Ali Cömert Thesis July 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ali Cömert Thesis July 2013 IST ANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY « GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPING A NAVIGATIONAL MODEL FOR THE TURK ISH STRAITS Ph.D. THESIS Ali CÖMERT Department of Maritime Transportation Engineering Maritime Transportation Engineering Programme JULY 2013 IST ANBU L TEC HNIC AL UNIVERSITY « GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPING A NAVIGATIONAL MODEL FOR THE TURKISH STRAITS Ph.D. THESIS Ali CÖMERT (5120220002) Department of Maritime Transportation Engineering Maritime Transportation Engineering Programme Thesis Advisor: Prof. Dr. Osman Kȃmil SAĞ JULY 2013 İSTAN BUL TEKN İK ÜNİVERSİTESİ « FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ TÜRK BOĞAZLARI İÇİN BİR SEYİR MODELİ GELİŞTİRİLMESİ DOKTORA TEZİ Ali CÖMERT (5120220002) Deniz Ulaştırma Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı Deniz Ulaştırma Mühendisliği Programı Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. Osman Kȃmil SAĞ TEMMUZ 2013 Date of Submission : 29 March 2013 Date of Defense : 3 July 2013 Ali Cömert, a Ph.D. student of ITU Graduv ate School of Science Engineering and Technology student ID 5120220002, successfully defended the thesis entitled “ThDEesVisELO AdvPisoINrG : A PrNAVof. DIrG. OMAsTamhIOamnNAu Kt CȃLme lialMl SABOARĞDEL LA F OR THE.............................. TURKISH ST RAI TS”, w hich h e prepared after fulfilling the requirements specified in the vi FOREWORD The Turkish Straits is very important, strategic and also very dangerous waterway. This thesis is prepared in order to develop a safe navigational model for this difficult and busy passage. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Prof. Dr. Osman Kȃmil SAĞ for his support and guidance. I would also like to extent my appreciation to my committee members Prof. Dr. Ömer GÖREN and Dr. Özkan POYRAZ for their advices during my preparation of this thesis. My sincere appreciation is extended to Prof. Dr. Nil GÜLER, Prof. Dr. Mahmut Celal BARLA, Prof. Dr. Sezer ILGIN, and Prof. Dr. Fevzi ERDOĞMUŞ for their support and guidance. This work is fully supported by ITU Graduate School of Science, Engineering and Technology, ITU Maritime Faculty, Directorate General of Coastal Safety and Turkish Maritime Pilots’ Association. I would also like to express my special thanks to the Director Prof. Dr. İsmail KOYUNCU and all academic and other working staff of the ITU Graduate School of Science, Engineering and Technology, to the Dean Prof. Dr. Nil GÜLER and all academic and other working staff of the ITU Maritime Faculty, to the General Director Capt. Salih ORAKCI and all other working staff of the Directorate General of Coastal Safety, and also to Capt. Hüseyin Şükrü ARIK, Chief Pilot (retired), to Capt. Saim OĞUZÜLGEN, Chief Pilot (retired), to Capt. Ömür ÖZTAŞKIN, Chief Pilot (retired), to Capt. Nihat TURAN, Chief Pilot, to Capt. Hüseyin ENER, Chief Pilot, to Capt. İsmail AKPINAR, Chief Pilot, President of the Turkish Maritime Pilots’ Association and Vice-President of European Maritime Pilots’ Association, and to the directors and members of Turkish Maritime Pilots’ Association and to all my maritime pilot colleagues. I would also like to extent my deep appreciation and thanks to my family for their support and encouragement. All figures (images, photographs, and graphics), tables, and texts in this thesis belong to the author, unless otherwise mentioned. July 2013 Ali CÖMERT Senior Maritime Pilot, Ocean-Going Master, Maritime Transportation and Management Engineer vii viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD............................................................................................................vii TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................................ix ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................xiii LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................xvii LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................xix SUMMARY...........................................................................................................xxiii ÖZET.......................................................................................................................xxv 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................29 1.1 Purpose of Thesis.............................................................................................29 1.2 Background, Short