DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Air Force Washington, Dc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of the Air Force Washington, Dc DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC AFI36-2903_AFGM2019-01 15 April 2019 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION C MAJCOMs/FOAs/DRUs FROM: SAF/MR SUBJECT: Air Force Guidance Memorandum to AFI 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel By Order of the Secretary of the Air Force, this Air Force Guidance Memorandum immediately changes AFI 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel. Compliance with this Memorandum is mandatory. To the extent its directions are inconsistent with other Air Force publications, the information herein prevails, in accordance with AFI 33-360, Publications and Forms Management. This memorandum provides policy and guidance for all military personnel serving in the United States Air Force, Reserve and Guard components. The specific changes to AFI 36-2903 are listed in the attachment. The paragraphs listed replace the corresponding paragraphs in AFI 36-2903 or add new paragraphs. Failure to observe the mandatory provisions in paragraphs 3.4.1 and 3.4.2 of this memorandum by Regular Air Force military members, Air Force Reserve military members on active duty or inactive duty for training, and Air National Guard military members in Title 10 status is a violation of Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Air National Guard members in Title 32 status performing full-time National Guard duty or inactive duty for training, who violate the mandatory provisions of this instruction, may be held accountable through similar provisions of their respective State Military Codes. There are no releasability restrictions on this publication. Ensure that all records created as a result of the processes prescribed in this publication are maintained in accordance with Air Force Manual 33-363, Management of Records, and disposed of in accordance with Air Force Records Disposition Schedule in the Air Force Information Management System. Questions should be addressed through your chain of command or by calling the myPers Total Force Service Center at Comm 210-565-0102/DSN 665-0102 or 800-525-0102. This Memorandum becomes void after one year has elapsed from the date of this Memorandum, or upon incorporation by interim change to, or rewrite of AFI 36-2903, whichever is earlier. SHON J. MANASCO Assistant Secretary of the Air Force Manpower and Reserve Affairs Attachment: Guidance Changes AFGM 2019-01 15 April 2019 GUIDANCE CHANGES Chapter 1 – General Information (Change) 1.2.2. Airmen assigned to non-Air Force organizations will wear the Air Force equivalent of the order of dress prescribed. For example, if the non-Air Force organization prescribes a utility uniform as the uniform of the day, assigned Airmen may wear either the Airman Battle Uniform or the Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP) until OCP wear is mandatory on 1 April 2021. (Change) 1.4.2. Except when authorized by the AF/A1, when participating in activities such as unofficial public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, rallies or any public demonstration, which may imply Air Force sanction of the cause for which the demonstration or activity is conducted. Chapter 3 – Grooming and Appearance Standards (Change) 3.1.3. Hair-Female. No minimum hair length to a maximum bulk of 3 ½ inches from scalp and allows proper wear of headgear. Hair will end above the bottom edge of collar and will not extend below an invisible line drawn parallel to the ground, both front to back and side to side. Bangs, or side-swiped hair will not touch either eyebrow, to include an invisible line drawn across eyebrows and parallel to the ground. See Figure 3.4. When in doubt, assess correct length of hair with Airman standing in the position of attention. Exception: While wearing the Physical Training Uniform (PTU), long hair will be secured but may have loose ends and may extend below the bottom edge of the collar. (Change) 3.1.3.2. Hair accessories. If worn, black hair accessories (e.g., fabric scrunchies, hairpins, combs, clips, headbands, elastic bands, barrettes, etc.) are authorized regardless of hair color. (Change) 3.1.3.3. Locs, braids, twists, micro-braids, french braids, dutch braids and cornrows are authorized. Locs are defined as portions of hair that have been intentionally or unintentionally fused together to form a loc or locs. A braid or twist is two or more portions of interwoven