUNSWICK STREET 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 WALDEN, BRUNSWICK STREET 14 0 0 14 13 0 1 (7.69%) 0 12 (-7.69%) CALLAGHAN WALK 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 CARTRIDGE STREET 27 0 0 27 40 0 0 0 40 COOMASSIE STREET 36 0 0 36 62 0 0 0 62 EMMOTT CLOSE 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 ERMINGTON COURT 22 0 0 22 26 0 0 0 26 FOX STREET 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 WAVENEY, FOX STREET 14 0 0 14 17 0 1 (5.88%) 0 16 (-5.88%) Page 315 WITHERN, FOX STREET 14 0 0 14 21 1 (4.76%) 3 (14.29%) 0 19 (-9.52%) GREENFIELD COURT 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 HILL STREET 15 0 0 15 22 0 0 0 22 HIND HILL STREET 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 HOLLY OAK GARDENS 26 0 0 26 46 0 0 0 46 KAY BROW 16 0 0 16 32 0 0 0 32 AVON, KAY STREET 14 0 0 14 15 0 0 0 15 MARKET PLACE 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 MARKET STREET 2 1(50.00%) 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 MARY STREET 11 0 0 11 17 0 0 0 17 HALTON, MEADOW CLOSE 14 0 0 14 20 0 0 0 20 HAMMOND, MEADOW CLOSE 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 KELSEY, MEADOW CLOSE 14 0 0 14 15 0 1 (6.67%) 0 14 (-6.67%) KENNET, MEADOW CLOSE 14 0 0 14 18 0 0 0 18 RAINSDALE, MEADOW CLOSE 10 0 0 10 14 0 0 0 14 RYBURN, MEADOW CLOSE 10 0 0 10 11 0 0 0 11 SUTHERLAND, MEADOW CLOSE 10 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 MELLOR BROW 5 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 11 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PENDLETON CROFT 24 0 0 24 22 0 3 (13.64%) 0 19 (-13.64%) ASHBURN, SCHOOL STREET 13 0 0 13 13 1 (7.69%) 1 (7.69%) 0 13 SEXTON STREET 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 93 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
LF - SEYMOUR STREET 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 SMYRNA STREET 3 0 0 3 9 0 0 0 9 ST JAMES GROVE 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 CARLTON, ST JAMES STREET 10 0 0 10 11 0 0 0 11 CLOUGH, ST JAMES STREET 10 0 0 10 9 0 0 0 9 DAWLEY, ST JAMES STREET 10 0 0 10 8 0 0 0 8 ST JAMES TERRACE 12 0 0 12 24 1 (4.17%) 0 0 25 (4.17%) TAYLOR STREET 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 THE BROOKLANDS 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 TOWER STREET 8 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 17 Page 316 WALKER STREET 18 0 0 18 34 0 0 0 34 WILTON GROVE 11 0 0 11 18 0 0 0 18 BEVERLEY, WILTON STREET 10 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 12 CALDER, WILTON STREET 10 0 0 10 11 0 0 0 11 WILTON STREET 11 0 0 11 19 0 0 0 19 6otl 7or 8 I! 9 @3) 0B)C04DE ) @30 F22 3 B)C34DE 0) B0C30DE ) F@4 B9)C40DE QP$6 EVWPP H1F@3 2B)C03DE 04B)CH)DE H1FH) F1@F@ HF B)C2ADE 0)3 B0C32DE ) F1@04 B9)CFHDE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 94 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
QA - CLEWORTH ROAD 33 0 0 33 62 2 (3.23%) 0 0 64 (3.23%) HOLLIN LANE 13 0 0 13 21 0 0 0 21 KINDER WAY 32 0 0 32 67 0 0 0 67 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PARSONS DRIVE 50 0 0 50 100 0 1 (1.00%) 0 99 (-1.00%) ROCHDALE ROAD 40 0 0 40 79 0 2 (2.53%) 0 77 (-2.53%) SPRINGFIELD ROAD 74 0 0 74 141 0 0 0 141 TOWNCROFT AVENUE 49 0 0 49 93 3 (3.23%) 0 0 96 (3.23%) 6otl 7or 8 ` 9 A4A ) ) A4A @23 @ B)C54DE 3 B)C@3DE ) @2@ B)C32DE
QB - ASSHETON STREET 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9
Page 317 BAMFORD AVENUE 21 0 0 21 41 0 3 (7.32%) 0 38 (-7.32%) BARROWFIELDS 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 BREWSTER STREET 12 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 19 BROWN STREET 13 0 0 13 18 0 0 0 18 CHEAPSIDE 18 0 0 18 29 0 0 0 29 CHURCH STREET 22 0 0 22 31 0 0 0 31 HULTON CARE NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 20 0 1 (5.00%) 0 19 (-5.00%) CLARKE BROW CLARKE BROW 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 CLOUGH ROAD 25 0 0 25 42 0 1 (2.38%) 0 41 (-2.38%) DIXON STREET 8 0 0 8 11 0 1 (9.09%) 0 10 (-9.09%) EDWARD STREET 17 0 0 17 22 0 0 0 22 FIELDING STREET 25 0 0 25 34 0 0 0 34 NORMAN WEALL COURT, FIELDING 33 0 0 33 29 0 0 0 29 STREET HIGH STREET 14 0 0 14 18 0 0 0 18 HILL STREET 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 KING STREET 35 0 0 35 41 1 (2.44%) 1 (2.44%) 0 41 LEVER STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 LONG STREET 46 0 0 46 35 0 3 (8.57%) 0 32 (-8.57%) LORD STREET 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 LOWER BAMFORD CLOSE 10 0 0 10 13 0 0 0 13 LULWORTH ROAD 55 0 0 55 118 0 0 0 118
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 95 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
QB - MORTON STREET 62 0 0 62 109 0 0 0 109 NEW LANE 10 0 0 10 9 0 2 (22.22%) 0 7 (-22.22%) NORTH STREET 48 0 0 48 77 0 0 0 77 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PETERLOO TERRACE 10 0 0 10 11 0 0 0 11 RADCLYFFE STREET 18 0 0 18 32 0 0 0 32 RECTORY STREET 16 0 0 16 25 0 0 0 25 ROCHDALE ROAD 67 1(1.49%) 0 68 96 1 (1.04%) 0 0 97 (1.04%) SAMUEL STREET 13 0 0 13 20 0 0 0 20 SMITHIES AVENUE 11 0 0 11 19 0 1 (5.26%) 0 18 (-5.26%) Page 318 SPRING GARDENS 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 ST LEONARDS SQUARE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 ST STEPHENS GARDENS 34 0 0 34 46 0 0 0 46 WALTON STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 WEST STREET 36 0 0 36 61 0 2 (3.28%) 0 59 (-3.28%) WHITE HART MEADOWS 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 WICKHAM TERRACE 8 0 0 8 12 0 1 (8.33%) 0 11 (-8.33%) 6otl 7or 8 `G 9 F32 0B)C0HDE ) F3F 0100F A B)C05DE 02 B0CH3DE ) 010)3 B90CA@DE
QC - BARROWFIELDS WALK 9 0 0 9 14 0 0 0 14 BARROWFIELDS 8 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 17 BOARSHAW CLOUGH WAY 62 0 0 62 81 0 2 (2.47%) 0 79 (-2.47%) BOARSHAW ROAD 79 0 0 79 113 0 2 (1.77%) 0 111 (-1.77%) BRASSEY STREET 27 0 0 27 58 1 (1.72%) 1 (1.72%) 0 58 BROOKLAND STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 CHEETHAM AVENUE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 CLOUGH COURT-BOARSHAW ROAD 29 0 0 29 35 0 0 0 35 HEMBURY CLOSE 20 0 0 20 29 0 0 0 29 HILLSIDE DRIVE 35 0 0 35 73 0 0 0 73 JOHN LEE FOLD 7 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 13 JUBILEE ROAD 109 0 18(16.51%) 91 204 0 5 (2.45%) 0 199 (-2.45%) JUBILEE TERRACE 22 0 0 22 43 0 0 0 43 LONGMEAD WAY 30 0 0 30 47 0 0 0 47 LYNWAY GROVE 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 96 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
QC - MORTON STREET 9 0 0 9 18 0 0 0 18 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PENROSE GARDENS 25 0 0 25 48 0 0 0 48 WAGSTAFFE STREET 38 0 0 38 67 0 0 0 67 WINWOOD DRIVE 3 0 0 3 10 0 0 0 10 6otl 7or 8 `( 9 @A5 ) 05 B3CH0DE @0) 545 0 B)C00DE 0) B0C00DE ) 554 B90C))DE
QD - ACRESFIELD ROAD 78 0 18(23.08%) 60 136 0 2 (1.47%) 0 134 (-1.47%) ADDISON DRIVE 48 0 0 48 102 3 (2.94%) 0 0 105 (2.94%) ARNOLD DRIVE 22 0 0 22 46 0 0 0 46 ASHBOURNE AVENUE 32 0 0 32 60 0 3 (5.00%) 0 57 (-5.00%)
Page 319 AYLESBURY GROVE 36 0 0 36 79 0 0 0 79 BOARSHAW CLOUGH 74 0 0 74 13 0 0 0 13 BOARSHAW CRESCENT 51 0 0 51 102 2 (1.96%) 0 0 104 (1.96%) CROSS AND PASSION CONVENT, 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 BOARSHAW ROAD BOARSHAW ROAD 123 0 0 123 248 0 0 0 248 BROWNING ROAD 16 0 0 16 27 0 0 0 27 BYRON ROAD 16 0 0 16 23 0 0 0 23 CANTERBURY CRESCENT 44 0 0 44 79 0 2 (2.53%) 0 77 (-2.53%) CHAUCER ROAD 12 0 0 12 27 0 0 0 27 CHELFORD CLOSE 64 0 0 64 142 0 0 0 142 COLERIDGE AVENUE 15 0 0 15 33 0 0 0 33 DALE ROAD 53 0 0 53 96 0 1 (1.04%) 0 95 (-1.04%) ELIOT WALK 17 0 0 17 45 0 1 (2.22%) 0 44 (-2.22%) GLENWOOD DRIVE 156 0 0 156 287 1 (0.35%) 2 (0.70%) 1 286 (-0.35%) GREEN LANE 109 0 0 109 183 0 2 (1.09%) 0 181 (-1.09%) GROVE ROAD 29 0 0 29 58 1 (1.72%) 2 (3.45%) 0 57 (-1.72%) GUILDFORD GROVE 106 0 0 106 189 2 (1.06%) 0 0 191 (1.06%) HAYFIELD CLOSE 23 0 0 23 29 0 1 (3.45%) 0 28 (-3.45%) HAZEL ROAD 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 HEREFORD WAY 201 0 0 201 420 0 3 (0.71%) 0 417 (-0.71%) KINGSLEY ROAD 32 0 0 32 71 0 0 0 71 MYRTLE ROAD 44 0 0 44 72 0 0 0 72
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 97 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
QD - OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 OXFORD DRIVE 42 0 0 42 58 1 (1.72%) 0 0 59 (1.72%) ASHBOURNE HOUSE, ROCHDALE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 ROAD BRIARMEDE, ROCHDALE ROAD 1 0 0 1 30 0 1 (3.33%) 0 29 (-3.33%) ROCHDALE ROAD 106 0 0 106 232 0 0 0 232 THE CLOSE, ROCHDALE ROAD 4 0 0 4 12 0 0 0 12 RUDYARD AVENUE 32 0 0 32 66 0 0 0 66 SHELLEY AVENUE 16 0 0 16 25 0 0 0 25 HIGHER FOLD, STANYCLIFFE LANE 15 0 0 15 17 0 0 0 17
Page 320 STANYCLIFFE LANE 40 0 0 40 73 0 1 (1.37%) 0 72 (-1.37%) SUMMERFIELD DRIVE 49 0 0 49 96 0 0 0 96 TENNYSON ROAD 106 0 0 106 183 2 (1.09%) 0 0 185 (1.09%) VALLEY ROAD 46 0 0 46 91 0 2 (2.20%) 0 89 (-2.20%) WHITEGATES ROAD 22 0 0 22 47 0 0 0 47 WORDSWORTH ROAD 26 0 0 26 47 0 0 0 47 6otl 7or 8 ` 9 01403 ) 05 B)C4HDE 0154@ 31@@2 0A B)C3HDE A3 B)C2@DE 0 31@H@ B9)C30DE
QE - ADELAIDE STREET 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 ALBERT STREET 9 0 0 9 10 0 0 0 10 AMY STREET 24 0 0 24 42 0 0 0 42 BAKER STREET 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 EDMONDS STREET 19 0 0 19 25 0 0 0 25 GILMOUR STREET 42 0 0 42 58 1 (1.72%) 1 (1.72%) 0 58 GREEN STREET 146 0 0 146 239 0 0 0 239 GREENBANK TERRACE 12 0 0 12 15 0 0 0 15 HANSON STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 HIGHFIELD STREET 30 0 0 30 52 0 0 0 52 HILTON FOLD LANE 50 0 0 50 81 0 1 (1.23%) 0 80 (-1.23%) HORNBY STREET 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 HULBERT STREET 42 0 0 42 70 0 0 0 70 WOLSTENVALE CLOSE, HULBERT 30 0 0 30 34 0 1 (2.94%) 0 33 (-2.94%) STREET SPRINGVALE COURT, JACKSON 20 0 0 20 25 0 0 0 25 STREET
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 98 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