History and Literature Review..........................................30 1.2.1 Turkish Straits during the antiquity..........................................................30 1.2.2 Settlement and sovereignty of Turks in and around the Turkish Straits...35 1.2.3 Ancient rule of the Empire........................................................................36 1.2.4 International agreements during the nineteenth century...........................36 1.2.5 The First World War and Çanakkale Battles............................................37 1.2.6 Occupation, Commission of the Straits, dark years for Turkish Straits....40 1.2.7 The Montreux Convention........................................................................43 1.2.8 Other legal instruments.............................................................................44 1.2.9 Other studies and resources related to the Turkish Straits or this study...44 2. PASSAGES TROUGH THE TURKISH STRAITS.........................................51 2.1 Southbound Passage.........................................................................................51 2.1.1 Approaching to İstanbul Strait from north................................................51 2.1.2 Türkeli to Çalı Burnu................................................................................54 2.1.3 Çalı Burnu to Büyükdere..........................................................................55 2.1.4 Büyükdere turn..........................................................................................56 2.1.5 Büyükdere to Yeniköy..............................................................................59 2.1.6 Yeniköy turn.............................................................................................60 2.1.7 Yeniköy to İstinye.....................................................................................62 2.1.8 İstinye to Emirgan.....................................................................................63 2.1.9 Emirgan to Aşiyan....................................................................................64 2.1.10 Aşiyan-Bebek-Akıntı Burnu turn............................................................65 2.1.11 Akıntı Burnu to Kuruçeşme....................................................................66 2.1.12 Kuruçeşme turn.......................................................................................67 2.1.13 Kuruçeşme to Kabataş ............................................................................67 2.1.14 Kabataş - Sarayburnu turn.......................................................................68 2.1.15 Sarayburnu to Ahırkapı sığlığı................................................................68 2.1.16 Ahırkapı sığlık şamandırası turn.............................................................69 2.1.17 Ahırkapı sığlığı to separation buoy.........................................................69 2.1.18 Separation buoy to Ambarlı ....................................................................70 ix 2.1.19 Ambarlı to Şarköy...................................................................................70 2.1.20 Şarköy to Gelibolu pilot boarding area...................................................70 2.1.21 Gelibolu pilot boarding area to Gelibolu pilot station.............................71 2.1.22 Gelibolu pilot station to Karakova Burnu...............................................72 2.1.23 Karakova Burnu to Akbaş Burnu............................................................73 2.1.24 Akbaş Burnu to Nara Geçidi...................................................................73 2.1.25 Nara Geçidi turn (southbound)................................................................74 2.1.26 Nara Geçidi to Kilitbahir.........................................................................76 2.1.27 Kilitbahir turn..........................................................................................77 2.1.28 Kilitbahir to Karanfil Burnu....................................................................78 2.1.29 Karanfil Burnu to Anıt Limanı................................................................79 2.1.30 Anıt Limanı to Mehmetçik Burnu...........................................................80 2.1.31 Mehmetçik Burnu to Mehmetçik pilot disembarking area......................81 2.2 Northbound Passage.........................................................................................81 2.2.1 Approaching to Çanakkale Strait from south............................................82 2.2.2 Mehmetçik pilot embarkation area to Kumkale Burnu.............................84 2.2.3 Kumkale Burnu to Karanlık Liman...........................................................85 2.2.4 Karanlık Liman to Kanlıdere (Kepez) Burnu............................................85 2.2.5 Kanlıdere (Kepez) Burnu to Çanakkale....................................................85 2.2.6 Çanakkale turn...........................................................................................86
