DOCSLIB.ORG

Alexander As Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alexander As Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Justin Grant Vorhis 2017 © Copyright by Justin Grant Vorhis 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch by Justin Grant Vorhis Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Kathryn Anne Morgan, Chair This dissertation concerns the connection between Alexander the Great (356-323 B.C.), the famous Macedonian king, and Achilles, the preeminent Greek hero of the Trojan War. As scholars have long recognized, Alexander’s connection to Achilles represents both a historical and a literary phenomenon: Alexander not only portrayed himself as a second Achilles, but was also portrayed as such by those who wrote about him. While scholars have traditionally concentrated on the connection’s historical dimension, I concentrate in this study on its literary dimension (the Achilles motif), taking Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch, the three extant Alexander historians with the most developed literary agendas, as the focus of my study. With each historian, I ask two fundamental questions: First, what is the thematic significance of the Achilles motif in the specific passages of each historian’s work in which it appears? Second, what is the thematic significance of the Achilles motif in each historian’s work overall? ii This dissertation consists of three chapters, the first on Curtius’ Historiae Alexandri Magni (Histories of Alexander the Great), the second on Plutarch’s Life of Alexander, and the third on Arrian’s Anabasis of Alexander. In Chapter 1, I argue that Curtius uses the Achilles motif to highlight Alexander’s moral decline over the course of the work, his transformation, in effect, from the good rex (“king”) of the first pentad to the corrupt tyrannus (“tyrant”) of the second. In Chapter 2, I contend that Plutarch employs the Achilles motif, by and large, to characterize Alexander as a “spirited” man (θυμοειδής), as a man of heroism and ambition, but also passion and emotion. In Chapter 3, I argue that Arrian deploys the Achilles motif as a means of reinforcing his complex portrait of Alexander, a portrait simultaneously encomiastic and Stoic. Based on these three chapters, I draw two main conclusions: first, that the Achilles motif represents a remarkably flexibile literary device; and second, that the extant Alexander historians should, in accordance with recent scholarship, be viewed not as mere compilers of the lost Alexander historians, but as sophisticated artists in their own right. iii The dissertation of Justin Grant Vorhis is approved. Robert A. Gurval Alex C. Purves M. Rahim Shayegan Kathryn Anne Morgan, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles iv DEDICATION For my dad, who sparked my passion for Alexander all those years ago For my mom, who provided me the love and support with which to pursue this passion and For Celsiana, who has been my best friend and truest partner through the ordeal of graduate school, the Achilles to my Patroclus, the Alexander to my Hephaestion v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................ xii BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ....................................................................................................... xiii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 The Alexander-Achilles Connection: The Historical Dimension................................. 2 The Alexander-Achilles Connection: The Literary Dimension ................................. 12 Aims and Methodology .............................................................................................. 18 CHAPTER 1 Curtius’ Historiae Alexandri Magni ....................................................................... 25 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 25 The Punishment of Betis (4.6.26-29).......................................................................... 29 The Marriage of Alexander and Roxane (8.4.22-26) ................................................. 37 The Battle between Alexander and the Indian Rivers (9.4.8-14) ............................... 43 Alexander’s Apologia to the Macedonian Generals (9.6.16-26) ................................ 51 The Diplomatic Exchanges between Alexander and Darius ...................................... 60 i. The First Diplomatic Exchange (4.1.7-14) ..................................................... 63 ii. The Second Diplomatic Exchange (4.5.1-8) ................................................... 69 iii. The Third Diplomatic Exchange (4.11.1-10, 16-21) ...................................... 72 The Death of Statira (4.10.18-24) ............................................................................... 