Prognosis for U.S. Firms in Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prognosis for U.S. Firms in Europe Prognosis for U.S. Firms in Europe By Ward Bower Ward Bower s we predicted last year, the only move- prospects and selling the deal to the inevitable ment of U.S. law firms into London in super-majority of partners needed to approve a A 2005 came from U.S. national firms, — merger in both firms, significant trans-Atlantic two who did so, effective January 1, by merger, London/U.S. mergers are more likely to occur (Kirkpatrick & Lockhart/Nicholson Graham & in the 2007/2008 timeframe. Jones, and Piper Rudnick Gray Cary/DLA) and For U.S. firms already in London, the strate- Katten Muchin Rosenman, by affiliation (Katten gy currently is to strengthen locally by recruit- Muchin Rosenman Cornish LLP). At least two ing high-quality lateral partners (e.g., top other national firms (Heller Ehrman and Nixon partners from Lovells, Allen & Overy to Hogan Peabody) are reported to be looking actively. & Hartson and Dechert, respectively, in 2005) Heller was even reported by the legal press to and by recently announced increases in the have opened an office in London staffed by starting salaries of newly qualified solicitors to expatriates, but that has not yet occurred. It is £85,000 ($153,000), 20 percent or more above entirely predictable that other national U.S. that offered by indigenous British firms. By firms will shift their attention to London, but gaining access to top partners from top firms, only after they complete their domestic priori- and the best and brightest of the young lawyer ties (Holland & Knight, currently reconsolidat- talent available, the foundation is created for ing acquisitions made during the 1990s; competition on the ground at a new level. Greenberg Traurig still embarked on its U.S. Retaliation from the London elite is predictable, expansion). An exception to this might be both in lateral and new solicitor markets, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, having ratch- although on the basis of partnership chances eted profitability to levels that will enable them rather than starting salaries. to look to combination with a solid mid-sized or Shifting to the Continent, 18 of the 27 new larger firm in the London market. offices of U.S. firms “opened” in 2005 represent- Top-end New York City-based firms are ed DLA offices brought to or opened after the unlikely to be attracted to a merger in London Piper Rudnick merger. In 2006 to date, three which would be dilutive of their profitability. more non-DLA offices have been opened. Over And, as we reported last year, regional firms half (7 of the 12) new non-DLA European offices based elsewhere will focus on achievement of a opened in 2005 and so far in 2006 are in national platform before shifting their focus to Germany. More openings of German offices by London. None of the firms identified in this cat- U.S. firms can be expected in 2006 and 2007. egory last year appears ready to move forward. Growth of the fee-earner headcount now In London, the intensely competitive local exceeding 10,000 in the U.K. and Europe is due market is causing independence-committed primarily to the strengthening of existing U.S. medium-sized and larger firms to think serious- offices, in part accelerated by the demise of ly about trans-Atlantic merger. Like their coun- Coudert Brothers in mid-2005 and the recent dis- terparts in New York, their sense of their own mantling of Haarmann Hemmelrath in Germany. position in that market is probably inflated, but Many lawyers in these firms joined London and that situation will rectify itself as options are European offices of U.S. firms in the last year. explored via discussions with U.S. firms. Those Our prediction for 2006 is therefore different discussions are likely to begin in earnest during for London than it is for Europe. In London, we 2006, and it is possible there will be trans- expect to see U.S. firms already on the ground Atlantic merger activity later this year. strengthening themselves through aggressive However, due to the time-consuming process of lateral recruiting of both individual solicitors identifying and vetting potential merger and teams and via organic growth through 8 July/August 2006 Report to Legal Management addition of top quality assistants, partners in those offices identify dis- firms and Brussels’ over-expanded relying on inflated wage scales to affected partners in both indigenous market are unlikely to see much new attract and keep highly credentialed firms and in European offices of entry. Eastern Europe is likely to see newly qualified solicitors. Mergers