Background Paper, October 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Background Paper, October 2009 Core Strategy Background Paper October 2009 Key Evidence for the preparation of Preferred Options Rochdale Borough Local Development Framework www.rochdale.gov.uk Rochdale Borough Core Strategy - Background Paper for Preferred Options report Contents Page 1. Introduction 5 2. The Local Development Framework and The Core Strategy 7 3. Preparing the Core Strategy? 9 4. Spatial Portrait 11 5. Background on key topics 29 5.1 Achieving a more prosperous economy 29 5.2 Creating successful and healthy communities 39 5.3 Improving design, image and quality of place 56 5.4 Conserving and managing the natural environment and resources 58 5.5 Improving accessibility and delivering sustainable transport 66 6. Background – National 77 7. Background – Regional And Sub-Regional 81 8. Background – Local 89 9. Background – Local Development Framework 101 Appendix 1. Housing trajectory from the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 103 Appendix 2. Glossary 105 Appendix 3. Web links for organisations referred to in the Background Paper 111 Appendix 4. References and sources of information 113 Please Note: This background paper is a ‘living document’ and part of the evidence base for the Rochdale Local Development Framework Core Strategy. It is updated continually throughout the production of the Core Strategy. This is to ensure that all references and statistics within this paper are up to date and relevant and to ensure that all parts of the Core Strategy have thorough and appropriate evidence backing them up. This document should be read in conjunction with the Core Strategy Preferred Options paper and the Report on Consultation on Issues and Options. This document contains references to other documents and sources of information. These references are numbered and a full list of them and where they can be found is provided at Appendix 4. Rochdale Borough Core Strategy - Background Paper for Preferred Options report 2 Rochdale Borough Core Strategy - Background Paper for Preferred Options report Maps and Key Diagrams Page Sub regional context 12 Setting the scene 13 Constraints 14 Major employment locations 16 Major housing areas 18 Index of multiple deprivation (IMD) 2007 – Overall ranking 24 Index of multiple deprivation (IMD) 2007 – Employment deprivation 33 Index of multiple deprivation (IMD) 2007 – Income deprivation 34 Town centres and retailing 37 Index of multiple deprivation (IMD) 2007 – Health deprivation and disability 49 Index of multiple deprivation (IMD) 2007 – Crime deprivation 52 Index of multiple deprivation (IMD) 2007 – Education, skills and training deprivation 54 Conservation areas 57 Flood zones 60 Green infrastructure resources 64 Key transport infrastructure 69 Areas of significant pollution 71 Housing trajectory from the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 103 3 Rochdale Borough Core Strategy - Background Paper for Preferred Options report 4 Rochdale Borough Core Strategy - Background Paper for Preferred Options report 1. Introduction 1.1 What is the purpose of this Background Paper? • To provide contextual information on the Core Strategy, its relationship with the Local Development Framework and other documents; • To identify and signpost to the key elements of the evidence base which have been used to develop the Core Strategy Preferred Options document, in particular: o Information, studies and research about the borough, its economy, its population and its environment; o Information, studies and research about national and regional trends and forecasts; and o National, regional and local policies and strategies that will influence the content of the Core Strategy. • To identify sources of information for the evidence base that has been used to develop the Core Strategy. As stated on the front page this is a living document and will be updated as necessary. Further studies and information are being collected to test out and justify our preferred policy approaches. These include sub regional and cross boundary studies on transport modelling, flood risk assessment, and energy. The results of these will be analysed and their implications for the Preferred Options considered. The key findings will be included in a further version of the Background Paper and this will be published to support the publication draft version of the Core Strategy. Separate documents, topic papers and an infrastructure plan will be prepared in due course as part of the evidence base. 1.2 The evidence base for the Core Strategy? Other documents which will form part of the evidence base for the Core Strategy are: • The report of our consultation on the Issues and Options (the views of stakeholders and the local community expressed so far). • The Sustainability Appraisal report on the Preferred Options (how the Preferred Options balance economic, social and environmental considerations). • The Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Impact of the Core Strategy on European Protected Sites. • The Equalities Impact Assessment. The Core Strategy is also influenced by policies at national, regional, sub regional and local level, and this document signposts to these. 