78 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 84 CHAPTER 2 Plutarch’s Life of Alexander ................................................................................... 86 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 86 The Tutelage of Lysimachus (Alex. 5.7-8) ................................................................. 89 The Pilgrimage to Troy (Alex. 15.7-9) ....................................................................... 97 Alexander’s Arming Scene at the Battle of Gaugamela (Alex. 32.8-11) .................. 108 Alexander’s Aristeia at the Mallian Town (Alex. 63.2-10) ...................................... 115 The Death of Hephaestion (Alex. 72.1-5) ................................................................. 128 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 137 CHAPTER 3 Arrian’s Anabasis of Alexander ............................................................................ 138 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 138 The Pilgrimage to Troy (Anab. 1.12.1) .................................................................... 141 vi The Death of Hephaestion (Anab. 7.14.2-8, 16.8) .................................................... 147 The Murder of Cleitus (Anab. 4.9.1-6) ..................................................................... 155 The Mutiny at the Hyphasis (Anab. 5.28) ................................................................ 162 Alexander’s Aristeia at the Mallian Town (Anab. 6.9.2-6) ...................................... 170 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 177 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 179 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... 183 vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Primary Sources1 Ael. Aelian V.H. Historical Miscellany Aeschin. Aeschines In Ctes. Against Ctesiphon In Tim. Against Timarchus App. Appian B.Civ. Civil Wars Arr. Arrian Anab. Anabasis of Alexander Ind. Indica Ath. Athenaeus Cic. Cicero Pro Arch. Pro Archia Curt. Curtius Dio Cass. Dio Cassius Dio Chrys. Dio Chrysostom Or. Orations Diod. Diodorus Siculus Dion. Hal. Dionysius of Halicarnassus Ant. Rom. Roman Antiquities Comp. On the Arrangement of Words Eur. Euripides Andr. Andromache Tro. Trojan Women Fg. Sabb. Fragmentum Sabbaiticum Harp. Harpocration Hdt. Herodotus Hom. Homer Il. Iliad Hor. Horace Ars P. Ars poetica Carm. Carmina Ep. Epistulae Isoc. Isocrates Phil. To Philip It. Alex. Itinerarium Alexandri Joseph. Josephus A.J. Jewish Antiquities 1 With Greek works, I give abbreviations in Latin, but titles in English, unless the work is known primarily by its Latin title (e.g., Indica). With Latin works, I give both abbreviations and titles in Latin, except in the case of the Metz Epitome. viii Jul. Val. Julius Valerius Just. Justin Long. Longinus Subl. On the Sublime M.E. Metz Epitome Ov. Ovid Am. Amores Her. Heroides Pind. Pindar Nem. Nemean Odes Plat. Plato Resp. Republic Plut. Plutarch Ad princ. inerud. To an Uneducated Ruler Alex. Life of Alexander Ap. reg. Sayings of Kings and Commanders Caes. Life of Caesar Cim. Life of Cimon Cons. ad uxor. Consolation to His Wife De Alex. fort. On the Fortune or the Virtue of Alexander Dem. Life of Demosthenes Mor. Moralia Pel. Life of Pelopidas Per. Life of Pericles Quaest. conv. Table Talk Quomodo adul. How a Young Man Should Listen to Poetry Quomodo adult. How to Tell a Flatterer from a Friend Rom. Life of Romulus Polyb. Polybius Porphyr. Pomponius Porphyrio In Hor. Ars P. Commentarii in Q. Horatium Flaccum, Artem poeticam Prop. Propertius Ps.-Call. Pseudo-Callisthenes Sen. Mai. Seneca the Elder Suas. Suasoriae Sen. Min. Seneca the Younger Ep. Epistulae Tro. Troades Simon. Simonides Strab.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Dynamics in Ionia at the End of the Second Millennium BCE
    Cultural Dynamics in Ionia at the End of the Second Millennium BCE: New Archaeological Perspectives and Prospects Edited e-Thesis The results, discussions and conclusions presented herein are identical to those in the printed version. This electronic version of the thesis has been edited solely to ensure conformance with copyright legislation and all excisions are noted in the text. The final, awarded and examined version is available for consultation via the University Library. Rik Vaessen PhD The University of Sheffield Department of Archaeology May 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures iii List of Tables vi Acknowledgments vii Abstract ix Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Setting the stage 1 1.2. Introducing the Ionians 4 1.3. Finding Late Bronze and Early Iron Age Ionia 12 Phokaia 14 Panaztepe-Menemen 16 Smyrna-Bayraklı 17 Limantepe/Klazomenai 19 Erythrai 23 Chios: Emporio and Kato Phana 24 Teos 26 Kolophon 26 Klaros 28 Metropolis-Bademgedi ǧi Tepe 29 Ephesos (Apaša) 31 Ku şadası-Kadıkalesi 33 Samos: Heraion and Pythagorio 33 Miletos 35 The Miletos-area: Assesos and Teichiussa 38 Cine-Tepecik 38 1.4. Outline of the study 39 Chapter 2. Tracing the Ionians in modern scholarship 43 2.1. Introduction 43 2.2. Dorians and Ionians: 1750-1870 43 2.3. The Ionians between 1870 and 1939 54 2.4. The Ionians and their migration become visible … or not? (1945-present) 60 2.5. The current debate in perspective 69 2.6. Final remarks 78 Chapter 3. Theoretical and methodological considerations 79 3.1. Introduction 79 3.2. Theory: some critical remarks 79 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Silence of Homer's Women in Pat Barker's the Silence
    International Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS) ISSN: 2707-7578 DOI: 10.32996/ijels Website: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijels Breaking the Silence of Homer’s Women in Pat Barker’s the Silence of The Girls Indrani A. Borgohain Ph.D. Candidate, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan Corresponding Author: Indrani A. Borgohain, E-mail: [email protected] ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT Received: December 25, 2020 Since time immemorial, women have been silenced by patriarchal societies in most, if Accepted: February 10, 2021 not all, cultures. Women voices are ignored, belittled, mocked, interrupted or shouted Volume: 3 down. The aim of this study examines how the contemporary writer Pat Barker breaks Issue: 2 the silence of Homer’s women in her novel The Silence of The Girl (2018). A semantic DOI: 10.32996/ijels.2021.3.2.2 interplay will be conducted with the themes in an attempt to show how Pat Barker’s novel fit into the Greek context of the Trojan War. The Trojan War begins with the KEYWORDS conflict between the kingdoms of Troy and Mycenaean Greece. Homer’s The Iliad, a popular story in the mythological of ancient Greece, gives us the story from the The Iliad, Intertextuality, perspective of the Greeks, whereas Pat Barker’s new novel gives us the story from the Adaptation, palimpsestic, Trojan perspective of the queen- turned slave Briseis. Pat Barker’s, The Silence of the Girls, War, patriarchy, feminism written in 2018, readdresses The Iliad to uncover the unvoiced tale of Achilles’ captive, who is none other than Briseis. In the Greek saga, Briseis is the wife of King Mynes of Lyrnessus, an ally of Troy.
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellanea a Repetition in the Myrmidons Of
    MISCELLANEA A REPETITION IN THE MYRMIDONS OF AESCHYLUS I recently suggested that Mette F 224, may be used to restore POx 2163, 6, and that the fragment belongs to the Myrmidons of Aeschylus 1). Although the correlation of three letters is not strong evidence for this restoration and attribution 2), an allusion in Aristophanes' Frogs to r ypoq 3), in combination with Trypho's reason for quoting the lines 4), makes the suggestion more plausible. At line g28 of the Frogs, Euripides criticizes Aeschylus for using the words and i«cpPoS. Aristophanes seems to have the Achilleis trilogy in mind in this section of the play 5) and Euripides seems to be criticizing the overuse of the word Tr«cppos (it is in the plural and certainly is not one of the 'horse-cliffed' words such as ypu7taLé1'ouç and (g29). It is thus possible that Aristophanes is alluding to our fragment in which 7a'ypoq appears (elsewhere in Aeschylus only Mette, F 201) and that, since he implies the word was overused, it is repeated in the Myrmidons. Trypho quotes the lines because they contain a figure of speech. After the quotation, he says: yccp cxvd rou axPysia.c. Trypho is illustrating a figure of speech in which the author used rpc18mxi« to mean 'accuracy' instead of the more common meaning 'sparing'. In the lines themselves, the word describes Teucer's success with his bow in stopping the Phrygians, who were attempt- ing to leap over the ditch (vid. Iliad 12, Ajax and Teucer success- I) C. P. 66 (1971), 112.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander and the 'Defeat' of the Sogdianian Revolt
