Haggai 1-2 Month

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Haggai 1-2 Month 1 2 3/17/17 d) But the months are based on the Jewish religious calendar, April being the first Haggai 1-2 month. e) Cyrus had decreed the first return in 538 The prophet Haggai is the tenth Minor Prophet but the B.C. fulfilling prophesy. Jer. 25:12; Ezra first post-captivity prophet, followed by Zachariah & 1:1 Malachi. 2) The word of the LORD came by Haggai. a) The word of the LORD refers to Divne There are three post-captivity historical books which revelation about the knowledge, will and will complement as well as supplement this period; purposes o God. Ezra, Nehemiah and Esther. b) This is Yahweh, Who had made a covenant with Israel on Mount Sinai. The book of Daniel will also shed some light since he c) The chosen insturment, as the mouth prophesied at Babylon through Nebuchadnezzar, piece of Yahweh was Haggai “Chaggay”, Belshazzar, Cyrus and Darius the Medo-Persian the prophet whose name means festive. kings. 2) The prophetic message was to be addressed * But in particular the book of Ezra for Haggai’s to two individuals. prophesies fit into chapter 5 of Ezra. a) To Zerubabbel “Zerubbabel”, that means sown on Babylon, indicating he was born 1:1-2 The confrontation of God over the people’s in Babylon. indifference over the building of the temple. 1)) Shealtiel means I have asked of God”. Ezra 3:2, 8; 5:2; Neh. 12:1 1:1 The introduction of the prophecy. * Pediah was his father and Shealtiel 1) The date of the first prophecy is recorded as his uncle, possibly through a Leverate the second year of King Darius. marriage because Jeremiah said he a) Sept. 1, 520 B.C. (Aug. 29?), Darius would be childless, like Boaz in the Hystaspes 521-486 B.C. book of Ruth. 1Chron. 3:17-19; Deut. b) This is not the Darius of the days of 25:5-10; Jer. 22:30 Daniel. 2)) He was the grandson of Jehoiachin, c) The dating at this point is no longer by also named Coniah, a descendant of Jewish kings for the “Time of the David through King Jehoiakim. Gentiles” had begun with Babylon. Dan. 1Chron. 3:17-19; 16:3-17; 2Kings 2; Lk. 21:24 24:15; Matt. 1:12 3 4 3)) Zerubabbel was the governor of 1)) Perhaps when there would be no Judah appointed by Cyrus. Ezra 5:14 more opposition? b) To Joshua. 2)) Or maybe they were gripped with fear 1)) The son of Jehozadak of the Samarians that brought the “y@howtsadaq”, means Yahweh is work to a hault? righteous. * Everyone is to be involved in the 2)) Joshua was the high priest, the Lord’s work, the convenient time is grandson of the high priest Hilkiah, now. his father was Seraiah the high priest. 1Chron. 6:15 1:3-11 The rebuke of the people by God. 3)) He was of the house of Aaron. 1:3-4 The people had become more interested 1:2 The indictment of the people by God. in their own houses than the house of God. 1) The one speaking to the people was the 1) God spoke through Haggai. vs. 3 LORD of host, the Captains of the armies of 2) God exposed the people’s motives and self- heave. centered comfort, rather than being * Haggai uses this title 14 times, Zechariah concerned for their spiritual life. vs. 4 will used it 53 times. a) The word of the LORD is presented in a 2) God quoted what the people were saying rehtorical in the form of sarcasm, “Is it about being involved in God’s work. time for you yourselves to dwell in your a) The people had become indifferent and paneled houses, and this temple to lie in complacent about spiritual things. ruins?” * Artaxerxes ceased the work of Cyrus 1)) The only correct answer is NO! decree by the false accusations of the 2)) The contrast is emphatic and Samaritans, but it really didn’t purposeful! prohibit the building of the temple b) The phrase paneled houses “caphan” only the city. Ezra 4:21 indicate the added extravegance and b) The suggestion is that the people were luxury the people blessed themselves dicussing wheather the starting date for with, while the temple lay n ruins. the end of the captivity was 606 or 586 1)) Jermeniah charged the people with B.C? their high living. Jer. 22:14 c) The people were waiting for a more convenient time. 5 6 2)) Solomon spent 13 years building his a) Consider your ways is an accusation and own house, 11 for the temple. 