hair. If adding additional hair, it must be a natural-looking color, similar to the individual's hair color. It must be conservative (moderate, being within reasonable limits; not excessive or extreme) and not present a faddish appearance. Hair must not exceed bulk and length standards and must not extend below the bottom of the collar (see figure 3.6). Headgear must fit properly. (Change) 3.1.3.3.1. All locs, braids, and twists, when worn will be of uniform dimension, no wider than one inch, with natural spacing between the locs, braids, or twists and must be tightly interwoven to present a neat, professional and well-groomed appearance. When worn, multiple locs, braids, or twists shall be of uniform dimension, small in diameter (approx. ¼ inches), show no more than ¼ inch of scalp between the locs, braids or twists and must be tightly fused/interwoven to present a neat, professional appearance. A loc, or braid must continue to the end of the hair without design and following the contour of the head, and may be worn loose or AFGM 2019-01 15 April 2019 in a secured style within hair standards in paragraph 3.1.3 above. [Exception: Micro-braids or twists are not required to continue to the end of the hair.] (Change) 3.1.3.4. Unauthorized: Mohawk, mullet or etched design. (Change) 3.4. Tattoos/Brands/Body Markings. For purposes of this instruction, a tattoo is defined as a picture, design, or marking made on the skin or other areas of the body by staining it with an indelible dye, or by any other method, including pictures, designs, or markings only detectible or visible under certain conditions (such as ultraviolet or invisible ink tattoos). A brand is defined as a picture, design, or other marking that is burned into the skin or other areas of the body. Body markings are pictures, designs, or other markings as a result of using means other than burning to permanently scar or mark the skin. Members who violate the prohibitions and mandatory provisions in paragraphs 3.4.1 and 3.4.2 are subject to prosecution under Article 92, UCMJ. [Note: The changes to paragraph 3.4 and subparagraphs became effective upon publication of AFPM 2017-36-01 on 9 January 2017, and remain in effect.] (Change) 3.4.1. Tattoos/Brands/Body Markings. (Unauthorized content/locations). Tattoos/brands/body markings will not be on the hands (except one ring tattoo on one finger on one hand), head, neck (anything visible above the open collar uniform), face, tongue, lips, eyes, and scalp. Tattoos/brands/body markings anywhere on the body that are indecent, commonly associated with gangs, extremist, and supremacist organizations, or that advocate sexual, racial, ethnic, or religious discrimination are prohibited in and out of uniform. Indecent tattoos/brands/body markings are grossly offensive to modesty, decency, or propriety, or shocks the moral sense, because of its vulgar, filthy, or disgusting nature, or its tendency to incite lustful thought. It is indecent if it tends reasonably to corrupt morals or incite libidinous thoughts. It must violate community standards. AFOSI maintains information regarding gang/hate group, etc. on tattoos/brands/body markings. Commanders should contact their servicing AFOSI unit for additional information. Extremist tattoos/brands/body markings are those affiliated with, depicting, or symbolizing extremist philosophies, organizations, or activities. Sexually discriminative tattoos/brands/body markings are those that advocate a philosophy that degrades or demeans a person based on gender. Racially discriminative tattoos/brands/body markings are those that advocate a philosophy that degrades or demeans a person based on race, ethnicity, or national origin. Religiously discriminative tattoos/brands/body markings are those that advocate a philosophy that degrades or demeans a person based on religion. Tattoos/brands/body markings with unauthorized content that are prejudicial to good order and discipline or the content is of a nature that tends to bring discredit upon the Air Force are prohibited both in and out of uniform. Airmen may not cover up tattoos, brands, and/or body markings with bandages or make-up in order to comply with unauthorized content tattoo policy. Failure by Regular Air Force members, Air Force Reserve members on active duty or inactive duty for training, and Air National Guard members in Title 10 status to obey the mandatory provisions in this paragraph constitutes a violation of Article 92, UCMJ. Air National Guard members in Title 32 status performing full-time National Guard duty or