Religion and Criminal Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Religion and Criminal Law RELIGION ANO CRIMINAL LAW RELIGION ET DROIT PÉNAL RELIGION AND CRIMINAL LAW RELIGION ET DROIT PENAL" Edited by MATTI KOTIRANTA NORMAN DoE PEETERS LEUVEN- PARIS - WALPOLE, MA 2013 En hommage a Alexis Pauly Pour sa jidélité aux travaux du consortium A catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. © 2013 Uitgeverij Peeters, Bondgenotenlaan 153, B-3000 Leuven' (Belgium) D/2013/0602/21 ISBN 978-90-429-2501-4 All rights reserved. Except in those cases expressly determined by law, no part of this publication may be multiplied, saved in an automated data file or made public in any way whatsoever without the express prior written consent of the publishers. CONTENTS Preface............................................................................................... 1 MAm KOTIRANTA The relation between religion and criminallaw as a topic of discussion throughout Europe: an introduction to the national reports .......... ........................ .... ..... .. .. ........... .......... 3 RicHARD POTZ AND BRioiTTB ScHINKELE- Religion and Criminal Law in Austria.................................................................................. 13 EvA BREMS Religion in Belgian Criminal Law............................. 21 HRISTO P. BEROV - Religion and Criminal Law in Bulgaria ........... 27 A~LES C. EMILIANIDES Religion in the Criminal Law in Cyprus 35 ZABoJ HoRAK AND JIIU RAJMUND TRETERA- Religion and Criminal Law: The Czech Republic ....................................................... 41 LISBET CHRISTOFFERSEN- Religion in Criminal Law: Denmark ...... 49 MERILIN K!VIORO - Religion and Criminal Law in Estonia.............. 55 KIMMO NuoTIO - Religion in the Criminal Law of Finland............. 63 lsABELLE RIASSETTO- Religion et Droit Pénal en France................. 75 RicHARD PuzA Religion in Criminal Law: Germany .................... 97 CoNSTANTL~os G. PAPAGEORmou The Special Treatment of Reli- gions in the Context of Greek Penal Law ................................ 115 BALÁZS ScHANDA- Religíon in Criminal Law: Hungary ................ 121 PAuL CoLTON- Religion in Criminal Law in Ireland ...................... 129 ENRico VITALI- Religion et Droit Pénal en Italie............................ 155 RINooLos BALoms Legal Protection of Religion in the Republic of Latvia.................................................................................... 163 ANDRIUS SPRINDZIUNAS - Religion and Criminal Law in Lithuania 177 ALEXIS PAULY (t) ET FRANt;::ois MovsE Religion et Droit Pénal- Luxembourg.. ........ .................... ...... .. .. .......... .......... .. .. .. .... .... ..... 189 VIII CONTENTS SoPHIE VAN BnsTERVELD - Religion and Criminal Law in the Netherlands ....................................................................................... 199 MICHAL RYNKOWSKI- Religion and Criminal Law: Poland ............ 205 PREFACE JosÉ DE SousA E BruTo- Religion and Criminal Law in Portugal.. 215 ANm BoGDAN - Religion and Criminal Law in Romanía................ 225 The 20th annual conference of the European Consortium for Church and State Research took place at the Church Training College in the MATÚS NEMEc - Religion and Criminal Law in the Slovak Republic 233 famous culturallandscape of Lake Tuusulanjarvi at Hirvenpaa, Finland, AGUSTÍN MoTILLA - Religion in Spanish Criminal Law . .. .. .. ... ..... 241 on 2-5 October 2008. The theme for the meeting was 'Religion and Criminal Law'. LARS FRIEDNER- Religion in Criminal Law: Sweden ..................... 255 The conference was organized and prepared on behalf of the Consor­ NoRMAN DoE, RussELL SANDBERG AND FRANK CRANMER- Religion tium by Professor Matti Kotiranta, University of Joensuu. The conference and Criminal Law in the United Kingdom............................... 261 papers, reproduced in this volume of proceedings, were prepared and circulated in advance, and the delegates consisted of both Consortium members and the national reporters. The conference was attended by forty-two people representing the countries of the European Union. The opening ceremony included speeches by Rt. Rev. Matti Repo, Bishop of Tampere, representing the Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Finland, Mr. Joni Hiitola, representing the Finnish Ministry of Education, and Professor Sophie van Bijsterveld, President of the European Consor­ tium for Church and State Research in 2008. Professor van Bijsterveld addressed the topic of religion in criminal law from the perspective of intemational human rights documents and the principie of freedom of expression. As she put it: "lt seems that there is a new element in the intemational dimension. Fundamental choices on the balance between freedom of expression and religion, made on the basis of a national