View of Location# I at Phonolite Hill

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

View of Location# I at Phonolite Hill ABSTRACT Phonolite Hill is a late Miocene volcanic center that is composed of at least six vents (three are still visible), which ejected clast-rich pyroclastic material. These eruptions were followed by the intrusion of a rhyolite dome, which is the topographic feature that Phonolite Hill is named for today. Previous work showed the important relationship between timing of eruptions at Phonolite Hill and initiation of Basin and Range extension in the High Plateaus of southern Utah. The volcanology of this area is also important in understanding the evolution of small-silicic volcanic centers, and the relationship of these centers to actively extending regions. The pyroclastic deposits, which are adjacent to the rhyolite dome, give information about the eruptive and depositional processes that were once active at Phonolite Hill. The margin of the rhyolite dome shows a variety of contact relationships with the pyroclastic units, and demonstrates significant interaction between solidified magma and country rock, with the formation of mixed breccia zones. This margin provides information on the mechanism of intrusion and the interactions that took place between the rhyolite and the pyroclastic rocks. The lithologies and bedding structures, in particular base surge deposits, visible within these rocks indicate the presence of groundwater, which was interacting with ii magma during the eruptive process. The groundwater fueled phreatomagmatic eruptions that formed tuff cones and possible tuff rings around the six volcanic vents. The abundant lithic fragments found in the pyroclastic beds provide information about the pre-emptive stratigraphy that was present at Phonolite Hill. These clasts were analyzed geochemically and compared with known volcanic deposits in the Marysvale volcanic field. Clasts indicate the former presence of distinctive ash-flow tuffs as well as clasts comparable to known rock units. The 9.00 Ma age of a vesicular basalt mega-clast on the northern side of Phonolite Hill indicates the presence of a basalt lava flow at the bottom of Kingston Canyon 9 million years ago. This implies that Kingston Canyon had already been formed by that time. Kingston Canyon was cut during uplift of the Sevier Plateau, than the Sevier Plateau and must, therefore, have been uplifted by 9 Ma. iii Figure I. I: Map showing the four major physiographic provinces in Utah. This study focuses on the Colorado Plateau Transition Zone. Actual location of this study, Kingston Canyon, is shown by the X. 2 112'15' 112'00' 111°45' Awa pa Plateau legend 0l • Trp - Rhyolite of Phonolite Hill • Trd - Rhyodacite of Dry Lake • Trf - Rhyolite of Forshea Mountain Aquarius Plateau 0 5 10 kilometers 38'00'._______________ _.__L..- _______________, 3°'0 00' 112'15' 112'00' 111°45' ift1 c"4W....___.11'-"3W'-'---''"'-12W:.:..;..._~ 42 ....... ,. 