DOCSLIB.ORG

Ukraine Food Security Cluster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UKRAINE FOOD SECURITY CLUSTER October 2016 Kiev Contact: [email protected] FSC PARTNERS SEPTEMBER ACHIEVEMENTS FSC objective 1 ACCESS TO FOOD The Raions labelled have more than 5 FSC partners working on Access to Food interventions. Coordination at settlement level done. 3 to 4 1 to 2 5 to 7 September 2016 Access to Food interventions HRP Humanitarians FS community TOTAL 66,334 134,881 482,171 Donetska 47,948 84,063 428,310 GCA 3,560 4,080 4,080 GCA (Bufer zone) 26,706 31,569 38,389 NGCA 1,272 4,826 61,546 NGCA (Bufer zone) 16,410 43,588 324,295 Luhanska 18,386 37,643 40,671 GCA 5,233 5,233 5,247 GCA (Bufer zone) 11,553 16,387 19,346 NGCA 80 80 NGCA (Bufer zone) 1,600 15,943 15,998 Dnipropetrovska 4,330 4,330 Kharkivska 8,845 8,860 This maps reflects people that have received a food basket/cash/ voucher value that covers at least 1,600 kcal per person per day (75% of the recommended daily calorie intake). Overplaning OBLAST RAION IDPs Population TARGET OBJ 1 PLANS GAP Luhanska Oblast Popasnianskyi 8,874 40,200 2,835 16,154 - 470 Luhanska Oblast Stanychno-Luhanskyi 6,600 49,800 1,871 9,975 - 433 Luhanska Oblast Novoaidarskyi 12,736 25,100 2,124 8,680 - 309 Luhanska Oblast Slovianoserbskyi 54,700 2,984 4,470 - 50 Overplaning OBLAST RAION IDPs Population TARGET OBJ 1 PLANS GAP Donetska Oblast Yasynuvatskyi - 27,700 519 21,897 - 4,116 Donetska Oblast Novoazovskyi 35,600 668 9,543 - 1,330 Donetska Oblast Artemivskyi 11,602 44,000 2,281 16,897 - 641 Donetska Oblast Shakhtarskyi 19,500 2,386 14,691 - 516 Donetska Oblast Telmanivskyi 29,200 1,948 9,429 - 384 Donetska Oblast Starobeshivskyi 50,300 1,612 12,383 - 668 Donetska Oblast Kirovske 28,200 1,658 7,490 - 352 Donetska Oblast Marinskyi 17,533 83,800 3,199 14,022 - 338 Donetska Oblast Amvrosiivskyi 45,000 2,646 9,335 - 253 Donetska Oblast Khartsyzk 103,200 6,068 20,583 - 239 Donetska Oblast Makiivka 389,900 23,039 74,188 - 222 Donetska Oblast Yenakiieve 127,700 8,216 22,248 - 171 Donetska Oblast Horlivka 274,700 16,152 45,965 - 185 Donetska Oblast Dokuchaievsk 24,000 1,762 6,306 - 258 Donetska Oblast Donetsk 966,000 56,801 151,552 - 167 Donetska Oblast Snizhne 70,000 4,915 11,385 - 132 Donetska Oblast Torez 80,000 7,573 14,680 - 94 Donetska Oblast Volnovaskyi 27,855 83,200 5,056 9,043 - 79 Donetska Oblast Dzerzhynsk 14,821 73,000 4,324 7,457 - 72 Donetska Oblast Avdiivka 2,124 35,000 1,713 2,749 - 61 Donetska Oblast Kostiantynivskyi 6,757 18,900 1,331 2,128 - 60 Underplanning OBLAST RAION IDPs Population TARGET OBJ 1 PLANS GAP Luhanska Oblast Kirovsk 35,900 5,073 1,464 71 Luhanska Oblast Bilokurakynskyi 9,380 19,500 1,586 158 90 Luhanska Oblast Perevalskyi 70,900 8,208 800 90 Luhanska Oblast Bilovodskyi 44,021 24,200 6,032 500 92 Luhanska Oblast Krasnodon 103,100 13,059 45 100 Luhanska Oblast Luhansk 463,300 55,978 103 100 Luhanska Oblast Antratsyt 77,200 11,125 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Brianka 52,900 8,756 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Alchevsk 110,500 14,242 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Krasnyi Luch 122,800 14,715 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Rovenky 83,300 9,644 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Sverdlovsk 97,700 11,638 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Stakhanov 91,400 10,581 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Antratsytivskyi 30,700 3,554 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Krasnodonskyi 29,400 4,469 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Lutuhynskyi 67,000 7,757 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Milovskyi 17,182 15,500 2,481 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Novopskovskyi 6,148 34,800 1,500 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Sverdlovskyi 11,900 1,378 - 100 Luhanska Oblast Troitskyi 2,749 20,600 776 - 100 Underplanning OBLAST RAION IDPs Population TARGET OBJ 1 PLANS GAP Donetska Oblast Krasnoarmiisk 27,255 77,000 5,402 1,100 80 Donetska Oblast Sloviansk 41,127 136,900 10,336 2,095 80 Donetska Oblast Shakhtarsk 60,300 4,054 764 81 Donetska Oblast Slovianskyi 13,300 33,900 3,064 788 74 Donetska Oblast Zhdanivka 13,100 1,277 331 74 Donetska Oblast Kramatorsk 64,308 196,200 13,392 2,600 81 Donetska Oblast Kostiantynivka 49,477 76,100 6,969 1,348 81 Donetska Oblast Velykonovosilkivskyi 17,235 40,600 4,221 978 77 Donetska Oblast Dymytrov 21,122 51,000 4,477 500 89 Donetska Oblast Druzhkivka 20,025 69,000 5,455 500 91 Donetska Oblast Oleksandrivskyi 2,287 19,300 1,025 - 100 Donetska Oblast Dobropilskyi 1,410 16,000 1,287 - 100 Donetska Oblast Krasnoarmiiskyi 18,686 31,500 2,755 - 100 Donetska Oblast Krasnolymanskyi 28,067 21,600 4,474 - 100 FSC objective 2 LIVELIHOOD Livelihood interventions (households) up to September 2016 Agriculture Assets creation Donetska 7,055 2,165 Luhanska 2,020 2,008 Kharkivska 192 692 Cherkаsy 122 Dnipropetrovska 838 Kherson 80 Khmelnytskyi 85 Kirovohrаdska 56 Kyiv City 125 Lvivska 164 Mykolаivska 23 Odeska 395 Poltаvska 243 Sumska 104 Vinnytska 105 Zaporizhzhska 528 Zhytomyrska 138 Total 9,267 7,871 .
Recommended publications
  • Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211

    Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211

    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211 Summary The SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations in Donetsk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 42 ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission recorded 40 ceasefire violations in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded five ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske, and again saw containers inside and near the southern edge of the area near Zolote. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable operation and maintenance of critical civilian infrastructure and a transfer of funds. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at five entry- exit checkpoints and two corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations near Bezimenne and on a road near non- government-controlled Korsun, Donetsk region.* Ceasefire violations2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 9 February 2021. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational, and weather conditions limited the observational capabilities of some of the other SMM cameras. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations, including nine explosions (five undetermined and four outgoing, all of undetermined weapons), which occurred in areas on the north-western edge of Horlivka (non-government-controlled, 39km north-east of Donetsk) and near the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) (15km north of Donetsk).
  • Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2015

    Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2015

    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2015 CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 II. RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, SECURITY AND PHYSICAL INTEGRITY 7 A. Casualties 7 B. Civilian casualties 8 C. Total casualties (civilian and military) from mid-April 2014 to 15 August 2015 12 D. Unlawful and arbitrary detention, summary executions, and torture and ill-treatment 13 III. FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 18 A. Freedom of movement 18 B. Freedom of expression 19 C. Freedom of peaceful assembly 20 D. Freedom of association 21 E. Freedom of religion or belief 22 IV. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS 22 A. Right to an adequate standard of living 23 B. Right to social security and protection 24 C. Right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health 26 V. ACCOUNTABILITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 27 A. Accountability for human rights violations committed in the east of Ukraine 27 B. Accountability for human rights violations committed during the Maidan protests 30 C. Accountability for the 2 May violence in Odesa 30 D. Administration of justice 32 VI. LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS AND INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS 34 VII. HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA 38 VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 42 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This is the eleventh report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on the situation of human rights in Ukraine, based on the work of the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) 1. It covers the period from 16 May to 15 August 2015 2.