5 Rochdale Borough Core Strategy - Background Paper for Preferred Options report 6 Rochdale Borough Core Strategy - Background Paper for Preferred Options report 2. The Local Development Framework and the Core Strategy 2.1 What is the Local Development Framework? The borough’s plan for local development is under review due to changing national, regional and local priorities. A new Local Development Framework (LDF) will over time replace the current Rochdale Borough Unitary Development Plan (BP 190). The LDF is the spatial planning strategy for a borough or district, introduced by the Planning and Compensation Act 2004 (BP 53). The new system replaces a single development plan with a portfolio of policy documents, Development Plan Documents (DPD). These aim to address planning or physical issues in an area as and when needed. Supplementary Planning Documents (SPD) will support policies in DPDs by further expanding, explaining and providing guidance on how to interpret policies. Traditionally, development plan policies have a regulatory planning approach focussed on the use of land. LDF policies should take wider ‘spatial planning’ approaches to ensure: • Integrating development spatially with land-use; • Co-ordinating development with vital infrastructure and services; • Gearing development to better meet the community’s needs and issues of: o Health; o Education; o Crime; o Deprivation; o Sustainability; and o Accessibility. • Delivering development through collaborative and partnerships working; and • Involving stakeholders and the community more at early stages in the preparation of documents. 2.2 What is the Core Strategy? The lead element of Local Development Framework is the Core Strategy. It sets out where over the next 15 years: • The overall direction of growth will be; • The overall scale of development needs to be; and • The focus for locations for development will be. The Core Strategy needs to set out how, in physical and spatial terms, it will support the local community strategy ‘Pride of Place’ (BP 210) and how it will support and inform new and existing strategies and initiatives. The Core Strategy must conform to the Regional Spatial Strategy (BP 98). All LDF documents must conform to the Core Strategy. The Core Strategy: • Sets out the strategic direction and criteria to assess planning decisions about the use of land against; • Sets the general policies to determine planning applications against; • Carries considerable weight in the determination of planning applications and other spatial planning decisions; and • Sets the framework for all other local development documents prepared as part of the LDF. It is prepared alongside a process of sustainability appraisal and public consultation and an Independent Inspector will test it for ‘soundness’ before it can be adopted. It terms of content, it will include: • The spatial portrait; • The vision; • The strategic objectives; • The spatial strategy (including strategic land allocations and designations); 7 Rochdale Borough Core Strategy - Background Paper for Preferred Options report • The core policies (including generic policies to management development1); and • The monitoring and implementation framework. The Council expects to complete and adopt the Core Strategy in 2010. It will then have formal status to guide spatial planning, regeneration and decisions on planning applications up to 2026. The Issues and Options Stage (BP 221) is the first formal consultation stage of the Core Strategy document. The issues and options paper was a consultation paper aimed at exploring what really matters in shaping the future of the borough. What issues does the borough have? What options and approaches should be further explored? Consultation responses (BP 222) were assessed and fed into the production of draft proposals and policies. This is the subject of the latest consultation - the Preferred Options. This Background Paper contains supporting evidence and sources of information for the Preferred Options. 2.3 What other parts make up the Local Development Framework? Local Development Scheme (BP 227) The project plan for the LDF explains what the different parts Adopted March 2009 of the LDF are and when we will produce them. We will revise the Local Development Scheme as necessary to keep it up-to- date. Statement of Community Involvement (BP 233) How we will involve the local community, other interested
Recommended publications
  • Statement of Accounts 2013/14
    ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2020/21 EQUALITY & DIVERSITY STATEMENT Finance Service aims to regularly review all documents, policies and procedures to ensure that there are no negative equality impacts. Consultation is an important part of how we achieve this. If you feel, on reading this document, that there may be a negative equality impact please tell us about this. Please also let us know if you need to access this document in a different format. You can do this by contacting: Name Telephone Email Rose Bennett 01706 925419 [email protected] Yvonne Dunease 01706 925273 [email protected] Page | 2 Rochdale Borough Council Annual Financial Report and Accounts 2020/21 CONTENTS 1. REGULATION & INTRODUCTION PAGE NO. Independent Auditor’s Report 4 Commentary by the Cabinet Member for Finance 5 Chief Finance Officer’s’ Narrative Report 6 Statement of Responsibilities 30 2. STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS The Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement 32 The Movement in Reserves Statement 33 The Balance Sheet 34 The Cash Flow Statement 35 Index of Notes to the Accounts 36 Notes to the Accounts 37 The Collection Fund Statement 114 3. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Glossary of Terms 117 Page | 3 Rochdale Borough Council Annual Financial Report and Accounts 2020/21 REGULATION & INTRODUCTION INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO MEMBERS OF ROCHDALE BOROUGH COUNCIL Page | 4 Rochdale Borough Council Annual Financial Report and Accounts 2020/21 COMMENTARY BY THE CABINET MEMBER FOR FINANCE As Cabinet Member for Finance I am responsible for ensuring that Rochdale Borough Council makes the most effective use of its resources in order to deliver the value for money services that local people need.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochdale News July 2005 Page 1
    ROCHDALE FREENews Save our Vital Services! The new MP for Rochdale, Paul Rowen, Maternity and Child Care gets a big hug from Mum How must stay in Rochdale Rochdale aul Rowen MP and future of these vital services. The encouraging everybody to take Voted Rochdale Liberal Government talk about investing part in this consultation - I will in the P Democrats are calling more in the National Health be telling them to keep their Paul for the future of Child Care Service – and here we have what hands off our services - staff 2005 and Maternity Services to be is basically a cost cutting exercise. morale at the Infirmary is at an Rowen MP General guaranteed. This is in the light There is no better investment all time low, this is another kick Labour of a controversial review that than in our children’s lives, we in the teeth everybody involved.” Lib Dem Election has been announced that were told 2 years ago that these Rochdale Liberal Democrat 41.1% 40.0% could put the future of our services will continue in Rochdale Leader - Cllr. Alan Taylor said, “If services under threat. - we have saved them once and we stand together we can send a Conservative NHS Bosses have threatened to we will do again.” clear message to NHS bosses that 10.5% dramatically slash the number of Kingsway Resident - Annette Child and Maternity Services are hospitals in Greater Manchester Foster said, “This really is a bolt so important. We are worried that - that provide Child Care and from the blue - I believe it is to if we lose these services the Maternity Services from 13 to do with staff shortages across residents of Rochdale will have to between 6 and 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester 1874-1876 New Church ACCRINGTON St
    Locality Church Name Parish County Diocese Date Grant reason ACCRINGTON School Chapel ACCRINGTON, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1874-1876 New Church ACCRINGTON St. Mary Magdalene ACCRINGTON, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1897-1904 New Church ACCRINGTON St. Paul, Barnfield ACCRINGTON, Christ Church Lancashire Manchester 1911-1913 New Church ACCRINGTON St. Peter ACCRINGTON, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1885-1889 New Church ALTHAM St. James ALTHAM Lancashire Manchester 1858-1859 Enlargement ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE Christ Church ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE, Christ Church Lancashire Manchester 1858-1860 Repairs ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE St. Peter ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE, St. Peter Lancashire Manchester 1934-1935 Repairs AUDENSHAW St. Hilda AUDENSHAW, St. Hilda Lancashire Manchester 1936-1938 New Church BACUP St. John the Evangelist BACUP, St. John the Evangelist Lancashire Manchester 1854-1874 Rebuild BACUP St. John the Evangelist BACUP, St. John the Evangelist Lancashire Manchester 1878-1884 Rebuild BAMBER BRIDGE St. Saviour BAMBER BRIDGE Lancashire Manchester 1869-1870 Enlargement BARROW-IN-FURNESS Mission Church WHALLEY, St. Mary Lancashire Manchester 1891 New Church BELFIELD St. Anne MILNROW, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1911-1913 New Church BENCHILL St. Luke the Physician BENCHILL Lancashire Manchester 1937-1939 New Church BIRCH St. Mary BIRCH Lancashire Manchester 1951-1952 Repairs BIRTLE CUM BAMFORD St. Michael, Bamford BIRTLE CUM BAMFORD, St. Michael, Bamford Lancashire Manchester 1883-1885 New Church BLACKBURN Mission Church BLACKBURN, All Saints Lancashire Manchester 1881 New Church BLACKBURN School Chapel BLACKBURN, St. Paul Lancashire Manchester 1876 Other BLACKBURN St. Bartholomew, Ewood LIVESEY, St. Andrew Lancashire Manchester 1908-1911 New Church BLACKBURN St. James BLACKBURN, St. John the Evangelist Lancashire Manchester 1872-1874 New Church BLACKBURN St.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications Registered by the Council During Week Ending 30Th September 2016
