TPS Professional Development Activity Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TPS Professional Development Activity Template TPS Professional Development Activity Template Debra Pope Johnson Southside Middle School; Dougherty County School System, Albany, GA September 2016 Title of 1976 and 2016 Presidential Campaigns: Democrats and Republicans from the Convention Activity Speeches (40 years later are issues eerily the same or vastly different?) Overview Teachers will participate in Professional Development that will allow them to create an election resource packet that will allow students to compare and contrast presidential election Convention Speeches from both the Democrat and Republican contenders for the years 1976 and 2016. In the last 40 years, the presidents of the United States have had some long and arduous terms. They have had to deal with everything from war to economic failure. Some of the most prolific events ever, happened during the terms of these presidents. The 1976 contest was between Georgia’s own Democrat Jimmy Carter and Republican Gerald R. Ford. The 2016 contest is a contentious pairing of Democrat Hillary R. Clinton and Republican Donald Trump. What did these speeches tell about the current state of affairs in the United States during the respective time periods? Investigative Democrats and Republican contenders make Convention Speeches when they accepted their Question party’s nomination for president; 40 years later are issues eerily the same or vastly different? Audience This activity is best suited for educators of grades 6-12 This activity is best suited for educators in these content areas Social Studies/ Social Sciences Georgia History American Government U. S. History Time Required One two-hour session Goal Teachers will receive primary source documents of the speeches given by Democrats and Republicans at their parties Convention in 1976 and 2016. Although 40 years separate these speeches by the contenders for President are issues eerily the same or vastly different? Standards 21st Century Learner Standards 2.1.5 Use technology and other information tools to analyze and organize information 2.1.5 Collaborate with others to exchange ideas, develop new understandings, make decisions, and solve problems 2.1.3 Use strategies to draw conclusions from information and apply knowledge to curricular areas, real- world situations, and further investigations Page 1 of 42 ISTE Standards for Teachers 1.b Facilitate and inspire student learning and creativity b. engage students in exploring real world issues and solving authentic problems using digital tools and resources 2.b Design and develop digital age learning experiences and assessments b. Design or adapt relevant learning experiences that incorporate digital tools and resources that promote student learning and creativity Learning Forward the Professional Learning Association Resources: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students requires prioritizing, monitoring, and coordinating resources for educator learning. Georgia Performance Standards SS8H12 The student will explain the importance of significant social, economic, and political developments in Georgia since 1970. SS8H12b Describe the role of Jimmy Carter in Georgia as state senator, governor, president, and past president. Objectives By the end of this PD Activity, participants will be able to: Access teaching tools and primary sources from loc.gov/teachers. Identify key considerations for selecting primary sources for instructional use (for example, student needs and interests, teaching s, etc.). Access primary sources and teaching resources from loc.gov for instructional use. Analyze primary sources in different formats. Analyze a set of related primary sources in order to identify multiple perspectives. Facilitate a primary source analysis using Library of Congress tools. Demonstrate how primary sources can support at least one teaching strategy (e.g., literacy, inquiry-based learning, historical thinking, etc.). Create primary source-based activities that help students engage in learning, develop critical thinking skills and construct knowledge. Digital Resources Primary sources from loc.gov: Title: [Jimmy Carter waving at the Democratic National Convention, New York City] Creator(s): Leffler, Warren K., photographer Date Created/Published: 1976 Jul. 15. URL: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2005696376/ Title: [President Gerald Ford and First Lady Betty Ford celebrate winning the nomination at the Republican National Convention, Kansas City, Missouri] Creator(s): Bledsoe, John T., photographer Date Created/Published: 1976 Aug. URL: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2005684026/ Other resources: Title: The American Presidency Project: Jimmy Carter XXXIX President of the United States 1977-1981: "Our Nation's Past and Future": Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in New York City July 15, 1976 URL: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25953 Page 2 of 42 Title: The American Presidency Project: Gerald Ford XXXVIII President of the United States: 1974-1977: 733 – Remarks in Kansas City Upon Accepting the 1976 Republican Presidential Nomination August 19, 1976 URL: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=6281 Title: The American Presidency Project: Hillary Clinton 2016 Democratic Presidential Nominee: Secretary of State: Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania July 28, 2016 