DOCSLIB.ORG

Chemical Cleaning and Degassing Refinery Equipment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chemical Cleaning and Degassing Refinery Equipment Chemical cleaning and degassing refinery equipment The safe removal of volatile hydrocarbons, hydrogen sulphide gas and pyrophoric iron sulphide from refinery equipment before inspection is indispensable. A chemical cleaning programme reduces downtime and the need for mechanical cleaning Berthold Otzisk Kurita Europe GmbH n petroleum refineries, distillation and Types of cleaning chemicals which requires the draining of the storage equipment frequently needs The most common types of chemicals hydrocarbon phase first. The cleaning I to be inspected during turnarounds. used for the cleaning of equipment are and degassing programmes are Necessary cleaning procedures can inorganic and organic acids, chelating commonly designed for injection into require several weeks of downtime if and complexing agents, alkaline the wash water phase at temperatures storage tanks, distillation columns, cleaners, surfactants, organic solvents between 60°C and 100°C with circulation product lines and heat exchangers have and speciality additives. times of 2–16 hours. Some cleaning to be drained. The presence of volatile For the removal of oxides and scales, programmes create a temporary emulsion hydrocarbons and hydrogen sulphide common acid cleaning agents such as for scavenging the hydrogen sulphide gas, as well as deposits of pyrophoric inhibited sulphuric acid and and volatile hydrocarbons. The emulsion iron sulphide and other fouling material, hydrochloric acid, phosphoric acid, will later break down on its own in the can be particularly problematic, which citric acid or other weaker acids are used. API separator or in a separate holding is why they have to be removed before By varying the chemical concentration, tank. The addition of an emulsion inspection. temperature and agitation, the metal breaker after the cleaning procedure is For many years, traditional mechanical surface can be cleaned slowly or more completed can accelerate the separation cleaning methods such as high-pressure rapidly. Concentrated solutions and process. In many cases, the intermittent and ultra-high-pressure water jetting, higher temperatures will accelerate the storage of cleaning solutions for emulsion steaming procedures and cold or hot cleaning procedure, but leads to the breaking is limited, because the necessary water washing methods have been used generation of dangerous and corrosive holding tanks are occupied for other to remove volatile hydrocarbon and fumes as well as increased corrosion purposes during planned turnarounds, hydrogen sulphide gases. However, large potential. and some refiners refuse to apply volumes of water are required and the Caustic cleaning agents are less chemical cleaning programmes that resulting wash water can be high in TOC. efficient and less economical compared create emulsions. Kurita is asked to Based on regulatory, safety and with acid cleaning agents, but they can deliver cleaning and degassing environmental requirements, more remove organic soils, including oils and programmes that create a temporary powerful chemical cleaning and grease, better than acids. emulsion, as well as programmes without degassing products have been developed Chelating and complexing additives any emulsification tendency. to shorten downtime by reducing the containing EDTA, NTA and sodium need for mechanical cleaning. diethanolglycine or ethylenediamine Removal of pyrophoric iron The applied technology and cleaning play a less important role in refinery sulphide deposits procedure will depend on the equipment cleaning procedures because of their Due to the pyrophoric nature of iron to be cleaned. For example, the chemical negative environmental impacts. sulphide and the potential for cleaning of a crude oil tank or sludge Surfactants can contain anionic, spontaneous ignition, refiners are very oil system using external mobile heat nonionic or amphoteric compounds interested in removing or neutralising exchangers will take longer than the and sometimes they are formulated iron sulphide deposits. Although some chemical cleaning of a distillation together with organic solvents to chemical programmes are fairly effective column or heat exchanger, where improve their cleaning performance. and can eliminate small, localised iron high-pressure cleaning equipment sulphide deposits, they have limitations can be used. The chemical cleaning Cleaning and degassing and are often less effective when the itself is defined as the removal of organic chemicals iron sulphide deposits are spread and inorganic fouling material from In general, cleaning agents are designed throughout the packing material of the process lines, distillation equipment and for scale and fouling removal (ie, viscous distillation equipment. metal surfaces by a combination of fouling, pyrophoric iron sulphides) with If higher amounts of iron sulphide solvency, fluid velocity and, in most metal surface cleaning. In addition to deposits are expected (ie, in packing cases, heat. While the fluid velocity these requirements, the cleaning and areas), the