2020 Annual Report on the Work of the for Our Children Foundation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020 Annual Report on the Work of the for Our Children Foundation MISSION The For Our Children Foundation provides professional social services to the most vulnerable young children by encouraging constant, secure and developing family relations. VISION Development and happy childhood for young children. CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Why is our work important ................................................................................................................................ 6 Complex for Early Childhood Development – a dream come true and more opportunities for the children and their families ............................................................................. 8 We achieved so much for children and families in Plovdiv .................................................... 15 The foster families in a year full of difficulties and challenges ............................................. 17 The transformation of the Children’s House ...................................................................................... 19 Our projects and initiatives help to protect children’s rights in Bulgaria ................... 21 Donations in a year marked by COVID-19 ........................................................................................... 25 The team – our most valuable asset ......................................................................................................... 31 Important moments from 2020 ................................................................................................................. 33 A focus on finance ................................................................................................................................................. 34 The donors .................................................................................................................................................................... 36 3 2020 ANNUAL REPORT obstacles. I often say that the in total because this is what IVANKA most difficult thing in Bulgaria is we work for: despite the high SHALAPATOVA, to do good! levels of child poverty, isolation, violence, abandonment, despair, Therefore, I would like to rejection and the fact that they PHD congratulate the Foundation are sometimes “invisible” in Chief Executive Officer team who turned 2020 into a historic year and the most our society, the CHILDREN are here, they are part of society and It is said that people “will be memorable since we began they have the right to and need known by their deeds”. We in 1992. I also thank all our for a harmonious and positive know that what matters is not supporters, the investors and how well we use words but the parents who have put their environment for development, what trace we leave behind trust in us. We achieved the to dream and to have a happy with our actions! objectives we set for ourselves childhood. To make sure that more than five years ago and Bulgaria will survive, we need If you are reading this, perhaps we did it against the backdrop adults committed to making sure you already know that the of the uncertainties thrust on us the children of our country thrive. For Our Children Foundation during the COVID-19 pandemic. is a unique organization What we share with you in And now I leave you with the bringing together committed this report demonstrates the story, the facts and evidence of professionals and enthusiastic valuable contribution of the the changes we’ve made and supporters. Together, we never civil society sector in bringing the happiness we feel in making waver in our determination to about democratic change in children’s lives meaningful, make sure that every single Bulgaria, encouraging respect our satisfaction in extending child in Bulgaria has an equal for children’s rights, as well as a helping hand to inspire and a strong start in life and is the role of the For Our Children confidence in a desperate parent, supported develop to their full Foundation as a genuine agent of to be a transparent partner potential. change. of a responsible company, to To achieve these goals, you need Reading the story of our propose wise policies to public the ability to dream, the courage achievements during the last institutions, to rejoice at the to confront the unknown, and year, you will notice that the word success of other civil society the persistence to withstand “development” appears at least organizations, and to be a mistrust, insults, and many other once on every page and 72 times successful change-maker! 