Genetic Basis of Speed of Development in Senecio Vulgaris L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genetic Basis of Speed of Development in Senecio Vulgaris L Heredity 77 (1996) 544—554 Received 19 January 1996 Genetic basis of speed of development in Senecio vulgaris L. var. vulgaris, S. vulgaris ssp. denticulatus (O.F. Muell.) P.D. Sell, and Senecio vernalis Waldst. & Kit. HANS PETER COMES* & JOACHIM W. KADEREIT Institut für Spezielle Botanik u. Botanischer Garten, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz, Bentze/weg 9, 55099 Mainz, Germany Thegenetic basis of differences in speed of development from germination to first bud formation was investigated in Senecio vulgaris var. vulgaris and S. vulgaris ssp. denticulatus, and also in S. vernalis sampled from Israel and Germany. In the case of S. vulgaris, F2 segregation analysis and the recovery of very late and very early lines from extreme F2 phenotypes showed that differences can be explained by a single major gene model, whereas segregation data from F2 and backcross progenies in S. vernalis are not incompatible with a digenic model of inheritance. Senecio vernalis from Israel and S. vulgaris var. vulgaris reached the different developmental stages in a substantially shorter time than did C. European S. vemalis and S. vulgaris ssp. denticulatus. In both species the increased speed of development was achieved through drastic abbreviation of the rosette stage of development rather than through an acceleration of the entire developmental programme. It is suggested that the genes controlling speed of development in S. vulgaris and S. vemalis may be homologous to major heterochronic genes identified from mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (e.g. early flowering [elfl—3]). Keywords:earlyflowering mutants, genetic basis, life history trait, Senecio vemalis, Senecio vulgaris, speed of development. Introduction required for development from germination to first flower bud formation, anthesis, and fruiting. Infor- Speedof development is an important variable in mation concerning the genetic control of these flow- theories of life history evolution (Sibly & Antono- ering characters is rapidly increasing in well-defined vics, 1992), as it is generally assumed to affect total experimental mutant systems, particularly Arabidop- lifetime fecundity (Lewontin, 1965; MacArthur & sis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Koorneef et aL, 1991; Sung Wilson, 1967). At the macroevolutionary level, varia- et aL, 1992; Zagotta et at., 1992; Bernier et at., 1993), tion in developmental timing in a derivative taxon and many species of agronomic importance, for relative to its progenitor is commonly referred to as example maize (e.g. Freeling et at., 1992; see also heterochrony (Diggle, 1992). A full understanding of Bernier, 1988 for a review). In addition, other such major evolutionary changes requires an under- cereals with genomes suitably mapped at the standing of the genetic basis of phenotypic differ- molecular level have recently been shown to provide entiation. A knowledge of the inheritance of speed excellent material for RFLP marker studies of major of development is also of value in testing key genes controlling flowering time and developmental assumptions of genetic models of life history varia- rate (Triticum aestivum, Law et al., 1993; Hordeum tion (Anderson & King, 1970; Lande, 1982; Charles- vulgare, Laurie et at., 1994). In contrast, the genetics worth, 1984, 1990). of developmental timing in most wild plant taxa is Developmental timing in plant species can be poorly known (Murfet, 1977; Bernier, 1988). More- objectively determined by the number of days over, only very few studies of natural plant popula- tions have provided evidence of the type and *Correspondence: School of Biological and Medical Sciences, direction of evolutionary change in developmental University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KYI6 9TH, U.K. timing by merging qualitative or quantitative genetic 544 1996The Genetica! Society of Great Britain. GENETICS OF SPEED OF DEVELOPMENT IN SENEC/O 545 information with hypotheses of progenitor-derivative rare taxon from the coasts of W. Europe and the relationships (Stephanomeria, Gottlieb, 1973, 1982; mountains of S. Spain and Sicily (Kadereit, 1984a, Mimulus, Macnair & Cumbes, 1989; Fenster & and unpublished results), where it occurs in both Ritland, 1994; Fenster et a!., 1995). A general natural and disturbed habitats (Comes, 1995a; conclusion gained from the studies cited above is Kadereit, unpublished results). Morphologically, var. that there is wide variation in the genetics of devel- vulgar/s and ssp. denticulatus are normally distin- opmental timing, and consequently there is no single guished by the presence of ray fiorets in the latter. type of genetic system —eitherMendelian inherit- Presence vs. absence of ray fiorets is governed by ance involving only a few genes with major effects, alternative alleles at a single locus (Trow, 1912). The or polygenic inheritance —thatunderlies the two taxa differ dramatically in two life history phenotypic differences. characters, with var. vulgar/s normally exhibiting no In this paper we examine the genetic