URL: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=118051 Title: The American Presidency Project: Donald J. Trump 2016 Republican Presidential Nominee: Businessperson NY; Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland Ohio July 21, 2016 URL: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=117935 Classroom Chart Paper Materials Projector for Pictures Copies of the Speeches by all four Contenders for President in 1976 and 2016 Preparation Teachers should be assigned the speeches before the professional development session At one school with two Georgia History Teachers one should be assigned the Democrat speech for 1976 and the Democrat speech for 2016. The other teacher should be assigned the Republican speech for 1976 and the Republican speech for 2016. There are usually two Teachers per school. Each teacher will outline important points in each of the candidates speeches for their respective years on chart paper utilizing the Teachers Guide for Analyzing Primary Sources by the Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/teachers/usingprimarysources/resources/Analyzing_Primary_Sour ces.pdf there is an additional document analysis form at: http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/worksheets/written_document_analysis_ worksheet.pdf that teachers can use from the national archives site that teachers may use and bring to the professional development session. Procedure 1. Before teachers report place signs on the walls with the two years 1976 and 2016 and Republican and Democrat. a. Teachers are to place their posters on the wall under their respective dates and party affiliation. b. What was done before the professional development is what we call the jigsaw strategy. Where different documents have been distributed to students/teachers for them to analyze and synthesize information from their reading 2. Teachers will participate in a gallery walk upon arrival and posting of the charts. a. Teachers will note variations/additions to what they have written. 3. Teachers will be given 20 minutes to allow writers to cite evidence in the speeches that allowed them to reach their conclusions. Which will allow them to create the thesis sentences for their papers. 4. Each Group of two teachers will select an editor who will type the paper for the group for submission and discussion at the end of the professional development. 5. Teachers will upload papers to professional development website for viewing and completion of the requirements for the professional development. Page 3 of 42 6. Rubric for grading the essays is located at: http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/lesson_images/lesson275/compcon_ru bric.pdf 7. Additionally I have attached word clouds for each of the speeches and an additional activity could be that they guess which political contenders speech is in the word cloud. ASSESSMENT See attached Evaluation Form Staff Development. Page 4 of 42 Citation: Jimmy Carter: “”Our Nation’s Past and Future”: Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in New York City,” July 15, 1976. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=25953. My name is Jimmy Carter, and I’m running for President. It’s been a long time since I said those words the first time, and now I’ve come here after seeing our great country to accept your nomination. I accept it, in the words of John F. Kennedy, with a full and grateful heart and with only one obligation: to devote every effort of body, mind and spirit to lead our party back to victory and our nation back to greatness. It’s a pleasure to be here with all you Democrats and to see that our Bicentennial celebration and our Bicentennial convention has been one of decorum and order without any fights or free-for-alls. Among Democrats that can only happen once every two hundred years. With this kind of a united Democratic Party, we are ready, and eager, to take on the Republicans—whichever Republican Party they decide to send against us in November. Nineteen
Recommended publications
  • “FRANCE DESERVES to BE FREE”: CONSTITUTING FRENCHNESS in MARINE LE PEN's NATIONAL FRONT/NATIONAL RALLY Submitted By
    THESIS “FRANCE DESERVES TO BE FREE”: CONSTITUTING FRENCHNESS IN MARINE LE PEN’S NATIONAL FRONT/NATIONAL RALLY Submitted by Lauren Seitz Department of Communication Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2020 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Karrin Anderson Julia Khrebtan-Hörhager Courtenay Daum Copyright by Lauren Nicole Seitz 2020 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT “FRANCE DESERVES TO BE FREE”: CONSTITUTING FRENCHNESS IN MARINE LE PEN’S NATIONAL FRONT/NATIONAL RALLY This thesis employs constitutive rhetoric to analyze French far-right politician Marine Le Pen’s discourse. Focusing on ten of Le Pen’s speeches given between 2015 and 2019, I argue that Le Pen made use of Kenneth Burke’s steps of scapegoating and purification as a way to rewrite French national identity and constitute herself as a revolutionary political leader. Le Pen first identified with the subjects and system that she scapegoats. Next, she cast out elites, globalists, and immigrants, identifying them as scapegoats of France’s contemporary identity split. Finally, by disidentifying with the scapegoats, Le Pen constituted her followers as always already French patriots and herself as her leader. This allowed her to propose a new form of French national identity that was undergirded by far-right ideals and discourse of revolution. This thesis presents several implications for understanding contemporary French national identity, the far right, and women politicians. It also contributes to the project of internationalizing public address research in Communication Studies. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, thank you to my advisor, Kari Anderson. I truly could not have completed this thesis without your guidance, encouragement, and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexist News Commentary on the Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin
