DOCSLIB.ORG

“Just Rage”: Causes of the Rise in Violence in the Eastern Campaigns of Alexander the Great

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Just Rage”: Causes of the Rise in Violence in the Eastern Campaigns of Alexander the Great CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Missouri: MOspace “Just Rage”: Causes of the Rise in Violence in the Eastern Campaigns of Alexander the Great _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _____________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by Jenna Rice MAY 2014 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled “JUST RAGE”: CAUSES OF THE RISE IN VIOLENCE IN THE EASTERN CAMPAIGNS OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT presented by Jenna Rice, a candidate for the degree of master of history, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Ian Worthington Professor Lawrence Okamura Professor LeeAnn Whites Professor Michael Barnes τῷ πατρί, ὅς ἐμοί τ'ἐπίστευε καὶ ἐπεκέλευε ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Professors Worthington, Okamura, Whites, and Barnes, for the time they spent reading and considering my thesis during such a busy part of the semester. I received a number of thoughtful questions and suggestions of new methodologies which will prompt further research of my topic in the future. I am especially grateful to my advisor, Professor Worthington, for reading through and assessing many drafts of many chapters and for his willingness to discuss and debate the topic at length. I know that the advice I received throughout the editing process will serve me well in future research endeavors. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ iv INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 Chapter 1. THE GREEK RULES OF WAR ..............................................................................5 2. ALEXANDER IN PERSIA ...................................................................................22 3. BACTRIA ...............................................................................................................37 4. INDIA .....................................................................................................................84 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................136 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................139 The following frequently cited ancient authors are abbreviated as follows: Arr. Arrian, Anabasis Alexandrou Curt. Quintus Curtius Rufus Diod. Diodorus Siculus Hdt. Herodotus Plut. Plutarch Thuc. Thucydides Xen. Xenophon The following frequently cited modern works are abbreviated as follows: Bosworth, Alexander and the East Bosworth, A.B. Alexander and the East:The Tragedy of Triumph. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. Bosworth, “Calanus” Bosworth, A.B. “Calanus and the Brahman Opposition.” Alexander der Grosse: Eine Welteroberung und Ihr Hintergrund (Vorträge des Internationalen Bonner Alexanderkolloquiums). Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 1998. Bosworth, Commentary [I-II] A.B. Bosworth, Commentary on Arrian’s History of Alexander. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980, 1995. Bosworth, Conquest and Empire Bosworth, A.B. Conquest and Empire: The Reign of Alexander the Great. Cambridge: Canto Classics, 1993. iv Fuller, Generalship of Alexander the Great Fuller, J.F.C. The Generalship of Alexander the Great. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1958. Hanson, Western Way of War Hanson, Victor D. The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994. Heckel, Conquests of Alexander the Great. Heckel, Waldemar. The Conquests of Alexander the Great. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Holt, Alexander the Great and Bactria Holt, Frank. Alexander the Greatand Bactria: The Formation of a Greek Frontier in Central Asia. Leiden: Brill, 1988. Holt, Into the Land of Bones Holt, Frank. Into the Land of Bones: Alexander the Great and Afghanistan. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005. Kern, Ancient Siege Warfare Kern, Paul. Ancient Siege Warfare. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. Pritchett, Greek State at War [I-V] Pritchett, William. The Greek State at War vols. I-V. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974- 1985. Rawlings, Ancient Greeks at War Rawlings, Louis. The Ancient Greeks at War. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007. Romm, Landmark Arrian Romm, James. The Landmark Arrian: The Campaigns of Alexander. Translated by Pamela Mensch. New York: Pantheon Books, 2010. v Tritle, From Melos to My Lai Tritle, Lawrence. From Melos to My Lai: A Study in Violence, Culture, and Social Survival. New York: Routledge, 2000. Worthington, Philip II Worthington, Ian. Philip II of Macedonia. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008. Worthington, By the Spear Worthington, Ian. By the Spear: Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the Rise and Fall of the Macedonian Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Translations Translations of Arrian’s Anabasis come from The Landmark Arrian. Translations of Herodotus, and Thucydides come from the Penguin Classics as cited in the bibliography. The translation of the title, a quote from Curtius, comes from the Penguin translation of The History of Alexander. All other translations of ancient authors come from the Loeb Classical Library except where otherwise noted. vi Introduction Alexander the Great of Macedonia (356-323) is perhaps the best known secular figure of antiquity. Acceding to the throne aged twenty in 336, in thirteen years he forged an empire that stretched from Greece and Macedonia in the west to India in the east, and its collapse drastically altered the political and intellectual spectrum of the Near East. The construction of this Macedonian Empire led Alexander and his army to the edges of the world; they travelled farther and for a longer time than any Greek army before them, spreading Hellenic culture in their wake. Given the extent of Alexander’s influence and the number of works written about him in antiquity, it is astounding that not one contemporary source survives intact; all are fragmentary. The only extant intact histories of Alexander’s reign were written centuries after his death and under Roman influence by Diodorus Siculus (1st century BCE), Pompeius Trogus (epitomized by Justin in the 2nd century CE ), Quintus Curtius Rufus (1st century CE), and Arrian (2nd century CE). To these we can add the 1-2nd century biographer Plutarch, who wrote a biography of Alexander. The way in which these later authors used the earlier (now mostly lost) sources is unknown, and for this reason their accounts should be treated with caution.1 Nevertheless, without them it would be impossible to proceed in the study of Alexander, and many of the obstacles the sources present may be overcome through consideration of credibility, purpose, and by presenting a reader with variations of an account. 1 See E. Baynham, “The Ancient Sources for Alexander the Great,” Brill’s Companion to Alexander the Great ed. J. Roisman (Leiden: Brill, 2003): 1-29; A.B. Bosworth, From Arrian to Alexander: Studies in Historical Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988). 1 It is the nature of the ancient sources to center their reports on Alexander or his generals, making the perspectives of unranked men, the majority of the campaign’s participants, difficult to determine. Such is the general state of accounts of war throughout history, but in his 1976 work The Face of Battle Keegan has shown that it is possible to reconstruct some degree of the common soldier’s experience.2 By considering the points of view of all participants in a battle, Keegan offered a fresh understanding of war through three case studies from between the fifteenth and twentieth centuries. Hanson followed in his footsteps by reconstructing the experience of the ancient Greek hoplite soldier in his The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece.3 In my thesis, I attempt to use a similar methodology on a smaller scale to investigate the type and acceleration of violence in Alexander’s army, aspects of his campaign in the East that bear further scrutiny. The Macedonian invasion of Bactria, Sogdiana, and India in the latter half of the campaign stands out as distinct from operations in West Asia, the traditional Persian Empire. The degree of slaughter involved in the conquest and occupation of these lands is emphasized in the ancient sources and used by some modern historians as a basis for forming a “new…orthodoxy”4 in order to combat the romanticized Alexander of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. However, I do not think that something as complex as human brutality can be easily explained, and attributing the rise of violence to 2 J. Keegan, The Face of Battle: A Study of Agincourt, Waterloo, and the Somme (London: Penguin Books, 1983). 3 V. Hanson, The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994). 4 P. Briant, Alexander the Great and His Empire, trans. A. Kuhrt (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), 140. 2 Alexander’s personality or suggesting that “killing was what he did best” is not sufficient.5 Rather, the causes of heightened violence are numerous, multifaceted,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eunuchs in the East, Men in the West? 147
