DOCSLIB.ORG

SFU Thesis Template Files

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SFU Thesis Template Files The Lisle Letters: Lady Honor Lisle’s epistolary influence by Jasmine Nicholsfigueiredo B.Ed., Simon Fraser University, 2004 M.A. English, Queen’s University, 2002 B.A. English, Simon Fraser University, 2001 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Jasmine Nicholsfigueiredo 2014 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2014 Approval Name: Jasmine Nicholsfigueiredo Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (English) Title: The Lisle Letters: Lady Honor Lisle’s Epistolary Influence Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Jon Smith Associate Professor Dr. Paul Delany Senior Supervisor Professor Emeritus Dr. Lara Campbell Supervisor Associate Professor Chair of the Department of Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Dr. Anne Higgins Internal Examiner Associate Professor Dr. Holly Nelson External Examiner Associate Professor Department of English Trinity Western University Date Defended: May 5, 2014 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This dissertation offers an original contribution to Tudor studies by examining The Lisle Letters as an illuminating example of how aristocratic Tudor women used the epistle to manipulate networks of obligation and gain socio-political influence. Women, such as Lady Honor Lisle, the primary subject of this study, fashioned letters to create and maintain communities of influence in order to assist their families, advance their social position, and bring various other projects to fruition. By using the lens of practice theory to examine the Lisle Letters, I will demonstrate that the relational aspects governing an individual’s agency, in the light of ever-changing variables – friends, kinship groups, societal knowledge, socio-economic status, and so on – are what allowed aristocratic women such as Lady Lisle to exercise influence, despite the fact they could not hold official positions of power, such as judge, magistrate, or Lord Privy Seal. I will argue that women’s involvement in the socio-political world was a perpetual process of negotiation and adjustment within a web of imbricated relations, and that mastery of this diplomatic process could put considerable power in a woman’s hands. The Lisle Letters highlight the importance of the epistle as a particularly important device of power accrual. The epistle, with its underpinning of obligation, its various styles, and its discursive conventions, allows us to consider how power was accessible outside of purely formal channels in a social (and political) context that attached great importance to written entreaties and the informal cultural rules surrounding them; it is because of such rules and conventions, that we discover, in the letter, a privileged tool for bridging the gap between formal and informal avenues of power. The Lisle Letters, for example, allow mistress and servant to traverse boundaries of gender and class by using the stylized rhetoric of patronage and the warm and more natural language of friendship. The various discursive styles allow for the boundaries between mistress and servant to be crossed by establishing intimate connections and trust – an area that has been little examined in epistolary scholarship. The letters further illustrate how the epistle could be used to create and maintain bonds across international borders – making connections and accruing influence to assist in a bid for upward mobility. The Lisle Letters also document Lady Lisle’s negotiations with one of the key power figures of the Tudor era, Thomas Cromwell, in the male public arena of the court. The letters show us not simply iv her personal strategies and tactics, but how she uses all of her resources, including the conventions of the epistle, to negotiate a better hand than the one she had been dealt. By examining the language of obligation and such rhetorical scripts as deference and assurance, we can see how women manipulated the epistle to create alliances and reinforce previous associations to bring their personal projects to fruition. Keywords: Lisle Letters; Plantagenet; Renaissance women; power; women’s agency; epistles v Dedication This work is dedicated to my mother Gabrielle Figueiredo and to my husband Morgan Nicholsfigueiredo. If it were not for their encouragement, wisdom, patience, and unconditional love, I would not have completed this scholarship. To my sister Nicole, my dear friend Dorritta Fong, and my mentor and friend, Sheila Roberts, for their countless hours of reading and advice, thank you. For my friends Elizabeth McCausland, Cindy Nichols, Robert McAdams, and Ryan Miller, I thank you for offering assistance and support