    Alexander the Great and the “Defeat” of the Sogdianian Revolt* Salvatore Vacante “A victory is twice itself when the achiever brings home full numbers” (W. Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing, Act I, Scene I) (i) At the beginning of 329,1 the flight of the satrap Bessus towards the northeastern borders of the former Persian Empire gave Alexander the Great the timely opportunity for the invasion of Sogdiana.2 This ancient region was located between the Oxus (present Amu-Darya) and Iaxartes (Syr-Darya) Rivers, where we now find the modern Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, bordering on the South with ancient Bactria (present Afghanistan). According to literary sources, the Macedonians rapidly occupied this large area with its “capital” Maracanda3 and also built, along the Iaxartes, the famous Alexandria Eschate, “the Farthermost.”4 However, during the same year, the Sogdianian nobles Spitamenes and Catanes5 were able to create a coalition of Sogdianians, Bactrians and Scythians, who created serious problems for Macedonian power in the region, forcing Alexander to return for the winter of 329/8 to the largest city of Bactria, Zariaspa-Bactra.6 The chiefs of the revolt were those who had *An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conflict Archaeology Postgraduate Conference organized by the Centre for Battlefield Archaeology of the University of Glasgow on October 7th – 9th 2011. 1 Except where differently indicated, all the dates are BCE. 2 Arr. 3.28.10-29.6. 3 Arr. 3.30.6; Curt. 7.6.10: modern Samarkand. According to Curtius, the city was surrounded by long walls (70 stades, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman D'alexandre
    Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman d’Alexandre Paul Henri Rogers A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Romance Languages (French) Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Dr. Edward D. Montgomery Dr. Frank A. Domínguez Dr. Edward D. Kennedy Dr. Hassan Melehy Dr. Monica P. Rector © 2008 Paul Henri Rogers ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii Abstract Paul Henri Rogers Myth, the Marvelous, the Exotic, and the Hero in the Roman d’Alexandre Under the direction of Dr. Edward D. Montgomery In the Roman d’Alexandre , Alexandre de Paris generates new myth by depicting Alexander the Great as willfully seeking to inscribe himself and his deeds within the extant mythical tradition, and as deliberately rivaling the divine authority. The contemporary literary tradition based on Quintus Curtius’s Gesta Alexandri Magni of which Alexandre de Paris may have been aware eliminates many of the marvelous episodes of the king’s life but focuses instead on Alexander’s conquests and drive to compete with the gods’ accomplishments. The depiction of his premature death within this work and the Roman raises the question of whether or not an individual can actively seek deification. Heroic figures are at the origin of divinity and myth, and the Roman d’Alexandre portrays Alexander as an essentially very human character who is nevertheless dispossessed of the powerful attributes normally associated with heroic protagonists.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia Under and After Alexander
    10:00—10:30 Razieh Taasob The Attribution and ORGANIZED BY Chronology of the Heraios Coinage: A Reassessment Institute of Classical Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University 10:30—11:00 Coffee break Ladislav Stančo, Anna Augustinová, Petra Cejnarová, International Jakub Havlík, Helena Tůmová conference SESSION VI: SOCIETY AND CULTURE Chairman: Gunvor Lindström Eurasia Department, German Archaeological Institute Gunvor Lindström 11:00—11:30 Guendalina Daniela Maria Taietti Alexander III’s Empire: University of Reading / Hellenistic Central Asia SEEN FROM Macedonian, Achaemenid or Oecumenic Research Network (HCARN) Greek? Rachel Mairs OXYARTES´ ROCK: 11:30—12:00 Marco Ferrario Memory and Communities in 329 B.C. Bactria: CENTRAL ASIA Beyond HDT 4. 204 12:00—12:30 Michail Iliakis Flipping the Coin: Alexander the Great’s Bactrian-Sogdian UNDER AND AFTER Expedition from a Local Perspective ALEXANDER 12:30—13:30 Lunch break 13:30—14:00 Olga Kubica Meetings with the “Naked Philosophers” as a case study for the Greco-Indian relations in the time of Alexander 14:00—14:30 Rachel Mairs The Hellenistic Far East in Historical Fiction: Ancient History, Modern Ideologies 14:30—15:00 Closing remarks and discussion Third Meeting of the Hellenistic Central Asia Research Network 14—16 November 2018 SESSION II: GEOGRAPHY 12:30—13:00 Viktor Mokroborodov Gishttepa Program Chairman: Laurianne Martinez-Sève and others: Recent Russian-Uzbek archaeological works in the Pashkhurd 15:00—15:30 Dmitry A. Shcheglov Alexander’s area WEDNESDAY 14 NOVEMBER 2018 Central
    [Show full text]
  • The Second After the King and Achaemenid Bactria on Classical Sources
