Monogenea (Platyhelminthes) Parazitující Na Severoamerických Rybách Řádu Cypriniformes: Druhová Diverzita, Spektrum Hostitelů a Biogeografická Distribuce

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monogenea (Platyhelminthes) Parazitující Na Severoamerických Rybách Řádu Cypriniformes: Druhová Diverzita, Spektrum Hostitelů a Biogeografická Distribuce PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA Monogenea (Platyhelminthes) parazitující na severoamerických rybách řádu Cypriniformes: druhová diverzita, spektrum hostitelů a biogeografická distribuce Bakalářská práce DOMINIK KRPAL Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Eva Řehulková, Ph.D. Ústav botaniky a zoologie obor Ekologická a evoluční biologie Brno 2020 MONOGENEA (PLATYHELMINTHES) PARAZITUJÍCÍ NA SEVEROAMERICKÝCH RYBÁCH ŘÁDU CYPRINIFORMES: DRUHOVÁ DIVERZITA, SPEKTRUM HOSTITELŮ A BIOGEOGRAFICKÁ DISTRIBUCE Bibliografický záznam Autor: DOMINIK KRPAL Přírodovědecká fakulta Masarykova univerzita Ústav botaniky a zoologie Název práce: Monogenea (Platyhelminthes) parazitující na severoamerických rybách řádu Cypriniformes: druhová diverzita, spektrum hostitelů a biogeografická distribuce Studijní program: Ekologická a evoluční biologie Studijní obor: Ekologická a evoluční biologie Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Eva Řehulková, Ph.D. Rok: 2020 Počet stran: 104 Klíčová slova: Monogenea, Cypriniformes, diverzita, hostitelská specifita, distribuce, hostitel, parazit MONOGENEA (PLATYHELMINTHES) PARAZITUJÍCÍ NA SEVEROAMERICKÝCH RYBÁCH ŘÁDU CYPRINIFORMES: DRUHOVÁ DIVERZITA, SPEKTRUM HOSTITELŮ A BIOGEOGRAFICKÁ DISTRIBUCE Bibliographic record Author: DOMINIK KRPAL Faculty of Science Masaryk University Department of Botany and Zoology Title of Thesis: Monogeneans (Platyhelminthes) parasitizing North American fishes of the Cypriniformes: species diversity, host spectrum and biogeographical distribution Degree Programme: Ecological and Evolutionary Biology Field of Study: Ecological and Evolutionary Biology Supervisor: Mgr. Eva Řehulková, Ph.D. Year: 2020 Number of Pages: 104 Keywords: Monogenea, Cypriniformes, diversity, host spectrum, distribution, host, parasite MONOGENEA (PLATYHELMINTHES) PARAZITUJÍCÍ NA SEVEROAMERICKÝCH RYBÁCH ŘÁDU CYPRINIFORMES: DRUHOVÁ DIVERZITA, SPEKTRUM HOSTITELŮ A BIOGEOGRAFICKÁ DISTRIBUCE Abstrakt Tato bakalářská práce je literární rešerší, která se zabývá druho- vou diverzitou monogeneí parazitujících na/v cypriniformních rybách Severní Ameriky. Hlavním cílem této práce bylo shromáždit všechny dostupné záznamy o těchto parazitech a shrnout je do dvou checklistů: parazit-hostitel a hostitel-parazit. Checklisty uvedené v této práci by měly být užitečným zdrojem informací pro budoucí parazitologický vý- zkum v této oblasti. Hostitelsko-parazitární záznamy pocházely z cel- kem 138 druhů cypriniformních ryb (420 záznamů). Checklisty zahrnu- jí celkem 234 druhů monogeneí, z nichž 228 druhů (10 rodů) reprezen- tuje podtřídu Polyonchoinea (Dactylogyridae, Gyrodactylidae, Pseudo- murraytrematidae) a 6 druhů (2 rody) podtřídu Heteronchoinea (Dis- cocotylidae, Octomacridae). Nejvyšší druhová bohatost monogeneí byla zaznamenána u těchto hostitelů: Luxilus cornutus (15 druhů), Semotilus atromaculatus (12 druhů), Carpiodes cyprinus (10 druhů) a L. chryso- cephalus (10 druhů). Z hlediska hostitelské specifity, 61 % severoame- rických druhů monogeneí lze zařadit mezi striktní specialisty, 19 % me- zi kongenerické specialisty, 13 % mezi supragenerické specialisty a ne- jmenší podíl (tj. 7 %) tvoří generalisti. Největší spektrum hostitelských druhů bylo zaznamenáno u monogeneí druhu Dactylogyrus banghami (13 hostitelských druhů) a Octomacrum lanceatum (10 hostitelských druhů). Nejvíce druhů monogeneí (tj. 74 %) bylo nalezeno na žábrách (druhy rodu Cleidodiscus, Dactylogyrus, Myzotrema, Neodisocotyle, Octomacrum, Pseudomurraytrema) a celkem 14 % druhů na kůži a ploutvích (většinou druhy rodu Gyrodactylus a Pellucidhaptor). Část druhů (7 %) parazitovala jak na žábrách, tak na povrchu těla (některé MONOGENEA (PLATYHELMINTHES) PARAZITUJÍCÍ NA SEVEROAMERICKÝCH RYBÁCH ŘÁDU CYPRINIFORMES: DRUHOVÁ DIVERZITA, SPEKTRUM HOSTITELŮ A BIOGEOGRAFICKÁ DISTRIBUCE druhy rodu Anonchohaptor, Gyrodactylus, Icelanonchohaptor a Pellucid- haptor). Zbývající část tvořily druhy nalezené v nosních dutinách a dva druhy rodu Acolpenteron parazitující v močovodech a ledvinách ryb podřádu Catostomoidei. Součástí bakalářské práce je také identifikační klíč pro