  • Subordinate Troops of the 2Nd Army Corps of Illegal Armed Formations

    Subordinate Troops of the 2nd Army Corps of Illegal Armed Formations in the Occupied Territory of Lugansk Region Information was collected and prepared By Project "StopTerror" Brigades of Battalions of Separate Disbanded Governmental Separate the National Territorial Tank and Transferred to Mechanized Brigade “Prizrak” Institutes of the Brigades and Police Defense Battalions Another Units LPR Battalions Yermak platoon Russian imperial Legion Tank battalion SSFB “Odessa” Unite Continental 1st motor rifle battalion 1st motor rifle battalion 1st company Rebellion platoon “BOS” 2nd motor rifle battalion 2nd motor rifle battalion Volunteer platoon “RNE” 3rd motor rifle battalion 2nd company 3rd motor rifle battalion Tank battalion 1st company Aleksandr Nevskiy battalion 1st company 1st Battalion Battalion “Zaria” “Leshego” platoon 3rd company 2nd company (reconnaissance company) 2nd company Artillery group Battalion “Don” Rapid forces SABOTAGE AND Mechanized group group “Batman” ASSAULT INTELLIGENCE GROUP “RUSICH” Mechanized group 3rd company Mechanized group Battalion “Huligan” “Vityaz” Separate patrol group 1st company Brgiade artillery group Artillery Group Tank group Mechanized group Tank group 2nd Battalion 2nd company Separate Reconnaissance 4th Separate Separate Commandants 2nd SMRB 4th SMBR SSFB Battalion of the Corps Brigade “Prizrak” Regiment Central staff of the LPR 2nd Army Corps of the National Police 6th Platov Separate Kozitsyn Bryanka USSR Separate Tank Battalions Separate Special Forces Slavyanoserbsk Cossacks Regiment Cossacks
  • Assessment Report Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine Published by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Ukraine

    Assessment Report Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine Published by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Ukraine

    ASSESSMENT REPORT IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF MINERS IN EASTERN UKRAINE Published by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine, November 2012 © UNDP, 2012 — All rights reserved All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are the author’s and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations, including UNDP or its Member States. The mention of specific companies does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by UNDP in preference to others of a similar nature. UNDP does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use. United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine 1, Klovsky Uzviz Str. Kyiv, 01021, Ukraine Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 5 KEY FINDINGS . .6 1. INTRODUCTION. 8 1.1 Miners. 8 1.2 Mining Industry. 8 1.3 National Priorities. .8 1.4 Gender Considerations . 9 2. COMMUNITY MEETINGS. 10 2.1 Methodology . .10 2.2 Factors Affecting the Health and Safety of Miners . 10 3. HEALTH DATA ON MINERS. 11 3.1 Key Findings from the Medical Exams of Miners . .11 3.2 Methodology for Conducting and Analysing the Medical Exams. 11 3.3 Health Data on Miners. 11 4. SAFETY DATA ON MINERS . .17 4.1 Key Findings. 17 4.2 Safety Data on Miners. 17 5. OPINION SURVEYS OF MINERS IN ROVENKY AND SVERDLOVSK . .18 5.1 Key Findings from Rovenky and Sverdlovsk . 18 5.2 Miners’ Opinions on Health . .18 5.3 Miners’ Opinions on Safety.
  • Ukraine SITREP 3-12-15 Approved

