DOCSLIB.ORG

Fleas and Lice of Mammals in New Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fleas and Lice of Mammals in New Mexico Fleas and Lice United States of Mammals in Department of Agriculture Forest Service New Mexico Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Paulette L. Ford Report RMRS-GTR-123 Richard A. Fagerlund February 2004 Donald W. Duszynski Paul J. Polechla Ford, Paulette L.; Fagerlund, Richard A.; Duszynski, Donald W.; Polechla, Paul J. 2004. Fleas and lice of mammals in New Mexico. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-123. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 57 p. Abstract All available records are compiled for three orders of ectoparasites of mammals in New Mexico: fleas (Siphonaptera), sucking lice (Anoplura), and chewing lice (Mallophaga). We have drawn from records at the University of New Mexico’s Museum of Southwestern Biology, the Vector Control Program of the New Mexico Environment Department, the Environmental Health Department of the City of Albuquerque, and several private collections. We list 99 species of fleas, 27 species of sucking lice, and two species of chewing lice. Included are appendices that list recorded ectoparasite species and their hosts in New Mexico and the coun- ties associated with host ectoparasite infestations. We report at least four new state host records for fleas. Keywords: Anoplura, chewing lice, ectoparasite, flea, lice, louse, Mallophaga, New Mexico mammalian hosts, Siphonaptera, sucking lice The Authors Paulette Ford is a Research Ecologist with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, in Albuquerque, NM. She holds an M.S. in biology from the University of New Mexico and a Ph.D. in Renewable Natural Resources from the University of Arizona. She has worked extensively in Latin America and the American Southwest on research ranging from the systematics of parasites and amphibians to small mam- mal and amphibian community structures in deserts, grasslands, and tropical deciduous forests. Richard Fagerlund is an Integrated Pest Management Coordinator with the University of New Mexico. He current- ly has a newspaper column in the Albuquerque Tribune on pest control and is the author of four books on in- sects. Donald Duszynski is a Professor of Biology at the University of New Mexico. He has an M.S. and Ph.D. from the Department of Zoology at Colorado State University. He has been at UNM since 1970 and specializes in endoparasites of wild mammals, especially the coccidian or parasitic protists. Paul Polechla is a Research Associate Professor at the University of New Mexico in the biology department’s Museum of Southwestern Biology Mammal Division. He earned his M.S. at Eastern New Mexico University and his Ph.D. at the University of Arkansas. He was a member of the Southwestern Zoonotic Disease Program (1996-2000) studying hantavirus and deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) ecology. His interests are mammalian ecology with an emphasis on predator-prey and host-parasite relationships. cover illustrations by: Johnna Autumn Strange. Louse (upper), flea (lower). You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media. Please specify the publication title and series number. Fort Collins Service Center Telephone (970) 498-1392 FAX (970) 498-1396 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.fs.fed.us/rm Mailing address Publications Distribution Rocky Mountain Research Station 240 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, CO 80526 Rocky Mountain Research Station Natural Resources Research Center 2150 Centre Avenue, Building A Fort Collins, CO 80526 Contents Acknowledgments . ii Introduction . 1 Fleas (Order Siphonaptera). 2 General . 2 Development . 2 Diseases Carried/Caused/Transmitted . 2 Control . 4 Sucking Lice (Order Anoplura) . 4 General . 4 Development . 5 Diseases Carried/Caused/Transmitted . 5 Control . 6 Chewing Lice (Order Mallophaga). 6 General . 6 Development . 6 Diseases Carried/Caused/Transmitted . 6 Control . 7 Guide to Checklist Format. 8 Host List—New Mexico Mammals and Their Ectoparasites . 9 Order Artiodactyla . 9 Order Carnivora. 9 Order Chiroptera . 12 Order Insectivora . 13 Order Lagomorpha . 13 Order Perissodactyla . 16 Order Primates . 16 Order Rodentia . 17 References . 39 Appendix A. New Mexico Ectoparasites and Their Mammal Hosts. 42 Order Siphonaptera (Fleas). 42 Order Anoplura (Sucking Lice) . 49 Order Mallophaga (Chewing Lice). 50 Appendix B. New Mexico County Records . 