DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental and Social Management Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental and Social Management Framework Environmental and Social Management Framework Provision of Essential Health Services Project South Sudan – 2019 Version December 3, 2019 1 | Page Table of Contents Acronyms.........................................................................................................................................................4 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................5 2 Introduction...........................................................................................................................................10 3 Project Description ................................................................................................................................11 3.1 Background Considerations ..........................................................................................................11 3.2 Delivery of High Impact Primary Health Care Services in South Sudan for the Most Vulnerable and Affected Communities........................................................................................................................13 3.3 Delivery of Mental Health and Psycho-Social Support in all ICRC Supported Health Facilities ....13 3.4 Delivery of High Impact Secondary Health Care Services as a Continuum of Care at Community Level 14 3.5 Geographical Setting.....................................................................................................................16 3.6 Contingency Emergency Response Mechanism (CERC)................................................................20 4 Legal and Institutional Framework........................................................................................................20 4.1 Legal International and National Frameworks..............................................................................20 4.1.1 Basel Convention, 1989 ............................................................................................................20 4.1.2 Stockholm Convention, 2001....................................................................................................21 4.1.3 Environment Policy of South Sudan, 2010................................................................................21 4.1.4 Environment Protection Bill of South Sudan, 2010 ..................................................................21 4.1.5 Environmental Protection Act, 2001.........................................................................................21 4.1.6 Environment Health Act, 1975..................................................................................................21 4.1.7 Public Health (Water and Sanitation) Acts of South Sudan, 2008 ............................................21 4.1.8 Policy on Medical Waste Management for South Sudan, 2012 ...............................................22 4.1.9 Guideline on MWM for South Sudan, 2011..............................................................................22 4.2 World Bank Environmental and Social Policies.............................................................................22 4.3 Institutional ICRC Environmental and Social Frameworks............................................................22 4.3.1 Framework for Sustainable Development at the ICRC .............................................................22 4.3.2 ICRC Framework for Environmental Management in Assistance Programs.............................24 4.3.3 Medical Waste Management....................................................................................................24 4.3.4 Acceptance of the ICRC (Social Considerations) and Security Management............................25 4.3.5 Accountability to Affected People Institutional Framework ....................................................27 4.3.6 Guidelines and Information on How to Do Business with ICRC................................................28 4.3.7 Code of Ethics for Purchasing (Goods and Services).................................................................28 4.3.8 General Conditions for Purchasing ...........................................................................................28 4.3.9 Reference of Manufacturing Standards for Relief Items Production .......................................29 4.3.10 Internal ICRC Logistics’ SOP ..................................................................................................29 4.3.11 Rules on Personal Data Protection .......................................................................................29 2 | Page 4.3.12 ICRC’s Approach to Protection .............................................................................................30 4.3.13 Headquarters Agreement.....................................................................................................31 5 Baseline data..........................................................................................................................................31 5.1 Situation Overview........................................................................................................................31 5.2 Problem Analysis...........................................................................................................................32 5.3 Analysis of Alternatives.................................................................................................................33 6 Environmental Risks, Impacts and Mitigation Measures.......................................................................34 6.1 Introduction to Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Risks and Impacts.35 6.2 Summary Table of Main Risks, Mitigating Measures and Indicators............................................36 6.3 Occupational Health and Safety....................................................................................................38 6.4 Community Health and Safety ......................................................................................................38 6.5 Medical Waste Management........................................................................................................39 6.6 Minor Facility Repair and Rehabilitation.......................................................................................41 7 Social Risks and Mitigation Measures....................................................................................................43 7.1 Grievance