Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Monday, October 18, 2010 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:44 Oct 15, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\18OCR2.SGM 18OCR2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES2 63898 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR conditions, threats, and conservation included a migratory component, and measures, please refer to the Bull Trout any resident-only forms found today Fish and Wildlife Service 5-year Review Summary and may often reflect a loss of the migratory Evaluation, completed April 25, 2008, component due to impacts such as 50 CFR Part 17 available at http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five habitat loss or migration barriers _year _review/doc1907.pdf. For (Muhlfeld 2010, pers.comm.). [Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2009-0085] information on bull trout critical Bull trout, coastal cutthroat trout [MO 92210-0-0009] habitat, and information on the (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii), Pacific RIN 1018-AW88 associated draft economic analysis for salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), and other the proposed rule to designate revised species that migrate from saltwater to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife critical habitat, refer to the proposed freshwater to reproduce are commonly and Plants; Revised Designation of rule to designate critical habitat for the referred to as anadromous. However, Critical Habitat for Bull Trout in the bull trout published in the Federal bull trout, coastal cutthroat trout, and Coterminous United States Register on January 14, 2010 (75 FR some other species that enter the marine 2269). environment are more properly termed AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, amphidromous. Unlike strictly Interior. Description, Distribution, Habitat and anadromous species, such as Pacific Recovery ACTION: Final rule. salmon, amphidromous species often Bull trout are members of the char return seasonally to fresh water as SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and subgroup of the family Salmonidae and subadults, sometimes for several years, Wildlife Service, are revising critical are native to waters of western North before returning to spawn (Wilson 1997, habitat for the bull trout (Salvelinus America. Bull trout range throughout p. 5; Brenkman and Corbett, 2005, p. confluentus) under the Endangered the Columbia River and Snake River 1075). The amphidromous life history Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). basins, extending east to headwater form of bull trout is unique to the We are designating a total of 31,750.8 streams in Montana and Idaho, into Coastal–Puget Sound population (64 FR km (19,729.0 mi) of streams (which Canada, and in the Klamath River basin 58921, November 1, 1999). For includes 1,213.2 km (754.0 mi) of of south-central Oregon. Bull trout additional information on the biology of marine shoreline) and are designating a historically occurred in the Sacramento this life form, see the June 25, 2004, total of 197,589.2 ha (488,251.7 ac) of River basin, and were more widespread proposed critical habitat designation for reservoirs and lakes. The areas in general than they are now. The the Jarbidge River, Coastal–Puget designated as critical habitat are located distribution of populations, however, is Sound, and Saint Mary–Belly River in the States of Washington, Oregon, scattered and patchy (Goetz 1989, p. 4; populations of bull trout (69 FR 35767). Nevada, Idaho, and Montana. Ziller 1992, p. 6; Rieman and McIntyre The decline of bull trout is primarily DATES: This rule becomes effective on 1993, p. 3; Light et al. 1996, p. 44; due to habitat degradation and November 17, 2010. Quigley and Arbelbide 1997, p. 1176). fragmentation, blockage of migratory Bull trout have more specific habitat ADDRESSES: This final rule and the corridors, poor water quality, past requirements than most other salmonids associated final economic analysis, as fisheries management practices, (Rieman and McIntyre 1993, p. 4). well as comments and materials impoundments, dams, water diversions, Habitat components that particularly received, and supporting documentation and the introduction of nonnative influence their distribution and we used in preparing this final rule, are species (63 FR 31647, June 10, 1998; 64 abundance include water temperature, available on the internet http:// FR 17112, April 8, 1999). Climate cover, channel form and stability, change may exacerbate some of these www.regulations.gov (see Docket No. spawning and rearing substrate impacts. The bull trout 5–year review FWS–R1–ES–2009-0085; at http:// conditions, and migratory corridors (Service 2008, p. 45) recommended that www.fws.gov/pacific/bulltrout/; and by (Fraley and Shepard 1989, p. 138; Goetz the recovery units identified in the 2002 appointment, during normal business 1989, p. 19; Watson and Hillman 1997, draft recovery plan be updated based on hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife p. 247). Large patches of these assemblages of bull trout core areas