    Three Networks, Two Candidates, One Problem: Sexist News Commentary During Hillary Clinton’s Presidential and Sarah Palin’s Vice-Presidential Campaigns Drue Marr | University of Nebraska – Lincoln This paper examines the political commentary of three major U.S. television news networks for their portrayal and criticism of and sexist commentary on Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin during their 2008 presidential campaigns and Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. I reviewed coverage by CNN, the news source “bordering the neutral zone” (Langlois); MSNBC, the news outlet with a “slightly more lib- eral audience” (Blake); and Fox News, the “perceived as right-leaning” media outlet (Rothwell). While I originally sought to assess imbalances in criticism of these women from opposing parties on each net- work (would one woman “catch a break” on a certain network but not from others), I instead found an even display of criticism and negative portrayal based on sexist commentary across all three. This find- ing suggests a connection between openly biased and sexist news media coverage of female candidates for national political office and underrepresentation of women in congressional and presidential politics. Through negative commentary on female politicians’ appearance, family roles, and competence based on stereotypes like “emotionality,” mainstream news media play a powerful role in women’s continuing struggle to occupy the White House. In 2013, the United States broke a record for number of women” (Zhou) with 117 women the highest number of women elected to the elected to Congress, totaling 127 seats held United States Congress. Out of the total 535 by female politicians. Even with this seats in Congress, 101 of those seats were ground-breaking surge of incredible women occupied by women, including 20 in the stepping into the political arena, a whopping Senate (Blackwill).
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Clinton Bibliography - 2002 Thru 2020*
    Bill Clinton Bibliography - 2002 thru 2020* Books African American Journalists Rugged Waters: Black Journalists Swim the Mainstream by Wayne Dawkins PN4882.5 .D38 2003 African American Women Cotton Field of Dreams: A Memoir by Janis Kearney F415.3.K43 K43 2004 For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Politics by Donna Brazile E185.96 .B829 2018 African Americans--Biography Step by Step: A Memoir of Hope, Friendship, Perseverance, and Living the American Dream by Bertie Bowman E185.97 .B78 A3 2008 African Americans--Civil Rights Brown Versus Board of Education: Caste, Culture, and the Constitution KF4155 .B758 2003 A Matter of Justice: Eisenhower and the Beginning of the Civil Rights Revolution by David Nichols E836 .N53 2007 Winning While Losing: Civil Rights, the Conservative Movement, and the Presidency From Nixon to Obama edited by Kenneth Osgood and Derrick White E185.615 .W547 2013 African Americans--Politics and Government Bill Clinton and Black America by DeWayne Wickham E886.2 .W53 2002 Conversations: William Jefferson Clinton from Hope to Harlem by Janis Kearney E886.2 .K43 2006 African Americans--Social Conditions The Mark of Criminality: Rhetoric, Race, and Gangsta Rap in the War-on-crime Era * This is a non-annotated continuation of Allan Metz’s, Bill Clinton: A Bibliography. 1 by Bryan McCann ML3531 .M3 2019 Air Force One (Presidential Aircraft) Air Force One: The Aircraft that Shaped the Modern Presidency by Von Hardesty TL723 .H37 2003 Air Force One: A History of the Presidents and Their Planes by Kenneth Walsh TL723 .W35
    [Show full text]
  • Women & Equality
    Dædalus Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences Winter 2020 Women & Equality Nannerl O. Keohane & Frances McCall Rosenbluth, guest editors with Dawn Langan Teele · Kira Sanbonmatsu Rafaela Dancygier · Susan Chira · Torben Iversen Øyvind Skorge · Jamila Michener Margaret Teresa Brower · Sara Lowes · Anita I. Jivani Mala Htun · Francesca R. Jensenius · Anne Marie Goetz Olle Folke · Johanna Rickne · Seiki Tanaka Yasuka Tateishi · Nancy Folbre Catharine A. MacKinnon · Debora L. Spar Dædalus Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences “Women & Equality” Volume 149, Number 1; Winter 2020 Nannerl O. Keohane & Frances McCall Rosenbluth, Guest Editors Phyllis S. Bendell, Managing Editor and Director of Publications Peter Walton, Associate Editor Heather M. Struntz, Assistant Editor This issue of Dædalus is published open access with generous support from Mathea Falco. Committee on Studies and Publications John Mark Hansen, Chair; Rosina Bierbaum, Johanna Drucker, Gerald Early, Carol Gluck, Linda Greenhouse, John Hildebrand, Philip Khoury, Arthur Kleinman, Sara Lawrence-Lightfoot, Alan I. Leshner, Rose McDermott, Michael S. McPherson, Frances McCall Rosenbluth, Scott D. Sagan, Nancy C. Andrews (ex officio), David W. Oxtoby (ex officio), Diane P. Wood (ex officio) Inside front cover (top left to bottom right): “Women at Work, Rajasthan,” by Richard Evea, 2008, published under a CC BY-SA 2.0 license. “I am not free while any woman is unfree,” by shaunl/Getty Images. View of the Women’s March on Washington from the roof of the Voice of America building, January 21, 2017; photograph by Voice of America. Lathe operator machining parts for transport planes at the Consolidated Aircraft Corporation plant in Fort Worth, Texas, October 1942; photograph courtesy of the Library of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WOMAN CARD the G.O.P
