DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimization of the Network of Schools in Serbia Project Was Conducted by the Education Forum from October 2001 to November 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Novi Knezevac Subotica Kanjiza 0 − 50 Senta Coka Sombor 50 − 75 Backa Topola Ada Kikinda Mali Idos Nova Crnja Apatin Kula BecejNovi Becej 75 − 100 Srbobran Odzaci Vrbas Zitiste Temerin 100 − 150 Bac Zabalj Backa Palanka Zrenjanin Secanj Backi PetrovacCity of Novi Sad 150 − 250 Titel Plandiste BeocinSremski Karlovci Kovacica Irig Indija Alibunar Vrsac Sid Opovo Sremska Mitrovica Stara Pazova Palilula Ruma Bela Crkva Bogatic Pancevo PecinciZemunNovi Beograd Kovin Sabac CukaricaRakovica Veliko Gradiste Vladimirevci Pozarevac Obrenovac Grocka Golubac Loznica Barajevo Smederevo Koceljeva Sopot Malo Crnice Ub Kucevo Krupanj Mladenovac Lazarevac Zabari Majdanpek Mali Zvornik Osecina Lajkovac Arandelovac Velika PlanaPetrovac Valjevo Negotin Topola Ljubovija Ljig Mionica Raca Svilajnac Zagubica Lapovo Bor Despotovac Kosjeric Gornji MilanovacCity of Kragujevac JagodinaCuprija Bajina Basta Knic Zajecar Uzice Cacak Paracin optimizationRekovac Boljevac Lucani Varvarin Cajetina Razanj Arilje Cicevac Sokobanja Kraljevo Trstenik OF THE NETWORK OF SCHOOLSVrnjacka Banja IN SERBIA Priboj Krusevac Aleksinac Knjazevac Nova Varos Ivanjica Aleksandrovac Prjepolje City of Nis Brus Blace Merosina Bela Palanka Sjenica Prokuplje Gadzin Han Pirot Novi Pazar Zitorada Kursumlija Bojnik VlasotinceBabusnica Dimitrovgrad Tutin Leskovac Lebane Medveda Vladicin Han Surdulica Vranje aleksandar bogojević Bujanovac (2)Trgoviste Presevo (2) ivan ivić raša karapandža education forum The Optimization of the Network of Schools in Serbia project was conducted by the Education Forum from October 2001 to November 2002. The project was done at the behest of the Ministry of Education and Sport of the Republic of Serbia and with the support of the Belgrade Office of UNICEF. The success of the project is a testament of the productive partnership between those three institutions. The current report documents the methodology developed and used by the project, gives an in- depth presentation of projects findings, conclu- sions and recommendations as well as a compre- hensive list of project results and products. Education Forum, 2002 Electronic versions of Education Forum publications may be found at: http://www.efprum.eu.org 2 optimization of the network of schools in serbia optimization of the network of schools in serbia 3 Table of Contents Preface 7 A. Introductory material 9 A1. Defining the problem .......................................................... 9 Background ...................................................................... 9 Project overview ................................................................ 11 Time frame ....................................................................... 13 Organization and outcomes ................................................. 14 A2. Basic characteristics ........................................................... 17 A3. Data acquisition ................................................................. 39 Forming of the project database .......................................... 40 Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see .. 43 Field work ......................................................................... 45 B. Network of Schools 57 B1. Products of the project “Optimization of the network of schools in Serbia” .............................................................. 57 B2. Current state of the network ............................................... 59 Connection of schools to utilities .......................................... 59 Small schools .................................................................... 72 Work in shifts .................................................................... 78 Multigrade classrooms and demographic change..................... 83 Networks of special, art and secondary school........................ 85 Gender balance ................................................................. 90 School equipment .............................................................. 90 Distributions of student/teacher ratios and of the 2 optimization of the network of schools in serbia optimization of the network of schools in serbia 3 Age of schools ................................................................... 100 B3. Basic cost-benefit analysis ................................................... 103 C. Strategies and models of optimization 113 C1. Optimization vs. rationalization ............................................ 113 C2. Optimization strategies ....................................................... 117 C3. Optimization parameters ..................................................... 119 C4. Hierarchical levels on which to implement Network optimization ......................................................... 