Simultaneous Production of Diacetone Alcohol and Mesityl Oxide from Acetone Using Reactive Distillation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Simultaneous Production of Diacetone Alcohol and Mesityl Oxide from Acetone Using Reactive Distillation Simultaneous production of diacetone alcohol and mesityl oxide from acetone using reactive distillation Suman Thotla, Vishal Agarwal, Sanjay M. Mahajani∗ Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India Abstract Dimerization of acetone (Ac) yields diacetone alcohol (DAA), which on further dehydration gives mesityl oxide (MO) along with various side-products. The reacting system is a combination of various series and parallel reactions. In the present work, the reaction is studied using a cation exchange resin (Amberlyst 15᭨) as catalyst. The effect of catalyst loading and temperature on reaction kinetics was evaluated and three models based on simplified Langmuir–Hinselwood mechanism are proposed. Aim of the work is to minimize undesired side-products and understand the effect of different parameters and operating modes on DAA:MO product ratio in reactive distillation (RD). It has been shown that the reaction when operated in a reactive rectification mode offers flexibility in the relative production rates of DAA and MO. The experimental results obtained are explained by simulation. Keywords: Acetone; Diacetone alcohol; Mesityl oxide; Reactive distillation; Cation exchange resin; Kinetics; Selectivity 1. Introduction further produces heavier products, such as isophorone. Fig. 1 shows the reactions of interest. Diacetone Alcohol (DAA) and mesityl oxide (MO) are indus- In the present study, we explore the possibility of using reac- trially useful products derived from acetone. DAA is produced tive distillation (RD) to conveniently manipulate DAA:MO ra- by selective aldol condensation of acetone. It is an industrially tio. RD is a popular multifunctional reactor that has been used important compound which is mainly used as a solvent in pu- successfully for many commercial processes in the last two rification processes. It is also used as a component of solvent decades (Sharma and Mahajani, 2002). There are various mo- blends for nitrocellulose, acrylic, and cellulose acetate lacquers tives behind its several applications and selectivity engineering and thinners. Other applications of DAA include metal clean- to manipulate the product composition is one of them (Agarwal ing compounds, degreasers, stripping aids for textiles, gum and et al., 2006). With judicious choice of operating parameters, one resin removers in automobile carburetor cleaners. Dehydration can manipulate the composition profiles in the reactive zone of of DAA produces 4-methyl-3-penten-2-one, commonly known the column and obtain enhanced selectivity towards the desired as MO. MO is a useful compound with various applications, product(s). the most important being the precursor for the production of Various kinetic studies on this reaction using different cata- a popular solvent methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK). Hydrogena- lysts have been performed in the past. The aldol condensation tion of MO under suitable conditions gives MIBK in high yields of acetone is commonly conducted in the presence of base (O’Keefe et al., 2005). Aldol condensation of MO and acetone catalyst such as NaOH, KOH, Ca(OH)2 and Ba(OH)2. Many other alternative catalysts such as metal oxides and hydroxides, which exhibit both acidic and basic properties, were found to offer less selectivity towards DAA as compared to that ob- tained by the homogeneous catalyst (Lippert et al., 1991). A detailed kinetic study of aldol condensation of acetone using 5568 O O Table 1 OH ᭨ K1 Properties of Amberlyst 15 1) 2 H3CHCH3 (H3C)2 C 2C CH3 K2 Acetone Diacetone alcohol Property Units Value OH O O Minimum exchange capacity (dry basis) eq/kg 4.7 2 K3 Internal surface area m /gm 50 2) (H C) C H C CH (H C) CHC CH + H O 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 Particle size mm 0.5(90%) Diacetone alcohol Mesityl Oxide Density gm/lit 780 Shape – Bead O O ◦ K Maximum operating temperature C 120 3) 4 Heavier products H3C CH3 + (H3C)2 CHC CH3 Acetone Mesityl Oxide O O K ties of the catalyst are listed in Table 1. Before its use, the fresh 4) (H C) CH + H 5 (H C) CH HC CH 3 2 CHC 3 2 3 2 3 catalyst was carefully washed with pure water, isopropyl alco- Mesityl Oxide MIBK hol, dilute hydrochloric acid and then again with pure water sequentially. It was then dried at 70 ◦C under vacuum for about Fig. 1. Reaction scheme for aldol condensation of acetone and related reac- tions. 