understanding, can trigger consequences on a worldwide scale, as the 'Danish cartoons' showed in spring 2006. What does this mean for the way we deal with religion and freedom of expression at the national level? Has an implicit hierarchy of rights emerged that is now being challenged? What concept of pluralism do we embrace? And what sort of society do we envisage as a consequence? What role is there for criminallaw? Is criminallaw meant to be effective, symbolic, or does it fulfil other functions? What does all this mean for the way the state, the law, or criminal law in particular, deals with or protects religion as a whole?" The first session, chaired by Professor Mark Hill, dealt with the penal protection of religion. On the basis of the wealth of information con­ tained in the extensive national reports, the discussion considered the legal framework (e.g. the degree to which religion is govemed by the 2 MATTI KOTIRANTA criminallaws of the conntries of Europe), the social reality (e.g. whether religion at the present time has a function in criminal law, or to what extent criminallaw coverage is favourable or hostile to religion), and the MATTI KOTIRAl"lTA dynamics (e.g. current or likely future developments) at work in the conntries of Europe. The second session, chaired by Professor Silvio THE RELATION BETWEEN RELIGION AND CRIMINAL LAW AS Ferrari, considered criminal offences committed in the name of religion, A TOPIC OF DISCUSSION THROUGHOUT EUROPE: an area which has experienced very different approaches across Europe. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE NATIONAL REPORTS The final session, chaired by Church Counsellor Lars Friedner, dealt with criminal law and sects. Here one can mention that criminal law may configure special offences out of behaviour considered typical of sorne Although there has been a desire in modero Europe to keep legislation sectarian religious movements (e. g. malicious abuse of ignorance or on freedom of religion outside the domain of the criminallaw, the mul­ weakness). In addition to this, questions might be asked about what ticultural character of the society in which we live has raised once again, offences are linked to the sectarian milieu. What are the material and and in a new form, the issue of whether particular protection should be psychological elements of each offence and its punishment? granted for religious feelings. 1 wísh to thank all those who have made contributions to this volume The stimulus for this discussion has arisen from the conflict in priorities and to the meeting of the Consortium: members, reporters and invited between the principies of freedom of expression and freedom of religious guests. 1 would also thank most cordially all those who helped organise conviction brought about by the multiculturalism, and most especially the this conference: the sponsor for the event, the Evangelical-Lutherari presence of Islam. The discussion flared up in 2006 in response to the Church of Finland, without which the conference would not have been extensive debate within Europe over the cartoons of the Prophet Moham­ possible, and most especially Mr. Risto Junttila, secretary-general to med, which concemed freedom of expression and freedom of religion as the Church Council, and his secretary, Mrs. Tuija Korva, who both specifically European values, and which even elicited a statement from the helped in organising the meeting in JarvenpiHi. Special thanks also go to chairman of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso. 1 Ms. Sirpa Koski of the Fínland Travel Bureau for making the flight arrangements, to Ms. Kati Valiaho, marketing secretary of the Church Training College at Jarvenpaa, for the accommodation and other arrange­ t "The publication of cartoons in Danish and other European newspapers and the .reac­ ments, and to the vigorous stewards of the conference, Ms. Siiri Toiviainen tions to this have revealed sensitive and fundamental issues. The cartoons have aggneved many Muslims all over the world.... The Commission's concem is n~t with the p~ac~ful and Mr. Heikki Repo, both students of theology. response of the majority to the cartoons. lt is with the violent reacttons of. a ~onty. Finally, I am indebted to Professor Norman Doe for preparing this Reactions which have been disowned by many Muslims ... Our European soctety ts based volume of proceedings. It has been a great pleasure and privilege to work on respect for the individual person's life and freedom, equality of rights between men and women, freedom of speech, and a clear distinction between politics and religion ..our with him. I also thank Peeters, in Leuven, Belgium, for the publishing point of departure is that as human beings we are free, independent, equal and responstble. work. We must safeguard these principies. Freedom of speech is