cleaning and degassing comes from spraying, stirring, degassing agents for refinery and chemicals may reach their limits, as they circulation, steam or air addition and petrochemical applications are designed are designed mainly for volatile the heat will be supplied through for the reduction of benzene and other hydrocarbons and hydrogen sulphide steaming, hot water injection or heating volatile hydrocarbons, as well as removal. For this reason, a formulation up the metal surfaces, the solvency hydrogen sulphide in the vapour phase. for providing fast and efficient removal depends on the chemistry of the These chemical programmes are of iron sulphide deposits has been cleaning agent and its concentration. typically injected into an aqueous phase, developed. This formulation does not www.eptq.com PTQ Q1 2008 77 chemical in combination with high- pressure or ultra-high water jetting, while other techniques will require the use of a chemical in combination with mobile heat exchangers, hot water, gas oil or diesel diluents, or other mechanical technologies. In all cases, it is important to specify requirements and verify limitations in advance (ie, availability of water, heat, diluents such as gas oil or diesel). The most efficient chemical cleaning method is usually the circulation method, where the pumped cleaning solution is fed back to the tank to reduce chemical costs. In this case, the tank should be pumped down as low as possible to check the actual sludge level. The sludge level will determine the amount of chemical, water and, in some cases, diluent (ie, diesel). As a rule of thumb, a warm chemical dilution Figure 1 Fouled heat exchanger with fluid velocity will provide better results than a cold dilution with poor agitation. The success of the selected chemical cleaning programme can be determined by using a good tank survey and laboratory testing. Large storage tanks are often not homogenous, which is why samples should be taken from as many points as possible. The definition of a clean tank is that the floor is clean of hydrocarbons and dirt, and the tank is free of gas. In certain special cases where catalyst slurry has been stored in the tank, the chosen chemical cleaning technique may not be applicable. The cleaning and degassing products in tank cleaning also have their limitations if higher amounts of pyrophoric iron deposits are present. In such cases, specific chemicals for pyrophoric iron sulphide removal such as Kurita CD-5101 will skip this hurdle. Chemical cleaning of distillation equipment While tank-cleaning procedures may require dosing pumps for the chemicals, mobile heat exchangers, high-pressure or ultra-high water jetting, steam, hot water, gas oil or diesel diluents, the Figure 2 Cleaning methods application of a chemical for a tower- cleaning and degassing procedure is generate hydrogen sulphide or produce tank. When such storage tanks are more simple. During the turnaround solid reaction products, which is why it emptied to be cleaned, conventional procedure, the refinery heat exchangers is ideally suited to iron sulphide cleaning methods may require some and pumps can be used to provide dissolution applications. As a further days or even weeks. For this reason, new the heat and fluid velocity. The way advantage, it can be injected into both chemical cleaning programmes have in which the chemical is applied to hydrocarbon and aqueous product been developed to reduce the time the system depends on the process streams and combined with Kurita’s required to remove the sludge from conditions. proprietary hydrogen sulphide and the tank. It is sometimes not possible to provide benzene scavengers to provide a highly There are a number of different a system where the chemical can be effective all-round chemical-treatment standard cleaning procedures pumped back. More chemical and wash programme (Figure 1). introduced to the oil refining industry, water is therefore required. In this case, and each cleaning technique can be the chemical has to be applied to the Tank cleaning characterised according to a cleaning wash water at the top section of the In crude oil and heavy oil storage, sludge procedure. Some cleaning procedures distillation column or reflux line always accumulates at the bottom of the will require the use of a suitable (cascading method). Steam can be added 78 PTQ Q1 2008 www.eptq.com to supply more turbulence on the trays cleaning are all good indicators for or packing. The chemical will cascade evaluating
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Use of 90% Ethanol to Decontaminate Stethoscopes in Resource Limited