    The Second after the King and Achaemenid Bactria on Classical Sources MANEL GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ Universidad de Barcelona–CEIPAC* ABSTRACT The government of the Achaemenid Satrapy of Bactria is frequently associated in Classical sources with the Second after the King. Although this relationship did not happen in all the cases of succession to the Achaemenid throne, there is no doubt that the Bactrian government considered it valuable and important both for the stability of the Empire and as a reward for the loser in the succession struggle to the Achaemenid throne. KEYWORDS Achaemenid succession – Achaemenid Bactria – Achaemenid Kingship Crown Princes – porphyrogenesis Beyond the tradition that made of Zoroaster the and harem royal intrigues among the successors King of the Bactrians, Rege Bactrianorum, qui to the throne in the Achaemenid Empire primus dicitur artes magicas invenisse (Justinus (Shahbazi 1993; García Sánchez 2005; 2009, 1.1.9), Classical sources sometimes relate the 155–175). It is in this context where we might Satrapy of Bactria –the Persian Satrapy included find some explicit references to the reward for Sogdiana as well (Briant 1984, 71; Briant 1996, the prince who lost the succession dispute: the 403 s.)– along with the princes of the offer of the government of Bactria as a Achaemenid royal family and especially with compensation for the damage done after not the ruled out prince in the succession, the having been chosen as a successor of the Great second in line to the throne, sometimes King (Sancisi–Weerdenburg 1980, 122–139; appointed in the sources as “the second after the Briant 1984, 69–80).
    [Show full text]
  • The Arms of Achilles: Re-Exchange in the Iliad
    The Arms of Achilles: Re-Exchange in the Iliad by Eirene Seiradaki A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Classics University of Toronto © Copyright by Eirene Seiradaki (2014) “The Arms of Achilles: Re-Exchange in the Iliad ” Eirene Seiradaki Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics University of Toronto 2014 Abstract This dissertation offers an interpretation of the re-exchange of the first set of Achilles’ arms in the Iliad by gift, loan, capture, and re-capture. Each transfer of the arms is examined in relation to the poem’s dramatic action, characterisation, and representation of social institutions and ethical values. Modern anthropological and economic approaches are employed in order to elucidate standard elements surrounding certain types of exchange. Nevertheless, the study primarily involves textual analysis of the Iliadic narratives recounting the circulation-process of Achilles’ arms, with frequent reference to the general context of Homeric exchange and re-exchange. The origin of the armour as a wedding gift to Peleus for his marriage to Thetis and its consequent bequest to Achilles signifies it as the hero’s inalienable possession and marks it as the symbol of his fate in the Iliad . Similarly to the armour, the spear, a gift of Cheiron to Peleus, is later inherited by his son. Achilles’ own bond to Cheiron makes this weapon another inalienable possession of the hero. As the centaur’s legacy to his pupil, the spear symbolises Achilles’ awareness of his coming death. In the present time of the Iliad , ii Achilles lends his armour to Patroclus under conditions that indicate his continuing ownership over his panoply and ensure the safe use of the divine weapons by his friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Plutarch's Lives of Greek Heroes
    V e p»>'e'.tt'"''''v-' -'sr.«'*:©?»e«4 gC'^S'*'^"''^"' joYin M. Kelly iWjnong Donated by William Klassen and Dona Hafioey The Uaiuefisity of St. MicbaeJ's College Toronto, Onton\o elrvv*^ DlacKie's Library of Famoxis DooKs Louisa M. Alcott. Good Wives. Little Women. abbey. Jane Austen. northanger R. M. Ballantyne. Coral Island. Martin Rattler. Ungava. the Wager, The Hon. John Byron. Wreck of Did. Susan Coolidge. What Katy What Katy Did at School. What Katy Did Next. Deerslayer. J. Fenimore Cooper. Ned Myers. The Pathfinder. Maria S. Cummins. The Lamplighter. R. H. Dana. Two Years Before the Mast. Daniel Defoe. Robinson Crusoe. Maria Edgeworth. The Good Governess. Moral Tales. Benjamin Franklin. Autobiography Oliver Goldsmith. The Vicar of Wakefield. Mrs. Gore. The Snowstorm. Captain Basil Hall. The Log-Book of a Midshipman. Charles Kingsley. The Heroes. W. H. G. Kingston. Peter the Whaler. Manco, the Peruvian^Qhief. Charles Lamb. Talbs from Sha^i?peaSe.U','^x Lord Macaulay. Essays on EngIkh Hiffr<»;Y.~ Ci^.' Captain Marryat. Children of., the New FoRE^.y-\ MaSTERMAN REAE^.^J ||5i3?OY ^ Poor Jack. Settlers in Catijada. Harriet Martineav'. Feats on the Fiord. Herman Melville. Typee, a Romance of the South Seas. Mary Russell Mitford. Selections from Our Village. Country Sketches. Peter Parley. Tales about Greece and Rome. Edgar Allan Poe. Tales of Romance and Fantasy. Mayne Reid. The Rifle Rangers. Cristoph von Schmid. The Basket of Flowers. Michael Scott. The Cruise of the Midge. Tom Cringle's Log. Sir Walter Scott. A Legend of Montrose. The Story of Prince Charlie. The Downfall of Napoleon.
