The Serbian Meat Value-Chain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Serbian Meat Value-Chain A systematic analysis of the agribusiness sector in transition economies: The Serbian meat value-chain Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was commissioned by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) jointly with the Investment Centre of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), under the co-operation agreement between the two institutions. The EBRD team was led by Heike Harmgart, Principal Economist in the Office of the Chief Economist in close collaboration with the Agribusiness banking team of the EBRD under the directorship of Gilles Mettetal. The FAO team was led by Emmanuel Hidier, Senior Economist; with team members D’mitry Prikhodko, Agricultural Economist, on whose background research a substantial part of this analysis is based, and Nada Zvekic, Communications Officer at the FAO. The report benefited further from discussions with Marc von Strydonck, Senior Banker, Vedrana Jelusic, Senior Banker and Miljan Zdrale, Principal Banker at the Agribusiness team of the EBRD. Special thanks to Kerstin Meins, analyst at the Office of the Chief Economist for her editing and layout assistance. The EBRD team would like to extend its warm thanks for the kind assistance received from all the government and private sector representatives who kindly shared time with the team, in particular. Zoran Bogdanov, Director, Nenad Miscevic, CFO and Svetlana Bogdanov, Economist from Mesopromet/Banat (meat processing company). From Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management Tomislav Topalovic, Expert on Bovine Production and Mirko Novakovic, Expert on Pig production. The EBRD is also grateful to Dragana Pogarcic, Head of Unit for livestock breeding and fishing statistics at the Republic Statistical Office; and the Association of Pig Producers in Bogatic, for their helpful inputs. Special thanks are extended to Milos Milovanovich and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management for his collaboration. 1 Executive Summary Serbian livestock husbandry has been faced with a twenty year crisis leading to a decline in the volume of production of around 1.5% every year. This has been driven by a significant shrinkage of the national market together with numerous other challenges of transition: the privatisation of state agricultural enterprises followed by the absence of any long-term livestock husbandry development strategy; the technological obsolescence and underinvestment into processing capacities, particularly in the exporting sector of the meat processing industry; poor relationships between livestock producers and processors with no coordinated representation on either side; an absence of positive structured policy measures and delays, sometimes lags lasting up to half a year, in the implementation of comparably sparse subsidy measures. All these factors resulted in the marginalisation in particular of livestock product exports. Compared to 1990, in 2005 total meat production was 30% lower, and by particular sectors the fall was: beef 42%; pig meat 11%; lamb 22% and poultry meat 40%. The major challenge now is to consolidate the primary production side to enlarge farm size and allow for specialisation. Farmers also need to upgrade genetic potential in particular in pig production. The slaughtering industry has the capacity to fulfil both domestic as well as export potential but years of underinvestment and low hygienic, sanitary and veterinary standards pose a significant obstacle. Here investment needs are substantial and one route the industry has taken is further vertical integration either with producers/farmers or with the processing industry. The processing industry itself has started to invest in increasing capacity, technology and standards, but only a few private processing companies have achieved EU standards. The major policy challenge is to harmonise certification beyond the beef industry with EU standards, as well as switching from vaccination of pigs against swine fever and poultry against Newcastle disease and most importantly upgrade slaughterhouses to EU HACCP quality standards. 