123 C5. Optimization models ........................................................... 127 D. Specific pedagogical problems of the part of the network dealing with small schools 143 D1. Organization of schools ....................................................... 149 D2. Changes in the school calendar ............................................ 149 D3. Change of school programs ................................................. 150 D4. Specific pedagogy of multi-grade classes .............................. 150 D5. Local educational resources ................................................. 151 D6. Teaching/learning methods ................................................. 152 D7. Grading students ............................................................... 152 D8. Training teachers for work in small schools ............................ 153 D9. Professional assistance to teachers in small schools ................ 154 D10. Follow-up activity related to the optimizing of small school .... 155 E. Conclusions and recommendations 157 E1. Findings ............................................................................ 157 E2. Recommendations .............................................................. 163 E3. General conclusions regarding optimization ............................ 167 F. Appendices 173 F1. Education parameters in the project database ........................ 173 Basic parameters ............................................................... 173 4 optimization of the network of schools in serbia optimization of the network of schools in serbia 5 Basic geographical data .................................................... 174 Auxiliary school parameters .............................................. 174 Additional data for municipalities ....................................... 175 F2. Proposal for the future organizing of annual network monitoring and optimization ............................................... 179 F3. Proposed questionnaire for annual monitoring of the network .......................................................................... 183 F4. Present and future follow-up projects and initiatives ............. 203 General directions - regional projects and rural development .. 205 F5. Project material available in electronic form ......................... 209 F6. Media visibility of the project ............................................. 211 F7. Members of the project’s teams and their affiliations ............. 213 Authors .......................................................................... 213 Core team ...................................................................... 213 List of experts that participated in project discussions .......... 214 Consultants .................................................................... 215 External consultants ........................................................ 216 F8. Gallery of school toilets ..................................................... 219 G. Figure and map captions 221 H. Bibliography 227 4 optimization of the network of schools in serbia optimization of the network of schools in serbia 5 6 optimization of the network of schools in serbia optimization of the network of schools in serbia 7 Preface This document gives a detailed exposition of the final results, employed meth- odology and recommendations of the year long project: Optimization of the Net- work of Schools in Serbia. The project was conducted through the active partner- ship of three institutions: Education Forum, Belgrade Office of UNICEF and the Ministry of Education of Serbia. The network of schools is an important part of the education system of any coun- try. The functioning of such an intricate system strongly affects many sectors of society. Because of this it was necessary to assemble a truly multidisciplinary group of experts who would look at the network and its functioning from the points of view of pedagogy, economy, school administration, culture, rural devel- opment, complex systems, information technology, etc. As head of the project it is my privilege to acknowledge the help of all of the experts that contributed to this project. The individual contributions of these people and their affiliations are given in section F7. The results of this activity are many and are documented in detail in this report. Briefly, the project’s results include: • Creation of the current document containing a description of the state of the network of schools and the strategies and models for its optimization. • Creation of a modular, web-based educational information system and the integrating of that database into a Geographical Information System (GIS) environment. The integrated educational information system is to be used both as an planning tool and as a platform
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020

    Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020

    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
  • Pagina 1 Di 40 09/12/2014

    Pagina 1 Di 40 09/12/2014

    Pagina 1 di 40 Print Bluetongue, Serbia Close Information received on 04/11/2014 from Dr Budimir Plavšić, Head, Animal Health Department Veterinary Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Belgrade, Serbia Summary Report type Follow-up report No. 3 Date of start of the event 30/08/2014 Date of pre-confirmation of the 03/09/2014 event Report date 04/11/2014 Date submitted to OIE 04/11/2014 Reason for notification Reoccurrence of a listed disease Date of previous occurrence 2002 Manifestation of disease Clinical disease Causal agent Bluetongue virus Serotype 4 Nature of diagnosis Clinical, Laboratory (basic), Laboratory (advanced) This event pertains to the whole country Immediate notification (04/09/2014) Follow-up report No. 1 (21/09/2014) Related reports Follow-up report No. 2 (18/10/2014) Follow-up report No. 3 (04/11/2014) Follow-up report No. 4 (04/12/2014) New outbreaks (300) Outbreak 1 (3920) Prolom, Kursumlija, Toplicki, SRBIJA Date of start of the outbreak 09/09/2014 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Backyard Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Cattle 6 0 0 0 0 Sheep 29 4 3 0 0 Outbreak 2 (04469) Ševica, Kucevo, Branicevski, SRBIJA Date of start of the outbreak 13/09/2014 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Backyard Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Sheep 5 1 0 0 0 Outbreak 3 (04226) Kruscica, Bela Crkva, Juznobanatski, SRBIJA Date of start
  • Modelling Obsidian Trade Routes During Late Neolithic in the South-East Banat Region of Vr[Ac Using Gis*

    Modelling Obsidian Trade Routes During Late Neolithic in the South-East Banat Region of Vr[Ac Using Gis*

    MIROSLAV MARI] Institute for Balkan Studies, Serbian Academy of Science and Arts, Belgrade MODELLING OBSIDIAN TRADE ROUTES DURING LATE NEOLITHIC IN THE SOUTH-EAST BANAT REGION OF VR[AC USING GIS* UDK: 903.3"634"(497.11) ; 903.03"634"(497.11) e-mail: [email protected] 903"63":528.856(497.11) Received: February 10, 2015 DOI: 10.2298/STA1565037M Accepted: May 29, 2015 Original research article Abstract. – The aim of this paper is to reconstruct the possible trajectory of the movement of the obsidian that was brought to the region of present day Vr{ac from Carpathian 1 and Carpathian 2 sources, located between Ko{ice and Mi{kolc (the present day border area between Hungary and Slovakia). This objective has been fulfilled using computer aided modelling performed within the constraints of geographic information system software based on the physical characteristics of the terrain and the reconstruction of paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic conditions in the period of the late Neolithic. The second largest obsidian collection in the territory of Vin~a culture originates from the site of Potporanj, south of Vr{ac. The abundance of finds indicates the importance this region had in the distribution of this resource during late Neolithic. In the paper the modelling of two different possibilities of land based distribution from the flow of the river Tisza are shown; the first from Perlez/Opovo (western route) and the other from Mureº (northern route), i.e. present day Arad and Timiºoara. The modelled results indicate the existence of a settlement patterning close to the modelled pathways in the period of Vin~a culture.
  • Uredba O Utvrđivanju Jedinstvene Liste Razvijenosti Regiona I Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Za 2014

    Uredba O Utvrđivanju Jedinstvene Liste Razvijenosti Regiona I Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Za 2014

    UREDBA O UTVRĐIVANJU JEDINSTVENE LISTE RAZVIJENOSTI REGIONA I JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE ZA 2014. GODINU ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 104/2014) Član 1 Ovom uredbom utvrđuje se jedinstvena lista razvijenosti regiona, koji su prema stepenu razvijenosti razvrstani u razvijene i nedovoljno razvijene regione i jedinica lokalne samouprave, koje su razvrstane u prvu, drugu, treću i četvrtu grupu i devastirana područja na osnovu podataka organa nadležnog za poslove statistike i finansija. Član 2 Razvrstavanje regiona vrši se na osnovu vrednosti bruto-domaćeg proizvoda po glavi stanovnika u regionu u odnosu na republički prosek, za referentni period. Razvijeni regioni su regioni koji ostvaruju vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda iznad vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Beogradski region; 2) Region Vojvodine. Nedovoljno razvijeni regioni su regioni u kojima je vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda ispod vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Region Šumadije i Zapadne Srbije; 2) Region Južne i Istočne Srbije. Pored regiona iz stava 3. ovog člana, status nedovoljno razvijenog regiona ima Region Kosova i Metohije. Član 3 Prema stepenu razvijenosti jedinica lokalnih samouprava prvu grupu čini 20 jedinica lokalne samouprave čiji je stepen razvijenosti iznad republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Bačka Palanka; 2) Beograd; 3) Beočin; 4) Bor; 5) Valjevo; 6) Vrbas; 7) Vršac; 8) Kanjiža; 9) Kragujevac; 10) Lajkovac; 11) Niš; 12) Novi Sad; 13) Pančevo; 14) Pećinci; 15) Požarevac; 16) Senta; 17) Stara Pazova; 18) Subotica; 19) Užice; 20) Čačak. Prema stepenu razvijenosti
  • Priručnik Za Obuku Training Guide