Redress.........................................................................................................................44 7.2 Stakeholder Consultations ............................................................................................................47 8 Institutional Arrangements of the ESMF ...............................................................................................47 8.1 Stakeholder Engagement and Information Disclosure .................................................................48 8.2 Project-Specific Consultations and Community Engagement.......................................................48 8.3 Contractual Relationship with Hospitals.......................................................................................49 8.4 Staffing and Hiring.........................................................................................................................49 8.5 Staff Training.................................................................................................................................49 8.6 Monitoring and Reporting ............................................................................................................50 9 Annexes .................................................................................................................................................53 9.1 ICRC Code of Conduct ...................................................................................................................53 9.2 ICRC Waste Disposal Methods Impacts and Mitigation Measures...............................................57 9.3 Sample Hospital Medical Waste Area Plan...................................................................................57 9.4 Sample Montfort Incinerator Design for Hospital ........................................................................57 9.5 Geographic scope of the program ................................................................................................58 9.6 Medical Waste Management Manual Checklists..........................................................................58 3 | Page Acronyms AAP Accountability to Affected People CBP Community-based Protection CERC Contingency Emergency Response Mechanism FI Financial Intermediary GBV Gender-based Violence GoSS Government of South Sudan HCiD Healthcare in Danger ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IDMC Internal Displacement Monitoring Center IDP Internally Displaced Person IHL International Humanitarian Law IPC Integrated Food Security Phase Classification MHPSS Mental Health and Psychosocial Support NGO Non-governmental Organization NIIHA Neutral, Impartial, Independent Humanitarian Action OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs OSV Other Situations of Violence PfR Planning for Results PHC Primary Healthcare PMT Planning and Monitoring Tool POM Project Operational Manual PoC Protection of Civilians SA Social Assessment SOP Standard Operating Procedure UNDP United Nations Development Program
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of South Sudan "Establishment Order
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN "ESTABLISHMENT ORDER NUMBER 36/2015 FOR THE CREATION OF 28 STATES" IN THE DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE SYSTEM IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN Order 1 Preliminary Citation, commencement and interpretation 1. This order shall be cited as "the Establishment Order number 36/2015 AD" for the creation of new South Sudan states. 2. The Establishment Order shall come into force in thirty (30) working days from the date of signature by the President of the Republic. 3. Interpretation as per this Order: 3.1. "Establishment Order", means this Republican Order number 36/2015 AD under which the states of South Sudan are created. 3.2. "President" means the President of the Republic of South Sudan 3.3. "States" means the 28 states in the decentralized South Sudan as per the attached Map herewith which are established by this Order. 3.4. "Governor" means a governor of a state, for the time being, who shall be appointed by the President of the Republic until the permanent constitution is promulgated and elections are conducted. 3.5. "State constitution", means constitution of each state promulgated by an appointed state legislative assembly which shall conform to the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011, amended 2015 until the permanent Constitution is promulgated under which the state constitutions shall conform to. 3.6. "State Legislative Assembly", means a legislative body, which for the time being, shall be appointed by the President and the same shall constitute itself into transitional state legislative assembly in the first sitting presided over by the most eldest person amongst the members and elect its speaker and deputy speaker among its members.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 2 USAID South Sudan Gender Based Violence Prevention And
    USAID/SOUTH SUDAN GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND RESPONSE ROADMAP SEPTEMBER 2019 Contract No.: AID-OAA-TO-17-00018 September 26, 2019 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Banyan Global. Contract No.: AID-OAA-TO-17-00018 Submitted to: USAID/South Sudan DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United States Government. Recommended Citation: Gardsbane, Diane and Aluel Atem. USAID/South Sudan Gender-Based Violence Prevention and Response Roadmap. Prepared by Banyan Global. 2019. Cover photo credit: USAID Back Cover photo credit: USAID USAID/SOUTH SUDAN GENDER- BASED VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND RESPONSE ROADMAP SEPTEMBER 2019 Contract No.: AID-OAA-TO-17-00018 4 USAID/SOUTH SUDAN GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND RESPONSE ROADMAP CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 ROADMAP OBJECTIVE 9 1.2 STRUCTURE OF ROADMAP 9 2. INTEGRATING GBV IN THE USAID/SOUTH SUDAN OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK 11 2.1 THEORY OF CHANGE 11 2.2 INTEGRATING THE THEORY OF CHANGE INTO THE USAID/SOUTH SUDAN OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK 12 3. GBV PREVENTION AND RESPONSE ROADMAP PROGRAMMATIC GUIDING PRINCIPLES 19 4. BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER – GBV PREVENTION, MITIGATION AND RESPONSE ROADMAP 27 5. GUIDELINES TO ADDRESS GBV IN MONITORING, EVALUATION AND LEARNING 39 6. KEY RESOURCES 41 ANNEX A: GBV PREVENTION AND RESPONSE ROADMAP LITERATURE REVIEW 57 ANNEX B: PROGRAM AND DONOR REPORT 73 ANNEX C: GBV LITERACY TRAINING 95 ANNEX D: LIST OF KEY DOCUMENTS CONSULTED 99 ANNEX E.