other U.S. and U.K. firms. Some of further incursion by U.S. firms only of real consequence can be expected the remaining indigenous firms will on an opportunistic basis, in now to follow in 2007 and 2008, as decide to make themselves available stable jurisdictions such as Poland growth strategies on both sides of for acquisition by a U.S. or U.K. firm, and Hungary. N the Atlantic mature and potential or will split and parts of the firm candidates find and get to know will be available for acquisition. Ward Bower is a principal of Altman each other. This activity is most likely in Weil Inc., working out of the firm’s offices On the continent there will be Germany, and, possibly, in The in Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. He continued opportunistic growth of Netherlands and Spain. Italy’s can be reached at (610) 886-2000 or existing offices of U.S. firms there as patchwork quilt of small family [email protected]. Legal Profession … continued from page 3 created risks and exposures at all lev- whom they barely know in different Corporate Law Departments els, both internally (employment law, practice areas and in geographically Finally, the most desirable law firm benefits law, etc.) and externally (pro- remote offices. Some firms are clients (major corporations with fessional and general liability, bank emphasizing more objective stan- in-house law departments) will and landlord relationships, etc.). dards to allay this problem. choose and use lawyers differently. Seventy percent of large U.S. firms Corporate client insistence on Understanding the thought process have formally designated a general diversity initiatives and demonstrat- of these important clients will make counsel to manage the legal affairs of ed progress in their outside law client surveys and interviews indis- the firm. That number is likely to firms has made this a management pensable to successful law practice. increase, and smaller firms are likely focus. Major firms are implementing The convergence of corporate to do this as well. The law firm gener- formal diversity policies in order to legal work into a smaller number of al counsel generally reports to the demonstrate results to existing and firms is only one corporate legal managing partner or governing board, prospective corporate clients. strategy. Corporations also are find- although rarely serving as an actual The traditional democratic part- ing more effective ways to handle member of the governing body. This is nership is dead. Large firms cannot their e-discovery responsibilities, to intentional, designed to help preserve afford to have every partner involved outsource routine quasi-legal and client privilege. in every decision. Definition of deci- legal work, both domestically and sions reserved to partners acting as a internationally, to find means of Cultural Change committee of the whole, delegating marrying their need for international Increasingly, large firms recognize the everything else to management, is and global delivery of services with need to identify and train leaders at increasingly the means by which large the convergence movement, and to all levels. Individual professional law firms are effectively managed. get better control over legal costs, coaching of selected partners has been The “billable hours culture” in law fees and pricing. Smart law firms the subject of investment by some firms will have to change as corporate will help accommodate them in all of firms and the results have been clients put real pressure on hourly these areas. N impressive. It is a small price to pay to rates. Except for firms doing premium increase the effectiveness of a lawyer. strategic and “bet your corporation” Ward Bower is a principal of Altman A second cultural change under work, where it almost doesn’t matter Weil Inc., working out of the firm’s offices way in some very large firms has what it costs and all that matters is in Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. He been to revisit the partner compensa- that you win, downward pressure on can be reached at (610) 886-2000 or tion system. This process frequently rates will squeeze profits even further. [email protected]. involves a great commitment of time Increasingly, firms doing commodity and energy by a committee of lead- and less valued work have to find ers and top lawyers, is imperfect at means of charging other than on an best, and at large firms requires the hourly basis, and means to use sys- committee to apply subjective judg- tems and efficient processes to meet ment to the remuneration of partners client needs profitably. Report to Legal Management July/August 2006 9.