    the parties were a battle between the sexes. AMERICAN CHRONICLES Republicans and Democrats are “just like men and women,” Trent Lott liked to say: Democrats might be from Venus, but THE WOMAN CARD the G.O.P. is “the party of Mars.” Dem- ocrats have talked about a Republican How feminism and antifeminism created Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. “war on women”; Trump says, of Clin- ton, “The only card she has is the woman BY JILL LEPORE card.” She polls better among women; he polls better among men. The immediacy and starkness of the contrast between the candidates obscures the historical re- alignment hinted at in their own biogra- phies: she used to be a Republican and he used to be a Democrat. This election isn’t a battle between the sexes. But it is a bat- tle between the parties, each hoping to win the votes of women without losing the votes of men. It’s also marked by the sweeping changes to American politics caused by women’s entry into public life. Long before women could vote, they car- ried into the parties a political style they had perfected first as abolitionists and then as prohibitionists: the moral crusade. No election has been the same since. or a very long time, the parties had no idea what to do with women. At Fthe nation’s founding, women made an argument for female citizenship based on their role as mothers: in a republic, the civic duty of women is to raise sons who will be virtuous citizens. Federalists dofed their top hats, and no more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2018
    SUMMER 2018 The Public Eye In this issue: Blurring the Border: Immigration Enforcement and Solidarity in Ohio Before the Alt Right: Anita Hill and the Growth of Misogynist Ideology Beyond Strange Bedfellows: How the “War on Trafficking” Was Made to Unite the Left and Right Trump, the Republican Party, and Westmoreland County editor’s letter THE PUBLIC EYE QUARTERLY With the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy, the bal- PUBLISHER Tarso Luís Ramos ance of the Supreme Court threatens to tip toward the Hard Right for decades to come. Com- EDITOR ing on the heels of several disastrous SCOTUS rulings, the administration’s cruel family sep- Kathryn Joyce aration policy, and Trump’s continuing embrace of authoritarianism, the stakes couldn’t be COVER ART higher. There are immediate threats to reproductive and sexual health and rights, commu- “The Love Series #17” by Rae Senarighi nities of color and immigrants, workers and voters alike, as well as longer-term repercus- PRINTING sions yet to be seen. Red Sun Press Nearly 30 years ago, another fierce and pivotal SCOTUS battle took place over the con- EDITORIAL BOARD firmation of Justice Clarence Thomas. As Alex DiBranco writes in “Before the Alt Right” Frederick Clarkson • Alex DiBranco (pg. 5), when law professor Anita Hill alleged that Thomas had egregiously sexually ha- Gabriel Joffe • Kapya Kaoma rassed her, her testimony helped launch an early reckoning over gender discrimination in Greeley O’Connor • L. Cole Parke Tarso Luís Ramos • Zeina Zaatari the workplace. But it also inspired a generation of conservative activists who advanced a secular form of anti-feminism, complementing the Christian Right’s scriptural case against The Public Eye is published by gender equality with vicious personal attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The World Is Not a Safe Place for Men': the Representational Politics Of
    ‘The World is Not a Safe Place for Men’: The Representational Politics of the Manosphere Mary Lilly Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In fulfillment of the requirements for the MA in Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Mary Lilly, Ottawa, Canada, 2016 Abstract This thesis offers an overview of the representational politics of the online antifeminist community known as the ‘manosphere’. It ana- lyzes how gender and gender politics are represented in the discourse, with an eye to how traditional gender constructs, and traditional gen- dered norms and inequalities, are reproduced. This project—the first study to focus exclusively on the mano- sphere—contributes to our understanding of the community in two ways; it addresses a significant gap in the literature on the topic, and it tests the accuracy of the ‘conventional wisdom’ on the manosphere. Using mixed-methods critical discourse analysis, the study ana- lyzed the discourse of the two primary subcultures of the community, and found that traditional gender norms and relations are reproduced therein, and that for the most part the conventional wisdom is accu- rate: femininity and women are disparaged, masculinity is imagined to be ‘in crisis’ (constantly under siege by feminizing forces), and feminism is represented as hypocritical and oppressive. ii Acknowledgements A thank you to my supervisor, Paul Saurette, who supported me when I needed support, challenged me when I needed to be chal- lenged, for his invaluable guidance, compassion, and expertise, and for all he has helped me to learn over the past almost three years.