4 childhood, more children needed their permanent families, the ASSOC. additional care, schoolchildren Children’s House welcomed its forgot the schoolroom habits first older children. We are also on PROFESSOR of sitting at a desk and raising the threshold of making another VELINA a hand to answer the teacher’s big dream come true, the question or playing non-virtual Early Childhood Development TODOROVA games. Complex in Plovdiv. Vice-Chair of the UN But this was a year in which Being a new member of the Child Rights Committee we also saw some good news Board of Trustees of the For Our because the Foundation Children Foundation, I am happy strengthened its leading role Member of the Board that I am joining an ambitious, in setting early childhood motivated, hardworking, and of Trustees of For Our development policy in Bulgaria. efficient professional community. Children Foundation We can be proud of our Let enthusiasm and commitment successful initiative Bulgaria to the cause never waver, let us Hello, dear colleagues and Grows with Its Children and take hardships as a challenge to friends, we will make further efforts to overcome together, and to have turn it into a government policy. more success stories like those of I cannot but start with the hard Hardships pressed us to seek new Emma, Victor, and Iveta. and unusual year when the opportunities so that we could pandemic changed our way of life reach out to more children at risk dramatically. We stayed home, and their parents. We developed isolated ourselves, put masks on, new programs including and our communication became emergency family help, online “unreal”. Children stopped going consulting, and new services to to school, to kindergarten, or to provide specialized assistance the sandbox to play. Parks, streets to children with developmental and shops looked deserted. The difficulties and disabilities and virus took over our lives and their parents. The Early Childhood added more risks to those we Development Complex, which we already knew - abandonment had been dreaming of, opened its of children continued, violence doors to its young clients in Sofia. and isolation changed their As we helped more children find 5 2020 ANNUAL REPORT WHY IS OUR WORK IMPORTANT? children waiting for their family of Bulgarian children aged 0-17 on the list of the adoption register, 33.3% are at risk of poverty or social 1,371 741 of who have disabilities or exclusion (Eurostat). developmental difficulties (as of 31 December 2020, ASA). children accommodated at Homes new cases of prevention of for Medical and Social Care for abandonment supported by social 408 Children – HMSCCs (31 December 3,781 services (31 December 2020, ASA). 2020, ASA). children living at HMSCCs, 150 of children successfully reintegrated in 290 whom are under three years of age 564 their own families after a period of (31 December 2020, ASA). separation (31 December 2020, ASA). children/young people child mortality rate compared to accommodated in Family Type 2,768 5.1‰ 3.4 ‰ in the European Union. Placement Centres. • Bulgaria lacks a comprehensive child welfare policy in general and an early childhood development policy in particular. • There are no early childhood development standards, despite the government commitment pursuant to the Pre-School and School Education Act. • Poverty and the lack of support from close relatives as well as from a well-functioning system of social services are among the most frequent reasons for child abandonment. • The large number of children accommodated at HMSCCs and the subsequent negative impact on their development is a cause for concern. • Services to support families with young children, especially those aged 0-3, are underdeveloped. 6 IN 2020, WE PROVIDED DIRECT HELP TO 2,307 CHILDREN, FAMILIES, AND SPECIALISTS, OUT OF WHOM: children, families, and specialists participated in 1,617 trainings at the Social Services Centres in Sofia and Plovdiv: newborn babies were rescued children in Social Care whose 22 from abandonment; 22 socialization skills we supported; families were supported to children received love and care in 277 prevent the risk of separation; 33 foster families; children and parents were involved in the Early children found a temporary home at 154 Childhood Development 12 the Children’s House; Programme; children with developmental families were supported difficulties received day care at the 131 during pandemic-related crisis; 20 “Development” Centre; children and parents received highly people participated in parental specialized therapeutic support at skills training and training 270 58 the Community Support Centre groups; “Happy Childhood”; children and parents children and families were were supported through 47 involved in the Reintegration 690 consultations thanks to the Programme; financial assistance from the Human Safety Net Foundation. • We develop alternative care in a family environment for children
Recommended publications
  • (EU) 2020/281 of 27 February 2020 Amending the Annex To
    28.2.2020 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union L 59/13 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/281 of 27 February 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 on protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 1248) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 (3) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in holdings where poultry are kept in certain Member States, and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by those Member States in accordance with Council Directive 2005/94/EC (4). (2) Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the Member States listed in the Annex to that Implementing Decision, in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in that Annex. (3) The Annex to Implementing Decision 2020/47 was recently amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/240 (5), following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in poultry in Bulgaria and Czechia that needed to be reflected in that Annex.
