DOCSLIB.ORG

Intolerable Acts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intolerable Acts WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE AN AMERICAN? The American Experience AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Marshall High School Unit One AC MR. CLINE * We’re Not Gonna Take It! • Intolerable Acts • Parliament and the King insisted on their rights to govern the colonies as they saw fit, and as punishment for what they saw as rebellion in America, they issued the Intolerable Acts, a series of punitive laws meant to punish the people for their behavior, particularly in Boston. • They closed Boston Harbor to all shipping until the destroyed tea and other looted and vandalized property had been paid for by the Massachusetts colony (Boston Port Act) • Anyone accused of a crime in Massachusetts could be taken into custody and transported to Great Britain for trial, as well as any possible witnesses the state would like to use (Administration of Justice Act) • He disbanded the Massachusetts legislature, and began compelling the other colonial legislatures meet away from their capitol in other locations far from it, or to close their doors as well. The King was given the power to appoint the government of Massachusetts, and all meetings and assemblies of people were declared illegal (Massachusetts Government Act) * We’re Not Gonna Take It! • Intolerable Acts • Allowed for the British Army to quarter their soldiers anywhere without waiting for the colonial legislature to pay or authorize it (Quartering Act of 1774) • They enlarged the borders of the Province of Quebec to include much of the western lands that had been declared off limits by the English to American colonists • The First Continental Congress met in Philadelphia and this time 12 of the 13 colonies (Georgia sent no delegates) attended out of sympathy for what was happening in Massachusetts, and fear that it may happen to them. • They made plans that if the King did not respond to them within a year, they would meet again. • Their agent, Benjamin Franklin attempted to deliver these messages, but instead, he was summoned before a royal council, and forced to stand before them for hours as they degraded and humiliated him as if he were on trial for all of the colonies. * We’re Not Gonna Take It! • Intolerable Acts • General Thomas Gage, the new military governor of Massachusetts knew men from Boston and all of the other Massachusetts towns had been convening illegally to train as militia units, and that they had weapons stockpiled in the countryside. He sent a large contingent of British soldiers out into the country to take these stockpiles. • As Massachusetts citizens heard of the march of British troops, word went forth that “The British are Coming!” and members of the militia, who had trained to be ready in a minutes notice, Minutemen, rushed out to meet them. • In between the towns of Lexington and Concord, minutemen hiding behind trees, stone fences, rocks and farms picked off the British contingent, and forced a rout and retreat by them back into Boston, where they were then surrounded. • In history, this battle became known as “The shot heard ‘round the world.” * We’re Not Gonna Take It! • The Last Mile • With the dressing down of Franklin, and hostilities commencing between colonists and the British soldiers, Congress convened again in Philadelphia as the Second Continental Congress with delegates chosen by popular election in the colonies • There was much debate as to what to do, but one of the first things they did was to adopt the Massachusetts militia as the Continental Army, and appoint one of their members who was always showing up in a military uniform as its commander. • George Washington, who was a sly political choice because it made the conflict one about all of the colonies, not just Massachusetts, and made allies of the southern colonies who had expected to be under the thumb of Massachusetts and New Englanders if they joined with them. • The architect of this political maneuver, and a future leader of this Congress, was John Adams * We’re Not Gonna Take It! • The Last Mile • A small minority in Congress, led by Adams, his cousin Samuel, and John Hancock felt war with England was inevitable, but they decided to bide their time before making any moves in order to build up support • Most of the congress still desired some reconciliation with Britain, and they were led by John Dickinson of Pennsylvania, who urged a last attempt be made by sending what came to be known as The Olive Branch Petition to King George, III • The petition suggested that perhaps a compromise that would allow either the formation of an American Parliament with free trade rights for the colonies, and taxes equal to those paid by people in England, or restricted trade with no taxes. • The petition claimed that Americans were not in rebellion, but were loyal to his majesty, and that the issues were only tax and trade, and to please accept this “humble petition.” * We’re Not Gonna Take It! • The Last Mile • The petition was somewhat undermined by the capture of a letter from John Adams to a friend that stated his unhappiness with the petition, and his belief that war with England, and rebellion, was inevitable. The English took this as a sign that the petition was insincere • Richard Penn, and Arthur Lee, delegates from Congress who had been sent to London to deliver it were sent away after the news of the Battle of Bunker Hill arrived. • When the Massachusetts militia besieging Boston learned that the British were going to occupy hills around the city the next day, they quickly took them