inactive duty for training, who violate the mandatory provisions of this instruction, may be held accountable through similar provisions of their respective State Military Codes. (Change) 3.4.1.1. Members who have or receive unauthorized content tattoos, brands, and body markings are required to initiate tattoo, brand, and body marking removal and alteration. At the AFGM 2019-01 15 April 2019 commander's discretion, members may be seen on a space and resource available basis, in a Department of Defense (DoD) medical treatment facility for voluntary tattoo, brand, and body marking removal. When DoD resources are not available, members may have the tattoo or brand removed or altered at their own expense outside of DoD medical treatment facilities. Permissive TDY is not authorized for this purpose; therefore, travel is at member's expense. Members who fail to remove or alter unauthorized tattoos/brands/body markings in a timely manner, or who choose not to comply with appropriate military standards, will be subject to a variety of appropriate quality force actions, including but not limited to reprimand, UIF, control roster, referral EPRs/OPRs, military justice action (Article 15, UCMJ punishment), ineligibility for schools and assignments and administrative discharge.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cadet Remembered During Memorial Service Christ with His Disciples
    VOL. 45 NO.06 FEBRUARY 11, 2005 Inside COMMENTARY: Prep school graduates winners, page 2 NEWS: New Secretary of the AF looks to future, page 3 Majors Night, page4 AF needs help understanding lan- guage. FEATURE: Airman in Superbowl ad, page 7 Family talent runs through veins, page 8 SPORTS:Hockey splits two, page 10 Briefly Exercise Evaluation Team member Staff Sgt. Michael Holland, 10th Security Forces, pays close attention to the emergency workers during the Major Accident Response Exercise held Feb. 1. The exercise was in preparation for the upcoming Unit UCI tip Compliance Inspection, which will be Feb. 28 through March 8. (Courtesy Photo) Have a positive attitude. Inspectors want you to do well and expect you are at least meeting mission Unit Compliance Inspection time: Get ready! requirements. Inspectors occasionally encounter indi- By Col. Tom Philipkosky team that we’re ready. The Unit inspectors: Introduce every- want to see documentation to Academy Inspector General viduals with uncooperative Compliance Inspection will one in your work area to the verify checklist items are being or adversarial attitudes. begin with the arrival of 170 inspectors as they arrive. followed. Have you heard? Unfortunately, when that inspectors from AFIA and Be proud: We have noth- Don’t be confrontational: The Unit Compliance happens, it can be more dif- AETC on Sunday, Feb. 27. The ing to hide. Presentation is You might disagree with the Inspection Team is coming!! ficult to find the positive inspection team will evaluate everything — be excited about inspector’s observations, but It is show time at the Air mission impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermoflex Pantone Swatches
    Pantone Color Match NOTE: Color match is approximate and can vary by manufacture batch ALTERNATIVE THERMOFLEX PLUS PART # PANTONE # PANTONE # THERMOFLEX XTRA PART # PANTONE # WHITE PLS-9100 N/A WHITE TFX-8100 N/A ICE GREY PLS-9120 428C STORM GREY TFX-8150 430C STORM GREY PLS-9150 430C BLACK TFX-8236 3C DARK GREY PLS-9152 425C RED TFX-8301 200C BLACK PLS-9236 3C HOT PINK TFE-8310 215C RED PLS-9301 200C ORANGE TFX-8333 165C ORCHID PINK PLS-9304 493C MAROON TFX-8350 229C DUSTY ROSE PLS-9305 210C ATHLETIC GOLD TFX-8426 1235C MEDIUM PINK PLS-9307 189C NAVY BLUE TFX-8513 2767 ROSA PLS-9308 214C ROYAL BLUE TFX-8522 301 CORAL PLS-9309 177C COLUMBIA BLUE TFX-8576 299 HOT PINK PLS-9310 215C ROYAL PURPLE TFX-8584 2755 CRIMSON PLS-9312 216C KELLY GREEN TFX-8633 342C FLAME RED PLS-9315 032C FOREST GREEN TFX-8676 553C ORANGE PLS-9333 165C ANTIQUE SILVER TFX-8834 877C TANGERINE PLS-9335 1585C OLD GOLD TFX-8843 871C PEACH PLS-9337 1565C SALMON PLS-9338 171C TEXAS ORANGE PLS-9340 1605C ECONOMYFLEX PART # PANTONE # MAROON PLS-9350 229C BLACK EF-01 3C VIOLET PLS-9360 249C WHITE EF-02 N/A ATHLETIC GOLD PLS-9426 1235C RED EF-03 200C MEDIUM YELLOW PLS-9450 116C 7502C ATHLETIC GOLD EF-04 1365C VEGAS GOLD PLS-9460 467C 465C NAVY EF-05 533C OCHRE PLS-9465 874C 394C GREY EF-06 422C LEMON YELLOW PLS-9472 3955C SKY BLUE EF-07 7454C BRIGHT LEMON PLS-9473 102C 296C KELLY GREEN EF-08 342C NAVY BLUE PLS-9513 2767 ROYAL BLUE EF-09 287C REFLEX BLUE PLS-9519 2746C ATH.