Recommended publications
  • Imagereal Capture
    The Right to Protection of Religious Feelings Rex Tauati Ahdar* Introduction Do religious people have a legal right to have their feelings protected? When publications, films, radio and television broadcasts, artwork and so on, deeply offend and upset the religious sensibilities of devout citizens, should the state intervene? Should insulting religious material be banned? This question was, of course, acutely raised, but not necessarily answered, on the world stage with the furore over the Danish newspaper editorial cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad in a highly unflattering light.' In New Zealand, a controversy over a satirical television programme generated similar feelings of outrage and indignation on the part of certain believers - fortunately without any violence erupting - and this event provides the impetus for this article. In February 2006, Canwest TV Works Ltd screened "Bloody Mary", an episode in the American Soufl~Park satirical cartoon series, on one of its television channels. In brief, the episode featured a statue of the Virgin Mary spraying menstrual blood on a cardinal and the Pope. Many complaints ensued, including one from the New Zealand Catholic Bishops Conference that charged that the show was deeply insulting and that it demeaned icons and practices venerated by Catholics. It said great pain and offence had been caused not only to the Catholic community, but also to members of other Christian denominations, Muslims and many non-Christians. In that last respect it is interesting that nonc other than the Prime Minister, Helen Clark, a self-confessed agnostic, said that, as a woman, she was offended: "I personally find it quite revolting."' The numerous complaints to CanWest did not lead it to change its mind and, indeed, it brought forward the scheduled date of screening by three months.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 a Quotation of Normality – the Family Myth 3 'C'mon Mum, Monday
    Notes 2 A Quotation of Normality – The Family Myth 1 . A less obvious antecedent that The Simpsons benefitted directly and indirectly from was Hanna-Barbera’s Wait ‘til Your Father Gets Home (NBC 1972–1974). This was an attempt to exploit the ratings successes of Norman Lear’s stable of grittier 1970s’ US sitcoms, but as a stepping stone it is entirely noteworthy through its prioritisation of the suburban narrative over the fantastical (i.e., shows like The Flintstones , The Jetsons et al.). 2 . Nelvana was renowned for producing well-regarded production-line chil- dren’s animation throughout the 1980s. It was extended from the 1960s studio Laff-Arts, and formed in 1971 by Michael Hirsh, Patrick Loubert and Clive Smith. Its success was built on a portfolio of highly commercial TV animated work that did not conform to a ‘house-style’ and allowed for more creative practice in television and feature projects (Mazurkewich, 1999, pp. 104–115). 3 . The NBC US version recast Feeble with the voice of The Simpsons regular Hank Azaria, and the emphasis shifted to an American living in England. The show was pulled off the schedules after only three episodes for failing to connect with audiences (Bermam, 1999, para 3). 4 . Aardman’s Lab Animals (2002), planned originally for ITV, sought to make an ironic juxtaposition between the mistreatment of animals as material for scientific experiment and the direct commentary from the animals them- selves, which defines the show. It was quickly assessed as unsuitable for the family slot that it was intended for (Lane, 2003 p.
    [Show full text]
  • FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations
    FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic Review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round For further information, GRECO Secretariat Directorate General I - Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex Tel.: + 33 (0)3 88 41 30 43 Fax: + 33 (0)3 88 41 39 55 www.coe.int/greco www.coe.int PREMS 67012 FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal Law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round Contents Introduction ........................................................ 5 General themes and observations ...................... 9 Specific Themes ................................................ 20 Public/private distinctions ..................................... 20 Public Official ...................................................... 20 Exercise of functions ............................................ 23 Autonomous offences ........................................... 26 Elemental Deficiencies and Consistency .................. 28 Undue advantage ................................................ 31 Private Sector ..................................................... 35 Trading in influence .............................................. 39 Bribery of foreign and international actors ............... 43 ETS No. 191 (Jurors and Arbitrators) ...................... 45 Extra-territorial jurisdiction ................................... 47 Sanctions ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Working Papers 00/1 International Series Chair Forest Policy and Forest Economics Department of Forest Sciences