Recommended publications
  • © 2008 Hyeong-Jong
    © 2011 Elise Soyun Ahn SEEING TURKISH STATE FORMATION PROCESSES: MAPPING LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION CENSUS DATA BY ELISE SOYUN AHN DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Policy Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Pradeep Dhillon, Chair Professor Douglas Kibbee Professor Fazal Rizvi Professor Thomas Schwandt Abstract Language provides an interesting lens to look at state-building processes because of its cross- cutting nature. For example, in addition to its symbolic value and appeal, a national language has other roles in the process, including: (a) becoming the primary medium of communication which permits the nation to function efficiently in its political and economic life, (b) promoting social cohesion, allowing the nation to develop a common culture, and (c) forming a primordial basis for self-determination. Moreover, because of its cross-cutting nature, language interventions are rarely isolated activities. Languages are adopted by speakers, taking root in and spreading between communities because they are legitimated by legislation, and then reproduced through institutions like the education and military systems. Pádraig Ó’ Riagáin (1997) makes a case for this observing that ―Language policy is formulated, implemented, and accomplishes its results within a complex interrelated set of economic, social, and political processes which include, inter alia, the operation of other non-language state policies‖ (p. 45). In the Turkish case, its foundational role in the formation of the Turkish nation-state but its linkages to human rights issues raises interesting issues about how socio-cultural practices become reproduced through institutional infrastructure formation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Waterway of Hellespont and Bosporus: the Origin of the Names and Early Greek Haplology
    The Waterway of Hellespont and Bosporus: the Origin of the Names and Early Greek Haplology Dedicated to Henry and Renee Kahane* DEMETRIUS J. GEORGACAS ABBREVIATIONS AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. A few abbreviations are listed: AJA = American Journal of Archaeology. AJP = American Journal of Philology (The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Md.). BB = Bezzenbergers Beitriige zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen. BNF = Beitriige zur Namenforschung (Heidelberg). OGL = Oorpus Glossariorum Latinorum, ed. G. Goetz. 7 vols. Lipsiae, 1888-1903. Chantraine, Dict. etym. = P. Chantraine, Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. 2 vols: A-K. Paris, 1968, 1970. Eberts RLV = M. Ebert (ed.), Reallexikon der Vorgeschichte. 16 vols. Berlin, 1924-32. EBr = Encyclopaedia Britannica. 30 vols. Chicago, 1970. EEBE = 'E:rccr'YJel~ t:ET:ateeta~ Bv~avnvwv E:rcovowv (Athens). EEC/JE = 'E:rcuJT'YJfhOVtUn ' E:rccrrJel~ C/JtAOaocptufj~ EXOAfj~ EIsl = The Encyclopaedia of Islam (Leiden and London) 1 (1960)-. Frisk, GEJV = H. Frisk, Griechisches etymologisches Worterbuch. 2 vols. Heidelberg, 1954 to 1970. GEL = Liddell-Scott-Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford, 1925-40. A Supplement, 1968. GaM = Geographi Graeci Minores, ed. C. Miiller. GLM = Geographi Latini Minores, ed. A. Riese. GR = Geographical Review (New York). GZ = Geographische Zeitschrift (Berlin). IF = Indogermanische Forschungen (Berlin). 10 = Inscriptiones Graecae (Berlin). LB = Linguistique Balkanique (Sofia). * A summary of this paper was read at the meeting of the Linguistic Circle of Manitoba and North Dakota on 24 October 1970. My thanks go to Prof. Edmund Berry of the Univ. of Manitoba for reading a draft of the present study and for stylistic and other suggestions, and to the Editor of Names, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Abundance of Octocorals in the Sea of Marmara, Where the Mediterranean Meets the Black Sea