    [Show full text]
  • UNHCR OPERATIONAL UPDATE 01/2017 01-15 January 2017
    UNHCR OPERATIONAL UPDATE 01/2017 01-15 January 2017 HIGHLIGHTS KEY FIGURES Maban IDP assessment undertaken after December Unrest: In Maban, UNHCR, and partners Humanitarian Development Consortium (HDC), WFP and South Sudan Relief and Rehabilitation Commission (RRC) forged a multi-functional team and INSIDE SOUTH SUDAN conducted a rapid need assessment to the areas hosting IDPs. On the riverbank site, the team identified 1,207 households consisting of 6,053 individuals displaced from two different communities from Doro and Tweji living in the open. The team visited the 262,560 second IDP site Haj Stipta which is hosting 348 households consisting of 1,923 Refugees in South Sudan individuals. Main priority findings included food, NFIs, and shelters. UNHCR extends relief support to vulnerable groups in Upper Nile: In 1.853 M Malakal’s Protection of Civilians site (PoC), UNHCR and its partners Humanitarian Development Consortium (HDC) and Danish Refugee Council (DRC) distributed IDPs in South Sudan, including hygiene kits including soaps and towels to 1,360 Persons with Specific Needs (PSNs). 204,370 people in UNMISS UNHCR and its partners HDC and Samaritan’s Purse also distributed NFIs to 2,464 Protection of Civilians site IDPs, including blankets, plastic sheets, mosquito nest, kitchen sets and sleeping mats for the newly displaced population from Tweji. US $172 million UNHCR distributes Fuel-Efficient Stoves to refugees in Unity: In Ajuong Thok, UNHCR distributed 1,500 Fuel Efficient Stoves (FES) to refugee 730 households. These Funding requested for comprehensive stoves will reduce the frequency of firewood collection thereby enabling refugees to do needs in 2017 other domestic duties.
    [Show full text]
  • Vistas) Q3 Fy 2017 Quarterly Report April 1– June 30, 2017
    VIABLE SUPPORT TO TRANSITION AND STABILITY (VISTAS) Q3 FY 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 1– JUNE 30, 2017 JUNE 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by AECOM. VIABLE SUPPORT TO TRANSITION AND STABILITY (VISTAS) Q2 FY 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 1 – JUNE 30, 2017 Contract No. AID-668-C-13-00004 Submitted to: USAID South Sudan Prepared by: AECOM International Development Prepared for: Office of Transition and Conflict Mitigation (OTCM) USAID South Sudan Mission American Embassy Juba, South Sudan DISCLAIMER: The authors’ views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Q3 FY 2017 Quarterly Report | Viable Support to Transition and Stability (VISTAS) i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 1 II. Political And Security Landscape .................................................................................... 2 National Political and Security Landscape ..................................................................................................... 2 Political & Security Landscape in VISTAS Regional Offices ...................................................................... 3 III. Program Strategy.............................................................................................................. 6 IV. Program Highlights ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of South Sudan
    Republic of South Sudan Situation Report #102 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 5 January 2017 Situation Update Cholera outbreaks have been confirmed in 9 (32%) of 28 states countrywide. The affected states include Imatong, Eastern Lakes, Jubek, Terekeka, Jonglei, Western Bieh, Northern Liech, Southern Liech; and Eastern Nile (Table 1 and Figure 1.0). In Southern Liech, one case from Ganyliel was confirmed in week 52 of 2016. Suspect cholera cases were reported in Mayendit and Ayod but were not confirmed (Table 4). Cumulatively 146 (35.7 %) of the samples tested positive for Vibrio Cholerae inaba in the National Public Health Laboratory as of 5 January 2017 (Table 3). Table 1: Summary of cholera cases reported in South Sudan as of 5 January 2017 Highlights in week 52 of 2016: 1. A total of 55 cases reported from Bentiu PoC in week 52 of 2016; compared to 101 cases in week 51 of 2016 (Table 1, Figure 1.1). 