    [Show full text]
  • Lot Qty Description 1001 1 Magnum Academy Jacket, Size 3XL, Black
    Tactical Shop #2 Online Auction 11/25/2019 Lot Qty Description 1001 1 Magnum Academy Jacket, Size 3XL, Black 1002 1 5.11 Tactical Men's Big Horn Jacket, Size 2XL, Black 1003 1 Rothco M65 Soft Shell Field Jacket, Size Large, Black 1004 1 5.11 Tactical Men's Leather Neck Jacket #48300, Size Large, Dark Navy 1005 1 Rothco M65 Soft Shell Field Jacket, Size Large, Olive Drab 1006 1 Pre Owned Men's Cold Weather Field Jacket, Size XL Short, Camo 1007 1 Two Rothco High Visibility Safety Vests 1008 1 Two Rothco High Visibility Safety Vests 1009 1 Two Rothco Safety Vests, Oxford Shell, High Visibility Tape, Velcro Closure, One Size Fits All 1010 1 Two Rothco Safety Vests, Oxford Shell, High Visibility Tape, Velcro Closure, One Size Fits All 1011 1 Two Rothco Safety Vests, Oxford Shell, High Visibility Tape, Velcro Closure, One Size Fits All 1012 1 5.11 Tactical Men's Taclite Pro Long Sleeve Shirt, Size XL Regular, Khaki 1013 1 5.11 Tactical Men's Taclite Pro Long Sleeve Shirt, Size XL Regular, Khaki 1014 1 5.11 Tactical Men's Taclite Pro Long Sleeve Shirt, Size Medium Regular, Khaki 1015 1 5.11 Tactical Men's Taclite Pro Long Sleeve Shirt, Size Small Regular, Khaki 1016 1 5.11 Tactical Men's Poly Cotton Rip Shirt, 2XL Regular, Dark Navy 1017 1 Tru-Spec 24/7 Series Ultra Light Long Sleeve Uniform Shirt, Size XL Regular, Black 1018 1 Tru-Spec 24/7 Series Ultra Light Long Sleeve Uniform Shirt, Size XL Regular, Dark Navy 1019 1 Tru-Spec 24/7 Series Long Sleeve Uniform Shirt, Size Medium, True Black 1020 1 Tru-Spec 24/7 Series Long Sleeve Uniform Shirt,
    [Show full text]
  • Approximate Weight of Goods PARCL
    PARCL Education center Approximate weight of goods When you make your offer to a shopper, you need to specify the shipping cost. Usually carrier’s shipping pricing depends on the weight of the items being shipped. We designed this table with approximate weight of various items to help you specify the shipping costs. You can use these numbers at your carrier’s website to calculate the shipping price for the particular destinations. MEN’S CLOTHES Item Weight in grams Item Weight in grams Underpants 70 - 100 Jacket 1000 - 1200 Sports shirt, T-shirt 220 - 300 Coat, duster 900 - 1500 UnderpantsShirt 70120 - -100 180 JacketWind-breaker 1000800 - -1200 1200 SportsBusiness shirt, suit T-shirt 2201200 - -300 1800 Coat,Autumn duster jacket 9001200 - -1500 1400 Sports suit 1000 - 1300 Winter jacket 1400 - 1800 Pants 600 - 700 Fur coat 3000 - 8000 Jeans 650 - 800 Hat 60 - 150 Shorts 250 - 350 Scarf 90 - 250 UnderpantsJersey 70450 - -100 600 JacketGloves 100080 - 140 - 1200 SportsHoodie shirt, T-shirt 220270 - 300400 Coat, duster 900 - 1500 WOMEN’S CLOTHES Item Weight in grams Item Weight in grams Underpants 15 - 30 Shorts 150 - 250 Bra 40 - 70 Skirt 200 - 300 Swimming suit 90 - 120 Sweater 300 - 400 Tube top 70 - 85 Hoodie 400 - 500 T-shirt 100 - 140 Jacket 230 - 400 Shirt 100 - 250 Coat 600 - 900 Dress 120 - 350 Wind-breaker 400 - 600 Evening dress 120 - 500 Autumn jacket 600 - 800 Wedding dress 800 - 2000 Winter jacket 800 - 1000 Business suit 800 - 950 Fur coat 3000 - 4000 Sports suit 650 - 750 Hat 60 - 120 Pants 300 - 400 Scarf 90 - 150 Leggings
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Ribbon Review (BRR) of Nuclear Weapons Policies and Procedures
    1.0 Executive Summary On 9 October 2007, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force (CSAF) appointed Major General Polly A. Peyer to chair an Air Force blue ribbon review (BRR) of nuclear weapons policies and procedures. On 19 October 2007, the Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF) announced the formation of the BRR in a press conference. The CSAF tasked the review to take an enterprise-wide look at United States Air Force (USAF) nuclear responsibilities. Specifically, the CSAF highlighted a need to examine organizational structure; command authorities and responsibilities; personnel and assignment policies; and education and training associated with the