51 Fleas (Siphonaptera) . 51 Lice (Order Anoplura and Order Mallophaga) . 56 Acknowledgments We wish to thank the following people and institutions: Sandra Brantley for her extensive work with the manu- script and the arthropod collections; Lee Couch for compiling the data, editing, and organizing the final man- uscript; Dawn Chen Sun for reviewing the reference material used in the manuscript; Clifford Crawford, Lane Eskew, and Deborah Finch for reviewing multiple drafts of the manuscript and making many valuable sug- gestions; and Terrence Enk, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, for specific consultation. Thanks to Ted Brown and Pamela Reynolds, New Mexico Environment Department; New Mexico Environment Department’s Vector Control Program; Rudy Bueno, City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department; Cheryl Parmenter and Kim Heckscher-Decker, Department of Biology, UNM and the Sevilleta Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Program; Dwayne Salazar, DJ’s Pest Control, Albuquerque, NM; and David C. Lightfoot, Sevilleta LTER, Jornada LTER, and Bandelier National Monument for supplying information, spec- imens, and identifications. We also thank Terry Yates, principal investigator of the small mammal hantavirus studies and Jon Dunnum, Brian Frank, W. Scott Knapp, Kimberly Leuthner, and Todd Meinecke for assis- tance in trapping small mammals that supplied specimens; Peggy Case for contributing ectoparasites from lagomorphs; and the Bureau of Land Management, the National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Bureau of Indian Affairs for funding mammal studies that contribut- ed data to this document. This manuscript is dedicated to Michael J. Patrick, assistant professor of biology at Pennsylvania State University, who contributed many of the host animals and flea descriptions that are includ- ed in the checklist. Dr. Patrick died 10 March 2000. ii USDA Forest Service RMRS-GTR-123. 2004 1 Fleas and Lice From Mammals in New Mexico Paulette L. Ford, Richard A. Fagerlund, Donald W. Duszynski, and Paul J. Polechla Introduction Of the 150 mammal species in New Mexico that po- tentially act as host to one or more species of fleas and lice, only 82 are documented to host these ectoparasites. The purpose of this work is to provide baseline data These reports are widespread temporally and geographi- of what is known and can be documented about the fleas cally, and most represent only one collection event from and lice of New Mexico mammals. Within that context, one locality. A total of 99 species of fleas, 27 species we summarize the publications on this topic, document of sucking lice, and two species of chewing lice are the fleas and lice that are accessioned into the Arthropod known and documented from New Mexico mammals. Division of the University of New Mexico’s Museum However, should every mammal species be thoroughly of Southwestern Biology (UNM-MSB), and provide surveyed throughout its known range, the number of flea some general information about the biology of fleas and and lice species on New Mexico mammals would clear- lice and the potential disease agents they may transmit ly be much higher than this. For example, we already to other mammals in New Mexico, including humans. have documented that at least 29 New Mexico mammals Since infestations of fleas, sucking lice, and chewing have 10 or more species of fleas recorded from them. lice in humans, domesticated animals, and wildlife may For these reasons, it is clear that the study of the mam- lead to discomfort, debilitating disease, and/or death, malian fleas and lice parasitizing New Mexico mam- this information has implications for, but not limited to, mals is in need of attention. federal, state, and private land managers, scientists, pub- Vertebrate biologists, who work in the field in New lic health officials, and the general public. Mexico, can play a pivotal role in our understanding of New Mexico has the distinction of having one of the the diversity and distribution of ectoparasites infesting highest diversities of land mammals in the United States. this state’s mammal (and other terrestrial vertebrate) There are approximately 150 extant, native mammal spe- populations by properly collecting specimens from cies representing eight orders, 25 families, and 71 gen- study animals. The methods for collecting and preserv- era in the state (Frey and Yates 1996). The potential for ing ectoparasites in the