DOCSLIB.ORG

Further Update and Final Recommendation Following Making

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Further Update and Final Recommendation Following Making DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES PLANNING PROTECTIVE SERVICES AND LICENSING COMMITTEE 18th May 2016 _________________________________________________________________________ FURTHER UPDATE AND RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING MAKING OF PROVISIONAL TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 01/16 IN RELATION LAND AT KINLOCHLAICH, APPIN _________________________________________________________________________ SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT No. 3 A) INTRODUCTION Members approved the making of a provisional Tree Preservation Order (TPO 01/16) in relation to several trees on land at Kinlochlaich, Appin at the meeting on 16th December 2015. The provisional notice of the proposed formal TPO was duly published and notification given to the owner of the trees, as a result of which an objection to the confirmation of the Order was received within the statutory 28 day publicity period. Further relevant information was subsequently received and this formed the basis of ‘Supplementary Report No. 1’ which was presented to Members at the Meeting on 16th March 2016 and requested a period of continuance to enable the objection and the relevant details to be properly assessed. Members agreed to this request. This current and final supplementary report, which supersedes the recently issued Supplementary Report No. 2 in the light of the most recent information, is to re-appraise Members as to the broad content of the objection to the provisional TPO, to the findings of an independent arboriculture report prepared at the request of the objector (and owner of the trees/land), to the content of a recent letter from the original proposer of the TPO and to summarise the examination of these findings and to recommend that the provisional TPO be withdrawn pending re-evaluation and recommendation at a later date. B) REPRESENTATIONS SUBSEQUENT TO THE MAKING OF THE PROVISIONAL TPO The provisional TPO was made, following approval by Members on 15th January 2016. The Town and Country Planning (Tree Preservation Orders and Trees in Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Regulations 2010 provides that a provisional TPO will expire unless confirmed by the Planning Authority within 6 months from the date on which the provisional Order took effect; in this case by 15th July 2016. An e-mail communication from the owner of the affected trees, Mr Donald Hutchison of Kinlochlaich, Appin was received on the 25th January 2016. This communication registered an objection to the confirmation of the provisional Order and posed several questions of a procedural and evidential nature, all of which have now been discussed with Mr Hutchison and responded to directly. Mr Hutchison is a Chartered Member of the Institute of Horticulture and operates a local garden centre nursery. A further e-mail communication from Mr Hutchison was received on 23rd February 2016. This correspondence attached an initial arboriculture survey of the trees. Further discussions have since taken place and a finalised version of the arboriculture report has recently been submitted. The objections raised by Mr Hutchison together with the broad findings of the arboriculture report are summarised below: The proposed TPO is not appropriate. The trees within and immediately surrounding the site of the approved planning permission for a new dwellinghouse (permission reference 15/00788/PP) are controlled by a planning condition which seeks the submission of an independent tree survey, clearly indicating those trees to be retained and those to be removed. The arboriculture survey has since been prepared and submitted. The plan accompanying the provisional TPO contains factual errors in relation to the identification of trees, namely misidentification of several of the tree species and misrepresentation of the positions of several of the trees. An arboriculture survey has now been prepared and submitted to the Planning Authority. This report, by a qualified and experienced arboriculturist, identifies 14 trees towards the south and south east margins of the development site and arranged in three general groupings as being within the family Abies (‘fir’ trees). The plan prepared by the Planning Authority for the provisional TPO identifies the same trees as being ‘cedars’. This identification is refuted by the owner of the trees and appears to be substantiated by the findings of the arboriculture report. ‘Cedar’ trees can belong to several family groupings but are not, it is alleged, within the family Abies. The arboriculture survey has examined the health and condition of each of the trees within and surrounding the development site (including all of the trees within the provisional TPO). There appears to be no dispute regarding the provisional TPO in so far as it relates to the individual specimen