41N _____ 40N Figure 1.2: Map of late-Miocene, silicic, volcanic deposits found in Kingston Canyon. All three volcanic centers are located on the Sevier Plateau, however, the 39N Rhyolite of Phonolite Hill is the only center within Location of Kingston Canyon. From Rowley (1981). • ' larger map 38> 38N 5 Figure 2.1: Map of the High Plateaus region of southern Utah. The High Plateaus are part of the Colorado Plateau Transition Zone, and record evidence of late stage Basin and Range extension (<10 Ma). One of the major features in the High Plateaus is the Marysvale volcanic field, which is shown above outlined in black. Modified from Rowley (1994). 8 MONTANA WYOMING COLORADO ARIZONA NEW MEXICO Figure 2.2: Map showing southward sweep of the • Challis Magmatic Belt (53 - 43 Ma) four major mid-Cenozoic magmatic belts of the Tuscarora Magmatic Belt (43 - 37 Ma) western United States. From Christiansen and Sierra-Wasatch Magmatic Belt I (37 - 34 Ma) Yeats (1992) Sierra-Wasatch Magmatic Belt II (34 - 21 Ma) 12 110" 100 200 300 km Montana Oregon 45 Wyoming Utah Arizona 3S 110 · 35' 0 10 20 )0 Figure 2.3 : Map showing the extent and orientation of major Basin and Range faults in the western United States. From Christiansen and Yeats ( 1992). Cross-section at 39.5 from Wannamaker et al (200 I). 14 Stratigraphy of the Marysvale Volcanic Field AGE SEQUENCE IGREAT BASIN I MARYSVALE VOLCANIC FIELD AND VICINITY 0 PLEISTOCENE 1.8 PLIOCENE 5 5.3 Localbasalt Sevier River Formatlon Local high-silica and other basin-fill r11yollle sedime tary rocks 10 15 MIOCENE 20 lava 5 0 onroe eak Calder Quichapa 23.0 Group Osiris Tuff U ana eak OW Turt' Member N~ W 25 O...Jcnu Q) u 0 f,r!innl~ Tulf Z;2:JZ u Mtrnh~ Albinus Can on W...JOW Q) c: r Uo<{UJ:J .s Q) lsorn Fm. 'jij 0­ nree ree 5 UJ'ZO "<lJ Tuff Member ...JUt?UJ ""<p Ki"'iJMnnI':.t'1)"M o...J-cn '" TLJII'M.mbef OLIGOCENE E! ~ 00<{ (0'.0:; _U Ua. Needle$Range ~ Group Q;" BullionCanyonVolcanics 30 and RetRted Unlta 33.9 35 Brian Head Forma tion and related units ? EOCENE 40 Claron Formation 45....L----....L------l.----'--------l.-----------------------' Figure 2.4: Stratigraphy of the Marysvale volcanic field and adjacent areas. Modified from Rowley (1994) 16 Stratigraphy of Kingston Canyon AGE SEQUENCE I STRATIGRAPHY I o PLEISTOCENE -1.8- Sevier River PLIOCENE Formation I-- 5 --5.3- I li nYO I ~t ~~ nl tt A = Hill 'iij3~8 I l2aai II"UIYOIIWAO '> -5,25- Loca l 0°(/) tn-"'51 8a,s. of -Z~ 1---- KillgSlons:;:::::> Basalt 2~Ow C 8f1yOI'l Flows 10 - O>-W O ZO:::ZZ 1""Yoo , ~P~. .'> w~Qw O~--l~ O:::W~a r----- W~OW o..-O(/) 0..0::2: ~W- 1----- (/)lll r--- 15 - MIOCENE UiS<- .gai . c.::3 ' Potassium -rich ~~ Basaltic Rocks '8 ~ " - '" '" 20 ~~ ; '" --Osiris--- Tuff--- 1---23.0- 0 OW 1----::- Mount Dutton N?; W Formation 25 - O--l(/)O AntImoo TuftMeO'lDer z~~z IllJS~, ~~C~~,y on w--l0w ) 0<X:w~ w . z o e --lOC)w '" c . Needles Range o--l-(/) .:.=c '"=' OLIGOCENE o~ Group -0 ~~ ~ ->'"0'" 30 - c..>Q."' ..2 '" 1---33.9- 1---- 35 - Claron >- oO:::w Formation o:::o~o wNZ z ~ow~ EOCENE OZ~a --lWCiw 40 - ow(/) (/) 45 Figure 2.5: Stratigraphy ofKingston Canyton, Utah. Modified from Rowley (1994) . 17 ) ·;;;;=····· ·· · ·· ······· ·~ - I r -1 ~ " .~ - ~--, l ./ .t............ ( \ ' ---.. -"·-·-····--...,_ ........ ·•··· ... Z£ ) ············ ..... "" ' ............ Figure 4.2 Continued b: Location #6 Unit Lithology , \ ~ - I ...... a: Location #1 Unit Lithology Structures Lithofacies 210 ft :~~i 'f: i i'.; ; :;~~~ :;;r 151 13 ·•97' A 50' B, C 180 ft 11~1~\j.~ii!i :;~ i'.: :l i;:~·( i1 1:. ii:~ it·~ i 240 ft 150 ft 14 22' B, C 1:~:~:~:1- ·~ 12 ' ':~, :;+·:~~;:. y=~i ~'? B, C 13 .. .. .. .. .. 5' B 210 ft 120 ft 11 B, C 12 37 B, C, D 180 ft r.;~![!~i~ril ·. .- ... ·.;:::.·. ·. :: 22' B, C 90 ft ;::!!~!!' : ~!'\:~:! 11 1.·~.i'~i>ji~\J!· 10 60 ft 9 !:;),;_~ B, C 8 .iit.. \ i1f 7 B, C 6 l-<'.:/'':.\{.:: ··.:.. ·.:::::.:- B. C 5 30 ft B, C 4 i~f&:11' ,\!~il~ 3 2 1 B, C, D 1 1r~r~:~i 1~~.ii 0 ft B, C 3 h;/;:;;·,'~ <:::: : ~:.. \'J 2 B, D .;,. ... :.-:.·:.· :.· \ 0 ft Continued 35 Figure 4.2 Continued c: Location #16 Stratigraphic Symbols 120 ft -, Unit Lithology Structures Lithofacies A: Mega-clast & tuff \ ~ ~.::~ ~ ~.~:~ ~ ~.~:~ ~ ~-~:~ ~ ~-~:~ ~ . breccia .. 8 9 ~n~nnnmim 15' B: Massive lapilli tuff,& lapillistone ... C· Planar-bedded tuff, lapilli tuff, · & lapillistone p' • 0 26' B, C D: Cross-bedded lapilli tuff ~ ~;f!,ti~!i!~i I. ·-· - • -• 90 ft 8 Fine grained tuff and lapilli p ·o· ,•, . EZ2J tu ff . .~ .. ~ ... , ' 7 l·:: :-:_,_,;:::.,;_,_,_... ,.:, 4' 8 c l ;)~;( ;~:;~;~:j Medium to coarse grained :.:_:~{:>\A:Hf~ -. lapilli tuff [WJ.J Tuff breccia 60 ft 6 :~,'i'~[\i!J! 29' 8, C .. D Rhyolite breccia ::;: -~·:::;:_:·{:·.-:~·;. :.-·::·~: ~~ ~ ~', Rhyolite 5 (')/i:\(.// 6' 8 ~ Cross-bedding 14' B, C 30 ft 4 \it@,~'''~:·';. Planar-bedding . ___,..._ Ballistic clasts/sag pits 3 t·\: :'(! .:~\·\/: 6' 8 Grey obsidian rich-bed • 8 2 rAf'ii,:·rm;·') • 15' : • Angular polymict clasts Mud cracks . :·.·_:.:.:::·:: . 0 ft 1 3' 8 ~ Channel fill deposits 4.2.2 Location #6 (Southwest Side of Phonolite Hill) The lower pot1ion of Location #6 (Figure 4.7) probably overlaps with the upper portion of Location #1 (~20-40 ' overlap), although beds cannot be traced between the two. The beds at this location are quite similar to those seen at Location # 1. There the degree of induration is much greater, and the surface has weathered to a light brown, which makes structures much less obvious than those seen at Location #1. The rocks consist of light brown, lithified, and poorly ~orted lapilli tuff, lapillistone, and tuff 36 Figure 4.3: View of Location# I at Phonolite Hill. The bedded pyroclastic sequences are dipping into the hill. This is the location of stratigraphic column A in figure 4.2. View is to the northwest. Figure 4.4: Photo of anti-dune structure at Location # I. Beds thin drastically as they are traced right across the photo and over the crest of the dune. Crest is at arrow. Flow direction is Hammer for scale. l 37 ~ Ballistic Cl~ · Figure 4.5: Ballistic and entrained clasts within the pyroclastic deposit at Location # 1. Pencil and field notebook for scale Figure 4.6: Small-scale faulting, and offset of laminer beds within the pyroclastic deposits at Location# I. Hammer handle for scale. l 38 Figure 4.7: Photo showing the outrop of Location #6. Location includes light colored deposits on the left side of photo (left ofred line), as well as the tree covered deposits in the center of the photo (right of red line). Figure 4.8, shows a close up photo of the contact between the the light and tree covered units.