1Kings call to examine their comfortable concern 7:1, 3, 7 about their own houses and their careless c) The implication was that their apathy in concern about the house of God, so that rebuilding the temple had nothing to do they repent. with their inability or oppression, but b) Literally, set your heart on your ways, a rather with their indiference and call to self-examination of motives and unwillingness. deeds. 1)) They lack purpose of heart. Dan. 1:8 * The 70 years were up. Jer. 25:11; Zech. 2)) Their comfort became their 1:12 condemnation. 2) The evidence of God’s disapproval over 3)) Notice the Samaritans bothered them their disobedience is the futility of their self in the rebuilding in the days of centered efferts in five areas, given in pairs. Nehemiah for the house of the Lord, vs. 6 but they didn’t bother them as they a) Their reaping of their fields had been built their own houses. megar, “You have sown much, and bring 4)) Solomon spent seven years in in little”, placing greater presure the next building the Lord’s house but thirteen year of harves. vs. 6a-b years building his own house. 1Kings b) Their nourishment was insufficient, “You 6:38; 7:1 eat, but do not have enough”, producing 3) The people in the church are no different. unhealthiness, weak and sickly. vs. 6c-d a) Some neglect church, until their children c) Their drink was unstimulating, “You are grown. drink, but you are not filled with drink”, b) Some neglect church, until they get a the fermentation did not allow them to home. become inebrated, being weak. vs. 6e c) Some neglect church, until they get out of d) Their clothing was inadaquet in quality, debt. “You clothe yourselves, but no one is warm”, material being scarse. vs. 6f-g 1:5-6 The people were called by God to e) Their earning did not let them get ahead, examine how they were living. “And he who earns wages, Earns wages 1) The One calling them to examine their lives to put into a bag with holes”, inflation was the Captain of the armies of heaven, the and expenses. vs. h-i LORD of host. vs. 5 7 8 * Their priorities for living were wrong, 1)) So the people could seek and worship God was not first! Matt. 6:33 God. 2)) For the Temple was the center of 1:7-8 The people were to build the house of national life. God. 3) The authority. vs. 8c 1) The One calling them to examine their lives a) The covenant God, “says the LORD.” for the second time was the Captain of the b) The One who placed and delivered them armies of heaven, the LORD of host. vs. 7 from Egypt, as well as Babylon. a) Consider your ways is for the second time stated, accusing them again of living for 1:9-11 The people were given the correlation self, while neglecting God. between their disobedience to build the house b) Consider your ways is a call to examine of God and meager lives is now plainly stated. how God withheld the abundance and 1) The accusation, “You looked for much, but prosperity, but they hadn’t seen the indeed it came to little; and when you relationship between their lack and their brought it home, I blew it away.” vs. 9a-c disobedience to God and needed to 2) The reason, “Why?” says the LORD of repent. vs. 9-11 hosts. “Because of My house that is in ruins, 1)) God used this as discipline and turn while every one of you runs to his own them. Amos 4:6-13; Hos 4:10; Mic. house.” vs. 9d-f 6:14, “Lev. 26:26: Deut. 28:38” 3) The manner, “Therefore the heavens above 2)) This deals with obedience and you withhold the dew, and the earth prosperity. Joel 2:19; Mal. 3:10 withholds its fruit.” vs, 10 2) The proclamation. vs. 8a * Heaven as brass and the earth as iron. a) They were to gather building matrial, “Go 4) The Divine discipline, again given in pairs. up to the mountains and bring wood and vs. 11 build the temple.” vs. 8a a) God withheld the rain, “For I called for a b) This was an imperative command, not a drought on the land and the mountains.” suggstion. vs. 11a 3) The purpose. vs. 8b b) God bringing the draught affected their a) That God might take pleasure in the harvest, comfort and finances, “on the work. grain and the new wine and the oil, on b) That God might be glorified. whatever the ground brings forth.” vs. 11b-c 9 10 c) God through the draught lessened the a) This is one of the shortest messages of the amount of grass for grazing and the work Bible, only 7 words in English, 4 in to be mor laborious, “on men and Hebrew.