basis of pronounced seed dormancy and up to twice the intraspecific differences in speed of development speed of development of ssp. denticulatus (Kadereit, from germination to first reproduction in two closely 1984a; Comes, 1995a). The difference in seed related species of Senecio L. (Compositae), S. dormancy appears to be regulated by a single gene vulgaris L. and S. vemalis Waldst. & Kit. Substantial with two alleles in ssp. denticulatus from Jersey differences were analysed between S. vulgaris var. (Kadereit, 1984a). Presence of seed dormancy was vulgaris and S. vulgaris ssp. denticulatus (O.F. Muell.) recessive to the absence of seed dormancy in British P. D. Sell on the one hand, and between populations var. vulgar/s. Seed dormancy, however, has also been of S. vemalis from Israel and Germany on the other shown to occur in var. vulgar/s from the Mediterra- hand. An almost twofold difference in speed of nean, where the winter-rain climate does not permit development has been observed in the former case the formation of more than one generation per year (Kadereit, 1984a, and unpublished results; Comes, (Ren & Abbott, 1991; Comes, 1995b). Seed 1995a), and a difference of almost identical magni- dormancy here appears to be regulated digenically tude was reported more recently in material of S. (Comes, 1995b). vernalis from different geographical regions (Comes, On the basis of morphological/phenological, 1995b). geographical and ecological considerations it has The genetic basis of the large difference in speed been argued that ssp. denticulatus should be of development in both S. vulgaris and S. vemalis is regarded as the progenitor of the weedy var. the subject of the present analysis. In the case of the vulgar/s, or as close to such (Kadereit, 1984b). On former taxon, it is conceivable that its polyploid the assumption that the differentiation of var. genomic constitution may lead to difficulties in inter- vulgar/s coincided with its geographical/ecological preting patterns of segregation. However, there is separation from ssp. denticulatus, var. vulgar/s may well-documented evidence in S. vulgaris of both have arisen in late glacial or early postglacial times. disomic inheritance at the ray floret locus (Trow, At that time ssp. denticulatus, which was probably 1912) and fixed heterozygosity at a number of distributed in Mediterranean coastal habitats during isozyme loci (AAT-3,c.EST-1,PGI-2; Ashton & the glacial period, reacted to climatic changes by Abbott, 1992), thus justifying the assumption that retreating into higher altitudes in the Mediterranean the species contains a diploidized genome. area, and north along the coasts, i.e. into those areas where it can be found today. At that time many new habitats would have become available for var. Material and methods vulgar/s. Senecio vulgar/s Senec/overnal/s Senecio vulgar/s (common groundsel, 2n =4x=40) consists of three taxonomic units, namely ssp. Seneciovemalis (spring groundsel, 2n =2x=20)is vulgans var. vulgaris, ssp. vulgar/s var. hibernicus widely distributed in C. to E. Europe, S. W. Asia, Syme, and ssp. denticulatus. Subspecies vulgar/s var. Siberia, S. Russia, and Afghanistan (Alexander, vulgar/s and ssp. denticulatus were the two taxa of S. 1979). The expansion of its range into C. Europe in vulgaris investigated in the present study. the last 200 years has been well documented (Hegi, Var. vulgar/s is considered to be native to W. 1987). In C. Europe S. vemalis mostly behaves as a Eurasia (Kadereit, 1984b), but is now distributed winter annual and is polymorphic for seed more or less worldwide, mainly as a ruderal and dormancy, which is regulated by a recessive allele of agricultural weed. In contrast, ssp. denticulatus is a a single gene (Comes, 1995b). In contrast, material The Genetical Society of Great Britain, Heredity, 77, 544—554. 546 H. P. COMES&J. W. KADEREIT from the E. Mediterranean appears to be fixed for data were pooled. This analysis also revealed that seed dormancy, and develops substantially faster neither block (i.e. local environmental) factors nor from germination to first reproduction (Comes, family x block effects (i.e. gene-environment interac- 1995b). tions) were significant (data not shown). The Although there is no doubt that the C. European material was scored daily for the number of days populations of S. vernalis are of introduced status, it from (1) germination to bud formation, (2) germina- is not known whether this material is directly tion to first anthesis, and (3) germination to first derived from populations in the E. Mediterranean. fruiting. It seems likely, however, that E. Mediterranean To investigate the underlying genetic model populations of S. vernalis lie within the range the further, a simple one-generation divergent selection species occupied before man started to alter the experiment was carried out. Nine individuals from 'natural' distribution of the species. In this respect, the F2 were selected for extreme low and high therefore, C. European populations may be consid- phenotypic values for the traits under study. Selec- ered as derived, relative to E. Mediterranean popu- ted plants were selfed and used for the production lations. Truly native populations of S.
