Richmond, BC, and Corix Partner on City Centre District Energy Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Richmond, BC, and Corix Partner on City Centre District Energy Program Richmond, B.C., and Corix partner on City Centre district energy program The city of Richmond, B.C., has created a novel public-private partnership with Corix Utilities to develop district energy services for its downtown core. Peter Russell, MCIP RPP, Senior Manager, Sustainability and District Energy, City of Richmond, B.C. Photo Peter Russell. City Centre, Richmond, B.C. ocated on Lulu Island in the Fraser Richmond (fig. 2), is being transformed 1.9 million sq ft of space in eight customer River estuary, the city of Richmond is from a low-density, predominantly com- buildings from two temporary energy cen- part of the Metro Vancouver area in mercial precinct into a series of high- ters, both equipped with natural gas-fired Lthe lower mainland of British Colum- density, mixed-used neighborhoods that boilers totaling 11 MW (37.5 MMBtu/hr) of bia. This coastal city of nearly 220,000 will have an estimated 50,000-80,000 hot water heating capacity. Future plans residents was a key venue during the residents at buildout by 2040. for the system call for construction of a 2010 Winter Olympic Games, site of the Today, providing space and domes- larger permanent energy plant that will long-track speed skating events. In re- tic hot water heating in City Centre is the extract low-carbon heat from a sewer force cent decades, Richmond has experienced new Oval Village District Energy Utility. main, reducing system greenhouse gas rapid growth and today continues its Located adjacent to the Richmond Olym- emissions by up to 80 percent. transition from suburban community to pic Oval – now an indoor multisport arena As it develops the Oval Village sys- a regional town center with international – this district energy system has been in tem, Richmond has been leading the way clout. In the process, its downtown core is commercial operation since 2014 and con- in creating a novel model for a public-pri- undergoing a major redevelopment: City nected its first customer in April 2015. The vate partnership that will see the provi- Centre (fig. 1), the fastest-growing part of first phase of the project currently serves sion of district energy services throughout FIGURE 1. City of Richmond, B.C., and its neighborhoods, including City Centre. FIGURE 2. The city of Richmond, B.C., and the Greater Vancouver area. Knight St Bridge Arthur Oak St Laing Bridge Bridge N Vancouver Mitchell Island International Airport Airport Connector Bridge BRIDGEPORT SEA ISLAND Moray Bridgeport Rd Channel Bridge No. 7 Rd Dinsmore Cambie Rd Bridge EAST No. 2 Rd WEST CAMBIE Bridge CAMBIE Highway 91 Boundary Rd HAMILTON CITY CENTRE Shell Rd EAST RICHMOND Westminster Hwy THOMPSON 8 No. 8 Rd Granville Ave No. 5 Rd No. 2 Rd Blundell Rd SEAFAIR FRASER LANDS BLUNDELL Highway 99 No. 4 Rd Francis Rd No. 3 Rd Garden City Rd ve A Williams Rd SHELLMONT No. 6 Rd No. 1 Rd BROADMOOR Railway Arm Fraser River Steveston Hwy STEVESTON South Shell Rd Gilbert Rd GILMORE George Massey Tunnel SOUTH ARM ISLANDS Source: City of Richmond, B.C. Source: City of Richmond, B.C. © 2018 International District Energy Association. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. District Energy / Second Quarter 2018 7 FIGURE 3. Aerial rendering of the Oval Village District Energy Utility service area. ment for new buildings undergoing rezon- ing. District energy-ready buildings must be designed to utilize energy from the district system when a neighborhood util- ity is available. Connection to the future utility is secured with a legal agreement prior to the rezoning adoption. Further down the development approvals, this commitment is also registered on the land title. Since implementing this practice in 2009, the city has secured over 8,000 district energy-ready residential units to date in the City Center area, ensuring the Source: City of Richmond, B.C. necessary demand for energy services needed to support a low-risk investment environment. City Centre. The model leverages private- district energy in its City Centre. Rich- sector design, financing, construction and mond’s City Centre Area Plan was rapidly operations expertise while ownership of being implemented; the 2,500-acre area, SINCE IMPLEMENTING A “DISTRICT ENERGY- the utility is retained via the city’s energy largely defined by low-density commer- READY” REQUIREMENT, THE CITY HAS company. The utility is regulated by Rich- cial uses, was transforming into several SECURED OVER 8,000 DISTRICT ENERGY- mond City Council, which defines rates high-density mixed-use neighborhoods. READY RESIDENTIAL UNITS. and service areas. The approach stands out The city envisioned that district energy as an efficient model for delivering district services would be developed in a phased energy services in Canada – a model catch- program, with smaller nodes emerging in To date, most of these buildings are ing the interest of other cities. different areas but eventually connected still in the design or approval stages. Some