Structural Evaluation of a Motorcycle Frame
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FACULDADE DE ENGENHARIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO Structural Evaluation of a Motorcycle Frame Carlos Filipe do Lago Vieira Dissertation for Master’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering Supervisor: Mário Augusto Pires Vaz Second Supervisor: Miguel Ângelo Nogueira da Costa Oliveira October 2014 c Carlos Filipe do Lago Vieira, 2014 Structural Evaluation of a Motorcycle Frame Carlos Filipe do Lago Vieira Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Mecânica [email protected] DEMec - Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto Porto, Portugal Abstract This thesis presents a numerical analysis of a trail motorcycle frame. The frame is evalu- ated in different tests and its performance is evaluated. Solustions are also suggested for the current problems. The finite element method analysis techniques were used for the solution of the prob- lem. To that end, the program ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 was used, for both modal analysis and static loads applied. The model was analysed and its behaviour was evaluated in each of the cases. To improve its performance, an optimization of the frame model was done and suggestions were made. i ii Resumo Esta tese apresenta a análise numérica de um quadro para um motociclo para trail. O quadro é avaliado em diferentes testes e a sua prestação é comentada. São também su- geridas soluções para os atuais problemas. As técnicas de análise pelo método dos elementos finitos são aplicadas para a re- solução do problema. Para tal efeito utilizou-se o programa ANSYS R Workbench 15.0, quer para a análise modal, quer para as solicitações estáticas. O modelo foi analisado e o seu comportamento foi avaliado em cada um dos casos, tendo-se realizado uma optimização do modelo do quadro ou realizadas sugestões para o melhor desempenho do mesmo. iii iv Acknowledgements I would like to thank all my family specially my mother and my father who have given me unconditional support and guidance as well as my brother who taught me that giving up is not an option. Also I want to thank all my friends that accompanied me all this years for the great moments and stories that we shared. A special thanks to my flat mates who put up with me for four years for their never ending support and understanding. I would also like to thank Professor Dr. Mário Augusto Pires Vaz for the support and availability during the course of this thesis. Carlos Filipe do Lago Vieira v vi “I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” Thomas A. Edison vii viii Contents 1 Introduction1 1.1 Given Objectives . .1 1.2 Methodology Applied . .2 1.3 Outline of the Thesis . .2 2 State of the Art5 2.1 Motorcycle History . .5 2.1.1 Early Days . .5 2.1.2 The War and the Motorcycle . .7 2.1.3 Motorcycles Nowadays . .8 2.2 Frame Designs . .9 2.2.1 Tubular Frames . 10 2.2.2 Trellis Frames . 11 2.2.3 Tubular Backbone Frames . 11 2.2.4 Fabricated Backbone Frames . 12 2.2.5 Monocoque Frames . 13 2.2.6 Twin-spar Frames . 13 2.2.7 Structural Engine . 14 2.3 Trail Motorcycle . 14 2.4 The Company: AJP Motos . 15 2.5 Finite Element Method . 17 2.6 Summary . 18 3 The Frame 19 3.1 Steel Parts . 19 3.1.1 Oil Tank, Steering Column and Engine Cradle . 20 3.2 Aluminium Alloy Parts . 21 3.2.1 Backbone . 23 3.2.2 Lateral Beams . 24 3.2.3 Swing-arm . 26 3.2.4 Connecting Rods . 27 3.3 Other Parts . 28 3.4 The Engine . 28 3.5 Summary . 29 ix x CONTENTS 4 Structural Analysis 31 4.1 Mesh . 32 4.2 Case 1: Landing with both wheels . 33 4.2.1 Analysis Parameters . 33 4.2.2 Results . 35 4.3 Case 2: Braking/Frontal Impact . 36 4.3.1 Analysis Parameters . 36 4.3.2 Results . 38 4.4 Case 3: Landing on the back wheel . 39 4.4.1 Analysis Parameters . 39 4.4.2 Results . 40 4.4.3 Optimization . 43 4.5 Case 4: Landing only with the front wheel . 44 4.5.1 Analysis Parameters . 44 4.5.2 Results . 45 4.6 Case 5: Torsional Stiffness . 45 4.6.1 Analysis Parameters . 46 4.6.2 Results . 47 4.7 Case 6: Lateral Stiffness . 49 4.7.1 Analysis Parameters . 49 4.7.2 Results . 50 4.8 Case 7: Vertical Stiffness . 52 4.8.1 Analysis Parameters . 52 4.8.2 Results . 52 4.9 Summary . 54 5 Modal Analysis 55 5.1 Lower Frame . 56 5.1.1 Analysis Parameters . 56 5.1.2 Results . 56 5.2 Lateral Beams and Backbone . 57 5.2.1 Analysis Parameters . 57 5.2.2 Results . 58 5.3 Main Frame . 59 5.3.1 Analysis Parameters . 59 5.3.2 Results . 60 5.4 Swing-arm . 