    Working Papers 00/1 International Series Chair Forest Policy and Forest Economics Department of Forest Sciences Trends in Forestry Legislation: Western Europe Maria-Teresa Cirelli and Franz Schmithüsen FAO Legislative Study On Line, Nr. 10; http://www.fao.org/legal/prs-ol/cirelli2.pdf (June 2000) Zurich 2000 I TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY II 1. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT FORESTRY LEGISLATION IN THE REGION 1 2. SIGNIFICANT TRENDS IN COUNTRY SPECIFIC FORESTRY LEGISLATION 11 2.1. Sustainable Forest Management 11 2.2. Forest Management Planning 12 2.3. People's Involvement in Forestry 14 2.4. Regulation of and Support to Private Forestry 17 2.5. Government Financial Support to Forestry 19 2.6. Harmonisation with Forestry Related Policies and Legislation 20 2.7. Protection against Forest Fires 21 3. FORESTRY RELATED EUROPEAN COMMUNITY LEGISLATION 22 4. CONCLUSIONS 26 LEGISLATION REVIEWED 28 BIBLIOGRAPHY 30 II SUMMARY In many countries of Western Europe forest laws have long histories, and have been subject to revision and amendment in light of new social, economic and environmental demands. As a result, there is a great variety of times of adoption, structures and contents in the principal forestry legislation as applicable at present. Nevertheless, a review of this body of legislation reveals certain overall trends and insights as to the evolutionary direction of forest law in the region. Generally, the content of most laws has become multi-purpose oriented and refers in particular to sustainable forest management, public participation, private forestry, Government support to forestry, integration of forestry and related activities, and protection against fires and the adverse effects from natural calamities.
    [Show full text]
  • Anssi Halmesvirta the British Conception of the Finnish
    Anssi Halmesvirta The British conception of the Finnish 'race', nation and culture, 1760-1918 Societas Historica Finlandiae Suomen Historiallinen Seura Finska Historiska Samfundet Studia Historica 34 Anssi Häme svida The British conception of the Finnish 'race', nation and culture, 1760 1918 SHS / Helsinki / 1990 Cover by Rauno Endén "The Bombardment of Sveaborg" (9-10 of August, 1855). A drawing by J. W. Carmichael, artist from the Illustrated London News ISSN 0081-6493 ISBN 951-8915-28-8 GUMMERUS KIRJAPAINO OY JYVÄSKYLÄ 1990 Contents PREFACE 7 INTRODUCTION 8 1. THE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY IMAGE OF THE FINN 29 1.1. Some precedents 29 1.2. The naturalists' view 36 1.3. The historians' view 43 1.4. Travel accounts 53 2. ON THE NORTH-EASTERN FRONTIER OF CIVILIZATION: THE EVOLUTION OF THE FINNS 81 2.1. The science of race 81 2.2. The place of the Finn in British pre-evolutionary anthropology, 1820-1855 88 2.3. Philology, ethnology and politics: the evolution of Finnish 111 2.4. The political and cultural status of Finland, 1809-1856: British perceptions 130 2.5. Agitation, war and aftermath 150 3. ARYANS OR MONGOLS? — BRITISH THEORIES OF FINNISH ORIGINS 167 4. THE FINNS, THEIR KALEVALA AND THEIR CULTURE.. 191 5. COMPARATIVE POLITICS AND BRITISH PERCEPTIONS OF THE PROGRESS OF THE FINNS, 1860-1899 209 5 6. BRITISH RESPONSES TO THE FINNISH-RUSSIAN CONSTITUTIONAL CONTENTION, 1899-1918 239 6.1. Immediate reactions 239 6.2. The Finnish question: variations on a Liberal theme 253 6.2.1. The constitutionalist argument 253 6.2.2. A compromise 266 6.2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Sec 2006/525 Annex to Report on Article 10 EN.Pdf
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 02.05.2006 SEC(2006) 525 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Annex to the REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT based on Article 10 of the Council Framework Decision of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings {COM(2006) 187 final} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL MEASURES TAKEN TO COMPLY WITH THE FRAMEWORK DECISION ........................................................................................ 3 1.1. Article 1: Offences concerning human trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation or sexual exploitation............................................................................... 3 1.2. Article 2: Offences related to the instigation,aiding,abetting and attempt................... 