to form a City Centre-scaled system with have already been constructed as district THE BACKGROUND STORY multiple energy plants. energy-ready but without a district energy When the city of Richmond devel- An early opportunity emerged to get connection. These buildings are built using oped its Community Energy & Emissions district energy planning work going. As hot water hydronic heating systems with Plan in 2012, it was estimated that Rich- a host city for the 2010 Winter Olympic a developer-installed boiler plant instead mond residents, businesses and insti- Games, Richmond committed to building of an energy transfer station. Given the tutions spent CA$440 million ($354.5 a speed skating oval venue. To raise a por- pace of development and the varied loca- million) on energy in 2010. Those dollars tion of the funds to build the venue, the tions of where redevelopment is occur- were largely directed to major energy city disposed of a number of consolidat- ring throughout City Centre, the city had utilities and multinational oil companies. ed sites in 2006, while retaining a major to make strategic choices regarding where At the time, the city already understood waterfront parcel in the center on which and when it would service new buildings. through the 2012 launch of its Alexan- to construct the Olympic Oval; significant The Oval Village was the first such area, dra District Energy Utility in Richmond’s residual funds raised from the disposition but other areas with potential for servic- West Cambie area (adjacent to City Centre) were used to replenish and further grow ing exist throughout City Centre. The city that district energy was an effective tool the city’s land inventory. The land disposi- expects that over time and with Richmond for reducing community greenhouse gas tion also created the opportunity for the council endorsement, those buildings emissions. District energy could also raise city to approach the waterfront parcel de- could eventually be connected once the new non-tax-base revenues while creating veloper to work together to assess the via- distribution network is more established in local jobs. Each new building connected to bility of district energy to service buildings those areas. district energy in Richmond represented on that site. The result of the city’s direct (and represents) a new significant reten- engagement with the developer eventu- ESTABLISHING A NEW ENERGY COMPANY tion of energy spending in the community, ally led to the parties signing a memoran- Given the investment potential of effectively “localizing” energy generation. dum of understanding to work together. the developer’s waterfront site alone and Of those cities and universities seizing This site and eventually surrounding sites given the multiple rezonings under way the opportunity in British Columbia, some would become the service area for the in the immediate surrounding area, the began investing directly using their own Oval Village District Energy Utility (fig. 3). city realized a new approach to financ- resources while others sought to engage Around the same time, seeing the ing a district energy project would be re- the private sector. long-term potential of district energy quired. Rather than become encumbered The city saw the opportunity to “get across City Centre, the city also began in- with debt, the city sought a private-sector ahead” of redevelopment by planning for cluding a “district energy-ready” require- partner in 2010 to design, build, finance 8 District Energy / Second Quarter 2018 © 2018 International District Energy Association. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. and operate the Oval Village District En- cluded infrastructure, business and finan- come to a final agreement that could be ergy Utility, choosing Corix Utilities. Then cial planning, and, second, development executed. Critical terms of the agreement in 2013, the city established Lulu Island and execution of a long-term concession included Energy Co. (LIEC) as a wholly owned mu- agreement. capital investment structure (debt/ · nicipal corporation to work directly with Given the MOU the city held with equity) with a defined debt rate and its private-sector district energy partner. the developer who purchased the water- return on equity for Corix; For context, under the British Co- front site, the due diligence phase started capital, capital expenditure and · lumbia Community Charter, local gov- with initially understanding development operating plan review and approval ernments have broad powers to provide timing for the waterfront site alone and processes; services to their citizens that “council developing an appropriate infrastructure customer service standards; · considers necessary or desirable, and may plan and financial model. The developer’s a process whereby LIEC had the right · do this directly or through another public plan was to develop the site strategical- to complete a service-level review; authority or another person or organiza- ly over an approximately 15-to-20-year expectations on service levels to be · tion” (Section 8.2); local governments also timeline.