field are simple yet important: flea and louse diversity is, therefore, very great. In addi- tion, when non-native mammals are introduced into the 1. Collect the organism(s) from the surface of the host state or increase their range(s) from adjacent states, they and place them in a vial or other container with 70 bring with them their ectoparasites that may be transmit- percent ethanol or similar alcohol (see Gardner 1996 ted to endemic species. and Whitaker 1982 for more specific details). In this manuscript we compile all available records 2. Using a No. 2 pencil or indelible (India) ink pen, for three orders of ectoparasites of mammals in New write the following information on a small label to be Mexico: fleas (Siphonaptera), sucking lice (Anoplura), placed into the collection vessel: careful and correct and chewing lice (Mallophaga). There is a lack of infor- identity of the host animal, its precise location of col- mation about these ectoparasites, due to the low num- lection, the sex of the animal and its approximate age bers of the host species studied and to the fact that not (juvenile, adult), the date (mm/dd/yy), and your name all areas of the state have been sampled thoroughly for and collection number (if any).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What Can We Predict About the Spread of Vector-Borne Zoonotic Diseases?
    2010 Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What can we predict about the spread of vector-borne zoonotic diseases? Ph.D. Dissertation Megan M. Friggens School of Forestry I I I \, l " FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? by Megan M. Friggens A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest Science Northern Arizona University May 2010 ?Jii@~-~-u-_- Robert R. Parmenter, Ph. D. ~",l(*~ l.~ Paulette L. Ford, Ph. D. --=z:r-J'l1jU~ David M. Wagner, Ph. D. ABSTRACT FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? MEGAN M. FRIGGENS Vector-borne diseases of humans and wildlife are experiencing resurgence across the globe. I examine the dynamics of flea borne diseases through a comparative analysis of flea literature and analyses of field data collected from three sites in New Mexico: The Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, the Sandia Mountains and the Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP). My objectives were to use these analyses to better predict and manage for the spread of diseases such as plague (Yersinia pestis). To assess the impact of anthropogenic disturbance on flea communities, I compiled and analyzed data from 63 published empirical studies. Anthropogenic disturbance is associated with conditions conducive to increased transmission of flea-borne diseases. Most measures of flea infestation increased with increasing disturbance or peaked at intermediate levels of disturbance. Future trends of habitat and climate change will probably favor the spread of flea-borne disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas and Flea-Borne Diseases
    International Journal of Infectious Diseases 14 (2010) e667–e676 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Infectious Diseases journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijid Review Fleas and flea-borne diseases Idir Bitam a, Katharina Dittmar b, Philippe Parola a, Michael F. Whiting c, Didier Raoult a,* a Unite´ de Recherche en Maladies Infectieuses Tropicales Emergentes, CNRS-IRD UMR 6236, Faculte´ de Me´decine, Universite´ de la Me´diterrane´e, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5, France b Department of Biological Sciences, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA c Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA ARTICLE INFO SUMMARY Article history: Flea-borne infections are emerging or re-emerging throughout the world, and their incidence is on the Received 3 February 2009 rise. Furthermore, their distribution and that of their vectors is shifting and expanding. This publication Received in revised form 2 June 2009 reviews general flea biology and the distribution of the flea-borne diseases of public health importance Accepted 4 November 2009 throughout the world, their principal flea vectors, and the extent of their public health burden. Such an Corresponding Editor: William Cameron, overall review is necessary to understand the importance of this group of infections and the resources Ottawa, Canada that must be allocated to their control by public health authorities to ensure their timely diagnosis and treatment. Keywords: ß 2010 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Flea Siphonaptera Plague Yersinia pestis Rickettsia Bartonella Introduction to 16 families and 238 genera have been described, but only a minority is synanthropic, that is they live in close association with The past decades have seen a dramatic change in the geographic humans (Table 1).4,5 and host ranges of many vector-borne pathogens, and their diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Characterization of JEZS 2016; 4(4): 713-717 © 2016 JEZS Ctenocephalides Spp Isolated from Dogs in North of Received: 06-05-2016