operation, maintenance, storage, handling, transportation, and security of USAF nuclear weapons systems. The chair formed a cross-command, cross-functional team of 30 Airmen with a mix of ranks, skills, and experiences from five commands, Headquarters Air Force (HAF), the Air Force Safety Center, and the United States Navy (USN). The BRR team defined the nuclear enterprise as the spectrum of nuclear weapons management responsibilities, aircraft and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), within the USAF. The team visited 29 locations, met with 54 organizations, and interviewed 822 people. Additionally, the team researched more than 250 books, periodicals, reports, papers, publications, and documents. The results are organized in five areas: • Leadership and Relationships • Mission Focus and Culture, History, Safety, and Surety • Training and Force Development • Transportation, Accountability, Tracking, Scheduling, and Security • Organization and Resources As the United States (US) reduced its nuclear stockpile following the end of the Cold War, emphasis on nuclear weapons declined and the forces assigned to operate, maintain, and support the nuclear capability reduced accordingly, especially in flying units.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Nefful Product Discontinued List
    DATE ITEM SIZE COLOR STOCK NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE 2017 NeffulCO Product Discontinued List Discontinued Items Feb-16 CA 48 M Black 318026 Classic Black Camisole $105.00 Feb-16 DW 05 LL Orange 315937 Shawl Collar PJ $780.00 Feb-16 TL 52 Regular Blue 616074 Teviron Long Socks $62.00 Feb-16 TL 59 L Black 616406 Full Length Circulation Socks $90.00 Feb-16 1707 ML White 717014 Body Wrap (1 per pack) $70.00 Feb-16 3364 M Chocolate 121834 Hip-Up Shorts $155.00 Mar-16 QF 23 3L Black 382094 Black Control Camisole $410.00 Mar-16 TL 02 5 - 7 US Purple 616063 Women's Summer Socks $38.00 Mar-16 1705 M Beige 717091 Wrist supporters (1 pair per pack) $60.00 Mar-16 2001 M Navy-White 317109 Chess Striped Woven Long Sleeve Shirt $360.00 Mar-16 CA 41 M Black 314059 Classic Black Long-Sleeve Undershirt $150.00 Mar-16 CA 47 L Black 318024 Classic Black Long Underpants $185.00 Mar-16 CA 52 L Black 318044 Men's Black Short-Sleeved Shirt $178.00 Mar-16 1489 LL Gray 616079 Men's Tight-Fitting Long Underpants $70.00 Apr-16 CA 11 M White 313085 Men's Long-Sleeve Undershirt $148.00 Apr-16 CA 41 L Black 314060 Classic Black Long-Sleeve Undershirt $150.00 Apr-16 1461 M Gray 717101 Teviron Gloves $18.00 Apr-16 QF 11 36C(C80) Beige 382013 Body Shaping Bra $290.00 Apr-16 QF 21 38C(C85) Black 382064 Black Shaping Bra $315.00 Apr-16 TL 02 5 - 7 US Black 616058 Women's Summer Socks $38.00 Apr-16 1479 ML Light Beige 616033 Pantyhose $30.00 May-16 CA 04 L Pink 313082 Women's Long Underpants $150.00 May-16 CA 45 M Black 314067 Classic Black Panties $65.00 May-16 1461 L
    [Show full text]
  • By Leslie A. Przybylek, Curator of History
    WE CAN DO IT! WWII By Leslie A. Przybylek, Curator of History 4 WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY | SPRING 2015 EVERY TIME I APPROACH PITTSBURGH, ESPECIALLY BY PLANE, I GET A SENSE OF TREMENDOUS POWER, A SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT. PITTSBURGH THRILLS YOU. Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox Thousands of Westinghouse workers pledge to speed up production at this wartime rally, c. 1944. HHC Detre L&A, Melvin Seidenberg Oversize Photograph Collection, MSS 566. OPPOSITE: A real-life Rosie, War worker identification badges illustrate just a few of Julie Bodnar inspects 155 mm the many thousands of area residents who contributed shell casings at the Christy Parks to the war effort through companies such as Dravo, Works of National Tube Company Westinghouse, and Carnegie-Illinois Steel. in McKeesport. HHC Collections, 96.196.1, 2011.21.1. Photo by Liz Simpson. Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of American History, Archives Center, Russell Aiken U. S. Steel Collection. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY | SPRING 2015 5 The cover of this April 1944 issue of US Steel News reminded readers that the giant steel conglomerate played essential roles in building America’s military machine during World War II, including the production of steel plate for battleships, LSTs, and tanks. HHC Detre L&A. “We are living in a jittery world, wondering what is going to happen next. And in my judgment it looks like anarchy. Law and order is breaking down all Residents of Pittsburgh’s Polish neighborhoods took to their churches and over the world. The nations are sure of nothing.” prayed when Hitler invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, officially igniting World Letter to the Editor, The Pittsburgh Press, October 6, 1938 War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Fashion Trends 2016
    Fashion Trends 2016 U.S. & U.K. Report [email protected] Intro With every query typed into a search bar, we are given a glimpse into user considerations or intentions. By compiling top searches, we are able to render a strong representation of the population and gain insight into this population’s behavior. In our second iteration of the Google Fashion Trends Report, we are excited to introduce data from multiple markets. This report focuses on apparel trends from the United States and United Kingdom to enable a better understanding of how trends spread and behaviors emerge across the two markets. We are proud to share this iteration and look forward to hearing back from you. Olivier Zimmer | Trends Data Scientist Yarden Horwitz | Trends Brand Strategist Methodology To compile a list of accurate trends within the fashion industry, we pulled top volume queries related to the apparel category and looked at their monthly volume from May 2014 to May 2016. We first removed any seasonal effect, and then measured the year-over-year growth, velocity, and acceleration for each search query. Based on these metrics, we were able to classify the queries into similar trend patterns. We then curated the most significant trends to illustrate interesting shifts in behavior. Query Deseasonalized Trend 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Query 2016 Characteristics Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Top Risers a Spotlight on an Extensive List and Decliners Top Trending of the Top Volume Themes Fashion Trends Trend Categories To identify top trends, we categorized past data into six different clusters based on Sustained Seasonal Rising similar behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Protection
    CATALOGUE 8 ACCREDITATIONS AND TESTIMONIALS 2015 Testimonials “I received the trousers this morning and everything has fi nally come together! All three fi t wonderfully and are exactly what I was looking for! Th ank you for the expedited shipping and the help with the orders... I will defi nitely be ordering from you in the future and will recom- mend your company to anyone looking for a top quality product and customer service. Th anks again, Danny” “I just received my order and tried on the jacket and trousers. I want you to know that I am very thoroughly pleased and impressed with the quality of the jacket/trouser set. Th ey fi t perfectly and look very professional. You truly deliver a solid product. Th ank you very much. I will be sure to make more orders in the future and I am positive me wearing this jacket/trouser set will market itself for you in the off shore oil & gas industry here in Th ailand. Have a great day! Regards, Ryan” “To whom it may concern. I’m lucky enough to work with an organization that supplies me with Sisley Uniforms. Originally I scoff ed at the initial price of the Sisley gear, however over the years have come to appreciate the quality. I’ve spent a lifetime wearing emergency services uniforms in a few diff erent continents, and have yet to fi nd any that are harder wearing or more comfortable. Recently my two piece fl ight suit, which may I say I had been wearing for nearly four years, spent over six months being hand washed in a third-world country, and has endured the abuse very well.