QE - JAMES ANDREW STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 JOPSON STREET 24 0 0 24 48 2 (4.17%) 1 (2.08%) 0 49 (2.08%) LANGTON STREET 7 0 0 7 10 1 (10.00%) 0 0 11 (10.00%) LARKHILL COURT 62 0 0 62 76 0 0 0 76 LITTLE GREEN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEWPORT STREET 22 0 0 22 48 0 0 0 48 NORMAN CLOSE 13 0 0 13 14 0 0 0 14 NORMAN STREET 84 0 0 84 140 0 4 (2.86%) 0 136 (-2.86%) OLDHAM ROAD 100 0 0 100 130 0 4 (3.08%) 0 126 (-3.08%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 TETLOW STREET, PEACH BANK 32 0 0 32 34 0 1 (2.94%) 0 33 (-2.94%) HOUSE Page 321 PEACH BANK 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 PILKINGTON STREET 58 0 0 58 103 0 2 (1.94%) 0 101 (-1.94%) SPRING VALE 22 0 0 22 43 0 0 0 43 TAYLOR STREET 27 0 0 27 39 0 0 0 39 TEMPLE STREET 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 TETLOW STREET 9 0 0 9 15 0 1 (6.67%) 0 14 (-6.67%) THORNLEY STREET 38 0 0 38 61 0 1 (1.64%) 0 60 (-1.64%) TONGE MEADOW 42 0 0 42 72 0 0 0 72 TOWNLEY STREET 31 0 0 31 49 0 1 (2.04%) 0 48 (-2.04%) VICTORIA STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 WILLIAM STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 OFF, WILLIAM STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6otl 7or 8 `E 9 01)32 ) ) 01)32 01@44 H B)CA@DE 05 B0C03DE ) 01@5@ B9)C55DE
QF - GREY STREET 28 0 0 28 44 1 (2.27%) 0 0 45 (2.27%) MARKET PLACE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 EXETER COURT, MARKET STREET 48 0 0 48 56 1 (1.79%) 0 0 57 (1.79%) MARKET STREET 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 MILTON STREET 17 0 0 17 33 0 0 0 33 MORTON STREET 10 0 0 10 22 0 0 0 22 SADLER STREET 14 0 0 14 26 0 0 0 26 NINIAN COURT, SADLER STREET 48 0 0 48 55 0 1 (1.82%) 0 54 (-1.82%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 99 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
QF - SUFFIELD STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 WOOD STREET 12 0 0 12 25 0 0 0 25 6otl 7or 8 `! 9 05F ) ) 05F AFH A B)CF3DE 0 B)C32DE ) AF@ B)C32DE QP$6 TSIE6PQ H124A 0B)C)ADE 32B)CFFDE H12@F 51))F A2 B)C3ADE F0 B)C54DE 0 F142A B9)C@2DE Page 322
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 100 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
IA - ALEXANDER DRIVE 17 0 0 17 35 0 0 0 35 BRAKEHOUSE CLOSE 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 BRANDON STREET 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 BRIDGE STREET 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 BUCKLEY HILL LANE 17 0 0 17 22 0 0 0 22 CROSSLEY STREET 15 0 0 15 23 0 0 0 23 ENTWISTLE STREET 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 FOX STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 FURNESS CLOSE 12 0 0 12 19 0 1 (5.26%) 0 18 (-5.26%) GEORGE STREET,FIRGROVE 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 HALLCROFT GARDENS 23 0 0 23 43 0 0 0 43 HALLIWELL STREET, MILNROW 49 0 0 49 82 0 0 0 82 Page 323 HEBBLE BUTT CLOSE 30 0 18(60.00%) 12 52 0 2 (3.85%) 0 50 (-3.85%) HOYLES TERRACE 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 LAYTHE BARN CLOSE 37 0 0 37 45 0 1 (2.22%) 0 44 (-2.22%) LEYFIELD ROAD 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 MONKS CLOSE 17 0 0 17 26 0 0 0 26 MOORHOUSE FARM 15 0 0 15 27 0 1 (3.70%) 0 26 (-3.70%) MOORHOUSE FOLD 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 NALL STREET 16 0 0 16 25 0 1 (4.00%) 0 24 (-4.00%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ROCHDALE ROAD 103 0 0 103 172 2 (1.16%) 7 (4.07%) 0 167 (-2.91%) THISTLEYFIELD, ROCHDALE ROAD 31 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 31 SELBY CLOSE 32 0 0 32 48 0 1 (2.08%) 0 47 (-2.08%) SHORE STREET 4 0 0 4 4 0 1 (25.00%) 0 3 (-25.00%) THE CRAY 85 0 0 85 105 0 1 (0.95%) 0 104 (-0.95%) THISTLE GREEN 7 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 13 TURBARY WALK 30 0 0 30 57 0 0 0 57 UNCOUTH ROAD 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 UPPER STONE DRIVE 31 0 0 31 46 0 0 0 46 WELBECK CLOSE 15 0 0 15 33 2 (6.06%) 2 (6.06%) 0 33 WESLEY STREET 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 WESTON STREET 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 WHALLEY CLOSE 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 101 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
IA - WHITEHEAD STREET 7 0 0 7 10 0 1 (10.00%) 0 9 (-10.00%) WINDSOR TERRACE 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 WOBURN CLOSE 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 6otl 7or 8 S 9 2F2 ) 05 BAC22DE 2@5 01)@3 H B)C35DE 04 B0C5)DE ) 01)35 B90CHADE
IB - ALBERT ROYDS STREET 74 0 0 74 136 0 2 (1.47%) 0 134 (-1.47%) ARCON CLOSE 19 0 0 19 21 0 2 (9.52%) 0 19 (-9.52%) BELFIELD LANE 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 BELFIELD LAWN 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5
Page 324 BROCKLEBANK ROAD 20 0 0 20 35 0 0 0 35 CEDAR BANK CLOSE 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 CHADWICK STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 COPPY BRIDGE DRIVE 66 0 9(13.64%) 57 84 0 2 (2.38%) 0 82 (-2.38%) CYPRESS GARDENS 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 DALTON AVENUE 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 DALTON CLOSE 54 0 0 54 62 0 1 (1.61%) 0 61 (-1.61%) DOBFIELD ROAD 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 EAST STREET 10 0 0 10 14 0 2 (14.29%) 0 12 (-14.29%) FIELD ROAD 28 0 0 28 61 0 0 0 61 FIRBARN CLOSE 11 0 0 11 23 0 0 0 23 FIRGROVE AVENUE 12 0 0 12 25 0 0 0 25 FIRGROVE GARDENS 37 0 0 37 63 0 0 0 63 HARTLEY PLACE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 HARTLEY STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 HEATLEY ROAD 49 0 0 49 64 0 0 0 64 HOLFORD WALK 11 0 0 11 18 0 1 (5.56%) 0 17 (-5.56%) REAR 117 ROCHDALE ROAD, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOLLYBANK COTTAGE JUNIPER DRIVE 69 0 0 69 129 0 0 0 129 KNOWL ROAD 55 0 0 55 95 0 0 0 95 LARCHWAY 11 0 0 11 25 0 0 0 25 LEIGH STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 LIMEFIELD 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 MENTMORE ROAD 70 0 0 70 103 0 2 (1.94%) 0 101 (-1.94%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 102 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
IB - MILNROW ROAD 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PRINCESS ROAD 77 0 0 77 139 0 1 (0.72%) 0 138 (-0.72%) REDWOOD PARK GROVE 11 0 0 11 18 0 0 0 18 OAKLAND HOUSE, ROCHDALE ROAD 13 0 0 13 11 0 1 (9.09%) 0 10 (-9.09%) ROCHDALE ROAD 108 0 0 108 167 1 (0.60%) 5 (2.99%) 0 163 (-2.40%) ST ANNS ROAD 68 0 0 68 118 0 0 0 118 UNCOUTH ROAD 4 0 0 4 12 0 0 0 12 WATERMILL CLOSE 28 0 0 28 32 0 0 0 32 WEST STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 WILDS BUILDINGS 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 WILLOWS COTTAGES 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 Page 325 WILLOWS LANE 88 0 0 88 147 0 1 (0.68%) 0 146 (-0.68%) 6otl 7or 8 SG 9 01)2A ) 4 B)C5@DE 01)@3 01F0F 0 B)C)2DE A) B0C02DE ) 01245 B90C00DE
IC - ALBERT ROYDS STREET 36 0 0 36 59 1 (1.69%) 0 0 60 (1.69%) BEAL CRESCENT 43 0 0 43 79 2 (2.53%) 0 0 81 (2.53%) BELFIELD MILL, BELFIELD MILL LANE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BELFIELD MILL LANE 30 0 0 30 45 0 0 0 45 BELLSHILL CRESCENT 120 0 1(0.83%) 119 233 2 (0.86%) 5 (2.15%) 0 230 (-1.29%) BELTON AVENUE 34 0 0 34 62 2 (3.23%) 0 0 64 (3.23%) BLACKSTONE AVENUE 20 0 0 20 41 0 0 0 41 CLOVER HALL CRESCENT 115 0 0 115 195 2 (1.03%) 0 0 197 (1.03%) EAFIELD ROAD 35 0 0 35 64 0 0 0 64 FARM WALK 30 0 0 30 55 0 1 (1.82%) 0 54 (-1.82%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 (100.00%) 0 0 (-100.00%) 6otl 7or 8 S( 9 H2@ ) 0 B)CAADE H2H 53H 4 B0C)5DE F B)C5HDE ) 532 B)CAHDE
ID - ALBERT ROYDS STREET 27 0 0 27 56 0 0 0 56 ARMSTRONG HURST CLOSE 58 0 0 58 167 0 0 0 167 BISHOP STREET 59 0 0 59 99 0 2 (2.02%) 0 97 (-2.02%) BRICKFIELD STREET 16 0 0 16 23 0 0 0 23 CALDER STREET 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 103 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
ID - CANON STREET 39 0 0 39 62 0 3 (4.84%) 0 59 (-4.84%) THE CLOISTERS, CANON STREET 16 0 0 16 19 1 (5.26%) 1 (5.26%) 0 19 CLARKE STREET 15 0 0 15 26 1 (3.85%) 0 0 27 (3.85%) COOK STREET 15 0 0 15 36 0 0 0 36 COOK TERRACE 11 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 15 COOPERS WALK 11 0 0 11 27 2 (7.41%) 0 0 29 (7.41%) DEACON STREET 20 0 0 20 36 1 (2.78%) 0 0 37 (2.78%) DITTON MEAD CLOSE 44 0 0 44 135 1 (0.74%) 0 0 136 (0.74%) DOVER STREET 35 0 0 35 40 0 1 (2.50%) 0 39 (-2.50%) EDGAR STREET 3 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 8 Page 326 FILEY STREET 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 HALIFAX ROAD 40 0 0 40 88 0 0 0 88 HAROLD STREET 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 HENDERSON STREET 89 0 0 89 104 1 (0.96%) 2 (1.92%) 0 103 (-0.96%) HOWARTH CROSS STREET 18 0 0 18 34 0 0 0 34 LEACH CLOSE 8 0 0 8 26 0 0 0 26 LOBLEY CLOSE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 MARTHA'S TERRACE 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 MAYFIELD TERRACE 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 0 17 MILLGATE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 NEWMAN STREET 11 0 0 11 17 0 1 (5.88%) 0 16 (-5.88%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PRESCOTT STREET 9 0 0 9 14 0 0 0 14 ROACH VALE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 ROCH STREET 26 0 0 26 41 2 (4.88%) 1 (2.44%) 0 42 (2.44%) BRAESIDE NURSING HOME, 8, 1 0 0 1 21 0 7 (33.33%) 0 14 (-33.33%) ROYAL STREET ROYAL STREET 11 0 0 11 17 0 1 (5.88%) 0 16 (-5.88%) SPOKESHAVE WAY 16 0 0 16 25 0 0 0 25 SPRING MILL WALK 8 0 0 8 20 0 0 0 20 STONIE HEYS AVENUE 18 0 0 18 48 0 0 0 48 WINDHAM STREET 5 0 0 5 10 0 1 (10.00%) 0 9 (-10.00%) 6otl 7or 8 S 9 255 ) ) 255 0130H 4 B)C25DE A) B0C@ADE ) 013)3 B9)C5HDE
IE -
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 104 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
IE - BACK LOUISE STREET 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BUCKLEY LANE 12 0 0 12 22 0 0 0 22 BUCKLEY VIEW 142 0 0 142 265 1 (0.38%) 7 (2.64%) 0 259 (-2.26%) 178-190, GREAT HOWARTH 13 0 0 13 12 1 (8.33%) 3 (25.00%) 0 10 (-16.67%) KINGFISHER COURT, GREAT 32 0 0 32 37 0 0 0 37 HOWARTH GREAT HOWARTH 149 0 0 149 216 2 (0.93%) 6 (2.78%) 0 212 (-1.85%) HALIFAX ROAD 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 KENTMERE AVENUE 12 0 0 12 18 0 0 0 18 LORNE STREET 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 LOUISE CLOSE 17 0 0 17 36 0 0 0 36 LOUISE GARDENS 57 0 0 57 90 0 0 0 90 Page 327 LOUISE STREET 38 0 0 38 60 1 (1.67%) 2 (3.33%) 0 59 (-1.67%) LOW BANK 21 0 0 21 21 0 2 (9.52%) 0 19 (-9.52%) LOW HILL 71 0 0 71 88 0 4 (4.55%) 0 84 (-4.55%) MAITLAND CLOSE 22 0 0 22 35 0 0 0 35 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 RHODES STREET 44 0 0 44 81 0 0 0 81 STEVENSON SQUARE 9 0 0 9 12 0 0 0 12 WARDLE EDGE 104 0 0 104 161 1 (0.62%) 3 (1.86%) 0 159 (-1.24%) WARDLE GARDENS 14 0 0 14 29 0 0 0 29 WARDLE ROAD 25 0 0 25 44 0 0 0 44 WESLEY CLOSE 17 0 0 17 34 1 (2.94%) 0 0 35 (2.94%) 6otl 7or 8 SE 9 5)5 ) ) 5)5 01AF3 F B)C@@DE AF BAC0ADE ) 01A@3 B90C@FDE