Recommended publications
  • German Mdps: Lessons to Learn Laurel S
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 2000 German MDPs: Lessons to Learn Laurel S. Terry Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Terry, Laurel S., "German MDPs: Lessons to Learn" (2000). Minnesota Law Review. 1781. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1781 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. German MDPs: Lessons to Learn Laurel S. Terryt I. Introduction: Why Study MDPs in Germany? ........... 1548 II. Background Information ............................................. 1551 A. Common MDP Regulatory Issues .......................... 1551 1. Threshold Issues ................................................ 1551 2. Functional Issues ............................................... 1552 3. Substantive Ethics Issues .................................. 1552 B. German Terminology and Background ................. 1553 1. Legal and Other Professionals .......................... 1553 2. Lawyer Regulatory Provisions ........................... 1557 3. Bar Associations and Lawyer Regulatory Authorities .......................................................... 1559 III. Germany's Regulation of MDPs ................................. 1560 A. The Development of MDPs ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2004-2005: Rankings & Listings
    Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2004-2005: Rankings & Listings Capital Markets Foreign firms China 1. Allen & Overy LLP Baker & McKenzie Clifford Chance LLP Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Herbert Smith Linklaters Shearman & Sterling LLP Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 2. Davis Polk & Wardwell Deacons Debevoise & Plimpton LLP Johnson Stokes & Master Jones Day Latham & Watkins LLP Morrison & Foerster O’Melveny & Myers LLP Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Richards Butler Simmons & Simmons White & Case LLP 3. Allens Arthur Robinson Gallant Y.T.Ho & Co Gide Loyrette Nouel Kaye Scholer LLP Livasiri & Co Lovells Mallesons Stephen Jaques Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP Woo, Kwan, Lee & Lo Firms are listed A-Z in tiers which are ranked in order of priority Source: Legal 500 Asia Pacific, 2004/2005 edition. Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with an affiliate in the United Kingdom and Italy, where the practice is conducted through an affiliated multinational partnership. © Copyright 2005 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved. Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2004-2005: Rankings & Listings Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP Infrastructure and Project Stephenson Harwood Woo, Kwan, Lee & Lo Finance Firms are listed A-Z in tiers which are ranked in order of Foreign firms priority China 1. Latham & Watkins LLP is a major name Allen & Overy LLP in projects worldwide, and has extensive Baker & McKenzie experience on significant projects in China Clifford Chance LLP from its Hong Kong office. The firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer advised the PRC and the international Gide Loyrette Nouel bank lenders on the US $4.3bn Nanhai Herbert Smith Petrochemical complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrait of a Firm Photos: Karsten De Riese, 83623 Dietramszell Portrait Photos: Eleana Hegerich, 81925 Munich Photos: Karsten De Riese, 83623 Dietramszell Portrait
    PETERS, SCHÖNBERGER & PARTNER PORTRAIT OF A FIRM PHOTOS: KARSTEN DE RIESE, 83623 DIETRAMSZELL PORTRAIT PHOTOS: ELEANA HEGERICH, 81925 MUNICH PHOTOS: KARSTEN DE RIESE, 83623 DIETRAMSZELL PORTRAIT Legal Advice Audit Tax Advice Family Office MUNICH ZURICH SHANGHAI SCHACKSTRASSE 2 80539 MUNICH PHONE: +49 89 38172-0 FAX: +49 89 38172-204 [email protected] www.psp.eu THE FIRM BETWEEN SIEGESTOR AND UNIVERSITY On the basis of its successful history spanning more than 35 years, Peters, Schönberger & Partner is one of the most highly regarded mid-sized firms in Germany. As tax consultants, auditors and lawyers, we assist you when you make important decisions and help you put them into effect. Our clients include small and medium-sized firms, family enterprises, wealthy private persons and private equity firms that seek interdisciplinary and customised advice. You will find that we are a professional, reliable and