Recommended publications
  • Hydrothermal Uranium Deposits Containing Molybdenum and Fluorite in the Marysvale Volcanic Field, West-Central Utah
    Mineralium Deposita (199K) 33 : 4774'14 ( . srl'lllt!~r-V~rlag 199X ARTICLE C. G. Cunningham' J. D. Rasmussen' T. A. Stcycn R. O. Rye' P. D. Rowley S. B. Romberger' J. Selverstone Hydrothermal uranium deposits containing molybdenum and fluorite in the Marysvale volcanic field, west-central Utah Received: 23 June 1997 I Accepted: 15 October 1997 Abstract Uranium deposits containing molybdenum \9-1 ~ Ma in a I km2 area. above a cupola of a com­ and fluorite occur in the Central Mining Area. near posite, recurrent. magma chamber at least 24 x 5 km Marysvale, Utah. and formed in an epithermal vein across that fed a sequence of 21- to 14-Ma hypabyssal system that is part of a volcanic/hypabyssal complex. granitic stocks. rhyolite lava flows. ash-flow tuffs. and They represent a known. but uncommon. type of de­ volcanic domes. Formation of the Central Mining Area posit; relative to other commonly described volcanic­ began when the intrusion of a rhyolite stock. and re­ related uranium deposits. they are young. well-exposed lated molybdenite-bearing, uranium-rich. glassy rhyolite and well-documented. Hydrothermal uranium-bearing dikes, lifted the fractured roof above the stock. A quartz and fluorite veins are exposed over a 300 m breccia pipe formed and relieved magmatic pressures. vertical range in the mines. Molybdenum. as jordisite and as blocks of the fractured roof began to settle back (amorphous MoS2), together with fluorite and pyrite, in place, flat-lying, concave-downward. "pull-apart" increase with depth. and uranium decreases with depth. fractures were formed. Uranium-bearing, quartz and The veins cut 23-Ma quartz monzonite, 20-Ma granite.
    [Show full text]
  • Detrital Zircon U-Pb Provenance of the Colorado River: a 5 M.Y
    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: CRevolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River System II GEOSPHERE Detrital zircon U-Pb provenance of the Colorado River: A 5 m.y. record of incision into cover strata overlying the GEOSPHERE; v. 11, no. 6 doi:10.1130/GES00982.1 Colorado Plateau and adjacent regions David L. Kimbrough1, Marty Grove2, George E. Gehrels3, Rebecca J. Dorsey4, Keith A. Howard5, Oscar Lovera6, Andres Aslan7, P. Kyle House8, 19 figures; 5 tables; 1 supplemental file and Philip A. Pearthree9 1Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, California 92182, USA CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] 2School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Building 320, Stanford, California 94305, USA 3Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA CITATION: Kimbrough, D.L., Grove, M., Gehrels, 4Department of Geological Sciences, 1272 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1272, USA G.E., Dorsey, R.J., Howard, K.A., Lovera, O., Aslan, 5U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025-3591, USA A., House, P.K., and Pearthree, P.A., 2015, Detrital 6Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 595 Charles Young Drive East, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA zircon U-Pb provenance of the Colorado River: A 7Colorado Mesa University, 1100 North Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, USA 5 m.y. record of incision into cover strata overlying the 8U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA Colorado Plateau and adjacent regions: Geosphere, 9Arizona Geological Survey, 416 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Geologic Map of the Southwestern Quarter of the Beaver 30' X 60' Quadrangle Utah Department of Natural Resources