Recommended publications
  • 477 Appendix 3B, I. NAMES Supplemental Listing ABIAH
    Appendix 3B, I. NAMES Supplemental Listing Note: This listing primarily offers additional avenues for comparison. Many of its names are explored in other segments (e.g. citations related to post-exilic proceedings are referenced in Appendix 3B, II, Detail A). Biblical encyclopedias comparable to those employed in this work will enable locating verses for some few items not referenced elsewhere in this work. ABIAH - see Abijah/Abijam. ABIEL - see Jehiel[/Abiel]. ABI-EZER (1) (a) (Manasseh-Machir-) Gilead and Gilead’s sister, Hammoleketh/Hammolecheth; (Hammoleketh-) Abiezer. 1 Chronicles 7:17-18; (b) (Asenath + Joseph-Manasseh-Machir-Sons of Gilead-) Jeezer/sons of Abiezer. Numbers 26:28-30; Joshua 17:1-2; (c) (Aaron-Eleazar-Phinehas-) Abiezer/Abishua in the chief priest line; (d) (Joash, the Abiezrite-) Judge Gideon; Judges 6:11--refer to Appendices 1C, sub-part VI, C, and 3B, II, sub-part II, A, and Attachment 1. (2) Ophrah of the Abi-ezrites.” Judges 6:24, 8:32. (3) Abiezer “the Anethothite/[Anathothite]” “of the Benjaminites”--one of king David’s 37 most valiant captains; head of a divisional force of 24,000 that served the king the ninth month of the year. 2 Samuel 23:27; 1 Chronicles 11:28, 27:12. ABIJAH/ABIAH/ABIJAM (1) (Benjamin-Becher-) Abiah. 1 Chronicles 7:8. (2) (Abiah/Abijah + Hezron -) Ashur, “father of Tekoa.” Refer to Appendix 1C, Attachment 1, at fn. 20. (3) “[T]he name of his/[Samuel’s (+ Hannah) ] son firstborn Joel, and the name of his second Abiah[/Abijah].” 1 Samuel 8:2; 1 Chronicles 6:28; refer also to Elkanah, this appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • Nehemiah 1-10 Questions and Answers Page 1 of 69 English
    Nehemiah 1-10 Questions and Answers Page 1 of 69 English • According to Nehemiah 1:1, who is writing this book? • According to Nehemiah 1:1, Who was Nehemiah's father? • According to Nehemiah 1:1, In what month did Nehemiah get a visit from his friend Hanani? • According to Nehemiah 1:1, in what year did Nehemiah get a visit from his friend Hanani? • According to Nehemiah 1:1, Where was Nehemiah when Hanani came to visit him? • According to Nehemiah 1:2, who was one of Nehemiah's friend or relative who came from Judah to visit Nehemiah at the citadel in Shushan? • According to Nehemiah 1:2, From where did Hanani come to visit Nehemiah? • According to Nehemiah 1:2, What did Nehemiah and Hanani talk about, besides Jerusalem? • According to Nehemiah 1:2, About which Jews did Nehemiah ask Hanani? • According to Nehemiah 1:2, Nehemiah asked Hanani about the Jews who had escaped and survived the captivity, and what else? • According to Nehemiah 1:3, Who was talking to Nehemiah, and said the survivors were in great distress and reproach? • According to Nehemiah 1:3, Who was in great distress and reproach? • According to Nehemiah 1:3, What did Hanani tell Nehemiah about how the survivors who were left from the captivity in the province felt? (2 points) • According to Nehemiah 1:3, In what state was the wall of Jerusalem? • According to Nehemiah 1:3, What had happened to the gates of Jerusalem? • According to Nehemiah 1:3, Why were the survivors who were left from the captivity in the province in great distress and reproach (2 points)? • According
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of the Genealogy of Jesus
    THE PROBLEM OF THE GENEALOGY OF JESUS Prof. M.M.Ninan 5708 Rudy Dr. San Jose, CA 95124 1985 THE PROBLEM OF THE GENEALOGY OF J ES U S Prof. M.M.Ninan CHAPTER ONE THE TWO GENEALOGIES CHAPTER TWO MATTHEW'S GENEALOGY CHAPTER THREE LUKE'S GENEALOGY CHAPTER FOUR WOMEN IN MATTHEW CHART OF THE GENEALOGY OF JESUS FROM ADAM TO JESUS PREFACE This article was written in response to an Islamic onslaught on the validity and accuracy of the Bible quoting the problem of genealogy as an error. This was in 1985 while I was in the University of Juba, Sudan, Africa. The problem is dealt with in this article to show that the Bible is the inspired word of God. In spite of its transmission through the ages through generations to generations and in their varying media and translations it still is the most reliable document mankind has ever possessed. Its accuracy speaks for its divine origins. This article was first published as a booklet by the Sudan Theological College, Juba, Sudan, Africa in 1985. It was widely distributed in the Southern Sudan and neighboring countries. ------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. M.M.Ninan is a Professor of Physics and have served in colleges and universities in India, Ethiopia, Ghana, Sudan, Jamaica, Yemen and United States of America. In all these countries he has been involved in church planting, missions and Christian Education as a Tent Maker. THE PROBLEM OF THE GENEALOGY OF JESUS CHAPTER ONE THE TWO GENEALOGIES People are often misled by a cursory look on the two widely, different genealogies of Jesus in the books of Matthew (1:1-11) and of Luke (3:23-38).