    Raghubanshi et al. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control (2017) 6:68 DOI 10.1186/s13756-017-0224-x RESEARCH Open Access Use of 90% ethanol to decontaminate stethoscopes in resource limited settings Bijendra Raj Raghubanshi, Supriya Sapkota, Arjab Adhikari*, Aman Dutta, Utsuk Bhattarai and Rastriyata Bhandari Abstract Background: In developing countries like Nepal, 90% ethanol is cheap and is available in most hospitals. The unavailability of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in these settings led us to compare the efficacy between 90% ethanol and isopropyl alcohol pads in reducing the bacterial contamination of diaphragm of stethoscope. Methods: A randomized blinded experimental study was carried out to determine the difference between cleaning stethoscopes with 90% ethanol and IPA. Cultures of diaphragm were taken before and after cleaning with one of the cleaning agent. Colony forming units (CFU) count and organism identification was done by a blinded investigator. CFU before and after cleaning were compared using Wilcoxon signed–rank test. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the decrease in CFU count between the cleaning agents. Results: About 30% of the stethoscopes harbored potential pathogens. Significant reduction in CFU was observed with both IPA (Wilcoxon signed–rank test, P value <0.001) and 90% ethanol (Wilcoxon signed–rank test, P value <0. 001). Comparing median decrease in CFU between cleaning with IPA and with 90% ethanol, no significant difference was found (Mann Whitney U test; U = 1357, P value >0.05). Conclusions: Both 90% ethanol and IPA are equally effective in decontaminating the diaphragm of stethoscope. Selection of agent should be done on the basis of cost and availability.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Note 160
    APPLICATION NOTE 160 Degas Options for Sample Preparation Introduction A degas study was conducted to determine the effectiveness 1. Inert environment – shift from of flow versus vacuum degas. An amorphous silica- adsorbed phase to inert. alumina and a microporous zeolite were prepared by both techniques and then nitrogen isotherms were collected 2. Heat – increase the rate. for both materials. The resulting isotherms established equivalence between vacuum versus flow degas. Vacuum versus Flowing Degas Methods In the present study we accept that temperature may be controlled by various methods and that commercial temperature controllers provide repeatable performance. Rather than studying temperature control, this document will evaluate the topic of vacuum versus flowing degas. 1. Vacuum degas utilizes mass action as the only method for shifting the chemical equilibrium. An adsorbed molecule has a concentration on the surface, C and a negligible pressure, P=0 in the vapor phase. The pressure is maintained near zero since the sample is in a vacuum. Heating the sample increases the rate of transfer from the adsorbed molecules to the inert environment. 2. Flowing degas also utilizes mass action Theory by constant inert purge. The desorbed molecules are swept from the system Typical degas options include vacuum or flowing degas. The via the continuous inert gas flow and the basic concept of degas is quite simple. The sample material partial pressure of the desorbed molecules is placed in an inert environment. This inert environment in an inert stream approaches zero in a exploits chemical potential and creates a favorable state for manner similar to the vacuum technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Disinfectant and Cleaning Agent Safety – Frequently Asked Questions
    Caribbean Public Health Agency Technical Guidance: COVID-19 Series No 33 Chemical Disinfectant and Cleaning Agent Safety – Frequently Asked Questions Suggested Citation: CARPHA. (2020). Chemical disinfectant and cleaning agent safety – frequently asked questions. Caribbean Public Health Agency Technical Guidance: COVID-19 Series, no. 33. CARPHA 2020 Chemical Disinfectant and Cleaning Agent Safety – Frequently Asked Questions 9 July 2020 Why are we concerned about cleaning agents and disinfectants? Selecting the correct chemical agent for cleaning and disinfecting and safely handling and using that agent is essential to health and wellbeing. Recently, with the increased focus on cleaning to reduce the risk of exposure to coronavirus disease, there have been an associated increase in media stories warning the public of the dangerous chemicals used for disinfectants. All chemical cleaning agents can be harmful to the health of the person using the product if it is not used as directed on the label by the manufacturer. Chemical agents can cause burns, breathing difficulties or damage to the lungs, or possibly result in poisoning. Persons should carefully read instructions for use, safety data sheets, and any health warnings to ensure they have selected the correct chemical agents, have the appropriate personal protection, and use and store the chemicals in a safe way. What are the properties of effective chemical cleaning agents and disinfectants? A wide variety of chemical agents can be used for cleaning, sanitising, and disinfecting. There are 4 categories of cleaners: detergents, degreasers, abrasives, and acids. Each is effective for cleaning different surfaces depending on the type of soiling. Different chemical agents are effective for killing different bacteria and viruses.1 Molds and fungus will require a sporicidal agent2.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 2 Cleaning Agents, Sanitisers and Disinfectants in Food Businesses: Detection of Traces and Human Risk Assessment Processes