throughout. Thank you to Paul Saunders, Jon-Paul Henry, Meg Stainsby, Jim McCarthy and Brian Swail for their editing expertise and guidance. To my Douglas College support network Christine Dewar, Susan Smythe, Calvin Wharton, Nancy Squair, Jaqueline Hoekstra, Kate Yoshitomi, and Barb Sekhon, thank you for always cheering me on. For the PhD student group, Jennifer Scott, Christine Lyons, Naava Smolash and Christina Alt (far, far away) it was wonderful to have your encouraging voices every step of the way. To the many SFU professors who have helped to guide me through this process I owe great thanks. Thank you to the Graduate Chair Dr. Jeff Derksen for his unflagging support and to the Graduate Assistant Christa Gruninger for always being so welcoming. I thank Dr. Carolyn Lesjak, Dr. Peter Dickinson, Dr. Julie Crawford, Dr. Tiffany Werth, Dr. David Chariandy, Dr. Mary Ann Gillies, Dr. Harvey De Roo, Dr. Tom Grieve, and Dr. Tirthankar Bose for their wonderful advice. As well to the supportive group from Queen’s University thank you to Dr. Edward Lobb, Dr. Maggie Berg, Dr. Marta Straznicky, and Dr. Elizabeth Hanson. To my nieces Katherine, Delaney, Elizabeth and my nephew Christopher, never give up; if you work hard enough you can achieve your dreams. Thank you to my entire family and all of my friends for their unflagging support throughout the years. vi Acknowledgements Completing this dissertation would not have been possible without the patience and support of my senior supervisor Dr. Paul Delany, to whom I am forever grateful. As well I am also indebted to Dr. Lara Campbell for her guidance and advice. I wish to thank my examiners, Dr. Anne Higgins and Dr. Holly Nelson for their thoughtful suggestions, and for helping to make the experience a rewarding one. vii Table of Contents Approval .............................................................................................................................ii Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................. iii Abstract .............................................................................................................................iv Dedication .........................................................................................................................vi Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... vii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ viii Introduction 1 Gender and Power ............................................................................................................ 4 Women and Politics .......................................................................................................... 7 Lisle Scholarship and the Lives of Women ..................................................................... 14 The Epistolary Tradition .................................................................................................. 23 Obligation and Reciprocity .............................................................................................. 25 Ars Dictaminis and the Familiar Letter ............................................................................ 28 Chapter 1. Mistress and Servant: The Familiar Letter............................................ 35 John Husee the Agent ..................................................................................................... 37 Tudor Service .................................................................................................................. 40 Husee’s Letters: Formal and Informal Negotiations ........................................................ 44 Illusions of Privacy .......................................................................................................... 46 On Crossing Boundaries: Mutual Interest or Romantic Liaison? .................................... 48 Husee’s Letters to Lady Lisle .......................................................................................... 51 Advice on Mothering ....................................................................................................... 53 Phantom Pregnancy ........................................................................................................ 58 Chapter 2. French Women and English Court Women: Creating and Maintaining Influence via the Epistle .................................................... 63 The Preferment Project ................................................................................................... 65 Calais and All Things French .......................................................................................... 67 Aristocratic French Friendships ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bills of Attainder