    SCIENTIA MARINA 79(1) March 2015, 125-135, Barcelona (Spain) ISSN-L: 0214-8358 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04120.09A Composition and abundance of octocorals in the Sea of Marmara, where the Mediterranean meets the Black Sea Eda N. Topçu 1,2, Bayram Öztürk 1,2 1 Istanbul University Fisheries Faculty, Ordu cad No 200 Laleli, 34470 Istanbul, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Turkish Marine Research Foundation, No 10, Beykoz, 81650, Istanbul, Turkey. Summary: Species composition and abundance of octocoral assemblages were investigated in the Sea of Marmara, which forms the connection between the Mediterranean and the Black Seas, two semi-enclosed seas with peculiar oceanographic conditions. Fourteen octocoral species were collected in the saline layer of the Marmara Sea (20-40 m), with a mean coral abundance of 5.21±5.11 colonies m–2 (mean ± SD) calculated from a total of 1390 colonies counted in transects. In spite of severe anthropogenic disturbances, dense assemblages of corals/gorgonians were observed during this study. The coral- ligenous communities—one of the most valuable structures of the Mediterranean Sea—harbored either Eunicella cavolini or Paramuricea macrospina as the dominant gorgonian in the Marmara Sea. Furthermore, the gorgonian assemblages of the Marmara Sea differed from those of the Mediterranean in their high abundance of P. macrospina and Spinimuricea klavereni, two species rarely encountered in the Mediterranean Sea at the studied depth range. The factors behind the observed differ- ences are discussed in regard to the particular oceanographic conditions of the Marmara Sea. Finally, we revised the main threats to corals/gorgonians in the Marmara Sea and provided some insights on management recommendations for coral conservation in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Edition 04 of 2018
    Notices 354--489/18 T & P Notices in Force ADMIRALTY NOTICES TO MARINERS Weekly Edition 04 25 January 2018 (Published on the ADMIRALTY website 15 January 2018) CONTENTS I Explanatory Notes. Publications List II ADMIRALTY Notices to Mariners. Updates to Standard Nautical Charts III Reprints of NAVAREA I Navigational Warnings IV Updates to ADMIRALTY Sailing Directions V Updates to ADMIRALTY List of Lights and Fog Signals VI Updates to ADMIRALTY List of Radio Signals VII Updates to Miscellaneous ADMIRALTY Nautical Publications VIII Updates to ADMIRALTY Digital Services For information on how to update your ADMIRALTY products using ADMIRALTY Notices to Mariners, please refer to NP294 How to Keep Your ADMIRALTY Products Up--to--Date. Mariners are requested to inform the UKHO immediately of the discovery of new or suspected dangers to navigation, observed changes to navigational aids and of shortcomings in both paper and digital ADMIRALTY Charts or Publications. The H--Note App helps you to send H--Notes to the UKHO, using your device’s camera, GPS and email. It is available for free download on Google Play and on the App Store. The Hydrographic Note Form (H102) should be used to forward this information and to report any ENC display issues. H102A should be used for reporting changes to Port Information. H102B should be used for reporting GPS/Chart Datum observations. Copies of these forms can be found at the back of this bulletin and on the UKHO website. The following communication facilities are available: NMs on ADMIRALTY website: Web: admiralty.co.uk/msi Searchable Notices to Mariners: Web: www.ukho.gov.uk/nmwebsearch Urgent navigational information: e--mail: [email protected] Phone: +44(0)1823 353448 Fax: +44(0)1823 322352 H102 forms e--mail: [email protected] (see back pages of this Weekly Edition) Post: UKHO, Admiralty Way, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 2DN, UK All other enquiries/information e--mail: [email protected] Phone: +44(0)1823 484444 (24/7) Crown Copyright 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Humanities
    FACULTY OF HUMANITIES The Faculty of Humanities was founded in 1993 due to the restoration with the provision of law legal decision numbered 496. It is the first faculty of the country with the name of The Faculty of Humanities after 1982. The Faculty started its education with the departments of History, Sociology, Art History and Classical Archaeology. In the first two years it provided education to extern and intern students. In the academic year of 1998-1999, the Department of Art History and Archaeology were divided into two separate departments as Department of Art History and Department of Archaeology. Then, the Department of Turkish Language and Literature was founded in the academic year of 1999-2000 , the