DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment Report Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine Published by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Ukraine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment Report Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine Published by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Ukraine ASSESSMENT REPORT IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF MINERS IN EASTERN UKRAINE Published by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine, November 2012 © UNDP, 2012 — All rights reserved All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are the author’s and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations, including UNDP or its Member States. The mention of specific companies does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by UNDP in preference to others of a similar nature. UNDP does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use. United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine 1, Klovsky Uzviz Str. Kyiv, 01021, Ukraine Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 5 KEY FINDINGS . .6 1. INTRODUCTION. 8 1.1 Miners. 8 1.2 Mining Industry. 8 1.3 National Priorities. .8 1.4 Gender Considerations . 9 2. COMMUNITY MEETINGS. 10 2.1 Methodology . .10 2.2 Factors Affecting the Health and Safety of Miners . 10 3. HEALTH DATA ON MINERS. 11 3.1 Key Findings from the Medical Exams of Miners . .11 3.2 Methodology for Conducting and Analysing the Medical Exams. 11 3.3 Health Data on Miners. 11 4. SAFETY DATA ON MINERS . .17 4.1 Key Findings. 17 4.2 Safety Data on Miners. 17 5. OPINION SURVEYS OF MINERS IN ROVENKY AND SVERDLOVSK . .18 5.1 Key Findings from Rovenky and Sverdlovsk . 18 5.2 Miners’ Opinions on Health . .18 5.3 Miners’ Opinions on Safety. 22 6. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS . .25 7. KRASNODON ACTION PLAN . .26 7.1 Key Findings. 26 7.2 Community Health Profile . .26 7.3 Krasnodonugol. 27 7.4 Priorities . .28 7.5 General Recommendations . .28 7.6 Action Items. 29 7.7 Budget . .33 8. ROVENKY ACTION PLAN. 34 8.1 Key Findings. 34 8.2 Community Health Profile . .34 8.3 DTEK Rovenkiantratsit. 34 8.4 Health and Safety of Miners . 36 8.5 Priorities . .36 8.6 General Recommendations . .37 8.7 Action Items. 37 8.8 Budget . .41 3 ASSESSMENT REPORT Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine 9. SVERDLOVSK ACTION PLAN . .42 9.1 Key Findings. 42 9.2 Community Health Profile . .42 9.3 DTEK Sverdlovantratsit . .43 9.4 Health and Safety of Miners . 43 9.5 Priorities . .44 9.6 General Recommendations . .44 9.7 Action Items. 45 9.8 Budget . .49 10. REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS. 50 11. APPENDIX. 52 12. BIBLIOGRAPHY . .55 13. ENDNOTES . .58 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive summary The “Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine” project aims to identify and address the health and safety needs of miners in Krasnodon, Rovenky and Sverdlovsk. This report summarises the results of the first or assessment phase of this project, while the second phase will focus on implementing the recommendations set forth in this report. To begin, UNDP partnered with DTEK and Metinvest, two of the largest energy and mining companies in Ukraine, to implement this project. UNDP also received endorsements from the mayors of Krasnodon, Rovenky, and Sverd- lovsk, as well as the governor of the Luhansk Oblast State Administration to proceed with the effort. UNDP then conducted dozens of interviews, focus groups, and community workshops to understand the health and safety needs of miners. UNDP also worked closely with DTEK Rovenkiantratsit, DTEK Sverdlovantratsit, and Metinvest Krasnodonugol to examine the working conditions of miners. Over the course of three months, UNDP had engaged over 250 miners, miners’ spouses, health workers, and government officials to discuss the miners’ needs and priorities. In addition, UNDP contracted GfK Ukraine, the country’s largest market research firm, to conduct a study on the health and safety of miners based on the medical exams and opinion surveys of 373 miners. The results of this study helped shape the proposed action plans for each of the three target communities. Overall, UNDP found the most pressing health and safety issues of miners to be respiratory diseases, cardiovas- cular diseases, and occupational traumas. While DTEK and Metinvest have done much to improve the health and safety of miners, there is still much work to be done. Each community has specific and unique needs, but in general, the proposed action plans focus on upgrading medical equipment, improving emergency transportation, and conducting preventative health work. The follow- ing sections describe the process, results, and proposed actions in greater detail. 