IF - ANN STREET, HURSTEAD 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 ASH CLOSE 32 0 0 32 46 0 2 (4.35%) 0 44 (-4.35%) ASHBROOK CRESCENT 44 0 0 44 85 0 0 0 85 ASHBROOK HEY LANE 64 0 0 64 123 5 (4.07%) 0 0 128 (4.07%) BIRCH HEY CLOSE 19 0 0 19 39 0 0 0 39 BIRCH VIEW, BIRCH ROAD 23 0 0 23 24 0 3 (12.50%) 0 21 (-12.50%) BIRCH ROAD 47 0 0 47 95 0 0 0 95 BOWER AVENUE 74 0 0 74 116 0 0 0 116 BRADDOCK CLOSE 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 105 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
IF - ASHCROFT, BRADDOCK CLOSE 43 0 0 43 48 0 0 0 48 CROFT HILL COURT, BRADDOCK 45 0 0 45 53 0 2 (3.77%) 0 51 (-3.77%) CLOSE GREENACRES COURT, BRADDOCK 24 0 0 24 28 0 0 0 28 CLOSE WESTCLIFFE HOUSE, BRADDOCK 4 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 10 CLOSE BRIDGE STREET 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 BROOK HEY CLOSE 14 0 0 14 15 0 0 0 15 COOPER STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 CORN MILL CLOSE 22 0 0 22 28 0 0 0 28 Page 328 CROFT SQUARE 3 0 0 3 6 2 (33.33%) 2 (33.33%) 0 6 CROFT STREET 35 0 0 35 17 21 (123.53%) 0 0 38 (123.53%) GREAT BENT CLOSE 21 0 0 21 34 0 0 0 34 GREEN MEADOW 70 0 0 70 114 0 2 (1.75%) 0 112 (-1.75%) GREENGATE CLOSE 32 0 0 32 46 0 2 (4.35%) 0 44 (-4.35%) HURSTEAD HOUSE NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 22 0 3 (13.64%) 0 19 (-13.64%) HALIFAX ROAD HALIFAX ROAD 52 0 0 52 81 0 0 0 81 HOLLOWSPELL 42 0 0 42 79 2 (2.53%) 1 (1.27%) 0 80 (1.27%) HOMESTEAD GARDENS 21 0 0 21 32 0 0 0 32 HOWARTH FARM WAY 23 0 0 23 28 0 0 0 28 HOWARTH GREEN 20 0 0 20 24 0 0 0 24 HURSTEAD GREEN 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 HURSTEAD MEWS 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 LITTLE HOWARTH WAY 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 MILL HOUSE CLOSE 18 0 0 18 25 0 0 0 25 NOBLE MEADOW 19 0 0 19 34 2 (5.88%) 1 (2.94%) 0 35 (2.94%) OAKCLIFFE ROAD 42 0 0 42 88 0 0 0 88 RALPH SHERWIN COURT, OFF 60 0 0 60 69 0 5 (7.25%) 0 64 (-7.25%) OAKCLIFFE ROAD OLD CLAY DRIVE 6 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 12 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 RYEFIELDS 40 0 0 40 41 0 1 (2.44%) 0 40 (-2.44%) STEPS MEADOW 36 0 0 36 62 0 1 (1.61%) 0 61 (-1.61%) THIMBLE CLOSE 44 0 0 44 94 0 0 0 94
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 106 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
IF - THE THIMBLES, THIMBLE CLOSE 80 0 0 80 98 0 4 (4.08%) 0 94 (-4.08%) TITHE BARN CLOSE 20 0 0 20 31 0 1 (3.23%) 0 30 (-3.23%) WALK MILL CLOSE 42 0 0 42 56 0 0 0 56 WEST AVENUE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 6otl 7or 8 S! 9 01A00 ) ) 01A00 015HF 3A B0CF3DE 3) B0C2ADE ) 015H4 B)C00DE STIIG$SUE Q !S$U$PaE H140) ) A5B)C@FDE H155A 51)35 2A B)CFFDE 0A3 B0C@3DE ) F14FF B9)CF2DE Page 329
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 107 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
OA - ARMITAGE CLOSE 57 0 0 57 98 0 0 0 98 BOARDMAN LANE 36 0 0 36 51 0 1 (1.96%) 0 50 (-1.96%) BONNY BROW STREET 43 0 0 43 75 1 (1.33%) 0 0 76 (1.33%) BOOTH BRIDGE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 BOOTHROYDEN CLOSE 22 0 0 22 43 1 (2.33%) 0 0 44 (2.33%) BOOTHROYDEN ROAD 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 BRAYSTON FOLD 13 0 0 13 30 0 0 0 30 BROAD STREET 30 0 0 30 55 0 0 0 55 WOODS COURT, BROAD STREET 40 0 0 40 40 0 0 0 40 CHAPEL WALK 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 Page 330 CLARKSON CLOSE 25 0 0 25 38 0 0 0 38 CROFT GATES ROAD 88 0 0 88 116 0 0 0 116 DALTON ROAD 34 0 0 34 74 0 0 0 74 EGERTON STREET 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 FOXALL CLOSE 9 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 15 FOXALL STREET 52 0 0 52 73 0 0 0 73 GREAT HEATON CLOSE 10 0 0 10 22 0 0 0 22 HANGING BIRCH 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 HEATON STREET 9 0 0 9 12 0 0 0 12 HEYWOOD OLD ROAD 11 0 0 11 17 0 0 0 17 HIGH HURST CLOSE 6 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 12 HILTON WALK 30 0 0 30 42 0 0 0 42 KELVIN AVENUE 12 0 0 12 17 0 0 0 17 LANDS END ROAD 19 0 0 19 32 0 1 (3.13%) 0 31 (-3.13%) LISTER ROAD 27 0 0 27 49 0 0 0 49 LITCHFIELD COURT 10 0 0 10 9 0 0 0 9 MANCHESTER OLD ROAD 144 0 0 144 230 0 3 (1.30%) 0 227 (-1.30%) NORTH MANCHESTER GOLF CLUB, 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 MANCHESTER OLD ROAD MARQUESS WAY 0 58 0 58 0 2 0 0 2 MOUNT PLEASANT 20 0 0 20 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) NEWTON ROAD 10 0 0 10 23 0 0 0 23 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 POOL BANK STREET 57 0 0 57 82 0 0 0 82 RHODES GREEN 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 108 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
OA - SCHOOL SIDE LANE 39 0 0 39 75 1 (1.33%) 1 (1.33%) 0 75 SCHWABE STREET 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 TOP SCHWABE STREET 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 VISCOUNT DRIVE 0 41 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 LITTLE HEATON NURSING HOME, 1 0 0 1 6 1 (16.67%) 1 (16.67%) 0 6 WALKER STREET WALKER STREET 71 0 0 71 102 0 1 (0.98%) 0 101 (-0.98%) WELLENS WAY 45 0 0 45 83 0 1 (1.20%) 0 82 (-1.20%) WELLS CLOSE 18 0 0 18 22 0 0 0 22 WEST GREEN 50 0 0 50 91 2 (2.20%) 0 0 93 (2.20%) WILTON STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 YATES STREET 37 0 0 37 59 2 (3.39%) 2 (3.39%) 0 59 Page 331 6otl 7or 8 P 9 010A0 44B5C53DE ) 01AA) 015)2 0) B)C@@DE 0A B)C22DE ) 015)H B9)C00DE
OB - ALKRINGTON PARK ROAD 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 ARCHER PARK 11 0 0 11 17 0 0 0 17 ARNDALE CENTRE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ASPELL CLOSE 35 0 0 35 63 0 0 0 63 BEECH STREET 15 0 0 15 19 0 0 0 19 BROOMFIELD PARK 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 BURTON STREET 16 0 0 16 24 0 0 0 24 CROSS STREET 15 0 0 15 22 0 0 0 22 CHISHOLM COURT, GREAT ARBOR 33 0 0 33 32 0 2 (6.25%) 0 30 (-6.25%) WAY GREAT ARBOR WAY 64 0 0 64 81 3 (3.70%) 0 0 84 (3.70%) GREENSON DRIVE 4 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 10 HARLEY COURT 14 0 0 14 20 0 0 0 20 HARLEY ROAD 14 0 0 14 19 0 1 (5.26%) 0 18 (-5.26%) HAROLD STREET 32 0 0 32 54 0 0 0 54 HYDE SQUARE 15 0 0 15 32 0 0 0 32 JOHNSON GROVE 4 0 0 4 12 0 0 0 12 KEMP STREET 10 0 0 10 16 0 0 0 16 KINGS DRIVE 30 0 0 30 52 0 0 0 52 LAWNBANK CLOSE 31 0 0 31 49 0 0 0 49
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 109 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
OB - LIME GARDENS 21 0 0 21 31 0 0 0 31 LITTLEHILLS CLOSE 27 0 0 27 50 0 1 (2.00%) 0 49 (-2.00%) LYNDHURST GARDENS 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 LYNDHURST 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 LIMEFIELD COTTAGES, 5 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 11 MANCHESTER OLD ROAD MANCHESTER OLD ROAD 51 0 0 51 83 0 0 0 83 MICHAEL STREET 12 0 0 12 22 0 0 0 22 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PARKFIELD DRIVE 30 0 0 30 50 0 0 0 50
Page 332 PARKFIELD 102 0 0 102 114 0 1 (0.88%) 0 113 (-0.88%) PRINCESS DRIVE 20 0 0 20 43 0 0 0 43 SCHOLARS WAY 15 0 0 15 24 0 0 0 24 SEFTON CLOSE 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22 SEFTON ROAD 21 0 0 21 40 0 0 0 40 SILK STREET 11 0 0 11 13 0 0 0 13 SUNNY BROW ROAD 39 0 0 39 74 2 (2.70%) 0 0 76 (2.70%) THE CRESCENT 8 0 0 8 22 0 0 0 22 TOP STREET 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 TRINITY STREET 17 0 0 17 21 0 0 0 21 WEAVERS COURT 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 WEAVERS ROAD 10 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 12 WENTWORTH CLOSE 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 THE ACRES, WENTWORTH CLOSE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 WHITTAKER STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 WOOD STREET 39 0 0 39 60 1 (1.67%) 0 0 61 (1.67%) 6otl 7or 8 PG 9 502 ) ) 502 01AF) 2 B)CHFDE @ B)C34DE ) 01AF0 B)C)5DE
OC - ALKRINGTON GREEN 20 0 0 20 46 0 0 0 46 ALKRINGTON HALL ROAD NORTH 17 0 0 17 35 0 0 0 35 ALKRINGTON HALL ROAD SOUTH 36 0 0 36 70 0 1 (1.43%) 0 69 (-1.43%) ALKRINGTON WOOD 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 ASH WALK 20 0 0 20 33 0 2 (6.06%) 0 31 (-6.06%) BEECH WALK 21 0 0 21 44 0 0 0 44
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 110 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
OC - COLSON DRIVE 19 0 0 19 38 0 0 0 38 CONWAY CLOSE 48 0 0 48 96 0 0 0 96 CROW HILL NORTH 39 0 0 39 79 0 0 0 79 CROW HILL SOUTH 62 0 0 62 136 0 0 0 136 DENE DRIVE 5 0 0 5 14 0 0 0 14 DINGLE ROAD 36 0 0 36 72 0 0 0 72 HALL DRIVE 42 0 0 42 88 0 1 (1.14%) 0 87 (-1.14%) HOME DRIVE 20 0 0 20 38 0 1 (2.63%) 0 37 (-2.63%) IVY DRIVE 25 0 0 25 45 0 1 (2.22%) 0 44 (-2.22%) KINGSWAY 70 0 0 70 146 1 (0.68%) 0 0 147 (0.68%) KIRKWAY 18 0 0 18 24 0 0 0 24 LAKE DRIVE 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 Page 333 MAINWAY 16 0 0 16 39 1 (2.56%) 4 (10.26%) 0 36 (-7.69%) MANCHESTER NEW ROAD 77 0 0 77 149 0 4 (2.68%) 0 145 (-2.68%) MANOR ROAD 32 0 0 32 70 0 1 (1.43%) 0 69 (-1.43%) MEADOW ROAD 23 0 0 23 55 0 0 0 55 MOUNT ROAD 27 0 0 27 50 0 2 (4.00%) 0 48 (-4.00%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PARKSIDE 26 0 0 26 54 0 0 0 54 ROOKWAY 26 0 0 26 51 2 (3.92%) 0 0 53 (3.92%) RYDAL AVENUE 10 0 0 10 20 0 0 0 20 UPLANDS 54 0 0 54 102 0 1 (0.98%) 0 101 (-0.98%) WEST CRESCENT 13 0 0 13 25 0 0 0 25 WOODFIELD ROAD 20 0 0 20 48 0 0 0 48 WOODLANDS WAY 18 0 0 18 40 0 0 0 40 6otl 7or 8 P( 9 5@A ) ) 5@A 01FA4 H B)CA3DE 05 B0C)HDE ) 01F0@ B9)C50DE
OD - ALCESTER CLOSE 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 BOARDMAN FOLD CLOSE 12 0 0 12 32 0 0 0 32 BOARDMAN FOLD ROAD 8 0 0 8 20 0 0 0 20 BRACKLEY DRIVE 23 0 0 23 47 0 3 (6.38%) 0 44 (-6.38%) CHELTENHAM GREEN 10 0 0 10 16 0 0 0 16 CHELTENHAM ROAD 63 0 0 63 110 0 1 (0.91%) 0 109 (-0.91%) EVESHAM CLOSE 17 0 0 17 32 0 0 0 32
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 111 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
