DOCSLIB.ORG

Bascule Bridge Lightweight Solid Deck Retrofit Research Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bascule Bridge Lightweight Solid Deck Retrofit Research Project BASCULE BRIDGE LIGHTWEIGHT SOLID DECK RETROFIT RESEARCH PROJECT DECK ALTERNATIVE SCREENING REPORT FINAL FPID 419497‐1‐B2‐01 Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation Structures Design Office Prepared by: URS Corporation, Inc. 7650 West Courtney Campbell Causeway, Suite 700 Tampa, Florida 33607 May 14, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT NEED ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 DECK SELECTION FACTORS ............................................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 Weight Considerations .......................................................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Deck Thickness Considerations ............................................................................................. 5 1.2.4 Deck Attachment Considerations ......................................................................................... 6 1.2.5 Bascule Leaf Framing System Considerations ....................................................................... 6 1.2.6 Constructability Considerations ............................................................................................ 7 1.2.7 Design Considerations ........................................................................................................... 8 1.2.8 Financial and Technical Support Considerations .................................................................. 8 1.2.9 Maintenance and Durability Considerations ........................................................................ 8 1.3 LIGHTWEIGHT SOLID DECK SYSTEM EVALUATION ........................................................................ 9 1.3.1 Evaluated Deck Systems ........................................................................................................ 9 1.3.2 Evaluation Process ................................................................................................................ 9 1.3.3 Evaluation Findings ............................................................................................................. 11 2.0 OVERVIEW OF EVALUATED LIGHTWEIGHT SOLID DECK SYSTEMS ................................................. 18 2.1 SANDWICH PLATE SYSTEM (SPS) DECK ....................................................................................... 18 2.1.1 Description .......................................................................................................................... 18 2.1.2 Product Development and Corporate Information ............................................................ 20 2.1.3 Constructability ................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.4 Functionality and Safety...................................................................................................... 22 2.1.5 Design and Analysis ............................................................................................................. 23 2.1.6 Durability and Service Life ................................................................................................... 27 2.1.7 Maintenance ....................................................................................................................... 29 2.1.8 Research .............................................................................................................................. 30 2.1.9 Recent Bridge Installations ................................................................................................. 30 2.1.10 Florida Bascule Bridge Specific Solution ............................................................................. 33 2.1.11 Costs .................................................................................................................................... 37 FPID 419497‐1‐B2‐01 Bascule Bridge Lightweight Solid Deck Retrofit Research May 14, 2013 i FINAL Deck Alternative Screening Report 2.1.12 References .......................................................................................................................... 38 2.2 ALUMINUM ORTHOTROPIC DECK ............................................................................................... 40 2.2.1 Description .......................................................................................................................... 40 2.2.2 Product Development and Corporate Information ............................................................ 41 2.2.3 Recent Bridge Installations ................................................................................................. 44 2.2.4 Florida Bascule Bridge Specific Solution ............................................................................. 46 2.2.5 Functionality and Safety...................................................................................................... 51 2.2.6 Durability and Service Life ................................................................................................... 51 2.2.7 Design and Analysis ............................................................................................................. 55 2.2.8 Constructability ................................................................................................................... 55 2.2.9 Costs .................................................................................................................................... 56 2.2.10 References .......................................................................................................................... 