Recommended publications
  • 2016 GVS&DD Environmental Management
    Wastewater The 2016 Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Environmental Management and Quality Control Annual Report Revised Edition July 2019 ISSN 1496-9602 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………iii LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………v APPENDICES …………………………………………………….…………………………………………………….…………………………………………vi PREFACE ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................................................. 15 1.1 LABORATORY PROGRAMS ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.2 MONTHLY REPORTING FOR OPERATIONAL CERTIFICATES ........................................................................ 16 1.3 QUARTERLY REPORTING FOR WASTEWATER SYSTEMS EFFLUENT REGULATIONS (WSER) ....................... 16 2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) ............................................................................. 19 3.0 ANNACIS ISLAND WWTP ............................................................................................................................... 23 3.1 EFFLUENT QUALITY ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Waterfowl of the Fraser Delta, British Columbia BARRY A
    45 The waterfowl of the Fraser Delta, British Columbia BARRY A. LEACH Introduction average annual rainfall on the north An account has been given earlier mountainous side is 200 mm. (80 in.). In (Leach 1970) of the establishment of a the centre, at Steveston on Lulu Island, ‘Slimbridge on the Pacific’. This paper it is 100 mm. (39 in.) and on the south describes the surrounding area, its water­ side, at Boundary Bay it is 90 mm. fowl populations and the management (36 in.). Snowfall averages 36 mm. (14 in.) problems. but in some winters it remains only a day The Fraser delta is part of the lowland or two. The average annual temperature which extends from the Coast Mountains at Ladner in the centre of the delta is of British Columbia southward across the 9.5°C. The minimum frost-free period is alluvial plains of the Fraser River, the about 150 days per year and the average Skagit and other small rivers, to the annual period is some 200 days (Taylor southern extremity of Pugit Sound in the 1970). Due to the ‘puddling’ of cold air State of Washington. It may, however, be between the dykes, frosts tend to linger treated as a clearly defined sub-unit of on the delta farmlands. The growing this ecological area because recent en­ season begins in mid-March and lasts for vironmental changes in the Fraser Valley 250 to 265 days. have been more intensive than in the The main geographical features of the neighbouring area of Washington State lower valley and delta of the Fraser River immediately south of the international were formed during the retreat of the border.
    [Show full text]
  • Vancouver Canada Public Transportation
    Harbour N Lions Bay V B Eagle I P L E 2 A L A 5 A R C Scale 0 0 K G H P Legend Academy of E HandyDART Bus, SeaBus, SkyTrain Lost Property Customer Service Coast Express West Customer Information 604-488-8906 604-953-3333 o Vancouver TO HORSESHOE BAY E n Local Bus Routes Downtown Vancouver 123 123 123 i CHESTNUT g English Bay n l Stanley Park Music i AND LIONS BAY s t H & Vancouver Museum & Vancouver h L Anthropology Beach IONS B A A W BURRARD L Y AV BURRARD Park Museum of E B t A W Y 500 H 9.16.17. W 9 k 9 P Y a Lighthouse H.R.MacMillan G i 1 AVE E Vanier n Space Centre y r 3 AVE F N 1 44 Park O e s a B D o C E Park Link Transportation Major Road Network Limited Service Expo Line SkyTrain Exchange Transit Central Valley Greenway Central Valley Travel InfoCentre Travel Regular Route c Hospital Point of Interest Bike Locker Park & Ride Lot Peak Hour Route B-Line Route & Stop Bus/HOV Lane Bus Route Coast Express (WCE) West Millennium Line SkyTrain Shared Station SeaBus Route 4.7.84 A O E n Park 4 AVE 4 AVE l k C R N s H Observatory A E V E N O T 2 e S B University R L Caulfeild Columbia ta Of British Southam E 5 L e C C n CAULFEILD Gordon Memorial D 25 Park Morton L Gardens 9 T l a PINE 253.C12 .
