Playing Our Part in New Zealand's Recovery
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Greymouth Memorial
1 THETRANSPORT JUN WORKER The2021 journal of the RMTU – NZ's largest specialist transport union Laying rail Greymouthin Timaru memorial The Transport Worker • June 2021 2 CONTENTS EDITORIAL ISSUE 2 • JUNE 2021 12 LONG DISTANCE RAIL Michael Nicholson looks at the present - and future - of long distance rail in Wayne Butson, New Zealand. General secretary 16 MEMORIAL DAY RMTU Once again work- ers gather in growing numbers around the coun- try to rememebr fellow workers Hillside rebirth who died on the job. worth waiting for 21 PRESIDENTIAL HONOUR HIS year is flying by and it is already time for Issue 2 of our Magazine. It Ex RMTU was personally pleasing to see our national president Aubrey Wilkinson president, Jim being reelected unopposed for a further two year term. Aubrey is an Kelly proudly excellent leader for our Union and continues to grow in his knowledge, showing the QSM skill and understanding of our Union and things union. His mana within the wider Tunion movement in New Zealand is a tribute to us and to him. he received for services to his This issue is a bumper 32 page edition and it is full of reports of the great things community and to happening within our Union and industries we work within. Please read the report railways. from the unveiling of our latest workers memorial in Greymouth (see page 29). It was a great day and the West Coast branch were excellent hosts and obviously have a talent for designing and laying out a stunning tribute to our fallen brothers and sisters. -
Table of Contents
Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Key Findings – Markets and Visitor Hubs ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Key Findings – Additional Factors to Drive Visitor Growth ............................................................................... 3 1.4. Key Findings – Financial Results ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.6. Marketing Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.7. Project Operational Risks .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.8. Financial Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.9. Summary Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... -
Rail Network Investment Programme
RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME JUNE 2021 Cover: Renewing aged rail and turnouts is part of maintaining the network. This page: Upgrade work on the commuter networks is an important part of the investment programme. 2 | RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME CONTENTS 1. Foreword 4 2. Introduction and approval 5 • Rail Network Investment Programme at a glance 3. Strategic context 8 4. The national rail network today 12 5. Planning and prioritising investment 18 6. Investment – national freight and tourism network 24 7. Investment – Auckland and Wellington metro 40 8. Other investments 48 9. Delivering on this programme 50 10. Measuring success 52 11. Investment programme schedules 56 RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME | 3 1. FOREWORD KiwiRail is pleased to present this This new investment approach marks a turning point that is crucial to securing the future of rail and unlocking its inaugural Rail Network Investment full potential. Programme. KiwiRail now has certainty about the projected role of rail Rail in New Zealand is on the cusp of in New Zealand’s future, and a commitment to provide an exciting new era. the funding needed to support that role. Rail has an increasingly important role to play in the This Rail Network Investment Programme (RNIP) sets out transport sector, helping commuters and products get the tranches of work to ensure the country has a reliable, where they need to go – in particular, linking workers resilient and safe rail network. with their workplaces in New Zealand’s biggest cities, and KiwiRail is excited about taking the next steps towards connecting the nation’s exporters to the world. -
Kiwirail & Interislander General Conditions of Carriage