OD - EVESHAM GARDENS 15 0 0 15 39 0 0 0 39 EVESHAM ROAD 35 0 0 35 69 0 1 (1.45%) 0 68 (-1.45%) GLOUCESTER ROAD 54 0 0 54 116 2 (1.72%) 1 (0.86%) 0 117 (0.86%) HANLEY CLOSE 9 0 0 9 14 0 1 (7.14%) 0 13 (-7.14%) HARDFIELD ROAD 137 0 0 137 254 0 6 (2.36%) 0 248 (-2.36%) KINGSWAY 36 0 0 36 68 0 0 0 68 KIRKWAY 72 0 0 72 132 0 0 0 132 LEDBURY CLOSE 21 0 0 21 41 0 0 0 41 MAINWAY 48 0 0 48 110 0 0 0 110 MALVERN ROAD 48 0 0 48 99 0 0 0 99 Page 334 MANOR ROAD 18 0 0 18 33 0 0 0 33 MERE AVENUE 18 0 0 18 39 0 2 (5.13%) 0 37 (-5.13%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 STRATFORD ROAD 14 0 0 14 33 0 0 0 33 TENBURY DRIVE 15 0 0 15 31 0 0 0 31 UPTON CLOSE 9 0 0 9 17 0 0 0 17 WALSINGHAM AVENUE 42 0 0 42 95 0 0 0 95 WARWICK CLOSE 21 0 0 21 36 0 0 0 36 WARWICK ROAD 122 0 0 122 223 0 1 (0.45%) 0 222 (-0.45%) WORCESTER ROAD 6 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 12 6otl 7or 8 P 9 55A ) ) 55A 01F3) A B)C0ADE 02 B)C4ADE ) 01F02 B9)C50DE
OE - ALRESFORD ROAD 17 0 0 17 46 0 0 0 46 BANBURY ROAD 59 0 0 59 116 0 0 0 116 BOARDMAN FOLD ROAD 50 0 0 50 100 0 0 0 100 CROSSBY CLOSE 20 0 0 20 35 0 0 0 35 DUFFIELD GARDENS 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 8 DUFFIELD ROAD 22 0 0 22 47 0 0 0 47 ELLERAY ROAD 49 0 0 49 104 0 0 0 104 GREENWAY 26 0 0 26 53 0 0 0 53 LOWER GREEN 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 MAINWAY 14 0 0 14 30 0 0 0 30 MALVERN ROAD 30 0 0 30 49 0 0 0 49 MANCHESTER NEW ROAD 34 0 0 34 61 0 0 0 61
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 112 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
OE - CAJETAN HOUSE, MOSS LANE 21 0 0 21 21 0 0 0 21 MOSS LANE 39 0 0 39 73 0 1 (1.37%) 0 72 (-1.37%) MOSSWAY 172 0 0 172 349 0 1 (0.29%) 0 348 (-0.29%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PEBWORTH CLOSE 25 0 0 25 58 0 3 (5.17%) 0 55 (-5.17%) STROUD CLOSE 20 0 0 20 34 3 (8.82%) 2 (5.88%) 0 35 (2.94%) WORCESTER ROAD 53 0 0 53 102 0 0 0 102 6otl 7or 8 PE 9 22F ) ) 22F 013)) 3 B)CA3DE F B)C@HDE ) 01A42 B9)C30DE SPX6 TSIE6PQ H1335 44BACA5DE ) H1H3F F153@ A@ B)C3ADE @5 B)CFHDE ) F15)A B9)CHADE Page 335
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 113 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
FA - BROADLEY FOLD 3 0 0 3 9 0 0 0 9 BROADLEY LANE 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 FERN HILL 5 0 0 5 12 0 0 0 12 KNACKS LANE 7 0 0 7 18 0 0 0 18 LANEHEAD 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 OFF KNACKS LANE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PRICKSHAW LANE 5 0 0 5 12 0 0 0 12 REDWOOD CLOSE 6 0 0 6 11 0 1 (9.09%) 0 10 (-9.09%) FAIR VIEW, ROOLEY MOOR ROAD 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 Page 336 ROOLEY MOOR ROAD 49 0 0 49 100 0 0 0 100 THE KNACKS, ROOLEY MOOR ROAD 4 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 10 ROWAN CLOSE 19 0 0 19 45 1 (2.22%) 0 0 46 (2.22%) SMALLSHAW ROAD 13 0 0 13 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) STONEHILL CRESCENT 20 0 0 20 35 0 0 2 35 STONEHILL DRIVE 44 0 0 44 101 0 0 0 101 STONEHILL ROAD 27 0 0 27 57 0 0 0 57 WOODHOUSE LANE 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 6otl 7or 8 ! 9 A03 ) ) A03 H@2 0 B)CAADE A B)CHHDE A H@@ B9)CAADE
FB - BROTHEROD HALL ROAD 124 0 0 124 207 0 2 (0.97%) 0 205 (-0.97%) DANIEL FOLD 62 0 0 62 113 0 1 (0.88%) 0 112 (-0.88%) DELL GARDENS 10 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 12 ELMPARK GATE 13 0 0 13 22 0 0 0 22 ELMPARK GROVE 18 0 0 18 32 0 0 0 32 ELMPARK VALE 10 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 19 ELMPARK VIEW 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9 ELMPARK WAY 49 0 0 49 90 1 (1.11%) 0 0 91 (1.11%) FOLD GARDENS 10 0 0 10 12 1 (8.33%) 1 (8.33%) 0 12 HALL GARDENS 19 0 0 19 21 0 0 0 21 INGS AVENUE 11 0 0 11 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) REDFERN HOUSE, INGS AVENUE 16 0 0 16 16 0 1 (6.25%) 0 15 (-6.25%) INGS LANE 128 0 0 128 242 2 (0.83%) 5 (2.07%) 0 239 (-1.24%) MOUNTAIN ASH CLOSE 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 0 19
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 114 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
FB - MOUNTAIN ASH 95 0 0 95 176 0 2 (1.14%) 0 174 (-1.14%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 HOWCROFT HOUSE, ROOLEY MOOR 6 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 3 ROAD ROOLEY MOOR ROAD 62 0 0 62 125 0 0 0 125 WYCHERLEY ROAD 53 0 0 53 88 0 0 0 88 6otl 7or 8 !G 9 F)A ) ) F)A 01AA4 H B)C33DE 03 B0C)2DE ) 01AA) B9)CF3DE
FC - AMY STREET 37 0 0 37 64 0 0 0 64 BALMORAL AVENUE 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 CHERRY GROVE 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 0 15
Page 337 CUTGATE ROAD 115 0 0 115 188 1 (0.53%) 4 (2.13%) 0 185 (-1.60%) EDENFIELD ROAD 41 0 0 41 67 1 (1.49%) 2 (2.99%) 0 66 (-1.49%) SPRING TERRACE, EDENFIELD 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 ROAD LYNNWOOD DRIVE 43 0 0 43 77 0 1 (1.30%) 0 76 (-1.30%) MARTIN LANE 99 0 0 99 146 0 1 (0.68%) 0 145 (-0.68%) MEADOW VIEW HOME FOR AGED, 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 MEADOW VIEW MEADOW VIEW 61 0 0 61 87 0 1 (1.15%) 0 86 (-1.15%) MOORLAND TERRACE 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 RAVENDALE CLOSE 60 0 0 60 70 0 2 (2.86%) 0 68 (-2.86%) SOMERSET GROVE 44 0 0 44 76 2 (2.63%) 0 0 78 (2.63%) SPOTLAND TOPS 67 0 0 67 92 0 1 (1.09%) 0 91 (-1.09%) 6otl 7or 8 !( 9 @5@ ) ) @5@ 543 H B)CH@DE 0A B0C3HDE ) 55@ B9)C4)DE
FD - AIR HILL TERRACE 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 BACK PATIENCE STREET 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 BAILDON ROAD 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 BALFOUR ROAD 16 0 0 16 24 0 1 (4.17%) 0 23 (-4.17%) BEAUFORT STREET 31 0 0 31 52 0 0 0 52 BELGRAVE STREET 18 0 0 18 29 0 0 0 29 BELVOIR STREET 29 0 0 29 42 1 (2.38%) 0 0 43 (2.38%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 115 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
FD - BENTINCK STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 BLAIR STREET 15 0 0 15 25 0 1 (4.00%) 0 24 (-4.00%) BLENHEIM STREET 24 0 0 24 30 1 (3.33%) 0 0 31 (3.33%) BOWNESS AVENUE 20 0 0 20 44 0 0 0 44 BROAD ING 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 CATCHES CLOSE 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 CHURCHILL STREET 47 0 0 47 82 0 0 0 82 CUTGATE ROAD 23 0 0 23 25 0 0 0 25 DELLAR STREET 24 0 0 24 35 0 0 0 35 EDENFIELD ROAD 98 0 0 98 183 0 0 0 183 Page 338 PASSMONDS HOUSE, EDENFIELD 1 0 0 1 9 1 (11.11%) 2 (22.22%) 0 8 (-11.11%) ROAD EDENFIELD STREET 29 0 0 29 55 0 0 0 55 FARADAY RISE 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 GREAT FLATT 17 0 0 17 37 0 0 0 37 HARTLEY STREET 59 0 0 59 104 3 (2.88%) 3 (2.88%) 0 104 GLEN ROYD, INGS LANE 5 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 11 INGS LANE 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 ALICE INGHAM COURT, LISBON 35 0 0 35 37 0 4 (10.81%) 0 33 (-10.81%) STREET LISBON STREET 36 0 0 36 62 0 0 0 62 LITTLE FLATT 13 0 0 13 29 0 0 0 29 LOWER GREEN 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 MADELEY GARDENS 12 0 0 12 31 0 0 0 31 MARLBOROUGH STREET 26 0 0 26 44 0 0 0 44 MEANWOOD FOLD 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 OFF ROOLEY STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PASSMONDS CRESCENT 38 0 0 38 73 1 (1.37%) 0 0 74 (1.37%) PASSMONDS WAY 17 0 0 17 36 0 4 (11.11%) 0 32 (-11.11%) PATIENCE STREET 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 PHOENIX STREET 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 PHYLLIS STREET 42 0 0 42 83 0 1 (1.20%) 0 82 (-1.20%) POPLAR AVENUE 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 PRESTON STREET 19 0 0 19 25 2 (8.00%) 0 0 27 (8.00%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 116 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
FD - RAKE TOP 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 ROEFIELD TERRACE 10 0 0 10 11 0 0 0 11 IVY COTTAGES, ROOLEY MOOR 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 ROAD ROOLEY MOOR ROAD 130 0 0 130 216 0 1 (0.46%) 0 215 (-0.46%) ROOLEY STREET 36 0 0 36 52 0 0 0 52 ROOLEY TERRACE 4 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 10 RUPERT STREET 24 0 0 24 30 0 0 0 30 RUSHY HILL VIEW 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 SHEEP GAP 6 0 0 6 11 0 1 (9.09%) 0 10 (-9.09%) SMITHY FOLD 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 SPOTLAND ROAD 5 0 0 5 16 0 0 0 16 Page 339 TENBY GROVE 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 THRUSH STREET 23 0 0 23 36 0 0 0 36 TRENGROVE STREET 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9 ULLSWATER AVENUE 23 0 0 23 38 1 (2.63%) 0 0 39 (2.63%) UPPER PASSMONDS GROVE 19 0 0 19 38 0 1 (2.63%) 0 37 (-2.63%) WHALLEY GARDENS 21 0 0 21 46 0 0 0 46 WHALLEY ROAD 29 0 0 29 41 0 1 (2.44%) 0 40 (-2.44%) WINIFRED STREET 26 0 0 26 38 0 0 0 38 WOODSTOCK STREET 33 0 0 33 50 0 0 0 50 WYKEHAM GROVE 12 0 0 12 21 1 (4.76%) 0 0 22 (4.76%) 6otl 7or 8 ! 9 01053 ) ) 01053 01452 00 B)C@@DE A) B0C)0DE ) 014FF B9)CH@DE
FE - BRIDGEFOLD ROAD 25 0 0 25 3 0 0 0 3 CHURCHILL STREET 13 0 0 13 26 0 0 0 26 DENEHURST ROAD 97 0 0 97 169 1 (0.59%) 4 (2.37%) 0 166 (-1.78%) DREW AVENUE 17 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 EDENFIELD ROAD 51 0 0 51 84 0 3 (3.57%) 0 81 (-3.57%) FALKLAND AVENUE 39 0 0 39 88 2 (2.27%) 1 (1.14%) 0 89 (1.14%) FURTHER PITS 24 0 0 24 49 0 0 0 49 GENEVA TERRACE 15 0 0 15 34 0 0 0 34 CHEVIOT HOUSE, GREAVE AVENUE 6 0 0 6 6 0 3 (50.00%) 0 3 (-50.00%) GREAVE AVENUE 78 0 0 78 136 5 (3.68%) 1 (0.74%) 0 140 (2.94%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 117 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
FE - PETRUS COMMUNITY GREAVE 1 0 0 1 15 9 (60.00%) 17 (113.33%) 0 7 (-53.33%) HOUSE, GREAVE AVENUE HUDSONS WALK 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 JUTLAND AVENUE 41 0 0 41 72 1 (1.39%) 1 (1.39%) 0 72 LONGFIELD ROAD 4 0 0 4 14 0 0 0 14 MARNE CRESCENT 51 0 0 51 83 2 (2.41%) 0 0 85 (2.41%) MELLOR STREET 19 0 0 19 2 0 0 0 2 MONS AVENUE 30 0 0 30 67 1 (1.49%) 1 (1.49%) 0 67 OAKFIELD TERRACE 19 0 0 19 41 1 (2.44%) 0 0 42 (2.44%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Page 340 PARK WAY 52 0 0 52 97 0 0 0 97 PATTERN AVENUE 29 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 PEARL STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 PITS FARM AVENUE 38 0 0 38 72 0 0 0 72 SANDY LANE 64 0 0 64 141 0 1 (0.71%) 0 140 (-0.71%) ST CLEMENTS COURT 12 0 0 12 14 0 1 (7.14%) 0 13 (-7.14%) VERDUN CRESCENT 30 0 0 30 60 0 0 0 60 VIKING STREET 45 0 0 45 79 0 0 0 79 WILLBUTTS LANE 42 0 0 42 76 0 0 0 76 6otl 7or 8 !E 9 5H2 ) ) 5H2 01H3H AA B0C@3DE 33 BAC3)DE ) 01HA3 B9)CFFDE