    Economy Directorate Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Number One Riverside, Smith Street Rochdale, OL16 1XU EMAIL: [email protected] Planning Applications Registered by the Council During Week Ending 30th September 2016 Application Ward Registered Application Decision Number Description Date Type Level 16/01180/DOC Balderstone And Kirkholt 29 September 2016 Approval of detail reserved by condition Delegated (subject to call up) PROPOSAL: Submission of details to comply with condition 3 on planning permission 16/00009/AM LOCATION: St Cuthberts Rc Business And Enterprise College Shaw Road Rochdale OL16 4RX APPLICANT: AGENT: Mr Michael Flinders frankshaw associates Penmore House Hasland Road Hasland Chesterfield Derbyshire S41 05J Case Officer: Ben Sandover ____________________________________________________________________________________ 16/01150/DOC Balderstone And Kirkholt 22 September 2016 Approval of detail reserved by condition Delegated (subject to call up) PROPOSAL: Submission of details to comply with condition 3 on planning permission 16/00325/FUL LOCATION: 16 The Strand Rochdale OL11 2JG APPLICANT: AGENT: Miss Maddi Mooney Triangle Architects Emma Carlin Great Places Housing Group Raven House 729 Princess Road 113 Fairfield Street Manchester Manchester M20 2LT M12 6EL United Kingdom Case Officer: Ben Sandover ____________________________________________________________________________________ Application Ward Registered Application Decision Number Description Date Type Level 16/01079/HOUS Balderstone
    [Show full text]
  • The Tramways Charges) Act, 1920” (10 and 11 Geo. V, C. 14
    PART IX (A) and (B)— (Local Authorities and Companies). List of Orders made under “ The Statutory U ndertakings (Temporary Increase of Charges) Act, 1918” (8 and 9 Geo. V, c. 34) and “ T he Tramways (Temporary I ncrease of Charges) Act, 1920” (10 and 11 Geo. V, c. 14) operating during the period covered by this R eturn. Name of Undertaking. D ate of Name of Undertaking. D ate of Orders. Orders. Local A uthorities : Companies : ENGLAND and WALES. ENGLAND and WALES. Aberdare U rban D istrict C o u n c i l .......................................... 28 Dec., 1928 B ath E lectric................................................................................. 29 Dec., 1928 Barrow-in-Furness Corporation ......................................... 28 Dec., 1928 B risto l.. 25 Jan., 1930 Bexley and Dartford Urban District Councils 28 Dec., 1928 G reat O r m e .................................................................... 29 Dec., 1928 Burnley C o rp o ra tio n .................................................................... 29 Dec., 1928 Llandudno and Colwyn Bay .......................................... 29 Dec., 1928 Colne Corporation .................................................................... 28 Dec., 1928 London U nited ....................................................... (a) 29 Dec., 1928 Gloucester Corporation and Gloucester County Council .. 28 Dec., 1928 Norwich E lectric ....................................................... 29 Dec., 1928 Haslingden Corporation ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Report 2019 Introduction
    IMPACT REPORT 2019 INTRODUCTION • Mission Statement • Improving peoples’ lives across our community through the power of sport • Respect • Opportunities for all • Caring • Health & wellbeing • Diversity • Ambitious • Life changing • Empowering Rochdale AFC Community Sports Trust works in partnership with Rochdale AFC to provide all members of the local community with the opportunity to access quality sport provision whatever their age, gender or ethnicity. We aim to increase participation in schools, improve health and wellbeing, while developing programmes that engage the whole of the community using football as the driving force. PARTNERSHIPS ■i®i!Ji � Premier '11League EFL TRUST Rochdale Rochdale Youth Service Boroughwide Housing ,.. (j)DALE SUPP□RTERS Level Playing Field � TRAIELSAFE T R U S T www.llfflplaylngfltld.org.uk -L Link4Life PARTNERSHIP _,..,, :1TOUT EFL TACKLING RACISM& DISCRIMINATION TRUST SPORT{?, FUTSAL ENGLAND PROJECT ACTIVITIES • SCHOOLS PROGRAMME - Intensive Week/PPA/Lunch Clubs/After school coaching/Match Day Visits/ EFL Trust Kids Cup & Girls Under 13’s Cup • SOCIAL INCLUSION – Premier League Kicks/Ability Counts/Open Arms/ Estates/Asylum seekers & refugees/Community Cohesion Programme • DISABILITY PROVISION – Schools/Under 16’s/Adults • HEALTH – Dale’s Silver 60s’/MIND/Walking Football • EDUCATION – Futsal BTEC Scholarship/NCS/Internship/Primary Stars/ Numeracy & Respect • MATCH DAY ACTIVITIES – Mascots/Birthday Parties/Half time events • SPORTS PARTICIPATION – Holiday courses/Weekend Clubs/Futsal/ Birthday Parties/Festivals/Open