jednotlivé rody monogeneí, který byl sestaven na základě in- formací získaných při rešerši literatury. MONOGENEA (PLATYHELMINTHES) PARAZITUJÍCÍ NA SEVEROAMERICKÝCH RYBÁCH ŘÁDU CYPRINIFORMES: DRUHOVÁ DIVERZITA, SPEKTRUM HOSTITELŮ A BIOGEOGRAFICKÁ DISTRIBUCE Abstract This bachelor’s thesis is a literature review that deals with spe- cies diversity of monogeneans parasitizing cypriniform fishes in North America. The main aim of this review was to compile all available rec- ords of these parasites and summarized them in two checklists: para- site-host and host-parasite. The checklists herein intend to assist and point at future parasitological research and surveys needed. In total, host-parasite records of monogeneans from 138 cyprinifom species (420 records) were used. The checklists include a total of 234 monoge- nean species represented by 228 species (10 genera) of Polyonchoinea (Dactylogyridae, Gyrodactylidae, Pseudomurraytrematidae) and six species (two genera) of Heteronchoinea (Discocotylidae, Octomacri- dae). The highest monogenean species richness was recorded for the following cypriniform hosts: Luxilus cornutus (15 species), Semotilus atromaculatus (12 species), and Carpiodes cyprinus and L. chrysocepha- lus (10 species each). From host specificity point of view, most North American monogeneans are represented by strict specialist (61 %), fol- lowed by congeneric specialists (19 %) and suprageneric specialists (13 %), with only a small proportion of generalists (7 %). The widest host range among North American monogeneans was reported for Dactylo- gyrus banghami (13 host species) and Octomacrum lanceatum (10 host species). Most species of monogeneans (74 %) have been recorded strictly on the gills (species of Cleidodiscus, Dactylogyrus, Myzotrema, Neodisocotyle, Octomacrum, Pseudomurraytrema) and 14 % on the skin and fins (mostly species of Gyrodactylus and Pellucidhaptor). A total of 7 % of monogenean species have been recorded on both the gills and the MONOGENEA (PLATYHELMINTHES) PARAZITUJÍCÍ NA SEVEROAMERICKÝCH RYBÁCH ŘÁDU CYPRINIFORMES: DRUHOVÁ DIVERZITA, SPEKTRUM HOSTITELŮ A BIOGEOGRAFICKÁ DISTRIBUCE skin (some species of Anonchohaptor, Gyrodactylus, Icelanonchohaptor and Pellucidhaptor). The remaining part consisted of species found in the nasal cavities and two species of Acolpenteron parasitizing the ure- ters and kidneys of Catostomoidei. The bachelor's thesis also includes an identification key for individual genera of monogeneans, which was compiled on the basis of information obtained during a literature search. MONOGENEA (PLATYHELMINTHES) PARAZITUJÍCÍ NA SEVEROAMERICKÝCH RYBÁCH ŘÁDU CYPRINIFORMES: DRUHOVÁ DIVERZITA, SPEKTRUM HOSTITELŮ A BIOGEOGRAFICKÁ DISTRIBUCE Čestné prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem svoji bakalářskou práci vypracoval samostat- ně pod vedením vedoucího práce s využitím informačních zdrojů, které jsou v práci citovány. V Brně 31. července 2020 ....................................... DOMINIK KRPAL MONOGENEA (PLATYHELMINTHES) PARAZITUJÍCÍ NA SEVEROAMERICKÝCH RYBÁCH ŘÁDU CYPRINIFORMES: DRUHOVÁ DIVERZITA, SPEKTRUM HOSTITELŮ A BIOGEOGRAFICKÁ DISTRIBUCE Poděkování Zde bych chtěl poděkovat především vedoucí mé bakalářské práce Mgr. Evě Řehulkové, Ph.D. za její odborné vedení, pozitivní přístup, cenné rady a hlavně její trpělivost! Poděkování patří také Blance Škoríkové (Biologické centrum AV ČR, České Budějovice) za pomoc při sběru dat. Dále bych chtěl poděkovat všem z oddělení parazitologie PřF MU, kteří mi v průběhu této práce jakkoliv pomohli. A jedno velké díky patří také mé rodině za finanční i morální podporu a pak ještě také mé přítelkyni Kateřině Žiškové za lásku a víru, kterou ve mě vložila. Šablona DP 3.0.7-SCI (2020-04-14) © 2014, 2016, 2018, 2019 Masarykova univerzita OBSAH Obsah Úvod a cíle práce 15 1 Cypriniformes (Actinopterygii: Actinopteri) 17 1.1 Základní charakteristika, fylogeneze a klasifikace .............................................. 17 1.1.1 Morfologické znaky ................................................................................................ 18 1.1.2 Fylogeneze a klasifikace ....................................................................................... 19 1.2 Diverzita severoamerických ryb řádu Cyprinifromes ........................................ 20 1.2.1 Leuciscidae ................................................................................................................ 