and reinforced them, and the next morning when the British attempted to take them, they were repulsed twice, but on a third attempt were successful. • Both sides suffered significant losses, and the Massachusetts militia was sent fleeing • When the King heard of this, the decision was made to proclaim the colonists of North America as rebels and to order the deaths of all who incited and participated in the rebellion, as those outside of the law. * We’re Not Gonna Take It! • The Last Mile • It was now that John Adams knew the time was right to call for independence, and to have the majority support he needed • He convinced Congress to form a committee to draft a document that would lay out the causes and principles of the independence, its members included: • John Adams • Benjamin Franklin • Roger Sherman • Robert Livingston • And the principal author of this document, Thomas Jefferson • It was hard work convincing Congress to take this step, and whether or not it would actually have enough votes to pass was in doubt until the very end * We’re Not Gonna Take It! • Independence • South Carolina had to be swayed that the vote would be unanimous before they would assent • New York’s harbors were full of British ships that carried German mercenaries, Hessians, and so they were scared, and rather than alert the British of treason, or disappoint her sister colonies, they abstained from the vote. • Most importantly, John Dickinson was convinced not to make the vote, which would go against him, appear to be doubted by standing up for what he believed in, reconciliation with England, and so he did not arrive in Congress that day. • The document that was approved that July 4, 1776 is considered to be one of the most influential political and philosophical works on the rights of man ever to be produced, and has guided countless generations of not only Americans, but others, in forming governments that to them seem just and worthy of their rights as individuals. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • X001132127.Pdf
    ' ' ., ,�- NONIMPORTATION AND THE SEARCH FOR ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE IN VIRGINIA, 1765-1775 BRUCE ALLAN RAGSDALE Charlottesville, Virginia B.A., University of Virginia, 1974 M.A., University of Virginia, 1980 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia May 1985 © Copyright by Bruce Allan Ragsdale All Rights Reserved May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: 1 Chapter 1: Trade and Economic Development in Virginia, 1730-1775 13 Chapter 2: The Dilemma of the Great Planters 55 Chapter 3: An Imperial Crisis and the Origins of Commercial Resistance in Virginia 84 Chapter 4: The Nonimportation Association of 1769 and 1770 117 Chapter 5: The Slave Trade and Economic Reform 180 Chapter 6: Commercial Development and the Credit Crisis of 1772 218 Chapter 7: The Revival Of Commercial Resistance 275 Chapter 8: The Continental Association in Virginia 340 Bibliography: 397 Key to Abbreviations used in Endnotes WMQ William and Mary Quarterly VMHB Virginia Magazine of History and Biography Hening William Waller Hening, ed., The Statutes at Large; Being� Collection of all the Laws Qf Virginia, from the First Session of the Legislature in the year 1619, 13 vols. Journals of the House of Burgesses of Virginia Rev. Va. Revolutionary Virginia: The Road to Independence, 7 vols. LC Library of Congress PRO Public Record Office, London co Colonial Office UVA Manuscripts Department, Alderman Library, University of Virginia VHS Virginia Historical Society VSL Virginia State Library Introduction Three times in the decade before the Revolution. Vir­ ginians organized nonimportation associations as a protest against specific legislation from the British Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Action-Reaction … the Road to Revolution
    Name:____________________________________ Class Period:_____ Action-Reaction … The Road to Revolution APUSH Guide for American Pageant chapter 7 & 2nd half of AMSCO chapter 4 (and a bit from chapter 8 Pageant and chapter 5 AMSCO) Directions Print document and take notes in the spaces provided. Read through the guide before you begin reading the chapter. This step will help you focus on the most significant ideas and information And as you read. Purpose These notes are not “hunt and peck” or “fill in the blank” notes. Think of this guide as a place for reflections and analysis using your noggin (thinking skills) and new knowledge gained from the reading. Mastery of the course and AP exam await all who choose to process the information as they read/receive. To what extent was America a revolutionary force from the first days of European discovery? Assessment: __________________________ Small extent? Large extent? Evidence to support your assessment: Evidence to support the opposing view: 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. Explain the impact of the following statement in terms of America. “Distance weakens authority; great weakness weakens authority greatly.” The Impact of Mercantilism Explain how Americans were supposed to ensure Britain’s economic and naval supremacy. What impact did this have on colonists? What was the problem with having no banks in the colonies? How did Parliament respond to colonies issuing paper money? How did English policy regarding its North American colonies change after the French and Indian War, Pontiac’s Rebellion, and the Proclamation of 1763? From Salutary Neglect to…. For each of the items listed below, identify the Before the actual war of the Revolution Action (English purpose/goal) and the could begin, there had to be a Reaction of the colonists.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 America in the British Empire
