Improving Resilience in Mixed Farming Systems to Pending

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Improving Resilience in Mixed Farming Systems to Pending Improving Resilience in Mixed Farming Systems to Pending Climate Change in Far Western Nepal Participatory Rural Appraisal Report Helen Keller International September 2013 Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER-ONE ................................................................................................................................. 9 1. Introduction / Background to PRA .............................................................................. 9 2. Objectives and Research Questions ........................................................................... 10 2.1 Objectives................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Objective ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Specific Objectives .................................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1.3 Research Questions ................................................................................................................................................................ 10 3. Methodologies and Procedures ................................................................................... 11 3.1 Study Sites ................................................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.1 Selection of PRA VDCs ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1.2 Selection of clusters ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1.2 Population Trend of the District and Study Area ...................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Target Population and the Participants ........................................................................................ 13 3.2.1 Target Population ................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Participants ..................................................................................................... 13 3.2.3 How Participants Were Identified and Approached ................................................................................................ 13 3.2.4 Numbers of participants: ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 PRA Training ............................................................................................................................................ 13 3.4 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................................... 14 3.5 PRA Process.............................................................................................................................................. 14 3.6 Development of PRA Handbook........................................................................................................ 17 3.7 PRA Tools .................................................................................................................................................. 17 CHAPTER-TWO .............................................................................................................................. 19 4. Analysis of PRA Findings of Participating Clusters ............................................. 19 4.1 Social Resource Map ............................................................................................................................. 20 4.2 Transect Walk ......................................................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Farm Sketches .......................................................................................................................................... 25 4.4 DAG Mapping ............................................................................................................................................ 26 4.5 Livelihoods Mapping .............................................................................................................................. 28 4.6 Gender Daily Calendar .......................................................................................................................... 29 2 4.7 Historical Timelines .............................................................................................................................. 30 4.7.1 Common findings of all four clusters .............................................................................................................................. 30 4.7.2 Cluster specific key findings ............................................................................................................................................... 31 4.8 Seasonal Farming Calendar ................................................................................................................. 33 4.8.1 Schedule of farming ................................................................................................................................................................ 33 4.8.2 Weather and Influences ....................................................................................................................................................... 33 4.8.3 Impact of climate change ..................................................................................................................................................... 33 4.8.4 Seasonal diseases .................................................................................................................................................................... 34 4.8.3 Main Festivals ........................................................................................................................................................................... 35 4.9 Stakeholders/Institutional Analysis ................................................................................................ 35 4.10 Focus Group Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 37 4.10.1 Awareness and understanding on climate change issue ................................................................................... 37 4. 10. 