12 h to remove moisture present in it. 2.1.2. Apparatus and procedure anion exchange resin (Amberlite IRA-900) has also been re- The reaction was performed in a 300 ml stainless steel batch ported in the literature (Podrebarac et al., 1997). This reaction is autoclave (Parr, USA) equipped with temperature and speed also catalyzed by acid catalyst, however, the rapid dehydration monitoring facility. The desired quantities of acetone (i.e. 190 of DAA to MO usually follows and DAA:MO ratio reduces to gm) and the catalyst were charged before the heating was a vanishing level (March, 1985; Panov and Fripiat, 1998; Flego started. The agitation was started, typically after 5 min, when and Perego, 2000; Kim and Hatfield, 1985). It is for this reason the desired reaction temperature was attained. This time was that the cation exchangers, as acid catalyst, have not attracted considered as the zero reaction time. The samples were re- much attention when the objective is to selectively produce moved after specific time intervals and were cooled through a DAA. To the best of our knowledge, barring few studies (Klein coil immersed in chilled water to prevent acetone evaporation and Banchero, 1956), there is not much information available during the sampling. Various experiments were carried out to on this reaction with cation exchange resin as catalyst. study the effect of different parameters like temperature and Podrebarac et al. (1998) used RD for this reaction with an ob- catalyst loading on the kinetics of the reaction. jective of selectively producing DAA from acetone, in the pres- ence of anion exchange resins. In the present study we address 2.1.3. Analysis the simultaneous production of DAA and MO from acetone in ᭨ A gas chromatograph (GC-911; Mak Anlytica India Ltd.) RD using cation exchange resin (Amberlyst 15 ) which has equipped with flame ionization detector (FID) was used to not been explored till date. The aim is to manipulate DAA:MO analyze the reaction mixture of acetone, MO and DAA. The ratio by conducting the reaction in a RD column, which oper- analysis was carried out in a 30 m long BP-5 column (SGE, ates close to or above the boiling point of acetone. To predict Australia) with an inner diameter of 0.55 mm. Elution was the performance of a catalytic distillation column, liquid phase established by nitrogen as a carrier gas at a flow rate of kinetic data for DAA and MO formation at temperatures near 0.5 ml/min. Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) was used as an exter- the boiling point of acetone is required. The kinetic data was nal standard. The water concentration was calculated based on obtained in a laboratory batch reactor and a kinetic model has the material balance. The molar amount of water formed was been developed. Batch reactive distillation (BRD) and contin- assumed to be same as that of MO because the formation of uous reactive distillation (CRD) studies have been performed heavier side-products was negligible compared to the amount to demonstrate the potential of reactive distillation to enhance of acetone converted or MO formed. Klein and Banchero the selectivity towards the intermediate product(s). The results (1956) proved that this method of analysis is sufficiently of BRD and CRD are validated independently using simulation accurate over a temperature range of 30.75 ◦C. studies based on the kinetics developed in the present work. 2.1.4. Calculations for selectivity and conversion 2. Kinetic model development Conversion of acetone is calculated on the basis of initial moles of acetone 2.1. Experimental moles of acetone present X = 1 − . (1) 2.1.1. Materials and catalyst initial moles of acetone taken < . Acetone (AR grade, moisture 0 02%) was supplied by Selectivity towards DAA is calculated as Merck Ltd. The catalyst used in the experiments is commercial ᭨ 2 × moles of DAA formed strong-cation exchange resin, Amberlyst 15 and was obtained S = . (2) from Rohm and Hass, Philadelphia, PA. The physical proper- moles of acetone converted 5569 0.07 Table 2 UNIQUAC model binary interaction parameters (Aspen Technology Inc., Total 2001) 0.06 Towards MO Acetone DAA MO Water 0.05 Towards DAA Acetone 0 79.56 −30.80 642.7335 − 0.04 DAA 36.17 0 212.5 1188.5242 MO 61.65 −102.1 0 −56.94 Water −87.7160 −351.0861 1044 0 0.03 Conversion of acetone 0.02 water concentration may be different for the two different re- 0.01 actions taking place simultaneously. Such an observation has 0 also been reported by Lemcoff and Cunningham (1971). The 0 50 100 150 200 models considered for reactions (3) and (4) are as follows: Time (min) Model A: ◦ n M (k a2 − k a − k a ) Fig. 2. Conversion vs time at 55 C and 3.5% (w/w) of catalyst loading. d DAA cat f Ac b DAA MO DAA rDAA = = , (5) dt (1 + KW aW )2 2.1.5. General course of the reaction dnMO McatkMOaDAA Fig. 2 shows the general course of reaction with respect r = = . (6) MO dt ( + K a )2 to time in the batch reactor. Since the equilibrium conversion 1 W W of acetone to DAA is very low, DAA concentration does not Model B: rise beyond a particular limit.