Recommended publications
  • Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants Used by the Andean People of Canta, Lima, Peru
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266388116 Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Andean people of Canta, Lima, Peru Article in Journal of Ethnopharmacology · June 2007 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.11.018 CITATIONS READS 38 30 3 authors, including: Percy Amilcar Pollito University of São Paulo 56 PUBLICATIONS 136 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Percy Amilcar Pollito on 14 November 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 111 (2007) 284–294 Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Andean people of Canta, Lima, Peru Horacio De-la-Cruz a,∗, Graciela Vilcapoma b, Percy A. Zevallos c a Facultad de Ciencias Biol´ogicas, Universidad Pedro Ruiz Gallo, Lambayeque, Peru b Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, Peru c Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, Peru Received 14 June 2006; received in revised form 15 November 2006; accepted 19 November 2006 Available online 2 December 2006 Abstract A survey aiming to document medicinal plant uses was performed in Canta Province Lima Department, in the Peruvians Andes of Peru. Hundred and fifty people were interviewed. Enquiries and informal personal conversations were used to obtain information. Informants were men and women over 30 years old, who work in subsistence agriculture and cattle farming, as well as herbalist.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Plant and Animal Species Observed
    Appendix C Plant and Animal Species Observed This list includes vascular plants, mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians observed in the BSA by biologists during various surveys in 2005 and 2006. This list does not include invertebrate species. Invertebrates that would be most commonly encountered on the site would include butterflies, flies, dragonflies, damselflies, beetles, earwigs, grasshoppers, crickets, termites, true bugs, mantids, lacewings, bees, wasps, ants, and spiders. PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED Scientific Name Common Name Invasive Plant Rating CLUB AND SPIKE MOSSES Selaginellaceae Spike moss family Selaginella cinerascens Mesa spikemoss TRUE FERNS Azollaceae Mosquito fern family Azolla filiculoides Pacific mosquito fern Marsileaceae Marsilea family Marsilea vestita Hairy waterclover Pilularia americana American pillwort Pteridaceae Lip fern family Pellaea andromedifolia Coffee fern Pentagramma triangularis Goldenback fern PINOPHYTA GYMNOSPERMS Cupressaceace Cypress family Juniperus californica California juniper DICOT FLOWERING PLANTS Aizoaceae Carpet weed family Carpobrotus edulis* Hottentot-fig HIGH Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum* Slender-leaved ice plant Trianthema portulacastrum Horse-purslane Amaranthaceae Amaranth family Amaranthus albus* Tumbling pigweed Amaranthus palmeri Palmer’s pigweed Amaranthus sp. Pigweed Anacardiaceae Sumac family Malosma laurina Laurel sumac Rhus ovata Sugar bush Rhus trilobata Skunkbush sumac Schinus molle* Peruvian pepper tree LIMITED Schinus terebinthifolius* Brazilian pepper tree LIMITED Mid
    [Show full text]
  • Poisonous Weeds and Toxic Factors in Hay Crops
    Poisonous Weeds And Toxic Factors In Hay Crops: Why You Should Worry Birgit Puschner Veterinary Toxicologist [email protected] School of Veterinary Medicine, UC Davis Overview of Today’s Talk • When to suspect a poisoning • Toxic plants: • Nitrate accumulators • Pyrrolizidine alkaloids • Oleander • Grasses that cause mechanical irritation Factors Contributing to Poisoning • Animal • Plant • Sensitive species • Palatable? • Adaptation to tolerate • Right time of the year? toxic plants is possible à concentrations of • What other feed is toxins vary with season available? • Does the plant remain • Unable to avoid toxic toxic