5 ASSESSMENT REPORT Improving the Health and Safety of Miners in Eastern Ukraine Key findings The following list summarises the key findings from the health and safety assessment of miners in Krasnodon, Rovenky and Sverdlovsk. Subsequent sections explain the findings in further details. Health Issues • The most prominent health issues of miners in Krasnodon, Rovenky, and Sverdlovsk are respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, occupational injuries and musculoskeletal conditions. • More than 37 per cent of miners in Rovenky and Sverdlovsk suffer from respiratory diseases. Chronic bron- chitis alone affects 330 per 1,000 miners—a rate seven times higher than the general adult populations in Rovenky and Sverdlovsk. • About 18 per cent of miners in Rovenky and Sverdlovsk suffer from cardiovascular diseases. For example, 57.6 per 1,000 miners suffer from ischemic heart disease compared to the national average of 53.1 per 1,000 people or the European average of 36.3 per 1,000 people.1 • In Rovenky and Sverdlovsk, the most common musculoskeletal conditions of miners are osteochondrosis (68 per 1,000 miners) and lower back pain (42 per 1,000 miners). • The Luhansk Clinic of the Ministry of Internal Affairs classified miners into three health groups: I) generally healthy, II) those who have had acute and/ or chronic disease(s) in the past, and III) those who currently have a chronic disease. Of those who took part in the study, 33 per cent were classified into Health Group I, 13 per cent into Health Group II, and 54 per cent into Health Group III. • Still, miners are rather optimistic about their heath: 61 per cent are satisfied with it even though 54 per cent are classified in Health Group III. In fact, only 8 per cent are dissatisfied with their health. • At the same time, 70 per cent of miners worry that their health might deteriorate because of harmful working conditions, and 46 per cent worry that it might deteriorate because of unhealthy habits (e.g., smoking, alco- hol consumption). • For the most part, miners consult doctors for their health problems (64%). They also consult health profession- als at their enterprise (34%), acquaintances and relatives (27%), pharmacists (23%), and the Internet (10%). • A large number of respondents prefer self-treatment or to do nothing in treating some of their health issues. For example, only 64 per cent of respondents consulted a doctor to treat bronchitis, 44 per cent for back- aches, and 40 per cent for sore throats over the last 12 months (August 2011-August 2012). • Fifty-nine per cent of miners (63% of underground workers and 47% among aboveground workers) consider that the health care system in their city satisfies their needs. • Eighteen per cent of miners are unsatisfied with the quality of medical care, 16 per cent with inconvenient schedules of medical institutions, 15 per cent with expensive medicines, and 12 per cent with expensive medical services. • Miners’ families and pharmacists play an important role in the health and wellbeing of miners. At least 15 per cent of miners use medical products advised by a pharmacist, 9 per cent use medical products advised by family members or acquaintances, and 8 per cent use folk remedies. 6 KEY FINDINGS Safety Issues • The rates of occupational injuries have decreased at all three enterprises since 2007: by 66 per cent at Krasno- donugol, 21 per cent at Rovenkiantratsit, and 20 per cent at Sverdlovantratsit. • In 2011, the national average for occupational injuries of.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rising to the Challenge