2 Impact of climate change and mitigation and adaptation options .............................................................. 38 CHAPTER-THREE .......................................................................................................................... 40 5. Priority Problems and Opportunities ....................................................................... 40 5.1 Process of Ranking Problems and Opportunities ...................................................................... 40 5.1.1 Initial Ranking ......................................................................................................................................................................... 40 5.1.2 Critique on the Initial Ranking ......................................................................................................................................... 40 5.1.3 Final Ranking of Priority Problems and Solutions .................................................................................................. 41 5.2 The Top-four Common Problems and Opportunities ............................................................... 42 6. Community Resource Management Plan (CRMP) ................................................ 44 CHAPTER-FOUR ............................................................................................................................. 46 7. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 46 8. Recommendations: The Way Forward ..................................................................... 48 8.1 Recommendation to the Community ............................................................................................... 48 8.2 Recommendation to the HKI .............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 8.3 Overall recommendations ................................................................................................................... 48 9. Annexes ................................................................................................................................ 49 9.1 Some Social Resource Maps ..................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Food Security Bulletin 29
    Nepal Food Security Bulletin Issue 29, October 2010 The focus of this edition is on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain region Situation summary Figure 1. Percentage of population food insecure* 26% This Food Security Bulletin covers the period July-September and is focused on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain (MFWHM) 24% region (typically the most food insecure region of the country). 22% July – August is an agricultural lean period in Nepal and typically a season of increased food insecurity. In addition, flooding and 20% landslides caused by monsoon regularly block transportation routes and result in localised crop losses. 18 % During the 2010 monsoon 1,600 families were reportedly 16 % displaced due to flooding, the Karnali Highway and other trade 14 % routes were blocked by landslides and significant crop losses were Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep reported in Kanchanpur, Dadeldhura, western Surkhet and south- 08 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 eastern Udayapur. NeKSAP District Food Security Networks in MFWHM districts Rural Nepal Mid-Far-Western Hills&Mountains identified 163 VDCs in 12 districts that are highly food insecure. Forty-four percent of the population in Humla and Bajura are reportedly facing a high level of food insecurity. Other districts with households that are facing a high level of food insecurity are Mugu, Kalikot, Rukum, Surkhet, Achham, Doti, Bajhang, Baitadi, Dadeldhura and Darchula. These households have both very limited food stocks and limited financial resources to purchase food. Most households are coping by reducing consumption, borrowing money or food and selling assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security Bulletin - 21
    Food Security Bulletin - 21 United Nations World Food Programme FS Bulletin, November 2008 Food Security Monitoring and Analysis System Issue 21 Highlights Over the period July to September 2008, the number of people highly and severely food insecure increased by about 50% compared to the previous quarter due to severe flooding in the East and Western Terai districts, roads obstruction because of incessant rainfall and landslides, rise in food prices and decreased production of maize and other local crops. The food security situation in the flood affected districts of Eastern and Western Terai remains precarious, requiring close monitoring, while in the majority of other districts the food security situation is likely to improve in November-December due to harvesting of the paddy crop. Decreased maize and paddy production in some districts may indicate a deteriorating food insecurity situation from January onwards. this period. However, there is an could be achieved through the provision Overview expectation of deteriorating food security of return packages consisting of food Mid and Far-Western Nepal from January onwards as in most of the and other essentials as well as A considerable improvement in food Hill and Mountain districts excessive agriculture support to restore people’s security was observed in some Hill rainfall, floods, landslides, strong wind, livelihoods. districts such as Jajarkot, Bajura, and pest diseases have badly affected In the Western Terai, a recent rapid Dailekh, Rukum, Baitadi, and Darchula. maize production and consequently assessment conducted by WFP in These districts were severely or highly reduced food stocks much below what is November, revealed that the food food insecure during April - July 2008 normally expected during this time of the security situation is still critical in because of heavy loss in winter crops, year.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 4.06 MB