    Eunuchs in the East, Men in the West? 147 Chapter 8 Eunuchs in the East, Men in the West? Dis/unity, Gender and Orientalism in the Fourth Century Shaun Tougher Introduction In the narrative of relations between East and West in the Roman Empire in the fourth century AD, the tensions between the eastern and western imperial courts at the end of the century loom large. The decision of Theodosius I to “split” the empire between his young sons Arcadius and Honorius (the teenage Arcadius in the east and the ten-year-old Honorius in the west) ushered in a period of intense hostility and competition between the courts, famously fo- cused on the figure of Stilicho.1 Stilicho, half-Vandal general and son-in-law of Theodosius I (Stilicho was married to Serena, Theodosius’ niece and adopted daughter), had been left as guardian of Honorius, but claimed guardianship of Arcadius too and concomitant authority over the east. In the political manoeu- vrings which followed the death of Theodosius I in 395, Stilicho was branded a public enemy by the eastern court. In the war of words between east and west a key figure was the (probably Alexandrian) poet Claudian, who acted as a ‘pro- pagandist’ (through panegyric and invective) for the western court, or rather Stilicho. Famously, Claudian wrote invectives on leading officials at the eastern court, namely Rufinus the praetorian prefect and Eutropius, the grand cham- berlain (praepositus sacri cubiculi), who was a eunuch. It is Claudian’s two at- tacks on Eutropius that are the inspiration and central focus of this paper which will examine the significance of the figure of the eunuch for the topic of the end of unity between east and west in the Roman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Works Herodotus
    Swarthmore College Works Classics Faculty Works Classics 2013 Herodotus Rosaria Vignolo Munson Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-classics Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Rosaria Vignolo Munson. (2013). "Herodotus". Herodotus. Volume 1-2, https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-classics/42 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction I. HERODOTUS TODAY 1.1 In a review article called 'A Triumph for Herodotus', Peter Green largely attributes the resurgence of Herodotean studies over the last forty years or so to our emancipation from the narrower model of historiography inspired by Thucydides. 1 We have been gradually liberated to experience the pleasure of Herodotus' text, and among the general educated public the Histories have increasingly been treated as a big book we carry around in our heads, keep on our table , refer to, study, and above all enjoy. Indeed, it is not unlikely for journalists and travelling intellectuals nowadays to pack a copy of the Histories in their bags.2 1.2 Herodotus' work is a history of the interactions between the Greek city­ states and their powerful Near Eastern neighbours that culminated in the Persian invasions of Greece in 490 and 480 BCE . It goes as far back as possible to explore the causes of this conflict, and it traces the rise of the Persians to be masters of a large multi-ethnic empire that conquered, or 1 Green (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Artaxerxes II
    Artaxerxes II John Shannahan BAncHist (Hons) (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University. May, 2015. ii Contents List of Illustrations v Abstract ix Declaration xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Conventions xv Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY REIGN OF ARTAXERXES II The Birth of Artaxerxes to Cyrus’ Challenge 15 The Revolt of Cyrus 41 Observations on the Egyptians at Cunaxa 53 Royal Tactics at Cunaxa 61 The Repercussions of the Revolt 78 CHAPTER 2 399-390: COMBATING THE GREEKS Responses to Thibron, Dercylidas, and Agesilaus 87 The Role of Athens and the Persian Fleet 116 Evagoras the Opportunist and Carian Commanders 135 Artaxerxes’ First Invasion of Egypt: 392/1-390/89? 