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016; 4(4): 713-717 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Morphological and molecular characterization of JEZS 2016; 4(4): 713-717 © 2016 JEZS Ctenocephalides spp isolated from dogs in north of Received: 06-05-2016 Accepted: 07-06-2016 Iran Amrollah Azarm Department of Medical Amrollah Azarm, Abdolhossin Dalimi, Mahdi Mohebali, Anita Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mohammadiha and Zabihollah Zarei Tarbit Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Abstract The main aim of the present study was to assess the infestation level of Ctenocephalides spp on domestic Abdolhossin Dalimi dogs in Meshkinshahr County, located in Ardabil province (north of Iran). A total of 20 domestic dogs Department of Medical were randomly selected for this study. After flea combing, results revealed that 100% of the dogs were Parasitology and Entomology, infested with fleas. A total number of 942 fleas were collected. Two species were identified, of which Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbit Modares University, Ctenocephalides canis the most abundant (98.73%) was followed by C. felis (1.27%). The dog flea, C. Tehran, Iran. canis was the most common flea infesting 100% dogs and C. felis was identified on 7/20 (35%).The internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences of C. canis and C. felis collected from dogs to clarify the Mahdi Mohebali taxonomic status of these species. The results of PCR assay and sequence analysis did not show clear Department of Medical molecular differences between C. canis and C. felis. Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran Keywords: Flea, Ctenocephalides canis, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulex Irritans COL Dirk M
    close encounters with the environment What’s Eating You? Pulex irritans COL Dirk M. Elston, MC, USA Identifying Features nae, the head has only a single pair of All fleas are characterized by laterally setae (hairs). It has no pleural rod, a compressed bodies and large hind legs. feature that differentiates it from Pulex irritans (Figure 1) lacks the cteni- Xenopsylla cheopis (oriental rat flea). dia (combs) that lend the appearance Fleas show little host specificity. of a mustache (genal comb) and mane Although known as the human flea, of “hair” (pronotal comb) to dog and P irritans is a common flea on dogs and cat fleas. It has a rounded frons (fore- cats. It is also found on wild animals head), which allows differentiation with no human contact.1 It can serve from the anteriorly flattened head of as the intermediate host of the dog the sticktight flea. Behind the anten- tapeworm (Dipylidium caninum). P ir- ritans may serve as a vector for The opinions expressed are those of the author bubonic plague2,3 and erysipeloid. It and should not be construed as official or as may have played a major role in the representing those of the Army Medical Department, the United States Air Force, or the spread of plague during Europe’s great Department of Defense. epidemics. From Wilford Hall Air Force Medical Center, San P irritans is implicated in the spread Antonio, Texas. of diseases historically associated with REPRINT REQUESTS to the 59th Medical Wing, X cheopis. Like X cheopis, P irritans in- Dermatology Service/MMID, 2200 Bergquist Drive, Suite 1, Lackland Air Force Base, TX fests rodents that harbor plague bacil- 4 78236-5300; or e-mail to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET Fleas Ctenocephalidesfelis