    CHAPTER 3 AMERICA IN THE BRITISH EMPIRE The American Nation: A History of the United States, 13th edition Carnes/Garraty Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Colonies had great deal of freedom after initial settlement due to n British political inefficiency n Distance n External affairs were controlled entirely by London but, in practice, the initiative in local matters was generally yielded to the colonies n Reserved right to veto actions deemed contrary to national interest n By 18 th Century, colonial governors (except Connecticut and Rhode Island) were appointed by either the king or proprietors Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Governors n executed local laws n appointed many minor officials n summoned and dismissed the colonial assemblies n proposed legislation to them n had power to veto colonial laws n They were also financially dependent on their “subjects” Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Each colony had a legislature of two houses (except Pennsylvania which only had one) n Lower House: chosen by qualified voters, had general legislative powers, including control of purse n Upper House: appointed by king (except Massachusetts where elected by General Court) and served as advisors to the governor n Judges were appointed by king n Both judges and councilors were normally selected from leaders of community n System tended to strengthen the influence of entrenched colonials n Legislators
    [Show full text]
  • THE GLORIOUS CAUSE the American Revolution 1763-1789
    THE GLORIOUS CAUSE The American Revolution 1763-1789 ROBERT MIDDLEKAUFF New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Oxford University Press Oxford London New York Toronto Delhi Bombav Calcutta Madras Karachi Kuala Lumpur' Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Nairobi Dares Salaam Cape Town Melbourne Auckland and associated companies in Beirut Berlin Ibadan Mexico City Nicosia Copyright© 1982 by Oxford University Press, In First published in 1982 by Oxford University Press, Inc. 200 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 First issued as an Oxford University Press paperback, 1985 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Middlekauff, Robert. The glorious cause. (The Oxford history of the United States; v. 2) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. United States-History-Revolution, 1775-1783. 2. United States-Confederation, 1783-1789. I. Title. II. Series: Oxford history of the United States; v. 2. E 173.094 vol. 2 [Ezo8] 973s [973· 3] 81-966o ISBN o-19-502921-6 AACRz ISBN o-19-503575-5 (pbk.) Printing (last digit): 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Printed in the United States of America 11 Resolution The reception accorded the Tea Act in 1773-74 is replete with paradox. For the previous two years the Americans had drunk tea, much of it legally imported, and they had paid the duty of three pence per pound. Smuggling was still acceptable and a good deal of tea was imported illegally from Holland, but equally acceptable was the legal but quiet importation of tea from England through Customs.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of the American Revolution
    Chapter 1 Have you ever wondered how we ended up with this great country? Well it. All came about about because of the American revolution. There were several causes to the American Revolution including the French and Indian war,(aka the seven years of war) acts and taxes, the colonists rebelling more acts, more acts from king George , and the British military being activated please keep reading to find out why we entered this important war. The first thing that started the chain of events that lead to the American revolution was the French and Indian war the French and Indian war lasted from 1756-1763 and started because of a territorial dispute over the Ohio River valley. The British ended up winning (which gave them all the land to the Mississippi River), but was deeply in debt. After the French and Indian war, the king raised taxes and passed several acts that made the colonists angry there were several act including the stamp act,quartering act,Townshend act,navigation act, and sugar act the stamp act made colonists pay extra taxes fall all paper products with stamps! In 1767 raised taxes on lead, paint, paper, glass, and tea. The Navigation act said that colonists could only buy goods from Britain. Finally the sugar act put taxes on sugar. All of the taxes and acts made the colonists angry.they were very angry because they had no choice. A group of people became very important during this time called the sons of Liberty. This group of influential people lead the patriots, the colonists against King George III.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Nurse Newsletter :: April 2005