    Plate 1 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Utah Geological Survey Open-File Report 686DM a division of Interim Geologic Map of the Southwestern Quarter of the Beaver 30' x 60' Quadrangle Utah Department of Natural Resources 113°00'00" 112°52'30" 112°45'00" 112°37'30" 112°30'00" b E E E E E ! ! E ! E ! E E ! ! E E ! ! ! ! F ! E ! 38°15'00" ! ! 38°15'00" ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tm (Ticl) QTs Qms *c ! Qal1 1 Ppk ! Qat ! Tm (Jn) E QTs Qal1 ! Qaf1 Qaf3 Tm (Tdv) Qat1 ! E ! E Qal1 Tm (Tlk) ! Pt M Tm (Tdv) ! Qaf ! E E 4 ! Qaf2 ! Qat1 E Qms A ! ! E ! E ! Qal1 Tm ! ! R ! Qal1 ! ! Tm ! E ! ! Qat1 ! Qaf1 31 K ! ! ! ! ! ! ^m ! ! A ! Pp ! 1 ! ! Qat ! (Tda) G ! ! ! ! ! (Tdv) ! E ! E ! E ! U ! ! ! E 1 E ! ! Qat ! ! ! N ! ! Tm (Tdv) ! ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! T ! ! QTs ! ! Qat2 2 ! Qaf ! ! Tm ! E E ! ! Qaf2 Tm (Tdv) ! ! ! Qaf1 Qat1 ! ! ! Tm (Tlk) ! E E ! ! E Tm (Ticl) ! ! Qat1 ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! (Tda) b ! Qat1 ! E ! ! Qaf3 ! ! ! Qaf1 ! ! E ! 7 ! E ! E ! ! ! ! Qaf3 Pt E 1 ! ! Qaf ! ! Tm (Tin) Tb Qat2 ! ! ! ! ^cm ! ! E E 1 ! ! ! Qaf ! Qaf2 Qaf3 ! ! ! E Qaf3 ! E ! Tm (Tlk) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ppk E ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E 3 ! Qaf E Qaf3 ! ! 1 ! E Qaf ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! Qaf1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tm (Tlb) ! ! ! ! ! E ! Tm (Tdb) ! ! ! ! E Tm ! ! ! E Qaf2 ! E ! ! Tm (Tda) E ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! Qaf Pq ! E ! ! ! E E ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tm (Tdv) E Qaf3 ! ! ! (Tin) ! Qaf2 ! ! ! E ! E ! Qaf2 E ! ! ! ! ! ! Qaf2 ! Tm (Tdv) ! ! ! ! ! E ! ! ! Tm E ! ! Qat1 ! ! Tm (Tdv) ! Qaf1 ! ! E ! ! ! ! E ! E ! Qal ! 2 ! ! ! E E! ! Tm (Tda) ! ! ! ! ! Tm (Tdv) ! ! ! ! ! ! E E E ! ! E ! ! ! ! Tm (Tdv) ! !
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial to John J. Anderson 1930–2017 PETER D
    Memorial to John J. Anderson 1930–2017 PETER D. ROWLEY Geologic Mapping Inc., New Harmony, Utah 84757, USA HARRY F. FILKORN Pierce College, Woodland Hills, California 91371, USA PETER L. LASSEN Architect, Los Angeles, California 90012, USA JOHN C. SPURNEY Independent Geological Consultant, Kent, Ohio 44240, USA John J. (Jerome) Anderson died on 30 October 2017, at his home in Seattle, Washington, from heart failure. He is survived by his wife, Linda Jones Anderson, his daughters, Janet Eulalia Anderson and Kathryn Anderson Wellen, and his grandchil- dren, Mary Hadley Simmons, Anneke Roos Wellen, and Lydia Jasmijn Wellen. John was predeceased by his older brother, Poul Anderson, a prolific author of science-fiction books. Linda was the love of John’s life, and she and their two daughters were the source of a happy marriage and family, of whom he never ceased boasting. John met Linda Jones during his first season (1963) of field work (mapping) on his Ph.D. dissertation, when in a major stroke of luck he needed a bar of soap and happened into Bulloch’s Drug Store in Cedar City, Utah, where Linda Jones, then a coed at the University of Utah, had a summer job. They married on 25 July 1964. John was born in Port Arthur, Texas, on 10 October 1930, to Astrid and Anthon William (Will) Anderson. Astrid Hertz had emigrated from Denmark, whereas Will was born in Pennsylvania but educated in Denmark; they were married in Port Arthur. Will died in an auto accident in Port Arthur, and widow Astrid W. Anderson and her two children moved to Northfield, Minnesota, to be near her brother Jakob Hertz, who lived there.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Belknap and Red Hills Marysvale Volcanic Field
    Mount Belknap and Red Hills Calderas and Associated Rocks, Marysvale Volcanic Field, West-Central Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1468 Mount Belknap and Red Hills Calderas and Associated Rocks, Marysvale Volcanic Field, West-Central Utah By C. G. CUNNINGHAM and T.A. STEVEN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1468 Description of the rocks, eruptive history, and inferred subvolcanic environment associated with the formation of the J1ount Belknap and Red Hills calderas UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cunningham, C. G. Mount Belknap and Red Hills calderas and associated rocks, Marysvale volcanic field, west-central Utah. (Geological Survey Bulletin 1468) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1468 1. Calderas-Utah-Marysvale region. 