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook for IPUMS Great Britain 1851-1881 Linked Dataset
    Codebook for IPUMS Great Britain 1851-1881 linked dataset 1 Contents SAMPLE: Sample identifier 12 SERIAL: Household index number 12 SEQ: Index to distinguish between copies of households with multiple primary links 12 PERNUM: Person index within household 13 LINKTYPE: Link type 13 LINKWT: Number of cases in linkable population represented by linked case 13 NAMELAST: Last name 13 NAMEFRST: First name 13 AGE: Age 14 AGEMONTH: Age in months 14 BPLCNTRY: Country of birth 14 BPLCTYGB: County of birth, Britain 20 CFU: CFU index number 22 CFUSIZE: Number of people in individuals CFU 23 CNTRY: Country of residence 23 CNTRYGB: Country within Great Britain 24 COUNTYGB: County, Britain 24 ELDCH: Age of eldest own child in household 27 FAMSIZE: Number of own family members in household 27 FAMUNIT: Family unit membership 28 FARM: Farm, NAPP definition 29 GQ: Group quarters 30 HEADLOC: Location of head in household 31 2 HHWT: Household weight 31 INACTVGB: Adjunct occupational code (Inactive), Britain 31 LABFORCE: Labor force participation 51 MARRYDAU: Number of married female off-spring in household 51 MARRYSON: Number of married male off-spring in household 51 MARST: Marital status 52 MIGRANT: Migration status 52 MOMLOC: Mothers location in household 52 NATIVITY: Nativity 53 NCHILD: Number of own children in household 53 NCHLT10: Number of own children under age 10 in household 53 NCHLT5: Number of own children under age 5 in household 54 NCOUPLES: Number of married couples in household 54 NFAMS: Number of families in household 54 NFATHERS: Number of fathers
    [Show full text]
  • Framlington Longhorsley Lowick Matfen Middleton Milfield Netherton Netherwitton N° L 82 / 70 Journal Officiel Des Communautés Européennes 26
    26 . 3 . 84 Journal officiel des Communautés européennes N° L 82 / 67 DIRECTIVE DU CONSEIL du 28 février 1984 relative à la liste communautaire des zones agricoles défavorisées au sens de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE ( Royaume-Uni ) ( 84 / 169 / CEE ) LE CONSEIL DES COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES , considérant que les indices suivants , relatifs à la pré­ sence de terres peu productives visée à l'article 3 para­ graphe 4 point a ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été retenus pour la détermination de chacune des zones en vu le traité instituant la Communauté économique question : part de la superficie herbagère par rapport à européenne, la superficie agricole utile supérieure à 70 % , densité animale inférieure à l'unité de gros bétail ( UGB ) à l'hectare fourrager et montants des fermages ne dépas­ sant pas 65 % de la moyenne nationale ; vu la directive 75 / 268 / CEE du Conseil , du 28 avril 1975 , sur l'agriculture de montagne et de certaines zones défavorisées ( 2 ), modifiée en dernier lieu par la directive 82 / 786 / CEE ( 2 ), et notamment son article 2 considérant que les résultats économiques des exploi­ tations sensiblement inférieurs à la moyenne , visés paragraphe 2 , à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point b ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été démontrés par le fait que le revenu du travail ne dépasse pas 80 % de la moyenne vu la proposition de la Commission , nationale ; considérant que , pour établir la faible densité de la vu l'avis de l'Assemblée ( 3 ), population visée à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point c ) de la directive 75
    [Show full text]
  • The WEA in Manchester.Indd
    wea.org.uk The WEA in Greate Manchester combined Littleborough authority Ramsbottom Milnrow Bury Horwich Rochdale Bolton Bury Crompton Bolton Rochdale Oldham Middleton Saddleworth Wigan Oldham Wigan Atherton Prestwich Worsley Mossley Tydesley Ashton Salford under-lyne Manchester Leigh Salford Droysden Tameside Stretford Irlam Denton Manchester Trafford Stockport Stockport Marple Altrincham Cheadle & Gatley Hale The WEA is a charity registered in England and Wales (no. 1112775) and in Scotland (no. SC039239). The WEA in Greater Manchester combined authority ADAB Creative Living Centre Prestwich Manchester Cathedral St James the Apostle All Saints Church Hall Crossley Centre Manchester Chinese Centre St Johns Centre All Saints Hale Barns with Ringway Parish Deeplish Community Centre Mayo Building St Mary and the Baum Church Church Deeplish Primary Academy Meadowfields Community and Children~s St Mary Magdalene Church Centre Altrincham Methodist Church Centre Denton Methodist church St Peter~s Church Apna Ghar Daycare Centre (KYP) Mechanics Institute Each Step St Peters Primary School Ashfield Valley Primary Methodist Church Cheadle Hulme East Didsbury Methodist Church St Phillips with St Stephens Ashton Central Library, Old Street Mind Wellbeing Centre Edge Lane Methodist Church STAG HQ (South Trafford Archaeological AVANTA Oldham Monton Memorial Hall Group) Falinge Community Hubb Bangladeshi Womens Organisation NEESA Woodville Community Resource Unit Sudden Community Centre Fallowfield Library Befriending Asylum Seekers and Refugees Old