2. One cholera case from Ganyliel, Panyijiar confirmed as Vibrio cholerae inaba on 3 Jan 2017 (Table 3). 3. Resurgence of cholera in UN House PoC with 6 cases confirmed in week 52 of 2016 (Table 1 and Table 3). 4. Overall; active transmission is ongoing in Northern Liech and Southern Liech with case resurgence in UN House PoC. In Northern Liech state, 835 cholera cases including 22 confirmed cases and nine deaths (CFR 1.08%) were reported in Bentiu Town/PoC since 29 September 2016. The cholera taskforce, chaired by MoH and constituted by Health and WASH cluster partners is coordinating the response.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp By
    SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES pROjECT PEACE IS THE NAME OF OUR CATTLE-CAMP LOCAL RESPONSES TO CONFLICT IN EASTERN LAKES STATE, SOUTH SUDAN SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES PROJECT Peace is the Name of Our Cattle-Camp Local responses to conflict in Eastern Lakes State, South Sudan JOHN RYLE AND MACHOT AMUOM Authors John Ryle (co-author), Legrand Ramsey Professor of Anthropology at Bard College, New York, was born and educated in the United Kingdom. He is lead researcher on the RVI South Sudan Customary Authorities Project. Machot Amuom Malou (co-author) grew up in Yirol during Sudan’s second civil war. He is a graduate of St. Lawrence University, Uganda, and a member of The Greater Yirol Youth Union that organised the 2010 Yirol Peace Conference. Abraham Mou Magok (research consultant) is a graduate of the Nile Institute of Management Studies in Uganda. Born in Aluakluak, he has worked in local government and the NGO sector in Greater Yirol. Aya piŋ ëë kͻcc ἅ luël toc ku wεl Ɣͻk Ɣͻk kuek jieŋ ku Atuot akec kaŋ thör wal yic Yeŋu ye köc röt nͻk wεt toc ku wal Mith thii nhiar tͻͻŋ ku ran wut pεεc Yin aci pεεc tik riεl Acin ke cam riεlic Kͻcdit nyiar tͻͻŋ Ku cͻk ran nͻk aci yͻk thin Acin ke cam riεlic Wut jiëŋ ci riͻc Wut Atuot ci riͻc Yok Ɣen Apaak ci riͻc Yen ya wutdie Acin kee cam riεlic ëëë I hear people are fighting over grazing land. Cattle don’t fight—neither Jieŋ cattle nor Atuot cattle. Why do we fight in the name of grass? Young men who raid cattle-camps— You won’t get a wife that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Bentiu and Malakal Poc Sites’
    Conflict Sensitivity Analysis: United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) Protection of Civilian (PoC) Sites Transition: Bentiu, Unity State, and Malakal, Upper Nile State Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility March 2021 This Conflict Sensitivity Analysis (CSA) was requested by the Inter-Cluster Coordination Group in October 2020 and examines the conflict sensitivity implications of the transition of UN Protection of Civilian sites in Bentiu, Unity State, and Malakal, Upper Nile State, from sites under the protection of United Nations Mission in South Sudan to camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs) under the jurisdiction of the Government of the Republic of South Sudan. The Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility is intended to support conflict-sensitive aid programming in South Sudan. The Facility is funded by the UK, Swiss, Dutch and Canadian donor missions in South Sudan and is implemented by a consortium of NGOs including Saferworld and swisspeace. Conflict Sensitivity Analysis: Malakal and Bentiu PoC sites Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Overview .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SITREP#109 24Feb 2017Final