Service, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office, components are necessary to support (metapopulations, or interacting 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83709; robust populations. This rule identifies breeding populations) that retain genetic telephone 208–378–5293; facsimile those physical or biological features and ecological integrity and are 208–378–5262. essential to bull trout conservation. significant to the distribution of bull FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bull trout exhibit a variety of trout throughout the conterminous Brian Kelly, State Supervisor, U.S. Fish migratory and nonmigratory life United States. After consulting with and Wildlife Service, Idaho Fish and histories. Stream-resident bull trout biologists from States, Federal agencies, Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES). If you complete their entire life cycle in the and Native American Tribes, and use a telecommunications device for the tributary streams where they spawn and applying the best scientific information deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information rear. Most bull trout are migratory, available, we identified six draft Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339. spawning in tributary streams where recovery units for bull trout in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: juvenile fish usually rear from 1 to 4 conterminous United States. Please refer years before migrating to either a larger Background to the ‘‘Critical Habitat’’ section below river (fluvial) or lake (adfluvial) where for additional information on this topic. It is our intent to discuss only those they spend their adult life, returning to topics directly relevant to the the tributary stream to spawn (Fraley Previous Federal Actions development and designation of critical and Shepard 1989, p. 133). Resident and On November 29, 2002, we proposed habitat for the bull trout in this final migratory forms may be found together, to designate critical habitat for the rule. For more information on bull trout and either form can produce resident or Klamath River and Columbia River bull biology and habitat, population migratory offspring (Rieman and trout populations (67 FR 71235). On abundance and trend, distribution, McIntyre 1993, p. 2). Historically most October 6, 2004, we finalized the critical demographic features, habitat use and bull trout populations may have habitat designation for the Klamath VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:44 Oct 15, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18OCR2.SGM 18OCR2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 63899 River and Columbia River bull trout and closed on March 15, 2010. We also designation for the bull trout, and are populations (69 FR 59995). On June 25, reopened the comment period for an addressed in the following summary 2004, we proposed to designate critical additional 15 days from March 23, 2010, and incorporated into the final rule as habitat for the Jarbidge River, Coastal– to April 5, 2010 (75 FR 13715, March appropriate. Puget Sound, and Saint Mary–Belly 23, 2010), to accommodate a request for Peer Review River bull trout populations (69 FR a comment period extension. We also 35767). On September 26, 2005, we contacted appropriate Federal, State, In accordance with our policy designated critical habitat for the tribal, and local agencies, scientific published in the Federal Register on Klamath River, Columbia River, Jarbidge organizations, and other interested July 1, 1994, (59 FR 34270), we solicited River, Coastal–Puget Sound, and Saint parties and invited them to comment on opinions from four knowledgeable Mary–Belly River populations of bull the proposed rule and the draft individuals with scientific expertise that trout (70 FR 56212). Please refer to the economic analysis. We held a public included familiarity with the species, above-mentioned rules for a detailed hearing in Boise, Idaho, on February 25, the geographic region in which the summary of previous Federal actions 2010, and held public meetings and species occurs, and conservation completed prior to publication of this open houses in Bend, Chiloquin, and biology principles. We received final rule. LaGrande, Oregon; Post Falls, Idaho; responses from each of the peer On January 5, 2006, a complaint was Missoula, Montana; Elko, Nevada; and reviewers we contacted. We reviewed filed in Federal district court by the Wenatchee Washington. During the first all comments we received for Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Inc., and comment period, we received a request substantive issues and new information Friends of the Wild Swan, alleging the for an additional public hearing from regarding bull trout critical habitat. We U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) the Native Fish Society; however, have addressed peer reviewer comments failed to designate adequate critical section 4(b)(5)(E) of the Endangered in the following summary and have habitat, failed to rely on the best Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) incorporated them into this final rule as scientific and commercial data (16 U.S.C.
