REPORTER ~ an Unollicial Buuetinfor Tho Information of Membera of Atew of Monash Uoi.Arait
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
; I®~&~[H] REPORTER ~ An unollicial buUetinfor tho information of membera of ateW of Monash Uoi.arait, \. ,1 f.-.- - 2 MISS LESLIE SMITH FACULTIES AND FACl The Uni"versity learned with deep sorrow of' the death o:f Miss Leslie it is almost it Smith, on Saturday. 8th April. ent line but, can: Miss Sm i. th had been secretary to Pr-o f'e s s or- R.R. Andrew, Dean of' the situation that is Facul ty of' jeo d Lc Lne , since May I 1961. mentioned in my 0] the Legal Officer ~aculty board it { }~CULTI~S A~D FACULTY BOARDS the Professorial 1 In response to a recent question from the Dean of the Faculty of action upon such c Science, the Academic Registrar, acting on the advice of the Legal O:fricer, without amendment advised that a faculty has no power to make decisions or pass resolutions Board must, if' so which woul:i bind its f'aculty board. Council. While this opinion is no doubt accurate in law it conveys an incomplete Thus there are picture of the situation. As many members have joined the s t a f'f' since believed, prove t< 1965 when the Faculty Statute was under review, I take this opportunity ordinary way it 51 to describe the thinking that lies behind our present constitution, the conducts the bus Lr place or the various committees in the scheme of things, and the oppor suggestions of inc tunities open to individuals to participate in University affairs. My own worry at It should first be explained that when first made the Act envisaged have built up sue} faculties as the main initiating and responsible ar.ademic bodies. No work will prove a mention was made of departments, which in many facult:ies are in fact the wrong. most important units of organization. The membership of faculties in cluded all teachers of the rank of lecturer an,j abo ve and it t her-e f o r-e s ee-ned that it WOJ1d grow to such a size that satisfactory meetings - at least f'or the conduct o:f day-to-day business - would be difficult. The decision was therefore taken to create faculty boards, the govern AUSTAALIAN/ AMERIGj ing committees of faculties, of' a size that would ensure that they were Listed below ar reasonably representative while not being too large for satisfactOry visiting Australi€ discussion. The Professorial Board originally decided that 25 members would be appropriate but, .for a variety of' reasons, the boards eventually constituted now have between ~8 and 67 members. Name It was obvious that as time went on an increasing number of members of faculties would not belong to their faculty boards and would therefore not Associate As s be able to participate directly in the government of the University as it Pr-o t'es s o r- Hi~ was originally envisaged in the Act. It was there.fore decided to institute John Chynoweth Unj formal departmental mecting~ as a regular feature of our system so that member-s of' the academic staff', other than those w Lth short-term appointments, Prof'essor Pr-e now have an acknowledged place in the hierarchy of committees. Rhoda Dorsey Gr( It is essential to the philosophy of' the system that - with a small Ma, number of obvious exceptions - the aff'airs of the University shall not be conducted in secret. The wide distribution of Board and Council papers is Emeritus PrE intended to ensure that every-one in the place can know what is going on if Pr-of'e s s o r- Amy MiJ he is so minded and can spare the time to wade through the paper. Hostler Edl The way in which the system operates can be illustrated by two examples - one in which a proposal is enthusiastically supported by the departmental meeting at which it is f'irst described; the second a more contentious Professor Pr-e matter, perhaps involving criticism of a chairman of' department, shall we Willard Lacy an( say over the allocation of teaching duties? e e r The first proposal would presumably result in a resolution being passed Mit which would be transmitted in turn from departmental meeting, to faculty Arj board meeting, to Prof'essorial Board and finally, if' necessary, to Council. Thus there is in actual fact a recognized route from the individual staff' Proressor L.J. Pr< member to the University's ultimate governing body. Loerfler ral The second proposal, or complaint, might be blocked at the departmental Col meeting, but, if a sufficient number of' f'aculty members f'elt sufficiently strongly about it they would have the power to convene a full meeting of' their faculty, at which the proposal might carry the day. At this stage ... ------ - J FACULTIES AND FACULTY BOARDS {c ont , ] of Miss Leslie it is almost inconceivable that the faculty board would take a differ ent line but, constitutionally it could. This is presumably the sort of w, Dean of the