    Priručnik Za Obuku Training Guide

    Program Exchange Municipal obuke u Training Courses opštinama Project PRIRUČNIK TRAINING ZA OBUKU GUIDE Razumevanje Understanding institucija EU institutions Evropske unije i and pre-accession procesa priključivanja process and their kao i njegovog uticaja impact on Serbian na opštine u Srbiji municipalities Projekat finansira Evropska unija preko EU funded project managed by the Evropske agencije za rekonstrukciju, a European Agency for Reconstruction sprovodi konsultantska kuća and implemented by Louis Berger SAS, Francuska Louis Berger SAS, France Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities Stalna konferencija gradova i opština Exchange – Program obuke u opštinama Razumevanje institucija Evropske unije i procesa priključivanja kao i njegovog uticaja na opštine Understanding EU institution and pre-accession process and their impact on Serbian municipalities CD Tiraž: 400 Ova publikacija ne predstavlja zvaničan stav Evropske komisije. Izdavač je isključivo odgovoran za informacije koje se nalaze u publikaciji. Projekat finansira Evropska unija preko Evropske agencije za rekonstrukciju, a sprovodi konsultantska kuća Louis Berger SAS S A D R Ž A J 1 Prvo poglavlje .................................. 13 Uvod u temu 2 Drugo poglavlje ................................ 17 Kratak pregled teme 3 Treće poglavlje ................................. 23 Teorija i praksa evropskih opština 4 Četvrto poglavlje .............................. 29 Metodologija obuke 5 Peto poglavlje .................................. 43 Primeri dobre prakse u Srbiji 6
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V

    SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V

    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
  • ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016

    ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016

    Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14.
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia

    Memorial of the Republic of Croatia

    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA APPENDICES VOLUME 5 1 MARCH 2001 II III Contents Page Appendix 1 Chronology of Events, 1980-2000 1 Appendix 2 Video Tape Transcript 37 Appendix 3 Hate Speech: The Stimulation of Serbian Discontent and Eventual Incitement to Commit Genocide 45 Appendix 4 Testimonies of the Actors (Books and Memoirs) 73 4.1 Veljko Kadijević: “As I see the disintegration – An Army without a State” 4.2 Stipe Mesić: “How Yugoslavia was Brought Down” 4.3 Borisav Jović: “Last Days of the SFRY (Excerpts from a Diary)” Appendix 5a Serb Paramilitary Groups Active in Croatia (1991-95) 119 5b The “21st Volunteer Commando Task Force” of the “RSK Army” 129 Appendix 6 Prison Camps 141 Appendix 7 Damage to Cultural Monuments on Croatian Territory 163 Appendix 8 Personal Continuity, 1991-2001 363 IV APPENDIX 1 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE CHRONOLOGY BH Bosnia and Herzegovina CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe CK SKJ Centralni komitet Saveza komunista Jugoslavije (Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia) EC European Community EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Union) HV Hrvatska vojska (Croatian Army) IMF International Monetary Fund JNA Jugoslavenska narodna armija (Yugoslav People’s Army) NAM Non-Aligned Movement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
  • The Enchanting Pannonian Beauty – Fruška Gora Tour Guide

