An Interpretation of Genesis, Including a Translation Into Present-Day English

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Interpretation of Genesis, Including a Translation Into Present-Day English JAN 5 rii39 ^ Ml SV! AN INTERPRETA OF GENESIS Including a Translation INTO Present-day English BY REV. F. P. RAMSAY, Ph.D. Pastor Third Presbyterian Church, Omaha, Nebraska NEW YORK AND WASHINGTON THE NEALE PUBLISHING COMPANY 1911 AN INTERPRETATION OF GENESIS N' Copyright, 1911, by THE NEALE PUBLISHING COMPANY To My Wife ——— " CONTENTS PAGB Preface 9 Introduction 13 Chapter I the text of genesis 19 The Autograph and Its Transmission 19 Reliability of Translations 24 Chapter II the origin of genesis ....... 27 Criticism and Critical Method 2y The Anti-Mosaic Theory of the Origin of the Penta- teuch 30 The Theory of the Mosaic Authorship of the Pentateuch 40 The Origin of Genesis 46 Conclusions 48 Chapter III the literary form and structure of genesis 50 Form and Method of Composition 50 The Compiler's Sections 53 Translation and Notes 57 Preface to the Translation 59 Section i (i. 1-2.8), The Seven Days d}. Notes to Section i , . 06 Section 2 (2.4-4.26), "The Descendants of the Heavens and the Earth " "j^ Notes to Section 2 79 Section 3 (5.1-6.8), "The Descendants of Adam" . 90 Notes to Section 3 92 " Section 4 (6.9-9.29), The Descendants of Noah" . 97 Notes to Section 4 103 Section 5 (10.1-11.9), "The Descendants of the Sons of Noah" 108 Notes to Section 5 no Section 6 (11.10-11.26), "The Descendants of Sheni 112 Notes to Section 6 113 The Names of God 114 " Section 7 (11. 27-25. 11), "The Descendants of Terah 117 Notes to Section 7 I49 7 ———— " 8 CONTENTS PAGE Section 8 (25.12-25.18), "The Descendants of Ishmael 161 Notes to Section 8 161 Section 9 (25.19-35.39), "The Descendants of Isaac*' 163 Notes to Section 9 194 Section 10 (36.1-36.8), "The Descendants of Esau" . 201 Notes to Section 10 201 Section 11 (36.9-37-1), "The Descendants of Esau in Mount Seir" 203 Notes to Section 11 205 Section 12 (37.2-50.26), "The Descendants of Jacob" 207 Notes to Section 12 247 Chapter IV the facts of genesis 257 Geography 2':^] Chronology 261 Wealth 270 Culture 271 Society 272 Religion 2^^ Biography 277 Chapter V the teachings of genesis 287 Revelation 287 God 290 Man 294 Covenant 298 Worship 305 Fellowship 308 Future Life 309 Chapter VI progress of doctrine 312 The Main Heads 312 The Silences 318 Conclusions 319 Chapter VII the value of genesis 320 Relation to Later Revelation 320 Method of Teaching 322 Modern Pertinence of Particular Doctrines . z^z Appendix difficuties and objections Z^ Historical 328 Scientific 331 Philosophical and Theological 335 Index of Biblical Passages . 337 Index of Topics 343 PREFACE Three convictions lie back of this effort to inter- pret Genesis. The first is the conviction that there is a science of interpretation. It is not meant that this science is as well understood and formulated as the sciences of astronomy and geology, or that any two men obeying the principles of the science will see the same meanings in a piece of literature, as no two astronomers or geologists see altogether the same phenomena in the heavens or in the earth; nor is it meant that, this science being once understood and applied to the Scriptures, there would then remain nothing new for future students to discover, as there is now no thought that there remains nothing new for future astronomers and geologists to discover. Rather it is meant that students using the correct methods of such a science would all come to agree- ment in the main interpretations, and would move on with scientific precision and certainty to new apprecia- tions. The second conviction is that the Scriptures do bring us in an intelligible literature an intelligible revelation from God. In all nature and in other literatures we may learn much that God intended for us to learn therefrom; but in the Scriptures God speaks, so that we can hear him and understand him. The third conviction is that I am appointed to help a little toward establishing this science of interpreta- tion, and in applying it to the interpretation of the 10 PREFACE Scriptures. Many have already wrought, and many are now at work, in this direction, and much has been accomplished and is being accomplished. I claim only a place among the workers, seeking to serve. To Genesis my mind has been directed by certain particular circumstances, and by the perception that the interpretation of Genesis lies at the basis of the interpretation of the Scriptures generally, as well as by the just now existing demand for a new study of Genesis. Can Genesis be understood as a literary