Recommended publications
  • Snohomish River Watershed
    ARLINGTON Camano Sauk River Island Canyon Cr South Fork Stillaguamish River 5 9 WRIA 7 MARYSVILLE GRANITE FALLS S Freeway/Highway t Lake e S a Pilchuck River l Stevens m o r u b County Boundary 529 e g o v h i a R t LAKE Possession k WRIA 7 Boundary Whidbey h STEVENS c 2 g u Sound u h Island c o l i l P Spada Lake Incorporated Area S ey EVERETT Eb EVERETT r e Fall City Community v SNOHOMISH i R on alm Silver Cr n S C a r lt MUKILTEO u ykomis N S k h S S Ri ver k n MONROE r 9 o MILL o SULTAN F h GOLD BAR rth CREEK o o Trout Cr m 2 N 99 is mis h yko h R Sk iv Canyon Cr LYNNWOOD 527 er INDEX 1 2 3 4 5 0 EDMONDS 522 524 R Rapid River iv So e Proctor Cr u Barclay Cr BRIER r t Miles WOODWAY h BOTHELL F o Eagle Cr JohnsonSNOHOMISH Cr COUNTY rk MOUNTLAKE WOODINVILLE S C k KING COUNTY TERRACE h y e r olt River k SHORELINE h Fork T Beckler River r ry C rt Index Cr om KENMORE No ish Martin Cr DUVALL R. 522 KIRKLAND r Tolt-Seattle Water C SKYKOMISH Tye River olt 2 5 s Supply Reservoir T R i ive r Sou r Miller River t Foss River r h Money Cr a Fo REDMOND 203 rk SEATTLE H r Ames Cr e iv R 99 t l Deep Cr o er Puget Sound S T iv un R d CARNATION a Lennox Cr r y 520 Pat C ie C te r Lake Washington r m s n l o ffi a Elliott n i u S r Tokul Cr Hancock Cr n q Bay 405 G C o o Lake SAMMAMISH r q n File: 90 u S a BELLEVUE Sammamish ver lm k Ri 1703_8091L_W7mapLetterSize.ai r r i lo e o ay KCIT eGov Duwamish River Fall F T MERCER R i City v h ISLAND Coal Cr e t r r Note: mie Riv SEATTLE Snoqualmie o al e r The information included on this map N u r C SNOQUALMIE oq Falls d has been compiled from a variety of NEWCASTLE Sn r ISSAQUAH gf o k in sources and is subject to change r D o 509 without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • A G~Ographic Dictionary of Washington
    ' ' ., • I ,•,, ... I II•''• -. .. ' . '' . ... .; - . .II. • ~ ~ ,..,..\f •• ... • - WASHINGTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY HENRY LANDES, State Geologist BULLETIN No. 17 A G~ographic Dictionary of Washington By HENRY LANDES OLYMPIA FRAN K M, LAMBORN ~PUBLIC PRINTER 1917 BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. Governor ERNEST LISTER, Chairman. Lieutenant Governor Louis F. HART. State Treasurer W.W. SHERMAN, Secretary. President HENRY SuzzALLO. President ERNEST 0. HOLLAND. HENRY LANDES, State Geologist. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. Go,:ernor Ernest Lister, Chairman, and Members of the Board of Geological Survey: GENTLEMEN : I have the honor to submit herewith a report entitled "A Geographic Dictionary of Washington," with the recommendation that it be printed as Bulletin No. 17 of the Sun-ey reports. Very respectfully, HENRY LAKDES, State Geologist. University Station, Seattle, December 1, 1917. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page CHAPTER I. GENERAL INFORMATION............................. 7 I Location and Area................................... .. ... .. 7 Topography ... .... : . 8 Olympic Mountains . 8 Willapa Hills . • . 9 Puget Sound Basin. 10 Cascade Mountains . 11 Okanogan Highlands ................................ : ....' . 13 Columbia Plateau . 13 Blue Mountains ..................................... , . 15 Selkirk Mountains ......... : . : ... : .. : . 15 Clhnate . 16 Temperature ......... .' . .. 16 Rainfall . 19 United States Weather Bureau Stations....................... 38 Drainage . 38 Stream Gaging Stations. 42 Gradient of Columbia River. 44 Summary of Discharge
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Trout Review: King County
    King County Department of Natural Resources Literature Review and Recommended Sampling Protocol for Bull Trout in King County Final Draft June 12,2000 …………………Salvelinus confluentus Prepared for: King County Department of Natural Resources Pam Bissonnette, Director Water and Land Resources Division Nancy Hansen, Manager Watershed Coordination Unit Steve Nicholas, Manager Bull Trout Project Team: David St. John, Project Manager Robert Fuerstenberg, Senior Ecologist Wendy Gable, Communications Specialist Sandy Kraus, Communications Specialist Gino Lucchetti, Senior Ecologist William Mavros, Senior Ecologist Kate O’Laughlin, Senior Ecologist Laurel Preston, Communications Specialist Prepared by: R2 Resource Consultants, Inc., Redmond, WA Edward Connor, Project Manager Historical Research by: Historical Research Associates, Inc., Seattle, WA Lisa Mighetto, Historian/Project Manager This report should be cited as following: King County Department of Natural Resources. Literature Review and Recommended Sampling Protocol for Bull Trout in King County. Seattle, WA. May, 2000. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Contributions of time, knowledge and expertise from numerous people were essential to the compilation of the information in this report. The efforts of those listed below to assemble and provide technical reports, participate in interviews, review drafts of this report and provide guidance regarding the most efficient manner to gather and present this information have been invaluable. Their spirit of openness and generosity has resulted in a product that will
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in the Puget Sound Region, Washington