when dried? plant (i.e. in hay cubes) Resources • Textbooks: • A Guide to Plant Poisoning of Animals in North America: by A.P. Knight and R.G. Walter, 1st edition, 2001. Teton NewMedia. www.tetonnm.com • UCANR publication: http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8398.pdf Detailed publication on Livestock-poisoning Plants of California (link on CERE under Lab resources) • Websites (with images and location) • https://www.ars.usda.gov/pacific-west- area/logan-ut/poisonous-plant- research/docs/poisonous-plants-by-toxic- syndrome/ • http://plants.usda.gov/about_plants.html Nitrate/Nitrite Accumulators • Sorghum spp (Sudan grass, Johnson grass) • Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) • Lamb’s-quarters (Chenopodium album) • Alfalfa, oat, corn, nightshades (Solanum) Chenopodium album Pigweed Johnson grass Sudan grass Orchard Grass Hay 5,900 ppm Nitrate Pigweed Sudan Hay 18,800 ppm Nitrate Amaranthus retroflexus Nitrate/Nitrite – Mechanism • Only ruminants and pseudoruminants are susceptible • Nitrate in plants à converted to toxic nitrite • Nitrite à methemoglobin • Methemoglobin: incapable of Oxygen transport à Anoxia NO3/NO2 – Clinical signs • Acute syndrome: – Onset within 1/2 - 4 hours after feeding – GI irritation, difficulty breathing, tremors, ataxia – Rapid, weak heart beat – Convulsions, death in 6 - 24 hours – Abortions, esp.
    [Show full text]
  • BSBI News Index 121-130 ABC 8Pt FINAL
    BSBI News INDEX to Nos 121 – 130 September 2012 to September 2015 Compiled by GWYNN ELLIS ISSN 2397-8813 1 GUIDE TO THE INDEX ABBREVIATIONS AEM Annual Exhibition Meeting Illus. Illustration AGM Annual General Meeting Infl. Inflorescence ASM Annual Summer Meeting Lvs Leaves cf. confer (compare) photo © photo copyright holder congrats congratulations Rev. Review CS Colour Section Rpt Report del. delineavit (drawn) s.l. sensu lato (broad sense) Descr. Description s.s. sensu stricto (narrow sense) Diag. Diagram v.c. vice-county Exbn Exhibition v.cc. vice-counties Exbt Exhibit (♀) female parent Fld Mtg Rpt Field Meeting Report (♂) male parent Fls Flowers ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The compiler wishes to thank David Pearman for much helpful advice and for scrutinising the final text. However, responsibility for checking the index and its final form rests solely with the compiler. BOOKS et al. are italicised as are Periodicals and scientific names COLOUR PAGES: In the index all colour page numbers are distinguished by being underlined with the cover pages enclosed in square brackets [ ]. The front cover and inside front cover are numbered [i] and [ii] respectively while the inside back and back cover pages are numbered according to the number of pages, thus with an issue of 76 pages the inside back cover is [77] and the back cover [78]. Colour Section plates are numbered CS1, CS2, CS3, CS4. Photographers are now indexed by name with the qualification (photo ©) COMPILATION: Using the original text on computer, the entries for each issue were generated by deleting all unwanted text. After checking, the entries were then sorted into alphabetical order, condensed, and finally output as pdf files for the Printer.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A—CHECKLIST of VASCULAR PLANTS Observed in the Vicinity of Sheffield
    PLANTS CHECKLIST APPENDIX A—CHECKLIST OF VASCULAR PLANTS Observed in the Vicinity of Sheffield COMMON NAME ORIGIN HORSETAILS HORSETAILS (Family Equisetaceae) ❏ Equisetum arvense field horsetail N ❏ Equisetum hyemale tall scouring-rush N FERNS ADDER’S-TONGUES (Family Ophioglossaceae) ❏ Botrychium multifidum leathery grape fern N (E) ROYAL FERNS (Family Osmundaceae) ❏ Osmunda regalis royal fern N HAY-SCENTED (Family Dennstaedtiaceae) ❏ Dennstaedtia punctilobula hay-scented fern N SPLEENWORTS (Family Aspleniaceae) ❏ Asplenium platyneuron ebony spleenwort N WOOD FERNS (Family Dryopteridaceae) ❏ Cystopteris fragilis brittle fern or fragile fern N (X) ❏ Cystopteris protrusa lowland fragile fern N ❏ Dryopteris marginalis leathery wood fern N ❏ Matteuccia struthiopteris ostrich fern N ❏ Onoclea sensibilis sensitive fern N ❏ Polystichum acrostichoides Christmas fern N GYNOSPERMS (GINKGOS & CONIFERS) GINKGOS (Family Ginkgoaceae) ❏ Ginkgo biloba ginkgo or maidenhair tree C PINES (Family Pinaceae) ❏ Picea glauca conica dwarf Alberta spruce C ❏ Picea pungens gluca blue spruce C ❏ Pinus nigra Austrian pine C ❏ Pinus strobus eastern white pine N ❏ Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir C ❏ Tsuga canadensis eastern hemlock N CYPRESSES (Family Cupressaceae) ❏ Juniperus virginiana eastern red-cedar N ❏ Thuja occidentalis arbor vitae N YEWS (Family Taxaceae) ❏ Taxus canadensis Canada yew N ANGIOSPERMS (FLOWERING PLANTS) DICOTYLEDONS (CLASS MAGNOLIOPSIDA) MAGNOLIAS (Family Magnoliaceae) ❏ Liriodendron tulipifera tulip-tree or tulip-poplar N ❏ Magnolia acuminata
    [Show full text]
  • Barcoding the Asteraceae of Tennessee, Tribe Senecioneae
    Schilling, E.E. and A. Floden. 2014. Barcoding the Asteraceae of Tennessee, tribe Senecioneae. Phytoneuron 2014-34: 1–5. Published 14 March 2014. ISSN 2153 733X BARCODING THE ASTERACEAE OF TENNESSEE, TRIBE SENECIONEAE EDWARD E. SCHILLING AND AARON FLODEN Herbarium TENN Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Results from barcoding studies of tribe Senecioneae for the Tennessee flora using data from the nuclear ribosomal ITS marker region are presented and include first complete reports of this marker for 3 of the 15 species of these tribes that occur in the state. Sequence data from the ITS region separated all Tennessee species of Arnoglossum , Erechtites , Hasteola , and Rugelia (all of which are native) from one another and from other, non-Tennessee congeners. In contrast, many of the species of Packera , both from the state and from other parts of the southeastern USA, had basically identical ITS sequences. The contrast in the distinctiveness of Arnoglossum species compared to those of Packera suggests the two genera have had different histories of introduction and diversification in southeastern North America. Tribe Senecioneae is one of the largest in Asteraceae and with a worldwide distribution has had the opportunity to diversify in many different regions. The boundaries and circumscription of the tribe have, however, changed over the past few decades, and its generic level circumscription is still being settled (Nordenstam et al. 2009; Pelser et al. 2007, 2010). Notable is the problem of the circumscription of the huge Senecio (ca. 1000 species), but changes have also affected other genera from the southeastern USA, most notably the recognition of Arnoglossum and Hasteola as distinct from Cacalia (Anderson 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Compositae of Central America–I. the Tussilaginoid
    Pruski, J.F. 2012. Compositae of Central America–I. The tussilaginoid genus Robinsonecio (Senecioneae), microcharacters, generic delimitation, and exclusion of senecioid Senecio cuchumatanensis . Phytoneuron 2012-38: 1–8. Published 23 Apr 2012. ISSN 2153 733X COMPOSITAE OF CENTRAL AMERICA–I. THE TUSSILAGINOID GENUS ROBINSONECIO (SENECIONEAE), MICROCHARACTERS, GENERIC DELIMITATION, AND EXCLUSION OF SENECIOID SENECIO CUCHUMATANENSIS JOHN F. PRUSKI Missouri Botanical Garden P.O. Box 299 St. Louis, Missouri 63166 ABSTRACT Robinsonecio has tussilaginoid microcharacters and is represented in Central America by a single species, the generitype Robinsonecio gerberifolius . A lectotype is designated for Senecio gerberifolius . Senecio cuchumatanensis of Guatemala has been suggested to be a congener of R. gerberifolius , but its senecioid microcharacters are found here to exclude it from Robinsonecio . KEY WORDS: Asteraceae, Central America, Compositae, Guatemala, Mexico, Robinsonecio , Robinsonecio gerberifolius , Senecio cuchumatanensis , Senecio gerberifolius, Senecioneae. Robinsonecio T.M. Barkley & Janovec (Compositae: Senecioneae: Tussilagininae) was segregated from the Lugentes subgroup (Barkley 1985) of Senecio L. (Senecioninae) based on its tussilaginoid microcharacters (often called "cacalioid" microcharacters, e.g., Robinson & Brettell 1973b, 1973b; Wetter 1983). The genus includes 2 species –– R. gerberifolius (Sch. Bip. ex Hemsl.) T.M. Barkley & Janovec (alpine areas in southeastern Mexico and western Guatemala) and R. porphyresthes