2 1. Introduction This report will closely follow the structure of the meat value chain combined with the EBRD transition assessment indicator methodology (Table 1). The analysis will focus on the extent and structure of markets; existing policies and institutions; skills and business conduct. The report concentrates on the commercial production of pig and beef meat, its processing and retail. In addition to secondary sources this report draws on interviews with relevant parties along the value chain such as the Ministry of Agriculture, the Pig Producer Association, meat processing companies and the Statistical Offices responsible for livestock. Table 1. The Meat Value Chain Value chain segments Activities Primary production Meat production (commercial pig and beef production) Processing Meat processing and preserving (slaughterhouses, processing plants) incl packaging and canning Wholesale & Retail Wholesale Open market sales Small-scale retail trade Large-scale retail trade 2. Primary production In the following analysis we will differentiate – if applicable – between poultry, pork and beef production with the main focus on the latter two since they are of significantly higher commercial importance for the country. Some of the institutional conditions faced by each sector are rather similar, but in particular in the primary production the individual markets look quite different. Overall agricultural production accounted for 14.5% of total Serbian GDP in 2006, with food processing and agriculture combined amounting to 20%. Within agricultural production in 2006, 67% was crop production and only 33% livestock production. The total meat sector accounts for 6% of Serbia’s agricultural exports by value and 2% of the value of agricultural imports in 2006. Pig production dominates the Serbian livestock and meat production, accounting for 58% of the total production in 2005, while the contributions from beef (21%), poultry (16%) and lamb (5%) were only modest in comparison. The overall trend in Serbian livestock population and meat production in the period between 2000 and 2006 was a significant decline in overall numbers of nearly all kinds of livestock (see Table 2). 3 Table 2 – Livestock population 2000-2006 and meat production 2000-2005 Kind of livestock 2000 2006/2005 Decrease in % Cattle (in mill heads) 1,246 1,096 2.0 Pigs (in mill heads) 4,066 3,213 21.0 Poultry (in mill heads) 20,373 17,905 12.1 Beef (in 000t) 104 90 13.5 Pork (in 000t) 283 253 10.7 Poultry (in 000t) 67 64 0.5 Source: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management 2.1. Structure and extent of markets Serbian livestock production is characterised by a dualism of a large number of small/medium- sized privately owned farms on the one side and of a large, unreformed state- owned livestock production on the other side. Only a small number of farms, in particular out of the smaller farms, are commercially orientated 1 and we can observe two opposing trends: smallholdings consolidating into commercial farming, and medium farms downsizing and moving into subsistence farming. Table 3 shows the breakdown of farms by ownership in 2006; 80% of cattle are produced on privately owned farms, whereas only 61% of pigs and 59% of poultry is farmed on private farms. Evidence suggests that the overall decrease in both livestock population and animal productivity was mainly due to a decrease on state owned farms. One important productivity indicator – the difference in average weight – is most pronounced for cattle with over 10% less average weight for cooperatives-reared cattle. This is somewhat surprising since privately owned farms are on average only 3 ha in size and thus produce significantly below efficient scale. For a detailed comparison of carcass weights see Annex IV. Table 3. Farm ownership structure in 2006 Total Private Cooperatives av. weight av. weight av. weight # thous. in kg # thous. in kg # thous. in kg Cattle 1096 418.30 867 427.80 230 380.66 Pig 3212 64.63 1966 65.33 1246 63.54 Poultry 17905 2.26 10601 2.30 7304 2.20 Source: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management 1 See World Bank report on “Supporting Serbia’s Agriculture Strategy”, 2006. 