    Ukraine SITREP 3-12-15 Approved

    Ukraine Crisis Update: March 12, 2015 1 March 7: Multiple roadside IEDs detonated near the 6 March 10: According to the ATO press center, Cossack militants separatist-held city of Alchevsk, injuring the Cossack launched mortar strikes near Stakhanov on other separatists likely commander of the “Prizrak” (Ghost) Brigade, a unit aliated aliated with the Luhansk People’s Republic (LNR). e ATO with the Luhansk People’s Republic (LNR) which controls reported the previous day that Cossack commander and the city. A pro-Kyiv group calling itself the “Tini” (Shadows) LNR critic Pavel Dromov was preparing Partisan Detachment claimed responsibility for the attack for clashes with the LNR near Stakha- although their involvement is unconrmed. Increased nov and Antratsyt. Ukrainian military reports of separatist inghting in Luhansk Oblast and analyst Dmytro Tymchuk reported the location of Alchevsk around 40 kilometers within that the Cossacks had been defeated separatist-held territory suggest that the LNR may also LUHANSK by the LNR in Antratsyt and have staged the assassination attempt. OBLAST Krasnyi Luch and at least some units had agreed to join the LNR. 1 2 March 9: A rail bridge was blown up near the village of Orikhove. Representatives of both the Ukrainian 7 March 10: Pro-Russian Anti-Terror Operation (ATO) and the Luhansk separatists launched mortar strikes People’s Republic (LNR) acknowledged the explosion Sievierodonetsk on the villages of Lozove and and the ATO suggested that separatists were to Shchastia Luhanske. blame. Separatist sources said the destroyed rail bridge was the last connecting LNR-held territory to Ukrainian-controlled Luhansk Oblast.
  • STATE of the SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN and RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical Report

    STATE of the SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN and RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical Report

    STATE OF THE SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN AND RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical report 3 Contents INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................................5 BASIN, WATER USE AND CHANGES OVER THE PERIOD OF HOSTILITIES ...................................................................7 ASSESSMENT OF WATER BODIES IN THE NON-GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED AREAS .........................................14 SURFACE WATER STATUS AND ITS CHANGES BASED ON THE MONITORING DATA .............................................20 HAZARD AND PREDICTED CONSEQUENCES OF ACCIDENTS.......................................................................................33 FURTHER STEPS: SURFACE WATERS ................................................................................................................................39 Dedicating the monitoring system to surface water quality ......................................................................................39 Analysis of sources and consequences of human-made accidents and emergency response measures .....42 GROUNDWATER STATUS .......................................................................................................................................................44 COAL MINE FLOODING AND ITS CAUSES ..........................................................................................................................54 FURTHER STEPS: GROUNDWATERS...................................................................................................................................61
  • The Donbas As an Intentional Community

    The Donbas As an Intentional Community

    THIS IS A DRAFT PAPER From Exit to Take-Over: The Evolution of the Donbas as an Intentional Community VLAD MYKHNENKO* International Policy Fellow The Central European University & Open Society Institute E-mail: [email protected] Paper for Workshop No 20. The Politics of Utopia: Intentional Communities as Social Science Microcosms The European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops 13-18 April 2004 Uppsala, Sweden ABSTRACT: The Donbas – a large old industrial region in the Ukrainian-Russian Cossack borderland – constitutes a particular intentional community. According to earlier positive accounts, it was a space, the open steppe, a frontier land, a fugitive’s paradise, where the notions of and desires for freedom and dignifying labour had been realised. According to its current negative associations, the Donbas is an allegedly realised utopia of an ‘anti-modern’ community, dominated by a ‘criminal-political nexus’ of terrorising mafia gangs and political clans. The purpose of this paper is to compare the Donbas community, the evolution of intentions of its founders and of the images produced in the process of its construction, in three very different points in time – under the Russian Empire, under the Bolshevik Rule and Stalin’s Great Terror, and during the post-communist transformation. * I would like to express my gratitude here to the International Policy Fellowships, affiliated with the Central European University and Open Society Institute – Budapest, for their generous help, which has allowed me, among many other things, to work on this paper. 2 In both a geographical and symbolic sense, the Donbas constitutes a particular community, just as a nation, city, or village does.
  • Ukraine SITREP 12-13-2015