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 2016 Bills of Attainder Matthew Steilen University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Steilen, Bills of Attainder, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 767 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE BILLS OF ATTAINDER Matthew Steilen* ABSTRACT What are bills of attainder? The traditional view is that bills of attainder are legislation that punishes an individual without judicial process. The Bill of Attainder Clause in Article I, Section 9 prohibits the Congress from passing such bills. But what about the President? The traditional view would seem to rule out application of the Clause to the President (acting without Congress) and to executive agencies, since neither passes bills. This Article aims to bring historical evidence to bear on the question of the scope of the Bill of Attainder Clause. The argument of the Article is that bills of attainder are best understood as a summary form of legal process, rather than a legislative act. This argument is based on a detailed historical reconstruction of English and early American practices, beginning with a study of the medieval Parliament rolls, year books, and other late medieval English texts, and early modern parliamentary diaries and journals covering the attainders of Elizabeth Barton under Henry VIII and Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, under Charles I.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Archives Prob 11/63/590 1 ______
    THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES PROB 11/63/590 1 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: The document below is the Prerogative Court of Canterbury copy of the will, dated 18 April 1581, together with a codicil dated 6 May 1581 and a nuncupative codicil dated 10 May 1581, proved 23 November 1581, of Sir William Cordell (1522 – 17 May 1581), Master of the Rolls, and one of the five trustees appointed by Oxford in an indenture of 30 January 1575 prior to his departure on his continental tour. See ERO D/DRg2/25. For a copy of the testator’s will of lands, dated 1 January 1581, see Howard, Joseph Jackson, ed., The Visitation of Suffolke, (Lowestoft: Samuel Tymms, 1866), Vol. I, pp. 248-59 at: https://books.google.ca/books?id=ExI2AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA248 In the will below the testator states that he had been executor to Sir Roger Cholmley (c.1485–1565), whose daughter, Frances Cholmley, was the first wife of Sir Thomas Russell (c.1520 - 9 April 1574) of Strensham, who by his second wife, Margaret Lygon, was the father of Thomas Russell (1570-1634), overseer of the will of William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon. The testator was appointed supervisor of the will, TNA PROB 11/51/33, of Edmund Beaupre (d. 14 February 1568), esquire, for whose connection to John de Vere (1516- 1562), 16th Earl of Oxford, see the inquisition post mortem taken at Stratford Langthorne on 18 January 1563, five months after the Earl’s death, TNA C 142/136/12: And the foresaid jurors moreover say that before the death of the foresaid late Earl
    [Show full text]
  • Lisa L. Ford Phd Thesis
    CONCILIAR POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE REIGN OF HENRY VII Lisa L. Ford A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2001 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/7121 This item is protected by original copyright Conciliar Politics and Administration in the Reign of Henry VII Lisa L. Ford A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of St. Andrews April 2001 DECLARATIONS (i) I, Lisa Lynn Ford, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 100,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. Signature of candidate' (ii) I was admitted as a reseach student in January 1996 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in January 1997; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St. Andrews between 1996 and 2001. / 1 Date: ') -:::S;{:}'(j. )fJ1;;/ Signature of candidate: 1/ - / i (iii) I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Ph.D. in the University of St. Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date \ (If (Ls-> 1 Signature of supervisor: (iv) In submitting this thesis to the University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • J\S-Aacj\ Cwton "Wallop., $ Bl Sari Of1{Ports Matd/I