144 CHAPTER 3 389-380: THE KING’S PEACE AND CYPRUS The King’s Peace (387/6): Purpose and Influence 161 The Chronology of the 380s 172 CHAPTER 4 NUMISMATIC EXPRESSIONS OF SOLIDARITY Coinage in the Reign of Artaxerxes 197 The Baal/Figure in the Winged Disc Staters of Tiribazus 202 Catalogue 203 Date 212 Interpretation 214 Significance 223 Numismatic Iconography and Egyptian Independence 225 Four Comments on Achaemenid Motifs in 227 Philistian Coins iii The Figure in the Winged Disc in Samaria 232 The Pertinence of the Political Situation 241 CHAPTER 5 379-370: EGYPT Planning for the Second Invasion of Egypt 245 Pharnabazus’ Invasion of Egypt and Aftermath 259 CHAPTER 6 THE END OF THE REIGN Destabilisation in the West 267 The Nature of the Evidence 267 Summary of Current Analyses 268 Reconciliation 269 Court Intrigue and the End of Artaxerxes’ Reign 295 Conclusion: Artaxerxes the Diplomat 301 Bibliography 309 Dies 333 Issus 333 Mallus 335 Soli 337 Tarsus 338 Unknown 339 Figures 341 iv List of Illustrations MAP Map 1 Map of the Persian Empire xviii-xix Brosius, The Persians, 54-55 DIES Issus O1 Künker 174 (2010) 403 333 O2 Lanz 125 (2005) 426 333 O3 CNG 200 (2008) 63 333 O4 Künker 143 (2008) 233 333 R1 Babelon, Traité 2, pl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyla-Koutsopetria I Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town American Schools of Oriental Research Archeological Reports
    PYLA-KOUTSOPETRIA I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF AN ANCIENT COASTAL TOWN AMERICAN SCHOOLS OF ORIENTAL RESEARCH ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS Kevin M. McGeough, Editor Number 21 Pyla-Koutsopetria I: Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town PYLA-KOUTSOPETRIA I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF AN ANCIENT COASTAL TOWN By William Caraher, R. Scott Moore, and David K. Pettegrew with contributions by Maria Andrioti, P. Nick Kardulias, Dimitri Nakassis, and Brandon R. Olson AMERICAN SCHOOLS OF ORIENTAL RESEARCH • BOSTON, MA Pyla-Koutsopetria I: Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town by William Caraher, R. Scott Moore, and David K. Pettegrew Te American Schools of Oriental Research © 2014 ISBN 978-0-89757-069-5 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Caraher, William R. (William Rodney), 1972- Pyla-Koutsopetria I : archaeological survey of an ancient coastal town / by William Caraher, R. Scott Moore, and David K. Pettegrew ; with contributions by Maria Andrioti, P. Nick Kardulias, Dimitri Nakassis, and Brandon Olson. pages cm. -- (Archaeological reports ; volume 21) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-89757-069-5 (alkaline paper) 1. Pyla-Kokkinokremos Site (Cyprus) 2. Archaeological surveying--Cyprus. 3. Excavations (Archaeology)--Cyprus. 4. Bronze age--Cyprus. 5. Cyprus--Antiquities. I. Moore, R. Scott (Robert Scott), 1965- II. Pettegrew, David K. III. Title. DS54.95.P94C37 2014 939’.37--dc23 2014034947 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper. For Our Parents, Fred and Nancy Caraher Bob and Joyce Moore Hal and Sharon Pettegrew Introduction to A Provisional Linked Digital Version of Pyla-Koutsopetria I: Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town We are very pleased to release a digital version of Pyla-Koutsopetria I: Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Thucydides Sparta
    102528_Prelims.qxp_Layout 1 27/11/2020 09:26 Page iii THUCYDIDES AND PROOFSSPARTA edited by Anton Powell† and Paula Debnar Contributors Jean Ducat, Thomas J. Figueira, Maria Fragoulaki, Emily Greenwood, Polly Low, Ellen Millender The Classical Press of Wales 102528_Prelims.qxp_Layout 1 27/11/2020 09:26 Page iv First published in 2020 by The Classical Press of Wales 15 Rosehill Terrace, Swansea SA1 6JN [email protected] www.classicalpressofwales.co.uk Distributor in North America. E-book distributor world-wide ISD, 70 Enterprise Drive, Suite 2, Bristol, CT 06010, USA Tel: +1 (860) 584-6546 Fax: +1 (860) 516-4873 www.isdistribution.com © 2020 All rights reserved.PROOFS No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN hard-back 978-1-910589-75-5; ebook 978-1-910589-99-1 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Louise Jones, and printed and bound in the UK by Gomer Press, Llandysul, Ceredigion, Wales ––––––––––––––––– The Classical Press of Wales, an independent venture, was founded in 1993, initially to support the work of classicists and ancient historians in Wales and their collaborators from further afield. It now publishes work initiated by scholars internationally, and welcomes contributions from all parts of the world. The symbol of the Press is the Red Kite. This bird, once widespread in Britain, was reduced by 1905 to some five individuals confined to a small area known as ‘The Desert of Wales’ – the upper Tywi valley.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Old Persian Prods Oktor Skjærvø