    [Show full text]
  • Geschichtsbücher Des Alten Testaments Und Biblische Geschichte (Außerhalb Der Urgeschichte Gen 1–11)
    © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Augsburg 2011, Version 2018 Geschichtsbücher des Alten Testaments und biblische Geschichte (außerhalb der Urgeschichte Gen 1–11) Inhalt: 1. Vorbemerkung zu den Datierungen für die biblische Geschichte.............................................................................1 2. Die fünf Bücher Mose...............................................................................................................................................2 3. Das Buch Genesis.....................................................................................................................................................3 3.1. Zu Abraham..........................................................................................................................................3 3.2. Isaak, Jakob und Esau...........................................................................................................................8 3.3. Joseph und seine Brüder.......................................................................................................................8 4. Moses und das Buch Exodus...................................................................................................................................11 5. Die Bücher Levitikus, Numeri und Deuteronomium...............................................................................................27 6. Das Buch Josua.......................................................................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2021 TE TA UN S E ST TH at I F E V a O O E L F a DITAT DEUS
    Commencement 2021 Spring 2021 TE TA UN S E ST TH AT I F E V A O O E L F A DITAT DEUS N A E R R S I O Z T S O A N Z E I A R I T G R Y A 1912 1885 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT AND CONVOCATION PROGRAM Spring 2021 May 3, 2021 THE NATIONAL ANTHEM CONTENTS THE STAR-SPANGLED BANNER The National Anthem and O say can you see, by the dawn’s early light, Arizona State University Alma Mater ................................. 2 What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming? Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight Letter of Congratulations from the Arizona Board of Regents ............... 5 O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming? History of Honorary Degrees .............................................. 6 And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there. Past Honorary Degree Recipients .......................................... 6 O say does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave Conferring of Doctoral Degrees ............................................ 9 O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave? Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Convocation ....................... 29 ALMA MATER Conferring of Masters Degrees ............................................ 36 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Craig and Barbara Barrett Honors College ................................102 Where the bold saguaros Moeur Award ............................................................137 Raise their arms on high, Praying strength for brave tomorrows Graduation with Academic Recognition ..................................157 From the western sky; Summa Cum Laude, 157 Where eternal mountains Magna Cum Laude, 175 Kneel at sunset’s gate, Cum Laude, 186 Here we hail thee, Alma Mater, Arizona State.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of the Ascent of Prayer by Sixteenth-Century Jerusalem
    The Concept of the Ascent of Prayer by Sixteenth-century Jerusalem Kabbalist, R. Joseph ibn Zayyah Thesis submitted for the degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” by Sachi Ogimoto Submitted to the Senate of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem August 2011 This work was carried out under the supervision of Professor Jonathan Garb Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Jonathan Garb, of the Department of Jewish Thought, Faculty of Humanities, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. I appreciate his support and patience in helping me complete this project and his provision of clear-cut advice with profound insight and encouragement. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................... 2 Zayyah’s Life ............................................................................................................. 3 Zayyah’s Writings ..................................................................................................... 7 Introduction to Perush le-Tefilah ......................................................................... 11 Survey of Research ................................................................................................. 16 Methodological Queries ........................................................................................ 19 The Structure of the Thesis ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peshitta Matthew and the Gowra Scenario