    [Show full text]
  • KNOWLEDGE – International Journal Vol.45.3 PESTICIDE RESIDUES in FEED and DAIRY PRDUCTS
    KNOWLEDGE – International Journal Vol.45.3 PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FEED AND DAIRY PRDUCTS Hristo Hristev Agricultural university of Plovdiv, Bulgaria, [email protected] Rumyana Ivanova Agricultural university of Plovdiv, Bulgaria, [email protected] Abstract: An analysis for residual amounts of organochlorine pesticides in feed, mixed sheep's milk and cheese from the Plovdiv region was made. The found presence of total fractions of DDT, Lindane, Heptachlor, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin, Hexachlorobenzene, were all within the permissible limits. The highest content of DDT-total fractions was found in feed from the region of the village of Kuklen (0,8965 mg / kg), highest content of Lindan (0,0440 mg / kg) from the village of Voyvodinovo and for Endrin (0,0802 mg / kg) from the village of Graf Ignatievo. The content of forbidden pesticides increases during the spring and summer months, when the use of products for plant protection, including the forbidden ones, increases due to the active outdoor agro-ameliorative activities. In mixed sheep's milk most often we found total fractions of DDT and Lindane. The same is observed for cheese samples. The milk from the village of Tsaratsovo has the highest content of DDT – 0,7249, and for cheese - from the village of Stroevo (1,8068). Keywords: feed, milk, cheese, organochlorine pesticides ОСТАТЪЧНИ КОЛИЧЕСТВА ПЕСТИЦИДИ ВЪВ ФУРАЖИ И МЛЕЧНИ ПРОДУКТИ Христо Христев Аграрен университет, Пловдив, България, [email protected] Румяна Иванова Аграрен университет, Пловдив, България, [email protected] Резюме: Направен е анализ на фуражи, сборно овче мляко и сирена от района на Пловдивска област за остатъчни количества хлорорганични пестициди.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Office
    7.6.2021 PL Dziennik U rzędowy U nii Europejskiej L 199 I/1 II (Akty o charakterze nieustawodawczym) DECYZJE DECYZJA WYKONAWCZA KOMISJI (UE) 2021/906 z dnia 3 czerwca 2021 r. zmieniająca załącznik do decyzji wykonawczej (UE) 2021/641 dotyczącej środków nadzwyczajnych w odniesieniu do ognisk wysoce zjadliwej grypy ptaków w niektórych państwach członkowskich (notyfikowana jako dokument nr C(2021) 4096) (Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG) KOMISJA EUROPEJSKA, uwzględniając Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, uwzględniając rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/429 z dnia 9 marca 2016 r. w sprawie przenoś­ nych chorób zwierząt oraz zmieniające i uchylające niektóre akty w dziedzinie zdrowia zwierząt („Prawo o zdrowiu zwie­ rząt”) (1), w szczególności jego art. 259 ust. 1 lit. c), a także mając na uwadze, co następuje: (1) Wysoce zjadliwa grypa ptaków jest wirusową chorobą zakaźną ptaków wywierającą poważny wpływ na rentowność gospodarstw drobiarskich, co z kolei wywołuje zakłócenia w handlu wewnątrz Unii oraz w wywozie do państw trze­ cich. Wirusy wysoce zjadliwej grypy ptaków mogą zakażać ptaki migrujące i być przez nie następnie przenoszone na duże odległości podczas ich jesiennych i wiosennych migracji. Dlatego występowanie wirusów wysoce zjadliwej grypy ptaków u dzikiego ptactwa stwarza stałe ryzyko bezpośredniego i pośredniego wprowadzenia tych wirusów do gospodarstw, w których utrzymuje się drób lub ptaki żyjące w niewoli. W przypadku wystąpienia ogniska wysoce zjadliwej grypy ptaków istnieje ryzyko, że czynnik chorobotwórczy rozprzestrzeni się na inne gospodarstwa, w któ­ rych utrzymuje się drób lub ptaki żyjące w niewoli. (2) W rozporządzeniu (UE) 2016/429 ustanowiono nowe ramy prawne dotyczące zapobiegania chorobom przenoszą­ cym się lub przenoszonym na zwierzęta lub na ludzi oraz ramy prawne dotyczące zwalczania takich chorób.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Molecular Identification of Rice White Tip
    ISSN 1314-6246 Valcheva et al. 2017 J. BioSci. Biotech. 2017, 6(3): 191-195 RESEARCH ARTICLE Silvia Valcheva Distribution and Molecular Identification of Harry Samaliev Milena Kostova Rice White Tip Nematode Aphelenchoides besseyi in Rice Growing Areas in Bulgaria Authors’ addresses: ABSTRACT Agricultural University - Plovdiv, 12 A study was conducted to determine the distribution of Aphelenchoides besseyi using Mendeleev Blvd., Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria. molecular identification and the nematode effect on yield components in the major rice growing areas in Bulgaria. One hundred forty one paddy seed samples were Correspondence: collected in 2015 and 2016. Molecular identification was performed based on the Silvia Valcheva previously developed SSU rDNA detection analysis. Тhe specific primer Agricultural University - Plovdiv, 12 Mendeleev Blvd., Plovdiv 4000, combinations: 5′-GCGGGATTCGTGGTTC*T and 5′- Bulgaria CGACATGCCGAAACATGAG were used. Analysis showed that 23,4 %, from the Tel.: +359 32 654200 collected samples, were infested with A. besseyi in the 10 studied locations in Fax: +359 32 633157 e-mail: [email protected] Plovdiv, Pazardzhik and Stara Zagora rice growing areas. In the infested samples, nematode densities were in the range 0-396 specimens/100 paddy seed. The effect of Article info: A. besseyi on cv. Osmancik variety showed that panicles with white tip symptoms Received: 11 December 2017 were significantly shorter (17.2%) and lighter (39.5%) than those without white tip Accepted: 11 April 2018 symptoms.This is the first molecular report for the presence of A. besseyi in Bulgaria. Key words: Aphelenchoides besseyi, rice, Bulgaria, morphology, SSU rDNA – based detection analysis, PCR countries around the world (Stoyanov, 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Decisión De Ejecución (UE)