FF - ARTHUR STREET 42 0 0 42 83 1 (1.20%) 0 0 84 (1.20%) ASHWORTH STREET 22 0 0 22 47 2 (4.26%) 1 (2.13%) 0 48 (2.13%) CLEMENT ROYDS STREET 24 0 0 24 53 0 0 0 53 COLLEGE ROAD 5 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 3 CRIMBLE STREET 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 EDEN STREET 7 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 8 COLLEGE COURT, HOLMES STREET 10 0 0 10 22 0 0 0 22 HOLMES STREET 46 0 0 46 59 0 2 (3.39%) 0 57 (-3.39%) KATHLEEN STREET 11 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 15 LITTLEDALE STREET 7 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 13 LOMBARD STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 MITCHELL STREET 49 0 0 49 140 1 (0.71%) 0 0 141 (0.71%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 118 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
FF - PRIMROSE STREET 22 0 0 22 36 0 1 (2.78%) 0 35 (-2.78%) PRIMROSE VILLAS 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 SPOTLAND ROAD 27 0 0 27 57 4 (7.02%) 0 0 61 (7.02%) STONEFLAT COURT 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 6otl 7or 8 !! 9 A53 ) ) A53 @@0 5 B0CH@DE H B)CF3DE ) @@@ B)CF3DE
FG - ASHWORTH STREET 23 0 0 23 34 1 (2.94%) 0 0 35 (2.94%) BESWICKE STREET 10 0 0 10 16 0 0 0 16 BROWNHILL VIEW 21 0 0 21 20 0 0 0 20 CHASELEY ROAD 32 0 0 32 68 0 0 0 68 CINNAMON CLOSE 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9
Page 341 CINNAMON STREET 19 0 0 19 43 0 0 0 43 CLARKES LANE 12 0 0 12 28 0 0 0 28 CLEMENT ROYDS STREET 60 0 0 60 129 0 3 (2.33%) 0 126 (-2.33%) EDMUND STREET 95 0 0 95 302 1 (0.33%) 1 (0.33%) 0 302 EMMA STREET 38 0 0 38 69 1 (1.45%) 2 (2.90%) 0 68 (-1.45%) FALINGE MEWS 36 0 0 36 36 0 1 (2.78%) 0 35 (-2.78%) FALINGE ROAD 27 0 0 27 74 0 0 0 74 PARKLANDS HOUSE, FALINGE ROAD 1 0 0 1 53 0 1 (1.89%) 0 52 (-1.89%) GREENHILL AVENUE 18 0 0 18 36 1 (2.78%) 0 0 37 (2.78%) HASLAM STREET 37 0 0 37 55 0 1 (1.82%) 0 54 (-1.82%) HOLLAND STREET 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 JANE STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 JULIA STREET 7 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 12 LITTLEDALE STREET 14 0 0 14 36 0 0 0 36 LOWER SHERIFF STREET 12 0 0 12 23 0 0 0 23 EAST VIEW, MITCHELL STREET 22 0 0 22 35 2 (5.71%) 0 0 37 (5.71%) MOLYNEUX STREET 76 0 0 76 116 1 (0.86%) 2 (1.72%) 0 115 (-0.86%) MOUNT STREET 37 0 0 37 65 0 0 0 65 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 PEEL STREET 53 0 0 53 90 0 2 (2.22%) 0 88 (-2.22%) PILLING STREET 45 0 0 45 70 0 1 (1.43%) 0 69 (-1.43%) SHERIFF STREET 11 0 0 11 40 1 (2.50%) 0 0 41 (2.50%) SPOTLAND ROAD 66 0 0 66 123 0 3 (2.44%) 0 120 (-2.44%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 119 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
FG - ROCHDALE COLLEGE, ST MARYS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GATE THORNTREE PLACE 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 WHITELEY'S PLACE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 WILTON TERRACE 6 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 12 6otl 7or 8 !U 9 F44 ) ) F44 01203 5 B)C@)DE 0F B0C)@DE ) 012)H B9)C@2DE SP6IQ Q !ISQUE H1200 ) ) H1200 5102A @5 B)CF0DE 0)0 B0CAHDE A 51004 B9)C@3DE Page 342
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 120 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
TA - ABERLEY FOLD 35 0 0 35 71 0 0 0 71 ALFRED STREET 18 0 0 18 24 0 0 0 24 BAMFORD STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 CALF HEY 3 0 18(600.00%) -15 6 0 2 (33.33%) 0 4 (-33.33%) CLEGG STREET 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 COTE LANE 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 EDMUNDS FOLD 33 0 0 33 68 0 4 (5.88%) 0 64 (-5.88%) FELLSIDE GARDENS 21 0 0 21 43 1 (2.33%) 0 0 44 (2.33%) FREDERICK STREET 24 0 0 24 45 0 3 (6.67%) 0 42 (-6.67%) GASKELL CLOSE 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 HIGHER SHORE ROAD 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 HIGHER SHORE 2 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 7 Page 343 HODDER AVENUE 28 0 0 28 55 0 0 0 55 KINDERS FOLD 16 0 0 16 30 0 0 0 30 LAKE VIEW 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 MIDDLEWOOD LANE,SHORE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 PETTS CRESCENT 41 0 0 41 83 0 0 0 83 RIBBLE AVENUE 29 0 0 29 53 0 1 (1.89%) 0 52 (-1.89%) SALTS DRIVE 14 0 0 14 30 0 0 0 30 SHORE FOLD 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 SHORE LEA 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 SHORE MOUNT 77 0 0 77 144 0 0 0 144 SHORE ROAD 46 0 0 46 85 0 0 0 85 SHORE 10 0 0 10 23 0 0 0 23 ST BARNABAS DRIVE 12 0 0 12 22 0 0 0 22 TURF TERRACE 22 0 0 22 32 1 (3.13%) 0 0 33 (3.13%) WARDLE STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 CALDER GARDENS, WHITELEES 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 ROAD WHITELEES ROAD 51 0 0 51 90 1 (1.11%) 0 0 91 (1.11%) 6otl 7or 8 6 9 @A2 ) 05 B3CHADE @)5 452 3 B)C3)DE 0) B0C)0DE ) 4F4 B9)CF0DE
TB - ALBION STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 121 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
TB - BAMFORD STREET 12 0 0 12 11 0 0 0 11 BROOKWAY 37 0 0 37 69 0 2 (2.90%) 0 67 (-2.90%) BUTTERWORTH STREET 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 CUTLAND WAY 27 0 0 27 63 5 (7.94%) 1 (1.59%) 0 67 (6.35%) DEARNLEY CLOSE 5 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 11 ELIZABETH STREET 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 ESTHER STREET 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 FEATHERSTALL BROOK VIEW 11 0 0 11 20 0 0 0 20 FEATHERSTALL ROAD 81 0 0 81 135 0 2 (1.48%) 0 133 (-1.48%) FOUR STALLS END 12 0 0 12 25 0 3 (12.00%) 0 22 (-12.00%) Page 344 FRANKLYN TERRACE 3 0 18(600.00%) -15 4 0 2 (50.00%) 0 2 (-50.00%) HALLIDAY COURT 21 0 0 21 22 0 0 0 22 HARTLEY TERRACE 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 HIGH STREET 25 0 0 25 38 0 0 0 38 HOLLINGWORTH COURT 15 0 0 15 17 1 (5.88%) 0 0 18 (5.88%) HOLTS PASSAGE 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 INDUSTRY STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 KERSHAWS PASSAGE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 LIGHTBURN AVENUE 41 0 0 41 80 0 0 0 80 MILL FOLD GARDENS 40 0 0 40 69 2 (2.90%) 2 (2.90%) 0 69 MINERVA TERRACE 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 ASHLEY DEARNLEY COURT, NEW 10 0 0 10 13 0 0 0 13 ROAD NEW ROAD 38 0 0 38 64 0 3 (4.69%) 0 61 (-4.69%) NEW STREET 20 0 0 20 34 0 0 0 34 OAKLEY STREET 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PADDOCK HEAD,DEARNLEY 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 RIVERSTONE BRIDGE 59 0 0 59 132 0 0 0 132 SAW MILL WAY 25 0 0 25 50 0 0 0 50 CALLIARDS MILL HOUSE, SMITHY 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 BRIDGE ROAD SMITHY BRIDGE ROAD 12 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 19 SPEN FOLD 14 0 0 14 28 1 (3.57%) 0 0 29 (3.57%) SPENWOOD ROAD 24 0 0 24 51 0 0 0 51
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 122 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
TB - STOPFORD AVENUE 34 0 0 34 62 0 0 0 62 STUBLEY GARDENS 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 STUBLEY LANE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 STUBLEY MILL ROAD 37 0 0 37 74 0 0 0 74 THE ELMS 10 0 0 10 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) THOMAS STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 VULCAN TERRACE 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 WHITEGATE 60 0 0 60 116 2 (1.72%) 1 (0.86%) 0 117 (0.86%) WILDS PASSAGE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 WILLIAM STREET 16 0 0 16 26 0 0 0 26 6otl 7or 8 6G 9 FH0 ) 05 BACH3DE FA3 013H@ 00 B)C5ADE 0F B0CA2DE ) 01334 B9)CH@DE
Page 345 TC - ALDERBANK 35 0 0 35 67 0 1 (1.49%) 0 66 (-1.49%) ALPINE DRIVE 73 0 0 73 153 0 1 (0.65%) 0 152 (-0.65%) ASHBOURNE CLOSE 14 0 0 14 31 1 (3.23%) 0 0 32 (3.23%) BANK BARN LANE 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 BANK LANE 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 BENT HEAD FARM 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 BIRCH HILL LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 BIRCH ROAD 36 0 0 36 60 0 0 0 60 BROOK STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 BROOKLANDS 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 CHAPEL STREET 10 0 0 10 16 0 1 (6.25%) 0 15 (-6.25%) CHURCH TERRACE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 CLOUGH STREET 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 CORNBROOK CLOSE 26 0 0 26 53 1 (1.89%) 0 0 54 (1.89%) CROSSFIELD CLOSE 34 0 0 34 65 1 (1.54%) 0 0 66 (1.54%) CROSSFIELD ROAD 15 0 0 15 29 0 0 0 29 DOVEDALE DRIVE 39 0 0 39 91 0 0 0 91 EAST STREET 7 0 0 7 16 0 2 (12.50%) 0 14 (-12.50%) ELM GROVE 50 0 0 50 80 0 1 (1.25%) 0 79 (-1.25%) FERN STREET 8 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 13 HARTLEY STREET 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 HAYMAKER RISE 20 0 0 20 33 0 0 0 33
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 123 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
TC - HEATH ROAD 16 0 0 16 43 0 0 0 43 HENRY STREET 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 HIBSON CLOSE 20 0 0 20 49 0 1 (2.04%) 0 48 (-2.04%) HOLLY STREET 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 HOWARTH KNOWL 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 JAMES STREET 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 KINGS GROVE 35 0 0 35 62 0 0 0 62 KNOWL SYKE STREET 28 0 0 28 60 0 0 0 60 LAWFLAT 5 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 9 LEAWAY 9 0 0 9 20 0 1 (5.00%) 0 19 (-5.00%) Page 346 SHAW LODGE, LODGE STREET 24 0 18(75.00%) 6 29 2 (6.90%) 4 (13.79%) 0 27 (-6.90%) LOWER HOUSE LANE 4 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 10 LOWERHOUSE LANE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 NEWHOUSE CLOSE 34 0 0 34 78 0 1 (1.28%) 0 77 (-1.28%) NEWHOUSE STREET 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 OLD SCHOOL PLACE 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 PENNINE DRIVE 15 0 0 15 27 0 0 0 27 PRINCESS AVENUE 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 QUEENS AVENUE 18 0 0 18 37 0 0 0 37 RAMSDEN ROAD 157 0 9(5.73%) 148 260 1 (0.38%) 4 (1.54%) 0 257 (-1.15%) ST JAMES COTTAGES, RAMSDEN 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 ROAD REGAL FOLD 11 0 0 11 24 0 2 (8.33%) 0 22 (-8.33%) SHAFTESBURY DRIVE 75 0 0 75 147 2 (1.36%) 2 (1.36%) 0 147 SPINNERS GARDENS 18 0 0 18 29 2 (6.90%) 2 (6.90%) 0 29 ST JAMES' WAY 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 VINEYARD CLOSE 13 0 0 13 23 0 0 0 23 WARDLE FOLD 11 0 0 11 20 0 0 0 20 WARDLE ROAD 70 0 0 70 132 0 2 (1.52%) 0 130 (-1.52%) WASP MILL DRIVE 58 0 18(31.03%) 40 105 0 4 (3.81%) 0 101 (-3.81%) WATERHOUSE CLOSE 39 0 0 39 73 0 1 (1.37%) 0 72 (-1.37%) WESTMORLAND DRIVE 17 0 0 17 33 0 0 0 33 WILLIE EDWARDS FOLD 20 0 0 20 25 0 0 0 25 WOODEND LANE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 124 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'% 6otl 7or 8 6( 9 010H) ) H@ B3C4@DE 01)4@ A10A0 0) B)CHFDE 3) B0CH0DE ) A10)0 B9)C4HDE