    A RUACH QADIM EXCERPT: PROOFS OF PESHITTA ORIGNALITY IN THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MATTHEW & THE GOWRA SCENARIO: EXPLODING THE MYTH OF A FLAWED GENEALOGY [Standard Electronic Edition] By Andrew Gabriel Roth twr Ly0yrbg wrdn0 dyb Copyright© 2002, 2003, by Andrew Gabriel Roth All rights reserved. Excepting scholarly citations for non- commercial use not to exceed 1,200 words (cumulative total), no part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. And, in addition to man's laws, there is a higher principle to consider. This book is the product of years of painstaking research and was produced with the intent of assisting the author in continuing ministry activities. Therefore, even the most innocent of intentions of reproducing this work will result in a major hindrance of those goals, especially since the funds raised from the electronic versions' sale will go to publishing the actual book. Please therefore search your heart diligently and consider carefully the spiritual aspects before even thinking about making any illegal copies. Finally, this work also contains the sacred name hwhy. Therefore, to avoid the chance of physically obliterating the Name, please treat this book with respect, even as you would a Hebrew Bible, since these pages do contain the four letters of the Holy Name of Elohim. Todah rabbah (thank you very much) in advance for your sensitivity and spiritual discernment in this matter, so that His Great Name may be known and revered in all the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Cline Family and Beyond
    The Family Volume II Appendices ii Contents Volume 11 Appendix A - Ancient Branches, 1 Britons, Franks, Hebrews, Scandinavian, Scythian, Sicambrian Appendix B - Direct Ancestral Links to the Ancient Past, 19 Norman-English, Celtic-French, Anglo-Saxon, Mayflower, Hohenstauffen-English, Hebrew Appendix C - Virginia Ligons, 51 Documents, Extended Families, “From Jackson to Vicksburg 1861-1865 - Memories of the War Between the States” Appendix D - Scottish Clan Connections, 85 Member Clans of the Standing Council of Scottish Chiefs: Bruce, Campbell, Drummond, Dunbar, Gordon, Graham, Hamilton, Hanna, Hay, Home, Keith, Ker, Leslie, Lindsay, Lyon, MacDonald, Montgomery, Murray, Ross,, Scott, Sempill, Sinclair, Stuart of Bute, Sutherland, Wallace. The Armigerous Clans and Families of Sc otland: Armstrong, Baillie, Douglas, Fleming, Hepburn, Livingston, Lundin, Muir, Seton, Somerville, Stewart (Royal), Stewart of Appin, Stewart of Atholl. Other Clan/Sept Connec tions: Angus, Barclay, Galloway, Haye, Knights Templar (Dress/Huntimg), Roslyn Chaple, Royal Stewart Appendix E - Magna Charta Barons, 131 The Baronage of the Magna Charta & Biographies: William d’Albini (Aubigny), Roger Bigod, Hugh Bigod, Henry de Bohun, Richard de Clare, Gilbert de Clare, John FitzRobert, Robert FitzWalter, William de Fortibus, William de Hardell (Mayor of London), William de Huntingfield, William de Lanvallei, John de Lacie, William Malet, Geoffrey de Mandeville, William Marshall Jr., Roger de Montbegon, Richard de Montifichet, Roger de Mobray, William de Mowbray, Saire
    [Show full text]
  • List of High Priests of Israel 1 List of High Priests of Israel
    List of High Priests of Israel 1 List of High Priests of Israel This page gives one list (partly traditional) of the High Priests of Ancient Israel up to the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD. Because of a lack of historical data, this list is incomplete and there may be gaps. Line of the High Priests of Israel The office did not always pass directly from father to son. The high priests, like all Jewish priests, belonged to the Aaronic line. The Bible mentions the majority of high priests before the captivity, but does not give a complete list of office holders. Lists would be based on various historical sources. In several periods of gentile rule, high priests were appointed and removed by kings. Still, most high priests came from the Aaronic line. One exception is Menelaus, who may not have been from the Tribe of Levi at all, but from the Tribe of Benjamin. From the Exodus to the Babylonian Exile • Aaron, during the Exodus from Egypt • Eleazar, son of Aaron • Phinehas, son of Eleazar • Abishua, son of Phineas According to the Samaritans, Shesha is incerted, said to be the son of Abishua and father to Bukki. A traditional list of the Jewish High Priests • Bukki, son of Abishua-ancestor of Ezra • Uzzi, son of Bukki • Eli, descendant of Itamar, son of Aaron [1] • Ahitub, son of Phinehas and grandson of Eli • Ahijah, son of Ahitub • Ahimelech, son of Ahitub, High Priest during the reign of King Saul; killed at Nob by Doeg; part of the curse on the House of Eli - that none of Eli's male descendants would live to old age - was fulfilled with the death of Ahimelech.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Orlov, “Celestial Choirmaster: the Liturgical Role of Enoch-Metatron In