Recommended publications
  • Alcohols Combined 1405
    ALCOHOLS COMBINED 1405 Formulas: Table 1 MW: Table 1 CAS: Table 2 RTECS: Table 2 METHOD: 1405, Issue 1 EVALUATION: PARTIAL Issue 1: 15 March 2003 OSHA : Table 2 PROPERTIES: Table 1 NIOSH: Table 2 ACGIH: Table 2 COMPOUNDS: (1) n-butyl alcohol (4) n-propyl alcohol (7) cyclohexanol (2) sec-butyl alcohol (5) allyl alcohol (8) isoamyl alcohol (3) isobutyl alcohol (6) diacetone alcohol (9) methyl isobutyl carbinol SYNONYMS: See Table 3. SAMPLING MEASUREMENT SAMPLER: SOLID SORBENT TUBE TECHNIQUE: GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY, FID (Coconut shell charcoal, 100 mg/50 mg) ANALYTE: Compounds above FLOW RATE: 0.01 to 0.2 L/min DESORPTION: 1 mL 5% 2-propanol in CS2 Compounds: (1-3 ) (4-9) VOL-MIN: 2 L 1 L INJECTION -MAX: 10 L 10 L VOLUME: 1 µL SHIPMENT: Routine TEMPERATURE -INJECTION: 220 °C SAMPLE -DETECTOR: 250 - 300 °C STABILITY: See Evaluation of Method. -COLUMN: 35 °C (7 minutes), to 60 °C at 5 °C/minute, hold 5 minutes, up to BLANKS: 2 to 10 field blanks per set 120 °C at 10 °C /minute, hold 3 minutes. CARRIER GAS: He, 4 mL/min ACCURACY COLUMN: Capillary, fused silica, 30 m x 0.32-mm RANGE STUDIED: Not studied [1, 2]. ID; 0.5 µm film polyethylene glycol, DB- wax or equivalent BIAS: Not determined CALIBRATION: Solutions of analyte in eluent (internal OVERALL standard optional) PRECISION (Ö ): Not determined rT RANGE: See EVALUATION OF METHOD. ACCURACY: Not determined ESTIMATED LOD: 1 µg each analyte per sample PRECISION: See EVALUATION OF METHOD. APPLICABILITY: This method may be used to determine two or more of the specified analytes simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information
    Supporting Information Section 1 Components of DCM based coating strippers Table 1. Composition of Klean Strip Premium. CAS # Components Concentration 75-09-2 Dichloromethane 70.0-95.0% 67-56-1 Methanol < 5.0% 127087-87-0 Poly(oxy-1,2-ethandiyl) < 5.0% 124-38-9 Carbon dioxide < 5.0% Table 2. Composition of Klean Strip X. CAS # Components Concentration 75-09-2 Dichloromethane 30.0 – 40.0% 67-56-1 Methanol 15.0 – 26.0% 67-64-1 Acetone < 10.0% 1330-20-7 Xylene < 10.0% 108-88-3 Toluene < 10.0% 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene < 5.0% 64-17-5 Ethyl alcohol < 5.0% 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol < 5.0% Section 2 Sample preparation for the dwell time test As Figure S1 shows, a gasket was pasted on the conformal coating surface and a sheet of parafilm attached to the back of the printed circuit board to avoid solvent leakage dur- ing the dwell test. Figure 1. Sample preparation for the dwell time test. Section 3 Thickness measurement of coated PCBs Materials and Equipment Printed circuit boards (PCB), acrylic conformal coating, tape, Dektak stylus profiler (Bruker, Arizona, USA). Methods A piece of tape was attached on a PCB before coating. The coating was applied on the PCB using the same method as dip coating in the dwell time test. The PCB was sta- tioned and dried at room temperature for over 24 hours. The tape was then torn out to create a coating step. The PCB was fixed on the detection table using tapes. The stylus scanned from sub- strate to coated area.