2. Volcanic ash, tuff, etc.-Utah-Marysvale region. I. Steven, Thomas August, 191 7-joint author. II. Title. III. Series: United States Geological Survey Bulletin 1468 QE75.B9 No. 1468 ( QE461] 557.3'08s 78-21191 [551.2'1'0979246) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock No. 024-001-03175-2 CONTENTS Page Abstract_ 1 Introduction _________ _ 2 Acknowledgments_ 4 Geologic setting __________ _ 4 Mount Belknap Volcanics ____ _ 6 Outflow facies ___________________ _ 7 Lower heterogeneous member _ 7 Joe Lott 'iliff Member 9 Red Hills 'fuff Member 11 Crystal-rich tuff member
    [Show full text]
  • Application to Neogene Bimodal Igneous Rocks and Mineral Resources in the Great Basin
    Development of an igneous rock database with geologic functions: Application to Neogene bimodal igneous rocks and mineral resources in the Great Basin Douglas B. Yager1*, Albert H. Hofstra1*, Katheryn Fifarek2*, and Ank Webbers3* 1Central Mineral and Environmental Resources Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, Box 25046, MS 973, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA 2Department of Geology, Mailcode 4324, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA 3516 Orchard Way, Louisville, Colorado 80027, USA ABSTRACT and various subsamples. Absolute radiomet- INTRODUCTION ric age determinations on samples from geo- Geologists routinely use sample data logic features and expert interpretations of Now that GIS is fully implemented for (descriptive, qualitative, quantitative) to relative age relationships between different Windows-based software platforms on personal characterize a hierarchy of larger geologic features may be captured and used together computers and has interoperability with rela- features that each have their own indepen- to constrain the ages of undated features. tional databases, a new realm for data investiga- dent attributes, use physical relationships Such age information is linked to features tion, display, and analysis is available to earth between geologic features to establish their of various scales in the hierarchy. Common scientists. GIS enables data to be input, man- relative ages, combine this information with attributes that are shared between the rela- aged (in a database management
    [Show full text]
  • West-Central Utah AVAILABILITY of BOOKS and MAPS of the U.S
    Isotopic Ages and Stratigraphy of Cenozoic Rocks of the Marysvale Volcanic Field and Adjacent Areas, West-Central Utah AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications re­ leased prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may no longer be available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices listed below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from • ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE ▲ the California Arc: Thick Granitic Batholiths, Eclogitic Residues, Lithospheric-Scale Thrusting, and Magmatic Flare-Ups, P
    Vol. 11, No. 11 A Publication of the Geological Society of America November 2001 INSIDE ▲ The California Arc: Thick Granitic Batholiths, Eclogitic Residues, Lithospheric-Scale Thrusting, and Magmatic Flare-Ups, p. 4 Mihai Ducea Rocky Mountain Section Meeting, p. 14 Cordilleran Section Meeting, p. 16 COLORADO CONVENTION CENTER IMPORTANT DATES FIELD TRIP CO-CHAIRS Mid-November Pardee Keynote Symposia and Eric A. Erslev Topical Session proposal forms (970) 491-5661 available at www.geosociety.org fax 970-491-6307 December 3, 2001 Short Course proposals due [email protected] January 17, 2002 Keynote and Topical Session proposals due Jerry Magloughlin April 2002 Call for Papers in April issue of (970) 491-1812 GSA Today fax 970-491-6307 June 2002 Registration and housing infor- [email protected] mation in June issue of GSA Today HOT TOPICS CHAIR July 16, 2002 Abstracts due Steve Getty (710) 389-6512 Field Trip proposals are still being accepted. fax 719-389-6910 Exhibit Space is