    [Show full text]
  • Orality, Fluid Textualization and Interweaving Themes
    Orality,Fluid Textualization and Interweaving Themes. Some Remarks on the Doloneia: Magical Horses from Night to Light and Death to Life Anton Bierl * Introduction: Methodological Reflection The Doloneia, Book 10 of the Iliad, takes place during the night and its events have been long interpreted as unheroic exploits of ambush and cunning. First the desperate Greek leader Agamemnon cannot sleep and initiates a long series of wake-up calls as he seeks new information and counsel. When the Greeks finally send out Odysseus and Diomedes, the two heroes encounter the Trojan Dolon who intends to spy on the Achaeans. They hunt him down, and in his fear of death, Dolon betrays the whereabouts of Rhesus and his Thracian troops who have arrived on scene late. Accordingly, the focus shifts from the endeavor to obtain new knowledge to the massacre of enemies and the retrieval of won- drous horses through trickery and violence. * I would like to thank Antonios Rengakos for his kind invitation to Thessalo- niki, as well as the editors of this volume, Franco Montanari, Antonios Renga- kos and Christos Tsagalis. Besides the Conference Homer in the 21st Century,I gave other versions of the paper at Brown (2010) and Columbia University (CAM, 2011). I am grateful to the audiences for much useful criticism, partic- ularly to Casey Dué, Deborah Boedeker, Marco Fantuzzi, Pura Nieto Hernan- dez, David Konstan, Kurt Raaflaub and William Harris for stimulating conver- sations. Only after the final submission of this contribution, Donald E. Lavigne granted me insight into his not yet published manuscript “Bad Kharma: A ‘Fragment’ of the Iliad and Iambic Laughter” in which he detects iambic reso- nances in the Doloneia, and I received a reference to M.F.
    [Show full text]
  • I I I: Briseis. to Achilles
    I I I: Briseis. to Achilles The character of Briseis is derived by Ovid from the Iliad. In that soQrce, however, the character of Briseis is scarcely developed and she is little more than a pivot around which the fabled wrath of Achilles is devdpped. While she may have been loved by Achilles in Homer's account, we should also note that for him the loss ofBriseis must surely have been perceived as an insult of the. gravest propor­ tions. We know very litde about Briseis and the charms she might have had in the eyes of Achilles; we only know that upon losing her Achilles retired from combat to his tent. In the Heroides, Briseis becomes a woman richly endowed with human feeling who grieves that she has not been reunited with the man she. loves, who fears that she will be supplanted by another, and who must now find her future life with those who destroyed her homeland, her family and her heritage. For Briseis the attraction identified u love is dangerously close to the fear of abandonment. She does not object so much to captivity as to the uncer~ty and instability that it has brought into her life. In this, Briseis echoes a theme which permeates the Heroidts: the lover and the beloved both seek to bring into their .lives a degree of permanence and changelessness that in reality is nearly impossible of attainment. But the situation of Bri~eis is still more tenuous. She is not only a pawn in a mysterious game being played out by characters superior to her in every way but she is also a barbarian.
    [Show full text]