    [Show full text]
  • (Anti)Social Media
    (Anti)Social Media The benefits and pitfalls of digital for female politicians March 2018 With data provided by Table of contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1: Analysis of Social Media Conversations ............................................................4 United Kingdom ......................................................................................................................10 Theresa May ...................................................................................................................12 Jeremy Corbyn ................................................................................................................14 South Africa .............................................................................................................................16 Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma ..............................................................................................18 Cyril Ramaphosa .............................................................................................................20 Chile ..........................................................................................................................................22 Michelle Bachelet ............................................................................................................24 Sebastián Piñera .............................................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Print Program
    Preliminary Program, PRE CONFERENCE Southern Political Science Association 2017 Annual Meeting version 4.0 January 9, 2017 2908 2908 Office - Thursday Thursday Meetings 7:00am-6:30pm Boardroom 2911 Registration - Thursday Thursday Meetings 7:00am-6:00pm 2101 2101 Executive Council I Meeting Thursday Meetings 8:00am-11:00am 2101 Political Philosophy for the Many Thursday Political Theory 8:00am-9:30am Participants Jarrett Carty, Concordia University David D Corey, Baylor University Bryan-Paul Frost, UL-Lafayette Daniel DiLeo, Penn State Altoona According to contemporary commentators, political philosophy came into being as a reaction to democracy (Ober) or as a cure for the tyrannic impulses of the most ambitious, capable, and privileged (Bloom). In neither account was it intended for a mass audience. And in fact, in Plato’s Republic, Socrates warned against exposing all but those few fully possessed of mature virtue to penetrating examination of conventional presuppositions. Today’s teachers of political philosophy take advantage of political philosophy’s power to challenge students to examine what they have accepted on faith. If they are bereft of such faith, they may take political philosophy’s challenge to convention as a call to destructive iconoclasm or license to indulge immoderate desires. The problem is that we cannot vouch for the mature virtue of our students. The teacher of political philosophy is therefore confronted with profound ethical questions. Should she or he keep the radically zetetic essence of political philosophy under wraps, saving it for those who have built a record of serious study over a number of courses and have come to be known through informal conversations? One cost of doing so is to make initial studies less exciting or more ideological than they should be.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing the Gender Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 Presidential Race
    Playing the Gender Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 Presidential Race Erin C. Cassese and Mirya R. Holman Late in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary, Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, attacked Hillary Clinton for playing the “woman’s card,” and using her gender as an advantage in the election. While pundits and the media pointed to this event as helping Clinton in the 2016 election, theories of system justification suggest that an individual’s attitudes about gender might produce negative or positive reactions. Using a set of two experiments, we find that hostile sexists exposed to the event increase their support of Trump and decrease their support of Clinton, including influencing vote choice (Study 1). Benevolent sexists, however, react to Trump’s statements by increasing support of Clinton, consistent with attitudes of protecting women. We then theorize that gendered events produce distinct emotional reactions among those with low and high levels of hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes. These reactions to the gender card attack increased the political participation of hostile sexists. We also find that the attack produced anger among those low in hostile sexism, which boosts political participation (Study 2). Keywords: ambivalent sexism, hostile sexism, system justification theory, politics, 2016 election, voting, political participation Erin C. Cassese, Associate Professor, West Virginia University, [email protected] Mirya R. Holman, Associate Professor, Tulane University, [email protected] Thanks to the Gender and Political Psychology Writing Group for their feedback on this work and for the Newcomb College Institute for funding. An early version of this paper was presented at the 2016 European Political Science Association meeting in Brussels.