63 5.4.1 Analysis Parameters . 63 5.4.2 Results . 63 5.5 Summary . 65 6 Conclusions and Future Work 67 6.1 Conclusions . 67 6.1.1 Results . 67 6.1.2 Critical Analysis . 68 6.2 Future Work . 69 CONTENTS xi A Results from the pre-analysis extracted from Solidworks R 71 B APLD Commands inserted in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 to retrieve the rota- tion in the torsional analysis 73 C Market Opponent Models 75 C.1 Yamaha XT660Z Ténéré . 75 C.2 BMW G650 GS . 77 C.3 KTM 690 Enduro R . 80 References 83 xii CONTENTS List of Figures 2.1 1867 Sylvester Howard Roper Steam Velocipede [2]............5 2.2 1885 Daimler Reitwagen [5]........................6 2.3 1901 Indian Motorcycle [8].........................7 2.4 WWI Harley-Davidson Motorcycle [9]...................8 2.5 Honda Model D: first ever Honda motorcycle [11].............8 2.6 Cradle frame [14].............................. 10 2.7 KTM 200 Duke Triangulated Frame [16].................. 11 2.8 Kawasaki Z800 Tubular Backbone Frame [17]............... 12 2.9 Fabricated Backbone Frame from the 1960s 250 cc Ossa GP [14]..... 12 2.10 1973 John Player Norton monocoque chassis [19]............. 13 2.11 Twin-spar frame from a Yamaha R1 [14].................. 14 2.12 1980 BMW R80 G/S [22].......................... 15 2.13 AJP PR5 Enduro [23]............................ 17 2.14 Process leading to fabrication of advanced engineering systems [24]... 17 3.1 Oil Tank, Steering Column and Engine Cradle . 20 3.2 Engine Connection Parts to the Cradle . 21 3.3 Cast Aluminium Alloy parts in the full model . 22 3.4 Chassis Backbone . 23 3.5 Connection detail of the Backbone to the Oil Tank . 24 3.6 Left and right side Beams . 24 3.7 Lateral Beam inside detail . 25 3.8 Swingarm . 26 3.9 Swing-arm inside detail . 27 3.10 Connecting Rods . 28 4.1 Mesh used in the analysis, generated by ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 .... 32 4.2 Case 1 parameters introduced in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ........ 34 4.3 Case 1 results extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 .......... 35 4.4 Case 2 parameters introduced in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ........ 37 4.5 Case 2 results extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 .......... 38 4.6 Case 3 parameters introduced in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ........ 40 4.7 Case 3 results extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 for the whole structure . 41 4.8 Case 3 results for the swing-arm in the different approaches extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ....................... 42 xiii xiv LIST OF FIGURES 4.9 Original and re-designed connecting rod supports . 43 4.10 Comparison between the stresses with the original design and the re- designed connecting rod supports extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 43 4.11 Case 4 parameters introduced in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ........ 44 4.12 Case 4 results extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 .......... 45 4.13 Case 5 parameters for the main frame introduced in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ..................................... 46 4.14 Case 5 parameters for the swing-arm introduced in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ..................................... 47 4.15 Torsional total deformation on the main frame extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ............................... 47 4.16 Torsional total deformation on the swing-arm extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ............................... 48 4.17 Case 6 parameters for the main frame introduced in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ..................................... 49 4.18 Case 6 parameters for the swing-arm introduced in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ..................................... 50 4.19 Lateral total deformation on the main frame extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ............................... 50 4.20 Lateral total deformation on the swing-arm extracted from ANSYS R Work- bench 15.0 .................................. 51 4.21 Case 7 parameters for the main frame introduced in ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ..................................... 52 4.22 Vertical total deformation extracted from ANSYS R Workbench 15.0 ... 53 5.1 Lower frame mesh for the modal analysis generated by.