58 2.3. FIBERGLASS REINFORCED POLYMER (FRP) COMPOSITE DECK ................................................... 59 2.3.1 Description .......................................................................................................................... 59 2.3.2 Product Development and Corporate Information ............................................................ 60 2.3.3 Recent Bridge Installations ................................................................................................. 61 2.3.4 Design and Analysis ............................................................................................................. 66 2.3.5 Functionality and Safety...................................................................................................... 69 2.3.6 Durability and Service Life ................................................................................................... 70 2.3.7 Florida Bascule Bridge Specific Solution ............................................................................. 77 2.3.8 Constructability ................................................................................................................... 80 2.3.9 Costs .................................................................................................................................... 81 2.3.10 References .......................................................................................................................... 83 2.4 ULTRA‐HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE (UHPC) DECK .............................................................. 85 2.4.1 Description .......................................................................................................................... 85 2.4.2 Product Development and Corporate Information ............................................................ 88 2.4.3 Recent Bridge Installations ................................................................................................. 88 2.4.4 Florida Bascule Bridge Specific Solution ............................................................................. 89 2.4.5 Functionality and Safety...................................................................................................... 91 2.4.6 Durability and Service Life ................................................................................................... 92 2.4.7 Maintenance ....................................................................................................................... 93 2.4.8 Design .................................................................................................................................. 94 FPID 419497‐1‐B2‐01 Bascule Bridge Lightweight Solid Deck Retrofit Research May 14, 2013 ii FINAL Deck Alternative Screening Report 2.4.9 Research .............................................................................................................................. 94 2.4.10 Constructability ................................................................................................................... 94 2.4.11 Costs .................................................................................................................................... 95 2.4.12 References ........................................................................................................................ 101 3.0 WEARING SURFACE EVALUATION ................................................................................................. 102 3.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visit Ohio's Historic Bridges
    SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION Visit Ohio’s Historic Bridges Historic and unique bridges have a way of sticking in our collective memories. Many of us remember the bridge we crossed walking to school, a landmark on the way to visit relatives, the gateway out of town or a welcoming indication that you are back in familiar territory. The Ohio Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ohio Historic Bridge Association, Ohio History Connection’s State Historic Preservation Office, TourismOhio and historicbridges.org, has assembled a list of stunning bridges across the state that are well worth a journey. Ohio has over 500 National Register-listed and historic bridges, including over 150 wooden covered bridges. The following map features iron, steel and concrete struc- tures, and even a stone bridge built when canals were still helping to grow Ohio’s economy. Some were built for transporting grain to market. Other bridges were specifically designed to blend into the scenic landscape of a state or municipal park. Many of these featured bridges are Ohio Historic Bridge Award recipients. The annual award is given to bridge owners and engineers that rehabilitate, preserve or reuse historic structures. The awards are sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration, ODOT and Ohio History Connection’s State Historic Preservation Office. Anthony Wayne Bridge - Toledo, OH Ohio Department of Transportation SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION 2 17 18 SOUTHEAST REGION in eastern Ohio, Columbiana County has Metropark’s Huntington Reservation on the community. A project that will rehabilitate several rehabilitated 1880’s through truss shore of Lake Erie along US 6/Park Drive.
    [Show full text]
  • CSX Rolling Lift Bridge