    Andrei Orlov Marquette University Celestial Choirmaster: The Liturgical Role of Enoch-Metatron in 2 Enoch and the Merkabah Tradition (published in the Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 14.1 (2004) 3-29) Introduction In one of his recent publications, Philip Alexander traces the development of Enoch’s image through the Jewish literature of the Second Temple period up to the early Middle Ages.1 His study points to ‘a genuine, ongoing tradition’ that shows the astonishing persistence of certain motifs. As an example, Alexander explicates the evolution of Enoch’s priestly role which was prominent in the Second Temple materials and underwent in the later Merkabah sources further development in Metatron’s sacerdotal duties. He observes that ‘Enoch in Jubilees in the second century BCE is a high priest. Almost a thousand years later he retains this role in the Heikhalot texts, though in a rather different setting’.2 Noting the long-lasting association of Enoch- Metatron3 with the sacerdotal office, Alexander draws attention to the priestly role of this 1 P. Alexander, ‘From Son of Adam to a Second God: Transformation of the Biblical Enoch’, Biblical Figures Outside the Bible (ed. M. E. Stone and T. A. Bergen; Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 1998), pp. 102-104. 2 Alexander, ‘From Son of Adam to a Second God’, p. 107. 3 On Metatron’s figure, see: D. Abrams, ‘The Boundaries of Divine Ontology: the Inclusion and Exclusion of Metatron in the Godhead’, HTR 87 (1994), pp. 291-321; P. S. Alexander, ‘The Historical Setting of the Hebrew Book of Enoch’, JJS 28-29 (1977-1978), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subject of Belief in the Gospel of John
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Western Evangelical Seminary Theses Western Evangelical Seminary 1-1-1980 The ubjecS t of Belief in the Gospel of John Arden W. Kinser THE SUBJECT OF BELIEF IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Western Evangelical Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements fo r the Degree Master of Arts by Arden W. Kinser April 1980 Major Professor: CoQperatiye Reader : CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION • . Statement of the Problem • • 1 Justification for the Study 6 Limitations of the Study ••• 8 A Hypothesis Concerning Belief • 9 Method of Procedure • 10 2 . THE INTERPRETIVE CONTEXT FOR THE GOSPEL OF JOHN • • • • . • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • 11 The Problem of Johannine Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • . • • 11 The Implications of this Context for the Study of John' s Gospel • • • • • • . • • • • • • 24 3 . THE INTERPRETIVE CONTEXT OF THE WORD PISTEUO . • • . • • • • • . • • . • . • • . 25 The Importance of Determining a Context From Which to Interpret the Word Pisteuo • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • ••25 Methods for Developing the Interpretive Context • 26 The Greek Background of Pisteuo • • 28 The Hebrew Background of Pisteuo . • 36 PisteuO's Greek and Hebrew Backgrounds Summarized • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 43 The Interpretive Context of Pisteuo • 45 4. BELIEF IN JOHN 'S GOSPEL ..•47 Data Indicating that Belief Means More Than Mental Assent . • • • • • • • • • • • • . 47 ii iii Data Indicating that Belief Means at Least Mental Assent " ,. .. " . .. .. "' .. .. .. ".. • 60 5. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND SUGGE STIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY .. ,. .... 63 Summary 63 Conclusions • • 65 Suggestions for Further Study • 65 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • 69 APPENDIXES 78 A. THE TEXTUAL VARIANT IN JOHN 20:31 • • 78 B. JOHN 'S USE OF PISTEUO, THE SEPTUAGINT , AND THE OLD TESTAMENT CONCE PT OF BELIEF • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 80 c.
    [Show full text]
  • Footnotes to the New Testament for Latter-Day Saints, Volume 1 the Gospels
    Footnotes to the New Testament for Latter-day Saints, Volume 1 The Gospels Edited by Kevin L. Barney Copyright © 2007 by Kevin L. Barney. All rights reserved. This book was typeset using Adobe® InDesign® CS2 4.0 from Adobe Systems Incor- porated, running on Mac OS X 10.4.8 from Apple Inc. The typefaces used are Min- ion Pro from Adobe Systems, Inc., Hebraica II from Linguist’s Software, and Symbol from Apple Inc. Preface In the mid-1970’s I attended an early morning seminary class in Sycamore, Illinois. I have a vivid recollection of the year we studied the New Testament. We had a cardboard chart with the names of the stu- dents down the left margin and the name of each book of the New Tes- tament across the top margin. Whenever we finished reading a book, we got to place a gold star in the accompanying square on the chart. I read the entire New Testament that year and completed my row on the chart, but my comprehension of what I read was very low. There were times when I would read several pages, reading every word, and then look back and realize that I did not have a clue what it was I had just read. I have never forgotten the struggle I faced as a young person in at- tempting to comprehend the King James Version (kjv) of the Bible. More recently, I was asked to give a presentation on studying the scriptures as a Relief Society Enrichment class. I made an overhead pro- jection copy of the book of Philemon (which I selected simply because it is so short), and then as I led the class we read and discussed it together, slowly, verse by verse, marking the projected image on the board liber- ally.
    [Show full text]