trees to the north and north west of the development site. All of these trees have been assessed as healthy and undamaged and are proposed to be retained (and secured by planning condition). The ‘fir’ trees within the family Abies, on the other hand, have been assessed as exhibiting various issues that would immediately threaten their long-term viability and amenity value – The submitted report states that they are generally dead / part-dead / part-decayed and/or damaged, with several having suffered lightning strikes. The arboriculture report and the detailed objection to the provisional TPO have been examined in consultation with the Council’s Amenity Services Technical Officer who has verbally agreed with the report’s findings. On the basis of the arboriculture evidence summarised above it is the considered opinion of the Local Planning Authority that the original recommendation to make provisional TPO 01/16 was fundamentally flawed and, although well intentioned, following a request for tree protection by a member of the public, was presented to Members without sufficiently detailed examination of the numbers, positions, species or condition of the trees themselves as has subsequently been alleged and would appear to be substantiated following the submission of a detailed arboriculture report. Whilst the trees the subject of the provisional TPO, and many others outwith the provisional TPO area but within the same land ownership, do undoubtedly add to the general visual character and the perceived quality of the area, it is alleged that the majority of these are not worthy of legal protection due to their health and/or condition. In addition to the specimen trees referred to above, the provisional TPO included 17 individual trees identified as belonging to three distinct groups. All of these trees were identified in the provisional TPO as ‘cedars’ but are claimed within the arboriculture report to be ‘firs’. Of the 7 trees proposed in Group 1, the arboriculture report states that all of them (plus a further tree not identified by the provisional TPO) should be removed. All of the trees in the identified Group 1 are identified in the arboriculture report as ‘fir’ trees and all fall into one of two condition categories; either Category Ui, Trees that have a serious irremediable, structural defect, such that their early loss is expected due to collapse or Category Uii, Trees that are dead or are showing signs of significant, immediate or irreversible overall decline. Of the 6 trees proposed in Group 2, the arboriculture report again states that all of them should be removed. All of the trees in the identified Group 2 are also identified in the arboriculture report as ‘fir’ trees and, again, all fall into one of the two condition categories, Ui or Uii as stated above. All of the Group 1 and Group 2 trees are therefore recommended for early felling in the submitted arboriculture report. Within Group 1, four of the trees are recommended for re-planting with appropriate native species and 1 of the trees in Group 2 is proposed for re-planting. These findings and conclusions have been verbally verified by the Council’s Amenity Services Technical Officer although further examination of the submitted detail is required. Of the 4 trees proposed in Group 3, the arboriculture report identifies only 2 existing trees; these being a ‘fir’ tree and a ‘lime’ tree. Of these, the ‘fir’ tree has been identified for early felling due to falling within Category Uii, Trees that are dead or are showing signs of significant, immediate or irreversible overall decline. The ‘lime’ tree, however, is recommended for retention and future protection through the creation and maintenance of a ‘root protection area’ (RPA). These findings and conclusions have also been verbally verified by the Council’s Amenity Services Technical Officer. A further letter has also been received by the original proposer of the TPO, Mr. Allan J. Colthart. Mr Colthart makes the following comments in support of his request for a TPO: My reason behind [the request for a TPO] is that these trees are part of the integrity of the surrounding planned landscape (along with others not listed as part of the Tree Preservation Order process such as the Oak tree lined avenue and others) which frames the setting for Kinlochlaich House a Grade B -Listed building allied with the gardens being one of the visitor attractions in the area as listed in the Glorious Gardens of Argyll. The trees in question are significant to the site and were omitted by the applicant from the original site plans and then subsequently detailed in later drawings when I advised that the site plan was inaccurate. The applicant’s agent referred to the reason behind the omission of these trees was that they were going to be felled; there was no mention of this in the Design Statement. Since the temporary Tree Preservation Order was put in place earlier this year, I have followed up this issue for the retention of the TPO with my local councillors where I received a written notification that there has been a tree survey commissioned by the applicant. I ask were the details of this tree survey: 1. Checked by the appropriate qualified officer for accuracy? 2. Was there mitigation for alternative actions such as tree surgery for retention of same included in the survey report? Thus ensuring that the landscape integrity of the site is conserved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Improvedforestharvesting and Reduced Impact Logging in Asia Pacific Region