TD - BEADLE AVENUE 17 0 0 17 38 0 0 0 38 BELVOIR MEADOWS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BIRCH AVENUE 44 0 9(20.45%) 35 75 0 3 (4.00%) 0 72 (-4.00%) BIRCH HILL CRESCENT 31 0 0 31 50 4 (8.00%) 1 (2.00%) 0 53 (6.00%) LONG STAY PATIENTS, BIRCH HILL 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 HOSPITAL BIRCH MOUNT 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 BIRCH ROAD 53 0 0 53 106 0 2 (1.89%) 0 104 (-1.89%) BIRCH VIEW 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BROOKLYN AVENUE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 BROWSIDE CLOSE 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 Page 347 CALLIARDS ROAD 25 0 0 25 57 0 0 0 57 CARRINGTON CLOSE 11 0 0 11 29 0 0 0 29 CHURCH STREET, SMALLBRIDGE 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 10 DOB WHEEL COTTAGES, DYEHOUSE 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 LANE DYEHOUSE LANE 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 EDWARD STREET 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 FLEMING CLOSE 17 0 0 17 35 0 1 (2.86%) 0 34 (-2.86%) FRANCES STREET 16 0 0 16 21 0 0 0 21 GEORGE STREET 54 0 0 54 99 0 0 0 99 GLOUCESTER AVENUE 26 0 0 26 38 0 1 (2.63%) 0 37 (-2.63%) GREENCROFT WAY 9 0 0 9 21 0 0 0 21 GREENFIELD HOUSE, GREENFIELD 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 6 LANE GREENFIELD LANE 10 0 0 10 20 0 0 0 20 GREENFIELD VIEW 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 GREENGROVE BANK 14 0 0 14 28 0 0 0 28 GUARDIAN CLOSE 21 0 0 21 54 0 0 0 54 HALIFAX ROAD 110 0 0 110 176 0 0 0 176 BELVOIR NURSING HOME, HALIFAX 1 0 0 1 12 1 (8.33%) 1 (8.33%) 0 12 ROAD HOLLAND STREET 14 0 0 14 25 0 1 (4.00%) 0 24 (-4.00%) JOHN STREET 12 0 0 12 16 0 0 0 16
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 125 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
TD - LAYCOCK STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 MANOR MILL CLOSE 12 0 0 12 26 0 0 0 26 MARY STREET 15 0 0 15 23 0 0 0 23 MOUNT AVENUE 13 0 0 13 23 0 0 0 23 OLD BROW LANE 12 0 0 12 30 0 0 0 30 OLD ROAD 24 0 0 24 54 0 2 (3.70%) 0 52 (-3.70%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 SMITHY BRIDGE ROAD 4 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 8 SOUTH VIEW ROAD 17 0 0 17 37 0 0 0 37 SOUTH VIEW TERRACE 19 0 0 19 35 0 1 (2.86%) 0 34 (-2.86%) Page 348 SPRINGFIELD LANE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 STAFFORD COURT 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 STOTT STREET, HURSTEAD 10 0 0 10 16 0 0 0 16 STOTT STREET 9 0 0 9 21 0 0 0 21 TARNSIDE CLOSE 40 0 0 40 80 0 0 0 80 TURNFIELD CLOSE 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 0 17 UNION ROAD 10 0 0 10 20 0 0 0 20 VICARAGE DRIVE 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 WHEELWRIGHT DRIVE 18 0 0 18 47 0 1 (2.13%) 0 46 (-2.13%) WILLIAM STREET 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 WUERDLE CLOSE 9 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 20 WUERDLE FARM WAY 9 0 0 9 22 0 0 0 22 WUERDLE PLACE 12 0 0 12 29 0 0 0 29 WUERDLE STREET 4 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 5 6otl 7or 8 6 9 5)4 ) 4 B0C00DE 5)) 01@@3 @ B)C3ADE 0H B)C4)DE ) 01@HH B9)C@5DE
TE - ALMOND CLOSE 11 0 0 11 23 0 0 0 23 ARM ROAD 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 ASH GROVE 16 0 0 16 34 0 0 0 34 ASHWOOD DRIVE 9 0 0 9 19 0 0 0 19 BACK JAMES STREET 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 BEAUMONT CLOSE 14 0 0 14 28 0 0 0 28 BENTS FARM CLOSE 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 BERKLEY WALK 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 126 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
TE - BIRCH HILL WALK 14 0 0 14 23 0 0 0 23 BRAMBLE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 BROOKFIELD DRIVE 35 0 0 35 82 0 0 0 82 CECIL STREET 17 0 0 17 32 0 0 0 32 CELANDINE CLOSE 6 0 0 6 13 0 1 (7.69%) 0 12 (-7.69%) CHESTNUT WAY 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 7 CLEGGS YARD 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 COPSE WALK 4 0 0 4 11 0 0 0 11 CROWTHER COURT DEARNLEY 15 0 0 15 17 0 0 0 17 DUKE STREET 12 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 21 ELMORE WOOD 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 FARM WALK 14 0 0 14 27 0 1 (3.70%) 0 26 (-3.70%) Page 349 FEATHERSTALL ROAD 64 0 0 64 107 0 0 0 107 FEATHERSTALL SQUARE 3 0 0 3 9 0 2 (22.22%) 0 7 (-22.22%) FINANCE STREET 9 0 0 9 12 0 1 (8.33%) 0 11 (-8.33%) HANOVER STREET 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 HAWTHORN WALK 14 0 0 14 28 0 2 (7.14%) 0 26 (-7.14%) HENDERSON STREET 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HIGHER STARRING LANE 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 17, JAMES STREET 17 0 0 17 12 0 0 0 12 19, JAMES STREET 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 JAMES STREET 42 0 0 42 65 0 0 0 65 LABURNUM WAY 58 0 0 58 95 0 0 0 95 LAW TERRACE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 LIME GROVE 20 0 0 20 42 0 0 0 42 MEADOW WALK 12 0 0 12 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) NEW ROAD 56 0 0 56 70 0 0 0 70 OAK HILL 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 OLIVER CLOSE 15 0 0 15 24 0 0 0 24 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 ROSEMARY DRIVE 4 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 9 SCHOOL STREET 4 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 6 SORREL DRIVE 15 0 0 15 33 0 0 0 33 SPRING THYME FOLD 46 0 0 46 94 0 0 0 94
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 127 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
TE - ST ANDREW'S CLOSE 24 0 0 24 52 0 0 0 52 STARRING GROVE 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 6 STARRING LANE 8 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 13 STARRING ROAD 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 STARRING WAY 103 0 0 103 184 1 (0.54%) 1 (0.54%) 0 184 SYCAMORE CLOSE 20 0 0 20 34 0 0 0 34 THOMASON SQUARE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 TREFOIL WAY 11 0 0 11 28 0 2 (7.14%) 0 26 (-7.14%) UNION ROAD 11 0 0 11 16 0 0 0 16 WHITELEES ROAD 27 0 0 27 42 0 0 0 42 Page 350 WHITTLE STREET 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 WOODS PASSAGE 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 6otl 7or 8 6E 9 53A ) ) 53A 01H25 0 B)C)FDE 00 B)CF@DE ) 01H@5 B9)C25DE W$IE Q WES6 IS66IEGP$PXU H1)H5 ) 4)BACAADE 314@5 F1HF3 3) B)CH)DE 5A B0C0)DE ) F1HA0 B9)CF)DE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 128 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
KA - BURY NEW ROAD 27 0 0 27 51 2 (3.92%) 1 (1.96%) 0 52 (1.96%) BURY OLD ROAD 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 GIGG 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 WATER FARM, GIGG 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 GORE CLOSE 7 0 0 7 18 0 0 0 18 HEAP BRIDGE 17 0 0 17 27 1 (3.70%) 0 0 28 (3.70%) HEAP BROW 17 0 0 17 39 0 0 0 39 LORD STREET 29 0 0 29 52 0 0 0 52 MOSS HALL ROAD 9 0 0 9 12 0 0 0 12 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PRETTYWOOD 33 0 0 33 57 0 0 0 57 ROCH VIEW 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 Page 351 WATERFOLD BUSINESS PARK 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 WATERFOLD LANE 46 0 0 46 71 0 1 (1.41%) 0 70 (-1.41%) 6otl 7or 8 R 9 044 ) ) 044 33H 3 B)C4)DE A B)C2)DE ) 33@ B)C3)DE
KB - ASHFORD STREET 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 AVON ROAD 46 0 0 46 91 0 0 0 91 BENMORE CLOSE 15 0 0 15 32 0 0 0 32 BOTANY CLOSE 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 BURY NEW ROAD 122 0 0 122 208 0 3 (1.44%) 0 205 (-1.44%) SEDGLEY VILLAS, BURY NEW ROAD 6 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 4 HEADY HILL COURT, BURY OLD 16 0 0 16 20 0 0 0 20 ROAD BURY OLD ROAD 135 0 0 135 258 0 3 (1.16%) 0 255 (-1.16%) BURY STREET 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 CHATBURN GARDENS 12 0 0 12 23 0 0 0 23 CHELMER GROVE 33 0 0 33 67 0 0 0 67 CHERWELL AVENUE 72 0 0 72 132 0 4 (3.03%) 0 128 (-3.03%) CONWAY CLOSE 35 0 0 35 70 3 (4.29%) 0 0 73 (4.29%) CUMBERLAND AVENUE 20 0 0 20 51 0 0 0 51 DEVONSHIRE CLOSE 17 0 0 17 33 0 0 0 33 DILWORTH CLOSE 10 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 DORSET CLOSE 20 0 0 20 39 0 0 0 39
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 129 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
KB - DOWNHAM ROAD 36 0 0 36 41 0 2 (4.88%) 0 39 (-4.88%) DURHAM WALK 26 0 0 26 39 0 0 0 39 EDEN CLOSE 21 0 0 21 38 0 0 0 38 EDGWORTH CLOSE 40 0 0 40 68 0 0 0 68 FRANK FOLD 41 0 0 41 88 0 0 0 88 GASKILL STREET 45 0 0 45 63 0 1 (1.59%) 0 62 (-1.59%) HARTFORD AVENUE 35 0 0 35 68 0 1 (1.47%) 0 67 (-1.47%) HARTFORD CLOSE 18 0 0 18 45 0 0 0 45 HEADY HILL ROAD 15 0 0 15 25 0 0 0 25 HEYS LANE 19 0 0 19 34 0 1 (2.94%) 0 33 (-2.94%) Page 352 HIGHER LOMAX LANE 159 0 0 159 315 0 3 (0.95%) 0 312 (-0.95%) HIGHFIELD AVENUE 12 0 0 12 27 0 0 0 27 HILLCREST AVENUE 24 0 0 24 45 0 0 0 45 HILLCREST CRESCENT 6 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 8 JEFFREY WALK 18 0 0 18 20 0 1 (5.00%) 0 19 (-5.00%) KENT WALK 36 0 0 36 68 2 (2.94%) 0 0 70 (2.94%) KNOWL HILL VIEW 8 0 0 8 14 0 0 0 14 LINCOLN WALK 46 0 0 46 84 1 (1.19%) 3 (3.57%) 0 82 (-2.38%) LIVSEY LANE 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 LONGRIDGE DRIVE 43 0 0 43 78 0 2 (2.56%) 0 76 (-2.56%) LOSTOCK CLOSE 12 0 0 12 24 0 0 0 24 LOWER LOMAX FARM 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 LUNE GROVE 13 0 0 13 28 0 0 0 28 LYN GROVE 12 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 21 HIGHER LOMAX LANE, MILLFIELD 91 0 0 91 66 0 3 (4.55%) 0 63 (-4.55%) MITTON CLOSE 14 0 0 14 24 0 0 0 24 MOOR STREET 16 0 0 16 25 0 0 0 25 NORFOLK AVENUE 27 0 0 27 48 1 (2.08%) 1 (2.08%) 0 48 NORFOLK GARDENS 4 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 OGDEN CLOSE 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 0 19 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 1 (50.00%) 0 0 3 (50.00%) PARTINGTON STREET 22 0 0 22 41 0 1 (2.44%) 0 40 (-2.44%) REGENT STREET 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 RIBBLE GROVE 13 0 0 13 22 0 0 0 22