21 1.2.2 Catostomidae ............................................................................................................ 22 2 Monogenea (Platyhelminthes: Neodermata) 23 2.1 Základní charakteristika, životní cyklus a klasifikace ........................................ 23 2.1.1 Morfologie a vnitřní organizace těla ............................................................... 24 2.1.2 Životní cyklus ........................................................................................................... 26 2.1.3 Klasifikace monogeneí .......................................................................................... 26 2.2 Determinační znaky monogeneí ................................................................................. 28 3 Diverzita monegeneí cypriniformních ryb Severní Ameriky 30 3.1 Metodika sběru dat .......................................................................................................... 30 3.2 Klasifikační přehled a klíč pro determinaci jednotlivých rodů monogeneí ..........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Notropis Girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis Tetranema)
    Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Species Status Assessment Report for the Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) Arkansas River shiner (bottom left) and peppered chub (top right - two fish) (Photo credit U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Version 1.0a October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM This document was prepared by Angela Anders, Jennifer Smith-Castro, Peter Burck (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) – Southwest Regional Office) Robert Allen, Debra Bills, Omar Bocanegra, Sean Edwards, Valerie Morgan (USFWS –Arlington, Texas Field Office), Ken Collins, Patricia Echo-Hawk, Daniel Fenner, Jonathan Fisher, Laurence Levesque, Jonna Polk (USFWS – Oklahoma Field Office), Stephen Davenport (USFWS – New Mexico Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Mark Horner, Susan Millsap (USFWS – New Mexico Field Office), Jonathan JaKa (USFWS – Headquarters), Jason Luginbill, and Vernon Tabor (Kansas Field Office). Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema), version 1.0, with appendices. October 2018. Albuquerque, NM. 172 pp. Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 INTRODUCTION (CHAPTER 1) The Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) are restricted primarily to the contiguous river segments of the South Canadian River basin spanning eastern New Mexico downstream to eastern Oklahoma (although the peppered chub is less widespread). Both species have experienced substantial declines in distribution and abundance due to habitat destruction and modification from stream dewatering or depletion from diversion of surface water and groundwater pumping, construction of impoundments, and water quality degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Species April 2007
    Fishes of Indiana April 2007 The Wildlife Diversity Section (WDS) is responsible for the conservation and management of over 750 species of nongame and endangered wildlife. The list of Indiana's species was compiled by WDS biologists based on accepted taxonomic standards. The list will be periodically reviewed and updated. References used for scientific names are included at the bottom of this list. ORDER FAMILY GENUS SPECIES COMMON NAME STATUS* CLASS CEPHALASPIDOMORPHI Petromyzontiformes Petromyzontidae Ichthyomyzon bdellium Ohio lamprey lampreys Ichthyomyzon castaneus chestnut lamprey Ichthyomyzon fossor northern brook lamprey SE Ichthyomyzon unicuspis silver lamprey Lampetra aepyptera least brook lamprey Lampetra appendix American brook lamprey Petromyzon marinus sea lamprey X CLASS ACTINOPTERYGII Acipenseriformes Acipenseridae Acipenser fulvescens lake sturgeon SE sturgeons Scaphirhynchus platorynchus shovelnose sturgeon Polyodontidae Polyodon spathula paddlefish paddlefishes Lepisosteiformes Lepisosteidae Lepisosteus oculatus spotted gar gars Lepisosteus osseus longnose gar Lepisosteus platostomus shortnose gar Amiiformes Amiidae Amia calva bowfin bowfins Hiodonotiformes Hiodontidae Hiodon alosoides goldeye mooneyes Hiodon tergisus mooneye Anguilliformes Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel freshwater eels Clupeiformes Clupeidae Alosa chrysochloris skipjack herring herrings Alosa pseudoharengus alewife X Dorosoma cepedianum gizzard shad Dorosoma petenense threadfin shad Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Campostoma anomalum central stoneroller