    [Show full text]
  • Silfort* SHC1200 Silfort* SHC1200
    Technical Data Sheet SilFORT* SHC1200 SilFORT* SHC1200 Description SilFORT SHC1200 Hard Coat SHC1200 hard coat has been found to yield a clear mar-resistant film when applied to a suitably prepared plastic substrate. It can be applied by flow, dip or spray coating. SilFORT SHP401 Primer SHP401 air-dried primer is used as an adhesion promoter for SHC1200 hard coat on polycarbonate resin. It can be applied by flow, dip or spray coating. Key Features and Benefits Fast cure Abrasion resistance Scratch resistance Good clarity Solvent/chemical resistance SHP401 Primer No thermal cure required Improves coating adhesion Improves water resistance Page 1 of 6 *SilFORT ist ein Markenname der Momentive Performance Materials Inc. SilFORT* SHC1200 Improves ultraviolet resistance SHP401 Primer/SHC1200 Hard Coat on polycarbonate (2 - 4 micron Topcoat Thickness) Cured Film Properties Film Thickness, slow dip coat, 10-18 cm/min 2 – 4 micron withdrawal,18-20% solids at 22C Taber Abrasion, 500 cycles 500G on primed < 6.0 % Haze measured per polycarbonate (CS10F wheel) ASTM D1003. * Index of Refraction 1.4 *Humidity during coating and testing will affect final values. Typical Physical Properties Property SHC1200 Hard Coat SHP401 Primer Solids Content, % 20 ± 1 2.1 ± 0.2 Methanol, Isobutanol, 1-Methoxy-2-propanol, Diacetone Solvent Isopropanol Alcohol Flash Point, PMCC 19.4C 36.1C Density, g/cm3 0.911 0.959 pH 7.3 ± 0.2 - Viscosity, cstk @ 25°C 20 ± 3 4 - 7 Dry Film Thickness, 2.75 - 4.5 0.5 micron VOC, g/l 710 937 Patent Status Nothing contained herein shall be construed to imply the nonexistence of any relevant patents or to constitute the permission, inducement or recommendation to practice any invention covered by any patent, without authority from the owner of the patent.
    [Show full text]
  • Methanol and Acetone Is in Organic Synthesis
    Honeywell Burdick & Jackson® Characterization and Evaluation of Technical Grade Solvents and Comparison to their Purified Counterparts S. Lorenz, M. Bosma, A. Kemperman, V. Mohan and J. Przybytek Abstract: Technical grade solvents and their purified counterparts are separately useful for many different applications. One important application for the common solvents acetonitrile, methanol and acetone is in organic synthesis. Another important application for acetonitrile and methanol is as a diluent or mobile phase in chemical analysis, ie: UV-VIS spectroscopy, HPLC and LC-MS. We have observed and identified a number of impurities in these solvents that may interfere with synthesis and/or accurate analytical testing. For instance, a common contaminant in acetonitrile is acrylonitrile. Trace aldehydes and ketones can be found in methanol. Diacetone alcohol is commonly found in acetone. We have characterized impurity levels in commonly used solvents and will show the variability present in technical grade and purified solvents, using GC, GC-MS and LC-MS. Results on the impurities and their probable effect on synthesis and analytical testing will be presented. METHANOL HPLC Comparison of Methanol Grades HPLC Trace using HPLC Trace using HPLC Method Technical Grade Methanol Purified Methanol 0.200 0.200 Time % % 0.190 0.190 0.180 0.180 (min) Water Methanol 0.170 0.170 0.160 0.160 0.150 0.150 0 95 5 0.140 AU) 0.140 AU) ( ( 0.130 0.130 e e 20 0 100 c 0.120 c 0.120 n 0.110 n 0.110 a a b 0.100 b 0.100 r r 25 0 100 o 0.090 o 0.090 s s 0.080 0.080