    Issue 41 use this 10/4/06 12:50 Page 1 In the picture The definitive publication for bridge professionals worldwide | Issue No. 41 | Fourth Quarter 2005 | www.bridgeweb.com Issue 41 use this 10/4/06 12:51 Page 2 movable bridges A moving story The sheer scope and variety of movable bridges that have been built in the last decade demonstrate just a few of the exciting possibilities that are available to designers and architects. Charles Birnstiel, Jeffrey Routson, and Paul Skelton explain movable bridge is generally a bridge across a navigable waterway ropes that pass over sheaves at the rest piers of the lift span; these sheaves that has at least one span which can be temporarily moved in order are usually on top of the towers. The counterweights minimise the energy to increase vertical clearance for vessels sailing through the channel. required to move the span. Vertical lift bridges can be categorised by the drive Few of the thousands of existing movable highway and railway machinery location; the main types of balanced vertical lift bridges are: the Abridges are alike, considering their architectural, structural, and span drive, the tower drive, the connected tower drive, and the pit drive, or mechanical features. Yet movable bridges can be classified on the basis of the table lift. motion of their movable spans; in terms of the displacement and axes of The movable span of a swing bridge rotates about a vertical, or pivot axis. displacement (see table). If this is at the centre of the span, it is said be symmetrical or to have equal The movable deck, or leaf, of a simple trunnion bascule rotates about length arms; otherwise it is unsymmetrical or bobtailed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Networks and Crossings Contents Contents
    WATER , NETWORKS AND CROSSINGS CONTENTS 3 Water, networks and crossings Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................. 164 3.1 WATER BALANCE ............................................................................................................................ 166 3.1.1 Earth ....................................................................................................................................... 166 3.1.2 Evaporation and precipitation ................................................................................................. 167 3.1.3 Runoff ..................................................................................................................................... 169 3.1.4 Static balance ......................................................................................................................... 174 3.1.5 Movement ignoring resistance................................................................................................ 175 3.1.6 Resistance .............................................................................................................................. 178 3.1.7 Erosion and sedimentation ..................................................................................................... 184 3.1.8 Hydraulic geometry of stream channels ................................................................................. 186 3.1.9 River morphology...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Article: Types of Movable Bridges and Their Construction Details I
    Article: Types of Movable Bridges and their Construction Details _____________________________________________________________ Introduction Movable bridges are designed and constructed to change its position and occasionally its shapes to permit the passage of vessels and boats in the waterway. This type of bridge is generally cost effective since the utilization of long approaches and high piers are not required. When the waterway is opened to vessels and ships, traffics over the bridge would be stopped and vice-versa. Moveable bridge is a bridge that can change position (and even shape in some cases) to allow for passage of boats below. This has a lower cost of building because it has no high piers and long approaches but its use stops the road traffic when the bridge is open for river traffic. The oldest know movable bridge was built in the 2nd millennium BC in the ancient Egypt. History also knows for one early movable bridge built in Chaldea in the Middle East in 6th century BC. Since then they were almost forgotten until Middle Ages when they again appeared in Europe. Leonardo da Vinci designed and built designed and built bascule bridges in 15th century. He also made designs and built models of swing and a retractable bridges. Industrial revolution allowed for new technologies like mass-produced steel and powerful machines and it is no surprise that new types of modern movable bridges appeared in 19th century. They are built even today but many movable bridges that are still in use in United States are built in early 20th century. In time, some of them are repaired with lighter materials and their gears are replaced with hydraulics.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Builders and Designers Active in Maryland the Following Companies and Individuals Are Known to Have Designed and Built Br