    7.6.2021 ES Diar io Ofi cial de la Unión Europea L 199 I/1 II (Actos no legislativos) DECISIONES DECISIÓN DE EJECUCIÓN (UE) 2021/906 DE LA COMISIÓN de 3 de junio de 2021 por la que se modifica el anexo de la Decisión de Ejecución (UE) 2021/641, sobre medidas de emergencia en relación con los brotes de gripe aviar de alta patogenicidad en determinados Estados miembros [notificada con el número C(2021) 4096] (Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE) LA COMISIÓN EUROPEA, Visto el Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea, Visto el Reglamento (UE) 2016/429 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 9 de marzo de 2016, relativo a las enfermedades transmisibles de los animales y por el que se modifican o derogan algunos actos en materia de sanidad animal («Legislación sobre sanidad animal») (1), y en particular su artículo 259, apartado 1, letra c), Considerando lo siguiente: (1) La gripe aviar de alta patogenicidad (GAAP) es una enfermedad vírica contagiosa de las aves que puede tener consecuencias graves en la rentabilidad de la cría de aves de corral, de manera que el comercio dentro de la Unión y las exportaciones a terceros países se vean perturbados. Los virus de la GAAP pueden infectar a las aves migratorias, que a continuación pueden propagarlos a largas distancias durante sus migraciones de otoño y primavera. Por tanto, la presencia de virus de la GAAP en aves silvestres constituye una amenaza continua de introducción directa e indirecta de estos virus en explotaciones en las que se crían aves de corral u otras aves cautivas.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/247 of 9 February 2017 on Protective Measures in Relation to Outbreaks of Highly Path
    L 36/62 EN Official Journal of the European Union 11.2.2017 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/247 of 9 February 2017 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2017) 1044) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra- Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in birds. Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry and other captive birds cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence. The low pathogenic form generally only causes mild symptoms, while the highly pathogenic form results in very high mortality rates in most species of birds. That disease may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming. (2) In the event of an outbreak of avian influenza in a Member State, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept. As a result, it may spread from one Member State to other Member States or to third countries through trade in live poultry or other captive birds or their products.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017/ 116 De La Commission
    24.1.2017 FR Journal officiel de l'Union européenne L 18/53 DÉCISION D'EXÉCUTION (UE) 2017/116 DE LA COMMISSION du 20 janvier 2017 modifiant l'annexe de la décision d'exécution (UE) 2016/2122 concernant des mesures de protection motivées par l'apparition de foyers d'influenza aviaire hautement pathogène de sous- type H5N8 dans certains États membres [notifiée sous le numéro C(2017) 376] (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE) LA COMMISSION EUROPÉENNE, vu le traité sur le fonctionnement de l'Union européenne, vu la directive 89/662/CEE du Conseil du 11 décembre 1989 relative aux contrôles vétérinaires applicables dans les échanges intracommunautaires dans la perspective de la réalisation du marché intérieur (1), et notamment son article 9, paragraphe 4, vu la directive 90/425/CEE du Conseil du 26 juin 1990 relative aux contrôles vétérinaires et zootechniques applicables dans les échanges intracommunautaires de certains animaux vivants et produits dans la perspective de la réalisation du marché intérieur (2), et notamment son article 10, paragraphe 4, considérant ce qui suit: (1) La décision d'exécution (UE) 2016/2122 de la Commission (3) a été adoptée à la suite de l'apparition de foyers d'influenza aviaire hautement pathogène de sous-type H5N8 dans des exploitations situées dans plusieurs États membres (ci-après les «États membres concernés») et de l'établissement de zones de protection et de surveillance par les autorités compétentes des États membres concernés, conformément aux dispositions de la directive 2005/94/CE du Conseil (4). (2) La décision d'exécution (UE) 2016/2122 prévoit que les zones de protection et de surveillance établies par l'autorité compétente des États membres concernés conformément à la directive 2005/94/CE comprennent au moins les zones de protection et de surveillance énumérées dans son annexe.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Office
    18.6.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union L 218/41 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2021/989 of 17 June 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2021) 4257) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (1), and in particular Article 259(1), point (c) thereof, Whereas: (1) Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an infectious viral disease in birds and may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries. HPAI viruses can infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations. Therefore, the presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or captive birds are kept. In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or captive birds are kept. (2) Regulation (EU) 2016/429 establishes a new legislative framework for the prevention and control of diseases that are transmissible to animals or humans.