    Environmental Compliance Monitoring Report Semi-Annual Report Project Number: 44214-024 Grant Number: 0357-NEP July 2020 Nepal: Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions Project Prepared by the Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank. This environmental Compliance Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Government of Nepal Department of Forests and Soil Conservation Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions (BCRWME) Project (ADB Loan/Grant No.: GO357/0358-NEP) Semiannual Environemntal Monitoring Report of BCRWME Sub-projects (January to June 2020) Preparaed By BCRWME Project Project Management Unit Dadeldhura July, 2020 ABBREVIATION ADB : Asian Development Bank BCRWME : Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco- Regions BOQ : Bills of Quantity CDG : Community Development Group CFUG : Community Forest User Group CO : Community Organizer CPC : Consultation, Participation and Communications (Plan) CS : Construction Supervisor DDR : Due Diligence
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of International Conference on Climate Change Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Livelihood 12-14 January 2015 Kathmandu, Nepal
    Proceedings of International Conference on Climate Change Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Livelihood 12-14 January 2015 Kathmandu, Nepal Organizers: The Small Earth Nepal (SEN) City University of New York (CUNY), USA Colorado State University (CSU), USA Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM), Government of Nepal Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NAST), Nepal Agriculture and Forestry University (AFU), Nepal Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC), Nepal Editors: Dr. Soni Pradhananga, University of Rhode Island, USA Jeeban Panthi, The Small Earth Nepal, Nepal Dilli Bhattarai, The Small Earth Nepal Executive Summary Climate change is one of the most crucial environmental, social, and economic issues the world is facing today. Some impacts such as increasing heat stress, more intense floods, prolonged droughts, and rising sea levels have now become inevitable. Climatic extremes are becoming more frequent; wet periods are becoming wetter and dry periods are becoming dryer. People are able to describe the impacts faced by climate change but not the meaning of „climate change‟. The impacts are most severe for the poor countries. It is high time to plan and implement adaptive measures to minimize the adverse impacts due to climate change, and it is important to explore innovative ideas and practices in building resilience for sustainable development and livelihood, particularly in rural areas of developing countries which are highly vulnerable to climate change. Climate innovation and technologies involve basic science and engineering as well as information dissemination, capacity building, and community organizing. In this context an International Conference on Climate Change Innovation and resilience for Sustainable Livelihood was held in Kathmandu, Nepal from 12-14 January 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Khaptad Chhededaha Rural Municipality Invitation for Bids
    Khaptad Chhededaha Rural Municipality Office Of The Municipal Executive Dogadi, Bajura Far-Western Province, Nepal Invitation for Bids IFB No: 1/075/076 Date of publication: 2075/12/29 Method of Procurement: NCB, Eligibility Procedure 1. Khaptad Chhetedaha Rural Municipality Office invites sealed Bids from all eligible Nepalese Bidders for Construction & Maintenance of Following Roads with construction detail as follows. (Name and Identification no of Contract are as follows.) Estimated Bid Cost Contract Bid S. Amount (NRS.) Security of Bid Identification Description of Work Security N. [Excluding VAT Validity Document No: amount & Contingencies] Period (NRs.) KCRM/NCB/ Chhededaha-Thamlekh 1 42,97,362.11 1,25,000.00 3,000.00 W/R/01/2075-076 Sadak Stharunnati KCRM/NCB/ Dungrikhola-Baddaune 2 43,06,503.61 1,25,000.00 3,000.00 W/R/02/2075-076 Sadak Stharunnati KCRM/NCB/ Adharikhola-Chhadipatal 3 43,05,041.53 1,25,000.00 3,000.00 W/R/03/2075-076 Sadak Stharunnati KCRM/NCB/ Atichaur-Chhededaha 4. 43,08,802.32 1,25,000.00 3,000.00 W/R/04/2075-076 Stharunnati Road Maurekhola- KCRM/NCB/ 5. Jayabageshwori-Raan- 87,94,058.32 2,55,000.00 last date of bid submission 3,000.00 W/R/05/2075-076 up to 120 days from the Validity Singada Sadak Stharunnati. 2. Eligible Bidders may obtain further information and inspect the Bidding Documents at the Khaptad-Chhededaha Rural Municipality office Bajura, Email Address: [email protected], Contact No: 096-690801 or may visit PPMO website www.bolpatra.gov.np.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Pray for Nepal
    Pray for Nepal Bajhang Bajura Doti Achham Kailali Seti, Bajura Greetings in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, Thank-You for committing to join with us to pray for the well-being of every village in our wonderful country. Jesus modeled his love for every village when he was going from one city and village to another with his disciples. Next, Jesus would mentor his disciples to do the same by sending them out to all the villages. Later, he would monitor the work of the disciples and the 70 as they were sent out two-by-two to all the villages. (Luke 8-10) But, how can we pray for the 3,984 VDCs in our Country? In the time of Nehemiah, his brother brought him news that the walls of Jerusalem were torn down. The wall represented protection, safety, blessing, and a future. Nehemiah prayed, fasted, and repented for the sins of the people. God answered Nehemiah’s prayers. The huge task to re-build the walls became possible through God’s blessings, each person building in front of their own houses, and the builders continuing even in the face of great persecution. For us, each village is like a brick in the wall. Let us pray for every village so that there are no holes in the wall. Each person praying for the villages in their respective areas would ensure a systematic approach so that all the villages of the state would be covered in prayer. Some have asked, “How do you eat an Elephant?” (How do you work on a giant project?) Others have answered, “One bite at a time.” (One step at a time - in small pieces).