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DW-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF STREAMS IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION, WASHINGTON By F.i *^m T. HidakaTT» i i , Prepared in cooperation with the State of Washington Department of Ecology OPEN-FILE REPORT 72- 1 LI 238427 Tacoma, Washington 1973 CONTENTS Page Abstract .................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................. 2 Physical and hydrologic environment ....................................... 2 Topography .......................................................... 2 Geology .............................................................. 4 Climate .............................................................. 4 Glaciers .............................................................. 5 Basic data used in analysis ................................................ 8 Occurrence of low flows ................................................. 9 Low-flow-frequency curves ................................................ 11 Indexes of low-flow characteristics ......................................... 13 Low-flow-yield index ................................................. 13 Base-flow index ....................................................... 13 Slope index ........................................................... 14 Spacing index ........................................................ 14 Factors affecting low flows by basins ....................................... 20 Elwha-Dungeness basins ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Wild Coho Forecasts for Puget Sound, Washington Coast, and Lower Columbia Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Science Division, Fish Program by Marisa N
    2020 Wild Coho Forecasts for Puget Sound, Washington Coast, and Lower Columbia Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Science Division, Fish Program by Marisa N. C. Litz Contributors: This coho forecast was made possible through funding from numerous federal, state, and local sources and the participation of numerous WDFW, tribal, and PUD biologists. The following WDFW employees, listed in alphabetical order, provided field data used in the 2020 forecast: Kale Bentley and Brad Garner (Grays River), Clayton Kinsel (Skagit River and Big Beef Creek), Matt Klungle (Nisqually River), Jamie Lamperth (Mill, Abernathy, and Germany creeks), Peter Lisi (Lake Washington), John Serl (Cowlitz Falls), Pete Topping (Green River and Deschutes River), and Devin West (Bingham Creek, Chehalis River). Sources of smolt data from tribal and PUD biologists and sources of freshwater and marine environmental indicators are cited in the document. Thank you to Skip Albertson for compiling data from the WA Department of Ecology Marine Water Monitoring Program. Mara Zimmerman, Neala Kendall, Dan Rawding, and Josh Weinheimer most recently completed these forecasts and provided much guidance and assistance on this one. Dave Seiler, Greg Volkhardt, Dan Rawding, Mara Zimmerman, and Thomas Buehrens have contributed to the conceptual approaches used in this forecast. Introduction Run size forecasts for wild coho stocks are an important part of the pre-season planning process for Washington State salmon fisheries. Accurate forecasts are needed at the scale of management units to ensure adequate spawning escapements, realize harvest benefits, and achieve harvest allocation goals. Wild coho run sizes (adult ocean recruits) have been predicted using various approaches across Washington’s coho producing systems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconnaissance Study of Certain Water Resources Management
    INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present the information developed on the water resources of the Cedar River above Lake Washington. Much work remains to be done before a logical water management policy can be developed for the Cedar River. How much work is actually done will depend on the requirements of the policy development section. BASIN DESCRIPTION The Cedar River is located in the eastern Puget Sound region (see Figures 1 and 2). It has a drainage area of 188 square miles and flows northwesterly from its source in the Cascade foothills into Lake Wash- ington at Renton. The Cedar River has two primary tributaries; Rex River and Taylor Creek. Approximate average annual flows for these tributaries are 120 cfs for Rex River and 103 cfs for Taylor Creek. Average annual runoff in the Cedar River Basin is approximately 900 cfs. This includes an average annual flow of 695 cfs at Renton and an average annual diversion rate of 210 cfs at Landsburg. Seattle diverts this water for municipal and industrial water supply use. The monthly diver­ sion rate varies with a maximum monthly rate over 300 cfs during the critical summer months. Land use for the Basin was described by the Soil Conservation Service in an addendum to the Columbia-North Pacific Region Comprehensive Framework Study, published in 1970. The following' table shows the SCS land use designations. In this description the land use classified as "other" includes urban, suburban, roads, water surfaces,and other miscellaneous uses. Land Use Acres Percent of Total Acres Forest Land 113,187 90 Cropland 2,672 2 Other 9,431 8 Totals 125,290 100 This table shows that the majority of the Basin's land (approximately 90 percent) is undeveloped.