4 Private sector livestock production is still used to large extends in a semi-subsistence way for household consumption and as a safety net. Most of these very small farms (<1 ha) have not specialised, but rather mixed their animal holdings - an average farm consists of two cows plus 3-4 pigs and 20 chickens. Total agricultural labour force accounts for around 17 % of the population, or over 1,300,000 people. However, according to government data, the farming population is rapidly ageing, and not being replaced in sufficient numbers, in turn putting the country’s industry at risk. Government figures point to the following agricultural labour force structure: livestock breeding (43%), field crop farming (42%), fruit and wine production (12%) and other crops (3%). Figure 1 shows the distribution of agricultural land by categories and ways of use in 2005. Figure 1 Source: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management Another important aspect for the decline both in numbers and productivity of livestock is the state of the food input industry in Serbia. Both fattening and overall numbers depend largely on maize availability and price. Several years of poor maize harvest and subsidised biofuel production
Recommended publications
  • Pagina 1 Di 40 09/12/2014
    Pagina 1 di 40 Print Bluetongue, Serbia Close Information received on 04/11/2014 from Dr Budimir Plavšić, Head, Animal Health Department Veterinary Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Belgrade, Serbia Summary Report type Follow-up report No. 3 Date of start of the event 30/08/2014 Date of pre-confirmation of the 03/09/2014 event Report date 04/11/2014 Date submitted to OIE 04/11/2014 Reason for notification Reoccurrence of a listed disease Date of previous occurrence 2002 Manifestation of disease Clinical disease Causal agent Bluetongue virus Serotype 4 Nature of diagnosis Clinical, Laboratory (basic), Laboratory (advanced) This event pertains to the whole country Immediate notification (04/09/2014) Follow-up report No. 1 (21/09/2014) Related reports Follow-up report No. 2 (18/10/2014) Follow-up report No. 3 (04/11/2014) Follow-up report No. 4 (04/12/2014) New outbreaks (300) Outbreak 1 (3920) Prolom, Kursumlija, Toplicki, SRBIJA Date of start of the outbreak 09/09/2014 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Backyard Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Cattle 6 0 0 0 0 Sheep 29 4 3 0 0 Outbreak 2 (04469) Ševica, Kucevo, Branicevski, SRBIJA Date of start of the outbreak 13/09/2014 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Backyard Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Sheep 5 1 0 0 0 Outbreak 3 (04226) Kruscica, Bela Crkva, Juznobanatski, SRBIJA Date of start
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Transition Survey II
    Life in Transition Survey II DRAFT Technical Report June 2011 Legal notice © 2011 Ipsos MORI – all rights reserved. The contents of this report constitute the sole and exclusive property of Ipsos MORI. Ipsos MORI retains all right, title and interest, including without limitation copyright, in or to any Ipsos MORI trademarks, technologies, methodologies, products, analyses, software and know-how included or arising out of this report or used in connection with the preparation of this report. No license under any copyright is hereby granted or implied. The contents of this report are of a commercially sensitive and confidential nature and intended solely for the review and consideration of the person or entity to which it is addressed. No other use is permitted and the addressee undertakes not to disclose all or part of this report to any third party (including but not limited, where applicable, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act 2000) without the prior written consent of the Company Secretary of Ipsos MORI. Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Background and history ....................................................................... 2 1.2. Structure of this report ......................................................................... 2 1.3. Key specifications ................................................................................ 3 2. Questionnaire development and piloting ................................. 5 2.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
    Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 1 23/06/2017 2 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES - Greenhouse
    [Show full text]
  • Godišnji Izveštaj O Poslovanju Za 2013.God