assertive partner that represents your legal and tax interests with passion and also performs the traditional tasks of auditors. The PSP Family Office also assists you in structuring your wealth and has proven expertise in the fields of succession, foundations and real estate. “We offer interdisciplinary and customised advice.” INTERDISCIPLINARY ADVICE TO SECURE YOUR SUCCESS Peters, Schönberger & Partner has long taken an interdisciplinary approach in which tax consultants, auditors, lawyers and our Family Office work together. This is also a key element in our business culture. On the basis of the combined efforts of various disciplines, we develop solutions that are specially tailored to you and therefore take account of your specific concerns. In this way, we avoid inefficiencies, communication gaps and duplicate costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Andreas Ziegenhagen Director
    Andreas Ziegenhagen Director Director Frankfurt Berlin D +49 69 45 00 12 144 D +49 30 26473 195 [email protected] Overview Andreas Ziegenhagen is a director at Dentons GmbH and managing partner Germany at global law firm Dentons in Berlin and Frankfurt. As a certified public auditor, certified tax advisor and lawyer, Andreasʾ main focus lies in auditing annual financial statements and restructuring concepts, performing due diligence reviews as well as the acquisition of trusteeships. Furthermore, he specializes in advising on corporate transactions (mergers and acquisitions), reorganization/corporate restructurings and tax structuring as well as advice in relation to white-collar crime. Experience Performing due diligence of a public limited company listed at the stock exchange regarding a mandatory offer pursuant to the Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetz (WpÜG) Advising Moeller Group on restructuring (incl. bank reporting) prior to the sale to a financial investor Preparing an audit according to the German party law (Parteiengesetz) Providing a plausibility check of a restructuring concept for a medium-sized business Preparing an audit of fraud for a non-profit company Preparing acquisition of double trusteeship within a restructuring on behalf of creditor banks of a national transport company, a large German retail company and an automotive components supplier Preparing an insolvency plan after introduction of a protective shield processing Activities and Affiliations Prior and Present Employment Director, Dentons GmbH (formerly Salans GmbH) and managing partner Germany, Dentons (formerly Salans LLP, 2006 to date) © 2016 Dentons. Dentons is an international legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal Notices.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Version of Issue 3.6. of the CEE Legal
    Year 3, Issue 6 CEE December 2016 Legal Matters In-Depth Analysis of the News and Newsmakers That Shape Europe’s Emerging Legal Markets Across the Wire: Deals and Cases in CEE On the Move: New Firms and Practices The Buzz Across CEE Market Spotlights on Czech Republic and Poland Schoenherr Dispute Resolution Specialists Consider the Rise of ADR Across CEE Building Blocks: The Rise of the Regional Austrian Firm Across CEE Inside Insights Wolf Theiss Partner Tomas Rychly Joins Czech Supreme Administrative Court Inside Out Czech Partner Round Table The Corner Office: First Clients Bigger & Better in Warsaw: DJBW Joins Noerr Experts Review: Dispute Resolution Warsaw, 1-2 June, 2017 3nd Annual CEE General Counsel Summit An invaluable opportunity for any General Counsel wishing to exchange ideas about best practices and preferred strategies with peers from across CEE. To learn more about how you can participate: Radu Cotarcea Managing Editor [email protected] Preliminary Matters CEE Editorial: A Reflection On Three Years Legal Matters And Three Fronts of Conservatism In-Depth Analysis of the News and Newsmakers That Shape Europe's Emerging Legal Markets As I write this edito- requests, we recently published our editorial policies rial, we are celebrat- on the CEE Legal Matters website). ing three years since In stark contrast, when the time comes to answer the CEE Legal Mat- many of our questions – the answers to which, espe- ters website (now cially when aggregated, would add real value and are already on its third uncontroversial in Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions – we version) first went see a considerable reluctance to engage.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual General Meeting of Shareholders 2012 Candidates for Supervisory Board Election Pekka Ala-Pietilä