    [Show full text]
  • Knapp, Porteous Triumph * Pinafore' Has a History
    Knapp, Porteous Triumph In CI OS€ cV^OUilC i l K sec Announcement of the winning candidates in the election for secretary, junior member, sophomore member and co-ordinator VANCOUVER, B.C., THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1947. No. 47 VOL. xxrx ODD SPOT of social activities was made at the end of ballot counting some Reported overcrowded conditions three hours after the close of voting at 5 pm. yesterday. existing at the University of Bri­ Taddy Knapp, Stu Porteous, Gordon^ tish Columbia were realistic facts Baum and Bob B'agnall respectively fill Livingstone to one student of an English 200 the positions of secretary, junior mem­ lecture when he fell from the ber, sophomore member and co-ordi­ window of Applied Science 100 last Monday afternoon. nator of social activities on next year's Starts Student Council. Anxiety as to his welfare wt'.i SECRETARY felt by some of the compressed student assembly but fears were First unofficial figures released at New Program dispelled when the unlucky strag­ press time indicate that on second Grant Livingstone, president of gler returned to the room appar­ choices indicated in the preferential ballots Taddy Knapp polled 1086 votes Branch 72 of the Canadian Legion ently none the worse for wear. as .against Joan Fraser's 948; Muriel and next year's Alma Mater Society Van Der Valk was eliminated in the president, was empowered by Stud­ first count. ent Council at Monday night's meeting Red Cross Seeks JUNIOR to form a committee to organize the Stu Porteous polled 1048 as against proposed University Institute for the Dewar's 1004.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Vancouver Volume
    Early Vancouver Volume Six By: Major J.S. Matthews, V.D. 2011 Edition (Originally Published 1945) Narrative of Pioneers of Vancouver, BC Collected During 1940-1945. Supplemental to volumes one, two, three, four and five collected in 1931, 1932, 1934, 1939 and 1944. About the 2011 Edition The 2011 edition is a transcription of the original work collected and published by Major Matthews. Handwritten marginalia and corrections Matthews made to his text over the years have been incorporated and some typographical errors have been corrected, but no other editorial work has been undertaken. The edition and its online presentation was produced by the City of Vancouver Archives to celebrate the 125th anniversary of the City's founding. The project was made possible by funding from the Vancouver Historical Society. Copyright Statement © 2011 City of Vancouver. Any or all of Early Vancouver may be used without restriction as to the nature or purpose of the use, even if that use is for commercial purposes. You may copy, distribute, adapt and transmit the work. It is required that a link or attribution be made to the City of Vancouver. Reproductions High resolution versions of any graphic items in Early Vancouver are available. A fee may apply. Citing Information When referencing the 2011 edition of Early Vancouver, please cite the page number that appears at the bottom of the page in the PDF version only, not the page number indicated by your PDF reader. Here are samples of how to cite this source: Footnote or Endnote Reference: Major James Skitt Matthews, Early Vancouver, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbour Operations Manual
    HARBOUR OPERATIONS MANUAL Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Updated - June 2010 HARBOUR OPERATIONS MANUAL Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................... 8 Section 2: General Information .................................................................................... 9 2.1 General Information .................................................................................... 9 2.2 Interpretation ........................................................................................... 10 2.3 Marine Traffic Contacts .............................................................................. 14 2.3.1 Marine Communications and Traffic Services (MCTS) 14 2.4 Harbour Masters Office .............................................................................. 15 2.4.1 Office Hours 15 2.4.2 After Hours 16 2.4.3 Harbour Patrol 16 Section 3: Navigation and Waterway .......................................................................... 17 3.1 First Narrows ............................................................................................ 17 3.1.1 Definition 17 3.1.2 Passing and Overtaking 17 3.1.3 Towing, Tugs and Tows 17 3.1.4 Maneuvering within First Narrows 17 3.1.5 Restrictions– Fishing, Sailing, Personal Watercraft and Deep Draft Vessels 18 3.1.6 Clearing Narrows 18 3.2 Second Narrows Movement Restriction Area Procedures ................................ 18 3.2.1 Introduction 18 3.2.2 Definitions 19 3.2.3 Application 20 3.2.4 Second
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE of the LOWER FRASER RIVER July 2014
    THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE LOWER FRASER RIVER July 2014 Prepared by the Richmond Chamber of Commerce with the assistance of D.E. Park & Associates Ltd. and with the support of: Richmond Chamber of Commerce Burnaby Board of Trade Maple Ridge & Pitt Meadows Chamber of Commerce Surrey Board of Trade Greater Langley Chamber of Commerce Chilliwack Chamber of Commerce The Vancouver Board of Trade Delta Chamber of Commerce Hope & District Chamber of Commerce Tri-Cities Chamber of Commerce Mission Regional Chamber of Commerce Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Abbotsford Chamber of Commerce New Westminster Chamber of Commerce THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE LOWER FRASER RIVER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Recognition goes to those organizations that funded this endeavour: • Richmond Chamber of Commerce • Surrey Board of Trade • Vancouver Board of Trade • Tri-Cities Chamber of Commerce • Abbotsford Chamber of Commerce • Burnaby Board of Trade • Greater Langley Chamber of Commerce • Delta Chamber of Commerce • Mission Regional Chamber of Commerce • New Westminster Chamber of Commerce • Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Chamber of Commerce • Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Special thanks go to the report’s principal researcher and co-author, Dave Park, of D.E. Park & Associates Ltd., and to co-author Matt Pitcairn, Manager of Policy and Communications at the Richmond Chamber of Commerce, who provided extensive support in data gathering, stakeholder engagement, document preparation and drafting report sections. The experience and detailed knowledge of Allen Domaas, retired CEO of the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, has also added significantly to this report. A number of organizations and knowledgeable individuals were consulted and generously provided input and perspective to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Take Train to Vancouver, Then Cycle Home to Seattle
    seattletimes.com http://www.seattletimes.com/life/travel/take-train-to-vancouver-then-cycle-home-to-seattle/ Take train to Vancouver, then cycle home to Seattle Bill Thorness Whenever I visit Vancouver, B.C., I itch for my bike. It’s a stellar cycling city, with miles of seawall trail and well-signed, interconnected neighborhood routes. But the great cycling doesn’t stop at the city’s edge, so on a recent trip, I charted a homeward path from Vancouver to Seattle that took me aboard ferries for a fun and adventurous detour: via the roads and trails of Vancouver Island’s Saanich Peninsula and Washington’s northeast Olympic Peninsula. You can easily make a vacation on your bike with camping gear, rail and ferry transit, and a few days to explore. Amtrak [www.AmtrakCascades.com] deposits you in the heart of Vancouver, just a block from the False Creek cycling trail. My spouse and I quickly connected with the Adanac greenway route that led to our Airbnb. A day tour took us on trails skirting downtown: Coal Harbour, Stanley Park and English Bay. Cafes on Granville Island sustained us, and East Van[couver] microbreweries revived us post-tour. If you go • Bringing your bike on Amtrak Cascades trains: AmtrakCascades.com/Baggage.htm • Vancouver cycling map: bit.ly/1uOJG3R • Victoria area cycling map: saanich.ca/services/roads/cycling.html • Olympic Discovery Trail map: bit.ly/1fbUNRV • Tsawwassen ferry: bcferries.com • Black Ball ferry: cohoferry.com • Washington State Ferries:wsdot.wa.gov/ferries The next day we headed for home. But our getaway was far from over.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.1 River Hydraulics and River Morphology
    George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project – PART B RIVER HYDRAULICS AND RIVER MORPHOLOGY ASSESSMENT 4.1 River Hydraulics and River Morphology Assessment Highlights: The proposed bridge will have a clear-span over the Fraser River South Arm, which eliminates potential changes to river hydraulics or river morphology resulting from the new structure. The Fraser River South Arm is dynamic with scour in the order of several meters during freshet and migrating sand dunes with heights of up to four metres. Removal of the Tunnel is not expected to result in changes in water level or affect flow splits between the main channel and nearby channels. Suspended sediment load in the Fraser River is naturally high and the temporary increase in suspended sediments anticipated during Tunnel removal is expected to be relatively minor. Tunnel removal is expected to result in temporary bed lowering between the Tunnel and the Lulu Island‒Delta watermain; however, with monitoring and mitigation, no permanent effect on the watermain is expected. No Project-related long-term residual effects or cumulative effects on river hydraulics or river morphology are expected. 4.1 River Hydraulics and River Morphology This section describes the existing conditions related to water levels, velocities, and flow patterns (river hydraulics), and their influence on sedimentation and erosion (morphology) within the Fraser River, as well as anticipated Project-related changes in such conditions. River hydraulics and river morphology is studied as an intermediate component (IC), and information on predicted Project-related change in river hydraulics and river morphology is used to support the assessment of effects of the Project on fish and fish habitat (Section 4.4 Fish and Fish Habitat), marine mammals (Section 4.6 Marine Mammals), and marine use (Section 5.2 Marine Use).