    Chemicals in Food Hygiene VOLUME 2 Cleaning agents, sanitisers and disinfectants in food businesses: detection of traces and human risk assessment processes Chemicals in Food Hygiene – Volume 2 Foreword The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) is a considering carry-over risks of traces in non-profit industry association tasked with foods; promoting continuous improvement of food ➢ Reviewed and identified gaps in the safety management systems to ensure suitability of existing methods for confidence in the delivery of safe food to detection of traces at relevant points in consumers worldwide. GFSI provides a the food production process; platform for collaboration between some of ➢ Developed the GFSI position on the use of the world’s leading food safety experts from cleaning agents, sanitisers and retailer, producers and food service disinfectants and the relationship with companies, service providers associated with microbial resistance. the food supply chain, international organisations, academia and government. The TWG produced 2 volumes within one document: Since GFSI’s inception in 2000, experts from all over the world have been collaborating in ➢ Volume one of this document provides a numerous Technical Working Groups (TWG) high-level overview of the considerations to tackle current food safety issues defined that a food business operator needs to by GFSI stakeholders. In 2017 a TWG was consider in relation to ensuring established to determine best practices in appropriate hygienic practices. This relation to biocides (defined as the residues volume is aimed at a variety of readers from cleaning agents, sanitisers and from the food truck operator or farmer disinfectants) in the food supply chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Degas Backfill Gas Selection for Micromeritics Gas Adsorption Instruments
    Application Note 73 Degas Backfill Gas Selection for Micromeritics Gas Adsorption Instruments Introduction adsorbed gas is one type of contaminant that you Specific surface areas and pore volume distribu- wish to remove during degassing, using nitrogen tions are often determined using gas adsorption as the backfill gas partially defeats the purpose of techniques. Prior to analysis, any adsorbed gas or degassing. Obviously, nitrogen is not a true inert vapor phase (such as water or other volatiles) gas when it comes to microporous materials. should be removed from the sample. This process is often referred to as degassing the sample. Therefore, for materials which tend to adsorb nitrogen, helium is a better choice as the backfill Degassing usually involves either heating the gas. Helium adsorption at room temperature is sample or flowing an inert gas across the sample negligible, even in the high energy pores of most during evacuation. In either case, molecules being microporous samples. desorbed from the surface of the sample are removed from the sample tube. After degassing, There are some highly microporous materials in the sample tube can be sealed and removed in one which helium (if used as the backfill gas) is ex- of the following conditions: tremely difficult to remove due to diffusion. Complete removal requires great care as well as • Under vacuum using the TranSealTM, an appa- time-consuming tasks. Otherwise its presence can ratus which is inserted into the sample tube. It severely distort an adsorption isotherm. is designed to close when removed from the degassing port and open automatically when For samples where neither nitrogen nor helium are installed on the sample port, maintaining a ideal, a vacuum-sealed transfer is the most vacuum-tight seal.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Simulation Applied to Studying Continuous Spirit Distillation and Product Quality Control
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Food Control 22 (2011) 1592e1603 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Food Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodcont Computer simulation applied to studying continuous spirit distillation and product quality control Fabio R.M. Batista, Antonio J.A. Meirelles* Laboratory EXTRAE, Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas e UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil article info abstract Article history: This work aims to study continuous spirit distillation by computational simulation, presenting some Received 7 June 2010 strategies of process control to regulate the volatile content. The commercial simulator Aspen (Plus and Received in revised form dynamics) was selected. A standard solution containing ethanol, water and 10 minor components rep- 2 March 2011 resented the wine to be distilled. A careful investigation of the vaporeliquid equilibrium was performed Accepted 8 March 2011 for the simulation of two different industrial plants. The simulation procedure was validated against experimental results collected from an industrial plant for bioethanol distillation. The simulations were Keywords: conducted with and without the presence of a degassing system, in order to evaluate the efficiency of Spirits fi Distillation this system in the control of the volatile content. To improve the ef ciency of the degassing system, fl Simulation a control loop based on a feedback controller was developed. The results showed that re ux ratio and Aspen Plus product flow rate have an important influence on the spirit composition. High reflux ratios and spirit Degassing flow rates allow for better control of spirit contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquid Degassing and Gasification Solutions