    :>- S' Ui-cfAarria, .tffzatirU&r- J\s-aacj\ cwton "Wallop., $ bL Sari of1 {Ports matd/i y^CiJixtkcr- ph JC. THE WALLOP FAMILY y4nd Their Ancestry By VERNON JAMES WATNEY nATF MICROFILMED iTEld #_fe - PROJECT and G. S ROLL * CALL # Kjyb&iDey- , ' VOL. 1 WALLOP — COLE 1/7 OXFORD PRINTED BY JOHN JOHNSON Printer to the University 1928 GENEALOGirA! DEPARTMENT CHURCH ••.;••• P-. .go CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS Omnes, si ad originem primam revocantur, a dis sunt. SENECA, Epist. xliv. One hundred copies of this work have been printed. PREFACE '•"^AN these bones live ? . and the breath came into them, and they ^-^ lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.' The question, that was asked in Ezekiel's vision, seems to have been answered satisfactorily ; but it is no easy matter to breathe life into the dry bones of more than a thousand pedigrees : for not many of us are interested in the genealogies of others ; though indeed to those few such an interest is a living thing. Several of the following pedigrees are to be found among the most ancient of authenticated genealogical records : almost all of them have been derived from accepted and standard works ; and the most modern authorities have been consulted ; while many pedigrees, that seemed to be doubtful, have been omitted. Their special interest is to be found in the fact that (with the exception of some of those whose names are recorded in the Wallop pedigree, including Sir John Wallop, K.G., who ' walloped' the French in 1515) every person, whose lineage is shown, is a direct (not a collateral) ancestor of a family, whose continuous descent can be traced since the thirteenth century, and whose name is identical with that part of England in which its members have held land for more than seven hundred and fifty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Daring Dynasty
    Daring Dynasty Daring Dynasty: Custom, Conflict and Control in Early-Tudor England By Mark R. Horowitz Daring Dynasty: Custom, Conflict and Control in Early-Tudor England By Mark R. Horowitz This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Mark R. Horowitz All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0378-X ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0378-6 For my father A NOTE TO THE READER This book came about from two different but related directions. For one, over time colleagues suggested that I pull together some of my articles, unpublished conference papers and essays into one volume for easy access. More recently, for four years I taught an upper-level course entitled The Tudor Kings at the University of Illinois at Chicago as a Visiting Professor. Students made a similar proposition with the addition of asking me to include “mini-Introductions” with anecdotes concerning how each piece materialized. I had assigned them several of my articles and essays to read as part of the class and they often asked about the process, the relationships between historians and how a project even came into being—interesting tidbits that usually never see the light of day.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Opposition at the Early Tudor Tower of London: Thomas More’S Dialogue of Comfort*
    Building Opposition at the Early Tudor Tower of London: Thomas More’s Dialogue of Comfort* kristen deiter Tennessee Tech University Medieval and early modern English monarchs constructed the Tower of London’s iconography to symbolize royal power, creating a self-promoting royal ideology of the Tower. However, the Tower’s cultural significance turned sharply when Thomas More wroteA Dialogue of Comfort against Tribulation (1534) as a Tower prisoner, laying the foundation for an early modern tradition of liter- ary and cultural representations of the Tower as oppositional to the Crown. In the Dialogue, through four progressive transgressions against Henry VIII, More defies the royal ideology of the Tower and refashions the Tower itself as a symbol of resistance to royal tyranny. Les monarques anglais du Moyen Âge et de la Renaissance ont représenté la Tour de Londres comme un symbole du pouvoir royal, mettant ainsi en place une idéologie de la Tour promouvant la royauté. Toutefois, la signification culturelle de la Tour a subi un retournement rapide lorsque Thomas More a écrit A Dialogue of Comfort against Tribulation (1534), alors prisonnier à la Tour ; l’ouvrage a en effet posé les fondations d’une tradition littéraire et culturelle présentant la Tour comme un lieu d’opposition à la couronne. Dans le Dialogue, à travers quatre étapes progressives de contestations à l’égard d’Henri VIII, More remet en question l’idéologie royale de la Tour, et la redéfinit comme un symbole de résistance à la tyrannie royale. n the mid-1530s, Henry VIII had Thomas More imprisoned in the Tower of ILondon and beheaded on Tower Hill to assert royal control over his obsti- nate subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Papal Bull: 16Th Century Alum Trade and English Royal Autonomy