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA, Inert (Other) Pesticide Ingredients in Pesticide Products
    Inert Ingredients ordered by CAS Number Updated August 2004 CAS PREFIX NAME List No. 50-21-5 Lactic acid 4B 50-70-4 Sorbitol 4A 50-81-7 L- Ascorbic acid 4A 50-99-7 Dextrose 4A 51-03-6 Piperonyl butoxide 3 51-05-8 Procaine hydrochloride 3 51-55-8 Atropine 3 52-51-7 2- Bromo-2-nitro-propane-1,3-dio 3 54-21-7 Sodium salicylate 3 56-81-5 Glycerol (glycerin) 1,2,3 propanetriol 4A 56-86-0 L- Glutamic acid 3 56-95-1 Chlorhexidine diacetate 3 57-10-3 Hexadecanoic acid 4A 57-11-4 Stearic acid 4A 57-13-6 Urea 4A 57-48-7 D- Fructose 4B 57-50-1 Sugar 4A 57-55-6 Propylene glycol 4B 57-88-5 (3.beta.)- Cholest-5-en-3-ol 4B 58-08-2 1H- Purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl- 4B 58-56-0 Thiamine mononitrate 4B 58-85-5 Biotin 3 58-86-6 D- Xylose 4B 58-95-7 Vitamin E acetate 3 59-30-3 Folic acid 4B 59-40-5 N-(2- Quinoxalinyl)sulfanilide 3 59-67-6 Nicotinic acid 3 60-00-4 Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) 4B 60-12-8 Benzeneethanol 3 60-29-7 Ethane, 1,1'-oxybis- 3 60-33-3 Linoleic acid 3 61-73-4 C.I. Basic Blue 9 3 62-33-9 Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), calcium4B 62-54-4 Acetic acid, calcium salt 4A 63-42-3 D-(+)-Lactose 4A 63-68-3 L- Methionine 4B 64-02-8 Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), tetraso4B 64-17-5 Ethanol 4B 64-18-6 Formic acid 3 64-19-7 Acetic acid 4B 64-86-8 Colchicine 3 65-85-0 Benzoic acid 4B 66-71-7 1,10- Phenanthroline 3 67-03-8 Thiamin hydrochloride 3 67-43-6 1,1,4,7,7- Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid 3 67-48-1 Choline chloride 4B 67-56-1 Methyl alcohol 3 67-63-0 2- Propanol 4B 67-64-1 Acetone 3 67-68-5 Dimethyl
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Assessment of Diacetone Alcohol As Used in Cosmetics
    Safety Assessment of Diacetone Alcohol as Used in Cosmetics Status: Draft Tentative Report for Panel Review Release Date: February 16, 2021 Panel Meeting Date: March 11 – 12, 2021 The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; David E. Cohen, M.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; Lisa A. Peterson, Ph.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. Previous Panel member involved in this assessment: James G. Marks, Jr., M.D. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Executive Director is Bart Heldreth, Ph.D. This safety assessment was prepared by Priya Cherian, Scientific Analyst/Writer, CIR. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1620 L Street, NW, Suite 1200 ♢ Washington, DC 20036-4702 ♢ ph 202.331.0651 ♢ fax 202.331.0088 ♢ [email protected] Distributed for Comment Only -- Do Not Cite or Quote Commitment & Credibility since 1976 Memorandum To: Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety Members and Liaisons From: Priya Cherian, Scientific Analyst/Writer, CIR Date: February 16, 2021 Subject: Safety Assessment of Diacetone Alcohol as Used in Cosmetics Enclosed is the Draft Tentative Report of the Safety Assessment of Diacetone Alcohol as Used in Cosmetics (diacet032021rep). At the September 2020 meeting, the Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Review Safety (Panel) issued an Insufficient Data Announcement (IDA) for this ingredient. In order to come to a conclusion of safety, the Panel requested impurities data. Since the previous review of this report, no new data have been received.