available. Call Brenda Martinez [email protected] at 1-800-472-1988 for an Exhibitor Prospectus. GSA TECHNICAL PROGRAM OFFICER Nancy Carlson For more information, contact: (303) 357-1061 [email protected] TECHNICAL PROGRAM CHAIR John W. Geissman GSA SHORT COURSE PROGRAM OFFICER (505) 277-3433 Edna Collis fax 505-277-8843 (303) 357-1034 [email protected] [email protected] For More Information (303) 447-2020 " 1-800-472-1988 " fax 303-357-1070 [email protected] " www.geosociety.org Contents GSA TODAY (ISSN 1052-5173) is published monthly by The Geological Vol. 11, No. 11 November 2001 Society of America, Inc., with offices at 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Oligocene Caldera Complex and Calc-Alkaline Tuffs and Lavas of the Indian Peak Volcanic Field, Nevada and Utah
    Oligocene caldera complex and calc-alkaline tuffs and lavas of the Indian Peak volcanic field, Nevada and Utah MYRON G. BEST US. Geological Survey and Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 ERIC H. CHRISTIANSEN Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 RICHARD H. BLANK, JR. US. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 ABSTRACT eruptive sequence consists of several cooling subject of recent controversy (Whitney and units of trachydacite tuff containing small to Stormer, 1985; Johnson and Rutherford, 1989; The Indian Peak volcanic field is represen- modest amounts of plagioclase and two Grunder and Boden, 1987). tative of the more than 50,000 km3 of ash- pyroxenes. Compared to contemporaneous volcanic flow tuff and tens of calderas in the Great These dominantly high-K calc-alkaline fields around the Colorado Plateaus to the east Basin that formed during the Oligocene-early rocks are a record of the biih, maturation, (Fig. l), the -10,000 km3 of ash-flow deposits Miocene "ignimbrite flareup" in southwest- and death of a large, open, continental in the Indian Peak volcanic field is an order of ern North America. The field formed about magma system that was probably initiated magnitude greater than in the Marysvale field 32 to 27 Ma in the southeastern Great Basin and sustained by influx of mafic magma de- (Steven and others, 1984) but similar to that of and consists of the centrally positioned Indi rived from a southward-migrating locus of the San Juan (Steven and Lipman, 1976) and Peak caldera complex and a surrounding magma production in the mantle.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERIM GEOLOGIC MAP of the NORTHWESTERN QUARTER of the BEAVER 30' X 60' QUADRANGLE, BEAVER and PIUTE COUNTIES, UTAH
    Utah Geological Survey Plate 1 a division of Utah Geological Survey Open-File Report 729DM Interim Geologic Map of the Northwestern Quarter of the Beaver 30' x 60' Quadrangle Utah Department of Natural Resources 113˚00' 112˚30' 38˚30' E MB Qal1 Qlae Xg Qs QTs SB 38˚30' Qaf3 Tm(Tbct) To Qaf2 QTs Trg Qaf1 SB E Tir Tm(To) Qms Tig To Tmj Qms Qaf3 Tig Qal1 Qaf1 QTs Tm(Tbc) Qafy Tig Qafy Qafo E Qs E E E Qaf1 E Qbr Qafy E Tic Tm SB E E Tm G (To) SB Tbct E E (Tbcd) G E — Tm G Qbk Qaf1 E E E Qs Tbc Qaf2 Tm(Tbc) (Tbc) E Trg Tbc E Tm Qafo SB Tm SB E Tic E E E Tic E (To) (Tbc) Qms Qaf3 Tm SB MNR ILE VILL MINERS E (Tbc) Tig QTs Trg QTs E E E Tm E (Tbc) Tbc E E Tm Tig Qrl (To) Tm(Tbc) G SB G E E Qms Xg E E QTs Tic MB Tmb Qaf1 E Tm Tmb Qes E (Tbcd) E E Tm(Tbc) Qms E E Tm(Tbc) Tm Tbc MB E SB (Tbc) Xg Qlae Tic E SB E Tbc Tm Tm(Tbcd) Tm(Tbc) E E QTs RL F To Qaf (Tbc) E E SB E 3 E Tbc E E E EE Tm(Tbc) Tm Qms E (Tbcd) SB MB E Tm(Tbcd) Tic Tig — E E Tbc Qs Qs E E SB Tig E Tmb Qaf2 Tig Tmv E QTs Tig Qbk Pq 32 Qll Tm(Tbcd) Qlg b E Qms QTs E E Qafy E Qaf3 Qrt Qms Qafy Tm(Tbcd) Qs Xg E E E Qafo E Qms E Tic E E FAUL T E E E Tbc E E QTs QTs Tic QTs E Tm(Tbcd) Tmv Trg b E Tbc Tmv Qlg Qaf1 — Trg 15 E E Pq QTs b Xg E Tig Qrd — — Tm(Tbc) 25 Qms E QTs — E Tic E E Tbc w Tig Qrt E Qaf1 E E E — E MB E Xg Qrd E E Qrl Qaf2 QTs Tmbl EE EE Qaf2 E E Qrt — E Pzc Qaf4 E Pq E E E E E E E E E Qrd Qaf Tbc Qaf2 1 — E QTs Tm(Tbc) E Qaf2 E QTs S B E Tir QTs Xg MB Qbk E Tmb E E Qaf2 Qaf2 Xg E Qal1 E Qaf1 Xg Trg Tir Tir Tic Qaf Qal1 Pzc 2 Qlg Tig E Xg Pq E Qaf Tmb Qms Tmv E 4 Tir Qaf