    FACT SHEET Fleas Ctenocephalidesfelis There are about 60 different species of flea in Britain. All species are parasites (i.e. they need a host animal to live off). Many of these are associated with particular animals, so the dog flea, cat flea, and bird flea are all slightly different species. The human flea is very rare, but unfortunately although the different species of flea prefer to feed on their specific host, they will bite other hosts if they are hungry enough. Most of the flea infestations found in houses and on people are cat fleas. Although still common, fleas have problems living in modern houses, as they like a little humidity and undisturbed surroundings. Central heating, vacuum cleaners and regular washing of bedding in washing machines all make life more difficult for the flea than in previous centuries. Although during an infestation of fleas you will often find them on pets, or may see one on your clothing, these fleas are only moving out from their living areas to feed. They do not live on the host animal all the time. Life Cycle The life cycle starts with a female flea laying eggs. These eggs are not usually found on the animal, but are on the floor or in the animals bedding area. The eggs hatch into larvae within 2 or 3 days and feed on any debris they can find in the cracks of floorboards and around areas where cats, dogs or birds have their regular bedding or resting places. After about 3 – 4 weeks the larvae spin a silk cocoon and inside this cocoon they turn into the adult flea.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Fleas (Siphonaptera) in Iran: Diversity, Host Range, and Medical Importance
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The Fleas (Siphonaptera) in Iran: Diversity, Host Range, and Medical Importance Naseh Maleki-Ravasan1, Samaneh Solhjouy-Fard2,3, Jean-Claude Beaucournu4, Anne Laudisoit5,6,7, Ehsan Mostafavi2,3* 1 Malaria and Vector Research Group, Biotechnology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran, 2 Research Centre for Emerging and Reemerging infectious diseases, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Akanlu, Kabudar Ahang, Hamadan, Iran, 3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pasteur institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran, 4 University of Rennes, France Faculty of Medicine, and Western Insitute of Parasitology, Rennes, France, 5 Evolutionary Biology group, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 6 School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 7 CIFOR, Jalan Cifor, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang, Bogor Bar., Jawa Barat, Indonesia * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 Background Flea-borne diseases have a wide distribution in the world. Studies on the identity, abun- dance, distribution and seasonality of the potential vectors of pathogenic agents (e.g. Yersi- OPEN ACCESS nia pestis, Francisella tularensis, and Rickettsia felis) are necessary tools for controlling Citation: Maleki-Ravasan N, Solhjouy-Fard S, and preventing such diseases outbreaks. The improvements of diagnostic tools are partly Beaucournu J-C, Laudisoit A, Mostafavi E (2017) The Fleas (Siphonaptera) in Iran: Diversity, Host responsible for an easier detection of otherwise unnoticed agents in the ectoparasitic fauna Range, and Medical Importance. PLoS Negl Trop and as such a good taxonomical knowledge of the potential vectors is crucial. The aims of Dis 11(1): e0005260. doi:10.1371/journal. this study were to make an exhaustive inventory of the literature on the fleas (Siphonaptera) pntd.0005260 and range of associated hosts in Iran, present their known distribution, and discuss their Editor: Pamela L.
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds
    c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa State College Journal of Science 18.2
    IOWA STATE COLLEGE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE Published on the first day of October, January, April, and July EDITORIAL BOARD EDITOR-JN-CHIEF. Joseph C. Gilman. AssrsTANT EnrToR, H. E. Ingle. CONSULTING EDITORS: R. E. Buchanan, C. J. Drake, I. E. Melhus, E. A. Benbrook, P. Mabel Nelson, V. E. Nelson, C. H. Brown, Jay W. Woodrow. From Sigma Xi: E. W. Lindstrom, D. L. Holl, C. H. Werkman. All manuscripts submitted ~~Quld be apdressed to J . C. Gilman, Botany Hall, Iowa St_a.t~ !Go~e~e.: !f..~s. I!J"!a; • : • • , . ~ . .. All remittances sfulolB :be ~tldr~~sed° to ~~.,"dQ~iiate Press, Inc., Col­ legiate Press Buildir\g, f\,m,.e9. lewa. • • • I • •• • • • • 0 Single CoP.~~s;''1.0ll ci;_c~~ V~.t~ ~~Il,:il0''. ~$2.QO}.•.A:U,.ual Subscrip­ tion: ~3 . ao;:in'Ca!'lada.$3.25~ Forei~. $S.!i0. ~ •• •• : ••• : ·· ~ .·· .............. :· ·: . .: .. : .....·. ·. ... ··= .. : ·.