    Bridge Builders and Designers Active in Maryland The following companies and individuals are known to have designed and built bridges in Maryland, based on documentary research alone. Descriptive information on each company or person was compiled from several sources, including prior historic resource survey data, historical research materials, lists provided by Rita Suffness of the Maryland State Highway Administration, prior bridge inventories performed in Pennsylvania and Delaware, and Victor Darnell's Directory of American Bridge Building Companies. A. and W. Denmead & Sons, Baltimore, Maryland This firm, located on the Canton waterfront of Baltimore, built bridges for Baltimore City during the 1850s. A. J. Boyle, Baltimore, Maryland This firm built SHA bridge 3010, US 1 over the Patapsco River, in 1915. American Bridge Company, Pittsburgh and Ambridge, Pennsylvania Founded in 1900, this massive bridge building company was the result of financier and U.S. Steel magnate J.P. Morgan's consolidation of twenty-eight formerly independent bridge companies, including several known to have marketed bridges in Maryland. In 1903, the American Bridge Company opened a huge new plant at Ambridge (Economy), Pennsylvania. Four additional companies, including the Toledo Bridge Company and the Virginia Bridge and Iron Company, were bought between 1901 and 1936. American Bridge Company is known to have fabricated or built numerous bridges for the State Roads Commission between the 1920s and the 1960s. Baltimore Bridge Company, Baltimore, Maryland Organized in 1869, this company was the direct successor to Smith, Latrobe and Company. The company was a major local competitor of Wendel Bollman's Patapsco Bridge Company and other Baltimore-based bridge building firms such as Campbell & Zell and H.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Water (Prof.Dr.Ir
    3 Water (Prof.dr.ir. C. van den Akker) 3.1 WATER BALANCE ..........................................................................................................................148 3.1.1 Evaporation and precipitation..........................................................................................148 3.1.2 Runoff .............................................................................................................................150 3.1.3 References to Water balance..........................................................................................151 3.2 RIVER DRAINAGE...........................................................................................................................152 3.2.1 River morphology............................................................................................................152 3.2.2 Q by measurement..........................................................................................................158 3.2.3 Q on different water heights in the same profile ..............................................................159 3.2.4 Calculating Q with rounghness........................................................................................161 3.2.5 Using drainage data........................................................................................................162 3.2.6 Probability of extreme discharges ...................................................................................163 3.2.7 Level and discharge regulators .......................................................................................165
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 – Introduction
    PART 1 – INTRODUCTION PART 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1– INTRODUCTION PART 1 – INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1-i CHAPTER 1.1 – PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 CHAPTER 1.2 – SCOPE .................................................................................................................................... 1-2 CHAPTER 1.3 – MOVABLE BRIDGE TYPES ................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.1 BASCULE BRIDGES ............................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3.1.1 Design and Operation ..................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.2 SWING-SPAN BRIDGES ...................................................................................................................... 1-9 1.3.2.1 Design and Operation ................................................................................................................... 1-10 1.3.3 VERTICAL-LIFT BRIDGES ................................................................................................................. 1-14 1.3.3.1 Design and Operation ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bascule Bridge” Galphade Krushna V
    e-ISSN (O): 2348-4470 Scientific Journal of Impact Factor (SJIF): 5.71 p-ISSN (P): 2348-6406 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development Technophilia-2018. Volume 5, Special Issue 04, Feb.-2018 (UGC Approved) “Bascule Bridge” Galphade Krushna V. , Morde Rahul R. Mr. Jadhav M. B. Department Of Civil Engineering , Jaihind Polytechnic Kuran. Abstract- A bascule bridge (sometimes referred to as a drawbridge) is a moveable bridge with a counterweight that continuously balances a span, or "leaf", throughout its upward swing to provide clearance for boat traffic. It may be single- or double- leafed.The name comes from the French term for balance scale, which employs the same principle. Bascule bridges are the most common type of movable span because they open quickly and require relatively little energy to operate, while providing the possibility for unlimited vertical clearance for marine traffic. It is commonly made by steelwork.It is cantilever type bridge having a short span. Keywords- drawbridge;movable;energy;balance span;short span;cantilever;steelwork. I. INTRODUCTION” Fortunately, misalignment usually becomes a problem for movable bridges after many years of service dueto changes in structural rigidity, machinery wear and fatigue, shifts in foundations due to subsidence, orbarge impact, which causes permanent structural distortion or rupture. However, in general, steel movable bridges are economical, compact, and useful transportation structures if they are well designed and built, properly maintained, and suitably aligned. They have honorably served many American states, cities, and counties for more than 100 years. bascule bridges are possibly the least practical, from a maintenance and operation standpoint, of all commonly used types of modern era movable bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Design of Movable Bridges