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Analysis of Mesityl Oxide and Diacetone Alcohol in Pharmaceuticals by Capillary Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection
    id22818046 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com AASeptemnnbeaar 2ll0y0y9ttiiccaall Volume 8 Issue 3 An Indian Journal Trade Science Inc. CCHHEEMMIISSTTRRYY Full Paper ACAIJ, 8(3) 2009 [346-349] Trace analysis of mesityl oxide and diacetone alcohol in pharmaceuticals by capillary gas chromatography with flame ionization detection K.Rama Seshaiah*1,2, V.Krishna Reddy1, Ch.Krishnaiah1, VVNKV Prasadaraju1, K.Mukkanti2, V.Ranga Reddy1 ’ 1Dr.Reddy s Laboratories Ltd. Active pharmaceutical ingredients, IPDO, Bachupally, Hyderabad-500072, A.P, (INDIA) 2Department of chemisty, J.N.T.University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500072, A.P, (INDIA) E-mail: [email protected] Received: 26th May, 2009 ; Accepted: 5th June, 2009 ABSTRACT KEYWORDS A capillary gas chromatographic method using flame ionization detection Pharmaceutical analysis; was developed and validated for the trace analysis (ppm level) of mesityl Mesityl oxide and Diacetone oxide and diacetone alcohol in pharmaceutical drug substance. The method alcohol. utilizes a megabore capillary column with bonded and crosslinked polyeth- ylene glycol stationary phase. A dissolve-and-injection approach was adopted for sample introduction in a split mode (1:1). Water is used as ppm and limit of sample solvent. A limit of detection of about 1.5 and 2 ppm were achieved for the Mesityl oxide and quantitation of about 6 and 10 Diacetone alcohol in drug substance samples. The method optimization and validation are also discussed in this paper. 2009 Trade Science Inc. - INDIA INTRODUCTION ods that are sensitive enough and meet all the regula- tory requirements. Recently, the potential health hazards of trace The pure mesityl oxide and diacetone alcohol are amounts of mesityl oxide and diacetone alcohol in phar- liquids at ambient temperature with a boiling point °C and 170°C respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Aspects in the Preparation of Phorone 2
    Novel Aspects in the Preparation of Phorone Maria Konieczny* and George Sosnovsky Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, USA Z. Naturforsch. 33b, 454-460 (1978); received Januaiy 4, 1978 Phorone, Mesityl Oxide, Triacetoneamine, Nitroxyls The condensation of acetone using anhydrous hydrogen chloride results after three weeks at room temperature, in a 15% yield of phorone (4) and a 75% yield of mesityl oxide (5). In the presence of one weight percent of the Lewis acid, aluminium chloride, the yield of 4 is increased to 39%. An increase in the amount of the Lewis acid, aluminium chloride, to ten weight percent results in a 22% yield of phorone (4) and a 68% yield of mesityl oxide (5). In the presence of one hundred weight percent of aluminium chloride, ( CH3)2C = CHC CHr C(CH3)2 (CH3)2 C=CHCCH3 in the absence of hydrogen chloride, the condensation produces a 62% yield of mesityl oxide (5) and no phorone (4). In the course of this investigation, two intermediates, 6 and 7 o u (CH5)2C CH2CCH5 (CHJ)2CCH2CCH2C(CH3)2 CI 6 7 were isolated and characterized for the first time. These intermediates are the actual products formed in the condensation of acetone with hydrogen chloride, and not the "free" phorone (4) and mesityl oxide (5). The conversion of 6 and 7 to 5 and 4, respectively, occurs during the isolation stage using a saturated solution of ethanolic potassium hydroxide. Since the discovery of the long-lived nitroxyl science. The most commonly used nitroxyls are radical [1], 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-oxopiperidine-l- prepared by the catalytic oxidation of triacetone- oxyl, and its derivatives, considerably interest has amine (1) or its derivatives with 30% aqueous been shown in the application of these nitroxyls in hydrogen peroxide in the presence of sodium various areas of biological [2, 3] and polymer [3] tungstate [3, 4].