    Republic of South Sudan Situation Report #109 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 24 February 2017 Situation Update A total of 13 counties in 9 (28%) of 32 states countrywide have confirmed cholera outbreaks (Table 1; Figure 1.0). The most recent cases were confirmed in Yirol East, Eastern Lakes state on 22 February 2017. Suspect cholera cases have been reported in Malakal Town; Pajatriei Islands, Bor county; Panyagor, Twic East county; and Moldova Islands, Duk county (Table 4). During week 8 of 2017, a total of 4 samples from Yirol East and 2 samples from Mayendit tested positive for cholera (Table 3). Cumulatively, 185 (37.8 %) samples have tested positive for Vibrio Cholerae inaba in the National Public Health Laboratory as of 24 February 2017 (Table 3). Table 1: Summary of cholera cases reported in South Sudan as of 24 February 2017 New New Total cases Total Reporting New deaths Total facility Total cases admissions discharges currently community Total deaths Total cases Sites WK 8 deaths discharged WK 8 WK 8 admitted deaths Jubek – Juba - - - - 8 19 27 2,018 2,045 Jonglei-Duk - - - - 3 5 8 92 100 Jonglei-Bor - 15 - 7 1 3 4 51 62 Terekeka - - - - - 8 8 14 22 Eastern Lakes 12 5 - 5 2 8 10 478 493 - Awerial Eastern Lakes 1 5 - 1 5 12 17 176 194 - Yirol East Imatong - - - - - - 1 1 28 29 Pageri Western Bieh - - - - - 4 - 4 266 270 Fangak Northern Liech - - - - 3 7 2 9 1,144 1,156 Rubkona Southern - - - - 3 - 3 91 94 Liech - Leer Southern Liech - - - - - 17 4 21 435 456 Panyijiar Southern Liech - 2 2 - - - 5 5 214 219 Mayendit Central Upper 5 181 Nile - Pigi 3 2 3 5 173 Total 18 29 - 19 55 67 122 5,180 5,321 Highlights in week 8 of 2017: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Report #99 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 15 December 2016
    Republic of South Sudan Situation Report #99 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 15 December 2016 Situation Update Cholera outbreaks were confirmed in 9 (32%) of 28 states countrywide. The affected states include Imatong, Eastern Lakes, Jubek, Terekeka, Jonglei, Western Bieh, Northern Liech, Southern Liech; and Eastern Nile (Table 1 and Figure 1.0). Suspect cholera cases were reported in Mayendit, Panyijiar, and Ayod (Table 4). Cumulatively 133 (34.2 %) of the samples tested positive for Vibrio Cholerae inaba in the National Public Health Laboratory as of 15 December 2016 (Table 3). Jubek state has recorded 2,006 cholera cases including 27 deaths (CFR 1.35 %). No new cholera case was reported in Jubek State during week 48 of 2016 (Table 1 and Figure 1.1). Active transmission is ongoing in Bentiu PoC where 118 new cases were reported in week 49 of 2016 (Annex 1). Ongoing transmission in the PoC is suspected to be associated with exposure to unsecured water reservoirs that are used for washing, bathing and swimming - largely in sectors 1, 2, and 3. The other factors include open defecation in the buffer zone around the water bodies; poor latrine use & poor inappropriate handing of child feces; and poor solid waste management. Table 1: Summary of cholera cases reported in South Sudan as of 15 December 2016 New New Total cases Total Reporting New deaths Total facility Total Total cases admission discharges currently community Total cases Sites WK 49 deaths deaths discharged s WK 49 WK 49 admitted deaths Jubek – - - - - 8 19 27 1,979
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Newsletter
    SOUTH SUDAN HUMAN RIGHTS MONITOR November 2017 - August 2018 Analysis This report is based on INTRODUCTION the work of internationally trained local monitors on South Sudan has seen widespread human rights abuses and crimes since the conflict broke out in December 2013, two years after its the ground in South Sudan independence. Since the beginning of the conflict, violence has working for a national escalated at an alarming rate across the country, resulting in widespread killings, rapes, extensive property damage and looting of civilian human rights organization. property. Clashes continue to occur despite several peace agreements Both the monitors and the to end the civil war having been signed and sanctions having being organization must remain imposed by international actors. This report analyzes the frequency of serious human rights abuses