    [Show full text]
  • Summit Purchase Orders for Consultant Contracts By
    City of Seattle - Summit Purchase Orders for Consultant Contracts By Department All City Contracts (Open and Closed) Active Since: 12/31/2014 Dept: Arts & Cultural Affairs Doc Type: Consultant Contract Total Total Spend Amount Purchase PO Start End As Of Authorized Name Vendor ID Dept Order # Status Attachment Description Date Date 3/4/2015 COMMUNITY 0000214060 ART CC150005 Open Creation and Implementation of Seattle Cultural 02/01/2015 12/31/2015 35,000.00 0.00 ATTRIBUTES, INC Spaces Interactive website 2015-CommunityAttributesInc-Cont.pdf CORIANTON HALE 0000289468 ART CC1400007 Closed Creation of Online Artist Space Finder Tool 03/15/2014 12/31/2014 39,400.00 39,400.00 2014-SleepOp-SpacefinderContract.pdf DAVEDA A RUSSELL 0000353648 ART CC1400011 Open LHPAI Transition Contract 05/01/2014 12/31/2015 40,000.00 38,400.00 Nyawela-LHPAI_Transition-2014.docx DAVEDA A RUSSELL 0000353648 ART CC1400023 Open Retreat Facilitation and LHPAI Transition 11/15/2014 3/31/2015 15,000.00 7,000.00 Elements Nyawela-_2014-Facilitation_and_Transition.pdf DUMB EYES LLC 0000351884 ART CC1400009 Closed 2013 Report to the Community 04/15/2014 1/31/2015 5,500.00 4,750.00 2014-Civilization-2013_Report_to_the_Community.pdf HISTORY INK 0000067597 ART CC1500003 Open 2015 Service Agreement Between The Office of 01/01/2015 12/31/2015 50,000.00 0.00 Arts & Culture and HistoryLink SEATTLE ART MUSEUM 0000002146 ART CC14000024 Closed Planning and execution of the Creative 12/12/2014 12/31/2014 30,000.00 30,000.00 Advantage Campaign 2014-SAM_DRAFT.docx WASHINGTON 0000014995
    [Show full text]
  • Water Powers of the Cascade Range
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATEB-SUPPLY PAPER 313 WATER POWERS OF THE CASCADE RANGE PART II.-COWLITZ, NISQUALLY, PUYALLUP, WHITE, GREEN, AND CEDAR DRAINAGE BASINS BY FRED F. HENSHAW AND GLENN L. PARKER PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1913 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SurpiiY PAPER 313 WATER POWERS OF THE CASCADE RANGE PART IL-COWLITZ, NISQUALLY, PUYALLUP, WHITE, GREEN, AND CEDAR DRAINAGE BASINS BY FRED F. HENSHAW AND GLENN L. PARKER PEBPARBD IN COOPERATION WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1913 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction............................................................ 7 Cooperation and acknowledgments......................................... 8 Conditions affecting stream flow........................................... 9 Variations in stream flow.................................................. 10 Kelation of irrigation to power development................................ 11 Physiography «f the drainage basins, by E. J. Saunders. .................... 12 Geology. ............................................................. 12 General features. ................................................ 12 Geologic history. ................................................. 13 Topography and drainage.............................. r ........ t . 15 Soils and vegetation.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Washington Basin