    April 2005 Inside… Single-payer health care: Employer-based insurance..........2 President’s column: You are the expert .......................3 THE NEWSLETTER OF THE MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION www.massnurses.org VOL. 76 NO. 3 Biosafety legislation backed ........3 NARH ordered not to admit more MNA on Beacon Hill: Overtime bill introduced ............4 patients than RNs can safely care for Governor’s budget blasted ........5 In a landmark victory for unionized reg- Labor Education: istered nurses and their patients at North All about the NLRB......................6 Adams Regional Hospital in North Adams, Landmark ruling is first an independent arbitrator has found that the to align staffing decisions Region 5 notes ..........................16 hospital can no longer admit “more patients than nurses can safely care for.” As part of a with RNs’ professional Continuing education.................18 ruling released in early March, the arbitrator issued an order for the hospital to “cease and standards and their ability MNF scholarships .....................19 desist” from these practices. to meet those standards Nurses from the Salem Hospital Com- “The nurses of North Adams Regional mittee. From left: Fran O’Connell, Ann Peer support..............................21 Hospital have made history with this Marshall, Joanne Raley, Mary Wignall. decision and, if the hospital complies with MNA benefits corner .................22 the arbitrator’s order, we believe it will make protects nurses from being forced to care Salem Hospital this hospital one of the safest in the region by for too many patients at once and places guaranteeing every patient first-rate nursing decisions about the safety of patients in the nurses vote for MNA care,” said Robin Simonetti, RN, co-chair of hands of those ultimately accountable for Survey says the nurses’ union at NARH.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of the Office of Justice Programs Victim Compensation Grants Awarded to the Massachusetts Department of Attorney General, Boston, Massachusetts * * *
    REDACTED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE LIMITED OFFICIAL USE - PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Audit of the Office of Justice Programs Victim Compensation Grants Awarded to the Massachusetts Department of Attorney General, Boston, Massachusetts * * * AUDIT DIVISION 20-089 AUGUST 2020 REDACTED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Redactions were made to the full version of the report for privacy reasons. The redactions are contained only in Appendix 3, the grantee’s response, and are of individuals’ names. REDACTED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Executive Summary Audit of the Office of Justice Programs Victim Compensation Grants Awarded to the Massachusetts Department of Attorney General, Boston, Massachusetts Objective Audit Results The objective of the audit was to evaluate how the The U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector Massachusetts Department of Attorney General, Victim General completed an audit of two Victims of Crime Act Compensation and Assistance Division (VCAD) designed (VOCA) victim compensation formula grants awarded by and implemented its crime victim compensation the Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of program. To accomplish this objective, we assessed Crime (OVC) to the Department of Attorney General in performance in the following areas of grant Boston, Massachusetts. The OVC awarded these management: (1) grant program planning and formula grants, totaling $2,726,000 from fiscal execution, (2) program requirements and performance years (FY) 2016 to 2017 from the Crime Victims Fund to reporting, and (3) grant financial management. provide financial support through the payment of compensation benefits to crime victims throughout Results in Brief Massachusetts. As of February 2020, VCAD drew down As a result of our audit, we concluded that VCAD used a cumulative amount of $2,718,557 for all of the grants its grant funds to compensate crime victims.
    [Show full text]
  • Resume Existing Programs for Preventing and Controlling Youth
    DOCUMeNT Resume ED 028 299 VT 008 189 The Re le of Organized,Labor in the Vocational Training and Placement of Hard-Core Youth. Massachusetts State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, Boston. Community Services Activities Committee.; Massachusetts Univ., Amherst. Labor Relations and Research Center. Spons Agency-Of face of Juvenile r N'nquency and Youth Development (DHEW), Washington, D.C. Note-121p. EDRS Price MF-$0.50 HC-$6.15 Descriptors-ActionPrograms(Community),*CommunityInvolvement,Conferences,DelinquencyCauses, *Delinquency Prevention, *Delinquent Rehabilitation, *Job Placement, Labor Unions, Program Descriptions, Skill Centers, *Skill Development, Vocational Education, Work Attitudes, Workshops This is a report of a training project conducted in Massachusetts to explore mechanisms through which organized labor might involve itself more fully in new and existing programs for preventing and controlling youth crime.Specificall. the objectiyes were: (1) to explore the problem of the young offender, (2) to ext./lore what is being done for the young offender and bv whom, and (3) to explore what might be the role of labor in these existing programs or what new programs labor might develop. The training proiect became operative inJuly 1966 and was subsequently continued until March 15, 1968. This report concerns itself with the following areas of the project: (1) planning, (2) conference, (3) workshops and training sessions, (4) impact znd recommendations. Recommendations include: (1) a program of trained, on-the-job counselors,(2) creation of skill centers, and (3) active support by organized labor of legelfAion pertaining to progressivecorrectional matters. (CH) s%1 co r,z THE ROLE OF ORGANIZED LABOR IN THE VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND PLACEMENT OF HARD-CORE YOUTH U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 North Zeob Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the moat advanced technological meant to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality it heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Misting Paga(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent page);. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacen pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, _ is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find ^ good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. Whan a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning |s continued again — beginning balow the first row and continuing on untjil complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest valuir, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 5 - the American Revolution