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 130 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
KB - ROCH AVENUE 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 18 SABDEN CLOSE 16 0 0 16 32 0 0 0 32 SEVERN ROAD 72 0 0 72 149 0 0 0 149 SHANNON CLOSE 9 0 0 9 26 0 0 0 26 SHERBOURNE DRIVE 48 0 0 48 109 0 3 (2.75%) 0 106 (-2.75%) SPRINGFIELD STREET 12 0 0 12 23 0 0 0 23 SUMMIT STREET 32 0 0 32 57 0 0 0 57 TAMAR WAY 20 0 0 20 47 0 1 (2.13%) 0 46 (-2.13%) THE MEDWAY 44 0 0 44 93 0 2 (2.15%) 0 91 (-2.15%) BRACKEN HALL COURT, TODD 47 0 0 47 43 0 1 (2.33%) 0 42 (-2.33%) STREET TOP OF HEAP 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 Page 353 TRENT AVENUE 12 0 0 12 24 0 0 0 24 TURTON CLOSE 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 WELLAND AVENUE 38 0 0 38 88 0 1 (1.14%) 0 87 (-1.14%) WHALLEY ROAD 94 0 0 94 119 0 2 (1.68%) 0 117 (-1.68%) WHAM BAR DRIVE 43 0 0 43 85 0 0 0 85 WILSON AVENUE 58 0 0 58 121 0 0 0 121 WITHAM CLOSE 11 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 15 6otl 7or 8 RG 9 A1)H4 ) ) A1)H4 312@5 5 B)CAADE 34 B0C)FDE ) 312AF B9)C5@DE
KC - ANGUS AVENUE 6 0 0 6 9 0 1 (11.11%) 0 8 (-11.11%) ARGYLE STREET 98 2(2.04%) 0 100 156 5 (3.21%) 1 (0.64%) 0 160 (2.56%) ARRAN WALK 18 0 0 18 31 0 0 0 31 ATHOLL DRIVE 146 0 0 146 235 1 (0.43%) 0 0 236 (0.43%) AYR GROVE 17 0 0 17 26 0 0 0 26 BALLATER CLOSE 23 0 0 23 37 0 0 0 37 BALMORAL DRIVE 51 0 0 51 78 0 1 (1.28%) 0 77 (-1.28%) BANFF GROVE 12 0 0 12 25 0 0 0 25 BERWICK CLOSE 32 0 0 32 62 0 1 (1.61%) 0 61 (-1.61%) BIRNAM GROVE 24 0 0 24 28 0 0 0 28 BRAEMAR GROVE 17 0 0 17 25 0 1 (4.00%) 0 24 (-4.00%) BRECHIN WAY 17 0 0 17 28 0 0 0 28 CRAWFORD SQUARE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 131 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
KC - CRINAN SQUARE 9 0 0 9 11 0 0 0 11 CROMARTY SQUARE 8 0 0 8 15 2 (13.33%) 0 0 17 (13.33%) DALKEITH SQUARE 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 11 DOUGLAS SQUARE 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 DUMBARTON DRIVE 44 0 0 44 69 0 1 (1.45%) 0 68 (-1.45%) DUMFRIES WALK 16 0 0 16 30 0 0 0 30 DUNBAR GROVE 33 0 0 33 57 0 1 (1.75%) 0 56 (-1.75%) DUNBLANE GROVE 22 0 0 22 31 0 1 (3.23%) 0 30 (-3.23%) DUNDEE CLOSE 14 0 0 14 22 0 1 (4.55%) 0 21 (-4.55%) DUNOON CLOSE 13 0 0 13 18 0 0 0 18 Page 354 DUNROBIN CLOSE 20 0 0 20 39 0 0 0 39 FUSTIAN AVENUE 0 34 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 GALLOWAY CLOSE 18 0 0 18 41 0 0 0 41 GIRVAN WALK 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 GLENCOE CLOSE 31 0 0 31 53 0 0 0 53 GREENOCK DRIVE 35 0 0 35 63 0 1 (1.59%) 0 62 (-1.59%) HEADY HILL CLOSE 5 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 11 HEYS LANE 7 0 0 7 11 0 0 0 11 LANGHOLME WAY 18 0 0 18 32 0 0 0 32 LEWIS DRIVE 14 0 0 14 20 0 0 0 20 LOCHAWE CLOSE 37 0 0 37 53 0 0 0 53 LOCHINVER GROVE 27 0 0 27 44 0 1 (2.27%) 0 43 (-2.27%) LORNE WAY 18 0 0 18 32 0 0 0 32 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PORTREE COURT 12 0 0 12 22 0 0 0 22 SELKIRK PLACE 9 0 0 9 12 0 0 0 12 SHUTTLE DRIVE 0 63 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 SKYE CLOSE 12 0 0 12 20 0 0 0 20 STIRLING PLACE 9 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 15 STRATHAVEN PLACE 9 0 0 9 18 0 1 (5.56%) 0 17 (-5.56%) STROMNESS GROVE 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 SUTHERLAND ROAD 56 0 0 56 80 0 2 (2.50%) 0 78 (-2.50%) TRIPPEAR WAY 0 57 0 57 0 4 0 0 4 WEAVER CLOSE 0 57 0 57 0 2 0 2 2
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 132 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'% 6otl 7or 8 R( 9 44A A03BA0CHFDE ) 01A)@ 01200 0H B)C5FDE 0H B)C5FDE A 01200 B)C))DE
KD - ARGYLE STREET 32 0 0 32 55 0 1 (1.82%) 0 54 (-1.82%) BIRCHFIELD AVENUE 32 0 0 32 59 0 0 0 59 BURY OLD ROAD 59 0 0 59 105 0 2 (1.90%) 0 103 (-1.90%) CALLANDER SQUARE 12 0 0 12 26 0 0 0 26 CRAIL PLACE 10 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 18 ESSEX AVENUE 26 0 0 26 44 0 0 0 44 GORDON WAY 41 0 0 41 72 0 0 0 72 GRASSINGTON DRIVE 32 0 0 32 55 0 0 0 55 HAMILTON WAY 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 4 HARRIS CLOSE 33 0 0 33 53 0 1 (1.89%) 0 52 (-1.89%) HAWICK GROVE 13 0 0 13 21 0 0 0 21 Page 355 HEAP STREET 16 0 0 16 23 0 0 0 23 HUNTLEY WAY 17 0 0 17 27 0 0 0 27 HUNTLY WAY 8 0 0 8 7 0 1 (14.29%) 0 6 (-14.29%) LANARK CLOSE 25 0 0 25 48 0 0 0 48 LAVERTON CLOSE 13 0 0 13 20 0 1 (5.00%) 0 19 (-5.00%) LENNOX WALK 14 0 0 14 18 0 0 0 18 LEWIS DRIVE 127 0 9(7.09%) 118 203 0 4 (1.97%) 0 199 (-1.97%) MOSS HALL ROAD 11 0 0 11 22 0 0 0 22 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PARTH STREET 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 STANBURY CLOSE 8 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 16 SUSSEX AVENUE 18 0 0 18 31 0 0 0 31 SUTHERLAND ROAD 34 0 0 34 52 0 2 (3.85%) 0 50 (-3.85%) 6otl 7or 8 R 9 @54 ) 4 B0C@3DE @5) 452 ) 0A B0CAADE ) 4FH B90CAADE
KE - AGINCOURT STREET 82 0 0 82 127 0 2 (1.57%) 0 125 (-1.57%) ALBERT STREET 36 0 0 36 54 0 1 (1.85%) 0 53 (-1.85%) ARGYLE CRESCENT 16 0 0 16 24 0 0 0 24 ARGYLE STREET 34 0 0 34 67 0 3 (4.48%) 0 64 (-4.48%) BANK STREET 12 0 0 12 15 0 0 0 15 BARKER STREET 26 0 0 26 46 0 0 0 46 BRAYSHAW CLOSE 31 0 0 31 69 0 0 0 69
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 133 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
KE - BRIDGE STREET 3 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 BROADFIELD STREET 18 0 0 18 28 0 0 0 28 BURY STREET 50 0 0 50 73 0 2 (2.74%) 0 71 (-2.74%) CLEMSHAW CLOSE 22 0 0 22 47 0 0 0 47 CROWN ROAD 24 0 0 24 32 3 (9.38%) 2 (6.25%) 0 33 (3.13%) MARLOR COURT, DERBY STREET 54 0 0 54 76 0 0 0 76 DERBY STREET 23 0 0 23 43 0 0 0 43 DUKE STREET 32 0 0 32 58 1 (1.72%) 0 0 59 (1.72%) EGERTON STREET 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 GLAZEBROOK CLOSE 19 0 0 19 40 0 0 0 40 Page 356 HIGH STREET 58 0 0 58 68 0 1 (1.47%) 0 67 (-1.47%) JURA GROVE 15 0 0 15 25 0 0 0 25 KERSHAW STREET 7 0 0 7 14 0 0 0 14 BRIDGEWOOD LODGE, MARGARET 30 0 0 30 29 0 0 0 29 STREET MARGARET STREET 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 MASON STREET 3 0 0 3 3 1 (33.33%) 0 0 4 (33.33%) MELLOR BROW 8 0 0 8 16 1 (6.25%) 0 0 17 (6.25%) MELTON CLOSE 20 0 0 20 38 2 (5.26%) 0 0 40 (5.26%) MELTON STREET 40 0 0 40 67 0 0 0 67 MILLS STREET 12 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 21 MOOR STREET 28 0 0 28 44 1 (2.27%) 2 (4.55%) 0 43 (-2.27%) NEW YORK STREET 20 0 0 20 33 0 0 0 33 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PASTURE CLOSE 19 0 0 19 32 0 0 0 32 PEEL STREET 3 0 0 3 5 0 1 (20.00%) 0 4 (-20.00%) PILSWORTH ROAD 90 0 0 90 148 0 0 0 148 REGENT CLOSE 6 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 9 REGENT STREET 35 0 0 35 66 0 0 0 66 RIVERSHILL DRIVE 20 0 0 20 36 0 0 0 36 ROSE HILL STREET 44 0 0 44 72 0 0 0 72 SHORT STREET 11 0 0 11 15 0 1 (6.67%) 0 14 (-6.67%) SOUTH AVENUE 39 0 0 39 51 0 1 (1.96%) 0 50 (-1.96%) SOUTH STREET 8 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 13 TOWER STREET 29 0 0 29 46 0 1 (2.17%) 0 45 (-2.17%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 134 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
KE - UNITY CLOSE 12 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 21 UNITY CRESCENT 56 0 0 56 93 0 0 0 93 UNITY STREET 34 0 0 34 61 0 0 0 61 VICTORY WAY 30 0 0 30 38 0 0 0 38 WEAVER CLOSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WHAM STREET 13 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 19 WILTON STREET 26 0 0 26 36 0 0 0 36 WINDSOR AVENUE 32 0 0 32 52 0 0 0 52 YEW STREET 18 0 0 18 38 0 0 0 38 6otl 7or 8 RE 9 01AF@ ) ) 01AF@ A1)@) 4 B)CHHDE 0F B)C53DE ) A1)HA B9)C34DE WES6 EVWPP @10)H A03BHC0FDE 4B)C05DE @13)5 51234 3H B)C34DE 5H B)C4FDE A 51@54 B9)C@5DE Page 357
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 135 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
PA - ELLIS LANE 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 HEYWOOD OLD ROAD,BOWLEE 68 0 0 68 114 1 (0.88%) 0 0 115 (0.88%) OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 RHODES GREEN 11 0 0 11 19 0 0 0 19 SIMON LANE 5 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 8 6otl 7or 8 9 4) ) ) 4) 0HF 0 B)C25DE ) ) 0H5 B)C25DE
PB - ABBOTSFORD DRIVE 26 0 0 26 47 1 (2.13%) 0 0 48 (2.13%) BARRATT GARDENS 36 0 0 36 63 0 1 (1.59%) 0 62 (-1.59%)
Page 358 BIRCH 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 BISHOP MARSHALL WAY 17 0 0 17 30 0 0 0 30 BISHOP'S MEADOW 12 0 0 12 25 0 0 0 25 CASSIDY GARDENS 8 0 0 8 15 0 0 0 15 CREATON WAY 9 0 0 9 18 0 1 (5.56%) 0 17 (-5.56%) LODGE VIEW, HEYWOOD OLD ROAD 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 7 HEYWOOD OLD ROAD,BIRCH 39 0 0 39 73 1 (1.37%) 0 0 74 (1.37%) HEYWOOD OLD ROAD,BOWLEE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 HOLLIN LANE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 KNIGHT CRESCENT 36 0 0 36 63 0 0 0 63 LANGLEY LANE 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 TOP'O'TH'HILL FARM, MANCHESTER 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 ROAD,BIRCH OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 RIMINGTON FOLD 14 0 0 14 33 0 0 0 33 RUSCOMBE FOLD 11 0 0 11 27 0 0 0 27 SILVERTON GROVE 23 0 0 23 50 0 1 (2.00%) 0 49 (-2.00%) TUDOR GROVE 64 0 0 64 103 0 1 (0.97%) 0 102 (-0.97%) WHITTLE LANE 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 0 11 WRIGLEY FOLD 19 0 0 19 38 0 0 0 38 6otl 7or 8 G 9 332 ) ) 332 2A0 A B)C3ADE H B)C2HDE ) 204 B9)C3ADE
PC - ALSTON WALK 11 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 15 ASHNESS DRIVE 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 BASSENTHWAITE CLOSE 10 0 0 10 24 0 1 (4.17%) 0 23 (-4.17%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 136 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