    An Introduction to Old Persian Prods Oktor Skjærvø Copyright © 2016 by Prods Oktor Skjærvø Please do not cite in print without the author’s permission. This Introduction may be distributed freely as a service to teachers and students of Old Iranian. In my experience, it can be taught as a one-term full course at 4 hrs/w. My thanks to all of my students and colleagues, who have actively noted typos, inconsistencies of presentation, etc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Select bibliography ................................................................................................................................... 9 Sigla and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 12 Lesson 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 Old Persian and old Iranian. .................................................................................................................... 13 Script. Origin. .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Script. Writing system. ........................................................................................................................... 14 The syllabary. .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Logograms. ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander and the 'Defeat' of the Sogdianian Revolt
    Alexander the Great and the “Defeat” of the Sogdianian Revolt* Salvatore Vacante “A victory is twice itself when the achiever brings home full numbers” (W. Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing, Act I, Scene I) (i) At the beginning of 329,1 the flight of the satrap Bessus towards the northeastern borders of the former Persian Empire gave Alexander the Great the timely opportunity for the invasion of Sogdiana.2 This ancient region was located between the Oxus (present Amu-Darya) and Iaxartes (Syr-Darya) Rivers, where we now find the modern Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, bordering on the South with ancient Bactria (present Afghanistan). According to literary sources, the Macedonians rapidly occupied this large area with its “capital” Maracanda3 and also built, along the Iaxartes, the famous Alexandria Eschate, “the Farthermost.”4 However, during the same year, the Sogdianian nobles Spitamenes and Catanes5 were able to create a coalition of Sogdianians, Bactrians and Scythians, who created serious problems for Macedonian power in the region, forcing Alexander to return for the winter of 329/8 to the largest city of Bactria, Zariaspa-Bactra.6 The chiefs of the revolt were those who had *An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conflict Archaeology Postgraduate Conference organized by the Centre for Battlefield Archaeology of the University of Glasgow on October 7th – 9th 2011. 1 Except where differently indicated, all the dates are BCE. 2 Arr. 3.28.10-29.6. 3 Arr. 3.30.6; Curt. 7.6.10: modern Samarkand. According to Curtius, the city was surrounded by long walls (70 stades, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia Under and After Alexander
    10:00—10:30 Razieh Taasob The Attribution and ORGANIZED BY Chronology of the Heraios Coinage: A Reassessment Institute of Classical Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University 10:30—11:00 Coffee break Ladislav Stančo, Anna Augustinová, Petra Cejnarová, International Jakub Havlík, Helena Tůmová conference SESSION VI: SOCIETY AND CULTURE Chairman: Gunvor Lindström Eurasia Department, German Archaeological Institute Gunvor Lindström 11:00—11:30 Guendalina Daniela Maria Taietti Alexander III’s Empire: University of Reading / Hellenistic Central Asia SEEN FROM Macedonian, Achaemenid or Oecumenic Research Network (HCARN) Greek? Rachel Mairs OXYARTES´ ROCK: 11:30—12:00 Marco Ferrario Memory and Communities in 329 B.C. Bactria: CENTRAL ASIA Beyond HDT 4. 204 12:00—12:30 Michail Iliakis Flipping the Coin: Alexander the Great’s Bactrian-Sogdian UNDER AND AFTER Expedition from a Local Perspective ALEXANDER 12:30—13:30 Lunch break 13:30—14:00 Olga Kubica Meetings with the “Naked Philosophers” as a case study for the Greco-Indian relations in the time of Alexander 14:00—14:30 Rachel Mairs The Hellenistic Far East in Historical Fiction: Ancient History, Modern Ideologies 14:30—15:00 Closing remarks and discussion Third Meeting of the Hellenistic Central Asia Research Network 14—16 November 2018 SESSION II: GEOGRAPHY 12:30—13:00 Viktor Mokroborodov Gishttepa Program Chairman: Laurianne Martinez-Sève and others: Recent Russian-Uzbek archaeological works in the Pashkhurd 15:00—15:30 Dmitry A. Shcheglov Alexander’s area WEDNESDAY 14 NOVEMBER 2018 Central