    Na osnovu člana 50. Zakona o tržištu kapitala („Sl. glasnik RS“ br. 31/2011) i odredbi Pravilnika o sadržini, formi i načinu objavljivanja godišnjih, polugodišnji i kvartalnih izveštaja („Sl. glasnik RS“ br. 14/2012), TP“INEX SOKOLICA“AD PRIJEPOLJE iz Prijepolja MB: 07270640, šifra delatnosti: 4719 objavljuje sledeći: GODIŠNJI IZVEŠTAJ JAVNOG DRUŠTVA Period izveštavanja: 01.01.2013 do 31.12.2013. godine POSLOVNO IME: AD OREOVICA MATIČNI BROJ: 17342118 POŠTANSKI BROJ I MES TO: 12370 ALEKSANDROVAC ULICA I BROJ: OREOVICA ADRESA ELEKTRNOSKE P OŠTE: [email protected] INTERNET ADRESA: KONSOLIDOVANI/POJEDI NAČNI PODACI: USVOJENI ( da ili ne ) NE DRUŠTVA SUBJEKTA KON SOLIDACIJE: SEDIŠTE: MATIČNI BROJ: USVOJENI ( da ili ne ) OSOBA ZA KONTAKT: JAGODA OBRADOVIĆ TELEFON: 012258255 FAKS: 012258070 ADRESA ELEKTRNOSKE P OŠTE: [email protected] PREZIME I IME OSOBE OVLAŠĆENE ZA MILORADOVIĆ ŽIVORAD ZASTUPANJE: NAPOMENE UZ FINANSIJSKE IZVEŠTAJE NA DAN 31.12.2013. GODINE 1. OPŠTI PODACI I DELATNOST 1.1. OSNOVNI PODACI O DRUŠTVU Pun naziv društva: AKCIONARSKO DRUŠTVO KLANICA OREOVICA , OREOVICA , ŽABARI Skraćeni naziv društva: AD “OREOVICA“ Sedište:Oreovica Oblik organizovanja: Akcionarsko društvo Matični broj:17342118 Šifra delatnosti:1011 Otkup stoke, klanje, obrada i prodaja mesa na veliko i malo. PIB:101580463 Veličina:Malo pravno lice Prosečan broj radnika u 2013. godini:30 Zakonski zastupnik:Miloradovic živorad Odgovorno lice za sastavljanje finansijskih izveštaja za 2013. godinu: Obradovic Jagodinka 1.2. ISTORIJAT DRUŠTVA Privredno društvo “OREOVICA” a.d., Oreovica, je akcionarsko društvo. Društvo je osnovano 04.11.2004. godine. Promena pravnog statusa preduzeća registrovana je kod Agencije za privredne registre u Beogradu, Rešenjem broj BD 4996/2005. od 27.08.2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Informator O Radu Opštine Žabari
    Informator o radu opštine Žabari OPŠTINSKA UPRAVA ŽABARI 25.6.2018 Informator o radu Opštine Žabari – opštinska Uprava Žabari, 25.06.2018. SADRŽAJ INFORMATORA O RADU ORGANA OPŠTINE ŽABARI I OPŠTINSKE UPRAVE OPŠTINE ŽABARI 1. OSNOVNI PODACI O ORGANU LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE I INFORMATORU ................................... 4 2. SPISAK NAJČEŠĆE TRAŽENIH INFORMACIJA ........................................................................................ 4 3. OPIS NADLEŽNOSTI, OBAVEZA I OVLAŠĆENјA ................................................................................. 5 1. OPIS POSTUPANјA U OKVIRU NADLEŽNOSTI, OBAVEZA I OVLAŠĆENјA ...................................... 5 4. NAVOĐENјE PROPISA .................................................................................................................................. 5 5. USLUGE KOJE SE PRUŽAJU ZAINTERESOVANIM LICIMA .................................................................. 5 6. POSTUPAK RADI PRUŽANјA USLUGA ...................................................................................................... 9 7. PREGLED PODATAKA O PRUŽENIM USLUGAMA ................................................................................. 9 ORGANIZACIONA STRUKTURA ..................................................................................................................... 9 8. PREDSEDNIK OPŠTINE ŽABARI ............................................................................................................... 10 Predsednik Opštine: ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indeks Rasta Broja Stanovnika Po Naseljenim Mestima 2002-2011
    Indeks rasta broja stanovnika po naseljenim mestima 2002-2011. godine KELEBIJA ĐALA HORGOŠ BAČKI VINOGRADI SUBOTICA PALIĆ MARTONOŠ RABE SRPSKI KRSTUR HAJDUKOVO LJUTOVO LEGENDA MAJDAN MALI PESAK ŠUPLJAK SIGET MALE KANJIŽA PIJACE FILIĆ DONJI TAVANKUT MALA GORNJI BANATSKO ARANĐELOVO BOSNA TAVANKUT ZIMONIĆ NOVI KNEŽEVAC NOVO PODLOKANJ SELO BIKOVO VELEBIT VRBICA MIŠIĆEVO ADORJAN pad broja stanovnika RIĐICA OROM BAJMOK SANAD CRNA TREŠNJEVAC BARA RASTINA ĐURĐIN TOTOVO ALEKSA VIŠNJEVAC SELO BANATSKI ŠANTIĆ MONOŠTOR STANIŠIĆ STARI NOVI DOLINE ŽEDNIK ŽEDNIK ČOKA BAČKI BREG GAKOVO ČANTAVIR SENTA PAČIR MOKRIN BOGARAŠ BAČKO DUŠANOVO porast broja stranovnika KOLUT JAZOVO MALI BEOGRAD TORNJOŠ SVETOZAR MILETIĆ OSTOJIĆEVO GORNJI BREG NAKOVO STARA MORAVICA BAČKI SOKOLAC KARAĐORĐEVO ZOBNATICA BEZDAN ČONOPLJA SAJAN KEVI NOVO TOMISLAVCI MIĆUNOVO ORAHOVO PADEJ BANATSKO KRIVAJA GORNJA VELIKO SELO ROGATICA SVETIĆEVO STERIJINO KIKINDA IĐOŠ UTRINE BAČKI ADA BAČKA TOPOLA KAVILO stagnacija broja stanovnika MONOŠTOR SOMBOR KLJAJIĆEVO POBEDA TELEČKA OBORNJAČA BAJŠA NJEGOŠEVO BOGARAŠ OBORNJAČA SREDNJI SALAŠ NOVI GUNAROŠ BOČAR KOZARCI MOL PANONIJA BAGREMOVO KUPUSINA BAČKO PETROVO SELO RUSKO SRPSKA SELO CRNJA LIPAR MALI IĐOŠ RADOJEVO SIVAC MILEŠEVO NOVO MILOŠEVO bez stanovnika NOVA CRVENKA BANATSKA TOPOLA LOVĆENAC PRIGREVICA TOBA STAPAR VOJVODA STEPA CRVENKA HETIN SVILOJEVO FEKETIĆ APATIN NOVA BEČEJ CRNJA BAŠAID NOVI BEČEJ ALEKSANDROVO KRUŠČIĆ KULA BAČKI BRESTOVAC nepopisano područje Kosova i Metohije DOROSLOVO SRBOBRAN SONTA TORDA RADIČEVIĆ VRBAS SRPSKI ITEBEJ BAČKI