    SAP Shareholder Magazine SAP INVESTOR Annual General Meeting of Shareholders 2012 Candidates for Supervisory Board election Pekka Ala-Pietilä Pekka Ala-Pietilä is CEO and co-founder of Blyk Ltd., a mobile media company. Prior to that, he spent over 20 years in Nokia senior management: from 1992 to 1998 as President of Nokia Mobile Phones, and most recently, from 1999 through 2005, as President of Nokia Corpora- tion and Head of Customer Market Operations. Pekka Ala-Pietilä currently serves on the SAP Supervisory Board, and since 2011 he has been the chairman of the Board of Solidium Oy, a state-owned Finnish holding company that is a major shareholder in 12 listed companies. He is an honorary member of Ornamo, the Finnish Association of Designers. Pekka Ala-Pietilä read economics at the Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration. He holds an honorary doctorate of Technology from Tampere and an honorary doctorate of Science from Helsinki. He is also a first class knight of the Order of the White Rose of Finland. Membership of other supervisory boards required by law: ■ Board of Directors of CVON Future Limited, London, UK ■ Board of Directors of Blyk Services Oy, Helsinki, Finland (Chairman) ■ none ■ Board of Directors of Blyk (NL) Ltd., London, UK (Chairman) ■ Board of Directors of Blyk (DE) Ltd., London, UK (Chairman) Membership of comparable controlling bodies in Germany and abroad: ■ Board of Directors of Blyk (ES) Ltd., London, UK (Chairman) ■ Board of Directors of Blyk (BE) Ltd., London, UK (Chairman) ■ Board of Directors
    [Show full text]
  • ROL-011 Bro ILF RZ 06 Mr.Indd
    YEARBOOK 2004/2005 Institute for Law and Finance • Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt A Note ofWelcome! Dear Students, Members and Friends, Another successful year has passed. The academic year 2004/2005 has been extremely active and eventful in more ways than one. Most importantly, we are honored by the fact that Mr. Jean-Claude Trichet, President of the European Central Bank, has accepted the Chair of the ILF Academic Advisory Board. This reflects the pan-European importance of the ILF. Our continuous efforts to increase the international prestige of the ILF were also happily rewarded with the official signing of a cooperation agreement between the ILF and Columbia Law School this Prof. Dr. Theodor Baums year. This new and exciting partnership consists of an exchange program for top students of both institutions and forges a close link between the ILF and one of the world’s leading universities. On a similar international note, the ILF was pleased to welcome a great number of leading ILF Executive Board academics and corporate experts from all over the world. They contributed to life at the ILF in many ways, either as visiting professors or faculty members, or guest lecturers and speakers at the annual ILF conferences. Their contributions at these ILF lectures and special activities have A Note of Welcome 03 definitely enriched the minds and experiences of the faculty and students alike. The ILF is grateful The ILF Completes its Third Year 04 for the time they have taken to be with us as well as their genial input at these events.
    [Show full text]
  • CEE Legal Matters
    Year 3, Issue 3 CEE June 2016 Legal Matters In-Depth Analysis of the News and Newsmakers That Shape Europe’s Emerging Legal Markets Across the Wire: Deals and Cases in CEE The Media Sector in CEE Market Spotlight: The Balkans CEE Buzz Inside Insights On the Move: New Firms and Practices Serbian and Croatian Round Tables Changes at YukselKarkin Time to Party for bpv Braun Partners Building Blocks of CEE: Dan Matthews Says Good-Bye Experts Review: IP/IT Istanbul, 6-7 October, 2016 2nd Annual CEE General Counsel Summit The 2015 GC Summit brought together over 100 Chief Legal Officers from across CEE for two days of meetings, professional development, networking, and fun, mak- ing it the single largest and most important annual gathering of CEE-based General Counsel. An even greater number are expected in Istanbul for the this year’s Summit. To learn more about how you can be among them, please