    Ukraine SITREP 12-13-2015

    Ukraine Crisis Update: December 14, 2015 1 December 10: Separatists attack near Mariupol. Separatists launched intermittent indirect and direct fire 5 December 1-December 14: Separatist launch attacks east of the strategic port city of Mariupol from low-level attacks in Luhansk Oblast. Separatists December 1 to December 13, including the use of heavy launched intermittent attacks along the frontline artillery on December 10. Ukraine’s military began in Luhansk Oblast, which has been less active than repositioning a government checkpoint northeast of the Donetsk Oblast frontline since the resumption Mariupol on December 3, retaking control of two of fighting in November. unclaimed villages within the demilitarized zone demarcat- ed by the February ceasefire agreement. The separatists 6 December 12: Separatist commander assassi- called the movement a “precondition” for the renewal of LUHANSK nated near Stakhanov. Semi-autonomous “combat operations” while Russia’s envoy to the UN OBLAST separatist commander Pavel Dryomov was killed demanded the withdrawal of Ukraine’s forces from the when an explosive device detonated in his car near villages. Starobilsk 1 the separatist-held city of Stakhanov. Dryomov is the fourth major Cossack commander to have been 2 December 12: Separatists attack Mariupol- assassinated in occupied Luhansk Oblast in 2015, Donetsk highway. Separatist forces launched Sievierodonetsk likely as the result of efforts by Moscow and its intermittent attacks along the strategic highway linking proxy “Luhansk People’s Republic” (LNR) to Mariupol to separatist-held Donetsk city from 5 consolidate control of separatist-held territory. December 1 to December 12. Separatists intensified Shchastia offensive operations on the highway on December 12, 5 7 December 9-11: Ukrainian authorities concentrating fire from tanks, infantry fighting Sloviansk Luhansk target pro-Russian groups in Kyiv and vehicles, and mortars on a Ukrainian frontline Pervomaysk Artemivsk Krasnodon Kharkiv.
  • Eastern Ukraine

    Eastern Ukraine

    UKRAINE - Eastern Ukraine Flow Diagram of Cross Contact Line Movement (NGCA to GCA) For Humanitarian Use Only (among permanent residents of NGCA) Production date: April 04, 2020 Other oblasts Donetsk oblast Luhansk oblast Note: Bilovodsk Data, designations and boundaries Sieverodonetsk contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free Stanytsia Luhanska and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associates, and donors mentioned on this product. Sloviansk Stanytsia Luhanska Bakhmut Kramatorsk Kharkiv Luhansk Luhansk Data was collected at EECPs from Kyiv Zaitseve City January 9th till February 24, 2020 Kostiantynivka Luhansk Center Luhansk in time period from 8am till 3pm West by stratified random sampling with 95% confidence level and Kadiivka Kadiivka Sorokyne Dnipro oblast 5% margin of error. Mayorsk Brianka Debaltseve Area of origin/destination settlement Alchevsk citation frequency was weighted Lutuhyne using total number of EECP Yenakiieve crossings as reported by UNHCR Rovenky (as of January and February 2020). Pokrovsk Donetsk Antratsyt Myrnohrad North The diagram displays only Horlivka Khrustalnyi Selydove NGCA to GCA routes, as reported Luhansk by respondents permanently Dnipro South residing in NGCA. Makiivka Interviews were conducted on official EECPs. Marinka Kurakhove Donetsk Donetsk Khartsyzk Current flow diagram can be used City East Marinka Chystiakove only for qualitative analysis. Vuhledar Snizhne Amvrosiivka Donetsk Proportion of respondents Zaporizhzhia oblast Novotroitske reporting a settlement Funded by: Implemented with: Novotroitske as their area of origin/destination: Volnovakha 5% Docuchaievsk 10% 15% 20% Respondents interviewed at (EECP): Stanytsia Luhanska Donetsk Russian Federation Mayorsk South Marinka Data sources Cross contact line movement data: Novotroitske Right to Protection, UNHCR Hnutove Contact: Hnutove Direction of the depicted [email protected] cross-contact line movement Mariupol Novoazovsk GCA NGCA Contact line Sea of Azov.
  • UKRAINE Highlights 1.1 Million Registered Idps Situation Overview