    Unit 5 - The American Revolution Focus Questions 1. How did British colonial policies change after the Seven Years’ War, and how did American colonists react to those changes? 2. What major factors and events contributed to the colonial decision to declare independence from Great Britain, and how did the Declaration of Independence justify that decision? 3. Was the War for Independence also a “civil war” in the American colonies? 4. How did the American Revolution affect the lives and social roles for women and people of color? Did the move to colonial independence usher in a “social revolution” for America? Key Terms Royal Proclamation of 1763 Lexington and Concord Stamp Act Thomas Paine’s Common Sense Sons and Daughters of Liberty Battle of Saratoga Boston Massacre Charles Cornwallis Coercive Acts Articles of Confederation 73 74 Unit 5 – The American Revolution Introduction In the 1760s, Benjamin Rush, a native of Philadelphia, recounted a visit to Parliament. Upon seeing the king’s throne in the House of Lords, Rush said he “felt as if he walked on sacred ground” with “emotions that I cannot describe.”1 Throughout the eighteenth century, colonists had developed significant emotional ties to both the British monarchy and the British constitution. North American colonists had just helped to win a world war and most, like Rush, had never felt prouder to be British. And yet, in a little over a decade, those same colonists would declare their independence and break away from the British Empire. Seen from 1763, nothing would have seemed as improbable as the American Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Confrontation Change in British Imperial Policy
    Growing Confrontation Change in British Imperial Policy End of “Salutary Neglect” Re-Assert authority over Colonies Taxation for Revenue What economic confrontation could this create? Post War Tension – Military Issue Colonials British Methods of •Indian-style guerilla March in formation or fighting tactics bayonet charge Organization •Militias served under Officers wanted to take own captains charge of colonials •No military Drills and tough Discipline deference or discipline protocols observed Colonists should pay for •Resistance to raising their own defense Finances taxes “Prima Donna” officers •Casual, non- with servants and tea Demeanor professionals Post War Tension – Military Troop deployment British left about 10,000 troops in America Fear of French rebellion in Canada Fear of Indian attacks Keep colonists from crossing Proclamation Line Fear of independence movement What confrontation could this create? Post War Tension – Economic War taxes British response Massachusetts refused to Currency Act of 1764 pay without military must pay with British control currency Virginia refused to pay; Parliament controls printed money to pay colonial currency debts (inflation) Revenue Act of 1762 Ensure collection of customs Royal Navy prohibit trade with French Post War Tension – Economic Result of French and Indian and Seven Years War National debt doubles New Prime Minister Lord Bute needed payment plan New King, George III, wanted debt paid Began to strictly enforce taxes in England Post War Tension – Political Reforms
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Crime in Massachusetts 2019
    Hate Crime in Massachusetts 2019 Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety & Security November 2020 Massachusetts Hate Crimes, 2019 Executive Summary Notes on Data This report is written in accordance with Section 34 of Chapter 22C of the Massachusetts General Laws. The 2019 Hate Crime Report for Massachusetts was compiled using data voluntarily supplied by police departments across the Commonwealth. The Executive Office of Public Safety & Security (EOPSS) received a total of 376 reports of incidents of hate crime (up from 351 in 2018) from 68 municipal police departments, 13 campus police agencies, and MBTA Transit Police. A single hate crime incident may include one or more offenses. In 2019, these 376 incident reports resulted in 421 offenses. In addition, 279 agencies submitted “zero reports” (indicating that they had experienced no bias-motivated incidents) and there were 45 non- reporting agencies (down from 64 in 2018). In 2019, reporting agencies and zero-reporting agencies covered approximately 95% of the population of Massachusetts. After receipt and state data quality checks, EOPSS submits all Massachusetts hate crime data to the FBI for further analysis, verification and inclusion in its annual Hate Crime Statistics publication. EOPSS continues to verify and update hate crime reports after submission to the FBI, and as a result, the data in this report may not match the FBI’s published data Data was collected utilizing two methods – the National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) and the Uniform Crime Report (UCR). Agencies that report data via NIBRS automatically upload their data to EOPSS. EOPSS then extracts the required data for analysis and forwards it to the FBI.
    [Show full text]