unit? If taken as a literary unit, and scientifically interpreted, does it show itself to be a credible record, and does it come to the open mind with a teaching of divine truth and authority? Or has it been settled that Genesis is a compilation of largely inconsistent and untrustworthy documents, and still contains not only legendary and mythical elements, but also ele- ments that were originally intended to deceive ? These are urgent questions, and their urgency justifies a fresh attempt to understand and interpret the book by one who believes in its full historicity, and therefore in its divine authority. The author submits his work to the candid examina- tion and criticism of scholars of all schools of belief, as well as to the practical use of ministers and other teachers and students of the Bible. He will endeavor by their friendly criticisms and counsels to do better work in future, and especially by any complaint that may reach him from such as desire help in the study of Scripture. Holding his mind open, or endeavoring so to do, that new light may come in from any source, he would be false to his own profoundest convictions if he did PREFACE II not gratefully acknowledge the revealing and appeal- ing power of Genesis ever growing upon him as he pursued his study. May the same power affect his readers also. I cannot close without acknowledging my large in- debtedness to my son, Robert L. Ramsay, Ph. D., who has aided me otherwise, and especially in putting the translation into present-day English. If that shall commend itself as measurably successful in turning the original into appropriate and idiomatic English of the twentieth century, the credit belongs so largely to his patience, taste, and English scholarship that I know not what to claim for myself. But I am the responsible author of the translation, and he is not to be blamed for any- of its defects or infelicities. F. P. R. INTRODUCTION The basal issue concerning the Bible is whether its statements of fact are true. For the historicity of the else. Bible, once established, carries with it everything Whoever accepts the Bible's statements of fact will of revela- necessity accept its miracles, its authority as a of tion, and the truth of its religion. The opponents Christianity, unless they utterly overthrow the his- the toricity of the Bible, are already defeated. On other hand, although Christianity may well be accepted fail as substantially true, even if the Biblical records historical basis of full historicity, it will have for its only such facts as can be sifted from their mistakes and misrepresentations. Before all our other answers about Christianity, then, must come our answer to this full historicity— controlling question : Has the Bible his- the position of the orthodox Christian; or partial a Chris- toricity—the position of those who hold to historicity in its tianity more or less modified ; or no deny distinctive facts—the position of those who Christianity? This issue concerning historicity finds a decisive Genesis battlefield in Genesis. If even the first part of the making of is truly historical, with its account of flood, and of all things, of the Garden of Eden, of the see the dispersion from Babel, no one who comes to with and believe so will have any serious difficulty are other Bible narratives; but if these first narratives myth and legend, if they are untrustworthy records, one who has come to see and believe so will be pre- 13 : 14 INTRODUCTION pared to find some degree of this unreliability in all later Bible narratives. Here, then, in the earlier Genesis narratives must the advocates of historicity make good, and here the opponents of historicity have the best chance for their fight against it. But it would not be a wise method to take up these earlier narratives alone, and still less to take up any one of them by itself, and endeavor to determine their or its credibility apart from the credibility of the book as a whole. How to understand these earlier state- ments is a question that cannot well be answered except in the light and atmosphere of the whole book. To determine the crucial question of the historical trust- worthiness of Genesis, or of any part of it, we must first be certain that we understand the book whose his- torical trustworthiness we are attempting to judge; and to this end we need to study the book until we understand every part in connection with the whole and the whole in connection with every part. It is to such study of Genesis, rather than to studies more or less pertaining to Genesis, that the reader is in- vited to proceed. In the study of any book of the Bible, there are seven steps I.