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the Addendum to The
    International Journal of Toxicology, 27(Suppl. 2f53—69, 2008 Copyright © American College of Toxicology ISSN: 1091-5818 print! 1092-874X online 001: 10.1080/10915810802244504 Final Report of the Addendum to the Safety Assessment of n-Butyl Alcohol as Used in Cosmetics’ n-Butyl Alcohol is a primary aliphatic alcohol historically used in care cosmetic products, but new concentration as a solvent nail INTRODUCTION of use data indicate that it also is being used at low concentrations in eye makeup, personal hygiene, and shaving cosmetic products. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) evaluated the safety it-Butyl Alcohol has been generally recognized as safe for use as a of n-Butyl Alcohol (n-BuOH) in 1987, finding it safe in the flavoring substance in food and appears on the 1982 Food and Drug practices of use and concentration in nail products (Elder 1987). list of inactive ingredients for approved pre Administration (FDA) This original safety assessment was specific in that the conclu scription drug products. n-Butyl Alcohol can be absorbed through regards the use of n-Butyl Alcohol in the skin, tangs, and gastrointestinal tract. n-Butyl Alcohol may be sion was issued only as formed by hydrolysis of butyl acetate in the blood, but is rapidly nail products. oxidized. The single oral dose ED50 of n-Butyl Alcohol for rats was Recently, CIR undertook a re-review of this ingredient to de 0.79 to 4.36 g/kg. The dermal ED50 for rabbits was 4.2 g/kg. Inhala termine what additional data relevant to the safety of n-Butyl Al humans demonstrate sensory irritation of tion toxicity studies in 3.
    [Show full text]
  • These Two Workbooks Are Provided by As a Convenient Introduc
    These two workbooks are provided by www.hansen-solubility.com as a convenient introduc They are Copyright © 2013 Prof Steven Abbott If you find bugs/issues or would like extra functionality, please email Steven Abbott [email protected] ction to some of the basic HSP methods HSP Sphere dD dP dH R Good 11 18.4 9.7 8.0 7.1 Bad 11 Test Value 16 7 8 Total 22 Delta 2.4 11.4 10.4 Distance 5.5 RED 0.77 Solvents dD dP dH MVol Score Distance Acetone 15.5 10.4 7 73.8 1 5.915773 Acetonitrile 15.3 18 6.1 52.9 0 10.52754 n-Amyl Acetate 15.8 3.3 6.1 148 0 n-Amyl Alcohol 15.9 5.9 13.9 108.6 0 Benzene 18.4 0 2 52.9 0 11.38507 Benzyl Alcohol 18.4 6.3 13.7 103.8 0 Benzyl Benzoate 20 5.1 5.2 190.3 0 1-Butanol 16 5.7 15.8 92 0 2-Butanol 15.8 5.7 14.5 92 0 n-Butyl Acetate 15.8 3.7 6.3 132.6 0 t-Butyl Acetate 15 3.7 6 134.8 0 t-Butyl Alcohol 15.2 5.1 14.7 96 0 Butyl Benzoate 18.3 5.6 5.5 178.1 0 Butyl Diglycol Acetate 16 4.1 8.2 208.2 0 Butyl Glycol Acetate 15.3 7.5 6.8 171.2 0 n-Butyl Propionate 15.7 5.5 5.9 149.3 0 Caprolactone (Epsilon) 19.7 15 7.4 110.8 0 Chloroform 17.8 3.1 5.7 80.5 1 7.075453 m-Cresol 18.5 6.5 13.7 105 1 6.563973 Cyclohexane 16.8 0 0.2 108.9 0 12.82752 Cyclohexanol 17.4 4.1 13.5 105.7 0 Cyclohexanone 17.8 8.4 5.1 104.2 0 Di-isoButyl Ketone 16 3.7 4.1 177.4 0 Diacetone Alcohol 15.8 8.2 10.8 124.3 0 Diethyl Ether 14.5 2.9 4.6 104.7 0 10.87429 Diethylene Glycol Monobut 16 7 10.6 170.4 0 Dimethyl Cyclohexane 16.1 0 1.1 140 0 Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) 18.4 16.4 10.2 71.3 1 7.066692 1,4-Dioxane 17.5 1.8 9 85.7 0 8.160898 1,3-Dioxolane
    [Show full text]
  • Gases Supported by IRI Analyzers