    UKRAINE Highlights 1.1 Million Registered Idps Situation Overview

    Situation Report No. 32 – Ukraine | 1 UKRAINE Situation report No.32 as of 20 March 2015 This report is produced by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers 14 March 2015 – 20 March 2015, unless otherwise noted. The next report will be published on 27 March. Highlights ● While the ceasefire generally continues to hold, humanitarian needs remain high across eastern Ukraine. ● Reports of incidents related to unexploded ordinance are on the increase. Mine and UXO/ERW contamination is a major issue, especially as planting season is scheduled to begin soon. ● A recent assessment confirms that humanitarian concerns are more severe in non-government controlled areas than in Government-controlled areas, largely due to household poor financial conditions, availability of drugs and food. ● Humanitarian funding for Ukraine continues to remain critically low: only 15 percent of the USD 316 required for 2015 has been funded or pledged. “When is gets warm we will return to live,” said Liuba defiantly. 1.1 million registered IDPs “We will start with one room.” Photo: UNHCR / A. McConnell / Nikishyne, Ukraine Source: Ministry of Social Policy Situation Overview While the ceasefire generally continues to hold, humanitarian needs remain high across eastern Ukraine. Three main flashpoints are of concern. In Mariupol, the situation remains tense with reports of shelling in the village of Shyrokyne, east of the city. Mortars, anti-aircraft artillery and heavy machine guns attacks continued in Pisky, Vodiane, Avdiivka, Opytne, Vesele and Tonenke, north of Donetsk city, as well as in the vicinity of Donetsk airport.
  • UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT April 2019

    UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT April 2019

    UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT April 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian 2019 Situation Report No. 4 © UNICEF/2019/Fillipov UNICEF’s Response with Partners 2019 Funds Available UNICEF 2019 Sector/Cluster 20191 UNICEF Cumulative Cluster Cumulative Funds received to date: Target results (#) Target results (#) $2.8M 13% Nutrition 2,000 0 1,300,000 n/a Health 24,800 1002 Carry-forward 2019 Funding WASH 1,125,500 746,265 2,000,000 n/a amount: Requirement $3.3M 16% $21.1M Funding gap: Child 170,000 34,391 1,300,000 n/a $15.0M 71% Protection Education 34,500 14,924 200,000 n/a HIV & AIDS 200 0 n/a n/a Number of people in need: 3,000,0002 (2019 UNICEF HAC). Number of children in need of humanitarian assistance: 500,0003 (2019UNICEF HAC). Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs The overall security situation in the Eastern Conflict Area (ECA) remains tense and unpredictable. The OSCE special monitoring mission continued to record daily ceasefire violations including artillery fire along the Line of Contact with damaging private households/infrastructure and wounding civilians. Moreover, the expected "Easter truce" to be agreed on 18th April 2019 was not reached. During the reporting period, two verified cases were reported by the education cluster on incidents affecting a school in non-government-controlled area. No injuries were reported. Seven different incidents were reported by the WASH cluster in the immediate vicinity of water facilities during the month of April 2019. On 15th April 2019, shelling in Dokuchaievsk damaged Voda Donbassa office and employees were forced to take cover in bomb shelters.
  • Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine

    Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine

    Annual Project Results Report Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine Project Number: Reporting Period: P006554 27 March 2019 – 31 March 2020 Country / Region: Date of Report: Ukraine / Europe 31 March 2020 Name of Implementer: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Implementer’s name and contact Information: United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme (UN RPP) Victor Munteanu Programme Manager United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 1 Aeroklubna Street, Kramatorsk, 84300, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Total Project Budget: CDN $5,000,000 Project start and end date: 27 March, 2019 – 30 June, 2022 1 3 Outcomes Achieved1 4 Progress towards the Ultimate Outcome 1000 Improved stability, enjoyment of human rights, and gender equality, of conflict- affected population, especially women and vulnerable or marginalized groups, of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts Prior to the establishment of a network of mobile administrative service centres (ASCs) in the conflict-affected areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, the programme carried out a comprehensive assessment and analysis to identify 10 target communities - five from Donetsk and five from Luhansk oblasts. The communities were carefully selected in line with the project’s objectives and applications received from local authorities. Preference was given to the communities in close proximity to the “contact line” and to exit and entry checkpoints (EECPs), as well as large districts with a significant proportion of rural residents. Last but not least, the interest of communities in working and closely cooperating with the programme was assessed so as to ensure the sustainability of subsequent results. As a result, the following communities were selected to participate in the “Mobile Service Delivery for Conflict-Affected Populations in Eastern Ukraine” Project: Kurakhove, Mariinka, Mariupol, Siversk and Vuhledar in Donetsk Oblast, and Novoaidar, Popasna, Shchastia, Sievierodonetsk and Stanytsia Luhanska in Luhansk Oblast (see Figure 1).