    RISING TO THE CHALLENGE ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2012 METINVEST ANNU METINVEST A L REPO L R T T A ND F ND IN A NCI A L ST A TE M ENTS 2012 WHILE 2012 WAS A CHALLENGING YEAR FOR METINVEST, OUR MARKETS AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, WE WERE PROACTIVE. IN RESPONSE TO THE CHALLENGES, WE HAVE TAKEN A SERIES OF DECISIVE ACTIONS IN LINE WITH OUR LONG-TERM STRATEGY TO PROTECT OUR STABLE FINANCIAL POSITION AND MARKET LEADERSHIP. Key Strategic Actions: #1: We have adapted our capital expenditure plans to focus on the most efficient investments in line with our Technological Strategy READ MORE ON PAGES 12-13 #2: We have pursued greater efficiency, quality and customer satisfaction through continuous improvement and lean production implementation READ MORE ON PAGES 14-15 #3: We have launched a major initiative to optimise working capital and enhance liquidity across the Group READ MORE ON PAGES 16-17 #4: We have adjusted and strengthened sales by expanding our network, focusing on strategic markets and balancing our product range READ MORE ON PAGES 18-19 STRONG MODEL IN STRATEGIC REVIEW OF OUR FINANCIAL ADDITIONAL INTRODUCTION CHALLENGING TIMES OVERVIEW THE YEAR GOVERNANCE SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENTS INFORMATION INTRODUCTION Metinvest is a leading steel producer in WE ARE METINVEST: the CIS and one of the top 30 steelmakers and top 10 iron ore producers in the world. A VERTICALLY INTEGRATED We are resourceful, managing every part of the value chain, from mining and processing STEEL AND MINING GROUP iron ore and coal to making and selling steel products.
    [Show full text]
  • Metinvest Today
    METINVEST SOCIAL REPORT 2009-2010 1 METINVEST'S CSR REPORT FOR 2009-10 HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING GUIDELINES OF THE GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE AND MEETS THE GRI'S B+ APPLICATION LEVEL 2 SOCIAL REPORT 2009-2010 METINVEST METINVEST SOCIAL REPORT 2009-2010 3 METINVEST AT GLANCE 2009-10 * STRONGER NEW GLOBAL №1 STRATEGIC PRESENCE Today Metinvest exports a large part of its IN THE TOP 100 output to more than 1,000 consumers in 75 UKRAINIAN BUSINESS PROSPECTS countries. Metinvest has approved a development strategy to 2020 Metinvest, is introducing quality-control and FOR MORE DETAILS, SEE PAGE 18 that targets long-term sustainable growth through the LEADERS RATING production-safety programmes at its PRODUCT QUALITY economic cycle. Each goal includes objectives for doing enterprises, and it works with consumers in Metinvest's Ukrainian enterprises paid business responsibly. various different ways. *For more on Metinvest's global presence, see www.metinvestholding.com MORE THAN SEE PAGE 12 FOR MORE ABOUT THE STRATEGY FINANCIAL CONSOLIDATED REVENUE: HIGHLIGHTS US$1,389.4m US$9,358m FOR 2010 ADJUSTED EBITDA IFRS: IN TAXES US$2,552m JOINT OPERATIONAL 35.7mt Iron ore IMPLEMENTATION HIGHLIGHTS concentrate PROJECTS FOR 2010 In 2010 in the first phase of the joint implementation project to utilise coal-gas at Krasnodon Coal, Metinvest received€ 598,000. Over the five years of the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, it expects to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions across 10.1mt 8.7mt all joint projects by more than 8 million tonnes of CO2 Coking coal equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2015
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2015 CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 II. RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, SECURITY AND PHYSICAL INTEGRITY 7 A. Casualties 7 B. Civilian casualties 8 C. Total casualties (civilian and military) from mid-April 2014 to 15 August 2015 12 D. Unlawful and arbitrary detention, summary executions, and torture and ill-treatment 13 III. FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 18 A. Freedom of movement 18 B. Freedom of expression 19 C. Freedom of peaceful assembly 20 D. Freedom of association 21 E. Freedom of religion or belief 22 IV. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS 22 A. Right to an adequate standard of living 23 B. Right to social security and protection 24 C. Right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health 26 V. ACCOUNTABILITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 27 A. Accountability for human rights violations committed in the east of Ukraine 27 B. Accountability for human rights violations committed during the Maidan protests 30 C. Accountability for the 2 May violence in Odesa 30 D. Administration of justice 32 VI. LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS AND INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS 34 VII. HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA 38 VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 42 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This is the eleventh report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on the situation of human rights in Ukraine, based on the work of the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) 1. It covers the period from 16 May to 15 August 2015 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sales Offices
    SALES OFFICES UKRAINE LVIV METALS SERVICE CENTRE BELGOROD SALES OFFICE 93 Kulparkivska Street, Office 307, 49a Pushkina Street, Lviv 79021, Ukraine Belgorod 308015, Russia METINVEST-SMC LLC Tel: +380 32 232 53 35 Tel: +7 472 221 84 75 HEAD OFFICE Fax: +380 32 232 53 05 15a Leiptsyzka Street, KRASNODAR SALES OFFICE Kyiv 01015, Ukraine MARIUPOL METALS SERVICE CENTRE Office 706, 709, 75/1 Uralskaya Street, Tel: +380 80 030 30 70 31a Zori Street, Krasnodar 350059, Russia Tel: +380 44 581 44 37 Mariupol 87500, Ukraine Tel: +7 861 201 26 06 Fax: +380 44 581 44 88 Tel: +380 62 940 94 75 Fax: +380 62 940 94 76 LIPETSK SALES OFFICE BROSHNIV-OSADA METALS Office 405, 29 Pobedy Avenue, SERVICE CENTRE MYKOLAIV BRANCH OFFICE AND Lipetsk 398024, Russia 58b Sichnya 22nd Street, Broshniv-Osada METALS SERVICE CENTRE Tel: +7 474 224 15 36 77611, Ivano-Frankivsk Region, Ukraine 28 Yavornytskoho Street, Tel: +380 34 744 71 48 Mykolaiv 54044, Ukraine MOSCOW SALES OFFICE Fax: +380 34 744 64 74 Tel/Fax: +380 51 276 71 28 Office 8, Block I, 1/1, Vasilisy Kozhinoy Street, BROVARY METALS SERVICE CENTRE ODESA BRANCH OFFICE Moscow 121096, Russia 1 Khmelnytskyi Street, Brovary 07400, 33b Shevchenko Avenue, Office 10, Tel: +7 495 739 26 26, extension: 7763 Kyiv Region, Ukraine Odesa 65044, Ukraine Tel/Fax: +380 45 946 70 30 Tel/Fax: +380 48 776 02 00 NIZHNY NOVGOROD SALES OFFICE 80 Orehovskaya Street, DNIPRO BRANCH OFFICE ODESA METALS SERVICE CENTRE Nizhny Novgorod 603086, Russia AND METALS SERVICE CENTRE 23/1 Novomoskovska Doroha, Tel: +7 831 261 04 89 15 Yakhnenkivska
    [Show full text]
  • Mariupol Metals Workers Help to Restore the Vostochny Microdistrict
    25 май 2015 Mariupol metals workers help to restore the Vostochny microdistrict Metinvest Group's metallurgical plants in Mariupol allocated UAH 6 million for restoration work in the Vostochny microdistrict that was damaged during an artillery shelling on 24 January. Construction teams from the plant installed glass windows in about 1,500 apartments and repaired dozens of private houses. Two damaged schools and four kindergartens were repaired and recommissioned. In February, Ilyich Iron & Steel Works of Mariupol repaired Regular Education School #57, Specialized School #5, and Kindergartens #47 and #165. Azovstal restored Kindergarten #42, which was damaged by a shock wave. By April, Ilyich Iron & Steel Works of Mariupol, Azovstal and Zaporizhstal had completed construction and repair work at Kindergarten #160, which had sustained the most damage from the attack. About 1,000 iron and steel workers worked every day in the Vostochny microdistrict. Besides the costs to renew the damaged infrastructure, the metallurgical plants allocated about UAH 2.2 million to residents to restore their residences themselves. The "We Help" Humanitarian Crisis Center of Rinat Akhmetov's Fund rendered a substantial amount of aid to Mariupol residents who were in need. The humanitarian organization sent medicine and provided hospitals with everything to treat victims already on the day of the attack. Volunteers from the fund also provided qualified psychological assistance to victims and their relatives. Yuriy Ryzhenkov, Metinvest Group CEO: "Despite our huge financial issues, our metallurgical plants gave a helping hand to all residents who suffered because of the attacks. Helping all of the victims is a principle from SCM shareholder Rinat Akhmetov.