    CARBONATION NITROGENATION LIQUID DEGASSING AND DECARBONATION GASIFICATION SOLUTIONS Providing sanitary processing equipment and customized services Since 1885 CO2 Control of Beer Adjust the carbonation level in beer. Sometimes natural fermentation does not create enough CO2 for the end product which impacts taste and the head of a beer. On the same note, removal of excess CO2 in over-carbonated beer is also an easy process. Nitrogenation of Beer There is a niche market for stout beer where nitrogen is added to beer to improve the foam head on top of the beer. Liqui-Cel® Membranes Liqui-Cel membrane contactors are leading gas transfer devices, commonly used in carbon dioxide removal, deoxygenation, nitrogenation and carbonation. Capable of achieving <1 ppm CO2 and <1 ppb O2, they provide precision in gas control. Because of their cleanliness and predictability, Liqui-Cel membranes are the standard degassing technology in ultrapure water applications. Due to the small footprint, lower installation costs and modular nature of the system, they provide flexibility and can be readily expanded to meet growing capacity. Membranes come in multiple sizes so that you can maximize efficiency and performance while taking into account the desired flow rate and footprint requirements. Need more info? Contact your local sales representative or visit our website at www.mgnewell.com. CREATE A SMOOTH BEER—A “KEG” BEER HOW IT WORKS Liqui-Cel membranes use a microporous hollow fiber membrane to add and/or remove gases from liquids. The hollow fiber is knitted into an array and wrapped around a center tube inside of the membrane housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Knolltextiles Cleaning Information
    Cleaning Information Regular Maintenance It is important to vacuum upholstery regularly to remove the surface dust that builds up and slowly contributes to a greying effect that diminishes the clarity of the original color. Please note that vacuuming should be done with the proper attachments to avoid breaking down the fibers and contributing to “pilling.” In addition to regular vacuuming, a professional cleaner should come in at least once or twice a year to thoroughly clean the fabrics and remove the soiling that a normal vacuum cleaner cannot reach. The expense of this service is small compared to the reward of seating that looks good as new after a lot of use. Cleaning Codes W: Water-based cleaning agents or foam may be used for cleaning this fabric. S: Only mild, pure water-free dry cleaning solvents may be used for cleaning this fabric. W-S: Water-based cleaning agents and foam or mild, waterfree solvents may be used for cleaning this fabric. W Bleach: Water-based or foam cleaning agents or diluted household bleach may be used for cleaning this fabric. W-S Bleach: Clean with water or solvent-based cleaning agents or diluted household bleach. X: This fabric should be vacuumed or brushed lightly to remove soil. Warning: Do not use water-based foam or liquid cleaning agents of any type on this fabric. Cleaning vs Sanitizing vs Disinfecting Cleaning, disinfecting and sanitizing are often used synonymously, but they are not the same thing. Cleaning removes the visible foreign matter from a surface. Disinfecting, when done according to the instructions of a suitable cleaner, kills all bacteria and viruses present, while sanitizing reduces the level of bacteria and viruses present.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet Quaternary Disinfectant Cleaner
    SAFETY DATA SHEET QUATERNARY DISINFECTANT CLEANER SECTION 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product name : QUATERNARY DISINFECTANT CLEANER Other means of identification : Not applicable Recommended use : Disinfectant Restrictions on use : Reserved for industrial and professional use. Product dilution information : 0.39 % - 1.54 % Company : Ecolab Inc. 1 Ecolab Place St. Paul, Minnesota USA 55102 1-800-352-5326 Emergency health : 1-800-328-0026 (US/Canada), 1-651-222-5352 (outside US) information Issuing date : 03/01/2021 SECTION 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION GHS Classification Product AS SOLD Flammable liquids : Category 3 Acute toxicity (Oral) : Category 4 Acute toxicity (Dermal) : Category 4 Skin corrosion : Category 1A Serious eye damage : Category 1 Product AT USE DILUTION Acute toxicity (Dermal) : Category 4 Eye irritation : Category 2B GHS label elements Product AS SOLD Hazard pictograms : Signal Word : Danger Hazard Statements : Flammable liquid and vapor. Harmful if swallowed or in contact with skin. Causes severe skin burns and eye damage. Precautionary Statements : Prevention: Keep away from heat/ sparks/ open flames/ hot surfaces. No smoking. Keep container tightly closed. Ground/bond container and receiving equipment. Use explosion-proof electrical/ ventilating/ lighting/ equipment. Use only non-sparking tools. Take precautionary measures against static discharge. Wash skin thoroughly after handling. Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. Wear 913496 1 / 13 SAFETY DATA SHEET QUATERNARY DISINFECTANT CLEANER protective gloves/ protective clothing/ eye protection/ face protection. Response: IF SWALLOWED: Call a POISON CENTER/ doctor if you feel unwell. Rinse mouth. IF SWALLOWED: Rinse mouth. Do NOT induce vomiting. IF ON SKIN (or hair): Take off immediately all contaminated clothing.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Cider Vinegar Snakes Cage Cleaning