Department of Philosophy was founded in the academic year of 2007-2008 and the Department of Russian Language and Literature was founded in the academic year of 2010- 2011. English prep school is optional for all our departments. Our faculty had been established on 5962 m2 area and serving in a building which is supplied with new and technological equipments in Yunusemre Campus. In our departments many research enhancement projects and Archaeology and Art History excavations that students take place are carried on which are supported by TÜBİTAK, University Searching Fund and Ministry of Culture. Dean : Vice Dean : Prof. Dr. Feriştah ALANYALI Vice Dean : Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erkan İZNİK Secretary of Faculty : Murat TÜRKYILMAZ STAFF Professors: Feriştah ALANYALI, H. Sabri ALANYALI, Erol ALTINSAPAN, Muzaffer DOĞAN, İhsan GÜNEŞ, Bilhan
    [Show full text]
  • The 90Th Anniversary of the Turkish Republic CHAIRMAN’S COMMENTS the Atatürk Society of America Voice of 4731 Massachusetts Ave
    Voice of OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ATATÜRK SOCIETY OF AMERICA | FALL 2013 The Unveling: The new Atatürk Statue in Washington, D.C. represents the first public monument in the United States honoring one of the greatest leaders of the 20th century. The 90th Anniversary of the Turkish Republic CHAIRMAN’S COMMENTS The Atatürk Society of America Voice of 4731 Massachusetts Ave. NW CONTENTS Washington DC 20016 Phone 202 362 7173 Fax 202 363 4075 Mustafa Kemal’in Askerleriyiz... CHAIRMAN’S COMMENTS E-mail [email protected] 03 www.Ataturksociety.org Reversal of the Atatürk miracle— We are the soldiers of Mustafa Kemal... Destruction of Secular Democracy EXECUTIVE BOARD “There are two Mustafa Kemals. One, the flesh-and-blood Mustafa Kemal who now stands before Hudai Yavalar you and who will pass away. The other is you, all of you here who will go to the far corners of our President land to spread the ideals which must be defended with your lives if necessary. I stand for the nation's Prof. Bülent Atalay PRESIDENT’S COMMENTS dreams, and my life's work is to make them come true.” 04 Vice President —Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 10th of November — A day to Mourn Filiz Odabas-Geldiay Dr. Bulent Atalay Treasurer Members Believing secularism , democracy, science and technology Mirat Yavalar Aynur Uluatam Sumer 06 he year 2013 marked the 90th anniversary of the founding of the Turkish Republic. And ASA NEWS Secretary Ilknur Boray Hudai Yavalar 05 it was also the year of the most significant uprising in the history of Turkey. The chant Lecture by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • CROSSJNG the STRAITS: the PERSIANS in THRACE' Jan P. Stronk Tn Or Shortly Before 5131, King Darius Collected a Large Fleet From
    TALANTA XXX-XXXJ (1998-1999) CROSSJNG THE STRAITS: THE PERSIANS IN THRACE' Jan P. Stronk Tn or shortly before 5131, King Darius collected a large fleet from among the Greek cities in Asia Minor and sent it to the Pontic coast. A Greek engineer, Mandrocles, constructed a boat-bridge across the Bosporus. As Herodotus states (Hdt. IV.87), two marble memorial ste­ lae commemorated this feat in Greek and "Assyrian characters", by which he can have meant Old Persian, Elamite, or Akkadian. The Persian army crossed the bridge and entered Thrace, following the fleet. People from the West Pontic coast until the Ister, including Greek colonies and Thracian tribes, submitted to the Persians without resist­ ance. Without problems the army continued its march to the Ister. Meanwhile a pontoon bridge had been constructed across the river. Darius crossed the Danube and started a campaign against the Scythians of the South Russian steppes. As Bury puts it: "Cyrus had conquered the eastern coasts of the Mediterranean; Cambyses had completed and secured that conquest on the south side by the subjec­ tion of Egypt; it remained for Darius to complete and secure his empire on the north side by the reduction of Thrace" (Bury 1970, 238). A key function in this policy was preserved for "The Straits", the Bosporus and the Dardanelles. Control of the Straits was in more than one respect important for Persia. First because the Straits connected rather than divided the Thracians living on either sides of the Straits (cf. Stronk 1995, 59-60), second because mastery of the Straits facili­ tated the hegemony of the Ionian states in the Euxine region,2 third * In 1994, I submitted a paper with this title to the Thracia Pontica VI conference at Soz.opol (Bulgaria).