    [Show full text]
  • Places of Illegal Detention
    EASTERN-UKRAINIAN CENTER FOR CIVIC INITIATIVES PLACES OF ILLEGAL DETENTION IN EASTERN UKRAINE DURING THE MILITARY CONFLICT HDIM WARSAW 2016 AUTHORS Volodymyr Shcherbachenko Ganna Ianova Olexandr Pavlichenko "JUSTICE FOR PEACE IN DONBAS" COALITION The Coalition was established in December 2014 and includes 17 NGOs, mainly from the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. The Coalition members are: Alchevsk Human Rights Analytical Centre, Centre for Civil Liberties / Euromaidan SOS, Civic Organization “Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group,” Donbas SOS, Donetsk "Memorial," Eastern-Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives, Ecological and Cultural Centre “Bakhmat,” Human Rights Centre “Postup” / Vostok SOS, Luhansk Regional Human Rights Centre “Alternative,” Luhansk Rights Defence Group, Public Committee for Protection of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of Citizens, Public Movement “Ochyshchennya,” Public Organization “Mirny bereg,” “Social Action” Centre NGO, Starobilsk District Public Human Rights Women’s Organization “Victoria,” Starobilsk Public Organization CONTEXT he armed conflict in Eastern Ukraine led to numerous gross and systemic violations of human rights on the territory of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, in particular the establishment of a network of illegal T detention places by Ukrainian army and Russia-backed separatists. International human rights law and international humanitarian law prohibit arbitrary detention.1 Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, applicable in both international and non-international armed
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine SITREP 3-12-15 Approved
    Ukraine Crisis Update: March 12, 2015 1 March 7: Multiple roadside IEDs detonated near the 6 March 10: According to the ATO press center, Cossack militants separatist-held city of Alchevsk, injuring the Cossack launched mortar strikes near Stakhanov on other separatists likely commander of the “Prizrak” (Ghost) Brigade, a unit aliated aliated with the Luhansk People’s Republic (LNR). e ATO with the Luhansk People’s Republic (LNR) which controls reported the previous day that Cossack commander and the city. A pro-Kyiv group calling itself the “Tini” (Shadows) LNR critic Pavel Dromov was preparing Partisan Detachment claimed responsibility for the attack for clashes with the LNR near Stakha- although their involvement is unconrmed. Increased nov and Antratsyt. Ukrainian military reports of separatist inghting in Luhansk Oblast and analyst Dmytro Tymchuk reported the location of Alchevsk around 40 kilometers within that the Cossacks had been defeated separatist-held territory suggest that the LNR may also LUHANSK by the LNR in Antratsyt and have staged the assassination attempt. OBLAST Krasnyi Luch and at least some units had agreed to join the LNR. 1 2 March 9: A rail bridge was blown up near the village of Orikhove. Representatives of both the Ukrainian 7 March 10: Pro-Russian Anti-Terror Operation (ATO) and the Luhansk separatists launched mortar strikes People’s Republic (LNR) acknowledged the explosion Sievierodonetsk on the villages of Lozove and and the ATO suggested that separatists were to Shchastia Luhanske. blame. Separatist sources said the destroyed rail bridge was the last connecting LNR-held territory to Ukrainian-controlled Luhansk Oblast.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of the SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN and RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical Report