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project- Additional Financing
    Indigenous People Planning Document Due Diligence Report Loan Number: 2796 and Grant Number: 0267 NEP May 2012 Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project- Additional Financing Barabis-Delta Bazar Road Subproject Bajura Prepared by the Government of Nepal The Due Diligence Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. District Development Committee, Bajura Office of District Development Committee, Bajura District Technical Office, Bajura Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project-Additional Financing (DRILP-AF) District Project Office, Bajura Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project-Additional Financing (DRILP-AF) Detailed Project Report Barabis-Delta Bazar Road Sub Project Section III: Safeguards Volume III: Impact Screening Report on Indigenous Peoples May 2012 TABLE OF CONTENT Page No. 1. Project Background………………………………………………………………………… 1 2. Road Sub-project’s Background…………………………………………………………. 1 3. Demographic information of ZOI…………………………………………………………. 2 4. Identification of IPs…………………………………………………………………………. 3 5. Sub-project activity………………………………………………………………………… 4 6. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………… 4 ANNEXES Annex 1: Indigenous People Screening checklist Annex 2: Meeting minute about consultation with stakeholders Annex 3: Certified letters from VDCs 1 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND 1. The Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project-Additional
    [Show full text]
  • TSLC PMT Result
    Page 62 of 132 Rank Token No SLC/SEE Reg No Name District Palika WardNo Father Mother Village PMTScore Gender TSLC 1 42060 7574O15075 SOBHA BOHARA BOHARA Darchula Rithachaupata 3 HARI SINGH BOHARA BIMA BOHARA AMKUR 890.1 Female 2 39231 7569013048 Sanju Singh Bajura Gotree 9 Gyanendra Singh Jansara Singh Manikanda 902.7 Male 3 40574 7559004049 LOGAJAN BHANDARI Humla ShreeNagar 1 Hari Bhandari Amani Bhandari Bhandari gau 907 Male 4 40374 6560016016 DHANRAJ TAMATA Mugu Dhainakot 8 Bali Tamata Puni kala Tamata Dalitbada 908.2 Male 5 36515 7569004014 BHUVAN BAHADUR BK Bajura Martadi 3 Karna bahadur bk Dhauli lawar Chaurata 908.5 Male 6 43877 6960005019 NANDA SINGH B K Mugu Kotdanda 9 Jaya bahadur tiruwa Muga tiruwa Luee kotdanda mugu 910.4 Male 7 40945 7535076072 Saroj raut kurmi Rautahat GarudaBairiya 7 biswanath raut pramila devi pipariya dostiya 911.3 Male 8 42712 7569023079 NISHA BUDHa Bajura Sappata 6 GAN BAHADUR BUDHA AABHARI BUDHA CHUDARI 911.4 Female 9 35970 7260012119 RAMU TAMATATA Mugu Seri 5 Padam Bahadur Tamata Manamata Tamata Bamkanda 912.6 Female 10 36673 7375025003 Akbar Od Baitadi Pancheswor 3 Ganesh ram od Kalawati od Kalauti 915.4 Male 11 40529 7335011133 PRAMOD KUMAR PANDIT Rautahat Dharhari 5 MISHRI PANDIT URMILA DEVI 915.8 Male 12 42683 7525055002 BIMALA RAI Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Man Bahadur Rai Gauri Maya Rai Ghodghad 915.9 Female 13 42758 7525055016 SABIN AALE MAGAR Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Raj Kumar Aale Magqar Devi Aale Magar Ghodghad 915.9 Male 14 42459 7217094014 SOBHA DHAKAL Dolakha GhangSukathokar 2 Bishnu Prasad Dhakal
    [Show full text]
  • PMT Result 2075 List.Xlsx
    Alternate Candidates for Diploma Ward VDC/Municip PMT S. No. Token No SLC Reg No Name District Numbe Father Mother Village ality Score r 1 29169 7063002034 NIRMAYA SHAHI Jumla Birat 3 Prem Bahadur Shahi Kabita Shahi Barkotebada 968.1 2 30698 7468080053 Laxman Pariyar Bardiya Sorhawa 9 Kuber Pariyar Bhula Pariyar Puspanagar 968.1 3 30798 7374036042 RAMESH BOHARA Darchula Sharmauli 1 HARDEV BOHARA HIRA BOHARA SARMOLI 968.1 4 33026 7100271008 SIDDHA DHUNGANA Achham Mangalsen 5 Moti Ram jaishi manshara devi jaishi kudabasti 968.2 5 33372 6724003049 Rajendra Bulun Rasuwa Laharepouwa 4 Jawan Singh Bulun Charimaya Bulun dhunge 968.2 6 28436 7429362034 SHANKAR THAPA Bajhang Patadewal 8 KRISHNA BAHADUR THAPA SITADEVI THAPA BAYANA 968.3 7 33115 7429729007 niraj kumar karki Mugu Kotdanda 6 ram chandra karki raj kala karki luwai 968.4 8 30775 7369007044 MANOJ BAHADUR BUDHA Achham Risidaha 2 Amar Bahadur Budha Dewa Devi Budha Sanikhet 968.6 9 29144 6662015026 LOKENDRA BAHADUR SINGH Dailekh Chamunda 1 PURA SINGH KARNASHILA SHAHI Palta 968.7 10 30158 7459010030 khemraj Sarki Humla Maila 2 Manrup Sarki Dhauli Sarki tajakot 968.7 11 30416 7436010092 AJAY MAHATO Bara Dahiyar 6 Bayanath Mahato Bigni Sahani Malahi Dahiyar 968.7 12 30792 7462050002 JAGAT B. K Kalikot Ranchuli 2 Anipal bk Biuri bk Ratada 968.7 13 31833 7463020058 SURENDRA PRASAD SIMKHADE Jumla Dhapa 7 Ganesh Prasad Simkhade Ram Simkhade Bistabada 968.7 14 35029 7363004002 NISHA HAMAL Jumla Narakot 2 DHARMAL BDR HAMAL DHAN LAXMI HAMAL NARAKOT 968.7 15 28683 7359004084 SITA PHADERA Humla ShreeNagar