    STATE OF 111E ARI REl^ORI ON IMPROVEDFORESTHARVESTING AND REDUCED IMPACT LOGGING IN ASIA PACIFIC REGION PRE-PROJECT PPD 19/99 REV. itF) STRENGTHENING SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENTOF NATURAL FOREST IN ASIA-PASIFIC , Cover page: Skidding 45, Reduced Impact Logging Activities, " Berau Forest Management Project (BMFP) " Location: Petak 29, Swakelola Labanan, East Kalimantan, PT. In hutani I STATE OF 11/1E ARI REPORT ON IMPROVEDFORESTHARVESTING AND REDUCED IMPACT LOGGING IN ASIA PACIFIC REGION PRE-PROJECT PPD 19199 REV. I (F) STRENGTHENINGSUSTAINABLEMANAGEMENTOF (^)^ NATURAL FOREST IN ASIA-PASIFIC o ITTO I FOREWORD The Indonesia Ministry of Forestry, in its capacity as Task Manager for the Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission's Ad Hoc Working Group on Sustainable Forest Management, with support from the International Tropical Timber Organization has implemented a pre-project focused on the application of the code of practice for forest harvesting in Asia- Pacific. The development objective of the pre-project PPD I 9199 Rev. , (F); "Strengthening Sustainable Management of Natural Forest in Asia-Pacific" is to promote the contribution of forest harvesting to sustainable management of tropical forest in Asia-Pacific countries. It is expected that after the pre-project completion the awareness of improves forest harvesting practices will have been significantly raised and political support for the implementation of the Code secured. To implement a comprehensive training programme and to operationalize demonstration sites for RIL implementation there is a need to understand the status of forest management particularly state of the art on forest harvesting in each Asia Pacific country. This state of the art report was prepared by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Preservation Orders: a Guide to the Law and Good Practice
    Tree Preservation Orders: A Guide to the Law and Good Practice On 5th May 2006 the responsibilities of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) transferred to the Department for Communities and Local Government. Department for Communities and Local Government Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone: 020 7944 4400 Website: www.communities.gov.uk Documents downloaded from the www.communities.gov.uk website are Crown Copyright unless otherwise stated, in which case copyright is assigned to Queens Printer and Controller of Her Majestys Stationery Office. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. Any other use of the contents of this publication would require a copyright licence. Please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/system/online/pLogin.asp or by writing to the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected]. This publication is only available online via the Communities and Local Government website: www.communities.gov.uk Alternative formats under Disability Discrimination
    [Show full text]
  • The Isabella Plantation Conservation Management Plan February 2012
    The Isabella Plantation Conservation Management Plan February 2012 Isabella Plantation Landscape Conservation Management Plan 2012 Prepared by The Royal Parks January 2012 The Royal Parks Rangers Lodge Hyde Park London W2 2UH Tel: 020 7298 2000 Fax: 020 7402 3298 [email protected] i Isabella Plantation Conservation Management Plan CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 3 Richmond Park ............................................................................................................................................. 3 The Management Plan ................................................................................................................................ 4 Aims of the Isabella Plantation Management Plan ................................................................................ 4 Structure of the Plan .................................................................................................................................. 6 2.0 GENERAL AND MANAGEMENT CONTEXT ............................... 7 Location ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing TRP Management Framework ................................................................................................ 10 Management Structure of Richmond Park .......................................................................................... 10 Landscape Management
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield Trees and Woodlands Strategy 2016-2030