    [Show full text]
  • Plains Minnow
    Plains Minnow - Hybognathus placitus Abundance: Rare Status: NSS3 (Bb) NatureServe: G4 S3 Population Status: Some populations appear vulnerable where they occur in low abundance and are restricted from historical distribution. This species has been extirpated from the North Platte River basin and may also be gone from the Bighorn River basin. Other populations appear stable. Limiting Factor: Habitat: impoundments in major river drainages reduced population size and distribution presumably through loss of stream connectivity, reduced turbidity, altered temperature regimes, and flow regulation. Comment: NSS Ranks are reviewed and revised with each SWAP revision. No changes were made for this species in this revision. Introduction Historically, the distribution of the plains minnow was similar to the range of the western silvery minnow (Hybognathus argyritis), found in the Missouri River and middle Mississippi River drainages, but was more widespread in western tributaries of the Missouri river (Pflieger 1997). They are considered native to the Mississippi, Red, Arkansas, and Missouri River drainages and are found primarily from Montana and Wyoming east to Iowa (Weitzel 2002). In Wyoming, plains minnow have been reported in the Belle Fourche, Big Horn, Cheyenne, Little Missouri, and Powder river drainages (northeastern and northwestern Missouri aquatic habitats; Baxter and Stone 1995; Patton 1997; McGree et al. 2010). They are rare in some drainages, for example, McGree et al. (2010) caught two above Keyhole Reservoir, Patton (1997) found one above and one below Keyhole Reservoir, and Pindel (1997) reported one from near Devils Tower. Dooenbos also (1998) captured low numbers in South Dakota near the state line. No Hybognathus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • And Wildlife, 1928-72
    Bibliography of Research Publications of the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 1928-72 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE RESOURCE PUBLICATION 120 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS OF THE U.S. BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE, 1928-72 Edited by Paul H. Eschmeyer, Division of Fishery Research Van T. Harris, Division of Wildlife Research Resource Publication 120 Published by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife Washington, B.C. 1974 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Eschmeyer, Paul Henry, 1916 Bibliography of research publications of the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 1928-72. (Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Kesource publication 120) Supt. of Docs. no.: 1.49.66:120 1. Fishes Bibliography. 2. Game and game-birds Bibliography. 3. Fish-culture Bibliography. 4. Fishery management Bibliogra­ phy. 5. Wildlife management Bibliography. I. Harris, Van Thomas, 1915- joint author. II. United States. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. III. Title. IV. Series: United States Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Resource publication 120. S914.A3 no. 120 [Z7996.F5] 639'.9'08s [016.639*9] 74-8411 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing OfTie Washington, D.C. Price $2.30 Stock Number 2410-00366 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS OF THE U.S. BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE, 1928-72 INTRODUCTION This bibliography comprises publications in fishery and wildlife research au­ thored or coauthored by research scientists of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife and certain predecessor agencies. Separate lists, arranged alphabetically by author, are given for each of 17 fishery research and 6 wildlife research labora­ tories, stations, investigations, or centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Silvery Minnow Hybognathus Argyritis