    Apple cider vinegar snakes cage cleaning Apple cider vinegar snakes cage cleaning >>> Look Here <<< Wipe down cleaning: Using this method of tank cleaning you will be wiping the 10 Easy Steps to Reduce Odor Problems (or twice as often as changing litter that is in the whole bottom of the cage). Clean Apple cider vinegar can help never be used on a tank where an animal lives. Instead, try white vinegar. Control Fleas Naturally With Common Be sure and empty your vacuum after each cleaning or the pests Also put 1-3 tablespoons of apple cider vinegar in 05/12/2016 · Here's how to keep their cage clean, the way they » Rats; How to Keep Your Rat Cage Smelling Lovely. vinegar but not apple cider vinegar.fumes!Cider Vinegar Truth - Comments for My miracle snake oil "ACV" How? Simply click here to return to Apple Cider Vinegar and Weight Loss Stories. Home; The Vinegar Vinegar Cleaning 11 Comments on “Mel’s Top Bird Cleaning Tips For Even The Messiest of Species we wipe down the railes of the cages with solution of apple cider vinegar 16/09/2008 · Uses for Vinegar: Pet and Animal Care. with apple cider vinegar. Another ear-cleaning remedy is to the entire cage with vinegar on a because you Apple Cider Vinegar Then I let the vinegar cool down and use it for cleaning the coffee and we put her back into her cage and add one tablespoon of white different species in the tank, as some species are more susceptible than others to your normal wash load to remove bacterial residue and fresh them 01/11/2012 · The most complex liquid I use is hot water.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008
    Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 William A. Rutala, Ph.D., M.P.H.1,2, David J. Weber, M.D., M.P.H.1,2, and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC)3 1Hospital Epidemiology University of North Carolina Health Care System Chapel Hill, NC 27514 2Division of Infectious Diseases University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7030 1 Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 3HICPAC Members Robert A. Weinstein, MD (Chair) Cook County Hospital Chicago, IL Jane D. Siegel, MD (Co-Chair) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX Michele L. Pearson, MD (Executive Secretary) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA Raymond Y.W. Chinn, MD Sharp Memorial Hospital San Diego, CA Alfred DeMaria, Jr, MD Massachusetts Department of Public Health Jamaica Plain, MA James T. Lee, MD, PhD University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH University of North Carolina Health Care System Chapel Hill, NC William E. Scheckler, MD University of Wisconsin Madison, WI Beth H. Stover, RN Kosair Children’s Hospital Louisville, KY Marjorie A. Underwood, RN, BSN CIC Mt. Diablo Medical Center Concord, CA This guideline discusses use of products by healthcare personnel in healthcare settings such as hospitals, ambulatory care and home care; the recommendations are not intended for consumer use of the products discussed. 2
    [Show full text]
  • NAEYC Standard 5 (Health), Especially Topic C: Maintaining a Healthful Environment
    Cleaning, Sanitizing, and Disinfection Frequency Table Definitions1 › Cleaning2 –Physically removing all dirt and contamination, oftentimes using soap and water. The friction of cleaning removes most germs and exposes any remaining germs to the effects of a sanitizer or disinfectant used later. › Sanitizing3 –Reducing germs on inanimate surfaces to levels considered safe by public health codes or regulations. Sanitizing may be appropriate for food service tables, high chairs, toys, and pacifiers. › Disinfecting–Destroying or inactivating most germs on any inanimate object, but not bacterial spores. Disinfecting may be appropriate for diaper tables, door and cabinet handles, toilets, and other bathroom surfaces. › Detergent–A cleaning agent that helps dissolve and remove dirt and grease from fabrics and surfaces. Soap can be considered a type of detergent. › Dwell Time–The duration a surface must remain wet with a sanitizer/disinfectant to work effectively. › Germs–Microscopic living things (such as bacteria, viruses, parasites and fungi) that cause disease. Cleaning, Sanitizing, and Disinfection Frequency Table 1 Cleaning, Sanitizing, and Disinfecting Frequency Table1 Relevant to NAEYC Standard 5 (Health), especially Topic C: Maintaining a Healthful Environment Before After Daily Areas each each (End of Weekly Monthly Comments4 Use Use the Day) Food Areas Clean, Clean, Food preparation Use a sanitizer safe for and then and then surfaces food contact Sanitize Sanitize If washing the dishes and utensils by hand, Clean, use a sanitizer safe
    [Show full text]