    Sheffield Trees and Woodlands Strategy 2016-2030 Sheffield City Council September 2016 Consultation Draft Key Strategic Partners Forest Schools Forestry Commission Froglife National Trust Natural England Peak District National Park Authority Sheffield and Rotherham Wildlife Trust Sheffield Green Spaces Forum Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield Local Access Forum Sheffield University Sorby Natural History Society South Yorkshire Forest Partnership Sport England Woodlands Trust Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Context ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 What the Strategy Covers ....................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Legislation, Policy and Strategy Linkages ................................................................................ 3 1.4 Our Vision and Aims ................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 Strategy Monitoring and Review ............................................................................................ 4 1.6 Additional Documents ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter for Broadland Tree Wardens
    Broadsheet The Magazine for Broadland Tree Wardens Issue 181 – October 2019 A Busy0 Month Broadsheet A Busy Month The Monthly Magazine for Broadland Tree Wardens ITHOUT doubt, October is going to be a busy month Issue 181 – October 2019 for Broadland Tree Wardens. We have what are possibly the two most important dates in our calendar W Inside this issue with the East Anglian Regional Tree Wardens’ Forum on Sunday 6 October in Reedham Village Hall, followed by our A Busy Month - Editorial 1 100 Years of the Forestry Commission 4 first AGM on Wednesday 16 October in Freethorpe Village Hall. Great Trees with even Greater Burdens 5 Now, I know I’ve said it before unsustainable economy with a “planet-sized (many times before in fact), and I debt” caused by climate breakdown, the groups Call for a Million People to Plant Trees 6 said. Tree Charter Day 6 will no doubt say it again (just as Although broadly welcoming the 2050 Is the World Really Ablaze? 7 many times I guess) but if you don’t target, promised by Theresa May among the attend any other Network events final acts of her premiership, the charities said Felling of Suffolk Wood to go Ahead 8 during the year these are the two the date needed to be brought forward by Giant Trees Susceptible to 3 Killers 9 several years and that policy and funding you must make every effort to Climate Change and Forestry 10 arrangements were not yet in place. attend. In the letter, the organisations urged the 800 Years Tracked by Tree Rings 10 Details of both events have been circulated chancellor to demonstrate that he understood Veteran Tree Management Certification11 together with the Agenda for our AGM and I the gravity of the challenge by holding a climate How Forests Shaped Literary Heritage 12 urge you to encourage members of your and nature emergency budget to unleash a town/parish council to also attend.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Work Application for Trees Within Marlhill
    DECISION-MAKER: PLANNING AND RIGHTS OF WAY PANEL SUBJECT: Tree work application for trees within Marlhill Copse that are protected by a tree preservation order and a tree work notification for trees within a conservation area. DATE OF DECISION: 2nd February 2021 REPORT OF: HEAD OF CITY SERVICES CONTACT DETAILS Head of Service Title Head of City Services Name: David Tyrie Tel: 023 8083 3005 E-mail: [email protected] Author: Title City Tree Officer Name: Gary Claydon-Bone Tel: 023 8083 3005 E-mail: [email protected] STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY NONE BRIEF SUMMARY To consider the content within application 20/00303/TPO, 20/00305/TPO and 20/00077/TCA for the felling of 61 individual trees and 7 groups of trees located within Marlhill Copse. RECOMMENDATIONS: In respect of the 59 individual trees and 6 groups of trees: (i) To grant consent to the TPO application for the felling with an attached condition for suitable replacement tree planting scheme, and, (ii) To raise no objection to the notification of felling of trees in the Conservation Area. (iii) To consent to a 1.5 metres lift but refuse a 3 metre lateral reduction in respect to T18. REASONS FOR REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The requested work has been identified by an independent arboricultural consultant who carried out a site survey to conduct a survey of trees within falling distance of properties on the western side of Hill Cottage Gardens and those trees within Marlhill Copse that are within falling distance of the carriageway and public footpath of Mansbridge Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees, Woodlands & Development Craobhan, Coilltean Agus Leasachad