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Agreement on Trade and Trade-Related Matters Between the European Community, of the One Part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the Other Part
    ISSN 1725-2555 Official Journal L 28 of the European Union Volume 53 English edition Legislation 30 January 2010 Contents IV Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty 2010/36/EC: ★ Council Decision of 29 April 2008 concerning the signing and conclusion of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part . 1 Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part . 2 Price: EUR 10 Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. EN 30.1.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 28/1 IV (Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty) COUNCIL DECISION of 29 April 2008 concerning the signing and conclusion of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part (2010/36/EC) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Article 1 Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph, and Article 300(3), first 1.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERIMSABKOMMEN Über Handel Und Handelsfragen Zwischen Der Europäischen Gemeinschaft Einerseits Und Der Republik Serbien Andererseits
    L 28/2 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union 30.1.2010 INTERIMSABKOMMEN über Handel und Handelsfragen zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft einerseits und der Republik Serbien andererseits DIE EUROPÄISCHE GEMEINSCHAFT, nachstehend „Gemeinschaft“ genannt, einerseits und DIE REPUBLIK SERBIEN, nachstehend „Serbien“ genannt, andererseits, nachstehend zusammen „Vertragsparteien“ genannt — IN ERWÄGUNG NACHSTEHENDER GRÜNDE: (1) Das Stabilisierungs- und Assoziierungsabkommen zwischen den Europäischen Gemeinschaften und ihren Mitglied­ staaten einerseits und der Republik Serbien andererseits (nachstehend „Stabilisierungs- und Assoziierungsabkom­ men“ oder „SAA“ genannt) ist in Luxemburg am 29. April 2008 unterzeichnet worden. (2) Mit dem Stabilisierungs- und Assoziierungsabkommen wird angestrebt, auf der Grundlage der Gegenseitigkeit und des beiderseitigen Interesses enge und dauerhafte Beziehungen zu begründen, die es Serbien ermöglichen, die bereits begründeten Beziehungen zur Europäischen Union weiter zu vertiefen und auszubauen. (3) Die Entwicklung der Handelsbeziehungen muss durch Vertiefung und Erweiterung der bisher begründeten Bezie­ hungen gewährleistet werden. (4) Zu diesem Zweck müssen die Handel und Handelsfragen betreffenden Bestimmungen des Stabilisierungs- und Assoziierungsabkommens so bald wie möglich durch ein Interimsabkommen (nachstehend „dieses Abkommen“ genannt) in Kraft gesetzt werden. (5) Einige Bestimmungen des Protokolls Nr. 4 zum Stabilisierungs- und Assoziierungsabkommen über den Straßen­ transitverkehr stehen unmittelbar
    [Show full text]
  • Филозофски Факултет, Универзитет У Београду Београдски Историјски Гласник Belgrade Historical Review
    БЕОГРАДСКИ ИСТОРИЈСКИ ГЛАСНИК BELGRADE HISTORICAL REVIEW Vol. IV (2013) Филозофски факултет, Универзитет у Београду БЕОГРАДСКИ ИСТОРИЈСКИ ГЛАСНИК BELGRADE HISTORICAL REVIEW Издавач: Publisher: Одељење за Историју Department of History Филозофски факултет Faculty of Philosophy Универзитет у Београду University of Belgrade Адреса Редакције: Address: Чика Љубина 18–20/V Čika Ljubina 18–20/V 11000 Београд, Србија 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Eлектронска пошта: E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Главни уредник: Editor-in-Chief: Др Никола Самарџић, редовни професор Prof. Dr. Nikola Samardžić, [email protected] Извршни уредник: Executive editor: Др Синиша Мишић, редовни професор Prof. Dr. Siniša Mišić, [email protected] Секретар редакције: Editorial secretary: Др Јелена Мргић, доцент Dr. Jelena Mrgić, [email protected] Технички секретар: Technical secretary: Др Јелена Пауновић-Штерменски, Jelena Paunović-Štermenski, PhD секретар Одељења за Историју secretary of the Department of History [email