    HEAVY MOVABLE STRUCTURES, INC. TWELFTH BEINNIAL SYMPOSIUM November 3rd thru 6,th 2008 ORLANDO, FLORIDA Innovative Design of Movable Bridges Karl HUMPF Reiner SAUL Manager Bridge Dept. Consultant Leonhardt, Andrä und Leonhardt, Andrä und Partner GmbH Partner GmbH Stuttgart, Germany Stuttgart, Germany humpf@s.lap-consult.com saul@s.lap-consult.com Karl Humpf, born 1951, received Reiner Saul, born 1938, received her civil engineering degree his civil engineering degree from from the University of Aachen, the University of Hannover, Germany, in 1975. Germany, in 1963, and his Dr.- Ing. E. h. from the University of Braunschweig in 2003. Summary The paper deals with the most outstanding movable bridges designed by Leonhardt, Andrä und Partner during the last five decades: 1 lift bridge, 3 swing bridges, 1 bascule bridge and present a design proposal for a totally new type of movable bridge, the double balance beam bridge. Keywords: Lift bridge with concrete towers – incrementally launched swing bridge from prestressed concrete – cable-stayed swing bridge – double flap bascule bridge designed against ship impact and earthquake – double balance beam bridge. 1. Introduction 1.1 General One of the great winners of the globalization is the transport sector, especially the maritime transport. With cost between Fareast and Europe of about - 2 $ for a DVD-player - 30 $ for a television set even the longest way pays off! This has lead to an explosion-like increase of container traffic, e.g . between 2004 and 2005 in Shanghai by 24 %, in Dubai by 17 % and in Hamburg by 17 % [1]. Consequently, the number of size of container ships has increased permanently, Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Validation of Operation of a Hydraulic Bascule Bridge
    Validation of operation of a hydraulic bascule bridge European Altair Technology Conference 2017 Ronald Kett, FLUIDON GmbH What is a bascule bridge? . A bascule bridge (sometimes referred to as a drawbridge) is a moveable bridge with a counterweight that continuously balances a span, or "leaf", throughout its upward swing to provide clearance for boat traffic . It may be single or double leafed Folie 2 What has FLUIDON to do with a Bascule Bridge? . The operation of bascule bridges is a safety-critical application . All parts (mechanics, hydraulics, control, …) have to be checked for function, operability, and safety . Although the movement is very slow, there might be high dynamic forces e.g. in case of an emergency stop . During design of the bridge a review of the hydraulic system by simulation is often prescribed . That’s where FLUIDON comes into play: . FLUIDON has large expertise in verification and optimization of hydraulic systems . FLUIDON is an engineering service provider specialized in the field of fluid power systems and simulation of fluid power . The simulation software DSHplus is a product of FLUIDON . Task: Validation of operation of the hydraulic system of the new Rethe bridge in Hamburg Folie 3 Some Impressions Best known bascule bridge Folie 4 Some facts New construction of Rethe bridge in Hamburg . Span length: 104 m . Width: ~ 25 m . 4 leaves with a length of 50 m each . Separation of road and rail traffic . largest bascule bridge of Europe . replaces a vertical-lift bridge . Utilization: . more than 7.000 trucks and passenger cars per day . about 30 freight trains per day .
    [Show full text]
  • Congress St. Bascule Bridge Spanning Fort Point Channel At
    Congress St. Bascule Bridge HAERMA-^S Spanning Fort Point Channel at Congress St. Boston Suffolk County Rf\&li Massachusetts 77 WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA PHOTOGRAPHS -.; Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD HAEE MA-38 CONGRESS STREET BASCULE BRIDGE Date: 1930 Location: Spanning Fort Point Channel at Congress St. Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts. Owner: City of Boston Significance: The Congress Street Bridge, built in 1930, is a trunnion bascule bridge and the most recent of the five movable-truss bridges spanning the Fort Point Channel. It replaced a steam operated swing draw and was electrically operated. Transmitted by: Dan Clement, 1984. Historical information written by Peter Stott. Addendum to: Congress Street Bascule Bridge HAER No. MA-38 Spanning the Fort Point Channel, located on the boundary between Boston Proper and South Boston Boston Suffolk County Massachusetts [ « \r^«j j PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record Mid-Atlantic Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 CONGRESS STREET BASCULE BRIDGE IIAER No. MA-3S INDEX TG PHOTCRAPHS (PAGE 5; ■ II-* 15 -M *E :1," 114 '■li- —'- V-HnhiiiiL fe-' >;-i :l i . i t ■ 2 4. ■a "*<§> Ltl .•5 "t® If WHi '31 ,*i ■•i. ■ . 5 ■ 'K -f'^T fefP 0 . ! ao ■ £ b> AIA5JT ?*" Addendum to: Congress Street Bascule Bridge HAER No. MA-38 (Page 2) One page of documentation was previously submitted to the Library of Congress. Location: Spanning the Fort Point Channel, located on the boundary between Boston Proper and South Boston Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts UTM: 9.331000.4690660 Quad: Boston South Date of Construction: 1929-1931; altered 1954-1955, 1974-1976, 1980, 1984 Present Owner: City of Boston Public Works Department Joseph F.
    [Show full text]