    Supplementary Guidance Stiùireadh Leasachail Trees, Woodlands & Development Craobhan, Coilltean agus Leasachad January 2013 Supplementary Guidance: Trees, Woodlands and Development 1 Introduction Ro-ràdh 1.1 The Value of Trees and Woodland...................................................................... 3 1.2 Purpose of Supplementary Guidance ................................................................ 3 2 Statutory & Non Statutory Regulations Riaghailtean Reachdail agus Neo-reachdail 2.1 Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 ........................................ 4 2.2 Scottish Planning Policy .......................................................................................... 4 2.3 Highland wide Local Development Plan ........................................................... 5 2.4 Highland Forest & Woodland Strategy ............................................................. 7 2.5 Scottish Government’s Policy on the Control of Woodland Removal ... 7 2.6 BS5837:2012 (Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction) ..................... 9 2.7 Tree Preservation Orders and Conservation Areas ....................................... 9 2.8 Felling Licences ......................................................................................................... 10 2.9 Protected Species ..................................................................................................... 10 3 Development within Woodlands Leasachadh taobh a-staigh Choilltean 3.1 Developments Involving Removal of Woodland
    [Show full text]
  • Look After Your Natural Assets
    Look after your natural assets 3RD EDITION Landcare for the bush block and small farms in the Upper Murrumbidgee Catchment Look after your natural assets 3RD EDITION 2010 Landcare for the bush block and small farms in the Upper Murrumbidgee Catchment Landcare Landcare is a unique Australian response to land and water degradation. Networks of local landowners are the backbone of Landcare. Landcare groups plan, implement and monitor on-ground works. They also raise awareness and share resources and knowledge. This book provides the basics on a wide range of topics. There are more than 1,977 (NSW Landcare 2009) Landcare The final chapter provides contact details for a range of groups in New South Wales and the Australian Capital government and non government agencies, who can help Territory working on a wide range of degradation problems. with further information. Landcare groups rank weed control, revegetation, remnant Good information is always good currency. Since the first vegetation loss/decline, soil erosion by water and river corridor edition of this document, the amount and quality of resources degradation as their top five issues. available on websites has increased. We have included links to follow up for many of the topics. How to find your local Landcare group Phone numbers for voluntary Landcare organisations are The Upper Murrumbidgee Catchment subject to change; contact www.landcarensw.org.au for details Coordinating Committee (UMCCC) of a Landcare group near you. The UMCCC is made up of rural land managers, local Look After Your Natural Assets was originally produced by governments, conservation groups, utility corporations, members of the Gearys Gap Wamboin Landcare Group with community Landcare groups and representatives of both assistance from the Natural Heritage Trust, edited by Maria NSW and ACT government agencies, with responsibilities Taylor and designed by Sue Van Homrigh.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Guidelines for Farmers and Other Stakeholders, Factsheets on Case Studies and Preparation of Policy Briefs ______WP5
    1 Innovative and sustainable intensification of integrated food and non-food systems in Europe April 2019 Technical guidelines for farmers and other stakeholders, factsheets on case studies and preparation of policy briefs __________________________________________________________________________________ WP5. Dissemination of outputs and communication to stakeholders Report Innovative and sustainable intensification of integrated food and non-food systems to develop climate-resilient agro-ecosystems in Europe and beyond Funding Scheme: ERA-NET Co-fund FACCE SURPLUS SUBTHEME: Subtheme 3. Sustainable intensification of integrated food and non-food systems of agriculture Authors: Andrea Pisanelli (CNR, Italy), Jo Smith, Sally Westaway (ORC, UK), Bhim Bahadur Ghaley, Lisa Mølgaard Lehmann (UCPH), Robert Borek (IUNG-PIB, Poland), Jacek Zajączkowski (SGGW, Poland), Mignon Sandor, Adrian-Eugen Gliga (USAMV, Romania), Elias Fereres, Manuel López, Tomás Roquette Tenreiro (UCO, Spain), Nina Röhrig, Moritz von Oppenkowski, Tim Roesler, Markus Hassler (UMR, Germany) The project is funded by FACCE SURPLUS, ERA-NET Co-fund between the European Commission and a partnership of 15 countries www.sustainfarm.eu 2 Innovative and sustainable intensification of integrated food and non-food systems in Europe SustainFARM fact sheet Project start date April 2019 Project duration 36 months Project website http://www.sustainfarm.eu Deliverable number D5.3. Technical guidelines for farmers and other Deliverable title stakeholders, factsheets on case studies and
    [Show full text]