    233 122°15’122°15’ 122°122° 121°45’121°45’ 121°30’121°30’ ISLANDISLAND k k e e e e r PugetPuget Sound Sound r C C SR r SR II r 522522 55 a a e e e e SNOHOMISHSNOHOMISH k k B B k k e e a mm a mm e KING SSaa e KING L aa L 47°47° mimi r r e e k k ss C C g e g e 45' hh 45' ee EXPLANATIONEXPLANATION a a r t r t t t SRSR CC REAL-TIMEREAL-TIME SURFACE-WATER SURFACE-WATER STATION STATION o o 522522 R R r C r C 1212800012128000 i i aa NONNON REAL-TIME REAL-TIME SURFACE-WATER SURFACE-WATER STATION STATION vv SRSR ee 9999 ee B 1212520012125200 r r B LAKELAKE OR OR RESERVOIR RESERVOIR STATION STATION ShilsholeShilshole UnionUnion BayBay KirklandKirkland WATER-QUALITYWATER-QUALITY SURFACE-WATER SURFACE-WATER SITE SITE BayBay II 405405 SRSR 520520 SeattleSeattle CCrreeee rr kk LakeLake ee BellevueBellevue cc SammamishSammamish r ElliottElliott r e 12120000 BayBay e 12120000 M LakeLake M II 1212200012122000 9090 WashingtonWashington 1212160012121600 WASHINGTONWASHINGTON EEaasstt FFoorrkk II IssaquahIssaquah ss ss a a SR SR q 47°47° 900 q 900 u u a 30'30' RentonRenton a CCe hh CedarCedar eddaarr 1211610012116100 1211900012119000 1212060012120600RR CC LakeLake i rr ivv ee ee ee 1211640012116400 rr kk 1211606012116060 ChesterChester SRSR 1211590012115900 1818 1211650012116500 MorseMorse Lake Lake 1211750012117500 RackRack CreekCreek T 1211500012115000 Taa 1211850012118500 yy R CC lloorr CCrreeeekk Ree eeddaa 1211450012114500 1211700012117000 xx rr RR 1211840012118400 RR 1211570012115700 iivv 1211760012117600 iivv ee e k e rr oorrk r r oo..FF KITTITAS BoulderBoulder NSNS KITTITAS 005101551015 20 20 MILES MILES 1211550012115500 oo CreekCreek ..FF oorrkk 005152551525 10 102020 30 30 KILOMETERS KILOMETERS LindsayLindsay SeattleSeattle PIERCEPIERCE CreekCreek CreekCreek 47°47° 15'15' Figure 32.
    [Show full text]
  • Snohomish River Watershed
    ARLINGTON Camano Sauk River Island Canyon Cr South Fork Stillaguamish River Snohomish River 5 9 Watershed MARYSVILLE GRANITE FALLS Freeway/Highway S t Lake e S a Pilchuck River l Stevens m o r u County Boundary 529 b e g o v h i a R t LAKE Possession k Watershed Boundary Whidbey h STEVENS c 2 g u Sound u h Island c o l i l Incorporated AreaFall P Spada Lake S ey EVERETT Eb EVERETT r City Community e v SNOHOMISH i R on alm Silver Cr n S C a r lt MUKILTEO u ykomis N S Sk h S Ri k ver n MONROE r 9 o MILL o SULTAN F h GOLD BAR rth CREEK o o Trout Cr m 2 N 99 is mis h yko h R Sk iv Canyon Cr LYNNWOOD 527 er INDEX 0 43521 EDMONDS 522 R 524 i Rapid River v No e Proctor Cr r Barclay Cr BRIER r t Miles WOODWAY h BOTHELL F o Eagle Cr JohnsonSNOHOMISH Cr COUNTY rk MOUNTLAKE WOODINVILLE S C k KING COUNTY TERRACE h y e r olt River k SHORELINE h Fork T Beckler River r ry C rt Index Cr om KENMORE No ish Martin Cr DUVALL R. 522 KIRKLAND r Tolt-Seattle Water C SKYKOMISH Tye River olt 2 5 s Supply Reservoir T R i ive r Sou r Miller River r th Money Cr Foss River a Fo REDMOND 203 rk SEATTLE H r Ames Cr e iv R 99 t l Deep Cr o er Puget Sound S T iv un R d CARNATION a Lennox Cr r y 520 Pat C ie C te r Lake Washington r m s n l o ffi a Elliott n i u S r Tokul Cr Hancock Cr Bay 405 n G q C o o Lake SAMMAMISH r q n File: 90 u S a BELLEVUE Sammamish ver lm k Ri 1703_8091L_W7mapLetterSize.ai r r i lo e o ay KCIT eGov Duwamish River Fall F T MERCER R i City v h ISLAND Coal Cr e t r r Note: mie Riv SEATTLE Snoqualmie o al e r N u r C The information included on this map SNOQUALMIE oq Falls n d has been compiled from a variety of NEWCASTLE ISSAQUAH S r ingf o sources and is subject to change rk D 509 Fo without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Wild Coho Forecasts for Puget Sound, Washington Coast, and Lower Columbia Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Science Division, Fish Program by Marisa N