situation that is contemplated in the question to the Academic Registrar mentioned in my opening paragraph. What would happen then? Although as the Legal Officer says, the faculty is not competent to instruct its faculty board it can certainly submit a resolution or a report direct to the Professorial Board which is expressly required to consider and take Faculty of action upon such a report. If the Professorial Board does not approve the Legal Officer, without amendment any recommendation made by a ~aculty the Pro~essorial pass resolutions Board must, ir so requested, transmit the original recommendation to Council. veys an incomplete Thus there are built-in sareguards in the system which will, it is he staff since believed, prove to be adequate even in quite extreme situations. In the his opportunity ordinary way it seems that the arrangement by which the raculty board nstitution, the conducts the business or the raculty does not prevent the views and and the oppor suggestions or individuals from being put forward and considered. y affairs. My own worry about all this is quite dirrerent. I am afraid that we Act envisaged have built up such an elaborate machinery that the €rfort or making it c bodies. No work will prove a real deterrent to experiment and change. I hope I am are in fact the wrong. faculties in- J.A.L. Matheson. i it theref'ore Vice-Chancellor. ry meetings - at iif'f'icul -t , ards, the govern AUSTRALIAN/AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION AWARDS that they 'Were Listed below are the names 01, American lecturers and research scholars satisf'actory visiting Australia under the 1967 programme. h.at 25 members Joards eventually Position in Position in Field Name or )er of members of U.S.A. Australia Specialization )uld therefore not Associate Professor University as it Associate of' University or American History )ided to institute Professor History, Ohio State Melbourne, system so that John Chynoweth University. March - Dec. 1967 ~t-term appointments, Proressor Professor of History, Monash and A.N.U. American History ~tees . wi th a small Rhoda Dorsey Groucher Gollege, Feb. - Oct. 1967 18th and 19th ;ity shall not be Maryland. Centuries. Council papers is ..-hat is going on if Emeritus President Emeritus, Melbourne Kinder Teacher Professor Amy Mills College or garten Teachers I Education for t e paper. Hostler Education, New York. College, ApJ:'i1 early childhood ~d by two examples ly the departmental July 1967. teaching. l contentious Professor PrOIessor of Mining University or Geology rr-t.men t , shall we Willard Lacy and Geological Engin Queensland, Feb. Copper Dep08its. ltion being passed eering, College of Sep. 1967. ;ing, to faculty Mines, University of Arizona. ~ssary, to Council. individual staff Professor L.J. Professor or Geog University of Physical Loerrler raphy, University 01 Geography water ; the departmental Newcastle, Feb. 'elt sufficiently Colorado Nov 1967. resource full meeting of problems and the geography At this stage or Anglo-America. - 4 AUSTRALIAN/AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION AWARDS (cont.) AUSTRALIAN/AMERIC Position in Position in Field of Name U.S .A. Australia Specialization Name Associate Associate Professor Polit~cs niversity of N.S.W. American Professor Pr Professor of Political Science, o'eb . - Nov. 1967. and government. M.H. stone Ma David Provost Fresno State College, si Cali:fornia. r i Dr. A.K. Chief, Psychology University of Sydney Clinical Professor Rosenwald Department, Illinois Feb. - Nov. 1967 Psychology N.J. Shaulis State Psychiatric Institute. Professor Professor of Chemical University of' N.S.W. Petroleum and M.R. Tek Engineering, Univer 8 months commencing Chemical sity of' Michigan. March or June 1967. Engineering. FACULTY CLUB Mr. A.A. Director (retired) Forest and Timber Forestry-Fire At the recent J. Brown Forest Fire Research Bureau, Canberra, control systems Club Cornmittee: 1 U.S. Department of Feb. - Nov. 1967. house; Honorary Sl Agriculture. Job Hawkes j Conani, C. Ambrose, Mrs. ] Assistant Assistant Professor New Guinea Research Anthropology, Mrs. H. Vebster. V • , specializing in Professor B.J. of Anthropology, Unit of' A. N• On the Monday :l Finney University of Calif Port Moresby. oocio-economic re-introduced and I ornia (Santa Barbara) Feb. - Nov. 1967. change. has proved very St and never less th~ Professor Research Professor University of N.S.W. Theatre Arts: service which memt Mordecai Southern Illinois June - Dec. 1967. contemporary Due to objectie Gorelik University. drama and theatre. the validity of rE children under thE Dr. H.C. Associate University of Agricultural advisers - becaUSE Knoblauch Administrator, Co Queensland, research policy, is planned to aIle operative State Aug. 1967 organization and Another decisie Research Service, May 1968.