protected] [email protected] Редакција Editorial board Чланови Одељења за Историју (Београд): Members of the Department of History (Belgrade): Dr Andrija Veselinović, Dr Radoš Ljušić, Dr Marijana Ricl, Dr Vlada Stanković, Dr Siniša Mišić, Dr Nikola Samardžić, Dr Jelena Mrgić, Sr Jelena Paunović-Štermenski Одељењe за Историју (Нови Сад): Department of History (Novi Sad): Др Ненад Лемајић, редовни професор Prof. Dr. Nenad Lemajić Историјски институт (Београд) Institute of History (Belgrade) Др Славенко Терзић, научни саветник Slavenko Terzić, Dr., Research Fellow Инострани чланови: Foreign members: Prof. Dr. Oliver Jens Schmitt (Institut für Osteuropäische Geschichte, University of Vienna, Austria), Prof. Dr. Ivo Goldstein (Odsjek za povijest, Filozofski fakultet sveučilišta u Zagrebu), Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Pravilnik O Određivanju Melioracionih Područja I Njihovih Granica
    Na osnovu člana 28. stav 3. Zakona o vodama ("Službeni glasnik RS", broj 30/10), Ministar poljoprivrede, trgovine, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi Pravilnik o određivanju melioracionih područja i njihovih granica Pravilnik je objavljen u "Službenom glasniku RS", br. 38/2011 od 31.5.2011. godine. Član 1. Ovim pravilnikom određuju se melioraciona područja i njihove granice, i to: 1) na vodnom području Sava: melioraciono područje "Podrinjsko-kolubarsko"; 2) na vodnom području Donji Dunav: melioraciono područje "Donji Dunav"; 3) na vodnom području Morava: melioraciona područja "Velika Morava", "Zapadna Morava", "Južna Morava" i "Nišava". Član 2. Granica melioracionog područja "Podrinjsko-kolubarsko" počinje na ušću reke Save i Drine (KO Crna Bara), ide granicama opština Bogatić, Šabac, Vladimirci, Ub, Lajkovac i Ljig, zatim nastavlja granicama KO Progoreoci, Partizani, Venčane, Tulež, Venčane, Ranilović, Aranđelovac, Garaši, Jelovik, Vukosavci, Bosuta, Trudelj, Zagrađe, Brezovica, Mutanj, Šilopaj, Nakučani, Kriva Reka, Ručići, Boljkovci, potom ide granicama opština Ljig, Mionica i Valjevo i dalje granicama KO Gornje Košlje, Donje Košlje II, Ovčinja, Svojdrug, Lještansko, Sijerač, Pridoli, Pilica, Solotuša, Mala Reka, Rača, Zaugline, Beserovina, Perućac, Rastište, Jagoštica, Rastište, Perućac, Beserovina, Zaugline, Rača, Lug, Bajina Bašta, Crvica, Sijerač, Svojdrug, Ovčinja, Gvozdac, Okletac, Strmovo i završava granicama opština Ljubovija, Mali Zvornik, Loznica, Šabac i Bogatić. Član 3. Granica melioracionog područja "Donji Dunav" počinje
    [Show full text]
  • Trend of Nuptiality in the Village Temska in Period 1879-2013
    Researches Reviews of the Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management 44-1/2015 Original scientific paper UDC 312.3(497.1 Temska) TREND OF NUPTIALITY IN THE VILLAGE TEMSKA IN PERIOD 1879-2013 Dragana BlagojevićI, Nemanja RogačI, Miloš MirićI, Igor LeščešenII Received: November 10, 2014 | Accepted: April 21, 2015 ABSTRACT: Marriage structure of the population is one of the basic demographic indi- cators because of the importance that has for the birth rate and population replacement. In this paper we have analyzed data from the registers of marriages of local offices in the village Temska. Data of the marriage date, place of birth of the spouses, year of birth of the spouses, the data on the distance traveled from the place of birth to the place of mar- riage, as well as data on the number of divorces were collected. Analyses of these data is the most important part of this paper. The results show that the Temska is in the serious depopulation problem. The constant decline in population automatically caused rapid aging of the population. This is also connected to emigration and most certainly with the decline of the marriage rate. This problem of depopulation is at the beginning so it is nec- essary to undertake certain measures in order to prevent and stop thisnegative trend. Key words: Temska, Nuptiality, Pirot, Population INTRODUCTION The settlement, which is the subject of research in this study is located in the mu- nicipality of Pirot in eastern Serbia, on the slopes of the Staraplaninamountain. Tem- ska village, throughout history, because of the frequent adverse historical events moved its location downstream and upstream, finally in the nineteenth century because of the bridge that was built over the river Temsticathe village wasfinally situated in the place where it is today.
    [Show full text]