    STATE OF THE SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN AND RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical report 3 Contents INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................................5 BASIN, WATER USE AND CHANGES OVER THE PERIOD OF HOSTILITIES ...................................................................7 ASSESSMENT OF WATER BODIES IN THE NON-GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED AREAS .........................................14 SURFACE WATER STATUS AND ITS CHANGES BASED ON THE MONITORING DATA .............................................20 HAZARD AND PREDICTED CONSEQUENCES OF ACCIDENTS.......................................................................................33 FURTHER STEPS: SURFACE WATERS ................................................................................................................................39 Dedicating the monitoring system to surface water quality ......................................................................................39 Analysis of sources and consequences of human-made accidents and emergency response measures .....42 GROUNDWATER STATUS .......................................................................................................................................................44 COAL MINE FLOODING AND ITS CAUSES ..........................................................................................................................54 FURTHER STEPS: GROUNDWATERS...................................................................................................................................61
    [Show full text]
  • I Impact O T of Th Oblasts E Conf S on Th Infr Lict in He
    15 September 2014 Kiev IMPACT OF THE CONFLICT IN LUHANSK AND DONETSK OBLASTS ON THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE SUMMARY This paper presents a summary of the damage assessment in areas affected by the armed conflict of Luhansk and Donets oblasts in the period since the beginning of the conflict until 14 September 2014. As of 14 September 2014, 1,968 facilities (including social infrastructure, residential houses, and enterprises) were reported to receive the damage, amounting to a monetary loss of total UAH 5.958 bn hryvnias, or US$ 440 mln (estimated, without account of unconfirmed damages in the residential sector, disruption of contracts, and lost profits of business enterprises). Among those reported 995 facilities are located in Luhansk oblast (UAH 1.094 million), and 783 facilities are in Donetsk oblast (UAH 3.964 billion). 190 facilities, with an estimated loss of UAH 900 m, belong to railway infrastructure situated in the territory of both oblasts. As can be seen in the consolidated table (page 6 and 7), 1230 housing buildings were damaged (667 in Luhansk and 563 in Donetsk oblasts), and this affected the shelter of 6,618 families (including 1,844 in Luhansk oblast and 4,774 in Donetsk oblast). Due to different limitations in determining the exact number of affected families, the real number of affected families is, most likely, of a greater scale than presented in this report. Indirectly (by worsened access to public services) the conflict in Donbass affected the majority of the 6,6 million population of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. It is worth noting, that the report indicates another 1873 housing buildings damaged during the conflict, however no verification (geographical/address localization) was possible by the team of data collectors, and this number remained outside the main analysis in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Food Security Cluster
    UKRAINE FOOD SECURITY CLUSTER October 2016 Kiev Contact: [email protected] FSC PARTNERS SEPTEMBER ACHIEVEMENTS FSC objective 1 ACCESS TO FOOD The Raions labelled have more than 5 FSC partners working on Access to Food interventions. Coordination at settlement level done. 3 to 4 1 to 2 5 to 7 September 2016 Access to Food interventions HRP Humanitarians FS community TOTAL 66,334 134,881 482,171 Donetska 47,948 84,063 428,310 GCA 3,560 4,080 4,080 GCA (Bufer zone) 26,706 31,569 38,389 NGCA 1,272 4,826 61,546 NGCA (Bufer zone) 16,410 43,588 324,295 Luhanska 18,386 37,643 40,671 GCA 5,233 5,233 5,247 GCA (Bufer zone) 11,553 16,387 19,346 NGCA 80 80 NGCA (Bufer zone) 1,600 15,943 15,998 Dnipropetrovska 4,330 4,330 Kharkivska 8,845 8,860 This maps reflects people that have received a food basket/cash/ voucher value that covers at least 1,600 kcal per person per day (75% of the recommended daily calorie intake). Overplaning OBLAST RAION IDPs Population TARGET OBJ 1 PLANS GAP Luhanska Oblast Popasnianskyi 8,874 40,200 2,835 16,154 - 470 Luhanska Oblast Stanychno-Luhanskyi 6,600 49,800 1,871 9,975 - 433 Luhanska Oblast Novoaidarskyi 12,736 25,100 2,124 8,680 - 309 Luhanska Oblast Slovianoserbskyi 54,700 2,984 4,470 - 50 Overplaning OBLAST RAION IDPs Population TARGET OBJ 1 PLANS GAP Donetska Oblast Yasynuvatskyi - 27,700 519 21,897 - 4,116 Donetska Oblast Novoazovskyi 35,600 668 9,543 - 1,330 Donetska Oblast Artemivskyi 11,602 44,000 2,281 16,897 - 641 Donetska Oblast Shakhtarskyi 19,500 2,386 14,691 - 516 Donetska Oblast Telmanivskyi