contact us today. Radu Cotarcea | Managing Editor | [email protected] Preliminary Matters CEE Editorial: What You May Not Know Legal Matters In-Depth Analysis of the News and Newsmakers Surprisingly (to us), pendently as well. That Shape Europe's Emerging Legal Markets Radu and I receive Did you know … that the annual CEE Legal Matters occasional inquiries Corporate Counsel Handbook is based on a survey about the extent to sent out to over 3000 Chief Legal Counsel in CEE which CEE Legal alone, and is then sent in hard copy to each of them Matters reaches an who participates (almost 700 in 2015, and we expect in-house audience, many more this year)? Did you know that the 2016 and whether or not Handbook will contain, for the first time, a Direc- we’ve thought about tory of business law firms in Central and Eastern ways of helping Europe? law firms in CEE get their messages to the Gen- We’re planning more, always.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Substance Around the World
    Economic Substance Around the World American Bar Association – Section of Taxation May 2004 Meeting - Washington, D.C. Joint Session Saturday, May 8, 2004 - 8:30 – 11:30 a.m. Panel topic: Economic substance around the world; a review of recent anti-avoidance jurisprudence in the US, the EU and Canada; an important session for cross-border tax planning. Speakers: Tom Akin (Canada), McCarthy Tetrault, LLP, Toronto, 416 601 7934, [email protected] Oliver Dörfler (Germany), Haarmann Hemmelrath, Frankfurt, +49 69 920 59-255 [email protected] Werner Heyvaert (Chair/Belgium), NautaDutilh, Brussels, +32 2 566 8612, [email protected] Michael McGowan (UK), Shearman & Sterling, London, +44 20 7655-5083, [email protected] Gonzalo Rodés Vilà (Spain), Rodes y Sala, Barcelona, +34 932 413 740, [email protected] Stanley Ruchelman (US), The Ruchelman Law Firm, New York, 212 843 8822, [email protected] 1 Belgium By Werner Heyvaert1 1. Introduction This presentation focuses first on the legislative aspects of economic substance in Belgian tax law, mainly direct (income) tax rather than indirect tax (such as VAT). Next, we highlight those rare provisions in the tax code that embody the Belgian legislature's desire to align tax treatment with economic substance, the most salient being those pertaining to financial leasing operations. We then provide a brief overview of the anti-abuse provisions in the tax law that allow the authorities to disregard the form of certain legal structures or constructions and levy tax in accordance with the substance of a transaction. After this brief report on economic substance, we summarize a number of landmark cases dealing with the issue of substance over form.
    [Show full text]
  • US Law Firms Go Glocal
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 2009 Between Diffusion and Distinctiveness in Globalization: U.S. Law Firms Go Glocal Carole Silver Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Nicole De Bruin Phelan Mikaela Rabinowitz Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Silver, Carole; Phelan, Nicole De Bruin; and Rabinowitz, Mikaela, "Between Diffusion and Distinctiveness in Globalization: U.S. Law Firms Go Glocal" (2009). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 37. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/37 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Between Diffusion and Distinctiveness in Globalization: U.S. Law Firms Go Glocal CAROLE SILVER, NICOLE DE BRUIN PHELAN & MIKAELA RABINowTZ* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GLOBAL, LOCAL, OR IN-BETWEEN ......................... 1432 II. SETTING THE SCENE: EARLY INTERNATIONAL FORAYS ........ 1438 III, THE LAWYERS: AN EMPHASIS ON THE LOCAL ................ 1445 A. LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION ................... .1446 B. EDUCATION ..................................... 1448 C. ADMISSION/LICENSING ............................. 1453 IV. THE OFFICES: THE REEMERGENCE OF A DISSEMINATION APPROACH ............................................ 1455 A. MIXED OFFICES .................................... 1456 B. EDUCATION CREDENTIALS OF PARTNERS .............. 1458 C. SIZE OF OFFICES AND UNMIXED OFFICES ............. 1459 V. OFFICES AS ELEMENTS OF DIFFUSION ...................... 1461 VI. PRACTICE GROUPS AS AN ELEMENT OF DIFFUSION ........... 1464 VII.