Recommended publications
  • The Expositor
    THE EXPOSITOR. BALAAM: AN EXPOSITION AND STUDY. III. The Conclusion. WE have now studied all the Scriptures which relate to Balaam, and if our study has added but few new features to his character, it has served, I hope, to bring out his features more clearly, to cast higher lights and deeper shadows upon them, and to define and enlarge our conceptions both of the good and of the evil qualities of the man. The problem of his character-how a good man could be so. bad and a great man so base-has not yet been solved ; we are as far per­ haps from its solution as ever : but something-much­ has been gained if only we have the terms of that problem more distinctly and fully before our minds. To reach the solution of it, in so far as we can reach it, we must fall back on the second method of inquiry which, at the outset, I proposed to employ. We must apply the comparative method to the history and character of Balaam ; we must place him beside other prophets as faulty and sinful as himself, and in whom the elements were as strangely mixed as they were in him : we must endeavour to classify him, and to read the problem of his life in the light of that of men of his own order and type. Yet that is by no means easy to do without putting him to a grave disadvantage. For the only prophets with whom We can compare him are the Hebrew prophets ; and ·Balaam JULY, 1883.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis 35-37 Let Us Do a Quick Review of What Has Happened Thus Far
    P a g e | 1 Genesis 35-37 Let us do a quick review of what has happened thus far. Jacob finally breaks free of his Uncle Laban’s scheming. He journeys home to face his brother Esau. But before he encounters his brother, he has a wrestling match with God and loses, and during the fight he realizes who he is up against, and he clung to God and asked for Him to Bless him. God does, and now Jacob’s name is changed to Israel, which means Governed by God. He faces his brother, they make up, and Jacob still a schemer, says I’ll catch up to you bro go ahead. And Jacob goes a different way. He does not go to Bethel, which as we will see tonight should have been his destination, but stops off near Shechem. Well he instead of being the spiritual leader of his household, kind of leaves his children to themselves. Dinah his little princess makes friends with the girls of Shechem. They teach her their provocative ways, and she than catches the eye of the prince Shechem. P a g e | 2 Now in the Canaanite lands the men would not think twice to have sex with whomever they wanted. Especially a prince, he did not know the customs, and morals of Dinah’s people. And he rapes her, and falls in love with her, and wants to marry her. Well then her brothers are infuriated. Simeon and Levi make a scandalous deal with the people of Shechem, if they circumcise every male they will intermarry with them.
    [Show full text]
  • SYLLABUS - BI6630 Studies in the Pentateuch
    SYLLABUS - BI6630 Studies in the Pentateuch Note: Course content may be changed, term to term, without notice. The information below is provided as a guide for course selection and is not binding in any form. SYLLABUS - BI6630 Studies in the Pentateuch Course Number, Name, and Credit Hours BI-6630 Studies in the Pentateuch, 3 credit hours Course Description This course is an examination of the Pentateuch. It includes a review of the content and structure of the Pentateuch; an analysis of its meaning and function with respect to both its ancient Near Eastern and canonical context; careful examination of particular texts from various genres embedded within the Pentateuch; exploration of various themes; interaction with various methods of interpretation; and a consideration of how the Pentateuch relates to the New Testament and the contemporary church. Prerequisites: BI-5500 Hermeneutics and BI-5533 Old Testament History, Literature, and Theology. Course Objectives 1. Describe and locate the basic content, key themes and the flow of the Pentateuch (Knowledge and Understanding) 2. Express how key historical, archaeological, geographical, structural, and cultural background issues affect the Pentateuch and defend their view of authorship (Reflection and Critique) 3. Exegete a passage in the Pentateuch by utilizing a variety of methods and appropriately using digital resources in the process (Performance and Action) 4. Articulate a theological framework which clarifies and defines how the Pentateuch applies and functions authoritatively in the church (Commitment and Identity) 5. Integrate biblical knowledge into a ministry setting (Performance and Action) Course Textbook(s) and/or Supporting Information Required textbooks for all Moody Online classes can be found on the Required Textbooks section of the Moody website.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of Yahweh and El: a Study of Two Cults and Their Related Mythology
    Wyatt, Nicolas (1976) The relationship of Yahweh and El: a study of two cults and their related mythology. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2160/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] .. ýýý,. The relationship of Yahweh and Ell. a study of two cults and their related mythology. Nicolas Wyatt ý; ý. A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy rin the " ®artänont of Ssbrwr and Semitic languages in the University of Glasgow. October 1976. ý ý . u.: ý. _, ý 1 I 'Preface .. tee.. This thesis is the result of work done in the Department of Hebrew and ': eraitia Langusgee, under the supervision of Professor John rdacdonald, during the period 1970-1976. No and part of It was done in collaboration, the views expressed are entirely my own. r. .e I should like to express my thanks to the followings Professor John Macdonald, for his assistance and encouragement; Dr. John Frye of the Univeritty`of the"Witwatersrandy who read parts of the thesis and offered comments and criticism; in and to my wife, whose task was hardest of all, that she typed the thesis, coping with the peculiarities of both my style and my handwriting.