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT the Office of the Science Advisor, US Agency For
    ANNUAL REPORT (1 September 1990 - 14 July 1991) The Office of The Science Advisor, US Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C., USA EXPLOITATION OF GENETIC YIELD POTENTIAL OF COMMON BUCKWHEAT (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) ECOTYPES IN DIFFERENT REGIONS OF NEPAL Principal Investigator: Dr. Binayak P. Rajbhandari Grantee Institution : Tribhuvan University Kathmandu, NEPAL Collaborator : Dr. Elwood Hatley Institution : Department of Agronomy Penn. State University Uniiversity Park, PA 16802 USA Project Number : 10.614 Grant Number: 936-5600.03 AID Grant Project Officer: Ms. Angali S. Pradhan Project Duration: 1 September 1990 to 30 September 1994 TABLE OF CONTENT Executive Summary .... 1 Section: 1 A. Research Objectives ... 2 B. Research Accomplishments ... 2 C. Scientific Impact of Collaboration ... 4 D. Description of Project Impact ... 5 E. Strenghthening of Tribhuvan University ... 5 F. Future Work ... 6 Section: 2 A. Managerial Issues ... 7 B. Budget ... 7 C. Special Concerns ... 7 D. Collaboration, Travel, Training and Publication ... 7 E. Request for AID or BOSTID Actions ... 8 Appendices ... 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The buckwheat is one of the staple food crops in high altitude mountains and hills of Nepal. In these regions b6th tatar or bitter buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) and common buckwheat (Pagopyrum esculentum) have been cultivated from ancient times, and the perennial species of buckwheat (Fagopyrum cymosum) is prevalent to the mountains in a altitudinal range from 1500 to 3000 masl). This indicates that this range comes among the native places of buckwheat. In Nepal buckwheat is extensively cultivated in moisture-, nutrient-deficient and temperature stress conditions with low inputs (manures and tillage). The farmers have been growing only indigigenous local cultivars with their own seeds - the ecotypes, and the yield level is as low as 600-800 kg/ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security Bulletin 26
    Nepal Food Security Bulletin Issue 26, October - December 2009 Situation Summary Figure 1. Percentage of population food insecure • The recent completion of the major harvest period of the year has improved the overall short-term food security situation 17.0% across the country. At a national level WFP household surveys revealed that food stocks and consumption levels have seen 16.5% an improvement since late last year when the harvest begun. • However, a number of districts in the Karnali and Far Western 16.0% Hills are suffering high or severe levels of food insecurity due to successive periods of drought, poor recent harvest, 15.5% insufficient supply of food in local markets and overall lack of economic opportunity. Over 50 percent of households 15.0% surveyed reported crop losses at 30-70 percent. • WFP Food for Work programming, which targeted 1.6 million 14.5% people in 2008/09, has significantly reduced the portion of Oct-Dec 08 Jan-Mar 09 Apr-Jun 09 Jul-Sep 09 Oct-Dec09 the total population which are highly and severely food Harvesting of the Summer crop and initiation of new WFP insecure. However, 145 VDCs across 12 districts of Nepal Food/Cash for Work programming have reduced the (mostly in the Mid– and Far-Western Regions but including 2 number of food insecure in the East in Sankhuwasabha) have been identified by the NeKSAP District Food Security Networks as being highly or severely food insecure. In these areas the estimated population which are unable to sustain their basic food consumption needs is 395,500.
    [Show full text]