  • Legal and Institutional Aspects of Urban, Peri-Urban Forestry and Greening: by Lidija Knuth
    Legal and institutional aspects of urban, peri-urban forestry and greening: A working paper for discussion by Lidija Knuth FAO LEGAL PAPERS ONLINE #48 September 2005 FAO Legal Papers Online is a series of articles and reports on legal issues of contemporary interest in the areas of food policy, agriculture, rural development, biodiversity, environment and natural resource management. Legal Papers Online are available at http://www.fao.org/legal/prs-ol/paper-e.htm, or by navigation to the FAO Legal Office website from the FAO homepage at http://www.fao.org/. For those without web access, email or paper copies of Legal Papers Online may be requested from the FAO Legal Office, FAO, 00100, Rome, Italy, [email protected]. Readers are encouraged to send any comments or reactions they may have regarding a Legal Paper Online to the same address. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations or the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The positions and opinions presented do not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. © FAO 2005 Legal Papers Online September 2005 Table of Contents Foreword List of abbreviations and acronyms Acknowledgements Executive summary 1. Introduction 2. Definitions of urban, peri-urban forestry and greening 2.1 Technical definitions 2.2 Legal definitions 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Application
    Mr M Jakes 7 Summer Close Stroud Glos GL5 1PF 27 Mar 2018 Application Ref: 018/450/17-18 Woodland Management Plan Ref: 00362 Dear Mr Jakes Felling Licence (Forestry Act 1967) Sladebank Woods Please find a copy of your approved Felling Licence and map enclosed. If you are an agent receiving this Felling Licence on behalf of the owner can you please ensure you forward a copy to the owner for their attention. Please note the expiry date for completion of the work. If the licence contains restocking conditions it is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that conditions are met by the required date(s) specified in the Licence. The Forestry Commission may visit the site at any time to inspect the progress of any restocking. I should also bring to your attention the Timber and Timber Products (Placing on the Market) Regulation 2013. This regulation came into being on 3rd March 2013 and implements the European Union Timber Regulation. This regulation prohibits the trade of illegally harvested timber and timber products and require those responsible for placing timber onto the EU market for the first time - whether an owner, contractor or timber merchant - to maintain documentation that proves that the timber is from a legally harvested resource. In conjunction with the National Measurements Office (the body responsible for the enforcement of the Regulation) and industry representatives, the Forestry Commission has developed a simple pro-forma to help those placing timber on the market to comply with this legislation. A pro-forma for this felling licence is enclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankhouse Plantation, Darvel Tpo 2000
    EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE : 1 AUGUST 2000 THE BANKHOUSE PLANTATION, DARVEL (PROVISIONAL) TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 2000 Report by Director of Development Services 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to advise the Committee of progress regarding the seeking of an agreement on the future management of the Bankhouse Plantation, Darvel with the owners of the plantation and to seek Committee approval for the Bankhouse Plantation, Darvel (Provisional) Tree Preservation Order 2000 to be confirmed. 2. BACKGOUND 2.1 A report on Bankhouse Plantation, Darvel was made to the Development Services Committee on 29 September 1999. This report advised that the owners of the plantation, James Jones and Sons Ltd, had not responded to formal invitations to discuss future management of the woodland with the Planning Division and Legal Services. 2.2 The report also set out the legal and financial implications to the Council in the event of, either a Management Agreement being made with the owners, or no such agreement being reached, if the above provisional Tree Preservation Order was confirmed. These implications are reprised as Sections 5 and 6 of this report. 2.3 The Committee decided that the Head of Planning and Building Control should continue to try and reach agreement with James Jones and Sons Ltd regarding the future management of Bankhouse Plantation and that such an agreement should be pursued with the Forestry Commission. 3. CURRENT SITUATION 3.1 Despite a further series of attempts by the Planning and Building Control Division to engage James Jones and Sons Ltd in discussions on their possibly entering into a Management Agreement for the Bankhouse Plantation with the Council, no response has been received by the Planning and Building Control Division from the owners of the plantation.
    [Show full text]