    [Show full text]
  • Smb: Chinesische Akquisitionen in Deutschland 2005-2017
    CHINESISCHE AKQUISITIONEN IN DEUTSCHLAND 2005-2017 - Studie und Überblick zu Unternehmen, Branchen, Größen, geograph. Schwerpunkten sowie beteiligten Beratern - SMB Consultants ° Neuer Zollhof 3 ° D-40221 Düsseldorf ° Tel. +49 211 22059-480 INDEX I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. CHINESISCHE AKQUISITIONEN NACH BRANCHE III. ZIELUNTERNEHMEN NACH BUNDESLAND IV. REGIONALE VERTEILUNG DER CHINESISCHEN INVESTOREN V. GRÖßENVERTEILUNG DEUTSCHER ZIELUNTERNEHMEN VI. GRÖßENUNTERSCHIED DER UNTERNEHMEN VII. ENTWICKLUNG DER AKQUISITIONSHÄUFIGKEIT VIII. ENTWICKLUNG DES TRANSAKTIONSVOLUMENS IX. ANZAHL DER PATENTE BEI ÜBERNAHMEKANDIDATEN X. KAUFVERHALTEN DER INVESTOREN XI. CHARAKTER CHINESISCHER INVESTOREN XII. POLITISCHER EINFLUSS AUF CHINESISCHE INVESTOREN XIII. INVESTITIONSGRÜNDE CHINESISCHER INVESTOREN XIV. QUELLENVERZEICHNIS KONTAKT CHINESISCHE AKQUISITIONEN IN DEUTSCHLAND (2017 – 2005) BETEILIGTE RECHTS- UND M&A-BERATER 2 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (1) ° Die vorliegende Studie der SMB Consultants untersucht Akquisitionen deutscher Unternehmen durch chinesische Investoren zwischen 2005 und April 2017. In diesem Zeitraum konnten 190 Transaktionen registriert werden, zwei Drittel alleine in den Jahren 2013 bis 2016. ° Der BranchenFokus chinesischer Investoren lag erwartungsgemäß eindeutig auF Maschinenbau, geFolgt von den Sektoren Automotive und Erneuerbare Energien. Insbesondere Transaktionen im Bereich Pharma/LiFe Science und High-Tech nahmen in den vergangen drei Jahren zu. ° Betrachtet man die Standorte der deutschen Zielunternehmen, stellt man Fest, dass Fast zwei Drittel ihren Hauptsitz in Nordrhein-WestFalen, Baden-Württemberg oder Bayern hatten. In den übrigen Bundesländern kam es nur vereinzelt zu Übernahmen chinesischer Investoren. ° Die Analyse der chinesischen Investoren ergab, dass Fast die zwei Drittel ihren Hauptsitz in Beijing, der Provinz Zhejiang (Süd-Osten), Hongkong oder Shanghai haben. Typischerweise lässt sich eine höhere Konzentration entlang der chinesischen Ostküste erkennen. ° Bis 2010 waren chinesische Akquisitionen deutscher Unternehmen eher eine Seltenheit.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenn Morgan and Sigrid Quack CSGR Working Paper No 169/05
    INSTITUTIONAL LEGACIES AND FIRM DYNAMICS THE INTERNATIONALISATION OF BRITISH AND GERMAN LAW FIRMS Glenn Morgan and Sigrid Quack CSGR Working Paper No 169/05 May 2005 1 Institutional legacies and firm dynamics The internationalisation of British and German law firms Glenn Morgan1 and Sigrid Quack2 CSGR Working Paper No. 169/05 May 2005 Introduction3 Institutionalist approaches to the study of the firm which emerged in the last two decades have tended to be dominated by static models of both firms and institutions. As a form of ‘equilibrium’ analysis which holds factors constant in order to allow a deeper understanding of how they are interdependent and complementary, this approach has yielded rich dividends in contributing to our understanding of how firms within different national business systems are structured and the effect which this has on their ability to compete in international markets. More recently, however, debates have moved on to consider firms, not just as passive recipients of institutional resources but as actors involved both in the construction and reconstruction of such resources within national contexts and in the selective learning and adaptation of overseas experiences into their own structures. This reflects a deepening integration of economic activities, organisational structures and markets across borders reinforced by a restructuring of regulatory activities away from the monopolistic dominance of the nation-state and the public arena towards a more diffuse and diverse set of regulatory activities and actors operating across states and across the public-private divide. Attempts to conceptualize these processes at a macro-level have traditionally been dominated by the ‘convergence- divergence’ debate, more recently wrapped up in the discourse of ‘globalization’ as an ineluctable force undermining national differences and increasing shared and common models of firms and markets.
    [Show full text]