    [Show full text]
  • THE GREAT WAR and the TRAGEDY of ANATOLIA ATATURK SUPREME COUNCIL for CULTURE, LANGUAGE and HISTORY PUBLICATIONS of TURKISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY Serial XVI - No
    THE GREAT WAR AND THE TRAGEDY OF ANATOLIA ATATURK SUPREME COUNCIL FOR CULTURE, LANGUAGE AND HISTORY PUBLICATIONS OF TURKISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY Serial XVI - No. 88 THE GREAT WAR AND THE TRAGEDY OF ANATOLIA (TURKS AND ARMENIANS IN THE MAELSTROM OF MAJOR POWERS) SALAHi SONYEL TURKISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY PRINTING HOUSE - ANKARA 2000 CONTENTS Sonyel, Salahi Abbreviations....................................................................................................................... VII The great war and the tragedy of Anatolia (Turks and Note on the Turkish Alphabet and Names.................................................................. VIII Armenians in the maelstrom of major powers) / Salahi Son­ Preface.................................................................................................................................... IX yel.- Ankara: Turkish Historical Society, 2000. x, 221s.; 24cm.~( Atattirk Supreme Council for Culture, Introduction.............................................................................................................................1 Language and History Publications of Turkish Historical Chapter 1 - Genesis of the 'Eastern Q uestion'................................................................ 14 Society; Serial VII - No. 189) Turco- Russian war of 1877-78......................................................................... 14 Bibliyografya ve indeks var. The Congress of B erlin....................................................................................... 17 ISBN 975 - 16
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Politics in Turkey
    WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY Sarıdemir Mah. Ragıp Gümüşpala Cad. No: 10 34134 Eminönü/İstanbul Tel: (0212) 522 02 02 - Faks: (0212) 513 54 00 www.tarihvakfi.org.tr - [email protected] © Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, 2019 WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY PROJECT Project Coordinators İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Editors İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Authors Süreyya Algül, Aslı Aydemir, Gökhan Demir, Ali Yalçın Göymen, Erhan Keleşoğlu, Canan Özbey, Baran Alp Uncu Translation Bilge Güler Proofreading in English Mark David Wyers Book Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Cover Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Printing Yıkılmazlar Basın Yayın Prom. ve Kağıt San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Evren Mahallesi, Gülbahar Cd. 62/C, 34212 Bağcılar/İstanbull Tel: (0212) 630 64 73 Registered Publisher: 12102 Registered Printer: 11965 First Edition: İstanbul, 2019 ISBN Who’s Who in Politics in Turkey Project has been carried out with the coordination by the History Foundation and the contribution of Heinrich Böll Foundation Turkey Representation. WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY —EDITORS İSMET AKÇA - BARIŞ ALP ÖZDEN AUTHORS SÜREYYA ALGÜL - ASLI AYDEMİR - GÖKHAN DEMİR ALİ YALÇIN GÖYMEN - ERHAN KELEŞOĞLU CANAN ÖZBEY - BARAN ALP UNCU TARİH VAKFI YAYINLARI Table of Contents i Foreword 1 Abdi İpekçi 3 Abdülkadir Aksu 6 Abdullah Çatlı 8 Abdullah Gül 11 Abdullah Öcalan 14 Abdüllatif Şener 16 Adnan Menderes 19 Ahmet Altan 21 Ahmet Davutoğlu 24 Ahmet Necdet Sezer 26 Ahmet Şık 28 Ahmet Taner Kışlalı 30 Ahmet Türk 32 Akın Birdal 34 Alaattin Çakıcı 36 Ali Babacan 38 Alparslan Türkeş 41 Arzu Çerkezoğlu
    [Show full text]
  • Obesity in Mediterranean Islands