    [Show full text]
  • Harbour Operations Manual
    HARBOUR OPERATIONS MANUAL Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Updated – January 2014 HARBOUR OPERATIONS MANUAL Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 2 Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................... 8 Section 2: General Information .................................................................................... 8 2.1 General Information .................................................................................... 8 2.2 Interpretation ............................................................................................. 9 2.3 Marine Traffic Contacts .............................................................................. 14 2.3.1 Marine Communications and Traffic Services (MCTS) 14 2.4 Harbour Masters Office .............................................................................. 15 2.4.1 Office Hours 15 2.4.2 Harbour Patrol 15 Section 3: Navigation and Waterway .......................................................................... 15 3.1 First Narrows ............................................................................................ 15 3.1.1 Definition 15 3.1.2 Passing and Overtaking 15 3.1.3 Towing, Tugs and Tows 15 3.1.4 Maneuvering within First Narrows 16 3.1.5 Restrictions– Fishing, Sailing, Personal Watercraft and Deep Draft Vessels 16 3.1.6 Clearing Narrows 16 3.2 Second Narrows Movement Restriction Area Procedures ................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of Lulu Island by Thomas Kidd
    HISTORY OF LULU ISLAND And Occasional Poems By THOMAS KIDD WRIGLEY PRINTING COMPANY LIMITED 1927 Reprinted by RICHMOND PRINTERS LTD. 1973 Reprinted by City of Richmond Archives 2007 A Note about the 2007 Reprint of Thomas Kidd’s “History of Lulu Island and Occasional Poems” In 2007, the Friends of the Richmond Archives and the City of Richmond Archives decided to prepare a third edition of Thomas Kidd’s “History of Lulu Island and Occasional Poems,” using funds provided by the Friends of the Richmond Archives. Kidd’s book was first published in 1927 by Wrigley Printing Company, and a second edition was printed in 1973 by Richmond Printers. At the time the decision was made to prepare a third edition, the Archives had only a few copies of the first and second print editions in its possession. The first edition of “History of Lulu Island and Occasional Poems” included thirty-one poems written by Mr. Kidd, only one of which was included in the 1973 reprint. In addition to removing the majority of the poems from the book, the compilers of the 1973 reprint included a table of contents and index, and changed the title of the book to “History of Richmond Municipality.” They also added 10 photograph plates reproduced from photographs provided courtesy of the Harold L. Steves Picture Collection and depicting scenes more recent than the stories told in the text. The 2007 reprint follows the 1973 reprint. It includes only one of Mr. Kidd’s poems and reproduces the table of contents and index (the index is not included in the PDF version).
    [Show full text]
  • GVWD Board Meeting April 28, 2017
    Board and Information Services, Legal and Legislative Service Tel. 604-432-6250 Fax. 604-451-6686 Rise and Report (Items Released from Closed Meeting) On April 28, 2017 the attached report was authorized by the Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) Board of Directors to be released to the public: Metro Vancouver Utilities within the Fraser River Deep-Sea Shipping Channel CLOSED MEETING To: Finance and Intergovernment Committee From: Andrew Wood, Director, Interagency Projects and Quality Control, Water Services Paul Lam, Division Manager, Major Projects and Programs, Liquid Waste Services Date: April 3, 2017 Meeting Date: April 19, 2017 Subject: Metro Vancouver Utilities within the Fraser River Deep-Sea Shipping Channel RECOMMENDATION That the Finance and Intergovernment Committee receive for information the report dated April 3, 2017, titled “Metro Vancouver Utilities within the Fraser River Deep-Sea Shipping Channel”. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to identify existing GVWD and GVS&DD marine crossings and outfalls located within the Fraser River Deep-Sea Shipping Channel and summarize the potential impact of deep-sea shipping channel dredging on these utilities. This matter is being presented at a closed meeting pursuant to Community Charter provisions, Section 90 (2) (b): “90(2) A part of a meeting must be closed to the public if the subject matter being considered relates to one or more of the following: (b) the consideration of information received and held in confidence relating to negotiations between the regional district and a provincial government or the federal government or both and a third party.” BACKGROUND Over the past decade, a number of major transportation infrastructure projects have been completed along or crossing the Fraser River (e.g., Golden Ears Bridge, Port Mann Bridge/Highway 1 Project, South Fraser Perimeter Road).
    [Show full text]