    [Show full text]
  • B COMMISSION DECISION of 30 October 2007 Laying
    2007D0716 — EN — 01.11.2008 — 004.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B COMMISSION DECISION of 30 October 2007 laying down transitional measures for structural requirements of certain establishments in the meat and milk sectors in Bulgaria provided for in Regulations (EC) No 852/2004 and (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C(2007) 5238) (Text with EEA relevance) (2007/716/EC) (OJ L 289, 7.11.2007, p. 14) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Decision 2008/290/EC of 4 April 2008 L 96 35 9.4.2008 ►M2 Commission Decision 2008/330/EC of 22 April 2008 L 114 94 26.4.2008 ►M3 Commission Decision 2008/552/EC of 24 June 2008 L 178 43 5.7.2008 ►M4 Commission Decision 2008/678/EC of 13 August 2008 L 221 32 19.8.2008 ►M5 Commission Decision 2008/828/EC of 22 October 2008 L 294 11 1.11.2008 2007D0716 — EN — 01.11.2008 — 004.001 — 2 ▼B COMMISSION DECISION of 30 October 2007 laying down transitional measures for structural requirements of certain establishments in the meat and milk sectors in Bulgaria provided for in Regulations (EC) No 852/2004 and (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C(2007) 5238) (Text with EEA relevance) (2007/716/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, and in particular
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Office
    7.6.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union L 199 I/1 II (Non-legislative acts) DECISIONS COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2021/906 of 3 June 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2021) 4096) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (1), and in particular Article 259(1), point (c) thereof, Whereas: (1) Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an infectious viral disease in birds and may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries. HPAI viruses can infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations. Therefore, the presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into holdings where poultry or captive birds are kept. In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or captive birds are kept. (2) Regulation (EU) 2016/429 establishes a new legislative framework for the prevention and control of diseases that are transmissible to animals or humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council Of
    Country Report COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE DUNJA MIJATOVIĆ REPORT FOLLOWING HER VISIT TO BULGARIA FROM 25 TO 29 NOVEMBER 2019 Strasbourg, 31 March 2020 CommDH(2020)8 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 6 1 RACISM, INTOLERANCE AND DISCRIMINATION ......................................................................................... 6 1.1 Intolerance and hate speech towards minorities ................................................................................... 6 1.2 Societal hostility and institutional discrimination against Roma, with a focus on the right to housing .. 8 1.3 The right to freedom of association of persons identifying as ethnic Macedonians ............................. 11 1.4 The authorities’ response to racism, intolerance and discrimination ................................................... 11 1.4.1 Institutional, legal and policy framework ...........................................................................................11 1.4.2 The authorities’ response to hate crime and hate speech .................................................................13 1.4.3 The Equality Body (Commission for Protection against Discrimination) and the Ombudsman..........13 1.5 Conclusions and recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Activity Report 2016
    Activity Report COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE DUNJA MIJATOVIĆ ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2019 Presented to the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly Strasbourg, 21 April 2020 CommDH(2020)7 CommDH(2020)7 Content Foreword ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 Country Work ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Visits ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Missions ................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3 Continuous dialogue ........................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.1 Reports from the 2018 visits ............................................................................................................ 13 1.3.2 Letters .................................................................................................................................................... 14 2 Thematic
    [Show full text]