    Obesity in Mediterranean Islands Supervisor: Triantafyllos Pliakas Candidate number: 108693 Word count: 9700 Project length: Standard Submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc in Public Health (Health Promotion) September 2015 i CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background on Obesity ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Negative Impact of Obesity ..................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 The Physical and Psychological ....................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Economic Burden ............................................................................................ 2 1.3 Obesity in Mediterranean Islands ............................................................................ 2 1.3.1 Obesity in Europe and the Mediterranean region ............................................. 2 1.3.2 Obesogenic Islands ......................................................................................... 3 1.4 Rationale ................................................................................................................ 3 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................. 4 3 METHODS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Attempt to Revitalize Part of an Island in a New Integrated System
    Sustainable Development and Planning IV, Vol. 2 703 An attempt to revitalize part of an island in a new integrated system M. Şahin Yeditepe University, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul, Turkey Abstract The main objective of this paper is to represent a revitalization project, aiming at recombining all valuable yet disintegrated cultural and natural components of a certain place, in a new coherent system. Covering 23 acres of land in a non-populated part of the island of Büyükada (Prinkipo), one of the few islands boasted by Istanbul, the private property in question has now been the subject of a revitalization project. The premises include two dilapidated ancient brick furnaces, a farm, a farmhouse, a family manor in a relatively fit state (the latter converted from a farm building in 1936 by Sedad Hakkı Eldem, one of the most prominent figures in modern Turkish architecture), a large vineyard once used by monks of the nearby St. George Monastery, and diverse flora and fauna. Firstly, all the natural and cultural aspects of the site, having evolved over a long period of time, were registered and re-evaluated by the owners, artists, architecture students and experts in the interrelated disciplines of archeology, architecture, landscaping, tourism and engineering. Secondly, all the rundown components of the site were remapped and redesigned to yield a new meaning, in an attempt to create physical, visual, functional and economic integrity, consequent to considerable discussion regarding relevant issues, such as sustainable development, revitalization and adaptive re-use, restoration and development. While preserving the distinct character of the place with a minimum of intervention, a number of fruitful propositions were developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Title of the Paper
    e-ISSN 2757-5195 Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Advanced Research in Natural and Applied Sciences Open Access doi.org/ 10.28979/jarnas.890866 2021, Vol. 7, Issue 1, Pages: 1-11 dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jarnas The Aphid Fauna (Hemiptera:Aphidoidea) and Host Plants of The Büyükada Island (İstanbul, Turkey) Hayal Akyıldırım Beğen 1*, Gazi Görür 2 1 Vocational School of Health Services, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin, Turkey 2 Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Niğde Ömer Halis Demir University, Niğde, Turkey Abstract – About 5100 aphid (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) species that feed on different host plants have spread all over the world. About 5000 aphid taxon feed on different plant species. Aphids are small, soft-bodied and Article History one of the sap-feeding insect groups and also can damage almost all plants. Some aphid species are specific to Received: 19.05.2020 only one host plant, while some feed on numerous host plants. In this study, aphid fauna and host plants of Accepted: 23.12.2020 aphids were determined in Büyükada islands of İstanbul was determined in this study. Aphid species were distributed from cultivated plants, wild trees and shrubs in the area. During these study, 150 aphid samples Published: 20.03.2021 were collected in the area. Apterae and alatae individuals of aphid samples were collected as much as possible from aphid colonies on cultivated and ornamental plants. 43 aphid taxa including two new records Turkey Research Article aphid fauna (1 family, 6 subfamilya, 6 tribus ve 23 genus) were determined on 46 different plant species at the end of the study.
    [Show full text]