    The Enchanting Pannonian Beauty – Fruška Gora Tour Guide

    Tourism Organisation of FREE COPY Vojvodina FRUŠKA GORA TOUR GUIDE The Enchanting Pannonian Beauty www.vojvodinaonline.com SERBIA Čelarevo NOVI SAD PETROVARADIN BAČKA PALANKA Veternik Futog Šarengrad DUNAV Begeč Ilok Neštin Susek Sremska Kamenica DANUBE Čerević Ledinci Banoštor Rakovac SREMSKI Beočin KARLOVCI Šakotinac Bukovac Man. Rakovac Popovica St.Rakovac Orlovac Testera St.Ledinci Lug Man. Paragovo FT Sviloš Grabovo Andrevlje Beočin PM Vizić Srednje brdo Stražilovo Brankov grob Man. Divša FT Osovlje Zmajevac PM Sot Ljuba Brankovac Šidina Akumulacija Dom PTT Bikić Do Sot PM Debeli cer Crveni čot V.Remeta Berkasovo Lovište Vorovo Moharac PM Iriški venac Man. Velika Lipovača Privina Akumulacija Ravne Remeta Papratski do Glava Moharač Stara Bingula Venac Letenka Man. Man. Grgeteg Privina glava Jezero Grgeteg Bruje Man. Petkovica Man. Stari Man. VRDNIK Man. Jazak Ravanica Kuveždin Man. Šišatovac Šišatovac Ležimir Man. Krušedol Man. Jazak Man. Neradin Krušedol Erdevik Bešenovo Man. Mala Divoš Remeta Gibarac Jazak Akumulacija M.Remeta Šelovrenac Akumulacija Remeta Akumulacija Grgurevci IRIG Bingula Manđelos Šuljam ČORTANOVAČKA ŠUMA Bačinci Bešenovo Manđelos DUNAV Čalma Akumulacija Akumulacija Kukujevci Vranjaš Kudoš Akumulacija Stejanovci Čortanovci 2 Stejanovci An Island in the Sea of Panonian Grain ruška gora is an island-mountain, an island in the sea of Panonian grain. It is sit- uated in Vojvodina, in the north of Serbia. It is immersed in the large plain of the FPanonian basin. Once it was splashed by the waves of the Panonian Sea, where- as today, towards its peaks climb regional and local roads that reveal beautiful local sto- ries about nature, ecology, the National Park, monasteries, tame mountain villages and temperamental people.
  • Who Is Still Engaged in Agriculture in Vojvodina?

    Who Is Still Engaged in Agriculture in Vojvodina?

    European Geographical Studies, 2018, 5(1) Copyright © 2018 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. Published in the Slovak Republic European Geographical Studies Has been issued since 2014. E-ISSN: 2413-7197 2018, 5(1): 32-41 DOI: 10.13187/egs.2018.1.32 www.ejournal9.com Who Is Still Engaged in Agriculture in Vojvodina? Milka Bubalo-Živković a , *, Bojana Kalenjuk a, Tamara Lukić a, Bojan Đerčan a a University of Novi Sad, Serbia Abstract In the territory of Serbia after the Second World War, the largest percentage of the population was engaged in agriculture. Industrialization in the post-war period and intensive rural-urban migration have led to a significant reduction in the number of people still engaged in agriculture. There are some differences in certain ethnic groups. In some groups, larger number of inhabitants stayed in the countryside and were engaged in agriculture, while in others, there was more intensive abandonment of the countryside and relocation to cities or departure from Serbia to some other country. The aim of this paper is to determine which ethnic groups, according to the Census of Population in 2011, are mostly engaged in agriculture in the area of Vojvodina, at the time when the percentage of the agricultural population in the northern Serbian province is reduced to only 4.4 % or to around 85,000 inhabitants. The analysis used data on the agricultural population and ethnic groups of the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. Detailed data by ethnic groups were obtained by additional processing of the data of the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia.
  • Council of Europe European Landscape Convention