    2021 Wild Coho Forecasts for Puget Sound, Washington Coast, and Lower Columbia Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Science Division, Fish Program by Marisa N. C. Litz Contributors: This coho forecast was made possible through funding from numerous federal, state, and local sources and the participation of numerous WDFW, tribal, and PUD biologists. The following WDFW employees, listed in alphabetical order, provided field data used in the 2021 forecast: Kale Bentley and Brad Garner (Grays River), Clayton Kinsel (Skagit River and Big Beef Creek), Matt Klungle (Nisqually River), Jamie Lamperth (Mill, Abernathy, and Germany creeks), Peter Lisi (Lake Washington), John Serl (Cowlitz Falls), Pete Topping (Green River and Deschutes River), and Devin West (Bingham Creek, Chehalis River). Sources of smolt data from tribal and PUD biologists and sources of freshwater and marine environmental indicators are cited in the document. Thank you to Skip Albertson of the WA Department of Ecology Marine Water Monitoring Program. Dave Seiler, Greg Volkhardt, Dan Rawding, Mara Zimmerman, and Thomas Buehrens have contributed to the conceptual approaches used in this forecast. Introduction Run size forecasts for wild coho stocks are an important part of the pre-season planning process for Washington State salmon fisheries. Accurate forecasts are needed at the scale of management units to ensure adequate spawning escapements, realize harvest benefits, and achieve harvest allocation goals. Wild coho run sizes (adult ocean recruits) have been predicted using various approaches across Washington’s coho producing systems. Methods that rely on the relationship between adult escapement and resulting run sizes are problematic due to inaccurate escapement estimates and difficulty allocating catch in mixed stock fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Baseflow Characteristics of Selected Washington Rivers and Streams
    Estimated Baseflow Characteristics of Selected Washington Rivers and Streams Water Supply Bulletin No. 60 October 1999 Publication No. 99-327 printed on recycled paper The Department of Ecology is an equal opportunity agency and does not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, disability, age, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, disabled veteran's status, Vietnam Era veteran's status or sexual orientation. If you have special accommodation needs or require this document in alternative format, please contact the Environmental Assessment Program, Joan LeTourneau at (360) 407-6764 (voice). Ecology's telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) number at Ecology Headquarters is (360) 407-6006. For additional copies of this publication, please contact: Department of Ecology Publications Distributions Office P. O. Box 47600 Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 (360) 407-7472 Refer to Publication Number 99-327 This report is also available on Ecology’s home page on the world wide web, at http://www.wa.gov/ecology/biblio/99327.html The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the Department of Ecology or the state of Washington. Estimated Baseflow Characteristics of Selected Washington Rivers and Streams Water Supply Bulletin No. 60 by Kirk A. Sinclair and Charles F. Pitz Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Assessment Program Olympia, Washington 98504-7710 October 1999 Publication No. 99-327 printed on recycled paper This page is
    [Show full text]