    [Show full text]
  • Noahidism Or B'nai Noah—Sons of Noah—Refers To, Arguably, a Family
    Noahidism or B’nai Noah—sons of Noah—refers to, arguably, a family of watered–down versions of Orthodox Judaism. A majority of Orthodox Jews, and most members of the broad spectrum of Jewish movements overall, do not proselytize or, borrowing Christian terminology, “evangelize” or “witness.” In the U.S., an even larger number of Jews, as with this writer’s own family of orientation or origin, never affiliated with any Jewish movement. Noahidism may have given some groups of Orthodox Jews a method, arguably an excuse, to bypass the custom of nonconversion. Those Orthodox Jews are, in any event, simply breaking with convention, not with a scriptural ordinance. Although Noahidism is based ,MP3], Tạləmūḏ]תַּלְמּוד ,upon the Talmud (Hebrew “instruction”), not the Bible, the text itself does not explicitly call for a Noahidism per se. Numerous commandments supposedly mandated for the sons of Noah or heathen are considered within the context of a rabbinical conversation. Two only partially overlapping enumerations of seven “precepts” are provided. Furthermore, additional precepts, not incorporated into either list, are mentioned. The frequently referenced “seven laws of the sons of Noah” are, therefore, misleading and, indeed, arithmetically incorrect. By my count, precisely a dozen are specified. Although I, honestly, fail to understand why individuals would self–identify with a faith which labels them as “heathen,” that is their business, not mine. The translations will follow a series of quotations pertinent to this monotheistic and ,MP3], tạləmūḏiy]תַּלְמּודִ י ,talmudic (Hebrew “instructive”) new religious movement (NRM). Indeed, the first passage quoted below was excerpted from the translated source text for Noahidism: Our Rabbis taught: [Any man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin.
    [Show full text]
  • Prophets, Posters and Poetry Joshua Fallik
    Prophets, Posters and Poetry Joshua Fallik Subject Area: Torah (Prophets) Multi-unit lesson plan Target age: 5th – 8th grades, 9th – 12th grades Objectives: • To acquaint students with prophets they may be unfamiliar with. • To familiarize the students with the social and moral message of selected prophets by engaging their analytical minds and visual senses. • To have students reflect in various media on the message of each of these prophets. • To introduce the students to contemporary examples of individuals who seem to live in the spirit of the prophets and their teachings. Materials: Descriptions of various forms of poetry including haiku, cinquain, acrostic, and free verse. Poster board, paper, markers, crayons, pencils, erasers. Quotations from the specific prophet being studied. Students may choose to use any of the materials available to create their sketches and posters. Class 1 through 3: Introduction to the prophets. The prophet Jonah. Teacher briefly talks about the role of the prophets. (See What is a Prophet, below) Teacher asks the students to relate the story of Jonah. Teacher briefly discusses the historical and social background of the prophet. Teacher asks if they can think of any fictional characters named Jonah. Why is the son in Sleepless in Seattle named Jonah? Teacher briefly talks about different forms of poetry. (see Poetry Forms, below) Students are asked to write a poem (any format) about the prophet Jonah. Students then draw a sketch that illustrates the Jonah story. Students create a poster based on the sketch and incorporating the poem they have written. Classes 4 through 8: The prophet Micah.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Lyon Class List