    Toll Free | 800.344.0321 Tel | 510.782.8100 Fax | 510.782.8101 www.InfraredIndustries.com The following is a list of gases and vapors that can be analyzed Gases Supported with certain gas analyzers from Infrared Industries. For any application of a particular gas, please contact us to by IRI Analyzers confi rm our ability to meet your needs. GAS/VAPOR GAS/VAPOR 1 Acetaldehyde (Ethanal) 30 trans2Butenal (Crotonaldehyde) 2 Acetaldehyde Diacetate (Ethylidene Diacetate) 31 2Butoxyetanol Skin (Butyl Cellosolve; Ethylene Glycol 3 Acetic Acid (Ethanoic Acid) Monobutyl Ether) 4 Acetophenone (Acetylbenzene; Methyl Phenyl Ketone) 32 Butyl Acetate 5 1Allyloxy2, 3Epoxypropane (A.G.E., Allyl Glycidyl Ether) 33 secButyl Acetate 6 1Aminobutane Skin (Butylamine) 34 tertButyl Acetate 7 Aminoethane (Ethylamine) 35 1tertButyl4Methylbenzene (ptertButyltoluene) 8 2Aminoethanol (Ethanolamine; Monoethanolamine) 36 Camphene 9 Aminomethane (Methylamine) 37 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 10 2Aminopropane (Isopropylamine) 38 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 11 2Aminotoluene Skin (oMethylaniline; oToluidine) 39 Carbonyl Sulfi de (CO 5) 40 Carbonyl Sulfi de (Carbon Oxysulfi de) 12 Ammonia (NH3) 13 Aniline Skin (Aminobenzene; Phenylamine) 41 Carvone (Carvol) 14 Benzaldehyde (Benzenecarbonal) 42 Chlorobenzene (Monochlorobenzene; Phenyl Chloride) 15 Benzene 43 1Chlorobutane (nButyl Chloride) 16 Benzyl Acetate 44 Chlorodifl uoromethane (Freon 22) 17 Bromobenzene (Phenyl Bromide) 45 1Chloro2, 3EpoxypropaneSkin (αEpichlorohydrin) 18 1Bromobutane (nButyl Bromide) 46 Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride)
    [Show full text]
  • Ketones and Quinones, Whether Or Not with Other Oxygen Function, and Their Halogenated, Sulphonated, Nitrated Or Nitrosated Derivatives
    29-VI Sub-Chapter VI KETONE-FUNCTION COMPOUNDS AND QUINONE-FUNCTION COMPOUNDS 29.14 - Ketones and quinones, whether or not with other oxygen function, and their halogenated, sulphonated, nitrated or nitrosated derivatives. - Acyclic ketones without other oxygen function : 2914.11 - - Acetone 2914.12 - - Butanone (methyl ethyl ketone) 2914.13 - - 4-Methylpentan-2-one (methyl isobutyl ketone) 2914.19 - - Other - Cyclanic, cyclenic or cycloterpenic ketones without other oxygen function : 2914.22 - - Cyclohexanone and methylcyclohexanones 2914.23 - - Ionones and methylionones 2914.29 - - Other - Aromatic ketones without other oxygen function : 2914.31 - - Phenylacetone (phenylpropan-2-one) 2914.39 - - Other 2914.40 - Ketone-alcohols and ketone-aldehydes 2914.50 - Ketone-phenols and ketones with other oxygen function - Quinones : 2914.61 - - Anthraquinone 2914.69 - - Other 2914.70 - Halogenated, sulphonated, nitrated or nitrosated derivatives The term “ ketones and quinones with other oxygen function ” means ketones and quinones which contain also one or more of the oxygen functions referred to in previous sub-Chapters (alcohol, ether, phenol, aldehyde, etc., functions). VI-2914-1 29.14 (A) KETONES These are compounds containing the group (>C=O), so-called “ carbonyl ” group, and can be represented by the general formula (R-CO-R1), in which R and R1 stand for alkyl or aryl radicals (methyl, ethyl, propyl, phenyl, etc.). Ketones may have two tautomeric forms, the true ketonic form (-CO-) and the enolic form (=C(OH)-), both of which fall in this heading. (I) Acyclic ketones. (1) Acetone (propanone) (CH3COCH3). Found in the products of the dry distillation of wood (methyl alcohol and crude pyroligneous acid), but is mainly obtained by synthesis.
    [Show full text]