PC - BOWNESS COURT 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BOWNESS ROAD 12 0 18(150.00%) -6 25 0 3 (12.00%) 0 22 (-12.00%) BRAITHWAITE ROAD 48 0 0 48 78 0 0 0 78 BRISCO WALK 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 BROUGHTON CLOSE 19 0 0 19 26 0 0 0 26 CALGARTH DRIVE 17 0 0 17 32 0 0 0 32 CARDINAL MEWS 31 0 0 31 35 0 0 0 35 CASTLERIGG DRIVE 59 0 0 59 49 1 (2.04%) 0 0 50 (2.04%) CAULDALE CLOSE 12 0 0 12 22 0 0 0 22 CAUSEY DRIVE 8 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 9 CLIFTON WALK 12 0 0 12 12 2 (16.67%) 0 0 14 (16.67%) DERWENT ROAD 48 0 0 48 75 0 0 0 75 Page 359 ELTERWATER CLOSE 18 0 0 18 36 0 0 0 36 GALE DRIVE 5 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 7 GRISEDALE CLOSE 14 0 0 14 30 0 0 0 30 HELVELLYN DRIVE 20 0 0 20 37 0 0 0 37 IREBY CLOSE 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 ISEL WALK 10 0 0 10 14 0 0 0 14 KENTMERE DRIVE 19 0 0 19 28 0 0 0 28 2 MILLBECK GARDENS, KESWICK 24 0 0 24 28 0 1 (3.57%) 0 27 (-3.57%) CLOSE 4 MILLBECK GARDENS, KESWICK 24 0 0 24 27 0 0 0 27 CLOSE KESWICK COURT 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 LANGLEY LANE 38 0 0 38 57 0 0 0 57 LATRIGG CRESCENT 82 0 0 82 123 0 2 (1.63%) 0 121 (-1.63%) LINDALE DRIVE 10 0 0 10 14 0 0 0 14 LINGMELL CLOSE 12 0 0 12 13 0 0 0 13 LONGTHWAITE CLOSE 14 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 14 MARTINDALE CRESCENT 99 0 0 99 131 0 1 (0.76%) 0 130 (-0.76%) MILLBECK COURT 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 MILLBECK ROAD 28 0 0 28 49 0 0 0 49 MOSEDALE ROAD 16 0 0 16 20 0 0 0 20 NEWLANDS WALK 30 0 0 30 45 0 2 (4.44%) 0 43 (-4.44%) NEWTON CRESCENT 74 0 0 74 125 0 0 0 125
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 137 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
PC - OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 RAVENGLASS DRIVE 16 0 0 16 27 0 0 0 27 SKIDDAW CLOSE 19 0 0 19 34 2 (5.88%) 0 0 36 (5.88%) STAINTON DRIVE 6 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 13 STYHEAD DRIVE 26 0 0 26 43 0 0 0 43 SWINSIDE CLOSE 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 SYLVAN CLOSE,WOOD STREET 6 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 10 THURSBY WALK 10 0 0 10 16 0 0 0 16 WATCHGATE CLOSE 11 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 15 WINDERMERE ROAD 122 0 0 122 179 1 (0.56%) 0 0 180 (0.56%) Page 360 WOOD STREET 12 0 0 12 22 0 0 2 22 WYTHBURN ROAD 16 0 0 16 26 0 0 0 26 6otl 7or 8 ( 9 01)4) ) 05 B0C2@DE 01)FA 012)4 2 B)C3FDE 0) B)C2ADE A 012)@ B9)CA@DE
PD - AMBLESIDE CLOSE 10 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 BARLEYFIELD WALK 27 0 0 27 36 0 0 0 36 BOARDALE DRIVE 18 0 0 18 27 0 0 0 27 CARMINE FOLD 27 0 0 27 49 0 0 0 49 CINNABAR DRIVE 24 0 0 24 51 1 (1.96%) 0 0 52 (1.96%) CROSSBANK WAY 12 0 0 12 15 0 0 0 15 DURNFORD STREET 95 0 0 95 172 3 (1.74%) 3 (1.74%) 0 172 EMERSON DRIVE 13 0 0 13 24 0 0 0 24 EYCOTT DRIVE 23 0 0 23 44 0 0 0 44 FAIRFIELD ROAD 112 0 0 112 184 0 3 (1.63%) 0 181 (-1.63%) FENWICK DRIVE 16 0 0 16 27 0 0 0 27 GABLE DRIVE 34 0 0 34 42 0 2 (4.76%) 0 40 (-4.76%) GAVEL WALK 19 0 0 19 25 1 (4.00%) 1 (4.00%) 0 25 GILPIN WALK 13 0 0 13 24 0 0 0 24 GOWAN DRIVE 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 HAWKSHEAD DRIVE 74 0 0 74 139 0 1 (0.72%) 0 138 (-0.72%) HIGHER WOOD STREET 31 0 0 31 54 0 0 0 54 HILTON STREET 3 0 0 3 6 0 2 (33.33%) 0 4 (-33.33%) JOSEPH STREET 6 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 7 KENDAL WALK 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 138 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
PD - LONG STREET 4 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 LOWTHER CRESCENT 39 0 0 39 70 0 0 0 70 MARDALE DRIVE 14 0 0 14 24 0 0 0 24 MELLALIEU STREET 89 0 0 89 122 0 0 0 122 OLD RECTORY GARDENS, 2 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 7 MELLALIEU STREET MIRFIELD DRIVE 29 0 0 29 54 0 0 0 54 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 (50.00%) 0 1 (-50.00%) RECTORY STREET 50 0 0 50 94 0 0 0 94 REDSCAR WALK 17 0 0 17 32 0 0 0 32 ROSGILL DRIVE 11 0 0 11 19 0 0 0 19 SEPIA GROVE 16 0 0 16 27 0 0 0 27 Page 361 STAVELEY CLOSE 15 0 0 15 21 0 0 0 21 THROSTLE HALL COURT 28 0 0 28 51 0 0 0 51 TRAYNOR CLOSE 30 0 0 30 49 0 1 (2.04%) 0 48 (-2.04%) ULDALE DRIVE 14 0 0 14 26 0 0 0 26 WARREN CLOSE 7 0 0 7 6 0 0 0 6 WOOD STREET 86 0 0 86 118 1 (0.85%) 3 (2.54%) 0 116 (-1.69%) WREN GARDENS 26 0 0 26 38 0 0 0 38 YEWDALE DRIVE 19 0 0 19 27 0 0 0 27 6otl 7or 8 9 01)@4 ) ) 01)@4 01F3) 2 B)C3@DE 0F B)C45DE ) 01F04 B9)C2HDE
PE - ALLONBY WALK 8 0 0 8 11 0 1 (9.09%) 0 10 (-9.09%) ASBY CLOSE 16 0 0 16 28 0 0 0 28 BOWNESS ROAD 147 0 0 147 221 2 (0.90%) 3 (1.36%) 0 220 (-0.45%) BROOMFIELD CRESCENT 70 0 0 70 140 0 0 0 140 BROWNRIGG CLOSE 24 0 0 24 40 0 1 (2.50%) 0 39 (-2.50%) CARROCK WALK 13 0 0 13 17 0 0 0 17 COPELAND CLOSE 50 0 0 50 83 0 0 0 83 DACRE CLOSE 16 0 0 16 29 0 1 (3.45%) 0 28 (-3.45%) DEAN WALK 14 0 0 14 19 0 0 0 19 DUNDRAW CLOSE 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 5 FAIRBANK DRIVE 24 0 0 24 42 0 0 0 42 GATESGARTH ROAD 84 0 0 84 116 0 2 (1.72%) 1 114 (-1.72%)
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 139 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
PE - GOWAN DRIVE 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 HARTSOP DRIVE 43 0 0 43 65 0 0 0 65 LINGMOOR CLOSE 29 0 0 29 46 2 (4.35%) 0 0 48 (4.35%) LORTON CLOSE 41 0 0 41 48 0 0 0 48 MILLBECK ROAD 34 0 0 34 46 0 0 0 46 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 OXENDALE DRIVE 19 0 0 19 38 0 1 (2.63%) 0 37 (-2.63%) PARKSIDE, BOWNESS ROAD 13 0 0 13 12 0 5 (41.67%) 0 7 (-41.67%) POOLEY CLOSE 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 12 ROSTHWAITE CLOSE 26 0 0 26 51 0 0 0 51 Page 362 ROWRAH CRESCENT 148 0 0 148 228 1 (0.44%) 4 (1.75%) 0 225 (-1.32%) SEARNESS ROAD 94 0 0 94 127 0 2 (1.57%) 0 125 (-1.57%) SEATOLLER DRIVE 12 0 0 12 14 0 0 0 14 THRELKELD CLOSE 7 0 0 7 12 0 1 (8.33%) 0 11 (-8.33%) THRELKELD COURT 24 0 0 24 25 0 0 0 25 THRELKELD ROAD 30 0 0 30 50 0 0 0 50 TINSDALE WALK 13 0 0 13 18 0 0 0 18 TORVER DRIVE 10 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 17 ULLOCK WALK 11 0 0 11 11 0 0 0 11 WALTON CLOSE 10 0 0 10 24 0 0 0 24 WHINFELL DRIVE 42 0 0 42 63 0 0 0 63 WINDERMERE ROAD 57 0 0 57 96 0 1 (1.04%) 0 95 (-1.04%) WOOD STREET 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 6otl 7or 8 E 9 010HA ) ) 010HA 01F2) @ B)CA5DE AA B0CA@DE 0 01FH3 B9)C4FDE
PF - BAMPTON WALK 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 6 BONSCALE CRESCENT 132 0 0 132 224 0 1 (0.45%) 0 223 (-0.45%) BORROWDALE ROAD 100 0 0 100 155 1 (0.65%) 1 (0.65%) 0 155 BOULTERS CLOSE 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 BRATTRAY DRIVE 11 0 0 11 21 0 0 0 21 BURNSIDE CRESCENT 64 0 0 64 98 0 0 0 98 BUTTERMERE DRIVE 29 0 0 29 44 0 0 0 44 CALDBECK DRIVE 43 0 0 43 57 0 1 (1.75%) 0 56 (-1.75%) CARTMEL WALK 30 0 0 30 48 0 0 0 48
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 140 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
PF - CONISTON DRIVE 29 0 0 29 51 1 (1.96%) 2 (3.92%) 0 50 (-1.96%) CRUMMOCK DRIVE 18 0 0 18 30 0 0 0 30 D'OLIVEIRA COURT,WOOD STREET 46 0 0 46 50 1 (2.00%) 1 (2.00%) 0 50 DOVEDALE COURT 42 0 0 42 49 0 0 0 49 DUDDON WALK 18 0 0 18 34 1 (2.94%) 0 0 35 (2.94%) DUFTON WALK 16 0 0 16 27 0 0 0 27 DUNMAIL DRIVE 17 0 0 17 23 0 1 (4.35%) 0 22 (-4.35%) ENNERDALE ROAD 61 0 0 61 108 0 1 (0.93%) 0 107 (-0.93%) ESKDALE DRIVE 29 0 0 29 46 0 1 (2.17%) 0 45 (-2.17%) ESMONT DRIVE 10 0 0 10 21 0 0 0 21 GALE DRIVE 5 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 10 GRANGE WALK 15 0 0 15 20 0 0 0 20 Page 363 GRASMERE WALK 14 0 0 14 21 0 0 0 21 GREYSTOKE DRIVE 25 0 0 25 42 0 0 0 42 GRISDALE DRIVE 3 0 0 3 5 1 (20.00%) 0 0 6 (20.00%) HAWESWATER DRIVE 17 0 0 17 28 0 0 0 28 HAWESWATER MEWS 22 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 22 HESKETH WALK 13 0 0 13 16 2 (12.50%) 0 0 18 (12.50%) HIGHER WOOD STREET 19 0 0 19 38 0 0 0 38 HILLCREST 10 0 0 10 15 0 0 0 15 HOLLIN LANE 59 0 0 59 102 1 (0.98%) 2 (1.96%) 0 101 (-0.98%) HOLLINS DRIVE 11 0 0 11 18 0 0 0 18 HONISTER DRIVE 17 0 0 17 32 0 0 0 32 KIRKSTONE DRIVE 15 0 0 15 20 0 2 (10.00%) 0 18 (-10.00%) LANGDALE DRIVE 27 0 0 27 55 0 2 (3.64%) 0 53 (-3.64%) LANGLEY AVENUE 8 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 10 LANGLEY LANE 40 0 0 40 72 0 0 0 72 LEE STREET 9 0 0 9 13 0 0 0 13 MELLALIEU STREET 31 0 0 31 42 0 2 (4.76%) 0 40 (-4.76%) MOSEDALE ROAD 57 0 0 57 105 0 2 (1.90%) 0 103 (-1.90%) MOWBRAY WALK 10 0 0 10 15 0 0 0 15 NEWTON CRESCENT 28 0 0 28 46 0 0 0 46 OTHER ELECTORS 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 PATTERDALE DRIVE 14 0 0 14 25 0 0 0 25
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 141 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
PF - ROSEMOUNT 27 0 0 27 34 0 3 (8.82%) 0 31 (-8.82%) ROTHAY DRIVE 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 SEASCALE WALK 7 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 9 SEATHWAITE CLOSE 18 0 0 18 32 0 2 (6.25%) 0 30 (-6.25%) ST BEES WALK 4 0 0 4 5 0 1 (20.00%) 0 4 (-20.00%) TALKIN DRIVE 33 0 0 33 50 0 0 0 50 THIRLMERE DRIVE 46 0 0 46 86 0 0 0 86 THIRLMERE MEWS 9 0 0 9 14 0 0 0 14 ULLSWATER DRIVE 36 0 0 36 74 0 0 0 74 WASDALE DRIVE 9 0 0 9 16 0 0 0 16 Page 364 WINDERMERE MEWS 10 0 0 10 13 0 2 (15.38%) 0 11 (-15.38%) WINDERMERE ROAD 179 0 0 179 276 0 1 (0.36%) 0 275 (-0.36%) SAXONSIDE, WINDERMERE ROAD 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 WINSTER DRIVE 15 0 0 15 27 0 1 (3.70%) 0 26 (-3.70%) LANGFIELD NURSING HOME, WOOD 1 0 0 1 44 0 1 (2.27%) 0 43 (-2.27%) STREET WOOD STREET 13 0 0 13 23 0 0 0 23 WOODHILL CLOSE 17 0 0 17 32 0 0 0 32 WOODHILL 29 0 0 29 49 0 1 (2.04%) 0 48 (-2.04%) WYTHBURN ROAD 17 0 0 17 28 0 0 0 28 6otl 7or 8 ! 9 012H2 ) ) 012H2 A1253 5 B)C3)DE 30 B0C02DE ) A122) B9)C52DE WES6 TSIE6PQ @1323 ) 05B)C3HDE @13H@ 51@@) A5 B)C33DE 5H B)C45DE 3 51H4H B9)C2@DE
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 142 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'% 401A2A 3H2B)C35DE H))B)CHHDE 401A)5 0@4122H F2A B)CH5DE 015A4 B0C0@DE A) 0@51@4F B9)C2FDE Page 365
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 143 Elector Stttc reStreet
including other electors Printed: 28 June 2011 o e Elector Street etl !rt ##e# to elete#( rre't !rt ##e# to elete# &&lc't ( rre't l"e# $e%ter l"e# $e%ter e'#'%
Ur'# 6otl 401A2A 3H2B)C35DE H)) B)CHHDE 401A)5 0@4122H F2A B)CH5DE 015A4 B0C0@DE A) 0@51@4F B9)C2FDE Page 366
ELECSTAT - Elector Statistics by Area/PD/Street Page: 144