    [Show full text]
  • Five Tectonic Settings in Five National Parks and Forests: a Field Camp Experience
    The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon Volume 86 Issue 2 Article 2 10-13-2014 Five Tectonic Settings in Five National Parks and Forests: A Field Camp Experience Spencer Francisco Southern Utah University, [email protected] John S. MacLean Southern Utah University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/compass Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Francisco, Spencer and MacLean, John S. (2014) "Five Tectonic Settings in Five National Parks and Forests: A Field Camp Experience," The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon: Vol. 86: Iss. 2, Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/compass/vol86/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Compass: Earth Science Journal of Sigma Gamma Epsilon by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Five Tectonic Settings in Five National Parks and Forests: A Field Camp Experience Spencer Francisco1 and John S. MacLean2 Southern Utah University 351 West University Boulevard Cedar City, UT 84720 USA [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT In summer 2014, Southern Utah University’s field camp visited five national parks and forests to study five different tectonic settings in five weeks. These included: thick-skinned contraction of the Laramide Orogeny at Capitol Reef National Park; normal faulting due to salt tectonics of the Paradox Formation at Arches National Park; thin-skinned folding and thrusting of the Sevier Orogeny at Fish Lake National Forest and Kolob Canyon of Zion National Park; foreland sedimentary transitions in the Book’s Cliffs areas of Utah; thrusting and conjugate fracture development due to the gravitational collapse of the Marysvale volcanic field at Bryce Canyon National Park; and a metamorphic core complex at Great Basin National Park and Hendry’s Creek in the Northern Snake Range of Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyroclastic Geology of the Johnson Valley Reservoir Andesite Grant
    Pyroclastic Geology of the Johnson Valley Reservoir Andesite Grant Rozier Senior Integrative Exercise March 10, 2006 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree from Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota Pyroclastic Geology of the Johnson Valley Reservoir Andesite Grant Rozier Senior Integrative Exercise March 10, 2006 Advisors: Charles M. Bailey, William and Mary Cameron Davidson, Carleton College Abstract The oldest volcanic unit exposed on the Fish Lake Plateau is the porphyritic, phenocryst-rich andesite of the Johnson Valley Reservoir. This unit is a homogeneous, 250-m-thick accumulation of densely welded, vesicle-poor pyroclastic flow deposits, unconformably overlying the Paleocene Flagstaff Limestone, and thinning to the southeast. The bulk composition is an intermediate alkali-rich andesite. The dominant phenocryst is plagioclase (andesine). Other phenocryst types are: clinopyroxene, titanomagnetite, olivine (sometimes altered to iddingsite), ilmenite and apatite. Chemical data relates the J.V.R. andesite to other nearby alkali-rich volcanic rocks. Keywords Utah, Oligocene, Plateaus, Pyroclastic flows, Calc-alkalic Table of Contents: Abstract Introduction 1 Literature Review 3 Physiography of the Study Area 6 Methods 8 Geologic Mapping 8 Petrography 8 Whole Rock Geochemistry 8 S.E.M. 9 Results 9 Stratigraphic Column of the Fish Lake USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle 9 Geologic Map 10 Petrography 10 Whole Rock Geochemistry 13 S.E.M. 13 Discussion 19 Emplacement Mechanism 19 Comparisons with nearby Alkaline rocks 22 Conclusion 24 Acknowledgements 24 References Cited 25 1 Introduction The High Plateaus of Utah are located in a zone of transition, southeast to northwest, from the stable craton of the Colorado Plateau and the extensional tectonic setting of the Basin and Range (Fig.
    [Show full text]