7 1.3. Article 3: Penalties .......................................................................................................9 1.4. Article 4 and 5: Liability of, and sanctions for, legal persons: .................................. 13 1.5. Article 6: Jurisdiction and Prosecution ...................................................................... 15 1.6. Article 7: Protection of, and assistance to, victims .................................................... 19 EN 2 EN 1. ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL MEASURES TAKEN TO COMPLY WITH THE FRAMEWORK DECISION As a preliminary point it should be noted that the implementation of the Framework Decision has in some Member States required the adoption of new legislation or the amendment of certain internal provisions. 1.1. Article 1: Offences concerning trafficking in human beings for the purpose of labour exploitation or sexual exploitation 1. The UN2 Trafficking Protocol’s definition of human trafficking formed the basis for the Council Framework Decision on combating trafficking in human beings (2002/629 JHA) (the “Framework Decision”). As a result, the definitions that have been agreed at EU level largely include the same elements used in the UN Protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of the Press 2008 Draft Country Reports
    www.freedomhouse.org Freedom of the Press 2008 Draft Country Reports Embargoed for April 29, 2008 Afghanistan Status: Not Free Legal Environment: 21 Political Environment: 30 Economic Environment: 20 Total Score: 71 As the media environment has continued to grow and diversify, journalists faced rising threats in 2007, mostly in the form of physical attacks and intimidation. Article 34 of the new constitution, passed in January 2004, provides for freedom of the press and of expression. A revised 2005 Press Law guarantees the right of citizens to obtain information and prohibits censorship. However, it retains broad restrictions on content that is “contrary to the principles of Islam or offensive to other religions and sects” and “matters leading to dishonoring and defaming individuals.” It also establishes five commissions intended to regulate media agencies and investigate complaints of misconduct; one of the commissions has the power to decide if journalists who contravene the law should face court prosecution or a fine. Critics of the law have alleged that its prohibition of “anti-Islamic” writings is overly vague and has led to considerable confusion within the journalistic community on what constitutes permissible content. Amendments to the media law proposed in May 2007 could give authorities greater control over content and include vague prohibitions on defamation; these were opposed by local journalists and the proposal had been withdrawn by the government by year’s end. Media outlets are occasionally fined or given warnings for broadcasting “un- Islamic” material or offending local culture. Cases of journalists and others being arrested on blasphemy charges have had a chilling effect on press freedom, with an accompanying rise in self-censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Headscarves in German Public Schools: Religious Minorities Are Welcome in Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They Are Religious
    NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 51 Issue 3 Perspectives on Post-Conflict Article 8 Constitutionalism January 2006 Headscarves in German Public Schools: Religious Minorities are Welcome in Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They are Religious Ruben Seth Fogel New York Law School Class of 2006 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Ruben Seth Fogel, Headscarves in German Public Schools: Religious Minorities are Welcome in Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They are Religious, 51 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 619 (2006-2007). This Note is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. \\server05\productn\N\NLR\51-3\NLR306.txt unknown Seq: 3 27-APR-07 7:38 VOLUME 51 | 2006/07 RUBEN SETH FOGEL Headscarves in German Public Schools: Religious Minorities are Welcome in Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They are Religious ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Ruben Seth Fogel earned his J.D. from New York Law School in 2006, and his B.A. from Yeshiva College, Yeshiva University in 2003. He is currently an Associate at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. Dein Christ war j¨udisch, Dein Auto ist japanisch, Deine Pizza italienisch, Deine Demokratie griechisch, Dein Kaffee brasilianisch, Dein Urlaub t¨urkisch, Deine Zahlen arabisch, Deine Schrift lateinisch, — und Dein Nachbar ist “nur” ein Ausl¨ander?1 I. INTRODUCTION: WITHOUT EQUALITY, NO FREEDOM OF RELIGION It began with an aspiring teacher who wanted nothing more than to wear a piece of cloth.