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine SITREP 12-13-2015
    Ukraine Crisis Update: December 14, 2015 1 December 10: Separatists attack near Mariupol. Separatists launched intermittent indirect and direct fire 5 December 1-December 14: Separatist launch attacks east of the strategic port city of Mariupol from low-level attacks in Luhansk Oblast. Separatists December 1 to December 13, including the use of heavy launched intermittent attacks along the frontline artillery on December 10. Ukraine’s military began in Luhansk Oblast, which has been less active than repositioning a government checkpoint northeast of the Donetsk Oblast frontline since the resumption Mariupol on December 3, retaking control of two of fighting in November. unclaimed villages within the demilitarized zone demarcat- ed by the February ceasefire agreement. The separatists 6 December 12: Separatist commander assassi- called the movement a “precondition” for the renewal of LUHANSK nated near Stakhanov. Semi-autonomous “combat operations” while Russia’s envoy to the UN OBLAST separatist commander Pavel Dryomov was killed demanded the withdrawal of Ukraine’s forces from the when an explosive device detonated in his car near villages. Starobilsk 1 the separatist-held city of Stakhanov. Dryomov is the fourth major Cossack commander to have been 2 December 12: Separatists attack Mariupol- assassinated in occupied Luhansk Oblast in 2015, Donetsk highway. Separatist forces launched Sievierodonetsk likely as the result of efforts by Moscow and its intermittent attacks along the strategic highway linking proxy “Luhansk People’s Republic” (LNR) to Mariupol to separatist-held Donetsk city from 5 consolidate control of separatist-held territory. December 1 to December 12. Separatists intensified Shchastia offensive operations on the highway on December 12, 5 7 December 9-11: Ukrainian authorities concentrating fire from tanks, infantry fighting Sloviansk Luhansk target pro-Russian groups in Kyiv and vehicles, and mortars on a Ukrainian frontline Pervomaysk Artemivsk Krasnodon Kharkiv.
    [Show full text]
  • Un Global Compact Communication on Progress 2015
    METINVEST HOLDING, LLC 116-A, Nakhimova av., Mariupol 87534 Ukraine www.metinvestholding.com Phone: +38 062 388 16 16 Fax: +38 062 388 16 00 E-mail: [email protected] UN GLOBAL COMPACT COMMUNICATION ON PROGRESS 2015 STATEMENT OF SUPPORT FROM METINVEST’S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Dear readers, Metinvest Group is a vertically integrated group of steel and mining companies that manages every link of the value chain, from mining and processing iron ore and coal to making and selling semi-finished and finished steel products. It has steel and mining production facilities in Ukraine, EU and the US, as well as a sales network covering all key global markets. By a number of indicators, Metinvest is the largest private company of Ukraine, and it occupies the 13th place among the largest companies in Central and Eastern Europe - Deloitte TOP-500 by results of 2015. Metinvest is the largest in Ukraine and one of the largest CIS producers of iron ore raw materials and steel. Metinvest is in the top 50 largest steel companies in the world according to the World Steel Association. Reported 2015 was a difficult year for us, both in Ukraine and globally. The Ukrainian economy suffered a sharp contraction, exacerbated by the crisis in the east of the country. As such, I consider it a major achievement that we were able to restore and maintain production at all of our steel plants after the disruptions during 2014 and the first quarter of 2015. We should never forget the bravery and teamwork demonstrated by our employees and managers on the ground in Eastern Ukraine.
    [Show full text]