    University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas Summer Research Student Research and Creative Works Summer 2020 Some Papal Bull: 16th Century Alum trade and English Royal Autonomy Kyra Zapf Follow this and additional works at: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research Part of the Chemistry Commons, European History Commons, Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, and the Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons Recommended Citation Zapf, Kyra, "Some Papal Bull: 16th Century Alum trade and English Royal Autonomy" (2020). Summer Research. 379. https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research/379 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research and Creative Works at Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Summer Research by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Some Papal Bull: 16th Century Alum trade and English Royal Autonomy Abstract The early 16th century saw the rise of a wealthy middle class fueled by the global textile industry. Many men made their fortunes off of this trade, so it is not surprising to consider that not all of these trades were legal. In this essay, I shall be looking at the popular alum trade in Italy, Spain, and England from the 14th to the 17th centuries and how the lucrative trade shaped their early modern economies, societies, and methods of ruling. Because of the importance of alum, many Christian rulers contested the Pope's regulation of the commodity, even going so far as to import it illegally. By the beginning of the 16th century, Henry VII had started an illegal alum racket, the pope had declared his monopoly "holy", and Spain profited from both while gradually exploiting the New World for its resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Pepys, Honor, and Emergent Bureaucracy in Later Seventeenth Century England Michael Fitzhugh Washington University in St
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Summer 8-15-2018 Samuel Pepys, Honor, and Emergent Bureaucracy in Later Seventeenth Century England Michael Fitzhugh Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, European History Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Fitzhugh, Michael, "Samuel Pepys, Honor, and Emergent Bureaucracy in Later Seventeenth Century England" (2018). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1621. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/1621 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Arts and Sciences Department of History Dissertation Examination Committee Derek Hirst, Chair Peter Kastor, Co-chair Daniel Bornstein Alexandre Dube Steven Zwicker Samuel Pepys, Honor, and Emergent Bureaucracy in Later Seventeenth Century England by Michael L. Fitzhugh A dissertation presented to The Graduate School of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2018 St. Louis, Missouri © 2018, Michael L. Fitzhugh Table of Contents List of Tables. iv List of Abbreviations. v Acknowledgements. x ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION. xi Dates, Orthography, and Source Abbreviations.. xii Introduction. 1 Notes to Introduction. 12 Prologue: England, Honor and Trajectories.. 17 Notes to Prologue.. 46 Chapter 2: Pepys as Servant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dudley Genealogies and Family Records
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com BOOK DOES 1WT ^\ t DUDLEY GENEALOGIES. THE DUDLEY GENEALOGIES AND FAMILY RECORDS. Arms borne by the Hon. Thomas Dudley, first Dep. Gov. and second Got. of Mass. Bay. BY DEAN DUDLEY. " Children's children arc the crown of old men ; And the glory of children are their fathers." .l^nftRTy" ^. State Historical So-: OF WISCONSIN,, BOSTON: 1876 „ PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR 1848. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1843, by Dean Dudlet, In the Clerk's office of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts. White & Potter, Printers, Corner Spring Lane and Devonshire street, Boston. as PREFACE. The Work, ^ Here presented, is intended as an introduction to a large • biographical account of the Dudley family, which I have long been collecting, and design to publish on my return from Eu rope, whither, I am about to proceed for the purpose of extend ing my researches further, than is practicable in this country. It seemed expedient to publish this collection thus early, in order, that an opportunity might be offered for the cor rection of unavoidable errors and the addition of such re cords, as might be found wanting in the genealogies. And, therefore, it is earnestly desired, that those, possessing addi tional records or corrections of errors, will forward them to me, as soon as possible ; and all appropriate biographical sketches will, also, be received with much gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Parliament
    MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT The first Parliaments of England, and subsequently of the House of Commons of England, of Great Britain and then of the United Kingdom, were composed of two members from each constituency. Indeed, a small number of these two-member seats survived until the 1950 general election, which was the first that returned members for only single-member seats. Before the Reform Act of 1832 the electorates were not only small but among the boroughs they varied in composition. Unlike some small towns of the same size or even smaller, Battle never had an MP of its own under the old régime. Only the counties, and boroughs in possession of a royal charter, could boast such a privilege. Until the reform of 1832 the county of Sussex elected two MPs, as did each of the boroughs of Arundel, Bramber, Chichester, East Grinstead, Hastings, Horsham, Lewes, Midhurst, New Shoreham, Rye, Seaford, Steyning and Winchelsea. As to the non-borough county, in fact it was inconvenient to have a single constituency, given the difficulty of journeying from many parts of the county to the county town of Chichester, and an informal agreement had been reached, rarely broken, that one member would come from the east and one from the west. It was not until 1832 that the non-borough county was divided for electoral purposes into the two areas that in 1888 became the two administrative counties (the eastern half being rather larger than it is now, further changes having been made in 1974). In 1832 East Grinstead, Seaford and Winchelsea lost their independent borough status and for electoral purposes were included in the ‘Eastern Sussex’ constituency.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Stapleton, the Life and Illustrious Martyrdom of Sir Thomas
    THE LIFE AND ILLUSTRIOUS MARTYRDOM OF SIR THOMAS MORE by THOMAS STAPLETON Translated by PHILIP E. HALLETT Edited by Katherine Stearns and Emma Curtis CTMS Publishers at the University of Dallas © 2020 1 AbbreviAtions Corr The Correspondence of Sir Thomas More, ed. Elizabeth F. Rogers (Princeton University Press, 1947), followed by page numbers. CW The Complete Works of St. Thomas More, 15 vols. (Yale University Press, 1963–97), followed by volume and page numbers. CWE The Collected Works of Erasmus, 86 vols. (Toronto University Press, 1974–), followed by volume and page numbers. EE Erasmi Epistolae, ed. P. S. Allen et. al, 12 vols. (Oxford University Press, 1906–55), followed by letter number. EW Essential Works of Thomas More, ed. Gerard B. Wegemer and Stephen W. Smith. (Yale University Press, 2020), followed by page number. H (Hallett) Thomas Stapleton’sThe Life and Illustrious Martyrdom of Sir Thomas More, trans. and notes by Philip E. Hallett (Burns and Oates, 1966), followed by page number. R (Reynolds) Thomas Stapleton’sThe Life and Illustrious Martyrdom of Sir Thomas More, trans. by Philip E. Hallett; notes by E. E. Reynolds (Burns and Oates, 1966; Fordham UP, 1984), followed by page and note number. S Stapleton’s note 2 Contents Preface by Thomas Stapleton . 4 1. Birth, Education, and Studies. 6 2. His Youth . 8 3. His Public Career. 13 4. His Wide Learning and Literary Work . 19 5. The Many Learned and Famous Men Who Were His Friends . 25 6. His Holiness of Life . 37 7. His Contempt of Honors and Praise . 42 8. His Contempt of Riches .
    [Show full text]
  • And Leicester. WILLIAM Dudley; Another Son, an Eminent Divine, Who Was Bishop of Durham, and Was Buried in \Vestrninster Abbey
    SL'TTON-DUDLEYS OF ENGLAND. Fro111 Hi/Hi to man. Preparinpfor Publicalioi; . \ CHTTJCAL F.Sql'JTI}' IXTO THE\" ,n1nrs STA.TE.,1.txn.; RELATIVE TO THE JIF \TH OF A:°\!l'J-: HOU.'AnT, .-\~Tl OF THJ.: LIBELS OX THE EAHL OF LEH"J-:.-:TJ:H: ,,~itli a Yindicatinu of tht• Earl by ~ir Philip 8idrn·y. A DESCRIPTJOX OF THE C.\STLE or KEXJL\\"ORTH, A }; D OF 'f H E S PL F. X J) I n 1-: S T £ R TA 1 S" ,r E X T G I Y E K T 0 <~ I" E E X E L l Z ..\. P, E T H . n Y T H I-: E .\ H L or LI l c E :-: T J: n . 1 '\" 1 5 7 j: TOGETHEH \\'JTll SfDIE ACCOl'XT OF HIS SOX, /'JR ROBERT Dl'DLEY. AXL> OF l!l'Cr!ESS Dl:J>Ll:Y. BY GEO. ADLARIJ. THE SUTTON-DUD LEYS OF ENGLAND AKD THE DUDLEYS OF MASSACHUSETTS I N N E W E N G L ..\ N D. From tlze },/orman Con1uest to tlze present time. By GEORGE ADLARD. NEW YORK: Printed for the Avtltor. MAY BE HAD OF CHAS. B. R1cHARDSON, 264 Canal Street, N e11· York; S. G. DRAKE, I 3 Broomfield Street, Boston. MDCCCLXII. Entered according to A.ct of Congre;s, in the nar 1 862, b,· GwRcr. ADLARD, in the Clerk\ Office of the District Court o( the United States for the Southern District of:\" ew York. --------------------------------- UKLY TWO lll.'?,DRE!l .-\">:D FIFTY COPIES PRIKT[D, [Vintm, Pr., .\',u.rm1 Street.] TO THE H O N BL E J A M E S S A V A G E, L.
    [Show full text]