and crimes against civilians that have anonymous given present been documented by local monitors working anonymously in multiple security concerns. locations around the country. The information reported Despite signing of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement (CHA), which took effect on December 24, 2017, all parties to the conflict have herein meets the threshold violated the CHA on numerous occasions. for initiating an investigation. We believe that there is a Since the beginning of the conflict, violence has reasonable basis to believe escalated at an alarming rate across the country, that the following incidents resulting in widespread killings, rapes, extensive occurred. property damage and looting of civilian property. The most recent peace agreement, signed in September, sets out the return of rebel leader Riek Machar (Machar) to the government as one of the five vice presidents and promises ceasefire.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Report #119 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 5 May 2017
    Reporting period: week 18 (1st -7th May 2017) Republic of South Sudan Situation Report #119 on Cholera in South Sudan As at 23:59 Hours, 5 May 2017 Epidemic trends Cholera confirmed in Kapoeta South after four of six samples tested positive for Vibrio cholerae on 5 May 2017 Table 3. Table 1 summarizes reported cases (confirmed or suspected), admissions and deaths during the current reporting period, and cumulatively, by affected county and state. Currently, 9 (47%) out of 19 counties ever affected (since June 2016) have reported cholera cases in the past 4 reporting periods (weeKs) and are considered to have active transmission Table 1. Table 1: Counties with active transmission (cholera cases in the last four weeks) as at 5 May 2017 Cases reported Inpatient admissions Deaths Cumulative Cumulative to date County or Date first New to date New New State during during Cumulative during site reported (attacK rate reporting reporting to date reporting Facility per 10,000) period period period Community Facility (CFR%)† Jonglei DuK 05-Jul-16 45 40 45 466 0 32 4 0.9 Fashoda Kodok 04-Apr-17 0 5.1 0 30 0 1 3 10.3 FANGAK 10-Aug-17 0 20.5 0 356 0 0 5 1.4 Fangak Ayod 30-Mar-17 2 11.6 2 308 0 38 0 0.0 Awerial 15-Aug-16 33 94.2 33 1126 0 11 2 0.2 Eastern Yirol East 05-Feb-17 117 69 117 917 3 40 16 1.8 Lakes Yirol West 12-Apr-17 12 3.5 12 96 0 0 0 0.0 Central Pigi- canal 10-Oct-16 0 12.2 0 202 0 0 5 2.5 Upper Nile Kapoeta Kapoeta 23-Apr-17 25 2.4 25 28 0 0 0 0.0 South Totals (South Sudan) 234 234 3529 3 122 35 1.0 † Case-fatality ratio (deaths among all cases discharged dead or alive from health facilities).
    [Show full text]
  • Displaced and Immiserated: the Shilluk of Upper Nile in South
    Report September 2019 DISPLACED AND IMMISERATED The Shilluk of Upper Nile in South Sudan’s Civil War, 2014–19 Joshua Craze HSBA DISPLACED AND IMMISERATED The Shilluk of Upper Nile in South Sudan’s Civil War, 2014–19 Joshua Craze HSBA A publication of the Small Arms Survey’s Human Security Baseline Assessment for Sudan and South Sudan project with support from the US Department of State Credits Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 2019 First published in September 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval sys- tem, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Coordinator, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2E 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Rebecca Bradshaw Fact-checker: Natacha Cornaz ([email protected]) Copy-editor: Hannah Austin ([email protected]) Proofreader: Stephanie Huitson ([email protected]) Cartography: Jillian Luff, MAPgrafix (www.mapgrafix.com) Design: Rick Jones ([email protected]) Layout: Frank Benno Junghanns ([email protected]) Cover photo: A man walks through the village of Aburoc, South Sudan, as an Ilyushin Il-76 flies over the village during a food drop as part of a joint WFP–UNICEF Rapid Response Mission on 13 May 2017.
    [Show full text]