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Western Silvery Minnow Hybognathus argyritis in Canada ENDANGERED 2008 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2008. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the western silvery minnow Hybognathus argyritis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 38 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report: COSEWIC. 2001. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the western silvery minnow Hybognathus argyritis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 14 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm) Houston, J.J.P. 1997. COSEWIC status report on the western silvery minnow Hybognathus argyritis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 14 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge M.K. Lowdon, D.A. Watkinson, and W.G. Franzin for writing the update status report on the western silvery minnow, Hybognathus argyritis in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by R. Campbell and C. Renaud, COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee Co-Chairs. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le méné d’argent de l’Ouest (Hybognathus argyritis) au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment (SSA) Report for the Ozark Chub (Erimystax Harryi) Version 1.2
    Species Status Assessment (SSA) Report for the Ozark Chub (Erimystax harryi) Version 1.2 Ozark chub (Photo credit: Dustin Lynch, Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission) August 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office This document was prepared by Alyssa Bangs (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) – Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office), Bryan Simmons (USFWS—Missouri Ecological Services Field Office), and Brian Evans (USFWS –Southeast Regional Office). We greatly appreciate the assistance of Jeff Quinn (Arkansas Game and Fish Commission), Brian Wagner (Arkansas Game and Fish Commission), and Jacob Westhoff (Missouri Department of Conservation) who provided helpful information and review of the draft document. We also thank the peer reviewers, who provided helpful comments. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019. Species status assessment report for the Ozark chub (Erimystax harryi). Version 1.2. August 2019. Atlanta, GA. CONTENTS Chapter 1: Executive Summary 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Analytical Framework 1 CHAPTER 2 – Species Information 4 2.1 Taxonomy and Genetics 4 2.2 Species Description 5 2.3 Range 6 Historical Range and Distribution 6 Current Range and Distribution 8 2.4 Life History Habitat 9 Growth and Longevity 9 Reproduction 9 Feeding 10 CHAPTER 3 –Factors Influencing Viability and Current Condition Analysis 12 3.1 Factors Influencing Viability 12 Sedimentation 12 Water Temperature and Flow 14 Impoundments 15 Water Chemistry 16 Habitat Fragmentation 17 3.2 Model 17 Analytical
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES
    ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES Tables STEPHEN T. ROSS University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-520-24945-5 uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 1 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 2 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 1.1 Families Composing 95% of North American Freshwater Fish Species Ranked by the Number of Native Species Number Cumulative Family of species percent Cyprinidae 297 28 Percidae 186 45 Catostomidae 71 51 Poeciliidae 69 58 Ictaluridae 46 62 Goodeidae 45 66 Atherinopsidae 39 70 Salmonidae 38 74 Cyprinodontidae 35 77 Fundulidae 34 80 Centrarchidae 31 83 Cottidae 30 86 Petromyzontidae 21 88 Cichlidae 16 89 Clupeidae 10 90 Eleotridae 10 91 Acipenseridae 8 92 Osmeridae 6 92 Elassomatidae 6 93 Gobiidae 6 93 Amblyopsidae 6 94 Pimelodidae 6 94 Gasterosteidae 5 95 source: Compiled primarily from Mayden (1992), Nelson et al. (2004), and Miller and Norris (2005). uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 3 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 3.1 Biogeographic Relationships of Species from a Sample of Fishes from the Ouachita River, Arkansas, at the Confl uence with the Little Missouri River (Ross, pers. observ.) Origin/ Pre- Pleistocene Taxa distribution Source Highland Stoneroller, Campostoma spadiceum 2 Mayden 1987a; Blum et al. 2008; Cashner et al. 2010 Blacktail Shiner, Cyprinella venusta 3 Mayden 1987a Steelcolor Shiner, Cyprinella whipplei 1 Mayden 1987a Redfi n Shiner, Lythrurus umbratilis 4 Mayden 1987a Bigeye Shiner, Notropis boops 1 Wiley and Mayden 1985; Mayden 1987a Bullhead Minnow, Pimephales vigilax 4 Mayden 1987a Mountain Madtom, Noturus eleutherus 2a Mayden 1985, 1987a Creole Darter, Etheostoma collettei 2a Mayden 1985 Orangebelly Darter, Etheostoma radiosum 2a Page 1983; Mayden 1985, 1987a Speckled Darter, Etheostoma stigmaeum 3 Page 1983; Simon 1997 Redspot Darter, Etheostoma artesiae 3 Mayden 1985; Piller et al.