KiwiRail & Interislander General Conditions of Carriage KiwiRail & Interislander General Conditions of Carriage – effective 18 September, 2017 1 1. DEFINITIONS In these Conditions, unless the context otherwise requires. "Act" – means the Carriage of Goods Act 1979 and includes any amendments, re-enactments or replacements thereto; "Actual Carrier" – has the meaning given to it under the Act; “Animal” – means any animal whatsoever and includes Livestock; "Business Day" – means any day between 0800 hours and 1700 hours which is not a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday under the Holidays Act 2003; “Commercial Vehicle” – means a self-propelled or towed road vehicle which is either: (a) operated in trade as that term is defined in the Fair Trading Act 1986; (b) being transported for the purpose of sale; or (c) designated as such by us in our absolute discretion, but does not include any vehicle which is being used for private conveyance. “Commercial Vehicle Freight” means a Commercial Vehicle (together with its contents) carried across Cook Strait by Ship; “Commercial Vehicle Services” – means the services provided by KiwiRail for the carriage of Commercial Vehicle Freight; "Conditions" – means these General Conditions of Carriage, as amended from time to time by KiwiRail; "Consignment Note" – means the KiwiRail document (including in electronic form) titled "Consignment Note" containing details of the Freight; "Container" – means any wagon, container or conveyance of any kind, and includes any truck, van, ship or other vehicle but does not -
Wellington Network Upgrade
WELLINGTON NETWORK UPGRADE Better rail services for the region. Around 500,000 Wellingtonians and visitors take over 14 million passenger journeys each year on our Metro Rail Network. KiwiRail, Greater Wellington Regional Council and Metlink are working together to modernise the rail, thanks to investment of almost $300 million from the Government to enable: Train services to be more reliable. More people and freight travelling on rail in the future. The Wellington Metro Upgrade Programme is being delivered on a busy, well-maintained but ageing network where trains run 18 hours a day. The focus of our work is: Renewing existing network infrastructure to improve rail services. Renewing traction power overhead line system and signals power supply, and improving the track across the network including inside the four major tunnels. Adding capacity to the network so more people can travel on trains in the future while still allowing for freight services. This includes: Double tracking between Trentham and Upper Hutt. Improvements to Wellington station approaches. Changes at Plimmerton. More information www.kiwirail.co.nz (Wellington Metro Upgrade) HUTT LINE DOUBLE TRACKING More frequent, reliable trains. The 2.7 kilometres of rail line between Trentham and Upper Hutt is being double tracked so trains can travel in both directions at the same time. This will allow more frequent and reliable services along this section of the busy line from Wellington to Upper Hutt and Wairarapa. Stations are being upgraded and we are making it safer around our tracks. Wairarapa Existing Upper Hutt Future Connecting new second track to the network Level crossing upgrade at Blenheim Street Wallaceville Closing pedestrian crossing just North of Wallaceville New platform with shelters will be built in the style of Ava’s (pictured). -
Appendix L WSP Integrated Transportation Assessment
Project Number: 5-MB97C.01 Waitohi Picton Ferry Precinct Redevelopment 2020-12-16 CONFIDENTIAL Integrated Transportation Assessment Contact Details Euan Fairbairn WSP 12 Moorhouse Avenue Christchurch 8011 +64 3 363 5400 +64 27 276 9250 [email protected] Document Details: Date: 16 December 2020 Reference: 6-MB97C.01 Status: Final Prepared by Euan Fairbairn, Transport Engineer Reviewed by Chris Morahan, Senior Transport Engineer Approved for release by Eliza Sutton, Head of Transport Infrastructure and Road Safety ©WSP New Zealand Limited 2019 i Document History and Status Revision Date Author Reviewed by Approved by Status 1 9/12/19 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Draft 2 21/01/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Draft 3 21/02/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Draft 4 12/03/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Draft 5 15/04/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Draft 6 23/07/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Draft 7 10/09/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Draft 8 22/10/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Draft 9 5/11/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Draft 10 11/12/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Final 11 16/12/20 E. Fairbairn C. Morahan E. Sutton Final Revision Details Revision Details 1 Draft for planners and project team review 2 Draft for planners and project team review 3 Draft for client team review 4 Draft incorporating feedback from client team and for Waka Kotahi review 5 Draft incorporating Waka Kotahi Feedback 6 Draft ITA 7 Amendments to traffic effects for Wairau – Kent intersection and 49 Auckland Street property. -
Case Study Kiwirail