    [Show full text]
  • School Supplies
    THURMONT PRIMARY SCHOOL SCHOOL SUPPLY LIST 2019 – 2020 Listed below are supplies that your child will use during the school year in the instructional program at each grade level. It is particularly helpful for our younger students if items could be labeled with their names prior to bringing them to school. We appreciate your support in providing these materials for your child, however, if you are unable to purchase any of these supplies, please contact the office and we will be happy to provide the items for your child. DONATIONS of the following items for class use throughout the year are appreciated: Tissues, Band-Aids, Ziploc bags – assorted sizes, crayons, pencil cap erasers, antibacterial pump soap, colored pencils, washable markers, bar pink erasers, EXPO fine point dry-erase markers (black only), 3 oz. paper or plastic bathroom cups (PK only), baby wipes (PK only) OPTIONAL for all grades: reusable water bottle, plastic or metal (no glass) with a push up top or straw top that seals lid tightly. No screw open cap bottles please. Please mark with student name. Pre-kindergarten Kindergarten Individual - label all supplies please Individual – label all supplies please: 1 regular size (not preschool/toddler) book 1 regular size book bag without wheels bag without wheels or toys 2 lined composition books Complete change of clothes in labeled Ziploc 1 red pocket folder with 3 prongs in middle bag (underpants, socks, shirt, pants or Complete change of clothes in labeled Ziploc dress) bag (underpants, socks, shirt, pants or 1 composition book (preferably unlined) dress) Community supplies our class will share: Community supplies our class will share: 4 large glue sticks 2 boxes of 24 crayons – Crayola 1 pack washable markers 2 packs EXPO skinny black dry-erase markers 2 packs EXPO black dry-erase markers 1 set #2 pencils, sharpened 4 large glue sticks Home – use these supplies at home: scissors Home – use these supplies at home: glue scissors crayons glue pencils crayons markers pencils old magazines, newspapers, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Soil Your Undies Or Soil My Undies Is an International Gimmick to Show That Soil Is Alive and to Guesstimate Its Vigor
    Introduction Soil your undies or soil my undies is an international gimmick to show that soil is alive and to guesstimate its vigor. A pair of brand-new 100% underpants is left underground to the mercies of soil biota, then retrieved after exactly two months for public display Here’s one of many descriptions. Procedures vary. The only standards seem to be 60 days underground and material all-cotton except for elastic waistband. It’s not clear to me whether the unmentionables used must be proper to females; several videos seem to show male briefs, which with the fly have more material. We did our first tests in summer 2018. Methods Two pairs of new white cotton male’s underwear were buried in our north park in August 2018 (a) on Aug 15 Fruit of the Loom boy’s (that was all I could find all-cotton at Target or Walmart) (b) on Aug 22 Calvin Klein men’s small size (32-34 “) Each pair was buried about 4 inches deep, laid flat with the sod replaced. No soil was put inside the cloth though this is done is at least one video. Both pairs were within 50 feet of where last year a soil sample had been submitted to a Comprehensive Analysis of Soil Health (CASH) at Cornell. On ten of the twelve dimensions that sample scored 93/100 or better. The overall score was 86 = OPTIMAL, pulled down from the high nineties by poor results for surface hardness and subsurface hardness, state-dependent variables. Rainfall Aug 9 - Oct 21 totaled 14.3 “ over 18 days (of 75) that saw precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Safety Has Improved Steadily for Many Years
    Official investigations confirm what USAF safety officials knew all along. Flying safety has improved steadily for many years. Flying Safety: The Real Story HREE major air disasters in 1994 By James Kitfield T set warning lights flashing through- out the Air Force about safety proce- dures. First, an F-16 crashed into two transports at Pope AFB, N. C., de- stroying the fighter and one transport and killing twenty-three service mem- bers. Next came the accidental shoot- down by two F-15s of two US Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters over 5 - Class A Flight Mishap Rate, Combined Services Iraq, killing twenty-six personnel. Fi- nally, a B-52 performing unauthorized rs maneuvers crashed near Fairchild AFB, 4- Wash., killing four. hou At that time, few members of the ing public would have guessed that the fly 3 Air Force safety record was not de- 000 teriorating. These tragedies by themselves would 100, 2 have been enough to trigger a review er p of USAF procedures, but Alan Diehl, s a former safety official at Air Force Safety Center, Kirtland AFB, N. M., hap added to the urgency by writing a Mis scathing letter to the Defense Secre- tary and members of Congress. In it, he charged that a lack of indepen- 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 dence and expertise on Safety Investi- Fiscal Year gation Boards (SIBs) had compromised DoD's Class A mishap rate, as many as thirty crash probes. calculated as the number Nowhere did those warning lights of accidents per 100,000 flying hours, declined from flash more intensely than at Kirtland about 4.3 in FY 1975 to 1.5 AFB, where Air Force Safety Center in FY 1995.
    [Show full text]