    [Show full text]
  • Common Groundsel Senecio Vulgaris L
    PNW 466 • July 1994 Common Groundsel Senecio vulgaris L. S. Aldrich-Markham C ommon groundsel, native to Europe, is now common throughout the temperate re- gions of the world. It is wide- spread in Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, but most common west of the Cascade Mountains. This weed is found in many crops, including forages, cere- als, mint, berries, and row crops, as well as in ornamentals and vegetable gardens. Groundsel is especially a problem in forage crops be- cause it is toxic to livestock. The toxins are four pyrrolizidine alkaloids, which cause irrevers- ible liver damage. Some of the same alkaloids are found in tansy ragwort (Senecio jacobea L.), but tansy ragwort also con- tains two additional alkaloids that are more toxic. Poisoning occurs most com- monly in situations where ani- mals cannot separate out the toxic plants—when they are mixed with the forage in a pas- ture, or when they are fed in hay or silage. The liver disease is chronic and progressive, re- sulting in death months later in most animals, with few or no Susan Aldrich-Markham, Extension agent, Yamhill County, Oregon State University. Figure 1.—Common groundsel grows from 4 to 18 inches tall. Leaves are deeply lobed with toothed margins. The lower stems and undersides of basal leaves usually are purplish-colored. A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication • Oregon • Idaho • Washington symptoms until 2 or 3 days be- hairy or woolly. Leaves have the base of the plant, becoming fore death. little or no leaf stalk, and are increasingly smaller toward the A lethal amount for cattle or arranged along the stem in a top.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Plants in Central European River Ports
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal NeoBiota 45: 93–115 (2019) Alien plants in Central European river ports 93 doi: 10.3897/neobiota.45.33866 RESEARCH ARTICLE NeoBiota http://neobiota.pensoft.net Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions Alien plants in Central European river ports Vladimír Jehlík1, Jiří Dostálek2, Tomáš Frantík3 1 V Lesíčku 1, 150 00 Praha 5 – Smíchov, Czech Republic 2 Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic 3 Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic Corresponding author: Jiří Dostálek ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ingo Kowarik | Received 14 February 2019 | Accepted 27 March 2019 | Published 7 May 2019 Citation: Jehlík V, Dostálek J, Frantík T (2019) Alien plants in Central European river ports. NeoBiota 45: 93–115. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.45.33866 Abstract River ports represent a special type of urbanized area. They are considered to be an important driver of biological invasion and biotic homogenization on a global scale, but it remains unclear how and to what degree they serve as a pool of alien species. Data for 54 river ports (16 German, 20 Czech, 7 Hungarian, 3 Slovak, and 8 Austrian ports) on two important Central European waterways (the Elbe-Vltava and Dan- ube waterways) were collected over 40 years. In total, 1056 plant species were found. Of these, 433 were alien, representing 41% of the total number of species found in all the studied Elbe, Vltava, and Danube ports. During comparison of floristic data from literary sources significant differences in the percentage of alien species in ports (50%) and cities (38%) were found.