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire: a Chronology of Flash Flooding
    LANCASHIRE: A CHRONOLOGY OF FLASH FLOODING Introduction The past focus on the history of flooding has been mainly with respect to flooding from the overflow of rivers and with respect to the peak level that these floods have achieved. The Chronology of British Hydrological Events provides a reasonably comprehensive record of such events throughout Great Britain. Over the last 60 years the river gauging network provides a detailed record of the occurrence of river flows and peak levels and flows are summaried in HiflowsUK. However there has been recent recognition that much flooding of property occurs from surface water flooding, often far from rivers. Locally intense rainfall causes severe flooding of property and land as water concentrates and finds pathways along roads and depressions in the landscape. In addition, intense rainfall can also cause rapid rise in level and discharge in rivers causing a danger to the public even though the associated peak level is not critical. In extreme cases rapid rise in river level may be manifested as a ‘wall of water’ with near instantaneous rise in level of a metre or more. Such events are usually convective and may be accompanied by destructive hail or cause severe erosion of hillsides and agricultural land. There have been no previous compilations of historical records of such ‘flash floods’or even of more recent occurrences. It is therefore difficult to judge whether a recent event is unusual or even unique in terms of the level reached at a particular location or more broadly of regional severity. This chronology of flash floods is provided in order to enable comparisons to be made between recent and historical floods, to judge rarity and from a practical point of view to assess the adequacy of urban drainage networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter II Normans and Plantagenets
    Chapter Two NORMANS AND PLANTAGENETS : 1086-1485 THE DOMESDAY BOOK . OCHDALE'S written history begins in 1086, when William the Conqueror sent his men all over England to find out how much land was being cultivated and how much revenue he might expect R to collect : the result was the Domesday (or Doomsday) Book, so called because of its uncompromising thoroughness and detail . Its two volumes, written in crabbed Latin, with words occasionally scored through in red for emphasis, instead of being underlined, are now displayed at the Public Record Office, London . One can imagine the difficulties of the Norman inspectors : how unwillingly and in what various dialects the English land-holders gave their answers when the " day of reckoning " came upon them . Perhaps this may account for the fact that "Rochdale" is set down as " Recedham ." It was probably then, as we still hear it today, pro- rounced as " Ratchda ' " with a long " a," and a soft Cheshire " c." Very freely translated and abbreviated, this is the gist of the Domesday entry concerning Rochdale as it was in the time of Edward the Confessor (1042-1066), excluding such details as the King's personal property and lands in the Salford Hundred : King Edward held Salford . To this Hundred belonged 21 manors held by as many thanes ; in which there were 112 hides and 102 carucates of land . Camel, a tenant of 2 of these hides in Recedham, was free of all customs but these six : theft, housebreaking, premeditated assault, breach of the peace, not answering the reeve's summons, and 1 4 ROCHDALE RETROSPECT continuing a fight after swearing on oath to desist .
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 322 LOCAL GOVERNirfKHT BOUNDARY COAIMISSIOH FOR ENGLA1ID REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KGB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr D P Harrison PH To the Rt Hon Merlyn Rees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF ROCHDALE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the metropolitan borough of Rochdale in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 28 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Rochdale Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to Greater Manchester County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies. 3. Rochdale Borough Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration.
    [Show full text]