    [Show full text]
  • You Shook Me All Campaign Long
    You Shook Me All Campaign Long You Shook Me All Campaign Long Music in the 2016 Presidential Election and Beyond EDITED BY Eric T. Kasper and Benjamin S. Schoening ©2018 University of North Texas Press All rights reserved. Printed in Canada 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Permissions: University of North Texas Press 1155 Union Circle #311336 Denton, TX 76203-5017 The paper used in this book meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, z39.48.1984. Binding materials have been chosen for durability. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Kasper, Eric T., author, editor, writer of introduction. | Schoening, Benjamin S., 1978- editor, writer of introduction. Title: You shook me all campaign long : music in the 2016 presidential election and beyond / edited by Eric T. Kasper and Benjamin S. Schoening. Description: Denton, Texas : University of North Texas Press, [2018] | Includes index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018030231| ISBN 9781574417340 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781574417456 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Music--Political aspects--United States--History--21st century. | Presidents--United States--Election--2016. | Campaign songs--United States--21st century--History and criticism. Classification: LCC ML3917.U6 Y68 2018 | DDC 781.5/990973090512--dc23 LC record available at https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A %2F%2Flccn.loc.gov%2F2018030231&data=01%7C01%7Ckaren.devinney %40unt.edu%7Cbc7ee94d4ce24da8c61108d5fd2b629f %7C70de199207c6480fa318a1afcba03983%7C0&sdata=RCKaP2yvdh4Uwe1bo7RKlObBDeb %2FvX3n35WV8ddVCfo%3D&reserved=0 The electronic edition of this book was made possible by the support of the Vick Family Foundation. Table of Contents Introduction: Tippecanoe and Trump Too Eric T.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Pennsylvania Voters Think About Gender and Women's
    What Do Pennsylvania Voters Think about Gender and Women’s Representation? What We Learned from 2016 and 2018 Exit Polls SARAH NIEBLER Dickinson College A. LANETHEA MATHEWS-SCHULTZ Muhlenberg College Despite ongoing interest in the role of gender in American elections, highlighted most recently by Hillary Clinton’s historic bid for the presidency in 2016 and the 2018 “Year of the Woman” elections, recent studies have shown that gen- der alone is not enough to explain voter behavior. This is especially true in an increasingly ideologically polarized landscape in which party and ideology retain significant explanatory power regarding electoral outcomes. The saliency of gender identity and gender issues may also vary across time and context. Moreover, voters may not have full information about the underrepresentation of women or of the consequences of gender imbalances in elective institutions, raising uncertainty about whether women’s representation in politics matters to voters. In this article, using data from a unique exit poll, we examine the extent to which knowledge about women’s representation and perceptions about gen- der and women’s issues mattered to Pennsylvanians’ vote choice in the 2016 and 2018 elections. We find that neither gender nor party alone can explain men’s and women’s political behavior, but rather that gender and party interact in complex ways. Although party continues to be the best predictor of vote choice, gender matters to how voters understand and explain women’s underrepre- sentation in politics—a finding that has important implications for furthering gender equality in politics in the future. COMMONWEALTH, Volume 21, Issue 1 (2021).
    [Show full text]