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note : Geographical landmarks are listed under the proper name itself: for “Cape Sepias” or “Mt. Athos” see “Sepias” or “Athos.” When a people and a toponym share the same base, see under the toponym: for “Thessalians” see “Thessaly.” Romans are listed according to the nomen, i.e. C. Julius Caesar. With places or people mentioned once only, discretion has been used. Abdera 278 Aeaces II 110, 147 Abydus 222, 231 A egae 272–273 Acanthus 85, 207–208, 246 Aegina 101, 152, 157–158, 187–189, Acarnania 15, 189, 202, 204, 206, 251, 191, 200 347, 391, 393 Aegium 377, 389 Achaia 43, 54, 64 ; Peloponnesian Aegospotami 7, 220, 224, 228 Achaia, Achaian League 9–10, 12–13, Aemilius Paullus, L. 399, 404 54–56, 63, 70, 90, 250, 265, 283, 371, Aeolis 16–17, 55, 63, 145, 233 375–380, 388–390, 393, 397–399, 404, Aeschines 281, 285, 288 410 ; Phthiotic Achaia 16, 54, 279, Aeschylus 156, 163, 179 286 Aetoli Erxadieis 98–101 Achaian War 410 Aetolia, Aetolian League 12, 15, 70, Achaius 382–383, 385, 401 204, 250, 325, 329, 342, 347–348, Acilius Glabrio, M. 402 376, 378–380, 387, 390–391, 393, Acragas 119, COPYRIGHTED165, 259–261, 263, 266, 39MATERIAL6–397, 401–404 352–354, 358–359 Agariste 113, 117 Acrocorinth 377, 388–389 Agathocles (Lysimachus ’ son) 343, 345 ; Acrotatus 352, 355 (King of Sicily) 352–355, 358–359; Actium 410, 425 (King of Bactria) 413–414 Ada 297 Agelaus 391, 410 A History of Greece: 1300 to 30 BC, First Edition. Victor Parker.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Ancient Settlement of Ak-Beshim (Chu River Valley, Northern Kyrgyzstan)
    New data on the ancient settlement of Ak-Beshim (Chu River Valley, Northern Kyrgyzstan) Bakyt Amanbaeva Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology of the National Academy of Sciences of Kyrgyz Republic Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic KG Abstract According to the archaeological data, a series of ancient settlement appeared on the territory of the Chu River Valley (Dzhety-Suu, Semirechie) in VI-VIII centuries. Some of them were composed of the citadel and shakhristan and transformed later (IX-XI centuries) into the territories surrounded with one-two rings of so-called “long walls” with considerable size in the perimeter. Of these cities was Suyab, which ruins correspond to the ancient settlement of Ak-Bashim known as a capital of three Turkic Khaganates in VI-X centuries: Western Turkic, Türgesh and Karluk. Scientific studies were implemented by Kyrgyz (National Academy of Sciences) and Janapese (National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Tokyo and Teikyo University since 2016) archaeologists. Excavation site No 15 put in place on the territory of shakhristan No 2 revealed the concentration of grey-clay tile, which corresponds to the remains of the collapsed wall of the building. Probably, the revealed construction may the component of the garden-park ensemble of the Tang Dynasty Period. Analysis of the aerial photo of 1967 and further geophysical studies of the territory of the “second” Buddhist temple have shown that it was a part of the larger complex with the walls of 140-150 m in length. As the result of the excavation site No 18 the revealed temple was occupying only its south-western corner, while another construction the role of which has to be identified during the further archaeological studies, was situated nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second After the King and Achaemenid Bactria on Classical Sources
    The Second after the King and Achaemenid Bactria on Classical Sources MANEL GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ Universidad de Barcelona–CEIPAC* ABSTRACT The government of the Achaemenid Satrapy of Bactria is frequently associated in Classical sources with the Second after the King. Although this relationship did not happen in all the cases of succession to the Achaemenid throne, there is no doubt that the Bactrian government considered it valuable and important both for the stability of the Empire and as a reward for the loser in the succession struggle to the Achaemenid throne. KEYWORDS Achaemenid succession – Achaemenid Bactria – Achaemenid Kingship Crown Princes – porphyrogenesis Beyond the tradition that made of Zoroaster the and harem royal intrigues among the successors King of the Bactrians, Rege Bactrianorum, qui to the throne in the Achaemenid Empire primus dicitur artes magicas invenisse (Justinus (Shahbazi 1993; García Sánchez 2005; 2009, 1.1.9), Classical sources sometimes relate the 155–175). It is in this context where we might Satrapy of Bactria –the Persian Satrapy included find some explicit references to the reward for Sogdiana as well (Briant 1984, 71; Briant 1996, the prince who lost the succession dispute: the 403 s.)– along with the princes of the offer of the government of Bactria as a Achaemenid royal family and especially with compensation for the damage done after not the ruled out prince in the succession, the having been chosen as a successor of the Great second in line to the throne, sometimes King (Sancisi–Weerdenburg 1980, 122–139; appointed in the sources as “the second after the Briant 1984, 69–80).
    [Show full text]