    [Show full text]
  • Hplc Analysis of Carotenoids from Senecio Vernalis and S. Jacobaea (Asteraceae)
    780 FARMACIA, 2009, Vol. 57, 6 HPLC ANALYSIS OF CAROTENOIDS FROM SENECIO VERNALIS AND S. JACOBAEA (ASTERACEAE) GEORGE DAN MOGOŞANU1*, ADELA PINTEA2, LUDOVIC EVERARD BEJENARU1, CORNELIA BEJENARU3, GABRIELA RĂU4, HONORIUS POPESCU1 1Department of Pharmacognosy & Phytotherapy 2Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Zootechny and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 3–5 Mănăştur Street, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 3Department of Vegetal & Animal Biology 4Department of Organic Chemistry & Medicinal Chemistry 1,3,4Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 2–4 Petru Rareş Street, 200349 Craiova, Romania *corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Through HPLC analysis, in two Senecio species (S. vernalis Waldst. et Kit. and S. jacobaea L.), carotenoid fractions have been determined for the first time. Therefore, in increasing order of the retention times, seven compounds have been identified and quantitative determined, as follows: neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein-5,6-epoxide, lutein, β-cryptoxanthin, α- and β-carotene. High amounts of lutein have been found in all Senecio extracts. Rezumat Pentru prima dată au fost analizate, prin HPLC, fracţiunile carotenoidice provenite de la două specii de Senecio (S. vernalis Waldst. et Kit. şi S. jacobaea L.). Astfel, în ordinea crescătoare a timpilor de retenţie, au fost identificate şi determinate cantitativ şapte componente, după cum urmează: neoxantina, violaxantina, lutein-5,6-epoxid, luteina, β-criptoxantina, α- şi β-caroten. În extractele de Senecio, luteina a fost preponderentă din punct de vedere cantitativ. Keywords: Senecio vernalis; S. jacobaea; carotenoids; HPLC analysis. Introduction Senecio vernalis Waldst. et Kit., spring groundsel and S. jacobaea L., tansy ragwort, of Asteraceae family, are native in Eurasia, North America, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, and Northern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oils from the Flower, Leaf, and Stem of Senecio Pandurifolius
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Rec. Nat. Prod . 5:2 (2011) 82-91 Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oils from the Flower, Leaf, and Stem of Senecio pandurifolius Nuran Kahriman 1, Gonca Tosun 1, Salih Terzio ğlu 2, Şengül Alpay Karao ğlu 3 and Nurettin Yaylı 1,* 1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Türkiye 2Department of Forest Botany, Faculty of Forestry, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Türkiye 3Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Rize University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye (Received July 15, 2010; Revised September 13, 2010; Accepted September 13, 2010) Abstract: The essential oils from the fresh flower, leaf, and stem of Senecio pandurifolius (Asteraceae) were isolated by hydrodistillation in a Clevenger-type apparatus, and characterized by GC-FID and GC-MS. A total of forty-five, sixty, and forty-two compounds were identified, constituting over 90.1%, 88.0%, and 89.0% of oil composition of the flower, leaf, and stem of S. pandurifolius , respectively. The chemical profile reveals the dominance of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (flower: 42.4%, leaf: 43.4%, stem: 52.3%). The main components of essential oils own to S. pandurifolius were α-cuprenene (30.7%) in flower, α-zingiberene (16.1%) in leaf and γ- curcumene (14.9%) in stem. Terpene related compounds were in minor amounts in all parts (flower: 1.4%, leaf: 1.5%, stem: 1.9%) of the S. pandurifolius . Also there was no monoterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated monoterpenes in the essential oil of the stem. In addition, antimicrobial activities of the essential oils of S.
    [Show full text]