    [Show full text]
  • (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae (Sensu Lato) Bychowsky & Nagibina, 1968): an Endoparasite of Croakers (Teleostei: Sciaenidae) from Indonesia
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae (sensu lato) Bychowsky & Nagibina, 1968): An endoparasite of croakers (Teleostei: Sciaenidae) from Indonesia Stefan Theisen1*, Harry W. Palm1,2, Sarah H. Al-Jufaili1,3, Sonja Kleinertz1 a1111111111 a1111111111 1 Aquaculture and Sea-Ranching, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany, 2 Centre for Studies in Animal Diseases, Udayana University, Badung Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, 3 Laboratory of Microbiology Analysis, a1111111111 Fishery Quality Control Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Wealth, Al Bustan, Sultanate of Oman a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS An endoparasitic monogenean was identified for the first time from Indonesia. The oesopha- Citation: Theisen S, Palm HW, Al-Jufaili SH, gus and anterior stomach of the croakers Nibea soldado (LaceÂpède) and Otolithes ruber Kleinertz S (2017) Pseudempleurosoma haywardi (Bloch & Schneider) (n = 35 each) sampled from the South Java coast in May 2011 and Joh- sp. nov. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae (sensu lato) Bychowsky & Nagibina, 1968): An nius amblycephalus (Bleeker) (n = 2) (all Sciaenidae) from Kedonganan fish market, South endoparasite of croakers (Teleostei: Sciaenidae) Bali coast, in November 2016, were infected with Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. from Indonesia. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0184376. Prevalences in the first two croakers were 63% and 46%, respectively, and the two J. ambly- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184376 cephalus harboured three
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Alabama Calibration of The
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist WATER INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM CALIBRATION OF THE INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY FOR THE SOUTHERN PLAINS ICHTHYOREGION IN ALABAMA OPEN-FILE REPORT 0908 by Patrick E. O'Neil and Thomas E. Shepard Prepared in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................ 1 Introduction.......................................................... 1 Acknowledgments .................................................... 6 Objectives........................................................... 7 Study area .......................................................... 7 Southern Plains ichthyoregion ...................................... 7 Methods ............................................................ 8 IBI sample collection ............................................. 8 Habitat measures............................................... 10 Habitat metrics ........................................... 12 The human disturbance gradient ................................... 15 IBI metrics and scoring criteria..................................... 19 Designation of guilds....................................... 20 Results and discussion................................................ 22 Sampling sites and collection results . 22 Selection and scoring of Southern Plains IBI metrics . 41 1. Number of native species ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Systematics of Western North American Cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)
    Zootaxa 3586: 281–303 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EFA9728-D4BB-467E-A0E0-0DA89E7E30AD Molecular systematics of western North American cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) SUSANA SCHÖNHUTH 1, DENNIS K. SHIOZAWA 2, THOMAS E. DOWLING 3 & RICHARD L. MAYDEN 1 1 Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, 3507 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. E-mail S.S: [email protected] ; E-mail RLM: [email protected] 2 Department of Biology and Curator of Fishes, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The phylogenetic or evolutionary relationships of species of Cypriniformes, as well as their classification, is in a era of flux. For the first time ever, the Order, and constituent Families are being examined for relationships within a phylogenetic context. Relevant findings as to sister-group relationships are largely being inferred from analyses of both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Like the vast majority of Cypriniformes, due to an overall lack of any phylogenetic investigation of these fishes since Hennig’s transformation of the discipline, changes in hypotheses of relationships and a natural classification of the species should not be of surprise to anyone. Basically, for most taxa no properly supported phylogenetic hypothesis has ever been done; and this includes relationships with reasonable taxon and character sampling of even families and subfamilies.
    [Show full text]