    [Show full text]
  • Forging Autonomy in a Unitary State: the Åland Islands in Finland', Comparative European Politics, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Forging autonomy in a unitary state Citation for published version: Hepburn, E 2014, 'Forging autonomy in a unitary state: The Åland Islands in Finland', Comparative European Politics, vol. 12, no. 4-5, pp. 468-487. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.10 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1057/cep.2014.10 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Comparative European Politics Publisher Rights Statement: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Comparative European Politics. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [Hepburn, E. (2014) Forging autonomy in a unitary state: The Aland Islands in Finland. Comparative European Politics (12) 468-487] is available online at: http://www.palgrave- journals.com/cep/journal/v12/n4/full/cep201410a.html General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 Forging autonomy in a unitary state: the Åland Islands in Finland Eve Hepburn (University of Edinburgh) As one of the most stable unitary states in the world, Finland has largely been overlooked in the literature on multi-level political systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Source of Law – Doctrine and Reasoning in Finland
    http://conference.ifla.org/ifla78 Date submitted: 26 May 2012 The source of law – doctrine and reasoning in Finland Prof. Juha Raitio European Law Faculty of Law University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland Meeting: 129 — Promoting global access to law: developing an open access index for official authenticated legal information. Part 2: Europe — Law Libraries Section with Government libraries, Library and Research Services for Parliaments, Government and Official Publications Abstract: In the article my aim is to provide a short overview on the basic features of the Finnish legal system and then move on to the more challenging issues such as the reasoning of the Finnish court decisions and legal certainty in Finland. More profoundly, in this article I try to challenge the influence of the European law in the Finnish jurisprudence. For example, the European emphasis on teleological interpretation of law, substantive legal certainty and too casualistic understanding of coherence in judicial application of law do not in my opinion reflect very well the main stream thinking of judicial interpretation and argumentation in Finland. One has to bear in mind that Finland is a modern civil law country, in which sources of law are very well systematized and the legal system is not that much based on case law than the legal system of the European Union seems to be. If the national courts settle for casuism and tend to neglect the systemic interpretation, the coherence of the legal system will be hampered, All my considerations come back the central idea that levels of justification, various legal arguments and legal normativity are intertwined and that these affect to the concept of legal certainty as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Osce Region 2006
    PROF. ANDREU ROCHA SCARPETTA European University (Rome) DOSSIER ON DISCRIMINATION AND INTOLERANCE AGAINST CHRISTIAN FAITH OSCE REGION 2006 PRESENTATION The present dossier offers the description of different acts of discrimination and intolerance against Christians in the countries that conform the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co- operation in Europe). It does not pretend to be an exhaustive description, but and approach to the rising situation of discrimination and intolerance against Christians and Christian symbols. The dossier is divided into two parts. The first part presents recent cases of public mockery against Christian Faith in countries not usually considered intolerant against Christianity. Each case is described under a specific title indicating the country where the act of mockery is taking or had taken place. Before the brief description of the case we have indicated its source. Most cases offer more than one source, in which case we have reduced the references to the most important one. The second part of the dossier considers situations of Christian intolerance in specific countries belonging to the OSCE. Most descriptions of specific acts of discriminations or intolerance are quoted chronologically. When discrimination or intolerance of Christians refers to a general national situation a broader explanation has been introduced. The main source is indicated after each case or description. Prof. Andreu Rocha Scarpetta E-mail: [email protected] 2 CONTENTS PRESENTATION..................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • National Press Club Luncheon with Christina Norman, President, Mtv Networks
    NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LUNCHEON WITH CHRISTINA NORMAN, PRESIDENT, MTV NETWORKS MODERATOR: JONATHAN SALANT, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB LOCATION: NATIONAL PRESS CLUB BALLROOM, WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME: 1:00 P.M. EDT DATE: APRIL 27, 2006 (C) COPYRIGHT 2005, FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC., 1000 VERMONT AVE. NW; 5TH FLOOR; WASHINGTON, DC - 20005, USA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION, REDISTRIBUTION OR RETRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES A MISAPPROPRIATION UNDER APPLICABLE UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW, AND FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PURSUE ALL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO IT IN RESPECT TO SUCH MISAPPROPRIATION. FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE, INC. IS A PRIVATE FIRM AND IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. NO COPYRIGHT IS CLAIMED AS TO ANY PART OF THE ORIGINAL WORK PREPARED BY A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AS PART OF THAT PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES. FOR INFORMATION ON SUBSCRIBING TO FNS, PLEASE CALL JACK GRAEME AT 202-347-1400. ------------------------- MR. SALANT: Good afternoon and welcome to the National Press Club. I'm Jonathan Salant, a reporter for Bloomberg News and president of the press club. I'd like to welcome club members and their guests in the audience today as well as those of you watching on C-SPAN. The video archive of today's luncheon is provided by ConnectLive, and is available to club members through the press club's website at www.press.org. Press club members may get free transcripts of our luncheons at our website. Nonmembers may buy videotapes, audiotapes and transcripts by calling 1-888-343-1940. For more information about joining the press club, please call us at area code 202-662-7511.
    [Show full text]