WE EMPOWER PEOPLE www.im-c.com Case Study KiwiRail IMC AG – Case Study KiwiRail Content Overview 3 Challenges 4 Results 5 System 6 Highlights 7 imc information multimedia communication AG Headquarters Saarbrücken Scheer Tower, Uni-Campus Nord D-66123 Saarbrücken Phone +49 681 9476-0 | Fax -530 [email protected] www.im-c.com 2 IMC AG – Case Study KiwiRail Overview KiwiRail is New Zealand’s national rail network operator and one of the largest transport employers in New Zealand with over 4,200 permanent staff and more than 6,500 contractors. The company transports over 33 % of New Zealand’s export goods. Their employees are split over five distinct business units: KiwiRail Freight, Interislander, KiwiRail Passenger, KiwiRail Infrastructure & Engineering and KiwiRail Corporate. KIWIRAIL MANAGES OVER 900 freight trains 44 inter-city passenger trains 4,200 suburban passenger services in Wellington and Auckland EACH YEAR THEIR INTERISLANDER FERRY MANAGES AROUND 4,600 sailings carrying 755,000 passengers 53,000 rail wagons 73,000 trucks 212, 000 cars between the North and South Islands of New Zealand 3 IMC AG – Case Study KiwiRail Challenges KiwiRail requires a single Learning Management System (LMS) for the five business units and over 5,000 users to replace their ageing and inflexible systems which don’t communicate with each other. As well as the need to consolidate into one platform, the system needs to ensure critical safety business processes, skill competencies and compliance with strict legislation are met while reducing administration efforts and costs, and improving data quality and availability. 4 IMC AG – Case Study KiwiRail Results After an in-depth requirements analysis through a series of onsite workshops and ongoing discussions, it’s decided to completely integrate all old systems and processes into one new LMS. -
Transpressional Rupture Cascade of the 2016 Mw 7.8
PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth RESEARCH ARTICLE Transpressional Rupture Cascade of the 2016 Mw 10.1002/2017JB015168 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand Key Points: Wenbin Xu1 , Guangcai Feng2, Lingsen Meng3 , Ailin Zhang3, Jean Paul Ampuero4 , • Complex coseismic ground 5 6 deformation can be explained by slip Roland Bürgmann , and Lihua Fang on six crustal fault segments 1 2 • Rupture process across multiple faults Department of Land Surveying and Geo-informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China, School of 3 likely resulted from a triggering Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha, China, Department of Earth Planetary and Space cascade between crustal faults Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 4Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, • Rupture speed was overall slow, but Pasadena, CA, USA, 5Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 6Institute of locally faster along individual fault segments Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China Supporting Information: Abstract Large earthquakes often do not occur on a simple planar fault but involve rupture of multiple • Supporting Information S1 • Data Set S1 geometrically complex faults. The 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake, New Zealand, involved the rupture of • Data Set S2 at least 21 faults, propagating from southwest to northeast for about 180 km. Here we combine space • Data Set S3 geodesy and seismology techniques to study subsurface fault geometry, slip distribution, and the kinematics of the rupture. Our finite-fault slip model indicates that the fault motion changes from predominantly Correspondence to: W. Xu, G. Feng, and L. Meng, right-lateral slip near the epicenter to transpressional slip in the northeast with a maximum coseismic surface [email protected]; displacement of about 10 m near the intersection between the Kekerengu and Papatea faults. -
Hokitika to Westport Tourist Rail Feasibility Study: Stop/Go Report
Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Key Findings – Markets and Visitor Hubs ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Key Findings – Additional Factors to Drive Visitor Growth ............................................................................... 3 1.4. Key Findings – Financial Results ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.6. Marketing Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.7. Project Operational Risks .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.8. Financial Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.9. Summary Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... -
Landslides Triggered by the MW 7.8 14 November 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand
This is a repository copy of Landslides Triggered by the MW 7.8 14 November 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/128042/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Massey, C, Petley, D.N., Townsend, D. et al. (25 more authors) (2018) Landslides Triggered by the MW 7.8 14 November 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108 (3B). ISSN 0037-1106 https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170305 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript BSSA_Kaikoura_Landslides_revised_FINAL.docx 1 Landslides Triggered by the MW 7.8 14 November 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake, New 2 Zealand 3 C. Massey1; D. Townsend1; E. Rathje2; K.E. Allstadt3; B. Lukovic1; Y. Kaneko1; B. Bradley4; J. 4 Wartman5; R.W. Jibson3; D.N. Petley6; N. Horspool1; I. Hamling1; J. Carey1; S. -
Plunket Annual Report 2016/17
ANNUAL REPORT The2017 Royal New Zealand Plunket Society Inc. a Our vision 3 From our New Zealand President 4 From our Chief Executive 6 Plunket by the numbers 8 Our heart 12 Our people 16 Our approach 18 Our insights 20 Our funding 22 Plunket Board and Leadership 26 Financials 28 Funding Partners 34 Principal Partner 36 ISSN 0112-7004 (Print) ISSN 2537-7671 (Online) 1 OUR VISION OUR GOALS OUR MĀORI PRINCIPLES Our vision, Healthy tamariki – We make sure every Mana Atua – Mana Atua is the most Whānau tamariki/child has the opportunity to be important foundation pillar, enabling āwhina as healthy and well as they can be. Māori to reconnect to the source of Confident whānau – We build the creation, based on their realities as goals, In the first 1000 confidence and knowledge of whānau/ tangata whenua. The disconnection families across New Zealand. of tangata whenua from their Mana days we make Atua (resulting in a state of Wairua Connected communities – We make Matangaro) is a source of ‘haumate’ the difference sure no whānau/family is left isolated, strategic (unwellness). disconnected or unable to cope. of a lifetime Mana Tūpuna – Acknowledging OUR STRATEGIC THEMES the ancestral dimension, a person’s Tamariki, their whānau/family and connection to their ancestry through themes whakapapa (genealogy). communities are at the heart of everything we do. Mana Whenua – Mana Whenua High performing Plunket people. recognises the physical, spiritual and emotional connection to the land. This & Māori Integrated, collaborative and includes forests, swamps, pa sites, connected approach. rivers and other geographical entities, Plunket is a learning organisation elements each in their own right able to principles fuelled by knowledge, data and define a person’s tūrangawaewae (place insights. -
Response of Instrumented Buildings Under the 2016 Kaikoura¯ Earthquake
237 Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 50, No. 2, June 2017 RESPONSE OF INSTRUMENTED BUILDINGS UNDER THE 2016 KAIKOURA¯ EARTHQUAKE Reagan Chandramohan1, Quincy Ma2, Liam M. Wotherspoon3, Brendon A. Bradley4, Mostafa Nayyerloo5, S. R. Uma6 and Max T. Stephens7 (Submitted March 2017; Reviewed April 2017; Accepted May 2017) ABSTRACT Six buildings in the Wellington region and the upper South Island, instrumented as part of the GeoNet Building Instrumentation Programme, recorded strong motion data during the 2016 Kaikoura¯ earthquake. The response of two of these buildings: the Bank of New Zealand (BNZ) Harbour Quays, and Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (MBIE) buildings, are examined in detail. Their acceleration and displacement response was reconstructed from the recorded data, and their vibrational characteristics were examined by computing their frequency response functions. The location of the BNZ building in the CentrePort region on the Wellington waterfront, which experienced significant ground motion amplification in the 1–2 s period range due to site effects, resulted in the imposition of especially large demands on the building. The computed response of the two buildings are compared to the intensity of ground motions they experienced and the structural and nonstructural damage they suffered, in an effort to motivate the use of structural response data in the validation of performance objectives of building codes, structural modelling techniques, and fragility functions. Finally, the nature of challenges typically encountered in the interpretation of structural response data are highlighted. INTRODUCTION [4–6], the 2013 Seddon earthquake [7–9], and the 2013 Lake Grassmere earthquake [8]. The 2016 Kaikoura¯ earthquake pro- Lessons learnt from historical earthquakes have played a vital duced intense ground motion in Wellington [10], with some role in the progressive improvement of our structural design stan- buildings experiencing ground motions of intensity correspond- dards.