    Council of Europe European Landscape Convention

    COUNCIL OF EUROPE EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION National Workshop on the implementation of the European Landscape Convention in Bosnia and Herzegovina Drawing landscape policies for the future Trebinje, Bosnia and Herzegovina 25-26 January 2018 SESSION 1 SERBIA Mrs Jasminka LUKOVIC JAGLICIC Director Advisor, Regional Economic Development Agency, Sumadija and Pomoravlje The role of the Regional Economic Development Agency for Sumadija and Pomoravlje in the process of the implementation of the European Landscape Convention at regional and local level The Regional Economic Development Agency for Sumadija and Pomoravlje was founded in 2002 as the partnership between public, civil and private sectors, with the purpose of planning and management of equal territorial development. The Law on Regional Development (adopted in July 2009, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 51/2009, 30/2010 and 89/2015) defined the competence and area of intervention of regional development agencies for planning of development processes at regional level, applying the principles of broad stakeholder participation, inter-municipal and cross-sector approach in identifying problems and measures to address them. REDASP consistently applies these principles in its work on the one hand and has the ratification of the European Landscape Convention on the other hand. Thus the Republic of Serbia has recognised the landscape as an essential component of the human environment and agreed to 1). establish and implement a set of policies aimed at the protection, management and planning of the area and 2). to establish procedures for involvement of the wider public, local and regional authorities, as well as other landscape policy stakeholders.
  • PUTARINA) Važi Od: 25

    PUTARINA) Važi Od: 25

    Beograd, Bul. Kraqa Aleksandra 282 POSEBNA NAKNADA ZA UPOTREBU AUTOPUTA (PUTARINA) važi od: 25. februara 2021. god. u 07:00 h (po kusnoj listi NBS br. 173 od 10.09.2018. god.) BEOGRAD PUTARINA u RSD ROAD TOLL in EUR Deonica: Beograd - Preševo I-а I II III IV Naplatne stanice I-а I II III IV 40 80 120 230 460 MALI POŽAREVAC 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 4,00 50 100 160 310 630 UMČARI 0,50 1,00 1,50 3,00 5,50 70 130 190 390 770 VODANJ 1,00 1,50 2,00 3,50 7,00 80 150 230 460 930 KOLARI 1,00 1,50 2,00 4,00 8,00 90 180 270 540 1.070 SMEDEREVO 1,00 2,00 2,50 5,00 9,50 90 180 280 550 1.110 POŽAREVAC 1,00 2,00 2,50 5,00 9,50 150 300 460 910 1.830 VELIKA PLANA 1,50 3,00 4,00 8,00 15,50 180 350 530 1.060 2.120 MARKOVAC 2,00 3,00 4,50 9,00 18,00 190 380 570 1.140 2.280 LAPOVO 2,00 3,50 5,00 10,00 19,50 200 400 590 1.190 2.370 BATOČINA 2,00 3,50 5,00 10,50 20,50 250 490 730 1.460 2.920 JAGODINA 2,50 4,50 6,50 12,50 25,00 270 540 810 1.620 3.230 ĆUPRIJA 2,50 5,00 7,00 14,00 27,50 290 580 880 1.750 3.500 PARAĆIN 2,50 5,00 7,50 15,00 30,00 320 630 950 1.900 3.800 POJATE 3,00 5,50 8,50 16,50 32,50 350 690 1.030 2.060 4.120 RAŽANJ 3,00 6,00 9,00 17,50 35,00 390 770 1.160 2.310 4.630 ALEKSINAČKI RUDNICI 3,50 7,00 10,00 20,00 39,50 400 790 1.190 2.380 4.750 ALEKSINAC 3,50 7,00 10,50 20,50 40,50 450 890 1.340 2.680 5.360 NIŠ jug 4,00 8,00 11,50 23,00 45,50 460 920 1.380 2.750 5.500 MEROŠINA 4,00 8,00 12,00 23,50 46,50 480 960 1.440 2.880 5.770 DOLJEVAC SELO 4,50 8,50 12,50 24,50 49,00 500 990 1.480 2.960 5.920 BRESTOVAC 4,50 8,50 13,00 25,50 50,50 510 1.020 1.520