······ Entered as second-class matter January 16, 1935, at the postoffice at Ames, Iowa, under the act of March 3, 1879. THE COCCIDIA OF WILD RABBITS OF IOWA II. EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES WITH EIMERIA NEOLEPORIS CARVALHO, 1942' Jos:E C. M. CARVALHO' From the Entomology and Economic Zoology Section, Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station and the Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior Received December 10, 1942 During the author's experiments with coccidia of wild rabbits in Iowa, the most complete studies were made with E. neoleporis, because it was able to grow in the tame rabbit. Experiments were carried on to observe its behavior, life cycle, biometrical or physiological changes, immunity relationships, etc., in the latter host.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Bartonella and Rickettsia in Small Mammals and Their Ectoparasites in México
    THERYA, 2019, Vol. 10 (2): 69-79 DOI: 10.12933/therya-19-722 ISSN 2007-3364 Detection of Bartonella and Rickettsia in small mammals and their ectoparasites in México SOKANI SÁNCHEZ-MONTES1, MARTÍN YAIR CABRERA-GARRIDO2, CÉSAR A. RÍOS-MUÑOZ1, 3, ALI ZELTZIN LIRA-OLGUIN2; ROXANA ACOSTA-GUTIÉRREZ2, MARIO MATA-GALINDO1, KEVIN HERNÁNDEZ-VILCHIS1, D. MELISSA NAVARRETE-SOTELO1, PABLO COLUNGA-SALAS1, 2, LIVIA LEÓN-PANIAGUA2 AND INGEBORG BECKER1* 1 Centro de Medicina Tropical, Unidad de Medicina Experimental, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dr. Balmis 148, CP. 06726, Ciudad de México. México. Email: [email protected] (SSM), [email protected] (CARM), [email protected] (MMG), [email protected] (KHV), [email protected] (MNS), colungasalas@ gmail.com (PCS), [email protected] (IB). 2 Museo de Zoología “Alfonso L. Herrera”, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Avenida Universidad 3000, CP. 04510, Ciudad de México México. Email: [email protected]. mx (MYCG), [email protected] (AZLO), [email protected] (RAG), [email protected] (PCS), llp@ ciencias.unam.mx (LLP). 3 Laboratorio de Arqueozoología, Subdirección de Laboratorios y Apoyo Académico, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia. Moneda 16, CP. 06060, Ciudad de México. México. Email: [email protected] (CARM). * Corresponding author. Fleas and sucking lice are important vectors of multiple pathogens causing major epidemics worldwide. However these insects are vec- tors of a wide range of largely understudied and unattended pathogens, especially several species of bacteria’s of the genera Bartonella and Rickettsia. For this reason the aim of the present work was to identify the presence and diversity of Bartonella and Rickettsia species in endemic murine typhus foci in Hidalgo, México.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Research: Texas Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys Elator Final Report (31 December 2019) John D. Stuhler, Michaela K. H
    Endangered Species Research: Texas Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys elator Final Report (31 December 2019) John D. Stuhler, Michaela K. Halsey, Carlos Portillo-Quintero, David A. Ray, Robert D. Bradley and Richard D. Stevens Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas 1 Executive Summary The Texas kangaroo rat is a rare and potentially threatened species that today only occurs in the state of Texas. Because of its small endemic geographic distribution this species is currently being considered for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Before an informed decision of whether to list D. elator under the ESA can be made, comprehensive assessment of the ecology, distribution, abundance, and genetic diversity of this species should be conducted. Although qualitative anecdotal accounts of habitat affinities are available in the literature, little is known about actual habitat characteristics that are important to this species. Moreover, important quantitative habitat characteristics can be determined and used to predict presence/absence or abundance of Texas kangaroo rats as well as to inform conservation and restoration efforts. Complicating this, however, are numerous observations of Texas kangaroo rats no longer occurring at sites where they were previously observed as well as novel records of occurrence. This research enhances our understanding of the biology of D. elator in the state of Texas and helps to inform the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the decision to list this species under the ESA. Here, we report results of research to
    [Show full text]