    Central Lyon Class List 1990 Albers, Kimberly Kuehl, Chad Altman, David Larsen, Shiloh Baatz, Joel Laurente, Myra Georgina Baldwin, Brian Lo, Chayra Boyle, Kathy Lutjens, Anita Bus, Michael Lupkes, Tracy Cunningham, Victoria Mantal, David De Beor, Jason Mellema, Duane, De Boer, Robert Mellema, Julie Driscoll, Heath Metzger, Craig Durst, Darren Milar, Jennifer Enersen, Erika Oliver, Amy Enguall, Lennart Pap, Michael Fegan, Andrew Rasmussem, Jeffery Gathman, Travis Roskam, Dawn Gerdees, Chad Roths, Craig Grafing, Krista Sambos, Keith Groen Shawn Schulte, Nathan Hauge, Ashley Scott, Chris Henry, Mark Scott, Sherry Herrmann, Tasha Skidmore, Melissa Thinner Hilbrands, Jason Spyksma, Jeff Hinsch, Sara Stientjes, Valerie Hoekstra, Christina Surma, Joe Hoogeveen, Kay Van Veldhuizen, Keri Hoppe, Lari Vande Kop, Holly Johnson, Lonette Vande Kop, Todd Kahl, Michael Venenga, Todd Kelderman, Jodi Vogl, Lissa Kix, Marla Vogl, Michelle Klinkenborg, Chris Warntjes, Wade Kooiker, Nolan Woodrow, Robert Central Lyon Class List 1991 Andy, Anderson Mantle, Mark Lewis, Anderson Matson, Sherry Rachel, Baatz McDonald, Chad Lyle, Bauer Miller, Bobby Darcy, Berg Miller, Penny Paul, Berg Moser, Jason Shane, Boeve Mowry, Lisa Borman, Zachary Mulder, Daniel Breuker, Theodore Olsen, Lisa Christians, Amy Popkes, Wade De Yong, Jana Rath, Todd Delfs, Rodney Rau, Gary Ellsworth, Jason Roths, June Fegan, Carrie Schillings, Roth Gardner, Sara Schubert, Traci Gingras, Cindy Scott, Chuck Goette, Holly Solheim, Bill Grafing, Jennifer Steenblock, Amy Grafing, Robin Stettnichs,
    [Show full text]
  • Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H
    Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H. C. Leupold Christian Classics Ethereal Library About Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 by H. C. Leupold Title: Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/leupold/genesis.html Author(s): Leupold, Herbert Carl (1892-1972) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: The Wartburg Press, 1942 Rights: Copyright Christian Classics Ethereal Library Date Created: 2005-10-07 Status: This document would benefit from proofreading. The Greek text needs to be corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Bible; LC Call no: BS1151.B3 LC Subjects: The Bible Old Testament Works about the Old Testament Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 H. C. Leupold Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page. p. 1 Introduction. p. 2 Chapter 1. p. 19 Chapter 2. p. 55 Chapter 3. p. 76 Chapter 4. p. 102 Chapter 5. p. 126 Chapter 6. p. 138 Chapter 7. p. 158 Chapter 8. p. 169 Chapter 9. p. 179 Chapter 10. p. 194 Chapter 11. p. 208 Chapter 12. p. 220 Chapter 13. p. 235 Chapter 14. p. 243 Chapter 15. p. 257 Chapter 16. p. 267 Chapter 17. p. 277 Chapter 18. p. 289 Chapter 19. p. 297 Chapter 20. p. 310 Chapter 21. p. 318 Chapter 22. p. 330 Chapter 23. p. 343 Chapter 24. p. 352 Chapter 25. p. 369 Chapter 26. p. 384 Chapter 28. p. 407 Chapter 29. p. 416 Chapter 30. p. 428 Chapter 31. p. 442 Chapter 32. p. 459 Chapter 33. p. 472 iii Exposition of Genesis: Volume 1 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of the Book of Genesis
    INTERPRETATION OF THE BOOK OF GENESIS BY FATHER TADROS Y. MALATY Translated by Dr. George Botros 2 3 4 AUTHOR’ S NOTE: The Word of God is the food granted by the Holy Spirit to the Church of Christ, to let her live continually renovated in spiritual youth; practicing no incapacity of old age or perishability. My good Lord gave me the grace, during the last few years, to study the Word of God, as experienced by the fathers of the early Church, as Spirit and Life. I began by going through meditations and interpretations of these fathers, in the hope that we also would live with the Spirit and thought of the early Church; enjoying, by the Holy Spirit, the Word of God active in us, until it raises us up to our heavenly Groom “The divine Word”, who is to come on the clouds, to grant us the fellowship of His glories, and to enter with us into the bosom of His Father, to be eternally with Him in His heavens. If I did not commit myself, in my interpretation, to the order of succession of the books as they come in the Holy Bible; My goal was not to author a comprehensive series of interpretations, but to enter with every soul into the secret place of the Word, and to enjoy Him as an eternal Groom, who fills the heart and mind and all the inner depths. Hegomen Tadros Y. Malaty 5 AN INTRODUCTORY STUDY: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE PENTATEUCH OR THE FIRST FIVE BOOKS OF MOSES 1- Unity of the five books.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AUTHORSHIP of the PENTATEUCH: an OLD CRITICAL ISSUE THAT REFUSES to EXPIRE Vernon J
    THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE PENTATEUCH: AN OLD CRITICAL ISSUE THAT REFUSES TO EXPIRE Vernon J. Steiner, Ph.D. The Emmaus Institute Lincoln, Nebraska 0. PREFACE The comparison is an unfortunate one, but taking up this topic reminds me of how a mortician might feel upon discovering that a cadaver in the advanced stages of rigor mortis continues to show signs of life. About the time one thinks all critical discussions on the history and authorship of the Pentateuch have died a long-overdue death, the topic suddenly sits up again as an interesting point of inquiry or even as a test of critical orthodoxy on the one hand or of Christian piety and scriptural fidelity on the other. This was brought to my attention again in a conversation just over a decade ago which reminded me of a course I endured early on in my graduate studies. That was in a previous millennium, at a time when the authorship of the Pentateuch was identified in conservative circles as one of four critical issues in the study of the Old Testament by which one’s commitment to the authority of Scripture could be measured (alongside the dating of the exodus, the authorship of Isaiah, and the dating of Daniel). The more recent exchange resulted in my being declined a teaching gig overseas, ostensibly because my views on the authorship of the Pentateuch did not align with the position espoused by the faculty of the school seeking my services as a visiting professor. The present piece, which many of my students have seen in one version or another over the decades, represents a kind of belated peace offering to my recent interlocutor and my earlier seminary professors.
    [Show full text]
  • “Your Kingdom Come, Your Will Be Done” (6:10) Prayer •“Every Great Movement of God Can Be Traced Back to a Kneeling Christian.” —Dwight L
    MY KINGDOM GO “Your kingdom come, your will be done” (6:10) Prayer •“Every great movement of God can be traced back to a kneeling Christian.” —Dwight L. Moody Matthew 6:10 “Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.” (ESV) Luke 17:20-21 “Being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, he answered them, ‘The kingdom of God is not coming in ways that can be observed, nor will they say, ‘Look, here it is!’ or ‘There!’ for behold, the kingdom of God is in the midst of you.’” (ESV) Colossians 1:5-6, 13-14 “Of this you have heard before in the word of the truth, the gospel, which has come to you ... He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.” (ESV) God’s Kingdom •“To pray that his kingdom may come is to pray both that his church will grow on earth now, and that he will return in glory later to take his people to his eternal kingdom. It has both a present and future reality.” —John R.W. Stott ACKNOWLEDGE THE RULE OF THE KING “YOUR Kingdom come …” God’s Will Is … •God’s will is for our highest good. •God’s will is what is in our best interest. •God’s will is that we become what he created us to be. •God’s will is to turn evil into good. •God wants what is the best in our lives.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Doctrine of Ishmael 1. Ishmael Was the Firstborn Son of Abraham By
    Doctrine of Ishmael 1. Ishmael was the firstborn son of Abraham by Hagar, an Egyptian maid of his wife Sarah. Abraham was 86 at the time and had lived in Canaan for 11 years. 2. Sarah, the barren wife, in keeping with customs of her times as seen in the Babylonian law code of Hammurabi, gave her slave Hagar to Abraham to produce an heir for the family. 3. When Abraham was 99 God renewed His covenant with him and enjoined circumcision of Ishmael as a sign of his membership in the covenant community. 4. God also announced that He would fulfill the divine promise through his wife Sarah, although Abraham looked on Ishmael with deep affection and prayed that he might be the promised heir (Gen 17:18). Gen 17:18 And Abraham said unto God, O that Ishmael might live before thee! Gen 17:19 And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him. 5. When Ishmael was circumcised, Abraham and his household (those born to the men and women who had grown up in his employ and newcomers to the household through purchase from foreigners) were also circumcised. 5.1 Ishmael was 13 years old at the time of his circumcision. Many Arab tribes still circumcise their youths at the age of 13. 6. Fourteen years after the birth of Ishmael, Isaac was born to Sarah and Abraham. The jealousy that had long separated Sarah from Hagar came to a breaking point at the time of the weaning of Isaac.
    [Show full text]